Politics

Scott Brown Says He Was Just Joking About Clothed Elizabeth Warren ‘Thank God’ Remark

Scott Brown Says He Was Just Joking About Clothed Elizabeth Warren Thank God Remark

Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown

Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown said Friday he was “joking” about the “Thank God” quip he made after Democratic rival Elizabeth Warren said she didn’t pose nude to pay for college.

The spat began Tuesday during a Democratic primary debate. Warren, when asked how she paid for school, said she “kept [her] clothes on” — a reference to Brown’s infamous Cosmopolitan photo spread when he was in law school.

Asked about Warren’s remark during a radio interview Thursday, Brown replied “Thank God” and ignited a gender-based firestorm.

Among his critics were the National Organization for Women, which suggested he shouldn’t run for re-election and called his comments “the kind of sexist misogynistic attack that we have very sadly come to expect from politicians whenever there is a strong woman who is capable and really dedicated to the betterment of all people.” The Massachusetts Democratic Party said they were “the kind of thing you would expect to hear in a frat house, not a race for U.S. Senate.”

Scott Brown Says He Was Just Joking About Clothed Elizabeth Warren Thank God Remark

Democratic Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren

Warren, the former White House financial reform adviser, brushed off Brown’s comments, saying “I’ll survive a few jabs from Scott Brown over my appearance.”

Speaking to reporters Friday, Brown made no apologies for his remark and dismissed it as just a “wisecrack.”

“I was responding to a wisecrack she made about a decision I made to help pay for school, it’s as simple as that,’ Brown said, according to the Boston Globe.

When pressed again, Brown suggested he draws undue scrutiny for the things he says as a Republican in the heavily Democratic state.

“Listen, I’m a Republican from Massachusetts,’’ Brown said. “Everything I do and say, every decision I made since the day I was elected is praised, criticized, dissected. And that’s OK. She was joking. I was joking. I’m not quite sure what else to say.’’

Several of Brown’s Senate colleagues stepped up to defend him earlier in the week as the story unfolded, including New Hampshire Republican Kelly Ayotte.

“I know Scott Brown’s story, and I know that he had many obstacles to overcome in his youth,” Ayotte said of Brown’s photo shoot. “It’s inappropriate to make light of his personal circumstances, or to disparage or belittle him for the decisions he made to improve his life. Scott is one of the best guys to work with in the Senate, and I am proud to call him my colleague.”

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) made a similar statement: “Scott was merely responding to comments made by professor Warren in which she made light of the difficult choices in his life.”

Comments (169)

  • trolltrainer
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:21am

    So let me get this straight, when asked how she paid for school she gave Scott a sucker punch but when he jokingly quipped back an amusing response he is suddenly the evil bad guy? Why am I surprised, this is the way the left works…

    Hey libt-a-r-d-s, get over it.

    Report Post »  
    • ltb
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 11:39am

      No kidding. After the way the Left has savaged Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann, I couldn’t care less if some poor liberal lady got her feelings hurt.

      Report Post » ltb  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 12:24pm

      Agreed, and Scott should stand up and say; yeah, I said it. It was funny and called for.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • NOBAMA201258
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 12:56pm

      May i suggest a mask for ms.Warren as well

      Report Post »  
    • leftisneverright
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 1:04pm

      Exactly…..Where is NOW when Sarah and Michelle are being brutalized by the press? NOW is a freaking joke!
      And…why is Scott Brown backing down? How about using the spine God gave you and say “I’m joking as much as she was with her comment!” What do you expect from a RINO from Mass.?

      Report Post »  
    • Rightsofman
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 1:43pm

      This is sooooo f—ing nothing.

      Report Post »  
    • greensteam
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 2:11pm

      make a pro capitalist comment on her facebook page, and watch as it gets deleted. i left one, it got deleted, so i left another and another, they got deleted.

      Report Post »  
    • progressives-are-retards
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 2:13pm

      Why deny it? She’s a nasty looking hyde!

