Santorum Allegedly Tells Fox Reporters: ‘Ron Paul Is Disgusting’
- Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:50pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum allegedly told FOX reporters “Ron Paul is disgusting” following an interview on “Fox and Friends” Tuesday morning.
FOX News Channel Producer Serafin Gomez wrote on the Greta Wire webpage that Santorum’s harsh words were directed at his fellow Republican presidential primary candidate in response to Iowa robo calls that claimed Santorum was pro-choice and against the Second Amendment.
The comment was made to a “handful” of reporters.
Throughout the campaign Santorum and Paul have regularly squared off against each other, engaging in nasty exchanges on the debate stage as well as each making comments in the press that the other is “too liberal.” Now both Paul and Santorum are neck-in-neck in what seems to be a three-way race with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney going into Tuesday’s caucuses.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (268)
I.Gaspar
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:25pmPaul doesn’t know anything about the robocalls…just like he didn’t know anything about the crap published in his newsletter.
Report Post »Face it, Paulists…your Emperor’s clothes are falling off.
He has some good ideas…but President Paul?
No way.
Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:27pmYes, Ron Paul has good ideas — it’s called the CONSTITUTION!
Report Post »scheduler
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:32pmRon Paul is a threat that is why.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Videos
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:32pmInstead of coming clean and answering his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey . . .
. . . Rick Santorum is attacking Ron Paul, who answered his survey 100% in favor of our Second Amendment rights and has a stellar pro-gun record in the House, unlike Mr. Santorum.
Please call Rick Santorum and let him know that you expect him to apologize for his past votes in support of gun control and promise to never do it again by returning his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey — at once.
Make your call right now:
His Iowa office: 515-421-7224
His South Carolina office: 855-206-7425
His New Hampshire office: 603-518-5199
————————
2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
http://www.gunowners.org
Ron Paul A+
Report Post »Rick Perry A
Michelle Bachmann A
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:34pmForgot the link for the gun owners stats:
http://gunowners.org/2012presidential.htm
2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
http://www.gunowners.org
Ron Paul A+
Report Post »Rick Perry A
Michelle Bachmann A
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
Rational Man
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:47pmI applaud Santorum for being so polite in his assessment of Paul.
Report Post »I’m sure I would be much more crude and detailed in mine.
DISPICABLE LIAR comes to mind…………………..
Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:53pmRon Paul is not a liar.
Romney is the liar “oops, I changed my mind”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=BI9yjhd8b84
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:57pmNow the loyal Paullowers will see, it is far more fun to give then receive…
I will vote for Ron Paul in the primaries and Romney in the General Election. I know when to protest and when to move forward.
Paul may win Iowa, so did President Huckabee!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:00pmFormer CIA Bin Laden Hunter Scheuer Endorses Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy
(Michael Scheuer has appeared on Glenn Beck’s tv show many times)
By Lauren Fox
January 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print
National security expert Michael Scheuer regards Ron Paul as the man with the plan to keep America safe, strong and secure.
Scheuer, a former CIA officer who was in charge of tracking Osama bin Laden during the Clinton administration, endorsed Paul via a blog post on his website.just hours before voters gather at the Iowa caucuses.
The former high-ranking intelligence officer who was in charge of the so-called “Alec Station” analysis cell monitoring bin Laden’s whereabouts at the CIA says he endorsed the 12-term Texas congressman because of his stance on foreign policy, his warnings on a double dip recession, and
Report Post »http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ballot-2012/2012/01/03/former-cia-bin-laden-hunter-scheuer-endorses-ron-pauls-foreign-policy
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:05pmRick Santorum is disgusting.
Rick’s support of arming and defending Muslim tyrants who hate Israel is disgusting.
Rick’s support of foreign aid is disgusting.
Rick’s support of more spending is disgusting.
Rick’s distractions instead of being honest is disgusting.
Rick is progressive. Likes to spend, likes war, intervention, redistribution of wealth internationally (foreign aid), aiding Israel’s enemies, views people in groups, likes UN, likes bigger government. Yup, Rick is progressive and that is why he hates Ron Paul.
Rick is to the LEFT on every issue verses Ron Paul. Rick is liberal (progressive) and is why he distracts when confronted by truth.
Conservatives don’t vote to spend more or to send tax dollars to Pakistan.
Christians don’t vote for those arming, defending, and aiding Israel’s enemies, Muslim tyrants.
TEA doesn’t vote for big government spenders.
Rick Santorum is disgusting!
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:05pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62m9CNvBNMU&feature=g-u&context=G2958f21FUAAAAAAAGAQ
Chuck Baldwin. Read up on Chuck and listen to both parts to his speech. RP ‘12
Report Post »lvjohn
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:07pmRon Paul is my favorite nut.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:24pmSo Constitution = Nutty? Cuba would love you people.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012
HippoNips
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:41pmYou are right, Paul is disgusting ,
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:45pmRon Pauls going to win & Bring out Liberty back. Read the constitution socialists. I’m no slave.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:13pmThe “Constitution” should be capitalized…
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:19pmI know that the All-informed, All-knowing Paulites will correct me on this…BUT
didn‘t Paul just come out on national TV saying he doesn’t see himself in the White House/ Oval Office? didn‘t Paul come out on national TV saying that he hopes the campaign is short because he can’t handle a long drawn out primary process?
so Paulinas…why is a man running for the presidency if he can’t see himself as the Commander-in- Chief? doubts his ability to handle a long drawn out campaign process? and only after 15 years is denouncing racists comments he didn’t know about but let be printed in a newsletter that carried his name and he paid for? and after 10 years is finally denouncing conspiracy theories that blame America for 9/11 or claim elements in the USA DID 9/11? and that those in power were salivating and giddy over 9/11 because it meant they could start a war? Well he didn’t denounce that last one in fact he and his staff are standing behind it.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:23pmVechorik, Colt & Okie, Congrats on your caucus victory tonight! Now focus on JOB ONE defeating Obama! Which means, eventually, get real and vote for Romney in November!
