Politics

Santorum Staffer Under Fire for ‘Sexist’ Email: ‘Is It God’s Highest Desire…to Have a Woman Rule’?

Santorum Staffer Under Fire for Sexist Email: Is It Gods Highest Desire...to Have a Woman Rule?

AP

A staffer to Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum is fending off controversy over an email he sent last summer questioning whether a woman should be president.

Jamie Johnson, Santorum’s Iowa coalitions director, sent an email in June saying children’s lives would be harmed if the country elected a female president, the Des Moines Register reported Friday.

“The question then comes, ‘Is it God’s highest desire, that is, his biblically expressed will, … to have a woman rule the institutions of the family, the church, and the state?’” Johnson reportedly wrote.

According to NBC News, he sent the message from his private email account. It surfaced in the fall after its recipient passed it on to a member of then-GOP candidate Michele Bachmann’s campaign.

Peter Waldron, who worked as Bachmann’s national faith outreach director, blasted the Santorum campaign Saturday in an email to Buzzfeed, accusing the former Pennsylvania senator of deploying a “sexist strategy” against his candidate in Iowa. He demanded an apology from Santorum and said “misogyny was a serious issue in Iowa” and that “medieval attitudes” are to blame for Bachmann‘s poor showing in the state’s caucuses, NBC reported.

Bachmann suspended her presidential bid after netting a mere 5 percent in Iowa, coming in ahead only of Jon Huntsman, who did not compete in the state.

But Johnson, a pastor at a central Iowa church, said the email was meant to be a private message to a friend and not intended to be read by anyone else, according to the Register.

He told NBC it has been “blown way out of proportion,” and was not an official campaign correspondence.

“I was sharing my personal reflections with a friend through my private email account -– not the campaign account,” Johnson told NBC. “They were reflections on over 25 years of formal, theological study” based in “classical Christian doctrine.”

According to the Register, the charge that sexism is the reason behind Bachmann’s poor performance in Iowa is not new: As her poll numbers plummeted following her historic Ames straw poll win, Bachmann’s “national aides and evangelical organization team privately complained that sexism coursed through Iowa’s religious conservative community,” the newspaper reported.

Santorum on Saturday won the backing of 150 social conservative and evangelical Christian leaders.

Comments (102)

1 2
  • sixdogman
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:36pm

    NBC reports? if they would report even ONE thing Obama has done or his staff we might have been able to stop this man. did you know the Obama adm. is monitoring your social media? they are spying on the American people. what for? WHERE ARE YOU NBC?

    Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 3:55am

      One way to fix this problem is stop watching NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, Current and CNN. If you have Cable, just turning to these Channels for a second counts as viewing for 15 minutes. Their ratings are low and if definitely effect what Advertiser pay per commercial time. Stop Watching.

      Report Post » db321  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 8:40am

      You know what would be really nice…is someone, ANYONE, would finally step up to the plate and ask the candidates just what are their views regarding the recently passed NDAA that allows for your arrest with no warrant, no charges, no trial, and no release date. (Yes nnelG, that includes YOU!)

      After that, perhaps they will find the time to ask them about the immoral and unconstitutional strip searches that are foisted on our people by the TSA?

      I seems quite clear that the media (including YOU nnelG) are doing their best to avoid these issues like the plague…so the question is why?

      Hhhhhmmmm.

      There is on one candidate who has stood firmly against these assaults on the Bill of Rights, and that candidate is Ron Paul.

      Vote for Ron Paul, or be ready to bend over for the NWO’s henchmen known as the TSA, for the simple right to watch your kids play a football game at your local high school.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 10:09am

      Santorum is a Keynesian, folks! He IS a big government guy.

      See here.

      Rick Santorum: We Want Inflation
      http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l124ellWdY

      The Federal Reserve is NOT constitutional, as Santorum supposes. And Inflation is NOT normal, as Santorum supposes. And WE ACTUALLY DO want price deflation, contrary to what Santorum supposes.

