Santorum on Glenn Beck Program: Clears Up Positions on Contraception, Fiscal Conservatism
- Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:06pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
Republican presidential primary candidate Rick Santorum called in to Glenn Beck‘s radio program Monday to talk about Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary, in addition to clearing up what he claims are misconceptions about his stance on certain issues.
The former Pennsylvania senator was first asked about his position on contraception, something that critics have accused the social conservative of being against.
“This is crazy,” said Santorum, in explaining that his opposition in the landmark Supreme Court Case Griswold v Connecticut, is not to the court’s decision to invalidate a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives. Rather Santorum is opposed to judicial activism, and “the creation of new rights because the court says so.” In the Griswold case the Supreme Court decided that the contraceptives law violated “the right to privacy,” which later led to the decision in Roe v Wade which said that the same “right to privacy” invalidated state laws that banned most abortions.
Santorum went on to defend attacks that the former two-term Republican U.S. Senator for Pennsylvania is an “economic liberal.”
“This economic liberal has proposed five trillion dolars in spending cuts over five years, a balanced budget in five years,” Santorum said over the phone before going on to point to his emphasis on entitlement reform, rebuking those who have questioned his fiscal conservatism.
Santorum also criticized those who have accused him of stereotyping African-Americans based off a video where he became tongue-tied and sounded as if he made insensitive remarks, when in reality only stumbled over his words.
“It’s an absolute absurdity,” said Santorum. ”It simply is not what I said, and certainly from my actions, nothing close to the record that I have.”
Santorum was quick to poke a little fun at his own campaign when Beck asked how his fundraising efforts were going.
After Santorum said his campaign raised more money in the three days following the Iowa caucuses than it had over the entire previous year, Beck joked “I think you were running your campaign off of candy wrappers.”
“That’s an insult to candy wrappers,” Santorum quickly responded.
Take a listen to the entire interview, where Santorum goes on to discuss his position on gun rights and takes a jab at Ron Paul’s record on Second Amendment protections:
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 367 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 367 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 410 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (239)
jscottu
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:10pmSorry…Santorum is NOT a fiscal conservative.
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:21pmSantorum hasn‘t a snow ball’s chance in Genenna to get the nomination, thank goodness. Only RON PAUL will bring us back to a Constitutional Republic, sound Fiscal Policy, Smaller Government, Abolition of the Federal Reserve and IRS (YEAH!) and NO WARS without Declation by Congress. How could any AMERICAN not vote for Ron Paul/ I will tell you: they are Progressive, Welfare Socialists like Obama who always want something for nothing and FREEDOM BE DAMNED.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:22pmSantorum talks about returning to the Constitution, as he votes to shred it.
I want to know why nnelG did not bring up the Patriot Act, the TSA, and the NDAA.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:24pmRick Santorum isn’t a social conservative either…
Conservatives are last to use Government intervention, social issues included.
Turning to Government on social issues is LIBERAL because it’s more Government. Santorum is for Government enforcing his social views. Obama is for Government enforcing his social views. Both are for GOVERNMENT enforcing social views. Both are LIBERAL (Progressive).
One is Communist and one is Fascist. Both are for Government.
A “family values” guy doesn’t hide his buddies affair. Protecting his buddy which he slept around on his wife is not protecting family values.
Rick Santorum is full of bull and is not a conservative, fiscally, socially, or internationally. Rick Santorum is a big Government progressive.
Wake up!
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:59pmI like how his budget is a 5 year plan to eliminate 5 trillion dollars. That way, if he does become president and fails to eliminate ANYTHING and is facing the chopping block, he can easily say “I need to be elected a second term in order to complete the FIVE year plan!”
Such a cop out. He could easily made it a 4 year, 4 trillion dollar cut or a 3 year, 3 trillion dollar cut….. but he picked 5 years knowing one term is 4 years long…. why would that be other than setting himself up so he can fail to produce those cuts or promise to complete them with a second term, at which point if he received a second term, he’s gotten all he needs from the American tax payers….
Pathetic. Show me where you plan on making those cuts Santorum, because I don’t believe you. Betrayer.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:28pmInstead of coming clean and answering his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey . . .
. . . Rick Santorum is attacking Ron Paul, who answered his survey 100% in favor of our Second Amendment rights and has a stellar pro-gun record in the House, unlike Mr. Santorum.
Please call Rick Santorum and let him know that you expect him to apologize for his past votes in support of gun control and promise to never do it again by returning his National Association for Gun Rights Presidential Survey — at once.
Make your call right now:
His Iowa office: 515-421-7224
His South Carolina office: 855-206-7425
His New Hampshire office: 603-518-5199
————————
2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
http://gunowners.org/2012presidential.htm
Ron Paul A+
Rick Perry A
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
Don’t list your candidates NRA rating because NRA does NOT protect gun rights! http://nrawol.net/
Report Post »NIPPOHIPS
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:15pmAnyone bother to ask Rick Santorum about his support for Jerry Sandusky…
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:25pmRick Santorum is anything but a conservative. Just consider his record, which includes:
*** Padding his own wallet as a corporate lobbyist at the expense of taxpayers;
*** Voting to RAISE the debt ceiling five times;
*** Voting to DOUBLE the federal Department of Education;
*** Voting with liberals like Ted Kennedy on multiple occasions in support of Big Labor’s radical agenda;
*** Urging more federal involvement in housing with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;
*** Voting to create a brand new, unfunded entitlement, Medicare Part D, the largest expansion of entitlement spending since President Lyndon Johnson – creating $16 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities;
*** Endorsing liberal Big Government RINOs like Arlen Specter over conservatives. Of course, Specter later became a Democrat and worked hand-in-glove with President Obama to pass his radical agenda;
*** Voting for Sarbanes-Oxley, which imposed dramatic new job-killing accounting regulations on businesses;
*** Supporting raising taxes on oil companies, which directly costs Americans more money out of their pockets at the gas pump;
*** Voting for gun control;
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:26pm*** Voting to give Social Security benefits to illegal aliens, while voting against an additional 1,000 border patrol agents;
*** Voting to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea;
*** Voting to send hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood – the nation’s largest provider of abortion – and hand out hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign aid to enemies of Israel.
