Media

Scarborough Laments New Media Outlets That Claim ‘Glenn Beck & Sarah Palin Are Persecuted’

Joe Scarborough Says New Media Has Stopped Compromise in Washington | Glenn BeckRecently, MSNBC morning show host Joe Scarborough gave a candid assessment of his take on the pitfalls of new media.

In a video posted by Accuracy in Media and described by the group as a private “town hall” event in Charleston, South Carolina, the “Morning Joe” host assessed the contemporary media landscape. Aside from lamenting the negative influence he believes modern forms of news and communication are having on the electorate, Scarborough went on to mention Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin as being continuously portrayed as faux victims by various outlets.

As you know, new media outlets, like The Blaze, the Huffington Post and Politico, exist online and, as technologies have progressed, these outlets have grown exponentially in popularity. But for Scarborough, new media outlets are a major barrier to rational debate, as he said during the event that they’ve done “more than anything else to stop compromise in Washington, D.C.”

“I think the biggest problem right now has to do with new media — and I’ll just say that. We’re in a transition,” Scarborough explained. “I wasn’t a big fan of when we just had three networks…sort of a voice of God…and three networks, the New York Times and the Washington Post. They decided what the narrative was and they shoved it down our throats,” he continued.

Here’s where he really delved deeply into the current dilemma he sees with media:

“I think the bigger problem now with new media is that people can select what they want to hear at all times and go searching for a media outlet that conforms with their ideology 100 percent, so they wake up in the morning and they turn on a news channel — a cable channel — that repeats everything they believe and doesn’t question any pre-existing prejudices.”

The phenomenon he’s speaking about here is selective exposure — the notion that individuals expose themselves only to the information that meets their pre-existing views. While this may hold truth to some degree, there is a irony here, as MSNBC, the network Scarborough works for, would qualify as one of the “news channels” he’s targeting. Of course, he wasn’t done describing his qualms, as he continued to delve into the problems he sees with selective exposure.

“And then, if they’re like my mother, they will, at night, just sort of surf the web — for her it’s right-wing web sites that say that poor Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin are persecuted and that Joe Scarborough’s a socialist,” he continued.

Watch his comments, below:

The Blaze does not yet have a full version of his address, but based on these comments, Scarborough seems to have some major issues surrounding the way in which news is consumed. In terms of Scarborough being dubbed a “socialist,” we’re not sure who, exactly, he’s referring to.

This isn’t the first time that Scarborough has mentioned Beck. Back in February 2011, Scarborough said, “[Beck's] bad for the Republican party. He’s bad for Fox News. It’s that simple,” referring specifically to Beck’s work to uncover the socialists, progressives, and unions behind the unrest in Egypt and Wisconsin.

Comments (152)

1 2 3 4
  • woodcellar
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:13pm

    We are too dumb to watch the right stuff.
    We are too dumb to eat the right stuff.
    We are too dumb to vote right so the must stff a few more ballot in the box to cancel us out.
    We are too dumb to buy the right car or truck in my case.
    We are just too damn dumb.
    Thanks you libs. We didn’t know.

    Report Post »  
    • Patrick Henry II
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:20pm

      Yes they are the Ranchers, We are the cattle. And sometimes they just need to eat a good steak.

      Report Post » Patrick Henry II  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 6:05pm

      TO SUM IT UP…Joe Scarorough likes his freedom of speech,but ours is destructive to his communist agenda…

      Report Post »  
    • WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges07
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 7:08pm

      “I think the bigger problem now with new media is that people can select what they want to hear at all times and go searching for a media outlet that conforms with their ideology 100 percent, so they wake up in the morning and they turn on a news channel — a cable channel — that repeats everything they believe and doesn’t question any pre-existing prejudices.”

      THANK YOU Joe Scarborough for finally exposing MSNBC as a leftist propaganda media AND yourself as a socialist.
      When they FIRE YOU, go work for GBTV — they’re always looking for whistle-blowers to keep up the good work!

      Report Post » WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges07  
    • JeromeParkin
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 9:31pm

      somebody is busy eating at you but you are unable to speak out you are less than stupid, you are a fool and lest that I speak lightly I say that I am cast upon the reighteousness of my lord where I am beholden unto Him.

