Sarah Palin Blasts GOP ‘Cannibals’ Using ‘Alinsky’ Tactics Against Gingrich
- Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:53am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
AP
The GOP establishment are “cannibals” using “tactics of the left” to take down Newt Gingrich, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin charged Friday.
The former House Speaker has come under fire from many prominent conservatives in recent weeks, including some questioning his credentials as a true Ronald Reagan conservative.
“I am in favor of contested primaries and healthy, pointed debate,” Palin wrote on her Facebook page. “They help focus candidates and the electorate. I have fought in tough and heated contested primaries myself. But what we have seen in Florida this week is beyond the pale.”
Palin has not endorsed a candidate for president, though has recently stepped up her defense of Gingrich.
Recalling her own time on the national stage four years ago, Palin said she is “sadly too familiar with these tactics.”
“The difference in 2008 was that I was largely unknown to the American public, so they had no way of differentiating between the lies and the truth,” Palin said. “All of it came at them at once as ‘facts’ about me. But Newt Gingrich is known to us – both the good and the bad.”
Palin went on to praise Gingrich, saying his relationship with Nancy Reagan and endorsement from son Michael Reagan — “no two greater keepers of the Reagan legacy” — should speak to Gingrich’s record as a conservative.
“What we saw with this ridiculous opposition dump on Newt was nothing short of Stalin-esque rewriting of history. It was Alinsky tactics at their worst,” she said.
Ultimately, Palin said, the clash isn’t between Gingrich and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney: It’s a fight between the Republican establishment and Tea Party and independent Americans who are “sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives.”
“Now, I respect Governor Romney and his success,” Palin said. “But there are serious concerns about his record and whether as a politician he consistently applied conservative principles and how this impacts the agenda moving forward. The questions need answers now. That is why this primary should not be rushed to an end. We need to vet this.”
Palin also went on to question whether the GOP establishment would use the same tactics they’re employing against Gingrich against Obama in the general election.
“They’re now using every available microscope and endoscope – along with rewriting history – in attempts to character assassinate anyone challenging their chosen one in their own party’s primary,” Palin said. “So, one must ask, who are they really running against?”
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 584 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 411 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 411 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 411 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (630)
HAZ-KiltEOD
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:38amThe VP Candidate has already been selected, I was told by a billionaire customer of mine two weeks back, that the Council On Foriegn Relations have already selected their own representitive for the GOP 2012 race. CFR member and “roundtable organizer” John Huntsman has been selected for VP and will drop out next week after NH. Sure enough he was right. So now we have to play the debate game, if the CFR endorses fellow member Newt, then who do the trilaterialists endorse? and how will their choice be sold to us, the american people?
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:44amIf that is true – LOL — no way that Huntsman will be in there. No worries…………too many others that would be 100% better.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:46amLittle do people know the CFR, which Newt and Soros are members, has a lot of pull with our domestic and foreign policies. The CFR was founded by leftist progressive bankers and Rockefeller. Newt was quoted in the beginning of the campaign that Romney was “the Rockefeller candidate”. I will hold my nose and vote for Romney, no way will I vote for a CFR member. I do like Santorum(the most conservative and consistent), but his chances are slim, sadly.
Report Post »Obamas.drunken.uncle
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:59amIf Huntsman is the VP choice I will give up on life.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:09pm.
Ms. Palin go shoot a moose……
It took awhile but I finaly have Palin Derangement Syndrome………
Report Post »gramma b
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:24pmIf Romney is the nominee, no way would he choose Hunstman as VP, for a number of reasons. But, as to Sarah, I nostalgically look back at how excited I was about her after she made he convention speech. Then, after listening to her babble for the past four years, I finally accepted the fact that she is a dim bulb. Intelligent conservatives, and not just the “establishment,” know that Newt is an unreliable dirtbag. Sure, he has great applause lines in front of an audience that already agrees with him. To everyone else, he comes across as an angry dirtbag.
This latest Palin stuff is just more of the populist — not conservative, but populist — claptrap that is her stock in trade.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:29pm@ a doctors labor
Report Post »As to whether Mr Gingrich is sufficiently Conservative enough for some, Dr paul certainly has no claim to the handle of Conservative at all. Dr paul is a Libertarian …there is a big difference.
seanscythe
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:36pmI‘m sorry but after newts remarks about Immigration I can’t vote for him, he is nothing but a softy for illegal aliens. That’s why he lost support in Florida, even the Cubans and legal Immigrants don’t agree with his views. I’ll hold my nose and vote for Romney, but newt needs to go he reminds me of Bush on immigration.
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:36pmOur total collapse in producing a candidate is as follows. Bush 1, Dole, Bush 2,(started out good because of 911 but ended up like Mass. liberals Kerry, Brown, and Romney) McCain and now the worst of the worst Willard (I saved the olympics) Romney.
Willard sounds like John Kerry “I was in Vietnam” when he says that “I saved the Olympics”
Just what we need another north east liberal as in Romney.
Ron Paul keeps looking better.
Report Post »Jinglebob
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:41pmName names Sarah…does the list start with Crystal and Rowe?
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:46pmRomney has totally ruined what was left of the Republican party. He has used the same hate filled tactics as the democrats. His lie soaked adds about Newt after Newt started in Iowa without all the negativity. We will never be united.
I can see how he became so rich. Just stomping out his competitors with daddys money. You gotta have money to make money.
Romney is the biggest of the biggest rhino that ever ran for a Republican office. (other than Scott Brown) He will never win over Obama.
Did I mention he saved the olympics?
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:48pmUBethechange, Romney‘s old man and Rockefeller were buds of the progressive Republican party back in the 60’s. Romney‘s roots run much deeper than Gingrich’s.
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:52pmBring on the third party.
(Pres.=Bachman )(Vic.=Palin) (Press Secr.=Newt ) (Finance=Ron Paul)
(Spy=Romney, because he wants to be Demopublican)
Romney could be in charge of olympics because he saved them once.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:58pm@THE_JERK Romney’s father supporting Rockefeller is not the same, they are two different people. Is Romney a member of the CFR? No.
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:59pmFlorida, you can’t be serious in voting for this guy. Please don’t let this millionaire continue to corrupt anymore the Republican party. His money corrupts the process.
A vote for Willard (now it’s my turn to talk) Romney will bring on a third party. Trust me it will. Maybe thats what we need?
Did I mention he saved the olympics?
Report Post »dutchy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:01pmI also am sick of the GOP character assinations just like Sarah Palin. My vote is for Gingrich or Santorum any day as president before the horrible mistake of Obama as a second term loser president! Romney is the one who started all the character assinations-a bad thing to do to fellow republicans.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:02pmUBETHECHANGE, perhaps you misunderstood. Romney’s old man and Rockefeller were the progressives of the Republican party, as was Romney’s mother.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:08pmIf Romney is the candidate, I will vote 3rd party. I’m sick and tired of lying Republicans. Better to have an open and honest communist. No one is fooled, as we were by Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain… and all of the other Lindsey Graham fakes.
endgamer
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:09pm@RJL I’m in Florida and I AM voting for Ron Paul on Tuesday.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:23pmA DOCTORS LABOR IS NOT MY RIGHT Absolutely the bext proof I have seen on the real Newt Gingrich… Vote for Newt and you get more Obama. All the crap Sarah fed us, all the great talks and speeches and now she supports the very same thing we have in the WH.. True colors are coming out on the Palins!
