Politics
S.E. Cupp on CPAC: Nice Mix of Far-Left Conservative Wonks, Tea Partiers, Ron Paulites & Establishment GOP
- Posted on February 9, 2012 at 11:49pm by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 367 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 367 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (150)
ambrosia
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:00am“S.E.” Cupp has no significance on anything.
She tries too hard, to be fascinating, earth-shattering & attractive.
She’s a complete wash-out.
No one takes her seriously-
she’s NO Megyn Kelly.
She’s, like a cartoonish cross, between Nancy Drew, Lois Lane & Jessica Rabbit-
fictional, wanting & annoying.
All the intelligent men & women reach for the remote control,
the moment they hear her name.
She threw a beautiful name, like Sarah Elizabeth, aside
& pretentiously, chose to go by, the unflattering, matronly-sounding, “S.E.”Cupp.
Suppose, by using her initials,
she thought that would
put her on par
with the likes of J.D. Salinger & J.C. Penney ?
Airwave Wags,
Report Post »like S.E. Cupp & A.B. Stoddard,
both desperately need….an I.Q. Intervention.
TAXEVERYONE
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:56amWhy would anyone care what she thinks?
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:52amIs it me or does S.E. Cupp look like she should be staring in a porn movie?
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:55amSE does DC?
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:00amIT’S JUST YOU. Her boobs aren’t showing like the ladies on FOX News. They are always trolling on FOX. SC Cup always looks fine.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:28amThxll38: Yes it is just you. If every time you see an attractive women you think she should be degrading herself by appearing in a porn movie then perhaps you should give the mouse a rest and find another way to spend your time than on the internet.
Report Post »blackmoefugga
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:49am………1 Cupp.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:53am.
Report Post »No! She’s way to smart to be in a Porn Movie. But she is easy on the eye’s……..
MS-GlenNBC
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:25pm“A Severely Conservative Republican” Romney actually called himself that….
Romney Supporter Calls in to Tell us why we should vote for Romney.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc19Fpe9kpQ
Glenn Beck Would N E V E R say this about Mitt Romney
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hD4QvMhFUM
babylonvi
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:04pmMore like a ‘B’ cup?
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:53pmDon’t forget you social conservative nuts, she is an atheist.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:09pmTHXll38, we already knew she was stupid but thanks for sharing.
Report Post »kimdraker
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 10:19pmYour hormones, perhaps?
Report Post »ThoreauHD
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:40amThose two anchors look like a Saturday Night Live parody. Please don’t make me watch them again. A ginger with a toupe for hair and a lipless chick… Bloody hell. Kill me now.
Report Post »riverdog1
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:00amso SE, the usual bunch of crazies then.
Report Post »C1ppy
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:11amHow mind numb do you have to be, to not realize that RP was not asked to speak this year at CPAC, especially after he won the CPAC Straw Poll two years in a row!? CLOWNS ALL OF YOU!!
Report Post »Baaaaaaaaa baaaaaaaaa baaaaaaaaa!!!
Obeckian1984
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:14amI am Sooo Sick of only hearing the 3 stooges being mentioned on TV news as the only candidates
Report Post »as if Ron Paul did not exist.
justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:28amLOL, I saw Eric yesterday intentionally blow off RP yesterday on the Five. He did a quick look around like god was going to strike him down for his deception. I‘m guessing he’s a pretty crappy poker player.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 1:08pmI‘d love to ask the RINO’s at CPAC this question….
What does it feel like to have views on foreign policy that are much closer to Obama and the CFR, than they are to Jefferson, Adams, and Washington?
Watching them have to admit that the founders views are “outdated” would be priceless.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 2:37pmPaulist, please stop wasting your time here. Volunteer, I have been Canvassing, Phone Calls, putting up signs and fliers, making copies, etc. for weeks now, reaching 100‘s if not 1000’s of voters a week. http://www.ronpaul2012.com/sign-up-as-volunteer/
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 6:44amC0MM0NSENSE like what you are doing isn’t wasting your time….. nothing like a glazed eyed cultist. And not a very smart one at that!
Report Post »C1ppy
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:07amI am so sick and tired of the same old attack on Ron Paul’s “foreign policy” beliefs. Mostly because it is a (mis)guided (overton window) half truth, in which one single policy alleviates a candidate to most of you Paul naysayers. If most of you Paul naysayers had any intellectual honesty, you could see that Ron Paul holds 99% of an ideology that Glenn has taught all of us over the past 10 years. The other 3 candidates are not even close to that! It is a shame that a 1% policy in “allowing” Iran to have a nuke (which is NOT the actual belief of Paul’s), could cloud that vision. Be honest, and ask yourself; if we cut all foreign aid (that includes all muslim countires who wish to harm us and Israel), and allowed Israel to defend herself without interference, do you think Iran would attain a bomb? NO! Israel would literrally blow the crap out of Iran, before that would happen! Ron Paul clearly states that if we go to war, we do it constitutionally through congress, then we go in and wipe them out QUICKLY! Now what’s wrong with that?
Report Post »Again people of the RP naysayers, intellectual honesty, it’s not just for breakfast anymore!
SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:11am“Ron Paul holds 99% of an ideology that Glenn has taught all of us over the past 10 years”
All the reason I would ever need to NOT vote for him. You’re not making the case you think you are.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:15amIt’s the Beckian, Saul Alinsky, tactic. They just pretend to be different.
Report Post »Obeckian1984
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:15amGlenn is lying about his true possition, he is total disinformation
Report Post »just like O’brian in the book 1984
Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:33amNo, Glenn’s not lying, he’s just being ignorant.
Report Post »HuckleberryFriend
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:38am@OBECKIAN1984
I think Beck is being sincere. He endorsed Bachmann, then put his weight behind Santorum. That seems pretty consistent with how he presents. How is he being consistent? Because of the Israel deal, and foreign policy in general. I wouldn’t say it is his number one issue, but it is probably in his top 3.
Having listened over the years, my guess is Glenn’s top 3 touchstone policies are like so:
1. Get our fiscal house in order. (Balanced budget while reducing the federal deficit.)
2. End the progressive attack on US citizens rights (borders, UN, IPCC, healthcare, etc).
3. Proactive stance on defense of our allies in general, and Israel in particular.
Whether you agree with him or not, it seems like Bachman and Santorum are closer to fitting all three of those, and Ron Paul is only 2 out of 3 without ever getting into the newsletter business. Now, it can certainly be said that on the 2 items Ron Paul does meet eye to eye with Glenn on, Paul is head and shoulders better than Bachman or Santorum, but he doesn’t meet #3.
