Politics

Ron Paul Releases Another Pro-Life Ad

Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:37pm by Christopher Santarelli
Print »
Email »

Ron Paul Releases New Pro Life Ad

In the crunch time leading up to the January 3 GOP Iowa caucus, Republicans competing in the state are making their last-minute ad buys in the key early primary. Because of his outspoken libertarian views, many Pro-Life voters have been hesitant in backing Texas Rep. Ron Paul, despite his claim of being Pro-Life. Rep. Paul, who had delivered more than 4,000 babies as an obstetrician and gynecologist before entering politics, had focused on his defense of the sanctity of life in the run-up to his strong finish in the Ames Iowa straw poll. A new ad released Wednesday by the Paul campaign centers on the congressman’s pro-life stance and previous career:

According to Real Clear Politics, Rep. Paul currently leads polls of likely Iowa GOP caucus-goers, three points ahead of Mitt Romney. Rep. Paul is polling third nationally, with a substantial gap between himself and frontrunners Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich.

(H/T: POLITICO)

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (213)

A Conservatarian
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:51pm
Jerry Doyle endorses Ron Paul … http://youtu.be/5_nuMvImQ9o

Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Top_Down
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:55pm
  What would he say if he found out Ron Paul was a Truther?
  Report Post »
- A Conservatarian
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:02pm
  Top down, bottom up eh? Stop being literally retarded, he’s not a truther.
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:05pm
  Top, that is a ridiculous remark as he is not. How is it we have so many low I.Q. people on The Blaze??
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:38pm
  Oh boy!!!!!!!!!! Iv’e been waitin months for the prized Jerry Doyle nod
  Report Post »
- chigger
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:16pm
  Never heard of Jerry Doyle. Why would I care who he endorses?
  Report Post »
- Solfire
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:48am
  With Mister Garibaldi and Chuck Norris backing him, who can stand against Ron Paul?
  Report Post »
Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:48pm
Vote in the polls…there are 2..be sure and scroll down and vote in both..
http://shark-tank.net/2011/12/20/23275/
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:09pm
  Clara, your guy is crashing and burning in these polls.
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:39pm
  That poll is a Bachmann ploy. She lied about this poll: Michele Bachmann email “only four points behind Ron Paul for first place in Iowa!” in a fundraising letter. Hope the news media “skins her alive” for lying (again).
  Report Post »
- circleDwagons
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:24pm
  @clara88. love your name. but how does it feel to be the sole perrybot ? lonely? come join us. the water is getting warmer. you could have people like “the great one” call you names
  Report Post »
SacredHonor1776
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:45pm
“While Roe v. Wade is invalid, a federal law banning abortion across all 50 states would be equally invalid.” 1-31-06

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:41pm
I can, it’s full of crap. Where did you get this link?

Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness….
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
garyM
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:38pm
Both sides of the mouth!
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
common cents
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:33pm
Go ron, you got my vote!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
wiggie89
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:31pm
If you vote for someone other then ron paul you might as well vote for Obama. Because you gonna get the same crape, just in a different package. That is a fact. Argue all you want, its still a fact.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:44pm
  It‘s like watching ’The Mummy’. Imotep Imotep Imotep.
  Report Post »
- wiggie89
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:30pm
  To therealconservitive,
  Why not argue me with some facts instead of calling me a mummy? Your tactic is one of a liberal. Your post had zero substance, maybe you should start commenting on code pink or huffpost. You would probably have better convo with them.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:42pm
  and where are your FACTS that if I don‘t for for Paul it’s a vote for Obama, oh wise one.
- Baddoggy
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:50pm
  Wiggie…I will not call you a mummy I will call you a dummy. Ron Paul is the exact oposite of Obama you fool. What the hell are you smoking?
  Report Post »
- Baddoggy
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:54pm
  Just when did the Constitution give the courts the authority to legalize MURDER? hmmmmmmmmmmmm
  Report Post »
- wiggie89
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:02pm
  Bad dog, I think you need to reread my post.
  TRC, all of the canidates represent the status quo,
  bachman voted for patriot act and worked for the irs
  rick perry and forced vaccines
  mitt and healthcare
  newt- big govt the answer
  santorum wants wars when we are broke
  
  So when I say if you dont vote for paul your voting for obama i didnt literally mean obama I meant his philosiphy of lies and complete disregard of civil liberties.. THEY ARE ALL PART OF STATUS QUO! Your not going to see the change America needs to survive voting for anyone but Paul. Im not a paulbot, a zombie, or mummy. I’m an American thats waking up and realize Washington has really dug a deep deep hole.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:04pm
  @Wigg
  
  Lets debate sport, unless your mommy won’t let you.
  Report Post »
WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:27pm
Ron Paul the only person to ever hit a homerun of the congressional baseball team. the only one who truely follows the constution. the rest are for NDDA and the unPatriot act. Hell even reagen was for Rex8. This is a true patriot. And I love Reagen but some of the bills he passed were bad.

