Sandra Fluke: A Fake Victim of Georgetown’s Policy on Contraceptives?
- Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:00pm by
Mytheos Holt
- Print »
- Email »
Since her controversial testimony on February 23, Sandra Fluke has been called many things, from a heroine to a “slut,” but actually, she may just be a fake. Gateway Pundit and Hot Air suggest that may be the case, with citations to a post by Jammie Wearing Fools that introduces the following interesting information:
For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
Though there aren’t links in the original post to the content mentioned, a little digging shows that it’s all true. Fluke has described herself as a third year law student at Georgetown University, and indeed, that is what she is. However, contrary to the narrative of innocent victimhood that portrays Fluke as a wide-eyed 23-year-old girl caught without contraception on a college campus full of predatory men, Fluke herself is really a 30-year-old women‘s rights activist who not only didn’t get caught without contraception at Georgetown, but specifically knew the university didn’t cover it and chose to attend for precisely that reason.
First, there‘s the matter of Fluke’s age. In a segment on Fluke’s battle with Rush Limbaugh, MSNBC reporter Anne Williams called Fluke “the 23-year-old Georgetown law student, prohibited from testifying.” Yet Fluke’s own Linkedin profile reveals a more mature woman:
In fact, according to that profile, she graduated from college in 2003. Barring Fluke being a child prodigy who somehow graduated college at the age of 15, this would make her at least 30 years old:
It‘s worth noting the massive number of women’s issues groups Fluke was involved in, even while in college.
Now, to be fair, Fluke’s age could have been misreported by the media. Most 3rd year law students are at least 25, and they could have confused her for being an undergraduate senior rather than a 3rd year law student.
The idea that Fluke is herself an unwitting victim of Georgetown’s policy on contraceptives is another matter entirely. In several interviews, especially following Rush Limbaugh’s attack, Fluke has implicitly included herself in the group of women who allegedly unwittingly suffer as a result of Georgetown’s policies. This is a key point for the Democrats supporting her, for if Fluke did happen to read Georgetown’s insurance policy before coming and decide to come anyway, that would, at best, undermine her spokeswoman status.
But what if she not only decided to attend the university anyway, but decided to attend specifically so she could fight this battle? Consider this passage from an early Washington Post story done on Fluke before she was permitted to testify:
Fluke came to Georgetown University interested in contraceptive coverage: She researched the Jesuit college’s health plans for students before enrolling, and found that birth control was not included. “I decided I was absolutely not willing to compromise the quality of my education in exchange for my health care,” says Fluke, who has spent the past three years lobbying the administration to change its policy on the issue. The issue got the university president’s office last spring, where Georgetown declined to change its policy.
Fluke says she would have used the hearing to talk about the students at Georgetown that don’t have birth control covered, and what that’s meant for them. “I wanted to be able to share their stories,” she says. “My testimony would have been about women who have been affected by their policy, who have medical needs and have suffered dire consequences.. . .The committee did not get to hear real stories I had to share, about actual women who have been dramatically affected by this policy.”
That’s right. It seems Fluke intentionally chose to go to Georgetown so she could agitate and sway them to cover contraceptives. She then went to a hearing as a representative of women who hadn‘t known about Georgetown’s policy until it was too late. Unsympathetic observers might liken this to James O’Keefe attending a hearing to speak against ACORN on behalf of pimps. It certainly raises the question of why the women Fluke claims to speak for couldn’t present their stories for themselves.
Indeed, in a video made after she was denied the opportunity to testify, Fluke raises two “stories” from women who had emailed her, supposedly about their non-sex-related need of contraceptive medicine. She does not identify the emailers by name, or even by school, saying simply that they are students at an unnamed Catholic University:
If Fluke’s stories are real, many will likely call on her to let the women who sent them speak for themselves and stop hogging the spotlight, given that she did choose to attend Georgetown knowing full well what its policy was on contraceptives, and with every indication of being willing to risk the price tag — whether that price tag would be $3000 over 3 years or not.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (671)
sallyredneck
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:36pmIs there not a place that is not tainted by the deception connected to regulations which Obama wants to become law? We cannot trust these people who make 2000 page bills knowing that somewhere in that law anyone in the country will become a felon and can be carted off to jail. Apparently she is the golden child of the Obamanites, showing up out of nowhere, or being groomed by the party.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:34pmMore information regarding the contraception debate…
It’s not just a “contraception mandate,” it’s an “abortion pill mandate” too http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/does-drug-ella-cause-abortions_626563.html
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:09pmAnd on a related side note…
I’m still trying to figure out what Ron Paul mean’t when he said “honest rape during his Piers Morgan interview?“ Is that opposed to ”dishonest rape?’ I see Ron Paul the politician conflicted with Ron Paul the doctor when it comes to “emergency contraception.” He seems to be rather vague…almost a purposeful and deliberate wishy washyness. It‘s like he’s talking out of both sides of his mouth… to appeal to both sides on the issue. The doctor, the politician.