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:25pm@ABBYGIRL1994 You go girl!
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:31pmHey, I gotta tell you, if this business about Romney is true, well, I can‘t see why anybody wouldn’t realize that he’ll be disassembled by Obama come October: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-2fE
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:39pmSound to me like Alinsky may get the VP nod.
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:40pmCaption and focus of article are a bit misleading
Read Sarah Palin’s ENTIRE LETTER at BigGovernment.com.
Andrew Breitbart posted it in its entirety….
She renders a very broad analysis….and also detailed.
You will walk away….thinking…..
And unfortunately, you may have your eyes opened, yet again.
Go now, read it…remember THE TRUTH HAS NO AGENDA.
Report Post »drobarts
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:40pmDo you really believe that? Wow, that is one amazing story!!!!
Report Post »patriot308
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:25pmWell a Quadrillionaire friend of mine says your friend is F.O.S. But this is really just my “friends” opinion………
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:33pmSarah Palin says they are using the tactics of the left on NEWT! That is downright laughable!
Newt has consistently played the emotion card, which is THE tactic of the left.
He plays on class envy, as evidenced by his continued attacks on Romney’s wealth.
He goes around implying that everything negative about him is “baloney” or “lies,” despite obvious evidence to the contrary.
He takes his own problems and projects them on others, such as declaring that others have CHARACTER issues! Newt! A serial adulterer!
He is a populist who says whatever he thinks the crowd he is currently in front of wants to hear.
Tactics of the left being used on Newt! Ha! Palin may have a future as a comedian!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:39pmGo here to learn about Newt: http://www.newtexposed.com/
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:48pmPaper, Paul is the most Conservative. In Oct 2004 there was a list of Congress showing from the top (most liberal) to the bottom (most consrvative). http://voteview.com/Is_John_Kerry_A_Liberal.htm Who’s name is at the very bottom? Pauls. You people wonder why Paul supporters get testy. The reason is all you people can do is listen to the elite media and spew their lies and call us names like Paulbot. If you people had half a brain and could think for yourselves, you would be better off.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:00pm@paperpushermj,
“… Dr paul certainly has no claim to the handle of Conservative at all. Dr paul is a Libertarian …there is a big difference.”
I’m glad you brought this up, because not only is Ron Paul Conservative, but Libertarianism IS IN FACT part of being Conservative, as Ronald Reagan said, such that they are NOT significantly different.
See here.
Inside Ronald Reagan
A Reason Interview
Manuel Klausner from the July 1975 issue
http://reason.com/archives/1975/07/01/inside-ronald-reagan
“REAGAN: If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism.”
…
“The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.
“Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say …”
…
“But again, I stand on my statement that I think that libertarianism and conservatism are travelling the same path.”
And here, where it is explained that the Republican Party USED to hold to Ron Paul’s foreign policy. It’s actually the Republican Party that has left Conservatism, rather than Ron Paul.
See here.
War, Ron Paul, and Conservatism
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUoWhWsOWk
B_rad
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:10pmRomney is not the conservative we need, no argument there, but I could hold my nose and vote for him a thousand times before I would ever vote for Newt. Newt is not only big govt., he’s MASSIVE, GIGANTIC, HUGE, internationalist progressive government. Newt is a lying liar who lies about everything depending on his audience at the time. He praises the worst presidents in our history – people who should have never be praised but instead jailed. He tries to say that they maybe did bad things but he praises them for the good they did. That’s like saying Hitler was great man because he spearheaded the Beatle. That anyone can say Wilson was great, along with both Roosevelts and Jackson, that he singles them out has the greatest, IS DISGUSTING. Newt is a brilliant man and a knowlegable historian, there is no way he doesn’t know what all 4 of them have done to this country. I’m appalled that so many conservatives, who lamented how the Democrats ignored all the obvious things about Obama as they were wowed by his pretty speeches, are now doing the EXACT SAME THING with Newt. Go ahead, make him the nominee. If you like Obama, you’re going to LOVE Newt. Count on it.
Report Post »marion
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:25pmI may not be real fond of Newt’s immigration ideas, but compared to self-deportation, it is a little more realistic. Remember, Newt says he will have a completely fenced border by January 2014, and then start dealing with the problem. Ain’t no way we can deport everyone with the border open for starters, and the point of there being a difference between a visitor, resident, worker program, and citizen, gives the ability to identify people in the country, something self-deportation does not do.
There is no quick fix for this problem, but there are enough rules and laws on the book to enact those laws. If not mistaken, doesn’t the amnesty that Reagan passed have the completion of the fence in it already? Have to start somewhere because the current system does not do anything but argue about it being a problem.
Report Post »ambrosia
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:43pmListen to Mark Levin-
Read why he says Conservatives must vote for Gingrich over Romney.
Floridians, America is counting on YOU to do the RIGHT thing !
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Levin-talk-radio-GOP/2012/01/27/id/425764?s=al&promo_code=E0ED-1
And THIS, from OUR Gal, Sarah Palin
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Sarah-Palin-Gingrich-attacks/2012/01/27/id/425784?PROMO_CODE=E0E9-1
America needs a REAL Leader…Wise, Strong, Fearless !
NEWTONIANS UNITE !
tSay NO to LIARs & manipulators-
Willard Mutt Romney, the RNC rats & their filthy, talking heads.
Vote against “Establishment” FRAUD-
VOTE for NEWT GINGRICH !
America’s Best
Report Post »Gingrich/West 2012
http://www.newt.org
lillymckim
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:48pmIf Huntsman gets the VP nod I will officially quit voting altogether
Report Post »Twinspeedr
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 4:56pmSarah, Sarah, Sarah… Newt Gingrich? Seriously? This is who you put your support behind?
You are so easily deceived and seduced by political influence. At least your true colors have come out now. You have lost my support, end of story.
Report Post »jonnydoe
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:35pmWhat the heck is she talking about? Newt IS the establishment!!
Report Post »ambrosia
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:43pmNOT to be missed-
Here‘s the audio link of Mark Levin coming to Newt’s defense
and exposes the slimy Willard Romney & RNC,
for their sleazebag mentality.
Levin, as always, gift wraps the Romney & “establishment” crap,
ties it up, in a pretty ribbon
and leaves it, steaming, on their front steps.
Good on ya’ Mark !
Go get em’, Gingrich !
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/if-this-is-what-the-conservative-movement-has-become-then-count-me-out/
America’s Best
Report Post »Gingrich/West 2012
We are Americans
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:58pmThis is the reason she didn’t run for
Report Post »president. To support Newt ? Gotta be kidding
me. At least Mitt finished all four of his years
as governor. What’s Glenn have to say?
Spyder
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 6:13pmIf Grinchy or Mittens get the nod and Ron Paul doesn’t jump on the Indie ticket, my vote goes to any 3rd party at that point. ANY! They are establishment and have no connection to everyday citizens.
Palin has shown her true colors and they are not the Red,White and Blue of the TEA party. She is on the black list for Bought-and-Paid-for political figures who split the vote last time around so that Obummer could win. Ya’ Betcha!
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:11pmWasn’t Palin behind the last losser ? Just saying she may have a“ big mouth little feet” syndrom.
