Ron Paul Yanks Mic During CNN Interview After Reporter Presses Newsletter Questions
- Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:02pm by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
As the Iowa Caucuses approach, the media is turning up the heat on a number of candidates, perhaps none so much as Congressman Ron Paul.
In a contentious interview with CNN’s Gloria Borger, Rep. Paul lost patience with repeated questions about incendiary language in newsletters published under his name back in the 1980′s.
When Borger asked the first time whether he had read the newsletters, Rep. Paul responded “not all the time, on occasion, we talked about this twice.”
Paul then further clarified his stance as “I didn‘t write ’em, I disavow them. that’s it.”
This was apparently not enough for Borger, who insinuated that Paul had profited to the tune of a million dollars off of the newsletters in 1993.
Paul got testy at this point and responded “I never read it, I was aware of it ten years after it was written…CNN does this every single time.”
Borger asked rhetorically whether the repeated questions were “legitimate.”
Paul finished off the exchange with “When you get the answer, it’s legitimate you take the answers i give,” then he removed his microphone and left.
You can watch the full exchange below, courtesy of CNN:
(h/t mediaite)



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (1494)
MightyMouth
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pmPeople. Ron Paul doesn’t have the temperament to be pres. I am sorry but that’s just the way it is. And besides that… he is a NUT!
Report Post »John 1776
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:31pmA lot of what he says is right on the money, but his stance on Iran disqualifies him.
Report Post »willbedone
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:33pmThat’s the problem, we expect too much political corectness.
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:44pmWhy lower yourself to there level? how many times must he answer the same thing over and over again?? he did not write, it he was not for it, he did not have anything to do with it..they have nothing on this guy other than to beat a dead horse and then some what a joke the media has become..I will vote Ron Paul because I do believe in sound money I want the dollar to be worth something again I want our freedoms back I want our debts to china and all other countries debt to be paid off so our children are not stuck with the bill I don’t want big government telling me how to live my life and taking all my money in taxes….. Go Ron Paul!!!! you have my vote.
Shasta
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:49pmHe is even more thin skinned that Obummer. Sorry, if the doctor can’t handle that little interview, he is in no way prepared to be president.
Report Post »RockstarRepublic
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:50pmOnly a nut would call Ron Paul a nut. He is quite sane and very intelligent. He follows the pre world war mindset to a T. He is the only candidate offering significant policies to remove the problems we face and their source, not just putting a bandaid on it.
Could you say Abe Lincoln’s temperment didnt qualify him to be president? What about any other president in the last 100 years? It is totally subjective as to what defines the perfect temperament. The irony is in the fact that all are humans and will never be perfect or someone you agree with 100% of the time.
His stance on iran is in my opinion not very good, but this is also because we live in a post “interventionalist” america in which the US has to play “world police”. Thats no good either. His ideology keeps him consistent, even if he may not like or agree with it entirely. Furthermore, our allies need to learn to stand up from time to time. We have no money to keep up this world policing.
metalurgy
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:50pmA nut? Really? Can you elaborate?
He acquitted himself well against a seething Borger. How does she expect to be successful screeming and nagging old irrelevant talking points dismissed by him years ago? Is that all they got?
I’d put him up against your guy, Obama, who loses his temper on a daily basis.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:51pmRon Paul is honest…His record speaks for itself..he has voted for “we the people ”every time….he proved that Michele Bachman was being deceptive in the debates on Iran..Michele Bachman is an attorney..Ron Paul proved her wrong..He is a doctor..he has been in Congress a long time and he knwows more than what we do about what goes on there..When you are a truther..someone can question you a million times and the only answer that you have to remember is the truth..It will be hard for them to disqualify him..He knwows much more about the workings of the government than we do…and I would imagine that he knows who is behind what…For instance…we must know that there is someone behind Hezbolah and the Alqeda.like the Muslim Brotherhood..who opened the door for the Muslim Brotherhood here in America? I was told that Wallid Shoebat..an ex PLO terrorist turned Christian..said that it was Hilary..armies armies everywhere..Money money war war…what do we really know?..
Report Post »Top_Down
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:53pmHe is just another Truther who can’t take the heat.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:57pmRon Paul is what we need. He answered the question several times, what else could he do but fuss with her….Ron Paul chose the classy approach and simply took the mic off and left.
Good job Ron Paul…Keep it classy and don’t take any crap. If the Obama supporting media tries to give you a hard time after repeatedly answering the same question, forget them….
Report Post »HoldingTheLineInTexas
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:06pm@RockstarRepublic
Report Post »*************
“He follows the pre world war mindset to a T. He is the only candidate offering significant policies to remove the problems we face and their source, not just putting a bandaid on it.”
*************
What mindset got us involved in WWII? Precisely what his views are, isolationism. We have to be PRO-active, not RE-active!
bioengineer
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:07pmIf anything is learned from this election and past year it’s that Republicans are just as immoral as the Democrats, truth be damned, say-anything, do-anything to get their way.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:13pmA nut that loves honors and cherishes the US Constitution! I’ll take him any day over any of these anti-American, War Mongering, Constitution hating Neo-Con big gov’t spenders!
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »Critical Thinker
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:13pmWhat exactly makes him a nut? Can you back up your name calling with facts?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:14pmBecause I know all you Paul bots are going to be on this thread tonight..
Report Post »On the thread about Mat Damon being upset because Obama didn’t have the “cajones” to go totally Communistic with Obamacare and what not..I said first we have God to thank for letting us have a Conservative Congress..Way to go Congress!!
Now we need to elect a Constitutional Congress to compliment President Dr. Ron Paul!!!
TexasConservativeCowboy
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:15pmRon Paul reminds me of that nut that keeps saying the worlds going to end,
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:21pmI am glad Paul did leave. It goes to show you that the media are nobodies. They think they rule this Country. They think they manipulate everything and get away with it. Time is now. Media is fighting back but they soon find out, they are losers.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:22pm@ MightyMouth
Because Ron Paul will not tolerate a bash interview on a dead topic? Because he will not allow himself to be subjected to intollerant hypocrites and biased yellow journalism tactics you call him a nut? they had to dig back 30 years to get anything to critisize him . That says a lot to me.
Age is the creator of wisdom. Consistancy is the path of integrity. Incorruptability is the foundation of Honor and Truth and result in one amazing American Patriot, to which there is no competition on this stage. Ron Paul IS OUR GEORGE WASHINGTON.
WAKE UP!!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:22pmTexasConservativeCowboy: You mean like Jesus?
And we wonder why the country is in the mess its in? lol
Report Post »Beeree
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:23pmI’d like to see how Obummer would have handled something like that reporter asking the same question over and over trying to get a different answer! What more did she want? He didn’t write them or read them at the time and he disavows them.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:24pmMy question is? Why would Ron Paul agree to go on the Communist News Network to begin with? Surely he didn’t think they were going to fawn over him, because he’s against everything they represent.
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:27pmPauls foreign policy views ARE dangerous!! Appeasment by England towards Nazi Germany caused WWII after Germany invaded Poland. We don’t need WWIII because a weak President Paul does nothing to contain countries such as Iran. That’s just nuts. Also, we all know Pauls views towards Israel. He would NOT come to there aid if they were to be attacked and THAT’S A FACT! Therefore, he DOES NOT deserve to hold the office of the Presidency. The American people, except for clueless college kids see this and that‘s why he’ll never be President IMO. The man lost his marbles years ago…………
Report Post »bring-it-on
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:34pm@MIGHTYMOUTH, your moniker says it all. Ron Paul is abiding by the Constitution. Obama is the narcissist with the ego and NO proven track record. Sounds to like you have no facts.
@HOLDINGTHELINEINTEXAS you really should look beyond the news headlines and your public school “education”.
The pre-WW II US citizens were reportedly isolationists. However, the US POTUS was not. FDR was looking for a way to get into the war to end the depression because his policies were stretching it out. Calvin Coolidge showed the way out in the 1920 depression – check it out.
The USA placed an embargo on rubber, fuel, and sugar on Japan – strangling its imperialism and causing it to hit harder into SE Asia. The US was sending arms and supplies to England, France, and Russia (remember lend lease?) that were being used to aid Germany‘s and Italy’s enemies. How does a country remain neutral and support enemies at the same time? They don’t – FDR was posturing to enter the war while cranking up factories (read employment) at the same time.
The US should have entered the WW II earlier, given what was being done to civilians in Europe and Asia.
FDR and the Dems (likely Reps. also) wanted (needed) the war to kick start the US economy.
Abiding by the Constitution and NOT being the world’s police force are very compatible.
Report Post »RockstarRepublic
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:35pm@HoldingTheLineInTexas
Oh god, not “isolationism” again. That is rediculous. Do you even know what it means? Ron Paul stand for the exact opposite of Isolationism. He just believes our military should be at HOME, not in other nations. That we shouldnt give other nations our TAX PAYER DOLLARS for no reason other than that we just do to keep them friendly with us. He believes that our foreign policy and alliances should be focused on TRADE and ECONOMIC SUCCESS.
Tell me, which part of that says “Isolationism”?
There were no winners in the World Wars by the way. Europes socialism and now great debt and lack of nationalism is a result of that World War, and they were supposedly the “winners”. If you think we should be spreading ourselves thin, spending too much money we dont have in countries that hate us, then you have a serious problem. Perhaps you think its a good thing we rely on the Middle East for over priced oil? You really want them to have that kind of choker hold on this nation?
I dont agree with RP’s assessment of Islam and the nations that war via it, but Im not so quick as to demonize the good as you are. Nor will you see me make up silly rhetoric just because you have a confirmation bias against him. No president will have stances everyone agrees with. Make a priority and see who can get it done. Mine is restoring a sound monetary system and getting rid of bloated government institutions. I dont think RP will rule war out if its necessary btw.
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:35pmHey, Reagan walked out on the Russians in 86. Why sit there and take crap out of some BSer who’s there just to make you look bad?
Report Post »nobull14
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:39pmI have watch Ron Paul for quite some time ? for thirty years ? He will implode every time he opens his big mouth and shoves his foot in it !!!!!! He does not have a foreign policy He would be a disaster for this country even know he might mean well. ?
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:41pm@ Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:27pm
Pauls foreign policy views ARE dangerous!!
————————————————————————————————
The ONLY danger in Pauls foreign policy can be seen from proponents of conquest and Nation building.
Read the Constitution and the Federalist and Anti Federalist papers to learn what American values are supposed to be.
I personally could care less if Iran builds a hundred nuclear weapons and uses all of them on the craphole of the Middle East. I can think of a no more efficient way to rid the world of a third of population, and probably 95% of all terrorists on earth.
Report Post »undyingsound
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:43pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFZpL8F4FgU&feature=player_embedded
A nut?
Your user name is right on the money. You are all mouth.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:43pm@Rock
Lincoln resideded over a country in civi lwar, he did not ever suggest rolling over and giving up to the CSA
Report Post »4truth2all
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:45pmHe answered the questions politely and he certainly did not “STORM” of the set.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:47pm@DELTA D53 Paul want war to be a Congressional decision..that is the Congress votes on going to war..THen if this happens..he wants to get in,…kick a$$ ..and get out…not stay in a bunch of wars all over the globe.. that takes money friend and we are already 16 trillion in the hole..Paul wants to rein in our country keeping immigrants out..build our economy here at home..no more making China and other countries wealthy while we suffer..we get more jobs..more cash..more peace..In his first year alone..he plans to cut our debt by one trillion and to balance the budget in three.years…high expectations…I’m betting he will cut it close.. A stronger economy equals a stronger military.. I keep thinking of a broke Amercia…a guy in a cartoon with his pants hanging down,no shirt and a few sprouting hairs coming from his face and head..pretty picture isn’t it…not riding that horse anymore..NO NONEY..NO DEFENSE…!!!
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:48pmLike I have been saying all along, The Saint Paul killer….Lew Rockwell and his ban of merry racist and all that money Saint Paul collected from his Neo-Nazi Supporters; Here is the list:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html
thewatcher93
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:50pm@ RIGHTALLALONG
The common response from someone when someone else doesn‘t like Ron Paul’s foreign policy. Just becuase he/she doesn‘t like his policy doesn’t mean he/she want to, “fight endless wars” and I don‘t know where the heck people get that idea from when people say they don’t like his foreign policy, just like I don’t where the heck Ron Paul gets the idea that Michelle Bachman “hates muslims and wants to go get them,” or she wants to, “declare war on 1.2 billion muslims.”
Report Post »Anarcho Capitalist
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:53pmNominate Ron Paul or me and the 20% that support him will not vote Republican.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:57pmGive it to em’ RON! Expose the media BS!
A Blatant tatic that the communist news network has used for many years. They did EXACTLY the same thing in 2008. Too bad there are many black people whom support him. You Blazers pointing the fingers ought to look into a mirror once in a while. I could NEVER support a person whom ‘hunted’ on a plantation called n*ggerhead. Nor Will i support someone who voted for the NDAA and the Patriot Act as well as wanting to lead a worldwide crusade. Nor will i vote for Chicken Hawks whom, like dictators, carelessly send our American troops into harms way without congressional approval. Especially those who went to FRANCE in avoidance of the draft. Nor will i vote for those who profited from fannie&freddy. Nor will i vote for a person whom started Obam….. i mean Romneycare. Santorum‘s an ’exceptional’ kinda interventionist but…… eeeaaannnanhhh (buzzer sound) :p I invite all of you Paul BASHERS to join US in OUR fight to BEAT oBama IN 2012! Lets quit the bickering and JOIN FORCES to WIN! Howabout it?
Restore Love: R[3VOL]UTION!
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:59pmPaul 2012.
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:00pmSo if someone comes at you EVERY DAY and gets the same answer EVERY DAY it is worth standing there and repeating yourself? Let’s see what could have happened here… Someone with NO NAME wrote an article in a news letter with Ron Pauls name on it…How is it a valid daily question…The liberal hate machine is spreading and all the lemmings are jumping on the corporate band wagon. Who owns Fox? Rupert Murdoch..Billionaire…Who owns CBS? Westinghouse…GE…Who owns ABC? Disney…CNN..Headline News? Ted Turner? So the only dirt they have on a 70 year old man is racial profiling in a newsletter 20 years ago…that had no ones name on it? A disgruntled employee? A liberal character assassin from an upcoming campaign? Whatever. I have never once heard Ron Paul mention RACE in any argument. NEVER and I have seen 100s of hours of him. So he thinks we should sell technology to our ALLIES and not support them with men…Israel has a 7 million man civilian military as they are made to serve in the military. Israel will beat Iran. Ron Paul will intervene if need be. But, there would be no need be. The Israeli propaganda is as bad as the Arab propaganda. If they fight finish the fight. I am tired of the arguments.
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:06pmYour the nut if you just repeat the propaganda being used to discredit Paul. If Iran wants a Nuke they have the money to buy one. You don‘t think the Russkis wouldn’t pass one to their ally for money? You are a bought and paid for, go along dupe for the people that want to milk us dry of our freedom and wealth in the name of World Police security…for all you hide under the bed people. How do live with yourselves? Oh NO…the big bad terrorist are out there…save me..
Common people..this is the home of the Brave and land of the free….act like it.
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:07pmRon Paul scares all you neo-cons. AND WE LOVE IT
Report Post »schroeder123
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:08pmRon Paul has more guts and savvy then you will ever think of in your life.
Report Post »Pyronaught
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:09pmAnyone who uses the “nut” or “crazy” argument against ANY candidate is just too much of an intellectual lightweight to come up with any coherent argument. It‘s no better than the race baiters who just call anyone they don’t like racist in order to keep from having to articulate any REAL reasons based on facts.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:12pm@REPUBLICORP Thanks for that site…this is what I took from it
Report Post »“Dr. Paul’s best credentials are those identifying him as a true libertarian, meaning a ‘classical liberal’ of the anti-Federalist genre of libertarians that helped found this country, true liberals such as Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams….”
Paul himself writing on antiwar.com says:
“Thomas Jefferson spoke for the founders and all our early presidents when he stated: ‘peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none…’ which is, ‘one of the essential principles of our government’. The question is: Whatever happened to this principle and should it be restored?”
techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:14pmDelta D-5-3: Like we had any business in Europe in the 40s? You speak of an invasion of Poland? Really now? What’s that got to do with the United States of America? How many Nations had Russia invaded after Lenin and his wicked crew took over? How many millions of Russians had been slaughtered by Lenin and Stalin before we ever even dreamed of WW2? But we had to save Poland? lol
Let me ask you ole wise one. What happened to Poland at the end of WW2? Eastern Europe? They wound up occupied by a Marxist Dictator if I’m not mistaken right? But that was ok eh? lol So it was not really about Poland after all was it?
Please I don’t expect you to answer.
Report Post »Maxim Crux
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:17pmYou sir are a victim of the mantra and have been properly propagandized and brainwashed. By the way, how are those policies of the people calling Paul nuts concerning Iran working out? Seems to me that Penetta said yesterday that that Iran is within two months of getting the nuke. Of course it was back in 2003 when they said Iran was only two years away from it. I guess the only alternative now is to either let them have it…which they did, or nuke them and start WW3. The latter idea is certainly to bring the destruction of the world as we know it before the former.
I am not even a Ron Paul supporter and will not vote for him, but I do see falsely labeling someone as crazy because they don’t agree with one of two options that has not been tried with Iran concerning Nukes as dangerous mental thought processes that lead to bad things in the end. This stuff out of the right is no different than that of the left calling tea party terrorist or racist.
Ron Paul is not Nuts, or Crazy, he just has a different approach and considering all these years and the dangerous situation that the world is in because of the real craziness that is going on concerning foreign policy, he may have the safest of the two options remaining. Ron Paul will not be the reason Iran gets Nukes. It will be those that have been in power and have allowed it over the past 20 years.
Report Post »sheerterror
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:20pmRon Paul 2012!!
Report Post »almilford
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:21pmThere are many good things about Ron Paul’s platform but they are FAR outweiged by the bad things!!!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:22pmbring-it-on “The US should have entered the WW II earlier, given what was being done to civilians in Europe and Asia.”
Man, I was with you right up to this statement. What exactly do you mean by this? Were you not concerned with the millions of civilians being slaughtered in Russia? Worked slap to death in sub zero temperatures?
