Rush Limbaugh: ‘The US Would Be a Better Place Without the New York Times’
- Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:30pm by
Mytheos Holt
- Print »
- Email »
Rush Limbaugh just doesn’t want to lay off the New York Times. First, he savaged this video by the New York Times editorial and reporting staff complaining about their potential loss of pensions:
With this clip from his show:
And now, fresh from that segment, Limbaugh has decided to dig in his heels and point out that, while their grievances are unrealistic, it might be good for America if the staff went on strike and refused to print information. Why? Because it would mean the end of the New York Times, and would demonstrate just what the results of support for liberal policies are – namely, bankruptcy. The Daily Rushbo has cut out the most searing part of the monologue, reproduced below:
RUSH: No, no, no. Follow me, Snerdley. There’s part… (interruption) Yes, yes! Let the union hold tight; have the Times go out of business. That might be one of the best things that ever happened to country. Stop and think about that. The US would be a better place without the New York Times. If these writers and all these people you hear in this video, if they get their way, if they don’t buck, they don’t buckle and force the New York Times into bankruptcy? Well, I asked the other day: Can you imagine what a different country we would be if we had a media that actually was as the Founding Fathers envisioned it?
The full segment, cut out to form a video, can be heard here:



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (71)
ottis
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 12:37amI know Cambodia would of been a better place with out them around period!
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 12:33amThe US would be a better place is more conservatives with the cash reserves could buy out the NYT, ABC, NBC and CBS and start airing fair and truthful news without agenda’s, let people actually know the facts and the truth and let them make informed and educated decisions.
Report Post »Dumpster Baby
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 12:01amWow. Project much Rush? You fat hypocrite.
Report Post »charles116
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 1:02amRush is angry he has zero ‘power’ in NYC.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 8:29amYou can call him a fat hypocrite if you want but, he does have 30 million listeners a week. 1/10th the population. Hmmmm… Wonder how many subscribers the NYT has. Especially if you don’t count the other pink-o commie journalist who subscribe? hee hee
Report Post »blaze2453
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 5:03pmReal cool comment. Shows your intelligence…just call someone names. Really smart. You must have a GED.
Report Post »OneShotPagan
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 11:40pmYou mean they aren’t bankrupt yet?!!? I mean financially, not morally … we know they lost that years ago.
Report Post »G-WHIZ
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 11:45amHmmmm…I smell(P.-U.!) a bailout tn their future. The prog/commies always bail each other out.
Report Post »Pat Alexander
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 11:33pmThe Grey Lady is dead.
They just forgot to bury her. But soon….
Report Post »MAMMY_NUNN
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 1:14amI agree NY is no longer a beacon but rather a embarrassment to be avoided.
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:50pmIts been said for a while now but still rings true. Journalism is dead. Seek the path of truth for your own self. Its the ONLY way your going to find it.
Report Post »charles116
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 1:06amRush his lucky.
Report Post »HE says he does comedy not journalism.
Kind of like Hee-Haw.
SquidVetOhio
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 8:30am21 years of being #1 isn’t luck. BTW, you know Zimmerman is free don’t you? ha ha ha ha
Report Post »tomacz
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:25pmTHE YEW NORK TIMES
Report Post »all the news that’s fit to print
from a to b
international edition printed in europese
worlds greatest birdcage liner
bladder for the democrat party
G-WHIZ
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 11:48amOi! Hey Ma…time ta rap the fish!
Report Post »BillnGA
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:15pmIf the New York times sends you an ad requesting you buy the paper,and there is a post paid envelope in it , send a “no thanks” back on their dime………feels good!
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:48pmThe New York Slimes is my name for them. Maybe Rupert Murdoch could by them or maybe Glenn could and make an honest paper out of them.
Report Post »VoteRightDammit
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:31pmA
G
R
E
E
Completely!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:45pmRush says, “Can you imagine what a different country we would be if we had a media that actually was as the Founding Fathers envisioned it?”
