Ron Paul Responds to Alleged Santorum ‘Disgusting’ Comments: ‘I Would Say That’s Not Very Nice’
- Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:02pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
During an interview with Fox News host Neil Cavuto, Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul responded to alleged comments made by rival Rick Santorum in which the former Pennsylvania senator called Paul “disgusting.”
“I would say that’s not very nice,” Paul told Cavuto. “I think he wants to deflect away from some of the charges made against him by having been a supporter of Arlen Specter. [He] was a pretty liberal senator. He supported prescription drug programs, No Child Left Behind and voted for all the foreign aid, so I would say that he ought to be talking about that rather than calling me names.”
Cavuto, however, pointed out that Paul has also engaged in negative attacks against his rivals.
“I think we’re all engaged in it and it’s probably the bad part of politics, but I work real hard at using the evidence that if people are flip-floppers, I think they should be pointed out, like I’m talking about right now about Santorum’s voting record.”
Paul stood by his beliefs, however, stating:
“To call me and label me a certain way because I believe in the Constitution … nobody tells me I’m not a principled voter and that I’m not a strict Constitutionalist,” Paul said. “So every time they say something negative about me, I say ‘you know, they don’t have a whole lot of respect for somebody that sticks to the Constitution.”
He added, “I want to defend the fourth amendment; I want to defend the fifth amendment, the ninth and tenth amendments. [They] won’t talk about that principle … they try to twist it around.”
“Winning would be better than not winning, and second place is better than third place, but I don’t think one or the other doesn’t close you out.”
Watch the interview below via Fox News Insider
:
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (197)
cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:37pmCavuto just aired very early reporting on the Iowa Caucus – Ron Paul 43%. True it’s early but it sure looks good.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:42pmAlso Drudge readers in Iowa chose Ron Paul with 33.5% and Drudge readers in general currently have Paul in front with 31.8%
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:08pmPaul and Santorum Neck n Neck. Romney 3rd and Gingrich poised to tare him apart now after what Romney did hypocritically. This may divide the Progressive vote. Paul and Santorum are acceptable. I like it. Keep Paying for a good outcome. :)
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:53pm(31% of precincts reporting)
Report Post »Mitt Romney 7,844 23.4%
Rick Santorum 7,726 23%
Ron Paul 7,655 22.8%
Newt Gingrich 4,440 13.2%
Rick Perry 3,433 10.2%
So it still up in the air….its anyone game
Old_Bones
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:30pmRon Paul is a space alien.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:32pmI know right? A politican who actually wants to follow the constitution and keep American money in America. Gosh what a freak.
Gotta love it.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »florida123
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:44pmAny Politician who is willing to protect your right of not being subject to unlawful search and seizure (4th) and your right to due process (5th) has got to be a totally freaking moron straight from another planet…………, Check out how the Patriot Act has resulted in TSA searching you at will and the National Defense Act just stripped you of your right to due process………..Come on Blaze Folks do some research on how the status quo in DC just set the Constitution on Fire. without the 4th and 5th the other rights mean nothing………………
Report Post »beckyspatflaveredstew
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:05pmBecky has a closet primary pick, who will save us all, with his open borders, gun control, government healthcare, carbon taxes, and blasphemous attempt to ascend to godhood. Isaiah 14:14
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:13pm@old_bones: You are irony in action.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:19pmOur economy is the best when those involved in its interactions are the safest. Bachmann is behind NDAA and the Patriot Act and … yet, she wants to help the economy and preserve our freedoms. Oh yes she’s a conservative too. Please tell me by what trick ill-logic do you make someone who supports the patriot act and NDAA… a Conservative?! By the way she’s a lawyer, she promised to uphold the constitution, please tell me why she supports destroying it, too? Santorum? The guy is as lying out of his ass as much as Bachman is in claiming to be a Conservative. Romney? Pffft.
Ron Paul’s foreign policy, you whine back. Tell me what’s Conservative about a president ignoring congress and declaring war at will? Do you think the process of president’s illegally declaring war in say Vietnam, Lebanon, the Dominican Rep., Beirut, Libya and more… may have given the current radical in chief the idea he should agree with the super neo-con McCain in signing NDAA? The law allows the president to arrest, execute, torture NOT THROUGH THE POLICE, but the MILITARY whomever the president wants.
Do you think Ron Paul would sign that law? No. All the rest have said as much that they would and support it. You all supporting them need to question your definition of Conservatism.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:25pmVery good my man!
Report Post »TheTrumanShow
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:02pmYou underestimate the power of Doublethink. Years of training in an indoctrination camp – oops, I mean public school – has certainly paid off . The sheeple are perfectly prepared for the new millennium.
As for me….
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012
undyingsound
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:31pmYes!
Report Post »Marineraider
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:37pmYour right, three weeks ago I had no idea who to support….after this NDAA B.S. the choice is clear for me. No Doubt… go Ron Paul!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:49pm@marine raider
Report Post »Welcome home Dear Patriot!
WD0331
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:24amRon Paul 2012!
Report Post »HADEN0UGH
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:30amRon Paul lost me when he said Iran should have Nukes. Anyone who believes that is an idiot.
Report Post »Joe_Camel
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:15pmhttp://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/41939/aliens-support-ron-paul-in-iowa/
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:59pmHey the guy with 15 names that trolls everything said about Ron Paul isn’t here posting yet? What’s up?!
