Ron Paul Relives Witnessing Late-Term Abortion in New Pro-Life Ad
- Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:14pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
GOP presidential contender Ron Paul unveiled a new pro-life ad campaign Friday in which the former OBGYN recounts a time when he witnessed a late-term abortion resulting in a live-birth. Pau,l who personally delivered more than 4,000 babies, is interviewed in the ad stating, “This whole notion of life not being valuable just is something I was never able to accept.”
The ad dubs Paul a “man of faith, committed to protecting life.”
Paul relives his experience:
“I happened to have walked into an operating room where they were doing an abortion on a late pregnancy. They lifted out a small baby that was able to cry and breathe and they put it in a bucket and put it in the corner of the room and pretended it wasn’t there. I walked down the hallway and a baby was born early — slightly bigger than the baby they put in the bucket and they wanted to save this baby. So they might have had 10 doctors in there doing everything conceivable [to save that baby's life].”
“Who are we to decide that we pick and throw one away and pick up and struggle to save the other ones,” Paul continues. “Unless we resolve this and understand that life is precious and we must protect life, we can’t protect liberty.”
What became of either baby, the ad does not reveal. Watch for yourself below:
Lifenews adds:
The ad is already getting strong reviews from conservative activists, with Tina Korbe of Hot Air writing that it “doesn’t feel like a campaign spot. It comes across instead as a public service announcement — and an utterly important one.”
“Paul comes across as so poignantly sincere when he speaks on the subject of life that it’s hard for me to believe this video is just a ploy for votes. Frankly, I wish more campaign ads were like this one — quiet encapsulations of important convictions,” she writes. “Paul told the anecdote about the baby in the bucket at the Ames straw poll and it was powerful then. I’m happy a few thousand dollars and airings in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada mean more people across the country will hear it, too.”
What do you think of Paul’s new ad spot? Do you think his message will be effective in rallying the pro-life GOP base?
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (389)
dcatman
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:59pmRon Paul’s stand on Life is solid and his position is clearly articulated in his record as well as on his campaign site. Research it yourself before making pro/con statements on this or any other site.
For those of you who are “surprised” by this video I am truly amazed that we can be so far into the campaign season and you don’t know the positions of the candidates yet. Seriously, how do you formulate your own opinion about the candidates unless you research for yourself…. Or do you wait until an outfit like TheBlaze or Fox tells you what to think?
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:23pmAnother scary thing about the Paulies is that they think they’re the only ones who research the candidates. Everybody here knew that Ron Paul was pro-life just as they know all the other candidates also are. Nobody is saying they didn’t know.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:51pmGreat comment. People hear negative things about Ron Paul on the radio, then tv, then by the anti-Paul trolls on this site, and it starts to resonate with them. It’s like what the Soviets did. If you tell a lie enough times, enough people will believe it. Just look for a few anti-Paul trolls and watch what they say, their post never has anything with substance, because facts>insults.
Unfortunately they jump on the hate Paul wagon, and never do the research to see what he believes, and WHY he believes it. His videos are everywhere, and would only take a few days to open up your mind to the fires of real liberty.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:00pmIf Ron Pauls critics really researched him, why do they misrepresent and lie about his positions? For example, no matter how many times the difference between isolationism and non-interventionism is explained the critics continue to falsely call him isolationist. Why is he constantly called “nuts” when he is not only completely sane but extremely intelligent and far more consistent than ANY other candidate?
Report Post »There are only two realistic possibilites 1) The critics are sorely lacking in their research (or understanding) of Pauls positions or 2) The critics are intentionally lying.
LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:18pmI 100% agree and I‘m glad I’m not alone in my fight for liberty. Thank you and keep up the good fight.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:55pmWhat we need to make very clear to the neocons who have hijacked the Republican party is that if Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination and all of the Ron Paul supporters write him in, the GOP can not possibly win the general election without us.
Of course the way they see that scenario is that if we don‘t vote for the team and it’s media chosen, status quo nominee in the general election, then we are responsible for Obamas re-election. But the way I see it is that if they don’t vote for liberty and the Constitution by chossing Ron Paul in the primaries, then THEY are in fact the ones who are responsible for Obamas re-election.
So neocons – it’s really up to you – is it going to be four more years of Obama on the fast track to socialism, or Ron Paul restoring the Constitutional Republic. Those are the only two choices. Choose wisely.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:56pmoops – typo. “choosing”
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 7:07amcous1933,
This is America. Your attempt to bully people into supporting your candidate with threats is unAmerican and despicable. You are talking like a spoiled two year old by threatening to do something to harm America if you don’t get your way.
In other words, you are a typical Paulie.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 6:24pmQp,
I’m not bullying or threatening. Vote for who you want. That‘s what I’m going to do and I’m going to feel good about my vote. If your status quo candidate doesn’t win, you will blame me and other supporters of liberty, but the way I see it we voted right and you voted wrong.
I‘m not surprised to see that you don’t see the hypocricy in accusing me of exactly what you and your fellow neocons do to Ron Paul and his supporters constantly. Click on my user name and you will see that I am always civil and don’t call anyone names. I‘ve clicked on your name and you can’t say the same.
* Before you even post it, “neocon” is not name-calling. It is not pejorative, but an accurate description of the political persuasion exemplified by the wing of the conservatives that, contrary to traditional conservatism, favors militarism and “spreading democracy” with our armed forces.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:55pm“This whole notion of life not being valuable just is something I was never able to accept.”
Report Post »Wrong–most advocates of abortion don‘t disagree that life isn’t valuable (which is just stupid), they disagree about your definition of “life,” more specifically your assertion of when it begins.
rs7316
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:04pmThen explain Obama arguing against medical treatment for babies that do manage to survive an abortion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUkbuhXzbvI&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL1833E6BD4C1B90A4
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:07pmLife:
Report Post »the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism.
the hawk
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:11pmAbortion IS MURDER, JUST ASK THE LATE dR. tILLER !