Good Ad

Ron Paul 2012
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
THXll38
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:27pm
I used to be a bad ass war monger like the many Chickenhawks that post here. Then I stepped back and looked at the whole picture and realized that Israel has the 7th most powerful military consisting of over over 400 nukes — Yeah . . . they can handle themselves. Then I realized that actions have reactions aka blowblack. Then I realized even more, that over 70% of the military contribute to Dr. Paul. That said, I want our troops home where they belong, I want a strong military; however, no where in the Constitution gives the US the authority to police the world.

PS

This is not a liberal view, this is a little r republican view aka the founders view.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:41pm
  yes the military supports Ron Paul more than anyother candidate. Just cause you know some bootlickers that would support Mao, doesnt mean most of the military isnt awake.
  Report Post »
- THXll38
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:49pm
  Ron Paul is right — it is none of our concern.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:49pm
  @wakeup
  
  As I said I’ve been to the sites, there from Paul or his supporters. Repeating it does not make it so.
  
  BTW. I know more active and retiree’s than you realize
  Report Post »
- Defense Of Ordinary Man
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:50pm
  I support Ron Paul.
  TSGT David N Vice, USAF
  
  He is the better candidate out of them all. The others are unable to see the threat within our country that is the Central Bank and the fiat money it prints without reguard. Iran can be delt with if need be with ease and without boots on the ground…. If you (The people of this Republic) let us do so ….
  Report Post »
- The Third Archon
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:01pm
  That private hands control nuclear weapons is an abomination–no single person, or group of people, can claim the right to the power to extinguish HUMANITY as a whole, that power can ONLY be exercised by the consent of the whole of humanity. If ALL of humanity is not represented in the decision of whether or not to use nuclear weapons, then an injustice has occurred, because nuclear weapons, and the decision to use them, EFFECTS all.
  
  Nuclear weapons have murdered the ideology of nationalism by rendering it obsolete. Many on the Left and Right want to resurrect its corpse, and they still think politically in its terms–but so long as they do so, the solutions to the problems which vex them shall remain outside their ability to grasp, and they pursue a fool’s errand.
  Report Post »
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:04pm
  therealconservative.(therealneocon)
  
  Just cause you say they dont support him doesnt mean its true. bootlicker
  Report Post »
- Defense Of Ordinary Man
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:10pm
  We do not have to use Nuck Technology. Drones, carpet bombing …. there are options other than Nuckular technologies. I do not think that we put boots on the ground in Dresdin. I place a higher value on my companions in armes than I do the enemy and I do not have much reguard for a Hearts and Minds campaign should I be forced into “Protecting” the world from Iran. Please do not think me selfish, but I always seem to end up the one doing all the work when the citizen cried out for War. Its getting old now….
  
  Hail to the Republic!
  Report Post »
- tzion
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pm
  Finally. A Ron Paul supporter who doesn’t seem obsessed with the guy. Personally I agree with everything about not interfering. Where I differ from Paul though is I consider Iran as an enemy and would advise not turning our backs on them.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:26pm
  @Defense
  
  I see you AF, and support RP. Did you know that your retirement is not in the Constitution. RP would take it away.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:52pm
  @wakup
  
  name all the active duty that support RP
  Report Post »
- The Third Archon
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:22pm
  “THEREALCONSERVATIVE
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:52pm
  @wakup
  
  name all the active duty that support RP”
  
  That would likely exceed the 1,500 character limit.
  Report Post »
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:29pm
  LOL I dont have nearly enough space. go to youtube bootlicker. see the people in uniform on base. go to the FEC. do some research. dont just listen to what others say
  Report Post »
- Naps
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:50pm
  THEREALCONSERVATIVE…..You are the very reason this country is going down the crapper.
  If Paul doesn’t get elected POTUS? 10 Years from now,when a loaf of bread costs $24.99,and the money in your pocket will be more useful if you wipe your crusty behind with it? 10 years from now you will be praying for a president Paul. Wake Up!!!!
  Ron Paul or none at all
  Report Post »
- Churchill
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:46am
  Well said. I’m tired of all these progressives who want my tax dollars to go to policing the world. Why should my taxes pay to defend europeans so they can waste their own money on ridiculous socialist programs? Why should my taxes be given to Islamic countries that hate us via foreign aid? Neo-cons are progressives. WAKE UP!!! RE Iran, they won’t do anything, why are you neo-cons so scared of them? Israel has over 300 nukes, if they deem Iran a threat they‘ll take ’em out. Period!
  Report Post »
Tri-ox
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:22pm
Okay, Ron Paul is personally pro-life, but as president, he would do nothing to reduce the number of abortions performed. Abortion must be stopped at the federal level, something which Ron Paul is adamantly opposed to.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- OneofMany
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:32pm
  Exactly! I never really thought about it, but something disturbed me when I saw the story on Ron Paul when he talks about being pro-life.. He tells the story about when he first started in medicine and he said he watched as one baby was put in a corner left to die and in another room 10 doctors are working to try and save another baby… He said it seemed so unjust… Yet he did NOTHING to go and protect the little one in the corner put aside to die… I’m sorry, but I’d go to jail first. In my opinion, doing nothing is the same as being part of them….. this is the kind of issue you are either with us or against us (with them)… there is no middle ground here.
  Report Post »
- Scottsman
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:35pm
  Leadership by example works well for Ron Paul. He can pull it off.
  Report Post »
- hallkbrdz
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:36pm
  I think you are wrong.
  