Personally I don‘t like the way China treats its civilians today especially the forced abortions and not allowing their people to worship as they desire but I don’t want to invade China and force democracy upon them.. do you? Why do we make so many distinctions upon ciivilians all over the globe? If I didn‘t know any better I’d suspect that some civilians are more important than others.. lol
Regardless our Founders never dreamed we’d be policing the world and nation building.. They would be disgusted with us.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:24pmHe answered the question….more than once in that clip….i was going to say “Come on Ron, you can’t do stuff like that if you are going to take the WH….” But it was obvious that is all that interview was going to be about….I see nothing wrong with what he did, and he wasn’t a ******** about it.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:26pm@TENTH Amendment I believe that he went on that network because the media in the US refused to give him coverage my friend…I believe that because of who Dr Paul is and what he stands for..that he has gained a great many supporters in this country who refuse to be lied to anymore,… they know that he is an insider with a heart for the people . the only one who hasn’t nor can be bought..did you know that he is willing to take a salary of approximately $39,300 s dollars a year to be President..? And he placed money back in our cofffers. (THe current one is getting paid $400,000. a yr)… and his supporters are the “only” ones aside from the foreign media who would give him a voice.Ron Paul is being carried by “We the People” If enough of us stand up..we will be heard..
Report Post »nick7
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:29pmSuch a light-minded remark. I’m not a Paul supporter but, I would say he has the best understanding of economic, job, tax and related issues. But you, like others with thin understandings of such important problems arean’t content until the US becomes an Orwellian society. Repeated untrue and unkind comments is your only ability.
You should take an honest review of your beliefs and
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:33pmGlenn Bec, interviews Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKEObC_vfwo&feature=related
Shortly after this, we had the partial audit of the FED. Look that up, if you haven’t seen that horror show.
WAKE UP, PEOPLE!
Report Post »Paul -Indiana
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:34pmI think that the greatest asset to a re-election of Obama is people like Ron Paul who can’t win, but could split the Republican vote by running as an Independant. Ron Paul‘s ego is right up there with Obama’s.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:34pmOh okay, a Change in the title of the article aye? Interesting that theBlaze would use the word STORM to couple with the stormfront accuastions. All the while knowing he did NOT ‘storm off any set’ nor is he a stormfront neo-nazi racist. Coincidence? Nah conspiracy, LOL. Nice try, i caught your subliminal propaganda.
Restore LOVE: R[3VOL]UTION!
Report Post »TakingTheWorldByStorm
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:36pm“It’s America Stupid!” – This is what I hear from Dr. Paul. I love helping other countries, and lending aides when they are needed. However; you have to take care of yourself FIRST, then you can afford to help others. Cancel all foreign aide and when they come crying – lets talk about it with a little diplomacy and maybe some respect will be returned to our country. Me settling over an inferior candidate is like settling for Muhommad over Jesus do to his numbers (and respect) right now! – I don’t think so.
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:37pmOMG RON PAUL ON A RACIST RANT!!!!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY&feature=related
cous1933
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:42pmJohn 1776 and Delta D-5-3
Jane‘s Defence Weekly quoted a warning from West German intelligence sources that Iran’s production of a bomb “is entering its final stages” — in 1984. We might wonder if those were the same “West German intelligence sources” that nearly 20 years later passed on information about a biological weapons program, obtained from a worker in an Iraqi defense plant — who turned out to be a fraud.* – from an article by Jack Kenny in yesterdays The New American.
Rhetoric about Iran being on the verge of obtaining a nuclear weapon has been used to scare Americans for decades.
Report Post »Americas military spending is over six times higher than Chinas military spending and is higher than the rest of the world combined, and yet neocons fear Iran so desperately that they gladly forfeit their own liberties and the Constitution so that the government can keep them safe. This is the very same government that they have zero trust in when it comes to domestic issues. Cowardice or paranoia are the only explanations I can see for being willing to give up liberties and collapse our economy just to make sure a country that can‘t even produce their own gas doesn’t come and get us.
techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:42pmA few days ago one of the writers from NewsWeek broke rank and warned that this was coming. Don’t know what possessed the man to do it but he gave the heads up. The Establishment were about to take the gloves off with Dr. Paul is what he said.. We see it happening now. You should here these so called conservative talk radio pundits.. It’s a constant barrage of attacks upon Dr. Paul and his supporters.
Like Ron Paul or not everyone should be concerned over the sway which our Media has in determing our President in these days. It’s an obsurd amount of power. I think the answer would be to break up the Media conglomerates into as many pieces as possible including print radio and satellite. That’s our only hope.
Report Post »Goldsteinbergman
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:44pmfor sure!
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:45pmAnother pathetic and futile attempt to discredit RON PAUL by the Main Stream Media (including the blaze).
All you people that say he knows nothing about Iran or foreign Affairs are the ones who know nothing !!!!
The Military’s men and women choose RON overwhelmingly, to be their Commander-in-Chief.
At the debates Ron makes the global elite’s Neo-Cons look like mis-informed school children:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
Report Post »Chappy123
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:46pmPaul got testy at this point and responded “I never read it”.
Do any of these guys read? WTF
Report Post »sheerterror
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:46pmGreat link — resme—-
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:47pmCause4Liberty: Yes you did… lol Bet you never see that in a Romney article.. Interesting how the Blaze and the rest of Media handles Romney compared to the others… They obviously consider him an acceptable alternative to Obama. In other words there’s not much difference in the policy. A big gov’t liberal/marxist vs a big gov’t statist.
Report Post »detest
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:49pmPaul seemed to handle the situation well and with dignity. If he had raised his voice, you would be here saying see he is a nut. If he had put her in her place effectively you would have claimed he was a mean old man. Anything to stop the peoples voice from being heard, both sides of the aisle can get behind his man. Trying to force him into some kind of corner on a non story is a joke. RON PAUL is electable, constitutional, and the strongest contender any side has ever offered. It is well known and it is why you see the endless attempts to discredit him. Constitutionalist does not equal conservative, that is the only reason why he doesn’t get any love from the right, which is unfortunate.
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:50pmHilarious to hear openly racist bigots invoke Jesus on this comment thread.
Ron Paul is to the left of Obama on his foreign policy. He attracts anti-semites as supporters. He also sounds like he makes sense when he talks about our economy, but he’s completely wrong about our military.
He’s really consistent, in a really inconsistent kind of way. That means he sticks to what he says, but what he says doesn’t seem to flow from a consistently applied life philosophy. That makes him sound nutty to people like us who apply the same core principles in our day-to-day lives.
You can dislike us for that, but we’re not hypocritical.
Report Post »Steve Lindsey
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:51pmI know Ron Paul and he is no Abraham Lincoln… That being said Ron is right on the Fed and the Economy…. BUT…. he is dead wrong on Foreign Policy and in today’s world that is a must. We cannot just put out a “closed for business” sign pull in the Welcome mat and say see ya.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:53pmWell, well, it turns out hit job specialist Gloria Borger is married to Lance Morgan. Morgan is according to the web site of his employer, Powell Tate,”chief communications strategist at Powell Tate in Washington, D.C. He specializes in developing and executing communications strategies for public policy debates, crisis communications and media training.”
So who might be the clients of Powell Tate, where Borger’s husband is “chief communications strategist and crisis communications” adviser for?
Just about every part of the military industrial-complex that Ron Paul wants to shrink or shutdown. According to the Powell Tate web site, they are strategic communications for among others:
The U.S. Army
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
The U.S Agency for International Development
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
and, I’m not joking, The National Pork Board.
Bottom line Gloria Borger’s husband is as inside Washington DC as you can get.
This was a total hit job, bringing up decades old accusations about a newsletter that everyone agrees was written by others, while Dr. Paul was practicing medicine. Further, as Justin Ramindo has clearly shown , most of the charges were made by people who couldn’t have read the newsletters in full context.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:00pmWe‘ll see about that when I write his name in if he doesn’t get the nomination.
Then you neocons can have 4 more years of the false left-right paradigm and watch America burn because of your stupidity.
You’ll get it sooner or never.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:01pmI GUARANTEE !!!!!!!! That the people that still say “RON PAUL’S foreign policy is crazy” have NOT
seen this 13 minute VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
I GUARANTEE this will educate you about the middle-east, and how RON knows more about it than you or his Neo-Con contenders !!!!
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:02pmPaul is the frontrunner now.
Time to pull out the anonymous newsletters…. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
This is so hilarious!
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:02pmRon Paul supporters:
Flood the inbox of CNN, The Blaze, FoxNews, MSNBC and every other lying news outlet with this clip of Ron Paul…..
Anyone who ever heard Ron Paul speak knows he is not a racist at all…In fact Ron Paul fights more for minorities than any other candidate because Liberty doesn’t see color….EQUAL JUSTICE!!!
Flood the inboxes until they are overloaded. We must get the truth out…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY&feature=related
Report Post »ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:05pmLet me get this straight, first it‘s Ron Paul isn’t war like enough for you people. And now that he won‘t respond five times to a question that is like 30 something years old he doesn’t have the temperament.
So if I have processed your machinations correctly, it would appear you people want someone who will easily drop bombs over other peoples countries, civilians and innocents be damned. Then that person should do it with a smile and polite words on CNN.
I think I have found your perfect candidate then. You see, Newt is accused of illegally profiting of his campaign, and this junk Ron Paul story is the best the blaze can come up with today. For some real campaign news check this link:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/20/gingrich-accused-of-illegally-profiting-off-campaign/
In conclusion for all of you who want the status quot, Newt has cheated on his wives, stolen from his campaign, and will undoubtedly do the same as President. Go ahead and get dirty with Newt. At least you will bring the inevitable to pass.
But if, just if, you still have a soul, and some reason left in you, then let us bring this country back to herself. Let us put her back on high, and return to her the honor she stands for.
Vote Ron Paul in 2012!
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:05pm@Jaycen: You can say the sun is black if you like, too. Won’t make that true.
“Although Texas Republican Congressman Ron Paul may be ignored throughout the mainstream media, one report shows that the presidential candidate may have strong support from the country’s military personnel.
Dr. Paul was able to produce $36,739.79 in donations from U.S. military personnel. His closest Republican competitor was Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain, who raised $6,223.”
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9044-ron-paul-campaign-receive-most-military-donations
Think that’s still not the case? Also, I like how you try to paint his support as anti-Isreal, when Israeli leaders are applauding him.
“Newsmax: What should our relationship be with Israel?
Ron Paul: We should be their friend and their trading partner. They are a democracy and we share many values with them. But we should not be their master. We should not dictate where their borders will be nor should we have veto power over their foreign policy.
This is not just about Israel, by the way, this is about how we should conduct ourselves with other countries around the world.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:06pm”
Newsmax: But Israel is not like other countries. We have a large Jewish population in America. What do you say to those who criticize your policy toward Israel?
Ron Paul: I think that some not only misunderstand the American Constitution and the role we should have in the world, they also misunderstand Zionism. Part of the original idea of Zionism, as I understand it, was that there should be Jewish independence and Jewish self-reliance. Today, America doesn’t want anyone to be self-reliant. We want to rule the world and be the saviors of the world and we are going broke in the process.
Newsmax: Some object to your policy of cutting foreign aid to Israel.
Ron Paul: I have objected to all foreign aid. I define foreign aid as taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries. We just can’t keep doing this. We don’t have the money anymore.
Stop and consider America’s policy: We give $3 billion a year to Israel in loans; and we give $12 billion or more in assistance to Israel’s self-declared enemies. Some of these are countries that say they will drive Israel into the sea.
Newsmax: What do you say to evangelical Christians who want that aid to continue?
Ron Paul: I say to them that our aid in the region is out of balance and it is wrong. Foreign aid does not help Israel. It is a net disadvantage. I say to them that “the borrower is servant to the lender” and America should never be the master of Isr
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:06pmNewsmax: What then, if anything, should we do for Israel?
Ron Paul: We should share intelligence for mutually agreed-upon goals. We should honor our pledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region.
But we should stop interfering with them. We should not announce bargaining positions even before she begins her negotiations. We should not dictate what she can and cannot do. We should stop trying to buy her allegiance. And Israel should stop sacrificing their sovereignty as an independent state to us or anybody else, no matter how well-intentioned.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Ron Paul Tells Newsmax: I Support Israel
Report Post »Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama’s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:07pmhttp://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/paul-israel-support-wead/2011/12/07/id/420247
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:08pmRon Paul 2012
Report Post »AzCowboy
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:13pmAbout Ron Paul,
Report Post »Well, First off I haven’t been for him. This was due to his ideas on Iran and such. Wait a minute and think about this. First off he is a constitutionalist( sp). That is what we need. There are three branches of goverment. If Ron went off the deep end on Iran, the other two branches would stop that. Unlike our current POS he wouldn’t do all the bypass congress BS. Maybe Ron Paul would point us in the right direction.. What do you Blazers think?
as catb would say
TEA
jH…
resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:14pmPlease, Ron paul is far from racist. He gave free medical care to minority mothers who couldn’t afford it.
Good job blaze with the terrific article name he sure did ronpage away…
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:15pm@Jaycen wrote:
“Ron Paul is to the left of Obama on his foreign policy.”
Wrong and I’ll show you quite easily how wrong you are.
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^
Constitution
^ ^
Intervention Non-Intervention
So by saying you hate Obama but support Intervention like Obama you are actually being a hypocrite.
Ron Paul is correct on the economy and every one says so….
Ron Paul is correct on our Military and policing the world and is also correct that we are broke and cannot afford to do so any longer.
How did the mighty Russians fall? By over extending their military that BROKE them…..
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:17pmGlenn Beck “pulled the plug” on CNN (HLN), too. How many times does he have to answer the newsletter question, 10, 100, 1000 times? The better part of the interview was when Blitz asked, “what do the people of Iowa see in Ron Paul?” with that dumbstruck look on his face, priceless. The newsletter thing is no more relevant than Romney hiring a lawn service that hired illegals. Who cares? The world is on the brink of economic collapse, and the talking heads are focused on a couple of minor mistakes from the past?
Report Post »kreese
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:18pmYou may be right about Ron Paul, but I have a question for Ms Borger: Would you ask these hard question of obama?
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:20pm@republicorps: In America, we defend the right of people to state their opinions. I remember being taught that we defend the rights of people to be wrong.
Some choose to use that to draw blood, when they have no other arguments to make their points. Those people are fascists, btw.
Report Post »garyM
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:20pmIf Paul can’t control his own supporters, how is gonna run anything else, answer, is not!
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:23pm@okie, I also love when they compare Iran to Nazi Germany in the 1930′s.
I don’t know what happened to Glenn, The establishment must have gotten to him. He used to praise Paul.
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:24pmWas the goofball expecting softball questions?
Report Post »thekuligs
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:25pmI’m glad Paul left, it‘s crap what the so called news media puts the GOP through BUT that doesn’t make me like Paul.
And also for my RP bots THIS is the definition of Isolationsim:
i·so·la·tion·ism/ˌīsəˈlāSHəˌnizəm/
Noun:
A policy of remaining apart from the affairs or interests of other groups, esp. the political affairs of other countries
So YES RP is an Isolationist. Quit trying to make the definition what YOU want it to be so you can say he isn’t. HE IS!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:27pmProbIemSoIver: Very good video. If we could only get FOX News to run it then some of these hard headed Neo-Cons would begin to understand.
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:28pm@GaryM, Why would you want to control your supporters? You must be a newt guy.
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:30pmOn the other hand Blaze, this was hardly a rampage, or Ronpage as you called it.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:32pmbad temper? that is laughable…
i get asked the same question 4 times and i will bite your flipping head off for it…
he has been asked this question for 20 years, and it’s been the same answer for 20 years…
and it’s the same as all the crap FOX puts out on their network… constantly simpsons will say bad things about them on their own network… do they agree with the simpsons, family guy, american dad, etc… on everything they say? they must… huh… hang em for it then… stick to your guns on all levels. fools… wake up people, your brains are being coopted.
name the countries in, alphabetical order, who have used a nuclear bomb against another country.
Report Post »I’ll get you started…
America.
resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:34pmi·so·la·tion·ism
[ahy-suh-ley-shuh-niz-uhm, is-uh-] Show IPA
noun
the policy or doctrine of isolating one’s country from the affairs of other nations by declining to enter into alliances, foreign economic commitments, international agreements, etc., seeking to devote the entire efforts of one’s country to its own advancement and remain at peace by avoiding foreign entanglements and responsibilities.
Sorry thekuligs, Wrong again. He supports free trade.
Isolationism is a country like north korea. Did you get your defintion straight of fox news website?
Report Post »48a30
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:35pmYou’re totally right. Paul and his supporters are all nuts. I truly believe both he and his supporters mean well, however they’re total nut-jobs. Paul saying he did not read them is a bunch of crap. He is a well known anti-semite. You‘re also right that he doesn’t have the temperament to be president. For example, he said of Michelle Bachmann; She hates Muslims. And of Rick Santorum, he said; He hates gays. Let alone that they’re both presidential candidates, but they’re also fellow Republicans. Ron Paul needs to get the hell out of the race he’s a total embarrassment. And as for his followers; am sure there’s another cult out there for them to join.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:35pmCNN never, EVER, beats a dead horse into the ground. nope… not CNN… not the MainStream Media.. NOOOO never… come on guys. do your homework. i doubt 1 in 10 of you are actually doing any homework.
watching glenn does not = homework
reading the blaze does not = homework.
WAKE UP PLEASE.
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:39pm*definition *off
Before the grammar trolls come out.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:42pmVechorik: Great catch. I was up in Maryland a few weeks ago attending a design review on a 15 million dollar defense project and while attending a dinner the ole political disscussion came up. The guys were drinking and having a good time so they weren’t holding back.. Very anti Obama which is fine since I am too but they were talking up Newt and Mitt.. When I mentioned Ron Paul you could not have believed the look on their faces. Trust me these guys are use to being fed the millions.. They don’t want anything to come between them and their goose.. lol
Report Post »Dudley Do-Right
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:44pmIn a comment at the Spectator, former Paul senior aide Eric Dondero claims Ron Paul was aware of racist comments in his old newsletters when they were initially published and that they were written by Lew Rockwell, among others. Based upon Paul’s Wiki entry, that would jibe with his campaign’s original response in 1996.
