Santorum: Gay Community Has ‘Gone Out on a…Jihad’ Against Me
- Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:45pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
Former Pennsylvania Senator and Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum feels that the gay community has waged a “jihad” against him. Santorum made the comments to a group in Spartanburg, S.C. on Friday:
“So the gay community said, ‘He’s comparing gay sex to incest and polygamy, how dare he do this,’ and they have gone out on a, I would argue, jihad against Rick Santorum since then.”
Throughout the primary campaign, Santorum has staked himself as the most steadfast social conservative in the field of Republicans vying for a chance to face-off against President Obama in 2012. The Hill reports on Santorum’s past positions in regards to LGBT issues:
“Santorum (R-Pa.) has been an outspoken critic of both Lawrence v. Texas, a 2003 Supreme Court decision that struck down state sodomy laws, and state laws that allow gay marriage.
‘This is a napkin. A napkin is what a napkin is. It isn’t a paper towel. It isn’t a car.’ You can call a napkin a car, but it doesn’t make it a car. You can call a paper towel a chair, but it doesn’t make it a chair. Marriage is what marriage is,’ Santorum said.
Comments like this have brought particular ire to Santorum in the gay community. In 2003, Santorum argued that the ‘definition of marriage’ has never included ‘man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.’”
But aside from a fourth place finish in the Ames Iowa Straw Poll, Santorum’s campaign has stayed in the periphery of most polls and media attention. And despite Ron Paul’s complaints about a lack of media coverage, a study from the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism shows that only Hermain Cain has received less media attention than Rick Santorum among the 11 Republicans running for President. Minnesota Rep. Thad McCotter was not in the study.
“Jihad” or not, perhaps this explains why the most outspoken social conservative among Republicans running for president is yet to be “Glitter Bombed” by the gay community. It could be that the LGBT community may not be aware of his campaign.
(H/T: The Hill)
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 367 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 367 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (245)
WhiteFang
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:33pmPeople; it does not matter what you or I think about the matter of homosexuality, adultery, fornication or any other sin.
Report Post »What matters is what our Creator thinks about these behaviors.
From the beginning of human history, the majority have refused to pay any attention to what our God has suggested and look at the results. Mankind has never been so depraved as they are now. Even Sodom and Gomorrah was child play compared to the filthy sink we are now in.
Oh, I know there are many good and I can even say righteous people on this earth, but we all know we are in serious trouble in the eyes of our Almighty, Righteous God.
momprayn
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:37pmUnfortunately, I second that !!!! Amen.
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:48pmWhitefang,
Good day my brother, I would like to add that so many are putting their faith in some political candidate, for them, to come to our rescue and save us from the insanity consuming the nation and the world.
They should be looking to our Lord and King Jesus to do this. He is the one with the authority and the power to accomplish what a silly politician can not. Pray for God’s Kingdom! – Matthew 6:9-10
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:11pmI appreciate your devotion. But, we are not a theocracy (my Gods be praised).
Report Post »JRook
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:15pmLook I don‘t like the lifestyle but you can’t quote the founding fathers liberty for all position here and not extend it to all. Worry about yourself and what you are doing for the country and the greater good. As far as Rich he appears to be playing the Palin, “their after me card”.
Report Post »Uncurable wound
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:15pmwhite fang-very true.We have turned from God in everyway.Even our money-Gods money is Gold and silver.Now we worship the created not the creator.Hows that fiat money working for all of you?Get rid of gold and silver and let the banks decide what is of “value”!-good one…
Report Post »We have murdered enough babies,destroyed enough families,commited enough sexual immorality.
We have removed God from our hearts.
The Love of so many has growin cold
Come nearer to God and he will come nearer to you.
ChiefGeorge
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:37pmI concur as well….judgment is already be meted out and it is going to be a bitter harvest.
Report Post »Sleazy Hippo
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:38pmRick appears to be a whining wussie weakling. The Gays look like magnificent manly men by comparison.
Put your man pants back on.
Or, BEG Christine O’Donnell to beat up these hated Gay US Citizens for you.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:57pmSo much truth in all of this Whitefang. We are in a filthy sewer morally. We had better start taking a stand or suffer all the consequences. God Bless Santorum for the stand he takes and no matter the riducule he will not back down – while so many just want to dance around it or ignore it altogether. Sad and tragic days we are in.
Report Post »BUDDY LITTLE
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:03pmWe have become TOLERANT and look at us??
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:53pmChristian tolerance has been its own worst enemy.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 6:17pm, yeah, they’ll do that. but fascist techniques are common for groups like these…
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 6:25pmWHITEFANG my Brother, the ONLY part of your statement I must disagree with was about some of us today being righteous. There is none righteous, no not one.
Report Post »Our righteousness is as filthy rags to the Lord.
I know I may be nit picking, but, other than that, I strongly stand with you.
TXPilot
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 6:41pmTake care Mr. Santorum, if you aren’t careful, you could be stabbed in the back…..um…or maybe a bit lower down……might want to tighten that belt a bit……..Oh come on!….most of you were thinking the same thing!!! :D
Report Post »Tall Tal
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 7:30pmYou can wear the wrath of the Queers anf Lesbians (gays) as a badge of honor. They have made themselves an object of ridicule because of their left wing agenda. What have we as Christians done to cause the hate towards us? We stand up and be counted. We speak up and we stand up and we will not shut up. We have stood on the sidelines to long. Not anymore. The sweaky whell gets the grease. So we will be loudest because God Almighty is on our side.
Report Post »TheBMT
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 11:25pmDid I really read what YING wrote? What kind of garbage is that?
Report Post »Solzhenitsin
Posted on August 31, 2011 at 3:18pm@TheBMT Ying’s a racist.