  I think Paul would point at the 10th amendment and point out it should be a states-right issue. We just need to restrict the commerce clause to what it was meant for, instead of making it a rights grab for the Fed Govt. on anything that could possibly cause competition.
  Report Post »
- Defense Of Ordinary Man
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:41pm
  No No No… This must be handled on a state level Only! I can not agree with the use of Federal law for this issue. Remember that god gave adam the option of free choice. He never placed a forcefield around the Damn apple! This issue is one of personal responsability not Federal Law! Let the states vote and rule themselves.
  
  Hail To the Republic!
  Report Post »
- thekuligs
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:46pm
  hallkbrdz how can you be pro life and say its a states rights issue? That is the same as saying you are nuetral. He just wants the pro lifers votes. Well he will not be getting mine. He’s proving he is a polotician talking out of both sides of his mouth.
  
  Someone put away the bat signal.
  Report Post »
- THXll38
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:52pm
  So much for federalism . . . .
  Report Post »
- American Soldier (Separated)
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:59pm
  The constitution does not give the Federal Government the authorization to legislate abortions. Thus the 10th amendment applies, leaving the decision of whether or not abortion is legal to the states. He adheres to the constitution before he adheres to his PERSONAL belief, just as a President should. You are free to lead a national campaign to convince voters of all 50 states to vote to have abortion criminalized, but to try to go through the federal government while shredding the constitution is not the way to do it. Be consistent, like he is. Either you cherish the constitution as it is written, to limit the federal government, or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways or be selective in where the constitution applies. If you start doing that, you are no better then the liberals that you claim to hate on a daily basis.
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:15pm
  Dr. Paul
  Immediately saving lives by effectively repealing Roe v. Wade and preventing activist judges from interfering with state decisions on life by removing abortion from federal court jurisdiction through legislation modeled after his “We the People Act.”
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:21pm
  Some of you just have a hard time understanding the concept of freedom and individual liberty. When the federal government is limited and the states have the power to make the laws, by the permission of its citizens, it is called freedom. If you do not like the laws of one state, you do not have to live there you can move to another that has laws more to your liking or if the majority of citizens in the state do not agree with the law, they can change it. If the federal government makes the laws, it is the same in every state, so where can you move then if you do not agree with the law? This is tyranny. It is much harder to change laws at the federal level than the state level. Why is this concept so hard for so many on The Blaze?
  Report Post »
Treaty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:16pm
Neocon: originated in the 1960s among conservatives and some liberals who were repelled by or disillusioned with what they viewed as the political and cultural trends of the time, including leftist political radicalism, lack of respect for authority and tradition, and hedonistic and immoral lifestyles. Neoconservatives generally advocate a free-market economy with minimum taxation and government economic regulation; strict limits on government-provided social-welfare programs; and a strong military supported by large defense budgets. Neoconservatives also believe that government policy should respect the importance of traditional institutions such as religion and the family. Unlike most conservatives of earlier generations, neoconservatives maintain that the United States should take an active role in world affairs, though they are generally suspicious of international institutions, such as the United Nations and the World Court, whose authority could intrude upon American sovereignty or limit the country’s freedom to act in its own interests.

Ron Paul is not a Neocon. He’s a Conservative in the true sense.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:21pm
  He is a Pacifist in the true sense.
  Report Post »
- cjd16585
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:44pm
  @therealconservative. Ron Paul is not a pacifist. Unlike the rest of the candidates, besides Perry, Paul actually served in the military. He also enjoys heavy support from the US Military, as he collects more donations from active duty than all other candidates combined.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:47pm
  @Realconservative Calling a vietnam vet a pacifist… makes sense. All gave some, some gave all. And for the record, I don‘t think it’s a bad thing not to want to kill people.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:02pm
  Ron Paul as no supprot from the military. BTW I’m a retiree NOT a vet, big difference.
  Report Post »
- American Soldier (Separated)
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:03pm
  Not only is he not a pacifist, he is actually going to be the strongest of all war presidents, if he were to ever have to be a CIC during a REAL war. If will go to war and send our troops to fight with a DECLARATION FROM CONGRESS. Not only will he accept their decision, he will hit hard and fast, destroying the enemy as quickly as possible with little American casualties. Depending on the enemy, we’d be in and out with a quickness. We have enough advanced weaponry that we can annihilate most countries in the world, minus the large ones such as China and Russia.
  