But unlike many of my other establishment opponents, Rick Santorum isn’t even trying to sweep his Big Government record under the rug.
He’s proud of it!
Rick Santorum said constitutional conservatives have a “crazy” idea that government should “keep our taxes down, and keep our regulations low.”
Not only that, but he endorsed Mitt Romney just four years ago!
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 9:11pm“nnelG”
Lets compare Santorum’s Career to Paul’s
Santorum got a B.A. in political science from Pennsylvania State University, a
M.B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh and a Law degree from the Dickinson School of Law then
began practicing in Pittsburgh at the law firm Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, now known as K&L Gates. Representing the World Wrestling Federation while with K&L, Santorum argued that professional wrestling should be exempt from federal anabolic steroid regulations because it was not an actual sport, rather, entertainment.
At age 32 elected to the House of Representatives U.S. Senate (1995-2007) after his defeat in the Senate he became a Lobbyist.
Ron Paul, Doctor of Medicine getting his degree from Duke University’s School of Medicine, then doing his medical internship at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, after that he served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force and then in the United States Air National Guard. After his service he became a
obstetrics and gynecology, and then began his own private practice delivering over 4000 babies. In between this he has served as a Congress for the Texas’s 14th congressional district.
Lawyer / Career Politician / Lobbyist
Report Post »VS.
Medical Doctor / Servicemen / OB/GYN, OBG / small business owner / Congressman
Vechorik
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 9:23pmLobby donations to candidates:
Ron Paul, the least
Romney, the most
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/388538_272869062772956_242807579112438_729446_630918877_n.jpg
Report Post »theaveng
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 9:38pmGLENN BECK is supporting a man who supported the mass slaughter of Irasis, Afghanis, and soon Iranians. (130,000 and counting innocent men, women, and children.)
He who votes for a warmonger is just as guilty for the killings that president engages in. Glenn Beck will spend all of enternity in the fires of hell for voting for Bush and Santorum (or Romney) and supporting murder.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 10:24pmMore importantly, I wish Obama’s parents would have used contraception. Even one condom makes a difference.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 10:26pmDid Ricky say he was going to cut 5 trillion in 5 years? I thought the budget was something like 3.8 Trillion for 2011. I’m not a Lawyer , Defeated Senator, or a Lobbyist like Santorum, but I think you could call that fuzzy math. How do we cut 5 Trillion out of a 3.8 trillion budget?
Report Post »libsdolie
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:02amMy god are you kidding me as a fiscal and social conservative he is the bomb. I am a fiscal conservative more than a socil conservative. But for sure you must be some kind of libeeral dem, good luck to you and go pedal your lies somewhere else. Santorum is a hundred times better than the Bamster. And if you were to add them all up all of thier good points the Rickster is still better than Paul, Newy and Romney by a factor of five. in these primaries all should vote the way you feel not how the talkning heads say too. For the presidential election i may have to vote for the most electible, maybe Romney or Newt but for now feel free to vote your heart.
Report Post »timks
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:36amhttp://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2011/11/09/santorum-angel-award-for-psus-sandusky/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MzFOzj0sG0
Report Post »C-Delta Conductor
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 4:22amSantorum may not be a good fiscal conservative but he is a disaster in foreign policy. His own election web site used to have “ten” foreign policy points (scrubbed) six and seven are the worst.
6: having supported popular sovereignty abroad, we have erred in failing to sufficiently support the conditions of liberty and the institutions necessary for a successful democracy. Too often we have acted as if liberty’s first order of business is a vote. Elections should be a consummation and not a commencement to democratic processes.
7: expand our commitment to humanitarian aid, especially in Africa… I helped lead many of our efforts to address third-world debt and the global AIDS crisis
Translation: more nation building minus free elections and print USDs to pay off Africa’s debt. This is scary policy opinion and where is GB on it? Swooning over RS’s tough stance on Iran.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 4:38am>
Idiots forcing badgers to fight amongst themselves instead of concentrating on our real enemy …
It’s the crooks in our White House and in our Congress you dopes
The progressives are laughing at us, while stealing our wealth and our freedom, right in front of us
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:40amG.W. DOBBS, if you think for one minute that if Ron Paul was even able to win the nomination and by some freak accident beat Obama, that Paul could do away with the Federal Reserve, you are living in a pipe dream. He does not have the power as President, and, if he did have the power to do away with the FED, that would be a sure fire way to get himself shot by the real powers that be – the Elitists.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:07amSomething you wont find on The ezalB
Report Post »Poll: Romney and Paul Tie Obama
http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-romney-paul-tie-obama-20120109
Vechorik
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:44am“Senator Santorum cosponsored the Workplace Religious Freedom Act with Democrat Senator John Kerry. The legislation would impose on business owners the requirement that they accommodate the religious practices of their employees. It is Santorum‘s belief that if companies don’t cater to their employees sundry faith observances then they should be compelled by law to change their business practices. Government is Santorum’s solution to social and business problems.”
more http://www.nolanchart.com/article9242-the-real-dirt-on-slick-rick-santorum.html
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:45amGlenn doesn’t ask the right questions:
While in office, Santorum voted to spend taxpayer money to fight AIDS globally, to help underprivileged children in third world countries, to pay off debts owed to the US by other nations and to combat political instability in Sudan. He voted to increase welfare programs such as Healthy Start. Such social-welfare spending projects are not typically associated with the concept of Republican conservatism.
In 2001, Santorum created a charitable foundation. This organization, Operation Good Neighbor Foundation, gave out nearly $474,000 to community groups in its first few years. Sounds great, right? The problem is that it had actually raised over a million dollars in that time. The remaining half million dollars was paid out to as salaries and consulting fees to lobbyists and fundraisers connected to Santorum’s campaign. Only 36% of the money raised by the foundation actually made it to those it was designed to help.
