Ron Paul Supporter Accuses Beck of Shilling for Israel, Defends Bin Laden, Ahmadinejad
- Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:50pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
During his Friday morning radio broadcast, Glenn Beck fielded calls from Ron Paul supporters, with each caller progressively reaching new depths of radicalism.
The initial phone-in went pretty well, coming from what Glenn called a rational Paul supporter. Feeling comfortable, Glenn went on to the next caller, a man named Tom from Florida, but it didn’t take long for the “passion,” and, conspiracy theories to emerge. Tom first accused Glenn of being on the payroll of the pro-Israel lobby. Then, while defending Paul’s foreign policy, the caller declared that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, along with Osama bin Laden, were not at all crazy.
“Hey, Glenn, how are you?” opened the caller. “I’m definitely a Ron Paul supporter, and I definitely believe that your interests for America are put after Israel’s interests, and you’re operating on behalf of Israel and not America.”
“I believe you took your 30 pieces of silver for Israel over America,” he continued.
After accusing Glenn of shilling for Israel, the caller went on to say that bin Laden was justified in his actions because Americans have “bombed his people and…killed his women and children with bombs and airplanes.”
Glenn then sarcastically asked the caller: “Osama Bin Laden and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, they’re not crazy?” To which the caller replied, “no,” pressing, “What makes Ahmadinejad crazy? What makes him crazy?”
Of course, there wasn’t much to the call after that. Glenn thanked the caller and joked that he was doing a real “service” to Ron Paul by spouting such rhetoric.
“This guy’s crazy, I believe uneducated, a conspiracy theorist, and a bigot,” concluded Glenn.
Considering the controversial views of some of his supporters, is Paul’s candidacy for President served well by the more radical elements of his base?
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (861)
MonkeyBeagle
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:46pmNot cool to be constatly painting Ron Paul people as crazies blaze. Truth is some of us are disillusioned republicans tired of a two party system that keeps passing the ball back and forth and running the ball further down the feild and away from our constitution. You are going to lose alot of Blaze readers and Beck watchers if you keep up the anti Paul Propaganda.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:53pm“I’ll take my ball and go home.” I’ve heard that quite a bit from the Paul folks. Wise up.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:55pmTRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:53pm
“I’ll take my ball and go home.” I’ve heard that quite a bit from the Paul folks. Wise up.
===========================================
Don’t complain when you get Obama for 4 more years then….
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:55pmHEY MONKEYBEAGLE
Report Post »The only anti-Paul propaganda comes from the crazy comments made on every web site, not just the Blaze from Paul’s own supporters. I think your beef is with them – not the sites that allow them to post their way over-the-top comments. Perhaps Paul should be more careful now with these nuts, than he was with the crazy letters ten years ago – or has nothing changed ?
recoveringneocon
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:56pm“nnelG” ,the other 2 stooges and the Paul haters on “The ezalB” should pay more attention to Palin.
Palin: GOP better not marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters
http://www.therightscoop.com/palin-gop-better-not-marginalize-ron-paul-and-his-supporters/
Report Post »We will remember this all the way to the polls.
NIPPOHIPS
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:57pmWow you read EVERY website? Good for you.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:58pmDoes anyone actually believe this? This is just another hearsay smear piece trying to ruin Dr. Paul’s good name. How do we even know these callers are really Ron Paul supporters? How do we know they aren‘t Romney the flipflop RINO’s people trying to give Dr. Paul a bad name? I support Dr. Paul 100% I support Israel and I am 100% against all the evil Mohammedans. Those who can not seem through this scheme is really deceived by the establishment.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:58pmWho was the conspiracy Freak on his Foxx Show with all his chalkboards? Flipping Lines going everywhere tying everyone together?
Report Post »Dudydoo
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:06amMonkeyBeagle, Beck was for Romney in 2008. Of course he doesn’t like Paul.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:23amPauls Jewish friend
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q37qyfHZ1c
recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:24amDudydoo
Report Post »Samtorum was for Romney in 2008
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:25amIf you are under 40 years of age and by letting Obama win because you wasted your vote by “writing in my candidate”….You will be rewarded by a very financially uncomfortable future. You will have allowed a socialist to continue to bleed the country of it’s liberty–true liberty; to do what you want, make money doing it–if you’re good at it and raise a family should that be a desire of yours. It is a gradual process that Obama and his alinsky allies have begun. It can be stopped this November by voting GOP. It doesn’t matter who that person is–I am not overjoyed by any of them. But if the one I pick doesn’t make the slot for nominee, I will not play the “waste my vote” card and take responsibility of allowing that deficient, Obama, to remain in office. I ask any conservative willing to reply: Is this not an accurate explanation of what is at stake?
Report Post »RavenGlenn
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:36am@ TRON
See…the problem with that argument that you GOP-huggers spit out…is that if we vote for whoever they put up in front of us, they‘ll never learn that we don’t want the crap they keep giving us. This election we can plainly see that they didn’t learn last time. They gave us a progressive liberal in McCain and a lot of us simply refused to vote for him(myself included).
This time around they are pushing for Romney. Same thing as we got with McCain. If Romney or Perry are anywhere near the ticket, I will NOT vote for them. The GOP needs to learn that we want someone that is at least leaning slightly to the right in some way. These left of center guys they throw at us need to have a D after their names, not an R.
I refuse to compromise my morals and values just so that we can get rid of Obama. Yeah, he’s screwing things up, but do you think Romney will turn it around and fix it? I sure don’t. He’ll just slow things down, not take us in the correct direction.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:37amNo, one is not justified for killing civilians, and Ron Paul wanted to go after bin Laden, like everyone else.
See here.
Ron Paul on “Letters of Marque and Reprisal”
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSP9NteApqI
And here.
How Ron Paul Would Defend America
http ://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1341058115001/
But Clinton did involve America in an unconstitutional war which killed a lot of civilians.
See here.
Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc
GrandmaPatriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:38amRon Paul is a crackpot, and his followers flat out nut jobs.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:44amTrollinginthemorning
And if you are over 40 it only means you been hearing these poop from the elitist of the Republican Party for longer. All this party loyalty sounds like something right out of the old Soviet Union. I’m not going to be treated like a cowpie, called names and go against everything I stand for and vote for some big government Rino.
Rick Santorum on small government
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gwwmm-cQxU
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:49am@TRONINTHEMORNING,
“I will not play the “waste my vote” card and take responsibility of allowing that deficient, Obama, to remain in office. I ask any conservative willing to reply: Is this not an accurate explanation of what is at stake?”
No, this is not accurate. You fail to understand how we got here.
BOTH parties have grown government and our debt, and have ignored the engine that fuels it all, the Federal Reserve.
Putting another statist “R” in Obama’s stead will not do anything to get us back to the Constitution. So, for Ron Paul supporters, Obama vs. any other GOP nominee besides Ron Paul is a false choice.
We will write him in, if we have to, we are so scared of statist D‘s and R’s. If you really will vote for anyone, besides Obama, then either convince us that there is someone better than Ron Paul, or vote him in, since it doesn’t matter to you.
If Obama gets reelected, it will be because the GOP chose something other than the Constitution as their criteria.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:52amThis isn’t about taking a toy and going home. This is about voting on principle and not compromising your values.
I’ll vote my conscience and you vote yours, and then you’ll blame us for the continuation of liberal/neocon tyranny… which won’t be any different no matter which you end up with, and which will really be your fault for not siding with liberty against tyranny and voting for Ron Paul.
Glenn Beck has never truly been a advocate of personal, financial, or religious liberty.
He doesn’t want drugs decriminalized because he likes people being locked away in banker-owned prisons undercutting businesses with legalized slave labor for petty drug “crimes” while our own government helps the drug cartels ship guns, drugs, and money back and forth across the border, and while our military helps the Taliban GROW poppy in Afghanistan, and he justifies it by hiding behind some fake religious morals when the fact of the matter is that Jesus Christ said what goes into the mouth doesn’t defile a man, but what comes out of his mouth defiles a man because it reflects what is in his heart.
He supported the banker bailouts.
He loves the idea of blowing up brown people in foreign countries based on our own government’s lies and actions.
Neocons act religious and try to impose their “religious” morals on people through big government.
END THESE WARS on “terror”, on “drugs”, on liberty, and the American People.
IT’S NOT IMPOSSIBLE
RON PAUL 2012
V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:55amFirst they try to demonize him with anonymous newsletters, and now anonymous callers.
They also used an “anonymous” hacker threat to count the Iowa ballots in secret and cook the vote.
We aren’t stupid. You’re in the bag for the Globalists, Beck.
Beck secretly chants “Glass parking lot!!” when he is at home.
Scottsman
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:06am@TRONINTHEMORNING,
A real Ron Paul supporter would not “Take their ball and go home” or said any of those things Glenn publishes. You do not know who those callers really support.
If you actually do have a radio show as you claim, how do you verify the candidate your callers (like Beck) really believe in and support? You cannot.
Here is the real Ron Paul supporter, and Ron Paul values:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:09amAlso, see here.
HUGE: ANOTHER Mossad Chief Agrees With Ron Paul: Nuclear Armed Iran NOT Inevitably A Threat to Israel
http://www.dailypaul.com/198088/huge-another-mossad-chief-agrees-with-ron-paul-nuclear-armed-iran-not-inevitably-a-threat-to-israel
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:25am@Tron
Wasted vote – Cut the vote – Obama’s going to be handed back the WH….Blah blah blah blah blah B.S…..
You give yourself away with the following line….
“It can be stopped this November by voting GOP” (GOP can GTH in my opinion)
That being said, If Ron Paul does not get the nomination, and does not run 3rd party, I will not write him in. I love Paul’s devotion to the constitution, and he is the only one I would willingly give my vote to, but to get that vote he has to stay in the game…
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:26amAnd here.
Judge Napolitano: What if they’re lying to you about Ron Paul? – Fox Business
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD_ybaXhXno
“What if, no matter who won an election, government stayed the same?”
SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:37amRecoveringneocon, calling someone who disagrees with you names? “Trollinginthemorning”
How Alinsky of you! Debate you opponents don’t use the Rules for Radicals… Or you are who you despise!
Jefferson
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:39amGlenn Beck describes himself as a “rodeo clown”.
I have always wondered what he meant by that.
“I’m a rodeo clown,” he said in a New York Times interview, adding with a coy smile, “It takes great skill.”
After a few years of watching him and doing my OWN research, I NOW realize that he TRULY IS a rodeo clown.
Here’s the analogy….. Our current situation is like a giant rodeo.
The American public represents the 2000lb BULL that has a PAINFUL STRAP cinching up his genitals. The bull has been kept in a pen, poked, prodded, and RIDDEN all of its life.
The bull is angry, scared, and confused. It keeps thrashing around trying to BUCK THE MAN, (which is represented by the international central banking cartel, foreign interests, corrupt politicians and their elite handlers) OFF OF HIS BACK….
The more the bull thrashes, the more the man digs his spurs into the bull’s sides.
Once the bull, (American public) finally BUCKS the MAN off of his back, he is briefly able to focus on who has been riding and tormenting him for so long.
But…..
Just as soon as the bull goes after the man, HERE COMES THE RODEO CLOWN to save the man’s life.
The rodeo clown, with his funny shoes, crocodile tears, and colorful clothes, jumps OUT IN FRONT of the bull to distract him JUST LONG ENOUGH for the man to get up, dust himself off, and escape out of the arena.
The bull is then corralled, and put back into a chute when it is needed again.
The rodeo clown is QUICK, agile, and
RepubliCorp
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:41amPaulbots are nothing more than disgruntled Obama voters. And if conservatives don’t embrace them they will punish conservatives by letting Obama win. That is why cult fixation on a little nothing of a man is dangerous. They hate America first just like Kook Paul
http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2011/09/30/ron-paul-cair-and-the-aclu-agree-killing-al-awlaki-was-wrong-2/
Jefferson
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:43am(continued) agile, and able to think on his feet. He has been WELL trained in the art of distraction, or in Glenn Beck’s case…. Disinformation. As Glenn Beck says, “It takes great skill”.
I ask YOU TO QUESTION BOLDLY!!! Just as Glenn Beck requests for you to DO YOUR HOMEWORK–I ask YOU to BOLDLY QUESTION GLENN BECK, and ask YOURSELVES if HE has given YOU….
The COMPLETE TRUTH?
Or…..Has he merely provided distractions for the REAL villains RIDING ON YOUR BACK, to escape without harm.
Trenaway
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:46amA lot of Ron Paul supporters are cultist freak jobs, like this caller. There crazy and illogical!
Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:48am@Glenn Beck. How about you explain your association with Jim Rogers. The man who founded the Quantum Fund along with George Soros in 1973. It seems you were all buddy buddy with him on your show during Fox days. The Nouriel Roubini may be a loose association and i may have been wrong in the earlier posts. But Jim Rogers was extremely associated with Soros in the past. You smear others for loose ties, lets here your excuse.
See here (spooky dudes buddy from 1973 whom got wealthy with Soros): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I1Hbow8d_Q&feature=related
Pt 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8P4rtRnTzQ&feature=related
Not one mention of his tie to George Soros. Plus, you even market his book! Pass the Loot!!!
It’s NO surprise that Tiffany Gabbay runs another Anti-Paul Propagand piece. Congrats on your ground breaking talent. Grade F indoctrination.
MeMadMax
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:04amYou know what… all I heard was Israel this, Israel that nothing about what Paul would do to fix OUR country…. and the fact of the matter is this: I’m sick of it….
Look, Israel is a big boy. They got nukes, they got a continuous supply of money… They proved that they CAN TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES during the Yom Kippur war…… No one is gonna mess with them….. Frankly, if Israel is the only problem we have about Ron Paul, then we got problems… And I’m sick and tired of the “military branch” of the republican party STILL trying to drum up war when we have been going thru it for the past DECADE NOW… I’m sick of it…. alot of people are sick of it too….. Look, we osama, we killed thousands of them, I think revenge has been SERVED… let’s go home and fix the mess we are in NOW.
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:05amCause4liberty, I‘ve seen enough of the Glenn Beck’s shows were he had Jim Rogers on he not only me tioned the past Soros connection be even jokingly mocked him for it, asking how he could live with himself for working with Spooky dude in the past…
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:20amwell said monkeybeagle, well said.
Report Post »blamelessace5
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:26amoh my god this guy needs to take is rediculouse ron paul revolution and go play in the corner by himself im not trading one obama for another just because the new one calls himself a repubublican…..ron paul revolution guys sound like 9/11 truthers
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:26amGrandmaPatriot, shame on you… really? just going for name calling with no links? and at your wisdom level? .. come on.. why is he a crackpot? because he listens to our founding fathers? obeys the constitution? wants to restore the republic? doesn’t want to police the world and just worry about our borders and helping our friends when constitutionally declared through congress (the people)?
Report Post »do you have an actual reason? or are you just parroting the MSM?
Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:26am@Sacredhonor… So that gives him a free pass? GB gets a free pass, while someone who was working in the actual congress, in a bipartisan effort to trim military spending, gets ridiculed and condemned by a very loose end accusation? It seems GB has a more mutual connection to Soros than some panel appointed by congress.
How do you know Jim Rogers and Soros are not still buddies behind the cameras?
Jim rogers made his bread and butter with Soros.
Report Post »ohiochili
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:31amRavenglen
you said
“I refuse to compromise my morals and values just so that we can get rid of Obama. Yeah, he’s screwing things up, but do you think Romney will turn it around and fix it? I sure don’t. He’ll just slow things down, not take us in the correct direction.”
That‘s like cutting off ones’ nose to spite ones’ face.
Report Post »Yeah, we’ll be sitting in the middle of what once was the United States, but you will have your principals, won’t you?
This election is like having cancer…you cut out the cancer first…
Copper Catfish
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:32amBut they never go away!
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:36am@Jefferson: Great analogy. I was puzzled by the “meeting” Beck had with a Soros operative which he talked about on his show. The man left a copy of the 1957 movie, “A Face In the Crowd” with Beck. Not sure if anyone else has checked out the theme of that film, but it fits with the analogy of the rodeo clown and your analysis. I like Glenn, and don’t plan on canceling my subscription. He shares some good information and there’s also that part of me, watching the crying tearful moments, and it‘s like going by the scene of a firey car crash and knowing why it’s blocked off and measurements are being taken. I wish ill on no one, and I hate to think he’s a Judas goat and not a sheepdog.
@Cause: I actually remember Glenn touching on the Soros issue with Rogers in an interview. They did work the Quantum Fund together, but aren’t friends or even close. I respect Rogers, and his outlook. He actually has shown support for Ron Paul and Gary Johnson as America’s best hopes for extricating ourselves from this economic quagmire.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:50am@jb kibs… grandmapatriot thinks he‘s a ’crackpot’ because Mark Levin said so… Just like he IS extorting the whole 3rd party thing over Rand Paul.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:02am@veritas.. Im glad some people are catching on, only to dismiss with a free pass. The Rodeo clown has seriously alleged Ron Paul is/was funded, and/or, connected with George Soros. He only gave limited facts about the situation… Who appointed the panel? Who else was involved in the BIpartisian effort besides, Frank and Paul?
“You take the welfare people and trim at the warfare, then you take the warfare people to trim the welfare.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDB9fm9C-Fo
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:21amWHY? RON PAUL MINIONS are as nutty as he is. THEY are totally incapable of mature thoughts. They are predictable. They can’t see the man for their own fantasies. HE is a DO NOTHING CONGRESSMAN, who has DONE nothing but run for higher office. HE has a very over-inflated view of himself and absolutely no sense of Noblesse Oblige. He has costs real candidates money, wasted effort, given Obama ammo…. He doesn’t need to be in any public office- not now, not ever. HE weakens America. I’m ashamed that he is American.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:22amtypo
*I didn’t write them. I didn’t read them at the time. And I disavow them.
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:24amI saw that episode Glenn didn’t try to accuse Ron Paul of having Soros connections, as much as he tried to make Ron Paul look naïve to knowledge of the Soros funded people in the panel.
I agree Dr. Paul needs to be careful who he chooses to show bipartisanship with. He needs to take a long look at his advisors especially if he be ones president. Because any of these forces would just as soon stick a k ice in his back and take scissors to the constitutution.
There have been several past presidents that had their legacy besmirched due to rampant corruption with those around them. Though the president themselves was generally considered honest! Just naive.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:24am^ wrong post
Report Post »BV FROM TX
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:26amI watch all of it and hear all of the callers including the ones on 4th Hour. I am sure there are many Ron Paul supporters that are reasonable voters but that is not the ones calling or emailing Glenn’s programs/network. He had the best support call this morning I have heard so far. The guy was polite and sensible. Most of them are screamers and insulting. They just want to get their point across without any futher discussion.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:28am@Patty Henry Paul graduated from Gettysburg College and Duke University School of Medicine. He served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force. He worked as an obstetrician and gynecologist, delivering more than 4,000 babies. He has written numerous books, winning best seller lists on some. He has won numerous awards for his stance against gun control and strict stance against arbitrary taxation, among many other awards. As a member of Congress, he continues to refuse to sign up for the government pension that he would be entitled to in order to avoid receiving government money, saying it would be “hypocritical and immoral”. As a doctor he would not accept Government healthcare from his patients, and would instead offer free service. He’s an American.
“Ron Paul has been a leader in the fight to defend and restore the Second Amendment.” – Larry Pratt, Executive Director, Gun Owners of America
“No member of Congress pays more attention to Second Amendment issues than Dr. Ron Paul.” – Dudley Brown, Executive Director, National Association for Gun Rights
Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman, and adviser to President Ronald Reagan: “I strongly support Ron Paul. We very badly need to have more representatives in the House who understand in a principled way the importance of property rights and religious freedom.”