Report Post »goodinohio
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:42amRidiculous
Report Post »nilo
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:32amIs Rick Santorum electable? Why not ask is Barak Obama electable? Good grief, how can people not see how much Rick Santorum is electable? He is the only “conservative” that doesn’t scare me. If Ron Paul would just control his libertarianism on foreign policy, I could have supported him too. Mitt and Newt are two cookies out of the same lliberal cutter.
SANTORUM IS THE MAN.
Report Post »Guttersmack
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:03amDitto
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:18am“Controlling his libertarianism” is exactly why the youth will never go for Rick Santorum.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:28amNILO and all you others that do not understand and/or refuse to grasp Ron Paul’s foreign policy, scroll up a tad and read C1PPY’s post. Santurum will not get the vote — he is a social conservative wacko and a war monger. He, Ricky the warmonger does not grab the attention of younger voters, he scares the crap out of them.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:09amNO to mentions, that is, besides being Ricky war monger, he will never carry the significant votes we need to cross back over the line that voted for Obama last election. Being from Pittsburgh, I assure you, you have seen nothing yet about Santorum. It isn‘t no accident or by mistake the Obama administration hasn’t bothered with him, nor any of the candidates except Romney, because they recognize the reality of this. For what ever reason, the right can’t figure this out, instead, want a mythological hero to emerge out of Santorum. HE isn’t, he is a fraud. HE wants to play up his roots, pretend he has some kind of Pennsylvania in him, but he does not. We have been fooled once, we won’t again. He is a sissy boy who wants to pretend he is like one of the guys. Many of us here in Western Pa, at least my generation, work hard and play hard. Growing up with dads in the steel mills, railroad, coal mines and so on, we have a work ethic Rick likes to pretend he knows all about, but instead, he is one of the sissy boys who never quite fit in. Which is fine, if he also had the other parts that go with showmanship, class and pure leadership skills, but he is a follower. Yes, he appears to be upfront now, gleaming with confidence, but go ahead and challenge him and his little boy come outs, getting mad and feeling insulted. I don’t know though, society has moved to being one who supports these little sissys. The video of the lady at the Pa town getting under his skin reminded me of
Report Post »MNCONSERVATIVEVETERAN
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:09amI do agree. I am very pleased that he won the straw poll here in Minnesota. Granted our delegates aren’t committed, but it sends a message to the rest of the nation from one of the most liberal states in the Nation. There is one thing Rick must do, that is get that “fire in the belly” attitude. He seems to be a bit Milquetoast.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 1:04pm@MNCONSERVATIVEVETERAN
Does this sound like a conservative to you?
http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2012/01/11/rick-santorum-a-massively-expanded-welfare-state-is-the-genuine-conservatism-our-founders-envisioned/
Rick Santorum: A Massively Expanded Welfare State is ‘The Genuine Conservatism our Founders Envisioned’
“What was my vision? I came to the uncomfortable realization that conservatives were not only reluctant to spend government dollars on the poor, they hadn’t even thought much about what might work better. I often describe my conservative colleagues during this time as simply ‘cheap liberals.’ My own economically modest personal background and my faith had taught me to care for those who are less fortunate, but I too had not yet given much thought to the proper role of government in this mission”
“I suspect some will dismiss my ideas as just an extended version of ‘compassionate conservatism.’ Some will reject what I have said as a kind of ‘Big Government Conservatism.’ Some will say that what I’ve tried to argue isn’t conservatism at all. But I believe what I’ve been presenting is the genuine conservatism our Founders envisioned. One that fosters the opportunity for all Americans to live as we are called to live, in selfless families that contribute to the general welfare, the common good”
Where he gets this nonsense from the founders writings is beyond comprehension. He must be confusing Marx with Jefferson.
Report Post »HuckleberryFriend
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:29amI am not a “Paulbot” by any means, but he still has a few delegates even though he hasn’t won a state so far. There are a lot of delegates to win and the race is wide open. Nobody is mathematically eliminated the last time I heard, including Gingrich and Paul.
Santorum has been most successful as of last weekend but dismissing Paul outright is not a fair assessment of the news and it became irritating to watch the video just to have the talking heads spend so much time telling me what to think and not think (ie dismiss Paul, dismiss what young voters are backing).
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:47am(dismissing Paul outright is not a fair assessment.) seems fair to me! A 30yr failed politician with a god awful squeaky voice. He panders to a kook base. A base he gathered by publishing a racist newsletter for 10yrs. A newsletter he now cant remember anything about. But he somehow made to the bank with the 900k the newsletter raked in.
Report Post »http://www.alternet.org/news/153551/ron_paul_and_libertarianism's_dirty_secret_–_pandering_to_racist_%22rednecks%22_to_get_ahead
justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:53amHey republicorp, I‘m still waiting for you to tell me which of RP’s bills, that didn’t pass, you disagree with.
Report Post »HuckleberryFriend
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:14am@Repubicorp
It is fine for you to think that. It is fine for SE Cupp, et al to think such things as well, but altering the results of their informal survey is not “real news”, it is just opinions that have flocked out other possible alternatives based on personal preference.
If you took a survey that said that 51% of boys prefer the color blue over other colors, do you ignore that result because you are more interested in green, saying “Well, the color blue is instilled in the male gender since they were babies, so that color doesn’t actually count.”? Is that news or opinion?
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:05amSE Cupp said “Far LEFT Conservatives” ?
Report Post »I’ve been Conservative most of my life
I don’t remember ever being called far left.
Extreme Right Wing, Neo-Con
(thats Ron Paul supporters favorite).