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:24pmSo that’s why you pro-abortion folks are rabidly against having a woman see an ultrasound of her BABY prior to having her child dismembered in the womb. Seeing the heartbeat and watching the BABY move around would destroy your precious argument that it’s just a blob, that there is no life in it, that it isn’t a “real” person. Seeing that ultrasound image would show that it is indeed a living human being that is about to be ripped apart. How you can defend an unspeakable act such as this is beyond reasonable comprehension. You must not be a parent and have experienced the joy of watching that “blob” develop into a beautiful little child who loves you unconditionally. May God have mercy on you and your ilk for promoting the slaughter of innocents.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:28pmI believe abortion is defacto murder, for it is done by shedding a human’s blood. As Huckabee once said, “It’s not broccoli”, it’s a human in there. I believe, that as long as there is blood flowing, there is life, as say the Scriptures. A fetus must be destroyed or harmed in order for its existence to end. It is guilty of no crime and completely innocent of any ill will. Do not pass the sin of the father unto the son. Parents must be held accountable and responsible for their own actions and choices. My sincere belief is that all human life (through whatever stage) is precious and should be protected.
Report Post »HumbleCitizen
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:30pm@ The Third Archon
Report Post »And the baby is the bucket…when did life begin for the child who was clearly heard to cry?
The Third Archon
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:42pm@RS7316
1) I said “most advocates of abortion don‘t disagree that life isn’t valuable,” not all, although I doubt that Obama believes life is categorically worthless, just that perhaps he doesn’t view a recently born child as significantly different from a fetus.
2) Infanticide and abortion are two different things–whether one supports one, both, or neither, are independent facts (though perhaps the reasons for one’s support, or lack thereof, are related). Why Obama supports, supposedly, not extending care to children born in attempted abortions is unknown to me, but it is not related to the issue of abortion and its merits.
@QPWILLIE
That’s one definition of life, yes. Although, by that same definition you would have to treat your snot, and single-celled bacteria, with the same reverence as fetuses. So not only would abortion be illegal, but so would anti-bacterial wipes under your definition of “life” that should be legally protected (from killing).
@THE HAWK
Report Post »So is eating a cheeseburger, but we don’t see people getting misty-eyed over that. For that matter, so is any execution (killing without consent), but again, same story. Clearly, all life is not categorically equal and sacrosanct (deserving equal rights and protection).
Anamah
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:33pmBecause Obama vote as “ present” born alive babies, are left on a bucket or a table alone until with any compassion reach their death. An absolutely monster, an hypocrite with a very secret amoral personality.
Report Post »navydoc2008
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:28pmWhen does life begin? Is it when the heart starts beating? That would be around DAY 21. Is it when the “fetus” is viable? Some babies are not viable even at 40 weeks. A fetus at 16 weeks is almost fully developed, and readily recognizable as a developed baby. If life doesn’t matter, why don’t we just remove all restrictions on abortion/muder, that way if you don’t like your child when they are a teenager you could just go down and have them killed? Who are we to make that decision? The truth of the matter is that study after study women who have abortions have more residual mental health issues than women who give up unwanted pregnancies to adoption. FIRST DO NO HARM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 3:17am@NAVYDOC2008
Report Post »It’s not your decision to judge the risk of mental trauma each individual questionably faces from choosing to have an abortion–if you think it‘s too great don’t have one, but leave that for each individual to decide personally. I’m not necessarily against reasonable limits on how late into pregnancy the abortion can take place whatever the democratic consensus decides upon.
Chuck Stein
Posted on October 16, 2011 at 8:42pm“Why Obama supports, supposedly, not extending care to children born in attempted abortions is unknown to me, but it is not related to the issue of abortion and its merits.” Wow, ARCHIE, you want to try and sell that tripe? “not related” ? You think you can just say something and that makes it so — no matter what facts, language & logic show.
Report Post »ritualrites
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:55pmGod’s mercy and grace extends to the lowest of sinners. JESUS SAVES if we come to him for forgiveness. This comment I expect the atheist will hate but, God loves them too. Jesus is coming the babies are precious innocent angels. They are slaughtered like the Lamb of God. That’s what gives them a special place in heaven around the thrown of God. The babies are actually lucky they don‘t have to grow up with a mom who’s heart does not mind killing their baby.
Report Post »grannygrottbags
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:54pmWell, i have to be honnest, i wish more polotitians here in UK were MORE like Ron Paul and, i am not going to apologise for that. He has Values, Merrit and a deep sense of morality, He is gentle but, says what he means and means what he says, as far as i have seen and been able to investigate, this man has repeated his same mesages for a good twenty to thirty years, i think this year might be the year that this man comes into his own, he hasn’t changed, maybe THAT is the big attraction, the fact that he has stuck to his guns, stuck to the ‘constitutional’ way, repeated his message over and over again without backtracking, telling lies, making ‘concessions’, he has based his words on one thing only, The Constitution. I’m from UK and even I am impressed by him, his track record and his values, i can only hope that one day we in UK can be lucky enough to have a man like him to lead our respective countries out of the dark side and into the light.
Report Post »One thing. He really needs to be aware of the messages that Glenn gives on air, especially from the danger we are in concerning the radical muslim ilk, totally frightening and even debilitating, that is a problem that doesnt have an answer too far in the future im afraid, by now it is so deep seated in our respective cultures, whats the answer?, i dont know yet but, i know one way is to send the radical ones back to their primary homes after all, when in rome and all that. They dont speak in english, they dont embrace the west wh
Stuck_in_CA
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:56pmWonderful ad! Thanks
Report Post »grannygrottbags
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:05pm..cont….