Report Post »more http://www.nolanchart.com/article9242-the-real-dirt-on-slick-rick-santorum.html
Vechorik
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:46amSimilar discrepancies can be found in a political action committee formed by Santorum. It was supposed to be raising money to help fellow Republican candidates. However, only 18% of the funds went to those candidates. Much of the remaining money was used to furnish Santorum with a lavish lifestyle. Reports also show dozens of trips to fast food joints, supermarkets, Starbucks and other everyday expenses that had little to nothing to do with the original intent of the funds raised.
http://www.nolanchart.com/article9242-the-real-dirt-on-slick-rick-santorum.html
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 9:48amAmong other legislative favors, Santorum was given six thousand dollars from Miller Brewing just half a year after Santorum introduced legislation to cut taxes on large brewing companies. He received three thousand dollars from US Tobacco Corp. the day after he voted against a tobacco regulation bill. The list of favors to his campaign contributors goes on and on. Taking money from corporations and then voting for legislation that favors them is called corruption.
http://www.nolanchart.com/article9242-the-real-dirt-on-slick-rick-santorum.html
Report Post »ccr
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 10:39amI’ve learned from the Blaze…….and from listening to Beck……..you get NEWS according to THEIR manipulation and propaganda……just like all of the others!
Just listening to Pat and Stu filling in for Glenn……..(changing or turning off) prop up Santorum. Oh, yes……..he’s SUCH a conservative in everything. He’s made his $$$ because of political influence peddling..or lobbying after losing miserably in his last election. Yes, he took $75K from a school district he did NOT live in.
Any yet…….Glenn and crew continue to prop up/protect ANYONE BUT ROMNEY. Oh, how they “love” America. They can‘t honestly think Santorum can win so it’s SAFE to protect/promote ABR. That way…….when Romney wins the GOP and hopefully the WH, they still can rag on him…..you know……for listeners. They NEED their wallets filled with angry, feed me listeners/readers.
Santorum, the latest FOTM……altho Jon, Jr. is getting a little spin at it in NH. Hurry, Beck……get on that one!!
Such manipulation and wallet talking from Beck & Co. I used to listen ALL of the time, never missed a show, came to the blaze 4-5/day. Haven’t done that for a while once realizing Glenn has blasted, called a liar and given nothing but hate over MA healthcare while overlooking Santorum’s history. Hypocritical.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 11:23amSomeone tell Rick Santorum that, while he’s right that the term “middle class” implies the existence of a class system which does not exist in America, SO DOES the term “blue collar worker”.
And yes, it bugs me that Ron Paul uses the term “middle class”, but I think he just means that it’s harder for people to accu*****mulate [asterisks required to get past the filter] wealth, such that only the super rich are able to weather harder times; There’s a difference.
(I still have no idea why those asterisks work where they do. LOL
Report Post »So, the words “d o c u m e n t” and “a c c u m u l a t e” are being filtered.)
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:29pmThe political battle will be waged in Congress not in the President’s office. Unless we elect conservative constitutionalist to the Senate and House and capture majorities in both, the last, best and final opportunity to save America is gone.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:54pmHey, Rick, I hear there’s an opening on the school board in Susquehanna, PA this Spring. Check it out.
Report Post »NoNannyState4me
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 11:56pmNext, maybe he can clear up his relationship to not just PRIESTS that bugger little boys, but also his tight relationship with that Boy Humper, Sandusky.
Report Post »http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/big_tent/Santorum-honored-accused-PSU-Coach-as-angel.html
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:50amRon Paul’s Vote on H.R. 6523 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Report Post »http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2010-650
NoNannyState4me
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 4:51pmDrudge readers in nh vote:
romney: 29%
paul: 29%
santorum 17%
gingrich 14%
huntsman 8% drudge readers in sc vote:
paul: 28%
Report Post »romney: 24%
santorum 22%
gingrich 16%
perry 6%
justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:49pmWhat no discussion on the NDAA. I guess we should just roll over and accept it now. Heaven forbid actually debate it. How many rights do we have left now anyway, 4, 5, 6? No way in heck would I trust Santorum with the power that has been given to the president recently. He and Newt strike me as angry fascists and scare the crap out of me.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:12pmSantorum on small government… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gwwmm-cQxU&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:14pmYeah I seen that. He scares the crap out of me.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:18pmAnd I would bet the farm that Ron Paul doesn’t scare you…..
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2NsXQcBtOQ&feature=related
Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:19pmI’ve been wondering if and when nnelG would finally start bringing up the NDAA. Seems he has no interest in bringing up the opinions of any of the current crop regarding this huge slap in the face of the Bill of Rights.
The silence right here on the Blaze is deafening, and none of the Paul bashers want to talk about it either.
I wonder why?
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:33pmIf Ron Paul didn’t publicly denounce it as tyranical it would scare me. It bothers me that Romney hasn’t come out against it, but I think he’s less likely to abuse it than Rick or Newt. I mean those two really don‘t seem to like anyone that doesn’t agree with them.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:39pm@Freedom GB is the only person I’ve heard nationally mention it in the Allen (ride the Tea Party to power then abandon its principles) West interview. Perhaps they’re scared to be shipped off to Gitmo if they rock the boat.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:41pm@RepubliCorp
I see you don’t want to even acknowledge your comrades at the TSA…eh? Why don’t you simply admit the reason you hate Ron Paul so much is you know your job at the TSA is gone if the people find out the truth about you and your kind?
I can only imagine the horror in your eyes as you come to grips with the fact that you just might not be able to strip search anyone that you please anymore, because all of us “fanatics” just might give him the nomination.
Perhaps now is the time to look for a new job?
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:51pmSantorum on the Tea-Party… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74 How long can you go on foolin there,Slick Rick??
