Sarah Palin: Newt Gingrich Ex-Wife Interview Will Help Him ‘Soar Even More’
- Posted on January 19, 2012 at 6:56pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
Just hours away from ABC News’ highly anticipated broadcast of a potentially explosive interview with Newt Gingrich’s ex-wife, Marianne, Sarah Palin has come out swinging in defense of the GOP presidential candidate. The former Alaska Governor appeared on Sean Hannity’s radio show Thursday, noting that Gingrich will likely “soar even more” as a result of the interview, rather than be harmed by it.
“I call them dumbarses,” said Palin in reference to the media. “They, thinking that by trotting out this old Gingrich divorce interview that’s old news — and it does feature a disgruntled ex, claiming that it would destroy his campaign — all this does, Sean, is incentivize conservatives and independents who are so sick of the politics of personal destruction, because it’s played so selectively by the media, that their target, in this case Newt, he’s now going to soar even more. Because we know the game now, and we just won’t put up with it. Good call, media.”
(h/t: HuffPo)



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (328)
Toxic Pirate
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmAh…patern behavior…Palin and “Todd” need to take a hike. Do you really want a psychopath as your President ….really. He asked his second to marry him before he told the first he wanted a devorice. I assure there were more women in Newt’s life than these 3. Now if we can just get Romney out of the way the coast is clear for Santorum.
Report Post »glennrocks
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmFirst she called Trump a Conservative now Newt, she is nuts. Donald Trump has always been a liberal and so has Newt. Don‘t fall for the I’m gonna talk tough in the Debates. That is what McCain did.
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:31pmSarah is right. If I was on the fence about who to vote for, I’m not anymore. Nice move ABC. Newt 2012!
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:31pmRick P? Sarah P? I’m mystified… I thought character mattered to these people. Newt is slippery slime.
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:31pmShe is nuts, and she wants to be his vice president
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:32pmlol. True colors, shining through.
Report Post »Endorses a self-proclaimed progressive like Newt, and is on the same presidential card as the One of the bioggest neocons in history; John McCain.
John mcCain Co-sponsor of the Most Unconstitutional Bills ever to be voted on in American History.
I am so glad Palin never made it to the Oval Office, or Washington for that matter.
Consider yourself booted from the TEA PARTY, hockey mom.
pakaeboiboi
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:33pmGlennRocks ….. Wow …. lets see here …. if y’r correct dat Trump and Newt are liberals …. that only leaves ….. that BO must be the “Devil” ….. learn sumpt‘n evr’yday …. justsay’n
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:33pmTrump is more a conservative than Romney.
If Romney gets the nomination and Trump runs as 3rd party in the general election, I will vote for Trump.
Report Post »toto
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:34pmNever heard McCain talk tough about anything. Nobody deserves a halo in this race, but I want someone with big conservative cost cutting ideas.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:34pmyeah.. that is pretty shameful of her… i wonder how much she got…
Report Post »follow the money.
bhohater
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:36pm@GLENNROCKS==Who do you like? Let me guess, Ron Paul.
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:36pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpbSwSlP4Yc
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:41pmI love it when people say that Ron Paul has never accomplished anything because he has only passed one bill during his 12 years in Congress!! Do they not realize that’s a compliment!!?? He’s the ONLY candidate that will not shove move government relegation down our throats!
Please consider how much you want government ‘intervention’ in YOUR life when you vote in 2012. I’m all for ‘isolating’ our government before they grow too big for us to have a choice in 2016!
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:45pmYeah, Newts big cost cutting conservative ideas are PROGRESSIVE, like how Obamacare is going to save us money ?? Newt was engineering pilot programs for medicare long before Romneycare or Obamacare. Newt is the reason my Mom no longer has a job. The company lost 23 million on Newts “Brainiac” idea. That’s why 600 nurses no longer have jobs and the company nearly went bankrupt. Mr Great Debater tricked the company into believing him, just like he got you so called conservatives fooled. The same ones who got us every progressive we had thus far. Get your stupid religious ideology’s out of view and look at who these people are. Don’t you fools realize the left wants to fight with Newt ?? That is the progressives game and they will win. Newt got run out of town last time he played with the big boy progressives,even with their financial backing now, he nothing but talk. He is so smart, just like the intellectual elite of the Left. Palin is a bigot, what else can explain her stance ?? I will never support her in any way ever again. You people supporting Newt brought me McCain last election and I am not going down quiet again. Those of you aligning behind your bigoted religious views can shove it, because that caused more damage than good last election. It brought us Obama, via, progressive McCain. I can’t believe after all Glenn taught about progressives, you still support Newt. Unbelievable. Palin has become a disappointment.