Report Post »#1 There is nothing in the Bible which prohibits interracial marriage. The Israelites were instructed not to intermarry with the Canaanites when they entered the land, but if you go back and read the table of nations in Genesis, you’ll see that God was telling the decendants of Shem not to marry those of his brother Ham, not a lot of difference between them. Meanwhile, God had no rebuke for Moses marrying an African woman from Cush (Ethiopia) and punished his sister Miriam with head-to-toe whiteness from leoprasy for a whole day for whipping up opposition to Moses on this account. #2 Nowhere are Sodom and Gomorrah condemned for interracial marriages, but outside of the Genesis account we are told that they were guilty of hording food while the poor went hungry (Ezekiel 16:49) as well as their sexual perversions (Jude 1:7).
cookcountypatriot
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:32pmlook at the dem party….all splinter groups..homosexuals,abortion,muslims,women,unions, and the old stand by the black community,,which by the way democrats have totally destroyed and these lumps we call teachers.the dems and thier progressive white slave surrogates in the media push these agendas,,and if you dont follow along your a racist…if your a dem…you must goosestep right along with them like the lemming you are…real americans will be out in droves to end this cancer on society in 2012…god bless
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:42pmI really try to read each comment and find a debatable point, but there is none here! I guess some just like to rant!
Report Post »henryKnox
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:29pmWow, @thomasdaddy said it all. None of your points are debatable. I guess it shows that the truth shall set you free and it is hard to argue with the truth. Congratulations.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:58pmDitto…. it is my hope that ultimately it is the rational independents and libertarians who will drive the political agenda towards a government that works for all, not one that preaches or proselytizes in either direction. IMHO that is what the founding fathers were driving towards.
Report Post »Brad Wesselmann
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:06pmBe careful, they may find you and force you to move to southern IL…come on down, the beer is cold and the BBQ is hot. ;-)
Report Post »DallyWama
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:08pm@Thomas
Why would you read each point? It’s the internet. Get a job.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:15pmhenry…
I’m sorry! Did that go over your head? So hard to believe! There are no debatable points meaning there are no points in his comment! It’s a rant of unsubstantiated BS, but I guess it would make sense to you!
dally,
Every comment that I read I try to find a debatable point! I have a career, not a job, and it affords me some time to speak to idiots like you when I get bored! LOL
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:30pmWhat the far left is saying is one of the reasons Santorum has not gained traction in the GOP primary. While I do agree with his stance on some of his social issues now is not the time to fight that fight. This election is all about the economy and the size and scope of government. People seem to care less what gays are up to when there house is being forclosed upon and they have no job.
Report Post »FedupinCA
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:44pmWhat Ookspay said. Nailed it.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:54pmHomosexuals have declared jihad on America. It is bad, and getting worse quickly.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:57pm@DallyWama
Funny, I have two jobs and if I wanted to I could read each post/point like @thomasdaddy. If he wants to read each point then THAT”S HIS GOD GIVEN RIGHT. Shove off >.<
@thomasdaddy, good comments.
Report Post »WeDontNeedNoStinkingBadges
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:14pm“the gay community”? There ain’t no such-a-thing. A bunch of perverts, maybe. Criminals, yes. And for death penalty crimes at that.
Good for you, Rich Santorum, for standing God’s ground and calling out these depraved criminals for what they are and their abominable crimes.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:34pmWhy is it that people who would normally be loving “Christians” find so much hate for gays. I too disapprove of their lifestyle but that boat has sailed my friends. Outlaw it? Criminals? Give me a flippin great. Sinners? Maybe that’s for God to decide. The freedom that comes with being an American means allowing freedoms that you may not agree, cuts both ways.
I have watched a normally conservative GOP push too hard on social issues that do nothing more than push away voters by being too “religious”. Candidates that would be fiscally superior often are passed over because pro life anti gay flame and other one issue voters hijack the platform and polarize the electorate, stupid. We need to do what the Libs do, tone it down until we get power and then BOOM!
FYI: Ookspay is pro life all the way and pro marriage. But I am also a realist and do not want to live in a religious theocracy. Perhaps some of you would be more comfortable in a country that stones gays, like Iran.
Report Post »BUDDY LITTLE
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:18pmIS ALBANY,NY the gay capital?
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:55pmThomasdaddy Wrote:
“Every comment that I read I try to find a debatable point! I have a career, not a job, and it affords me some time to speak to idiots like you when I get bored! LOL”
With those qualifications, one would think you could figure out how to get the complete “JETS” logo to appear in you picture. Unless of course you intended for it to look that way. LOL
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 6:41pmIt’s really a Marxist party with all sorts of devilish self centered demonic splinter groups attached to it for the sole purpose of getting a free ride off of someone or promoting some perversion.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 6:49pm@Ookspay
2 Kings 23 And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD
The kings in the Bible that did right in the eyes of God, ran the sodomits out, and tore down their houses. Sodomites destroy nations and civilizations. Every nation in the history of the world that has embraced homosexuality has fallen within two generations. they are an evil people. Jump over to the Center for Disease Control website, and see what percent of STDs are passed on by homosexuals, Check their suicide and drug use rates, check and see the rate in which they molest children….
They destroy nations/.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 9:07pmRangerRep, You are missing my point. I am not talking about the benefits or evils of homosexuality and am not interested in having a quote the Bible contest, even though I would blow you away… All I am saying is we either win this next election with somebody who doesn’t alienate a huge portion of the population or we can watch the slouching towards Gomorrah continue. Win now and negotiate the terms of surrender later. Straighten out the finances and secure a conservative SCOTUS and Federal courts for years to come and then make some real changes.
I am quite certain that Jesus Christ did not hate gays (he never even mentioned them), nor does God hate them, why do you?
Remember, what God wants God gets….
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 10:03am@ Mr Ookspay
Sorry Sir, if you are going to tell me what God wants, likes, or dislikes, you will have to quote Bible, as that is the standard, and that way that God communicates with us. You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own truth or facts.
Homosexuals destroy nations. It is not only Biblical, it is historical.