There is no Santa Claus but there still is a Christmas. It might not be an Ipod in your stocking, but it still plays music and beats a lump of coal (racial slur not intended).
Report Post »GUNNSUP
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:25pmYou want to break the chain of the same old fraud & corruption coming from the establishment or not? They’re stealing us blind, soon to be taking your bank accounts, pensions, killing more free enterprise & entrepenurship, devaluating our dollar by 40%. Giving our $$ the the FED then in turn they give it to foriegn banks to pull off more ponzi schemes. Do you want more government in our lives, more Homeland Security on the streets, TSA, military surveilling you 24/7? More illegal wars for profit, the continuing loss of our Bill of Rights & Constitution? More regulation of our food sources, the rights to grow our own foods, more restrictions on medicine, health care? The UN & the globalist big 6 mega banks want to control everything we now have, they want to put a tax on the air that we breathe. Soon they will take away our first ammendment with this SOPA act to control the internet, then it’s freedom of assembly, then freedom of press, then the 2nd ammendment, the right to protect ourselves.
People out there calling Ron Paul a nutcase better think long and hard on what your vote will stand for. What is happening now (all these PSYOPS) is exactly how Hitler & Stalin gained their power. STOP believing the goverment controlled media. Even FOX has turned into a bunch of progressive blowhards. They are in essence trying to tell us who to vote for. Just research Ron Paul, I believe you’ll find him to be a true patriot for the people….
I AM A VETERAN FOR RON PAUL….
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:41pm@VRW Conspirator
Ron Paul said he doesn’t see himself in the Oval Office when he goes to sleep at night… Ron doesn’t sit around fantasying about being President nor all the power that comes with it. That is a good thing. George Washington sure didn’t sit around fantasying about being President. In fact, George was frustrated he was asked…
Ron didn‘t say he can’t see himself as commander in chief.
Ron disavowed those comments a while back.
Ron Paul never supported 9/11 as an inside job
Ron Paul still holds 9/11 was blowback because it was
The Bush administration did use 9/11 to go to Iraq (al-Qaeda link remember)
Why wouldn‘t America want a President who doesn’t sit around fantasying about being President and having all it’s power, who understands blowback and spoke truth about a progressive administration looking to not let a crisis go to waste?
Can you tell us how Rick Santorum is pro-Israel when he supports aiding, arming, and defending Muslim tyrants who hate Israel like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan?
How Rick Santorum is a conservative when supporting foreign aid which is redistribution of wealth internationally (foreign welfare)?
How Rick is TEA but supported every spending bill while in office as well as foreign aid and more war, which all lead to higher taxes?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:44pmRick Santorum’s Nephew indorses Ron Paul
Report Post »“The trouble with my uncle, Rick Santorum”
http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/03/the-trouble-with-my-uncle-rick-santorum/
snakeyes4liberty
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:57pmRon Paul will NEVER get the nomination. He is an annoying, strange little man who reminds me of an equally strange, little man from Texas whose initials are also R.P.—Ross Perot. He couldn’t get the Republican nomination and neither can Ron Paul. Two losers don’t make a right. Ron Paul is the conductor of the right wing whack job train and his son Rand better think about shutting his trap or he will end up a one termer.
Report Post »Maxim Crux
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:04pmThe more I am seeing of Ron Paul’s past as well as things he has said recently, such as being friends with Iran, the more I am thinking that he is one of those wolves in sheep’s clothing as in the Fabian picture.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:10pmBE AWARE POSTERS….
If you say ANYTHING about Soros and his connection to Ron Paul…you will be called names by CAUSE4LIBERTY and your comments will be reported to The Blaze by his friend VECHORIK as SPAM!!! Gee..you have NEVER reported ANY of my comments BEFORE??? Hmmmmm…??
Looks like free speech and the Constitution only applies to the TWO OF YOU!
And…YES…CAUSE4LIBERTY i reported a comment once BECAUSE the Ron Paul supporter called me a Hitler lover, nazi and a racist just BECAUSE i had the numbers 88 after my name and ALSO because i did NOT support Ron Paul.
The Ron Paul supporters on this blog have done MORE to turn people AWAY from Ron Paul than to get more people to support him.
VECHORIK….i have seen THIS comment many times on the The Blaze today…hmmm??? You should REALLY report yourself for SPAMMING
//////////////////////////////////////////////
New anti-Romney ad in Iowa starts this morning:
It’s pretty good
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=BI9yjhd8b84
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:27pm@Clara88
There is no Ron Paul and George Soros connection. None. You are trying to twist what Glenn Beck said today which was NOT that.
Can you explain why Rick Perry attended buildaberg that George Soros attends? See, Rick Perry is connected to Soros……George Soros backs Rick Perry!!!
Can you remind us what the name of the hunting location that Rick and his family hunted at for decades is called and what was wrote on that rock?
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:36pmClara,
You know I love Ya kiddo, even when we disagree. I have defended you against the Paul bearers before… But don’t take this too seriously. Let ‘em attack, ramble, cut and paste. It shows their true colors. You are dead on, they are chasing away potential supporters… “I would never join any group that would have me as a member”.