      Santorum is a disaster waiting to CONTINUE TO happen. Don’t do this, America!

      Even if you believed that Santorum wanted to shrink government – which he has already said he’s not a libertarian – the existence of a fiat money system makes it IMPOSSIBLE not to grow government, and in fact, the WHOLE POINT of a fiat money system is to grow government.

      See here.

      “What is Constitutional Money?” with Edwin Vieira — Ron Paul Money Lecture Series, Pt 2/3
      http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6gMkKmQSW4

      And here.

      Smashing Myths and Restoring Sound Money | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
      http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAzExlEsIKk

      Report Post »  
    • Secret Squirrel
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 11:04am

      .
      So Santorum’s staffer was thinking out loud.
      He didn’t trash anyone, he didn’t call for action.
      I don’t see the big deal.
      Maybe more politician’s staffers should think.

      Report Post » Secret Squirrel  
    • Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 11:05am

      Santorum is a dig government Keynesian and a fascist… Not surprised that he is likely a misogynist on top of that… Santorum is yet one more psychopathic politician we don’t need.

      Report Post » Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 11:41am

      @Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool,

      “Not surprised that he is likely a misogynist on top of that…”

      I actually agree with the staffer with regard to women. It’s emasculating to have a woman in charge of most things.

      Part of the male identity is to seek to be a good provider and protector, and to be admired for it by their women; And a lot of women will agree with this, as long as the men aren’t trying to OWN them.

      Report Post »  
    • Ruler4You
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 11:46am

      The MSM “IS” a communist cabal. Any expression of faith or the perception that you rely on God or His Word is the fresh meat those dogs are looking for.

      obango has no faith beyond the communist faith of state (http://shutking.blogspot.com/2010/06/video-of-tom-fife-telling-of-his-story.html). he doesn’t attend Church and his “faith” adviser is a self proclaimed communist. And none of his people are faithful followers of the Christian God.
      But you don’t hear a word about that.

      IMHBLO, God doesn’t look favorably on man when he shirks his duty. Both sexes have their place on the stage of life in the Christian world. Each unique and each uniquely dependent on the other for their skill set and purpose for the other to survive as He intended.

      There are examples in the Bible where the roles were reversed as lessons for modern day man to consider. will he?

      Report Post » Ruler4You  
    • ProbIemSoIver
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 3:20pm

      I thought this was a story until I saw that it was a Staffer.

      Major FAIL !!!!

      On a personal Note, Santorum is an Ignorant Neoconservative.

      Report Post » ProbIemSoIver  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 6:06pm

      Senator Davis noted, “Ron Paul’s record matches his rhetoric, his fiscal plan matches the fiscal challenges that our nation is facing, and his movement represents the taxpayers whose interests have been ignored in the political process for far too long.”

      “I’m also endorsing him because unlike what the pundits have led you to believe, he is the candidate who gives the Republican Party the best chance to beat Barack Obama in November.”

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
  • JP16
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:18pm

    If Rick Santorum had said this, I’d have concerns, but this is just someone who supports him. It’s just like when Ron Paul supporters get blamed for some idiot doing something stupid and also being a Ron Paul supporter.

    Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 9:05pm

      yeah.. i agree, the media is just full of crap now.
      they don’t even report on actual problems that people could be solving… it’s pathetic

      Report Post »  
    • Publius Novus
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 7:25am

      Amen. Ridiculous story.

      Report Post » Publius Novus  
    • Secret Squirrel
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 11:08am

      .
      Man, NBC can dig.
      So, please dig up how Obama paid for Harvard, and what were his grades?
      Maybe a scrap of what he wrote as Harvard Law Review.
      Can you find anyone who went to class with him?

      Yeah, you may have to pull resources off Bristol Palin, I know it’s asking a lot.