The Bible clearly states that God hates sin. Thus the word “Holy”. A Holy God, recognizes sin. The Bible clearly states that homosexuality is a sin. I will not vote for a leader that does not shun homosexuality. I am not interested in appeasing 1-2% of the population that is evil, and is an abomination to the God I serve.
If you would read your Bible, you will clearly see that the New Testament also speaks against homosexuality. Read the first chapter of the book of Romans.
If you think Jesus was easy on sin, you obviously do not understand the Bible, understand Jesus, or why he was curcified.
Jesus loved sinners (which I am), and hated the sin.
If you are going to debate with me, you will have to do better than this.
Thanks, have a nice day.
Report Post »Solzhenitsin
Posted on August 31, 2011 at 3:32pm@rangerp “Jesus didn’t speak about homosexuality” is a favorite cop-out which you need to address as well.
The answer is that Jesus upheld a ‘heteronormative’ view of marriage which has its roots in God’s desire to see his image reflected within holy matrimony (Matthew 19:5) and He also upheld the moral teachings of the law in which God declared homosexual activity an abomination. Matthew 5:17-20:
“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
Christians uphold God’s moral law and are under attack for doing so. If we respond, we are accused of “hate.” After years of being attacked and misrepresented, it is all too human to allow real hate to develop in response so we need to be careful and guard against that.
Report Post »geonj
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:30pm.”… a study from the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism shows that only Hermain Cain has received less media attention than Rick Santorum among the 11 Republicans running for President” social engineering by the media. i am not one for a lot of gov. regulation, but i would like to see the media be required to cover equally any candidate for any position from any party.
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:52pmIt will not happen on our watch. They, like the pretender in chief likes to pick the winners and losers.
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:48pmThe media should be required to give equal coverage to every candidate of every party? Be careful what you wish for. Both parties harbor lunatic fringes, and let’s not get started on the third parties. Watch for parties and candidates to multiply exponentially. Just sayin’.
Report Post »Scrubpuppy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:29pmWell, as long as we know where Santorum stands on gay rights, I guess that means everything else in the country is ok.
Judging by most of the comments, it would seem that the Religious right hijacked Tea Party would be more than happy to watch these citizens be exterminated. How does that poem go again? The one about who they came for first?
Report Post »encinom
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:34pmThe Tea-PArty wa always cover for the religious right. Look at the stance on abortion, instead of less government interference in ones life they are arguing for micro-management of women’s health issues.
Report Post »PDMacGuire
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:40pmNobody invited Jesus to the Tea Party. He can stay the hell home.
SamAdamslives
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:09pmNo, Tea Party patriots do NOT all believe that God will condemn and banish all gays. No, not all Tea Partiers hate gays. Some are even gay. Rick has taken moral stands against gay marriage that are, per usual, a HUGE threat to gays, some of whom of the loudest live on either coast (Rachel Madcow, Dan Pervert Savage) and are EXTREME gay radicals who don’t care who they offend. If Rick would offer a plan on how gays could be legally allowed to provide financial/medical/legal property benefits to their partners, alot of this acrimonious debate would cease. Stop persecuting gays. And stop retaliating against the Moral Majority with hateful invective. We need a smart, legal solution to stop this oceans-of-emotion crazed debate. The stereotypes of both gays and Tea Partiers are torturing me.
Report Post »Scrubpuppy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:24pmWell maybe if the Tea Party hadn’t been hijacked, they could have taken to the government out of civil unions. They could have said that marriage is a religious institution and that the government controls its people through that institution. They could have stuck up for homosexuals when the Religious right started taking swings at them, but they did nothing.
Is it too much to ask that consenting adults be allowed a civil union? Apparently yes it is.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:16pmLOL@Scrubpuppy
Report Post »retriever
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:32pmMost Americans do not hate homosexuals. But they do hate their choice in lifestyle, which is upside down and backward compared with nature.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:38pmoh and Thomasdropkick…this was reported recently:
[...] a group of mental health professionals, dubbed “B4U-ACT,” are arguing that pedophiles are simply misunderstood and therefore, should not be criminalized. (Yes Thomasdunderhead…I‘m aware pedophiles aren’t exclusively homosexual).
A partial statement by the group reads:
“Stigmatizing and stereotyping minor-attracted people (”minor-attracted people”..don’t you love those liberal-elitist euphemisms?) inflames the fears of minor-attracted people (never mind the fears of the parents of the minors who are “attractive” to the “minor-attracted people” right?), mental health professionals and the public, without contributing to an understanding of minor-attracted people of the issue of child sexual abuse.”
“B4U-ACT’s aim is allegedly to create “tolerance” for people who are sexually attracted to children. ”
Why…it sounds uncannily similar to the campaign of homosexual advocacy groups doesn’t it Thomasdopey? “LGBT” community. “Safe Schools” and Czars for those “safe schools” who happen to be homosexuals themselves. States like California issuing orders to include homosexual “achievements” in the school cirriculum. Groups like GLSEN (a homosexual advocacy group) pushing an agenda of teaching school-age children extreme sex acts. And lo and behold..it’s children that are being targeted for this campaign. Nah…nothing going on here Thomasdenial..children aren’t being tar
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 10:11am@PDMacGuire
Some of us Tea Party folks invited Jesus into our hearts. When we show up, he shows up. If you send all tea party people home that have christian beliegs, I think you will find that there is not much tea party left.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 1:23pm@rangerp
Because the Libertarian Party is a losing proposition, they’ve tried to hi-jack the Tea Party in hopes they could make inroads there. They are anarchist moonbats. As insane as the left.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 7:56pm@Viet Vet
I like your posts. This one is about played out, and not sure you will visit it again, if not, I will catch you on another.
I wanted to tell you thanks for your service, and your time spent in Viet Nam. I know that not every Nam Vet got spit on when they returned, but you boys had a tough row to how. The Johnson administration crapped on you, and the media sold you out.