… newsletters which had contained derogatory comments published in Paul’s name concerning race and other politicians.[9] Paul’s campaign replied at the time that voters might not understand the “tongue-in-cheek, academic” quotes out of context, and rejected Morris’s demand to release back issues.
There’s nothing academic about the comments. More on that issue here.
Paul resumed his private medical practice as well as taking part in other small business ventures. For 1992, RP&A earned $940,000 and employed Paul’s family as well as Lew Rockwell (its vice-president[52] and occasional editor)[53] and seven other workers. Murray Rothbard and other libertarians believed Rockwell ghostwrote the newsletters for Paul;[52] Rockwell later acknowledged involvement in writing subscription letters, but attributed the newsletters to “seven or eight freelancers”.[54]
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2011/12/ron-paul-didnt-deny-racist-newsletters-in-1996-may-hold-grudge-against-newt.html
He’s a racist…AND a NUT!
ozchambers
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:47pmI am definitely not a “Ron Paul nut”, but this newsletter thing from decades ago, written by others really is such a smear job in my opinion. He’s been asked a thousand times about it, and he’s answered the questions a thousand times. Any of us would say “enough is enough”. I am not saying that he’s my favorite candidate, but he walks the constitutional walk better than anybody I’ve seen. And there are definitely some things that I disagree totally with regarding policy, but our freedom and liberty and the true roles of government are the most important issues now and even more so in the not so far future. More important than the threat of terrorism. I think I could trust him to do everything in his Constitutional power as president to tackle those problems. I’d take a Constitution-loving president with off the wall beliefs over a “genius” tyrant any day. Oh crap, did I just talk myself into being a Ron Paul bot???
Report Post »JohnnyinthePedros
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:48pmScrew Them All!
Report Post »Vote Ron Paul!
thekuligs
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:49pmresme: my DEFINITION came right out of the dictionary.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:56pm@ RockstarRepublic
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:35pm
@HoldingTheLineInTexas
Oh god, not “isolationism” again. That is rediculous. Do you even know what it means? Ron Paul stand for the exact opposite of Isolationism. He just believes our military should be at HOME, not in other nations.
—————————————————————————————————————–
EXACTLY right. Ron Paul believes in non interventionism, not isolationism. That is a dramatic difference!
We would save a couple hundred billion dollars annually getting the hell out of just Europe and that fake ass organization known as NATO.
Paul would also bring an end to the UN and would withdraw our bankrolling the world through the IMF. Prosperity would return to America with-in a few short years. Regulations that shackle small business growth will be eliminated, and we would see hundreds of thousands of NEW jobs created in Pauls first year with drilling, and fracking our own world leading oil resources.
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:58pmRon Paul’s polices will get us all killed!! We DON’T need to another Jimmy Carter. Paul will have a policy of appeasment like the UK did towards the Nazis. He will cut the military so bad, IT WILL invite attack. Notice how appeasment worked out for England in WWII? If it weren’t for the U.S. there wouldn’t be a UK or Europe today. Who‘s going to help us when Paul dismantles the military and we’re attacked?? NO ONE!!! THERE’S A REASON why only college kids are the only supporters of this wack job. ADULTS see him for what he is. A DANGEROUS anti-American wack job looking for fame. Yea, he pretends to love the Constitution but never does anything to protect it. Thank god he doesn’t have a chance to win………
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:58pmThekuligs, Oh Did you? Looks like you just copy pasted to me. I Did however go to dictionary.com for my DEFINITION.
i·so·la·tion·ism
[ahy-suh-ley-shuh-niz-uhm, is-uh-] Show IPA
noun
the policy or doctrine of isolating one’s country from the affairs of other nations by declining to enter into alliances, foreign economic commitments, international agreements, etc., seeking to devote the entire efforts of one’s country to its own advancement and remain at peace by avoiding foreign entanglements and responsibilities.
Sounds like a DEFINITION that doesn’t support “trade”.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:59pm@Dudley Do-Wrong
Report Post »Did you say “Paul’s WIKI entry” ?
WIKIPEDIA ??????
The most corrupt source of information available ????
That is a Socialist/Progressive, Global-Elite owned, spin machine. It is a mass-manipulator, and indoctrinating distorter of the facts !!!
The10thAmendment
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:00pm@ ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:26pm
@TENTH Amendment I believe that he went on that network because the media in the US refused to give him coverage my friend…
———————————————————————————–
I know that you’re right brother. People should see what‘s happening with Paul’s campaign by taking note that ALL the normal lame stream media ignores Paul, JUST LIKE FAUX NEWS.
Progressives FEAR a Constitutional Conservative.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:01pmIn this thread the Neocons side with the MSM. Never thought I’d see the day – how sickening.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:02pmI must admit I’m disappointed that Ron left.
He needs to be able to stick these out because No-Substance in Chief will do what this reporter did, but ten times better.
Ron Paul is brilliant, and when given the time to answer questions he is articulate and precise. Pressed for time, however, he looks unpolished. And against Obama, who is all style, this will color the perceptions of those who are easily impressed.
As for the newletters, themselves, I keep challenging people to please give me the most so-called racist thing they can think of from them, and I will probably be able to show how they’re not racist; Because so far what I’ve heard about what is written in them is not actually racist.
Any takers?
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:04pm@techengineer11. I don’t have time to give you a history lesson. Obviously you skipped history if you can’t understand how showing weakness or appeasment towards a country such as Nazi Germany might not bode well for a country. Serously, pick up a book before displaying such stupidity. Thanks and Marry Christmas!!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:07pm@Rsme
it is amazing how they draw up Iran is like Germany….The two are so different…Germany could make gasoline and was very industrialized. Iran not even close. Most simply don’t want to be responsible….
Glenn supports Paul more than Glenn even knows. In fact, Glenn disagrees with Santorum and Bachmann more than he does Ron Paul.
Glenn is for gay marriage
Glenn is for bringing troops home
Glenn is for not policing the world
Glenn is against patriot act
Glenn is not for aid to Israel, financially or militarily
Glenn thinks Ron is weak on Islam. If Glenn believed in the Constitution Glenn would know Islam would never prevail under the Constituion. Ron Paul understand this, Glenn does not. There is the disconnect….Glenn is scared of Islam…
@The Kuligs
Isolationist-Kim Jung-il, N Korea, starves own people
Non-Intervention-most countries of the world
Interventionists-Progressives who intervene with Government in foreign nations.
Educate yourself….
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:11pmDelta D-5-3
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:04pm
@techengineer11. I don’t have time to give you a history lesson. Obviously you skipped history if you can’t understand how showing weakness or appeasment towards a country such as Nazi Germany might not bode well for a country. Serously, pick up a book before displaying such stupidity. Thanks and Marry Christmas!!
That’s funny. You are not a serious person. Please.
Report Post »Dudley Do-Right
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:14pmPROBIEMSOIVER
Did you even read what I posted? Former Paul senior aide Eric Dondero claims Ron Paul was aware of racist comments in his old newsletters
Let me repeat…Former Paul senior aide Eric Dondero claims Ron Paul was aware of racist comments in his old newsletters
But don’t take my word for it, scroll through the comments and read Eric Dondero’s own words (near the bottom)
http://spectator.org/blog/2011/12/16/smoking-ron-paul-gun-part-ii#commentcontainer
Report Post »Buddyc
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:16pmHe sure does.
Report Post »Borger is a slut whore for the democrats. She got her job and kept it even though she is in her 70sby “F”ing Ted Turner.
YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:19pmGod the ignorance of many is painful. Our republic is truly dead. We live under totalitarianism.
Here are a few points for you kind folks:
The Mainstream Media often uses propaganda given to them by the government or big corps.
http://toddholm.com/main/page_prepackaged_news.html
(yes the story is about Bush’s abuses of this, but can we honestly believe the current MSM would speak out against ‘the one’). WAKE UP PEOPLE, your news station [cnn, fox, msnbc] all lie to you to push agenda’s for $$$$. I even have proof the major occupy police interactions were staged…
Second, you idiots using Lincoln as a reference. Lincoln was a TYRANT, like many of our prior CICs. Read ‘A Constitutional History of Secession’ or even the emancipation proclamation (where slavery was only abolished in certain areas of Louisiana and elsewhere)…
Third, you can’t deny the soon to pass NDAA, along with the over reaching Patriot act and the militarization of police forces…
Im not going to tell you who to vote for, I just ask that you smarten up and be aware of whats going on.
“In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.” Mahatma Gandhi
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:20pm@okie, Agree 100%.
It‘s amazing how conservatives don’t want government involvement in their own lives, But support our government’s progressive intervention to install “democracy”, I mean pro-usa dictatorships.
Intervention is progressive, wake up levinbots,hannitykooks,and rushidiots.
Have a nice Christmas okie, Stay safe.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:20pmOK, we all know RP’s stance on Iran having nukes. What is RP’s stance an China hacking our Government and Private Companies computers? Can any of you RP supporters tell me that?
Report Post »Dudley Do-Right
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:27pmHere’s PROOF
http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/2011/12/16/who-wrote-the-ron-paul-newsletters-ron-paul-wrote-them-clear-proof/
Report Post »SometimesTheNutsAreRight
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:27pmWell the thing is https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it he is sane in an insane world.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:30pm@tech ” The Establishment were about to take the gloves off with Dr. Paul is what he said.. We see it happening now. You should here these so called conservative talk radio pundits.. It’s a constant barrage of attacks upon Dr. Paul and his supporters.
Like Ron Paul or not everyone should be concerned over the sway which our Media has in determing our President in these days. It’s an obsurd amount of power. I think the answer would be to break up the Media conglomerates into as many pieces as possible including print radio and satellite. That’s our only hope”
——————————————————————
Great Point! I have heard it ALL OVER “conservative” news talk radio. Even GB-radio had some yahoo on there mocking us. All i can say is….. BRING IT! and IS THAT ALL YOU GOT!? LoL.
a wise martial artist once said. “Be like water”
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:53pmBig mistake, Ronnie and stupid, as well. Your childish action shows your hot temper and other journalists are now salivating to badger you on the subject. You’re going down, baby. It will be a major flame-out and hopefully it will quiet all the Paulbutz and be the end of you.
Report Post »BMartin1776
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:55pmEx-Ron Paul Aide Disputes Paul on Newsletters http://spectator.org/blog/2011/12/20/ex-ron-paul-aide-disputes-paul
“Eric Dondero| 12.18.11 @ 8:24AM
Report Post »Lew Rockwell and Jeff Tucker wrote the Newsletters (with major input from Murray Rothbard and Marc Thornton). Jean McCiver edited them for clarity and grammar out of the Houston office on Nasa Blvd. Ron was merely a figurhead.
But he did read them, every line of them, off his fax machine at his Clute office before they were published. He would typically sign them at the bottom of the last page giving his okay, and re-fax them to Jean to go to the printer.
Eric Dondero, Personal Asst./Travel Aide
Ron Paul, Libertarian for President, 1987/88
Crdtr. Ron Paul for President Exploratory Comm. 1991
Campaign Coordinator, Ron Paul for Congress, 1995/96
Senior Aide, US Cong. Ron Paul, 1997-2003″
wzanesdad
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:59pmAt first I thought he was a nut also, but lately he has been making a lot of sense to me. The constitution is pretty clear about not becoming embroiled in other nations political affairs, After the last 3 years I have really opened my eyes to liberty and freedom, and that’s what paul is all about.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:03amRight on Dr. Paul! This is how you handle the corrupt media who is only now giving you airtime because they see that their tactic to blackout your campaign didn’t work. Now they are only inviting you on to smear and attack you. This is exactly how you handle the corrupt media garbage, get up, walk away and don’t even waste your time with these animals.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:04am@MONK
I have mad respect for you but who do you support? Im just curious. As for China, not only are they our previous primary financiers but they are currently having massive internal issues (read econ/finance forums for a better picture – there is a reason they were building those ghost cities [to keep folks working...]). Clinton sold military tech to china for millions…… Wake up bro. I fully believe we will be in a state of massive internal conflict in the near coming years (or outright WW3 designed by TPTB). But hey war is their answer… Aristotle said it best: apathy and tolerance are the last two virtues of a dying society.
@DUDLEY
Your website presented hollow arguments and pics of the articles in question. It draws no conclusive proof. Look at it like this, back in the day the newsletter was the internet. Knowing this, how many internet sites exist about people (hell even celebs) that are not written by them directly ….
And Id ask for people who name call and use the ‘Rules for Radicals’ tactics – please identify who YOU support in your comment so we can give your choice equal investigation.
Report Post »GilbertAcct
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:08amTop_Down (aka Craig Romney)… show the link, show some proof. You’ve attacked me for supposedly “smearing” daddy Mitt when I was giving you links to audited financial statements of MA, yet you come spew lies about Ron Paul and refuse to show your source. You are a hypocrite my friend.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:16amThe polls are useless. EVERY source is different.
Report Post »Paul is leading on this poll, Romney is leading on this poll…. Obama is neck and neck with the GOP on THAT poll.
WTH????
JJ Coolay
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:21amSidenote: The word “neocon” is the new “beat it in to the ground” word huh???
Report Post »Geeeeeeeeeeez!
KidCharlemagne
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:22amHoldingTheLineInTexas
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:06pm
What mindset got us involved in WWII? Precisely what his views are, isolationism. We have to be PRO-active, not RE-active!
===========================
The Soviet Union and Communism was PRO-active too….
I don‘t know why you’d want to use that as a model.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:23am@BMartin1776
Keep shilling, it shows. Real folks do research for and against…
This ‘ex-aide’ of Paul, one Eric Dondero was a fired disgruntled employee who tried to run against Paul afterwards and failed miserably. Then he tried (failing miserably) to back another politician to do this/his bidding and was overwhelming unsuccessful. Damn your stupid, sucks to be you who cant even research the characters you introduce to the BLAZE…
Report Post »Jakareh
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:28amRon Paul = Liar
Report Post »RCScrolls
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:38amSo you can what? put up with a flip flopper and Lier, or vote for Gingrich which is a progressive Establishment Republican but you can vote for Paul because He knows and speaks the truth. R U sure your American. I look at it this way I have to give up on more than a few things with both Romney and Gingrich
Report Post »with Ron Paul I only have to dismiss Him, on one thing His foriegn policy. And when you really understand Liberty understand this Iran has every right to have a Nuke, after all we have hundreds who gave us that right.
Gingrich wont do 10% of what He claims He will Do, Romney is about as much establishment as you can be without being in office. Ron Paul is the Tea Party favorite weather you think so or not, even if you dont like it.
We have been very silent but we have between 74 million and 96 million votes out here. And we want our Country back and stand for liberty again. I will vote for Him which is a very recent final decision,
777patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:39amBlazers, Patriots, Citizens of these United States,
I stand with Dr. Paul. I come to you today as a concerned citizen. Our Liberties, Freedoms, and way of Life have been under attack for far to long now. I have never been associated with anonymous before, but sign me up for this declaration:
We are anonymous
Report Post »We ask that you post the following in public places
Whereas, on the 14th of December, 2011, the House of Representatives of these United States voted in favor of indefinite military detention, without charges, of any American, anywhere, anytime, without due process of law, at the discretion of the government alone;
Whereas, on the 15th of December, 2011, the Senate of these United States voted in favor of the same bill;
Whereas, the proscription against the use of military force to police the populous has been an essential feature of American civic life and civic liberty since the arrival of our civilization upon this continent;
Whereas, the wanton violation of this proscription was one of the chief causes of the separation of the American peoples from their government in Great Britain;
Whereas, the Constitution so chartering the government of these United States does not grant this power;
Whereas, the Constitution forbids the addition of any power not enumerated to the general government;
(con’t post 2)
777patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:39am(post 3 con’t)
We, SHALL NOT aggress against any employee of any American government who shall not attempt to enforce or aid and abet the enforcement of HR 1540, they being as trapped as the rest of the populous.
Such STATE OF WAR shall continue until HR 1540 is stricken from the code of law, and all who had hand in HR 1540 are brought to justice under due process of law.
Signed and witnessed by we, the individual citizens of these United States, below:
777Patriot(A line must be drawn, and held now.)
Report Post »777patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:40am(post 2 con’t)
Whereas, the use of such draconian measures has been an essential feature of the enforcement of tyranny by totalitarian governments of the 20th century, including, but not limited to, the Nationalist-Socialist government of Germany, the fascist government of Italy, the government of the United Soviet Socialist Republics, and the government of Vietnam;
Report Post »Whereas, the use of such draconian measures is carefully calculated to quash all political dissent amongst a captive people;
Whereas, the codification of such draconian measures effectively nullifies all civil liberties the people may hope to hold;
Whereas, the codification of such draconian measures are the last act in the quest to hold a people captive to the rapacious will of their government without recourse;
And whereas, the codification of such draconian measures is an act of war against the populous at large;
Therefore, be it declared that a STATE OF WAR formally exists between the Government of these United States and the People of these United States.
We, the People of these United States, declare any and all attempts to enforce the provisions of HR 1540 to be unlawful, void, and of no force.
We, declare ALL WHO voted in favor of HR 1540, and ALL WHO attempt to enforce HR 1540 to be traitors to these United States, punishable under law.
We, SHALL DISOBEY, APPREHEND, OR RESIST WITH DEADLY FORCE, in our discretion, any person who attempts to enforce the provisions of HR 1540.
(con’t post 3)
The-Monk
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:42am@YoungBloodNews
Report Post »Howdy, haven’t talked with you in a while. How have you been doing?
Presently, I’m not “for” anyone; just against the current political garbage in DC. I saw some reports today about China hacking the Chamber of Commerce for the last 10 years and I was wondering what RP AND all the other Republican candidates have to say about this. Since this article was about RP and surely will draw out the RP crowd, I thought to ask the RP fans if they know his views on this subject. I hoped to get some YouTube video clips….
I also sent a direct e-mail to GB’s staff asking them if they know how ALL the Republican candidates stand on this issue. It seems to me that this is a bigger issue than illegal immigrants since they (China) infiltrate our computers and networks from afar and are not just picking fruits and veggies in our fields for us.
