Politics

Sarah Palin Challenges Romney’s History of Job Creation at Bain

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin challenged GOP presidential front-runner Mitt Romney to furnish his tax returns and supporting documents that would prove he created the 100,000 jobs he claims he did while CEO of Bain Capital.

“Governor Romney has claimed to have created 100,000 jobs at Bain and people are wanting to know is there proof of that claim and was it U.S. jobs created for United States citizens?” Palin told Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

Palin said that transparency was needed as Romney would likely be targeted by Democrats on this issue if he were to become the Republican nominee.

Watch the segment below:

Comments (261)

1 2 3 4
  • BODYBAG
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:38am

    Ive been saying this since nearly the beginning….it isnt just the GOP establishment pushing
    Willard McRomney. The liberals and the Barry O Administration are also pushing him as the
    chosen nominee. There’s a reason for that.
    C’mon people wake up. If we allow McRomney to just waltz through and get the nomination
    then we’ve doomed this nation to another Obama term. Frankly the USA wont survive that.
    Santorum & Huntsman are establishment guys like McRomney. The only 2 wildcards are
    Ron Paul & Gingrich. As much as Paul’s message is appealing on many levels, he cant
    win. Gingrich is the only one who can go head-to-head with Obama and win.

    Report Post » BODYBAG  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:48am

      You’re insane. Obama fears going up against Romney.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:01am

      @jj

      I am sure he even smokes more now.

      Report Post »  
    • texrubarts
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:54am

      I agree with you… Gingrich is the one that can go against Obama and WIN…. Plus Gingrich can keep Ron Paul in check.

      Mittens is going to take our guns AWAY if he is elected – WAKE UP AMERICA…

      Gingrich/Paul 2012

      Report Post » texrubarts  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:00am

      Wrong.
      Yet another Newt-bot spreading baloney.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0Mh6a4mGFxw

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:03am

      Here’s an idea folks.. stick to what you know and stop spreading lies.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • Californiasodbuster
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:25am

      Right on
      Thank You

      Report Post »  
    • Californiasodbuster
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:26am

      To body bag
      Right on
      Thank You

      Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:01am

      You base your voting for people running for elected office on financial success, and not good moral character.
      ___________________________

      Good financial success is a HUGE reason why Romney would make the perfect POTUS to fix the economy. He’s had success in the private sector, in the state of Massachusetts and with the Olympic Games. He knows what the hell he’s doing and with a country in dire straights—FINANCIALLY, he’s what we need.
      By the way, you wanna talk about a electing someone with good moral character, I wonder if you voted for Bill Clinton??

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:04am

      JJ stick to what I know all right born and raised in Detroit his father was my governor for three terms guess what his father was a moderate Republican who worked with the unions at the time that was called the big three that I know to be fact. And that my friend was in the Jimmy Hoffa era in fact as a child going to school we would take field trips to the river Roush plant in downtown Detroit, and at that time living in the neighborhood the Romney’s lived a lavish lifestyle that is fact. So you throw out half-truths about your candidate without backing your statements up! There you go again! Just one question though if Newt Gingrich is what you make them out to be then why is the establishment throwing him under the bus and along what Wall Street backing Mitt Romney which they have from the start? Who would you say the real progressive is?

      Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:08am

      What did he promised all the foreign countries in return to bailout the Olympics is that public record? We are all led to believe that the Olympics are a profitable venue.

      Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:24am

      What half truths am I throwing out? Please enlighten me.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • Churchill
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 8:32am

      Are you high? I can’t believe there are honestly people like you in real life who believe Gingrich has the best chance against Obama. He’s got more baggage than all the other candidates combined. And he’s not even conservative, he’s a progressive just like O. I don‘t like Romney because he’s also a progressive and a flip flopper, but at least he’s got a chance against Obama and the polls back that up. The only two who do well against Obama are Romney and Paul so if you’re going to pick someone soley on electibility then you need to ditch Gringrich.

      Report Post »  
    • last frontier
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:59am

      DId the people on our side take a moron pill or a suicide pill? sure Obamanation will find the same stuff but now there going to have a ton of conservative footage to back it up, Sara I think John Mcain may have rubbed off on you in that last election.

      Report Post » last frontier  
    • mhannah.vera
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:33am

      @BODYBAG, I agree, I’ve been saying the same thing. The media has been pushing him too hard but if you noticed they also pushed Newt when they thought he was the “ONE”. When someone pushes a candidate like crack cocaine, beware!!!

      Report Post » mhannah.vera  
    • thegrassroots
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:33am

      The candidate issue would be settled if Sarah tossed her hat back in the ring.

      Sarah Is Who Scares BHO Into Paralysis. BHO Can‘t Stand Up To Sarah’s Honesty.

      I hope that Sarah‘s seeing more and more that there isn’t anyone in the candidate line-up who America needs. Not One Of Them Is The Total Package! It’s just bits and pieces scattered here and there among all of them.

      Notice here even. At the mere mention of Sarah’s name, the trollish types are forced to curl up in little balls and hopelessly hiss.

      Report Post »  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:48am

      I’m for Santorum and I wish that Perry and Gingrich would drop out right now.
      That being said, I think that some of the “flip flopper” hits on Romney are unfair. One of Romney’s supporters is Congressman Jason Chafetz — the number 2 rated conservative in the House of Representatives. Chafetz was a Democrat and an outspoken supporter of Dukakis in 1988. Guess what? Chafetz changed his political point of view. Education. It happens. People learn. On that note, I hope that Ron Paul’s candidacy will educate a lot of people about “Austrian” economics.