I have numerous deployments to the middle east, and I am always humbled when I return. Every time I have come home, there are always Nam Vets waiting to welcome us home, thank us, and shake our hands at the airport. I sometimes get a lump in my throat, and feel that we should be thanking them. Life in the middle east is no walk in the park, but it aint Nam. We get internet, airconditioning….. I spent time in the jungles of Panama back in the 80s. I do not think most service members today would like to trade conditions in the middle east with what you had in the jungles of southeas asia.
Thanks again.
Report Post »Solzhenitsin
Posted on August 31, 2011 at 3:39pmNo one has hijacked the Tea Party, only the opposition has projected everything they hate about conservatives onto them. Last time I looked, the Tea Party’s activities are all about reigning in profligate government spending.
Report Post »dtitus1304
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:27pmDid you see the sign on the window during Santorum’s speech? It said “Men-A-Plenty Bible Study”. Sounds pretty gay to me.
Report Post »LiberalMarine
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:26pmComparing Homosexuality and Pedophilia doesn’t make sense because while they may be born that way, Homosexuality is between two consenting adults whereas pedophilia obviously isn’t.
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:34pmWhat does not make sense is that these agenda pushers are not trying to help the country, just themselves. Seems like selfish homosexual agenda pushers. Maybe you should go get glitter bombed libby. IMO
Report Post »PDMacGuire
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:44pmAnd statistically almost all pedophiles are married men.
Report Post »LiberalMarine
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:45pmHell, I’m not going to get glitter bombed since I support them. I will let the GOP candidates take the glitter facials.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:48pmSo how do you explain male, homosexual pedophiles? There are entire underground industries based on homosexual men being able to get access to male children. Obama’s very own “Czar of safe schools”- Kevin Jennings- formed a group called GLSEN which advocates teaching extreme sex acts to school-age children. Jennings is a homosexual who in his capacity as a teacher did not report a boy he believed was under age at the time having sexual liasons with much older men.
Report Post »Nice try champ but homosexual pedophiles are rife in the homosexual communty.
Furthermore, Santorum should be applauded, he’s got the guts to stand up to “Gay Inc.” which is an ultra-militant lobby group that sets out to destroy anyone that goes against their agenda. It’s time to stop coddling homosexuals and call them out on their creepy little community.
thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:01pmGerk,
“So how do you explain male, homosexual pedophiles?”
You do know that all homosexuals aren‘t pedophiles and all pedophiles aren’t homosexual right?? You have grown men that have sex with under-aged girls, or do you think that’s o.k. as long as they’re heterosexual? See you on the right tend to try to put homosexuals in the same category as pedophiles to make your argument sound more substantial. It’s like when you guys use footage of a partial birth abortion to advocate against all abortion! Pedophilia, and partial birth abortions are both illegal in this country, so save it!
“which is an ultra-militant lobby group that sets out to destroy anyone that goes against their agenda.”
Their agenda being, they just want the rights afforded to them as stated in the constitution! That’s just creepy!!! LOL!
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:06pmAll the actual double blind studies have shown categorically that they aren’t born that way, it’s a learned behavior brought on by the environment you are raised. Pedophilia is just part of the the movement, they want admit it in public, but with out it, the homosexual community would wither and die.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:09pmYou must also support the work of Dr Fred Berlin at Johns Hopkins who, along with a few other colleagues, is trying to have the “stigma” removed from pedophilia. They tend to think that pedophiles should be allowed to have relations with minors as long as it’s consenting. After all, these folks are just born that way so why not normalize it, right? They would also like to also remove it as a clinical diagnosis in the DSM V so that it is considered an “alternative behavior” such as homosexuality and exhibitionism, which could have dire consequences as far as child protection and sexual offender laws go. But hey, it‘s all good since they’re born that way…..
http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/15/conference-aims-to-normalize-pedophilia/
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:26pmbiohazard
Report Post »I read that too. It is disgusting [minor attracted] WTF. I wonder if they have allergic reactions to heavy metals?
let us prey
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:29pmAnegerk
Report Post »It is a sad state of affairs. Good for Santorum.
joe1234
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:54pm@fascistdaddy…why don’t you show us where marraige is a right defined in the constittion? don‘t worry I won’t hold my breath LOL
the gays are pursuing a fascist agenda, trying to eliminate the rights of christians who disagree, which is why you support them…fascists of a feather flock together…
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:07pmThomasdroppedatbirth…yes I’m aware that not all homosexuals are pedophiles. I’m also aware that pedophiles target young girls. I was reponding to Liberalmarine’s post warning not to equate homosexuality with pedophilia..when in fact there’s is a genuine concern connecting the two. However, you being the shrill bomb-hurler you are, you didn’t address any of the facts I posted. Kevin Jennings (Obama’s “Czar of safe schools”) indeed helped found GLSEN (a homosexual advocacy group) which today endorses teaching school age children extreme sex acts like “fisting”. Jennings has distanced himself from that endorsement. However when one recalls that as a teacher, he didn’t report a young boy he believed to be underage at the time that was having sexual liasons with much older men..then his distancing himself from GLSEN’s school agenda fails to be very credible, wouldn’t you say?
Report Post »What‘s actually creepy Thomasdon’tknowmuch, is you ignored all that and went into your conditioned and Pavlovian defense of “Gay Inc.” Good dog…
saranda
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:11pmSWAMPY – you are more wrong than you will ever know. How do you explain a single brother from a family of 7 boys being gay and the rest as hetero as you? How do you explain gay men “choosing” to be gay under the threat of violence and alienation from friends and family?
Report Post »And to say that pedophilia is the unspoken reality in the gay community is so disgusting as to be evil. That would be akin to saying all who speak with southern accents are stupid, or all southerns have cousin marriage in their recent past.
Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:18pmExcept for the high degree of pedophilia amonst queers.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:27pmgerk….
