Sandra Fluke Tweets Support for S.E. Cupp Over Hustler Photo
- Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:06pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
Sandra Fluke joined a stream of S.E. Cupp supporters on Wednesday after a faked sexually explicit image of Cupp appeared in Hustler magazine.
As The Blaze exclusively reported, the photo was accompanied by the headline “Celebrity Fantasy” and wondered, “What would S.E. Cupp look like with a [d**k] in her mouth?” A disclaimer acknowledged the image was phony.
“.@HustlerMag depiction of @secupp so offensive. Sexualization of female public [figures] attempts [to] limit them [to] being sexual figures and not more,” Fluke tweeted.

Planned Parenthood also weighed in with a tweet that stated: “Sexist attacks made against women like @SandraFluke and recently @secupp are disgraceful and cannot be tolerated.”
UPDATE:
Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt has confirmed the photo in a response to The Blaze. Read how he justifies the image here.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (61)
moussiagilda
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 7:48pmGraphic sex. What can we do about it. Outlaw it, I suppose. Then everyone will feel caged and cursed forever, which is what the pinched-lipped battalions want.
I swear. You people. There’s more to life than suffering, agony, despair, and inadequacy.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:26amWho really cares what some socialist leech thinks about some socialist letch.
Report Post »chucksue351
Posted on May 24, 2012 at 12:10pmboycott, boycott,boycott…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Report Post »CAmom
Posted on May 24, 2012 at 1:24pmOh, I suppose there’s nothing to be done about the disgusting attack on a Conservative woman. Oh well, let’s just accept it and say nothing. Move along, nothing to be seen here.
Of course, I forgot. I’m a Conservative. I have no rights.
/sarcasm
Report Post »conserve48
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 7:17pmThe only thing Fluke is upset about is that the pemis doesn’t have a free condom on it.
Report Post »dontbotherme
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 7:04pmWell now. I prefer to believe that the support of Ms. Fluke & Planned Parenthood (choking) is genuine, no matter what the possible motives we may attribute the support to. Know this, Ms. Cupp, I support you. I am sorry that this vile creature has done this to you. I have a question for those here who have opted to chastise and, or, name call Fluke. Are you worse, or the same as Flynt?
Report Post »lucasjsr
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 10:39pmSE did not go public with false claims to promote an agenda. Fluke did go public in support of her party or parties agenda and request public money to support her outrageous ENTITLEMENT.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:34amI got an answer for you If you embrace one evil to attack another you’re still embracing evil. And I’ll not side with a lying socialist leech who wants to bleed the tax payers to attack a lying socialist letch who wants to screw morality.
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 6:40pmSomeone whispered in Ms Fluke’s ear…..just do the “Hope & Change” thing and many will believe you are very sincere about your concerns on the attack on Ms.Cupp. Ms.Fluke is not believable to me..just saying. Ms. Cupp did handle this matter her way..being gracious and moving on with her life.
Report Post »EvaGirl
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 6:31pmSorry, but my take is that Fluke is trying to put Rush in the same category as Flynt. The left is forever playing mind games.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on May 24, 2012 at 8:29amThe funny part is a socialist leech who claims to use 3000 dollars in condoms year is attacking a soialist letch who inspires the use of 3000 dollars in condoms a year.
Report Post »bustedupvet
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:45amI’m surprised that liver fluke is still yammering. I thought she slithered back down the sewer.
Report Post »Sharon Rose
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 6:27pmMs. Fluke trying to make nice?
Report Post »Zurich
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 5:49pmSandra, we don’t need your help. Just stay where you are. We are talking here about decent women. You have your own agenda and we don’t need any kind of progressive infiltration. Don’t even try to suggest that it is about a common women cause. In other words, don’t try to steal female votes!!!!!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 5:31pmWho cares what this twit has to say. She just wants more attention. And you gave it to her.
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 6:21pm@RATIONAL MAN
I care. Good job Sandra.
Walkabout
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 6:24pmShe needs attention lots of it. We can start by pointing out how much her Spanish vacation cost. she has money for a vacation many Americans cannot afford & yet she wants us to pay for her birth control.
Doesn’t hurt sometimes to be nice to see if your opponents will come around.
Report Post »AllAmericanGirl22
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 5:30pmWow, I’m quite surprised, but it’s nice to see some liberals coming out against attacks on women no matter their political views.
Report Post »ArcticDodge
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:56pmWhile the majority strongly opposses Sandra Fluke’s beliefs, I‘ll take Fluke’s comment of support to S.E. as sincere and welcomed. Maybe what happened to Ms Fluke has opened her eyes a little to other viewpoints.
Report Post »EP46
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:47pmDon’t worry….barry will call S.E…..right after he calls Nikki Haley.
RANGER1965
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:45pmThe feminist left has to respond this way or be labelled hypocrites.
Report Post »vox_populi
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:49pm…or maybe they just honestly agree that the image is distasteful and sexist?
Maybe?