      Report Post » JeromeParkin  
    • db321
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 11:05pm

      I smell desparation coming on – the Liberal Media is losing viewers and GBTV is about to kick their butts.

      Report Post » db321  
    • Hossua
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:28am

      While It is obvious that the liberal media is biased it is no less true that so called “new media” also carries bias (most of it). What he was saying about people picking a news source that meets their ideology is true. When that news source inevitably lies, omits, or stretches the truth the consumer of that media is duped because they don’t question their favorite sources.

      I think this is equally a failing of ourselves as it is a failing of the media, and shame on us for not doing our own homework. It’s easy to attack the liberal media because their bias is so obvious to us. The bias that plays to our own ideologies and fears is much harder to admit.

      Report Post »  
    • BreeZee
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:55am

      If we had news medias that were unbiased and balanced we would‘nt hear assinine statements from RINO’s like Joe, like this:

      “I think the bigger problem now with new media is that people can select what they want to hear at all times and go searching for a media outlet that conforms with their ideology 100 percent

      Report Post »  
    • Ruler4You
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:30am

      What he should be lamenting is his ratings.

      Report Post » Ruler4You  
    • jollica2
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:21am

      But remember we are not to dumb to see the turncoat Scarborough for what he is,,Scarborough is a little man with limited intelligence, who works for MSNB what more do you need to know about this Benedict Arnold. What cracks me up is, he is always villifying the right saying they are too critical, cruel, devious etc. Whilst this nincompoop does exactly the same thing everyday on that brainless show he has. Anyone who listens to Scarborough is a fool.

      Report Post »  
    • Fonz777
      Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:46pm

      WOODCELLAR – right! Just listen to these public service broadcasts!

      Report Post » Fonz777  
    • cja23
      Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:36am

      Scarborough is so full of himself. Never in my lifetime has so much crap been thrown at a politician like Gov. Palin. The left filed numerous ethics complaints against her, all of which were dismissed, they’ve broken into her email account, harrassed her children, delved into her past, moved in next door to creepy spy on her family, but don’t you say anything against Obama or his family. So Scarborough, don’t pull your righteous indignation with us because the station you work for is the worst corrupt, cover up so-called media going. You never vetted Obama and look what we suffered with for four years. This country is in a horrible mess.

      Report Post »  
    • Gates
      Posted on April 1, 2012 at 3:46pm

      Am sorry he is a fan of the Alabama Crimson Tide. And that he “claims” to be a conservative. His dishonesty in where he is politcally is bordering on criminal. People like him are true Trojan Horses.

      Report Post »  
  • Spinolio
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:13pm

    That’s why your ratings stink!

    Report Post » Spinolio  
    • Patrick Henry II
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:23pm

      I remember when I was fooled into thinking Scarborough was on our side and a decent Human being. Wow, the roaches are starting to scatter now that the light is on them.

      Report Post » Patrick Henry II  
    • dealer@678
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 9:03pm

      Why are THEY so afraid of the new media (GBTV) . Hmm

      Report Post »  
  • crazyrightwingmom
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:12pm

    Years ago I used to admire Joe when he would spout the Conservative line. Then he went to T.V. and got stars in his eyes and in his brain. So sad!! What happened to his soul??

    Report Post »  
    • RIGEL_ORION
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:18pm

      Erosion under a never ending torrent of Progressive/Marxist ideology.

      That’s what happened to him and his conservative ideals. Erosion.

      Report Post »  
    • HKS
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:24pm

      Looks like old Joe has been learned by the dark side.

      Report Post » HKS  
    • MCDAVE
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 6:09pm

      Sold his soul to socialism

      Report Post »  
    • WPtG
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 6:43pm

      Scarborough had a radical ideological conversion shortly after Lori Klausutis’ body was found in his office. Imagine that.

      Report Post » WPtG  
    • TexasTall
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 8:10pm

      Could he have become one of those “media whores”? Looks like it to me.