  He just isn’t into fighting everyone without a declaration of war or real goals. He won’t sit around for a decade nation building while our troops suffer day in and day out, 18 month long deployments away from family. He’d his the enemy hard and fast, then leave as quickly as we entered.
  Report Post »
- cjd16585
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:14pm
  @therealconservative http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9044-ron-paul-campaign-receive-most-military-donations
  
  “Dr. Paul was able to produce $36,739.79 in donations from military personnel. His closest Republican competitor was Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain, who raised $6,223.”
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:33pm
  Rea;progressive, So you are just a grumpy old man that was afraid to give to his country. I am a Vietnam Veteran and I am proud of that fact. You sir are just a moron.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:48pm
  I’m a vet and I support him and so do most of my Navy buddies. You say he has no support from the military, but military campaign contributions suggest otherwise. It’s like a 7:1 ratio between him and his nearest rival. That’s a substancial difference. Perhaps you’re out of touch.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:49pm
  @cdj
  
  Seen the sites, their put together by Paul supporters. I deal in real life.
  Report Post »
- cjd16585
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:11pm
  @therealconservative http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/07/ron-paul-military-campaign-donations-/1. This is not a pro-Paul site and they report the truth about military support for Paul. The FEC fillings are also available. You can’t run from the facts.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:30pm
  Like I say before, I’ve been to the sites.
  
  Like I said before there is a HUGH difference between “Vets” ( I did a hitch and left”) and the curent Active Duty and Retiree’s. Ron Paul has the support of the “vets”, because they do not realize that their “VA Ben’s” (VHA loan, GI Bill, etc) are in the Constitution.
  So if you support Paul and get these and a whole lot more your are a hypocrite or a O Team plant.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:46am
  @therealconservative Wow dude. I‘ve never seen any ex military member regardless of whether they were just a veteran or retiree ever belittle another’s service before. Hope you’re enjoying it up there on your ivory tower. You do realize that some vets may have done more than their one hitch if they weren’t daisabled, don’t you? BTW the 7:1 support ratio of Ron Paul statistics I was referring to is from active duty members NOT those one hitch veterans whose opinions you hold in such disregard. Shame on you!
  Report Post »
- U.S. Navy Veteran
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:34pm
  @ JUSTANGRY Speaking of ivory towers, how are things going up there in your ivory tower? You must be enjoying yourself after trashing my military service and the extraordinary contributions which I continue to make for my country. You asked before what ship I served aboard and when. O.K. I’ll answer that question here and now. USS Toledo SSN 769 From February to April 1998 ( 2 months 19 days) I was at sea for approximately 31 days, as far as Catania, Sicily. Now you’re probably wondering why so short a time? You want to know why? I’ll tell you, but I don’t expect you to believe a single word. During the time in port (Groton, CT), I descended into pure madness. I couldn’t stand being back on land. I wanted to be back out at sea. I wanted those machines to turn back on. So one night, I’m Petty Officer of the Deck, and I suddenly find myself with my service pistol in my right hand and a 15 round magazine in the left. What the hell was I supposed to do? Kill myself? Kill my shipmates? Hell no! I went AWOL!
  
  I want you to do something. You know those Salvation Army Red Kettles? I want you to go up to one of those great Americans who stand there in the cold, ringing that bell, endlessly. I want you to look him/her square in the eye as you take ALL the money out of your wallet and put that money into that red kettle.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:40pm
  I said you didn’t sound legit, because you posted that you were homeless, that you returned your veterans benefits, that you took baths in the river, etc. What didn‘t add from you comment is I just don’t believe homeless people are spedning much time posting to the Blaze, so I questioned you. Then you said that YOU lied. I pointed out that I thought it was disgusting for anyone to lie about military service, and still believe that to be true. That’s it! I think you’re confused.
  Report Post »
- U.S. Navy Veteran
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:08pm
  Confused?? No, I was being extremely sarcastic when I said: “I am not a veteran. I am just a lazy, worthless, unemployed strung out heroin junkie. I lied. I don’t even collect bottles and cans. I stand around in front of liquor stores and beg for spare change.”
  