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:27pmFreedom Lover,
What about the NDAA? Paul Bashers? I guess you are going to say he voted against it? right? WRONG!!
Report Post »Ron Paul took an oath to execute his duties as a member of the House of Representatives, yet he failed to show up to vote against the NDAA, a bill he supposedly opposes. He didn’t bother to take a few hours out of his day to vote against something he considers dangerous to American rights and freedom. Instead, he decided to ignore his congressional responsibilities in order to remain on the campaign trail. You’d think a self-proclaimed libertarian would do his job when bills as important as the NDAA come up.
See who voted for the bill, who voted against it, and who else besides Ron Paul didn’t vote on it at all
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll932.xml
justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:38pm@babeuf Very lame. He knew his vote wasn’t going to count because of the OVERWHELMING bipartisan support for it and he was running for president when it happened. Was he supposed to stop trying to get into a position where he could actually do something about it to go vote down something he knew he had no chance of stopping. Even if he doesn’t win, he’s bring attention to it which is desperately needed! Bachman was absent for the vote as well, and I didn’t hold it against her. We all know she would have voted for it if she could have.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:45pm@Babeuf
Take a look at the vote count silly and take note of the fact that Paul’s vote would have done nothing to stop this madness from passing. Man are you desperate. Why stop spreading the truth all around this nation rather than wasting time voting on a bill that was sure to pass? His time was much better spent spreading the truth.
Here’s just one quote of many where Ron Paul tells the truth about the NDAA.
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/10379-ron-paul-calls-national-defense-authorization-act-qslip-into-tyrannyq
“The founders wanted to set a high bar for the government to overcome in order to deprive an individual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is to endanger everyone. When the bar is low enough to include political enemies, our descent into totalitarianism is virtually assured. The Patriot Act, as bad as its violation against the Fourth Amendment was, was just one step down the slippery slope. The recently passed National Defense Authorization Act continues that slip into tyranny, and in fact, accelerates it significantly.”
Ron Paul
Now tell us…what other candidate other than Ron Paul is warning the people about this latest insane law?
Now tell us…which progressive candidate to you support?
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:28am@repubicorp. You’re actually using that link as reference to scare someone! … Wow!!!!!!!! hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Report Post »NILAP
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:49pmA lot of voters are deciding on Romney because they see Tea Partyers and conservatives splitting their votes for Santorum, Gingrich and Perry. Confused, dazed, stubborn and indecisive is how the ‘other than Romney’ voters seem to most independents and Republicans.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:47pmSantorum on the Tea -Party… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 7:07pmGov Rick Perry is the ONLY Tea Party Candidate
Gov Rick Perry Was Drinking TEA Back In 2009
San Antonio Tea Party …July 4th 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmtPI7F9nUs&feature=relmfu
Report Post »LOJ
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:48pmAll the spin and tactics to smear Santorum and other Conservatives is not working. The people will vote for who they believe will be the best President, and all the Lefts ridicule and the Medias polls and biases will not help them this time!
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:54pmSantorum’s own words is not smearing…This is what he thinks of the Tea -Party… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:01pmRick Santorum on small government and individual rights in his own words…scary stuff!!!.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gwwmm-cQxU&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:17amCamera in every bedroom – Santorum 2012
lol
Report Post »NILAP
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:44pmRon Paul is a Progressive, Rick Santorum is a real conservative.
Report Post »Mike4Freedom
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:48pmLMAO. Nice try.
Rick Santorum on small government:
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gwwmm-cQxU
Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:59pmProgressives want to the destroy the constitution. Your statement is invalid, because it implies Paul wants to off the constitution.
Santorum IS a Progressive. He wants Gov’t intervention in the personal life (anti-constitution). He thinks we should be more involved in tangling foreign affairs (anti-constitution). He voted to raise debt ceiling, not once, not twice, but FIVE times (not fiscally-conservative). Santorum has a collective outlook and lied on stage claiming he worked in the coal mines (progressive). Santorum is all about War with Iran, which leads us into the WWIII conflict (progressive). He rejects the Tea Party and Libertarianism. He’s for the Patriot Act. For NDAA. He is a Pro Big-Government Progressive Republican.
Report Post »jscottu
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:11pmYou’ve got it backwards. Santorum voted for Medicare part D…no child left behind…the bailouts…etc. etc.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:13pmYes, please enlighten us on how Ron Paul is a progressive.
Report Post »Mr.Truth
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:23pmLMAO!!! Ahhh you smokin crack??
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:36pmPaul is a cherry picker when it comes to the continuation. Considering that Washington invaded Canada and Jefferson sent the navy after the Barbary Pirates (Islam), it is a bit rich to compare their foreign policy with Ron Paul’s, don’t you think? Madison wanted no part of the Articles of Confederation, or the pure “states’ rights” position, which is a misnomer considering states do not have rights. Ron Paul’s position, at best, would turn the states into separate warring “factions” (i.e. what Madison wanted to avoid)
Ron Paul Letter to the GOP
Report Post »“I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy,” he wrote in a letter offering advice to the Republican party: not a letter about the Obama administration — a letter about the Reagan administration. So Paul would have kept the Soviet Union intact. Such a smart guy. Paul isn’t a conservative so why do the Bots pretend? You are thrifty Liberals, not conservatives
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:42pmNiLap
Nilap cannot back up his claim because it’s untrue.
On every issue Ron Paul is to the right of all the other candidates. Ron Paul is the most conservative and it can easily be proven.
Total==============================================Anarchy
Gov ^
Constitution
A conservative always keeps their hands in their pocket in regards to Government because a conservative is last to opt for Government to intervene cause it costs money (taxes). Instead of pulling money out to pay for Government intervention conservatives opt for individual responsibility, less Government. Conservatives are the most generous outside Government (charity) due to these principles.
From the Constitution, each time a candidate wants Government to intervene, fiscally, socially, or internationally such candidate progresses LEFT and becomes less conservative because more Government is created.