I also don’t understand why the
Establishment Republicans are there
They Hate Conservatives OH YEA !
they USE them to get Elected I Forgot !
carbonyes
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:15amFar left Conservatives, didn’t know there was such a thing. Wouldn’t really consider The RINO, John McCain, as a far left wing Conservative ideologue, although McCain is certainly NOT a conservative by any means. Take a hike would be a good message for Dear John, who probably lost his grit and backbone as a POW in Vietnam – sad, but true.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:23amJohn McCain is Republican Establishment Elite
Report Post »Hates the TEA Party an calls himself a Progressive
along with his dipstick dauther Meagan.
flipper1073
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:24amopps Daughter
Report Post »SUPERTODD
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:59amI hate the notion that if someone does not kiss Ron Paul’s a** they are not showing him the “proper respect”. He is not getting the nomination. There is a glass ceiling that he has hit in terms of the support he is going to get. This is mostly due to his foreign policy statements. Paul supporters can accept this or not, but it is reality. He should set his sights on being the Treasury Secretary. He could save our country’s future in that role every bit as much as he could as President without the tragic consequences his naive foreign policy would create. If this Presidential run is about saving the nation then he should withdraw and throw his support behind someone who has a chance to beat Romney. I would suggest Santorum because if the choice is between Newt and Santorum there really is no choice.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:16amSilly Todd. You think social PROGRESSIVISM (thanks Colt1860) is as popular in the rest of the country as it is on the Blaze. Seriously, I don’t see much of a difference between Santorum and Bush and people hated Bush so much that we have Obama. You think the rest of the country is going to vote for another George W? God, my head’s going to explode!!!
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:35amExcellent post and your right about Ron Paul. He would be a valuable member of the new administration as the Treasury Secretary. He’s a good man but his foreign policy is a show stopper. I can’t understand why Ron thinks Iran is a rational partner in nuclear armament. He also thinks that if we leave the Islamists alone they’ll stop their jihad against America and the rest of the world. How can anyone can believe that is beyond comprehension and defies common sense.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:50amjustangry
We have Obama because we have a media that lied to much of the electorate, a lousy candidate in McCain who was not willing to call it as it was. They spent more time bashing Sarah Palin than Obama, A party willing to appease rather than confront the hard choices before us but to call Santorum a Progressive is plain ignorant.
The one thing he has done is earmark bills as has Paul. The difference is he’s coped to it, unlike Paul who hid it for as long as he could. While earmarking then voting against the bills, which is just dishonest. You know the Progressive, “Do as I say not as I do”. as is your rewriting history. What’s next changing the definition of words…?
JustSilly
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:13am@Miami, I would have called Santorum a social conservative before I started reading this blog. Someone here pointed out that a social conservative wouldn’t use the government to push social issues, therefore anyone who does is really a social progressive. I thought they made a valid point. Sure the media lies, they do it all the time. Their a NASTY group of people, but still believe the 2008 election was more a vote against W. than a vote for the democrats.
@Behindblueeyes
“I can’t understand why Ron thinks Iran is a rational partner in nuclear armament. He also thinks that if we leave the Islamists alone they’ll stop their jihad against America and the rest of the world. How can anyone can believe that is beyond comprehension and defies common sense.”
In the modern era, how many countries has Iran invaded? How many has the United States invaded? How does your common sense rationalize this?
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:28am@JUSTANGRY
Report Post »My common sense is based on knowledge, real life experiences and more importantly (in the case of Iran) based on what they do and say. If you believe they are not dangerous people I don’t know how you come to that conclusion.
You say “How many has the United States invaded?”. You tell me and what do you mean by invade? Are you implying that America is the problem in the world?
Miami
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:48amJust silly
“In the modern era, how many countries has Iran invaded? How many has the United States invaded? How does your common sense rationalize this?”
You can’t be serious,
They’ve had a hand in attacking our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan…! Hello..!
Hamas, Hezbollha are sponsored arms of Iran. they’ve allied with Turkey, Egypt and Libya, as well as aided revolts throughout the Middle East like Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain and Yemen. Not to say their new ties with Venezuela, Cuba and Hamas camps with Mexico’s drug lords.
No you’re right, they’ve not invaded a State, they’ve infiltrated them.
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:55amI agree. I do not support Paul as president because of his foreign policy statements and ‘it’s America’s fault” beliefs.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:12am@Behindblueeyes
Yeah, my common sense relies heavily on the same things you mentioned. Where I differ is my knowledge seems to be shaken because I’m awaking to the idea that my knowledge is largely based on what the media tells me, and I’m starting to believe there’s something nefarious going on there. My experiences that I rely most heavily upon come from my time spent in the Navy. I’m hearing the same propaganda I heard in the 90’s and I got a little “fool me twice” thing going on. I just think the media is spinning this thing and Iran is not really that big of a threat. We’d crush them badly even if they had nukes, because our military is so INCREDIBLY potent. Yes, I believe our foreign policy is causing a lot of problems in the world. That doesn’t mean that I think that, in the cases where we were attacked, the invasion wasn’t warranted, or that we’re a bad country, just we’ve made some mistakes. We need to go back to walking softly while carrying a big stick, instead of just whacking everyone with a big stick. I don’t see anything good coming out of the military action the US took while I served. (Desert Storm, Yugoslavia) My point is I hardly think Iran is as aggressive as we have been, but they’re being portrayed that way. Granted, they’re whacko, annoying pains in the asses, but…
Report Post »BSdetector
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:22am@justangry
The ONLY thing that has driven me from Paul is his fantasy land belief that we can make peace with the Muslims through appeasement. Their own holy book says there are only 2 ways to have peace between Islam and Infidels.
1) The Infidel submits to the authority of Islam and pays a heavy sustained tax to Islam(forget what they call the tax) just for the privilege of not being killed.
2) The Infidel who does not submit, must be purified by the Sword.
And the only viable alternative
3) The Infidel kills and maims SO MANY of them that they either cannot, or that they lose the will to fight back, and surrender on the Infidel’s terms.
Unfortunately, the good Doctor chooses the first method and that is not acceptable to the vast majority of America.
Report Post »Peace Through Superior Firepower is the only acceptable peace with Muslim Terrorists.
BSdetector
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:32amHmm I know we‘re all grown ups here so I shouldn’t need a disclaimer, but this IS teh internets and some media matters troll will come here and try pick apart my last post so..
There are good Muslims out there (Dr Zudhi Jasser comes to mind) but those I was referring to, are the ones to make war on us. Iran is without a DOUBT one of them, as are most middle east countries, and sponsoring terrorism IS a form of war.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:51amAlright guys, I hear what you’re saying about radical islam. My question to all of you is… has anything you’ve told me come from any other source other than the media? Example, Miami, when you list all the nasty things Iran’s done covertly, where did you get that information from? Did you independently verrify it? There’s so much misinformation out there, which is why I support congressional debate and a declaration of war. Then send the troops in to kick their ass until their unconditional surrendor. After the ass-whipp’n we let them rebuild their own country. Why is that bad?