  Do you mean to tell me that you bought that sarcastic b.s.? I think it is you who is confused. I AM a veteran. And I AM a great American. Good day, sir.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 22, 2011 at 5:32pm
  Well you do seem a little OCD with me and your latest statement where you say, “So one night, I’m Petty Officer of the Deck, and I suddenly find myself with my service pistol in my right hand and a 15 round magazine in the left. What the hell was I supposed to do? Kill myself? Kill my shipmates? Hell no! I went AWOL!” makes appear you have some stability issues. I don’t really know. It happens to the best of them, and I always support my fellow sailors, so best of luck to you, brah!
  Report Post »
Bartlebee06
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:14pm
I am so sick of people telling me that if I vote for Ron Paul its my fault if Obummer gets back in. No its your fault for continuing to vote for the lesser of 2 evils and playing the game that the R’s & D’s have designed to keep power bouncing back and forth between them. If you want to play that game then you will be to blame not me. You actually want me to be part of the blame when Gingrich gets in and shows his big govt., progressive A$$. Sorry, thats on you not me. I am also sick of people saying I’m throwing my vote away if I dont vote for the usual turds that the parties pick. You only throw your vote away when you dont vote your conscience. Think about it.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Treaty
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:20pm
  I‘d rather have a ’tard like Obama in there then Gingrich or Romney. It‘s RP for me whether he’s Republican or Independent.
  Report Post »
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:23pm
  And I’m tired of Ron Paul supporters saying “He’s our only hope”
  Report Post »
- OneofMany
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:34pm
  I agree with your position that a man (or woman) should vote his/her heart and let the chips fall. That’s how we do it in my family… But I won’t be voting for Ron Paul because his foreign policy is devoid of modern realities.
  
  When the founding fathers made our foreign policy, wars were fought 3 months away by ship. Not 5 minutes away by nuclear tipped rocket.
  Report Post »
- qpwillie
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:35pm
  @Bartlebee06
  
  There is a logical principle involved here. If you do an action that causes a particular thing to happen, it is at least partly your action that caused it to happened. If you write in or vote third party for Ron Paul, you are helping 0bama to get reelected.
  
  This is not a matter of opinion. It’s a principle of logic, something Paulies are completely lacking in.
  Report Post »
- techengineer11
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:35pm
  I heard my old boy Wilcow go off today on a Ron Paul supporter. The feigned outrage is hillarious.. Our lamestream Media can’t even mention indefinite detention so that we can have a debate about incarceratin American citizens without trial but the Media and conservative talk radio is going out to express and display their disgust for Dr. Paul, his followers and the US Constitution which we are all loyal too. lol
  
  I‘m just glad that we are finally getting to see the wolves in sheep’s clothing.. And that’s what they are. They don’t give a damn about our Constitution just like the Liberals on the Left. They are raking in the bucks by prostituting themselves before the Military inudstrial complex supporting the status quo and advocating lower tax rates for the richest… Now I’m all for a flat rate but you never hear them arguing for that.. It’s only less taxes on the rich. These radio pundits suck with the exception of Mike Church.
  Report Post »
- Scottsman
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:37pm
  I agree with Bartlebee06 but not theFakeConservative. All the other Repub-retreads are the same as Obummer and the dumbocrats.
  
  Ron Paul 2012!
  Report Post »
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:51pm
  qpwillie
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:35pm
  
  If you write in or vote third party for Ron Paul, you are helping 0bama to get reelected.
  ======================================
  
  These days, then it’s looking more and more like a vote for any other liberal that the GOP is currently promoting then that is for sure the way to get Obama re-elected! (LOL)
  Report Post »
- jcannon98188
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:53pm
  @Oneofmany
  
  Wrong. When the Founding Fathers wrote the constitution, it was written shortly after they themselves served and fought for the independence of America. The wars were fought in their backyards, amongst their neighbors. The introduction of missiles does nothing to what the constitution requires. Stop the illegal wars. Stop the destruction of our constitution. Bring our men and women home! If missiles are a problem, then build missile defense systems. Simple as that.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:57pm
  @qpwilly If Ron Paul wins, will you pull the lever for him?
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:57pm
  @QP “Willie”
  
  I’m voting Ron Paul whether write in or third party. Your action of not voting Ron Paul will give us Obama…. According to “your” own logic my statement is true.
  
  Quit blaming Ron Paul supporters for the failure of the GOP to produce conservative candidates. Ron Paul is the only conservative in the race. All the others hold Obama policies…
  
  Besides, you voted Obama in ‘08 and you will do so in 2012 too I’m sure cause QP Willie loves Obama!!!
  Report Post »
- Defense Of Ordinary Man
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:04pm
  Here Here good sir. I agree with your wisdom. Any other candidate will bring us to the same destination, just at a slower pace. I will vote for Obama in oreder to speed up the ship if left with either of the other socilists as options. After all, I dont want to be to old to survive the crash to come if we do not change our financial habits.
  Same destination, differant speeds….. Obama is full speed ahead! Im just not the type to drag things out anyways…
  Report Post »
nordique26
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:13pm
Ron Paul is the right guy for this time. We need to stop fighting wars and taking care of the rest of the world. We’re no in danger from anyone if we focus on only defending ourselves. Close most of the military bases and spend all that money here fixing our won country. Stop all the big government waste. Look into Ron Paul and what he stands for…don’t listen to the media, Fox or the rest….
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:26pm
  That just what people said in the 30′s, that turned out great didn’t it.
  Report Post »
louise
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:12pm
I love this ad. I have always wanted a President who values life. The testimonials from the women are wonderful.
Class act, as usual!