Report Post »cuinsong
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:44pmStop, take a breath, This song is for all of you! http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_9134749
Report Post »Bush Hating Conervatives make me sick
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 8:22pmPeople don’t be fooled! No way in HELL, does Romney pick Huntsman as VP.. He brings nothing to the table, plus you’d have 2 mormans. That’s not happening..
I think this guy, is just trying to scare people off, from voting Romney..
The VP, will either be, Christie, Santorum, Jindal, Rubio, Rice, maybe Brewer
Report Post »EL ZORRO
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:24pmLet there be no doubt, we have a utterly CORRUPT government, both DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN, there is a establishment criminal oligarchy, run by the COUNCIL OF FOREING RELATIONS, CFR, that select presidents acording to the agenda previosly stablishet on the Builderberg group annual mettings, where they study the felling of the country mod and select wich party put in the White House to carrie the plan for they NEW WORLD ORDER: DNC+GOP+MEDIA=CFR; the ESTABLSHMENT will select they PUPPET and the MEDIA will support it and carrie the water for him/her.
Report Post »EL ZORRO
Chuck Stein
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:59pmRemember how miserably Sarah palin was treated by the media in 2008? I do. I bet that SHE certainly does. Now consider how Newt has gotten so many votes for “taking on” and “talking tough” to debate moderators (members of the media). I think this is a big part of what is driving Sarah Palin in her endorsement. She is acting on emotion. She is livid with the media and she sees Newt as a sort of paladin to champion her (well grounded) grudge with the media.
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:16pmRomney could not even win against McCain last time, and now he is supposed to go up against Obama, the supposed greatest orator of all time. He may buy the nomination, but I doubt he will win the general and people will be wondering what happened. With all that’s being said by the Media, and people falling for it, it’s looking more and more like Obama will be re-elected.
Report Post »Mizurax
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:19pmOMG, he’s got an “R” next to his name. We must support him! Don’t you dare say anything negative about him. Speak only happy thoughts. Because he’s a republican!
Wake the F up.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:22pmA DOCTORS LABOR IS NOT MY RIGHT Can your guy ever be president?
Report Post »http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man?id=e2f15397-a3c7-4720-ac15-4532a7da84ca
Wont happen…..
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 2:47am@RepubliCorp,
“Can your guy ever be president?” …
“Wont happen…..”
Why not? Our Founders held his views.
See here.
Thomas Jefferson on Secession (1803)
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/8508.html
“The future inhabitants of the Atlantic & Missipi [sic] States will be our sons. We leave them in distinct but bordering establishments. We think we see their happiness in their union, & we wish it. Events may prove it otherwise; and if they see their interest in separation, why should we take side with our Atlantic rather than our Missipi descendants? It is the elder and the younger son differing. God bless them both, & keep them in union, if it be for their good, but separate them, if it be better.”"
Whatever wrongs the South – as well as Lincoln, since he was a racist tyrant, himself – did to many black people at the time, Lincoln did not have the Constitutional authority to keep states in the Union.
I know there’s more to the article, and I’ll address them like I likely have done before, if you bring up specifics here in the comments; but give Ron Paul credit for this one, for now, ok?
He’s trying to get us back to the founding principles of local self-government, sound currency, and non-interventionism.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 10:59amAH, I see the typical PAULBOTS and OBAMA supporters are trolling again, paid by SOROS.
SIMPLY PUT: Sarah Palin is the Most Important AMERICAN WOMAN Alive today. She has gained the respect of millions and millions for her ‘no-nonsense’ truth-telling; her insight into what our nation needs in order to regain it’s status as the “CITY ON THE HILL”.
Report Post »Zorro6821
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 12:13pmPalin, your 15 minutes are up….your true colors show and It its always about Palin and what Palin can gain financially and politically. Just leave the stage already, nobody cares what you say.
Report Post »stogieguy7
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 12:16pmHuntsman would bring nothing to the table as VP. Normally, you want someone who will bring in some voters – geographically or ideologically. Or, you pull in the party runner-up to promote unity. Huntsman does none of this for a Romney ticket.
By the way, Palin shooting her mouth off makes me wonder whether she really wants to see Obama defeated. Or is she hoping to set herself up for ‘16?
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 12:18pmI can’t believe the Acrimony from so called Paul supporters on this page toward Mr Palin. Your claim you come from the Conservative side of the political spectrum is in serious doubt, you sound more like spoiled brats toward anyone that does not function as a sounding board for your feelings. Maybe that is why many think of you as zealots and an Embarrassment to Dr Paul
Report Post »stogieguy7
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 12:19pm@Patty Henry: You need help. A psychiatrist, not a psychologist because you need drugs of some sort.
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 2:53pm2012 is only step 1 – i.e get BHO out! If we don’t get step 1 done, there won’t be any other steps, ever.
Report Post »http://youtu.be/7kqVZUCRth0?t=9m49s
rinnyroo
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 4:37pm@ HAZ-KILTEOD
this was a commnet made by rep. congressman jason chaffetz on his facebook page….. pay close attention to THE SLAVES, NWO AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN….. these are the good old boys elite club working for romney. harrasing newt in florida at all his campaign stops
Report Post »rinnyroo
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 4:39pm2 HAZ-KILTEOD
HERE IT IS…………..
A picture is worth a thousand words. The subtlety of U.S. mainstream media censorship is exposed in the action occurring, inconspicuously, to the left of this photo, in the face of the lovely white woman monitoring the voice of the long haired, faceless, androgynous, Undecided Conservative Republican Latin-American Voter. Note to any intelligent person patiently standing next in line to ask a question of the individual asking to be Commander in Chief of the most powerful military force in the “free world” in 2012: If your question is not in the form of praise for going to war in the Middle East with Iran, then don’t bother to follow the rules and ask politely to have your voice heard. Welcome to the New World Order United Slaves of America 2012 election. Let the games begin. …. IT’S PRETTY TELLING WHO THESE PEOPLE ARE AND WHAT WE ARE TO THEM
Report Post »rinnyroo
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 4:40pm@ HAZ-KILTEOD
THIS IS JUST A PART OF WHAT IS GOING ON IM SURE THERE IS MORE DIRTY STUFF GOING ON.. TIME TO START CALLING THEM OUT… RE: Romney campaign surrogates originating from Capitol Hill are stepping up their own campaign that includes following former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to each of his campaign stops in Florida.
Congressman Jason Chaffetz, Utah Republican, Congressman Connie Mack, Florida Republican, Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack, California Republican, and Congressman Charlie Bass, New Hampshire Republican are appearing at Gingrich events to speak to the press and “rebut” Speaker Gingrich’s remarks on the campaign trail.
I WILL participate in making sure every constituent you represent is aware that you believe it’s alright for you leave your duties to go harass Newt Gingrich while he is campaigning. Mitt Romney will pay the price for ripping off Medicare through Damon and YOU will pay a price for this despicable activity you are now taking part in. You will regret this. I’LL BE MAKING CALLS TO WASHINGTON TOMRROW BECAUSE THIS IS DISGUSTING DIRTY POLITICS
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 7:32pmIt is amazing that sooo many people here who are good Patriots are making/regurgitating these cliche, set up, propaganda/PR, Bernays style arguments and not even relizing that they are being used by their own enemy. I include Glenn Beck in this. I am not defending Gingrich specifically here but the arguments made against him are those set up by the Progressive establishment who is trying to knock him down. Even those who support Paul are falling for this. As an example, the CFR argument was started and propogated by the progressive establishment and the Paulies fell for it. I am not saying that Gingrich is the best but he is the best to stop Romney in FL just as Paul is the best to stop Romney in VA and NV. The progressive left is fooling all of you and using you as tools. How does that feel? You are a tool of your enemy.