      Report Post »  
    • ItsMsBtch2U
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:13pm

      Obama fears NO ONE and the sooner people get that the better. He has blatantly broken the law on several occasions and nobody takes his sorry ass to task for it out of fear of being a racist. That fool created (C-R-E-A-T-E-D) more chaos and division since the civil war itself!

      WAKE UP people…this guy has been given a pass and a electronic pen which will be proven to be more dangerous than any nuclear weapon when it comes to the sovereignty of this country!!

      Report Post »  
    • FranciscoDAnconia
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:34pm

      This is a sad day for Sarah Pallin the tea party queen. I use to think I was a part of the tea party. After Sarah Pallin questioning Bain capital I am distancing myself away from the tea party. Turns out she is for the Washington insider. I don’t care about social issues. I want a great economy. I want jobs. Newt and sarah shame on you. Shame on you both.

      Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:37pm

      @Bryan

      Let’s talk morality for a moment. It is moral to earn money. It is moral to spend that money as you see fit. It is moral to be married and faithful in that marriage. It is moral to be more intelligent and wealthy than someone else. It is perfectly moral to be raised with privilege.

      It is not moral to covet the possessions and lifestyle of another (Commandment #10). It is not moral to believe that after having been paid for the hours you worked that you are somehow entitled to more hours than your employer is willing to give you. It is immoral to think that making money from your own company is evil if your employees haven’t been given as much as they want. It is immoral to slander a moral man with an exemplary family because he had more than you growing up or was able to live a “lavish” lifestyle.

      Poor people don’t provide jobs for anyone. Wealthy people do. And if it wasn’t for wealthy people who create and manage opportunity for themselves, there would be no opportunity for you. If you resent their wealth then by all means work hard and become rich and then show them how wonderful it is to give away all your money. Class warfare is immoral. God allowed Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, David, and Solomon to experience great wealth all while serving him. Job got to experience great wealth twice. Don’t be angry at the servant who received 5 talents and made them ten, when you choose to bury your one in the dirt for safekeeping. For that is truly immoral.

      Report Post »  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:18pm

      JJ, So since Mitt says so in a campaign clip, it has to be so. You don’t need to look at his record, just listen to him. I suppose if Barack Obama came out with a clip saying he truly believes in the Constitution, you would believe him too? The real 2nd amendment record of the candidates: http://gunowners.org/2012presidential.htm

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • 2theADDLED
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:15pm

      Romney has his wealthy buddies backing him up just like barry does and they are seeking crohny capitalism. Are you sure you want him and his buddies making money off your back just like barry. He is showing his arrogance just like Howard Dean did thinking it is all wrapped up just before he lost.

      Report Post »  
    • Jinglebob
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:22pm

      Don’t go there Sarah.

      Report Post » Jinglebob  
    • godlovinmom
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Sarah….come on girl…get in the race…show them what a true conservative is.

      Report Post » godlovinmom  
    • jnpg
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:57pm

      Stop listening to Stu and Pat. The GOP has one choice to beat Obama- that is Ron Paul. I am a 25+ yr Repub- I volunteered for the GWBush campaign in 04. I have woken up and Ron Paul is the reason. I agree with him 99%. I will vote for no one other than Ron Paul. The GOP needs us a heck of a lot more than we need them.

      Report Post »  
    • qzak491
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:03pm

      osama is romney, soros is probably backing romney as he is osama.

      Report Post »  
    • SEPARATENOW
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:38pm

      Never thought I’d say this…Sarah your 15 minutes are up. Sad.

      Report Post » SEPARATENOW  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:57pm

      BODYBAG
      Poll puts Ron Paul neck-and-neck with Obama
      http://rt.com/usa/news/poll-ron-paul-obama-467/

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • Bentrt
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:08pm

      In the interview Sarah Palin was clear she was against these attacks on capitalism (!); she only pointed out that Romney needs to backup his claim that he created 100,000 jobs while at Bain.

      She is also correct that Obama and his cronies will bring up many,many questions about Bain Capital and this issue needs to be fully addressed now. We need to diffuse the power of any attack on the GOP nominee, whoever that may be.

      Report Post »  
    • KTsayz
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:40pm

      Bodybag, Newt and Ron Paul couldn’t be more polar opposites if they tried.
      Newt voted for wars, more troops in those wars and for foeregin aid every time. Paul did not.
      Newt voted for the UN when he voted to grab land under the UN’s enviromental programs, energy subsidies, and conservation legislation. Ron Paul wrote a bill, HR 1146, to withdraw the US out of the UN and kick the UN out of the US.
      Newt voted for strengthening fed home loan agencies, Chrysler bailout, increase power to FDIC for bailouts, gas tax increases. Ron voted NO to all.
      Newt voted for increased regs on car manufacturers driving companies offshore, voted for increased power at FDA, voted for more regs on our natl waters per UN instructions. Ron Paul voted NO on all.
      Newt voted to extend HUD and to create several new bureaucracies. Paul voted NO.
      You can read Newt’s TERRIBLE voting record below and even watch videos provided if you are so inclined
      http://www.hithimagain.com/2011/11/13/newt-gingrichs-voting-record-cant-compare-to-ron-pauls/

      Newt is Big Gov, progressive, CFR global elitist if ever there was one.
      As for Mitt, when in college he protested FOR the Vietnam draft, then let daddy send him away to France for an extended vacation… I mean missionary work.
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083002/Mitt-Romney-19-demonstrated-favour-Vietnam-War-draft.html
      This tells me Mitt is more than willing to have OTHER people get killed in useless, but won’t let go himself or risk HIS fam

      Report Post »  
    • nationalcalvin
      Posted on January 13, 2012 at 1:49am

      @jj

      Sorry you’re wrong, Romney would lose to Obama. It’s funny that all you Romney supporters are all up in arms about Capitalism being attacked, and yet you support a man that instituted socialized medicine in his State. At one point in time Romney has supported nearly every position that Obama supports. What on earth would they have to debate about?