That’s a hoot. Like Rush Limbaugh is an example of the kind of media the Founding Father’s envisioned? Please everyone, you simply cannot be that stupid. Please tell me you’re not that stupid.
Report Post »dblaess
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:10pm@jzs
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:45pm
Rush says, “Can you imagine what a different country we would be if we had a media that actually was as the Founding Fathers envisioned it?”
That’s a hoot. Like Rush Limbaugh is an example of the kind of media the Founding Father’s envisioned? Please everyone, you simply cannot be that stupid. Please tell me you’re not that stupid.
Report Post »—————————————————————————————————————————————
Rush is not media, he is entertainment as he has often said. The sad part is because the main stream media has become “Pravda”, Rush has become media as he reports the “news”. The founding fathers did not envision the media as becoming the talking parrots of the government as is the current situation. This is why Obama wants to redo the first admendment and would like to get rid of the internet (the media you and I use to find out the real news). No we are not that stupid, but I see you still don’t use your real name so either you are that stupid or is this George, yet again?
Walkabout
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:20pmRush Limbaugh is much closer to what the Founding Fathers had than the NYT.
You want me to like the NYT that bashes the Republicans without end? The NYT is in the tank for the Democrats & supports them after all the times they propose sh_t that is not actuarially feasible.
If Rush Limbaugh were gone there would be another 60 or 70 talk show hosts you would want to censor, put in a re-education camp or worse.
Face it, you just don’t like conservative, Republican voters & many libertarians.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:33pmNYT Presidential Endorsements
Scr ew the NYT!
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/10/23/opinion/20081024-endorse.html
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:36pm@JZS
Report Post »You can disagree with people, and that’s perfectly fine. Argue and debate. That’s what life is all about. But, when your argument is simply “you’re stupid”, you get anger from some and respect from no one. You can’t help yourself, I know, because your a liberal and you guys are very limited in your abilities. Now, get out of here…you’re an idiot.
jzs
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 10:18pmdblaess says, “This is why Obama wants to redo the first admendment and would like to get rid of the internet…” dblaess, where did you get the idea that President Obama “would like to get rid of the internet”? Could you provide a quote or link? That’s schizophrenic nonsense as far as I can tell.
Walkabout, I suppose you also believe that the President “would like to get rid of the internet”? Beware the company you keep!
Okay, so you say that the NYT, “bashes the Republicans without end?” Walkabout, are you able to take advantage of the internets? You say the NYT, “bashes the Republicans without end.” So you wouldn’t have a problem posting “without end” links to the NYT “bashing Republicans” would you?
But, rather than call you out as a liar, I’ll simply ask you for one NTY article “bashing Republicans.” Not an huge list as you claim is the basis for your opinion. Just one. Just one NYT straight news article that “bashes Republicans.” You have have access to the Google don’t you? So, let’s see it. I’m calling you a liar. Prove me wrong.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 10:56pmJZS
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffield/2008/01/03/bush-bashing-republican-henry-lowenstein-nyts-favorite
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 7:38am@JZS
Report Post »Your mother is going to be p*ssed when she sees you were posting here at 10:18 pm last night. I’ll be emailing her this link today for proof. You’re in big trouble. It‘s a good thing you don’t have a Dad living with you (most liberals don’t) or it would be even worse. He’d spank you.
jzs
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 8:49amWalkabout, we’re talking about New York Times articles. Do you have one of those?
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 9:14amI had an article & it didn’t post.
First the editorial board of the NYT is heavily slanted. The NYT is/was a national newspaper. It has a token Republican commenter. It says that it takes predominantly letters to the editor from liberals because that is what gets sent in (they say). The Republicans a liberals posing as Republicans. For a national paper they can choose to pretend that letter from the editor come form more than just Manhattan or the NE corridor. Moot point now because they are doomed.
I once had a subscription to the NYT. Was that ever a mistake.
Report Post »TROONORTH
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:31pmBudgie-birds and Parrots across the nation are suddenly nervous!