      Report Post » Secret Squirrel  
  • SilentReader
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:14pm

    Maybe if the Leftist MSM had put the same scrutiny on Obama we might not be in the mess we are in right now. It’s amazing how much scrutiny they put on “staffers” compared to the zero scrutiny that they put on Obama.

    Keep up your traitorous work MSM. It’s why you have now become irrelevant.

    Report Post » SilentReader  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 2:00am

      We would still be in a mess — President McCain would make sure of that, “MY FRIEND”.

      Report Post »  
  • Eliasim
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:06pm

    “Rule the institutions?” I find the mindset of Americans disheartening.

    Report Post »  
  • SurhanSurhan
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:04pm

    I’m shocked. The only female Christian in the presidential race accusing Christians of misogyny and sexism. Wow! By the way, why hasn’t America elected a female president? Benazir Bhutto was elected Prime Minister of Pakistan last century (At 35, she was one of the youngest chief executives in the world, and the first woman to serve as prime minister in an Islamic country).

    C’mon America, get with the program.

    Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:35pm

      Could it be that the only one capable and qualified so far was Sarah Palin? Asked and answered!

      Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:39pm

      Certainly isn’t, wasn’t and never will be Hillary!

      Report Post »  
    • Snidely
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 12:08pm

      Electing a woman just for the sake of “making history” would be just as stupid as electing someone with a darker skin tone to “make history”. I voted for Alan Keyes in the 2000 caucuses, but I voted for him because he best articulated the positions I felt strongly about. Not because I wanted to make history. As an evangelical Christian, if a woman comes along that is the best person to be president, I’ll vote for her. As much as I like Congresswoman Bachmann, I didn’t see the qualities that I want in a president. When Bob Dole ran for president, and I saw Elizabeth campaigning for him, I realized we nominated the wrong Dole. She would have made a great president.

      Report Post » Snidely  
  • LeadNotFollow
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:26pm

    Men have managed to really screw up America in only 235 years, so maybe it’s time for a woman president. Let the women do what they do best. Clean up messes men have created.

    Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:40pm

      LEADNOTFOLLOW, get your head out of your hind end and get a breathe of fresh air. You sound like my wife.

      Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:13pm

    .
    ‘Sexist’ Email: ‘Is It God’s Highest Desire…to Have a Woman Rule’?

    Well as long as she look’s like Wonder Woman in a Leather Corsett, holding a Riding Crop with something “Dirty” in mind. She can Rule all she want’s…………..

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:09pm

    .
    C’mon man I say worse stuff than that, on a Daily Basis…….

    If that is the worse thing that guy say’s, follow him til the “End of Time”. Cause he’s gonna have a remarkable passage……….

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • recoveringneocon
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:07pm

    This is all really irrelevant, ricky is not on the ballot in to many key states, he just cant win, so what is the point of talking about something so stupid?

    “Santorum, didn’t get on the ballot in Virginia or the District of Columbia. His campaign also filed incomplete slates of delegates in Illinois and Ohio, which could limit his ability to win delegates in those key states.”

    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/53297511-68/ballot-delegates-candidates-primary.html.csp

    Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • momprayn
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:06pm

    Agree that it doesn’t matter one little iota since it was a STAFFER (NOT Santorum) sent the e-mail !!
    Agree that the Bible says women and men have different “roles” when it comes to the family — and you can argue about what the New Testament says re being a “pastor” (although there were “deaconesses”). However, the Bible does give examples of women as very strong authoritative leaders — such as…..Deborah and used Esther. Makes no difference it was only a couple we know of. Only depends what God wants (not contradictory to scriptures).
    Also I don’t get what he said — how does a President ” rule the institutions of the family, the church, and the state” here? I don’t think so. There’s also the Senate and the House, etc. and state issues are theirs, not his. The church? How’s that? He talks like he’s supposed to be some totalitarian – like Obama. This guy has problems himself but I certainly don’t blame Santorum & wouldn’t affect him as President even if he does personally believe that. Sheesh!
    We all need to concentrate on the Senate (and keeping the House). That way, even if we do get some “moderate”, they will keep him in check – as it’s supposed to be for once.