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 8:44pmRemember this “Reagan” was not the choice of the Republican establishment either .. FORD was…. and HE lost to the second worst President … Carter!
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 8:48pmOk…I’m over Sarah. Next.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 9:54pmWow, since when did Miss Palin turn progressive?
Report Post »kspatriot
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:37amPalin became a part of the “big government establishment” she railed against. She “sold out”. Her endorsement of John McCain over the Tea Party candidate for senate said it all! The fact that so called “Tea Party” people are NOT backing the one TRUE Tea Party candidate, RON PAUL, is a disgrace. They all cried about restoring the country to our Founding Principles, yet the ONLY candidate that vows to do that and acually MAKE REAL CUTS IS RON PAUL. She is a HYPOCRIT. Glenn Beck is right there with her.
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:50amSorry bud but Ron Paul is a FRAUD. As for Palin, I have been wondering why Gingrich hasn’t called out Mutt for his Alinsky tactics from the start in Iowa. Mutt can’t win a debate on ideas so he uses the liberal tactics of name calling and lies. He is a progressive in his own words and obviously has learned the liberal playbook well. OBummer will portray Mutt as part of the 1%, which he is, and use class envy warfare in the campaign to destroy Mutt.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:16pmShe is beyond a hypocrit. She will say and do anything for any attention she can get. She has had more then her share of blasting away at the party and now she is having fits about them doing it. She needs to go back to reality shows.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:32pmYou Paulbot are frothing at the mouth today. Oh just so you know Paul is a Libertarian not a Conservative, there is a difference you know.
Report Post »resme
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:33pm@paper, In 1975, Ronald Reagan stated, “I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism”.
Silly newtbots wanting to move the moon after you have started world war 3.
Report Post »drobarts
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:48pmEven though Ron Paul is not my first choice, I certainly would not have to hold my nose voting for him, (as long as its not a 3rd party ticket). I love your comments on Sarah, she has become a total joke. I say that, having been a fan of hers at one time, I and I don’t mean in the same sense as though who worship her.
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:51pmGuess What…KSPatriot…
Sarah Palin, in her ENTIRE LETTER, does NOT single out Gingrich.
She points out Establishment GOP using Alinsky tactics against Ron Paul,
and other Tea Party-minded candidates, as well.
This article and caption….are extremely misleading.
Report Post »What happened to TRUTH?
Because you care so much, you would appreciate Palin’s entire letter.
patriot308
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:36pmExcept… you spelled S A N T O R U M wrong…. not crazy uncle ron……
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:58pmPaper, look at my post above moron. You can call us Paulbots and I will call you moron. I believe that is fair.
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:37pmOnly Ron Paul and the Paulies call Paul ‘the one true Tea Party candidate. Get a life people
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 7:42pmHey @West Coast, if I had a dollar for every time one of you Paulies called someone a moron, simply because he did not agree with you, I would be as rich as Romney.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 9:58pmShasta, I will call anyone a moron that wants to call me a Paulbot anyday. That is what you people do not understand. We Paul supporters started out talking about our chosen candidate and what he believes in, just to be bombarded by people calling us kooks, crazy, Paulbots, Paulies, and a range of other derogetories. You all seem to think that we should just take this abuse and stay positive. Well, you are wrong. We will fight back with everything and anything we can. We are in a revolution and I can tell you this, when the economy crashes, and it will, and any of you progressive followers come to me for help, as I am very prepared, I will turn you down. It will be war at that point and you all can suffer for what you are about to bring upon your family and mine for your ignorance. I have been talking about this scenario for over twenty years, and it is upon us now. You can continue to stay blind at what is happening here but I have been awake and preparing for years. I have weapons, ammo, gunpowder, reloaders and enough food and water to keep my family alive for at least five years. How are you prepared? When this country goes under, you will be looking for help from people like me, but I will tell you to take a flying leap as I tried to help you now and you would not listen. Have fun in your destitute life that will end soon because you would not wake up when called upon.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 11:01pm@DROBARTS
Report Post »DROBARTS
I love your comments on Sarah, she has become a total joke. I say that, having been a fan of hers at one time, I and I don’t mean in the same sense as though who worship her.
.
IMO this is the problem of seeing Mrs Palin as a Celebrity. Celebrity is one inch deep and does not hold Loyalty. Mrs Palin articulates a political point of view which has depth and is not easily abandoned.
Of Course if you merely see her as entertainment then I can understand your claiming to be an Ex-Fan
paperpushermj
Posted on January 30, 2012 at 11:05amWEST COAST PATRIOT
Report Post »Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:58pm
Paper, look at my post above moron. You can call us Paulbots and I will call you moron. I believe that is fair.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I could call it fair, but in your case ….it’s Inaccurate
qzak491
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:36amI THINK THE WRITE IN CANDIDATE SHOULD BE NONE OF THE ABOVE.
See who wins.
Report Post »10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:01pmObama
Report Post »10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:03pmObama. He will be running too, incase you forgot.
Report Post »natebub
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:30amTo me this is just sad,,,Talking about a dog returning to its own vomit……I stood at the Alamo with Glenn at one of the First Tea Parties. Everyone hoopin and hollaring about how they were fed up with politicians and we wanted to boot them all out……Now were down to Newt and Mitt. After all the work thats been done just seems it was for nothing. Where is George Washington…….
Report Post »RDG013
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:41amThe real scary part is Romney may get the Rep Nomination! A man that voted for Carter and MOndale over Reagan and whose father praised Saul Alinski? So Palin brings up Mitt and the establishment are using Alinski tactics, maybe she should also help bring to light on how Mitt‘s father ws a fan of Alinski’s? The apple does not fall far from the tree and Mitt is right there hanging out at the bottom of the tree!
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:43am@natebub,
“Now were down to Newt and Mitt. After all the work thats been done just seems it was for nothing. Where is George Washington…….”
George Washington held Ron Paul’s foreign policy, so does that mean you’re going to vote for him?
See here.
Washington’s Farewell Address
http://www.heritage.org/initiatives/first-principles/primary-sources/washingtons-farewell-address
“The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.”
Report Post »natebub
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:51amI’m just talking about how us,,,,the people who were fed up with all these politicians,,,,we put nobodys in Congress that came from nowhere,,,,,how the heck did we end up with these two… Obama basically came from nowhere in a very short time. How the heck could we not do the same thing…..Its just like I said,,,a dog returning to its own vomit. We ran right back to the ones we wanted to kick out,,,,,,Its our fault these are our choices and nobody elses!