      Report Post »  
    • PATTY HENRY
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 2:21pm

      DO NOT APOLOGIZE TO ELIZABETH WARREN about ANYTHING!!! But do ask her this:

      IF the RICH got RICH by using all of the Roads/Educations etc. that is available in America, paid by ALL of us….HOW is it that ALL of us aren’t RICH ?

      Think about it. IF we all have the SAME “assets” to work with… WHY aren’t all of us RICH??? What??? Are you saying that “some people work harder” …is that It? THEN can you ‘splain why the ones who work harder and take risks have to give up what they have for people who pop out babies trying to game the system? HUH?

      DO NOT APOLOGIZE to that ILLOGICAL WOMAN. THAT CZAR for OBAMA, that “can’t-connect-the-dots” uber Liberal who has put us into this mess…. INSTEAD OF trying to LIFT all people up, she’s tryiing to bring those who try, work and risk down to the sit on your butt make babies to game the system group. NO WAY. COME ON 2012!!! PS: for the sob-sister out there…we probably (each Conservative) donate MORE money per capita to help other people than any 100 of you.

      Report Post » PATTY HENRY  
    • rangerp
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 2:36pm

      stop apologizing every time you hurt a libs feelings.

      Heck, look at her. She is uglier than a scab on a dog’s butt.

      Report Post » rangerp  
    • mkurbo
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 4:14pm

      I agree w/ MacPappy because:
      a) It was funny !
      b) If she took her clothes off, it would not be funny !
      c) Warren‘s socialist rant was one of the most appalling vids I’ve seen in a long time. As a business creator I was insulted by her remarks and Mass. voters should be ashamed…

      Report Post » mkurbo  
    • Down2TheC
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 4:55pm

      He was wrong in what he said. As a republican he should have mentioned “The free market probably made that decision for her. Supply and demand.”. That would have been much more appropriate.

      Report Post »  
    • stifroc
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 5:12pm

      Why does he feel the need to defend his remarks?
      I wouldn’t apologize, justify or explain anything.
      If I was ever asked about it in a press conference I would reply, “If she’s big enough to dish out one liners then she should be big enough to take one liners. If all the media feels the most pressing issue is a one liner, then I would say the media has a huge disconnect.”

      STOP APOLOGIZING TO THESE PEOPLE! It just validates them! Why do you think they never apologize to us? Because they don’t want to validate us!

      Report Post » stifroc  
    • Cynic-clinic
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 7:36pm

      She is why paper bags will always be necessary. Same goes for her lib girlfriends.

      Report Post »  
    • hagar
      Posted on October 9, 2011 at 10:01am

      Scott Brown is almost a democrat I am surprised he didnt get a pass. Posing nude for a buck is probably a high point for most ******** the question is who did she have to ….

      Report Post »  
    • satotbs
      Posted on October 9, 2011 at 1:35pm

      I agree 100% percent. Remember “F with the Bull and you might get the horn”. He should not have said he was “Just Joking”. Another weak kneed politician just craving the office. Not what we need to lead our country right now, or ever. Japan invades Pearl Harbor, President says “day of infamy, a clear declaration of war”, then says he was just joking, we lose.

      Report Post » satotbs  
  • timej31
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:20am

    Remember let us citizens do your bidding she is a nasty disease carrying Mao worshiping bag.

    Report Post » timej31  
  • plugthedamnhole
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:20am

    Scott K E N N E D Y Brown !

    Thanks for voting for the finiancial bill, you just cost me 5 dollars a month.

    Report Post » plugthedamnhole  
    • PATTY HENRY
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 2:42pm

      IF Warren were in there, you would not take home ANY money you earned, okay? Not saying he‘s perfect but he’s better than some COMMIE, MARXIST, LAME-BRAINED LIBERAL SOCIALIST GOOF-BALL.

      Report Post » PATTY HENRY  
    • RoccoT
      Posted on October 9, 2011 at 5:45am

      Isn’t 5 bucks a month a lot better than collecting your property, making you depend on the government, and giving you no freedom?