Report Post »ahall1950
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:46pmI’m with Faith. If God can forgive Newt, then which one of us can cast the first stone.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:48pmWow Sarah..I voted for you when you ran with McCain..I hated that you are a war monger but thought maybe you would change your mind..But yours and Todd’s supporting Newt shows a complete lack of judgement and I would never consider supporting you or valuing your judgement again..You really are clueless….Oh buy wait…Seems I remember Newt was tossing you around for a VP….and you are doing this? I really did think that you were smarter than that…guess not….
Report Post »We are Americans
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:50pmIt took almost 4 years for most to figure
Report Post »out this woman has no real moral values. It’s all
for show and profit. Of course she wants to
be his VP. Is Glenn going to rip on her
like he did that fan Ray? Probaly won’t
even mention. Im sorry but I think this
is the ending for Glenn’s empire and any
of Sarahs conservative credibility is destroyed
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:55pmNow just replace newts name with Paul’s and change the content from ex-wife to news letters, and Sarah….I agree with you 100%
I even agree with you about newt but i know what newt is….It’s easy to see the game….
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:55pmWhat a bunch of limp noodles
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:08pmThis woman makes me ill. She wouldn’t support Bachman but she throws all of her support behind the big government, progressive,immoral pig Gingrich.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:10pmFAITH and AHALL must be Sarah and Todd..haha
Report Post »B-Neil
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:11pmNewt has the X factor. I’d just love to see him as President and watch all the special people shimmy and shake just from a look newt could give them. Not to mention how he would tower over them verbally. I think he’s an excellent candidate and future President. CARRY ON McDUFF
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:12pmThe GOP has no business harping on family values when they nominate a pig like Newt Gingrich.
Report Post »nanzofsc
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:17pmMcCain had NOTHING in the debates – was not tough, could not take on Obama. Newt will clean his clock!! And yes, I am in SC and I WILL VOTE FOR NEWT!!
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:21pmAs bad as Newt is he is at least a million times better than Mitt.
Report Post »BJC
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:22pmQuestion: What would a Republican primary be without the national media scheming to destroy one of the candidates?
Answer: A Democrat primary.
With brazen disregard for journalistic ethics and a mere two days before the South Carolina primary, ABC News is going to air an interview tonight with Newt Gingrich’s ex-wife, allegedly complete with lurid details about her ex-husband’s sex life.
Not surprisingly, and in line with ABC’s long track record of double standard journalism, during the 1990’s ABC News refused to report Juanita Broaddrick’s allegations that President Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her.
Call ABC News right now. Let them know that this double standard is unacceptable.
ABC News President David Westin: 818-460-7477
ABC News Executive Director Jeff Winn: 212-456-2700
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:25pmAn “impeachment” trial made B.J.Clinton ‘sore’ too.
Report Post »FranciscoDAnconia
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:27pmI guess character is a thing of the past for the tea party.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:45pmOkay you guys..Newts private life does show his character..His wife lay dying in bed while he brought his girlfriend up with him to tell his dying wife that he was divorcing her to marry his girlfriend.. great guy that Newt..lays all the cards right out there on the table..Like telling Americans to get off the wellfare dime while he supports funding illegals to the tune of 338.3 billion a year and wants anmesty for them..He supports Obamacare, he has consistently voted for higher taxes..supports nation building, huge governmental land grabs and global warming..cap and trade…anything for more money for big government and for Newt..You might think talks a good game.and he does…but he’s a snake. If you vote for a snake and you get him..then you deserve what you get..He is mean spirited..and I don’t have to cast the first stone to know what he is.
Report Post »your sensei
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:53pmCharacter doesn‘t matter to those who don’t have it.
Report Post »tbl10
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:58pmWell I hate to say this, but were screwed as a country. Only one of the candidates is serious about fixing America and he is considered unelectable by many, although I would disagree. Well we are all gonna learn the hard way, your candidate has already been selected. Newt isn’t even on any of the primary ballets for future primaries. Hate to tell ya folks your nomination is Mitt Romney for better or worse unless we get behind Ron Paul. Mitt and Obama are the same coin just different sides. You are all being deceived by the real masters the Federal Reserve the true Government of this country. Kiss the Constitution and your civil liberties goodbye folks, the police state headed up by Homeland Security and TSA will be rounding up all who don’t comply to Big Brother.