RON PAUL 2012
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:02pmCheck out the candidate poll on Drudge. Paul is #1.
http://www.drudgereport.com/
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:48pmThey will be slithering out of their holes at any minute now.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:53pmEverybody blitzkrieg against Paul!!!! Remember, the war pays well, you get a paycheck, and you get to continue propping up insane regimes around the globe (Saddam Hussein) so you can eventually go to war against them. Its a never ending money hole and serves to weaken your country financially and militarily.
Think people, think.
Report Post »Romney-Rubio 2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:00pmThat is right, please think…
Paul has no experience. The only managerial experience Paul had, he failed. He didn‘t see the decades of radical newsletters and doesn’t speak against the person who put them up. That seems to be a failed executive. Not someone ready to be the executive of our country.
Romney is the only one that has actually turned around economies of many types. And did it in a conservative way.
RON PAUL IS OUT.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:22pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hvuru-Slls
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:26pmHere you go, “Romney”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hvuru-Slls
Report Post »Romney-Rubio 2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:34pmThose are great partial clips distorting Romney’s record. Can you come up with something more deceptive? I would expect this from Ron Paul supporters.
For all of Romney’s negatives, Ron Paul is 100 times worse. He has been running for President since 1988. He has only passed one bill in his 30 something years. What does he have to show for the time we were paying him and he was laundering US dollars in earmarks.
SORRY ANYONE THAT IS RESPONSIBLE AND WANTS THE BEST FOR THE US WOULD PICK SOMEONE OTHER THAN PAUL… AND OBAMA.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:23pmRomney-Rubio 2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:34pm
Those are great partial clips distorting Romney’s record. Can you come up with something more deceptive? I would expect this from Ron Paul supporters.
For all of Romney’s negatives, Ron Paul is 100 times worse.
=========================================================
Follow the money:
Mitt Romney: Top 20 Donors (2012 Election Cycle)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?id=N00000286&cycle=2012
This is an almost identical list to Barack Obama’s top campaign donors in 2008….
Romney = Obama.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:25pmRomney has never mentioned the Constitution until he knew it was popular.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:15pmPaul graduated from Gettysburg College and Duke University School of Medicine. He served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force. He worked as an obstetrician and gynecologist, delivering more than 4,000 babies. He has written numerous books, winning best seller lists on some. He has won numerous awards for his stance against gun control and strict stance against arbitrary taxation, among many other awards. As a member of Congress, he continues to refuse to sign up for the government pension that he would be entitled to in order to avoid receiving government money, saying it would be “hypocritical and immoral”. As a doctor he would not accept Government healthcare from his patients, and would instead offer free service. These are only some things he has achieved. What have you done that’s so much better than him?
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:17pm^ @omney-Rubio 2012
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:51pmThis is what I love about Ron Paul. He gets personally attacked, and yet, he does not resort to third grade recess period whining and fighting, he simply observes that Santorum is not being nice, and moves on. There will be no gigantic attack from the Paul camp as a result of Rick’s poorly-executed smear job.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:58pmAnd he was such a gentleman about it. He didn’t even snicker sarcastically when he heard what was said about him. Ron Paul, the only principled candidate in the race.
Report Post »Susie Liberty
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:11pmIntegrity. Decency. Seemingly ‘immune’ to corruption. Highly desireable qualities in a “Freedom Fighter” in my opinion. Descriptive of Dr. Paul.
Let’s Legalize Liberty, shall We? Please join me in resisting the pressures of the Corporate Media… Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:13pmUm, Santorum said that in response to Ron Paul calling him a liberal.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:28pmWillie,
Ron Paul correctly pointed out that Santorum proved while he was in Congress that he spends like a liberal.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:30pmlol at QP. Just a hater. The vileness and trash talk from both sides is bad. But QP and YEP take the cake by ffffffaaaaaarrrrrr
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:34pmqpwillie
Report Post »I could be wrong, but I thought ricky was calling Ron Paul names because of some phone calls. Maybe you could check the facts and get back to us.
WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:50pmFacts mean nothing to these people. Just spew their hate
Report Post »1PORattler
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:46pmPiss of you dumb spamwench
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:44pmRon Paul is the indispensible man. Romney? Don’t make me laugh. Perry? Nice try. Santorum? HA.
None of these jokers comes without serious lack of depth with the Constitution. Ron Paul correctly understands that our foreign policy has bought us an overpriced war machine and actually decreased our ability to defend ourselves. We should have Congress declare war, not have police actions which are unconstitutional. Israel has said they don’t need our help, and they don’t.
And anyway, we can still support whatever country we want to, but without the Federal Government doing it, but WE THE PEOPLE.
Unless Congress declares a war, it ain’t in the Constitution. Who among the candidates understands that but Ron Paul?
The FED should be removed as the monopoly provider of our money. Who understands that among the candidates but Ron Paul?
Romney thought Romneycare was a beautiful thing. What principles of collectivist economics is he waiting to unleash upon us when we are least suspecting it?
Ron Paul would put us on a sound financial footing. Romney would be the king of appeasement to leftist economic skullduggery.