    Report Post »  
    • loriann12
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 6:43am

      that would be the only way there would be a problem, if the President ruled the church. In the Bible, it ways women shouldn’t teach men in areas of religion. I (being a woman) don’t agree with female pastors and only like female ministers of women or children. I (as a personal opinion) believe a woman CAN teach a Sunday school class, as the men have the choice of going to a different one. But President isn’t a dictate of the Bible, and he/she wouldn’t be teaching things of the Bible. I’d vote for a woman for President if she was qualified. I’d vote for Sarah Palin, but I hadn’t made up my mind about Michelle Bachmann.

      Report Post »  
  • RightPolitically
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:52pm

    Crazy, stupid crap. The country is half in the toilet and this is news? Another sorry media display.

    Report Post » RightPolitically  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:23pm

      Here’s some News

      Ron Paul Wins Texas Presidential Straw Poll

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • MrButcher
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:36pm

      “Half in the toilet”??

      We’ve already been flushed and are weaving our way through the subterranean sewer system and are rapidly approaching the sewage treatment plant which is out-of-service. Expect messes and backups…

      Report Post » MrButcher  
  • HippoNips
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:46pm

    He asked a question It’s not a statement

    To everyone that doesn’t know already The staff Glenn Beck for The Blaze are mostly far left liberal hacks , some that worked for Huffngton Post
    Madeleine Morgenstern is liberal
    They are hsyterically supporting Romney , the far left wing liberal

    Report Post »  
    • Babeuf
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:51pm

      I agree there too! I have tried to post all day regarding the Bain ad showing that it was a Perry supporter that made the ad, but they will not post it. It is extremely disheartening to see the agenda that their truth really does have.

      Report Post » Babeuf  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 8:40pm

      Go back to any of the stories. You will find that “The ezalB” and “nnelG” Delete all kinds of post and comments. This Place is nothing more than a “Propaganda Machine” I’m wondering if they will throw Ricky under the bus in the end. They must know by now he cant win.

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • BO_Bill
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:35pm

    Natural Law dictates that men are to fight and lead. This same Law dictates than women are to nurture and sustain. People are happiest when living their lives in accordance with Natural Law.

    This Law can be observed by viewing the chests of the respective genders. Men have large pectoral muscles, designed to project power forward in all environments, including hostile. In the female gender, we observe smaller pectoral muscles, capable of domestic tasks. But females also have boobs, capable of attracting males romantically, and, as a future consequence, nurturing a family.

    God’s plan is readily viewable for all who (like me) are willing to look.

    Report Post » BO_Bill  
  • MissKitty33
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:33pm

    Whoo the hell cares!!! How would he be as president IS the question we need to ask. Many people have many different views and need not apologise for them. It is called freedom.

    Report Post » MissKitty33  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:48pm

      Guess they’re talking about the “submissive woman” thing

      Report Post »  
    • Marine25
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:58pm

      I care. I don’t respect anyone who believes women should be limited by biblical text, and I don’t trust any politician who would retain Neanderthal opinions like that on their staff. Santorum is a Roman Catholic, and the Catholic Church is historically very misogynistic.

      Report Post »  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:26pm

    Santorum merely asks the question and all of the PC idiots go crazy. I am tired of PC. I am tired of liberalism. It does NOT work. There is a reason that men are in certain positions and women in others. It works for societies in general. All of this PC crap has been tried before down through historoy and it is a failure;

    Report Post »  
  • jsDway
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:13pm

    Love Rick Santorum – don’t care what his staffer said, we can’t be held responsible for what someone else says! I know this is not Santorum’s platform belief. There are very few women that I would trust with being president, I think women in the congress has caused a great downfall of our country – most are leftists and easy to be manipulated!!! I am a 63 yr old woman and have three adult daughters and four granddaughters, I believe the woman who rocks the cradle rules the world!!!!! Santorum believes in family – the family core is the strenght that holds this or any nation together – one of the main reasons I love and trust him.