      Report Post »  
  • YepImaConservative
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:19am

    She is the punch-line of her own smarmy comment. Good for him.

    Report Post » YepImaConservative  
  • Mandors
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:16am

    She started it, she brought up the subject to belittle Brown, and then she got smacked down by his comeback. Now, we’re supposed to feel sorry for her? No, I don’t think so. Complete double standard.

    Report Post » Mandors  
    • Ruler4You
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:18am

      Scott Brown is a liberal republican (is that possible?). He’s a democrat at heart and in function, meaning he’s a liberal. Just like John McCain. Just like Mitt and so many other so called GOP members.

      Report Post » Ruler4You  
    • trolltrainer
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:26am

      ruler4you,

      Thanks for that biography, I think we all know who Scott Brown is. What is your point? He is the most conservative thing you are going to get from Mass. It is him or Warren. Just the way it works.

      Report Post »  
    • Mandors
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:37am

      @Rule4you

      Romney, McCain or Obama? Hmm.

      You do the math.

      Report Post » Mandors  
  • drmarkr
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:15am

    The ugly beotch started it….he simply finished it.

    Report Post »  
  • Liberty7
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:15am

    This story line is just another example of focusing on “the process” and completely ignoring the issues. Our political dialogue in this country is so assinine and childish and the more I analyze it, the more I am firm in my assessment that we DESERVE the BS that masquerades as government and the charlatans running the show.

    Report Post »  
  • blazingaway
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:14am

    Why isn’t anyone defending the right to appear nude in a magazine? If Warren had appeared nude and Brown had made the same remark I bet Brown would be attacked for judging Warren‘s right to appear nude and Warren’s comment “thank God” would be taken as a joke, just having a little fun and that Brown has no sense of humor.

    Report Post » blazingaway  
  • Chasvs391
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:09am

    Oh, but they can call Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman ***** and NOW is silent! WTF, who gives a CRAP what the LEFT has to say? It’s TIME to TAKE them ALL DOWN!

    Report Post »  
  • tobywil2
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:00am

    With the economy in shambles & the leaders of the “occupy wall street” movement threating the “violent overthrow” of the Constitution the media continues to highlight this drivel! http://commonsense21c.com/

    Report Post » tobywil2  
  • broken1
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:54am

    This is typical of the democraps on two fronts. You have a stupid democrap “woman” make a derogatory comment about a republican. The republican responds in kind. Then the democrap gets her pannies in a wad over said comment and gets outraged. Oh and lets not forget the NOW hags getting mad at said republican. It’s funny that republican women like Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman can be attacked by a democrap man and nothing is done but when a liberal woman is attacked by a republican man all hell breaks loose.

    Report Post »  
    • Bum thrower
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:08am

      True. Liz Warren would be a “10” after a 6-pac!!

      Report Post »  
    • lillymckim
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:13am

      To Warren I say stop your whining we have been called terrorists, and the enemy, and that was by our President and VP …
      I’m sick of walking on PC egg shells being told “WE MUST BE PC” just so the Marxists don’t get their feelings hurt ..all the while the Marxists tells Union thugs it’s OK to say
      “Take The Sons Of Bitches Out” as the President walks on stage ..

      feelings hurt? … too bad go tell the State Press “CORPSE”

      this “lady”(?) is a Mao loving pit bull in comfortable shoes

      Report Post » lillymckim  
    • godhead
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:15am

      Wrong a$$wipe. She made the joke, about something he actually DID. That’s funny. He attacked her on her looks, because he’s shallow and petty. It’s the same thing we saw with Debbie Wasserman Schultz and that piece of human garbage Allen West. We already ow conservative have a “woman problem” They’re scared and frightened of them, and so they lash out, over-react in an attempt to appear confident and in control. They don’t.

      Another victory for liberal women over conservative men. Stick to paint ball, fellas.