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:17am@JUSTANGRY
So we are morally inferior to Iran? You and RP keep running on that. And you guys wonder why people don’t support RP. Do you not understand how inane that sounds? And for your information, Iran is (not so) covertly arming the Shiites in Iraq, the Pashtun in Afghanistan, Hamas, Hizbollah and working with Chaves in Venezuela because they are too freaking cowardly to take us on directly.
So there is your answer. You keep proppin up Iran though.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:41amI’m not propping up Iran. I don’t like them (their leaders, that is) anymore than anyone else on here. I’ve had troubles throughout my life not letting my predudices towards muslims get the best of me. I think our leaders have made mistakes, such as Iraq, and Yugoslavia.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:45amSupertodd-
Report Post »The thing people forget is to win the general election, you need to get votes from the other side. Ron Paul is the only candidate the has support on both sides. Santorum will get no dem votes and most likely very few independents. If you put This guy as the nominee, we will get McCained in the election and the end of America will surely follow. If you vote for this guy, make sure you enlist to fight the war, make sure you don’t complain as he continues the process of dismantling our rights and freedoms. we need four year of Ron Paul’s policies. I doubt enough “conservatives” really care about freedom, they just want power. Having McCain the office would have been just as detrimental to our liberty as Obama, and placing Santorum or Romney in there will end in the same results. We will all get to watch as the american flag sinks from the horizon and witness the flag of the new world order rise in its place. You will be accomplices to the death of this nation.
Freedomluver
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:03pm@justangry
Your ability to keep your cool when dealing with those who refuse to see the obvious is admirable.
We build bases in their holy land, prop up ruthless dictators, invade their nations, kill them by the thousands…(including civilians who had nothing to do with any of this insanity), and then they blame them for wanting to get back at us.
I’d love to see the reaction these brainwashed simpletons would have if Iran propped up a dictator over here, built bases in their back yard, and did the same things to us that we do to them…and see how they would feel about it.
The people of Iran have not forgotten about the Shaw who was put in place by the CIA, and I doubt these war happy control freaks would take too kindly to Iran forcing an Ayatollah on us back when they were children.
The term “blowback” simply goes over their heads.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:06amAll you guys are still sipping on the tea of lies. True Tea does not lie. You guys are afraid of Iran, ohhh the big bad boogeyman. You listen and believe what the people who want to continue making fortunes off our young men and women lives that are serving their country, while many die in the process, over a lie. We just tested, successfully I might add, a missle defense system for Isreal that went off several times without a hitch. Our technology, from the defense system to unmanned mini-jets that travel 8X the speed of sound along with subs, aircraft carriers and nuclear weapons galore will keep us safe from any attack by any country in the world. We do not need bases surrounding Iran or Afghanistan or any other country to be safe from Iran. Get a grip people. Our biggest threat as a nation is our economy falling. Romney will not stop it with his ideas, neither will Newt or Santorum. We need someone who is actually willing to take on the establishment head on. If we do not, then we are toast. I cannot believe that you guys just do not get that. http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Report Post »Daddymac10
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:09amAfter Ron Paul retire this year, who will his cult-like followers follow next??
Santorum / Bachmann 2012
Report Post »or
Romney / Bachmann 2012
justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:03amWhoever embraces the constitution the way the founders envisioned.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:45am@Daddymac10
Report Post »They’ll most likely go back to the Democrat party where most of them came from. When you think about it, there’s really no difference between them and the old anti-war liberals.
justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:25amYeah because war’s great. Ain’t it, Willy? Have you been in one?
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:41am@justangry
Report Post »Nobody likes war but sometimes it’s necessary to our national security. The anti-war liberals are a particular group of people who think all our wars are the result of something bad that America has done and that all we need to do is hand our enemies a big bouquet of flowers and the world will be a happy, friendly place for everybody.
justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:59amMan, you called RP supporters would go back to the democrats then associated them to the liberal anti-war movement. RP supporters are right of today‘s conservatives and they’re not anti-war. They’re anti-undeclared war.
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:36amQPWILLY -
We not not go to war anymore — we nation build and occupy foreign lands. Get your head out of your warmongering ass.
Report Post »Naps
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:42amSantorum=Military Industrial Complex Wins
Report Post »Romney=Banks Win
Gingrich=Lobbyist’s Win
Paul=The American People Win
The 2012 GOP Race in a nutshell.
Diane TX
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:12amThe only sane choice is Rick Santorum because the main purpose of the Federal Government is to protect Americans from foreign invasions. The Federal Government wasn‘t supposed to become American’s “nanny”, where we’re told what to eat, and have an “one size fits all” socialized healthcare system. I’m an older person that has no need of abortion “services” or contraceptive devices. I also won’t need any kind of drug or alcohol rehab services. I also don’t have any kind of mental illness. I “could” get cancer, or have a heart attack. I “could” be in a auto accident, but not a skiing accident, because I don’t ski. Why should I, and others like me, have to pay for any possibility that might happen to another human being?
Obama’s “Affordable Health Care” is unaffordable for someone like me. I can’t afford to pay for others contraceptive needs, and I refuse to pay for someone’s abortion; or for their drug or alcohol rehab. Those people made their own mess. Let THEM pay for it.
Report Post »Robert999
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:45amSantorum will end abortion and birth control. I hope he will also make all unions illegal too.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:21amRobert
Unions may go the way of the buggy wipe, if their purposes has come down to preserving power for the sake of power it may just be their time to go.
One man cannot change law even though Obama has tried to do so, who should be charged with treason.
Birth control? really? Are you on drugs?
As for abortion as birth control? Late term abortions should be illegal except where the life of the woman is in danger and real danger not cold feet. Simplify adoption so people don’t have to go overseas too adopt. Life is precious and should be treated as such.
Hell Planned Parenthood was established to eradicate minorities by Margaret Sanger.
http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:31amRon Paul lost me when he said: “If Iran wants to have a nuclear bomb, they should have it”. He further elaborated: “… everyone around them has nuclear weapons, so why shouldn’t they?”. Ron Paul is a class one nut job. He doesn’t seem to realize that Iran wants to destroy both Israel and the USA, mainly because they’re not Muslim Nations.