      Report Post »  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on January 13, 2012 at 2:10am

      BODYBAG, YES, Finally someone agrees with what I have been saying. Palin is absolutely correct, it needs to come out now rather that during the presidential election. Gingrichs dirty laundrey has been hung out in the open. Gingrich is the ONLY one who can successfully debate Obama. Paul will never be able to stand up to Obama.
      We do not have to settle for Romney. I agree, Wake Up People.

      Report Post » pamela kay  
    • nationalcalvin
      Posted on January 13, 2012 at 3:03am

      @PamelaKay

      I disagree, it has to be Santorum simply because he never supported an individual mandate. Santorum also has a better chance of taking out Romney. The reason Newt is attacking Romney in this manner is because they have held alot of similar positions. We need someone who can go after Romney on Romneycare and global warming, Newt can’t.

      I don’t know why nobody attacks Romney for working with John Holdren on setting CO2 caps in Massachusetts. For everyone that doesn‘t know John Holdren is the radical enviormentalist who is Obama’s science czar.

      Report Post »  
  • wordweaver
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:36am

    Sarah, very few people care what you think about anything. You are rapidly becoming a punchline and a footnote to history. Why Fox continues to give you a microphone is beyond me. I switch channels when you come on. Please just go away.

    Report Post » wordweaver  
    • JQCitizen
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:35am

      why ever should she go away; plenty of us think she is as good as any of the candidates running, and she certainly has as much right to speak out as any other public figure.

      And to boot, she has done more in her work term in Alaska to promote reform and fight corruption than many others, like Hollywood, and political consultants who’ve never run for anything, or held public office.

      After all, we’re hearing every day what Whoopie Pie, or Arrogant Huffington, or Karl Strove think, so I think Sarah, who has not forgotten what it means to be the American everyman(woman), deserves to be heard as much as any of them. She doesn’t claim to speak for everyone, but she often speaks what I am thinking.

      Report Post »  
    • ROMNEY2012
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:16am

      Sarah Palin is a Romney Hater.

      She supports the ANTI-CAPITALIST, 2x ADULTERER, Gingrich.

      PLease GO AWAY And SHUT UP Sarah.

      Your opininon’s are a waste of time.

      Report Post » ROMNEY2012  
    • Bentrt
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:34am

      Did you see the full interview?

      In the interview Sarah Palin was clear she was against these attacks on capitalism; she only pointed out that Romney needs to backup his claim that he created 100,000 jobs while at Bain.

      She never agreed with or used the term vulture capitalism. She agreed with Perry that Romney’s claim that he created American jobs by purchasing companies and then streamlining them should be backed up with facts and numbers.
      No where in this interview did she say Romney shouldn’t buy companies and part and parcel them for profit.
      She is also correct that Obama and his cronies will bring up many,many questions about Bain Capital and this issue needs to be fully addressed now. We need to diffuse the power of any attack on the GOP nominee, whoever that may be.

      Report Post »  
    • Bentrt
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:40am

      I am proud to say I have loved Sarah Palin from the first time I heard her. She is the model True ‘Conservative’ and has a clear message of smaller government, fiscal restraint and responsibility. She cleaned up Alaska’s Old Boys Club corruption and I feel she is the perfect fit to clean up Fedzilla. She is a force and I feel she is a Tea Party Patriot all the way. There is no person closer in mirroring my beliefs than Sarah Palin.

      Report Post »  
    • ItsMsBtch2U
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:15pm

      @Romney2012

      I don’t think your boy has the experience to be president…he’s just a governor.

      Report Post »  
    • godlovinmom
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Well…the last election proved to us that you don’t need ANY experience to be president…just a little community orgainizing.

      Report Post » godlovinmom  
  • BellaMia7
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:36am

    She’s right, she has good political instincts. It hard to hear,but he should have anticipated this, It will be oK he’s a talented guy.

    Report Post » BellaMia7  
  • ambrosia
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:32am

    Palin & Gingrich are doing Willard Romney a favor.

    Romney better toughen up now & put on his BigBoy Pants
    because Axelrod & Obama are going to throw the Bain Crap,
    the Cayman Island Tax free accounts,
    the pending tax investigations & everything else at him.

    The ONLY reason he‘s cryin’ foul now is because he knows the same issues
    will put a nail in his nominee coffin.

    Romney & the RNC are the ones that STARTED the BULLYING & lies at Gingrich.

    Just who is the one mocking capitalism ?
    Romney, childishly, brought up Gingrich’s personal, Tiffany account on Hannity-
    Hannity’s response was“OUCH”-
    as in “ouch, your nastiness is disturbingly juvenile”.

    Romney is slick-
    he’ll tell you that he wants to be everything to everyone,
    as long as it benefits Willard Romney…very similar to the slimebag in the White House.

    He probably has “President of the United States” written on his bucket list.

    Sarah is NOT interested in his conservative charade.
    Come on Sarah, say so out loud before the South Carolina primary.
    Show Nikki Haley what it’s like to stand with the Tea Party.
    Show her NOBODY has to kiss the RNC’s butt to reach the American people
    & garner their vote.

    We like Gingrich because all the lowlife politicians, empty-talking heads
    & jaded media that dismiss him are the very same arrogant, useless people
    America should have kicked to the curb years ago…very telling !

    Go get em’, Gingrich !

    Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:05am

      He brought up the Tiffany account because Newt tried to paint himself as a member of the middle class. Hardly appropriate of Newt to do so. And Romney simply repeated already available facts previously reported in the news. Gingrich’s camp is trying to create new news with the 27 minute tissue fest they recently released. Gingrich is a brat. Romney is spot on or in other words RIGHT.