Report Post »greensteam
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:58pmthere is no one running in the primary more negative than ron paul. i would say i have not seen as much hostility from supporters of the occupy idiots as i have from the ron paul supporters. they certainly dont make me want to take another look at ron paul. and besides, i knew all along that he didnt agree with entering WW2 because of things he has said in the past and then his 12 year aide comes out and says it. thanks for the confirmation
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:21pm@greensteam So you’ll believe a disgruntled employees accusation against Paul with no evidence? Did you believe Cain’s four accusers of sexual harassment also?
I strongly recommend that people read, The Creature from Jekyll Island, by G. Edward Griffin. Even Glenn Beck interviews the author: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmW3ytfhZ9M
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:37pmspam
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:31pmRand Paul son of Ron Paul talking to Alex Jones 5/21/09
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2010/02/rand-paul-anti-war-anti-gitmo-and-anti.html
“You’re basically what i would call a chip off the old block. Your policies are basically identical to your father, correct? ”
“I‘d say we’d be very very similiar. We might present the message sometimes differently..i think in some ways the message has to be broadened and made more appealing to the entire Republican Electorate because YOU HAVE TO WIN A PRIMARY.”
A Conservatarian
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:42pmYup, but you don’t see either of them pandering to the neo-con inter-party love fest do you Clara?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:44pmClara
Report Post »you can do better than that. A Blog? lol
Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:13pmYou Ron Paul supporters who call other people names BECAUSE they do NOT support Ron Paul are REALLY hurting your case. No one is going to listen to YOU
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:14pm“Rand Paul, Anti-War, Anti-Gitmo and Anti-American”
So being pro-America is being for war and torture and indefinite detention of whoever disagrees?
You‘re not an American lady you’re a Bolshevik.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:17pmlol Clara88 hows your candidate doing? Not very well. You can join the team anytime. Wont hold your big governemt guy aginst you. I live in Texas I know Rick Perry doubled the size of Texas government.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:24pmcan you say winning? neocons dows. freedom lovers, personal liberty lovers up. sorry neocons and progressives but you had your time. even if Paul doesnt win, we still win by injecting real issues. so neocons go back to sleep your not welcome here anymore.
Winning
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:40pmClara88
Report Post »Supporters of anyone calling names hurts their case. Some here dont even have a Candidate or you never hear of them.
Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:05pmHey CommonSense…blog?? heehee…i refused to go to Alex Jones Conspiracy Channel
I respect YOU and congrats on your candidate doing so well tonight….Clara
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:13pmCommonSense…we saw how many Blaze readers took Glenn Beck’s Quiz the other day. Some people won’t post comments OR mention the candidate they are supporting BECAUSE of the meaness from some Ron Paul posters here. I just keep on speaking my mind and will continue to do so. Clara
Report Post »GOD BLESS AMERICA
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:20pmClara88
Report Post »Thanks, one day I hope we are on the same team. You are quite an assent to the Perry camp.
circleDwagons
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:53pmhey Clara have you listened to levin? he name calls Paul supporters all the time. i used to find it it funny now it ticks me off. i’ve had my own run ins with paulbots. the term NEOCON is a complete turn off for me. i was one of the first to use the term Paulbot, at the time i used it as an insult but now i embrass it. call me a pauli, paulbot etc. Come join us and it looks like Perry will finish 5th. congrads
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:30pmPaul fights for our Freedom.. WAKE UP! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:40pmwhat has he done for my Freedom in the last 30yrs?
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:55pmHe hasn’t written a bunch of useless laws to further erode our liberty,the less congress does as a whole the better.He’s never voted to raise taxes and has forgone his pension.He’s the only constitutional conservative running and would use the constitution to limit the power of the federal government.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:56pmRepubliCorp
Report Post »1st take a look at the legislation Dr. Paul fought to get passed. Next ask your senators and congressmen why they didn’t you support it and what have you done for your Freedom and Liberty. Standing alone is not easy. Ron Paul has been standing up for the Constitution in every vote.
CFL Tea Party
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:02pmI‘ve always defended Beck but he’s either nuts or working for someone who opposes Ron Paul. I’ve read every book both of them have written and their ideas are identical. It makes no sense for Beck not to support Paul.
Report Post »jawakisser
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:29pmWhat I am noticing is that Ron Paul starts everything from the position that he should be skeptical of the government. I think if I have to choose to start from a position of trusting the government or not trusting them, skepticism and mistrust of the government is a much saner and healthy way to look at any issue. I love Glenn and pretty much agree on everything he says but I do disagree with him on Ron Paul. I think he is the guy Glenn has been waiting for the entire time and he doesn’t even see it. Glenn brought me to Ron Paul because I trust the constitution and the founding fathers on liberty more than any other proposed option out there. I just think Glenn is mixing up his desire to support Israel with doing the right thing in divorcing our government from the equation. We need our government as small and powerless as we can get it yet be able to maintain our security. Ron Paul can make principled people uncomfortable because he protects everyones right to liberty including the loser pot smokers and other miscreants of society because he holds to the principle of liberty over controlling the outcomes. We can’t keep setting up and supporting big government over people liberties on the right then complain when that power get voted over to the liberals. We need a government so small it hardly matters who is in charge. We need good honest people that love and support the constitution.HONEST is the key word. We dont need blowhards who say they will fix everything.Liberty
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:33pmI agree with you. It surprises the vitriol that Glenn and Pat spew about Ron, he is the man they have been looking for. He is the George Washington. He’s right under their nose.
They need to read the Constitution themselves instead of talk about it in their self congratulatory vacuum.