As for the Ghost Cities; I think they are being built for us. When China starts taking over our Country they will have to move us to a different location and move the Chinese laborers into our locations. The Ghost Cities serve two purposes; keep the economy in China growing and have a place outside the USA to put the Americans in internment camps. Did I hear you say that you liked Chinese food???
PS: Good to hear from you again! I like your posts. Much respect back to you.
The10thAmendment
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:00amNeocons just LOVE the warmongering pukes like Gingrich and Romney, and even Michelle.
Here’s the test for Delta.
Some guy just drug another guy out of a bar at Put-In-Bay on Lake Erie and kicked the crap out of him. Are you going to rush to his rescue, and why would you even consider it?
The fact is that it would be none of your business, and there’s a good chance that when you stick your nose in, both combatants are going to turn on you.
That stupid White Knight Egomania is why America is so hated abroad. My job sends me to places I wouldn’t want my dog to be, and they hate America and blame ALL Americans for the police state actions of the Federal Government of the United States for interfering with their sovereignty.
The sad part? They’re right.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:06amIts tough being the front runner, lets see how he holds up to CNN tough questions.
Report Post »Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:08amJOHN 1776
By “His stance on Iran” you mean that he doesn‘t want to start another war which is the only way to prevent them getting a nuke and then it’s a maybe. We can‘t afford another war and without going to war we can’t stop them from getting a nuke. So what do you want?
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:43am@OZ CHAMBERS,
Report Post »No sir you did not just talk yourself into being a paul bot, You talked yourself into putting the Constitution first and than this great Country, the only thing US Ron Paul supporters are doing! Please join us in yaking back our freedoms from the corrupt establishment!
LibertarianRight
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:47am“A lot of what he says is right on the money, but his stance on Iran disqualifies him.”
Well, by all means. Let’s give up our freedoms and send our country to Hell under the leadership of Obama or “white Obama” (aka Romney) or even “I’ve got a new idea to shred the Constitution” Gingrich because Iran MIGHT get and use a nuke. (Requiring, of course, them to start up their nuke program, build the thing, and then use it – knowing that doing so would be national suicide. This, of course, is also the reason North Korea hasn’t used theirs, and the biggest worry for South Korea right now is the collapse of the North, and the economic shock that would be due to refugees.) Who needs a Congressional declaration of war (besides, supposedly, EVERY PRESIDENT EVER)? Let’s just drop a nuke on them before they get one they might use on us! And Paul’s the nutty one? America has lost its damn mind – or at least the so-called “conservatives” have, given “Mr Republican” Robert Taft argued against foreign intervention on the basis of “what if X happens”.
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges06
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:58amBravo, Ron Paul.
Don’t put up with the commie Propaganda Press and their attempts to obfuscate the real issue of Progressives (communist) takeover of the United States Of America by collapsing it from within with the puppet / straw-man Barack Hussein Obama (AKA Barry Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro, illegal alien, Kenyan national):
“DICTATORSHIP PLAN For America 2012!! :: Glenn Beck Names The TRAITORS & Exposes Their CONSPIRACY!!”
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAu_-UmERuo
GloriaJH
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:02amI may not agree with everything RP believes, but the heading of this article is misleading.
Report Post »He answered the questions but Gloria (reporter) asked it over and over and over … .
He simply realized what she was doing – trying to get a story – quietly started taking off the microphone, ending the badgering interview. He did not do any “Storming” as the misleading title said he did. (Shame on you, Buck Sexton.) If you watch the video you can see this for yourselves.
MEANS2RESIST
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:12amI’d like to hear how some of you would address the Iranian situation that has been such a danger to us for the last 30 or so years? I’d rather see our domestic issues & the disasterous effects from obama patched up, end theFED, tell the global NWO elites & UN to shove it, and take the chance on getting Iran under control by means other than war. If in fact we did have the threat of going to war with them, at least Ron Paul would confide in congress as to what should be done. Not like obama illegally bypassing congress to bomb Libya beacause Kadaffi wouldn’t play ball with Britain, France and the globalist bankers/IMF….Libya & Egypt are a disaster and are in the hands of the muslim sisterhood because of obam & Hillery And Hitlery, stating on public TV “we came, we saw, he died?”….she is one sick bi*th
Report Post »lvjohn
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:20amgood post.
Report Post »StrongWesternbabeluvinherWesternMAN
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:20amWill one of these candidates please ask these lib news organizations, “Did you ask candidate Obama any questions about his affiliations and his life before he was elected president? Did you invest yourself and did your news company do ANYTHING to warn the American public WHO BARACK OBAMA was and is? IF NOT WHY? Any American news company should be ashamed and should cower because of what is happening to this great nation!”………then just take the mic off and tell them until their organization acts on behalf of the American public…..these phony reporters will be treated like the phonies they are!
Report Post »US_SOLDIER
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:24amI love how the are so many phycics in both parties who claim to blindly see the future and say that he cant win. That is some outrages abilities and I applaud you for making voting for your establishment candidate so easily for me :|. Dont think so, I will laugh when you reject RP so he flips and runs as libertarian, which im sure he will with the amount of support (he is not getting) according to you guys and either one of two scenarios plays out. 1. He wins and I laugh at your false prophecies or 2. He takes the majority of votes with him and were stuck with Obama. Do you people really think that us military people would support a candidate that was so weak on foriegn policy? He draws the most support of the military yet you ignore that fact and place yourself as a subject matter expert because Fox or MSNBC told you hes weak on it. By your definition of weak, meaning he said we should use diplomacy, then Ronald Reagan and JFK were weak because he talked to the Russians during the cold war and they had 30,000 nukes pointing at us. Should we really be scared to death of just one? Which the IAEA “proof” has been discredited yet your news keeps up the facade of its real so you believe it. Ill make a prediction for you right here and now, If any other candidate to include ****** in the WH now gets elected besides RP we will see WW3 in the next 5 years. The Financial situation, the economic situation and the propaganda coming out the governement is a recipe for war
Report Post »kenXIII
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:28amanyone see the story about the teacher Melissa Bollow Tempel in Milwaukee with her twisted gender teaching methods on the huff & rethinking schools . org?? and we wonder why our nation ranks 26th in the world. people like this should not be teaching 1st grade kids.
Report Post »thetreyman
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:01amAll that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Report Post »- edmund burke
yes, i have gone and helped that guy that was being beaten in the parking lot by not one person but four and i did it because it was the right thing to do. you can cower and run away if you like but i will always stand and fight when i see something bad happening to someone else. it was non interventionism that took the life of my friend joey when i was a kid and he overdosed. i told my parents, thats what you are supposed to do right, but they didnt talk to his parents because they didnt want to get involved. never again will i watch something bad happen to someone and not get involved saying its none of my concern, i dont even know them, or any other thing people say to themselves because they are scared.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:19amAll you Progressives on here that do not have a clue, I can tell you one thing. Paul is going to win. This is nothing to the support Paul is getting. The media is freaking out and no not what to do. They are going to try to make everyone think that Paul is a nut as that is all they can do. They are not going to win on issues with Paul as all his issues are right on. You did hear at the end of this report what the people gave him standing ovations on, did you not? His foreign and domestic policies. I am running into more and more people everyday that cannot wait to vote this year because they are voting for Paul. I just turned around a liberal today. He could not believe that he had been so blind for so long. I love the look on peoples faces when it actually dawns on them, when their eyes are opened for the first time. It is priceless. The Progressives are losing. All you Progressives that are still blind, that post here on the Blaze will have your eyes opened soon. Ron Paul will be the next POTUS.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:26amDelta, Do you think everyone on here are as ignorant as you saying statements like that? Do you really think comparing Iran to Nazi Germany is a fair comparison? Nazi Germany had technology of the times, they were strong militarily, had a standing army, navy and airforce. Iran has NONE of the above. Get real man. We are not stupid here. Do some real research and quit spewing out absurd statements like that one.
Report Post »Kevin The Elder
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:57amThis reporter (and Wolf Blitzen) act righteous as if they have the right to ask these question, receive an answer, ask the next time and the time after that, as if their main purpose isn’t to continuous discredit Paul simply by asking these same question again and again. Did either of these two ever once ask Barack Obama when he was a candidate about his 20 attendance in the Rev Wright’s church, let alone ask him over and over again? What CNN (and the rest of the MSM) is doing is exactly the sort of stuff that Allen West was referring when he said the Dems have an incredible propaganda machine that would have made Joseph Goebbels very proud.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:10amSteve Lindsey, I am guessing that you are lying about knowing Ron Paul because if you did you would not say ridiculous things like you just did. You are talking about isolationism and that is not Pauls policy view. Go to this link and maybe, just maybe you will understand his policy a little better:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=351761#ooid=VtMWZ2MjoZHMco4i8lZolGtHwphRu_Xt
Stop telling lies. Ron Paul will be the next POTUS.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:34amTheKuligs, I wanted to add to Resme’s post in which he taught you one lesson.
Interventionism: abstention by a nation from interference in the affairs of other nations or in those of its own political subdivisions.
That is the key, interference in the affairs of other nations, get it? We still can be friends with, trade with and even help them in a conflict if they ask us and Congress approves it with a declaration of war. Get it? The Constitution. All you people that are for any of these Progressives that are not for Constitutional principles and bash Ron Paul that is for Constitutional principles, must not like the Constitution. That is how I see it and that, my friends, makes you dangerous Progressives.
Report Post »LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 5:39amif the media had vetted obama one tenth of what EVERY republican has to deal with…..
Tyoical leftist question to obama:
Report Post »Mr President, how wonderful are you?
cosette
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 6:46am@Shasta- More thin skinned than Obozo? Are you on drugs? Obozo was NEVER asked the tough questions that his nefarious past should demand be asked by an authentic journalist! From his communist upbringing to the racist anti American church which he attended for 20 years, not to mention his affinity for home grown terrorists such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine. Dohrn. You really have no idea of how thinned skinned he is because he’s never been VETTED!
Report Post »TheWholeTruth
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 6:49amSheesh what hypocrites. When McCain or Newt or ‘fill in the blank’ gets harassed ad nausium and decides enough is enough, this place cheers them as being, strong and ‘not going to take it from those Communist News Network people. Yet now, you‘ve bought into it hook line and sinker because Paul isn’t their flavor of the month.
Listen. Those newsletters were written over 20 years ago. They called them out 4 years ago. They were debunked and soundly devowed and even the writers said that he DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM until he was told after the fact and one staff writer said “He was VERY angry.” If this is the best they can come up with on Paul, a 20+ year old, fully debunked, already hashed and rehashed set of newsletters which he did not write nor endorse…. COME ON!! Can’t you see it? WAKE UP! He isn’t crazy. He CAN WIN and they are scared to freakin DEATH about that!
Iran? Really? Oh didn’t you hear? Now IRAN was in on 9/11!!!! and they have WMD’s! EVERYTHING they pulled out to go into Iraq is now being said about Iran. When are you guys going to take the blinders off your eyes and realize that MSM is MSM it doesn‘t matter if it’s MSNBC, CNN or Fox! Though I will credit SOME of the pundits on Fox for coming around to not bashing Paul. Maybe some of the zombies out there will quit regurgitating the establishment lines and start thinking for themselves. Our government is laying a trap and you lemmings are walking right into it! Eyes w
Report Post »kennyg933
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:09amI disagree with you RP bashers. You all sound like the Drive By Media, particularly with the “He’s Nuts” opinion. How about discussing his platform and the issues. His platform is righteous. If we could have an unemotional discussion of what it means for all of US and OUR GREAT-GRANDCHILDREN to have to pay for our govenment‘s ’empiring’ all over the world, that’d be worthwhile. If we could have a discussion on the 1-2 punch of the 16th amendment, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and President Kennedy’s executive order 11110 (never repealed) that’d be worthwhile. But too many of you don’t know history, get your ‘educated opinions’ from Fox or NBC, and so you dismiss Paul as wanting. The fact is, more politicians need to chastise reporters on camera so the people can see the harassment the left dishes out as the business of salacious storytelling, aka, “the News”. It’s not about being thin skinned, it‘s about not engaging those with a direct objective to sling mud for no other purpose than to make ’the other guy’ look better than the guy they just threw mud on. Paul answered her question, but her marching orders were to not accept his answer. How long was he supposed to stand there and endure the idiocy. Ron wasn’t the one who looked bad taking off his mic. He said “CNN always does this.” Is he wrong? Don’t they? Then you people throw your own mud with the blanket quips. Ron is all about improving AMERICA, not the Federal Reserve Corp or it’s propogan
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:18amOk your right then I guess we Ron Paul supporters will stop supporting him. Mitt Romney is going to win the nomination then, thank for telling us that you think Romney is going to win.
Ronney/ Rice 2012 Yay.
Report Post »JAYBECONSERVATIVE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:18ami’m not a Romulan but I understand and would have walked out too. It’s like that stupid aquabuda thing they kept bringing up against Rand Paul. It has no bearing at all on current issues. They don’t want to address current issues with how crappy our President is, they want to bring up 20 year old dirt that isn’t even newsworthy and spend the entire interview on it. OUR COUNTRY IS BROKE PEOPLE! Demand these reporters cover the real issues and not the BS!
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:22amThat’s all the liberal media has on Ron Paul….a series on news letter he didn’t write or approve before it was published. They can’t ask him about his economic stance because it would hurt every progressive running. They can’t ask him about is views on stopping Government growth because it will hurt every progressive running. The can’t ask him his views on globalazation because it would hurt every progressive running. They can’t ask him his views on freedom because it would hurt every progressive running. The can’t ask him his view on war because it would hurt every progressive running. They can‘t ask him anything about his voting record because he’s been consistant from day one. They can’t ask him about any current event because it would hurt every Progressive running.
Report Post »THEY CAN’T DO ANYTHING EXCEPT DRUDGE UP 10-20 YEAR OLD NEWS LETTERS WRITTEN BY SOMEONE ELSE WITH RON PAUL’S NAME ON IT.
The media is pushing for a liberal progressive but if they can’t get that they at least want a moderate progressive via the Republicans candidate. They want choice removed leaving only fast progressives or slow progressive.
THE MEDIA IS OUR COUNTRY’S GREATEST ENEMY
colt1860
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:38amHere’s an old interview regarding the same matter:
Paul addresses charges of racism on CNN
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw
Polwatcher
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:46amI remember the old joke about nuts. A driver had a blowout and pulled over in front of a mental institution. He had removed the flat tire wheel and put the spare tire wheel back on when he realized that the lug nuts had fallen down into the gutter drain. He didn’t know what to do. Then from the other side of the fence he hears a voice (from a nut). The nut suggested that he take one nut from each of the other wheels and put them on the reinstalled wheel to get him to a service station. The driver told the nut that that is a great idea and asked the nut why he was in an institution when he is so smart. The nut said that he was there because he is nuts, not because he isn’t smart.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:57amMixed feelings on Ron Paul, but got recently educated relative to his stance on Israel. It is much sounder than I use to think. Still not completely sold on him, but would definitely support him if he becomes the candidate for the Republican Party. Would not support him as a Third Party candidate. That would give Obama 4 more years and the destruction of this country.
Think Paul has a good shot of winning the nomination. That is not such a bad thing and could turn out to be a very good thing.
BTW, Blitzer and Borger are a couple of a$$e$ and shills for the liberal left – always have been and always will be. It is a sickness and almost incurable.
Report Post »drago
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:06am@Bring-it-on
Report Post »You refer in your statement about lend-lease that that helped Germany and Italy.Since you were critical of others on here, and in a sense demanded “facts’, where are your facts that the lend-lease program helped Germany and Italy? Since i have time, i will wait with baited breath for your “facts”……..
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:14amgaryM
How does Ron Paul “control” his supporters? If I decided to make a gigantic “Mitt Romney is Gay” sign and put it on my freeway overpass, why would Ron Paul have to respond to that or “control” that?
How do you compare some imaginary “control” over some random (anonymous) individual’s comments or actions to “running” anything? You, sir, are an imbecile.
“So when did you stop beating your wife?” garbage is NOT going to work against Ron Paul. His supporters are too dedicated and the rest of the people are sick and tired of the left-right paradigm’s games.
thekuligs
I’m an “Awakist”. I like to “awake in the morning”. This is the simplicity of your argument. Ron Paul is not an isolationist. He is a Non-interventionist. There’s a difference. Since you‘re so hyped up on Webster’s, try defining them both and placing them side by side for an honest comparison.
So now Paul has a “BAD TEMPER”? AHAHAHAHA!!!! Because CNN wants to ask gotcha questions and dwell on a fabricated story for an entire interview? Yea, I’m walking off too. I could see if he was accused of cheating on his wife with MULTIPLE women like Herman Cain, or actually HAS cheated on his wife like Gingrich, but seriously, an anonymous newsletter? From 20 years ago?
Will the real author please stand up? No? Well, will the lamestream media please STFU?
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:25amIs this reporter mentally ill? or it was sting op?
Report Post »Ron Paul’s Iran stance is the best for our country and Israel, not so much for warmangers and military industrial complex.
Keggs1961
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:29amSo which Progressive is better, Mitt? ooh how about Newt…oh wait Barack. Are you stoned or stupid!
Report Post »It is time for you morons to understand that these Progressives are destroying our country. My God wake up people!
demint.disciple
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:34amOk, so let me get this straight.. CNN takes obama’s word that he never heard Rev. Wright say some of the racist black theology things he has said, even though he sat in the pews for over 20 years.. But when Ron Paul says he never read the racist news letters they don’t believe him and keep pressing him on it.. Does anyone see a problem with this ?
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:35amNo doubt, TheBlaze is totally anti-Ron Paul.
Report Post »mrfunn
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:36amHe is funn to have in the debate.
Report Post »I agree.
KTsayz
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:40amI know there’s been a lot of CNN bashing going round, but back in the day, Wolf Blitzer was very fair to Ron Paul during an interview and I truly appreciated it.
Report Post »Also, Jack Cafferty seems to like Ron Paul, and usually has good commentary about him.