To abort or not to abort… that is the real question…
Report Post »sooner12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:11pmI would like to know if Fluke is being paid or her tuition and/or her student loan is being paid by these affiliations she is so associated.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:22pmSOONER. I bet there is MUCH more to this story. I hope someone is digging as we write.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:48pmI am waiting for the story to come out and find that she is actually a lesbian. Now wouldn’t that make the story interesting.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:55pmHOBBS. That WOULD definately add a twist… hmmmm. I am seeing intellectual dishonesty at it’s finest with this young lady along her 15 minutes of fame on a few different levels.
Report Post »Patrick Henry
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:16pmBUSTED! http://patdollard.com/2012/03/breaking-sandra-fluke-exposed-as-fraud-activist-possible-white-house-operative-with-video/ This broad went to the school strictly to challenge its insurance’s contraceptive policy, not even as a real student…and all magically timed to coincide with Obama’s big contraceptive push…
Report Post »Razorhunters
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:42pmas some have told you before, it is because of the people that would use the excuse they were raped , when in fact were just stupid.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:01pmRAZOR. Too thin. Expand. Where does Paul really stand? Seems he’s riding both sides of the fence. Why? I thought he was a man of principle? A doctor of principle. Or is he just a politician?
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:03pmSo not only is she a slut……she’s also a decientful slut…..
Report Post »Gent
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:08pmIt is not a contraception mandate at all. It is an abortion/pill mandate. Consider these college women Fluke alludes to are having multiple partners. The only safe contraception would be condoms or abstinence since STDs cannot be stopped by the pill. So they must be after something else because obviously these educated women would know that. Since condoms are the cheapest form of contraception and protection nowhere near $3K it appears they are after something else at our expense
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:11pmBLUE. Lol.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:19pmGENT. Bingo… You win!!
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:08pmSTEPN’FETCHIT. Your posting speaks for itself. I’ll leave you to your own devices. Hopefully they are not sharp… those devices…
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:19pm“Sandra Fluke: A Fake Victim …”
… but a Real Commie Operative. This bitch is dirty, so keep digging “the new fourth estate” — that means YOU Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, et al !
Report Post »TikeSissy
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:24pmWonder if the President knew about all this before that phone call.
Report Post »AMERICA4EVER
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:04pmI’ll bet you a dime to a doughnut this whole thing was orchestrated by this administration. How does one get called before a committee on a subject like this? This sure stinks to high heaven.
Report Post »ianmc002
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:23pmTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
There you are. Read my past posts please. Turns out there is a good reason Paul voted against the Rules of Engagement.
Report Post »jpotter1357
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:23pmI didn’t find it to be that ambiguous when Ron Paul said “honest rape” during that interview. What he meant was a situation in which someone was really, truly raped, as opposed to a woman who had consensual sex, became impregnated, and then waited 6 months and suspiciously purports that she was raped (in order to get an abortion).
Ron Paul’s opinion here is pretty simple. It isn’t a question of the benefits or drawbacks of contraceptives, it’s a question of whether or not government can force private or religious employers/insurance companies to provide contraceptives and to potentially violate their personal beliefs. On abortion, his personal opinion is to protect the sanctity of life, but he would not impose his opinion and would instead allow the states the power to decide, under the 10th Amendment.
Report Post »sbenard
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:53pmI don’t think “she” is even female! Has she had any “surgeries” in the last few years?
Report Post »ianmc002
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:54pmTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Report Post »Congress does NOT (is not supposed to) regulate/legislate ROE (Rules of Engagement)…the PRESIDENT/MILITARY DOES!!! This is why Dr. Paul voted against the amendment STUPID! Our military and generals determine ROE…the president can supercede those rules but Congress has NO say. Turns out if you voted for the amendment you’re anti Constitution.
By Congress legislating ROE or whatever, they are essentially tying the hands of the military via legislation and regulations…so it is YOU and the DOLTS who voted for the amendments that are anti military.
SavvyCowboy
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:57pmSandra Fluke is a Civilian Under Naval Training!
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:27pmWell, well! I knew this woman was not humiliating herself without a motive. It was as many of us suspected. She was being paid well for this fraud. This makes her worse than Rush called her.
Report Post »Someone else we know is also a liar.
lynskinners
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:43pmThere are at least 2 stories that suggest Fluke is also gay. If that is the case, why the need for contraceptives? This whole thing is just a progressive strategy to socialize our health care system and diminish religious freedoms.