Fiscal intervention is progressive
Social intervention is progressive
International intervention is progressive
No one being honest can rightfully call Ron Paul a progressive. It is simply to easy to show as a lie.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:53pm@RepubliCorp
You can copy and paste that ridiculous slew of lies and distortions, but each time you do it…you get owned.
How many times do we have to remind you of the fact that Ron Paul was all for going after the Taliban in Afganistan?
He was all for the Air Piracy and Reprisal Act of 2001 and the September 11 Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001.
Had we followed the founders wisdom who you pathetically distort, 911 may never have happened.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:04pm@repubicorp, Do you keep that post on your clipboard?
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:19pm@justangry
Yea…he does. So I may as well hit him with a copy of my own eh that drives him nuts! :)
http://www.fff.org/comment/AdamsPolicy.asp
“Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.
She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all.
She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.
She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.
She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.
The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force….
She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit….
[America's] glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is, Freedom, Independence, Peace. This has been her Declaration: this has been, as far as her necessary intercourse with the rest of mankind would permit, her practice.
John Quincy Adams
Words that are like Garlic to progres
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:14pmYes REPUBLICORP and CLARA88 copy and paste the same stuff over and over.
Take a section of it, put “ ” around it in Google — you go right to the source.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 2:00pm@Vec…you admitted on the baze that you reported by comments…you said i was spamming. Didn’t like my comments against Ron Paul huh? Too bad…the truth hurts. I’ve noticed you post the SAME comments over and over again on LOTS of threads. I haven’t reported you for spamming. I stick to threads that are relative to the subject matter with my posts.
no hard feelings……but i will continue to speak MY mind on The Blaze just like YOU and everyone else.
Perry For President
Report Post »http://www.rickperry.org/
Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:40pmWarning!!!! Ron Paul puts on his tin-foil hat and goes Kooky in this Foreign Policy blooper!
See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KiRAMvAlpQ
Ron Paul goes on a Racist rant! See Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANMGAomxq_A
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:54pm@Cause4Liberty
If Ron Paul is worth considering, why do you have to be deceitful when you post links to his propaganda videos?
I hope you don‘t think that’s a good reflection on him.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:05pm@Qp willie. That “wording” is aimed at Blazers like you! Enjoy! It‘s actually quite humourous because its taking YOUR talking points and providing the FACTS and truth behind RP’s views.
As for deceitful… Im just taking your accusations and using them to provide the reality check. So whose the deceitful one?
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:08pm@Qp… “I hope you don‘t think that’s a good reflection on him”
If my reflection shapes your opinion about a Candidate, what does that say about you!?!!
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:15pm@qpwillie
Here‘s another one of Ron Paul’s racist rants!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ccbaxter/22-facts-that-dont-jibe-with-ron-paul-being-a-rac-41xp
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:15pmQPWILLE Propaganda was today on GB. That “interview” was stage.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:17pm@Cause You’re wasting your time, he doesn’t respond, he bashes then runs. I‘m guessing if he didn’t get a rise out of Paul‘s supporters he’d go away.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:20pm@Cause4Liberty
So you’re saying you had no purpose whatsoever in mind for posting two links? You still can’t be honest about it, can you?
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:28pmQP WIllie..
Check this out! You know Ron Paul is the ONLY one in the “Democrat Party” that understands racism…
http://www.5min.com/Video/Ron-Paul-Says-Hes-the-Only-One-That-Understands-True-Racism-517242249
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:55pm@babeuf. Noticed he said “I understand racism better than anyone up here, on this stage, AND in the Democratic Party.” Selective Hearing much!?
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:04pm@Babeuf
Yea…he is the only one who seems to get this.
“Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans only as members of groups and never as individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike; as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. Their intense focus on race is inherently racist, because it views individuals only as members of racial groups.
Conservatives and libertarians should fight back and challenge the myth that collectivist liberals care more about racism. Modern liberalism, however, well-intentioned, is a byproduct of the same collectivist thinking that characterizes racism. The continued insistence on group thinking only inflames racial tensions.
The true antidote to racism is liberty. Liberty means having a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims.
This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Rather than looking to government to correct what is essentially a sin of the heart, we should understand that reducing racism requires a shift from group thinking to an emphasis on individualism.”
Ron Paul
What part of this goes over your “collectivist” head?
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:14pmI guess the Republican Party is only on that stage. Spin it however you like, he is not IN the democratic party is he? oh maybe he is.
Report Post »Removal of Congressman Charles Rangel-D-NY – Ron Paul voted NO! Ron paul voted YES to KEEP as Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi!
retiredLEO
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:38pmThey could have at least scrolled something across the screen and told us, the subscribers, and any new people that tuned in tonight for the 30 day free trial, that they are advertising on FOX tonight. I don‘t know who Glenns’s tech’s or marketing people are, but they aren’t doing a very good job.
Report Post »brendeer
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:37pmI was just on here to see why Glenn wasn’t LIVE tonight. Found my answer above. Disappointed, but understand now. I think you should run a post on the website letting viewers know what‘s going on so they don’t think it’s THEIR mistake (which I did!). Just my two cents worth.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:45pmI’m not sold on Santorum, at all. Seems like a nice guy, but haven‘t I heard someone saying we shouldn’t vote for anybody on that premise?
Report Post »I knew how Glenn feels about Newt, but I just watched a town hall meeting with him. He’s fantastic in that setting.
WHERE’S JIM DeMINT????????
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:33pmSantorum did not clear anything up at all.
Too bad Glenn didn’t ask “social” conservative suck up Rick Santorum why a “family” values guy tipped off Senator Ensign that Fox was tipped off to Ensigns affair. Wouldn’t the family values guy hold Ensign responsible and not protect him as Santorum said he was doing? Why would a “family values” who says it all begins with the family protect a guy who was screwing around on his wife for 8 months?
http://www.lvrj.com/news/santorum-admits-tipping-off-ensign-130549713.html
Glenn didn’t ask Rick about his collectivism beliefs. Rick Santorum does not believe in personal Liberty. He believes we are collective.