Report Post »rgalunas
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:27pmI love the NY times. You may disagree with some that’s why our country is great. Debate honestly with truth and wisdom.
Report Post »lovenfl3
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:35pmI do agree that debate and freedom of speech are great. The free market system is also great, and that’s why the New York Times is going down the tubes. Rush was absolutely right when he pointed out that these reporters have been pushing the very agenda that’s now biting them in the rear end. I think it’s called kharma. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJC5Zw-ggrc
Report Post »PrfctlyFrank
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:45pmThe NY Times has covered up more global atrocities than any fish wrapper rag in the US.. They have been corrupted, and thereby corrupting, since before they knowingly hid Russian atrocities from the World.. The US is a better place without the NY Times, just as Rush said..
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:47pmRGALUNAS – I have a car that mows grass on the fourth day of the awakening of the earth Day manifesto commonly cared for by muppets are friendly.
Now that makes as much sense as what you just wrote.
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 9:01pm@Frank:
Report Post »Very well put. Sure made more sense than what rgalunas had to say.
ByzantineAngel
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 1:37amrgalunas- I suspect you made your statement in complete sincerity and without any sarcasm or irony.
When I see how low the NYT share price has fallen I smile and think tick tock…tick tock.
I loath the NYT for colluding with the Communist and deliberately printing misinformation of the evil that was really going in the former Soviet Union. May Walter Durante burn in Hell and a curse upon his family for a thousand generations.
In Memorium of my great grandfather who was executed by the Soviets and for the millions of people who died in the Holodomor, and the small children who were sent to Gulags for stealing grain so they and their families wouldn’t starve I would never ever by the NYT.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:24pmSave a tree . . . cancel your modern day liberal local newspaper.
Report Post »G-WHIZ
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 11:58amAnd my great supply of T.P. will dry-up…and I will actually have to go out and buy some. :o)
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:19pmImagine an America without the NY Times – now that’s Utopia.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:16pmHey Rush! Many feel that the world would be a better place without you as well — to each their own.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 8:34amYea, communists and RINO”s. Wondering which category you fall in…..
Report Post »G-WHIZ
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 12:00pmIf the world had no Prog/socialist/commies, there would be no need for RushL. .
Report Post »South Philly Boy
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:12pmNo Truer Words SPOKEN
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:11pmThe Media Networks take their leads from the NYT… so whom will they copy from if it fails? Will they have to go directly to MM or the WH?
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:10pmi could make a very long list of what and who America would be better off without.
Report Post »Welcome Black Carter
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 10:29pmJust give us your top five…
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:03pmOnce again, Rush is AS RIGHT as rain!
Report Post »Mess23
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:59pmThey deserve exacty what they get because they asked for it. They only problem, this is what is happenning to America and the lame stream is still sponsoring it. Freakin idiots. We are all going t o lose because of these freakin idiots.
Report Post »Conservative_T-Rex
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:48pmas usual, El Rushbo is dead on. I am happy that i will witness the NYT going out of business in my lifetime!!!!
see if u can ID fox news personalities quiz: http://www.sporcle.com/games/Bohnfather/fox-news-personalities
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:48pmI agree with Mr. Limbaugh. But then again, we need to keep them around so that we never forget how corrupt leftist media really is!
Report Post »G-WHIZ
Posted on April 25, 2012 at 12:02pmThe word [zoo] comes to mind… .
Report Post »LeadNotFollow
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:43pm…
Report Post »In my opinion, the New York Times ranks below used toilet paper.
I would not stink up my home with that Obama butt kissing rag.
progressiveslayer
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:40pmRush is right kind of,the ‘journalists’ lmao would simply work for another left wing rag,there’s always some fool with more money than brains to run a lib newspaper.I‘m afraid we’re stuck with these communist pigs,they’re nothing more than the propaganda arm of the current Marxist regime.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 7:36pmRushbo says plenty of stuff that I disagree with, but this is something that I could really get on-board with.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on April 24, 2012 at 8:02pmFor Instance?
Report Post »