Watch this great video – the reP.U.b establishment are making a big mistake and Cafferty is quick to point that out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM7K6zi6_G4&feature=related
SgtB
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:40amMighty mouth, I’ve got news for you. If I were approached by someone saying that I has authored material of a racist nature 28 years ago and they did this over and over after I had already told them that I didn‘t write them and that I didn’t agree with their message; I’d probably do more than end an interview. I think I’d have to sue them for defamation or if it were a guy doing that to my face, I’d probably shove him onto the floor where he belongs. And that would be letting the “reporter” off easy.
All of this BS is just the national media trying to discredit the ONLY presidential candidate who has a real clue as to why the economy, debt, and wars are the way they are. If anyone here thinks that Newt or Romney can “fix” this nation, then they have another thing coming. I really hope that more of you religious “right” and neocons wake up and realize that we live in a constitutional republic and then vote your conscience and not popularity and name recognition. But if the two party system screws us over again and you get your savior Newt/Romney, I hope that you all suffer under an even larger gov’t and I pray for our troops that will undoubtedly be forced to invade Iran without cause.
Report Post »Mr_Meaner
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:42amThere are plenty of reasons to not vote for Ron Paul, but this interview isn’t one of them.
Report Post »That was EXACTLY the kind of reaction I want to see, when some hack tries to badger ‘em with garbage, and won’t move on.
Gloria Borger is piece of trash anyway. No-one was offended, that matters
That attitude was the only thing I liked about Christie
demint.disciple
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:42amI don’t know if my first comment went through but I was just wondering how many times CNN or Borger questioed Obama about his sitting in rev wrights pews for over 20 years and never hearing his racist black liberation theology crap.. Ron Paul they keep asking him like he is supposed to admit something and they ask and ask until what, he lies and admits reading it ? Amazing, what do they want him to say ? I don’t get it..
Report Post »libertylion
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:58am@Republicorp – http://www.lewrockwell.com site bashing
I am tired of crap like this from the govt trolls like yourself that believes anything your politicians and media tell you. I am not racist which has no meaning any longer because of it’s overuse due to trolls like yourself that disagree with a point of view. You really need to write Walt Williams, Thomas Sowell, and William Grigg and ask them why they have their articles published there if you think it is a racist site, but you probably don’t know who they are.
Report Post »inblack
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:59amShe admits Wolf already asked him about this.
CNN/Time/Huffington Post is the goon squad for the left.
I’ll vote for the honest man over the slick politician thank you.
Report Post »Segosa
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:00am@JOHN 1776
Ron Paul won’t support an all out war against Iran and that disqualifies him as President? People keep making this accusation based on a 30 second sound bit from a gotcha question in the debates. If you ever listen to his long answers about the subject, you‘d see there’s no doubt that if Iran became an imminent threat during his presidency, Mr. Paul would deal with the problem through special Ops, just like Obama is currently doing.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:04amWatch and learn. Cavuto sticks it to the other Fox ‘pundits’.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJLHyrecog0&feature=related
Report Post »warriorspirit
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:08amI am simply appalled at the disgraceful attempt being made by all of media to destroy Ron Paul. The bias against him is truly pathetic. I for one will not let the media pick my candidate for me. LISTEN UP MAIN STREAM MEDIA!!! The more you ignore Ron Paul, the more you lie about Ron Paul, or the more you try to shove the “establishments pick” down my throat; the more convinced I am that I am voting for the right person and the more motivated I am to fight for him. RON PAUL 2012!!!
Report Post »wesinLR
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:10amI agree , Paul isnt the one. I think he would bring about ww3 by not handling the mid est correctly.
Report Post »I look in his eyes and I just dont think he is a leader, or a person who can really properly set the nation on the right track. Knowing where we should be and seeing we are not there is easy. I have read his solutions and i disagree with the steps he wants to take. I actually think obama would hurt us less in the long run than paul…This is the only person running who i think BHO may be better in the long run… even more so if gop gets all of congress on board.
FEISTY
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:10amHe should have said, “Do you have any more questions on ANY OTHER topic? If no, then this interview is over.” Who the hell wants to hear this woman babble on and on over one topic? “Noooooo, it was pretty incendiary. C’mon….you have to admit it….noooooo.” Lady, SHUT UP!!
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:21amWhat can we say? The losers are desperate.
You wanna anger Neocons and Liberals?
Do they make you SICK?
Vote RON PAUL 2012!!!!!
Let them foam at the mouth as we write our votes in if he doesn’t get the nomination!
Report Post »MichiganPatriot
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:35amNo the MSM doesn’t have the respect they should for a great man, if all we have to vote for is progressives like Romney and Gingrich you can kiss America good bye.
Report Post »flik221
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:36amur wrong mity rat
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:08amI’ll give one example of “nutty” ; “Michelle Bachman hates all muslims….” Who really believes that? Maybe the same people that take issue with his spicy newsletters? Ron is about to feel baracks charachter assassination machine in full force. Look what happened to Cain.
Report Post »brewmaster
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:16amI agree with Mty Mth, and Im sure the P-bots will go nuts about this,,, there starting to act like the Obama progressive Liberals, if you disagree with RP they go into attack mode
Report Post »Melvin Spittle
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:20amAgreed. He is a nut. You cannot have a president that accuses Israel of the first bombing of the Trade Centers. He has always been anti-Israel.
Does everyone here understand how dangerous it is to be an isolationist president?
Report Post »mdefu2
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:20amhypocrites!!! How can you say that the government is to big and needs to get out of your business, then turn to the left hand telepromter and say that this government need to police the rest of the world because we know what is best for the them. Just look at all the outrageous things this government is doing, then say again how they should be occupying another country with threats in one hand and bribes in the other. How would you like a government employee sitting on your couch, and telling you what to do or else? You are just like all the other ********, who KNOW how everyone ELSE should be living and thinking.
Report Post »Iswingright
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:36amYou reap what you sow Ronnie!
Report Post »Iswingright
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:41am“sew” that is. :)
Report Post »mils
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:50amAlthough I agree with you..
Report Post ».I think the interviewer was really pushing and out of line.
She would NOT have done this to a democrat..esp Obama..
Winterboarder
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:57amDid you all know that the troops that are coming home from Iraq are being sent after the holidays to Afghanistan close to the border of Iran? How is Ron Paul wrong on Iran? This is why CNN is beating the dead horse because they have nothing else to pin on him. If Ron Paul wins, the war will not happen and they do.
Report Post »Mr Galt
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:57amHere’s a little tidbit for all you Paultards out there, and Mr. Beck as well (who says he’d vote for Ron before Newt): Ron Paul endorsed Cynthia Mckinney – yes, the cutest little communist evah. Read it and weep:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/09/ron-paul-to-announce-presidential-endorsement-plans/
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:14amSometimes one has to look OUTSIDE of Fox News to find the truth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1JukFv9rkU
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:16amMr. Galt
You just don’t like Cynthia McKinney because she was over there in Libya exposing NATO working with Al Qaeda performing ethnic cleansing on blacks after they tricked Gadhafi into giving up his nukes, then let Al Qaeda execute him in the streets like a dog.
So buzz off with your guilt by association garbage. No one wants to hear it.
We DO want to hear who YOU would vote for, so we can lambast you about how much of a NeoLiberalcon you are.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:17amI’m not a Paul supporter, but this is senseless: he’s being denigrated because he gets testy when being harangued by a reporter? Any of you who wouldn’t do the same probably argue with children as well.
Report Post »TXsecedeNOW
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:26am@ MIGHTYMOUTH
“And besides that… he is a NUT!”
What a great analogy. I guess that seals it for him, now that you clarified it for everybody.
Report Post »It’s exactly of shallow comments like this, that offer no prove, that people like you should read a bit more before making commenting on anything. Just because you heard or read something, somewhere, you shouldn’t go around just repeating it, but find out for yourself:
a) what was said is true, and
b) whats the agenda of the person who said it.
mck05002
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:36am@holdingthelineintexas Are you familiar with what got us into WWII? It wasn’t isolationism. It was us trying to play both sides. FDR kept claiming we were going to stay out of WWII because WWI was still fresh in everyone’s mind. But he was aiding France and Great Britain, and occasionally holding German ships hostage. But what really got us into the war was Pearl Harbor…and can you explain to me how that has anything to do with isolationism? Or do you prefer us to attack any perceived enemy we have, just in case they are thinking of attacking us? Because that sounds like a really excellent foreign policy!
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:44amI agree, he is a nut. I would like to read those newsletters though. Is Paul a racist?
Report Post »black9897
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:44amHe’s the best choice out there. So you should vote for him. How is he a nut? The fact that all the other ppl running are pro-fed automatically disqualifies them. You want someone who follows the constitution? Then vote Ron Paul. If not vote for another person.
Report Post »jimroc
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:52amI 100% agree with him.
Report Post »Screw these puppets, we have work to do.
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:54amSimonne
You seem predisposed to hitchhiking on bandwagons, so why do you need to read the newsletters?
Just keep your brain in your back pocket and follow the bouncing ball!
Report Post »Hoseycanyousee
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:04pmHe is the only honest one. Go ahead and vote for a liar. At least he is honest.
Report Post »Beck Junkie
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:18pmNot a Ron Paul fan, but this clip does bring up an intersting question: the news chick claims to just be doing her job, and wolfy agrees with her….. WHERE THE HELL WERE THEY WHEN OBOZO NEEDED TO BE VETTED? WHERE THE HELL ARE THEY ON FAST AND FURIOUS? But, damit if a Republican printed something 22 years ago, or went hunting at someone elses property that had a racial epithet painted on a rock in the woods 10 years ago? WHERE ARE THEY WHEN THEY HAVE TO “JUST DO THEIR JOB” WITH OBOZO?????………….. crickets….
Report Post »Goodforall
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:32pmI love it! That litlte worm can blast Newt but can’t take any heat to his moronic stance. He doesn’t have it! Better stay in Freeport TX.
Report Post »inspcowboy
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:38pm@ Shasta
Report Post »Your missing the point. I would not have sat there and been pestered by the same insignificant question either. Not when there are real questions, serious questions pertinent to today that should be answered. She could have asked him to explain his stance on Iran and hammered the dog poo out of him but she chose some really insignificant topic from 20 years ago that doesn’t mean a thing today. I would not have wasted another min on that interview either. Ron Paul 2012!
brnice
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:43pmNo one seems to recognize that Ron Paul is 76 years old !!?? He would be a month away from being 78 at inaugeration, and would be 82 in his 4th year in office. I think it may be dementia..
Regan was 69 when he was inaugerated.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:48pmYou got it, Mightymouth!
Report Post »flagbearer
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:51pmIt is too bad that CNN didn’t “press” Obama for his credentials to being president. They don’t want the “legitimate” answers of Ron Paul, but tell everyone else that Obama’s responses are “legitimate” and that it is okay for him to get tired of answering questions about his past.
Report Post »guido.cavalcanti
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:06pm@Shasta Take things into context. The man was interviewed twice already by CNN the previous day regarding this same issue. He explains himself twice, gives the same answer both times. Then another interviewer from CNN asks him the same question, he explains himself politely for the third time to the same network and the interviewer continues to push and prod. This is a presidential candidate, he should expect just a little more respect than this. None of the other candidates get treated half as bad as this man, to the point where Fox News debate panelists roll their eyes when he answers their questions. So let’s talk about thick skin sir or madam. Please tell me what other representative in D.C. has stood up for personal liberty and the constitution as long and as consistently as Ron Paul has? I already have the answer, no one. This isn’t easy to do when you have virtually the entire Republican and Democratic establishment working against you, please tell me that doesn’t require thick skin.
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:09pmI sure wish the Biased Liberal Progressives would ask Obama all about his past. Funny how they never ask the Communist’s any questions? None of them have any place in Journalism. They are all a joke and we all know it. Why don’t they question Global Governance, NWO’s Agenda 21 and who is behind it all. Answer is: They are all part of it and think that they will be in with the elite class. Wish they knew History, because they are the first to be slaughtered. They are the useful idiots.
Report Post »geotico
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:13pmWell this is not going to help the GOP http://www.ronpaulblowback.com We need to start asking for fair treatment of Ron Paul or get 4 more years of Obama. We are not going to get their vote if we keep this up.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:18pmdemint.disciple: Your comment goes without saying yet this is getting real old. The Media is no longer favoring and showing bias they are determing the outcome of the Presidential, Senatorial, and Congressional races.
We must insist on a break up of these Media Conglomerates such as the old Standard Oil Monopoly. They are destroying if not already destroyed the Republic. Media reform or like I suggest break up must become one of the top priorties of our elected leaders but lets face it.. If they are getting elected then usually the Media is behind them so we are in a catch-22.
Report Post »Tsam
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:30pmGood for Ron Paul. What he did was exactly right.
No need for him to follow CNN’s game plan to destroy him. I think he showed patience and clearly stated his case. How does he win the game? By not playing THEIR game.
Good for him!
Report Post »Old_schoola77
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:34pmRON PAUL STORMS OUT OF CNN INTERVIEW
Congressman Ron Paul was being interviewed by CNN’s Gloria Borger yesterday. However, he cut the interview short when Borger persisted on pushing the presidential contender for answers about some controversial pamphlets his company published 22 yeats ago. Watch the encounter
What is a yeats?
Report Post »ltb
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:36pmReporter: “I’m sorry, you understand it’s our job to ask these questions of Conservatives.”
Report Post »JDW3
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:42pmThanks for setting us straight. Now that you have given the world this important insight regarding Statesman Patriot Dr Ron Paul MD, we all know what to think and how we should vote. Is there any other important advice that you have for us? What we should eat, drink, think? Oh, that’s right, Obozo is already doing that. At least I have you to help me understand the important issues. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
Report Post »FlyingFox
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:44pmHey, MightyBigMouth. I think you’re a nut… How about that ? See, Name calling get no one anywhere, and your unsupported and moron comments are just that — Ron Paul is probably one of the better candidates for president we’ve seen in decades…He is consistent, intelligent, supports the Constitution, has the public interest at heart – and he’s human. Let he without sin cast the first stone…
Report Post »So get a life and wise up my brother…try something positive, unless you’re comments got you paid by the opposition ?
SamFox
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:44pmFor some one with the handle mightymouth you sure put up a weak statement.
Saying “…he’s a nut” with no citations is just one of the many ad hominem attacks that Ron has had to put up with for some years now. “When ya have no substance, call him names” seems to be the ticket for Ron Paul detractors. That Ron is a nut is merely your opinion. It is not a fact, it’s a chosen point of view. Name calling, obfuscation of subject matter & ad hominem attacks are Rules For Radicals tactics used by lib progs, D & R.
Why wasn’t the 2nd half of the interview highlighted? :-) Because it wasn’t as easy to spin?
So, somebody show us how minding our own business around the world while we trade, have diplomatic relations with & travel to other nations is isolationism? Why, when it comes to Ron’s foreign policy, does non-intervention suddenly these days default to isolationist? Don’t people know the diff? Willful ignorance is not a good thing. Doing honest research is.
SamFox
Report Post »ROMANS 10-9
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:47pmDitto that!!
Report Post »FlyingFox
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:52pmIt’s interesting how and when major media is so slanted – let them ask Romney about the erasred state government tapes in Mass. – These folks are obviously zeroing in on Ron Paul… I haven’t seen these talking idiots do this with anyone else. These media pinheads either ignore Ron Paul or harrass him…it is obvious these morons are so slanted toward the “status quo” and are just as corrupted as the dumb-a** politicians srewing this country.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:30pm@Mr Galt.
Yes, McKinney is a Communist, but she is definately Anti-Establishment (Global elite) Now.
She spills the beans in this video @ 16:00 in.
I will gladly accept information about my enemies from my other enemies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1y3maNzFo4
Report Post »ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:36pmAn Open Challenge to The Blaze & Glenn Beck,
I challenge you to stop your disinformation campaign against Dr. Ron Paul, and become the the word of truth you promised us you would be. Buck Sexton, and any other reporter/writer that blatantly lies, or misrepresents the truth should be fired. News is not about sensationalism, and the people have grown weary of these blatant bold faced lies.
All should be held accountable,
I see no difference between the treasonous actions of the corrupt politicians that openly mock The Constitution, To the fascist enforcement arm of the government who may not yet realize they are on the wrong side, & every news agency or reporter who skews the truth to appease their share holders, or the corrupted system. In the end all should tried for treason.
The Burning Bush of Truth,
Dr. Ron Paul is not a racist.
1) Nelson Linder Director of NAACP in Austin, TX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGhv3paNz6U
2) Ron Paul on defense of the Inner City,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fl0vy44GO0&feature=player_embedded
I challenge any person on this board to find one example of Dr. Paul being racist in all the 35 years of his public service. You can’t there is not one example from him that can be brought to this debate. Dr. Ron Paul cares about you, he cares about your children and grandchildren, he cares about your freedoms, and he loves and wants to save your country.
For Liberty,
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012!
calvet53
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:39pmReally???? Ron Paul does not suffer fools. He answered the interview. Instead of trying to ask “GOTCHA” questions they should try real journalism. Ron Paul has been on the money from the beginning regarding getting our country on a sound financial footing. If you all don‘t realize that if we don’t fix our debt, nothing else will matters. Iran won’t matter, nothing. We have to be energy independant with oil, gas, and coal, we have to close our southern border to invasion, and fix our debt. If we don’t do that right now, we are finished. So, to heck with Iran and the rest of them. If we quit buying oil from Chavez and the Saudi’s, stop bribing these dictatorships with foriegn aid, these countries will be crippled more than any missle can hurt them.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:43pmWho is Gloria Borger? Better yet, who is she married to?
Prior to joining the firm in 1988, Morgan served as press secretary and spokesman for the U.S. Senate Iran-Contra investigating committee, which was led by Senators Daniel K. Inouye (D-HI) and Warren Rudman (R-NH). He was a principal writer and editor of the committee’s majority report on the investigation. From 1983 to 1986, Morgan was press secretary to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY). During his congressional service, Morgan routinely prepared Democrats and Republicans for newspaper and television interviews.
Before his Senate service, Morgan was a journalist for British and American newspapers.
He is married to Gloria Borger, Senior Political Analyst at CNN.
Sen Inouye is the dude that shut down that question during the Ollie North hearings about the suspension of the Constitution during times of emergency.
Not much different than Andria Mitchell (MSNBC) being married to Alan Greenspan.
