Politics

Scarborough Says ‘There Will Be Blood’ If Romney Wins Iowa and New Hampshire

Scarborough: There Will Be Blood If Romney Wins

Former Republican Florida congressman and current MSNBC host Joe Scarborough has been vocal in his opinions about the 2012 Republican presidential primary and its candidates.

Two weeks ago the Morning Joe host said with the surge of Texas Rep. Ron Paul in national polls, that “there is always a strain of anit-Semitism” among some of his supporters at events. Scarborough did not raise those concerns a little more than a week prior to the Anti-Semitism statement, when he said if then front-runner former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was able to secure the Republican nomination, he would take “a long look” at voting for Ron Paul on a third-party ticket.  In November, Scarborough shot defiant “told you so” type words at conservative bloggers as the presidential campaign of Texas Gov. Rick Perry looked to be collapsing, lambasting those who doubted his prediction that the success of both Bachmann and Perry campaigns would not last. And truth be told, both Perry and Bachmann have long been favorite targets of MSNBC’s anointed conservative commentator.

Scarborough’s latest observation: “There will be blood” among conservatives if Mitt Romney seems to be easily securing the nomination after Iowa and New Hampshire wins:

Newsbusters transcript of Scarborough’s juicier remarks:

“JOE SCARBOROUGH: I will tell you this.  I know this sounds crazy, but if I’m just looking at the field right now: keep your head down, don’t blow yourself up in Iowa, because there‘s going to be a lot of teeth gnashing and weeping after the guy that’s got a 24% ceiling wins Iowa and the conservatives split. Cause everybody’s going to start looking and saying OK, who is the conservative? We are not going to allow a guy that has the 24% of the moderates in the Republican party voting for him, while this conservative party pushes another, let’s say, Gerald Ford to the finish line. By the way, I need to explain this.  This isn’t necessarily what I feel. I need to explain this. I’m telling you, as I predicted, crazy never wins in the Republican party, and it doesn’t.

But the Republican party, just like I said when Newt Gingrich was at 38, 39% wasn’t going to stand for that, they’re not going to stand for the guy who has a 24% ceiling walking away with their nomination. Anybody who thinks it’s going to be over after Iowa and New Hampshire, if Romney wins, does not understand the conservative base.  There will be blood if Mitt Romney seems like the guy who’s going to walk away with it . . . So, Mark Halperin, do you think it’s over if Mitt Romney wins out?

MARK HALPERIN: I think it is, Joe. I know you think it won’t.  And I do think there will be this spasm of conservative angst, of saying it can’t over, he’s not the right person.

SCARBOROUGH: They should have thought of this before!

HALPERIN: They should have thought of it before. I mean, if he wins Iowa I think he will roll out of New Hampshire and I think he’ll be in a strong position in South Carolina.  Willie and I were talking, as we like to say, off air, about the notion of people dropping out. I don‘t think anybody’s going to drop out.  I think even Michell Bachmann will go, try to fight on in South Carolina. It’s perfect for Mitt Romney to have a crowded field in South Carolina”

 

Take a look at Scarborough and the rest of the Morning Joe panel live from Iowa take on the Romney campaign:

Comments (229)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • Goldi
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:14pm

    Actually, Glenn said if you vote for Newt you will be wishing you had voted for Romney!
    The more I see of Romney and his family, the more I want him to win. I want him to pick Rubio as VP. That will help with the Spanish voters and one or more of Romney’s sons is fluent in Spanish and can speak to them in their own language.

    Report Post »  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:18pm

      Do you like the fact that Romney still defends the portion of RomneyCare which uses taxpayer money to pay for abortions?

      Report Post »  
    • An Arizonan
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:34pm

      Romney is as anti-abortion as a candidate can get, anyone who says otherwise, is pushing a bold face lie. Romney-Rubio 2012. Make America Great Again!

      Report Post » An Arizonan  
    • justin.blake
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:35pm

      Remember folks, he was the Governor of Massachusetts…elected to represent and lead the people of that state. THEY wanted a health care mandate. THEY wanted what has been dubbed ‘RomneyCare’. To throw that out there and use it as fodder for pundits or proof that he is just like Obama is ridiculous. He was representing the citizens of his state and did what the majority of them asked him to do…create a health care system for them. He may not have been thrilled to do it, but he should be proud that he was able to get it done. Most folks forget that he was threatened with a huge loss of Medicaid funds if he did not reduce the number of uninsured folks seeking medical care in his state. Also remember that the state legislature amended his plan and added more people to it as well as removing the high deductible plan option. (which changed the overall numbers for it to pencil out) If you also look at the conservative actions he took to reduce the $3 billion deficit he had handed to him when he was sworn in, you would applaud them! He cut spending, he closed tax loopholes, and in the end, closed with over $700 million surplus. So when he says States should decide for themselves, he is spot on with the Founding Fathers..thats what Mass. wanted and thats what they got.

      Report Post » justin.blake  
    • Roaran
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:43pm

      The same people who fund Obama, fund Romney. *cough* Goldman Sachs *cough*.

      Report Post »  
    • Cosmos102
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:56pm

      I can’t believe how many people think Glenn Becks rants against Newt Gingrich were legitimate complaints. He sounded so hysterical. Mark my words, something is up with Beck. He has been more and more histrionic (read histrionic, not historic. Look it up if you don’t know what it means) in the delivery of his morning broadcasts. Something is troubling that man.

      Report Post » Cosmos102  
    • nelbert
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:57pm

      As things draw to a close, Romney seems more and more the choice and I am less and less opposed to him as the candidate. Yes, there are some things that I may not be totally pleased with, but he’s vastly better than the man currently in office.

      Report Post » nelbert  
    • antisocial21
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 12:48am

      @dani As president, Romney will have absolutely no power to reverse Roe v. Wade, that will ultimately be decided by the supreme court if that case is ever revisited (highly unlikely). A president can only do so much if he wishes to abide by the constitution. You really shouldn’t judge a candidate based off of his stances on social issues like gay marriage, since defeating Obama and stopping the Left SHOULD be our #1 priority. Having pissy fits over abortion and gay marriage will likely doom the GOP candidate, since those issues largely alienate many voters. Economy and Jobs are #1 and it is important that the eventual candidates focuses on Obamao’s failures on those fronts.

      Report Post » antisocial21  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:01am

      To those of you who are seing Romney in a better light, look again at Rick Santorum, please? If Rick Santorum wins in Iowa, there will be a strong Conservative in the race. Along with the Moderate and the Libertarian, that will make for a good presentation of those three paths forward (or backward, depending on your point of view.)