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:54amHey — I was there too. We should all “hang in there” – keep doing what we can……things usually as they seem and we don’t know everything. Plus unexpected things usually happen to change the course – whatever. It’s still early. We’re on the right track – also God is in control. I finally just came to the conclusion that we must pray that He will interevene however necessary and put in whoever it is He wants that will do the necessary stuff at this point. He‘s the only one who knows the future and people’s hearts. But I know one thing for sure — all of us must vote for whoever the nominee is. You can vote your “conscience” in your state election but then if the nominee is different — please vote for him. Your non-vote is a vote for Obama – if you are one of those that says he won’t vote — you don‘t understand what we’re up against – please check out: http://www.commieblaster.com
Report Post »Also remember that even if we get a Progressive in, if we win both Houses, which I think is likely – they will keep him in check.
natebub
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:56amNever read anywhere George Washington Blame America for evreything and I doubt he would now. Your gonna tell me if George Washington had been pres that on 9-11 he would have not done anything??? Oh well its our fault,,,,sorry guys. You and all the rest of you Ron Paul Robots are smoking to much of the stuffthe stuff he wants to legallize……Shut UP… they all make me sick.
Report Post »10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:10pmNo “normal” people can run. It takes too much money. Palin was the last one and the closest to a “normal” person I have seen running for high office. We the people screwed the system up by not holding them accountable. They grab power and we vote for them again. Who is to blame in your eyes?
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:44pmAgree…and that is what Palin’s entire letter is about.
This article has refocused her words…
She has a much broader concern,
upon which she elaborates at length…yes, it is long…and in detail.
She is concerned in the same way you are…
Report Post »and not candidate-focused, as this article misrepresents!
GeorgieJo
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:17pmRDGO13?
Report Post »PLEASE provide PROOF of your words regarding Romney and how he voted.
Me thinks you drink too much kool-aid.
Ohio Guy
Posted on January 29, 2012 at 3:05pmCheer up! My understanding is that alot of Tea Party activists are living out what Beck said by looking locally for solutions not to Washington DC. Putting their energy and focus on local offices and state legislatures but also on the House & Senate. A more heavily TEA influenced Congress can be a major roadblock to Obama or hopefully a force steering a Republican President to govern as a conservative. Many of the Tea Partiers in Ohio believe it is necessary to beat the Republicans first before taking on the Democrats by that I mean primary challenges on local & State races.
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:28amPalin Spin
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:30amYour name is inaccurate.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:32amPalin Truth
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:43amPATTY – Good one LOL
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:54amMore “Blah-Blah-Blah-are you getting my good side?-Blah-Blah-Blah-How’s my makeup?” from yet another one that was too gutless to join the race, but has to hop in front of the cameras every chance she has in order to stay relevant.
Report Post »BuggiOlleo
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:26amNote to all Floridians;;;
Read a RReagan speech–ANY of them. Then, go meditate, pray do whatever it is you do..
the ire 31 of Jan is coming soon.
Do we really want to tap a Candidate as Supreme already?! I cannot.
If it takes pulling a lever for a long horse or the underdog–maybe the favorites might start to get in shape-better in shape.or wake the F-up..
NO MORE freakin elected leaders not listening or having the cahones to go against the Tide of American Voice
My nose I can pinch; but, the Country will not survive any dark horse RINO or a Neo Conservative..
I say draw the Primary out.. Check these politicians and let them know..No more ..
No more tinkering Legislative cloaked Leadership
No more spending
No more tapping favorites for lobby or work
No more taxing just to breath
No more condoning Destruction of our Constitution
No more borrowing from our future
No more neglecting our voice
No more terrible International Policy deals..the one like ACTA–who knew
No mores until you are exhausted — with all the Hypocrisy in WDC
and my favorite bone,–
NO more UN
We need to get the New Tea Party Version into the Old Slap on the Back version of our Government..
Grasshopper, choose wisely–and may we have faith that the best Candidate continue to surface and
Freakin listen for a change.. !!
Don no bout you mate, I am exhausted– since before Iowa …Geeze!
Report Post »RReagn..To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sai
10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:33amYou ROCK. Love the post.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:36amVoting Santorum on Tuesday in Florida.
OMG … OBAMA MUST GO 2012!
Report Post »Theodwulf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:24amI used to love her…Then she backed Newt Gingrinch…. we had to put her…. on television…riding snowmobiles around…
Newt is a sleeze and is corrupt, Palin is squandering the last bits of her credibility on him…so sad. I don’t like Romney, I despise Gingrich. I will hold my nose when I vote Romeny, I will NOT vote for Gingrich. He can say “Ronald Regan” all he wants we know he is a phony.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:31amWe are on the same page! I totally agree!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:35amLas Vegas billionaire Sheldon Adelson(who claims to be the richest Jew) and his wife donated
Report Post »10 million to Newt’s campaign.and in the process strong-armed the Nevada Republican Party to allow Clark County to have a special after-sundown caucus for Jewish Republicans at the Adelson Educational Campus, a private school in Las Vegas founded by Adelson. The special Adelson caucus would reportedly accommodate some 500 conservative observant Jewish voters (remember Romney lost Iowa by only 8 votes!) who presumably would be observing religious traditions on Saturday. Gingrich, lacking organization and campaign efforts in the Silver State, is having his billionaire buddy try and buy an election for him. The rest of the general population is instructed to take part in caucuses Saturday morning starting in various locations from 9 a.m. to noon. Under Nevada caucus rules, there’s no absentee voting allowed; if voters are working or unable to attend because of business or personal issues, they can’t participate. But, if you’re rich in this state, you can buy anything, including a caucus Adelson has been under criminal investigation for a year by the Department of Justice and the Securities Exchange Commission for alleged bribery of foreign officials http://www.dailypaul.com/208974/we-need-help-in-nevada-now-please-write-letters-about-the-theft-of-our-caucus
10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:37amUh, there are two others running?! RP crazy as he is with votes he can still send a message to the party, or Santorum so you can choose the smallest of the big government guys.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:20pmAgree with you totally. When she ran around campaigning for mccain was the beginning of showing what she is.
Report Post »jank0614
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:57pmI was caught offguard when Palin said that it‘s not Bachmann’s time. But then when she came out for Newt? Now I’m through with her. She’s not who we thought she was. I know what the Tea Party stands for in Texas. And I know what I stand for. Did Santorum withdraw or something? Why are people here saying we’re down to Newt/Mitt? There might as well be 3 Obamas running.
Report Post »My vote goes for Santorum. Period.
standupbcounted
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:52pmWhere is the Sarah Palin who said she wasn’t going to endorse anyone? I used to think she was an honest person but her supporting Newt has left me thinking she just likes to be on TV and in the news and makes me wonder what position in his cabinet Newt has promised her?? Sarah your opinion is worthless. You are certainly not a tea party leader if you can support Newt..
Report Post »youguysready_letsroll
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:19amThe truth has no agenda. So, what are the facts about Gingrich? Do they suggest that he is a conservative?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:36amHave you seen All the News??
Report Post »10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:06pmI guess you don’t do your own homework!
Report Post »youguysready_letsroll
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:48pmThese were just rhetorical questions hahaa. I know the facts – just trying to provoke thought.
Report Post »HAZ-KiltEOD
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:16amWhy does no none mention that it was Newt and Rueben who wrote the legislation to repeal the Glass-Stiegel act which lead to the economic collapse of 2008? What about Newts bi-sexual relationship with Rep Steve Gunderson? Are our memories that short? Newt is a progressive tool of the central banks, a huge fan of the Fed, and even has ties to the Bank of International Settlements (old NAZI money) if Newt or Sarah are elected (who I find both very entertaining) the pendeulm will stop swinging. Can you say “Welcome to the technocratic-oligarchical world government” Folks, its all over :(
Report Post »johnnylingo
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:15amI can’t tell when Newt is telling the truth. He said the other night that Romney is pro abortion, Something Romney has explained on several debates and denied. We already have a LIAR IN CHIEF. We can’t believe a word he speaks, I don’t want another 4 years of not being able to listen to a lying president. Newt treats us voters like we were one of his sick wivrs. While he’s looking for another wife he lies to us..ROMNEY/RUBIO 2O12
Report Post »karenm
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:22amRomney already said that he had a pivot point about abortion. He changed his mind about it- lots of people do this. New is a progressive.