Report Post »ere they ‘escaped’ to, they dont trust the western people who suround them in their neighbourhoods, they dont hardly mix and mingle (though, in my experience there are of course, exceptions to this rule), they just dont want to have anything to do with us and indeed shun us, where is the life in that??, if i wanted to go to america to live, or spain, or france, or germany or portugal or italy…i would try to use the language to communicate, i wouldnt rely on government to cover all bases, having said that i can also understand assylum, threat from loss of life, violence, hunger and despair, of course i can. Shouldnt those ones be grateful for the chance to escape those afflictions?…just a little even?, if the boot was on the other foot and it was me and mine, im dam sure i would be most grateful, i wouldnt have to surrender my values because everyone knows a good host accomodates but, a good guest knows when he/she is lucky enough to encounter a good, benevolent host, kind and other…..dont they?.
Yet, violence begats violance, hate begats hate, murder is within the hearts of an othrwise loving humanity. Theres a sentence in a song, from a vets eye view of world war 11:
For the one who calls the shots
is not among the dead or lame,
and on each end of the rifle,
we’re the same.
LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:33pmI wish you were here in America. We need more like you. Good luck to you on your side of the world; you’ll need it.
Report Post »Steverino
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:28pmNicely put, Granny.
Report Post »Steve
momrules
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:54pmAbortion is a crime against God. These aborted babies are true innocents that the stroke of a pen made legal to kill. America is suffering now because of it’s moral decay and the proof of that is before our eyes every day.
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:09pmAnd here I thought we were suffering due to all the unwanted welfare babies sucking our tax money dry.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:15pmYou got that right! I’m 6 months pregnant right now and there is NO WAY you can convince me that that squirming, kicking little being inside my womb is not a living human baby. You can’t tell me that the heartbeat I hear when I go for my monthly check-up doesn’t belong to a viable, precious little person. Anyone who believes otherwise is out of their mind. My baby and every other unborn baby out there has the right to life. Abortion IS NOT BIRTH CONTROL even though liberals treat it as such.
These liberals are the same people who will scream desperately for the “right” to dismember innocent babies but will fight tooth and nail to save a convicted murderer or rapist from Death Row. Sick, twisted, perverted individuals who should be grateful that their own mothers didn’t view them as an “inconvenience” or an “unnecessary burden” to be disposed of like household garbage….
Report Post »Berealalready
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:33pm@ Creestof
That moral decay also means that random hooking up with no sense of responsibility creates the issue in the first place. The choice is not between paying for welfare babies or abortion, it is between waving your genitals wildly wherever or *cough* breeding responsibly. Actions have consequences, some more than others. Sex has some pretty serious consequences. So, if we can’t collectively behave ourselves all that well, perhaps we could slap a hat on the baby plunger? For those who argue that it is unrealistic to expect people to have responsible sex I would argue, then you are not really any different from a dog or a goat. Let’s use our minds in conjunction with our junk.
Report Post »hi
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:45pmThe Almighty Cristof
Report Post »The welfare babies are created on purpose so as to keep grabbing more and more money from the taxpayers.Stop the payments and see how women become responsible.
Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:55pmit is a spiritual fight- don’t forget the satanic cults of the world are alive and well. who do you think performs these baby sacrifices unapologetically.
Report Post »We often believe that satan worship is in thick dusty books full of legends. or the goofy nerdy groups doing the unthinkable to get a “piece”.
Ginnette Paris: The Sacrament of Abortion
Lion420
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:51pmWow…I forgot how good it feels, when Ron Paul actually makes sense!
Report Post »bmwrider
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:57pmSo much for Grandpa Ron being a libertarian…
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:07pmBM- Are you saying that all libertarians are pro-choice?
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:09pmYes, a libertarianism that doesn’t care when babies are being killed is soooo ATTRACTIVE.
Has it occured to you that this is Paul‘s way of showing people that Libertarianism doesn’t have to mean heartless individualism?
being prolife is what converted me from the Democratic Party. Any ideology that doesn’t see the unborn as deserving protection is unworthy of the freedom it presumes to defend.
Report Post »joejohnheath
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:13pm@ bmwrider
This is a Libertarian p.o.v., although not shared by all. Ron Paul believes in the RIGHT of LIFE guaranteed by the Constitution.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:51pm@BMWRIDER
Psst. Don’t tell anyone, but Ron Paul has been elected over 12 times as a REPUBLICAN.
He’s what the Republican party USED TO BE. In the same spirit as Goldwater and Taft.
He’s a PALEOCONSERVATIVE (sound it out) not a NEOCONSERVATIVE.
Maybe cookie monster can help.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2EqhZND1_I&feature=youtu.be
ecmarc
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 1:38pmAs Ron Paul explained, he has to stand up for the liberty of everyone, including the unborn.
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:49pmUntil they are 21…duct tape their legs together!
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:55pmIn other words, the issue SHOULD have nothing to do with abortion, and EVERYTHING to do with morals and responsibility.
Stop trying to solve the problem at the 11th hour…and focus on the problem where it starts…at the conception!
Report Post »sarahchar09
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:11pmoh bless you! I laughed my butt off!
Report Post »toto
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:37pmParents should educate their children that they don’t have the right to bring children into this world if they are not in a position to give them a married mother and father who can care for them. Though pregnancy will still occur at times, the welfare of the child should come first, not that of the parent. That’s where morals have been turned upside down. Children and young adults are now taught that they are more important than anything they might conceive.
Report Post »sweetieboat
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:48pmThis is one of the reasons we cannot vote for Ron Paul; what happened to the baby? Would a person who is pro-life just leave the room?
Report Post »My Question is: Did Ron Paul think that pro life er’s would vote for him after leaving a child in a bucket?