Are all Americans ready to convert to Islam to satisfy Iran under a Ron Paul Presidency?
Report Post »Naps
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:45amWhat are you smoking,seriously? With that statement,I can tell you are definitely a faithful Beckistani.
Report Post »FEAR…it’s a hell of a drug. And if you keep listening to Beck…your gonna OD
TSUNAMI-22
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:10am….and if you listen to Paul you’re likely to glow, eventually.
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:27amDiane… Look if anyone… and I mean anyone lights one of those roman candles the whole world will over react. Iran will just be the first all glass parking lot… It’s what happens after that that worries me. If Isreal strikes first… parking lot… Egypt… parking lot… Do you get my point…
Everybody has them but nobody will use them and if they do the retaliation would be so fierce that it would be like self destruction or suicide.
It would be like lighting a brick of firecrackers… I don’t think Iran is that stupid, nor Egypt, nor Israel…
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:48amSo much fear and stupidity.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:59amFear..?
What is it?
What do you not understand about a Nuclear device?
No matter how tuff you are, Radiation will kill you, No it‘ll vaporize you if you’re lucky.
Do any of you Paultrons even understand that Islamist terrorist do not value life, merely their objective. Iran leaders have vowed time and again to destroy the little Satan (Israel) and the Big Satan (America) Iran has declared war on America and the western way of life way back WWII and have never made nice. Even re-declared it in 1979 during the Carter’s Arab spring.
As for the belief that Islamist hate us for our meddling in their “world” and Holy lands, why are they immigrating at about 10,000 a month to the US of A?
The Muslim Brotherhood was formed in the 1920′s to reform the Caliphate after it had fallen in WWI when it sided with Germans. The Brotherhood also sided with Hitler in WWII as did Iran, and all this before we were ever involved in their “World”
Have you ever read World History pre WWI or WWII? The Dark ages or what brought about the Crusades? Why Mosques in Europe are built on Church ruins? Or the Muslim Slave trade, which continues today…?
Good little sheeple
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:58amI am a libertarian, and I’m not naive on Iran. However, I’m also not naive on freedom.
Congress can force the hand of any President and any administration to pursue military action on any country. That’s where the “Ron Paul’s foreign policy is crazy” argument has ended for me. That just leaves the decentralization that Paul advocates so much, which Santorum absolutely does not want to do. His domestic policy can’t be argued without making yourself look like you are on team Obama.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 12:58pm@Miami
Seems Khrushchev vowed to bury us as well…didn’t he? Tyrants make all kinds of idle threats they never follow through with…eh? They use it as propaganda to empower themselves at home…and that’s about it.
If these Muslim fanatics are as suicidal as you claim they are, what on earth is stopping them from invading Israel and bombing our coasts with the subs they already have? Perhaps because they know they could not win that contest? Do you really think they would all of a sudden decide they could win a Nuke contest? Not much use in starting a war, if your nation is a sea of glass…now is there? You sure do make some pretty wild assumptions for a person who claims not to be a sheep.
I bet you really thought old Saddam with a real threat as well, eh? How’d that work out for you? You mean you will fall for the same NWO lie twice?
Hhhhmmm, the term sheeple comes to mind….
Now let me ask you a simple question…what does it feel like to have views on foreign policy that are much closer to Obama‘s and the CFR’s than those of Jefferson, Adams, and Washington?
Now repeat after me…Bbbaaaaahhhh, and then look in the mirror.
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:18amI saw tonight’s Blaze broadcast… I shut it off less than half way through.
The disrespect and dismissal of Ron Paul I would expect to see on MSM…But not at this level on the Blaze or on GBTV… I can get that kind disrespect for free every day.
“Smilin Buck” Really upset me tonight with his disrespect for a man that has spent half of Bucks life serving his country. The other half he was a Doctor of Medicine.
All I’m asking is that you show Ron Paul the respect he deserves. The half harted grin at the mention of Ron Pauls name just so you could say you addressed him was about as insulting as it gets.
Will’s point about the 26B for housing is right on.
A perfect example of taking the good with the Bad.
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:29amI too quit paying as much attention to Glenn as the links I posted in other comments one states Glenn agrees with Dr. Paul’s foreign policy, today Glenn says he “viemently” disagrees with him now, and it’s the SAME POLICY. The other link stated he talked with Rick Santorum and he‘s not serious about looking into the federal reserve and Glenn claims it’s eminent of needing addressed. Now Glenn is supporting Santorum. It proved to me that Glenn doesn’t have the true convictions on anything that he claims we should seek out we choosing candidates. Time has come to where integrity matters.
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:50amBoycott I so whole heartily agree. I’m thinking I miss the two iced coffees a month that this subscription costs me… Like I said I can watch people disrespect Ron Paul all day long for free…
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:58amYa YA YA. You Ron Paul whiners are a fickle bunch. I pity anyone that would have to rely on you folks as customers. Ron Paul is a great American but too many of his supporters are cranks.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:01amWorkforit
Report Post »Im not so sure Iran would’nt use theirs…. They are so filled with vile hatred, and they are inbred nutjobs, and they basically tell israel they will wipe them off the map…. So , maybe Bush shoulda handled this mess years ago, but he didnt . But i dont thinl Israel should assume they are safe with a nuclea Iran… But i dont know either…Very tricky deal, no doubt …
Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:31am@BULLCRAPBUSTER We’re only viewed as cranks because the other side refuses to reason with us.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:02amAlso, Glenn has failed to explain his positions; if he is a libertarian as he has said he is for a long time now, how can he justify Santorum’s wanting to drive him out of the Republican party? How can Santorum justify understanding where Beck does? They can‘t because they’re not even listening to each other, they’re just uniting on partisan lines… instead of using the word Republican, they use the word Conservative… progressivism.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:15amGlenn Beck and his staff better watch out that they don’t get declared “terrorists” and disappear under our new wonderful NDAA law. The fact that he moved his office out of New York to Texas is a prime indicator of terrorism. Criticizing the government’s over bloated spending is also potential terrorist activity. If you’re declared a potential terrorist, your Constitutional rights are automatically void and you fall under military rules (water boarding, finger nails pulled out, bullet to the head, etc). Paying cash for a coffee is now considered terrorist activity. In fact, breathing is now considered potential terrorist activity. Anything and everything is now terrorism. Here is a news story about it:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/everything-is-terrorism-mike-adams-on-infowars-nightly-news.html
This kind of reminds me of how post revolutionary France went nuts and starting beheading everyone during the Reign of Terror. Anyone who wasn’t a radical revolutionary was an enemy of the state. Now it’s everyone is a terrorist and ripe for assassination.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:15amGlenn Beck and his staff better watch out that they don’t get declared “terrorists” and disappear under our new wonderful NDAA law. The fact that he moved his office out of New York to Texas is a prime indicator of terrorism. Criticizing the government’s over bloated spending is also potential terrorist activity. If you’re declared a potential terrorist, your Constitutional rights are automatically void and you fall under military rules (water boarding, finger nails pulled out, bullet to the head, etc). Paying cash for a coffee is now considered terrorist activity. In fact, breathing is now considered potential terrorist activity. Anything and everything is now terrorism. Here is a news story about it:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/everything-is-terrorism-mike-adams-on-infowars-nightly-news.html
This kind of reminds me of how post revolutionary France went nuts and starting beheading everyone during the Reign of Terror. Anyone who wasn’t a radical revolutionary was an enemy of the state. Now it’s everyone is a terrorist and ripe for assassination by the state.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:32am@Bryan Because it‘s a good thing they’re putting Americans on a Terror Watch list, and curtailing human rights in so doing.