Report Post »Eugene1
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:27amRomney is honest as the day is long. True Mormons that are in good standing must be honest and true in their dealings with their fellow men. How many of us pay 10% of our total income to our church on top of his bigger tax burden than most of us.
Report Post »Gamaliel
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:28amTO JOHNNYLINGO
If you believe Romney is prolife check this out. If you want the slickest politician the Republican Party is offering keep up the attacks on anyone who gets close to Romney!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4
Report Post »lost tribe
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:36amMitt Romney, as you all know is a Mormon. He is an ex-Bishop. Abortion to a Mormon is murder and to have one or advocate one would get you excommunicate faster than you can say it. Anyone who thinks Mitt was, or is ever in favor of abortion does not know what they are talking about.
Report Post »johnnylingo
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:53amI watched your video. When running for Governor , he said he would uphold and defend the law of the state. ,Which he did.Didn’t mean he liked it. We are a nation of laws. If you don’t like them change them. He chose not to make that his fight at that time and kept his word to those people who had made that choice.
Report Post »RJL
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:28pmHey Gringo what about the babys right to choose? This guy is worse than Obama. We new how corrupt Obama was when he got elected. He didn’t try to hide it. But Willard (my turn to talk) Romney uses his millions spreading lies and dragging up others past when if he is elected will be the most corrupt Republican that was ever selected.
I can‘t believe his church don’t throw the bum out. Must be the millions he gives them that keeps him in good standing.
Report Post »Trading_barracuda
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:14amRon Paul is the ONLY candidate who can attract massive support from conservatives and liberals for the win.
If the people really want Obama evicted, they need to start sending $5 a week — every week — to Ron Paul’s campaign http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
A very small price to pay to get the IRS and Obama Inc. out of our lives.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:21amThat’s right.
Somebody tell Palin it isn‘t about who we’re running against, but it’s about who and what our next president is.
Sarah and Newt are progressives. We don’t want any (…or another) progressive president.
Ron Paul 2012.
Not a progressive bone in his body.
Report Post »Fus Patrol
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:13amWhy in the $&@$ is she supporting this “Wilsonian” who loves FDR, Teddy, and Wilson probably three of our worst Presidents ever? She made herself irrelevant by refusing to run (scared Sarah?) and now is just trying to grab attention by supporting Newt. Newts critics use his own words and actions to be critical, nothing “Alinsky” about that. Go hunt some bear Sarah, you are not needed here.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:21amYep!
Report Post »dcart888
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:24amWhy is Sarah supporting Newt? She perceives wronged by MSM as she made tactical errors and played victim now she’s coming to side of another so called victim who has left a trail for us to judge him by. Bigger issue is she wants chaos and a brokered convention so she can step in as candidate! Sarah we are onto you. You have supported Newt you can‘t come out later when Romney wins and say I didn’t endorse!
Report Post »10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:31amLook how she was/is treated. I do not think she is sticking up for him I take it as she is trying to make the selection process about the differences in policy or management style not personality. She was pointing out that Newt has some good qualities, which he does, and not to take what is said about each person as the truth. Take away the person let their actions, past and stated for the future speak for them and decide if you beleive them as well as decide if that is the direction you want the country to go. I do not blame her for her view of the GOP machine
Report Post »RIGHTNOWLEFTBEHIND
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:47amI truly believe the reason Gingrich has people like Sarah defending him is the following:
Report Post »1: there is a bloodlust in some parts of the conservative/tea party community to see Obama not just defeated, but having his butt kicked publicly by someone who can zing an zap him verbally to loud republican and hopefully enough swayable indies cheers in a debate and these folks see Newt as a Mike Tyson (debate wise).
2: There is also an unfortunate view in many of the same circles that this is in some ways entertainment, like the way my wife watches women fight and argue on those stupid Real Housewives shows. This view plays into the above.
Bottom line, Glenn has done more to expose the evils of progressives on the right and left in America than anyone else (incl Rush). The facts are clear by Newt’s own words. Three or four yrs ago we had an excuse to still vote for a Newt and still think we were truly small govt conservatives. Now anyone who has paid attention and done their homework has none. Unfortunately, I fear there may be too many who are willing to just toss all of the evidence aside to watch ” a WWE style steel cage death match between Obama an Newt. This will be like eatin a gallon of ice cream at once. It will feel good but you will regret it later.
Principles first. Try to be GW. This election is too important to ignore the warnings. It won’t fix everything, but it will be a start.
13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:13amYou dolts are so fast to bash Sarah, you make Perfect little DEMOCRATS. With you’re panties in a bunch, and woosie,” I don’t like her anymore” attitude, welcome to Barry’s Four More Years.
Report Post »nanzofsc
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:17amAMEN!!! Well said! GB, the establishment and these will hand Barry 4 more!
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:19amElecting Newt “big ideas big solutions” CFR member along with Soros Gingrich will solidify 4 more years of Maobama.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:35pm@CIRCA53 Bingo!
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:13amSarah is simply wrong about Gingrich. Gingrich’s history tells the real story – he is morally bankrupt and cannot be trusted. As Rick Perry said in the December ABC debate, “If you cheat on your wife, you’ll cheat on your business partner” – or, as president, the American people. America cannot risk electing Gingrich. Gingrich is as dirty as obama and would be equally as devastating to America.
Report Post »nanzofsc
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:16amAnd the bible says if you ask forgiveness, God is willing to forgive. He is not selective – like those of you!
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:17am4 More Years, Four More Years,
Report Post »Debbie0819
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:55pmSarah isnt endorsing yet she comes out for NEWT? Newt and his wife…two cheaters. Sarah forgets who put HER in power and who can take HER out. Sarah works for Fox News…she is one of those GOP establishments now also. I just wish Sarah would be quiet and honestly, I have tuned her out.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:56pmThey are certainly two peas in a pod.
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:12amOne unelectable person sticking up for another unelectable person. Yawn. Next…
Report Post »dmforman
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:52pmAgreed. I never knew what people saw in her in the first place. She is showing her true colors and she is worse than I could have imagined.
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:30pmYep, New’ts running mate.
Does suicide count if you have a good reason? (sarcasim) for all you mother types!
Here’s hoping Newt, Sarah, B O and Nancy all bugger off!
The American People 2012!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:08amI bet Newt would be kinda tasty. He would be like a fatted calf…Well marbled.
For the life of me I cannot see what she sees in Newt. He is a Big Government Progressive.
You Newt supporters tell me how we are supposed to pay for that Colony on the moon that Newt wants….Anyone?
Report Post »dcart888
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:12amExactly Romney talks about cutting big govt. Newt says American colony on moon… from loans from China? Well then it would be Chinese colony Newt . Mitt right he panders to every community be it a bridge, NASA or whatever. One think I agree with that Ron Paul said at last debate. Send some politicians to the moon. Newt 1st and if Sarah continues supporting progressive Newt she can go with him. She has no clue she is ruining her career. Sarah take of Newt’s suicide vest he loaned you!