      Report Post »  
    • QuIzAcK
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:14am

      Who is Mitt Romney?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_6BCXIsgLE

      He is the same person as Obama. I mean EXACTLY the same. Wake up!

      Report Post » QuIzAcK  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:47am

      @quiz

      And absolutists who say words like always, exactly and precisely have opinions worth digesting. Yeah, yeah, yeah and apples are comparable to oranges because they share a common spheroid shape, grown on trees and contain seeds. They are exactly alike, I tell you, exactly!

      Report Post »  
    • ambrosia
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:51am

      @Quizack

      THIS is the BEST video capsule of the great Liberal, Willard Mitt Romney !

      You will feel the need to take a bath after viewing it.

      The man is a liar, he’s slick & slimy, inarticulate-
      he’s using the word “Conservative”
      to snatch & grab the title of “Commander-in-Chief”.

      It’s so clear to me now-
      why he flips & fumbles his words while speaking.
      His brain can’t kick in
      because
      his lying mouth can’t reconcile with his liberal past .

      If the American people can’t recognize another snake oil salesman-
      then SHAME on us.
      Romney can NOT take down Obama, he’s a RNC lightweight.

      Gingrich does not have this problem-
      his thoughts, issues & solutions flow from his brain
      with no stammering, no slobbering.

      Watching his face, you can see him reasoning with the truth
      because THAT’S all that matters.
      He states the problem, defines it, truthfully
      and approaches it with reasonable logic
      to form an opinion and search for the best solution.

      Look at the difference between these two men.
      Romney is a successful marketeer…..Gingrich is the WISE Leader !

      Don’t get this wrong, people-
      America is not a used car lot……….she’s OUR sacred ground.

      Romney wants the title-
      Gingrich wants the job….please, America…let HIM win it !

      Report Post »  
    • texrubarts
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:04am

      The Media is pulling for Romney and if Romney thinks he can just slide in the White House – think again Romney – the AXE is waiting for you. Obama & the AXE are setting the stage. I feel sorry for Gingrich because ALL I hear from the media is “Newt is angry”. ENOUGH… Newt is only doing what he should be doing – FIGHT to WIN… It’s called a “political race” NOT a “Cake Walk”.

      Gov. Palin is not endorsing Gingrich until she knows he can win at least one primary to get him going! She is not stupid – she has to think of her future as well. Todd Palin endorsed Gingrich but it didn’t give him the lift he needed in NH. :(

      Report Post » texrubarts  
    • ambrosia
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:42am

      @texrubarts
      Agree with you completely-
      NO one has had more restraint than Gingrich
      but it’s like the bully that picks on the nice, kind, smart kid-
      Willard Romney & his RNC rats figure Gingrich is too decent to fight back.
      Wrong !
      They & the stupid media can not argue with Gingrich’s intelligence
      so they stick needles in him every which way.

      I, NO longer care that they label Newt “angry”.
      It’s a conservative feather in his cap.

      I wish he would do a campaign ad thanking them for that tag
      and then reiterate that Americans ARE also ANGRY at the sad state of America
      and that they, out of everyone have a RIGHT to be angry-
      that puts HIM in FINE, patriotic company
      with the good American folk….with REAL america.

      He needs to make lemonade out of their rotten lemons-
      nobody does it better, with more wit & resolve than Newt Gingrich.

      Yeah, we are NO longer complacent, we are ALL angry.
      Anger processed & directed the right way, within reason, can be soberly productive-
      the Tea Party can vouch for that !

      Good on ya’ Newt…..keep up the good fight…America is “angry” enough to know
      we can do better and lightweight Romney can’t beat Obama.
      It’s time to embrace our anger
      and elect a REAL Leader like you !

      Wrong !

      Report Post »  
  • MacPharlan
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:28am

    This is really starting to bug me. If Obama came out and said what these folks are saying, we’d be outraged and say they have not right:

    Newt: Romney needs to hold a press conference and go over it line by line, tell us what happened, square with the american people.

    Newt: You make 30, 60 or 90 million, but when do you put some of that back to keep the company alive

    Palin: He needs to explain where the numbers come from, show us the records, the taxes

    Perry: Come clean, show us why those jobs were lost and why you din’t leave some money behind

    Really, what the heck are we doing? We would NEVER allow Obama to make these attacks, we would tell our candidate to say none of your freakin business. These folks are crazy!

    I just watched this segment on hannity (bugs me that hannity won’t mention that Newt is doing this just as much as Perry), Sarah does not think Perry is attacking Bain/Romney or capitalism, only his job claims? Really, did you even listen to what they are saying?

    I am lost, don’t get it, fools

    Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:40am

      Yeah Mac… unbelievable. They are starting to sounds like socialists.
      “Leave money” “put money back in”. This is all too closely familiar with sharing the wealth.
      Since when did hard work and earning money become a bad thing? Who‘s to say what amount is ok to earn and then once you go over that amount you’re no longer allowed to keep it? THAT is a communist mindset.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:17am

      okay JJ then explained to me the difference between Mitt Romney and John Corzine?

      Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:06am

      What about John Corzine?
      Are you knocking a guy for making money?
      I don’t know what your point is.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:49am

      Surely you jest JJ what is my point you really had to ask that question and can’t make the comparison. Never have taken a penny from my government as in the way of food stamps or unemployment and quite honestly coming up to the age of Social Security not even looking for that so take your communist crap or reference to that somewhere else pal. In your humble opinion do you honestly think that Mitt Romney would even question Barack Obama status or of any of his other pals do you think he has the fortitude to do that I don’t, he cannot even call him a socialist he has a hard time choking it up if he has to. No disrespect to Dr. Paul but I would love to see a Gingrich Romney debate that is my hopes.