Again I would ask that this blog be for people who love discussion and honestly try to engage in an way that brings value to the issue.
prolifeevangelical
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:03pmI thought the same thing. It is sort of a weird ad. He at least should have said something like “looking back, I should have stepped in” or something like that. I know I would have some major guilt about leaving a crying baby to die in a trash can.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:08pmThe man said, there were about TEN PROFESSIONAL DOCTORS trying to save the life of a bit older and bigger baby born too early, in the next room. How was he, alone, an inexperienced student still needing much to learn and study about medical practice, going to save the life of a baby, that was weaker, younger and smaller than a baby that ten professional doctors were having difficulty saving? Did he posses some supernatural powers and knowledge that these other doctors didn’t have? CPR? Mouth to Mouth? Shock? Would you have the slightest clue? We’re talking about a baby that was already dying and left to bleed out in a bucket. We’re not talking about a healthy natural size baby. Most people would just run out of the room to cry and throw up.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:07pmI can’t vote for Ron Paul after hearing about this…Why didn’t he take this non-human they threw in the trash and punch this buck-toothed rodent in the face and smother it with a pillow…That’s what Dr.Tiller and Rachael Maddow would have done
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:21pmI can‘t even believe I’m reading this horse ****. You people always find ways to distort what Dr. Ron Paul says… He used this as an example of how Life is precious and is guaranteed by our Constitution. You people make me sick, and I serious wonder what this man has done to for people to have such hate for him.
This man stands up for our liberties day in and day out for 30+ years, and all you can do is criticize him? I seriously hate people, and sometimes wonder if this country is even worth saving.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:33pmLibertyfading,
You are exactly right. There are many people on this site who are so irrational in their hatred of Ron Paul that they will distort and twist everything he says in their attempts to villainize him. The most disgusting part is that almost all of them consider themselves conservatives, Christians, and pro-Constitution. Dr. Paul is the most conservative, most (truly) Christian, and ONLY Constitutionist candidate in the race and they attack and disparage him at every turn. I don’t know how they sleep at night.
Report Post »CottonMPG
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:22pmActually, I think it happens all the time. If you try to save the child’s life you get fired and are no longer allowed to work in a hospital. Then you aren’t even able to treat the people you would have helped. George W. Bush signed a bill into law to protect children that are born alive and giving medical professionals the right to refuse involvement with abortion or dispensing abortion drugs. I’m pretty sure Obama signed a bill effectively repealing it though.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:26pm@sweetieboat
Report Post »Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:48pm
This is one of the reasons we cannot vote for Ron Paul; what happened to the baby? Would a person who is pro-life just leave the room?
My Question is: Did Ron Paul think that pro life er’s would vote for him after leaving a child in a bucket?
Again I would ask that this blog be for people who love discussion and honestly try to engage in an way that brings value to the issue
***
You have just stated exactly what I felt reading of this ad. Was he not pro-life before this incident? Was this a heart change? Did he repent of simply walking out of the room? This ad leaves sooo much to wonder about. If he is the POTUS, would he stand up for individual rights? He can say the difference in the 2 babies treatmenst made him pro-life, but he was a Dr. (or at least a medical professional) at that time. Was he AFRAID to take a stand and attempt to save that baby in the bucket? I’ve often wondered what happened to the nurse in Chicago who lost her job for attempting to comfort the dying baby, MAY GOD BLESS HER FOR CARING BRAVELY FOR IT!
Jefferson
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:08pmWhat part of HE WAS A STUDENT, DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND?
“After being forced to witness an abortion being performed during his time in medical school, he knew from that moment on that his practice would focus on protecting life. And during his years in medicine, never once did he find an abortion necessary to save the life of a pregnant woman.”
Report Post »http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/abortion/
colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:13pm@Mil Mom You raise some good questions. At least they’re not intended to slander the man. Maybe someone could ask him to detail the story a bit more in a interview or something. It is an interesting story.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:31pmAh. Thanks Jefferson. I guess a little research and less assuming always seem to work best.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:40pmPaul said, “they might have had 10 doctors in there doing everything conceivable” trying to save the other baby that was in somewhat better condition. Should we expect that one unlearned young student can do the miraculous by himself that even ten doctors (professionals) had difficulty doing? We’re talking about a baby taken out of the womb forcefully with the intent to cause him damage and harm, leading to his death. Left in a bucket already dying, bleeding to death. Most people would just run out of the room to go cry and throw up. This man decided to become a doctor and help women give life to over 4,000 babies!
Report Post »DrWho
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 1:53amHe has done more to fight abortion than anyone blogging on this site.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012
momprayn
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:46pmWell, I applaud him for what he said period. It reminded me of what I’ve read about how horrible abortions are from former nurses at these clinics that quit & if more people knew about it they might be a little more upset. They throw them into trash cans, etc. just like they are trash…no attempt to keep alive; however, they‘ll do everything to keep some premature baby that wasn’t aborted alive. It’s crazy & irrational, just like liberals thinking. It’s all twisted, self -serving & doesn’t make sense. BTW many don’t know that Roe v. Wade decision was by some activist lib judge and can be proven to be unconstitutional.
Report Post »Having said all that, I don’t know why this kind of ad? I think most, if not all of the other candidates are passionately prolife.
No Free Beer
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:45pmYou Blaze people are unbelievable…
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:59pmI can’t believe you believe that we are unbelievable.
Report Post »OneofMany
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:45pmWow…. a LOT of progressive TROLLS on this story….
I thought it was a very emotional ad and I don’t believe Ron Paul is a hypocrite in ANY form… that guy may not have the foreign affairs stuff down yet, but he has everything else.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:38pmYeah, I thought I was used to it, but this is a whole new breed of trolls. These “people” on the blaze somehow find a way to turn this on Ron Paul. Disgusting. I‘m trying to find a new website that isn’t so full of this nonsense.