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:24am

      Bought & paid for to get his ratings. (If he still has any.)
      Did you notice how EMPTY that meeting place was? To have everyone bunch up in one place only works if you stand still and don’t move from area to area! Now if it’d been a Sarah Palin speaking occasion, they’d have had to have big screens outside for the overflow. Beck, it’d depend on where and what the purpose of the meeting was!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • Bill Burns
      Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:21am

      Joe used to make good conservative sense but now he has sold his soul to the Mika moron* and his lust for sensational sound bites that get attention. Their dreadful ratings are in the crapper and declining steadily. *(Mika and Joe are both married)

      Report Post » Bill Burns  
  • Pbizzel
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:09pm

    I actually see his point here. The reality is that the internet and demographic focused cable channels have enabled us as consumers to watch and/or listen to exactly what we want to here. Over time this reinforces are perceptions. However, I would argue that the left is the party of anger and lies. As a conservative, I have no problem debating another person’s viewpoint, but what I see only too often is bitter resentment. The left has MSNBC, NPR, and pretty much all the main stream media outlets to get their information. The right has FOX, GBTV, and most of talk radio. My point here is that I agree with Joe about the divide being caused with new media, but I would argue that it is more divisive on the left than it is on the right.

    Report Post » Pbizzel  
    • RIGEL_ORION
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:24pm

      Playing devils advocate…

      Why would you assume that the big three TV networks as well as the NYT and WaPost ever gave you any real diversity in opinion? One could easily postulate that these entities provided as much objectivity 30 years ago as they do today. Basically, they’ve always promoted a center-left agenda and only the emergence of new media was able to break apart this group-think monopoly.

      Report Post »  
    • term limits for congress
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 6:44pm

      The MSM created this environment and now they‘re upset that they’ve lost (or, are losing) control.

      The truth is never the first priority when it comes to news. It is all about spin. And, we’re getting better at recognizing spin. We’re more jaded. Who watches a commercial and believes it at face value? Who watches a news report on politics and believes it at face value?

      Sadly, mis-information/partial facts are the standard around the globe. I watched a BBC story on pollution in Beijing. The conclusion was that China‘s pollution is a result of the USA’s consumerism. Right.

      The MSM could remove of the appeal of Fox or GBTV if they would play both sides of the fence. They won’t. It is ‘sexier’ to spin the stories. They have an agenda. Unfortunately, when they begin to fail, they‘ll be determined to be ’too big to fail.’ Then, we will officially have state-sponsored media… and as a result, the end of alternative news sources.

      Report Post »  
    • EchoHawk
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 8:12pm

      I see your point, it’s all their fault, we should emulate them… wait we should completely lie through our teeth and act indignant because some of them do it. Very adult or very Alinsky.

      Report Post »  
    • Hossua
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:43am

      I would argue that BOTH left and right are designed to keep the people fighting each other when we should be uniting to end the corruption in our political system.

      We like to think of moderates being somewhere in the middle, I contend that the constitution and rule of law is in the middle, with right wing and left wing dictatorships on opposing ends.

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 2:44am

      Don’t forget, this has been over 100 years of progressing toward being only 1 voice, and they’re about to harvest their crop of seeds of subversion, and along comes an internet, available to nearly every American, and it’s evem worse than “RADIO FREE EUROPE”, they try and try to get only that one message out, and those of us who believe in Freedom can keep re-igniting the American Spirit, as fast as they can tromp it down, and they just can’t keep ahead of us no matter how hard they try!
      Sometimes I wonder if we‘re not at the point in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream where the toes are part of potters clay, (Representative Government) part of Iron (Dictatorship) And I wonder if the stone cut from the mountain (Gospel of God’s Forgiveness and Salvation) isn’t sent rolling into the image in the dream via the internet? (Even as it gets harder and harder for missionaries to go into so many countries, yet the ruling power set to take over the world and trying to stomp out the people’s spirits, finds that the internet, permit’s that Gospel of Jesus Redeeming Blood be able to reach all over the world, to be read by whosever will, that they may come! (Taken from Daniel 2, & John 3)

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • BOstinks
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:16pm

      I find you can’t discuss any subject very long with left leaning folks before they just get angry and the name calling starts.

      Report Post »  
  • iamgorilla
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:09pm

    He‘d probably be singing a diffrent tune if his employers ratings weren’t in the toilet!

    Report Post » iamgorilla  
    • Lamarr01
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 6:17pm

      ABC, CBS, NBC, New York Times and Washington Post had a monopoly on “THE NEWS” for years. Only stories that were covered by the New York Times had the official stamp of approval. Now there are thousands of websites that present biased and distorted stories.