Ookspay
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:48pm@VRW CONSPIRATOR
Perhaps you should invest in some reading comprehension classes. I can’t fault you completely, the headline for that article is very deceiving.
The headline read “Does Ron Paul See Himself in the Oval Office? ‘Not Really’”
While the actual reporter asked “When you lay your head on your pillow at night, do you see yourself in the Oval Office?”
If you can’t distinguish between the two and the difference between the answers given, you have some serious comprehension issues. His answer of “not really” was in a response to whether or not he was an egomaniac that went to bed at night dreaming of being the most powerful man in the free world. To that question, no, he doesn’t. He’s a humble civil servant, here to educate us from our apathy and to save our republic. To him, it’s a tiring struggle to wake us from our sleep.
So go ahead, vote for the candidate that goes to bed at night and has dreams of being the commander in chief. Imagine all that power! What will I do with it when I have it! That’s who you want as president? That’s the answer you prefer from your nominee?
Pathetic….
Report Post »wolfinshdo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:05pmDo Ron Paul supporters constantly have the munchies?
Report Post »Do Ron Paul supporters really think Iran should be allowed to have a nuclear bomb?
Do Ron Paul supporters really think 95% of Black males in D.C. are criminals?
I think the MSM will leave him pretty much alone as long as they know he is only damaging Republicans. If they thought he had any chance they would be going through his trash, his voting record (including all the bills he wanted that never passed), his association to those racial statements that he knew about but didn’t know about, his belief that we shouldn’t have helped stop Hitler, etc………
Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:16pm@@Okie…
WRONG..did NOT listen to Glenn Beck today…read it HERE..breaking news this morning…
Ron Paul Endorsed By George Soros “Blue Republican” Organization
http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/03/ron-paul-endorsed-by-progressive-blue-republican-organization/
When somebody is integral to the Progressive Movement in America as Ralph Nader… embraces the Ron Paul Campaign, Conservatives would do WELL to pause.
It seems interesting that an organization that appears quite hopeful to see Obama re-elected in 2012, and is CLEARLY linked to Progressive Anti-American globalist George Soros is simultaneously calling for Democrats to register as Republicans and support Ron Paul in the Republican primaries.. DOES IT NOT???
***********************************************
**And LAST TIME I Checked…Gov Rick Perry Hadn’t Been Endorsed By ANY George Soros Organization
He HAS Been Endorsed By VETERANS…MANY VETERANS! :)) GOD BLESS THEM!
http://blog.4president.org/2012/2011/12/gov-rick-perry-announces-veterans-for-perry-coalition.html
**AND..Considering That YOU Are A Ron Paul Supporter…YOU Should REALLY Be More Concerned About Letters That Ron Paul ACTUALLY WROTE HIMSELF And Have HIS SIGNATURE On Them Then WHERE Someone Went Hunting!
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:48pmthe naked Paul doesn’t scare me. if you got them flaunt them
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:51pm@clara Paul was able to garner more than 300 congressman to co-sponsor a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, which included both Democrats and Republicans. The man doesn’t care who the person is, as long as the US Constitution is adhered to.
“I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend.” – Thomas Jefferson
He has joined with many to cut spending, here at home and abroad, audit the fed, secure our individual rights, and protect our personal privacy from Government invasion. He has never joined with anyone from the left to advance a Progressive (more Big Government) law or to advance a Marxist agenda. And that is a fact.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:25pmDerka, derka, derka. If you‘re concerned about anyone’s opinion of Ron Paul it should be this guy. If you don’t know who he is, do your own homework so your findings are unbiased.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J5GHRhUURI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
You’re being given a clear choice for course correction.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:36pmJim Rogers is to be admired….even Glenn Beck admires him.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:03pmNope, getting us into another war is disgusting Rick…… And if you win and if you do, it will be the end of the Republicans… Even pro military hawks understand this.. We are broke buddy, i will support our candidate no matter what, but please, no more wars…
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:26pmunfortunately…sometimes you don’t have a choice about war…it comes and finds you…if Iran gets a nuke…there will be war…not because we start it but because they will and then we can either be Ron Paul and sit back and wait for them to attack us as they glass the entire Middle East or prevent the nuke with preemptive air and sea base attacks and avoid the war.
and trust that China and Russia will bankroll, back up, and provide whatever help necessary to stop us from doing those strikes because they WANT IRAN nuclear to start the war so they can ride in and end it and take over the entire region…
expect a Middle East nuclear war if Obama is re-elect or Paul is elected…China to attack and take Tiawan and North and South Korea, Vietnam, and the whole Indonesian peninsula…Russia to reform the USSR…and Europe to collapse as terrorists stream across our southern border from Central and South American bases…
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:51pmVRW Conspirator
Report Post »Let me get this right. China is going to borrow us the money to go to war with Iran and then back Iran at the same time?
Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:54pm@VRW: The trouble will be the SCO (I’ll leave that acronym for your own unbiased research.) The foreign policy of debtor nation like the United States is not conducive to adventurism and nation building. Make no mistake the Chinese are gunning up for a war against the U.S. (that takes us back to the SCO) and Iran is a tripwire.
Our boys are already spread to thin for what this would bring about, and we’re broke! Do you think the Chinese will buy more of our debt to allow us to wage war against their interests, or their forces directly? The world isn’t as we wish it were, my friend. Open your eyes to the reality of the 21st century. There is only one course our foreign policy can take to maintain our national sovereignty, and that is nonintervention.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:38pm@VRW Conspirator
“I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past.”