Report Post »proudinfidel54
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:03amThis woman’s story about the poor, poor girl that was denied contraception and now she can’t have babies, sounds an awful lot like the liberal arguement for abortion, the poor poor girls that were raped by uncle billy-bob and because abortion was illegal she had to give birth to a 2-headed baby.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 7:47amShe reminds me of a crazy b#%ch i dated in my twenties….she would threaten to kill herself Everettime i tried to break up with her….anyway this reminded me of the Anita Hill hearings. This is the Obama Machines plan to get women to turn on the Republican Party. Still praying for stage 4 colon cancer for the president….it could happen.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 7:56amlike all good socialists fluke has an agenda. she will lie and distort the truth to promote that agenda. to say anything less is a lie.
Report Post »dublinthewagons
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:05amShe is using the presidents fuzzy math. $3,000. She needs to contact SPCA and make an appointment with a low cost spay/neuter clinic. The president call her because she reminds him of his mother. (Beware of men from Nigeria)
Report Post »Mrtoohappy
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:24amI’ll bet $10.00 she is gay. Sure looks it
Report Post »kathleenlee
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:24amI wonder if she’s paid by planned parenthood or the tides foundation. Or maybe even pelosi herself. Disgraceful how they pranced her out to lie and lie. Actually choosing a college a religious one at that..what an awful person. Progressives really stink
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:58amThe rest of America uses this secret method we stole from rocket scientists… We budget.
We calculate our “needs” and add that to the cost of college. If we cannot afford the total, junior just has to go to a cheaper college. That’s how it works for blue-collar Americans! But, the intellectual elitists like this, er, “person” and like obama, do the same math, but come up with an answer of “TAKE THE MONEY FROM SOMEBODY ELSE”. Even if that somebody else believes you are taking THEIR MONEY, for murder!
Even if your “needs” are cases of condoms, kegs of beer, and truckloads if pizza…
You still do the math before enrolling in college. You include room and board, tuition, books, fees, fees, fees, fees, fees, and fees, and then you round up a bit for inflation and unexpected expenses like professors going on strike jacking up tuition, etc.
If junior calls you and says, “Hey, Pops, I need $3,000.00 for rubbers,” what is going to be yor reply? To your own son? You’ll say something along the lines of, “HELL NO!” followed by a lecture on how he is supposed to be studying, and how he should respect himself and women and therefore not “need” $3,000 worth of rubbers.
But these obama elitists want to skip all that and make it legal to TAKE the money FROM TOTAL STRANGERS!!
“THAT is why the ‘lady’ IS A TRAMP”
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:03amhey; if she wants the government to pay for her ‘screwing around’ roll the cost of BC Pills into her student loan!! Schazam….the government pays for it….and she gets to pay it back….maybe?
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:38amFluke is yet another liberal, mutant fluke of nature. I wouldn‘t be surprised if she were a ’plant’ by The Regime, as she has the same phony, deceitful characteristics that Obama has and admires.
Report Post »Falindraun
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:45amHere is some free contraception for you KEEP YOUR LEGS CLOSED. Its very simple if you dont have sex then you dont need condoms, birth control or the morning after pill. If you want to have fun go for a walk, play a board game, play a video game, go to the gym … the list is endless.
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:56amTime to get back under that ROCK with Miz. Palosi….
Report Post »Dig a little deeper, bet it goes to the top !!!
But the Media WILL turn a blind eye, Guess Rush
didn’t have to apologize after all…Good Gawd !!!!!
RayOne
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 10:22amGood Call, the real objective is create a story, confuse an issue and then pass a ‘solution’ with so many pages, some friend of the Posse gets a sailboat out of the deal.
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 10:40amHa! Ha! This so funny – she even got Obama’s attention. You have your brown nosers – you have your two brown racing stripes, one on each side of the nose and then you get Fluked. In some circles its called full face brown noseing. This is how she got the Presidents attention. Maybe he should send her to Gitmo as a terriost. Mr. President you should not be embarrassed like this – get your pen out and do it – we won’t miss her.
Report Post »proudinfidel54
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 11:27amShe needs to go Fluke herself…
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 11:35amThe same people who vetted Obama, cleared this FLUKER..
Good Job, even sucked in Bama this time….OORAH !!!!!
Thanks Rush, You were RIGHT, Shes a Fake Slu**….
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 3:35pmRush why….your big enough without goggle and the others. for the ones you lost you would have gotten back ten fold……so for you let me say it…..she’s a slut….she’s super slut. …she’s super slutty….I’m Rick James b%&ch!
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:07pmThe world is exploding with death and murder and all see can advocate for is more killing in the womb. I swear the most dangerous place to bel for a human is in the womb of a woMAN!