    Report Post »  
    • Simonne
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:21pm

      I guess you haven’t noticed but how many politicians have scandals compare to men. Not many, as a matter of fact, I can’t even think of one. I don‘t care what gender or religion someone is because I’m for the best candidate & I find that to be Romney this time around.

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:24pm

      Believe me..Santorum is a FUNDAMENTALIST. He also believes this stuff. The problem is that he wants to push his religious agenda like the dumb DOMA law. Get the Government out of our lives and this stuff will not matter. A staffer could say anything he wanted if it wasnt something the Government could have control over.

      Gay rights would not be an issue if the Government was out of the marriage business completely…No regulations, no licensing…Only the Church would be responsible for marrying or not marrying people…Until the Government is out of the marriage business your Fundamentalist Neocon Nazi wanna be will suffer from ridicule…Why? Because he wants to define marriage when the Government has no business defining anything!

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:50pm

      I think the STAFFER is the fundamentalist feeding points to Santorum. Santorum is a CATHOLIC — not fundamental at all.

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 6:20pm

      catholics can be Fundamentalist too. It is not limited to Evangelicals…

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • stockpicker
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:06pm

    Get over it Santorum is a phoney christian, an arminian, an idol worshiper.

    Report Post »  
    • oldironsides
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:27pm

      Sanctimonious – not very christian of you – he who is without sin etc.; judge not lest etc

      Report Post »  
    • forlinianslip
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 9:29am

      Ha ha ha ha ha. I’ve had a great laugh on this one! Someone damns Santorum for being an Arminian! Still laughing! Tears in my eye laughing!

      For the uninitiated, Arminianism is a theological system which most Christians affirm. It denies the deterministic notion that God picks and chooses who will have faith and who will not. Arminianism rejects the Calvinistic claim that Jesus only died for a select few.

      For more info: http://arminians.org/?q=Are_You_an_Arminian_and_Dont_Even_Know_It

      Report Post »  
  • Grasshopper42
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:56pm

    If one looks in THE history book, very few women ruled over His people. Ever wonder why? Do a little work, Blaze readers, and figure out why. You will have to look past your sensitivity training and enlightnment (politicall correctness) to find the answer.

    Report Post » Grasshopper42  
  • alabamaslammer
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:55pm

    Hey glenn!! You know what would be great? If you three professional broadcasters would get santourum supporters to call up. Then you can heckle them and ridicule them on air. . You do it to Ron Paul supporters. Maybe Pat can storm off his own show again like the view girls did.

    Report Post » alabamaslammer  
  • dontbotherme
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:42pm

    I think the right woman would be able to be president of our country. I’m getting so sick of people (media) demanding an apology from the candidate running for president for comments made by a staffer that he may or may not even know. How about the person who spoke, or wrote, the “offensive” words being held responsible for whatever perceived or real indignity they may have uttered.

    Report Post »  
  • CatB
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:39pm

    Why is it that it is okay for conservative private emails to be hacked? He wasn’t stating or making policy and the only ones who can decide who to vote for ARE the voters. This matters how ?.. just because this guy is sexist? When is the media going to report on Obama’s friends … Ayers, Wright, Van Jones … etc.

    OMG .. Obama must Go 2012

    Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 10:42pm

      It wasn’t hacked, it was shared by the recipient because even the people this guy thinks of as his friends consider him a jerk.

      Report Post »  
  • OLDBIKEFIXER
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:39pm

    Oh, wow, One of Rick Santorum’s staffers sent an email that might possibly be considered kinda-sorta-maybe just a little bit sexist. GASP!