      Report Post »  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:01am

      RomneyCare uses taxpayer money to pay for abortions and Romney still defends this aspect of the program— http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2007/nov/27/fred-thompson/indeed-abortions-are-covered/
      Mitt Romney is just as bad as Obama and even if he picks a fantastic VP candidate I cannot vote for him

      Report Post »  
    • wbalzley
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:15am

      CRYSTAL BALL: With the popularity of the two candidates, I see a Romney-Paul Ticket in our future…Romney is “The Chosen One” and making Ron Paul VP is a great way for the GOP to put him out to pasture…he has been a thorn in the RHINO’s side for far too long…

      Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:19am

      How nice… One MORE hit piece of propaganda provided to you by, Santarelli. Part of the story is from TWO WEEKS AGO? Just to add “anti-semitic” into the article? Seems that you and Tiffany G. are teaming up to do some last minute paul bashing? “There will be blood?” You so-called journalists do nothing more than ‘skim read’ other news sites and add your BIASED 2 cents. IMPOSTERS! I cant believe GB even pays you.

      Dear Tiffany, Santaerlli, and Joe Smo:

      How can Ron Paul be Anti-semitic, as you have insinuated b4, yet his fundamental monetary policies are guided by the teachings of TWO Jewish men?

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:33am

      @An Arizonan
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:34pm

      Romney is as anti-abortion as a candidate can get, anyone who says otherwise, is pushing a bold face lie. Romney-Rubio 2012. Make America Great Again!
      —————————————————————————————

      Please watch this video of Mitt running for Governor in 2002 and tell us if you believe he has a firm stance on that.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFMdK0TWtks

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • Miami
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:56am

      To the Ronbots

      I unlike many of you college students and alike, Swore to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic, Will do so again if called upon and proudly.

      Please tell me what good the Constitution is going to be against an Iranian Nuclear device?

      Ron loves to say that the Constitution has no previsions for projecting our force globally.

      Which is true but so is the fact that they had no prevision for Nuclear weapons that could wipe out a whole city in one strike.

      Denial of the of group intent in the face of their declared motivation, reaches and surpasses neglect too the level treason. We have enemies, ignoring them will not make them go away or like us anymore. For a candidate who has said he would’ve not intervened in WWII, leaves one to wonder if he would fight off an invader off shore or wait till they land.

      He falls in a group who blame the US for all the world’s political flaws. While mistakes have been made but living in the past is not possible. As 12/7/1941 & 9/11/2001 proved we can be hit History and modern day media have proven we have plenty of enemies right here at home. Whom are more than willing to collaborate with external enemies.

      Ignorance of the threat is no excuse at this point, they’re at the gates

      Clowns like Joe Scarborough are nothing more than a distraction to confuse the issues and preserve the power for their Socialist Progressives bosses.

      Report Post » Miami  
    • ConstLaw
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:03am

      Mitt Romney is pro-choice and he says so in his own words…
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4

      Report Post »  
    • nzkiwi
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:07am

      @Goldi

      Rubio has unequivically ruled himself out for VP.

      Report Post »  
    • nzkiwi
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:09am

      Which is a pity.

      Report Post »  
    • GUNNSUP
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:09am

      I see Scarborough has his little lap dog in tow. She is always holding something in her hand and putting it to her mouth. NWO primadonna

      Report Post » GUNNSUP  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:10am

      @antisocial21 You think that we Tea Partiers hate Romney because of the social issues? Yes, he was dead wrong on the social issues but that’s nothing compared to the way he screwed up the Mass economy with RomneyCare. Do you honestly look at Romney Care and think “yeah this guy is a fiscal conservative”?
      We are entering a very dangerous area when Conservatives are being forced to defend a Socialist program like RomneyCare.

      Report Post »  
    • Miami
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:42am

      (continued)

      Who want to continue weakening the nation, politically, militarily and financially. While Ron Paul agrees with all but the Financial

      I wonder what would happen to the world‘s trade routs if we weren’t their to protect them? How are our goods going to be distributed around the world? When every American flagged ship would become a target. As would any ship destined for the US, returning the high seas to a time before anyone can remember. When Pirates roamed the seas, yeh ha

      Oh by the way, Hezbollah and Hamas already have camps in Venezuela, right off the Panama Canal. Can you say Pirates of the Caribbean…. So much for cruise ships.

      If we bail on the Philippines, we already seen the spread of radical Muslims there. Just recently the influence of radical Muslims ban common practices through the reign.

      Lets not forget that they’re also in Mexico aligning themselves with the Narcos and Marxist rebels.

      Report Post » Miami  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:23am

      Danibal…. the most important factor in this election is getting a man in office that can help fix the economy. EVERY OTHER ISSUE is a back burner issue. I don’t care if Romney is 100% pro-choice (and I’m 100% pro-life by the way). Romney is an economist that can fix our country’s mess. He is the best man for 2012. If and when things get turned around, then and only then do we need to start worrying about back burner issues. Right now, if we don’t fix the economy, there won’t be a 2016 election for us to worry about.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:33am

      2 follow up points on even the supposition that Romney is pro-choice.

      #1 – Rove v Wade is already law. If Romney is pro-choice, he won’t be doing much to change what is already in place. Meaning, it’s not going to get any worse than it already is.

      #2 – The POTUS doesn’t have a whole lot of bearing on RvW, so his position on abortion is nearly moot. The US Supreme Court will either let RvW stand or overturn it, not the POTUS.

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • TheePolitinator
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 4:52am

      I’m from MA, I know Romney and his policies. Hes big gov’t all the way. The single payer health care drove taxes on everything in the state through the roof and the state is in the red bigtime. Stop reading the cover of a book. Its what these politicians DON’T say that you should base your decision on. That and policies. His says what you “need” to hear, not what he does.