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:17amPaul People! Please get smart and concentrate on Congressional elections. What a dream– to have a Libertarian Congress!
On the other hand, we need a President who has actually read the Little Green Book. It’s easy to understand– like The Constitution.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:38amThe fact is we can’t know if these guys were real Ron Paul supports or were put up to do this.
All I do know is that I don’t think nnelg is the same guy he was on Fox.
Monkeybeagle, I also disapprove of the way this blog does everything it can to disparage the only candidate fighting for our Constitution and I really have to question what its principles are.
@grandmapatriot – you do exactly what Ron Paul supports are accused of doing. What was the point? Does it make you feel superior to talk that way? Because what you wrote was not nice.
@Jefferson, very good analogy. I am one who will not be ushered into the corral anymore.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:07amThis radio segment is a perfect illustration of why I stopped looking at Paul.
He has inspired a kind of religious fervor among his followers–reminiscent of the Democratic candidate….
Then again, I see the power in running a political campaign as a quasi-religious figure. Obama WILL do this again. The Right needs to broaden its Christian base to include more than just “conservative” Christians. The mega-churches are not all evil, and they are full of Christians who voted for Obama.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:21amMeh this is OK. I still have to hide the fact that I Glenn Beck without being crazy too. He’s a good dude. Though, to be fair, it would be nice if they also posted the “best call of the week” they referred to at the start of the clip.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:23am*that I like Glenn Beck
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:37amI listened to Glenn’s comments about Paul Friday on the radio and his points are valid, just as they are with the short-falls of the other candidates. I also heard this caller, and I think he may have been one of the guys who stole Mr. Johnson’s coin collection Christmas Day – it was one of the dumbest accusations I have ever heard Glenn accused of. Also, if Ron Paul is sending out a news letter, and doesn’t know what is in it (which I seriously doubt), then he is the President of Incompetence. The buck stops at the top, which is why Obama needs to go, along with Paul.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:46amJudge Napolitano: “What if they’re lying to you about Ron Paul?”
Report Post »http://youtu.be/eD_ybaXhXno
ctownfrank
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:55amYou people who say we are wasting vote or we have to vote for the GOP are the problem. A vote for anyone but Paul is a vote for the same. You think John McCain would have done us better. WAKE UP!
Report Post »If Ron does not win it won’t matter who does because they take us down the same road!
Ron Paul 2012
helicop
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:00am“Painting Ron Paul supporters as crazy”? Are you nucking futts? They are painting themselves as crazy and don’t need a bit of help from rational people. I’m going to go into the tin foil hat business for these guys and make a mint!
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:15amYeah, a call from a crazy Paul supporter isn’t news. They should have posted the previous caller, who really was totally rational.
I can see the headline now: “Glenn Beck takes call from Paul supporter who isn’t nuts”
Report Post »val1224
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:17am@kickillegalsout – we know this is propaganda from another camp because Ron Paul HIMSELF has said these very things in the debates!
Report Post »louise
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:17amThe last sentence in this article reads……………………
Considering the controversial views of some of his supporters, is Paul’s candidacy for President served well by the more radical elements of his base?
___________________________________________________________________________________
What kind of question is this? lol. Each and every candidate running for president has SOME supporters who have controversial views.
I heard Glenn’s radio show yesterday and listened to the first caller described in this article. this article claims “The initial phone-in went pretty well, coming from what Glenn called a rational Paul supporter.”
Report Post »What this article fails to say is that Glenn was feeling “comfortable” because the caller was agreeing with him on everything he (glenn) said. Was this caller a Constitutionalist and Ron Paul supporter? Makes me go hmmm.
Glenn has backed himself into a corner trying to crucify Ron Paul by way of his “supporters.” First off, Glenn, most of Ron Paul supporters are not like the way you tried to paint us yesterday on your radio program. Your screeners pick and choose who to give air time with you. If you want pariahs (like the second caller) to come on your show for ratings, then we now know what you are about. Ratings. Ron Paul supporters are educated and informed. The only reason, Glenn, that you hate Ron Paul is because you do not agree with a Constitutionally correct foreign policy. So who is the uneducated one
ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:54amIf anyone is elected but Ron Paul..it will be the same as Obama..so really…you guys are the only ones who will care…
Report Post »louise
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:55amLOVE_JOHN_GALT, Absolutely FANTASTIC video of Andrew Napolitano!!!!!
I have always said that Napolitano would make the BEST VP for Ron Paul. This is an awesome video…thanks
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:09amJefferson: OMG That’s an awesome analogy and that is Glenn Beck!! I was saying that for years even when I was mostly happy with Glenn Beck. There’s no doubt that not only Beck but many in the Media are payed well to be Rodeo Clowns!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:16amVeritas LibertasL: “I wish ill on no one, and I hate to think he’s a Judas goat and not a sheepdog.”
I too have struggled with this. You want to believe the best in someone but I’ve long quit trying with Glenn Beck. He is a goat. Please do not trust him. He does share some good information but as Jefferson’s analogy suggests, Beck is here to distract us from who the real enemy is. It‘s really as simple as discovering who owns the Media which hosts Beck’s radio show or the CEO and the same for his show on FOX. Who are these two people? What do they have in common? And who are the CEOs Presidents and largest shareholders of other major Media.. Answer those questions and it all becomes clear.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:34am“This guy’s crazy, I believe uneducated, a conspiracy theorist, and a bigot,” concluded Glenn.
Considering the controversial views of some of his supporters, is Paul’s candidacy for President served well by the more radical elements of his base?
Really now Glenn? I know most Paul supporters want to stay away from this stuff and I don‘t blame you because we don’t have the Media looking out for our interests but the Media’s sole purpose is to keep the status quo, protect the Central Bankers, keep printing the money, and keep sponsoring the Wars while clamping down on Liberty step by step.
As an educated person, not necessarily a very smart person but educated and thoughful. A person that graduated college with a Master’s in Engineering with honors, I totally accept the callers logic. There’s nothing out of order with what he said in that interview. As a matter of fact it’s absolutey true.
Is it possible for Osama and Amahdin to be “crazy”? Absolutely. I dont’ know. But are they justiified in desiring to protect their homeland’s from foreign invaders? I believe they are. I don’t see how an American Carrier has anymore right to be in the “Persian” Gulf than a Iranian, Chinese, or Russian Vessel has to be trolling the coasts of the GOM. I wonder what the residents of FL would say if they looked out and saw a Chinese carrier off their coasts? lol
It’s not pretty America, but don‘t’ run from the truth. Think through it one step at a time.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:35amBy golly! I do believe that CTOWNFRANK and ASHESTOASHES have found the new Messiah! I can almost hear the choirs of angels! Do you guys call each other “brother” and “sister” at campaign meetings? Is Paul going to make the waters recede too?
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:40amPlease do forgive me for leaving you out SWEETCONCERN. You are obviously a devoted disciple!
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:45am(Have to read onward to get to SWEETCONCERN’s gospel according to Paul.
Report Post »We are Americans
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:54amGlenn is so biased against Paul. Look into
Report Post »Santorums record Glenn. Educate yourself
Maybe he can have one of his crazy
supporters posting on the blaze on his show
and call Michelle Obama the crap they call
her on this site and the rest of the press
can go all Becks listeners are rascists.
Losing lots of respect for u Glenn. Lots.
Warrior4Zion
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:59amJefferson: So you are basically saying that Beck is trying to shield America from the Jews? You evil anti-American anti-Semite disgusting human being! Thank God for Ms. Gabbay who is willing to expose these crazy conspiracy theories for us. No American should be exposed to any of this sort of garbage like this caller spewed. Sunstien is correct. We’ve got to criminalize these conspiracy theories immediately or everybody will be blaming the Jews.
I’m so sick and tired of these Paul nuts wanting to return to the 18th century. It’s 2012 and the World needs us to guide it. We are here to protect freedom and protect our ally Israel. There‘s no sacrifice that’s too great when you’re in our position. Israel needs us. If they fall, we fall. We have to take these Muslims out before they try to take us out. Peace comes through strength not weakness. Ron Paul is the only one in the race who doesn‘t want to wage War on Iran because he’s a weak pacifist! We need courageous Warriors in the White House at this time not someone who won’t commit to our number one ally.
Report Post »Thewayiseeit
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:00amSo, MonkeyBeagle,
Perhaps you should read more background chatter?
A good portion of the Progressives like Ron Paul, While the Left strongly recommends endorsing him so they can label Conservatives with Ron Paul’s extreme stance on some of his issues.
Here is one article I found that states as much:
http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2011/12/27/ron-pauls-base-of-support-not-republican/
Take in to consideration just who the “Young Voters” are, College students, most of which side with either the far left or the Progressives, Why would they pool so much of there vote, even go to other states caucuses, just to promote an otherwise Conservative runner?
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1676749/ron-paul-youth-vote-iowa.jhtml
I read the blathering of ALL sides of this Political charged country.
One thing is for sure, you read just what you believe & you will have a picture that does not represent reality. Sometimes those you do not agree with will flat-out tell you what they are up to, What they plan, How they intend to do it. You must have your own beliefs firmly secure to do it, but it pays dividends in understanding what drives the whole thing & who is playing whom.
Ron Paul paints a pretty picture for some,
I want to know what was on the canvas before?
Dogs playing cards or Washington Crossing the Delaware?
What’s on the wall behind it, a nasty stain or just a nail?
Hold politicians responsible for their actions, statements & how they dishonor those who e
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:11amTry googling John McCain and his connection to George Soros..there are some websites that say they are best friends..now who all has dealt with John McCain.?..I believe anyone would be hardpressed not to run into associates of Soros in Washington…Seems like Soros owns Washington.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:15am@PATTY HENRY..You once made a rousing speech on here..you call yourself PATTY HENRY as the feminine counterpart of Patrick Henry..yet you degrade the very man who upholds your said values..Was it not Patrick Henry who said “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death.” Wow Patty..How brainwashed are you? Try looking in the mirror. Who is Patty Henry?
Report Post »fidel1234
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:24amI’m already going to cancel my GBTV over this,one thing about Ron Paul he flushed out the liberal republicans like Beck,Rush,Savage,and Levin,I will be getting my news from the National Inflation Assoc. at least they got sense enough to see through these main stream candidates.
Report Post »joshcomm
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:45amHow about being “half crazy” then? Ron Paul is about 1/2 times right on what he believes, and is a definite threat to this country and where it goes if he is elected to the Presidency. Obama is on the same level, and a better leaders are much needed for the 2012 elections. Oh……..Glenn…..keep “shilling,” your doing well.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:06amWhen one of the candidates rises up and actually openly condemns the likes of the NDAA which allows for your arrest with no warrant, no witnesses, no trial, and no release date, they may have my attention.
When one of the candidates plainly states that the actions of the TSA such as strip searching our children and our spouses for the simple right to go to a football game are downright unconstitutional, they may have my attention.
It is beyone obvious that the only one who has even the slightest of respect for the Bill of Rights is Ron Paul, so how on earth can you expect anyone to vote for a candidate that is more than willing to place a rope around your neck, while spitting on the Constitution?
The choices we are likely to be given is basically a choice between Mao and Mussolini, and there is no way I will ever be forced into falling for a false choice, when the real answer is quite clear and it is none of the above.
The fact that the establishment has still not gotten the message from the last election when they offered up a hard core progressive, while expecting those like myself to hold their nose and pull the lever may only be hammered home by teaching them another hard learned lessen.
I will never vote for someone who blatantly spits in the face of the priciples this nation was founded upon, and the terrorists have surely won if we allow for the destruction of our freedoms, just so we can get ourselves into another dumb war.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:51amI tell you this Neo-Cons: You are not Christian. You are just liars.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:53am@Thewayiseeit,
“A good portion of the Progressives like Ron Paul, While the Left strongly recommends endorsing him so they can label Conservatives with Ron Paul’s extreme stance on some of his issues.”
Progressives like Ron Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy because they think that the free market is what makes America imperialist.
But the fact is that the Republican Party USED TO hold a non-interventionist foreign policy before they got co-opted by Progressives, and this was our Founders’ position, as well.
Further, it was Progressives that set the stage for the rise of Hitler in WW2 due to a Progressive foreign policy in WW1 – AND we sided with Stalin, who was WORSE THAN Hitler.
As for the affect of a free market on a country’s foreign policy: First, it must be said that we don’t have a free market, but a mix of Socialism and Corporatism, not to mention our use of the decidedly ANTI-free-market fiat money.
So it was actually Progressivism that turned America into an imperialist country, and the economic crisis as well as our military-interventionism is fueled by the Federal Reserve.
A sound money economy solves both of these problems.
See here.
War, Ron Paul, and Conservatism
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUoWhWsOWk
And here.
Did FDR Provoke Pearl Harbor?
Report Post »http ://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan198.html
V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:19pm***HEY GLENN BECK***
Guilt by association with anonymous callers and newsletters? Ron Paul?
THE MAN WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL RECORD?
***FAIL***
***FAILURE***
***ERROR***
***SYSTEM SHUTTING DOWN***
***ACCESS DENIED***
***FILE CORRUPTED***
***FORMAT***
Report Post »fldammy
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:22pmDr Ron Paul is not going to win the nomination, end of story. Nor could he, as POTUS, stop the upcoming global financial cataclysm that has been in the works for decades. The only thing to do is elect the most conservatives you can to begin the recovery operations afterward the financial cataclysm. while you and your family prepare for hellish times.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:23pmNeocons are really Liberals, folks.
Do the research. They’re warmongering liberals.
They’re the SAME. That’s why arguing with them and hearing their illogical assertions and conclusions is like arguing with a Liberal.
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »kaimana
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:18pmI’m sure that the loss of Ron Paul supporters will be welcomed by The Blaze and GB. I know that I will not miss them at all.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:24pmA Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
“But the fact is that the Republican Party USED TO hold a non-interventionist foreign policy before they got co-opted by Progressives, and this was our Founders’ position, as well.
Further, it was Progressives that set the stage for the rise of Hitler in WW2 due to a Progressive foreign policy in WW1 – AND we sided with Stalin, who was WORSE THAN Hitler.”
I‘ve been saying this for years yet all I’m called is anti-semite for pointing out this most obvious fact… good luck trying to educate these block heads… Not going to happen. They need to hear it from one of their FOX News gods..
Report Post »rock-n-roll-rebel
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:32pmWhy do those that preach “thou shalt not kill” want more war in the Middle East? Why is it that liberals (a word derived from liberty) want less freedom and a larger more intrusive government? Why is it that the Constitution says there must be a FORMAL declaration of war? Why do conservatives ignore that fact then in the very same breath say they are Constitution conservatives? How is a country like Iran considered a threat to us when they don’t have the military might to challenge us. These are the same people calling us crazy for supporting Ron Paul yet they seem quite insane in their own ideology.
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:52pmI find a lot of similarity between the OWS nuts and the many Ron Paul supporters who frequent the blaze. “We are the 99%” so don’t confuse us with the facts, and “Ron Paul, the only friend of the constitution so if you aren’t with us then your stupid”. Neither position leaves much room for dialogue.
The further similarities between the rabid Obama supporters of “The One” and the supporters of Ron Paul as “the only one”, strikes many as another cult of personality turn off. The last thing this country needs right now is the exchange of a radical leftist cult of personality for a radical right cult of personality.
While the other Republican candidates have their issues, at least their supporters will admit to having concerns about some of their candidates issues while still supporting them. You Ron Paul-ites come across as viewing the very suggestion that Ron Paul isn’t the best political candidate since Jesus campaigned for King of Kings and Lord of Lords, like a son of the south who‘s had his sister’s honor besmirched. In the same breath these supporters will WAY over inflate and conspiratorialize the most mundane flaws of their Republican opponents. I will grant you that Glenn Beck could be accused of over selling the Newt is an evil progressive thing by just the thinnest/tinniest/most miniscule of margins, (tongue firmly in cheek) but that’s Glenn and not every 9 out of ten Romney, or Santorum supporter on the blaze.
Report Post »(This rant to be continued)
maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:06pm(Rant Continued)
Report Post »Please take carful note that in this rant, as of yet, I have not said one negative thing about Ron Paul himself or his positions. I have only laid out my concerns about his supporters.
And that is the heart of the issue.
I may disagree to some degree with Dr. Paul on his Foreign Policy/National Defense stances, but I disagree far more with the radical isolationist rantings of his supporters. Any chance Ron Paul may have in clarifying his positions in such a way as to win me over is darn near completely ruined by the lunatic ravings of his supporters.
In the end I will vote for anyone but Obama. But could you Ron Paul supporters tone it down a bit so if it comes to the point where I, as a good American, have to pull the lever for your candidate, it will only require a few stiff drinks first rather than the whole bottle?
My liver thanks you in advance.
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:26pm@maccow I understand you reasoning here. I tend to find that many of these supporters which you encounter are just the most vocal, or internet savvy. Most are not like that. Some of these folks are just new voters, and are just really energized or enthusiastic about having a candidate that actually convinced htem to get involved politically, among other reasons. Your concerns are legitimate though. We should all be able to find common ground here, and talk with respect, civility and open debate. I‘m support Paul’s candidacy, and support the message of Limited Government, Constitutional principles, secure borders, free markets, gun rights, and other Conservative positions. My desire is to restore our Constitutional Republic. It’s not about the man. If Mickey Mouse was a candidate and he said he would strictly adhere to Constitution, and his record proved it, I’d vote for him. That’s not to say, I don’t take character into consideration. Paul is honest, and rarely changes positions. To save space here, I encourage you to read the comment pages on this article wherein I have discussed Paul’s foreign policy with other users. Just look for my name, I think I’ve explained some issues pretty well. You don’t have to agree, but you’ll get a better picture, IMO. As for now, I’ll try my best to nominate the best Constitutional Conservative and small Government candidate. God bless.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:29pm@maccow,
“Any chance Ron Paul may have in clarifying his positions in such a way as to win me over is darn near completely ruined by the lunatic ravings of his supporters.”
How about just making your decision based on the candidates’ policies? Then you won’t have to care what their supporters say or do.
If you want to discuss Ron Paul’s actual policies, I would love to participate.
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:37pm@Colt1860
Report Post »You do your candidate a great service. Thank you sir.
kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:56pmI almost retched when I heard the clip on Glenn where Ron Paul calls Usama bin Laden a “gentleman” — and yes, that WAS Perfect Paul’s voice.
The man is being nicer to jihadists than Hussein himself. Unbelievable. Yep, he agrees with Holder that we are “a nation of cowards.” He’s just a coward himself, so he won’t say it openly, but those young ones on the left know it and love him for it.
COLT, Paul is a career politician who should have done what he does well, and that is stay in the medical field. But no, like Hussein and his crowd, he LUSTS, LUSTS and yet LUSTS some more for power.
How DARE Ron Paul call UBL a “gentleman!” (retch, retch). Apologies to the families of those courageous SEALs Hussein put in harm’s way as tit for tat to appease the Taliban.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:02pmShould read: “…when I heard the clip on Glenn’s radio show…”
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:09pm@Colt1860 and @A Doctors Labor
Colt
I read your postings and I see the true conservatism in them. I trust that they are a fare rendering of Ron Paul’s stances on these issues. Maybe If it now comes to it I can pull the lever for Ron Paul and then have a beer afterwards.
You are a reasoned and well thought out Paul supporter who makes a great conservative case for supporting Dr. Paul. Sadly you are an exception to the Ron-Bot rule which is what my rant still stands by. You should devote some of your Comments to talking the likes of V-Man, Kickilligalsout, Troninthemorning, and ashestoashes down out of the rabid trees.