Report Post »The Third Archon
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:16pmYup–she’s dumb alright.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:30pmBeware– large group of Beckbots
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:09pmMs Palin is way too polite where the-drive-by-media is concerned.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:14pm@sWampy
But more importantly, 10 million times better than Barry Soetoro.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:18pmShe is nuts. Somebody should ask her if she explained to her daughter that Levi didn’t “steal” her virginity…
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 10:57pm@SENSEI
I have many times tried to distill all of my true feelings about liberals in to one, short, concise sentence.
But all attempts seemed to come up short.
THANK YOU
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:01pmV-MAN MACE
Report Post »{She is nuts. Somebody should ask her if she explained to her daughter that Levi didn’t “steal” her virginity} Someone should explain to the Bots that Dr Ron is responsible for the 10yrs of Racist newsletters that he made millions off. but there are the Bots on a river called the-Nile
YoungBloodNews
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:10pmPalin a dumb, loser mama-fizzly. Leave the GOP alone b!tch, youve done enough harm. Sarah ‘north korea is our friend’ or ‘I can see russia’. HHHAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA, she is the best you blaze fools have. The republic is doomed.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:44pmNewt a liberal? Hardly.
If Newt beats Mitt (man that sounds weird).
He Picks Rand Paul for Veep, good north south balance, placates the Paulistininas.
Will name Sarah Palin as Energy Secretary. Gets Sarah and Tea Party excited!
Appoints Andrew Napolitano as Attorney General.
John Bolton as Secretary of State.
I can dream can’t I?
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:19amSarah HAD my respect and even appeared to identify with the Tea Party. I have known Newt for a long time. He is a FDR and Woodrow Wilson Progressive just like Hillary Clinton said that SHE was. He is a global warming embracer and has no morals. His only redeeoming quality is that he does the best at slapping people down in debates. That being said, his anti-capitalist agenda he apparently adopted due to jealousy over Romney SHOULD have really hurt his chances. Our only hope for a non progressive tea party type candidate now is Santorum since Bachman dropped out at the first sign of failure. These caucuses are whittling away at the field far before any other of the remaining 47 states yet to choose will have any say and leaves us with the worst choice for the candidate instead of a wide variety. Perry and Palin supporting Gingrich is ludicrously incredulous. They are NOTHING alike. Why not endorse Santorum? After their smear against Romney, I guess they felt they had no choice. Palin would have done better in a run had she tried and not endorsed McCain for his re-election. She has lost credibility with me and so should she with the tea party. Newt lost credibility back in the 90′s when he had his own sex scandals and admitted to smoking pot way back then so it would not be an issue when he eventually ran for president which he also said that he would NEVER do when I asked him about it. Newt is a PROGRESSIVE. That is why we cannot vote for him.
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:25amOOKSPAY:
Newt is from Georgia and Paul is from Texas. I don’t think that qualifies as a Nort/South Balance. It qualifies as a Progressive for Pres and an extreme right/left wing conspiracy theorist indoctrinated by Alex Jones as VP.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:35amSure, an ex-wife slamming her two timing ex-husband always make politicians “soar.” That’s conventional wisdom.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 12:53amNice move? Newt is a disgusting old man. I just lost so much respect for Palin.
Report Post »TrueLiberal
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:48amNukehaze,
You are an idiot. Rand Paul is not from TX but is, in fact, from KY. The idea presented was to garner the support of Ron Paul’s supporters by nominating his son, Rand. Senator from a state not what I would call North but certainly North of GA or TX.
“Better to remain silent and allow people to think you an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt.”
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 2:13amI just lost so much respect for Sarah. She used to speak for the Tea Party, but now she just seems to be looking to further her career just because Newt mentioned her as a VP choice. Newt talks like a Conservative in the debates, but I remember his sex scandals, the disgrace he brought to the Republican Party, and I’ve heard audios of him praising Wilson and FDR. Even his name reminds me of a slimy salamander. If she could support someone like this, then she is not who I thought she was. She wouldn’t even support Bachman who also represented the Tea Party. Santorum does not have the temperment to be president; his performances in the debates has been like a spoiled child not getting enough attention and wanting to throw mud at everyone. Ron Paul is just too nutty to be a serious candidate. By default, that leaves Romney, who is a successful businessman with a stable marriage. Mormans do not believe in polygamy – as some here have claimed – and his explanation of his pro-Life stance and reasons for Romneycare satisfy me. Unless someone who truely represents the Tea Party jumps in at the last minute – I’ll support Romney 2012. Sarah is history in my opinion – she’s begining to sound like the fruitcake the media has made her out to be.
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:27amRight is wrong and wrong is right, Evil is righteousness and righteousness is evil. How have we fallen so greatly to slap our Savior in the face?
Newt Gingrich is the most corrupt individual seeking the election. At least Obama has a puppetteer, but Gingrich is his own Satan.