      Report Post » TheePolitinator  
    • rock-n-roll-rebel
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:47am

      Romney has more flip-flops than a Jimmy Buffett concert

      Report Post » rock-n-roll-rebel  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:51am

      Obummer is sitting on Air Force 1 laughing his a*** off
      Republicans (Conservatives) should STAND together!!!!
      The people on here who will write Ron Paul in are simply voting for Obummer.
      TRUE the system is flawed (on both sides) BUT we must vote BHO OUT of OFFICE
      He and his programs are killing this country.
      ObamaCare will RUIN this country
      ALL this bickering about religion and Massachusetts Health Care (dominated by DEMOCRATS) will divide us and Obummer gets a free ride to 1600.
      It’s not a perfect world but Romney/Rubio would be a great match or
      Romney/Christie

      Is Romney perfect? Absolutely not BUT look what Obummer has done to our deficit in 3 years!!!
      BTW WHERE IS THE BUDGET?
      Reid/Peelooski and Obummer don’t need a budget—–They just keep SPENDING YOUR MONEY.
      So if you want to be a “slave” to MORE GOVT regs when will certainly come from Obummer—-Vote or write in Ron Paul.
      Then you can be proud of your vote and sit back and watch the country crumble. (Crumble even MORE)

      Report Post »  
    • sWampy
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:37am

      I didn’t think the republicans could screw up and pick a worst person than McCain, now they double down and pick Mitt or Newt, you couldn’t select 2 bigger RINOS if you tried.

      Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:40am

      Romney considers himself to be a progressive..progressive taxes..progressive gun control.. he has been a flip flopper.. he has come out to support global warming ..that means Agenda 21 and heavy taxation..He has not come out against indefinite detention..All of these candidates line up for the NWO except Ron Paul. Not one of them has a viable fiscal plan except Ron Paul. The government has just enacted 40,000 new laws for us..Obama has just signed away our Bill of Rights…We are sitting on 16 trillion dollars of debt.soon to be 17.5 to stop a gov. shutdown..How much longer do you think we have? NWO was spoken of by George H Bush, and Henry Kissinger is on record talking about it and saying that the American people are not going to take kindly to it..but that it would be for their own good. I had a woman tell me not long ago…she said..well I would rather take financial advise from a rich man than a poor one.” and I said to her..”well…you must assume that they have your best interests at heart. People..this is the only shot we have. If we don’t bring our military home to build it here..we will have no defense whatsoever because we will have no government..The UN will serve its purpose being the ones policing us..No more US..That has been the plan all along..George Soros is known for collapsing economies and changing their regimes..Look up the Rose Revelution..Look up Soros..There have been I believe 5 major revolutiions in which he was at the helm..

      Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:58am

      @MIAMI…I respect the fact that you have sworn to protect this country..Ron Paul is the only one who will uphold our Constitution..The point is that we are 16 trillion gong on 17.5 trillion in the hole and the military will not continue to even exist at this point..Do you remember that a short time back that Iran’s nuclear facilities jjust kind of went up in smoke? There are other ways of doing things that don’t invlove spending one trillion a year by policing the world and nation building..That is what got us in our current situation.Just because Paul wants to bring our troops home and build our military here doesn‘t mean that Congress won’t decide to declare war..Paul wants to get in..win and get out.. We need to have more faith in the future and not trust the people who are annilating our Constitution…We have more to fear from the enemies within our own government than from our outside enemies..Please watch this video Glenn explains it better that I can
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyx9tw0TEPM

      Report Post »  
    • sewinthyme
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:14am

      @Danibalyeat, I think you may have missed something there…The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the health care bill that passed had to cover abortion. There were many things that the Massachusetts bill had in it that Romney vetoed. Unfortunately when you have a veto proof majority in the legislature you don’t necessarily get your way (often times you don’t). He did have a balanced budget all 4 years, he did cut taxes, he did order the police to cooperate with ICE and immigration enforcement, he did stand for life when it push came to shove. Being in an extremely blue state myself, I wish that when we had a Republican governor he had fought for the things that Romney fought for in Massachusetts, but Schwarzenegger just rolled over and let the legislature pass every far far-left bill they wanted.

      Report Post »  
    • DrFrost
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:36am

      @NELBERT

      Most politicians tell you what you want to hear. Romney’s message is not bad… not as conservative as I would like but not bad. But why should I believe him? Romney has never answered that question to my satisfaction.

      I don’t trust Romney. Not because he’s done something questionable in his past (though Romneycare is not a good indicator) but simply because he’s running for president. Call me jaded if you will, but it’s a matter of fact that most promises made by people seeking that office are not kept. It’s naive to think this time will be different.

      I will not vote for him in the primary. If he wins the republican nomination I will vote for him in the general election or for the libertarian candidate, whoever has the best chance of beating Obama.

      So who am I going to vote for? That’s a good question. My top three right now are Newt, Paul and Santorum. Each has their own set of strengths and weaknesses and, to be honest, I’m not yet sure which one would be the best choice for our country.

      Report Post »  
    • West Coast Patriot
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:19pm

      This is what Glenn said about Romney, Perry and Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcAYJqG0NEI

      This is what Glenn says about Gingrich and Paul: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyx9tw0TEPM

      Any reponse? Or are all of you too scared to respond to this?

      Report Post » West Coast Patriot  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:01pm

      @SEWINTHYME– From Redstate.com— “The law, in addition to providing healthcare coverage for the uninsured and forcing everyone to have insurance, expanded abortion services in the State of Massachusetts. It also required that one member of the MassHealth Payment Policy Board be appointed by Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts.

      From Chapter 58 of the Acts of 2006:

      SECTION 3. Chapter 6A of the General Laws is hereby amended by inserting after section 16I the following 6 sections: . . . Section 16M. (a) There shall be a MassHealth payment policy advisory board. The board shall consist of the secretary of health and human services or his designee, who shall serve as chair, the commissioner of health care financing and policy, and 12 other members: … 1 member appointed by Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts … (Massachusetts General Court Website) http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/12/30/mitt-romney-didnt-just-give-planned-parenthood-money-he-gave-them-extra-power/

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:08pm

      Some of you never experienced the Carter years first-hand. There‘s no real difference between Paul’s foreign policy and Carter’s. Beck et al. are out of their minds when they say they’d rather lose Washington — or some other city to a foreign power — than the entire nation to a Repub progressive. Remember the domino effect you passionately lectured on, Glenn? Well, give this country over to Ron Paul and that’s what we will get. Russia, China and every other big power out there will eat us alive. You don‘t know what that’s like, Glenn. Not really. Otherwise, you wouldn’t make such obtuse comments. Ron Paul is half-senile. He wants to take us back to the 1800′s, when America was a young nation blossoming in a non-globalized world. This is 2012, folks. We can’t turn back the clock and shield ourselves from the rest of the world.

      In re domestic issues, I keep asking Paulists, Just how does Paul plan to get his makeover-of-America through Congress? In 20+ years, he has been able to pass only ONE of over 600 bills. Does he plan to rule by executive order a la Obama — or worse?