But then I guess I would have to do the same for Patrick Henery II, clara88 etc. etc
I see Romney and Newt as the political establishment’s choices, which I oppose. The rabid would and have lumped every body but Ron Paul into that category. This leaves me with Santorum, Perry and Paul. I would prefer that one of these get the nomination and probably in that order. They all have their issues but they each bring conservative principles to the table.
Report Post »God Bless
Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:14pm@maccow
Thanks for your candor.
Would you vote for any candidate that will not openly rebuke the latest assault on the Bill of Rights known as the NDAA… that allows for your arrest without charges, with no witnesses, with no trial, and no relase date?
I know this is going to sound quite blunt, but it does get to the heart of the issue for many of Paul‘s supporters like myself who can’t bear to watch the constitution being shredded before their very eyes…all while realizing the very party they are trying to support is responsible for passing laws such as this.
I simply can not support any candidate who fails this test…can you?
Foreign policy is pretty much meaningless if your own country has become a police state…in my view.
It is for reasons like this that I support Ron Paul.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:22pmThis is the gist of neocon rhetoric: “If you don’t toe a neocon line of reasoning, if you don’t believe the official lies about 9-11, if you don’t hate all muslims, if you don’t chant glass parking lot as foreign policy (scorched earth), then you are unamerican, unpatriotic, you hate our troops, you’re a leftist, go back to HuffPo, wacky Ron Paul supporter, nuts, etc.etc.etc.”
They are Manifest Destiny PSYCHOPATHS.
These warmongers are more extreme than Muslims who want an Islamic Caliphate!
They want a Worldwide Imperial Police State headed by a skewed visage of the United States through the UN. They claim to impose all these religious morals, but they’re not really religious (as evidenced by their bloodlust)…they’re warmongering murderous Con Men who simply want to dictate your life to you because they consider you an animal. This is the root of the cause of the War on Drugs. The Federal government deliberately perpetrated a false flag attack on us with 9-11, it was Hitler blowing up the Reichstag, and we all know they used it as a pretext to OBLITERATE THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTION.
We now see who the new Hitler is…the Office of the President of the United States…not just Barack Obama, but the office itself.
Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who will restore our liberties and end these FALSIFIED wars. He will NOT assume more executive power and continue to allow Congress to abdicate authority to the executive branch.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:38pmYou don’t think a “BeckBot” could be made to look like a fool and then used to say all Glenn Beck listeners are idiots or racist or conspiracy theorists or anti-American or crazy? The left does it everyday…..
All I heard Glenn say was that we must protect Saudi Arabia’s oil because we “need” it, because we might have high gasoline prices if we do not.
Perhaps Glenn needs to clarify his foreign policy: is Glenn a interventionist or a non-interventionist….Does Glenn hold the same foreign policy as Barack Obama, George Soros, and Samantha Powers (intervention) or does Glenn hold non-intervention like Ron Paul, George Washington and our founders?
I wish Glenn would have Michael Scheuer on to discuss why bin Laden created al-Qaeda and why they attack us. Mike would explain to Glenn exactly what Ron Paul says and this is why Glenn avoids Michael Scheuer and his requests to be on Glenn’s show.
http://www.non-intervention.com
I would also like Glenn to explain the difference in Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum. Glenn exposed Mike Huckabee as a progressive due to Mike‘s support of M Obama’s state lunch program. Rick Santorum not only would support the same, Rick Santorum would double it in size.
If Huckabee is a Progressive than Santorum is one for sure…..
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:46pm@@kryptonite I’ve heard Paul use the term “gentleman” before, quite often. He uses it quite liberally when speaking. Maybe he’s old fashioned? I don’t think he was trying to characterize Bin Laden as a good man though.
Recently, Paul got asked, if when he rests his head on the pillow before going to sleep, does he think about being President. He said, “Not really”. His life and career do not in any way show he’s been looking for some higher authority position. In fact, he stated he ran for Congress, not for a desire of working in Government, but because of his concerns that Government has abandoned the Constitution and free market solutions. To this task, he’s done a great job in warning and informing our young generation and other folks to take notice and be active in the political process. He has also said that the main thing he desires to get out of his campaigns is to spread the message of Liberty, free markets, and Limited Government.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:52pm@maccow
Oh, pls! TRON is not here to clear his name, so I’ll stand up for him: He is *not* a Ron Paul supporter; nor is he an extremist. He’s one of many conservatives who are warning about him like we did regarding Obama in 2008. Also, ASHES has fallen into the Ron Paul trap, but she’s not vitriolic — at least not in my estimation.
You should consider one thing before you include Paul in your pool of candidates. IF Paul should win the nomination (which is highly unlikely), the kind of polarization you are currently seeing from his camp would explode in the political field, both left and right. The man is so fringe he will have to rule as a dictator to get any of his agenda passed. He was never able to do it in Congress, and that FACT would be exacerbated once he became president.
Paul is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He has managed to create a cult around himself, though, and is doing great harm within the Repub Party. If he were even half as honest as his followers claim, he would have left the “corrupt Repub Party” and gone solo. Oh, I forget; he tried that strategy and it didn’t work. Don’t be deceived by his “Constitutional” talk. The real Ron Paul is an ideologue, a bigot and a power-hungry man — and there’s more, if you read between the lines.
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:07pm@Freedumlover
Report Post »I am afraid you are making the case of my earlier rant. For me Ron Paul is not the end all be all of conservatism, at least not to the degree that many of his supporters paint him. He is not the only conservative, constitution loving, candidate in the field. No one issue, no matter how egregious to the constitution, is the end all litmus test to this election. The assault on the Constitution is legion, and the battle for its survival is the heart of this election. But as I have already stated, Ron Paul is not the ONLY conservative candidate with the capacity and will to see and do something about this. Repealing the NDAA would be a good thing constitutionally, but so long as the next president doesn’t enforce its provisions on their first day in office, then repealing it on the first day won’t be necessary either. Other candidate’s supporters will claim that not ending Obamacare, or Foreign aid, or The United Nations, on the first day disqualifies someone else’s candidate. Kind of myopic don’t you think?
So to answer your question is repealing NDAA a worthy litmus test for choosing my presidential candidate? No. And on the first day I will be happy if they just get the oath of office right and mean it from their hearts when they swear to support and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and bear true faith and allegiance to the same so help them God.
For what its worth I swore and lived that oath for 25 years.
noczars
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:09pm@monkey= SPEAK FOR YOURSELF, not blazers. Speaking for MYSELF, I personally agree with Glenn; Wilkow; Rush and many other SANE people. Ron Paul is an extremist, racist; and Israel hater (many of his videos on the internet say Palestenians are being mistreated by Israel). I have listened and listened and listened to RP supporters and they all sound like they have a screw loose.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:10pm@kryptonite We better elect a TEA party Congress come elections. What we need now is someone who knows the right message and will allow We the People to restore our Nation. We don’t need another Big Government Progressive telling us what he thinks is best for the Nation. And we don’t need another Politician getting in our way. We the People approve the Constitution, and want them to faithfully follow it. That means, do what it says, and do as we say. They are our Servants. We are their Masters. They are bound. We are free.
The Constitution would be the one great balance which would ensure that it would not happen through dictatorial means. The message of Liberty resonates with everyone. By the common message of freedom people are able to unite from various backgrounds. We need those candidates elected to Congress who will be willing to follow the Constitution, not some special agenda or personal interest outside the duties and Powers delegated to the Government.
“And say, finally, whether peace is best preserved by giving energy to the government or information to the people. This last is the most certain and the most legitimate engine of government. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. Enable them to see that it is their interest to preserve peace and order, and they will preserve them. And it requires no very high degree of education to convince them of this. They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” Jefferson
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:11pmRegarding Ron Paul’s position on al-Awlaki, our Founders held the same position.
The law our Founders put in place for due process of law is not for the protection of our enemies, but for the protection of citizens from our own government.
See here.
Federalist Papers #84
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa84.htm
“The creation of crimes after the commission of the fact, or, in other words, the subjecting of men to punishment for things which, when they were done, were breaches of no law, and the practice of arbitrary imprisonments, have been, in all ages, the favorite and most formidable instruments of tyranny. The observations of the judicious Blackstone, in reference to the latter, are well worthy of recital: “To bereave a man of life, [says he] or by violence to confiscate his estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of despotism, as must at once convey the alarm of tyranny throughout the whole nation; but confinement of the person, by secretly hurrying him to jail, where his sufferings are unknown or forgotten, is a less public, a less striking, and therefore a more dangerous engine of arbitrary government.” And as a remedy for this fatal evil he is everywhere peculiarly emphatical in his encomiums on the habeas corpus act, which in one place he calls “the BULWARK of the British Constitution.”"
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:13pm@kryptonite… Acting a little Petty? When using legal language most defendants and prosecutors, as well as judges, use the word “gentlemen.” That’s sickening, to conspire triangulation of “a love for jihadists” by RP using the word. gentlemen. Down right pathetic pettiness on your behalf.
@Warrior4zion… We need a holy warrior to start the holy war! We need to start this armageddon quick like! Lets GO GET’em! Lets fight the whole world while teetering bankruptcy! (sarcasm)
Report Post »P.s. – i thought you have said b4 you’re joining us Paulbots? Bottom line, we need to let Israel whoop Iran, while we sit on the sidelines waiting to Intervene if necessary. You know, its kinda like fighting like ‘gentlemen.’ One-on-one. If the two fight one-on-one, everythings fine, and they’re allowed to settle their differences. However, if one of the opposing enemies jumps in the fight, to gang up, it then becomes an all out brawl. Also, Kinda like in baseball, when the benches clear. The fight is between the pitcher and the batter, not the whole team. But if more team members start intervening, then its an all out team battle. We need to be more like hockey and let the two players duke it out. While keeping eyes on our more serious enemies like China, NK, and Russia. Btw, RP WOULD go to War, but only with a Declaration from Congress. Delcare, Go-in, whoop @ss, and get out with NO nation building.
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:23pm@Warrior4Zion The only real solution to these Islamist extremists would be to exterminate and obliterate them in their own lands. This we cannot do, economically, constitutionally, military, or globally. God has said that he will gather all these nations against Jerusalem, and that he will stand on Mount Zion to defeat these enemies, by his might alone, that the whole world may know that he alone is King over all the Earth. God alone has always defended Israel, and will never betray her. We the US should not think that we are God and can defeat all these Nations with our sole might. The battle is the Lords, and the Glory is to him alone. Read Ezekiel 38-39, Psalms 83, and Zechariah 14. Read the Israelite’s fight to conquer the land of Caanan wherein God proclaims his hand alone will defeat their enemies. Read wherein David defeated Goliath through his faith in the might of the Lord.
Have we forgotten in whom our trust is in? Do we not have faith in him who has made us prosper beyond our wildest expectations? Do we not recognize anymore him who has blessed us exceedingly well? Do we not remember anymore in whom our firm reliance lies? Do we seek our own might and reject the strength of him who fought our battles for us?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:23pmThis is one of GBTV. Glenn is wrong on this. Why are we not listening to the caller from an hour earlier? This Paul supporter is not informed like some of us. The issue on Iran is, they are not a threat to us. Isreal can take care of themselves as they are the fourth strongest military force in the world. Paul would stop the regulations that keep us from drilling. Paul is not weak on our countries Natl defense, he has the best idea’s for our Natl. defense. Stop spending all the money overseas, as we are broke, and bring the troops home to defend our country and not everyone elses. Our largest Natl security issue is the economy. If our dollar falls, we will be no use to anyone. If Iran becomes a threat, get Congress to declare war and then go in with all our might. Police actions cause more American lives than all out war because we are held back. Everyone says that they like Paul’s ideas on the economy, well guess what gang, his foriegn policy is a big part of his economic solution. Why is it so hard to understand? If we allow our economic system to crash with a progressive in office, we will lose the Constitution, period. Glenn knows this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyx9tw0TEPM
Report Post »I call on all Paul supporters to cancel GBTV.
kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:26pm@COLT
I’ve heard Paul use the term “gentleman” before, quite often. He uses it quite liberally when speaking. Maybe he’s old fashioned?
———
You’re kidding, right? Nobody calls a filthy terrorist whose very first fantasy as a teenage boy was to wage jihad against the world and make Islam the supreme religion of the globe, a “gentleman.” I don’t care how old-fashioned you are. No, COLT, you rationalize the warning signs, just like Obama’s followers did in 2008. The man was sympathetic to UBL — and it slipped out. Just like “spreading the wealth around” slipped out of Obama’s heart.
I don’t buy that explanation of why he has been in Congress for so many years. Term limits are one of the sine qua nons of fixing this Republic. Lead by example, I’d say, but the man’s ego gets in the way, you see.
Look, Colt, I respect you. I am sorry I have to say what I do, because I know you sincerely believe Paul is a good man. I would be remiss, if I didn’t sound the alarm. I’m not crazy about Santorum, either, and he’s about all we have left. But we‘ll have to make do with what we’ve got. Paul and Obama are just two sides of the same coin.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:26pmFor some reason I missed the first sentance in my post above. This is the reason I cancelled my GBTV. Pleas Blaze, have Glenn read my post above. You have my e-mail, have him write me.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:27pm…….and who can prove who were Ron Paul supporters and who were opposing candidate supporters posing as Ron Paul supporters?
No one.
I thought Glenn was better than this…..but now I’m seriously wondering………what’s wrong with Beck these days?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:30pmKryptonite
Can you now explain why we shouldn’t be allowed to smoke cigarettes and why we do not have the right to choose for ourselves?
Will you admit you are a Progressive Kryptonite?
You support intervention, domestically (Government intervenes to say we can’t smoke cigarettes) and foreign (Government intervenes for “humanitarian purposes” in foreign nations) and this belief in MORE Government thru intervention makes you a Progressive like Huckabee and like Santorum which are both like Obama…..You all support intervention (MORE GOVERNMENT)
Call us Ron Paul supporters “fringe” all you’d like. We won’t be the ones taking the “Mark” but you progressives sure will be.
Be honest about what you are Progressive Kryptonite. If you have any honor you will.
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:31pm@kryptonite
I didn’t do hours of research before picking a few posters to pick on. If the shoe I threw down doesn’t fit Tron then I apologize to him/her.
You on the other hand have picked up the shoe and are wearing it proudly. And it looks good on you to by the way.
My point is that if we continue to polarize the conservative majority in this country, by portraying our candidate as the conservative messiah and their candidate as the conservative anti-christ, then we risk seeing an actual anti-christ(ian) re-elected. And when that happens he will sit back and watch us tear ourselves apart and rightly take great joy in it.
We all like to talk about putting our principles before our politics. Why don’t we all here resolve to fight hard FOR our conservative candidate of choice. Acknowledging that there are other conservatives in the race. Then fight hard For the winning conservative agains the current White House Occupier (WHO). (Just came up with that one. Now thats funny right there, I don’t care who you are)
There’s the slogan for this campaign. “Occupy the White House, with a conservative in 2012″.
When it becomes a case of our conservative candidate or no one, then we may all end up with no one.
God bless
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:31pm@Warrior4Zion Consider these words:
“Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step over the ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! — All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a Thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.” – Abraham Lincoln
No enemy can ever destroy our Nation, only our own corruption and dissolution of morality, religion and education can dissolve the greatest hope of freedom ever given to mankind.
“Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.” – William Penn
I adhere to the principles of non-aggression, strong national defense, and Just wars. I follow the Constitution, the Rule of Law, and Reason. I stand with God, the Bible, our Republic, and America. I support Israel, our only true ally in the ME. I have full faith in Divine Providence. I trust God will protect the US and Israel. I believe that God alone is the Ruler and Judge of the World. I put my trust in Him, and not in earthly Kings or man’s power.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:33pm@Cause4Liberty
Report Post »… Acting a little Petty? When using legal language most defendants and prosecutors, as well as judges, use the word “gentlemen.”
–
BUT, Ron Paul is not a lawyer or a jurist. Furthermore, HE WAS NOT IN A COURTROOM, so don’t give me that BS. He was speaking (arguing, really) from the heart in a radio interview. Spin it all you want. It’s Perfect Paul for you, I see.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:35pmKrypto, how is Paul the same side of the coin as Obama? Obama hates the Constitution and believes it is full of negative liberties. You are way off base here. Do you even know what the Constitution is about? Have you even read it? I studied early American history and the Constitution in college. Wise up man. Do you think we are as free today as we were even 20 years ago? I say we are not. Do you want your children to inherit communism or fascism, or do you want to pass freedom to them? Progressivism is the enemy, not Ron Paul.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:44pmKrypto, Remember that Paul is a Congressman and they use that language everyday. The gentleman from Texas, the gentleman from Oregon, the gentleman from New York, etc…. Do you think that all from Congress deserve the term gentlemen? I do not. Get real.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:44pm@COLT
I agree in re Congress. However, even if we managed to get all Tea Party candidates elected, we’d still need term limits. Without the latter, they would start to fail us as well. As you know, power corrupts.
I’ve said this before. Vote your conscience, friend. I just wish your eyes were open.
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:45pm@Colt1860
Report Post »Hey everybody I think David Barton is writing under the psudoname of colt1860.
Colt. I love your postings and the tone in which you present them. I copied and pasted your entire dissertation on Thanksgiving off this site and have it saved for future reference.
I’m still not a Ron Paul supporter but you make it easier to not be a hater.
Keep it up brother
kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:04pm@MACCOW
if we continue to polarize the conservative majority in this country, by portraying our candidate as the conservative messiah and their candidate as the conservative anti-christ
—-
Hmm. You can go as far back as you want on any thread here on the Blaze and you will not find me painting any of the candidates as a messiah. I have only one Messiah, Jesus, period. That is why it bothers me to no end that Paulists should act that way. I find it highly distasteful and reprehensible, because it is a liberal tactic and has always been what liberals do. It is not the conservative way, and unfortunately, it has polarized the Repub Party. You’ve read the Paulist posts. They helped Obama by refusing to vote in 2008, and they’ll do the same this time around. To me that shows either a cultist view of politics or a total lack of understanding of what communism does to a country.
As I did before the 2008 election, I will speak out, should anyone want to hear. You are far more honorable than me, having served in the military, but I do my best to serve my country. Peace.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:18pmKryptonite
Obama
-Intervention militarism (Humanitarian purposes)
-Intervention fiscally (Bailouts, GM, socialist programs, Spending, Education)
-Intervention Socially (Believes Government has role in family, collectivism)
Santorum
-Intervention militarism (Humanitarian purposes)
-Intervention fiscally (Spending, Education, Prescription drug, subsidies)
-Intervention Socially (Believes Government has role in bedroom and believes in collectivism)
Ron Paul
-Non Intervention
-Free Markets (No Government intervening)
-Non Collective, Individual Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness
Obama and Santorum are flip sides to the same coin; one is progressive left and one is progressive right, both are progressive. Ron Paul is opposite to both. Ron Paul is the anti-Progressive candidate. All the others are simply progressives who hold the same policy as Obama just in a different aspect.
Kryptonite would choose a moderate more like Obama and this explains why Kryptonite does not like Ron Paul. Kryptonite stands to the LEFT of the Constitution thru support of moderates more like Obama.
Kryptonite will continue to avoid replying because Kryptonite cannot explain why she supports the same policies as Obama.
The Overturn Window is being used to make us more LEFT…….Ron Paul is the only one standing on the right, the rest are all LEFTIES even if they don’t know it like Kryptonite….
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:22pm@West Coast Patriot
Krypto, Remember that Paul is a Congressman and they use that language everyday. The gentleman from Texas, the gentleman from Oregon, the gentleman from New York, etc…. Do you think that all from Congress deserve the term gentlemen? I do not. Get real.
——-
In re your other comment, Paul is not the same side as Obama. He’s the flip side.