“He without sin cast the first stone”…i could throw a brick and I’d have to stand in line. I don’t associate with men that would treat their most sacred relationship as he. He did it twice and deserted both women in the most vulnerable moment of disease.
And so many of you on this post honor him with your applause. He screams his positions of progressivisms and still you applaud. He warns you of whom he idolizes as a political model: Wilson, Roosevelts and you do not see this is commonintity between he and Obama.
I was having such hope, and once again the immorality which you people embrace rules your discernment. How any true believer of all things worthy of our nation could choose this sub-human over Santorum, Romney or Paul; men who show and esteem higher principles of fidelity and honor, only demonstrates you careless of the direction of our nation. Indeed, you are sealing its fate.
Repent.
Choose righteously people. Quit discriminating over good moral standards. This choas we are enduring is not the way its suppossed to be. We can correct some of the hell we are endurring, at least slow it down to prepare more adequately. But not with Gingrich.
Report Post »ausonius
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 8:18amSarah, you are becoming irrelevant. You had a brilliant opportunity handed to you, and blew it.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 9:41amSarah Is Right On!
LET The Romneys and The Libs Fire Those Smear Guns! “Good Luck” To Them, Handling The BackFire!
It’s ALWAYS Very Interesting to me. how at the mention of Sarah’s name, the trolls start coiling and hissing and spewing mud.
The Fear Of Sarah Still OverWhelms The Libs! I Love It!
RANT ON Little Lib Trolls! Thanks For Campaigning AGAINST Romney and BHO! Good Job!
Newt 2012!
Report Post »Smittyflakes
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:06amIts really easy to get on here and talk about casting the first stone, but this is an election for the most powerful chair in the world. We should just let some windbag who cheats on multiple wives, takes money from corupt organizations, and uses religion to get sweet with you about asking for forgiveness. God may have forgiven his actions, but that doesnt mean I should vote for a wolf in sheep skin clothes. I am not casting stones, but if he did not want his personal life and actions to be judged, he should have stayed home. No Bama and No Newt.
Report Post »Heather Mae 74
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:35pmWOW I can’t believe that all of you are not smart enough to figure out why Palin said she would vote for Newt if she were a South Carolinian. What would have happened if Romney won South Carolina by double digits? The Republican primary race would be over or not go forth with any other debates or testing of Romney until he is up against Obama. In case you are unfamiliar with Obama’s campaign tactics when he is facing a tough election without any momentum to be had or any record to run with he finds a way to have his opposition removed from the ballot without any time for anything to be done about it by the other side therefore winning by default. Newt and Romeny are just as progressive as each other and Santorum has not been able to gain any momentum himself. Ron Paul scares people with his defense stance and there is no one else left on the stage. Cain was destroyed, Perry was inadequate, and Bachman couldn’t pull it off. It is our own faults this could have been a lot easier if we had put together a better crop of candidates not Palin’s fault.
Report Post »ranger22x
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 2:08pmNewt 2012
Report Post »johnboy0007
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 12:30amI wasn’t sure who to vote for but now I am solidly in the Newt camp. Sara is more then right. Newt will win SC and you can thank the media for helping him. After 12 years Marianne is just a recentful and bitter ex wife who will twist the truth anyway she can for the publicity and money. She is just a pon of the liberal media.
Report Post »NukeHaze
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 4:09amTRUELIBERAL
I should have you define “idiot” without using a search engine before using the term. Ron Paul is from Kentucky which was SOUTH of the mason/dixon line which I would wager you have no idea what it truly is nor how many stones make it up. He serves elsewhere as most “idiots” you like to name call in you romper room tough talk manner. You, in fact probably do it with a voice much like Congressman Paul’s. If you do not see then maybe you should “remain silent and not remove all doubt” to preserve your future troll arguments
Report Post »mocnarf
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:59pmSarah just wants to be able join Newts new style polygamy. Open marriage Newts best idea. Though he might have to keep that hidden like Bill Henderson did until he gets elected. Go Newt !
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmSwinger’s Club Rendezvous, perhaps?:
Team #1: Sarah and Todd
Team #2: Newt and Callista
Sarah better stop talkin’, ’cause you know somewhere out there that the wheels are already turning in some smut-producer’s mind about making some trashy political-themed flick featuring the aforementioned persons in a taboo free-for-all down on the mat with one another.
Report Post »bolsen00
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:10amUnfortunately I can see the same thing happening…Palin is so in the tank for Newt the pathetic user, she‘s so obvious and needs to just endorse him and flat out reveal the idiot we’ve known she is since McCain announced her. The incredible hilarity and disappointment of that moment just never goes away. She embarrasses women everywhere everytime she opens her mouth…on the upside, if she can make a lot of money sounding that dumb, anybody can!