Report Post »Wayner
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:39pmConsider: If she’s having sex with all these males who are not wearing protection, what are the odds that she eventually will be a carrier of aides??? Then who get’s sued?
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 11:33pmFluke certainly appears to be a real fluke. Names do mean something!
Report Post »zorrosd
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 11:43pmLooking and listening to her she’s actually doing us a service. The last thing we need is for her/he to be allowed to procreate
Report Post »db321
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 12:58amCant wait to hear Rush on Monday – He is going to get harassed by his callers for apologizing – I think his attorneys told him too.
This Women is dangerous – beyond belief.
Report Post »ILUVJESUS
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 2:04amHave her sit down with some doctors and look into this story, one thousand dollars per year of on contraception?
Report Post »Did she tell congress that she was 23? ‘
theaton
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 11:12am“I hope someone is digging as we write.”
This is why we are where we are. We expect everybody else to do the work for us.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 12:07pmOnly Ron Paul can tell you what he meant by “honest rape” but my guess would be that he was alluding to the fact that rape, while being one of the most unreported crimes, is also one of the most falsely reported crimes. Being a doctor he would be well aware of this fact. Also, if you made abortion legal when the mothers life is in jeopardy and in cases of rape and incest, it doesn’t take a genius to conjecture that some women might falsely report rape in order to get an abortion.
Report Post »RJGUSA
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 12:14pmIf she’s spent 3K in 3 years at Georgetown on contraceptives then Fluke needs to reintroduce her left leg to her right leg because they have been separated for so long!!!
Report Post »vp1438
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 7:06pmThere’s no such thing as an “abortion” pill. How does someone have an abortion apply the day after sex? Do you have an abortion every time you masturbate into the bathroom towel? Same thing.
Report Post »Julian_Hale
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 9:05pmTime_2_end said:
I’m still trying to figure out what Ron Paul mean’t when he said “honest rape during his Piers Morgan interview?“ Is that opposed to ”dishonest rape?’
My interpretation is that “real rape” is forcible or coerced, versus statutory rape which could be a 17 year old and an 18 year old who were both there of their own accord. There’s a huge difference between the two.
Report Post »candcantiques
Posted on March 6, 2012 at 1:14pmI will be glad to let EVERYONE know that my lady takes the pill, it IS NOT covered by her insurance. We collect aluminum soda cans every night when we go for our evening walk. Doing so we actually make about $125.00 per month. The cost of the pill out of pocket? $50.00. DAMN PEOPLE GET OUT AND EARN WHAT YOU WANT. I am so damn tired of all of these people that say give me give me give me I cant do it for myself. BULLSHEET. If there was no government, if there were no people but you and your own lazy azz I guarantee that you would find a way to do for yourself. Get up off of your lazy azz and quit demanding everyone do for you. Do it for yourself or die you lazy liberal pissant sob’s.
Report Post »candcantiques
Posted on March 6, 2012 at 1:23pmThere is money EVERYWHERE in this world. I guarantee you that if I found myself homeless today with no money and no food by tomarrow I would have money food and a roof over my head by nightfall. WHY? BECAUSE I CAN THATS WHY. Why cant you? I can walk down the street and pick up cans or trash and make money from it all day long. Oh I’m sorry you dont have the time thats right I forgot. YOU HAVE TIME FOR SEX BUT YOU DONT HAVE TIME TO EARN WHAT YOU WANT. Lazy liberal pissants. You make me sick.
Report Post »MistyBlueAngel
Posted on March 11, 2012 at 12:40pmI don’t get why this is an issue at all. The old saying “Just vote with your feet” should apply here. If it’s that important for a person to have someone else pay for their contraception, then they could just choose to attend a non-sectarian school, or they could obtain contraception from Planned Parenthood, or any number of other places who give it out. Not to mention the obvious here, but with tuition at Georgetown being about 65K’s a year, this woman shouldn’t have a problem coughing up a little more for birth control, and if she does she can do like the rest of us and adjust her ambitions to fit her own budget, without trying to dip into someone else’s.
Report Post »Ronda
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:33pmI heard that ahe said her contraceptives cost her $3,000 per year. I priced condoms today (as a mother of 7, I didn’t know) and did some math. $3,000 would buy her about 7,500 condoms a year. Now my sons want to go to Georgetown.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:51pmI believe she said the $3,000 was “during law school” which depending upon how you count that could be 8 years or simply 2.
Eiher way she went on to equate that to an entire summer’s salary instead of differentiating 8 years x $3,000 (summer) = $24,000 – $3,000 and it was a deceptive comparison. If it is costing only $375 per year it doesn’t sound nearly as good.
Report Post »greeneyes1982
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:00pmSo in other words…if by using condoms only, she would be having sex 20.5 times a day! When does she find the time to study and go to class??!!! Geesh! I have a hard time believing anything that comes from this woman’s mouth already and this story solidifies that for me.