Report Post »TheObamanation
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:57amAt least she didn’t say Paulbots.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:40amThis is a different primary election that I have ever seen. I am thinking we are headed for a brokered convention which we have not had in over 100 years. If we end up having a brokered convention, none of the delegates will be bound by the election results and can vote for whomever they want. If you have been listening to the media’s take on the delegate counts so far, you are being misinformed (who would ever guess the media would lie) as Paul has way more than you think.
- In one precinct in Larimer County, the straw poll vote was 23 for Santorum, 13 for Paul, 5 for Romney, 2 for Gingrich. There were 13 delegate slots, and Ron Paul got ALL 13.
- In a precinct in Delta County the vote was 22 for Santorum, 12 for Romney, 8 for Paul, 7 for Gingrich. There were 5 delegate slots, and ALL 5 went to Ron Paul.
– In a Pueblo County precinct, the vote was 16 for Santorum, 11 for Romney, 3 for Gingrich and 2 for Paul. There were 2 delegate slots filled, and both were filled by Ron Paul supporters.
- We are also seeing the same trends in Minnesota, Nevada, and Iowa, and in Missouri as well.
Ron Paul supporters are going to continue to get the delegate spots as we are very well organized. When we head into the brokered convention, how faithful do you think your candidates delegates are going to be? I am guessing that even the hard delegates that they have won, at least 20% are Paul supporters as we have done our homework. You all know that delegates for Paul WILL be
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:51amcontinued… You all know that the delegates for Paul WILL be faithful. You can see how this is working by watching this Fox report: http://www.fox19.com/story/16774836/reality-check-caucus-chaos-and-why-delegates-are-what-really-matters
Do not count Paul out yet. The media blackout is not succeeding the way the establishment media is hoping for. Paul supporters are completely awake and doing what is necessary.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:18amWCP
Report Post »The last brokered convention for the Repub’s was 1940.
the Dem’s had one in 1952.
Time for Another One don’t you think ?
but then I’m nit-picking not quite 100 yrs.
flipper1073
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:30amSorry I mis spoke
Report Post »1948 for the Dem’s (Stevenson)
1952 for Repub’s (Dewey)
FDR last winner from a Brokered Convention (1932)
West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:22amFlipper, Yes I was off a bit, but still I cannot wait to see a brokered convention. I believe it will bring results that will be good for our country.
Tell me, do you live in a world full of wonder? LOL
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:28amFlipper, your name is not fair! After reading it I got that song stuck in my head. Thanks a lot.
Report Post »Taldren
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:48amheh, she must of gone out of her way to avoid the Paulites for her non-scientific survey. Then again, it IS SE Cupp here … think she would vote for Obama over Paul. :p
Report Post »reform
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:55amThis election is not even funny anymore!
Report Post »Taldren
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:02amDon’t know why you ever believed we were joking in the first place.
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:31amWasn’t SE hot For Rick Perry? I’m pretty sure she said she wanted to have his babies…
I guess that was before he dropped out…
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:40amGlenn Beck Supports Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy:
http://youtu.be/SXUBDT75jyI
Report Post »reform
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:53amI’ll try again was Glenn Beck not a keynote speaker last year what gives S C? So now everybody that attends is really against us conservatives?
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:54amGood lord the media has done a number on so many of you. Seriously, are your fears about Iran having a nuke grounded in anything other than the distortions spewed by the media? If you’re relying on our misinformation service, please search out who owns it and whether there’s a common denominator between them. In a perfect world, we’d still be the only country that has nukes, but the reality is that since we’ve opened that can of worms, eventually every nation in the world will end up having them some day. As for Iran being state sponsors of terrorism, I suggest you read the following article. It’s tucked away under the Blaze’s story entitled “Muslim Brotherhood Calls on Egypt to Dissolve Gov’t and Appoint a Brotherhood PM”…
Report Post »http://rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/08/10354553-israel-teams-with-terror-group-to-kill-irans-nuclear-scientists-us-officials-tell-nbc-news
Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:05pm@ Bryan from Florida: You are right the same exact thing was said about Ronald Reagan when he promoted the SAME EXACT foreign policy when handling the Soviet Union during the Cold War EXCEPT they ACTUALLY HAD 30,000 nukes with many pointed straight at us.
Now go back and check under your bed for that Jihadist Boogyman from the country who cannot even manufacture their own gasonline!
Ask yourself which foreign policy worked Ronald Reagan‘s or the one we’ve being doing for over a decade?
Report Post »Gnostyk
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:40amLook, I have to admit that S.E Cupp (wearing her eyeglasses) is the embodiment of the eighth-grade teacher I wish I’d had (I was taught by nuns). But her characterization of Ron Paul supporters as “Paulites” is just one more attempt to marginalize the good doctor. We don’t hear about Romneyites, Gingrichites, or Santorumites. In my opinion, Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Coulter, and Fox News are scared to death that Paul could be the man who confronts Obama. I was just informed that Judge Napolitano’s show, FREEDOM WATCH, was cancelled–and not for low ratings. Way to go, Fox. Your strategy seems to be: “Let’s eliminate all mention of Ron Paul”–that way, the sheeple will vote for one of the New World Order candidates.