Report Post »educatedowl
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:39pmvery well put.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:44pmYea, I had o turn off Glenn today when they were making fun of Dr. Paul. It‘s a shame because they don’t really want anyone else if they really studied some. They are all Progressives except Paul…
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:49pmWell said! Glenn has a lot to learn, but I am being patient with him. After a year of watching Ron preside over the country, I am 100% sure Glenn will be singing Ron’s song. He will see the light and it will be quite glorious. I don’t fault Glenn for being so anti-Paul, I just consider him human, capable of mistakes. Just like me.
Report Post »PoliticalOpinion
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:49pmjawakisser,
A excellent reply my friend. Vote for the constitution, not a politician!
The GOP candidates, with the exception of Dr. Paul, are the same hacks who helped to get us to this point of insolvency and near collapse. Ron Paul is the ONLY one who speaks for the wisdom of our founding fathers.
Place Ron Paul against Obama in a debate and Paul will win hands down. The current president might have taught the constitution in classes but he lacks the conviction as to its supremacy, and does NOT follow it. Consider that Obama gave himself the power this last Saturday by signing a bill giving him the right to kill any of us here. Ask yourself, does that include political opponents?
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:50pmI believe that Becks negative opinion towards Paul comes directly from Pat Gray. Gray did a radio interview with Paul years ago (before Gray was on Becks show), and Gray was rude and obnoxious while Paul remained civil and reasonable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eidhI7BDQM&feature=related
link is part 1 of a 3 part series
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:55pmWhat an excellent comment! I 100% agree. It‘s a shame that Glenn is twisted in one direction and can’t see passed it.
Report Post »Ron Paul is right man for our time. Our country will go down in flames if its policies, both economic and foreign, aren’t reversed.
It’s great that so many have opened their minds and are now supporting the only candidate who will restore America, Ron Paul.
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:07pmI listened to “s’nnelG” show today for the last time. He and his 2 other stooges twisted and downright lied about Paul’s record. I gave him the benefit of doubt for to long.
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:10pmWell if you guys can do better than Glenn Beck…. please explaine to me..
Report Post »The Ron Paul / George Soros / Barney Frank …connections.?
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:19pm@SawBuck
What connection?
Glenn Beck has that Rogers guy who is a billionaire investor who lives in China now that was George Soros’s business partner. Glenn praises him and tells us to listen to him.
Is Glenn connected to George Soros too?
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:25pmSawbuck,
If you want the story about the letter to scale back military spending, please read this…
http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1875&Itemid=28
There is no connection to Soros at all. No politician in America is more contrary to New World Order Soros than Ron Paul.
BTW, If you want an information source that is more reliable, honest, and intelligent than Glenn Beck, check out Tom Woods.
Report Post »TheTrumanShow
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:41pm@COUS1933
Pat Gray certainly was rude. I‘m surprised Glenn Beck hired him if that’s representative of his past – although, from what I’ve heard on the radio, I thought he was just hired for his ‘sound affect’ interjections. Not exactly an intellectual.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »A True Gentlemen
ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:50pmKTSAYS Did you see this video with Glenn talking to Lisa about Ron Paul? Glenn seems to be missing the point about the foreign policy…but I do believe that Glenn is coming around
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:57pm@KTSAYS Sorry..here’s the link with that powerful conversation and braindead Lisa.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyx9tw0TEPM
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:01pmashestoashes
Report Post »after todays show, I dont think there is any hope for him.
ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:18pm@COMMON Wow! I am sorry to hear that…I really thought he was coming around…
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:23pm@CLAR CLar..that myth has already been debunked..it is in a Congressional letter written by Paul and 5 other house members…one of them being Barney Frank…stating among other things that they want to reduce the commitment of the military..to bring them home and build them here and focus on anti terrorrism defense. There was no connection whatsoever to George Soros.. George Soros economics are working perfectly now to collapse the world’s economy and to overturn this once great nation..You are getting ready to be a slave Clar..and congratulations..you will help to make that dream come true for yourself.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:53pmIf you doubters could only look around and see what your government has done and is doing you wouldn’t trust them either…open your eyes.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:28pmRon Paul Endorsed By George Soros “Blue Republican” Organization
http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/03/ron-paul-endorsed-by-progressive-blue-republican-organization/
When somebody is integral to the Progressive Movement in America as Ralph Nader… embraces the Ron Paul Campaign, Conservatives would do WELL to pause.
It seems interesting that an organization that appears quite hopeful to see Obama re-elected in 2012, and is CLEARLY linked to Progressive Anti-American globalist George Soros is simultaneously calling for Democrats to register as Republicans and support Ron Paul in the Republican primaries.. DOES IT NOT???
Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:34pmHello, they are using reverse psychology you dope. You are just as easy to manipulate against a candidate as you were easy to manipulate for GW Bush and all the other neo-cons. Wake up and think for yourself.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:38pmI heard Glenn today say, RON PAUL has met with George Soros people. That’s dangerous.
You’re gonna have to explain to me why that is necessarily dangerous. Better the enemy you know and try to influence than to be ignorant.