      Paul would never beat Obama. He would be blasted by the Obama machine as the worst racist and bigot since David Duke, and a man too old to serve as president in these increasingly stressful times. See ya, Paul. See ya, America. Back to the commie Muslim, Phase II.

      Report Post »  
    • Ruby in FL
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:42pm

      GOLDI : re: Rubio.. Be careful what you wish for. Until last night when reading Rubio’s book, I too was for him – but his solutions for FL issues are BIG GOV solutions.

      Cosmos102 said: I can’t believe how many people think Glenn Becks rants against Newt Gingrich were legitimate complaints. He sounded so hysterical. Mark my words, something is up with Beck. Something is troubling that man.

      I agree, and it worries me.
      GB is FOR Paul & Romney, both of whom have ties to SOROS and against Newt who not only has NO ties to SOROS, but he also vehemently HATES SOROS !
      GB stands on Newt being a Progressive ??? LOL. For proof that Newt is NOT a Prog, just tell your
      progressive friends Newt is progressive – your friends will laugh in your face.

      If GB and voters were to read Newt’s book TO SAVE AMERICA – they would know he IS the one who could do it. And he would do it quickly.
      Obama plays dirty. USA needs a new Prez that can do the same to BENEFIT us.
      Romney (like Obama for his party) will disappoint because he will not do enough.
      Romney favors big business – Newt 100% for small business.
      Newt is getting good numbers WITHOUT Big Business $

      GB doesn’t understand why the Tea Party likes Newt. Maybe they read his book
      To Save America, and also realize by his present deeds/words that he has changed his personal life
      (like GB did) and that Newt’s love of America just oozes on those pages.

      Middle of the road Mitt won’t save America fast enough – bulldo

      Report Post »  
    • Abraham Young
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:07pm

      Romney’s another Bush. He’s the rising star, the bright boy, the anointed one. We should allow the Neo-Cons to have their way just like we did with the Bushmeister who was SOOOO good for conservative ideals!!!!!

      Report Post »  
  • patbarker
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:55pm

    Joe..got some splainin’ to do…what about it, Joe???

    http://www.americanpolitics.com/20010808Klausutis.html

    Report Post »  
    • mamatango
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:54pm

      So does Ron Paul….. He almost had me fooled until I read this!!!

      Ron Paul’s Soros Defense Plan
      http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/

      Does anyone know the validity of this online magazine?

      Report Post »  
    • Maji
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 12:14am

      Scab-boro is bad enough but the blonde “transexual” next to really sucks!

      Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:04am

      @mama tango… Totally bogus allegations. Bogus source and ZERO PROOF.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • Twobyfour
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:34am

      Which part, Cause4Liberty?

      The factual part: http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1875&Itemid=28

      As for Soros, that’s a tad of inference, but Soros had “Ideas” that went in the same thrust (some articles/interviews and his book). There are some interesting connections/associations that relate to the members of the group that was involved in the “plan”. Nothing definite, but I‘ll run it through a some crosschecks and will post whatever I’ll find. Why Paul is associating with these people is hard to comprehend.

      Report Post » Twobyfour  
    • Twobyfour
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:43am

      Mamatango, frontpagemag is a credible source. You can also verify some factual details of the article via Ron Paul site link I provided.

      Report Post » Twobyfour  
    • Bill Burns
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 5:05am

      Good post PATBARKER.

      Report Post » Bill Burns  
    • Babeuf
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:12am

      mamatango

      Here is the link to the matter of your question:
      http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/1006SDTFreport.pdf
      The Sustainable Defense Task Force was formed in response to
      a request from Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), working
      in cooperation with Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC),
      Representative Ron Paul (R-TX), and Senator Ron Wyden
      (D-OR), to explore possible defense budget contributions to
      deficit reduction efforts that would not compromise the essential
      security of the United States.

      Report Post » Babeuf  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:53am

      @2×4. It seems my other post got deleted or filtered. How about showing some credible article by a webstie that ACTUALLY has authors! NEITHER article is credible, AT ALL. You say because RP had common ground with a democrat (anti-war) that he is automatically funded and backed by SOROS? Because they joined in a bipartisian effort to cut some of the military spending? Youre CRAZY! Those ARE some SERIOUS allegations that are only followed up by your phony BOGUS articles with NO author name? Put up or Shut up.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:59am

      @MAMATANGO I just read your link..It is breaking news and so there are a lot of other media outlets quoting their words exactly.. it appears to me that frontpage is written by David Horowitz. apparemty of Jewish persuasion, .his family had broken of from the Communist Party. And then there was some affiliation with Reagan and the Republican Party.then independent..It appears to me that he has used his biases to sway people to his point of view..and if I am reading this right..he has done so falsely in some instances. It should be left to Dr Paul and his camp to answer these allegations.. I can say this..Paul is the only one offering us the chance to remain free and to reinstate our Constitution..If we don’t have this to rely on..then it does not matter anymore and this great nation will not survive.. the only one in this world that we can absolutely trust is God..Father and Son…after all..it is He that is in charge of it all.

      Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:12am

      Correction: Mama’s article was posted by Daniel Greenfield. However, it seems like a complete conspiracy theory.

      “a proposal to gut national defense via a panel of experts, quite a few of whom were tied to George Soros”​ – propaganda

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:29pm

      @Cause 4 Liberty..Thank you for pointing that out..and please correct me if I am wrong again..but it appears to me that Horowitz is the editor of Frontline Magazine. And it also appears that he has done some good work in trying to keep left wing propaganda out of Academia. SO I laud him for that.. As for Greenfield..can’t find much of anything of him..

      Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:49pm

      TWOBYFOUR.@CAUSEFORLIBERTY…What part? I read your link 2×4 and it does have Ron Paul along with 5 other Congressmen including John Campbell (R) and 4 democrats including Barney Frank. This is the headline .House Members Ramp Up Efforts to Scale Back Military Commitments and Cut Spending
      now I will tell you what parts…This headling insinuates cutting committments.would that not mean exactly what Dr Paul has been saying all along? Appropriations Committees, Congressman Hal Rogers and Senator Daniel Inouye, requests a thorough re-examination of national security needs in light of the fact that “more than 21 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall and 18 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, our military planning and appropriations process go on largely as it has since the 1950s.”
      So this is a far cry from gutting our military..it is bringing it home and building it here.. The George Soros connection only gets in line with Obama and the Rhinos who perpetuate the trillion dollar a year to us free to them policing of the world and nation building. Ron Paul has consistently voted in favor of “we the people.
      He has voted for lower taxes,,our right to bear arms and everthing Constitutional He has said would accept a salary of only $36,334 a yr although I would never hold him to that. and he has always placed money back in the coffers..He is an honest man and a straight shooter.

      Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:57pm

      Here’s some more on what these terrible republicans and democrats had to say on the military spending
      America’s national debt represents the single, most dangerous threat to our future security, prosperity and hegemony in the world,” said Congressman John Campbell, who has offered amendments to eliminate waste in the 2011 and 2012 Department of Defense budgets and has called for an audit of the Pentagon. “As we engage in a debate this year about reducing spending, we must examine all areas of the federal government, including the Department of Defense, for responsible efficiencies and expense reductions through a reassessment of our national defense needs.”

      “I firmly believe that the best way to protect America is by enacting a budget that invests in all dimensions of our national security,” said Congressman Rush Holt. “That means a budget that supports our conventional military forces, invests in our counter-terrorism efforts, and – just as importantly – protects our economic security by reining in needless or excessive spending.”

      Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 6:32pm

      BE AWARE POSTERS….

      If you say ANYTHING about Soros and his connection to Ron Paul…you will be called names by CAUSE4LIBERTY and your comments will be reported to The Blaze by his friend VECHORIK as SPAM!!! Gee..you have NEVER reported ANY of my comments BEFORE??? Hmmmmm…??

      Looks like free speech and the Constitution only applies to the TWO OF YOU!
      And…YES…CAUSE4LIBERTY i reported a comment once BECAUSE the Ron Paul supporter called me a Hitler lover, nazi and a racist just BECAUSE i had the numbers 88 after my name and ALSO because i did NOT support Ron Paul.

      The Ron Paul supporters on this blog have done MORE to turn people AWAY from Ron Paul than to get more people to support him.

      @@VECHORIK….i have seen THIS comment many times on the The Blaze today…hmmm??? You should REALLY report yourself for SPAMMING

      New anti-Romney ad in Iowa starts this morning:
      It’s pretty good

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=BI9yjhd8b84

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • patbarker
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 7:16pm

      I lived in Joe’s district in Fla. when the VERY HEALTHY, HAPPY, YOUNG LADY was found very dead in Joe’s office..THIS THING STUNK AS BAD AS SOME OF THE CLINTONISTA DEATHS….EVEN CONSERVATIVE MEDIA OUTLETS SAID SO.

      SOMETIMES YOU MIGHT THINK PEOPLE COULD GET AWAY WITH …ERRR, MURDER???

      Report Post »  
    • ashestoashes
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 8:24pm

      Clair..please don’t stay mad..I don‘t know why you don’t like Ron Paul..but his supporters realize that these are desperate times call for desperate measures.. I am sorry if any of us have offended you..We know that Ron Paul is the last chance that this country has for survival.. hope you see your way clear..Sorry..

      Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:14am

      @Ashes. Dear friend, with all due respect, you do not have to apologize for me or anyone else. CLARA88 has consistently displayed she is a hater of the freedom of speech. She has reported more than one of my posts and MANY others for he blatant progressive tatics. If you say ANYTHING, referring to facts regarding her candidate, she will report your post and have it deleted. I dont even do that to the hardcore anti-paulists. Also, i wasnt the one to call her a nazi. But, that Besides the point. We can not simply change everyones mind. Some people find bliss in their ignorance.

      @Clara88… The only name i EVER called you was a Progressive. If the truth hurts, then im… Not Sorry. How would you know, IF, Vech reported your post as SPAM or not?? Are you sometype of Beck Insider? Do you work for theBlaze? Did you get GB to spew this conspiracy theory on GBTV today. Congrats, on your progress.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
  • LibertyGoddess
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:46pm

    evangelicalsformitt.org

    Report Post » LibertyGoddess  
  • Chappy123
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:28pm

    gross. please be adult about this. not a time to try to crack a sick, not funny joke.

    Report Post »  
  • BlazingChance
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 8:59pm

    There’s not that big of a difference between Obama and Romney. LOOK at Romney’s record! It’s horrific! Don‘t try and tell me that I’m “handing the election to Obama if I vote third party.” YOU’RE handing the country over to the progressives by continually voting for the lesser of two evils. Believe it or not, there are still are few of us out there that have morals. I wouldn’t be able to sleep at night knowing I voted for a closet progressive like Romney. If his past is any indication as to what lies ahead of us in the future, God help us.

    Report Post »  
    • Chappy123
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:24pm

      Vote for the lesser of two evils. That’s all we got! A third party vote will be a vote for the most evil.

      God help us.

      Report Post »  
    • KTsayz
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:37pm

      Chippy – that’s a pretty ignorant statement.
      Ron Paul is the only candidate who adheres to the Constitution and wants to restore our Republic.
      Didn‘t you hear Beck speak to that woman about our ’choice’?
      You either vote for the progressives (Newt, Mitt) or the one candidate willing to abolish the TSA, squash the unPatriot Act and NDAA, and return to our founding principles.
      Even Beck believes it’s our last chance and that only Ron Paul fights for our liberty.

      Report Post »  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:38pm

      Blazingchance,

      Would you please list a link(s) with the statistics and reports of similarities between Obama and Romney? Statistic without self-editorials would be exacting and undebatable.

      Report Post »  
    • Tusker
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 12:04am

      LUKE611 I can’t stand Mittney either. But if I HAVE to, I‘ll be voting for him as much as I’d hate to. There will be no change with Romney in office. The spending will continue and the healthcare will be virtually the same.

      http://2012.candidate-comparison.org/?compare=Romney&vs=Obama

      Report Post » Tusker  
    • Babeuf
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:27am

      KTsayz

      Did you hear what Glenn Beck, Stu and Pat were saying regarding Paul this morning? Sorry, he is NOT a Ron Paul supporter.

      Report Post » Babeuf  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:40am

      Wonder who Beck and crew will support when it’s between Romney and Paul?
      I already know the answer because I watch GBTV

      Report Post »  
    • 321481
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:27am

      You are right, Romney is the slow track, Obama is the fast track, if Romney gets elected we will all end up at the same place just at a different pace, to Socialism and worse. God Help Us!