Glenn also didn‘t ask what was the difference in Rick’s lobbying verses Newt’s lobbying…There is no difference either….
Glenn also didn’t ask how selling munitions, defending and sending foreign aid to Arab Muslim tyrants is standing for Israel.
Any conservative wanting Government for a solution to a problem is not a conservative. I will not vote for Rick Santorum. Santorum is simply more of the same. Santorum is Bush III, another Huckabee all who Glenn called and showed as Progressive.
Glenn’s own words on radio speaking of conservatives show Rick is not one. Glenn is right about one thing he has said several times, Glenn sucks at politics.
Glenn did a real disservice to Americans by not showing Santorum for the Progressive he is.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:40pmThat is what is so disengenuious about the whole thing – they can make the interview to come out just to please them and I am really sick of all the hypocrisy!
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:27pmThis is not the same Glenn Beck that I would DVR and watch everyday…everyone can be fooled,and I admit Santorum had me at family-values…but come-on…listen to Santorums words on small government and his thoughts of the Tea-Party… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3TVoVqvt74 The Taliban is not fond of gays either…The 12th iman wants war also…SNAP OUT OF IT GLENN!!!…Santorum is more Taliban than a Founding Father
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:32am@SHYLOW
I never bought what Santorum was selling. Glad people are finally coming around to this loon.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:56amHow is that interview convincing me? He is a Status Quo Republican with little conservative views.
Report Post »JP16
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 8:46amGlenn just didn’t do his homework and settled for the guy who he thought had a chance of winning and was vocal in his support for Israel when it came to threats from Iran. Glenn is also forgetting that Congress has the power to declare wars, not the President, so a Ron Paul presidency as far as the foreign policy goes is not as dangerous as he plays it up to be.
But, Glenn probably is forgetting that politicians will do almost anything to be elected, and Santorum is doing just this. He‘s saying everything to keep Glenn’s support because he knows the power of talk radio. The result is that Glenn is losing credibility with his audience, and he’ll continue to have some die-hard supporters but just like Obama, the support becomes less and less over time.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:29pmGlenn, through out his back cheerleading for santorum, stu threw him in the air and then dropped him instead of catching him.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:50pmLol. I was gonna say that The founding fathers pushed him off that ladder. Serves GB right for saying that they would punch Paul in the head. It’d be more like, The founding fathers would challenge GB to a duel!
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:30pm@Cause4Liberty
I was gonna say that The founding fathers pushed him off that ladder.
————-
Absolutely. OTOH, if Beck supported Paul, the god of this world — plus all the good vibes from former Obama Youthful Idiots — would have protected him. Definitely your loss, Glenn.
==> “Serves GB right for saying that they would punch Paul in the head.”
—–
It’s not the first time – nor the last — that Paulists openly celebrate bad things happening to those who criticize Perfect Paul.
Want good karma to follow you in this life? Support the ONE and ONLY (and there is none other) RON PAUL!
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:14pm@kryptonite
You want bad Karma, vote for the candidate who praises the Patriot Act, who refuses to stand up to the TSA as they strip search their children and their spouse, and who will not condemn the NDAA that allows for YOUR arrest with no witnesses, no trial, no charges, and no release date.
Let’s see, that would include every candidate except Ron Paul…right?
If Ron Paul loses, I’m sure you will thank the TSA as they search you for the simple right to go to a football game.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:42pm@Freedomluver
Report Post »If Ron Paul loses, I’m sure you will thank the TSA…
——–
If Ron Paul loses, I will breathe a sigh of RELIEF. And if Obama is defeated by any other Republican candidate, I will dance before the Lord with all my might like David did. And I KNOW you Paul sheeple will hate us for it, just like Michal did David, because you WANT Obama to win if Ron Paul loses the nomination. Be man enough to admit it.
Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:45pm@krpytonite… since my last reply would NOT post. I’ll make it short.
You Beckistani’s can mock, riducle, call us: kooky, looney, nuts, crackpots, anti-semitic, drug abusers, liberals, wacky, losers, paulbots, paulistians, paulies, paulites, pauliticians, etc, etc… You can ill-wish us, bash/smash us, say we wear tin-foil hats, etc.
But WE can NOT make you eat your own medicine? You DO to others, and expect them to NOT do the same to you! Its okay for stew, p@t, and GB to join the MSM in demonizing and making fun of Paul and his supporters? Its okay for Gb to call RP and supporters, everything that he was accused of being no less than a year ago? Its okay for him to say he thinks the founding fathers would punch RP in the head? But no one can wish the same to him!?
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:59pm@kryptonite
Dodged the point didn’t you! LOL
As for your ridiculous claim that I want Obama to win, good Lord are you desperate!
Obama and the RINO policies Bush left us is the reason we have the TSA, the Patriot Act, and the NDAA.
Why on earth would I press you on your views of the TSA if I want Obama elected, when that fool is responsible for the strip searches that I’m exposing your kind with?
One thing is for certain, if anyone other than Ron Paul is elected, you will see an expansion of the power and scope of the TSA, and you will get more laws just like the despicable NDAA.
That’s obviously what YOU want, because you mock the only candidate who is trying to tell the people how wrong these laws are.
Now remember, if Ron Paul loses, be sure to thank yourself and the TSA blueshirts, as they search you, your children, and your spouse simply for the right to go to a football game.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 10:08pm@Cause4Liberty
Its okay for Gb to call RP and supporters, everything that he was accused of being no less than a year ago?
———
You’ll have to ask the man himself. It’s a fair question. Why don’t you call into the radio show, act normal, and put the question to him?
==>Its okay for him to say he thinks the founding fathers would punch RP in the head?