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 11:18amSarah Palin is a ROMNEY HATER like many other Tea Party WACK-JOBS.
Palin would rather support a 2X ADULTERER than Michelle Bachman or Rick Santorum because she is so filled HATRED for MITT ROMNEY?
Is Sarah Palin an ANTI-MORMON BIGOT or just an ANTI-CAPITALIST CONSERVATIVE?
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:21pmIf Obama goes after Newt on this we can go after Obama on his Cocain addiction and etc…
Report Post »toto
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:35pmAnd the suddenly dead gay “associates”.
Report Post »bastone
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:54pmdont forget o’bama was born in africa and is a muslim. not only that, he’s an irish american. it never ends.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:07pmuh, Obama actually said he was a cocaine user. That source was actually BHO.
Report Post »Jude 4
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:21pmSo if Todd decided he preferred a different woman that Sarah, and he sought public office, then “republicans and conservatives” would be even more enthusiastic to support Todd, regardless of Sarahs perspective as the “disgruntled X”. The bible says that when a man puts away his covenant wife, he “deals treacherously” with her, and “covers his garment with violence”. Apparently, this is a reason for those who believe in morality, to flock to his side. One could be a good magistrate with regard to the law, and personally be an immoral man, but Mr Gingrich has violated his oath of office, and his marriage vows. Todds wife believes that he should “soar”, in spite of these facts. This is the classic gang warfare mentality; you fight for your team, regardless of the facts, becasue your enemy attacked them.
Report Post »symphonic
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:33pmshe has obvious ulterior motives. she is still seeking for power and sees Newt as a “ticket to ride.”
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 11:25amConservative support for a 2X ADULTERER to serve as President is DISGUSTING and HYPOCRITICAL.
Would MICHELLE BACHMAN receive the same “FORGIVENESS” if she had COMMITTED ADULTERY TWICE and had asked her ex-husband for an OPEN-MARRIAGE?
Would a DEMOCRATIC candidate receive the same “UNDERSTANDING” if they had COMMITTED ADULTERY TWICE and asked their ex-spouse for an OPEN-MARRIAGE?
‘Conservative’s’ who call themselves “VALUES VOTERS” supporting Gingrich are MORALLY BANKRUPT FRAUDS.
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:21pmAnyone have a website where this debate is streaming that isn’t CNN? I don’t watch TV… no subscriptions anywhere or cable. Little help?
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:24pmGoogle “Watch Republican debate live on-line”
There were many sources like the one below
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-tonights-abc-newsyahoo-republican-debate-live-here/
Report Post »A Conservatarian
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:29pmtried, everything on the first page was cnn crap (on to page 2 next time) – thank you!
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:34pmLet me look for more. CNN may have locked it up.
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:39pmhttp://www.nowpublic.com/world/republican-debate-january-19-2012-where-watch-live-online-2882074.html
Looks like CNN has exclusive rights to the debate ON-LINE. The Communist News Network is bad but not as bad as ABC/NBC/CBS. It won’t hurt to watch CNN stream the debate live.
You might minimize the CNN debate after it starts and Google search to see if anyone is streaming it outside of CNN. Don’t post it though because they may not be doing it legally.
Report Post »mccracken
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:41pmIf you hate CNN so much, then don’t watch it.
Report Post »Redmanblackdog
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:20pmWay to go Sarah! Sarah knows how to burn the liberal medias arse, just like Newt does.
I love to see the media put in its place. And there seems to be so much more to love, Juan, Mathew, Madcow, Pelosi.
They are the WWE of the media. Like fake wrestlers, they go on t.v. and spew crap. Sometimes it is down right entertaining, but most of the time it is down right sad and sickening!
Report Post »calebgs83
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:20pmWhat? I don’t understand her support for Newt. I would really like her to explain why she likes him. He is a SYCOPHANT!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:29pmThe biggest reason is probably because he is not Ron Paul………………………
Report Post »NOTvotingforRomney
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:32pmRINO Juan McShame (John McCain) who never met a war he didn‘t want to fight or a country he didn’t want to occupy whether they want us there or not (the better to kiss up to the oil) or meet a program like TSA or the Patriot Act which trash the Constitution he didn’t want to support endorsed fellow RINO Mitt Romney.
Sarah Palin is hedging for Newt. There is hope for Sarah Palin after she endorsed RINO Juan McShame’s AZ re-election after all. Palin’s husband is a patriot.