Or MSNBC‘s Mika Brzezinski’s dad being instrumental in funding the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan in the 80′s fighting the Russians by proxy.
These people are ALL interconnected. It’s not just “the liberals.”
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:46pmYou mis-informed people really want to learn the truth ????
This is One film of many like it. I suggest you watch them, if you really want to take the blinders off and become enlightened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw&feature=related
Report Post »actor44
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:03pmyes you are correct.the U.S.C. is for pychcos!!
Report Post »Ken
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:35pmAnd where in this video do you see him with the wrong temperament? To most of us, he was appropriate to leave after answering the same question numerous times.
Report Post »broper
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:48pmI have always liked his blunt honesty, and much of what he says… unfortunately his IS a nut. Just yesterday he said that if Iran had the bomb and attacked Israel, and if he were President, he would stay out of it. WHAT ?? The man is so clueless about international issues, that he would go on record and tell Iran – in advance – ” I hope you don’t, but if you do nuke Israel, I won’t help them”… That is a stupid as Obama telling the terrorists when he is pulling out of Afghanistan so they can delay their plans to takeover until the Americans are gone.
Report Post »Donald Dunnam
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:49pmFor those who don‘t like Ron Paul’s foreign policy, let’s look at the facts.
Report Post »We went to war in Iraq and gave them democracy. They started killing Christians. We went to war in Afghanistan and gave them a democracy. They started killing Christians. We pushed Egypt into a democracy and they started killing Christians.
We helped push out terrible dictators and what did we really achieve? Murdered Christians. The present foreign policy is working real good isn’t it.
RON PAULS FOREIGN POLICY EXPLAINED
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:01pmYOU LIKE RON PAUL EXCEPT FOR HIS FOREIGN POLICIES?
You have to WATCH THIS and be informed the next time he brings up FOREIGN POLICY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:30pmWalking off of an interview with CNN after they repeatedly ask the same question…. I don’t have a problem with that.
Report Post »quickstudy
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:36pmI’d rather have a person as pres that says what he means and means what he says over some flip flopper progressive who says what he needs to say to get elected. Go Ron Paul
Report Post »ccfonten
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:55pmYou ar 100% correct. He is a nasty, testy old man. And, yes, he is a nut.
Report Post »EmaMarlene
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:55pmI agree that Paul is an idiot and not presidential material. However, I am proud of him for taking off the mic and walking away from her. He answered over and over and she kept asking the same question that he had answered.
Report Post »Allen Raymond
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:56pmI have read too many comments attacking and defending Ron Paul with references to history that may or may not be correct. As to Iran, i believe there is a lot to consider here. Who or what nation is their greatest enemy? That would be the US. Who do they believe, possibly true, is the greatest terrorist nation int the world? That would be the US. It would stand to reason that if I were the President, dictator or whatever, of Iran I would seek the best possible defense machine possible to defend my country from their greatest enemy,
Report Post »The financiers that began the Soviet Union, communist nation were Americans (http://www.thehiddenevil.com/communists.asp). Our great government has finally released the evidence that Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen in order to get public support to enter into a war in a foreign land. I have questions as to whether we really should have been in either war.
As to Viet Nam, the government finally admitted that the attack on the USS Cole was a hoax.
There are a number of concerns as to whether the attack on the Twin Towers was truly a terrorist attack or a created event to get us into Afghanistan and Iraq. Why did building 7 collapse in the same manner as the twin towers? Please don’t get me wrong it was a drastic event that costs American lives and put us into another “War on Terrorism” action.
I am afraid it is too late to return to the country our forefathers would be proud of. There are too many emotionally retarded personalities now
nmgene
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 5:13pmIt was Ron Pauls organization that wrote these pieces but he didnt read them or know anything about them for 10 years. I cant lie that well!!! If he didnt know about them or read them who was running his organization? The buck always stops ate the top. Ron Paul is a fool and an idiot. Lets cut the military in half then we will have 1000s more out of work. Just what we need, more of our heroes out of work!!!!
Report Post »libadvsor
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 5:23pmYou know much like Dwight Eisenhower. Paul responded from his understanding “he did not write the items which ‘they’ accuse him of. That it. Dwight answered the question. So did Paul. You either believe him or not. His track record for consistency and honesty for 30 odd years is enough.
Report Post »W_Hart
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 6:09pmJust how long was he supposed to wait for her to move on? He answered the question 3 times for her, and 2 times the day before. The truth is like that. The answer doesn’t really change. I guess that’s something people will have to get used to, when they interview President Paul.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:01pmAllen Raymond: Careful pointing out facts to the Neo-Cons on the Blaze.. They are so intent on another War for Israel that they can’t think or see straight.
ProbIemSoIver: I’ve not seen that Obama deception movie yet. I‘m sure I’m familiar with most of it but I look forward to checking that out. Thanks for posting it.
Several have put up Dr. Paul’s position on Foreign Affairs on YouTube. Well I shared that with my Brother N Law this afternoon… a brother n law that has been prone to vote D in past elections and quickly came on board. They guy is a well informed dude. No college but he‘s read more books than any 10 people I’ve ever met in my life.. Anyway, he wasn’t familiar with the 53 coup in Iran or the CIA contacts w/ Bin Laden and he also wasn’t familiar with what was in the DAA which was recently signed. Like most he‘s just interested in someone returning to small go’vt and getting back to following the Constitution.
Report Post »Captain Curvy
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:24pmRon Paul 2012…….
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:24pm@Mr Galt,
“Here’s a little tidbit for all you Paultards out there, and Mr. Beck as well (who says he’d vote for Ron before Newt): Ron Paul endorsed Cynthia Mckinney – yes, the cutest little communist evah. Read it and weep:”
It’s kind of hard to endorse FOUR candidates at once.
No, what he was doing was using a coalition of outsider parties to help break America away from a two-party system.
See here.
Ron Paul Endorses the Third-Party Field
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/09/10/ron-paul-endorses-the-third-party-field/
““Presidential elections turn out to be a charade more than anything else,” Paul said, and so he urged his supporters to vote for candidates who would expand the debate beyond the major party’s platforms.”
And here.
“[Bob Barr] said that Paul had “dissipated” the impact of the libertarian agenda by supporting a field of candidates rather than focusing his efforts through the Libertarian Party. “We need bold, specific, focused leadership,” said Barr, “not amorphous leadership that says ‘all of the above or any of the above.’”
Ron Paul is an Austrian Economist, so he is far from being a Commie sympathizer.
But he has been known to work with the Left to try to end American interventionism, even if the reason the Left would agree to do so, is only because they see Capitalism as necessarily interventionist.
Report Post »lexus
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 7:42pmWhy doesn’t any and all candidates, once they have ANSWERED, turn around and ask the ignorant liberal Obama media, that persist on badgering, AND NOW CAN YOU TELL ME OR ANY AMERICAN WHAT COUNTRY OBAMA WAS IN 20 to 25 years ago, where did he live, and was that when he was smoking post or doing cocaine? I am a conservative and not a Ron Paul supporter but it’s really time NOW FOR ALL OF THEM TO CONCENTRATE ON OBAMA. HE HAS STARTED FOLKS AND IF YOU DON’T THINK THEY ARE TAKING NOTES AND THE LAME STREAM MEDIA IS ALSO FOR GENERAL ELECTION DEBATE QUESTIONS AND OBAMAS BILLION DOLLARS TO BOOT THEN WE WILL HAVE THIS OBAMANATION FOR 4 MORE YEARS. If Paul can walk on CNN and Romney won’t debate Newt neither will make it in General. Everyone has a past and Sarah Palin tried to expose it yet McCain camp stopped her, hence the title of her book, and McCain lost. I still have to go with NEWT, Stay focused on Obama, follow Reagan’s 11th Amendment, make Obama start depleting those funds NOW. It would cost him a fortune to defend 6 constantly dropping factual bombs, and may the BEST REPUBLICAN WIN, not based on how rich you are AND PERSONALLY OBAMA COULD NEVER EVER STAY IN THE HEAT DEBATING NEWT. Romney is way to soft and had the MOST RECENT FLOPS, PAUL CAN’T EVEN STAY IN WITH CNN, AND NEWT HAS WORKED WITH REAGAN AND CLINTON. Has he made mistakes, sure but please be the first to cast the stone if you are perfect. RESTORE AMERICA. REPBS KNOW THE REAL EVIL HERE, FOR US AND OURCHI
Report Post »lefco1
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:31pmobvious you have no idea what is happening in this country.
Report Post »maybe four years from now you will be more aware of the mistakes.
lefco1
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:32pmidiots………….t
Report Post »Righteous Outlaw
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:00pmKeep attacking Ron Paul and watch his numbers rise:) Like it or not Ron Paul is one of about 3 people who will be our next president and when you call a nonracist person racist the “Blowback” discredits you significantly. Most Americans have dealt with both sides of racism before and I trust the wisdom. Consider the small African Americans percentage of the population and the overwhelming percentage in the prisons and then spin that to imply the individual fighting that inequality for decades is somehow a racist…The psycho/sociopath spin machine known as the MSM are soo clever they can call you racist without ever making the direct charge. All the fast talkers have taken over and it will not stand. Americans…Vote your conscious! It’s as simple as that. I resonate with Ron Paul.
Report Post »fognog2
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:04pmJust what we need another war payed for from money borrowed from china.
Report Post »VicTheconservatarian
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:35pmWhy do you think Ron Paul is a nut?
Report Post »tigasport
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:35pmNewt Gingrich has more luggage than a B-52 bomber can carry. Mitt Romney can’t even recognize that Social Security is a ponzi scheme. Both Mitt & Newt have a ton of luggage, so where is someone questioning them on matters that are over 20 years old like they are questioning Ron Paul? Answer me this also those who think that Ron Paul’s foreign policy is crazy: Where the hell are you going to get the money to stop anyone right now? Again where’s the money? One of the major factors why Rome fell was due to fighting to many wars & debt. Also, one of the main reasons Obama won against Hillary Clinton was because of the Iraq war, Hillary supported it yet Obama did not, thus how many more Obama’s do you guys want after we elect another George Bush republican? Were broke, over spent, 16 trillion reasons to stay the hell out of other peoples business, are Army is spread out all over the world, we currently have the second highest taxes in the world, were bailing out other country’s via the IMF (billions of our money with out congressional approval can you say taxation without representation), The main point is this, we need a real constitutional President who will limit the size of this over large Government, not another Progressive, Socialist Republican in sheep’s clothing.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 12:15amHis stories do not add up. If YOU published any sort of Newsletter, especially the one that has YOUR name all over it, would you at least glance at the content? Of course you would, any SANE person would. Whooops, did I make a point?
Report Post »Either Ron Paul is a huge liar or he is totally incapable of making executive decisions. Or, what did I say about being SANE??? Hmmmm?
thepatriotdave
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 12:43amOkie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:57pm
Ron Paul is what we need. He answered the question several times, what else could he do…
=============================
WHAT ELSE COULD HE HAVE DONE??? HE COULD HAVE TOLD THE TRUTH.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 12:49amAmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:22pm
Ron Paul IS OUR GEORGE WASHINGTON.
===============================
Please do NOT denigrate the memory of a true American HERO. Ron Paul is but a flea on the crotch-hairs of GW, our very first President, and a real leader of men and of a newly born country… The United States of America.
Report Post »MEANS2RESIST
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 1:31amNewt…
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=36799
Ron Paul in 012
Report Post »IMPEACH GEORGE SOROS!!
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 3:54amYou do realize that Ron Paul is the “Truthers” candidate don’t you? And he believed Brad Manning is a hero, not a traitor…
Report Post »violetteal
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 4:06amNot a nut. I don’t blame him for being annoyed. CNN is ridiculous.
Report Post »Jim AZ
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 7:51amUtter hack piece. Blaze offers a hack title to go with. Paul handled it near perfectly.
Report Post »The (w)itch dreams that the established media is lord. Paul thinks the truth is.
Funny observation: With their worst editing attempts, Paul still looks GOOD!
Purveyor
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 8:03amMOUTH,
I firmly believe Ron Paul is showing signs diminished faculties. I do not say that to insult the man, rather, he has “ticks” and quirks along with his odd views that warn me he may be ill. Ergo, I will not vote for the man. Furthermore, I find it strange that others haven’t picked up on this? Whether senility, Alzheimer’s, or muscular/nervous system problems, something is wrong!
ALSO, what is wrong is CNN? Self important, self righteous, etc… What a wasted interview. Talk about “beating the [proverbial] dead horse”! There had to be a few more pertinent questions in her “bag-o-tricks?” Jeez!
Purveyor
Report Post »ConservDadASD
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 9:33amPeople, the press is trying to “Cain” him, but in a different way. Since they shot their wad on the sexual angle, and since they have Newt on cheating, and Romney on flipflopping, now they are trying something different…. such as the racial/anti-semitism thing… since that seems to be more available to them thanks to those newsletters, which Paul is unfortunately connected to some writings of another person 20 yrs ago.
The long term aim of the press is to knock down all the GOP candidates in the polls to a level just below Obama’s. They will grab anything they can use to achieve this goal…. to re-elect their messiah.
While i am not very interested in Ron Paul… I don’t like seeing what is going on here. It should be “we the people” not “we the press” who choose who we want to elect.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 9:50amConservDadASD
The press needs something tangible to “Cain” Dr. Paul. Anonymous Newsletter is not going to cut it.
Herman Cain “Cained” himself.
Why do you think the Blaze came out with Ron Paul’s investment portfolio? They think they can derail this man with facts, but all the facts are in his favor.
They ***FAIL***.
Report Post »TheBMT
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 10:07amyea, we’ll just ignore the interview done by Wolf at CNN too about these EXACT same newsletters that he did a couple years ago. Yea, just rehash it to be politically expedient in trying to get at somebody. Its like these journalists never do any actual research and are all basing their “facts” off one guy’s research.
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 10:47amWow you Paul-istinians have been busy..!
Report Post »What the hell did you think was going to happen.? You laughed at Cain’s demise and even contributed to his crucifixion … You people use the word “neocon” like a grenade… I think its your code-word for “nobody but R.P.” Well guess what..? Now you can say too .. It sucks to be us..!
And the powers that be, has Ron Paul “on the record” WELL SORT OF ..! Allegation are grounds for being guilty “in the public eye” and “in his own words“…well kind of….! And the left will use this comment against Ron Paul and they will portray him as having a whining voice and shriveled up old fart looks . And coming soon a SNL skit , making him look like a fool with flash-backs of… Ross Perot / Dennis Kucinich wearing a tin-foil hat.You laughed at Herman Cain. What did you think was going to happen ..Did you people think Ron Paul was exempt from a OBAMA smear campaign.. ?
And if R.P. split’s off and runs 3rd party , you might as well pull the lever for Obama .
Congrats on helping the establishment pick our next GOP candidate…! That will surely loose to Barry.
Divide and conquer ..Thanks for playing along.!
Welcome… come on in….!
Crazy Times
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 11:08amhe is a nut, and his “followers” are nutjobs….
he’s not libertarian… all conversatives and libertarians love what he says about the economy…
.. but for international policies… WATCH OUT
Report Post »rightwinger76
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 11:19amTo all of you Paulistinians;( during a time of mutually assured destruction,economic chaos, and Middle East turmoil), Ronald Reagan’s supporters did not threaten to vote for Carter if he did not get the nomination. I would contend that Ron Paul is a little kooky, but not nearly as insane as his supporters are.
Report Post »GROW UP
Travelassie
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 11:46amYeah, someone with the courage of his convictions, and the willingness to do and say what he believes is right despite the attempts at character assassination and/or annihilation of his person- someone who is his own man and doesn’t dance on puppet strings to the Masters with their own agendas- naaaah, someone like that would NEVER have the temperament to be president….
But just to think about, how do you believe the Obamarama would react at attempts on the part of the news media to quiz him about his college records, his activities as “community organizer” his associations and relationships with those who advocate and/or carry out violence against the government and Americans…… of course, we all know this would never happen since the news media is in the business of protecting and advocating their Obamarama.
Report Post »CNN’s interview with Ron Paul is just another attempt on the part of the news media (always in the pockets of the left wing Democrats) to annihilate another potential Republican presidential candidate whom they believe could be a threat to their agenda.
njmilitia
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 1:08pmHe‘s not a nut he’s just a republican/libertarian. They have their philosophy which is not that foreign to The American principles of non Governmental interference in our freedoms. Certainly better than the communist one world government of George Soros and his Marxist Progressives Like the Clintons and Odumbo the Magnificent.
Report Post »foobear
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 1:47pm@Mighty, you’re playing right into the hands of the MSM.
CNN faked this story to provoke exactly this reaction from you.
Report Post »waspanglosaxon
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 9:52pmOh, so now it’s his temperament? Really! Maybe Dr. Paul should have cheated on one wife after another, a la’ Gingrich. Or possibly he should have cheated with one man after another, a la’ Perry? Or possibly he should advocate defending ‘Israel’ to the last drop of American blood, expending the federal government and going to war with formerly friendly countries for no apparent reason – a la’ W.?
Report Post »G-Momma
Posted on December 27, 2011 at 4:08pmIf getting a little teed off because someone keeps asking the same thing over and over againespecially after you‘ve already answered makes you a nut then I guess all parents are nuts when their 2 year old keeps asking ’why’…EVERYONE has a breaking point when they say enough is enough. If anything, I’d say his reaction shows everyone – including other countries – that, as President, he‘ll take so much but don’t push America ’cause we WILL show who’s the boss here!
Report Post »miked166
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pmCan someone please find the footage of Wolf Blitzer & Gloria Borger asking Barack Obama everyday for 3 straight days about Rev. Wright back in 2008. Maybe seeing that will shut you right wing nut jobs up…whats that, there is no footage of that! What do you mean they didn’t ask him the same question everyday, twice a day about the hate & racism being spewed by that awful man… I got to go.
Report Post »MightyMouth
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:34pmGive that up. The MSM will side with and protect Obama right through the election… but this time we have Obama’s record to showcase. Unless the GOP takes a 44mag to their head, like they did in 2008, we will win.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:37pmIt’s always black history month at CNN
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:43pmExactly what I was thinking. Headline of the article is misleading, too. He didn’t storm off the set. He took off his microphone and walked away as the interviewer acknowledged the interview was over.