    Okay, we better put that Santorum guy on the next flight to the South Pole, and never even consider him as presidential material, because he knows somebody who might have ideas that are different than other people.

    On the other hand, Obummer is has dinner with Bill Ayers, appoints Van Jones to a “Czar” position, and thinks it’s fine for his wife to decide what our kids are allowed to eat.

    Hmmm… I think I’ll stay with the guy who might know the kinda-sorta sexist staffer.

    Report Post » OLDBIKEFIXER  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:55pm

      Yes .. going to go to a Santorum Rally a week from Tuesday .. will be good to hear straight from the candidate without the media or pundits trying to spin it!

      OMG … Obama MUST GO 2012!

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 16, 2012 at 8:26am

      @CatB

      Perhaps you can tell us… just what is Santorum’s official position regarding the recently passed NDAA that allows for YOUR arrest with no warrant, no witnesses, no trial, and no release date?

      It would also be nice to know just where he stands on the unconstitutional strip searches foisted upon our people by the blueshirts at the TSA.

      Seems he’s all for them…correct?

      How on earth can you back someone who openly spits on the Bill of Rights?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
  • recoveringneocon
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:37pm

    No wonder his Nephew did not support him, He was raised by a Commi and now he is Sexist.

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/03/the-trouble-with-my-uncle-rick-santorum/

    Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • Anthony7
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:35pm

    we should not attemt to what ” the Almighty’s highest desires” are. We cane comment on our own opinion or desire.

    Report Post »  
    • football lady
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:46pm

      As a woman, I am offended by these people who cry sexism and racism at every turn. It’s women like this I would definitely not want to be president. Don’t get me wrong. It is NOT that I would not vote for a woman but she would be the kind who is self assured and wouldn’t cry sexism every time someone criticized her. Women like that are horrible bosses in the workplace.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:00pm

      @FOOTBALL LADY…

      I totally agree .. some of the worst bosses I have ever had were women like that. That does NOT mean that I would not vote for a woman .. but it has to be the RIGHT woman … not just because she is a woman anymore than blacks should support a candidate based being black. .. or a man because he is a man …etc.

      Report Post »  
    • TumbleBumble
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 5:35pm

      FOOTBALL LADY AND CATB ~

      As a woman, I agree with you two. By the way, have you ever had any dealings with a woman cop? lol! Attitude unbelievable.

      I understand and completely accept that there are roles specifically for a man and those that are for a woman. If someone wants to discuss or debate what those are according to the Bible, I am open for it. There is no offense taken here. It is not demeaning to me. Actually, rather helpful. We have to try and shed all the ‘women’s lib’ propaganda that has been fed to us for decades.

      Report Post » TumbleBumble  
  • BetterDays
    Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:33pm

    This doesn’t concern me nearly as much as Ricks family history in combination with his congressional voting record.
    As for a woman being the President, why not?
    As long as she is a constitutionally sound individual, and not a socialist/communist I could vote for a woman.
    And the Usurper tyrant we have now sets such a low standard, even I would get rave reviews.

    Report Post »  
    • AhLeahIris
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:37pm

      To be blunt, this doesn‘t bother me nearly so much as Mitt giving away the GOP’s biggest issue in the upcoming election: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-21K

      Report Post » AhLeahIris  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 4:51pm

      @AH
      Indeed, another reason why “mittens” won’t be getting my vote. Besides he is a globalist New World Order socialist telling us “great empty words” to get our vote, not going to happen.

      Report Post »  
    • Marine25
      Posted on January 15, 2012 at 7:10pm

      “mark” has his figures wrong. Health care reform repeal fails in every poll outside the Heritage Foundation. And when individual parts of the reform are polled, they all have favorable polling results. The real problem is Republicans coming up with something to replace it with. Voters don’t want more pro-insurance company legislation, and that’s all the GOP has now that they have taken a billion dollars from big insurance. Repeal is potential political suicide.

      Report Post »  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love