      Report Post »  
    • DrFrost
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:44am

      I agree with Chappy. The worst thing that could happen, IMO, is for Obama to get four more years. This coming November I will be casting my vote for whoever has the best chance to beat Obama. Until they fix how voting is done when there are more than 2 candidates, this is a reality we have to deal with.

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 12:18pm

      @Chappy123
      Let’s see, if you were given the choice between Mao and Mussolini, who would you vote for?

      The only real choice is none of the above., and your lesser of two evils scenario really is misplaced when the choices are both equally evil.

      Our government just past a law called the National Defence Authorization Act that allows for your arrest with no charges, no warrant, no witnesses, no jury, and no release date that was completely buried by the main stream press. Obama just signed it, and Romney will not even discuss it.

      We are quickly becoming a police state, and the only candidate that will at least try to stem the tide is Ron Paul.

      Ron Paul 2012

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
  • ddg7
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 8:54pm

    I used to think that Scarborough was one of the biggest idiots around. Now I think Mika‘s husband must be a bigger idiot for letting her ’work’ with Scarborough. I’m sure Scarborough has worked her over pretty well.

    Report Post »  
  • ddg7
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 8:50pm

    Does Scarborough mean Romney will meet the same fate as his former secretary?

    Report Post »  
  • setusfree2012
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:35pm

    ” of saying it can’t over, he’s not the right person”

    “I think even Michell Bachmann will go, try to fight on in South Carolina”

    Does anyone ever proof their articles before publishing? Sorry, but it drives me crazy that I can’t read a story on the internet anymore without seeing some kind of typo!!

    I’m assuming this should say “can’t BE over”, and Mrs. Bachmann’s first name is MICHELE.

    Report Post »  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:07pm

      Setusfree2012

      No, we dont proof read…you seem to interpret well what was intended; why do you feel such a need to correct. Some of us may have parallysis and must depend on voice mechanism, expensive personalized proprietary software… and even mechanical aides to assist us to communicate and idea which may take you all of nineteen seconds to type where it may take another…lets say 3:51.44 seconds.
      Did you ever consider that?… or are you still basking in your self-obsorbed glow of self-glorification of your deep rooted narcissism?

      …Im just curious?

      Report Post »  
  • Eugene1
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:26pm

    I am sick and tired of those ignorant bloggers who speak ill of Governor Romney! Someone on this blog even said that a vote for Romney was a vote for murder!!.. Romney is a thoughtful man with integrity. He is a devoted husband and father and has prime executive experience with an economic background. Let’s vote for someone that can actually beat President Obama and the polls agree he is the only one that shows him ahead in the general election. Get past your biases and get behind Mitt!

    Report Post » Eugene1  
    • chicago76
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:26pm

      With everything you just said about Romney you could stick Obama’s name in there and it would sound the same. Romney=Obama whether you like it or not. There is a reason the people in the People’s Republic of Massachusetts liked him you know. Would you vote for someone who recently ruled the USSR? Like say Putin for instance.

      Report Post »  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:19pm

      Chicago76

      “…With everything you just said about Romney you could stick Obama’s name in there and it would sound the same. Romney=Obama whether you like it or not…”

      Obama has no experience whatsoever in employment in the private sector of corp America. He graduated from Columbia and Harvard Law, employed as a non-litigating lawyer and then a law-orator professor. He is incapable of employment if it requires fiscal managment.
      However, if you have any info whatsoever that you can link without your self-editorials, this audiance would sincerely appreciate your contribution to the process.

      Report Post »  
    • Norm D. Plume
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:04pm

      Obama is coming into the election with 4 years experience at being POTUS. That’s gotta count for something, when you’re stacking him up against Romney. Given that their policies are likely to be exactly the same, I don‘t see how Romney’s a better choice than Obama, who already has that experience.

      Report Post » Norm D. Plume  
  • independentvoteril
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:23pm

    This election is GOING to be a blood bath no matter WHOM wins on the right that’s because the LEFT has NO class.. they are a bunch of bottom feeders who can’t win on ANYTHING positive OBAMA has EVER done.. which is WHY Obama is going to the HIGH SCHOOLS to get voters now event he COLLEGE age kids see what a LOSER he is..

    Report Post » independentvoteril  
    • Chappy123
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:14pm

      bottom feeders have more morals.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:48pm

      Yes any “blood” will be the left trying to DESTROY anyone who dare challenge THEIR Obama. Once again Joe is trying to project on to the Republicans what the Democrats WILL BE DOING!

      Report Post »  
  • vtxphantom
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:18pm

    There is going to be blood no matter who wins. This country is too divided.

    Report Post »  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:31pm

      @Vtxphantom

      Unfortunately, many of us agree…and appreciate your insight and warning. Do what you can to talk ‘em down from the ledges; continue to be that voice of reason.

      Report Post »  
  • glennrocks
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:15pm

    How about Romney with Nikki Haley as VP?

    Report Post »  
    • Tired of Idiotic Comments
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:31pm

      I’ll vote for Romney if he has M. Bachmann for his VP running mate.

      Report Post »  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:28pm

      Romney…VP West from Florida? Or Perhaps Palin? or Conde Rice

      Bachman would be wasted as VP…not that it would be a waste to be VP,….
      Ron Paul over Treasury…or even DoJ..imagine a DR running the Justice dept. Holder for sure would be prosecuted,… the man has good ideas and at 76 he isn’t in it for money…..but his foreign policy will lead us to war, appeasement created Hitler

      Report Post »  
    • flipper1073
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:03am

      Better yet Sarah Palin
      then at least he might draw a crowd.

      Report Post » flipper1073  
  • bioya1
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:01pm

    If Romney wins the nomination, the Tea Party and evangelicals best get behind him. To do otherwise is to allow B Hussein to win. Of all groups, do they want that?

    Report Post » bioya1  
    • ccr
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:20pm

      http://www.independencehallteapartypac.com/ A BIG TeaParty…….and supporter of Glenn’s 8/28……..has endorsed Mitt Romney!

      Are people going to call them RINO’s now?? Glad to see more and more SANE Tea Party people realizing just HOW prepared with intellect and experience, organization and discipline that Mitt Romney IS! The VA ballot fiasco is just ONE example of that!!