Report Post »portague
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:09pmbirth control with out insurance can go 100$ or more a month without insurance. Making cost of
Report Post »1200$ a year. So 3 years about 3k 8years 8k and based of that condom math thats a lot of sex. If do not want to get pregnant use condoms thier far cheaper and can buy them only when plan on having sex wich will make them significantly cheaper and of course there is the option of not having sex untill your ready for a family. Condoms also have the bonus of stoping most std’s of course not havindg sex would make it so you dont either. Also birth control has health risks to it and side effects when you use them. Condoms do not unless your allergic to latex then use a different brand. Then there again is dont do it untill your ready for the responsibility that comes with sex.
portague
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:15pmyes generics would be in the 375$ range a year as well god knows why the hell doctors allways recomend the expensive stuff when you have insurance. When the generic have the exact same ingrediants as the brand name. We pay way to much for a name.
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:39pmNext time we hear from Flake…oops…Fluke, will probably be some sexual harassment suit against someone trying to cop a free feel after hearing about this woman’s sexual appetites.
Report Post »JimCDew
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 6:27amIf you assume 8 years of condoms totalling $3,000 and a cost per condom of $.25 that works out to a little over 4 condoms per day. Rush was being his conservative self when he called her a slut. I would say she was a sex addicted nymphomaniac with low self esteem and a need to fill a void in her life.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 8:02amShe needs to wax her mustache……
Report Post »The Lady Patriot
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 7:44amJIMCDW: Condoms have nothing to do with any of this, since the topic is hormone pills.
You just liked doing that math and picturing all that sex, didn’t you? LOL!
Report Post »candcantiques
Posted on March 6, 2012 at 1:26pmCondoms cost $0.00. All you have to do is go to google and search for free condoms. Companies will be glad to send them to you for FREE.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:33pmBlaze you are late with this info. TIME_2_Stop_Paul_2012 told us all of this several days ago. Yes, Fluke is a Nancy Peolsi plant and a fraud.
Report Post »We know this but the folks who want to be on her side of this”women’s health issue” will never read this information.
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:37pmTy for your acknowledgement. Wasn’t going to rub it in, lol.
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:07pmThe pronunciation of her name sounds fraudulent. They pronounce it like fluck. Have never seen a name or a word that ends in …uke pronounced like …uck. (Had to be sure about typing and spelling on this one).
Report Post »Eternal Lucy
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:28pmI was going to say too, how ironic: the pronunciation of her name.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRC0nsjtKQ
lol
I don‘t think it’s a coincidence.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 11:22amYou notice tho, the liberal media hasn’t made much of it yet. The truth!
GUYS: I’m turning over a new leaf. Instead of getting angry at so many mean spirited, hateful people from the liberal stance, I’m simple going to make a remark about how I feel without the nasty words, which I regret. Makes me as low-down as they are.
Report Post »Sometimes we get caught up wanting to call them what they call us, or how they treat us with such
disregard for our feelings that, for me, I want to lash out and call them the vile names I only read and hear about. See, this is what Bill Maher and all his ilk are doing to our society.
BlackAce41
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:33pm“she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.” So she is now Lying in front of Congress she need to be Blasted for this. What other ********* is she going to come up. If her So called persons she know are worried about paying birth control then they should become cellulite finish school and then they can go buck wild when they start make money.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:45pmContempt of Congress … I believe is against the law …does she have to be or was she sworn in? I would like to see this THEATER STOPPED!
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:24pmIn other words……she is nothing but a “FAKE”……And to think…..Rush wasted his time apologizing….how can you apologize to a fake….a plant…Got me!
Report Post »what4
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:39pmHow many professors does she have to screw to get through law school? Just wondering…Stupid Slut!
Report Post »AMERICA4EVER
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:06pmShe truly is a fluke!
Report Post »Winedude
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:58amOK folks…remember that she didn’t get to testify before a full congressional committee…Issa wouldn’t let her. The testimony she gave was before a panel of Democrats to give her a forum. Therefore, there‘s no way she’s guilty of any wrongdoing in regards to Congress. One can agree or disagree with the idea of providing contraceptives; it isn’t really hard to be civil in the discussion. The death of this medium will be the moronic rants…
Report Post »psychokittis
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 2:02amI believe that perjury before Congress is a majoe felony-or am I wrong here?
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 11:20amCan we say FAKE SLU**, smells like a Pelosi Plant to push Bama agenda..
Report Post »http://patdollard.com/2012/03/breaking-sandra-fluke-exposed-as-fraud-activist-possible-white-house-operative-with-video/
The Lady Patriot
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 10:53pmHa! You’re so silly. She never said she was twenty three in front of congress, that’s what the liberal media reported! It even says so right up there in the article.