Now, what you’re saying here is that Paul is a very stupid, unlearned man. He can’t tell the difference between a Congressman and a jihadist. So he calls them both “gentleman.” Honestly, what is wrong with you guys?
Calling a Congressman “gentleman” is protocol. All members of Congress observe protocol. How does that compare with gratuitously affixing a term of respect to a terrorist in a heated argument? It slipped because he sympathized with UBL. You, too, are spinning the issue.
Report Post »Patriot Z
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:22pmnobody it, but RP supporters are doing it to themselves. come on you have paul claiming we deserved 9-11 etc it is just nuts. it has nothing to do with the ‘2 party system’ it has everything to do with ignoring threats that are not only big threats but obvious ones as well. i used to like paul and there are some things i may agree with him on, but holy crap is his policies suicide.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:35pm@maccow
It would appear that we differ greatly regarding the intentions of the Republican party as a whole. I’m simply going by what their record makes abundantly clear. They fully support the Patriot Act, they as a whole have no problem whatsoever with allowing the TSA to search you wherever they please, and they were directly responsible for the passage of the NDAA. Why on earth you would place your trust with such folks is beyond me.
It is abundantly clear that none of the candidates other than Ron Paul stands against these unconstitutional laws and many have actually praised them, and the ones who are silent offer their consent by their silence.
Where you get the idea that the nominee, whoever they may be will not use the laws their own party is responsible for seems quite naive indeed, and the fact that none of them will openly condemn them other than Ron Paul should in all reality be enough to wake you from your slumber.
The current crop says a lot about going back to the constitution, but their own actions speak otherwise, and it’s really nothing more than empty rhetoric that has used many times over by candidates who govern the opposite of what they ran on.
If you can sleep at night knowing you voted for someone who thinks the TSA has a right to search you, your children, and your spouse simply to have the right to go to a football game, so be it. I’m simply not that guy.
I pray that folks like yourself will open your eyes.
Report Post »the1whowaites
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:35pmBeck baited Paul supporters and his call screeners picked out a few of them to be cast in a bad light. I support Paul for my own reasons reguardless of Beck’s games.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:44pm@Kryptonite… Have you ever watched C-Span? The language of congressmen and women, IS the same as if they were in a COURTROOM… Having served in the congress, dont you think he would have adopted that Legal talking language. You are petty, with a capital P. Petty.
See Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OkITedQrek&feature=related
Report Post »AmericanDogMan
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:44pmAll Christians who Support Israeli’s are dummies.
I love America as a Black Man. Because at least she tries to pay for the atrocities done to my grandparents and geat grand’s. But Israel is the most racist country on planet earth. And the kicker is…
Those people are Germanic implants and profane the old ways of God and practice witchcraft kabbalah. Not what Jesus or even Paul practiced. Talmud all the way. The tribes did not go north
Glenn Beck is fully in the pocket of the Elite! I tried to stomache him after the 8/28 I fell in love with him. My family and I traveled and stood on the mall. But then he started promoting the most racist Nation in the World (israel). And I still stuk with him up until November of 2011. had the premium subscription and all. Now I won’t listen to him. I’m a Mike Church guy now. And again I love America because I like freedom and believe she’s trying to pay for her sins. But Israel is a lieing disgusting place that doesn’t allow Blacks (the true descendants of Shem and Abraham) any rights! They stole the land, people say ok stay here and recognize them.
and this is what they do, no inter-racial marriage. Spit on the memory of Jesus then call the true descendants Beta Israel! No, let Israel take care of herself!
Genesis 10:2The sons of Japheth; Gomer, …
Report Post »Genesis 10:3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz,
Genesis 10:5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their familie
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:46pm@Patriot Z
Progressives say the Constitution is suicide. Are they right? NO
Ron Paul said 9/11 is an indirect result from our actions and it is true. Just like if I go and hump your wife while you are gone and you come burn my house down after finding out. Is it my fault you burnt my house down? YES
If you truly believe Muslims attacked us simply because we are “free” than how could you support any candidate wanting to send your tax dollars, military, and military munitions to Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Jordan, or Yemen?
Either Muslims attack us here simply because we are free and they want to rule the world or they attack us in response for our actions there.
We have candidates like Santorum who says they hate us and want to rule the world but at the same time wants to send them billions of dollars in aid or protect them with troops and munitions….How does that make any sense? it doesn’t…..
Islam will never prevail under a Constitutional Republic
Report Post »Islam will thrive under a Progressive Democracy
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:48pm@Patriot Z I don’t think Paul ever claimed we deserved 9/11. If he did I would like to see this evidence. As to foreign threats, I believe that we should confront them, but by Constitutional means. We cannot deny that our current policies are outside Constitutional bounds. The TSA, DHS, FEMA, ATF, and the like have all infringed upon some of our rights in the name of security. My fear has always been the abuse of Power to detain or apprehend any danger here at home or abroad. The TEA party and returning veterans have already been labeled as dangerous to this country by Government officials. This is not paranoia, but the history of the World.
Adolf Hitler said, when announcing the Gestapo to the people, “An evil exists that threatens every man, woman and child of this great Nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland.”
Take a look at Bush’s conservative foreign policy, when campaigning in 2000: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9SOVzMV2bc
Consider James Madison’s warnings: “The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.” – “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” – “Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended, from abroad.”
IMO, I believe the greatest danger is the destruction of our Constitutional Republic.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:55pm@PatriotZ Please take a look at page three of this article, and read my comments wherein I post links that show Paul warning about the same things, well before 9/11.
I honestly believe that before we go off to destroy whatever threat we may find, we think wisely before destroying our own Republic to achieve that goal.
“One of the most traumatic events in German history occurred soon after Hitler took office. On February 27, 1933, in what easily could be termed the 9/11 terrorist attack of that time, German terrorists fire-bombed the German parliament building. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that Adolf Hitler, one of the strongest political leaders in history, would declare war on terrorism and ask the German parliament (the Reichstag) to give him temporary emergency powers to fight the terrorists. Passionately claiming that such powers were necessary to protect the freedom and well-being of the German people, Hitler persuaded the German legislators to give him the emergency powers he needed to confront the terrorist crisis. What became known as the Enabling Act allowed Hitler to suspend civil liberties “temporarily,” that is, until the crisis had passed. Not surprisingly, however, the threat of terrorism never subsided and Hitler’s “temporary” emergency powers, which were periodically renewed by the Reichstag, were still in effect when he took his own life some 12 years later.” http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0703a.asp
Report Post »maccow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:58pm@fredumlover
Report Post »I never said a thing about Republicans. I spoke of giving the next president more than a day to get around to dealing with NDAA.
I get it. You think Ron Paul is the only one willing or capable of saving us from the barbarians at the gate. Actually the barbarians are inside the walls warming their feet by the fireplaces in Washington, but I digress.
I’m not with you in your assessment that Ron Paul is “The Only One” but if he ends up being “The Last One” standing, then I will vote for him.
But until then I am keeping my options open.
Peace
West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:58pmKrypto, What I was saying is, it is a term that is used all the time. I am not going to vote for a progressive period (Romney, Gingric, Santorum). I know that all Paul supporters are expecting him to run third party if he does not get the nod. We are a movement and cannot be swayed. Sorry to tell you that, but it is the truth. I believe that Paul will take 70-80% of the Independent vote and 30-40% of the disenfranchised Dem vote. I believe he can get 25-30% of the Republican vote. That would put him winning on a third party in my view. That is why if he runs third party, he will get the Paul supportes votes. If Obama is able to get elected, I will blame the progressive Republicans like you for that.
Report Post »lschillinger
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:03pmAll of the talk about Dr Paul. I have some questions, I believe need real answers. First, what is his belief in God? If we talk about our Constitution, the greatest majority were followers of Jesus Christ, and is the most important fact in life. Second, what is his true belief about Israel. If it is to walk away, and I believe that is what he has said, then we are doomed as a nation, not my words but God’s word. Does he claim Jesus as His Lord and Savior? That is my main question, and do not use the excuse that that is personal, because to know Jesus as Savior, no one should ever be a shamed to tell the world.
In a lot of areas, I can agree with him, but other areas I can not. Does that mean if gets the GOP nomination that I will not vote for him? Not at all. But, and this is a very big but, if he is not and you or anyone writes in Dr Paul’s name then, you are voting for Obama, and then you have no complaint about what he does to our nation, just look around.
My main concern for our nation is to turn back to God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit, if we will only follow Him and His Word, we will again prosper as a nation
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:14pmlschillinger, Go here and read his statement of faith http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/ Then go here, it is an entertaining video but gives Pauls foreign policy in a nutshell http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3N0s_Ibau4 and then look at who funds the candidates http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3N0s_Ibau4
Report Post »nevinc
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:15pmI’ll take Obama over Ron Paul… If you have to ask why then you are too far in the box to see it…
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:17pmLschillinger, Go here and read his statement of faith http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:18pmLschillinger, Go here and watch this entertaining video that tells Pauls foreign policy in a nutshell http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3N0s_Ibau4
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:19pm@PatriotZ In this interview Paul denies blaming America for 9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXvHPkRHBvk Please do review those videos I posted on page 3, you may not agree with his positions, but they are not what the MSM portrays them to be.
Many say that we should listen to Amadenijack and take his warnings serious, that he is out to destroy us. Yet, when Paul says the same about the warnings and statements given by the CIA, other investigative agencies, and even Bin Laden’s own words, he is called an appeaser and traitor. That is unfair, if we are to take Amadenijack’s words serious also. I do believe that the MSM has taken Paul’s position out context. We give financial aid to Pakistan, though they have a Nuke. That is appeasement. We just sold a bunch of F-15′s to the Saudi Arabians, though Bin Laden and 15 of the 19 hijackers of 9/11 were Saudi Arabians. That’s appeasement. We leave our borders unprotected, unmanned (with an inadequate number of troops), and unsecured, allowing countless of foreign nationals to illegally cross into our country. That’s appeasement.
We should not use our troops as a global police force or world peace corp. We are spreading our military too thin around the world, especially our troops. Neither should we engage in Nation building. We have enough satellites, carriers, submarines, stationed missiles and other high tech weaponry to protect our homeland and our interests here at home and abroad. We can’t be defeated.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:19pmLschillinger, go here and see who funds these guys http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/264837/20111209/ron-paul-newt-gingrich-mitt-romney-funds.htm
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:32pmI apologize for the last three posts, it looked like The Blaze blocked my post as they have been doing that often. But watch this video on Pauls foreign policy http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=MoLjbdT4HxU
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:42pmGingrich
Romney
Fascism Santorum Ron Paul
| | |
| | |
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov | | |
| | |
Communism Obama Constitution
^ ^
Fiscal Intervention Sound Money
Social Intervention Liberty
Militarism Intervention Non-Intervention
Which is more like Communism/Fascism, Ron Paul’s platform or Santorum/Romney/Gingrich/Obama’s?
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:32pmthe call screener was trolling!
I am a Ron Paul supporter and don’t believe this.
What is Beck doing by theses calls? To say his hands are tied?
Santorum stinks.
Romney had to change from killing babies is a woman’s choice to maybe not such a good idea?
Gingrich has always been a moral slob
these b00bs won’t get my vote -no matter what
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:01pm@GRANDMA PATRIOT- and you drink republican koolaide because it says“republican”
Obama 2012 for you! how sad.
You don’t hear me calling you names though.
I don’t believe the other candidates.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:07pm@ JEFFERSON- beautiful analogy.
Report Post »true
lwillis59
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:34pm@Jefferson… well said.. :)
Report Post »theaveng
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:58pmI think Beck screens his calls to eliminate intelligent Ron Paul supporters. Here’s how I would have responded to each of his points:
(1) Iran doesn’t have a nuke, anymore than Iraq had WMDs. Please stop listening to UN propaganda which was wrong in 2001 and is wrong now.
(2) Even if Iran developed a nuke, they would not use it against Israel. That would be MAD (mutually assured destruction). Rather than nuclear holocaust we would see a Cold War between Iran-Israel just as we had between Russia-America, and currently have between Pakistan-India.
(3) The alternative plan, which Glenn Beck & Santorum endorse, is to drop bombs on Iran. We already killed ~150,000 in Iraq… 100,000 of which were innocent men, women, and children. Non-combatants. That’s exactly what will happen when we go to war against Iran.
I can not sit here (or in the voting booth) and support a candidate that wishes to execute tens of thousands of innocent civilians in cold blood. I don’t care if they are my own people, or foreigners.
“Thou shalt not kill” is what the bible says. I‘m pretty sure it doesn’t mean “unless they have a nuke.” Killing is only justified in the case of self-defense – after an individual or nation has been attacked – as was the case with Pearl Harbor.
I do not support an “attack first” policy. It is NEVER acceptable to go-around shooting your neighbors, either on a personal level or on the world stage.
Ron Paul support (for over 10 years)
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:59pmCause4Liberty
Have you ever watched C-Span? The language of congressmen and women, IS the same as if they were in a COURTROOM… Having served in the congress, dont you think he would have adopted that Legal talking language.
—————
First, Congressional protocol is not the same as courtroom protocol. Second, the word “gentleman” is not used exclusively in legal settings or protocol contexts.
Now to your questions: yes to the first, no to the second. In fact, I haven’t heard Ron Paul call his male Republican contenders “gentleman” in any of the debates. Prove me wrong. He has referred to them either as “you” when addressing them directly, or as “he,” when talking to the moderators about them. Same goes for males whose questions have been read in the debates. The term of address from Paul has always been “he”. Even if he had, that would still make it unacceptable in UBL’s case. It was a deferential reference to UBL. Care to spin some more?
Jihadists are a “petty” issue, especially UBL. Understood. You are either naive — in bold — or disingenuous. I’ll go with the former, for now.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:25pmnevinc: Most Constitution hating anti-American big-govt’ war mongers would. So why should that surprise true Patriots? Seriously. As far as I’m concerned people can begin honoring and abiding by the US Constitution or get the hell out of this country.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 1:09amAnother reason to be wary of Paul supporters…
“…on Fox News this morning about your guy. They were interviewing the Politics Editor from either the Boston Globe or the other big name paper in Boston, I simply forget which one. Anyway, while they were talking about Pauls chances in NH the Editor said that back in 2008 they did a study after the election and one of the things that shocked him was that most RON PAUL VOTERS ENDED UP VOTING FOR OBAMA!!!! ”
This is exactly what I have been afraid of with his supporters.
Report Post »JL320
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 1:33amWe probably wouldn’t think you were a bunch of crazies, if you Paulbots didn’t act so crazy.
Report Post »Amarath01
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 1:40amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5nGCpzel6o
Report Post »Pretty simple. Ron Paul is obviously crazy.
conservativewoman
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 1:47am@MONKEYBEAGLE
Report Post »So you want to expand government even more with a third party?
muzikant
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 2:14amAll the crazies in the Paul camp are actually former ultra-leftist dope-smoking liberals who are against a lot of what Paul says, but are so stoned that all they wanna hear is legalize drugs!
Report Post »stand4something2
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 9:41amCrazy religious Ideas are not something I would hang my hat on as proof that a man is crazy Glenn.
Report Post »Mr Smith and golden plates hmmm Love ya man.
Steve Lindsey
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 10:15amSorry but most Branch Paulians are nuts IMHO. I speak to many almost daily. Alex Jones could not preach it better. No doubt the Anti-Israel pro Iranian element have found a home.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:15pmHow do we know that this person really was a Ron Paul supporter? With all the dirty tricks in politics, it wouldn’t surprise me in the least that the establishment would have plants call in to these shows. Back in 2008, I always wondered if there were any rational Ron Paul supporters because the only ones who ever got on the air were the crazies. It’s called propaganda, folks. They only put the people on who will do the greatest harm to Paul’s candidacy. There are A LOT of Paul supporters who are simply disillusioned with the whole process of Democrat and Democrat-light and a bunch of establishment politicians playing inside the 40-yard lines. This is what the Tea Party was all about, We the People standing up to the establishment in both parties. Ron Paul does that and Glenn Beck of all people tears him down. Beck is losing more and more credibility every day, as are Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Sean Hannity. Any objective observer can see that these guys are bent on silencing Ron Paul‘s message and doing the establishment’s bidding to torpedo his campaign.
Every single one of the other candidates will be for the status quo. The status quo is taking this country down the crapper. It‘s disgusting that these guys who say they’re anti-establishment clearly are part of the establishment and are fighting against a guy who is a threat to business as usual in Washington.
Report Post »1389AD
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 4:41pmThe Ron Paul voters are NOT conservative. They’re a fringe coalition made up of people who are vastly ignorant of politics, outside of what the Ron Paul operatives tell them. They don’t know or care anything about what any of the other candidates stand for. When it comes to foreign policy, they all live in a dream world in which the Muslims are always right and the Jooooos are always wrong.
If Ron Paul is no longer in the running, the vast majority of the Paulbots will continue sniping at the Republicans but they won’t go to the polls.
http://1389blog.com/2011/12/29/john-bolton-if-youre-thinking-of-voting-for-ron-paul-think-again/
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 5:39pm@1389AD I’m registered Republican and have never been anything else. I’m a Conservative. In 2010 I voted in the primaries for the TEA party Conservative candidate in MD, running for Governor, over the RINO. I study my Bible, adhere to Constitutional principles, and desire to restore America to it’s greatness. I’ve never voted for any democrat, and don’t see me self ever doing that. I do believe the GOP is becoming Big Government or Progressive, which is why I identify with the Constitutional, free markets, and small Government TEA party movement. I will not vote for Obama in 2012, and it has never crossed my mind. Do not take the comments of a few others and dump them on all supporters. I support Paul’s presidential candidacy and the message of Liberty, free markets, and Constitutional principles. It’d about the message. I am against every Marxist attempt to destroy our Nation. I honestly believe the MSM is trying their hardest to smear and distort every one of Paul’s positions. They see his message of Constitutional principles and Liberty as a threat to their Marxist agenda. Read Paul’s statement here: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/
Here’s the MSM bias: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHMJ2J
Report Post »CindyRBP
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 7:44pmAre you telling us that if we don’t start respecting Paul you and all the supports will just leave the political process and leave the rest of us the hell alone…………FANTASTIC!
Report Post »Cornflake
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 11:50pmAre you kidding with that statement? Ron Paul makes sense half the time. The other half he sounds like he is possessed with the spirit of Nancy Pelosi! He’s Ross Perro all over again. Go ahead, throw your vote away! Or, you can take the time in the next four years to actually create a party leader that doesn’t come away sounding like the man behind the curtain! It seems that the youth are enthused about Ron Paul, just as they were with Barrack Obama, and look what a MESS that got us into!
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 12:05am@Cornflake Many older veterans are supporting Paul’s candidacy. While Paul has garnered many votes from the youth, he also has garnered the votes of many traditional Americans.
Paul came in third in Iowa, losing just by 3%. He is in second place now in NH, with 24%. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/5/santorum-gets-big-bounce-new-hampshire/ And is within top three in SC. Newt was nowhere near the votes as the top three in Iowa. Santorum is way behind in NH.
I’ll do my best to nominate the most Constitutional and small Government candidate up there. The one other thing to consider is that Paul, along with Romney, are the only ones who’s support has not spiked up or down. Paul has a steady support, and is slowly but surely rising. IMO, it might come down to Paul and Romney. Watch the MSM in action. They’re liars: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHMJ2J8Ra3U
According to exit polling Ron Paul was…
#1 with independents
Report Post »#1 with strong conservatives
#2 with evangelicals
theaveng
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 10:12amGlenn Beck seems intent upon labeling all Ron Paul supporters as “cracy”.
Well here’s Mr. Beck from his DJ days. He was pretty bat-crazy himself, and was fired after he was caught by his manager doing drugs (or possibly crazy drunk; he had to be bailed-out of jail). I don’t think he has any right to criticize others
# 1 ad – http://youtu.be/qoyOSrwAATU
# 2 ad — http://youtu.be/QuC7OTpZt0U
.