Seriously?? Do you people do anything other than try to substantiate your views with chain emails that were debunked long ago?? I’m not doing this again! It’s the same nonsense over an over with you! Seems like you need to pull more than your fist out you’re a$$!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:16pmYou know what your problem is Thomasdropkick? You bleat before you think. I was clear in stating that Kevin Jennings was under the impression that the boy he was protecting from authorities was underage when the events took place. The boy (now a young man) has since stated that he was of legal age of consent at the time. It doesn’t change the fact that Jennings himself though, has written that he believed the boy was underage at the time. So from Kevin Jennings’ perspective at the time this took place, the boy was under age and meeting with older homosexual men for sex and Jennings made a conscious decision not to report the boy’s activities. It’s not difficult Thomasdunderhead..but it is for you apparently. Jennings is a homosexual himself and helped found GLSEN. Obama has made him the Orwellianly named “Czar of safe schools”. This isn’t “debunked emails” Thomasdenyitall. This is fact. If your reading and comprehension aren’t up to an acceptable level then you have my sympathy.
Report Post »Then again..your written skills do leave a lot to be desired- case in point: “Seems like you need to pull more than your fist out you’re a$$!”. Expanding the contraction “you’re”, you have written “Seems like you need to pull more than your fist out you are a$$!”. Keep trying to convince yourself that you’re smarter than anyone here Thomasdope but let me offer you a backhoe for that hole you keep digging for yourself.
Therightsofbilly
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:06pmNice job AVENGERK !!
Report Post »psst
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:24pmIMO, Santorum does not have a chance.
Report Post »IMO, Santorum would make the best president of the candidates running.
We’ll get either Perry or Mitt. Both creatures of the NWO/OWG/Bilderbergers/CFR(same as Soetero).
Both w/ beaucoup $ behind them.And mucho more where those came from.
PDMacGuire
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:23pmIf he is going to invade the privacy of other citizens who are mostly minding their own business, and attack them for things that are none of his business, he shouldn’t be surprised that they object to it and attack him back. It is pretty pathetic that he is attempting to blame his utter rejection by voters on the actions of homosexuals. He is about as appealing as a cobra compared to any other of the Republican candidates – aside from Newt Gingrich.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:33pmGood post PDMacGuire.
Nice move Santorum, linking people who disagree with your positions to terrorists. I guess in your political calculations, you‘ve decided you’ll get more support by offending the gay community, and those who support them, than by softening your position. Good luck with that.
Report Post »DYNA
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:43pmIf you have not noticed, homosexuals have not been minding their own business for over 30 years. An example is in the public education system. They will only get worse and attempt to be more overbearing.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:53pmDYNA has the point. Most of us couldn’t care less what the gays do, just keep it to yourself. Don’t go pushing your queer agenda on me! It is sin, it is sick, it is perverted. I do not accept it. My children will not accept it. I will not allow anyone to teach my kids it is “normal”, “right”, or “proper.” If you want to come out of the closet and wear drag and march in rainbow parades…whatever…But do not get upset when the world treats you like the sick pervert you are.
On the flip side, if you want to live with your lover then I think you should be granted the same legal rights as a married couple. I agree with you here. I will not call it “marriage” but you or the government can call it whatever the hell you want. I simply do not care.
Just quit shoving it in my face. If you do then I am going to push back and you are going to make me an enemy where before I was simply ambivalent.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:10pm@PDMAC
Yes, he did say that they are out on a “Jihad” against him.
But please tell me how you are able to make the jump that Rick is somehow claiming they are responsible for his lack of traction with the voters.
You too JZS, since you think that was a great post.
I did not see him blaming anyone for his poor showing.
Looks to me like he does not care what they think about his opinions.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:48pm@trolltrainer Read the previous post by this individual. This is exactly where people need to be on this. There are real issues out there that effect all of us much more directly than someone’s lifestyle. And as is pointed out the real danger is that this interest group like so many others organize and spend money on lobbyists which distract our political leaders, pervert (no pun intended) policy decisions and ultimately effect society at a level that is way beyond what is reasonable or necessary.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:05pmyou don’t mind the gays invading the privacy of those they disagree with though do ya now? like the catholic charities in MA? you know where the ‘tolerant’ fascist gays drove them out of the adoption business??
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:25pm@DYNA
Exactly!!!
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:25pmI was on FOXNEWS and a poster told me he wanted acceptance not toleration.
How did we get to that point in the conversation? I told him there are Christians of certain denominations that will never accept me because I am not of their denomination. It bothered me at the time but it doesn’t anymore.
But this gay poster said he wanted acceptance by society at large. So the social wars go on. It is not about inheritance or hospital visitation. I have libertarian leanings. It is their money & not mine. Hospital visits is about freedom of association. But promoting gay culture at school, etc that is a non starter. That will segregate schools and society.
There is nothing to being gay except instant self gratification. No one has demonstrated that there are gay gene(s). It is all sham. I have only seen one biological/genetic theory that could hold any water. We’ll see if it pans out in the future. Until then I will see being gay a mental/social disorder.
Report Post »AmericablessGod
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:21pmRick Santorum is a good and Godly man who speaks truth. That is what the gay “community” finds offensive. That their life choices are a lie is the reason they cannot stand the truth.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:36pmNo, I don’t think the truth offends the gay community! It may have something to do with their sex life being compared to pedophilia, polygamy, and now their opposition to this idiot being called a “Jihad!” What everyone else finds offensive is Santorum wanting to govern according to his religious beliefs! 2 consenting adults have every right to marry! The right is so very hypercritical! They want government out of their lives, but think it’s o.k. to tell someone who they can marry, and what medical procedures they may have! People need to live and let live! In short, mind your f n business!
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:45pmhow about 3 consenting adults? Do they have the same “rights?”
But…As far as that goes, I don’t much care what anyone does. If gays want to “marry” then let them! It does not matter what the government thinks or consents to. Homosexuality is still a sexual perversion and a sin. What man thinks or what the government says does not change that.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:54pmtroll,
“how about 3 consenting adults? Do they have the same “rights?” ”
I don’t even know what the hell this is supposed to mean!