He’s been a Champion of Life and the Constitution for 30+ years, and all people do is criticize him. God bless that man, and I sincerely hope to God there are more like him in the future.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 7:06amI think Ron Paul has the wars figured out in the right way already (has for decades).
The difference between a neo-conservative and a conservative:
definition and names: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuefjIYKkjE
2. Chinese invade Texas:www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHrkc6EB6h0
3. Judge Napolitano re: Tea Party Split http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF30eMuWFHI
End the Fed
Report Post »End the wars
End the income tax Ron Paul can do it!
nancienice
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 9:31pmIgnore them and they will go away.
Report Post »meegancm
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:43pmI like Ron Paul’s ad and agree with his stance on abortion. I would, however, like Ron Paul to discuss other issues at hand. He is one of my favorite candidates so far, but he needs to move off this subject and onto something else.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:44pmThere are more ads posted on YouTube for Ron Paul than any other candidate.
Why?
The political parties like to put candidates in nice, neat little boxes so the Democrats and Republicans can take turns running the banking/military machine. Ron Paul is a financial conservative and a social liberal. Ron Paul doesn’t fit that box so the conservative and liberal media both ignore him. His name is seldom mentioned because he dares BUCK THE SYSTEM.
As far as Wall Street occupies and us, yes there is common ground says Judge Andrew Napolitano:
Report Post »“Occupy Wall Street”people warned not to let their efforts get hijacked (like the GOP hijacked the Tea Party)
Napolitano suggests common goals.
End the Fed
End the wars
End the income tax
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF30eMuWFHI
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:43pmGreat ad Ron Paul! Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, in that order!
For the haters as to “why didn’t he save it”, he couldn’t and had no authority to do so. If he had tried he would of been disbarred and thrown in jail on multiple charges and the baby would have still died. Understand the time it occurred.
I bet the ones trying to spin this negative are the same ones who want to take lives of someone who does not agree with you instead of change their mind to think correctly.
Ron Paul has fought for life his entire life. Life is the most important gift from God and Ron Paul champions it. He believes life begins at conception. Hope you all do as well.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:58pmWhile I seriously doubt he would have been thrown in jail for saving the baby’s life, such a trial no judge or hospital wants, I am sure he would have lost his liscence or at least been fired.
But that is beside the point. I don’t think it is clear that he DID leave the baby there or that he had an opportunity to save it. This story was edited and there may be many relevant facts to this specific question that were left out because it is the sanctity of life that is being highlighted, not Paul’s actions on that day. For all we know he may have walked in after the baby had died but that he learned later what condition it was in when it was born.
It’s a good ad, and if it makes us wonder why he didn’t save the baby maybe it will make others think the same, and then we can ask, “Why aren’t WE saving ALL the babies born this way? Obama wants them to die.”
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:40pm“It’s a good ad, and if it makes us wonder why he didn’t save the baby maybe it will make others think the same, and then we can ask, “Why aren’t WE saving ALL the babies born this way? Obama wants them to die.””
@ISLESFORDIAN Great point.
Okie, I don’t see either how this ad could be turned into negative but for slander. I mean, the ad makes a valid observation of the irrationality of abortions, irregardless of the candidate that made the ad. Other than that, I’m glad Paul is not afraid to speak his mind on all issues. Honesty is a virtue.
Report Post »Mohawk1773
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:11pmYes, great ad, Okie. Blessings to Ron Paul.
No I will not try to spin this or anything else Paul has done (although I easily could).
Like you all have done to Mr. Cain.
Peace.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:39pm@Okie from Muskogee
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:43pm
Great ad Ron Paul! Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, in that order!
For the haters as to “why didn’t he save it”, he couldn’t and had no authority to do so. If he had tried he would of been disbarred and thrown in jail on multiple charges and the baby would have still died. Understand the time it occurred.
I bet the ones trying to spin this negative are the same ones who want to take lives of someone who does not agree with you instead of change their mind to think correctly.
Ron Paul has fought for life his entire life. Life is the most important gift from God and Ron Paul champions it. He believes life begins at conception. Hope you all do as well
Report Post »***
Don‘t know if I’m called a hater, but my point still remains, “I’d like to have heard that this cemented his pro-life stance, or that he has had trouble living with the fact that he walked away.’” In ending the ad without either of these stated, he leaves so much to wonder about. I’d like to know how this changed his life. I realize an ad must be short, but he left soooo much out of this one.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 1:34amI would like to point out Ron Paul’s ad does state what happened to the baby.
“They lifted out a small baby that was able to cry and breathe and they put it in a bucket and put it in the corner of the room and pretended it wasn’t there.”
Obviously an ignored baby in a bucket does not survive.
Ron Paul’s ad also tells how it effected his thought or confirmed his thought:
“Who are we to decide that we pick and throw one away and pick up and struggle to save the other ones,” Paul continues.
“Unless we resolve this and understand that life is precious and we must protect life, we can’t protect liberty.”
We can’t protect Liberty until we protect Life first.
1.)Life
2.)Liberty
3.)Pursuit of Happiness
It all starts with Life
Appreciate your thoughts..Except IsLesFordian….Just kiddin…
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 3:29amMil Mom, you are asking “I’d like to have heard that this cemented his pro-life stance, or that he has had trouble living with the fact that he walked away.’”
I believe that is between Ron Paul and God. That you want him to beat his chest and cry out of shame is disturbing. Jesus quietly started writing the sins of those who wanted to stone the prostitute. After they left, He didn’t demand that the prostitute recount every sinful act to all and sundry, not even to Him. He just told her to repent and sin no more. Why do you have this need to know every intimate detail of Paul’s conversations with God? I think you should look into that before you ask others to reveal their communion with God.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 7:10amKTsayz, spoken like a true Christian. God doesn’t want us walking around bound by GUILT — he wants us to serve Him — and that’s what Ron Paul saw, learned and is practicing.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:42pmCan’t please every one I guess.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:54pmor everyone.