RON PAUL 2012
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
LouC57
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:11pm
I appreciate his stance on this (and his stance on the Constitution) but…he’s a nutcase.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- nordique26
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:18pm
  Everyone who doesn’t buy into all the propaganda put out be the media in not a “nutcase”. He’s right on far more issues than anyone else. Getting back to what our country is supposed to be is the msit important one….
  Report Post »
Top_Down
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:10pm
Oh stop complaining, all the Paul supporters believe that their candidate is the only one that has been attacked. Every candidate that has reached the top of the polls have been looked into and vetted. Some have scarier items in their pasts than other, Paul is no exception. Such as:

1) Calling the Wikileaks spy a patriot.
2) Demonizing Israel for the blockade, which was set up with Egypt to protect their people.
3) The fact that he is a truther.

YEAH THAT IS RIGHT, VIDEO CAME OUT TODAY THAT RON PAUL TRULY IS A TRUTHER, OR HE WAS PANDERING TO ONE OF HIS SUPPORTERS.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Santorum2012
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:19pm
  A ‘Truther’. Where is the video? I want to see it.
  
  Everyone already knows he is but the video would completely destroy him.
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:22pm
  Ron Paul is not a 9/11 truther.
  
  To bad no one knows it:
  The history of 9/11 — why they want to kill us —
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy3KDYE5KQE
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:23pm
  You are a lying troll.
  Report Post »
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:23pm
  Hes not a truther u idiot. He also voted to go into afghanstain after 911 so that shows how stupid you are. You worship a state. He stands for the constution. you neocon dumb***
  Report Post »
- Top_Down
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:54pm
  Oh, I have seen the video, its pretty incriminating. It’s either he completely believes in it or he was completely pandering to one of his supporters.
  Report Post »
- GilbertAcct
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:56pm
  Wakeupusa… That is correct. If Ron Paul were a truther then he definitely would not have voted to go into Afghanistan. He simply argues that we are not being attacked because we are free, but because we are bullies.
  
  Google Robert Pape and find his study which shows that 95% of suicide bombings are a result of occupation. He is not affiliated with RP, and his study was funded in part by our own DoD.
  Report Post »
- GilbertAcct
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:11pm
  Top_Down (aka mad_hatter_, aka Craig Romney)… Why don’t you post the link to the video? I’m sure you found it on that precious website for which you advertise. We’re all waiting anxiously!
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:34pm
  Here is the Proof
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYSKCfsLuuE&feature=related
  Report Post »
- West Coast Patriot
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:52pm
  I went to a link the other day from someone making this claim, but the claim is false. There are three videos which are hard to hear. Paul was talking about not trusting government investigations and a government cover up, but it was not about a belief that the government did 9/11, but the government not wanting the FBI to have something embarrasing come out. He says the FBI had intel about some of the terrorists from 9/11 wanting to learn to fly but not caring about learning how to land. This should have brought up red flags to the FBI and they may have been able to stop the attacks. Progressives just want to throw this stuff out there to distract you. Progressives lie, it is what they are best at.
  Report Post »
David
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:09pm
Ron Paul is the only candidate that I believe is serious about taking power away from the federal government. The power of the federal government is certainly in better hands with Romney or Gingrich, but they are not serious about releasing the power of the federal government.

Ron Paul 2012!!!!!
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
nordique26
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:06pm
Ron Paul is neither weak or a dove. He doesn‘t believe that every time some country is naughty that it’s our responsibility to spank them. He’s for strong defense, not strong offense. This starting wars all over the globe needs to stop. Japan and Germany realized that with having a big army comes the compunction to use it so they decided to not have one. TIme for us to do the same and just protect ourselves.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:18pm
  Wrong! Japan and Germany did not decide not to have a big military, they had them. It was the US that finally stepped forword and defeated them, after years of the Ron Paul mentality of is not our problem.
  Report Post »
JustPeachy
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:05pm
Ron Paul’s trying to get every single vote he can–now trying to appeal to the Pro-Life voters. That’s all this is. He’s also hoping Pro-Lifers will like this so much we might overlook other areas we don’t like.

Sorry, Mr. Paul. Not biting. I don’t care if you are “Pro-Life” and PROMISE to overturn Roe v Wade–because of other issues, I still cannot in good conscience root for you in this election. I don‘t think you’ll be getting the GOP nomination and I am sure hoping you don’t.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:11pm
  Why? Are you a war with Iran advocate?
  
  Odd isn’t it, that so many Pro-Life groups are advocating waging war without considering the innocent life lost in war. Almost hypocritical.
  
  What’s also odd is Obama and advocates for war with Iran have that same intervention policy in common….
  
  Ron Paul is doing great! He will protect life and will turn the economy around. Ron Paul 2012!!
  Report Post »
- GOA_AMD65
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:12pm
  Why don’t you want to support Ron Paul. What don’t you agree with. He offers the same foreign policy as our Forefathers. He understands economics. He has never flip flopped. He is our only hope for a conservative candidate.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:12pm
  Aren’t all the candidates trying to get as many votes as possible? What’s your beef with Ron Paul?
  Report Post »
- Treaty
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:17pm
  He can’t explain – he just knows that FOX news avoids RP.
  Report Post »
Vechorik
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:01pm
It really saddens me to see an honest man attacked so viciously at an article that should represent something we all believe.