“Homosexuality is still a sexual perversion and a sin.”
And you have every right to your opinion, but once the government makes laws that unfairly target a segment of the population that’s where the American liberty is infringed upon! Funny how the right’s hypocrisy goes! The Constitution is to be followed to the letter………in most instances! Unreal!
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:10pmI mostly agree with you here thomasdaddy.
What I meant by 3 consenting adults is polygamy. How do you feel about that? I am mostly libertarian, I just want the government out of my business. I will not push my Christian morals on nonbelievers. Why should I? God does not, nor has ever, blessed the USA. He blesses believers. Government cannot legislate morality. The only point where I diverge from this is abortion. Murder is against the law and abortion is murder.
You want God out of your society? Fine! Good riddance to you also! Do not be surprised when your society goes down the crapper. It is happening now and it is blatantly evident what the root problem is. Christians offer the way out. Nonbelievers cannot see this from inside a Christian society, but the church grows stronger when persecuted. This is all according to God’s plan. There will either be revival or tribulation. Either way, it is coming fast.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:39pmtroll,
“What I meant by 3 consenting adults is polygamy. How do you feel about that?”
It’s illegal. If you ask me if I agree, I’ll tell you no, but they should have the right! Who are they hurting?
“I just want the government out of my business. ”
Kind of like gays? Looks like you agree with the gay agenda! LOL
“Murder is against the law and abortion is murder. ”
That’s only true if you believe that life begins at conception, and many don;t subscribe to that theory!
“You want God out of your society? Fine!”
Never said that! I said Rick wants to govern according to his religious beliefs and that’s wrong! There are Christians that don’t agree with him. What he is doing is trying to get the far religious bible thumping right on his side as he uses the Gay community as an excuse for his failure! The government should reflect it’s citizens, and be governed according to the constitution.
Society will go down in the crapper because there is no religion at home, not because there is no religion in government! Didn’t you just say, “you can’t legislate morality”?
Report Post »JRook
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:50pm@thomasdaddy not trying to simplify but in a phrase “what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas” There are way more productive things for our political leaders and government to concern themselves with.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:50pmdyna,
“1. You wrote “2 consenting adults (I assume of the same sex) have every right to marry!”
Where does this right come from? Who said its a right?”
The U.S. Constitution! “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
“2. There are those promoting homosexuality in various institutions like the public schools and military by teaching and modifying what others should think about homosexuality.
Is this an example of live and let live? Or do they have ulterior motives?”
Whoa!! Please post a “Promotion” for homosexuality please!! I’d love to see one from a public school! Before I answer that you have to supply me with some proof of your claim!
“Fact- When vileness is exalted amongst the sons of men, the wicked prowl about on every
Report Post »side. In other words, there is no freedom without morality.”
I still don’t see how you are arguing what is not the concern of government, with bible versus! You and Rick can think what you want. You can both have beliefs that go against how others live their lives, but the minute you advocate for restrictions against a segment of the population base on religious beliefs, that’s where I have a problem! I may not agree with their lifestyle, but I will defend their right to live as they please as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone!
trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:53pmAgree with the gay agenda? Lol, no. I will never accept homosexuality as anything but sexual perversion. But do I want to persecute gays? God no. I have known many throughout my life and by and large they are normal, caring, great people. We are all sinners in one way or another.
Yeah Thomasdaddy, I think we pretty much agree here. You cannot legislate morality, however, you cannot have an “everything goes” society and not expect it to have bad consequences. I heard an analogy in the last couple days about how in the 1950′s the I Love Lucy show had to have separate beds in the bedroom and still fought the censors about that. Look where we are today, I see things on prime time family channels I would not have believed 30 years ago. Should we draw a line? And where do we draw it?
But you are right, it all begins in the home and this is where Christians have lost the battle. Who cares what school or church teaches? The teaching at home SHOULD have priority in your children’s minds.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:59pmThomasdaddy Wrote:
“That’s only true if you believe that life begins at conception, and many don;t subscribe to that theory! ”
Gee, I wonder why they don’t subscribe to that “theory”
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:03pm@fascistdaddy..you said “but the minute you advocate for restrictions against a segment of the population base on religious beliefs, that’s where I have a problem! ”
uh huh murder is against religious beliefs…so you’re ok with murder then……you really aren’t that clever are you now?
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:27pmExactly!!! And the Jihad has been going on for a number of years.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:44pmtroll.
Nice that you have a sense of humor! LOL
“I will never accept homosexuality as anything but sexual perversion.”
That’s fine! I don’t agree with the lifestyle, but that is their life! I don’t agree with anything Rush or Beck say, but I will defend their right to say it!
Offending someone’s sensibility is one thing. Legislating what they are able to do with a consenting adult behind closed doors in another. If they never showed Lucy and Ricky’s bedroom we would have all assumed they had one bed, its only when people want to peek where they have no business being that they have their sensibilities offended. What if the government said it was only acceptable for a heterosexual couple to have sex twice a week, anything more is lust, and has to be punished? I’d be pissed! LOL I think all those arguing against “Big Government” are hypocrites when it comes to gay rights.
See, 2 people with differing opinions can not only find common ground, but be respectfully disagreeable! I’m a Christian man, although some people on here cause me to loose my religion. God said hate the sin not the sinner. I’d rather the laws of this country have no religion in them, than only some religion. The founding fathers had that right in the “congress shall make no laws respecting an established religion…….”
Pleasure talking to you!!
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:48pmjrook,
I completely agree!
Report Post »UlyssesP
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:57pmHey all, let’s go easy on thomasdaddy,
Report Post »Guessing by what those panzies the Jets do in the showers after a practice, we know he has a particular bias in this story.
Therightsofbilly
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:01pmThomasdaddy Wrote:
“The founding fathers had that right in the “congress shall make no laws respecting an established religion…….”