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:46pmWould you like her more if she supported Romney? Surely you don’t expect her to commit political suicide and come out for a fruit cake like Ron Paul. If somehow by hook or crook he got the nomination he wouldn’t get 15 percent of the popular vote in November.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:55pmMy guess would be is that she smells more money and more power and that seems to be ultimate goal. Everything aside,
Report Post »Wakeup Maggie
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:06pmI think she wants Newt to stay in because she know Romney is probably going to be the nominee and she wants Newt to stay in as long as possible to continue bringing out all the skeletons. That way, when obummer starts his corrupt campaign–mitt will be a stronger competitor. If only Jim Demint would jump in and give us a real conservative.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:45pmBecause Newt threw it around awhile back that he was considering her for his running mate..
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 11:17amYes, I would like her better if she had endorsed Romney. He will be our party’s eventual nominee, and she could have avoided looking foolish by starting now to rally the troops against Obama, instead having to eat crow later or refuse to endorse the nominee at all – thereby helping Obama. She smells money, and thinks Newt is her ticket to ride. She is wrong. Liberals like politcians who cheat on their spouses – Conservatives should not. She has lost credibility as far as I’m concerned.
Report Post »miser9
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:18pmThis is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard Palin say and that is saying a lot. The personal character of a president does matter. If a man cheats and lies to the people in his life that he loves imagine what he will lie about to the citizens of this country in order to get what he wants.
This guy is a smooth talking salesman and Palin has a colossal case of penis envy. They are made for each other.
Report Post »toto
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:38pmUnfortunately, even a faithful husband can be a lying politician.
Report Post »sonja42
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:18pmAppears Obama has taken a break from his golfing to post on here against Newt, lol.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:52pmNo Sonja42—He went to Orlando Disney (owned by ABC/GE) then he’s off to New York to gather 3 million in contributions from the SPIKE LEE crowd…
Report Post »Geeze Obummer loves Air Force One.
progressiveslayer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:18pmWe have a communist in power now why would we want a big government progressive to be the next president? Gingrich admitted being a Realpolitik Wilsonian,that’s all I need to know to never vote for that man.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 11:18pmAnd what would call a guy that sounds like Alex Jones and Jesse Ventura
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:02amAlex Jones? He makes points. At least he’s not afraid of the Government like you are. I am not a fan but I’ve listened. Seems to me that Alex wants to be free. Sorry that Freedom isn’t on your list to have.
Report Post »sonja42
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:17pmLOL, oh mine, the left on here are really pushing it, disgusting. NEWT HAS MY FAMILIES VOTES, YEAH FOR NEWT for being a gentleman & not telling what “fruitcake” his ex is. Cleary he is so lucky to not be married to her anymore, so lucky as she is EVIL.
Report Post »Smittyflakes
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:31amSo evil that she would not let him have an open marriage. The nerve of that woman.
Report Post »Smittyflakes
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:34amIs he a gentleman because he asked his current wife if he could continue to sleep with his mistress? You have your priorities mixed up.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 11:42amYOU ARE DISGUSTING.
Gingrich’s EX WIFE Is the PROBLEM?
If she does not want to FORGIVE him THAT IS HER PREROGATIVE. Lets not forget, HE CHEATED ON HER.
If I had an ex-wife who was a TOTAL SLEAZE and was trying to convince America that she was some STAND UP HONORABLE WOMAN, I WOULD SCREAM from the rooftops to keep her from being Elected.
YOU are obviously filled with BLIND HATRED for Mitt ROMNEY.
Are you an ANTI-MORMON BIGOT or just an ANTI-CAPITALIST CONSERVATIVE?
Report Post »singleparent
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:13pmWell she did run as V.P. for a progressive..Just saying..
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmApparently she’s partial to progressives.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:45pmActually, she is a very conservative REPUBLICAN. I don’t think she ever represented herself as anything else, it was all the tea party/libertarian freaks that tried to make her their spokeswoman. “Progressive” is a subjective term, does the belief in a basic social safety net and government involvement beyond a literal interpretation of the constitution make one a progressive? If yes then I wager the vast majority of people in here are progressive and may not even realize it.
Palin believes in government and would support such things as the FDA, welfare, SS, and projecting democracy throughout the world. Is that progressive? Does this surprise anyone?
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:06pm@ TROLLTRAINER So whats wrong with the literal interpretation of the constitution? We started getting into trouble a century ago with all of these so called ‘rights’ that have somehow appeared in the constitution which aren’t there.Our government is so bloated and wasteful it’s disgusting,I can appreciate Sarah supporting welfare or FDA or any other useless department,none of them are constitutional and that’s the problem
Milton Friedman summed it up quite nicely: If the federal government were in charge of the Sahara desert it would be free of sand in five years.It’s immoral to tax one to pay for another,charities are for the poor and it isn’t the governments role.Also why would you want to spread mob rule throughout the world?