John Cavuto did a rant about journalists on Fox doing the same thing:
Cavuto: We, in the business, have an obligation to SHUT UP. Let’s THANK Neil!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=ib3OMmMsMbs
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- louise
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:07pm
  I agree Vechorik
  Report Post »
gretsch62
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:56pm
This man is not a GOP candidate, he is a dove. With Iran flexing its muscles with Obama absent from the decision making process, Republicans and Democrats are going to need a much stronger president. Gingrich or Romney are acceptable, the others will make good cabinet members but not presidents – and no more “debates” are needed to make a choice.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:02pm
  @Gretsch Will either Newt or M I double Tizzle move to repeal the Patriot Act and NDAA?
  Report Post »
- sgt.smithc
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:02pm
  So your answer is bid government (Romney) and even Bigger government (Gingrich). Though Ron Pauls ideals on the Mid east may seem loony at times(but there not we need to worry about our own countries security and stop being the world police), he is still the most fiscally responsible person and someone who I believe really wants to put this country back on track in the direction it was founded on. Stop listening to the media and do some research on Ron Paul.
  Report Post »
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:05pm
  Ron Paul is not a dove. He’s a TOUGH cookie that sticks to the Constitution. I’ll be glad when the candidates are thinned out. Right now, I can’t tell Democrats from opposing voters at the Blaze.
  
  O’Reilly Warns Romney: Bombing Iran “Starts World War III” | P
  O’Reilly should warn Bachmann/Santorum/Gingrich as well
  http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10280-oreilly-warns-romney-bombing-iran-qstarts-world-war-iiiq
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:05pm
  You are not a conservative so no wonder you like Romney or Gingrich.
  
  We do not need a dictator, just someone who follows the Constitution.
  
  Romney is not a conservative.
  Gingrich is definitely not a conservative.
  Both will give us four more years of Obama. Both support the same policies as Obama…..
  
  Follow the Constitution. Take care of America. That is what Ron Paul will do.
  Report Post »
- bajasurfer
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:09pm
  Ron Paul is the only true Conservative out of all the candidates . If you believe Iran will get the nuke bomb then I guess you believe in the tooth fairy too . Plus, Iran will not be attacked . It’s all political propaganda my man .
  Report Post »
- Mort
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:11pm
  Newt and Mitt may be in the lead, but I can’t support either one for very different reasons. First, Mitt is simply not up to the task and he is not a real christian. The definition of Christ in the Mormon church is not the same as the Christ of the Bible as determined by 2000 years of faithful believers who have known the presence of the Holy Spirit. Second, Newt is ignorant of the Islamic threat, and to me, is too much connected to the Agenda 21 and Big Government.
  Report Post »
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:12pm
  @ gretsch62 – you sir deserve another 4 years of Obama – and do not pass go for not doing your homework on Paul.
  
  How has our military interventionalist policy been going for the past 50 years or so? Not so good really.
  
  What does the constitution say about that? Maybe you ought to check that out. Oh wait – why do that – when you believe everything the media spoon feeds you.
  
  http://www.dailypaul.com
  
  Ron Paul 2012!
  Report Post »
- GilbertAcct
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:29pm
  US Department of Defense: “At present Iran‘s forces are sufficient to deter or defend against conventional threats from Iran’s weaker neighbors such as post-war Iraq, the GCC, Azerbaijan or Afghanistan but lack the air power and logistical ability to power much beyond Iran’s boarders or to confront regional powers such as Turkey or Israel.”
  
  Benjamin Netanyahu to Congress: “My friends, you don’t need to do nation-building in Israel; we’re already built. You don’t need to export democracy to Israel; we’ve already got it. And you don’t need to send American troops to Israel; we defend ourselves. You’ve been very generous in giving us tools to do the job of defending Israel on our own.”
  
  Mohamed ElBaradei, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency: “But somehow, many people are talking about how Iran’s nuclear program is the greatest threat to the world. In many ways, I think the threat has been hyped,”… “the idea that we‘ll wake up tomorrow and Iran will have a nuclear weapon is an idea that isn’t supported by the facts as we have seen them so far,”
  Report Post »
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:05pm
  gretsch62
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:56pm
  
  Gingrich or Romney are acceptable,
  =================================
  
  You lost all credibility right there….
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:46pm
  “ With Iran flexing its muscles” When Iran can make its own Gasoline, then they might be able to flex a muscle.
  Report Post »
ENOUGHISENOUGH
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:53pm
Get lost Ron Paul. I’ve had enough of you. I will personally hold it against you (and your blind followers) if we end up with Obama again.
Log in to ReplyReply
- Shasta
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:59pm
  NoBama, NoPaul and NoGinrch 2012.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:59pm
  You sound like a 5 year old kid. Grow up!
  