      Report Post »  
    • TOMSERVO
      Posted on January 13, 2012 at 1:20pm

      @JJ Coolay Wow. It’s called investing profits back into your company in order to spur further growth. Some very low level corporate finance classes will teach you that reinvesting profits is necessary to grow the pie and compete.

      This is an incredibly basic tenet of capitalism and competition, and if you don‘t understand that it’s hard to take your opinions seriously.

      Report Post »  
  • 13th Imam
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:28am

    I just saw Sarah on Hannity. All she said was for Romney to produce proof of the jobs that were created or saved by Bain. We ask the same of Barry , but he lies like a rug

    Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 5:29am

      Well there may be good news on the horizon as Leo the lawyer will have his case heard January 25 or 26, the one involving Occidental College and the foreign aid scholarship.

      Report Post »  
    • Bill Rowland
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 6:34am

      The Occidental scholarship is only the tip of the Ice Berg. Who paid for for Columbia and Harvard? Why isn’t he in the Columbia year book or in any class photos? Who were his professors? Who were his classmates?
      There are just to many questions about that period of his life. Who sent him to Chicago to learn dirty politics from the professionals? Who wrote his book? How involved were Bill & Bernatte in his campaign for the Illinois senate or the US Senate?

      PLEASE, PLEASE ANYBODY BUT THIS PHONY IN NOVEMBER!!!!

      OMG

      Report Post »  
    • Bentrt
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:41am

      In the interview Sarah Palin was clear she was against these attacks on capitalism; she only pointed out that Romney needs to backup his claim that he created 100,000 jobs while at Bain.

      She never agreed with or used the term vulture capitalism. She agreed with Perry that Romney’s claim that he created American jobs by purchasing companies and then streamlining them should be backed up with facts and numbers.
      No where in this interview did she say Romney shouldn’t buy companies and part and parcel them for profit.
      She is also correct that Obama and his cronies will bring up many,many questions about Bain Capital and this issue needs to be fully addressed now. We need to diffuse the power of any attack on the GOP nominee, whoever that may be.

      Report Post »  
  • abbygirl1994
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:27am

    Is Sarah showing her true colors.. her husband just endorsed Gingrich.. personally I was shocked… maybe after all this time Sarah is about big government.. she is about global warming and Obamacare… what are the Palin’s thinking and why is she attacking Mitt Romney.. this is very distrubing to me.. How about you go back to Alaska,, and hunt and fish a little, because all this time you were about the Tea Party.. and now its just more Obama bull roar.. Lord help us!

    Report Post » abbygirl1994  
    • ashtongramp
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:41am

      She is all about promoting herself. She loves the attention, she loves making money from her books. I hope people start seeing that. I’m sorry, but I am not to impressed.

      Report Post »  
  • READRIGHTHERE
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:26am

    And there you have it folks, she has mounted her trusty steed and taken off into the sunset of irrelevance. You betcha!

    Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:52am

      You’re pretty funny the most scrutinized woman on the planet and you make a statement like that my gosh they even knew how much her dress and shoes costs. Just a little tidbit today is Wednesday and the polls come out Romney 27 Gingrich 23 one day after New Hampshire primary. now let’s go back and not to discredit Iowa or New Hampshire but upon entering the polls you could be a Democrat changer party vote Republican and then upon leaving re-change back to Democrat how convenient. As South Carolina says the true test will come from that state with what the people believe it’s a very good barometer to see who will merge as the candidate. But once again we don’t have no investigative reporters that would look at New Hampshire and gives the results of one then people when in voted regardless of who they voted for but if they win in as a Democrat did they come back out with their little pink or purple piece of paper reclaiming a Democratic status. I know it may not matter to you but it does me because the way I see it I was against it before I was for it.

      Report Post »  
  • Quencher
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:23am

    Why does the Republican establishment insist on pushing it’s choice of a candidate? Normal people would learn not to run a candidate that the majority of Republicans simply reject. We well could have another Bob Dole or John McCain situation if they force Romney on us. I agree with Sarah that Romney is the weakest candidate running for the nomination. He simply does not have leadership qualities and he really “puts people off”. He really has no “job creating” history and he is a proven “Flip-Flopper” on important issues.

    Report Post » Quencher  
    • deathorliberty
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:31am

      Exactly quencher! Listen up republican establishment!!!!! If you force another progressive rino on us like mccain, he will be defeated! I refuse to vote for him…..Sorry!!!! Go ahead, see what happens! Give us gingrich or santorum, but no romney the “the flip-flopper”

      Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:36am

      I agree with Sarah that Romney is the weakest candidate running for the nomination.
      _______________
      Wow, really? The weakest? Really?
      You think Perry, Huntsman, Santorum are all better suited to run the country?? WOW.
      By the way.. what’s with this “Republican establishment” nonsense?
      The people are voting for who they believe to be the best person to run the country coupled with the best person to take down Obama. I’m so tired of hearing “the Rep. establishment” B.S. The voters are voting their minds, get used to it.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • Hobbs57
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:40am

      Sorry Quencher, you can’t be more wrong. Newt is the establishment candidate. The Super PAc, sonors, and behind the scene political money shakers who brought McCain and the Bushes, is the same behind Newt. Actually Newt was a major player in that group. The more I research on him and the group he represented, I am finding some sick stuff. Palins husband edorsed Newt and it makes me wonder. Newts X starting singin and esquire got an 8 page article on him. He is a rat and this is what she says about him,”He believes that what he says in public and how he lives don’t have to be connected,” she says. “If you believe that, then yeah, you can run for president.” I don’t know how Mitt was actually able to raise enough support to over power this group. Newt has member that are purely Islamic and only buy companies up according to Sharia Law. No joke. Arcapita Inc. is the name. Check out the article then check out source watch for Newts Super PAC. I bet Mitt doesn’t win because of how powerful of an influence these groups are. They are the kind who have sold their souls, and while I support Mitt,I am afraid he might be knocked off by this group. Just watch.