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:16pmI never said anything was wrong with a literal interpretation of the constitution. I can sympathize with that argument and I am most definitely for a small federal government. However, I do believe in the basic safety net and other government programs designed to help those in need. I also realize that we have little choice but to be the world’s police, though I tend towards isolationism myself. It is never an all or nothing argument like Libertarians want to make. This is why Paul will never be elected. It is unfortunate because I feel he would actually be the nest president, much better than the other RINOs.
But this is not about my beliefs.
Report Post »bastone
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:11pmsarah who?
Report Post »frust@ted
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:11pmVery disapointed with Sarah backing Newt. This must be some form of Mea Culpa she has been ordered to do in order to have the powers that be in the Republican parties support in the future.
Newt is a life long politician who is more concerned with playing the game and having the power. He will change his values in a second if he thinks he can gain an advantage.
Report Post »mils
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:14pmsounds like mitt….
Report Post »Redd
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:17pmSarah is backing the best conservative candidate in the race. Newt/Sarah 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »frust@ted
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:32pmNot a Mitt supporter. This is my list in order. If Santorum could convince me that he would not legislate morality he would top my list.
Paul
Report Post »Mitt
Santorum
Newt
13th Imam
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:11pmSarah brought the Dipsticks out , All at once. She must be right on the money.
Report Post »texrubarts
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmGov. Palin is right on target!!! Obama is AFRAID of Newt so of course they had to dig up the scorned ex-wife and make a big horrah about it. It WILL back fire – I agree with Gov. Palin. This is not the first bomb to aim at Newt – Romney did it first – how soon everyone forgets!! Mittens hands are not clean!!! Plus Obama’s girlfriend was placed in a remote island by Michelle and NO ONE talks about that!!!
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmmoney? Sarah so loved Alaska that she quit being the Governor to make lots of money
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:25pmSpeaking Of,
Report Post »Hey Rust Noggin
mbriz
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:25pmShe is the dumbest women in politics. Stop looking at her boobs, then you’ll see.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:34pmI agree with you. I don’t just believe everything the media hypes anymore like some do. Why is everyone ready to believe this latest gossip from an ex wife?
Newt has admitted publicly that he has made many mistakes in his life, repented and asked Jesus for forgiveness. Who are we to not forgive if the Christ does.
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:33amHey mom..sure forgive him but don’t be foolish enough to trust him. He has serious character flaws that would make him a disasterous president. He is too unstable.
Report Post »SUMTHINSTINKS
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:10pmThere’s more to the story than you are hearing in the media………..http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/when-marianne-cleaned-out-the-house/
Report Post »mils
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:15pmthere is always more to tell and hear than the liberal media wants to put out there…esp about republicans..The media is out of hand and causes more trouble than it helps..very biased
Report Post »DatabaseSue
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:06pmWell, you guys just showed your IQ…..
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:08pmRon Paul speech on the NDAA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg69QM1yXQQ
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:10pmI find it interesting that Fox and GBTV chose to excuse ‘faults’ of some GPO candidates, but rides the wave of other’s… Romney – “well ..that’s not illegal” & “now he feels differently about that point”. Gingridge – “well that happened 15 years ago – he’s a changed man” blahhh blahh blahh
Fox/GBTV is equivalent to Maddow/MSMBC – just different agenda’s – both are obviously bias and use scare tactics to make their points.
How about we just follow the Constitution for once?! Can we please just give that a shot.. it’s been a while – we might discover it actually works!
Report Post »CanteenBoy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:13pmAnd you, yours.
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:22pmObam’s Connecticut SSN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bFApqxm7Dk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8oFHBu351c&feature=related
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:32pm@Tower7_TRUTH Thanks for the clip,sadly Paul is the only patriot running and he tried to get the provision to hold Americans indefinitely removed from that draconian bill.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:05pmSo far she is the only politician that is smarter than I am. Both parties are afraid of Americans.
Report Post »mils
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:13pmthey think we are stupid…because we have acted that way.
we send the same people back to washington time after time, no matter what they do, what they do or do not vote for, or vote simply vote “present” time after time..eg obama…then wonder what the heck happened when we fall apart….we are stupid…so far…hope it ends now or we could be in for the total destruction of our republic…
I like none of the republican candidates.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:28pmBoth “Parties’ are PROGRESSIVES. Replacing a Progressive D with a Progressive R will not fix the problem – it will ONLY shift the BLAME! Come on Republicans… do you really want to be blamed for Obama’s 4 years of failure?