Report Post »eagle2715
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:48amOr maybe it was a joke?….
Report Post »HAPPYRWE
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 11:51amRon Paul 2012
Report Post »Ron Paul supporters or those who are not brainwashed by the Socialist agenda….
thank you for being the voice of reason and sanity. I think if the truth is repeated
enough people will catch on. On the other hand those who attack Paul as sport or career will never
see the light, we just have to keep repeating and supporting the truth, those
who truly want to know the truth will catch on. I am saddened by Beck’s ambush
of the truth. He used everything good to trick the people. I knew when he first
came to the scene it seemed “too good to be true”. He rides on the coattails
of The John Birch Society, Ron Paul, Freedom, The Constitution, the LDS
Church and even God to prop himself up to status of a “watchman on the tower”.
It is so apparent now, I had hope that he was truly challenging viewers to “question
with boldness”.
Ron Paul, the Constitution, Truth, Freedom
and we who follow, are seemingly alone against this rising tide of deceit. How easily
the masses are controlled. The Communist agenda is in full swing, control the people
by controlling the mass media, control thought, outcome and then conquer.
The Constitution does hang by a thread……but we are that thread that eventually
saves it……………..
Daniel 7:25
25And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing
Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:28amI’m 32 and registered to vote for the first time so I can vote for Ron Paul, why don’t you “elders’ actually research a candidate rather than letting the media decide it for you…..
Report Post »C-Delta Conductor
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:35amAgreed, the only reasons why Rick Santorum is considered a Conservative is because he wears his faith on his sleeve, likes big wars, and the MEDIA (left and right) says that he is…. just like Newt Gingrich.
If we lived in a sane society we would be calling Santorum what he is: a Statist and a Technocrat.
Report Post »RabidPatriot
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:36amYour vote for Ron Paul will carry the same weight as all those other years that you did not vote. Registering to vote is a start. Next you should learn to make that vote count for something more than just personal pride.
Report Post »eagle2715
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:39amI’ve done tons of research, spent countless hours reading reports, dug deeper into most of these guys histories than their campaign managers, and that is exactly why Ron Paul terrifies me…
Report Post »Gnostyk
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:46amSantorum is a social conservative, but he is a fiscal big government totalitarian progressive. He never met a national debt increase that he didn’t like.
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:07am@ RabidPatriot….Hence the reason I have not voted until now because who cares about voting just because your pretty sure you win, I could care less if the Republican or Democrat is in the office My vote goes for the person not the party as both parties have screwed this country and us citizens. And no candidate besides him has mentioned one thing about cutting the spending and eliminating the debt. You voting the way you do IS why these politicians continue doing just as they have been!
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:42amI keep reading but I still can’t find a reason to vote for Santorum, Romney or especially Gingrich.
I’m old enough to remember what a piece of work Gingrich was the first time around. That guy is a thorn in anybody’s paw…
Romney is Obama “lite” Jjust take a glance at Romney care…
and Santorum is “The new world orders poster boy” with scripted bible quotes and a sweater vest…
come on people….
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »THXll38
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:41amFunny aint it? Since the media is mostly libtarted, they will promote the conservative that Obama can beat. That is why Paul is never mentioned — because he can beat Obama.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:40amMost of us on here have been researching Politics longer than you have been alive.
Report Post »I started with Barry Goldwater. an most of us don’t pay a damned bit of attention to
anything the Media says.We fight against the Media to get to the FACTS.
justangry
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 9:39am@Flipper, What sources have you been using other than the media? I’m asking as a relative newcomer to politics much like Boycott. (I pretty much just watched/read the news until I got pissed off about the Patriot Act) Now that I’m looking for an alternative to the media, I’m finding that all the sources I look at seem to lead back to the CFR or I wind up suspecting that they might be riddled with conspiracies. It’s an exhausting task trying to find decent sources, so I’m hoping you can help me out here.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:27amwhy Rick and Newt keep pulling apart voters is beyond me… neither can get the required delegates to get the GOP nomination.
It‘s Mitt ’Sachs’ Romney or Ronald Ernest Paul.
I, for one, am not choosing the “bank backed” candidate… that would be the defintion of insanity…
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:12amI pray that our youth do see the light and elect a real conservative…we do have a choice and it is Santorum…and by the way…conservative women rock!
Report Post »C-Delta Conductor
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:30amYeah, *real* Conservative meaning: uses the tax code to redistribute wealth to manufacturing, believes in a Progressive tax code, believes in using U.S. tax dollars to promote his “morals” in other nations, likes the USA PATRIOT act, supports the NDAA (retroactively, in fact), does not believe in federalism (rather thinks that the federal government should dictate to the states… just as long has he’s dictating), supports preemptive wars in countries that Reagan transformed using economists not bullets (e.g. South American nations). Yeah, as one of those under 25 “youths” Rick Santorum is a real COUGH–Statist–COUGH-cough “Conservative” that I can support.