Report Post »RANGER1965
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 5:25pmWell Vox you have more faith in humanity, or in this case the left, than I do. But I’m willing to consider the possibility. It might take at least 4 beers before I could be convinced however.
RANGER
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 5:37pm@vox_populi No chance most here can’t possibly accept a narrative that is outside underpinnings ideological underpinnings or inertia.
Report Post »Godzgrl247
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:40pmHelloooo???!!! It’s not just women who are public figures who are being sexualized! This has been going on for years. Even in school, the teachers give you more help if you are pleasing to the eye. If a woman tries to speak her mind, she must be “on the rag” or “needing her hormone pills.” Movie stars think they cannot make it in Hollywood unless they do a photo shoot with Playboy. I have complained until I’m blue in the face about mysogenistic lyrics in so many of the songs. Yet, even women laugh and think they‘re cool so how do we expect to get respect when we don’t stand up to this attitude? No, everytime a woman begins to be a threat and shows she has the skills to do a job, she is reduced to being a sexual object. Women still do not get paid the same as men for the same job and sometimes the glass ceiling gets higher and higher.
Report Post »Godzgrl247
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:53pmIt doesn‘t matter what side you’re on; left or right. Be nice! If you can’t fight intelligently, get out of the ring!
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 5:36pmHaving managed both men and women I will tell you the micro level reality that leads to the so called wage gap. Three things that were present in the majority of the women I had authority over with respect to evaluations and pay increases. First, women tended to be more concerned and/or interested in their title more than their salary. That is they would ask for a better title without equal concern or interest in their salary. Two, the women rarely if ever presented a credible threat to look elsewhere and leave to obtain a higher salary. It is a fact that you salary goes up the most during job changes. Third, productivity tended to be lower due to the fact that these women tended to put forth too much effort in some tasks at the expense of doing more. I spent a lot of time explaining to them that everything did not have to be done at an A level. Particularly when there was clear diminishing returns in terms of the added effort and time that was expended.
Report Post »firstgenesis
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:39pmDear Sandra Fluke,
Report Post »You do not know me, but you and I have been at opposite ends of the “agreement pool” with respect to free (or subsidized) contraception. But right now I want to put ALL that aside and in total sincerity thank you for your support of S.E. Cupp. Supporting her may turn out to be unpopular regardless the size of the atrocity perpetrated. But it still is the right thing. Thank you for your support.
TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 10:14pmAgreed.
Report Post »Crazy Times
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:37pmSandra Fluke is a far left womens rights activist, (not just your regular law student)…..at least she is staying true to what she believes in by stating her feelings on this issue by supporting S.E.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:32pmI though SE would be above accepting pandering from Fluke!
Report Post »Jim in Houston
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:31pmThe heat must be really turned up on the Fluke bimbo.
Report Post »firstHat
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:31pmThe problem with this is it establish an equivalency between what Rush said and what Flint did. In my mind there is no comparison. Fluke was discussing sexual issues and Rush commented on them in terms that gestured to a worldview most people would have of someone parading their sexual exploits in a national venue.
On the other hand, S.E. was voicing opinions about many issues that did not reference her own sexual life.
Rush’s audio is not likely to be haunting Fluke.
S.E. (and her future children) will no doubt be haunted for a long time.
I could go on. . .
Report Post »flat_top_particular_about_the_point_it_makes
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:49pmHaunted? Time to consider women who have actually been raped, servicemen and women who have experienced hell on earth and then put this nuisance in perspective.
Report Post »lassiegirldawn
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:30pmI still don’t approve of paying for her birth control, but the lady does show some integrity standing up when another woman is being trashed by a piece of trash.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 8:59pmDon’t buy into it! She’s just trying to make herself look sympathetic!
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:29pmShe is such a hypocrit! She can say that her buddies at college need so many condoms that they can’t afford it, but yet she can feel that this is offensive! What a phony! Go use a few cases of those condoms hypocrit!
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:28pmIrrelevant trying to be relevant, that Sandra is….
Report Post »donh2
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:27pmI would like to see Rush offer Mother Fluke an opportunity to appear in published advertisements for his Two If By Tea drink…Make a public offer of $100,000 and see if she will take it. Flesh out her position to see if her “ sexualization of women ” objection extends to modelling in general as something degrading to women. She bears a curious resemblance to a 1920s Coca Cola model…. > http://img3.etsystatic.com/il_570xN.319252999.jpg
Report Post »jhrusky
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:24pmWow… wonder if Sandra wrote that or she had a little bit of assistance from her handlers to try and diminsh the negative publicity?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:21pmSupport S.E. Cupp.
Report Post »amyb73
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:20pmWonder if she’d feel the same way if it was done to Sarah Palin…
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:29pm…or Rush Limbaugh…
Report Post »Weiners Wiener
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:40pmIt HAS been done to Palin. Filthy liberals started posting porn images photoshopped with Palin’s face shortly after she became a household name in 2008.
Report Post »amyb73
Posted on May 23, 2012 at 4:51pmOh I know.. maybe someone should show her.
Report Post »