― Patrick Henry
Did we find the WMD’s in Iraq after we invaded? Did we find Al-queda in Iraq after we invaded?
Do you know about the 1953 Iranian coup d’état? There is a lot more that has been going on around the globe then what they teach us in high school or what is on the news. The real history and the behind the scenes dealings of the past century are not in the text books. The history is available though. You just have to find and read it.
Did you learn anything about the Federal Reserve in high school?
Foreign policy of policing the globe and bombing who we don’t like; will only continue the growth of our enemies.
“Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto.”
Report Post »― Thomas Jefferson
WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:53pm@ VRW Conspirator
Also, did you know as of 2008 we had over 50 military bases surrounding Iran? Not to mention all of Iran’s neighbors having nukes (one caught hiding Osama that we pay foreign aid to).
Wouldn’t you want a nuke if you were Iranian?
Report Post »ENTP
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:24pmI hear people talkin’ bad,
Report Post »About the way they have to live here in this country,
Harpin’ on the wars we fight,
An‘ gripin’ ’bout the way things oughta be.
I don‘t mind ’em switchin’ sides,
An‘ standin’ up for things that they believe in.
When they‘re runnin’ down our country, man,
They‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
They‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
Runnin’ down the way of life,
Our fightin’ men have fought and died to keep.
If you don’t love it, leave it:
Let this song that I‘m singin’ be a warnin’.
When you‘re runnin’ down our country, hoss,
You‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
I read about some squirrely guy,
Who claims, that he just don‘t believe in fightin’.
An’ I wonder just how long,
The rest of us can count on bein’ free.
They love our milk an’ honey,
But they preach about some other way of livin’.
When they‘re runnin’ down our country, man,
They‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
They‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
Runnin’ down the way of life,
Our fightin’ men have fought and died to keep.
If you don’t love it, leave it:
Let this song that I‘m singin’ be a warnin’.
When you‘re runnin’ down my country, man,
You‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
You‘re walkin’ on the fightin’ side of me.
Runnin’ down a way of life,
Our fightin’ men have fought and died to keep.
If you don’t love it, leave it:
Let this song that I‘m singin’ be a
Rational Man
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:49pmOne of my favorite Merle Haggard songs!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:05pmI’m pretty much all in on the Revolutionary War, War of 1812, Spanish-American War, Indian Wars but about everything since I have to really question our involvement. I don’t think I’d be looking to a country music star with perhaps an 8th grade education in order to validate foreign policy questions although I do like the spirit of the song.
Report Post »thekuligs
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:24pmAttention Ron Paul supporters: Directing people to the “facts” on daily Paul is worse than the girl scouts directing troops to Media Matters. One sided much?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:29pmWell, collect your own facts then. I see them as a “public service.”
Don’t take their word for anything, but at least you can track down from other sources to see if it’s true.
You will find that those facts are TRUE.
Report Post »WD0331
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:31pmhttp://www.citizensforethics.org/index.php/press/entry/crew-releases-second-annual-most-corrupt-members-of-congress-report/
Report Post »rock-n-roll-rebel
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:43pmThere isn’t any honor in journalism anymore so finding the truth is not easy. Take it where you can get it.
Report Post »thekuligs
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:47pmCREW huh? Must not have done any research on them. Founded to mostly to attack republicans, they even stooped so low as to complain that John Edwards was being unfairly prosecuted. CREW is a liberal watch dog group.
And yes, I will get my own info. I just can’t see how you think biased like that will help Pauls campaign at all. If you like him so much you should maybe do him a better service.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:55pmLike I said — are the facts true? — the source doesn’t matter when it comes to truth.
Report Post »The truth will always win.
Rational Man
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:55pm@thekuligs
Good observation!
Report Post »Glad to see Blazers are paying close attention to what is posted and where it comes from.
justangry
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:27pmJust google “US Constitution” and read that.
Report Post »SeanW
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:21pmFunny.
Report Post »People very much up in arms over Obama’s church membership. Right? Jeremiah Wright, “God Damn America” etc etc?
Apart from the deaths of John Paul II and Mother Theresa there has been ONE overriding theme of Catholics in the news. The Catholic Church’s protection and apparent acceptance of pedophiles in their ranks. If Santorum is a Catholic and wants to legislate morality, well I for one do not accept the raping of children in the name of God as being moral. He has not denounced the Catholic Church for their actions, so by the very same logic that attacked Obama for his questionable faith, should not Santorum be held to the same standard?
DesdemonasCrew
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:06pmTo make a proper comparison, please provide the name of the priest and the date of the Mass that Mr. Santorum attended where pedophilia was defended from the pulpit while Rick sat there and said nothing. Audio or video of that behavior from the pulpit by a named priest would also be useful. Standing by.
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:41pmUnlike with Black Liberation Theology, which Rev. Wright preaches…NO WHERE in Catholic doctrine does it say pedophilia is okay…it does however CONDEMN ANY form of sex outside of the marriage of one man to one woman…it stands against the MURDER of a human life in ANY stage of development (and no capital punishment is not murder, it is punishment for crimes committed, something even God permits, read your Bible – abortion, especially partial birth abortion which Obama is for and created legislation for is MURDER)
now we can debate why certain priests were allowed to stay in the flock once their crimes were known…that is fine…we can even talk about the trustworthiness of the bishops and cardinals that believed these men could be treated, counseled, and rehabilitated – since in almost every instance of a priest not being turned over..that is what happened. They went to confession, confessed their sins, and they were believed to be honest and truthful, and confessions even to this day are protected in courts.