Report Post »Speedward
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:46pmRon Paul would end ALL foreign aid. Why is the focus always on Israel? Why is it always assumed we will not defend an ally that’s attacked just because we cut foreign aid? Sorry Glen I still like Ron Paul despite the daily attacks from the Blaze. He’s the most Constitutionally sound candidate. He attracts a lot of people and even some that my not have the same love for Israel Glen does. I wish no harm to Israel or any other country we just can’t keep giving away money for nothing. Do we need to buy friends in the world?
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:00amHey SPEEDWARD
Report Post »What do you mean buy friends. What the hell is the matter with you people ?
Do you not get it ? After Israel is gone they WILL come for you – you fool.
And talk about spending – how about you look to curtailing the spending of the foolishly outrageous entitlement programs which are turning people into government serfs.
Sheesh – you want Ron Paul ? You might just as well keep Obama. Both will destroy the U.S. and I think Paul will actually do it quicker than Berry.
Speedward
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:12amI don’t understand your comment. 1.Ron Paul would curtail/eliminate entitlement programs if possible. 2.I also don’t want to see Israel destroyed. 3.Obama thinks he is a King while Paul would stick to the Constitutional authority given to the office of the president.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:13amSusie..how do you figure Paul would destroy this nation by taking us back to the Constitution..It was founded on Father God and Jesus Messiah…Paul would cut 5 communistic bureaucracies..saving us mega bucks..He would give Israel free reign to go to war on her own..and if she asked for help..it would be a Congressional decision..we go in win and get out..that simple. but bringing our troops home and building our military here saves us a trillion a year and we get stronger Do you realize that we are 16 trillion in the hole and Obama has asked for 1.5 trillion more to keep our government from shutting down..THat’s serious Susie..How can we even defend ourselves then.? Why are we giving foreign aid to Israel’s enemies Susie.. Why does Pakistan have nuclear bombs..Why does Russia have nukes? Did you know that while we fed Russia,. she spent her own money that she should have been spending on feeding herself to build nukes?
Report Post »we have no business giving away foreign aide when we owe money ourselve…do you understand that?
sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:17amHere is a letter from an Israeli I know if reasonable people read this they will see thing in a better light. From Israel: Vote Ron Paul and Let My People Go!
by Rafi Farber
Lately I’ve been having trouble sleeping. I sit here in my living room in
Karnei Shomron, Israel, on the 8th night of Chanukah, wondering what other
miracles lay in store on January 3rd and in the months ahead. The name Ron
Paul is constantly at my fingertips. I’ve typed it in so many times the
past month it’s insane. I’m experiencing an excitement I’ve rarely ever
felt, and I don’t even live in America anymore. During the last Republican
debate I woke myself up at 3am Israel time to watch an 8pm EST live stream on
YouTube, with no fatigue whatsoever. I’m on overdrive, and I can’t calm
myself.
I’ve only recently figured out what this excitement actually is.
I first got interested in the whole freedom movement when I heard that Ron
Report Post »Paul wanted to end all foreign aid, including to my country, Israel. This
seemed like a spectacular idea to me. I hate the idea of taking American tax
payer money I don’t need. The only reason we take it, by the way, is not
because we need it. It’s that we don’t want to feel alone, and Jews
always feel a deep existential isolation and loneliness. “As I see them
from the mountain tops, gaze on them from the heights, this is a people that
dwells alone, not counted among the Nations,” says Balaam of the People of
Israel in Num
LibertarianForLife
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:18amAfter Israel is gone? Israel would wipe the floor with Iran, and we would literall take them off the face of the Earth if they tried anything on us. You neocons are so paranoid.. must be from sleeping with mommy for a few too many years.
Report Post »sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:20amLet My People Go “As I see them
from the mountain tops, gaze on them from the heights, this is a people that
dwells alone, not counted among the Nations,” says Balaam of the People of
Israel in Numbers 23:9. We still feel that loneliness. So we take the money.
It’s shameful, it’s theft, it’s destructive, it’s morally wrong, and
it makes people hate us for tying them into a conflict they have no business
trying to solve. I wanted it to end and didn’t trust any Israeli leader to
give it up on his own, so I looked up more about Ron Paul. continues
What I found was fascinating. On the forums, I learned of people who, back in
’08, literally gave their lives short of death to this man. Some poured
money into his campaign they could not afford to give, and some even lost
their marriages because of their single-minded insane dedication. This
shocked me. I couldn’t yet understand it, but after a few days of listening
to him, it began to click.
What is it about Ron Paul that inspires such extremes? Such maddening support
on the one hand, and such fear and loathing on the other? I can give the
answer in one word: Soul.
The essential soul of a human being is by definition free. The idea that men
Report Post »are free as determined by God is a concept that is foreign to most men. This
is because most men want to control others, to take away their freedom. continued
sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:24amLet My People Go This
is usually referred to as the drive for power. The drive for power is
antithetical to freedom because power means the ability to control others.
There is only one legitimate thing that power can and should be used for,
whether it be military, legislative, or executive power. That is, to legalize
freedom.
Ron Paul doesn’t want to be President to “give” me freedom. He
doesn’t own my freedom and he didn’t give it to me. The only reason Ron
Paul wants to be President is to stop punishing people for using their
freedom that is rightfully theirs. He wants no power. This is clear to anyone
who listens to him speak.
There are two kinds of human beings. Those who want power, and those who want
Report Post »freedom. You can tell which one’s which very easily. Those who want freedom
are straight-edged. They are consistent, principled, and you can feel their
human soul when they speak to you. There’s a continuum out there of human
souls somewhere in spiritual cyberspace, and when you come into contact with
one of these souls, you know immediately, because souls are by definition
free. You sense sincerity, realness, consistency, a free human being. If
you’re a man who seeks freedom and you come into contact with a real human
soul, you become instantly addicted and you swallow up anything you can get
your hands on. You want to unite immediately, no matter what you disagree on.
There are people in the freedom movement that don’t exactly li
ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:27amAnother message from Israel posted by Vechorik which was posted on Ron Paul forum.
Ron Paul forums:
Report Post »“I live in Israel, and I can tell you that if a libertarian like Ron Paul was a candidate here he would get at most 100 votes, not 30,000. You are lucky that you live in a country where so many people appreciate freedom. So when I hear you guys being so upset that RP received 22% and not 30% of the votes, I can‘t help but think that you simply can’t comprehend what great thing you have accomplished by supporting RP and freedom. We, libertarians in Israel and in Europe, can only dream about something even remote as what you have accomplished in Iowa
sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:27amLet My People GoThere are people in the freedom movement that don’t exactly like Israel,
especially me being a “settler” and I don’t care. If they want freedom,
I sense it and my human drive for individualism suddenly turns into an
intense desire to unite into a collective – but a collective of free
individuals. It’s a beautiful dialectic, and it doesn’t matter what we
agree or disagree on, as long as we agree on freedom.
You get hooked on Ron Paul and you desperately seek more and more, any video
you can find from the past, any speeches you missed, anything he said that
you haven’t heard yet, even though you’ve heard it a thousand times
already in different words. You can’t help yourself. The voracious hunger
to be able to use your God-given freedom takes you over entirely. It’s like
you suddenly realize you’re human and the Divine Image with which God
created you comes alive and catches fire.
But something else happens to you. Once you get hooked on Ron Paul, you can
Report Post »no longer bear to listen to a man who wants power, and you become instantly
disgusted when they start saying words. Before, they were just boring. Now
they’re revolting. Listening to Romney or Gingrich or Bush or Obama makes
you sick and you don’t know how Ron Paul gets through those debates without
getting nauseous. You see a political veneer in these politicians that’s so
transparent it’s like a ghost flapping its ethereal tongue at you. You
can’t bear
ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:30am@SWEET CONCERN Well said..I applaud you..
Report Post »sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:31amLet my People Go What’s so maddening about hearing Romney or Gingrich talk is that there’s
someone standing there saying things, but there’s no soul in it. These are
not free men. These are power men. Not that Romney or Gingrich don’t have
souls. They do. They are men just like you and I. But they have practically
forfeited their souls to try and attain power, to control others with spin
and talking points and contradictory statements like “I want to cut the
budget and expand the military!” and they’ll say it with a polished tone
and a straight face, just like a soulless recording. Their humanity is so
buried under the mountain of lies they have told themselves, that neither
they themselves nor you can even sense their souls in the human continuum.
The scene of a human body speaking but no soul communicating can drive a free
man mad.
The reason that Ron Paul never goes down in the polls is that he’s not
Report Post »“convincing” people in the everyday sense that he’s right on whatever
issue. He’s activating human souls, lighting spiritual fires one by one
speaking about freedom. Once a soul gets activated, and the man realizes that
he IS free no matter what people do to him or tell him, there is no turning
back. The other candidates are trying to turn heads with snappy one-liners
that sound cool. Slaves follow these one-liners like mobs, and follow each
other from candidate to candidate. Slowly but surely, Ron Paul activates a
few of the indiv
sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:38amLet My People Go Yet, we cannot expect every man woman and child to understand or get excited
about the message of liberty. In fact, most just can’t handle it. Being
truly free is as terrifying as it is electrifying. The Bible tells us this
very clearly in the story of the Exodus from Egypt. When Moses finally
accepts the role of deliverer from God, he was assigned to say the following
to my great-grandparents the Israelites:
“Therefore say to the Israelites: I am God. I will free you from the labors
of the Egyptians and deliver you from their bondage. I will redeem you with
an outstretched arm and with amazing signs. And I will take you to be My
people and I will be your God, and you will know that I am the Lord who freed
you from the labors of the Egyptians.” (Ex. 6:6-7)
And what was my grandparents’ response?
“And Moses told this to the people, but they didn’t listen due to lack of
Report Post »spirit and cruel bondage.” (6:9)
sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:42amLet My people GoNot everyone can handle the message of freedom. It’s too frightening for
some people, and some are just too enslaved. Those are the people that
despise Ron Paul, the same types who rebelled against Moses in the desert and
attempted to go back to Egypt. Freedom is too much for them and they can’t
handle the Divine gift. They want and need someone to control them. Their
souls have been too battered by slavery, taxation, and wars.
But nonetheless, God forced my stiff-necked great grandparents to leave
Egypt, and as a result I’m here today, preaching freedom once again,
fighting not only for America’s freedom, but for my own from America’s
influence in my own region.
Vote Ron Paul and let my people go once again! Stop meddling here and stop
Report Post »trying to buy influence by giving me money. Stop trying to be the all
powerful Peace Maker and let us work out the problems here on our own! If we
think Iran is a threat, we can handle it and we’ll take the consequences.
It’s not America’s problem and you can’t afford another war. continued
sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:44amlet My People Go
Now I understand why people will give everything to this man. Whenever he’s
asked the question, “Would you legalize heroin?” Ron Paul answers, “I
want to legalize freedom!” Little do these people understand that freedom
is a thousand times more addictive than heroin.
American Jews! Wake up! Set your brothers in Israel free! We were the first
nation ever to be set free by God, and we brought the concept of liberty to
the world when we left Egypt over 3000 years ago. It’s about time we set
the example we were chosen to set.
December 31, 2011
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:01amNo SUSIE, they don’t get it; but my family, friends, and I do get it.
Go Broncos!
Report Post »THE-FINAL-ACT
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:03amIf you believe Israel would be destroyed then you have no faith is God. God will defend Israel not America. God has a miracle to show all you with very little faith and no faith at all. Israel can take care of itself. If Benjamin Netanyahu could cast a vote in America it would be for Ron Paul. As a previous poster said, Israel will wipe Iran all over the floor.
Report Post »THE-FINAL-ACT
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:05amIf you believe Israel would be destroyed then you have no faith in God. God will defend Israel not America. God has a miracle to show all you with very little faith and no faith at all. Israel can take care of itself. If Benjamin Netanyahu could cast a vote in America it would be for Ron Paul. As a previous poster said, Israel will wipe Iran all over the floor.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:05amPaul is a cherry picker when it comes to the continuation. Considering that Washington invaded Canada and Jefferson sent the navy after the Barbary Pirates (Islam), it is a bit rich to compare their foreign policy with Ron Paul’s, don’t you think? Madison wanted no part of the Articles of Confederation, or the pure “states’ rights” position, which is a misnomer considering states do not have rights. Ron Paul’s position, at best, would turn the states into separate warring “factions” (i.e. what Madison wanted to avoid) In other words Bots are as clueless of American history as Dr.Kook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2NsXQcBtOQ&feature=related
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:43amWe have controlled the airspace over Iraq for almost a decade, keeping Israel from bombing Iran’s nuclear development sites. We can’t babysit them forever. Not only do they have an extremely capable defense force, but I‘m quite sure Ron Paul wouldn’t simply watch Israel be destroyed. He would, however, do the unthinkable, and wait for Congress to declare war.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:35amYour quote from Scripture is not correct , but only half true: Numbers 23: 9 King James – ” For from the top of the rocks I see him , and from the hills I behold him: lo, the people shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations.” If one reads Numbers 24:9, ” He couched, he lay down as a lion: who shall stir him up? Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee.” – “ reckoned ” as a force to be reckoned – “ He” refers to the Lion of Judah – Balaam curse follows all the way through the Holy Bible – but to understand – one has to study and pray in the Spirit.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:54amSWEETCONCERN, are we supposed to make the sign of the cross after reading each post, or can we wait until we’re done reading?
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:02amThe wicked king Balak did not want Balaam to count them – one, two , four ,three – the wicked king wanted Balaam to curse them – instead if one reads the Entire Holy Bible – finds that Balaam, Balak, and all the people that aligned with them were killed.
Report Post »searching for the Truth
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:08amAgain, all Nations shall be blessed through Israel – Holy Bible.
Report Post »JustMel71
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:26am@sweetconcern What a powerful and inspiring message from your friend Rafi Farber. Sadly the message may fall on deaf ears. When I discovered Dr. Paul, it was like your friend. It was the day I awoke from my own complacency and realized our God given rights were doomed. The power controllers aren’t going to stop now because they realized the following they have from both political sides. Doesn’t matter which one is in control, all that matters that they remain control over our lives. I’m inspired by Dr. Paul not because of as others call us ‘cult followers’ but because I honestly believe he can help us restore our faith back to God and not the government. If your message from your friend inspires another, then maybe they will inspire another and so on. I hope it becomes a chain reaction and reaches more and inspires more to wake up from their own complacency. God Bless Us All.
P.S. Please thank your friend for this touching message sweetcorn.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:54am@RepubliCorp
You call others clueless and then bring Madison into the discussion at your own peril.
You might want to digest this…and then come back with your nonsense.
James Madison, Feb. 3, 1792 “It is to be recollected that the terms ”common defence and general welfare,” as here used, are not novel terms, first introduced into this Constitution… On the contrary, it was always considered clear and certain that the old Congress was limited to the enumerated powers, and that the enumeration limited and explained the general terms. …”If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare…they may a point teachers in every state, county, and parish, and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision for the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress; for every object I have mentioned would admit of the application of money, and might be called, if Congress pleased, provisions for the general welfare.”
You sir are terribly confused, as the only one who gets this in this race is Ron Paul.
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:22pmSo, FREEDOMLUVER, Ron Paul for Congress!
Report Post »The President’s job is national security– and that’s where he is buddies with the Soros crowd.
Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:51pm@GETLIFE
You seem to think that Obama’s (who certainly has ties to Soros) foreign policy is the opposite of yours eh? You really do know how to stick your foot in your mouth.
Ron Paul’s foreign policy mirrors that of the founders, and yours mirrors the progressives.
Try to wrap your head around that fact.
http://www.fff.org/comment/AdamsPolicy.asp
“Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy…
She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.
The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force….
She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit….
[America's] glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is, Freedom, Independence, Peace.”
John Quincy Adams
Now who will you quote…Obama? LOL
Report Post »GOVT_ABOVE_THE_LAW
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:03pm@SWEETCORN- loved your post from Rafi Farber. Would like permission to post it on other sites. It was very inspiring. Thanks
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:35pmFundamentally, I don’t trust Glenn Beck!
Report Post »Steve Lindsey
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 10:23amSpeed slow down there buddy. Once Israel is attacked because we pulled out what do you think Israel will do with all those nukes? Don‘t you think they will release hell’s fire on the Middle East? Even if they don’t do you want the Jihadist to gain control of them? Do you people really believe this will just all work out by itself?
For better or worse we are joined at the hip with Israel. Better to support them then kneel at the feet of Mohammed.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 2:03pmSusie, Your statement makes no sense unless you are a person who believes the media and does not research on their own. Isreal has the fourth strongest military in the world after the U.S., China and Russia. Just how are they in trouble from a puny little country like Iran? Please enlighten us on how you come to this conclusion. Iran doesn’t even have the technology to refine their own oil into gas!! Isreal could take out their Navy in three days, we could take them out in one. If they were to get a nuke, it will be because of China or Russia and then our beef would be with them. China has already told their Navy to prepare for war with the U.S. What is wrong with all you people? I am really beginning to believe that all of you really are sheeple. Romney? Look who backs him: Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse Group, Morgan Stanley, HIG Capital, Barclays, Kirkland & Ellis, Bank of America, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, EMC Corp, JPMorgan Chase. He is the progressive elite’s choice as he would continue to take us to the OWO. Santorum loves spending and war so is a Neoconservative, progressive. Gingrich? Listen to Glenn: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyx9tw0TEPM What is really wrong with you people?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:41pmThink that the wackos who support Paul are really Too Far Righties , who are either drug addled , or Obama Lefties who are Trolls hired to divide conservatives. All directed by their handlers : Crazed Righties who must have drug issues or Crazed Lefties whose goal is to just cause disruption , chaos, trouble and to DIVIDE the Republican vote in 2012. Hopefully there are enough of us centrist / righters/ rational voters to reclaim sanity in America and our government. We voters are being played like violins….
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:47pmhahaha!
you should re-examine who sounds crazy friend.
Report Post »sweetconcern
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:58amYou Protest to Much! I am a Mom, Gmom, GreatGmom. have never done any kind of drug in my life and most all of the others on this site who care for Dr. Paul are Christian. We had respect for Mr. Beck and enjoyed his show when he was on Fox. I no longer watch or listen to him because I feel he is trying to mislead people. I come to the blaze now only when I have found an article that needs to be spoken to. I don’t have to, but I pray for Mr. Beck and his listeners because I really want a salvation for them and God Bless Our Country America.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:18amRick Santorum supported radical anti-gunner Arlen
Report Post »Specter in his bid for reelection in 2004. Specter was running against pro-gun candidate Pat Toomey. Specter went on to wreak havoc against gun rights in the U.S. Senate.
ShyLow
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:38amGingrich supporters are the worst…Have you ever seen one eat a bowl of soup?..it’s freakin disgusting…and Santorum supporters,all have small hands and smell like cabbage…don’t even get me started on Romney supporters…they’re born without finger-prints and like to pick things up only using their elbows
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:53am@ Shylow
Thanks. I laughed.
Report Post »Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:58amSweetconcern,
I am with you on Paul 100% and everything you said was good, until you had to attack Glenn. That just kinda throws it off a little bit. I to am Frustrated to no end with Glenn, but to say he is misleading people on purpose (that’s how it sounded to me) is a little far out there. I believe that Glenn is still the same Glenn that he was on FOX….Look at all the time he has spent on Israel, before the candidates were even running….I can see Glenn having an issue with Paul because of the Israel issue…..I don’t completely understand it (everything else about Paul is what Glenn has been saying we need) but i can see it. He hasn’t changed.