Report Post »bernbart
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:41pmAbortion is a legal medical procedure and a woman’s right to privacy is protected by the Consitution of the United States. Under Roe v. wade there is equal protection for the woman and the fetus. Late term abortions is not an issue as they are very rare, and can only be performed in the third trimester (approx 24 weeks) when a doctor determines the woman’s life or health is in danger. Even if he is a doctor Ron Paul would not be allowed to just through surgical rooms and procedures being performed by other doctors. The AMA and the College Of OBGYN both support legal abortion. Maybe you should all check into Dr Paul record. there is a reason he no longer practices medicine.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:54pmBERN – Sorry, it can be proven to be unconstitutional — has nothing to do with “privacy rights”, etc. — it was ruled by an activist judge….legal doesn’t = right
.http://www.rightgrrl.com/carolyn/roe.html
I’m waiting for it to be reversed & justice to come back to this nation and hopefully God will bless us…….again.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:02pm“Under Roe v. wade there is equal protection for the woman and the fetus.”
Riiiiight…because there is an equal chance that a baby will come out of the clinic alive as there is that the mother will.
I guess your Koolaid has some 80 proof in it.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:08pmBlah ,blah ,bla-all the words and laws and everything else on earth can’t negate the reality that human innocent beings are being killed by so called healers[doctors and nurses]
Report Post »thinkingoutloud
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:18pmThe AMA and college of OB reflect their liberal viewpoints and are not o the majority of practicing MDS. These two groups are driven by academic liberalism. Roe vs Wade may be the law, however it is an immoral law and certainly not God’s law.
Report Post »Atomic
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:23pmRoe v. Wade is the poster child for activist judges gone wild. Its just bad law. abortion = murder.
Did all the aborted (murdered) babies enjoy equal justice? Did they get the American right to pursue happiness? Did they as individuals live in a free country?
abortion is unconstitutional, immoral, and un-American.
Report Post »HumbleCitizen
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:46pm@bernbart
Report Post »Just because something is “legal” doesn’t make it right. Remember the Jews in Germany where it was “legal” to exterminate them.
Try visitng this website (WARNING GRAPHIC)http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/photosbyage/index.htm
that shows the dismembered fetuses that were ripped apart then talk to God about “legal right to murder”.
Vechorik
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:48pmI remember reading that Dr. Paul “was called” to serve in Congress because he was so ticked about how the Constitution was being ignored and the crazy games they were playing with finances (sounds like a true patriot, huh?)
As far as abortion, I also remember Dr. Paul debating on the View and really put Joy in her place. Dr. Paul wants counseling for all pregnant mothers and that counseling includes ULTRASOUND. He believes that once they see their baby’s face, they will realize they have a person inside them — not just a blob to get rid of.
Report Post »DrWho
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 2:01amYou also had a right to own a slave once too…
Report Post »You did not have the right to drink a beer for a few years…
Women did not have the right to vote…
Today you have the right to kill a baby.
mr.goodvibe
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 10:59amGood, maybe you need to have a late term abortion performed on you douche. Obviously if life means nothing at the begining it should not matter later. You idiot liberals always defend the guilty and punish the truly innocent. Truly mad!
Report Post »waluman353
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:38pmfirst time i ever watched a political comercial that actually makes sense
Report Post »shandog
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:32pmWhy didn’t Ron Paul try to save it? Where was his Hippocratic Oath? Cause no harm and DO ALL GOOD? He just walked away. Pathetic.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:40pmThat‘s what I’ve heard many say. They say a young intern, who was lucky to be selected by the hospital could ruin his career by saving the baby. What would he do with it? I’m sure he was practically in shock — one of those things you think about later and thing — on, my God!
“Occupy Wall Street”people warned not to let their efforts get hijacked (like the GOP hijacked the Tea Party)
Report Post »Napolitano suggests common goals.
End the Fed
End the wars
End the income tax
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF30eMuWFHI
colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:57pm@Shandog. You ask very good questions. But your conclusion without seeking an answer is truly pathetic. I’ll start you off. He was being given a group tour of a hospital as a student for the University he was attending at the time. At that time abortions were not popular and they were illegal. Hypocrite? Do you live in a state that allows abortions? How far away do you live from a clinic that does abortions? The man said, there were about TEN PROFESSIONAL DOCTORS trying to save the life of a bit older and bigger baby born too early, in the next room. How the heck was he, himself, an inexperienced student still needing much to learn and study about medical practice, going to save the life of a baby, that was weaker, younger and smaller than a baby that ten professional doctors were having difficulty saving? Did he posses some supernatural powers and knowledge that these other doctors didn’t have? That’s another good question.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:42pm@Shandog
You’re a terrible person, and I seriously hate you. The only pathetic thing about this post are the trolls like you polluting it.
Ron Paul has been fighting for Life and the Constitution for 30+ years, and in a few sentences you manage to smear worse than you would a pro-choice Romney. You truly disgust me, and make me want to give up on humanity altogether.
Report Post »DrWho
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 2:07amThen please go save a baby tomorrow. If you give me your zip code, I will post the local abortion clinics for you to choose from. Show Dr. Paul how its done, or are you pathetic?