What was the result of this supposed HORROR and was it or was it not harmful to the Constitution? If you don’t know the answer, if you can’t articulate that, you are far too shallow. I am referring to Glenn and Pat. They didn’t go into any depth, they just left the taint there enough to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt, and moved on. THiNK for yourself, like Glen says, don’t just take his word for it.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:40pmReally? You believe New World Order/Commie Soros wants a constitutionalist in the Whitehouse?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:40pmClara88
Report Post »Lots of People like Liberty and Freedom , Blacks, browns, yellows, reds, the right, the left, heck Jefferson was considered a liberal in his day. The Constitutions cant tell what you are, it can only tell the government how you will be treated.
Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:46pm@Justangry Exactly. They don’t want him in office, and so of COURSE they endorse him, knowing that fools are born every minute and would think no further – but knee jerk react against him.
If you know Paul, and if you know the Constitution, this is obviously a ploy to engender your fear, uncertainty, and doubt, nothing more.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:12pmRon Paul newsletter: “How to kill a black person and get away with it.”
It is the hip-hop thing to do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting whites like pianos. The youth simply walk up to a car they like, pull a gun, tell their family to get out, steal their jewelry and wallets, and take the car to wreck. Such actions have ballooned in the recent months.
In the old days, average people could avoid such youth by staying out of bad neighborhoods. Empowered by the media, police, and political complicity, however, the youth now roam everywhere looking for cars to steal and people to rob.
What can you do? More and more Americans are carrying a gun in the car. An ex-cop I know advises that if you have to use a gun on a youth, you should leave the scene immediately, disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible. Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you, but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for example).
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:32pmFor 1992, the newsletter earned **$940,000** and employed Paul’s family as well as Lew Rockwell (its vice-president] and occasional editor) and seven other workers. Murray Rothbard and other libertarians believed Rockwell ghostwrote the newsletters for Paul; Rockwell later acknowledged involvement in writing subscription letters.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:37pmC0MM0NSENSE Now tell me who is the dummy?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:56pmThis should answer all the questions on the newsletters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:26pmC0MM0NSENSE When I was a kid the Crime Family of Stefano Magaddino ran Buffalo NY. Magaddino described as “the grand old man of the Cosa Nostra,” He did many nice things But that didn’t make him any less of a murderer
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:29pmClair..I responded to you above..please read
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:29pm@RepubliCorp Outside of these disputed letters (and already answered) what other statement is there of Paul that even resembles those comments? I can’t find any.
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:24pmSantourum is really ridiculous, he helped get Arlen Specter re-elected, he is an establishment rubber stamper, that is disgusting.
How dare these people throw Iran at our face. We aren’t capable of making these foreign policy decisions carte blanche. How dare these self righteous fools blame us for flocking to Paul. The Washington DC politician is going extinct. Pretty soon they will be throwing bananas and feces at eachother. Trillions not billions will get cha.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:26pmArlen Specter
Report Post »Wasn’t he a Democrat?
ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:37pmCommon..he was a liberal posing as a republican ..then he switched sides losing the respect from even the democratic side.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:41pmCommon, he was a Rino before he decided he had a pair of balls and wore his true colors… and promptly lost his re-election bid. I met his chief of staff back in 00, he became one of the most powerful lobbyists in DC. Proggs multiply. Must squash and stamp them all out. Buncha friggin’ cockroaches skitterin around everywhere.
Report Post »Kiba
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:22pmThat Cavuto is about as bad as that Chris Wallace. What has gotten into the FNC people anymore? They are way to rough on the Repubs when they go on their shows. Its like other than getting into the policies they wanna dive into the past for every fart they let out back in college.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:30pmWhat’s going on at FOX? The same thing that caused Beck to withdraw.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:22pmI think he would make an excellent Physician.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:37pmBut first, would you remove the Taliban out of the al-Qaeda for me, because it seems surgically impossible?
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:17pmRon Paul is endorsed by Rick Santorums own nephew.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/03/the-trouble-with-my-uncle-rick-santorum/
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:24pmWhat office is Santorum’s nephew running for and what does it have to do with Rick Santorum?
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:32pmLMAO! Oh that is priceless! Eat that, Rick Santorum!
In any event, I think it is clearly evident based on this exchange (Paul and Santorum) just who the more mature person is. It is a desperate person who lowers himself to name-calling without any supporting arguments, and it is a sign of wisdom when a person like Dr. Paul is able to turn the other cheek without resorting to baseless ad hominems.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:35pmQPWILLIE
Just because his nephew isn‘t running for office doesn’t mean that his opinion isn’t valid. I think it‘s very telling that Rick Santorum can’t even get all of his close relatives to support his run for President. I can assure you that if Rand Paul’s son was to denounce Dr. Paul that all of the anti-Paulers would jump on that like a pack of wolves on a deer carcass.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:36pmFurther, this is going to be Santorum‘s nephew’s FIRST Presidential election and he’s not even voting for his own kin….
That says a LOT about Santorum.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:56pm@Doctor Nordo
Report Post »Ronald Reagan’s son is a flaming liberal. It says nothing about Ronald Reagan. It’s simply not relevant.
riseandshine
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:02pmDr. Nordo…..It says more about having someone worthwhile to vote for.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:03pmAnd lets look who supports Paul. A collection of Neo-Nazis, White Supremacists, Holocaust Deniers, 9/11 “Truthers” and other paranoid and discredited conspiracists.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:03pmI disagree. I think it would be very tempting for anybody, no matter what their political slant is, to vote for a close relative, particularly in their first election as a registered voter. Besides, by all accounts Rick’s nephew is anything but a liberal.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:06pm@Doctor Nordo
“Just because his nephew isn‘t running for office doesn’t mean that his opinion isn’t valid.”