Real change will only happen when we finally vote in absolute Constitutional principles… not excuses. Once you compromise those values -it doesn‘t matter which ’party’ does it – We will still FAIL as a country!
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:05pmI couldn’t agree more, Sarah Palin. People are certainly sick of the tabloid networks like ABC, NBC, and CBS; trying to play America. Not this time, libs. Your big failure is looming. You are going to lose this round. America will see to it.
Report Post »LiberalMarine
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:12pmIt’s tabloid journalism when someone points out that a candidate who is supposedly for tradition marriage asked to be in an open marriage? I didn’t realize pointing out hypocrisy was only for tabloids.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:13pmso you support open marriage Tron?
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:19pmNope, open marriage is contrary to what I believe in; but I also believe in forgiveness and strong candidates; of which Newt is.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:23pmIt’s No journalism when a candidate gets a free pass on his complete history. Most of Jugears past is hidden. Why?? What is he ashamed of?? What has he done to someone? At what point did he and Eric decide to give guns to Mexican Drug Cartels?
Report Post »mbriz
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:31pmThese people reject truth, that’s why they like S.P. Lord know she has nothing to do with truth.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:32pmSo far I only have the ex’s word on what happened. Newt has remained silent and will not play. He admits he did wrong in the situation and sought forgiveness.
Good enough for me.
I dislike Newt for many reasons. I will not play this petty game though, just as I refuse to criticize Romney on his money situation. They are both non-issues meant to distract. Too bad the folks that comment in this forum can’t see that. I expect it from trolls, but I was hoping real conservatives were beyond this kind of stupidity.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 9:53pm@TRON SO you are a liberal for big government..higher taxes for bogus causes. land grabbing. Obamacare, supporting illegals, global warming, cap and trade etc?
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 11:49amYOU ARE A Fraud.
What would you be saying if the same issue surrounded a DEMOCRATIC candidate for the Presidency?
Conservatives are showing that they are just as MORALLY BANKRUPT as the LEFT with their BLIND HATRED for MItt Romney and their BLIND SUPPORT for Newt “THE ADULTERER” Gingrich.
Since when does CHARACTER, HONOR AND MORALITY no longer matter in America?
Report Post »CanteenBoy
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:03pmWe’ll see, but for sure I’m sick of it.
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:17pmThe National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was recently approved by an overwhelming majority of the Senate. It will place domestic terror investigations and interrogations into the hands of the military and which would open the door for trial-free, indefinite detention of anyone, including American citizens, so long as the government calls them terrorists. This law is diametrically opposed to the rights provided by the Constitution and opens the door to an effective police state. Forbes (of all magazines) describes it as the “greatest threat to liberties Americans face”. Here’s an article from The New American describing the law. http://www.infiltratednation.com/2011/12/national-defense-authorization-act.html
Report Post »Whirling Dervish
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:01pmThat’s real “conservative” you know.
Gosh you are such a fake as well.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:00pmNewt wants our forgiveness and has been reborn. lol , Sarah’s brain is frozen
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:03pm??? What brain ?
Report Post »teresa2010
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:09pmOff the site you liberal pukes……..Yuckkkk!!
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:12pmWhat brain indeed.
Report Post »jsciai
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:18pmUh, I do not think you can be a “born again” catholic. Maybe a reborn catholic, or a newly converted catholic. All this based on generally accepted definitions of the term.
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:24pmTERESA I have watched the Obama deception
Have you ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
now call me a Liberal
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 20, 2012 at 1:07amHe can ask for forgiveness from God, but how does that convince me that Newt should be our President? This guy is a manic progressive. For Tea Party Palin to come out backing Newt is sadly a disgusting to hear. Newt is not even on some ballots. How can you expect this man to win independents. It’s impossible. I can’t imagine this at all.
Report Post »Baikonur
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:00pmA loser supporting another loser. They both have wonderful ‘family values.’
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:04pmSarah must support open marriage
Report Post »teresa2010
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:10pmYeah you libs sure showed your IQ…OOOOOOO
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:16pmGreat commentary by one of the biggest losers on the Blaze.
Report Post »Do even YOU take anything you say seriously?
Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 8:19pmSorry BAIKONUR
The party of abortion can not claim the moral high ground on any issue. Period.
Liberalism has destroyed more families than you can fathom. (Or maybe you can)
And I was not referring only to the abortion issue.
Report Post »Whirling Dervish
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:00pmMaybe a new wife swap is in order since you seem to be supporting this rhino.
Report Post »