Report Post »RockstarRepublic
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:07pmThe only reason Obama was asked about his pastor, and not as often as you pretend, was because the media was told to support Hillary Clinton. They needed to knock down her competition. When the memo came in that Obama is now the one to support, they began calling him the “messiah” among other things.
The way you use the term Right Wingers clearly must be a compliment, because its essentially recognizing the people which have a more accurate perception on reality.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:14pmRepublicorp: Ron Paul supporters have KNOWN ABOUT THIS ALL ALONG. He disavowed somebody else spewing hate in his newsletter, which was brought to his attention ten years after the fact.
We’ve known all along that the tact will be to use that argument, and the falicious and false arguement that he’s “the biggest ear-marker” in Washington. We already know the fake argument.
So stop. It’s demeaning to yourself.
Report Post »sheerterror
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:46pmRon Paul 2012!!!!
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:56pmShyLow
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:37pm
It’s always black history month at CNN
So CNN is off the air, there is not black history, beyond, being lazy trouble makers incapable of growing beyond hunter gathers without outside help. Take the smartest 200 of them give them all the shelter, food and equipment to last 50 years and 10000 acres of land, and unless someone props them up with in aid, within 100 years they will be back to wearing untanned leather hides as clothes and eating whatever is laying around.
Report Post »sbenard
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pmI’m not a Ron Paul supporter, but that was just plain despicable! Good for him!
Report Post »DetritusScreener
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:35pmFinally a candidate that won’t let the media badger him.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012!
Republic
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:46pmTry this “test” to see who you want to vote for based upon your responses to candidate policy questions. Kinda fun.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/fullpage?id=15177995
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:57pmRepublic… #1 Ron Paul, Michelle Bachmann #2 and Perry#3 Landslide for Paul! only one question went to Bachmann and the last was a three way tie because they all share the same views.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:56pmI got the same results as you did, LOL!
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:00pmThe Lib media wont use any of this against Dr. Saint Paul…
Report Post »“Martin Luther King Jr. earned special ire from Paul’s newsletters, which attacked the civil rights leader frequently, often to justify opposition to the federal holiday named after him. (‘What an infamy Ronald Reagan approved it!’ one newsletter complained in 1990. ‘We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.’) In the early 1990s, a newsletter attacked the ‘X-Rated Martin Luther King’ as a ‘world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours,’ ‘seduced underage girls and boys,’ and ‘made a pass at’ fellow civil rights leader Ralph Abernathy. One newsletter ridiculed black activists who wanted to rename New York City after King, suggesting that ‘Welfaria,’ ‘Zooville,’ ‘Rapetown,’ ‘Dirtburg,’ and ‘Lazyopolis’ were better alternatives. The same year, King was described as ‘a comsymp, if not an actual party member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.’ This is why the Kook is unelectable
Partygirl
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:08pmI love Ron Paul! Good for him!!! That sicko media should all take a leap as far as I am concerned. Why should he sit there and be abused? Ask a question get an answer move on. That is mental and verbal abuse from the media as far as I am concerned. Ron Paul is not a nut!! He is a great person with strong convictions about our country and our constitution. Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »GadsdenGurl
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:09pmGood for you. I will stand by ANY of our candidates when attacked with this kind of CRAP.
I might think they are despicable on some of the issues but NOT ‘racism’… the most overused charge.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:09pmPaul has CNN and Newt has the OWS At least Newt has security for the OWS.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:20pmAgain,the Blaze prints another misleading headline..“Storms off the set”…Oh please.
Report Post »The media is going to try their hardest to blow this BS newsletter out of proportion. Remember Americans…think for yourselves,don’t let the talking heads lay the foundation for your mind.
Ron Paul or none at all
AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:25pmRepublicorp (or should I say TROLL)
Your progressive-ISM is showing! Keep up the vanity. Your “ I know better than you little people” attitude is a dead give away. Go back under your “bridge” to nowhere.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:53pmAMERICANPATRIOT01 Translation: The Truth Hurts
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:30pmWhy didn’t he just answer the question? Not that I think he has the chance of a snowball in hell of winning the nomination, but I’d sort of like to know more about that newsletter myself.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:39amWhile the establishment media continues to hype a 15-year-old story concerning decades old newsletters as part of a dirty tricks campaign to smear Ron Paul as a racist, the latest CNN poll shows that Paul has the most support from non-whites out of all the Republican candidates.
The latest CNN/ORC poll released Tuesday finds that Congressman Paul scores highest amongst minorities when matched up against Barack Obama in a hypothetical election head to head.
Paul scores 25% of the vote amongst non-whites, whereas Romney polls at 20% and Gingrich gets 15%.
Ron Paul is clearly the most popular GOP contender amongst non-whites out of the entire field, suggesting that the “racist” smear, which was heavily pushed back in 2008, has had very little impact whatsoever on the views of those who presumably would be the most likely to be offended by it.
http://www.infowars.com/cnn-poll-ron…st-non-whites/
Report Post »Mr Galt
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pmDid he crumple up his tin foil hat and throw it at her?
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:40pmActually Dr. Paul does not wear a tinfoil hat. Those would be the chickenhawks (like you) that are paranoid of their own damn shadow.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:43pmRon Paul does not need a tinfoil hat. Those are for paranoid chickenhawks (like you).
Report Post »Critical Thinker
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:25pmDid you watch the video?
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:26pmMore on the tin foil front from Dr. Saint Paul
Report Post »The newsletters display an obsession with Israel; no other country is mentioned more often in the editions I saw, or with more vitriol. A 1987 issue of Paul’s Investment Letter called Israel “an aggressive, national socialist state,“ and a 1990 newsletter discussed the ”tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to work for the Mossad in their area of expertise.” Of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, a newsletter said, “Whether it was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little.”
Mr Galt
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:28pm@THXll38
Hmmmm. Interesting. You know nothing about me at all, and yet you’ve proclaimed me a “chickenhawk”. Thank you Mr. Moore. BTW, is that Alcoa or Costco brand you’re wearing?
Report Post »endgamer
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:24pmI hope he takes some lessons form Chris Christie on candor and frankness.. This was a start telling CNN to F. OFF!
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:52pm@bradley
Is it past your bed time and mommy turn the computer off.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:23pmRon Paul and his supporters would like to believe that his history doesn’t exist.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:34pmso, you’re using the race card before the NAACP on ron paul? jesus you people are weak.
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1134-naacp-president-ron-paul-is-not-a-racist.html
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:43pm@ BR@DLEY – Uh, I have no idea what your bizarre response has to do with my comment, but, whatever. I must assume from your nonsensical response, that you are a Ron Paul supporter.
Report Post »RockstarRepublic
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:59pmYour post is equally as disturbed. People who know history know that the progressive creation of the federal reserve, FDR’s “New Deal”, and the start of playing war nation, has only hurt this country. These people understand that the only candidate not bought by lobbyist and campaign financiers is Ron Paul. Its a nice change than the illusion of choice you are used to getting.
Remember the US was a creditor nation. We lent money, we didnt owe it. Our allies were from trade and diplomacy not war. We always hesitated to join any war just prior to the World Wars, now we rush into it and put up bases in every far reaching corner.
Ron Paul is more sane than you are by far. You dont have to agree with him 100%, i dont think anyone does. I cant find any candidate I can do that with. But give him some proper respect as an adult and stop insulting the people that see the good he can do.
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:00pmThat history of his isn’t of any concern to me. Possibly blown out of proportion. There are 3 or more relevant issues about him that I dislike him for.
Middle East – he gives the impression that the spread of Islam is no threat to the free world when it is by its very definition at war with liberty.
Legalization of drugs – he haves you believe drug dealers will be something other than violent criminals after legalization.
Excise tax – does nothing to remove lobbyist from Washington, most likely will make things worse.
Paulites – not Ron Pauls fault but these people are nut jobs.
Those things aside, he’s alright.
Report Post »Norm D. Plume
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:11pmTell me, sir, do you fear getting shot by the cashier when you go to the corner store for a six pack of beer? Or that the beer you buy will be laced with rat poison or some other diluent?
Report Post »Critical Thinker
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:20pmSmear, smear, smear. Implying his supporters are ignorant does not make it so.
Report Post »Rats56
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:21pmyou sir are uneducated, I would suggest removing your cranium from you anal cavity so that you can see the light of the day.
Report Post »its the other guy hiding his history, get your facts right.
AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:40pmRon Paul’s history, integrity, devotion to principals like honor, truth, individual freedom, free markets are his strongest weapons against all of the detractors and critics like you and your ilk. Any of the other candidates wish they had the history Ron Paul has because then they wouldn’t have to worry about what might come out next. Ron Paul is proud of his history, it is PROOF of his dedication and a foundation for his standing on so many IMPORTANT issues facing this nation.
We wont have to geuss what he will do. We will know exactly how he will perform and respond to most any situation because his playbook is the CONSTITUTION not the latest program from the FED and the people behind the progressive agenda. WE CAN TRUST WHAT HE SAYS TO BE THE GOD”S HONEST TRUTH. (you can’t even come close to that with any other candidate)
WAKE UP!!
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:47pmHey it’s @bradley the deck hand that’s a wizard on the middle east. Seen any more intel on Iran, I have (today)
Report Post »GadsdenGurl
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:11pmHis ‘history’ is one of integrity — most of the 4000 babies he delivered were black or brown.
Many of them were delivered and their moms treated for FREE.
Gingrich just told a voter who was gay to go vote for Obama, Santorum is always bashing gays.
I‘ve never heard one bad word out of RP’s mouth… this is a non-issue.
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:05pm[treated for FREE.]
It wasn’t for “free”, it was at someones expense.
[Gingrich just told a voter who was gay to go vote for Obama,]
He essentially told an admitted “Democrat” he’s wasting his time trying to get Gingrich to pay him lip service. Why should he waste his time on someone that polarized?
[I‘ve never heard one bad word out of RP’s mouth]
Report Post »Out of Ron Paul, no. Out of his supporters, all the time…
Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:25pmTri-Ox, reading comprehension aside, did you read the link that was provided to you? Or did you choose to just believe what you choose to, and let facts die?
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:29amnope, i’m out of the military. and, unlike you, i actually served. you’re pathetic.
Report Post »mrfunn
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:48amThe Ron Paul supporters seem to be like the 2008 Obama supporters.
Report Post »No clue who this man is.
GoodStuff
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:22pmRuPaul = kook
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:46pmAnother Levin-Bot trolling the Blaze.
Report Post »Critical Thinker
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:24pmReally? You know, name-calling with no factual arguments essentially destroys your credibility. You did know that, right?
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:25pmLook how hard there trying to knock Paul off the list. I almost laugh every time now. The whole establishments a joke. They making them selves look like the biggest fools on earth 7 the whole word sees it. Even with the comments, lol, name calling & making stuff up. Once the person starts name calling, you lose. You name call because your offended some how, which means Paul is winning. I love, he is soo getting on Ya’lls nerves its hilarious.
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:40amRuPaul is bizarre… Ron Paul, however, is awesome!
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:22pmlive townhall debate‘s where the american people ask the question’s… you tired of the media picking who we vote for yet… i bet not we are screw’ed….
Report Post »Dirty Harry
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:21pmBorger looked like a fool! Does she think it’s aggressive journalism to keep asking the same question over and over until she finally irritates the interviewee?
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:13pmIts only because they got nothing else to hit him with. There are no skeletons in the closet with Ron Paul. “What You See, Is what You Get” Honest Integrity!! They have to dig back almost 30 years to find any dirt on him???? No personal indescretions, no political inconsistancies, No insider trading, No compromise on constitutional support, No dirty secrets to expose.
Ron Paul is a True man of principal, a patriot, and a man of god. He has been and will be a person of MERIT and MORAL fortitude, unlike anything they have had to work with for the past 30 years, the media has no idea how to attack him, other than to tell you he is a nut, whacko, eccentric old man. These “commie/socialist” media types probably have the same opinion of our founding fathers. They have no basis for manipulation, no dirt to use as leverage and no talking point to twist.
I predict that Ron Paul will win in Iowa and Mass. and maybe even in SoCo. We already know that he will walk away with the California primary and show really strong in Florida if not win there as well.
Did you notice that as soon as it looked as if Ron Paul might win these early primaries the media started discounting the early primaries as insignificant????
WAKE UP!!
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:57pmno skeletons?
Pot and Herion legal
Open borders
Let Iran have nukes
Can’t go after terrorist
Your right, nothing to see there comrade, move along.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:32pmTHEREALCONSERVATIVE…..the war on drugs makes the cartels rich and locks people in prisons so they can receive 3the hots and a cot,paid for by the taxpayer. Iran? Iran is as much of a threat to us as Zimbabwe..all war propaganda. As for open borders? He wants to stop entitlements such as welfare,housing and medical so illegals don’t have a reason to sneak in here. When our country goes bankrupt,I’ll start the blaming with you
Report Post »Ron Paul or none at all
AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:38pmThose things are not sleletons. Those are stances on issues that have constitutional backing. Those are issues that he believes should be addressed with individual responsibility and free markets. The fact that you think those are skeletons shows that you need to educate yourself with personal honest research.
Skeletons are things or events that are morally dishonest, criminally hurtful or outright lies and corrupt. Non of those apply to the subjects you listed. Your list is a personal disagreement on policy, please learn the difference.
P.S. I am not your comrad, I stand with those that defend the CONSTITUTION, not the political whims of an agenda driven group of politicrats he’ll bent on world domination.
WAKE UP!!
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:50pm@Naps
Suprise!!!
Iran has missile that can reach into Nothern Europe and their working on a ICBM, with the help of Russia, China and North Korea. So you see it‘s not just about the ’Evil people in Isreal’ that you and Ron Paul like to talk about.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:04pm@THEREALCONSERVATIVE
So now your saying we should invade North Korea,China,and Russia? So let’s say we invade Iran? Is Pakistan next? They have a nuke? Maybe India,I heard they got a few as well? Or you know what? F&%K it! Let’s make every country with nuclear capability start popping em off like bottle rockets on the 4th of july. That will make me feel so much safer from the BIG BAD Muslims
Report Post »mtnhimike
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:21pmGloria why do you not ask the tough questions of Obama….Like where are your College Transcripts ? Where is your Thesis ? What is your relationship to Bill Ayers and drill down on the answers. Why do you not ask Obama about where he lived and his drug use in NYC ?
Report Post »What is the reason he relinquish his IL law license ? Where are you on these questions ?
You are a liberal, Progressive enabler.
carbonyes
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:26amShe absolutely is a Progressive enabler and supporter.
Report Post »panz
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:20pmBut the little ***** can go after others, call them bigots, etc. Thin skinned old fart.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pmYes .. this is nothing compared to what they did to Palin in the last election and continuing after .. she has class and stands up .. Paul runs away. And yes .. he thought it was funny saying that Bachmann hates Muslims didn’t he? … a bully is someone who can dish it out but can’t take it .. we already have one of those in the White House now.
TEA!
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:46pmOne of the things I dislike most about Ron Paul is his supporters. A large percentage of them behave like he’s the messiah…the savior. Now where have we heard that before?
I’m extremely tired of rabid Paul fans pushing him down my throat every time anything is discussed. And it’s not just here on the Blaze. It’s everywhere. I’ve looked at the man & his platform and I don’t like parts of it. But I don‘t like parts of every other candidate’s platform. Honestly his supporters have annoyed me to the point of dropping him from my “still checking out” list.
Yes other people express support for their candidate but in comparison only a small percentage of them are as “in your face” as the Ron Paul camp.
Report Post ».
Stopit
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:31pmHey CatB, don’t forget that Bachmann skewered Ron Paul and essentially called him a nutjob publically in the dabate for taking his principaled stance based on his assessment of the threat of Iran on the American populace. Taken alone, I wouldn’t condone his comment, but in context with Bachmann’s self-righteousness on the issue in lambasting a close political ally (assuming she is for small constitutional government still) she deserved the light retort in humor. And the element of truth about it reflects the only alternative to mandating no nuke for Iran, which are sanctions and military action, which results in deaths to the general populous…most of which are muslim. One point about the hawks is that they forget they are dealing with real people and real deaths on both sides in their pursuit of power positions in the world. Pre-emptive warfare halfway around the world is beyond the pale in my opinion, and represents exactly the anti-founding fathers position of the NeoCon’s.
There are some nutjobs in support of Paul due to his opposition to the FED, and libertarian federalist positions, but I’m not going to let that ruin the tremendous positions on everything else that Ron Paul stands for. Bachmann said she viewed other threats, beside our national debt and pending collapse, as greater national security issues. She is free to take that position, but I don’t. WIth our massive miltary spending and conventional & nuclear arsenal, if we aren’t secure, it’s not possi
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:37pmYep, the little Magoo man has now begun to spontaniously combust. He just isn’t fit for the leadership position as prez of the U.S.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:31am@ CATB, MIDWESTMOM
I agree if Ron Paul can’t stand up to CNN
how is he going to stand up against
Obama, David Axlerod, Union Thugs,
Obamatactics 101 ?
His RABID SUPPORTERS are my biggest problem
Report Post »I agree with Ron on many issues just not
Foreign Policy “Peace Thru Strength”
not Appeasement.
The name calling is off the wall
they sometimes sound like Obama supporters
or OWS Idiots (not calling RP people idiots)
or Wisconsin Capital Occupiers.
if that’s the kind of people that support him
then I stop listening to your arguments.
Name calling an rudeness have never won an argument.
Unless you’re a Democrat.
AxelPhantom
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:19pmA better follow up question would have been: So someone writes some terrible things in your name and you don’t know about it for ten years and yet, as some Republicans have suggested Obama and certainly Eric Holder should have known about operation Fast and Furious? Isn’t that a responsiblity of any good Executive to know what is going on in his name, or in the name of his company?
Report Post »red1
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:25pmHaha good point. You should be running for President!
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:33pmNo thanks Red, I had too much fun when I was a teenager. :)
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:38pmHere is what Saint Paul had to say: The Big Lie (I don’t know)
Report Post »http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/ron-paul-addresses-racist-newsletters-on-cnn/
jordy2010
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:18pmIs it just me???? I find that more and more I can’t play the video clips that are posted on here…………not just 2 or 3…….more more like 10 of them in the last week………..