Report Post »Teufel Hunden
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:32pmI don‘t want to pay for her contraceptives unless I’m doing her, in which case the govt would need to supply me with a guide dog and some Viagra..
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:37pmLOL … perfect!
Report Post »hard.right
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:41pmif the gov‘t doesn’t offer to cover it, you could go paper bag and playboy magazines vs the dog and pills. works just as well and alot cheaper. then again, just find yourself a hot chick and pass on this one would be my recommendation. personally, i’d rather skip the ugly chick, paper bag, pills, dog, and just get the playboy magazine and take care of it myself.
Report Post »gbfreak
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:28pmAnother socialist obama puke. Fluke the puke.
Report Post »LSDsr
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:27pmWell, if as she says there are others who use contraceptives for non-sex related issues, it would be relevant to first disclose why there are no covered medical treatments other than contraceptives, that would be paid for by insurers. Second her purposes for the contraceptives are for pure pleasure and if the government is going to mandate paying for an individuals pure pleasure needs, I want to know where my vaction check to travel the world is and which insurer is going to be required to pay for it.
Report Post »merik59
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:21pmWell, I think after reading all these posts & seeing all the news media granted to this Fluke, I would be willing to kick in to have this woman fixed permanently or lobotomized or whatever extreme procedure it would take so her troubles would be over. I just cannot imagine how miserable she must be when she can’t find someone to pay for her sexual intercourse or maybe no one will have sex with her any more or it might even be that she has become a complete turnoff because she runs credit checks on all her partners before she goes out & finds out no one has health insurance to cover her definitions of birth control. How sad. If she would just submit to a simple out patient procedure, she would never have to worry about getting pregnant again & we wouldn’t have to worry about her getting pregnant & indoctrinating more just like her. We could eliminate this problem from the gene pool before it becomes an issue.
Report Post »Capitalist Mama
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:25pmTo be sure, there are non-sexual reasons for birth control. I have a condition with few platelets, without birth control, I would not stop bleeding (sorry, tmi I know!).
Whatever the reason you need the medicine, you should pay for it yourself. If you can’t afford it, there are plenty of low income medical insurers out there (medicare anyone?). Furthermore, all college students UP TO 26 YEARS OLD! can still be on their parents insurance.
There is no reason for this testimony. The protections this woman seeks are already in place; this is merely a smear campaign to bring down religious institutes.
Report Post »meeterman
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:27pmHey if contreceptives shouldbe free why not have sex aids free,such as gels,lubes, toys and what the **** , now that I think of it (as there was no thought to Flukes presentation) why not have porn for free?!
Report Post »Smoovious
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 3:07pmWe got more free porn than we can handle already on the net.
Report Post »DevilsPrinciple
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 12:20pmWell stated Capitalist Mama !
Report Post »tbolt71
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:25pmthese commies should go into theatre….every time they want to push their agenda,they bring in the actors and the props
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:38pmyes another the ends justify the means made up story … if their lips are moving they are LYING! They wouldn’t know the truth if it bit them in the butt .. as my mother always said.
Report Post »The Lady Patriot
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 7:37amRight! It’s just like that kid who went to Planned Parenthood dressed as a pimp. Those dems are always faking stuff to make a point!
Report Post »The Lady Patriot
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 7:40amRight! Just like when that kid went to Planned Parenthood undercover dressed as a pimp. That was like a bad high school play! Wait, that was the socialists, right?
Report Post »noland
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:23pmi wish these people would go live in a hut some where with shortage of fresh water or clothing or a roof and nice bed, and see some real suffering that real humane beings are going thru that would trade places with her any day of the year. These types aren”t going to ever be happy no matter what you GIVE her and her KIND
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:28pmRight on!
Report Post »338lapua
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:23pmNice little piece of journalism here! Wonder if the bobblehead press will follow up….or…..Oh come on, who am I kidding. The sycophants will bury this,or make her out to be a martyr for the cause….. COCKROACHES!!!!!
Report Post »Weedwhacker
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:22pmJust another liberal/progressive activist looking for any opportunity to lie in order to further their “righteous” agenda.
Report Post »shorthanded12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:29pmFluke falls in line with Botox Pelosies agenda. It would not surprise me if Pig losie had something to do with this scam called a congressional hearing.
Report Post »uffdaubet
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:21pmI agree with you you moderationisbest. She is not a slut.
She is a lying slut.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:20pmhttp://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/03/a_statement_from_rush :^) awRush…
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:26pmwell now that we know she is a fake, will Rush take back his apology? Hope so.