       
    • lonejane
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:17am

      As a women, I was not at all offended by Senator Browns reply. I thought it was funny and the way I look at it, if Ms. Warren can dish it out then she should be able to take it! And as far as some of these women’s groups who are upset over this, they disgust me when they selectively defend some women and not others. Like Herman Cain says, “Americans need to be able to take a joke”!

      Report Post »  
    • CountMeIn
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:59am

      Hey “god”-head. You must worship excrement since, based on your posts, that appears to be what your head is full of. Actually, liberals have far more issues with women… at least those that wander off of the progressive plantation and speak for themselves, than conservatives do. Apparently you don’t know how to think for yourself and need talking heads like Rachel Madcow to put words in your mouth. Hopefully you will grow up someday.

      Report Post »  
    • trolltrainer
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 11:24am

      countmein,

      Finally someone responded to the idiot! You gave doghead an orgasm when you noticed him!

      Report Post »  
    • jbrock09
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 11:50am

      Warren a six pack, methinks more like a case

      Report Post »  
    • Gamaliel
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 12:44pm

      To GODHEAD: It’s liberals who are afraid of real women. Note the left’s alliance with radical Islam. They are so terrified of intelligent, articulate, principled women all they can do is attack them with misogynism at its’ absolute worst. If the left didn’t fear what distinguishes women from men they could handle life without the killing of the unborn. Blind as you are I wouldn’t expect you to follow this.

      Report Post »  
    • Bill Rowland
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 12:50pm

      And a bottle of Tequila

      OMG – Psalm 109:8

      Report Post »  
    • lillymckim
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 6:28pm

      too bad …. man up Warren!

      Report Post » lillymckim  
  • kralspaces
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:49am

    So NOW shows up for Warren, but never for Palin or for that matter, any other conversative woman.

    Report Post » kralspaces  
    • Secessionista
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:14am

      Agreed, NOW is not a feminist organization, but a POLITICAL organization. One that specializes in using sex as their weapon of choice. Much the way the NAACP uses race as their weapon of choice. Both organizations are PERCEIVED to be sex or race organized, but they are really political fronts.

      If NOW truly cared about women, they would have found themselves UNABLE to stay quiet while the left sexualized Sarah Palin. And they must have truly been silently squalling when the “I am not a witch” campaign slander was in full force.

      Report Post » Secessionista  
  • biohazard23
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:48am

    At least Frances Fox Piven isn’t threatening to do the Full Monty on us, thanks be to God for that.

    Report Post » biohazard23  
  • commonsenseguy
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:45am

    so this commie good for nothing, loud mouth bunch of two faced idiots would rather scott brown no run for reelection because of he returned a wise crack remark, these liberal morons would rather stand with and elected a communist anti american,anti capitalist. before they would a republican, what a bunch of hypocrites,they will crap about something like this, but would not stand up for a conservative woman if see were being attacked right in front of them , these over testosterone,under hormone idiots are nothing more than george soros puppets.

    Report Post »  
  • leftcoastslut
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:44am

    no the real question is “how did you pay for college?” perhaps if she hadn’t been so smug and just answered the question, this would be a non-story

    so elizabeth warren “how did you pay for college?“ ”did you serve your country in the military?“ and ”why not?”

    Report Post »  
    • godhead
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:10am

      Excellent point – Mr. Romney, Mr Perry, Mr. Cain, Mr. Santorum, Ms Bachmann, Mr. Gingrich, did yo serve your count54y in the military? And why not?

      STFU a$$ hole.

       
    • chips1
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 8:13pm

      Warren has penis envy.

      Report Post »  
  • WakeUp
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:44am

    Why do republicans always appologize when the overly sensitive liberal media gets “offended” by something they say? With all the hate the left wing spews out all the time, a simple little comment like the one made by Brown is nothing to even discuss. Besides, didn’t Warren start it by meaninglessly attacking Brown?

    Report Post »  
  • AntiLiberal74
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:44am

    I love how every article that uses a pic of Elizabeth Warren shows the same pic. Her making an inch sized gesture with her fingers. Is this her opinion of the size of Scott Brown‘s ’manhood’?? Is it the size of her clitoris??? Is it her chances of winning??