      Report Post »  
    • dimitrisokolov
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:49pm

      If Romney wins, I will sit out or vote for Obama. Let Obama run the country into the ground, screw it. If this is the best the GOP has, they don’t deserve to win. The picked that idiot McCain / Palin ticket which is why Obama is in office in the first place. Just look at who is behind Romney and tell me again why you would vote for him? http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150654687098574&set=a.10150622327538574.491087.828988573&type=1

      Report Post »  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 12:24am

      Just like all of us here the Tea Party will vote for ANY republican candidate for one simple reason, to get rid of Obama. We have no choice. After the election regardless of who wins will the real work begin. It won’t be over with after the election. It will be the time when we all have to hold politicians responsible. Right now we have to win in 2012, period. Baby steps for now, but only temperarily until we stand a chance to reverse as much of the damage Obama has forced on our country. It won’t be pretty for a long time. We have to unite and do what ever necessary to win first.

      Report Post » pamela kay  
    • sWampy
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:28am

      I’d rather have Obama back, than a northern liberal progressive, at least you know not to turn your back on Obama, Mitt on the other hand pretends to be your friend, but will endup selling us into slavery.

      Report Post »  
  • Oraclevoiceofreason
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:00pm

    I am bored with the “ a Mormon will not get the Evangelical vote ” But would they rather have Obama????

    Report Post » Oraclevoiceofreason  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:59pm

      Oraclevoiceofreason

      “…I am bored with the “ a Mormon will not get the Evangelical vote ” But would they rather have Obama????…”

      It is not the Tea Party and the Evangelicals needed for Romney to succeed in achieving the nomination. Romney would be best assisted with a supporting far-reaching national and multi-ethnic stalwart conservative organization which can not be COMPROMISED, co- joined with a colition of TRUE non-bigoted actual professing Christians.

      9 pm Monday night in before the Iowa caucus, where can that be found?

      Report Post »  
  • danibalyeat
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:49pm

    Glenn Beck himself said that voting for a Third Party Ron Paul candidacy would be better than voting for a RINO. And there is no bigger RINO than Mitt Romney

    Report Post »  
    • ccr
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:21pm

      Glenn Beck’s extreme words are making him more and more irrelevant. This is coming from a former HUGE supporter of Beck. (just ask my family……)

      Report Post »  
    • titan
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 12:20am

      i have to agree with CCR. Beck is really getting out there. i also was a huge supporter.

      Report Post »  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:51am

      @IMAWAKENOW
      Wrong. Mitt Romney is the architect of ObamaCare. Obama has admitted that he used RomneyCare as the template for his plan.

      Report Post »  
  • powedj
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:33pm

    A third party will guarentee Obama’s reelection. Does Ros Perot ring a bell?.

    Report Post » powedj  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:41pm

      Honestly, if its not Ron Paul, it doesnt matter. All the others including Obama are headed the same direction.

      Voting for Paul even if i have to write his name in.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • beverlee
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:26pm

      It certainly does…I voted for him…we got Clinton…and I’ve regretted it ever since. My only voting regret ever. And not because I would not have wanted Ross Peroit as president, but because we ended up with Clinton. Sometimes you have to forsake what you want for what is needed.

      Report Post » beverlee  
  • adastra2005
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:25pm

    The only way I ever hear a word these twits say is because you print it as if it were meaningful.

    Why do news organizations report what Joe, Cindy Sheehan, Ellen Barkin, OWS, etc say? I trust if you’d stop paying attention to them, they would be forgotten VERY quickly.

    Report Post »  
    • independentvoteril
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:20pm

      That is the truth.. I know that the Blaze wants to bring ALL the news but IF we wanted to see what the MISFITS in MSM were saying we’d tune into the show OR visit their websites..

      Report Post » independentvoteril  
  • danibalyeat
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:21pm

    If Romney is the nominee many of us Tea Partiers will be voting Third Party. We cannot vote for the man who created and still defends RomneyCare. Not only does he still defend RomneyCare he still defends the portion of it that uses taxpayer money to pay for abortions. There is no way we can vote for this man.

    Report Post »  
    • Simonne
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:37pm

      So you will elect Obama & you will deserve him & don’t complain when he wins re-election. Obama is far left & Romney is a moderate conservative as I am. I want someone who will move us forward instead of deadlocks because nobody wants to compromise. The far right & left just want their way & have no interest compromising on anything & this is why we are in such a mess. An ultra conservative in the White House will get us nowhere, just another partisan hack like Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • hucksqr
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:47pm

      I would actually reverse that. If the Republican party puts up a candidate that is blatantly not a defender of the Constitution, why in the heck should we violate our own morals and vote for them? My vote is a precious thing, and you do not get to have it automatically just because you are a Republican. You have to earn my vote, and if you don’t, and the guy that nobody wants to win does, then it’s your fault, not mine. It is not my responsibility to vote for whatever criminal piece of crap they shove at me. Holding my nose and voting for Romney means I support more murder, more loss of Freedoms, more debt slavery for my grandchildren, hell I might as well just sell my soul while I’m at it.
      Sorry, but We the People are waking up. Either the Republican party starts to live up to it’s name, or it can go the way of the Whigs.

      Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:19pm

      So, if you are in fact representative of the TEA party, then what lefties have tried to say all along must be terribly true. Bigotry runs deep, Born-Again/Main Stream Christian, is the only answer, regardless of previous experience, success, or the electable status of the front runner. Because, unless you have had your head buried in the sand for the past couple of years, you know dang well that Romneycare as it stands today is not the legislative solution created and championed by the former Governer. Turns out it doesn’t work when being adulterated by a democrat state legislature with liberal ideals, but in its original form it was an intelligent attempt to solve an increasingly devastating financial problem for his state, it was designed as a cost cutting measure shifting more responsibility on the individual and away from the state. As originally passed it was considered Conservative by the Heritage Foundation.

      This is not an argument. At all.

      Obamacare will be repealed if and only if we have control over the congress or the Supreme Court does their job. Either way, Romney in the White House will at least mean support for its appeal at the top will be guaranteed. Romneycare=Obamacare is non-issue. The matter at hand is we have an entity (The United States) in severe economic peril. No one else has done what Romney has done to entities in severe economic peril. And the last thing we need is another Legislator in chief.

      Report Post »  
    • Jenny Lind
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:20pm

      Well good for you, I and many others will remember who gave the election to Obama. If Mitt Romney ends up being the one, I will support him , he knows more about jobs than any other candidate,and he is friend to Israel. The only one I would have to hold my nose to vote for is Paul. I think he is a loon. Santorum would be a very good choice, but he , Romney and Bachman have moral values higher than the rest of the pack. By the way, Romney has the same view on abortion I have, we all have the moral choice given by God to choose good from evil, the government should not be in it at all.