Report Post »nanzofsc
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:14am90% private sector – but obviously you don’t listen to or spew anything but garbage!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:15amSarah!! What the heck happened to you? Has that dream of being Newt’s VP clouded your judgement? I so supported you and even dissed Ann Coulter for dissing you..But now I see how wrong you would be for our country..Maybe you should have vetted Newt a little better.. I can‘t believe you haven’t I think you know exactly who he is..so what does that say about you? I have zero respect left for you.
Report Post »http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts
The_Jerk
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:15amRomney and Santorum are not the answer.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:20amPalin’s comments are about the lies and deceptions that are being used currently against Newt. These tactics were also used against Cain; remember? The RNC chosen one is not getting the same treatment from the media. AND Palin has NOT endorsed anyone. All of this is in the article.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:20amDecart: “Exactly Romney talks about cutting big govt.” Exactly, Romney TALKS about cutting big government, but when he had the chance, he did not. Bush TALKED about requiring an exit strategy before committing troops to harms way. Bush TALKED about nation building and how he would never participate in that action. TALK is cheap. And, the GOP has done a whole lot of talking.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:06pmNASA could certainly build a colony on the Moon. They know how to get there, and they know what to do when they land. Engineers have already designed the rockets, the spacecraft, the rovers, and inflatable habitats — all prepared after President George W. Bush proposed in 2004 to go back to the moon. That program was called Constellation. It lasted until President Obama took office.
Report Post »An American moon base could provide America with enough Helium-3 to provide for all of country’s energy needs. Nations and private companies are racing to be the first to scout the moon for Helium 3, a rare gas which could make almost unlimited, clean fusion energy a reality. Some experts estimate there a millions of tons in lunar soil — and that a single Space-Shuttle load would power the entire United States for a year.
Both China and Russia have stated their nations’ interest in helium-3. The U.S. could accelerate its gains in space by setting aside a share of NASA’s budget as prize money for private space companies. The commercial and military applications that would come from establishing a moon base would make the project worthwhile, and China might if we don’t. The potential for monetary return is huge.
Babeuf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:07pmCont…
The potential for monetary return is huge. Think of the payback you’d see from space tourism, alone… then realize that every time a new resource is tapped, every time a new technology is developed, every time a new system is successfully demonstrated, it will be a boon for those who have contributed towards making Man’s presence on the Moon a reality.
Newt is bringing up and important economic and national security issue, just like Kennedy did. He said by the end of his second term – about 9 years from now. Romney would have fired Kennedy! Newt is a visionary and not a simpleton. He does not want to go back to the Articles of Confederation like Paul. He does not want the current progression from Marx to Lenin to Alinsky to BHO to succeed like planned. Newt is for people who have an open mind, for people who want someone with experience in doing what needs to be done and for those who want America to be a leader into the future.
Report Post »Advancement of scientific knowledge, economic expansion, public engagement… it’s all there!
Babeuf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:09pmThe potential for monetary return is huge. Think of the payback you’d see from space tourism, alone… then realize that every time a new resource is tapped, every time a new technology is developed, every time a new system is successfully demonstrated, it will be a boon for those who have contributed towards making Man’s presence on the Moon a reality.
Newt is bringing up and important economic and national security issue, just like Kennedy did. He said by the end of his second term – about 9 years from now. Romney would have fired Kennedy! Newt is a visionary and not a simpleton. He does not want to go back to the Articles of Confederation like Paul. He does not want the current progression from Marx to Lenin to Alinsky to BHO to succeed like planned. Newt is for people who have an open mind, for people who want someone with experience in doing what needs to be done and for those who want America to be a leader into the future.
Report Post »Advancement of scientific knowledge, economic expansion, public engagement… it’s all there!
Baddoggy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:23pmWhat are you guys smoking? You really want colonies on the moon?
If you do then PAY FOR IT YOURSELF! re tards!
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:30pmYou asked a question, I answered it! You didn’t ask if “we wanted it” did you?
Report Post »******? Typical Ron Paul Alinksy tactic!
resme
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 1:35pmmove to the moon newtworldorderbots
Report Post »JustMel71
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:07amSarah Palin is more of a straight shooter than any other Fox News contributor. Did anyone know this about Mr. Gingrich? Bet you didn’t.
Newt Gingrich Testifies Against Al Gore/Cap & Trade, Rips Gore‘s Global Warming ’Facts’ To Pieces
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9bOfQItB8c
And before anyone ask, no I’m not a Newt supporter just trying to keep fair reporting on their toes. =)
Report Post »nanzofsc
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:15amThanks for sharing – I am a Newt supporter and thank you for your fairness!! I would do the same for another candidate!
Report Post »Eugene1
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:25amNewt has so many ideas that he can’t remember which side he is on in any given day. You can find proof of this anywhere you look. You can provide proof of his lambasting Gore over global warming and I can show you Newt sitting on a couch with Pelosi promoting the global warming lie.
I used to love Newt, but now he is Oscar the Grouch on steroids. He‘s proven time and time again that he can’t play with the other kids in the same sandbox without hurling insults and names at his playmates.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:26amNewt isn’t stupid…he changed some of his “facts” in his book because the global warming and cap and trade was exposed as a scam.. you ought to check out the website I provided above.. He knows how to tell the people what they want to hear.
Report Post »JustMel71
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:27am@nanzofsc You’re welcome. I‘m tired of the ’go get em and knock them out of the race’ attitude that has been happening as of late. We all must look at each candidate and decide who lines up with our core values and principles. Not allow right wing conservatives to put the idea of someone they don’t like into the firing squad and not vet all candidates equally. They all have their flaws but the most important thing to do is find the ideal candidate for whom you agree with not let others decide.
And to that note, here is Mitt Romney on carbon cap.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnryDuV9_SI
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:29amHa , So that would make Newt a flip flopper, just like you accuse Mitt of. I can give you entire pages of Newt flip flops, actual ones he voted for, like taking your 2nd amendment rights away from you for spanking your child, to name one of 100′s. Her’s a few dozen-.http://www.newtexposed.com/.
Report Post »Funny, you say your not a Newt supporter, I am guessing you are a Ron Paul supporter then, but just voting for Newt ?? Actually, now that you are quoting Soros, I have to wonder who it is you do stand for or behind. I see you posting comments reflecting how Glenn is right on, then, when Glenn doesn’t agree with your point of view, you post he only tells the truth when it fits his agenda. So what is it ?? If you support Ron Paul, well, here is a post where Newt and Gore agree on another matter, besides climate change, concerning nation building. ( From another Paul supporter) http://www.writehimin.com/newt-gingrich-and-al-gore-are-ideological-brothers-when-it-comes-to-nation-building/
Stoic one
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:35amYes thank you, I am not for Newt. I was confused on his stance on the climate because of the pelosi scene. I remember the 90′s well and now there is a coherent picture.
Report Post »All of these candidates are being maligned and we needs to hear them CLEARLY.