Report Post »but lets not forget that the instances of pedophilia in the Catholic Church is NO higher than that in any religious order or group for that matter. the percentages of child molesters in general society, gay society, clergy, and atheists are all about the same actually…the MSM just uses clergy more often because it serves their purpose and all you enlightened Paulonian free thinkers don‘t check your facts like you complain to us we don’t and buy into it!!
BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:18pmALL the polls are rigged to make any GOP look bad v obama. Paulistinians are democrats who want to see obama re-elected.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:22pmI don’t know what a Paulistinian is, but if you’re talking about Ron Paul supporters, you’re so wrong.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:27pm@VECHORIK ditto
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:44pmso you do not think obama has planted his minions in the Paul movement to swell it to try to encourage the old man to go 3rd Party just to spoil the election in Nov. — as it is, EVEN ‘WE’ think the old guy has a LOT of normal old-fashioned “pre-1917 WWI isolationist” yet GOOD ideas, like NO MORE WORLD POLICEMAN !!!, but most of them are taken out of moth balls too late for our NATION and it will take a younger stronger man to lead America thru what will be bloody Hell here if obama loses — cos obama‘s ’private army’ will be REAL upset with ALL of normal America.
November, AMERICA must go one on one against obama, no 3rd parties like the Paulistinians are formenting if Paul “loses” the nom.
Report Post »LOJ
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:45pmPaul is not a Republican..hes Libertarian with Liberal supporters as well, who know he could be the spoiler for the GOP and are going to great lengths to get him elected!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:52pm@BURNTHILLS I don‘t know if you’ve seen my other posts but I routinely bash our Marxist president,hope that answers your question.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:29pmWhat does OBAMA have to do with following the Constitution? Ron Paul supporters want a turn back to the Founding Fathers way of thinking. Does Obama? What an idiotic statement. I hope they cut off your welfare check soon.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:46pmbunrthills calls people names because he represents a losing canindate. Do me a favor & stop calling out names, you sound foolish.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:07pm@BurntHills
Report Post »Dumb comment about Paul and his followers. Obama, Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum are polar opposites to Ron Paul and his supporters.
So your progressive? Socialist? Communist? What do you stand for because i know it can’t be the U.S. Constitution.
smackdown33
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:17pmPaul for President.
Report Post »WD0331
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:27pmRon Paul 2012!
techengineer11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:32pmRick Santorum and his War mongering Israel first mantra gives me the creeps. He has about as much respect for the US Constitution as one would have for a piece of used toilet paper.
Go to the Drudge Report and cast your vote.. So far Dr. Paul leading the race. Be sure to call in to these Neo-Con talk radio dolts and have them explain how wasting 2-3 trillion dollars in the Middle East and trying to start another War is so conservative or better yet even rational.. I’m absolutely sick of FOX News and its bias and the bias of the Neo-Cons on talk radio. Especially the very feminine Sean Hannity. I think he’s about a chromosome or so away from being a girl.
Report Post »jcannon98188
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:46pmI was watching CNN today while waiting for my mother to finish up her doctors appointment so I could drive her home. Whilst listening to the report they showed a clip of Newt Gingrich talking about the Federalist Papers, how they were nothing more than campaign propoganda. That alone disqualifies Gingrich in my mind, ignoring everything else he has ever done.
RON PAUL 2012!
Report Post »eagle2715
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:20pmPaul supporters have never been known to spoof ‘non-scientific’ polls….
That drudge thing is Crap…
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:32pmeagle2715
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:20pm
Paul supporters have never been known to spoof ‘non-scientific’ polls….
That drudge thing is Crap…
Why is it crap? Matt Drudge is no Ron Paul guy. He’s a Neo-Con if anything. The truth is that Dr. Paul will probably do well in it because his supporters are more educated and informed than the average voter… Just a fact. That’s why they are more fervent because they know and realize the truth when spoken and we realize that this field of Republicans is lying to us and is actually no diffferent than Obama.
don’t get mad because your clown Santorum is losing.. lol
Report Post »SMACKD0WN33
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:37pmPaul supporters never spoof!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:57pm@Tech
Every Santorum or Bachmann supporter you come across that “Supports Israel” and are voting Santorum or Bachmann because they “support Israel” simply ask how does Rick or Michelle support Israel when they support sending foreign aid, arms, and troops for defense of Muslim tyrants who hate Israel like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
I’m no Israel first-er but the ones who are and support Santorum or Bachmann are just hilarious. They support the candidates that want to give guns, money, and troops to the very enemy they are standing against. How do they not get that if you sell Saudi Arabia 80 F-15′s and Saudi bombs Israel WE contributed to the bombing of Israel by enabling Saudi Arabia with F-15′s…..
Can any Santorum or Bachmann supporter who “stands with Israel” explain this please………
Hope you are well…Keep up the good fight!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:53pmOkie from Muskogee: I certainly appreciate your approach in trying to help people see through the trees always maintaining the high ground.. Bottom line is they don’t know because CNN, FOX and other Cable News Media doesn’t tell them.. If they don‘t hear it on the News they are not going to consider it but the truth is America is now in such poor financial condition that we must traffic in weapons to stay afloat even if it means selling hundreds of billions of dollars in deadly weapons to Isreal’s enemies.
I’m with you on that issue. There’s no good that can come from it. Eventually it will lead to a middle eastern conflict in which there will be no winners. Of course on the issue of foreign aid I don‘t see how so many people can call themselves Conservatives while having a view that it’s ok to borrow money from our future in order to spread it around the globe today especially given the fact that we are some 15 Trillion in short term debt right about now… lol Such contradications.