Report Post »—-
Yes, because he doesn’t mean it literally. He injects a lot of humor and hyperbole into his comments, and the only reason you take it to heart is because you have a cultic attachment to Paul. Your comment, on the other hand, was cruel. I don’t know if Beck sustained a serious back injury, hopefully not, but he’s probably hurting a lot right now.
kryptonite
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 10:24pm@Freedomluver
Dodged the point didn’t you! LOL
——-
No, I just have my priorities straight. While I HATE the TSA, I hate the idea of losing America to a fringe ideologue even more, be it Paul or Obama, the snake or the scorpion.
==> “As for your ridiculous claim that I want Obama to win, good Lord are you desperate!”
I never said you wanted Obama to win. You definitely want PAUL to win. I said you would RATHER Obama win than any other Republican candidate besides Paul. In other words, the Paulist attitude is, if we don’t get Perfect Paul in office, let America go to h*ll with Obama. THEY (meaning us) got what they deserved (which is a similar reaction to the one you just displayed regarding Glenn). That is why you refuse to vote for any other Repub nominee in the presidential election.
Report Post »retiredLEO
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:27pmHow long will his show last if he keeps cancelling shows?
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:25pmLooks like his god isn’t really all that pro-life:
Report Post »Numbers 5:11-21
11 Then the LORD said to Moses, 12 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If a man’s wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him 13 so that another man has sexual relations with her, and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act), 14 and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure—or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure— 15 then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of an ephah[a] of barley flour on her behalf. He must not pour olive oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for jealousy, a reminder-offering to draw attention to wrongdoing.
16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the LORD. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the LORD, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that br
ModerationIsBest
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:33pmRead the story of David and Bathsheba to see how loving and just God is.
Report Post »retiredLEO
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:23pmWith him continuing to disappoint, people will stop watching and listening, the man is off more now then on the air.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:54amI don’t know what happened to him. I use to have so much trust.
Report Post »ModerationIsBest
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:22pmI don’t have a problem when people talk about judicial activism. I do have a problem when people are for judicial activism when it’s things they agree with, and cry out against judicial activism when it’s things they disagree with.
Report Post »EJames439
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:22pmRick has not been focused on creating a marketable persona for retail politics and media centers – because he is the same professional, steady approachable leader earning approval from his fellow Americans to serve as their president.
Report Post »Recently “We the People” have given candidates our trust with the opportunity to serve us and they have failed US by serving their own agenda. There’s only one candidate standing before us today that has the historical record, the endurance and unwavering courage as a genuine leader of the free world. Rick Santorum is that candidate – a man who loves the United States of America and will serve “We the People” of this nation well.
As a father of seven, husband of 21 years and a leader who believes in one nation under God – his Faith, Family and Freedom campaign gives rise to the American spirit that solidified this nation 235 years ago.
President Richard J. Santorum, 45th President of the United States – Amen!
Mr. Oshawott
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:37pm@EJames439
You may want to rethink your viewpoint about Rick Santorum, as his history and voting record may not be what you think it is…
Sources:
Report Post »http://www.nolanchart.com/article9242-the-real-dirt-on-slick-rick-santorum.html
http://hillbuzz.org/why-rick-santorums-pennsylvania-residency-scam-and-school-tuition-fraud-still-matters-and-why-he-cant-be-the-nominee-because-of-it-95754
Copper Catfish
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:21pmAmen!
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:21pmSorry, Glenn, here’s Santorums record.
Voted for taxpayer funding of the National Endowment for the Arts.
Report Post »Voted against a 10% cut in the budget for National Endowment for the Arts.
Voted for a Schumer amendment to make the debts of pro-life demonstrators not dischargeable in bankruptcy.
Voted for Sonia Sotomayor, Circuit Judge
Voted against National Right to Work Act
Voted against Real of Davis-Bacon Prevailing union wages
Voted for Alexis Herman to be Secretary of Labor
Voted for mandatory Federal child care funding
Voted for Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Voted for Job Corps funding
Voted twice in support of Fedex Unionization
Voted to require pawn shops to do background checks on people who pawn a gun.
Voted twice to make it illegal to sell a gun without a secure storage or safety device
Voted for a Federal ban on possession of “assault weapons” by those under 18.
Voted for Federal funding for anti-gun education programs in schools.
Voted for anti-gun juvenile justice bill.
Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators
Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens
Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens.
booger71
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:02pmRight on the money
Report Post »krjones
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:12pmYet Glen keeps on singing his praises! I am starting to think we are just doomed as a nation. Progressives have us on the right and left.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:14pmBingo!!
Report Post »Marine25
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:15pmYou want junior high kids with assault rifles? You want to allow pawn shops to remain a clearinghouse for laundering stolen weapons? I’m all for the 2nd Amendment, and zealots like you are a greater danger to it than progressives are. The NRA is to the 2nd what the ACLU is to the first.
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:25pmNice list, For me one was enough, He is a LAWYER !!!!
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:04pm@Marine25
“You want junior high kids with assault rifles? You want to allow pawn shops to remain a clearinghouse for laundering stolen weapons? I’m all for the 2nd Amendment, and zealots like you are a greater danger to it than progressives are.”
Hmm…Judging from that last sentence, it seems that you favor gun control more than you favor the Second Amendment. Where in the Constitution does it say that the government has authorization to bar junior high kids from using a firearm of any sort and/or mandating pawn shops to perform background checks on people that want to buy and/or sell firearms?
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:18pmLawyer explains the Latin,and his skill to manipulate,he had me fooled…Thank you God for youtube…Sad the videos exposing Santorum have such a low view count
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:34pm@Marine25
Perhaps it would do you some good to take a few history lessons.
‘The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.”
Nunn vs. State
My, how far we have fallen.
Report Post »Copper Catfish
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:24pmYou are GREAT at cutting-and -pasting George Soros’ list of lies. If you have personally checked out each one, then you KNOW they are false! Shame on you! That’s called libel.