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/01/04/santorum-conservative-technocrat/
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:53amGlenn, is not so much of a fan of Santorum he states it at :38 seconds
http://youtu.be/vTC2LphVN8U
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:23amWhat you say may very well be true…alot of them conservatives voted for the patriot act…the more I know about it the less I understand why they did…but..having said that…they ALL have some kind of strike against them…you know why…they’re human…Mr. Santorum is the only guy in this race as it stands that I would even consider voting for…and thats including Mr. Paul…don’t like his legalizing of things I consider very harmful to our society…and quite honestly his foreign policy scares the crap out of me…and the fact that the dude is 74 years old…most of the time he looks like he’s drawing his last breathe…I don’t begrudge him his age…but I believe it’s time to retire already…newt and mitt make my skin crawl…don’t know who I dislike more…its looking like Santorum more and more for me…God Bless.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:00amGODLOVINMOM, Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:41am@Godlovinmom, At the risk of making too many assumptions, your definition of real conservatism seems more grounded in religous text rather than the Constitution. I can respect that, but having a government that has always been corrupt controlling social issues scares me more than RP’s foreign policy. I just don’t see much of a difference between a Christian, Jewish, or Muslim theocrazy.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:45pmBecause I believe in God’s ways…doesn’t mean you have to…lets just look at conservatism at a non-christian point of view…do we want to be known as a nation that MURDERS babies…don’t think so…do we want o be known as a nation that has no control over our drug use…no thanks…do we want to be Europe, where anything goes…no…no body works over there…so whether you believe in God or not, decency, common sense tells me that conservatism goes beyond any beliefs…God only strengthens it…like every thing in your life…personally I pick God, but hey this is America, you don’t have to…you just have to deal with him later down the road. :)
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:53pm@godlovinmom: I understand your concerns. The “legalizing things that are very harmful” The fact is the current policies are NOT working, anyone can go down just about any street and buy any drug at anytime, (hence why prohibition DOES NOT WORK, “reality”) Also those who have a drug problem alot of people doesn’t believe their treatment for that problem should be prison rape. If you would research Dr. Paul without assuming his positions you would have a better understanding. Murder is not a federal crime. Why? Because the states handle it and they deem it a crime. The same thing applies to any behavior “you” deem inappropriate, the states with majority consent will regulate it. Just remember what behavior “you” deem inappropriate someone else may feel the same way about something “you” do, therefore be careful on how quick you are to regulate someone’s freedom as yours may be next to be regulated.
Lastly, I do understand when you are being preached to by every media source available that the jihadist boogyman is just waiting to come get you it‘s very hard to accept someone’s foreign policy that promotes peace especially since we have not had that in decades. However, do to our current debt crisis (which Mr.Santorum has to plan to address.) That “crazy” peace foreign policy will be forced upon us when bankruptcy happens and we no longer can pay the troops. When the inevitable bankruptcy happens the last thing I want is a big government Pres. tak
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:27pmAs in your name…let the people decide…agree…I totally believe in states rights…its what our founders conceived…I don’t want to rule over any ones rights…I just don’t want common sense to be set aside…nevermind God or conservatism…common sense tells me if we legalize all that junk…we are asking for it…as in abortion…since we’ve legalized this barbaric “practice” do you know how many babies are murdered in America each year…a heck of alot more than when abortion was illegal…so you tell me…as far as Paul’s policies on foreign affairs…common sense tells me that if we remove our troops from these other lands…we’re asking for it to come here… let Iran have a nuke if they want one…I believe is a direct quote of Mr. Pauls…ummm no thanks…I realize that this cost our great nation alot of money…money well spent I say….as far as drug use being penalized…personal responsibilty has to have its place…agree on the fact that the war on drugs is not working…I believe there should be stiffer penalties on peoples that sell them…if we get tougher on this issue…we might win it. (border security would definetly help)… I am glad that you did not find the need to call me names or harrass me for my stance..I appreciate that…so many on this site do that..thanks again!
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:17pm@GODLOVINMOM, I don’t call names you are entitled to your opinion just as I am. All I’m stating is the exact argument you are making regarding freedom of using drugs yet the state regulating it, is the exact same argument made when we had prohibition of alcohol, and the people finally realized they were losing the battle on people using alcohol and repelled that amendment, now people are free to use it however, the states still regulate it, % of alcohol per container, time of day you can purchase it, etc. Now with that you have very minimal “underground” alcohol production, yet roughly 99% of the alcohol produced now produces tax revenue from the sale as it did not when prohibited. Granted the system with alcohol is not perfect but it is far better than it was when it was prohibited.
As far as Iran “getting” a nuke, and I put quotes because like I’ve stated in previous comments Ronald Reagan dealt with the USSR who “had” 30,000 nukes with many pointed straight at us, which in my opinion is much greater threat than a country who cannot manufacture its own gasoline. Yet R.R. handled the USSR threat by doing the exact same thing as Dr. Paul is proposing, yet the only similarity was that back then there were several like Newt who was calling his foreign policy “crazy” but It Worked! My disapproval of Santorum is for example Cuba, we have had sanctions on them for 50 years and has NOT worked in bringing peace, He wants to double down on that policy, why?
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:37pmwhoa..okay…so we agree on alot of things…regarding cuba…are we bad off there…from what we’ve been doing…unless some crazy nut like castro decides he wants to blow up lets say florida…sanctions do work…but I’m not big on all this foreign policy stuff…I just know that those nuts over in the middle east would just as soon have us all dead then to look at us…end of story…I believe God’s word regarding revelations and I believe those guys over there have to be controlled in one form or another..yes I said controlled…some humans just don’t have compassion for their fellow man…like I said Santorum is not perfect…but I would vote for him long before anyone else in the race…heck I think I’m even gonna donate to his campaign!…All men/women fall short…some a little more than others…know what I mean?
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:27amI “used” to believe just as you about those over there, once I actually started researching the issue, I realized that I had been brainwashed by the media (and no I am not insinuating anything), What I found by actually researching this is there are people/companies that actually benefit from having conflicts happen and the number of these people are alot larger than you would suspect. Also, there are many people (in politics) who are entangled with these people/companies. But not just that. As you previously stated I tried putting some “common sense” to this and ask myself. Why does specific countries in the middle east specifically ONLY have a problem with just OUR freedom(as the media claims). Why aren’t they threatening Europe, Austrailia, Canada, Mexico, or any other “free” countries if “freedom” is why they hate and want to destroy us? Therefore I researched more about our history in that region. This is the area that most people have a problem with Ron Paul, because he tells them things they do not understand therefore it makes him appear “crazy”. The only way you can fix a problem that you have is to understand the history and correct it, however, because of pay attention to this word “blowback” the U.S. public is not capable of putting into context as to what causes our problems with the middle east. I not trying to switch your vote I’m just asking you inform yourself as much as possible please watch this entirely, and look for more info http:/
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 11, 2012 at 1:27amhttp://youtu.be/ZsTkG3INFWk
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:12amI’d vote for Rick Santorum over Mitt Romney everyday of the week.
Report Post »C-Delta Conductor
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:32amhttp://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/01/04/santorum-conservative-technocrat/
Report Post »reform
Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:45amReally interesting Ms. Cupp talks about this being the establishment and Paulie supporters wait a minute was not Glenn Beck a keynote speaker last year?
Report Post »