Report Post »TOPOFTHEGAME
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:17pmLet me try once again on web site of Knights of Maltia, http://biblebelievers.org/au/Jesuits.htm#Knights
Report Post »CorpsmanToPA
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:28pmYeah – here is the link I found http://moversandshakersofthesmom.blogspot.com/2008/09/rick-santorum.html
It is pretty scary – his loyalty is committed to the Pope before his country! So he does not want a theocracy huh? So either you people need to say you want a theocracy as well or get your mind straight and vote for a real Constitutionalist – Ron Paul – supporting freedom of religion, not mandates by religion.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:41pmI didn’t even know that relation. I do know the Catholic church is for world distribution of wealth, therefore supports the socialists.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:43pmSantorum will have to get out of that organization. Presidents must swear to uphold the Constitution, not the Pope!
Report Post »VRW Conspirator
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:46pm@Vechorik…
you should like all the Nixon supports in 1960 that were claiming JFK would hand the keys to the USA treasury and government to the Pope if he was elected….wait..NOPE never happened…you dolt!!
the RCC is NOT for worldwide redistribution of wealth…SITE chapter and verse please?
if you can’t…then shut your pie hole about the RCC and debate the merits of Paul, Santorum, or any candidate ONLY on what the candidate says and does….
YOU and YOUR type of support are why Ron Paul ALWAYS LOSES!! People don’t care what he stands for when they know the most vocal of his supporters are imbeciles and conspiracy nutjobs!!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:16pmLiberation Theology was supported by Ratcliff before becoming Pope.
Google it and get his own words if you are too stubborn to accept it.
Yes the Catholic Church as well as the Pope both came out for redistribution of wealth as well as a global government who overseas all countries. Google it.
Yes the Catholic Church supports agenda 21 thru the Club of Rome. Google it.
Yes Rick Santorum is a nut who contradicts his own views by saying he stands for Israel but also supports arming, aiding, and defending her enemies like Muslim tyrant Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, etc.
Rick Santorum sucks!
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:15pmfunny how all the obamademocrats are rooting for Ron Paul, thinking the real Americans will lose to obama then.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:23pmHow do you figure that?
Report Post »Fox chooses Rasmussen polls, which are GOP voters.
INDEPENDENTS LIKE RON PAUL (independents elected Obama last year).
I can’t understand your line of reasoning.
BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:32pmobamademocrats [no longer "Americans" since Nov 08] have been ranting for Paul as if they would vote for him to go 3rd party to split the vote to get obama an easy victory. over Christmas trip we heard a whole group of them in a Chicago restaurant bragging about pumping up old Paulie. if RP goes 3rd party and all his actual Paulistinians vote for him thinking they have a chance in numbers, obama gets in. a vote for any 3rd party spoiler is a vote FOR obama.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:34pmany obama-communist answering a phone to a Rasmussen pollster can answer they are GOP, just to PSYCHOLOGICALLY thwart the poll for obama.
Report Post »SeanW
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:41pmOr could it be that Buchannan was right on Sunday? That there is no longer two parties in the United States of America. There is now one party with two wings. Look at Obama, the scary lib dem right? He has, pretty much carried on and expanded everythign that George Bush put in place. Let that sink in. Everything Obama has done are the exact same things Bush had done. Dem or Republican both of em are using YOU and ME as their personal ATM throwing our treasures away on frivolous pursuits while making our own country rot from within.
Maybe the agents of the status quo WANT you to believe the nonsense you just wrote. Maybe the agents of globalization and progressivism are doing everything in their power to convince you that Dr. Ron Paul is something other than who he really is? That his foreign policy is dangerous, that he is a wacko and could never win in a general election. And when that doesn’t work try to get you to believe he is a birther, truther, and racist and that he can’t win the general. And when that doesn’t work get all the ******** that you have bought off to go and sing his praises while still saying that he is unelectable. How many more fantasties do they have to present as reality before you finally wake up and go “hmmm something smells funny”.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:39pmWatch out for this third-party “Anyone with the remotest interest in replacing Barack Obama as America’s president in 2012 should take his eyes off Iowa and the boring ups and downs of the race for the Republican nomination.
The real action that may well decide our next president is quietly going on elsewhere, in the state offices that qualify candidates and parties for the November 2012 presidential ballot. You may not have heard much about a shadowy group called “Americans Elect” (it does not disclose its contributors because of alleged concerns that they might suffer loss of business or social contacts, and because it fancifully but only occasionally declares itself to be a 501[c] [4] tax-exempt organization [though it has qualified as a political party for ballot position in multiple states including Ohio, California, Nevada, and Arizona, which should deprive it of tax-exempt status]). But if you haven’t heard of Americans Elect, you soon will.”
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/americans_elect_obamas_third-party_tar_pit.html#ixzz1iQwjPKcJ
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:14pma vote for Ron Paul will become a Presidential vote for whoever his VP would be because Paul will not last 4 years in office. he as much as admits it.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:21pmPresidential candidates aren’t supposed to announce cabinet position/VP etc. It’s against the law.
Gingrich doesn’t seem to think so.
The Paul administration will carry on with conservative, Constitutional principles — count on that.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:12pmwho cares who says what about who right now, they are all full 100% AMERICANS up there.
come November it will be the voting booth and actual real Americans will be voting for ANYONE BUT the anti-America /100% communist /50% “American” POS obama.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:21pmSo first you bash Ron Paul and his supporters then turn around and say it doesn’t matter who says what to who right now?
Report Post »Well it does matter to me. I have done my research and then did it over again.