That being said neither Dr. Paul or Glenn Beck are Gods. Why completely write off Glenn because he has an issue with who you want to be president, when he is so right on everything else?? That is foolish…If you were a fan of Glenn before tell me what he is doing now that bothers you besides his view on Paul.
I don‘t listen to Glenn much now because i can’t take his blatant hatred for Paul, but I have not written Glenn off as someone trying to mislead anyone…After all this election stuff is done I will get back into listening to what he has to say again….because after all everything else Glenn is trying to do is right….and good.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:12amBARBER2 Please don’t confuse the Bots………
Report Post »Their roots : http://www.alternet.org/news/153551/ron_paul_and_libertarianism's_dirty_secret_–_pandering_to_racist_%22rednecks%22_to_get_ahead
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:22amI don’t think he wrote Paul wrote those newsletters. Here’s some proof.
Reality Check: The name of a ‘Mystery Writer’ of one of Ron Paul‘s ’Racist’ newsletters:
http://www.fox19.com/story/16458700/reality-check-the-name-of-a-mystery-writer-of-one-of-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:27amCOLT1860 Do you believe he made to the bank with the money that the Newsletter generated ($940.000) ? Well, he did….
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:12am@RepubliCorp He said this in an interview: (Go to the 5:30 mark) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0
- Interviewer: But you made money off of them?
Report Post »- Paul: I was still practicing medicine. That‘s probably why I wasn’t a very good publisher because I had to make a living.
- Interviewer: But there are reports that you made a million dollars off of them in 1993.
- Paul: I’d like to see that money.
- Interviewer: But would you give it back?
- Paul: To whom?
- Interviewer: But if you made money off of them and you disavowed them.
- Paul: Really?
- Interview: Well, to charity.
- Paul: That’s nonsense.
- Interviewer: If you made money off of them and you disavowed it.
- Paul: You know, I didn’t write them. I don’t endorse those views. And I’ve explained it many times.
- Interviewer: So you read them but never did anything about them?
- Paul: I never read that stuff. I probably became aware of it ten years after it was written. And it’s been going on twenty years that people have pestered me about this. And CNN does every single time… I didn’t write them. I didn’t read at the time. And I disavow them.
- Interviewer: But you made money off of them.
- Paul: If you know I made money off of them then you know more about my finances than I do… It was published for ten years. So if that was one percent of all the newsletters, I made money talking about gold stocks. I think you’re really confused on that.
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:24am*I didn’t write them. I didn’t read them at the time. And I disavow them.
Typo.
Report Post »str8blues
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:46am@sweetconcern I don’t know what your looooonnnnnng rants are about. They‘re so long I’m not going to read them…..as nobody else does. These blogs usually consist of short to the point remarks and not rant after rant after rant after rant. I expect you must be a Paulbot. They are the most obnoxious bunch in every post. They are sent out by the Paul campaign to infiltrate every discussion about the GOP race and they always end up turning people away from Ron Paul.
Report Post »When Ron Paul runs yet again……he needs to shut the pie hole of Alex Jones cult member neocon spewing loons and the rest of his vile supporters and let his own words win for him…..because his loony supporters are a BIG BIG TURNOFF.
Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:38am@str8blues and all you other haters…..
Funny how you call others obnoxious when all you have done is to string together a bunch of insults and guilt by association bile.
This simple question will demonstrate that you are either a sheep, or a goat.
Would you vote for any candidate that will not openly rebuke the latest assault on the Bill of Rights known as the NDAA… that allows for your arrest without charges, with no witnesses, with no trial, and no relase date?
Please…do tell.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »GOVT_ABOVE_THE_LAW
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:54pm@SWEETCORN – I loved your letter from Rafi Farber. It was very insiring. I would like permission from you to post it elsewhere. Thanks.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:23pmBarber, you are dead wrong. I am a 55 year oldRepublican Navy Vet who studied Law in college along with the Constitution and early American history. You want to see the Republican vote split? Paul supporters are with him because of a movement to try and get back the liberties that progressives have taken away over a century. He WILL run third party if he does not get the Republican nod and we will all vote for him (approx 25% of Repubs) and he will pull in 70-80% of the Independents and 30-40% of disenfranchised Dems. If Obama wins, it will be because of progressive Republicans like you. I am not voting for a progressive ever again in my life. The H E double hockey sticks with all you progressive leaning S O B’s.
Report Post »donttemptme
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:41pmi am dismayed at the opinion of mr. beck.
Report Post »i first started listening to glenn about 5 yrs ag and i have to say it was not easy. i had occasion to hear something he said that clicked down deep and i was a disciple. did a couple of events and really like what he was saying..
i’m over it now , but i would like to ask what the real problem with ron paul is.
i gotta know .. he is a strict constitutionalists and has always voted that way.
he believes in non interventionism as the best way to peace, what can be wrong with that?
he has voted in favor of war when necessary and opposed when not.
he has the ideals of the founders and no support for those who would want the chaos to stop.
i think you may be more effected by feeling than logic,
in this era of personal destruction i would hope for better but know the worst.
recoveringneocon
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:59pmWhy would anyone believe this man anyways. He is a know liar. No surprise most alcoholics are. Wonder if “nnelG” remembers this little lie?
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg673tl4zPA
CptStubbing
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:59amOf course he lies. He just did today on his show. He said he was quoting Osama bin Laden in his letter to America. Which was a complete and total lie, but on his site he calls it (paraphrasing.)
“Glenn explained that Osama bin Laden has said (paraphrased) that in OBL opinion and the opinion of subscribers of Radicalized Islam, every person must either submit, live under the scrutiny of Islam, or die. Period.”
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/01/06/the-folly-of-ron-pauls-foreign-policy/
He then goes onto say:
“It is a total, it is a total naivety at best, at best, from the Ron Paulians and people on the left as well say the same damn thing. They do not think like people from the Middle East. They don’t understand the Middle East mentality. They are looking at it as a Westerner,” Glenn said.
“I’m sorry, but you cannot sit down with somebody who says the matter is clear. It is not right to let an infidel live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit or live under the scrutiny of Islam or die. Excuse me, but we don’t have anything to talk about. None.”
“We don’t coexist with people who believe that. If they strike, you strike them back. You protect yourself. You protect your friends. Because it is in the national interest,”
You know what Glenn? They feel the exact same way you do, and as long as you are not willing to sit down with them and you think it is ok to kill their children they will feel it’s ok
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:03am(continued)they will feel it’s okay to kill yours.
BTW for those of you who would like to actually know what Osama bin Laden did say to the people of America, you should actually take the time to read his letter. 10 years later and we keep asking ourselves why they attacked us. Well he explained it to us 10 years ago, but nobody cared to listen.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver?fb=optOut
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:34amRecovering neocon, sorry to say resorting to attacking someone‘s past ’alcoholism’ and mocking their name is the Saul Alinsky method. You become the people you despise’ or at least I assume you despise… Perhaps even Glenn falls to the Alinsky method on his show as well. But why do it yourself?
Report Post »Dudley Do-Right
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:52am10 years later and we keep asking ourselves why they attacked us. Well he explained it to us 10 years ago, but nobody cared to listen.
Evidently, Ron Paul and his supporters are part of the reason OBL attacked us! From OBL’s letter that you linked…
(iii) You are a nation that permits the production, trading and usage of intoxicants. You also permit drugs, and only forbid the trade of them, even though your nation is the largest consumer of them.
Report Post »GOVT_ABOVE_THE_LAW
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:51pmI really have a hard time listening to Glenn now. He used to be principled. I learned so much from him about our founders and how far away from them we have gotten. In 2008 I was calling Ron Paul a kook too. I bought the BS that was being peddled to me. I have heard Glenn as us to do our own homework, so I did. What I found was that Ron Paul is for Freedom and the Constitution. Everything he says is tied directly to it. No other candidate even mentions the constitution. Glenn used to have Judge Napolitano on regularly because he is a big “constitutionalist” and supports freedom. Now I don’t think he has him on anymore because Napolitano supports Ron Paul. I am still waiting for Glenn to have Ron Paul on his program instead of using some of his less seasoned supporters against him.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:27pm“ nnelG” with his radio show and “ The ezalB” are just Propaganda Machine. Every story on here is Pro Santorum and Anti-Newt, Anti-Romney, Anti-Paul and just wait if Perry gets some momentum. He is not even hiding it anymore. The stories running here don’t even make the headlines anywhere else. I wonder if this caller was really a Paul Supporter or just a plant for the 3 stooges.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:34pmIF WE do not want Romney to win the minority we have to back one of the others. One on one and Romney loses. If a 3rd party runs Obama wins.
Report Post »That is the FACT. If Obama wins, I hope you like your new roomates.
recoveringneocon
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:45pmIf this guy was certainly not the sharpest tool in the shed, but did you see how it took all 3 stooges to twist his words. Don’t call out “Moe” out or Larry and Curly will have to jump in and defend him against an uneducated bigot.
Report Post »Thats if he was really a Paulist. Funny how they were all ready to jump all over him. with the audio and all.
ashestoashes
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:50pm@RECOVERINGNEOCON..Hi.. nnelG was always in the tank for Bachman and Santorum..nnelG is torn..he really knows that we are finacially doomed by any of these Warmongering fiscally irresponsible Neo Cons..but I think his fear overrides his common sense.. You can see it in this passionate video..this is where his common sense took over..it‘s like he’s psychitzophrenic. This was somewhat reasonable nnelG. He just has a hard time connecting the dots over foreign policy…The government has brainwashed the majority of the people.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyx9tw0TEPM
Fella
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:51pmNoticed that too. A bit too prepared.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:00amTo be honest I do not think Paul is not as weak on defense as he lets on/or is covered. I think he would defend the trade and trade routs and if someone attacked us or major interest he would maybe warn them and then Nuke the bejeeebers out of them if they did not comply. That is the drift I get from him. He always says oh they would not attack us. I think he means it quite literally.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:16amHey RECOVERINGNEOCON, I know you ! You‘re the guy who came to my door the other day collecting for Berry’s re-election campaign. What you doing shilling for Paul ? Come-on. Tell the truth.
Report Post »I won’t tell anyone…Promise.
ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:34am@SUSIE..Recvoering Neocon is far from an Obama fan..you are much closer..you just have your eyes closed and are blinded right now..Hopefully you will have your eyes opened and see for yourself just how much you are supporting Obama.
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:30amI course Glenn was prepared… Remember in these talk shows the host has someone else answer the calls who takes down the callers message, then the host can choose who he wants to speak too, and already knows much of what the person will speak about. That gives the hosts time to prepare often during the break. In the meantime the caller could have been holding for many minutes.
Report Post »fallguy80
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:26pmLet me get this straight. The two Mormons on the show were calling the 12th Imam stuff “CRAZY”. The LDS faith isn’t exactly known for their mainline Christian ideaology.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:36pmHey FALLGUY – Please tell us all you know about the LDS and their non-mainline Christianity. I would bet that you know as little about the 12th Imam “stuff” as you do about the LDS “stuff.”
Report Post »Talking out your butt makes you look like an idiot.
veruca salt
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:45pmGood point. Mr. Beck, with all his “question boldly” rhetoric, chose to throw his cards in with a group who believes an angel showed up in the 1820′s and gave a known charlatan a set of golden tablets that were then “translated” into their holy book. Given the size of the pill that must be swallowed to buy into that hogwash, apparently Mr. Beck doesn’t practice what he preaches.
Report Post »Lord_Frostwind
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:05amBecause we all know that an angel visiting someone never happens, now if it is a burning bush, a talking donkey, or a man who can turn a staff into a serpent that would be completely acceptable. Bible thumpers are so predictable.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:08amFALLGUY80 AND VERUCA SALT
Report Post »Wondered how long it would take for the anti-Mormon “stuff” to start coming out.
Bigotry like this comes as soon as legitimate arguments can no longer be made.
Jerks !
mrsalvage2
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:08amWell, at least he does not believe in Octogod.
Report Post »veruca salt
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:20amDoesn’t sound like critical thinking is your strong suit, Susie. Don’t stop believing…
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:49amSusie is one of the so called Conservatives throwing names and insults around…………..next she will be telling everyone how nasty the palists are
Report Post ».
NoNannyState4me
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:15amFallguy, Veruca, and RecoveringNeocon. Thank you for saving me so much typing, I love you guys.
Ron Paul, YES! 2012
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:39amFallguy? Rules for Radicals much? No need to resort to Alinsky style tactics against people’s faith. You can debate a person far more civilly than that…
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:10am“Susie is one of the so called Conservatives throwing names and insults around…………..next she will be telling e”
Unfortunately, Recoveringneocon, I’ve seen you throwing names and insults around to those you disagree with as well!
Not only are you following the Alinsky method, as put forth in Rules for Radicals;
Do you know what it is called when a person does something that they complain a out another doing? “hypocrisy”.
Don’t resort to the level of those you debate.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:25amSacredHonor1776
Report Post »Just like the 3 stoogies radio show, fire with fire
fallguy80
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:35am@susie People are free to believe whatever they want to believe. But don’t mock the beliefs of Islam and not expect a little mockery in return. If you think that my pointing out some of the more “unusual” aspects of the mormon faith, i.e. Golden tablets, Kolob, etc., is bigotry. Why don’t you same the same about Glenn and his crew publicly mocking the beliefs of some Muslims?
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:25pmI would still vote for Ron Paul over Obama…. PERIOD
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:32pmOh, hell yes. But we won’t have to.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:55pmTRONINTHEMORNING
Oh you are anti-guns too
The fact is, Rick Santorum does have a long history of supporting gun control.
In the 90s, he voted to support the Lautenberg Gun Ban, which stripped law-abiding gun owners of their Second Amendment rights for life, simply because they spanked their children.
He voted for a bill in 1999 disguised as an attempt to increase penalties on drug traffickers with guns… but it also included a provision to require federal background checks at gun shows.
And then he voted with gun-controlling Democrats Dianne Fienstein and Frank Lautenberg to mandate locks on handguns in 2005.
He also supported and openly campaigned for anti-gun New Jersey governor, Christine Todd Whitman.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:09amRick has an A+ rating with the NRA.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:53amYou may want to check the facts , Rick Santorum does have a long history of supporting gun control.
In the 90s, he voted to support the Lautenberg Gun Ban, which stripped law-abiding gun owners of their Second Amendment rights for life, simply because they spanked their children.
He voted for a bill in 1999 disguised as an attempt to increase penalties on drug traffickers with guns… but it also included a provision to require federal background checks at gun shows.
And then he voted with gun-controlling Democrats Dianne Fienstein and Frank Lautenberg to mandate locks on handguns in 2005.
He also supported and openly campaigned for anti-gun New Jersey governor, Christine Todd Whitman.
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:23amSantorum get FAILing grade from NAGR. They say ONLY Bachman and Paul are 100% Gun Rights. Bachman is gone, that leaves Ron!
http://www.nationalgunrights.org/rick-santorums-anti-gun-history/
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Wool-Free Vision
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:25pmThis behavior is not at all surprising to the observative and discerning Conservative. Just reading the threads on pretty much EVERY story here at The Blaze alone would give the objective reader ample evidence to expect a significant percentage of Paul’s legions to behave EXACTLY as this caller did.
Report Post »Sadly, MOST of the Paul supporters I know in the real world are actually more disenfranchised and misinformed Conservatives than they are blame-America-first isolationists. But there are plenty of nuts in the mix too.
Wool-Free Vision
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:38pmAnd this thread, in particular, is quickly proving to be a case in point.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:39pmTo say nothing of the detractors on EVERY story that start EVERY response with “Paultards”, “Paulbots” “Paulastenian” is rather curious. I know that you can‘t honestly be making the observation that it’s only the Paul supporters that are disrespectful and obnoxious. I think you may be viewing this from a slanted perspective. Hmmm.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:49pmA lot of people are giving Paul a look. The crazy Paulies (and you know who you are) should do something different than public appearances. Try donations, licking stamps, providing transportation, putting the screws to Obama, etc…
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:10amWhen did Being for States Rights, Pro Gun Rights, Smaller Government, Pro Life, Open Trade, Lower Taxes, Less Regulation, Getting rid of 5 Departments, Balancing the Budget by Cutting a Trillion dollars, against socialized Medicine, Reining in the Fed, Opening up drilling, No Amnesty, Enforcing Border Security, Abolishing the Welfare State, Ending Birthright Citizenship, etc. become Crazy?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:39am@RECOVERING NEOCON Thank you for all that you do..I appreciate you.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:56amashestoashes
Report Post »We are in this together, you deserve much more thanks then I do.
Remember, “ The Love of Our Country is Our Ammunition”
WiredRight
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:02amYep, we’re a pretty motley crue alright. Here’s how the Iowa caucus breaks down:
Ron Paul had the majority of:
military support
Independent support
youth support (actually he had the most from 17yrs old to 39)
Democrats that “voted for change” support
Paleoconservative support
anti-establishment support
minority support
And then there’s the actual republican support. This is the support needed to win a in general and not one of the other candidates can bring these people together.
Report Post »larrylarrylarry
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:23pmPaulistinians, paulbearers, I tell you this place has more comedy talent than a comedy central roast. The editors should start a thread now and then to “roast” someone. I bet it would be hillarous.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:21pmDidn’t i see on the Daily Pawns of Ron site that one of the sponsors was Alcoa, coincidence?
Report Post »Marine25
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:20pmActually, it was gold. Glenn prefers gold.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:20pmThe caller is defintely an idiot but I honestly don’t trust Glenn anymore not to set a call like this up.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:40pmHey FELLA – get real ! No one has to set a call like this up. Paul supporters are irrational at best and are fast going over the edge. Libertarian – get it ? Anything goes. Chaos- no matter whether you have Obama or Paul; the result will be the same.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:07amYou are delusional. Please seek help.
Report Post »woodyb
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:35amSuzie sounds pretty sharp to me!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:21pm@Susie
Hey girl, using your twisted line of reasoning, the founders were nothing but a bunch of “anything goes” fanatical anarchists.
Paul and Obama are the polar opposites of each other, as one is for no limits on Federal powers, and Paul is for staying in the confines of the constitution and letting the states deal with powers not vested to the Feds.
Just what on earth do you think the 10th amendment means?
Now let me ask you a question that none of you fanatical Neo-Cons seem to wish to answer….
Would you vote for any candidate that will not openly rebuke the latest assault on the Bill of Rights known as the NDAA… that allows for your arrest without charges, with no witnesses, with no trial, and no relase date?
Please…do tell.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »WEBWITHDEB
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:31pmNo, “anything” does not “go”. What “goes” is the rampant WASTE that our current system perpetuates. That ONE candidate out of all the “mainstream” ones wants to change the current system of waste, and that anyone who supports such a candidate is seen as irrational, must mean that waste is rational. Oh, it is, but would you rather it be in an out house (setting around with you) or flushed down into the sewer (removed to be re-purposed) ?
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:17pmI’ve heard Glenn say before that he thinks that we still ought to be killing the Indian tribes out West because they attack us because of our freedom and because they are jealous of our way of life:
————————————————————————————————–
“The battle, which occurred on June 25 and 26, 1876 near the Little Bighorn River in eastern Montana Territory, was the most famous action of the Great Sioux War of 1876. It was an overwhelming victory for the Lakota, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho, led by several major war leaders, including Crazy Horse and Gall, inspired by the visions of Sitting Bull. The U.S. Seventh Cavalry, including the Custer Battalion, a force of 700 men led by George Armstrong Custer, suffered a severe defeat. Five of the Seventh’s companies were annihilated; Custer was killed, as were two of his brothers, a nephew, and a brother-in-law. Total U.S. deaths were 268, including scouts, and 55 were wounded.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Little_Bighorn
Could it actually be that they look at us as foreign invaders though instead?…. as the Sioux and the Cheyenne once did at Little Bighorn??