I’ve noticed that Paulies have a real problem with simple comprehension. I didn’t say anything to suggest his opinion was valid or not valid. I will say this though, his opinion is no more valid than anyone else’s. Evidently, he’s a goofy kid who has been brainwashed into the Paulie cult. 0bama doesn’t care whose nephew helps him get reelected.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:11pmqpwillie
Report Post »On problem with that . Little Ronny hated his dad. Ricks nephew loves his Uncle.
Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:12pmMy comprehension level is just fine, thank you. I think his opinion is at least a hair more valid than Average Joe’s. He’s a conservative with close familial ties to a Presidential front-runner and he’s not even voting for him. This guy knows Rick on a personal level that none of us can claim, has a personal stake in who he votes for (can you imagine how awkward family reunions might end up being?), and is not afraid to come out and proclaim to the world that his uncle is full of shi-.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:13pmLook at Ron Pauls real supporters… Tom Woods, Judge Andrew Napolitano, Peter Schiff, Colonel Douglas Macgregor, Michael Scheuer, Chuck Baldwin, Jack Kerwick, and just for fun, a few notable historical figures who would most likely endorse Ron Paul:
Lord Acton (1834-1902)
Report Post »Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850)
John T. Flynn (1882-1964)
F.A. Harper (1905-1973)
Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992)
Henry Hazlitt (1894-1993)
Patrick Henry (1736-1799)
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
Rose Wilder Lane (1886-1968)
Lao Tzu (600 BC?)
Robert LeFevre (1911–1986)
John Locke (1632-1704)
George Mason (1725-1792)
H.L. Mencken (1880–1956)
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)
Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973)
Albert Jay Nock (1870-1945)
Franz Oppenheimer (1864-1943)
James Otis (1725-1783)
Thomas Paine (1737-1809)
Lane Isabel Paterson (1886-1960)
Ayn Rand (1905-1982)
Leonard Read (1898-1983)
Adam Smith (1723-1790)
Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:16pmRepulicrap
Every group has their bad apples. Racists, truthers, and holocaust deniers certainly don‘t make up a significant part of Paul’s supporters.
I could bring up lots of odious groups of people supporting any of the other candidates.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:48pmDOCTOR NORDO But Paul’s racist newsletter milked that cow …… and that is the difference
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:55pmRepublicorp
Yes, Paul’s newsletter has indeed been milked to death by his detractors. Unfortunately for them, it has also been soundly explained away. Seriously, if this is the best dirt his enemies can come up with then they need to try harder or just give up.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:30pmqpwillie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:24pm
What office is Santorum’s nephew running for and what does it have to do with Rick Santorum?
================================================
Thanks!….
You’ve just finished explaining exactly no one should listen to QPWillie!!
Report Post »HumbleMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:49pm@COUS1933
Yeah … almost all of those guys lived long enough to know Ron Paul.
Look … the man has good points. But he has a big race problem and a big anti-jew problem. I can’t overlook that … sorry.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:05pmDOCTOR NORDO so Paul gets a pass……. while the bots crucify other candidates
Report Post »I see…thanks
RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:22pmCOUS1933 channeling the dead?
Report Post »AlcoholicMB
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:15pmMan, the only problem with Dr Paul is the changes he wants to implement are too many, too quickly. It took what, about 110 years to get this far away from the constitution that implementing the needed changes all at once would put the country in danger instead of saving it. I think slow and steady is the approach needed here. It sure was the course we took to this point, wasn’t it?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:25pmSo your saying that in a 100 or so years I can have my freedom and liberties back?
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:25pmBecause we don’t have time for gradual! Look around you, do you honestly believe we have another 100 years to gradually go back to Constitutional governance? We don’t!
Even then, none of the other Republican nominees are trying to go back to Constitutional governance, just slow down the pace towards socialism. We just don’t have time to take the slow route.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:34pmWe don’t have time for slow and steady..We are 16 triioion in the hole headed for 17.5 to prevent a government shutdown.. This train is headed off of a cliff…we need someone at the wheel who can make a full recovery now.
Report Post »spiritsmonger
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:34pmYou’ll think a collapse of the dollar is happening too quickly also.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:35pmYeah, we have to postpone our liberty until the GOP tells us they have made the country safe for it. ROFL.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:35pmSure, I think we should restore America slowly right after we hunt down an execute the communist progressives.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:41pmI agree with AMERICAN SOLDIER (SEPARATED) We don’t have a century to get back to the constitution,and our Marxist president is destroying the capitalist system by deign.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:44pm@LEL2007 I like your approach,like they say a good communist is a dead communist.
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:46pmcommonsense you make rp look bad.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:50pmDeath from a thousand paper cuts is still death!
I hope Rom Paul comes in and cleans house to return us to the Constitution. But it would indeed be an uphill battle as the Republitards have almost all been brainwashed into the Progressive movement.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:56pm@AlcholicMB
One thing you are not considering, no President ever gets entirely what they want. Presidents are not dictators.
Ron Paul is staunchly right and has big plans in reducing Government in many ways but to expect it to happen over night on his first day is not realistic.
Progressives (Liberals) were able to use the Overturn Window in moving the electorate. Obama being far left makes the “right” electorate believe Liberal Republicans are actual Conservatives. The “right electorate will then vote for a Liberal Republican. The Left reacts and votes for a more Left Lefty which then moves the “right” more left as said above.