The Republic is disappearing whether you want to believe the “conspiracy theories” or not. The fight against the Constitution has been raging for over 100 years and the proof is all there in the legislation passed. This really could be the last chance to start getting back to the Constitution. If you haven’t read it; buy a copy. GOOGLE IT? GOOGLE NDAA. There is plenty more proof that the “conspiracy theories” are actually true. Don’t be a sheep.
WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:39pmBTW
Report Post »Ron Paul has received the most $ contributions from military vets, democrats, and minorities.
You want to remove Obama at whatever the cost? He is the one to do it but don’t do it for just the reason of removing Obama; Do it for freedom, liberty, and restoring the U.S. Constitution.
Vote Dr. Paul 2012!
TOPOFTHEGAME
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:09pmHere is one of my biggest concerns of R. Santorum, being a member of “THE KNIGHTS OF MALTIA” http://www.biblebelievers.org/au/kist1.htm
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:12pmNever heard of them. Most Catholics are members of Knights of Columbus, of course, Santorum is a bit strange.
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:14pmBad link. Try again.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:18pmYour link didn’t work, but I found this in Wickipedia:
Report Post »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:53pmI am a Catholic and a member of the Knights of Columbus. I wouldn’t vote Santorum to be dog catcher.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:09pmSantorum backed Mitt Romney as the “conservative” candidate in 2008
Saontrum has virtually zero presence anywhere except in Iowa
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:09pmAnother misleading headline. Cmon Blaze. You’re supposed to be better than this.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:08pmSantorum Listed as Most Corrupt Member of Senate in 2006
http://www.dailypaul.com/198638/hot-santorum-was-named-most-corrupt-senator-by-watchdog-group-in-2006
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:12pmYou’re linking from The Daily Paul? gimme a break! What a joke, paulite!
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:17pmthe Blaze will be full of Paulistinians from now til the nominee is announced. they think getting Paul in would help them re-elect obama.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:19pmDaily Paul gives you a link to follow:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/index.php/press/entry/crew-releases-second-annual-most-corrupt-members-of-congress-report/
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:22pmAs stated by another blazer, this organization is a George Soros funded scam. If Soros doesnt like someone, it’s more likely to INCREASE my support for said individual.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Report Post »http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1237
WD0331
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:30pmOK, Dagynet…. Here’s another one:
Report Post »http://www.citizensforethics.org/index.php/press/entry/crew-releases-second-annual-most-corrupt-members-of-congress-report/
2smart
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:37pmIsn’t getting info about R. Paul on the Daily Paul like getting the facts about Obama on Obama’s website? Come on Vechorik, non biased sites are a better choice. But I guess you, like Obama believe it’s easier to pull the wool over the publics eyes when you lead them to sanitized information.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:46pmWho cares where info comes from, if it’s double-checked and true?
I’ve learned quite a few things from the Huffington Post, for example.
Fox tells viewers to avoid news outlets because FOX WANTS TO CONTROL THE VOTER.
Why do you think Rupert Murdoch started Fox in the first place? As a public service? No, for money and control!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:07pmRick Santorum has family values except when it is a family he is friends with and is trying to protect from a scandal. He unethically protected a fellow Senator who cheated on his wife.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N6Gd…ayer_embedded#!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:07pmEarly in the George W. Bush administration, along with Dick Armey, Tom DeLay, and Grover Norquist, Santorum was at the center of the Republicans’ tactic of pressuring lobbying firms to hire only Republicans. At regularly scheduled once-weekly meetings held since Republicans took Congress and in 1994, Santorum and other leading Republicans were provided with a list of job openings at lobbying companies, and literally told the lobbyists who to hire — always well-connected Republicans. It was called the “K Street Project” because most lobbying firms have offices on Washington’s K Street, but the system backfired when the lobbyists’ “freeze-out” of Democrats became so successful that all the legislators on the take from crooked lobbyist Jack Abramoff were Republicans. When the arrangement was first reported in 2006, Santorum denied it was true and claimed to not even know Abramoff. When it was proven that Abramoff had been involved, Santorum announced that the “K Street” meetings had been ended. Months later it was reported that the meetings between lobbyists and Republicans were still being held at the same time, place, and day, once weekly. In 2006, the non-partisan Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington named Santorum one of the twenty most corrupt US legislators.
http://www.nndb.com/people/035/000025957/
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:06pmPerry’s ad against Santorum “unelectable”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt6XCZz2X1Y
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:06pmthey can sling it at each other all they want, but the final nominee better be gloves-off and ready to band together with all of these actual 100%-blooded AMERICANS, and sling THE TRUTH on the anti-America obama and stand on him all the rest of year.
to save America, obama has GOT to be REMOVED.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:22pmI’m all in for that!
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:05pmFox News / Blaze
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:10pmFox News = Blaze didn’t you mean?
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:17pmYes
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:18pmI like how Santorum wants to oppress through sanctions,bomb for Jesus,and spend other peoples money…Santorim 2012!!!…He won’t return The Bill of Rights back to the people like the loon Ron Paul would do…Santorem knows best!!!…Bomb for Jesus…Sintorom 2012!!!!
Report Post »oriondma05
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:20pmThank goodness. If you said MSNBC = Blaze or Media Matters = Blaze, then I would have to stop visiting the Blaze.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:03pmWow Rick what an insult to the only candidate fighting for our liberty and freedom,you people are insane,he wants to reduce the size of government thereby increasing our liberty from government.He’s a real radical wanting less government I see what you mean now.He wants to put an end to perpetual war,and I used to be in that nuke em all camp to.But we‘re broke and war costs in the trillions and more importantly lives and I’ve lost enough friends in these endless wars,our Marxist president has us in several undeclared wars which are all unconstitutional but hey who cares the constitution is pretty much dead anyway.