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:29pmI listen to Glenn all the time and I have never heard him say anything like that, so let me be the first to call you a LIAR.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:46pmKIDCHARLEMAGNE
Report Post »You heard Glenn advocating the killing of the indian tribes out west.
What are the other voices in your head telling you ?
PLEASE SEE DOCTOR NOW !
KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:59pmCOFemale
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:29pm
I listen to Glenn all the time and I have never heard him say anything like that, so let me be the first to call you a LIAR.
==============================
Oh, so you think the Indians deserved to be exterminated by Union soldiers on their own land?
Yes or no?
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:46am@ kidCharlemagne
Report Post »Sir I grew up on the Rez. My father and his father before him also grew up there (Crow Agency) where this battle took place. You might want to read Black Elk Speaks, a 1932 book by John G. Neihardt
The Scottish got slaughtered on their own land, but you should know that…Some things are not right but they are over Sir.
MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:55amThe Indians were NOT exterminated by the way:
Report Post »ex·ter·mi·nate (k-stûrm-nt)
tr.v. ex·ter·mi·nat·ed, ex·ter·mi·nat·ing, ex·ter·mi·nates
To get rid of by destroying completely; extirpate. See Synonyms at abolish.
Do0d, are you some kind of drama queen or what man?
heartitorleaveit
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:15pmsooo, Glenn on one side With America and Israel vs Paul, this nut, Bin Laden and Ahmadinejad.
Report Post »Ill take Glenn every time. :]
KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:30pmheartitorleaveit
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:15pm
sooo, Glenn on one side With America and Israel vs Paul, this nut, Bin Laden and Ahmadinejad.
Ill take Glenn every time. :]
==========================
‘Which’ Glenn do you wanna’ take though?:
“Glenn Beck (06/14/2011): Ron Paul is the closest to our Founding Fathers”
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyyI1EC5i2U
lel2007
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:15pmAh, God love those Ron Paul apostle. I think they mean well, but some tend to be a tad obnoxious and cultist. They’re not really Conservatives you know, but die hard libertarians.
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:18pmwhat is wrong with libertarians. The Founders were all libertarians. or Republican Democrats. MEANING Strong on defense lenient on CIVIL LIBERTIES….What is the problem?
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:36pmI don’t think the founders knew about Ron Paul, but I’ll check the history books….
Report Post »J3nn.net
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:58pmOf course we’re not Conservatives, we actually honor the Constitution and do not want to regulate morals and get into unnecessary wars while giving foreign aide to the enemies of our friends.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:05am@KAOSCONTROL The founders knew nothing of Ron Paul..but Ron Paul knows about the Constitution and has voted every time to lower our taxes and to preserve our 2nd amendment and has supported Israels right to be a soveregn state and that she had the right to go to war against Iran..I believe he was one of 12 Congressmen who did so..Paul does not support the Patriot Act nor Indefintite Detention..nor any infringement of our Constitutional Rights. He is the only man runnng who could put this country back in good fiscal standing and preserve and build our military..If someone like China declared war on us now..we woule not have the money to fight her..Paul does not want to deminish our military ..but rather bring her home and build her. to be stronger..That takes money..He would cut our government down to size and reduce our risks of becoming enslaved..You won’t realize what freedom is until you have lost it..
Report Post »Texred
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:14pmO.K. I’ll try again. I’m a Texan by birth and by heritage and ronpaul does not speak for me, and his supporters cannot create enough distance from his delusional rhetoric to make me think he is anywhere close to being presidential material. Sheila jackson lee is laughing right now because someone crazier than her is in the limelight!
Report Post »BV FROM TX
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:08amIf the Ron Paul supporters would drop the hatred of everyone that disagrees with them, it would stop turning people off. It sounds too much like the left’s hate posts.
Glenn owns all of this network and if you don’t like what he has to say, go find your kind elsewhere. Most of us that support Glenn like to read and post with like-minded people without all of the hatred. I go to hear postive and objective posts but am totally turned off by the spewing of so much hatred of people who cannot accept other people’s opinions. FYI – Glenn is getting some of the same calls from Newt’s supporters. Since I actually watch the 3-hr radio show and the 2-hour show, I find that many of the people who posts all of the negative comments do not listen to him directly and are instead responding to comments made by the MSM regarding his shows.
I get the impression from most Paul supporters here will vote for Obama if Paul does not get the election. I hope that does not happen. Soros would love it.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:08pmSome people must of had their tin foil hats tied a little too tight.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:26pmNice, NIPP. Get help.
Report Post »PutAFatWadOnYou
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:42pmPeeps be havin’ downs up in here.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:16amTrollinginthemorning
Report Post »After having to read your posts I really miss Yepimatroll
NIPPOHIPS
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:44amTron, go do something you never did before in your life. Have an original thought.
Report Post »Texred
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:07pmPaulTard, right on topic with your “leader”? For all you blaze readers, ronpaul does not speak for the majority of Texans! Sheila Jackson Lee is laughing right now because someone crazier that her is actually in contention for leader of the free world. God help us!
Report Post »DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:04pmWell Beck. I called your show twice as a calm, non-pot-head, non-paulbot, rational Paul supporter. Your screeners seemed excited for you to take my call. I was going to put you in your place over Israel using your own words.(your screeners knew that also) You let me sit for 5 hours total for fluff callers. Any day you are ready, coward. I will simply use your words and prove you a true hypocrite. Also the offer still stands, I’ll debate you in private and sign any non-disclosure form you like. And remember, I will only use your own words/standards.
Like you used to tell the white house beck… “call me”.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:10pmLol.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:21pmYeah I’ve gone throught the same thing. The call screeners seem to have an agenda. Who would have guessed.
Report Post »Grannie4news
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:22pmIf I had ever (which I haven’t) thought about voting for Ron Paul, his supporters alone would have changed my mind. They are obnoxious, overbearing and are so ignorant, I feel sorry for them.
Report Post »Why can’t you get it through your thick heads, the majority of the people are NOT going to vote for Ron Paul and if he ran against Obama, he would get slaughtered. He just flat acts like a fruitcake.
BetterDays
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:53pm@DT
Report Post »Almost THREE years ago I emailed Glenn a bunch of FEMA camp information, back when he used to expose how Obama was a socialist/Radical. I miss those days, I actually learned something from him back then, alas. He never did a show, but after the NADA passed the house, and KBR ( a division of Halibutron) announced they were looking for staffing contractors for those camps Glenn ran ONE article here at the Blaze. Not to mention the DHS is taking bids for services for those same FEMA camps even today.
I often wondered why Glenn would choose to do such a disservice to his viewers when he appeared to be willing to expose Obama for what Obama is. Then the Soros visit happened, and Glenn faded away, and I got it, Glenn stepped on the Globalists toes and as a Neocon ( other half of the progressive disease) he wasn’t supposed to out those who truly run the show.
That’s why Glenn is so anti-Paul, and why he ran the setup of a radio show, because he is a Neocon, or if not he’s a scared little boy. Frankly, I think it’s the former, because if Glenns worked the 12 steps, fear now longer holds sway in an individuals life thereafter because we
Earn how to identify it and to overcome our fears.
Hope life is well with you and yours DT
DcBs Blaze
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:53pmI was so glad to hear that a Paul supporter is reaching out to you in such a rational manner! It is great to know that a supporter, not to mention, such a well-grounded individual would wait on hold on the phone, for five hours, to put you in your place, you coward. We can all rest in peace tonight knowing that the offer still stands… “call me”! Are you calling yet?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:15amGrannie4news
Report Post »A vote for anyone but Paul is a vote for 4 more years of obama
noczars
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:25pmYou must be an idot for waiting 5HOURS for Glenn. Either that or you are a LIAR.
Report Post »Morgan Hopson
Posted on February 19, 2012 at 11:51pmI get a real kick out of everyone trying to attack Paul supporters. The fact is Ron Paul has more outspoken supporters than any of the other candidates. What I don’t get is why the Tea Party, GB, and the rest protest that they want smaller government, Less taxes, and a balanced budget. It is disappointing to see everyone trying to knock Candidate Paul. If you look on youtube and compare event turnouts to the other candidates Ron Paul wins by a landslide. I have changed and started supporting Ron Paul because I believe he is the only candidate that can beat Obama. A vote for any other candidate will be a loss for the Republican party this cycle and for the foreseeable future. This is the cycle to bring in the younger generation and keep conservative ideas alive. If not we might as well refer to the GOP as the Whig party because they will share the same fate. At least with Dr. Paul we can get a balanced budget and save our children’s future. With the other candidates we will default on our debt and foreign policy won’t matter anymore because there will be a world war when China and others call us on our debt. Are we going to give our land away to appease them? We have to control our money then we can worry about world affairs. I am a disabled Veteran that fought in Iraq, Yes the world is dangerous, but RP doesn‘t say he wouldn’t defend America, He would just require the people to declare the war through congress. If we don’t address the debt we will face the fate of Rome
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:03pmThe Company Ron Paul Keeps
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/company-ron-paul-keeps_613474.html
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:06pmCheck Out This Photo….
Regardless of what ANYONE says….THIS is MY next President
http://yfrog.com/g05cadjj
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:15pmhahaha!
if one supports a complete moron(perry), is said individual even dumber than their candidate?
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:20pmhahaha….i’m sharp as a tack…
Perry For President
Report Post »http://www.rickperry.org/
Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:24pmSantorum>>Was A Senator
Newt>Was Speaker Of The House
Paul>Congressman
Romney>His HealthCare Plan Was The Blue Print For ObamaCare And Obama WILL Thank Him For THAT At EVERY Debate
Gov.Perry has NEVER served in Washington. He TRULY IS a Washington Outsider and THAT is WHAT the TeaParty Conservatives Have Been FIGHTING For!!! We WANT and NEED NEW BLOOD in Washington! Someone To FIGHT For US…..WE THE PEOPLE!!!!
Like Gov Rick Perry Says….If Washington IS the problem…then why trust those who have been IN Washington to FIX the problem???? I AGREE!!!
http://www.rickperry.org/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:27pmGov Rick Perry
The ONLY Candidate In This Race Who {{{ VOLUNTEERED }}} To Serve His Country…
And is supported by BRAVE VETERANS thru the Veterans For Perry Coalition
http://blog.4president.org/2012/2011/12/gov-rick-perry-announces-veterans-for-perry-coalition.html
A President Of Honor…
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/user/RPerry2012#p/u/18/ypXu2IU68CU
Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:30pmWhen It Comes To Closing The Border…Gov Rick Perry Has Been Endorsed By America’s Sheriff….Sheriff Joe
http://blog.4president.org/2012/2011/11/sheriff-joe-arpaio-endorses-gov-rick-perry-for-president.html
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:33pmOn Security
http://www.rickperry.org/issues/national-security/
While advancing our interests abroad, Perry believes it is equally important to defend our interests at home by securing our border.
As president, Perry will substantially increase manpower, technology and fencing along the border to protect the American homeland and stop illegal immigration. This strategy has proven effective in Texas, where Gov. Perry has directed nearly $400 million in state tax dollars to do the federal government’s job of securing the border.
Perry will deploy thousands of National Guardsmen to the border until a sufficient number of border patrol agents can be hired and trained. He will order federal officials to expedite construction of strategic fencing, especially in high traffic areas where manpower alone is insufficient to do the job. And he will make greater use of unmanned aerial assets to gather reliable, real-time intelligence that law enforcement can immediately act upon
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:38pmPerry in the race = Romney.
Report Post »We need to weed out fast NOW. I do NOT care if perry is your favorite. I like him too. Does not matter now. Perry & Gingrich out and Romney does not get the nomination. We wait fourmore states and Romney wins. Remember 08? Duh.
Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:38pmVid
The Rick Perry I Know
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh0dJnb-rlc&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:44pmGov Rick Perry WILL Be The Nominee
After South Carolina….everything heads into the south…Florida Georgia Tennessee Texas Virgina Alabama Mississippi. Also Arizona will be favorable. The South will support Rick Perry 100% WHY? Because Gov Perry is for state’s rights…BIG DEAL in the red states. Gov Perry is the ONLY candidate who {{Volunteered}} to serve his country. Gov Perry is also supported thru The Perry For Veterans Coalition..the south loves the military. Gov Perry will repeal health care…BIG DEAL in the south. Gov Perry has been endorsed by America’s Sheriff…Sheriff Joe>>who is currently fighting to bring down Obama. The south loves and supports Sheriff Joe. Gov Perry does NOT play golf he loves guns…The 2nd Amendment>>HUGE DEAL in the south. Rick Perry is a Christian….HUGE Deal in the south. The south LOVES SEC college football and Gov Rick Perry attended Texas A&M. Texas A&M is now a part of the SEC. HUGE thing in the south. And Rick Perry stood up to the liberal media..the south loves a man with GUTS. And the MAIN REASON……THEY consider HIM to be one of their OWN…A VERY BIG AND HUGE DEAL in the south….It is because of these and MANY MORE reasons why the south loves Gov Rick Perry. I know some may NOT….but the MAJORITY do and that is what is IMPORTANT.
This will give Gov Rick Perry all of the momentum in the race….going forward ..to finish his marathon ALL THE WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE……
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:51pmHow’d that South thing work for Huckabee?
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:00amRick Sans made an enemy of the wrong person in South Carolina…Jim DeMint.
In South Carolina..Jim Demint IS conservative politics. He won’t get ANY favors from Mr DeMint
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/04/this-wont-play-well-in-south-carolina/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:02amSouth Carolina LOVED Mike Huckabee
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/02/huckabee-wins-2012-county-straw-poll-in-south-carolina/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:05amAnd In the last election for President…i didn’t vote for McCain…i like most republicans voted for Sarah Palin
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:18amClara
Report Post »Wait until this Propaganda Machine starts attacking Perry
Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:22amBring It …Gov Perry handles the media JUST FINE!!! :))))
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:25amThank You Gov Perry For Answering Our Nation’s Call…You Are A True Patriot
Video…On To South Carolina
Report Post »http://youtu.be/DGN_9ACuvh4
Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:39amWow!!!!!! CNN??? Thanks Dana!! :) You are EXACTLY RIGHT :))
CNN Contributor Dana Loesch: Rick Perry is the only conservative who can defeat Mitt Romney in the GOP primary
http://youtu.be/W6yaS_UcLlU
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:44amQUOTE
“This election is about stopping a President of the United States and his administration that is abusing the Constitution of this country, that is putting America on a track to bankruptcy. It is a powerful moment in Americans’ history, and you are on the front lines. This is Concord. This is Omaha Beach. This is going up the hill realizing that the battle is worth winning.” ~ TX Gov. Rick Perry
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:16amReality Check: The name of a ‘Mystery Writer’ of one of Ron Paul‘s ’Racist’ newsletters:
http://www.fox19.com/story/16458700/reality-check-the-name-of-a-mystery-writer-of-one-of-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:35amGreat Post, Colt. It’s odd that ALL the candidates have indeed been branded racists by the MSM, and from other candidates along with their supporters.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:57amGov Rick Perry….A Fiscal Conservative
http://www.youtube.com/user/RPerry2012#p/a/u/2/726AV2dexM4
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:46pm@Clara88
http://redstateeclectic.typepad.com/redstate_commentary/2011/08/rick-perrys-progressive-corporatism.html
Perry’s prescription for Texas (and America) is in direct contrast to his “small government” rhetoric. Texas’s debt under Perry grew a staggering 281%, a much faster rate than the nation he hopes to lead. He was also a big proponent of TARP, even writing a letter to Nancy Pelosi urging her to support that bailout. Texas also benefited greatly from the Recovery Act, which Perry used to cover 97% of the massive $6.6 billion deficit Texas incurred in 2009. Using New York‘s or Nevada’s taxpayer money to plug your state‘s deficit shortfall while touting your state’s record is not a “miracle,” but deception.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:55pmAbout Rick Perry
http://www.rickperry.org/about/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:04pmRon Paul???????
I would be MORE than happy to put Gov Rick Perry‘s record next to Ron Paul’s ANYDAY
Ron Paul has BEEN in congress…he has HAD his chance. It’s time for New Blood in Washington.
Gov Rick Perry has NEVER served in Washington….but that’s about to change SOON!! :)))
Like Gov Perry says…If Washington IS the problem…then WHY trust the ones who have BEEN in Washinton to FIX the problem?? I agree 100%
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:18pm@FreedomLuver
Texas has the lowest debt per capita of the top 10 most populous states. Texas is a relatively low debt state.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:32pmAnd also…..Rick Perry and Tarp
http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/governor/Texas/Rick_Perry/views/TARP/
Summary
On September 1, 2008 Governor Perry co-wrote a letter to leaders of Congress urging them to act. The letter provided no specifics on the action to be taken. However, that TARP legislation had recently failed to pass Congress and was the only legislation being considered in Congress. The legislation that created the TARP program passed Congress on the day that the letter was written. A year later, Governor Perry stated that this letter was an attempt to spur action other than the TARP legislation.
When more bailouts were discussed after the TARP program, Governor Perry co-wrote another letter in opposition to all bailouts. He stated that the federal government was not only burying future generations under mountains of debt, but also taking our country in a very dangerous direction.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:40pm@@clar8 Here are my concerns about Perry. Perry signed into law a Bill to support instate tuition for illegal aliens, rejected a proposed bill resembling that of Arizona‘s SB1070 and hasn’t done much to stop the growing number and size of sanctuary Cities in his State. Many of the jobs created in Texas are federally funded jobs and Government positions. Very much resembling Maryland’s (my State’s) rapid development around the DC area due to increasing federal jobs and massive funds coming into the State. One of the reasons why businesses are moving to Texas is because there is abundant cheap labor without the hassle of adding benefits or a long term contract for their employees, thanks to illegal aliens. His dealings with companies and their interests concerns me, see his support for the Trans-Texas Corridor (a massive private-land grab and intended for a North American Union similar to the EU) and his arbitrary executive order for an HPV Vaccine for young girls. His State’s debt has doubled during his Governorship. Texas has ranked, during his two terms, as one of the lowest performing States in Public Education. About 60,000 anchor babies are born in the State annually. He had originally avoided or ignored a proposed bill restricting the TSA. Perry changes his message according to the topic of the day or the audience present, IMO. He’s an opportunist, as he has made millions of dollars in Real State, while Governor.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:45pm@Clara88
Here’s the lefts view of what will happen to Perry.
http://recovering-republican.com/rick-perry-is-toast/
What really hurt Rick Perry in this last debate is his moderate (yet sane) position on immigration. He really alienated and offended the conservative base of the Republican Party with his stance on immigration. That won’t play well in the primary election.
Being the governor of a huge border state like Texas, it’s practical politics. Mr. Perry also supports the “Dream Act.” This position will be the death knell of his campaign. He appears to have been dismissed by the tea party and the extreme right of the party. This is the one area where moderates and liberals support Gov. Perry.
———-
Face it…Perry is toast.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:55pmGee…when you guys find the PERFECT candidate with-out a flaw….PLEASE…let me know. No..it’s NOT Ron Paul. We only have a few to pick from on the GOP side. Gov Rick Perry is MY pick. He is the ONLY fiscal conservative left IN this race and his record speaks for itself.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:00pmThese are students in Texas who ONLY get this in-state tuition rate if they COMMIT to becoming LEGAL citizens
It is NOT amnesty…and Gov Rick Perry is on record opposing the federal DREAM ACT
http://www.redstate.com/tex_whitley/2011/09/23/rick-perry-is-right-on-in-state-tuition-for-immigrants-in-texas/
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:09pmOn the vaccine…
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/15/rick-perry-admits-mistake-on-gardasil-hpv-vaccine-decision/
Gov Perry Admits His Mistakes….He Is A Great Man And A Patriot
He Takes Full And Complete Responsibility For What He Says And Does
**Still Waiting On Ron Paul To Do The Same>>>Won’t Hold My Breath
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:24pmHmmmm???? “an opportunist making millions of dollars as Gov”
//////////////////////////////////////
Compared to Ron Paul and his wife who made millions of dollars off of HIS LETTERS?? Letters he says that he never read?? uh huh…sure
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 4:48pmGov Rick Perry is the ONLY one running as a limited-government candidate, with the stuff to PROVE it.