In order to reverse the Progression of the last 100 years as you said we must vote in the 1 to the furthest right so as to turn the current momentum left back towards the right to begin undoing all the progression.
The person furthest to the Right is Ron Paul. Ron Paul won’t get everything he wants and desires but Ron Paul will transition the momentum back to reducing Government and towards the right.
If we elect a moderate (liberal) Republican we are still progressing Left and will never ever save our country. The momentum must be reversed.
Have a great night!
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:01pmPerfect reply Commonsense.
*Also, unlike Rational Man, Humbleman, and Yepimaconservative, your user-name fits you perfectly.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:34pmThe founding fathers didn’t wait around. They fought a revolution to regain their freedom and independence. That’s called courage. It takes brave men to fight the battle. They earned their liberty, and then some. I’m not going to wait any longer.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:10pm@common, no he saying keep voting for progs. let’s not vote for obama but vote for obama-lite and then obama-liter… you know we should vote for jeb bush yeh that’s the ticket
Report Post »Susie Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:09amWell, Honey…seems to me that this assault on our Sovereign Country has indeed been going on for a very long time…and rapidly accelerated to this point…that we have actually reached the point that “NO election” THIS year has actuaklly been floated/Martial Law may already be declared, and we’ve not acknowledged that little problem…and you think we need to try to reverse this SLOWLY?! “DANGER! Republic on FIRE!” billboards are burned to a crisp, and you want slooow effort to stop the Arsonists’ Licensed Lunacy. I believe you should rethink that position. WE the PEOPLE have a Republic to save and not a moment to waste.
Report Post »hallkbrdz
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:15pmDisgusting – lame attack.
Let’s talk policy and views taken, not call people stupid names. Santorum, you lose points on that.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:13pmWell, Paul called Santorum a lib. So tit for tat..Welcome to politics. Paul will lose in the end; he even says so in so many words. RE: ABC interview
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:23pmLiberal isn’t calling names. That defining some one by there moves. & He fits a liberal 95 percent of time.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:26pmTron-calling you a radio host and disgusting are two different things. One is what you are the other is an insult.
Rick Santorum is Liberal. Intervention, domestic and foreign, is Liberal. Rick supported domestic intervention and Rick supports foreign intervention and both GROW Government.
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^ ^
Constitution
Intervention Non-Intervention
Liberal Conservative
You do understand Intervention, domestic and foreign, is LIBERAL don’t you?
Hope you are doing well.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:49pmSantorum was in the top tier of CREW’s “Most corrupt politicians’ list two years running.
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/rick-santorum-top-tier-on-most-corrupt-member-of-congress-list-2-years-running
There goes the notion that the guy is a ‘conservative’. He was a Penn Senator who didn’t live in Penn but DC, stole thousands of $$ from Penn to homeschool his kids and sponsored bills that benefited his donors.
Santorum must have been looking in the mirror when he made that comment.
Report Post »Dudley Do-Right
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:12pmBut why would Ron Paul allow George Soros that much power and influence over America’s defense policy? There are a number of possibilities. There is the possibility that Ron Paul just didn’t know and didn’t bother to do his research. Which is not much of a recommendation for the job he’s running for. There’s another possibility that Ron Paul knew and didn’t care, that he had no objection to being part of a left-right alliance against the “American Empire” with Soros. But there’s also a third possibility.
During the previous election, Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI) ran an ad praising Ron Paul for his position against the war. AAEI was an umbrella group for MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, SEIU, Americans United For Change, the National Security Network and others in the progressive bestiary. A number of those beasties were Soros groups.
I’m not one to dabble in conspiracy theories, but when Soros pays for an ad praising you during the Republican primaries and then you put his experts in charge of America’s defense policy, then maybe some questions should be asked.
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/2/
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:26pmDear Dudley did-wrong,
It’s not only the far left that likes Paul, but the far right. When you start understanding he has a huge independent following as well, that leaves the progressives out in both parties. That’s fine with me. I can deal with a nutball tree hugger pretty easy as well as with the occasional militia group. What I can‘t stand is progressives in both parties claiming to be democrats or republicans when they are nothin but a bunch of progressives trying to lie to everyone that they really aren’t.
You like the Patriot Act and support it? Progressive. You like NDAA and support it? Progressive. You like nation building? Progressive. You like government mandates healthcare? Progressive. You like the global warming BS? Progressive. You like an interventionist president that supersedes congressional authority? Progressive. You like protecting other countries before your own first? Progressive. You like international welfare? Progressive. You’re a Keynesian? Progressive…
Report Post »Just STFU already with trying to say you’re any other party. Claim your colors, ya buncha b*tches, including your candidates.
bernbart
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:30pmYou are dabbling in conspiracy theories and the biggest conspriacy theory of the right importance and influence in the Democratic party. It is zippo.
Report Post »AndreLarango
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:39pmDudly… i think you got to Consevatarian. ha ha. I can’t understand Paul worship and I find blind devotion makes my skin crawl. Problem is, if he is a truther babbling BS that Iran is no threat then he hcasts a shadow on the things he is right about. It also makes me worry that if his tin foil hat falls off he might go wacky on some other subject.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:44pmNo, he didn’t get to me, I just enjoy calling out BS where ever I see it :) Do you care to tell me how I’m wrong or are you gonna stroke your fellow progressive and tell him how good of a job he did passing off a conspiracy theory as truth?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:48pm@DUDLEY There was never any Soros connection..that was just propaganda..Here’s the real story..