      Everybody can become a journalist with the abundance of blogs. There is no need for direct quotes from eyewitnesses or fact checking a story. All you need is an opinion and vague “facts” from unnamed sources.

      Report Post » Lamarr01  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 9:59pm

      Ahh, but didn’t Bill Clinton recently endorse MSNBC? It will be interesting to see how that changes their ratings.

      Report Post » pamela kay  
  • jakartaman
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:09pm

    Hey Joey,
    Envy is a sin.

    Report Post »  
  • barber2
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:07pm

    George Bush, Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin took three of the earliest Character Assassination Hits by the Left. Anyone who does not acknowledge that fact would have to be a Hit Squad supporter or a new arrival from planet Bruce…

    Report Post »  
    • Steelhead
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:27pm

      the people you mentioned brought it on themselves i.e. in what respect Charlie?- self inflicted character assasination

      Report Post » Steelhead  
    • Git-R-Done
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:50pm

      Steelhead has the same mindset that a rape victim brought it on themselves.

      Report Post »  
    • We are Americans
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 5:30pm

      Comparing rape and a disagreement
      on a political point is an extreme view.
      Palin didn’t want to be vetted. Bottom line.
      She whined and Hannity , Rush , and Glenn
      act like everybodies attacking this poor woman
      Don’t get it. You want to play big boy politics
      then you have to expect this. My God if she
      had become President she probaly would have
      dropped a nuke on any country who complained
      about any of her policies. Yet she can dish out
      verbal abuse with the best of them. Weak. Very
      weak.

      Report Post »  
    • Steverino
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 7:34pm

      WEAREAMERICANS-
      “Sarah Palin didn’t want to be vetted. Bottom line.”
      OK.
      Who would want to be vetted? – Probably right up there with a colonoscopy. I‘m sure Obama didn’t want to be vetted. Therefore, his vetting was like a lil’ tummy rub versus a 12 gauge blast to the gut.
      Steve

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 3:02am

      @ weareamericans
      So are we!
      re : Palin didn’t want to be vetted. Bottom line.
      She whined and Hannity , Rush , and Glenn
      act like everybodies attacking this poor woman
      Don’t get it. You want to play big boy politics
      then you have to expect this.
      So we’re going to expect the lsm to do the same to barack obama this time around? I’m waiting with baited breath, Bring on the stories of bill ayres, and bernadine dhorn. How about publishing in the lsm the story of michelle o. joining them to present to hugo chavez the education award for successfully removing capitalism from vezuelan textbooks at the beginning of bo’s campaign. Only saw it on fox once, never on the wa post, huffington, times, alphabet letter news sites or any of the others on tv. It pointed out that she was a former intern for dhorn or ayres one, but according to bo, he was “only a guy in my neighborhood”. AND OF COURSE WE’LL SEE THE STORIES CONDEMNING THE NEW BLACK PANTHERS FOR ONCE AGAIN GUARDING POLLING PLACES AND INTIMIDATING VOTERS!
      Can‘t wait until they challenge bo’s voting record in both state and DC senates. How about THEY look into whether he’s using a Social Security # that was issued to a dead guy from CN?
      Yep! He got into politics, he should grow up and expect to be vetted! Some of those lies he’s told, may just be his “Chickens come home to Roost!”

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • We are Americans
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:23am

      At milmom. If you know about these things
      then somebody reported on it. So somebody
      somewhere in the media wrote the story.
      Yet you complain about the media not reporting
      on something they reported on. Is this
      Sarah P? Mrs Palin is just a very thin skinned
      person who cam dish out venom yet acts
      like a victim when somebody does it to her.
      Just saying. Weak. Very weak.

      Report Post »  
    • cosette
      Posted on January 21, 2012 at 1:31pm

      @ We are Americans_ I have no objection to vetting candidates. You have quite a selective memory. Bush had a DUI conviction in his twenties. Do you remember the anal exam he endured when that was discovered? Obama, by his own admission,used cocaine in his twenties, no exam. Palin had a downs syndrome child who the media speculated was actually her daughters baby. How is that vetting? She was also vilified for outsourcing her maternal obligations to others. Not a peep from feminist groups. And the outrage over her the price of her wardrobe was truly mind boggling. Michelle Obama has a wardrobe that would rival that of royalty, not a word! Dan Quayle was ridiculed mercilessly for misspelling potato, to this day he is characterized as an idiot. Obama is commander in chief and doesn’t know the proper pronunciation of the word CORPSMAN! The MSN never even mentioned it! You argue we’ve heard the negative stories about liberals, yes we have. Not through the MSM, but through alternative sources. But for FOX, talk radio and honest internet sites, we would all be in the dark. The point being, the news and the way it’s presented is no longer the sole property of the leftist spin machine. And they are NOT happy about losing their ability to shape opinions as they once could.