And…immigration laws and their enforcement are the responsibility of the Federal Government. Obama and his administration would rather SUE states instead!! Gov Perry has used almost 400 million in state tax dollars to do the GOVERNMENT’S JOB.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:02pmStop Insider Trading Dead In Its Tracks
http://www.redstate.com/governorperry/2012/01/05/stop-insider-trading-dead-in-its-tracks/
Posted by Gov. Rick Perry (Diary)
Thursday, January 5th at 10:00PM EST
Earlier this week, the Chicago Tribune ran a little noted editorial on the insider trading scandal plaguing Congress, calling out phony efforts to reform the rules and demanding that we finally put a stop to this outrageous and unethical behavior.
If you haven’t read the editorial yet, I recommend you do because while the professional political punditry class is more interested in superfluous items like the political horse race and candidate attire, the reality is that members of both parties in Washington, D.C., are abusing their positions and ordinary Americans have had enough.
As the editorial notes, “’60 Minutes’ reported that Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering from Visa in 2008, just as credit card legislation started moving through the House. The Pelosis bought 5,000 shares at the IPO price of $44 a share. Two days later, the shares traded at $64. The legislation, which was likely to cut credit card company profits, went nowhere that year. It passed two years later.”
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:06pmCont…
It’s not enough members of Congress make $174,000 a year, some are trading on inside information to use their public service to enrich themselves.
The Tribune is right, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Justice Department should be using every available tool to put a stop to this. But they are not. So, Congress needs to pass the STOCK Act as a matter of urgency, to do even more to ensure that this kind of thing is stopped dead in its tracks.
In addition to calling for tough measures to outlaw insider trading by Members of Congress, I’ve called for making Congress part-time, like the Texas legislature, cutting congressional pay in half, and amending FOIA to apply to Congress and the White House.
We have a $15 trillion national debt that is growing by the day, a direct result of establishment, insider politicians who are more interested in constantly increasing their personal power and profit than in reforming the system, bringing spending under control, and doing the work they were elected to do. It’s time to uproot and overhaul Washington. We can start with ensuring insider trading by members of Congress results in prison time, and not unseemly profits.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:18pm@Clara88 Here‘s Paul’s response to those newsletters: (Go to the 5:30 mark) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0
- Interviewer: But you made money off of them?
Report Post »- Paul: I was still practicing medicine. That‘s probably why I wasn’t a very good publisher because I had to make a living.
- Interviewer: But there are reports that you made a million dollars off of them in 1993.
- Paul: I’d like to see that money.
- Interviewer: But would you give it back?
- Paul: To whom?
- Interviewer: But if you made money off of them and you disavowed them.
- Paul: Really?
- Interview: Well, to charity.
- Paul: That’s nonsense.
- Interviewer: If you made money off of them and you disavowed it.
- Paul: You know, I didn’t write them. I don’t endorse those views. And I’ve explained it many times.
- Interviewer: So you read them but never did anything about them?
- Paul: I never read that stuff. I probably became aware of it ten years after it was written. And it’s been going on twenty years that people have pestered me about this. And CNN does every single time… I didn’t write them. I didn’t read them at the time. And I disavow them.
- Interviewer: But you made money off of them.
- Paul: If you know I made money off of them then you know more about my finances than I do… It was published for ten years. So if that was ONE PERCENT of all the newsletters, I MADE MONEY TALKING ABOUT GOLD STOCKS. I think you’re really confused on that.
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:24pm@clara While I understand why you support Perry (BTW, I have considered his candidacy as well) these are some other concerns of mine why I can’t vote for him in the primaries:
Perry’s North American Highway
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXdhph3pwXk
Bank of America Lobbyist Tells Perry They’ll Help Him Out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F0RQLFybtw
Federal Reserve to Backstop Bank of America’s European Derivatives
Report Post »http://www.theblaze.com/stories/shock-report-federal-reserve-to-backstop-bank-of-americas-european-derivatives/
Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:45pmRon Paul wants to legalize herion also….
Ron Paul is NOT for me
Perry For President
Report Post »http://www.rickperry.org/
Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:03pmCorrection….heroin
///////////////////////////////
Ron Paul sounds like a card-carrying member of Code-Pink
No Way…No How
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:15pm@clara I understand why you would vote for Perry. I considered him too before. Here are some reasons why I can’t vote for him:
Perry’s North American Highway
youtube.com/watch?v=yXdhph3pwXk
Bank of America Lobbyist Tells Perry They’ll Help Him Out
Report Post »youtube.com/watch?v=1F0RQLFybtw
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:17pmFederal Reserve to Backstop Bank of America’s European Derivatives
Report Post »http://www.theblaze.com/stories/shock-report-federal-reserve-to-backstop-bank-of-americas-european-derivatives/
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:20pm@clara His stance on drugs basically lies not on Legalization but decriminalization, which are two different things. And considering his positions consist of federal matters, not state, makes a huge difference. The main reason he takes those positions is because of the Constitution. The Constitution does not contain the word “drug” or mention anything of that matter in it. So my question in considering this from a legal (not political) perspective is as follows. What part of Article 1 Section 8 and Amendment 9 and 10 gives the federal Government Power to govern in those issues regarding private drug use by Citizens? Shouldn’t the States take care of that (punishment, regulation, and all)? Recently not even CA was able to legalize marijuana in a popular vote. I believe the federal Government has been a huge failure with these Progressive prohibitionist laws. They have not improved our society’s problems or immorality. I rather Jesus tell me what’s right, than have Big Government force me to do what they believe is right. It all comes down to individual responsibility. I do believe though that Law Enforcement may detain those who cause damage or transgress the rights of others, bring them to trial, and rule with exact judgement. These drug laws only give the impression that Government must, will and can take care of our society’s ills, but do nothing to place personal responsibility ahead. We need God, not more Government.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 7:35pmClara88, Some of the things you say are dead wrong as you do not know how to do real research. I guess if you believe all the crap about those newsletters, I can say that you are a Nazi with your 88 symbol which is an old Nazi symbol. I am a realist though and believe that is the year you were born? If not your birth year, does it show that you are a Nazi? See how things can be twisted around? Paul has been the most honest person in Congress and you will not even give him consideration that he is telling the truth? What does that say about you?
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:59pmCan’t you guys find something BETTER to do than to post your NONSENSE on ALL of my comments??? Ron Paul will NEVER be the nominee..PERIOD
I have been insulted…and called names repeatly because i do NOT like Ron Paul. I do NOT call anyone else names and i do NOT insult them either. I’m a nice person…But I have had my FULL of a few on here.
I hope the mothership that Ron Paul has been waiting for arrives soon and takes Ron and his buddy Alex Jones Info Wars and their 1000 conspiracies and a couple of bloggers from The Blaze and flies to the planet PARANOIA very soon. They can live happily ever after as isolationists.
See…i HAVE done my research….Ron Paul NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Now….BUZZ OFF
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:49pm@clara First, I have never insulted you. Second, this is an open forum. Third, you don’t have a monopoly to post only your views. Fourth, you mentiond Paul, and thus we responded to defend him.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:35pm@Colt
I read all of the comments on most threads and your comments are never unkind….and you also use the words Please and God Bless :)
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:35pm@clara Thanks : )
Among those up there on stage I’d prefer Paul and Perry. Paul being my first choice. I have my reasons. We’re all in campaign mode. Keep researching. God bless.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 2:39amClara88, you see, you just show ignorance here and ignorance is not a virtue. You began this thread with a “Weekly Standard” link? Has Fox News all over it. Fox News is part of the MSM, haven’t you noticed yet? They are not for Perry, they are Romney all the way. Romney is the chosen establishment candidate, look at who funds him here. http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/264837/20111209/ron-paul-newt-gingrich-mitt-romney-funds.htm
Report Post »You say you have had it with, who me? I only point out lies. Go here, if you dare, to learn about those newsletters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95CagSkXZYc&feature=youtu.be Perry is toast at this point. He said he was ready to send troops back into Iraq immediately. Bad move. Sorry, but that is the truth.
Clara88
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 11:04am@WestCoast….i’m farrrrrrrrrrrrr from ignorant but if putting other posters down makes you feel SUPERIOR about yourself than so be it. Even referring to the 88 after my name and bringing up nazi AT ALL says MORE about YOU than it does ME.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:08pmBlinded By The Left-How Marxists Wrote Ron Paul’s Defense Cuts Plan
by Trevor Loudon
http://www.biggovernment.com/tloudon/2012/01/08/blinded-by-the-left-how-marxists-wrote-ron-pauls-defense-cuts-plan/
Clearly Ron Paul and Barney Frank’s Sustainable Defense Taskforce was totally dominated by the hard left – people with an interest in transforming America through socialist revolution.
How did get Ron Paul get sucked into this leftist scam? Did he not care who wrote his country’s defense policies? Did he not do due diligence on the people he entrusted with such a huge responsibility?
Either Ron Paul was extremely negligent in checking the bona fides of those he entrusted with such a vital responsibility, or he just didn’t care that anti – American Marxists were involved.
I think Ron Paul was probably negligent. He was o blinded by his own prejudices, that he was willing to a deal with the devil to get publicity for his cause.
That a serious contender for the presidency of the United States could be so careless over such a vital issue speaks volumes about his judgement
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:13pmCont
http://www.biggovernment.com/tloudon/2012/01/08/blinded-by-the-left-how-marxists-wrote-ron-pauls-defense-cuts-plan/
Ron Paul is the best there is on financial and economic matters. That is the field where he can best serve his country, and the cause of liberty.
unfortunately, he clearly doesn’t have the understanding of defense issues required of a man who aspires to the highest office in the free world
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 3:27pmAlso from this article
It seems, that when it comes to defense, Ron Paul is stuck in 1776. He seems not to realize that America’s enemies, real or potential, Russia and China, and Iran chief among them, have a very long reach. The continental US is only partially protected by the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans . The enemy can now attack the American homeland with ICBMs, biological weapons, cyber warfare, dirty bombs smuggled across the Mexican border – any number of deadly methods of mass destruction.
Just as frontier forts would have outposts to warn of Indian attack, the US needs people all over the world to protect not just her friends and allies, but the American homeland itself.
Why then does Ron Paul, a man so supremely rational in many areas, have such a blind spot when it comes to US national security?
The answer, in my opinion, is that Ron Paul’s justified distrust at the growth of government power in many unconstitutional areas, has irrationally created an antipathy to Federal Government activity in one of its few legitimate areas – national defense.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 8, 2012 at 10:47pmClara, I was just pointimg out how you can take anything and make it seem what it is not. Just trying to wake people up. The economy IS going to crash. Are you prepared for that? It does not matter if we put a progressive in or Ron Paul. I would rather have Paul as he is the best to prepare us for what is in store for us when this happens. If we are not careful, we will lose the Constitution and then what? Are you and your family prepared to go through the tribul;ations of Marxisism or Fascism? I bet you are not. All these guys have the ability to sound good. Paul is just the one that talks about running the country the way it was set up to be run, all the rest want war.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:02pmYeah, I’ve seen enough “paulbearers” that are either medicated or need to be. Paul is not for me nor is he fit to be prez. Those newsletters are enough to rot any campaign.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:09pmif you believe he is a racist, you’re more pathetic than the NAACP (they don’t even believe that garbage).
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:12pmas for “not fit to be president”, why is he the only one to pre-emptively speak out about our current dire straits.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM
seems to me your arguement is not only misinformed (trying to be nice here), but quite obtuse. good evening sir.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:12pmYou dam Paulestinians are crazy . I know youre trying to do the right thing BUT calm down
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:17pmI just read what he put his name to; pretty sad.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:20pmI’m just sick of the inane followers blindly following a guy who is, in reality; just another rich politician making money off of easy prey.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:21pmi am far from crazy sir. i am, in fact, quite lucid.
btw, when will you republicans learn that calling independents names like paulbots and such other infantile insults will not help your cause in the general election?
you cannot win without our support. don’t be myopic.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:25pmI call you ‘paulbearers’ not ‘paulbots’…Save your election day threats. Go ahead and be ignorant and write your hero in, because he ain’t gonna make the ticket. Or, you can join reality and see things as they are.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:28pmYawn. Really hope you watch this, Tron. Here is what real journalism looks like, btw. Note that you’ll never see theblaze or Glenn give you an analysis like this when they have an agenda to peddle.
http://youtu.be/95CagSkXZYc
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:28pmAfter seeing the tape i changed my mind. The Paulestinians have lost all sense of reality. Their crazy man
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:34pmi have made no threats, but i will not vote for romney simply because he is not obama. that is a dangerous (and might i say stupid) way of thinking. i will consider the libertarian of constitutional party candidate before any of the other GOP losers. it’s not a ron paul thing, it is about substance sir. you cannot realize this in politicains or individuals i see…
-you’re sinking your own ship and will blame other for your loss. grow up.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:43pmThe hateful and crazy Paulies are Ron Pauls worst attribute. If they like their guy they would either shut up or shape up or direct their vile towards Obama and he could win. Paul is not the worst, but the paulies sometimes make him sound that way. I would certainly like him better than Obama.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:44pmFELLA,
just watched the whole video. The problem is, Paul was asked by that CNN winch, “did you read them all?” He said, “not all of them.” Oopsy. If my name was on a newsletter, you bet your batman doll, I’m gonna see what in blazes is in it. Paul failed to do so and here is the blowback that he has brought upon himself.
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:58pmhaha Oh Tron. You cling to that CNN interview like your life depends on it. I guess you’re just going to believe what you want regardless of any evidence to the contrary. Whatever. Your reasoning is disappointing but not unexpected.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:21amHere is Paul being a racist
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4
colt1860
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:18amI don’t think he wrote them. Here’s some proof.
Reality Check: The name of a ‘Mystery Writer’ of one of Ron Paul‘s ’Racist’ newsletters:
http://www.fox19.com/story/16458700/reality-check-the-name-of-a-mystery-writer-of-one-of-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters
Report Post »Fella
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:31amIsn’t it sad that a local news station has done a better job of investigative journalism than theblaze, Glenn Beck, and the entire MSM on this story. Hardly matters now though.
Anyway, thanks for posting the update, I had not seen the follow-up yet.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 3:04amhe was a publisher (funding) and the economic contributer, not the editor (the person responsible for censoring thoughts, opinions and ideas that you might not agree with)… do you really believe that all networks, magazines, etc, etc, agree with everything that every show, article and ad says and does “in their name”.
Family Guy is constantly racist, in the name of “comedy” and “shock value”, so Fox agrees with everything they say? Or do you think all the actors agree with everything that was said by other actors in every show they do? really people? we’ve been reduced to this?
Report Post »No Free Beer
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:02pmI am a Ron Paul supporter and this caller is an idiot. I disagree with Glenn Beck on foreign policy, but this caller was just ridiculous.
Anyway,
RON PAUL 2012!
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:19pmthat’s what screeners do, they scrape the bottom of the barrel in to chose the least intelligent paul supporter in order to fortify the host’s point of view. it’s a simple form of propaganda.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:55pmIn Glenn’s defensehe said before and after the call that it was a bottome of the barrel caller. But there are too many of them. THose type of people should put their passion somewhere else in the campain than calling shows or other public displays.
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:27amPaul is as looney as anyone, you paulistinians need to get behind the republican nominee and get that POS “out the house”, Iran is no friend of ours and ronnie doesn’t get it,if you vote for this clown I want to kick your ass !
Report Post »maroon67
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:59pmWow… do you see the tunnel vision some of these Americans have? Wake up America! Wow
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:05pmNo doubt, that caller was stuck in a tunnel. Hope he makes it out ok.
Report Post »DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:06pmYou are right, Beck has gotten ridiculous.
Report Post »NIPPOHIPS
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:56pmDuring the live chat at the Iowa caucus 44% of Blaze readers who participated liked Ron Paul.
Report Post »Since the Blaze sells advertising one wouldn‘t think they’d go out of their way to annoy so many readers.
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:04pmIf they don’t like the Blaze, they should go make their own site. Capitalism, right?
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:17pmSo the Blaze should adjust the truth to pacify their readers? Pauls own words and actions are doing him in. And if that isn’t enough his fringe supporters will finish the job. It’s a pity because Paul has some great ideas and could be a great benefit to the nation. INMO he is no more fit to be POTUS than my cat.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:26pmWell I was part of that live chat and I question your percentage. Most everyone I spoke too was not a Ron Paul fan, unless they were on at the beginning. I did come on later.
Report Post »NIPPOHIPS
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:37pmThere was a poll at the bottom of the chat screen. The questions changed periodically. The first set of questions asked which candidate people supported. Paul had 44% which was way more than the other candidates. Considering who on the Blaze is the most opinionated other than Paul supporters it was a surprise.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:37am@82dAirborne
Report Post »insightful, you must be a great thinker? why is paul so unfit to be president? and what would you better than what he has written on his plan?
str8blues
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:15amThe Blaze panders to no one. The Truth has no agenda.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:11pmI say hit Glenn where it hurts, his pocketbook. He put everything into GBTV and I say if you support Paul, drop GBTV, I already have. I did not drop it the normal way as it does not give my reason, I e-mailed GBTV and gave my reason. I was a huge Beck fan, to the point my wife thought I was obsessed with him. I did think that he was the guy, the one who you could trust, the one that was right on just about everything. Funny how things change. Funny how Beck changed. All his Founding Father Fridays are now, to me, a waste of time.
Report Post »Freedom Keeper
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:56pmWhat a crazy nutjob. I feel sorry for people like this. And I don’t blame Glenn for not being to nice to him. He deserved it.
Report Post »Leopold
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:03amat freedom What is wrong with people. Glenn is in business. I believe it is his business, no? This site is his, no? And when idiots call he has all the right in the world what to do with them. You don‘t like what he says don’t listen, don’t watch, don’t read. These paul supporters are crazy people. They call other talk shows as well,. And they sound just as ignorant and fanatical there. There is a lot of hate on this site. If what Glenn showed, and it looks that way, is true, then we can be pretty sure that soros is behind a lot of theses calls. It is his style. It is just so sad that people cannot think for themselves and let themselves be used like this, thinking they are in the know. They are just as much useful idiots as the ows people. Sad and scary. God please protect America and grant wisdom to it’s people,
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 7, 2012 at 8:49am@LEOPOLD Sorry Leo…you people are Soros’ puppets because you go along with the NWO..You are supported the financial ruin and downfall of America..Paul people are the ones trying to reach out to people such as yourselves..The media has done a great job in brainwashing you.. We stand on our Constitution..and we stane with God and His Son Jesus Christ..We are not responsible for what others do..It is frustrating trying to educate a nation which gets all of its views from “tell a vision.”.You see..they brainwash you into what they want you to believe.. Our founding fathers did not have some one elses tell a vision..It has been a great way to brainwash a nation..I would bet that you would be hardpressed to find any organization not touched by George Soros in Washington. Google John McCain..and Soros..Ron Paul has a proven record of how he has voted..he has voted our Constitutional rights everytime. He has voted in favor of Israel..He is the only one with a sound fiscal plan..You vote any of these others in…it will be the same as Obama..I would say just a little slower destruction..but when you are already over the edge of a cliff..how long does it take one to die?
Report Post »