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:18pmAnyone who has been in DC for as long as ronpaul is as responsible for the mess we are in, as anyone else!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:26pmHe never voted for an earmark and has forgone his pension and never voted to raise taxes.
Report Post »countryfirst
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:42pmRon Paul never voted for ear marks? What he would do is put them in a bill he knew was going to past then vote against it. Very slippery dealing, he would make a better car salesman the POTUS.
Report Post »beachj11
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:35pmCountryFirst: How about a reference? I‘ve never read any such thing from anywhere other than a few people’s comments here on the blaze. Please don‘t tell me you’re just up-chucking what you’ve read from other comments!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:40pmPrinciple 1: Represent your district
Principle 2: vote no on spending
Principle one has Ron request/allocate/appropriate (earmark) the most money his district can get from each spending bill. That is the right thing to do as if money is not earmarked the Executive branch gets it.
Principle 2 has Ron Paul vote NO on all spending. Ron would never have to earmark money for if he had his way the spending bills would not have existed.
Glenn Beck did a very dishonest job of explaining this today on the radio. Very disappointed in Glenn not understanding this process and principles betters.
It’s pretty easy to understand if you have principles and follow them oh and are honest about it.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:03pmRick Santorum’s Nephew says: Vote for Ron Paul
It is not the government’s job to dictate to individuals how they must live. The Constitution was designed to protect individual liberty. My Uncle Rick cannot fathom a society in which people cooperate and work with each other freely. When Republicans were spending so much money under President Bush, my uncle was right there along with them as a senator. The reason we have so much debt is not only because of Democrats, but also because of big-spending Republicans like my Uncle Rick.
It is because of this inability of status quo politicians to recognize the importance of our individual liberties that I have been drawn to Ron Paul. Unlike my uncle, he does not believe that the American people are incapable of forming decisions. He believes that an individual is more powerful than any group (a notion our founding fathers also believed in).
Another important reason I support Ron Paul is his position on foreign policy. He is the only candidate willing to bring our troops home, not only from the Middle East, but from around the world.
Ron Paul seems to be the only candidate trying to win the election for a reason other than simply winning the election.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/03/th…#ixzz1iQYhaSAb
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:06pmJohn Garver is a 19-year-old student at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. A small liberal arts college.
Like I care what a first year liberal arts student thinks.
Just another liberal endorsement from a kid who wants “the man” off his back and not follow the rules of a civil society.
I’m impressed…………..NOT!
Report Post »kifeb221993
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:59pmRomney wins iowa so none of this matters
Report Post »afishfarted
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:09pmIt really doesn’t matter who wins Iowa. Barry will stay in office. So the people’s efforts need to be concentrated on replacing Congress
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:11pmCrystal ball again — latest poll shows Romney slipping, Santorum/Paul rising.
Report Post »Let’s just let the votes be counted, alright?
kifeb221993
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:54pmWhat Poll?(shows him slipping)
Report Post »MEANS2RESIST
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:36pmPaul is in the lead….He’s a good man, do more research, not just what the dinosaur media tells us about him. They have an agenda and its The New World Order. To have every one of us on welfare while they do what they wish with our tax $$
Report Post »kifeb221993
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:55pmEvreyone has yet to tell me the poll that has Romney slipping and Paul gainning.
Report Post »I smell a lie or a poll that no one trust except for Ron Paul supporters!?!?!?
DRSAVAGE24
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:55pmRick Santorum’s support of No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, and voting to raise the debt ceiling 8 times is disgusting.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:02pmRasmussen was on fox not too long ago talking about how polls may not be accurate and that Ron Paul could win. He mentioned that Ron Paul is expanding the voter base which is very hard to do and only has been done by two people in the past; one of those people being Obama.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:19pmYes, Ron Paul is definitely expanding the voter base, Santorum is only getting those that left bachmann.
Report Post »kifeb221993
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:12pmRon Paul is the Republican Obama i just hope the result is not the same. if he wins its dooms day for us as in you and i and us as in the United States of America!
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:54pmDo these damn robo calls work at all, I would never vote for anyone that called me begging for money or my vote.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:59pmThe Ron Paul campaign know NOTHING about the robo-calls Santorum is talking about. Last I heard, Gingrich was the only one making nasty robo-calls against Ron Paul.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:11pmI wasn’t talking about and particular ones, I just wonder if any work. I am very turned off any time anyone I don’t know calls me, for pretty much any reason.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:26pmI don’t think negative robo-calls work. Everyone hates them — especially the campaign that puts them out. Maybe that’s why Santorum is accusing the Ron Paul campaign (with no evidence).
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:29pmI had the Newt campaign call me a some time ago, it was a recording so I have time to pull up a little tune off of the web. So when the lady came on I played the chorus for her. Last campaign call I have received. Here it is.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiKh9Ko3mw4
Babeuf
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:37pmVechorik,
Shouldn’t you be making more calls for Paul?
Report Post »Iowa Caucus Training Video
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?335404-Iowa-Caucus-Training-Video&s=c069758f43e515b148dc88938c74fb4c
vechorik
Signature
Call for Dr. Paul! — Phone from Home is how we win — Easy survey/script to read — YOU can do this! — Check in – Listen to Dr. Paul’s plea – Make your first call! http://phone.ronpaul2012.com/v/login.php?v=1