      Read more: http://www.esquire.com/features/newt-gingrich-0910#ixzz1jDXMI6UV

      Report Post » Hobbs57  
  • Robert-CA
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:21am

    if Romney said that let him prove it .
    You guys are more worried about what Palin said instead of being worried about what the dems will say about Romney .

    Report Post » Robert-CA  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:46am

      No, the concern here is how the socialist mentality is creeping its way through the conservative camp.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
  • Kilkman
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:18am

    Why hasn’t Glen pointed out who signed the legislation that let Fist gate man into the Massachusetts schools. He was Romney‘s pick before he became Obama’s Safe School Czar. And now that same legislation is being implemented on a national level without mention. Sara would be a better commander and chief than any of our current candidates. But if I have to hold my nose and vote, Gingrich would be my choice. Romney is just another Rockefeller “progressive” republican.

    Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:44am

      @kilkman

      And you feel this way because in comparison to Romney, Newt is not a flip-flopper? Because his anti- capitalistic comments against Romney reflect deep seated conservatism? Oh wait, maybe you respect Gingrich for his deeper abiding faith in God, vows, and oaths? Because Romney‘s views on global climate change are to the left of Gingrich’s couch? Maybe Gingrich is your choice because he is smart enough to coordinate his Super-pac’s efforts (illegal) and Romney has only seen one of the commercials put out by his? Maybe you like Gingrich for organizing himself off the ballot in Virginia. Who needs that rotten little commonwealth anyway, right? So after all… Gingrich had the fortitude to abandon the ballot as a political statement regarding unfair primary laws? His foresight reveals his dizzying intellect?

      No? OK then, so I get it, Gingrich is your man because he is adept at repeating Massachusetts Moderate, a phrase that for most of us we could never say ten times in row really fast? No, I am sure you are above such petty comparisons, what really has you in his corner is that Newt is truly the only seasoned Lawmaker and Congressional leader in the race, and surely all the great solutions to our problems will be generated by the legislature of this great country. Eh?

      Report Post »  
  • Luke611
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:13am

    Where in the hell did this the pressure for a candidate to show their personal tax history become a law? I thoroughly have no reason to ever esteem Mrs Palin in a leadership roll from here on out.

    This is fine for the candidate to test each other, but to be pressured from a conservative commentator in this regard suggests she has an agenda that is conflicting with the healing of this country from the Obamanation that those who detest financial success created.
    This is truly an extremely harmful position.

    Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:22am

      Hell, you don’t even have to show your birth certificate to be POTUS anymore, so who cares about tax records??

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:42am

      Ahh,..Ooops. Let that be a lesson to all you morons on the BLAZE to look at the video first.

      She is correct actually– she’s not demanding in a sharp tone, she is merely suggesting and I gather her position to do is to put the info out there so that Obama doesnt bring it up in the future.

      However, there is an obvious and simple math equation to consider.
      Domino’s Pizza was sold to Bain Capital in 1998 and went public in 2004. Currently the company reports 145,000 employees. Staples began in 1985 and reports current roster of 90,000.
      Sports Authority reports 460 stores with my est for a big box store 30 employee (low est) equals 13,800 employees….Yep, he lied— he’s created OR SAVED closer to 300,000 jobs.

      Y’all need to see this link, Bain Capitol is extraodinarily successful at creating, sustain, and merging companies into successes. This is truly the business man we need to lead our nation.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital

      Report Post »  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:49am

      Im soooo relieved to have done this little study,…really, for a sec i thought she was cheating on me with someone other than her husband.

      Report Post »  
  • slr4528
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:12am

    What do Perry,Gingrich,Huntsman and Palin propose? Would these clowns prefer the government come in and create regulations that will prevent failing companies from laying off people? Would they prefer that governments place limits as to how much profits Romney’s company could make for his investors who were taking a risk with an investment to save a failing company. Better yet maybe they would prefer to have regulations in place to prevent private investment. Maybe these BIG GOVERNMENT HACKS think that the government should be the ones to make decisions as to who can invest in failing companies. I am sure this would generate alot of pay outs to politicians to get deals approved. Gingrich and Perry I am sure would be at the front of the line with their hands out.

    Report Post »  
    • JPDevuyst
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:23am

      Bingo! Exactly!

      Report Post » JPDevuyst  
    • MacPharlan
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:31am

      Agree, sure smells like Congress calling on execs to come explain themselves before their high and mighty chairs. That is what we are giving Obama, this opens the gates for Libs to meddle even more on private business and have to justify every layoff, every profit.

      Report Post »  
  • GoodStuff
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:10am

    Go away woman! By staying in the spotlight, you’re gonna hand the election to Obama.

    Get off the TV screen if you care about the American people voting Obama out of office in November!

    Report Post »  
  • Mr. Oshawott
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:02am

    I really have to question Mitt Romney’s shaky claim that he created 100,000 jobs while being CEO of Bain Capital. How in the world can Mitt say that he’s created 100,000 jobs when, in reality, he spent most of his time DESTROYING them, just so he can make a quick substantial profit at the expense of Main Street? Perhaps that may explain that statement, “I like to fire people,” that he made not too long ago?

    Source: http://www.webcasts.com/kingofbain/

    If this isn’t proof that Mitt Romney is a real dangerous person to elect as President when it comes to economic issues, I don’t know what is.

    Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
    • slr4528
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:16am

      You obviously know nothing about private equity and investment. Perhaps the government should prevent people from investing in risky businesses and perhaps we should just let the businesses go under with no possibility of turn around.

      Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:24am

      So you put on your Anti-Romney glasses and had a long hard look at the facts. Ergo your comment.

      Try again, except ask yourself questions like these. In cases where Bain broke up companies, were they already facing financial ruin? How many succeeded with Bain’s assistance versus those that were destined to fail? Was Romney a typical venture capitalist or did he score above the average. Was Bain capital considered a failure or a success?

      Or… Have you been swayed in your views by a preexisting desire to not see Romney as the republican candidate? Are you simply zealous in protecting your own favored candidate and will seize on any opportunity to diminish the front-runner in the vain hope of catapulting your nominee to the front of the pack?

      Then ask if you really think it prudent of so called right wing candidates to disparage Romney’s financial accomplishments by trudging out a parade of potentially educationally-challenged factory workers who made the mistake in life of assuming that whatever their company was providing them in the past they were somehow entitled to continue to receive in perpetuity? Do you firmly believe that companies that offer to pay their employees a certain amount of money for a certain amount of work done in a certain amount of hours, are by force of their employees tenacity at their jobs somehow then obligated to provide their employees with the exact same opportunity until at such time as the employee deems requisite? Well…?

      Report Post »  
    • seeker9
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:37am

      http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000066884
      The truth about P.E. (private equity), i.e. Bain Capital..

      Report Post » seeker9  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:55am

      Mr. Oshawott

      Go read what companies BAIN still holds from the time Romney was CEO. Do the math and you will find he created and saved a hell-of-a-lot more than 100k jobs. Click on the comapnies and each page shows a standard box to the right of the company profile with stores and employees.
      But that would kill your aurgument and you would have to admit your wrong.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital

      Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 4:41am

      I beg your pardon but Romney didn’t start Staples the gentleman was just recently on TV John Stossel the be more correct and explained why he started Staples. Now being a man of small means he could not grow his dream hence venture capitalists. Have you ever dealt with a product or idea you had and tried to bring a product to market, the next time invent help runs an advertisement go sit in and see how much they take or are willing to leave you with your product idea meaning your percentage of the company. The question remains of the remaining 77% of the companies that were profitable what percentage was lent out to foreign countries for production and then return to this country. Of the 22% that did happen to fail that is a mere write off on tax forms and if anybody has anybody to thank it should be Mitt Romney for what Newt Gingrich did in the house to lower the corporate tax structure in which allowed Mitt Romney to profit handsomely.

      Report Post »  
  • Bush Hating Conervatives make me sick
    Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:02am

    Please Sara go AWAY!! Call for BHO to release his records!! Romney/Rubio 2012

    Report Post »  
  • TelepromoterNChief
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:59pm

    Palin…..Palin……………Palin….yes, the name does sound familiar ….Palin……….Ah yes, she let the people of Alaska down at quit being their governor so she could make reality shows and go on a forgettable bus tour to sell a book.

    Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:17am

      @teleprompterinchief So I am guessing that you would stay in office with your office being barraged by lawsuits costing the citizens that you were governing loads of money while rendering you ineffective just so you wouldn’t let the people down…I am quite sure the citizens would really appreciate just what a real trooper you are.

      Report Post »  
    • texrubarts
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 2:13am

      Go do your homework on Palin – she didn’t quit to go and sell a book!!! And she is telling the truth on Romney and what do you care it looks like you are pulling for the crooks in the White House!!

      Report Post » texrubarts  
    • ashtongramp
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 11:43am

      I have to agree with TelepromoterNChief.

      Report Post »  
  • welovetheUSA
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:57pm

    We need to knock all this off now…………Romney is the Only one who can beat Obama, period. If I didnot know any better I would be thinking you all are on the democrats side…Tea party has had 3 years to get this out there………..now is not the time, We must get Obama out and the Only way is with Mitt….he’ll pick a great VP……..and get Obama out………..our goal.

    Report Post » welovetheUSA  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:27am

      Completely agree with you. There is WAY too much dissention in the ranks.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
  • Eugene1
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:54pm

    Oh, Sarah, by your own choices you have made yourself irrelevant. If you would have finishe out your term as the Alaskan governor, you wouldn’t have lost your credibility. Romney is a big boy and can handle things himself without your help of protecting him against Obama.

    Report Post » Eugene1  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:10am

      @EUGene1 It helps to know the details about Sarah’s stepping down from her governorship.. She stepped down because the opposition bombarded her office with lawsuits rendering her office ineffective and was of great cost to the citizens of Alaska..so she spent her time effectively being a Tea Party Activist. Sarah Palin..a great Libertarian.

      Report Post »  
    • slr4528
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:20am

      Sarah’s support for Newt proves she is an opportunist and a big government progressive. She never defended Bachman but she goes and defends Perry and Gingrich in a heart beat and her husband Todd endorses Newt……that tells me alot!

      Report Post »  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:29am

      Ashes… I‘m not taking a stand one way or another on Palin’s resignation, but the lawsuits filed against her cost the state of Alaska around $3 million. Newt Gingrich is spending more than that in South Carolina adverstising alone!

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:40am

      @JJ COOL I just read the other night if I am not mistaken that Newt had only 3 million raised to Pauls 13 or 14 million..and that Newt just got 5 million from one lone contributer. getting him to 8 million..I have always liked Sarah..but if she is supporting Newt..then that says something negative about her judgemnet..Newt is an awesome debator..but he is such a freakin crook. all one has to do is see his voting record and look at his NWO Agenda 21 accomplilshments..like Global Warming..Obamacare..higer taxation..federal land grabs..Newt is smart and he has great ideas..we can learn the good from him…but he would never get my vote..he’s a Communist in my opinion.

      Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:54am

      SLR Yes..you are right…and she is also thinks that we need to police the world..that automatically makes her a big government progressive

      Report Post »  
    • Bentrt
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 10:10am

      Sarah Palin resigned to get the countless attacks against her out of the governor’s office, and the money they cost the state, away from the burden of taxpayers; her entire administration was paralyzed by those frivolous complaints.
      The frivolous ethics suits in effect crippled the ability of the executive branch to function properly.

      For the past three years Sarah Palin has worked tirelessly to fight Obama’s policies and elect conservatives; Sarah Palin was #1 in the fight and she basically spearheaded the 2010 victory with her endorsements and rallies all over the country.

      Report Post »  
  • scout n ambush
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:53pm

    Yes everyone needs looked at under a microscope, air all the dirty laundry and leave the dems less ammo .Mitt has that typical demorat smile and it really is creepy.Not that it all matters as the dnc chair debbie wassername said during a metting in new hampshire that the tea party was responsible for the gabrielle giffords attack ,this will get uglier after the gop pick is sealed .

    Report Post » scout n ambush  
  • ThinkingClearly
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:46pm

    Here we go again, more so called “conservatives” acting like a bunch of anti capitalist, entitlement Europeans. Look, it obvious that the work Bain did helped create jobs and lots of them! It’s amazing that these clowns like Newt, Perry and Santorum who have literally spent their ENTIRE lives in government are attacking Romney for his private sector experience! Here’s an idea, why don’t these guys tell us about all of the jobs they created???? I’m sorry but the Republican Party has gone mad and at this point is looking more and more like the party of OWS and Obama, at least they admit that they hate the free markets.

    Report Post »  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:57pm

      Have you all forgotten how nasty the dems were to each other in the last election? Didn’t Ole Hillary show a picture of A towel headed Obama? Let Sara point out Romneys issues that need to be addressed, maybe the others won’t have to and they can get back to the important issues regarding Obama and the progressives. It might help us have a candidate that is a true conservative that can beat Obama. I do not think Romney can. I have been groaning about being stuck with Romney for months. He and Paul give me a hinkie feeling. As for Beck defending Pauls speech, why was that a problem? He is like the rest of us who are sitting on the fence. You have to listen to all of them before you make a choice. Say what you will about Newt, he is the only one that can successfully debate Obama. It keeps bothering me that the dems and the main stream media hasn’t come down hard on Romney, why?

      Report Post » pamela kay  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 12:32am

      @PAMELA KAY I remember Hilary showing ********** Obama..lol.. Obama is establishing a world wide Caliphate..There may be no reversing this as he has Elena Kegan and Janet Napolotano helping him., adn they have infiltrated key positions in government. Newt may be able to successfully debate Obama..but really..It is Obama‘s teleprompter who he would be debating and isn’t that like having one snake debate another..in the end….you still get a snake..Check out Newt’s roster..skim down to the bottom of the page..There is another federal land grab in the works spanning from New Mexico to Montana..The last one involved millions of acres I believe in 1979.. Newt has always voted higher taxes and Newt has always been for sale..
      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818630/posts

      Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:24am

      @ Pamela

      Who says Obama is smart (can’t function without a teleprompter)?
      Who says he can debate? He defeated Hillary, the Hair, and McCain. Big whoop! I mean that must have been tough on the poor old smoker.
      Who says he can possibly defend the indefensible? Our economy is in shambles and our future prospects are bleak. Does he think he can convince us of the 2nd great depression he helped us avoid that never materialized, or does he think that four years into his administration he is still not at all responsible for our dim performance since he took office? Does he think the country will re-elect him just because he made the decision to off Bin Laden? As if somehow that act alone makes him the smartest commander in chief with which we have ever been blessed?

      Methinks you overestimate too much.

      Report Post »  
    • ThinkingClearly
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 1:30am

      Pamela, are you kidding me??? How is Newt going to debate Obama? First issue, they are both anti capitalist free market haters so how will he differentiate himself from Obama there? Second issue, Romney and Paul ran a few attack ads pointing out all of Newts baggage and within 2 weeks he completely crashes his campaign into the ground and starts making crazy, unplanned, insane and completely out of control comments every time a microphone is put in front of his mouth! Newt wouldn’t stand a chance against Obama in a debate, I mean for heavens sakes Obama would be able to stand there on the stage with Newt and represent the social and family values side of the argument better than the Republican candidate! It would be a train wreck, Newt wouldn’t last 10 minutes against Obama!

      Report Post »  
  • Toxic Pirate
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:44pm

    Oh God ! Sarah, will you please go away. Im no Romney supporter but you shilled for the progressive John McCain and now TODD is pumping for Newt. As smoking hot as you are ,you are the part of the problem.

    Report Post » Toxic Pirate  
    • Bentrt
      Posted on January 12, 2012 at 9:42am

      She never agreed with or used the term vulture capitalism. She agreed with Perry that Romney’s claim that he created American jobs by purchasing companies and then streamlining them should be backed up with facts and numbers.
      No where in this interview did she say Romney shouldn’t buy companies and part and parcel them for profit.

      She is also correct that Obama and his cronies will bring up many,many questions about Bain Capital and this issue needs to be fully addressed now. We need to diffuse the power of any attack on the GOP nominee, whoever that may be.

      Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:41pm

    .
    Oh go shoot a Moose……….

    I almost have Palin Derangement Syndrome, if she was gonna do something. She should have done it already…………..

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • spankadonkey
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:34pm

    Ron FRAUD Paul – what a guy

    Report Post »  
  • Maxim Crux
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:32pm

    I agree…get all the truth out now and anticipate what they will try later on and make it a non issue before it becomes an issue

    Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love