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 11:10amHate is pretty strong. Libertarians sometimes seem to be arrogant and condecending to those who may not agree with them. That is hypocritical, they have a right to free spech just as you. If some one is basing there views off of opinion and not fact, lead them to the facts don’t disparage themand hate them. Ron Paul has some blind followeres that lash out at anyone that does not see the world there way. Ron is great and if he is the nominee he will get my vote however some of his supporters turn me away with their vitriol to those who are otherwise on the same side. Knock the BS off! Good thing most people can separate the man from his supporters, I hope or he does not stand a chance!
Report Post »AuntJane
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 6:40pmWhen he ran four years ago I heard him tell this story. He was an intern, just out of medical school. A young doctor observing an abortion as part of his training would have no clue what to do and couldn’t do anything if he tried. According to Paul this incident changed his point of view . If you want to criticize him, know what you’re taking about.
Report Post »I won’t support him this election mostly because of his age, 70 plus. I’ve noticed he is not as articulate as he was 4 years ago. He is still one of the smartest most ethical men in Washington but not able to handle the office and I don’t think he is electable and we MUST bet rid of Obama. All just my opinion but I admire him greatly.
Vechorik
Posted on October 16, 2011 at 10:55amSounds like you‘ve spent too much time in front of tv and haven’t investigated issues from other sources.
Haven‘t you heard that we’re not to discriminate because of AGE and color?
Report Post »Judge Napolitano had a segment about RON PAUL CAN WIN
how/why
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM-QpVSjsLY
babayaga
Posted on October 16, 2011 at 6:37pmSo, do you think just holding and comforting this child until its’ “unnatural” death would have gotten him more than just a “reprimand” in his file?! This reminds me of a story about a National Geographic photographer who stopped and photographed a starving child trying to get to an aide station and just walked away after he got his photo! Sorry I can’t vote for or support someone with this kind of disconnect! Just to “save” his position?! Really?!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:30pmI noticed Paul is spending alot of money on TV ads.
Waste of money, IMO…………………….
Like Paul is the only candidate against abortion, for veterans, a change in foreign policy and boosting the economy by creating jobs. Just because he is in agreement with the others on many basic issues doesn‘t mean that it outweighs his negatives and he’ll get elected.
Report Post »Not gonna happen!………..
Vechorik
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:41pmRomney is FOR “the woman’s right to choose” to abort babies.
Report Post »jmiller_42
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:33pmHe’s just the only one that has always stood for all those positions.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:57pmWhat negatives?
Report Post »Fella
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:48pmRationalman is just another troll that rushes to every Ron Paul thread to spew garbage. No substance in his posts or between his ears.
Report Post »ecmarc
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 1:43pmRon Paul is the only candidate receiving significant support and donations from the military, and the only one that served in the military in a combat zone. The only other veteran candidate, Perry, was a REMF transport pilot.
Report Post »bernbart
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:30pmI think Ron Paul LIES. Late term abortions are very rare, and are only done for reason of life or health to protect the woman. I guess this proves he is not really a libertarian after all.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:41pmDo you drink your Kool Aid straight or on the rocks?
Report Post »kathystone
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:46pmOH HONEY! A friend of mine was put through nursing school by the state wiht the understanding she would work for 2 years in a “woman’s clinic”. She is an angel who would never hurt a fly. She was in tears after the first day in the clinic, run by planned parenthood. She bucketed 6 babies who ALL CRIED. Her job was to put them in the water until they drown. When a baby is able to move it’s arms and legs in utero, how can it be NOT alive. When you think of the PAIN it feels as it is pulled apart during a d and c, how can that not be called torture? She ahd to account for arms, legs, feet, and other body parts of infants that were 7 months along in gestation. She eventually quit after a month and still has nightmares to this day even though she is now a retired hospice nurse.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:30pm@Bernbart:
Report Post »That was a long time ago, so how the hell would you know, and being a Libertarian does not make you pro-choice. I, like Ron Paul believe life is a right, and that it‘s a damn shame that not everyone see’s it the way I do.
ssklr
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:17pmIt‘s not true to say that late term abortions are done mainly to save the mother’s life, etc. There is one infamous, now dead, abortionist who routinely performed abortions on women for reasons that had nothing to do with saving their lives. One of his patients had an abortion at 8 months b/c she wanted to go to a rock concert (not sure why she couldn’t go pregnant). The abortionist listed the reason for abortion was his fear that the women might become severely depressed if he did not give her the abortion. The fact of the matter is, the “doctor” has the liberty to make the judgment if the abortion is needed or not. Late term abortionists make a lot of money for what they do compared to early term abortionists -they will always find a reason why the woman needs the abortion. Obviously you have not read the testimony of former abortion doctors and nurses who confess the tricks and deceit they used to perform more abortions in order to make more money. You also have to remember that the industry is not highly regulated and anything can happen behind closed doors. And, not surprisingly, these people don’t always follow the law. I mean, when you kill people for a living, lying and breaking the law is no big deal. Personally, I can’t understand how anyone in the profession could be proud of it. You never hear kids/teenagers going around saying “when I grow up, I want to be an abortionist”. + If it’s so noble, why isn’t it touted as a career choice to kids in th
Report Post »G.E.R
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:24pmThis whole sanctity of life stuff is a bunch of man made BS so that he can feel noble about himself.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:29pmAre you contending that life is not precious? Not even your own life? If you count your own life as precious then I don‘t think it’s noble to count another’s life as precious… I think it’s simply fair.
If you don’t count your own life as precious, you’re in a very small minority.
Report Post »amtsoundsmith
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:44pmI think I heard Hitler say the same thing.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:45pmRon Paul is a staunch supporter of INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY — even for the smallest and what you seem to be insignificant human life.