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:31pmSometimes I have to click on the red ‘MEDIAite” logo above the video to go to their site and find the video.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:12pmTry manually updating your media player. and adobe flash. That has been a problem recently for a lot of folks. I am an M.I.S. by trade.
Report Post »red1
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:18pmThose were tough question? Please! I don’t support Paul but he has already answered that question many times. All a person can do is accept his answer or offer proof that his answer is untrue. CNN offered nothing. Ron Paul is many things but he certainly isn’t a racist.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:23pmI don’t think Paul will be given a break by the leftist media anymore than any other candidate, the games are just beginning, wait ’till the opponent is Obama!
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:17pmUnlike the other candidates, the vile spew of personal smears will hit Paul from all directions. The right will hit even harder.
Both parties are controlled, and neither wants to shut off the spigot that is lining their wallets. They can’t allow Paul to win.
Report Post »G.E.R
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:18pmMaybe him storming off is in another video because it wasn’t in this one.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:02pmI know…He really stormed off..lol
Report Post »MightyMouth
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:17pmRon! Really?? Just leave? Dude. We need someone who can throw this monkey crap back at the monkeys! You are not the guy!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:26pmYes!
TEA!
c
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:33pmCatB why don’t you leave….
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:52pmWhat’s the matter …OKIE? .. don’t like someone who will stand up to a bully? Paul supporters are the biggest bullies I have met .. outside of the Obama ones in 08 .. but they are coming close.
TEA!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:12pm@CatB
Hahahahahahahahahaha….. Bully? Hahahahahahahaha…
You are a liar…..You lie more than Obama supporters….
Frankly, you are plain out stupid and you contradict yourself with every post.
You say TEA and then spend more on me……The likes of you is what destroyed America….
TEA
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:18pmCatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:52pm
What’s the matter …OKIE? .. don’t like someone who will stand up to a bully? Paul supporters are the biggest bullies I have met .. outside of the Obama ones in 08 .. but they are coming close.
TEA!
Really? TEA? lol But you’re ok with ******* a trillion and a half dollars down the toilet in these meaningless asinine Wars in the Middle East? Where do you think that money comes from? the money tree? Please get a brain. TEA. What a disgrace.
Bottom line is that Dr. Paul wins on all the issues. You can’t argue the issues with him because you have no facts on your side.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:20pmYes .. and the name calling .. that is what else Paul supporters like … 2 year olds having tantrums.
TEA!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:43pm@kitty, Why did you change your pic?..lol.. Sensitive?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:22pm@CatB
Once again you prove my point. You start off calling Ron Paul supporters bullies (name calling)…..You then criticize yourself as acting like a 2 year old throwing tantrums for name calling…..
CatB how stupid are you……sharp as duct tape you are…..
You are not TEA. You are a “wanna-B” TEA and you know it…
CatB is a lying hypocrite…
Solzhenitsin
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:29pmLooks like they proved your point Cat. RP’s supporters are the main reason I could never vote for him.
Report Post »David
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:17pmOf course he got mad and left! He’s answered the questions dozens of times, and he’s done playing the politics game.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »RojBlake
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:35pmIf that‘s true then he shouldn’t be running.
How many times have Romney, & Gingrich answered the same questions…& will continue to do so.
It isn’t fair, but it is politics.
BTW isn’t this the behavior they were stating was a weakness in Gingrich?
Ron Paul broke under the pressure of the media, he is NOT the right man for the job.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 8:44amYouTube-NAACP Nelson Linder defends Ron Paul. If this is what the MSM considers dirt on Ron Paul.
Report Post »Then I would hope the American public isn’t that stupid to fall for it.
Ron Paul or none at all
David
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:12pmI think the article overstates when it says rampage or “ronpage.” He seemed pretty calm when he said that he was leaving. He wasn’t exactly “storming” out of the interview.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:14pmIt sure sounded to me like he answered her question not once but twice. When does reporting become pestering and petty?
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:47pmSo I guess Jesus is responsible for everthing done in his name?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:54pmLOL .. now what Ron Paul = Jesus! Did Jesus have a newsletter?
TEA!
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:28pmRon Paul is Ron Paul…he did not write or give consent to what was written in his newsletter…he didn’t know about it till years later…
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:32amIf that is true .. he had his name on it and knew nothing .. then that is just as bad if not worse … if you put your name on something you better DARN well know what it is ..
Oh and for Okie …dopey…
TEA!
WE ARE FOR A STRONG DEFENSE FOR AMERICA … not Paul’s wimpy … isolationism.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:47am@CatB
What does the “B” stand for Cat?
Once again you demonstrate how you contradict yourself….You post all these negative remarks about Ron Paul supporters saying they call names but YOU come out throwing insults time and time again….
You say “TEA” and then support the Fed, more spending, and higher taxes….
You say less Government but please more Government telling others what to do.
You say less Government but want to intervene in other Governments..
You say “strong DEFENSE” but then want to attack other nations…
I’m not the only one who sees you for the fake “TEA” you are….
You seriously don’t know the difference in isolationism and Non-Intervention? I think you do and you are purposely saying what Ron is not. Or is it you are truly ignorant? It is one or the other…
P.S. Intervention is MORE Government, MORE spending, MORE taxes….so you are not Taxed Enough Already…You support intervention like OBAMA….hahahahahahahaha
Cat “B” is not TEA and has been exposed once again! Now go kick rocks….
Rational Man
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:13pmAHH, HA HA HA HA HA HA…………………….
AHH, HA HA HA HA HA HA…………………
I can just see this little twit negotiating with crazy world leaders.
Report Post »Especially Muslim leaders!
The guy is always pouting and acting immature cause he can’t handle the heat.
How funny is that?
DetritusScreener
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:33pmRon paul 2012!
Report Post »Norm D. Plume
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:07pmSounds Reaganesque to me. You have to be prepared to leave the table, if diplomacy is failing. Think Reykjavic.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:20pm@Norm D. Plume
Thats even more funny!…………Thanks!
Report Post »DOCCONSTANT
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 12:09amRon Paul 2012.
Sorry don’t have much to say against drivel.
Report Post »foobear
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 1:49pm@Rat Man: “The guy is always pouting and acting immature cause he can’t handle the heat.”
He actually very calmly removed the mike and ended the interview. CNN fraudulently edited the video to make it look like he stormed off the set. Go watch the unedited version on youtube.
Report Post »Stfwud
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:13pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZt4SACTIq8
MUST WATCH
Report Post »NWWADD
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:13pmCNN = Corrupt News Network.
Report Post »CNN = Clinton News Network.
ShyLow
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:33pmI love CNN’s “Not White IN America”specials
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 11:11pm@ROJBLAKE Apparently you haven’t done your homework on Newt…Newt is slick..we can learn a lot from Newt..Newt talks a good game..but what Newt says and what Newt does are entirely two different things.. check out this article and the URLS down toward the bottom of the page.Newt will rely on the uniformed to waltz him into office…that is the only way he could get in..For a man’s record speaks volumes about him…enjoy..it will blow your mind.. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:12pmYou can NOT take the heat Paul…sorry….but YOU just proved THAT by your OWN actions…so get OUT of the kitchen!
This is NOT Presidential material….
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NWWADD
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:16pmAre you kidding me.. CLARA88 – How many times must he be asked? I have heard him been asked that same question 3-4 times just in the last few weeks. Don’t be so stupid.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:16pmLooked more like wind then heat to me Clara….
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:22pmYou think this is rough? .. wait until the WHOLE Obama machine comes out against THE candidate .. they have to be able to stand up to it .. not run away! We need a fighter .. Paul isn’t it!
TEA!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:24pmHe could have said NEXT QUESTION or is THIS the only question that you have for this interview? Fine…i’ve answered the question and so the interview is over…. Getting up and walking out on camera ONLY hurt HIM and makes HIM look childish. I don’t like the commie media AT ALL…
but he just played right into THEIR GAME. He should have been prepared better for the interview…just my opinion…and STOP with the name calling people…not necessary to get YOUR point across….
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:27pm@Clara88
What was the name of the hunting ground Rick Perry and his family hunted at for decades??? Any person who hunts at a place called “ni ggerhead” is clearly racist. A person hunting at “ni ggerhead” has no room to speak about ghostwriters writing indecent comments in Ron Paul’s newsletter without his knowledge nor his endorsement.
Take that log out of your own eye before you come talking bout specs in mine.
Veterans support Ron Paul
https://www.facebook.com/VeteransForRonPaul
Military Families support Ron Paul
https://www.facebook.com/MilitaryFamiliesForRonPaul
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:37pmCATB…I know…can you imagine HIM in a debate with Obama?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:46pmThis story is not debunked .. unless you truly believe that he had a newsletter FOR YEARS that he did not read and did not know what was in it .. and then .. WHY NOT? … this is not what we need ..someone so CLUELESS!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:49pmNews Bulletin…Ron Paul A Huge Racist??
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/12/news-bulletin-ron-paul-is-a-huge-racist.html
Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:01pmAngry White Man…The Bigoted Past Of Ron Paul…
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man
Fella
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:16pmNote that almost all pieces critical of Ron Paul conveniently sidestep discussion of his philosophy & platform, hoping to instead distract the reader with hysterical (albeit evidence-free) insinuations of “racism”, “antisemitism”, and “homophobia”. The liberal name-calling holy-trinity, used to neatly quash all dissent.
Just once I’d like to have an honest discussion with one of the detractors. Just once.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:23pm@Clara88
Why did Rick Perry hunt at a place called “Ni ggerhead”?
Report Post »Fella
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:28pmWould also like to add how ironic it is that someone that identifies themselves with the tea party, who has faced equally ridiculous charges of racism, I’m sure, is now clinging so dearly to such a tactic. Telling really but whatever. Enjoy your evening, folks.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:28pmwhat heat? He doesn’t need to be on CNN to win this election. CNN is irrelevant. Herman Cain should have done the same thing.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:31pmThat’s all they got on Paul. Written paper work LOL
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 8:57pmOkie….
Even Gov Rick Perry’s critics defend him on hunting ranch furor. Wallace Jefferson..the first black chief justice of the Texas Supreme Court said it was “Much Ado About Nothing” He was appointed to the post by Perry.
Report Post »http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-presidential-election/perrys-critics-say-hes-no-racist/
Fella
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:03pmHate to be the one to point this out but that doesn‘t prove that Rick Perry isn’t a racist. Sorry about that. See how this works?
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:05pmEven some of Perry’s fiercest Texas critics say they do not believe he is racist. They point to his record of appointments as evidence: He appointed the state’s first African-American state supreme court justice, Wallace Jefferson, and later made him chief justice. (Jefferson’s great grandfather was a slave, “sold like a horse,” Perry once said with disgust.) Perry’s former general counsel and former chief of staff, Brian Newby, is black; so is Albert Hawkins, the former Health and Human Services commissioner who Perry handpicked to lead the massive agency in 2002.
“He doesn’t have a racist bone in his body,” said former Democratic state Rep. Ron Wilson, who is black and served with Perry in his early years in the Legislature. “He didn’t then, and he doesn’t now.”
Added Dallas Democratic Sen. Royce West, who is also black: “I don’t agree with him on policy issues, but you can point to many things he has done that were sensitive to ethnic minorities.”
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:08pm@Clara88
So again, why did Rick Perry and his family hunt at a place called “Ni ggerhead” for decades?
I‘ll keep asking the same question like CNN and you’d better not walk away…
Clara88
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:23pmVeterans are supporting a VETERAN….Gov Rick Perry
Report Post »Our military deserves a Commander In Chief they can be PROUD of and RESPECT
GOD BLESS OUR BRAVE MILITARY AND OUR BELOVED BRAVE VETERANS
http://www.rickperry.org/veterans/
He’s a Christian.. AND..he doesn’t golf…he likes guns *SMILE*
GOD BLESS THE 2ND AMENDMENT
resme
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:42pm@carla, Look at paul being a racist.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3EADdr-5AY&feature=related
ashestoashes
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 10:38pm@CLAIR88 Yes…and Rick Perry certainly isn’t racist either while spending us into a hole as a part of the problem with spending 338.3 billion on illegals in the form of weffare every year..Yes Sirree! He wants you and your childen to pay $125,000 to go to school while you and your child can pay that small extra $25,000 for each of those illegals to go to school..Yep..he knows how to stick it to the government to make that money for Texas!!!
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:00am@Clara88
Since you seem to be hung up on old rumors, I thought you and others on the Blaze should take a look at this!
http://www.fitsnews.com/2011/07/29/is-rick-perry-gay/
Enjoy the heat in the kitchen ;)
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:42amThanks for the link…
Report Post »I’m not homophobic ;)
flipper1073
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 10:52amPease people don’t get CLARA started on Rick Perry
Report Post »Too late you’ve already gone an done it !
Clara88
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:13amRon Paul Is Blowing It On The Newsletter Story..
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/12/22/ron_paul_is_blowing_it.html
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:38amPoll…Ron Paul walks out on CNN interview after being asked about newsletters. What does this say about him??
Report Post »http://www.wepolls.com/p/6760952/Ron-Paul-walks-out-of-CNN-interview-after-being-asked-about-racist-newsletters%3B-what-does-this-say-about-Paul?force=1
Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:14pm@Clara88: So you’re openly sating Rick Perry is homosexual?
Report Post »resme
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 2:42pm@clara, I heard rick perry was gay? Care to elaborate? Can you disavow this comment? I also heard one of his supporters was racist, Can you tell me if perry supports this? Afterall he did have a ranch named n iggerhead.
I also heard his supporters were hannitybots and levintrolls.
Report Post »altops
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:11pmthese guys ask the same questions 20+ times a day how many times does a man have to answer a darn question?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:16pmJust like they badgered Barry about Rev Wright, or Tony Rezco, or his college transcripts , or his college boyfriend, or Bill Ayers,,, or Bernadine Dorn,
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:19pmOnly once, then he can just clam-up and refuse to respond. The voters want to hear the answers over and over about a new letter with Ron Paul’s name on it.. The news letter has been around for years. If not Ron Paul’s views – how come so long with his name on it? No answer, no vote.
Report Post »RojBlake
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:40pmI’m no Romney supporter, but how many times will he have to answer for “Romneycare”?
I am a Gingrich supporter, how many times will he have to say that the commercial with Pelosi was “the dumbest thing he’s done in recent history”?
This is the way its done, your upset because it shows Ron Paul may lack presidential temperment…deal with it; & get used to it.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:52pmI want to hear Newt tell us that man-made climate change is a scam and the biggest mistake he made besides sitting on a couch with Pelosi was believing that we should have legislation to combat man-made climate change. I haven’t heard him disavow his global warming beliefs yet. He’s said he was against cap and trade, but he won’t come out and say he no longer believes in the global warming scam. Newt is a politician, skilled with words. Pay attention to his words. If he still believes in climate change and it’s up to government to fix it, then his act of contrition about the couch thing with Pelosi is hollow.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:04pmHere is the proof!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYLW3zNOv_o
RojBlake
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:49pmDRSAVAGE24
What Gingrich HAS said is that he isn’t sure what to believe as far as climate change/global warming.
He has stated that many reputable scientists support the idea, & many don’t; as such he is a “global warming agnostic”; but until it is proved one way or another there should be no legislation/policy made based oin an unknown/unproved science.
I tend to agree, I’m not a meteorologist etc.; & while I lean toward the idea that Global warming is a hoax, my opinion means nothing.
This was Gingrich’s answer several weeks ago & he has not changed it to my knowledge.
I find this interesting for a number of reasons: 1. For being an arrogant know-it-all, it is a suprising admission is it not?
2. Much like the Ron Paul answering questions, so will Gingrich, & Romney etc.
3. He has consistantly opposed cap & trade legislation, & no one seems to care about that.
Gingrich has a better than 90% conservative rating, which for a man that had to compromise with a liberal President is pretty freaking amazing.
Report Post »PurrrpleMtnMajesty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:10pmCan’t say I blame him. I think ALL non-democratic candidates should avoid all the MSM stations like the plague. It won’t change the minds of those who only vote democratic, and whatever they say will be spun into something ugly for those who are open to choosing the BEST candidate. Also if they have NOTHING on the other candidates (besides the big O) they will look like the ignorant, biased bast#ds they are & people who WANT to know more about other candidates will realize they have to look elsewhere for their information.
Report Post »Bad press doesn’t result in votes so better to avoid these pr*cks.
GETLIFE
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 3:29amHave to agree…. They all should do it when the drive-bys are just taking shots. The best would be for each candidate to request an interview with Gloria, then walk off when she starts with the character assasination. Gloria Borger is like the woman down the street who didn’t get through college but loves to play “reporter.” Her analysis, questions, and mannerisms are all somebody else’s.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:05amSarah Palin learned that years ago
Report Post »now she tells them to pound sand
Drakkhanlord
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 7:10pmLame A$$ed Govt propaganda media…
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 5:11amTell me, if Paul didn’t write the newsletters why wont RP say who did? Was it because they generated $900.000.00 aka money bomb and the truth is he was okay with them? If he runs as a third party I will email a copy of those newsletters to every newspaper in this country.
Report Post »http://www.usnpl.com …. I will be a one man wrecking-ball
Drakkhanlord
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 6:47amdo what ya gotta do…might want to dig up a few more facts 1st…
Report Post »weldman7
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 9:12amRepubliCorp,
Report Post »Sweetie you want to make threats really? OK here is one for you from myself and the Millions of Ron Paul supporters out there if he is unable to win the GOP nomination. We will get him to run third party. We will not switch our allegiance just to get Barry O out of office. We do not drink of the establishment Kool Aid. We will ruin your election and do it proudly. Ron Paul may even win because we are bringing in more and more free thinkers every day so sit and swill on that for awhile.
URKiddinMee
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:52pm“Weldman” – You would REALLY screw the pooch to finish our once great republic off by giving Obozo four more years? So many others have said that Paulistas are crazy. YOU just about have me swayed to that conclusion.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:41pmWELDMAN7 swill on this, the press loves raw meat and Paul wont be able to take a crap without being asked who wrote your letters…. Until he answers that simple question he and the free thinkers will look the fool…….
Report Post »