Now, now Thomasdaddy, if you are going to quote the Founding Fathers, at least do it correctly.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”
Report Post »AmericablessGod
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:08pmTHOMASDADDY – I have to say this about homosexuality being condoned, sanctioned, made acceptable, etc. by the government. One of the roles of government is to provide for the common good of society. Let me explain how homosexuality is in stark contrast to the good of society:
1. Homosexuality leads to the extinction of the human race (no procreation possible).
Report Post »2. Homosexuality leads to severely increased incidents of communicable diseases and a shortened life span.
3. Homosexuality does not provide what is scientifically and socially accepted as the best environment to raise families (although adoptive). Families are the core foundation of society.
4. “Marriage” is not just a Sacrament and a religious institution, it is a societal institution that must be upheld in order to continue a healthy society. Homosexuality does not fit this definition.
DYNA
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 3:49am@Thomasdaddy
“1. You wrote -“2 consenting adults (I assume of the same sex) have every right to marry!”
I asked- “Where does this right come from? Who said its a right?”
You answered -”The U.S. Constitution! “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
You concluded- “I still don’t see how you are arguing what is not the concern of government, with bible verses! You and Rick can think what you want. You can both have beliefs that go against how others live their lives, but the minute you advocate for restrictions against a segment of the population base on religious beliefs, that’s where I have a problem! I may not agree with their lifestyle, but I will defend their right to live as they please as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone!”
———————————————
My belated response.
Thomasdaddy, If “their Creator” is just a religious belief that should have no influence on government, then there are no unalienable rights.
If “their Creator” is the Creator written of in the Bible as inspired by the Holy Spirit, and I have no reason to think otherwise, then we should also know what our Creator has to say about the role of government.
Report Post »DYNA
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 4:15am@Thomasdaddy
My belated response continued.
If “their Creator” is the Creator written of in the Bible as inspired by the Holy Spirit, and I have no reason to think otherwise, then we should also know what our Creator has to say about the role of government and the practice of homosexuality.
The only laws of liberty are the laws that are both of man and God. Practicing sin is a reproach to any people. Look around you. Do you see any improvement with the freedom to sin? Righteousness exalts a nation. This righteousness is not of men. It is the righteousness of God that is ascribed to men who by faith in the good news of redemption, turn away from practicing sin and its deadly consequences, both temporal and eternal.
The subject of good government and God are inseparable. Our limited form of government recognizes that no one can be forced to believe because the Creator does not force anybody to believe. We are not animatrons. All have the God given right to chose between heaven and hell. But no one has the right to chose hell for others and certainly not for those who are in Christ.
Contrary to worldly religious thought, Jesus is very much alive with all authority on both heaven and earth. He is not a pacifist.The Creator is not religion. The religious traditions of men along with man made righteousness are powerless to save. As He said, they will exhibit a form of godliness but will deny the power thereof.
Report Post »Solzhenitsin
Posted on August 31, 2011 at 3:48pmRight on in every respect.
Report Post »crookedcreek
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:20pmI’ll leave this for you all to decide for yourselves, so here goes:
Scientific assumptions = common denominators for a specific activity.
Homosexuality has a common denominator = no future human race.
Q: Does a person who is heavily invested in, promoting and justifying an activity that would achieve no future human race actually seclude this attitude to the bedroom only?
Report Post »Texas woman56
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:16pmThey try to shove down everyone’s throat. I don’t think most Americans care what two adults do in their bedroom, straight or gay. The problem is gays want you to approve of what they are doing. They want laws passed that no one can say that what they do is wrong.
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 7:54pmExactly and that’s what I despise about the homosexual rights groups. These same liars claim they support tolerance and diversity yet they won’t support anybody who disagrees with them.
Report Post »Solzhenitsin
Posted on August 31, 2011 at 3:53pmThey want more than that. They want to force you to say they are right, they want to force you to celebrate them. The day may come when, like Haman in the book of Esther that they may want to legislate deference to them. It’s not equality they seek, but privilege.
Report Post »WhoIsTheCoon
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:15pmwhy should we curtail to 2 million people when minimally 100x that are against same sex marriage?
Report Post »thinkinghuman
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:18pmI have no idea. Its time to stop CAVING in to the lopsided PC.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 5:56pmHey, where did my post go regarding the fudge packers????
Report Post »Eric Von Zipper
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:12pmMy friends… What do you expect from a bunch of Genetically Defective Mutants?…
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:10pm‘He’s comparing gay sex to incest and polygamy,
How do you compare IT ?? No matter you look at it “It’s WRONG” !!
Don’t give a SHI** this PC Crap SUCK’s, Keep this away from my KIDS..
and SCHOOLS !!! One PIS**D OFF American, Why do YOU keep
pushing this kind of stuff on us..?? I say, Politicians for Votes…….
Bloomberg and Brown are examples of this corrupt Bullshi**
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:06pmNot the gay community, but the socialists who happen to be gay.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:36pmYes, I’ve noticed a “great many” Socialists/liberals are gay. Don’t hear of those that are gay and not activists and are Christians – abstinent. But that’s all on purpose of course……….
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:59pmMOM- That is the problem. Most people who are content in their lives, don’t feel the need to defend their free will. Totalitarianists on the other hand, are always filled with hate and disgust for those who live free.
Report Post »cntrlfrk
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:02pm‘
Tickle fight!
.
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:01pmhomosexuals are hitler like mean spirited.
Report Post »thinkinghuman
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:18pmYes, just look at their comments on the youtube video itself. And how MANY dislikes, its like there is a PACK of them that go around and DISLIKE videos and it is done worldwide, as a pack, linked on blogs, etc., and they think people can’t see through this? The only reason there are not more positive comments on that vid for Rick S. is because they probably don’t want their youtube videos DISLIKED as a consequence of getting on a GAY HATE BOMB LIST, designed to shut down conservative thought.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:27pmWrong. Socialists are though.