Report Post »G.E.R
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:57pmLiving people have a strong interest in promoting the idea that somehow life is sacred. Only living people care about it so the whole thing grows out of a completely biased point of view. It’s a self serving story that makes you feel noble. Well let me ask you this: if everything that ever lived is dead, and everything alive is gonna die, where does the sacred part come in? We don’t practice it. Look at what we’d kill: Mosquitoes and flies. ‘Cause they’re pests. Lions and tigers. ‘Cause it’s fun! Chickens and pigs. ‘Cause we’re hungry. Pheasants and quails. ‘Cause it’s fun. And we’re hungry. And people. We kill people… ‘Cause they’re pests. And it’s fun! There’s nothing sacred about those things. So at best the sanctity of life is kind of a selective thing. We get to choose which forms of life we feel are sacred, and we get to kill the rest. Pretty neat deal, huh? You know how we got it? We made the whole thing up!
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:22pmI hope this was done for entirely sincere purposes. I don‘t know whether Paul’s political campaign helps get more exposure to this issue or confuses it with his candidacy. I would hate for people to think that only politicians running for office care about this issue enough to talk about it on TV.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:43pmI‘m a Ron Paul supporter and don’t really like that ad. There are many, many great ads that pertain to the welfare of America. I think The Blaze chose the ad most likely to “knock Paul.” and to avoid a discussion of MAJOR FINANCIAL ISSUES.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 3:46amThe abortion issue is the first issue addressed in Paul new book, “Liberty Defined”. I do not believe he put this as out for political expediency. I believe he wants more people to know what he believes and stands for. I read a comment (not here) where someone said Paul was pro abortion, so there are many people still ignorant when it comes to his message.
Report Post »Vechorik, I like this ad. I don’t think the blaze put it up to knock Paul, though Tiffany’s rather snarky question at the end, “Do you think his message will be effective in rallying the pro-life GOP base?” does show the bias of the blaze’s writers. I can’t imagine Tiffany writing anything like that about her guy, Cain.
That the blaze is bias against Paul there is no doubt. But at least they let this through.
EqualJustice
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:20pmHe is RIGHT about life having NO VALUE any longer. We lost our way when we lost Roe vs Wade. Everything changed after that…..robbers don’t just rob now, they turn and shoot and laugh.. pathetic.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:26pmI’d like to ask the doctor who put that baby in the bucket what happened to his oath to do no harm?
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:07pmBoth of our close friends who are Doctors refuse to perform abortions. They said just seeing the videos was enough for them! They can’t work at hospitals for that reason. They both have a private practice.
Report Post »prolifeevangelical
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:20pmWell, I am glad Paul is one of the few people in the race talking about abortion. That is really cool and good for him.
With that being said……the right thing to do in that situation would have been to physically walk in and fight to save that baby in the trash can. Don’t let it lie there and die.
The whole story is sad. Abortion is sad. We need to end it. It will be viewed with horror in future generations and people will ask, “why didn’t they do something?”
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:34pmA bunch of miners were sitting around mourning the loss of a baby deer (a pregnant deer had been hit on the road up to the mine that morning and several people saw it on their drive in). My father walked over and said “That wasn’t a baby deer.” People started immediately getting angry, stating that the deer was very clearly pregnant and a baby deer had indeed been killed. My father simply said “The supreme court says it’s just a blob.”
And no one said another word….
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:19pmhorrific to think there is a OB-gyne talking about an aborted infant =alive= being thrown away in a bucket ………and he walked down the hallway to the next room.
yes it happens everyday NOW in this horrific world but Ron Paul just made us SICK just looking at him.
Report Post »ritualrites
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:49pmthe law is the law what’s he going to do spend the rest of his life locked up for saving a life? What does thast tell you about how far this country has gone in giving another man the right to murder & you can’t interfere with another dr. & patient breaking all confidentiality laws etc. etc. This country has lost it’s soul to hell. These babies should haunt these mothers day and night for the ungodly decisions of abortion with no reason at all except for their inconvenience. God have his mercy on them more than they give their child.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:51pm@BURNTHILLS Do you know the whole story? Was he a Doctor at that time or an unlearned young student?
So, let me get this straight. Letting a baby die in a basket “happens everyday NOW in this horrific world” (1.21 million in 2010, just in the US) but you have saved how many? Right.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 7:27pmBurnhills you are a miserable human being, and I‘m disgusted to know that you’re even on this site. Only an evil person could take this pro-life, real life ad, and turn it into something that it’s not.
Being libertarian, I have a huge faith in people, but sometimes I wonder if you deserve what what’s coming to you. I wonder why people like Ron Paul fight for our rights everyday, when people like you just twist them to fit your agenda. People like you make me sick.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 10:58pm@LIBERTYFADING
dailypaul.com would love to have your input.
I come here to try and plead the case for true conservatism and liberty, but it is taxing. Especially with some of the foaming at the mouth, radical “talibangelists” here.
Report Post »BTW, don’t sweat superficial creeps like burnthills. They don’t have enough intellect to see past the packaging. Don’t waste keystrokes on them.
If by chance the GOP doesn’t wake up and nominate Paul, then they will remember our words and attempts to awaken them, when they are suffering because of it.
LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 12:02amI’ll take you up on your word Jefferson. I’ve been to thedailypaul for videos, but I‘m not sure if I’ve checked out the forums or not. It‘s been a few hours so I’m not so angry about all these posts. I know exactly how you feel about spreading liberty being a taxing process. I feel in my heart that man is good, and that we can overcome anything without government aid or oppression, but it’s hard to spread the message when I am attacked by both liberals and so called conservatives alike.
Thanks for the kind words.
Report Post »TheBloodOfTyrants
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:18pmFirst!
Report Post »TheBloodOfTyrants
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:24pmStupid Blaze!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:35pmMy view is from newest to oldest, so you are at the bottom of the page where no one will notice your say nothing post anyway………………….
Report Post »ConfederateExile
Posted on October 15, 2011 at 1:53pmStupid is as stupid does. You betray your own
Report Post »