JustMel71
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:17pm@Hobbs57 It appears so. Romney and Gingrich have both been ‘for it before they were against it’. Now I have vetted Gingrich because a few months ago via someone from Twitter told me to not dismiss Gingrich’s baggage, so I didn’t. I looked into giving him the nod, although I believe he could beat Obama even now, he still doesn’t line up with my values. Only one that does that for me is Dr. Paul. Saying that, before I was putting my vote behind Dr. Paul only, I was all for Cain because of the media‘s character assassination he received only to find out he did send a ’friend‘ money for 13 years without his wife’s knowledge. Whatever truly happened between them really is anyone’s guess but certainly none of our business. He’s out.
As for quoting Soros, I was bringing up the fact that Wall Street would be no different with Obama or Romney from his opinion. Besides, Romney now receives the largest donations from Wall Street crowd. Do your own research on that. =) Yes some things I agree with Beck on and other things I don‘t and if I have a difference of opinion it’s because I think independently and feel at times it is bias reporting. Am I not allowed to think that way? Well maybe in your eyes I’m not allowed to but too bad, I do. Besides, Beck states in 2010 he knows the GOP is already giving Romney the nomination. It‘s not like he didn’t say that. I gave you the video proof. So in the end, yes I’m a Dr.Paul supporter and hope he get’s the nomination. Nice
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:20pmGINGRICH: Well, I never believed in Al Gore’s fantasies and, in fact, if you look at the record, the day that Al Gore testified at the Energy and Commerce Committee in favor of cap and trade, I was the next witness and I testified against cap and trade. And in the Senate, I worked through American solutions to help beat the cap and trade bill. Cap and trade was an effort by the left to use the environment as an excuse to get total control over the American economy, centralizing a Washington bureaucracy. In the end it had nothing to do with the environment. It had everything to do with their desire to control our lives.
Report Post »JustMel71
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 3:21pmNYT: Goldman Sachs ties enrich Romney
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46172017/ns/politics-the_new_york_times/
Don‘t know why I’m bothering to post this but I‘m hoping those on the fence or falling for the establishment’s tactics look a little deeper into our candidates.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:07amAlinsky tactics? How about having some eyes and ears and being aware of Newt’s true progressive colors Sarah? Newt is a “big ideas, big solutions” think tank progressive and if you don’t see that you are dumb as rocks. Newt started this campaign saying we need to unify and go after Obama, but now he has turned on his Alinsky style tactics on his own base. Newt and Obama are one in the same.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:23amGreat negative campaign. Who do you stand for, ?? and Why??
C/B Barry??
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:25pmRomney has more in common with Obama
Report Post »http://www.dailykos.com/tv/w/002651/
However, Beck did say that it was Romney’s turn, so I guess that makes it so! He is a prophet afterall, right?
http://gop12.thehill.com/2010/01/beck-its-mitt-romneys-turn.html
neverending
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:44pmSarah is aware of nothing more then when, where and how she gets her next attention AND $.
Report Post »Eugene1
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:05amI used to really like Palin, but now she is as much a political hack as the next crony in Washington. Don’t kid yourself . . she says she hasn’t endorsed anyone, but all she talks about is Newt. Hubby Todd has already endorsed Newt (like that carries much impact). She thinks someone will name her as VP again so she doesn’t want to burn her bridges. Her downfall started when she bailed out as the Alaskan governor for the big money and supposed power she should gain. Politics can ruin even the good people.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:23amWell said!
Report Post »10-32inIdaho
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:57amI think you may have a scewed view of the Alaska exit. I look at it like this- if a person is the president of a company and something happens to draw attention to them personally(Not about the company) that could cost the company a lot of money, if they take a volentary lay off saving unknown money and jobs, is that bad or good. It all comes down to their intent. I guess you do not give her the benefit of the doubt. Hey I think that is what she was saying! Give them the benefit of the doubt and let the facts help you decide not the nasty comments made by some ad paid for by a lobbiest sway you. Huh, I think I agree.
Report Post »Common.Cents
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:04amAnd to think, I used to like her. She is using the same “cannibalistic” rhetoric of OWS. And I am sorry, we are NOT re-writing history when using HIS OWN WORDS!
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:09amBingo!
Report Post »SychinLegacy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:04amOh Sarah, Sarah, Sarah…
We all see the game you are playing. Is “Alinsky tactics” the new flavor of the month phrase? Because that seems to be the only thing people are tossing around. Especially when someone is calling someone else a progressive. “YOU’RE JUST USING ALINSKY TACTICS!!!!”. Ironic huh?
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:39amThe only person left in the race that isn’t trying to build themself up .. by tearing others down is Santorum.
Santorum 2012!
Sarah you are backing the wrong “horse”.
Report Post »SychinLegacy
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 12:53pmExcept for that whole “OMG YOU WANT IRAN TO HAVE NUKES AND DESTROY ISRAEL” thing he says about Ron Paul every debate….
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 2:07pmSantorum will end “radical individualism” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gwwmm-cQxU&feature=youtu.be Santorum 1412!!!
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:04amThat’s how the GOP got Bush, Dole, Bush, and McCain… all big government, foreign meddling, progressives.
Report Post »NCREPUB
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:02amLooks like Romney has bought the Florida voters now!!
Report Post »dcart888
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:09amRomney paid 40% of his income between taxes & charity. Stop smearing this generous ethical man. Look at other candidates? Newt spends his money at Tiffany vs charity.
Report Post »Eugene1
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:19amdcart888 is absolutely right.
I know people who know Mitt and his family. He is as nice and honest as anyone can be and can also do what is necessary as president. This country will succeed with him as president and his wife as 1st lady. Both would bring honor and respect back to the White House.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:20amDCart is illiterate
Report Post »Eugene1
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:32amYou call others illiterate, but how can anyone take you seriously with the moniker “13th Imam”. If you subscribe to the Islamist faith, I apologize. If you don’t, then you are mocking someone else’s faith. In any case, leading with a religious icon takes you out of the fairness discussion.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:35amAlinsky Tactics ,.
Report Post »Don’t care what you think.
dcart888
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:01amThis isn‘t about Newt it’s all about Sarah. She did her not an endorsement endorsement for Newt after hubby supported newt few days prior. Sarah is sitting on sidelines trying to guide process to brokered convention where she plans to smile and state oh OK I’ll be your nominee. PUKE! I use to be one of her biggest fans as a former Alaskan but she has made so many tactically poor decisions I can’t support her for anything but Secy of Energy. Furthermore if you make a post of interest & facts without profanity on this FB article she deletes it. Sarah what happened to freedom of speech?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:05amJust illiterate rambling
Report Post »Fed up in Bama
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:11amNo wonder our country is as screwed up as it is. We have a knack at throwing good ppl under the bus.
Report Post »You tell ‘em Sarah. VET THEM GOOD!!
LeeroyJenkins
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 10:59amirrelevant. Oh I mean “Hi, my name is Sarah Palin.”
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:04amExample of Alinsky Tactics
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:15amOh gotcha because a half term governor did something to improve???? She sells books. What else? Reality TV? 40k a speech? She’s a rich feeding off suckers like you.
Report Post »dcart888
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:19amI totally agree she needs to pursue her career with reality TV shows. Everytime she’s on Fox I have to turn channel she uses same poll tested words in effort to paint herself as Reagan. The next great leader will use their own words with passion not flat quoting of such words.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 28, 2012 at 11:33amShes a rich feeding off of ppl like you.
Thanks Saul. Barry speaks the same way you do. Envy is a pathetic thing. Stealing is stealing what ever way you do it. Typical 47%er.
Report Post »