    Report Post »  
    • YepImaConservative
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:15am

      That’s how liberal women describe their less than masculine Liberal male-folk. They have all but removed the manliness from their “life pardners” and are pretty much used to their own well worn junk dangling lower and with a larger set of cajones.

      Report Post » YepImaConservative  
  • Speak without Fear
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:43am

    This isn’t sexist misogynistic attack…..plain and simple……some people are better viewed in clothes….then viewed with their clothes off man…or woman.

    Report Post »  
  • lukerw
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:40am

    Personally… I do not want to see her in either condition!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • NothingButCrickets
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:39am

    Hard to believe the hypocritical nerve of NOW. Oh, now I remember–must be a Liberal female to get this type of reaction and protection from this ‘organization’. Where were they when Palin and Bachmann and others were being abused by press and politician alike? Listen to their response and you’ll hear nothing but crickets.

    Report Post »  
  • Quasimofo
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:39am

    Awwwww, did the poor wittle girl get her feelwings hurt by the big bad Senator man? Don‘t start it if you can’t take it biatch.

    Report Post »  
  • neckcarjim
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:37am

    Scott for one second just speak the truth because we all know what you ment and we all think it was a pretty good line. Face a fact your seat is the number one target for Democrats in 2012 so it won/t matter what you say they will find something to attack you on.

    Report Post » neckcarjim  
  • BrotherWill
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:34am

    I dunno, I will thank God for it.

    Report Post » BrotherWill  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:32am

    I wonder if the National Organization for Women would have found his remark as offensive if it had been directed towards Sarah Palin? Somehow, I doubt it.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • commonsenseguy
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:38am

      @gonzo, no no and no, they only care about their commie democrats, i hope you have a great day, suppose to rain this afternoon, can’t wait,i just may have to go dancing in it, any way have a great day,and ““ thank god ”” we don’t have to see a communist naked.

      Report Post »  
    • Ex-Democrat
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:01am

      They have had numerous chances to defend Palin and Bachman and out-and-out refused to. Recent examples include Bill Maher who has called them “MILF”s, “bimbos” and two other derogatory terms reserved for naming the lower female anatomy. I recall that a high ranking member of NOW did go on Fox News to defend Bill Maher and his right to free speech. Now has show that it is not about women’s rights, but about manipulating women in order to advance liberal politics.

      Report Post »  
    • commonsenseguy
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:12am

      @ex-democrat, this is how it works, if you can bash enough conservatives then you can be a liberal talk show host, if you can push the anti america,anti capitalist, everything is free agenda, then you get a t v show, and when you push gerorge soros new world order and become a communist lover you get the full support of all liberal left wing nut job,mao loving,soros paid you get to become a white house adviser just as long as you follow your communist handbook,and bash conservatives, you are set..

      Report Post »  
  • biohazard23
    Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:30am

    And he was wrong in thanking God that a hag kept her clothes on because…..? I mean, really. If she were to remove them, retinas everywhere would be burning for all eternity. Think of the health care costs THAT would entail…… ;)

    Report Post » biohazard23  
    • commonsenseguy
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:39am

      that’s funny, but darn scary.

      Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 9:47am

      CommonSenseGuy, thanks! Even my mind’s eye cries out in pain at the very thought of seeing her that way, and I’m a woman. Tee hee!!

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • commonsenseguy
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:06am

      it would appear that when she was a baby,they had to feed her with a sling shot,now she can chase buzzards of a dead skunk.

      Report Post »  
    • Mandors
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 10:22am

      Aw, come on Bio, maybe can get the Warren do a nude calendar with other Harvard faculty members, like Henry Louis Gates, Stephen Jay Gould and Doris Kearns Goodwin. A feast for your eyes!

      Report Post » Mandors  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on October 8, 2011 at 11:14am

      Mandors!!!! My retinas!!!! Oh, the pain, the searing, burning, agonizing pain…… :)

      Report Post » biohazard23  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In