Report Post »Ducky 1
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:50pmHe needs to keep his sponsors and stay on the air. Don’t think he had a choice.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:13amHe not only called her a s***, he told her to post sex vids. He lathered, rinsed and repeated for three days. He has done this for years. The only thing sicker than his misogyny, racism and lies are the dittto-head followers who find this entertaining.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 2:39pmCry me a river, Tifosa. You lefties say a lot worse all the time than what Rush says.
Report Post »DevilsPrinciple
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 11:54amFive thumbs up to Jenny Lind. You rock !
Report Post »hempstead1944
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:20pmDidn’t know lesbians used contraception….
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:06pmOh yea, they can get knocked up with spit– Its in their genes- just like being a lesbian is.
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:15pmPretty sure, if I bought her pie plates as a wedding gift, I wouldn’t be wrong.
Report Post »Nobummer
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:18pmThe only “Fluke” here is that her “behavior” costs money and she cannot grasp that you don’t “do” what you can’t afford. She’ll make a good liberal lawyer–bottom feeder. We were asleep when the liberal democrats were framing this as reproductive “rights,” a woman’s “right” to choose and a woman’s health issue. This is the product of our inaction, bipartisanship and fear. When it comes to liberals, we “should” apply the Koran that they often defend–convert to conservatism or be destroyed.
Report Post »FlatFoot
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:17pm“Adding comments has been disabled for this video.”
Go figure.
The last thing Liberal Tools want is the light of truth touching them. Sends em scurrying for the cover of darkness like so many cockroaches.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:16pmWait and see. She’s probably a ****.
Report Post »cookcountypatriot
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:15pmfluke is a fake..
Report Post »Weedwhacker
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:24pmAnd a Flake….
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:14pmWhether she is a fluke or not doesn’t really matter. I don’t believe that I should have to pay for her pills no matter what kind they are. If she is the one that needs them then she can buy insurance to cover them where it will come out of her pocket not mine.
Report Post »If the insurance company doesn‘t cover that then they shouldn’t be forced to. It’s not like cancer or heart trouble. She is knowingly participating in something she knows that can get her pregnant. So she is the one responsible for keeping her legs closed or buying the pill.
meeterman
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:20pmhey if contraceptives must be free, why not have the aids for free? Such as gels, lubes , toys. etc. Hell while we’re thinking of it why not free porn?!
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:33pmHow would this come from you?
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:15pmTifosa,
I pay taxes, a lot of them. So I pay for the roads you drive on, the shrimps you put on treadmills, the going-out of business green companies, and yes, government subsidized health care.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:26pmHow does this come out of YOUR TAXES?? Do you pay her insurance bills?
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:29pmYou were hugely misinformed, AXEL, if you were told that this is government subsidized healthcare. I’ve read several posts like this on here, though, and you’re not alone.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:50pmYes, Tifosa I do. Because you see insurance is a pool, and until now I was able to chose an insurance pool that does not cover drug and alcohol rehab or birth control.
If ALL insurance companies are now required BY LAW to cover those things, my insurance costs will go up as I will be required to pay for others to use them.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:55pmWho will pay for the administrative boards put together for the purpose of setting this all up? Answer: Tax payers.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:03pmWho will pay for the enforcement mechanisms? Answer : Tax payers
Who will pay for the lawsuits that come about because of this policy? Answer : Tax payers
Try using your head instead of coughing up the talking points you ate at the $10,000 a plate re-election fundraiser.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:18pmNice attempted stretch, AXEL. This is about private insurance companies. Your tax dollars aren’t involved. Like Rush, you wanna see her vids too? Disgusting stuff, “apology” or not.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:31pmDidn’t answer the questions did you? Who pays Tiffosa? I read the entire bill myself and didn’t rely on others to read it and tell me what was in it. Who pays?
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:41pmLet me make it simpler for you. If it was not for Obamacare, would this even be a discussion? No.
How many more administrative people will be necessary to make sure that this “Dictate” of free contraception is being followed, the paperwork submitted and correctly filed. Who will pay for that? Bottom line, the tax payer, therefore I am, as a taxpayer, paying for her ability to have free sex without consequences under the Obama mandate.
Without my tax money being used through the government she would get zero and the status quo remains.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:53pm@ tifosa
Where do you think the government gets money? They tax us and our taxes are distributed as payments. We pay for anything the government does. At least, up until now. Of course, now that the Fed is printing money and devaluing our dollar, it isn’t all coming from us, but it is coming out of our hide!
This “battle” that the left is determined to fight is NOT ABOUT CONTRACEPTION! It is about RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. Do not let those with little to no faith take our Freedom away!
Lord, hold us close and open the eyes of the “blind” and the ears of the “deaf”!