Report Post »hwcmo4
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 1:13pm@nickderinger That may all be true but GB says he’s a conservative and a small government guy so you can just erase that whole record thing. And please try not to think for yourself next time ok buddy? Santorum doesn’t like your free thought and individual liberty
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:19pmGlenn loves him some progressive Santorum. The old adage comes full circle on you. While someone is showing you something with the right hand (like teaching original intent, Biblical positions, etc……like you are), we need to pay attention to what’s happening with the left hand. You expose yourself to being no better than the MSM by hucking up with Santorum, a certain progressive.
Report Post »krjones
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 9:39pmLawyer..Enough said.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:17pmwhy bother with Santorum? he said it
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:17pmSantorum is against NAFTA… which allowed Middle Class Jobs to exit the US… while increasing Corporate Profits… resulting in a Greater Gap between Classes and killing the Middle Class!
Markets are Regulated on both sides… so Free Markets are PropagandaSpeak!
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:29pmyea and so was Obama… Didnt BO say he would repeal Nafta and Gat? Lol. Santorum must be taking that out of O’s playbook.
No to the “Knights of Malta” Santorum.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:45pmRon Paul is against NAFTA as well.
Report Post »“I am for free trade but not the type of system we have today. We do better trading. We cannot solve trade policies without looking at our monetary policy. Only a protectionist for national security concerns. I would get rid of NAFTA and WTO.”
http://youtu.be/_b5mnBNd00A‘
He has also been critical of NAFTA, which he says “is just one part of a plan to erase the borders between the U.S. and Mexico.”
neverfinal
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:16pmI like Rick Santorum. I can’t find any connections to the NWO on him.
Report Post »Conservative and what we need.
BurntHills
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:16pmwe’d vote for Hitler or Stalin or Mao before voting for obama — or a 3rd party. the #1 objective is to SAVE AMERICA: remove obama.
voting ANYONE BUT obama in Nov. because no one.. NO ONE.. will be the communist anti-America rabid animal that obama is.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:23pmWoodrow Wilson’s 17th Amendment… screwed us… because otherwise States could recall Senators who did not vote to Impeach a Dictator!
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:40pm@BURNTHILLS
So explain how claiming you will vote ONLY for your candidate is NOT anti-American. Explain how saying you as a presidential candidate could not vote for any of the OTHER candidates is NOT anti-American. Explain how justifying Islamist attacks on America is NOT egregiously anti-American. Explain how recruiting members of the Dim Party to sign up and vote for your candidate in the caucuses is NOT anti-American. Explain how playing the race card and instigating class warfare like Ron Paul did in the NH debate is not only anti-American, but the same tactic the despicable Commie-in-Chief employs routinely to destroy America.
That‘s just a few insights into the man’s character and that of most of his followers. Would you still vote for that neo-liberal?
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:13pm@Kryptonite
Voting is a right and if one decides to vote for one person they are being American by acting on that right. Being American does no include having to vote for one party or the other party. American is to be free to decide yourself, not as a COLLECTIVE.
It is American for candidates not to endorse fellow candidates with different platforms. It is Anti-American to do as told and endorse someone a candidate doesn’t like as you suggest.
Understanding why Islamists attack us is not Anti-American. Irresponsible people like you who believe they never do anything wrong are anti-American. American‘s accept their failures and don’t hide from the fact we aren’t perfect. Anti-American would be to say it‘s always everyone else’s fault.
Democrats and Independents vote every cycle in the Republican caucuses. Was George Bush or Reagan anti-American for the same?
NEO-Liberal? I can show you on every policy Ron Paul is the conservative and all the rest are to the LEFT of him. Care to disprove it or you gonna run away again because you are exposed as a progressive once again.
You sure harbor a lot of hate Kryptonite. Do you ever post in favor of anyone? I only see hate filled posts…..Hate will destroy you….
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:14pmobama’s little devils are already cheering their new hopeful stats that 6% of the Right will vote 3rd Party… handing the election right back to obama (the vile rabid communist anti-America anti-Christianity animal).
Report Post »Hossua
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 11:50pmMaybe you should try not voting for statist douche bags in the primary? Seems like a logical place to start.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:14pmHere come the Paulbot/Alex Jones zombies in 1, 2, 3, 4,…
Report Post »Mr.Truth
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 7:29pmI suppoort Paul and think Alex Jones is a damn idiot…
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:50amHow can Glenn Beck have this man on here. He’s a fraud. A Liar. He’s a mad man. He would be GUNS blazing first thing in office.. He’s a war monger. How come he won’t touch the Federal Reserve? Where is that talk on that BECK? Did you forget? What about getting rid of the EPA. The TSA? Department of Education? Santorum says nothing of it. I am sick of people like Santorum trying to me how I should live my life. Who cares if he is Pro Guns.. so is Ron Paul. So is Rick Perry. So is Newt. What there point?
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 10, 2012 at 12:52amI am a Ron Supporter. I don’t listen to Alex Jones. I’ve heard some of his stuff. What’s the difference between him and Beck? Or Mark Levin or Rush? There all out there to gain Popularity. It’s all about the money.
Report Post »Speak without Fear
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:11pmWHere is Glens evening show? I can’t find it on GBTV. Is he having one tonight?
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:13pmYes, and it is one that shouldn’t be missed. About finances.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:17pmGlenn got hurt on the new set, he is injured, no show tonight
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:17pmHe fell off the GBTV sets coffee table after jumping on it and hurt his back. For reals. :( Hope he is alright.
Report Post »retiredLEO
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:18pmWondering the same thing, where is Glenn, he is replaying “For the Record”
Report Post »n8dogg
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:20pmGlenn threw out his back so today’s program will be moved to tomorrow. Glenn Beck for the Record is tonight’s programming.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:21pmThat’s why I came here. I can’t get it either. Hope everybody’s OK.
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:21pmHe threw his back out jumping off of a ladder onto a table – according to Stu
Report Post »chips1
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 5:42pmIn other words, “he rung his beck”.
Report Post »JAHodel
Posted on January 9, 2012 at 6:07pmWell I guess Glenn doesn’t have a future in the WWE.
Report Post »