Report Post »http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1875&Itemid=28
Nothing about gutting the military..rather Paul joined with 6 other house members to write a letter proposing we get out of all of these foreign wars and bring our military home and build it here to fight against terrorrism..
AndreLarango
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:23pmYeah and here is the smartypants brainiac paul-bot response to everything… Dr. Paul is great! snif snif and you are a big %$%%$%&**@##$##%$!… Very sophisticated.
Report Post »Dudley Do-Right
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:46pmThank you for proving my point. Ron Paul backed Barney Frank’s Sustainable Defense Task Force which was made up of Soros funded liberal think tanks mentioned in the article. He might as well appoint Soros Secretary of Defense!
The Project on Defense Alternatives coordinated the work of the task force, which included the following members: Carl Conetta, Project on Defense Alternatives; Benjamin Friedman, Cato Institute; William Hartung, New America Foundation; Christopher Hellman, National Priorities Project; Heather Hurlburt, National Security Network; Charles Knight, Project on Defense Alternatives; Lawrence J. Korb, Center for American Progress; Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action; Laicie Olson, Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation; Miriam Pemberton, Institute for Policy Studies; Laura Peterson, Taxpayers for Common Sense; Prasannan Parthasarathi, Boston College; Christopher Preble, Cato Institute, and Winslow Wheeler, Center for Defense Information.
What a pathetic farce.
The only organization on this list that is not in the radical left camp is the Cato Institute, which is libertarian. And we all know how weak libertarians tend to be on national defense.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/frank-panel-wants-1t-in-defense-cuts
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:01pmBeing sarcastic about sophistication and saying I’m not sophisticated is a compliment. Sophistry is deplorable :) It’s what the fake conservatives are using to pretend to be conservatives.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:11pmLOL!
Report Post »Mr Paul, when someone says you’re “disgusting”, I don’t think they mean for it to be very nice.
MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:08pmDr. Paul seems to be so far to the right he came in the back door of the left..
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:15pmExactly!………….
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:51pmYou guys wouldn’t know the Cionstitution if it bit you on the a@@.
Report Post »HumbleMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:05pmThe truth is, Dr. Paul … you disgust me too. You’re an anti-semetic who’s hiding behind pure denial.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:09pmThis is a vicious lie, and unfounded attack. You disgust me.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:11pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4
Dr. Paul is a compassionate, loving man. Lies about his supposed racism are just that, be careful every idle word you say. You can‘t recall your lies about another’s reputation.
Report Post »LibertarianForLife
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:14pmFoolish, foolish person.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:19pmYawn! Oh yeah, you’re an anti-semite. Now proove you’re not! See how that works? Do you know this man, or are you just spouting what the media wants you to believe? …and a follow up. Do you like and trust the media in its curent state?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:20pmRon Paul’s Friend comes out against Paul the racsit.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q37qyfHZ1c
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:24pmShame on you Humbleman. Shame on you for not sticking up for the constitution. How can you not want freedom in your life, it baffles me.
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:37pmDr. Paul is responsible for years worth of racist writings. He is in bed with George Soros. His foreign policy is as dangerous as it is ridiculous. We went into WW2 after we were declared war on and attacked, yet Ron says we should not have gotten involved.I could go on, but it’s getting late. Ok Paulies, attack!
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:43pmHumbleman is not humble. Rational Man is not rational. Yepimaconservative is not a conservative. These are people who seem to have no other purpose on The Blaze than to insult, attack, and lie about a decent, (truly) humble, Christian man (and also anyone who appreciates having an honest candidate for a change).
Report Post »Their m.o. is ad hominem, name-calling, slander, and of course the user-name that is exactly contrary to their true personality. Never expect any honest debate on issues with these guys, they aren’t capable of, or interested in honesty.
eagledown
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:45pmRight. Also, Glenn dismantled Ron Paul on GBTV.
Report Post »Thank G. Go Glenn!! Tell the truth about this loon.
The left and the racists right wants him, now….then the media will take him down and repeat everything Glenn is relieving if he goes up against BO(God forbid). BO re-elected.
Ron Paul is here to destroy the Republican Party.
He needs to run as he is, a Liberal with many Soros connections.
Any candidate that thinks IRAN is OK with a Nuke, is a MAD MAN!
HumbleMan
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:09pmDo you really know anything about the so called “Palestinians”? Do you know what they’re saying and doing … and what they wish for us?
There’s no reasoning with Paul-bots. You think he’s a conservative and you honestly believe Santorum is a “progressive”.
Hey Paul-bots … let’s just wait for Iran to loose a nuke on us. Then we’ll be provoked. Great plan … we’ll hit em back real hard after that.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:31pmABRAHAM YOUNG The Paul newsletters display an obsession with Israel; no other country is mentioned more often in the editions I saw, or with more vitriol. A 1987 issue of Paul’s Investment Letter called Israel “an aggressive, national socialist state,“ and a 1990 newsletter discussed the ”tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to work for the Mossad in their area of expertise.” Of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, a newsletter said, “Whether it was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little.”
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:38pm@eagledown The GOP has been in self destruct mode for years now. And to even think one man could bring the whole party down proves it!
Report Post »