Report Post »Dalady
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:04pmTifosa is a good example of stupid people voting. Insurance cos. aren’t going to eat the cost, it will be spread out among all policy holders. That makes us all responsible for others’ life style decisions. My premiums are already exhorbitant. If I‘m forced to pay for someone’s prescripition coverage, I expect it to be for someone who truly needs help and not some feminist bimbo. Most everyone here would gladly send a condom to the flake…might cover her for a minute.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:23amNobody engages in civil discourse quite like the “religious right.” Georgetown University. A private insurance company.{{{sigh}}}
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:05am@ tifosa
If the ‘insurance companies“ are forced to ”pay” for these added benefits, the premium charged the employer will just go up to compensate the number of employees/students who are to be covered. If the employer is SELF INSURED, and many religious organizations Catholic, Mainline and Evangelical are SELF INSURED, they don’t by from and “insurance company,” they pool money to cover expenses, THE EMPLOYER WILL BE BEING “FORCED” TO PAY THESE BENEFITS”! Some employers will choose to go out of business.
The RATIONALIZATIONS of the Jesuits of Georgetown and elsewhere, and other liberal/socialistic leaders within the Catholic Church have brought us to where we are now. The “rules” of the Church haven’t changed, but many thought they should, so they went their own way explaining away the rules, believing that God changes, but He is changeless, “… Therefore, CHOOSE LIFE… ” Deaut 30:19.
In the U.S., the government has NO RIGHT to FORCE AN EMPLOYER to provide a benefit that is antithetical to the employer’s belief system, whether an organization or an individual employer with strong faith.
WE THE PEOPLE were given RIGHTS from our Creator, God. The government as an entity were given no such rights, but must be managed BY and FOR the PEOPLE, through legally enacted LAWS, NOT THROUGH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OR nor the mandates of a DICTATOR!
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:09ambtw AXEL, hate to surprise you, but this has already for years been in 28 states, at least 9 (maybe 12?) with no religious exemption.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:34amBilly, these are preventive health services, much less costly than the alternatives, and already provided a several states.
Report Post »disgustedAmerican
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 4:17am@ Tifosa…
Sure that private insurance companies pay for this; but nothing is for free. What happens is, the insurance companies will apply the cost of said medication across the board in higher premiums. Indirectly that might not be called a tax, yet in reality, it equates to the same thing. For you and your left utopian believers it is still a bill that we should not have to pay. To pay for this is equating to slavery. I should not have to pay for someone else to benefit from my tax dollars, unless they “need” it. Excluding the military, which I have no problem paying for because they are protecting our rights.
Report Post »jM Wofford
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:10pmI agree, we should not have to pay for her having fun sexxing around Georgetown. I think Rush is right in calling her a slut, although I believe that is a mild description of her!
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:14pmGeorgetown is “Catholic” in name only! Thanks to Obama all the phony Catholics are now free to do their false beliefs, because their pope is in the White House and not in the Vatican.
Report Post »AquaBuddha
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:13pmJust another liberal scam. Lets see if the leftest media tells this part of the story.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:11pmShe is also an admitted slut. The Commies owe Rush an Apology.
Report Post »The Lady Patriot
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 10:58pmYou didn’t read her testimony, did you? LOL! If using contraceptives makes someone a “slut” then that’s our whole country! Are you saying you never do? ‘Cause that’s not safe! I hope you know how to use a love-glove!
Report Post »DevilsPrinciple
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 11:14amI certainly thonk that contraceptive use is wise. Does it make her a slut ? Not necessarily. Is she a liar? Most likely. I think Georgetown would have every reason to tell her she’s no longer going to be enrolled involuntarily as a violation of their policies. I would bet that there are incongruities on her application for admittance to G~Town. If so, she should be barred from continuing for lying.
I would also hope future hiring attorneys and judges are on notice to read her CV and her congressional testimony before even considering her.
Report Post »floradaze
Posted on March 5, 2012 at 2:04pm@theladypatriot How, if you are married to a faithful man and can no longer get pregnant because of a surgery is it not safe to not use contraceptives? Not everyone gets it from strangers.
Report Post »I feel sorry for you if you feel that way.
ModerationIsBest
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:06pmCertainly not a heroine, not a slut.
Most of these people are fakes. What’s new?
Report Post »tbolt71
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:26pmpossibly a planned parenthood stooge???
Report Post »shorthanded12
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:31pmNancy Pelosie would be my guess
Report Post »Snow_Leopard_is_Cool
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 5:36pmI’m with you. I think someone with the means to do so should try to uncover more on this.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 1:09amShe’s a “paid stoodge” by those who are paying for her education and whomever else they’ve now arranged to push her forward!
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 9:18am@BRYAN From Georgia…news media can not be trusted..they have been covering for the Obama administration the entire time…we don’t know who he is or where he comes from.
Report Post »