      Report Post »  
  • NeoFan
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:07pm

    I have an antenna for the local news and weather, the internet and a Roku for GBTV. Its all the the media I need. No dish or cable needed.

    Report Post »  
    • saranda
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 10:41pm

      And by narrowing your view of the world that way you are part of the problem and no where near providing a solution. Watch some BBC or CBC (Canadian) if you can get it. Read a newspaper online or just use google news and search a news event and read multiple reports on it to get some real info. GBTV is the worst source for news and local is something to pay attention to sporadically. Expand your world and expand your mind. What a concept.

      Report Post »  
    • ZomBrad
      Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:00am

      Saranda…..truth is black and white. Either it’s true, or false, no middle ground. If you hear one side of a story which is truth, but then another from a liar…..how does that help? How does that “expand your world”?

      Yin and Yang does not = balance, only chaos! A divided house cannot stand!

      Listening to what England, or Canada thinks about American issues helps about as much as listening to a Pearl Harbor survivor’s opinion about Japanese people.

      Report Post »  
  • lodgerat
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:05pm

    He just doesn’t get it. The reason I come to the Blaze and GBTV is beause they see the world as it really is. It’s not my fault all the lefties are wrong in their world view. How’s that for selective exposure. LOL :o)

    Report Post » lodgerat  
  • rich43068
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:05pm

    So Joe doesn’t like journalism, the watchdog for the people, where everything is questioned.
    He likes one sided activism like at MSNBC. surprize!

    Report Post »  
  • zaverett
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:02pm

    This dumb fool is a complete weenie…who is he? oh ya hes the idiot that is scared of Glenn and Sara…hahahahahahahah har har har har…aaaaaaaaaaa hes dumb

    Report Post » zaverett  
  • vtxphantom
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:00pm

    And I lament an old media that can‘t get it’s head out of obama’s a$$.

    Report Post »  
  • cuinsong
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:00pm

    Is this an omission of truth confession of just a CYA moment? what ever it is I still think Sarah P. should run and can be elected. here is a song for the media and a video for the people who hate our country.
    http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_11826046
    and a little video to enlighten you on patriotism
    http://youtu.be/lJXb0LLkx1Y

    Report Post » cuinsong  
  • RIGEL_ORION
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:59pm

    Someone should alert Joe that people have been selectively editing their news exposure for years. It just used to be called grabbing the sports & comics sections and putting the rest in the trash.

    Back in the days of the Founders, you also had the same type of selective editing. Except instead of selectively choosing URLs, people would selectively choose the penny press rag they wanted to read. Each rag was firmly dedicated to a certain viewpoint and I‘m certain that ardent followers didn’t bother reading any other paper.

    Yet we still managed to avoid going through another Dark age

    Report Post »  
  • Barack_Must_Go
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:56pm

    This jackass is so far up Barack’s rear end, everytime he opens his filthy, lying mouth to whine,…….there is Scarborough, behind B’s tonsils,……..himself whining away, and comepletely oblivious.

    Report Post » Barack_Must_Go  
  • NeoFan
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:56pm

    So according to an actor playing the part (not believably) of a conservative thinks he can convince us that we need less free media so that the message of a wannabe dictator can be more effectively shoved down our throats? These people are mentally disturbed.
    Thank god for a still free press. This is an indicator that people like Glenn Beck are not just clowns that the powers that be can just ignore. Does anyone remember the celebration and the libs singing ding dong the witch is dead when Glenn left Fox News? If that was true then why even mention his name Joe?

    Report Post »  
    • RIGEL_ORION
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:15pm

      I actually feel bad for him. He has been brainwashed over time by his environment. He has been gradually taught to see and understand issues from a Liberal perspective. This is where his doubts in conservatism began as well as his compulsive need to ‘moderate’ everything to the left. I call it brainwashing because he thinks himself part of an enlightened group, when in reality his Progressive/Marxist colleagues would sooner cut his throat than attempt to see things from a Conservative perspective.