      Report Post »  
    • Eugene1
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:30pm

      Romney did not support government money for abortions, he vetoed that and his veto was overridden by the democratic legislature! Get your facts right!

      Report Post » Eugene1  
    • IMAWAKENOW
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 7:43pm

      Get it through your thick heads, IF YOU VOTE THIRD PARTY YOU ARE ELECTING THE ARCHITECT OF OBAMACARE! WTF would that prove?

      Report Post » IMAWAKENOW  
    • dimitrisokolov
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:54pm

      Yes we will vote third party or stay at home or vote for Obama instead. We will let Obama win again and run the country into the ground. The GOP doesn’t deserve to win if they pick Romney. Don’t you understand this is how Obama won in the first place? The idiot GOP picked that idiot RINO McCain and the completely clueless Palin as their ticket. If Romney wins, then Obama victory is a certainty. Go ahead and pick Romney. The GOP will be to blame, not independents.

      Report Post »  
    • chfields62
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:06am

      I guess doing your due diligence and getting the facts right are too much for you people….I don’t care if the GOP puts up a cockroach, that would be infinitely better than who we have now. If you like our government as it is, then stay home or vote 3rd party, but remember this…the destruction of our country will be on your head!! WAKE THE F^%$ UP!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • WD0331
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 1:43am

      Ron Paul or bust!

      Report Post » WD0331  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 2:46am

      @Jenny Lind
      You wrote: “By the way, Romney has the same view on abortion I have, we all have the moral choice given by God to choose good from evil, the government should not be in it at all.” That is not Romney’s view. Romney thinks that the government should use taxpayer money to pay for abortions–http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2007/nov/27/fred-thompson/indeed-abortions-are-covered/

      Report Post »  
    • danibalyeat
      Posted on January 3, 2012 at 3:04am

      @Eugene– Romney allied himself with Planned Parenthood and appointed them to a special council which ensured that RomneyCare would cover abortion. Romney has still not apologized or recanted this aspect of RomneyCare. Here are the facts– http://prolifeprofiles.com/romney

      Report Post »  
  • Kathleen3
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:19pm

    Joe “when I was in Congress” Scarborough and Mica “my father (the Communist) Brzezinski,” really believe their opinions are relevant. These two, and the others regularly appearing on this show, remind me of the pathetic group of non-achievers played on the sitcom, Seinfeld,

    Report Post »  
    • jjoy
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:37pm

      Evidently, beck thinks it is revelent, or he wouldn’t publish it in “the blaze”…

      Report Post » jjoy  
    • TexOkie
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:37pm

      JJOY, Do you really think that Glenn Beck has the time to personally edit this site. That is quite naive of you.

      Report Post »  
  • mrsalvage2
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:17pm

    Joe is right.

    The PEOPLE cannot edure another rudderless politician in the Whitehouse.

    The status quo will have to end, one way or the other, and looking at violent revolution and blood in the streets is not an opiton that most can handle, so they will waste more energy and captal on trying to work around the corruption.

    They had best just accept that the past 98 years of ‘work around’ has gotten us to this point where the OBomber has Martial Law Power, and just go ahead and get the Irnfists and Jackboot scene overwith, while they can at least no put up a resistence.

    Report Post » mrsalvage2  
  • burke
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:13pm

    Why would anyone take was this piece of trash has to say as credible,

    Report Post »  
  • jnobfan
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:13pm

    Mitt is not the only candidate that can beat Obama.
    If conservatives cannot make a winning case against this total failure of a Presidency then its over for liberty in America.
    IMO
    RS easily beats Obama
    MB easily beats Obama
    I like the RS + Rubio or Bachman ticket.
    They win easily because the debate will have to be about policy not personal politics.
    Newt = personal politics
    Perry = personal politics
    RP makes way too much sense the media doesn’t get it and would run him off.

    Report Post »  
    • Simonne
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:39pm

      Your wishful thinking but, unfortunately, that doesn’t work.

      Report Post »  
    • KTsayz
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 9:31pm

      Bachmann voted for the NDAA when it was first introduced in May. I thought it was generally agreed that anyone who voted for that vile legislation is a traitor?
      IMO, only Ron Paul is determined to restore America to her founding principles and make Congress follow the Constitution.

      Report Post »  
  • bombshelterbob
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:12pm

    An empty headed communist and a failed rino, yeah right- I’ll sure take their advice!!!

    Report Post » bombshelterbob  
  • oldironsides
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 5:03pm

    anyone but obama -

    Report Post »  
  • kaygee
    Posted on January 2, 2012 at 4:19pm

    mitt is only candidate who can beat bho thats reason

    Report Post »  
    • dcart888
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 4:45pm

      agree and so does Independence Hall Tea Party group who took many buses to Beck’s 9-28 event http://mittromneycentral.com/2012/01/02/big-romney-endorsement-from-independence-hall-tea-party-pac/

      Report Post » dcart888  
    • G.W. Dobbs
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:22pm

      The only difference in America under Romney and America under Obama is the slowing down of the NWO; but America will STILL become Socialist, will Economically collapse and will allow the U.N. to
      “rescue” the World as America becomes a Third World Country except Americans will NOT be allowed to grow their own food, milk their own cow or purchase Health Products not manufactured by the Big Boys.

      Report Post »  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:42pm

      A Mormon will not get the Evangelical vote.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • KidCharlemagne
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:49pm

      Yeah….but WHICH Mitt?:

      “How Well Do You Know Your Romney?”
      http://www.democrats.org/which-mitt/quiz

      Report Post »  
    • LibertyGoddess
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 8:38pm

      Martinez, you may not vote for a Mormon, but I for one can’t wait for the day we have a woman, or a Jew or a Hindu for that matter become the president. This country is too great for your hate. You must be the head of the Christian Taliban. Please, take a moment and realize your bigotry is exactly why many of us can’t wait to vote for Mitt.

      Report Post » LibertyGoddess  
    • Luke611
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 11:19pm

      Martinez

      I hope Romney doesn’t get the Evangelical vote either. However, it would probably greatly assist the advancement of the nation if perchance true Christians who do not personify bigotry, self-interest, or fall to Satan’s will of dividing this nation would all join at the polls tomorrow and sing ” Come, Come, Ye Saints”….Nevertheless, individuals such as yourself noted from your repititous discriminative remarks, seemingly projecting no Christian prinicples or values, please do your country the honor of allowing the observant and studious to pull the levers.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love