Report Post »junkmaninohio
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:00pmThe Gay community would be better served if they would stop trying to shove their lifestyle down every one’s throat. That’s what ****** off the majority of Americans.
Report Post »rpp
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:07pmIt comes as no surprise. Actual same-sex attractions is clearly a very serious mental disorder. However, many more people simply CHOOSE to engage in this disordered behavior so they can be different. The whole point is to do something to get attention, they want to be a “victim”. Of course mentally disturbed people will attack those who dare point out that what they are CHOOSING to do is wrong. I do not know what else I would expect from sexual deviants.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:41pmJust as the Christian community as a whole does not want our nation turned ino a theocracy, the whole of the “gay community” does not want to impose their lifestyle onto you. These people are socialists first that happen to be gay.
Report Post »commoncents5
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:58pmIt is was it is. Most people probably believe that this is a disease or that people are born with this attraction to the same sex. We have had it flaunted in our faces for so many years that we forget that God would NOT create a soul who could not do anything to correct what He obviously hates. If God loved this perversion why would He take the time to wipe out Sodom & Gomorrah? It makes common sense to me that then this perversion must be a choice and not one that God approves of. Satan the father of the Kenites may approve of this perversion. I don’t know what do you think?
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:06pmChristians will agree with you.
Gays will not.
Report Post »thinkinghuman
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:21pmThe BORN THIS WAY argument is extremely flawed justification for homosexuality choices, because you could say this same thing about PEDOPHILES. Oh, I forgot, that was just covered on the news. They ARE saying that now about these poor poor “minor-attracted” individuals (you mean the male perverts?)
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:49pmthink,
How did you manage to post 3 sentences of a comment and not make a point?
Are you TRYING to say that everyone if born heterosexual and something in their lives turn them gay? If that’s the case, what about families with multiple children, and only 1 child ends up being gay? What about children raised by gay parents that grow up to be heterosexual?
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:59pmGee Thomas, kind of destroys the theory of a “gay” gene, does it not?
People are all different we all have different weaknesses and perversions. Homosexuality is just one of many sexual perversions that can manifest itself in some. There are many whose weakness is heterosexual sex. Lust is a common sin. Nothing more to it than that.
Report Post »thomasdaddy
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:51pmtroll,
“Gee Thomas, kind of destroys the theory of a “gay” gene, does it not? ‘
how do you figure that?
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:58pmits called logic…do you even read what you wrote???
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:05pmBecause as you point out, it is random. Normal kids coming from gay “parents” and gay kids coming from normal families. It is not a genetic trait that is passed along.
Report Post »welovetheUSA
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:57pmTime to take this gay conversations out of America, our of our military, our schools and realizinging this unstable population that amounts to less than 1% of who American is a society, the rest of us want them in mental hospitals and off the streets, period.
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:54pmIt is true that there are some truly vile attacks from the gay community. One sick freak gay in San Fransicko even has managed to get Santorum to show up on google as being referenced to some disgusting gay sex matter. It doesn’t matter that he is in the public eye, how many of you would be able to handle that without freaking out, without physically attacking the piece of garbage who did that to you? It is really an outrage.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:03pmSee it for what it is, scared to death libs. Scared that a conservative will get elected and halt their gravy-train.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 3:39pmThey are perverts of the first magnitude.
Report Post »Solzhenitsin
Posted on August 31, 2011 at 3:45pmSo much for those who think it silly to equate gay activists with terrorists.
Report Post »welovetheUSA
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:54pmTime to take the gay conversations out of our America, our schools and our way of life, they are Unstable human beings who belong in mental hospitals, period.
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:52pmThey should plan a cruise to Uganda and party down with the locals.
Report Post »Margret Edwards
Posted on August 30, 2011 at 1:07amMy daughter gay about 30 yrs. old she wasn’t born that way, she ran out of men to lie, cheat to. gays are part of the people who are trying to tell us not ot smoke, where to smoke what to eat , save the lizards not jobs. and they should stay the hell out of our lives.
Report Post »Sleazy Hippo
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:51pmIt is actually the other way around. The Gay community was reacting to a multi-year unapologetic and take no prisoners out and out assault from Senator Santorum. I guess they felt turn around is fair play.
But who cares what the well organized GLBT Community thinks.
Rick needs to put his man pants back on and escalate his Godly righteous fight against deviant American citizens.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:57pmGLBT? You mean the sexual perverts? I do not much care what they think. They have always been around and are not going anywhere. I no more care what they think than I care what heroin addicts think. It is simply a sexual perversion.
Report Post »LinkedIn G
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:57pmThey have always felt turn around in fair play.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:58pmThat’s turn about is fair play.
But you’re right, the gblt community is at best 7% of the population, maybe 10%. Unless you ask the liberals how many of them there are, then it’s higher. But the people who call themselves that is low. Why should 7-10% of the population control the rest? I thought “democracy” was majority rules. I guess they should get behind the fact that we’re a republic.
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 1:19pm“Rick needs to put his man pants back on and escalate his Godly righteous fight against deviant American citizens.”
You sound just like a mullah in Iran. Can we stone them to death just like the good book says?
Santorum got what he deserves. His surname has effectivly entered the vanacular as an unsavory term for …well, look it up if you don’t know…… and he doesn’t like it. Too bad.
Report Post »Strait Talk Express
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 4:52pmThanks for the edit, LA12.
Santorum was turned against gays when he was just a child — sent to dance class.
Unlike Ron Reagan Junior, young Rick managed to drop out before being affected by the “artistes.”
I guess you could say he dodged a ballet.
Report Post »Roberto G. Vasquez
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:50pmShouldn’t homosexual attacks be viewed as an endorsement?
Report Post »jkduh
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 7:23pmGood one..
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:50pmWho’s Rick Santorum?
Report Post »Evil_Conservative
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 12:56pmlol indeed. Cannon fodder for the left works. As long as the left is not hammering viable candidates we make out to the good.
Report Post »