      Report Post »  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:18pm

      Don’t forget the ding-dong crowd is still pursuing the Murdoch witch hunt. When the Left isn’t OCCUPYING, they are re-calling, media smearing, or witch hunting ! Ah, the Land of the Left where “Mob Rule” has replaced majority rules….

      Report Post »  
  • West Coast Patriot
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:56pm

    Here is an example of a professed socialist that works for MSNBC, Lawrence O’Donnell, actually reporting a story the right way. Who would have thought it was possible. He hates all anti-government spending candidates (basically fiscal conservatives), but in this story he needs to be given a kudo of some type. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vcn15iZSjQo&feature=youtu.be

    Shame on Associated Press.

    Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
  • 912er
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:55pm

    So Joe, you’re saying news media was too small when it was just three networks, and it’s too big now with “new media”? So, we should have just stopped when you got a job at MSNBC? You are a tool…

    Report Post » 912er  
  • AZ Patriot
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:49pm

    Listen to your mother, Bozo!

    Report Post »  
  • MONICNE
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:49pm

    The nice thing about the ‘Scarboro vs Mika’ program is that they do try to argue three or four sides to each issue, but the bad thing is that they treat each side with equal respect. Everyone knows when you reach a certain age and have attained sufficient wisdom, that mere facts will not change your beliefs. At least they do not discuss the weather every eleven minutes. Anyway, Morning Joe does qualify as a self righteous info-entertainmental exercise for the truly infirm and those in waiting rooms all across America.

    Report Post » MONICNE  
  • thop1960
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:49pm

    So Joe has a problem with questioning what people say and trying to figure out where they are coming from? Or is it he just doesn’t like the exposure he and other “socialist” are getting by Glenn? He wants us to go on with our daily life and pretend nothing is going on in the shadows to undermine the Constitution of the USA.”You there, go on about your business, there is nothing to see here…” Not gonna happen Joe, we’re onto you and Barry.

    Report Post » thop1960  
  • elosogrande
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:48pm

    Joe is nothing more than an irrelevent hack. One of the very few incombent politicians who could not get re-elected.

    Now he wants to lend his expertise to broadcasting. For God’s sake Joe, you have no expertise – no one watches your program. Stp giving advise – try to get some!

    Report Post »  
  • flyingeagle
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:48pm

    sdffrrddcfvf

    Report Post »  
  • Steelhead
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:45pm

    is that why Ailes fired Beck because he’s bad for the republican party? I think he was fired for being crazy

    Report Post » Steelhead  
  • I.Gaspar
    Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:36pm

    You know, maybe Colbert was right. Scarborough may well have a serious problem with John Barleycorn.
    It would explain a lot.

    Report Post »  
    • Bluefish49
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 3:46pm

      Don‘t know which one’s a bigger dipstick….Joe or Mika.

      Report Post »  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:01pm

      Instead of “selective exposure” we should allow joe to select what we will watch or read or hear. He could program several hours of mandatory viewing per day. For those of us who refuse, they could tie us to chairs and cut off our eyelids, and force us to watch.
      Yep, joe, sounds like you are the new arbiter for freedom of speech in America, so long as it is the speech YOU think is appropriate or proper.

      Tell ya what, joe. If you want “change” start with the man in the mirror.
      Start REPORTING FACTS…
      SANS OPINION…
      then I’ll sit and discuss media bias with you.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • I.Gaspar
      Posted on January 20, 2012 at 4:07pm

      Bluefish:
      Mika.
      As big a doofus Scarborough is, she may be the biggest dipstick on the air…even worse than Ed Schultz.

      Report Post »  
    • Bill Burns
      Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:40am

      I.Gaspar
      regarding your post, “Mika. As big a doofus Scarborough is, she may be the biggest dipstick on the air…even worse than Ed Schultz” –
      - You are correct; pea brain Mika is certainly not representative of women. Scarecrow legs, a bird brain and 2 plastic boobs. I have never seen her make a valid point on anything. There’s just so much of that “There are others with differing views” and “Do we have that Obama clip?” that viewers can digest. Her only strong point is keeping frisky Joe Happy ;^)

      Report Post » Bill Burns  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love