  If you do not want 4 more years of Obama vote for Ron Paul.
  
  Great ad Ron Paul!
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:59pm
  You’re enjoying the TSA gropings then?
  Report Post »
- CorpsmanToPA
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:01pm
  Come get some ignoramus
  Report Post »
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:05pm
  @ ENOUGHISENOUGH –
  go vote for some Rino or neo-con chicken hawks like Bachmann or Santorum. Or better yet vote for The Grinch or Romney – you sir deserve another 4 years of Barry Soetoro! Have fun!
  
  Ron Paul 2012!
  Report Post »
Die Trying
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:52pm
if you don’t support Paul you may as well just vote for obama. every other candidate is a puppet for the republican party, the party that has worked HAND IN HAND with the democrats to steal your rights in the name of security and to redistribute your wealth in the name of compassion. Bachman Romney and Perry are not conservatives, they are snakes in the grass. they will do and say whatever they have to to get your vote. This is what evil does. Wake up! Stop serving the republican party! We are forging our own chains with every vote we cast for these golems.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- therealconservative
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:55pm
  NoPaul 2012
  Report Post »
- Shasta
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:58pm
  Thanks Die, I appreciate you telling me how it is so I don’t have to do my own research and make up my own mind. Ok, back to reality. Every candidate has their own problems and baggage. Of all of the candidates, Dr. Paul and Speaker Gingrich are so far out there, that I could never have voted for either of them. And given how the GOP establishment are distancing themselves from Backman and Santorum, your basic theory is untrue as well.
  Report Post »
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:11pm
  @ Shasta – what don’t you agree with on Paul? Oh let me guess – foreign policy!
  
  I think you ought to check that out again – Ron Paul is not an appeaser or an isolationist – he’s a non-interventionist.
  
  Why don’t you youtube Ron Paul foreign policy and listen to him explain it himself.
  
  Or are you one of those that believe the media hype about Iran is going to kill us and we have to protect Israel at the expense of our own welfare as a country?
  
  You must be for that big military industrial complex that has 900 some military bases around the world and that we have to nation build.
  
  How did that work for Rome? Oh that’s right – it didn’t!
  
  Ron Paul 2012!
  Report Post »
Average_JoeMN
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:49pm
Yeah, so he’s pro-life. He’s still crazy, dangerous, arrogant and a pacifist.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Die Trying
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:54pm
  so you will be voting for obama then? or perhaps one of the rino candidates? you are part of the problem average joe.
  Report Post »
- ENOUGHISENOUGH
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:54pm
  Amen!!!!
  Report Post »
- This_Individual
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:02pm
  Wrong, ignorant, misinformed fool.
  Report Post »
- Shasta
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:02pm
  No Die, I will either be voting for Santorum or Backman in the primary. And in the general election, I will vote for any republican over Obama, with the possible exception of Dr. Paul. I really like much of what he has to say, and I can live with his cookieness, but his stance on the middle east and Iran are unacceptable.
  Report Post »
- Okie from Muskogee
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:18pm
  @Shasta
  
  How is it you want anybody but Obama but then won’t vote Ron Paul because he is not like Obama and does not support intervention? That’s just plain stupid and makes no sense.
  
  Santorum and Bachmann both agree with Obama on intervention and you support that?
  
  Are you saying you support Obama’s foreign policy of intervention?
  Report Post »
- undyingsound
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:25pm
  What is more dangerous are people like you who do nothing but name call and judge instead of debate with actual facts. Go work for Fox News.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:25pm
  So shasta, you think the constitution is way out there or that Ron Paul‘s position isn’t in line with it?
  Report Post »
Micmac
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:45pm
Nice ad but still didn’t say he was anti-abortion.

NoBama 2012
Reboot Washington
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Vechorik
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:53pm
  What? How clear can he be? Ron Paul has ALWAYS been pro-life (not like flippers Gingrich/Romney)
  Another ad:
  Ron Paul – Life is Precious
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1HQboY8Oss
  Report Post »
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:02pm
  He is personally against abortion.
  
  He does not like Roe v. Wade, not only because of its subject matter, but because it was the product of an activist judiciary, and brought too much power to the Federal government.
  
  He advocates devolution of the regulation of this abhorrent act back to the states, which have shown greater fortitude in outlawing it.
  
  The Constitution yields no power to the Federal government to regulate in this area.
  Report Post »
- louise
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:06pm
  Micmac, pro-life is anti-abortion.
  Report Post »
- Shasta
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 6:06pm
  Norm D. Plume, you call it regulation of an act, I call it the defense against the murder of unborn children.
  Report Post »
- c0mm0nsense
  Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:50pm
  Dr. Paul
  “Immediately saving lives by effectively repealing Roe v. Wade and preventing activist judges from interfering with state decisions on life by removing abortion from federal court jurisdiction through legislation modeled after his “We the People Act.”
  Report Post »

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.