Media

Watch the Secret Service Stop a ‘Glitter-Bomber’ From Hitting Romney

Secret Service Arrests Man Attempting Glitter Bomber of Romney

A would-be glitter-bomber is escorted away after trying to pull a stunt with Mitt Romney. (AP)

CNN cameras were following Mitt Romney as he was shaking hands with supporters at a Colorado campaign event. The cable news channel’s Anderson Cooper and Donna Brazile were chatting about Tuesday‘s caucus results as they watched Romney’s Secret Service detail abruptly moved the candidate to one side while a man was hustled from the room.

We later learned that the man was attempting to cover the candidate with a “glitter bomb:”

 

Comments (197)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • LukeAppling
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:26am

    It is past time to stop the violent homosexuals with their “glitter-bombs” while you’re jailing them also jail the OWS slugs all over the country. If I wanted to camp out on public or private property and defecate wherever I am I’ll bet I would be in jail….or the nuthouse.

    Report Post »  
    • TeaPartyForRomney
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:41am

      Interestingly enough, every GOP candidate was hit with glitter bombs last night. Here are the videos: http://url2it.com/lnpb

      Report Post »  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:52am

      .
      Super Glue & Zip Ties………….

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • barber2
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:56am

      Agree. Am so tired of the ” in-your-face ” hostility of these various groups. What exactly is their message ? Seems to be ” Look at me..me..me / I hate you” from all that I can see. Seems like a number of our young adults are stuck in a juvenile state of Temper Tantrums. Witness the Occupies and these Glitter Bombers…

      Report Post »  
    • twotones
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:35am

      There is a group connected by face book that does this my sister in law has a co worker that is involved heavly in it. They organize large grops of protester to go around to where ever a Repub is at its pretty sick. They also glitterd a pastor from our local church

      Report Post » twotones  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 11:09am

      Wait? Is Romney the elected official who affects the lives of others? NOOOOOPE! He’s a private citizen with rights just like anyone else. The right to be left alone and to pursue happiness as he see’s fit and if that means running for public office then he has the right and the right not to be molested in the course of that. These people fail to see it is they who are the threat to the very values they say they fight for on behalf of others.

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 11:32am

      Throwing anything at another human being is an act of violence. It’s assault.

      Militant homosexuals. Goodness.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • TH30PH1LUS
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 12:03pm

      IMO this whole “glitter-bomb” stupidity only serves to further alienate the homosexual community. Gays cannot possibly think that people who watch them acting out like this will be sympathetic. No, this is only done to antagonize and express their rage for the perceived wrong of “not being accepted”. Childish.

      Report Post » TH30PH1LUS  
    • Kaoscontrol
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 12:31pm

      If heterosexuals started throwing pink paint at gays, it would be considered a hate crime. These fruit loops should be sent to prison where they they can have all the ‘Man Love’ they want from their cell mates.

      Report Post » Kaoscontrol  
    • restless 1
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 12:33pm

      Wonder if they dropped him on in “Jack City”?

      Report Post » restless 1  
    • ModerationIsBest
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 1:24pm

      I support gay people, that being said, I never understood throwing glitter on someone.

      What does that prove or accomplish?

      Report Post »  
    • JayCee
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 1:48pm

      It is scary to think they might try this with something other than glitter.

      Report Post »  
    • bernbart
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 2:41pm

      Since when is throwing glitter violent. It is stupid but not a real threat. Besides the glitter has Nothing to do with sexual orientation. It is a protest of Mitt’s multi Millions offshore accounts to avoid paying taxes.
      However I think these guys could so something more constructive, as they are starting to look like the violent Pro-life domestic terrorists who protest outside PP.

      Report Post »  
    • Hollywood
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 3:18pm

      Maybe one or two will get shot, for their efforts!

      Report Post » Hollywood  
    • MonkeyBeagle
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 3:22pm

      The Moon Man tryed to sprinkle Moon dust on Gingrich… No but this protester wins for getting a point across http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLAOCemtB1g

      Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 4:35pm

      Agreed. These militant homosexuals have worn out whatever welcomes they may feel they have received. Enough of their juvenile antics. It’s the same passive/aggressive nonsense OWS has been trying to spark incidents with.

      Report Post »  
    • B_rad
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 4:51pm

      @TH30, well said.
      @Berbart, what are you smoking? You are not permitted to throw anything at anyone, period. It’s an invasion upon their person. What happens when we get complacent about these “glitter bombs” and the next nutjob mixes in a little something extra? As far as what they’re protesting, you’re wrong again. It is well established that militant gays, riled up by the big left, are doing this as a supposed protest to what they perceive as anti-gay policies. They are useful idiots.
      As a gay man, I’m offended these morons are doing something like this and claim to be doing it in my name. They do their cause absolutely no good and instead do it great harm. The average person looks at this behavior and thinks “I have nothing in common with these freaks.” Well neither do I. All I want is to be left alone with the freedom to quietly live my life with no fear of harm to me or my family, and to have equal protection under the law. If these protesters and big gay left organizations did that, there wouldn’t be nearly the backlash and opposition against us.
      Arrest them for assault and penalize accordingly.
      BTW, since Obama claims to have the same stance against SSM as the GOP candidates, why did he never get “glitter bombed”? I can’t imagine.

      Report Post » B_rad  
    • walrus808
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 4:52pm

      Many of us gays are tired of them too! I thought the Act Up crowd went the way of the dinosaur back in the 90′s. I don’t even socialize with a lot of the gay community anymore and much prefer to hang out with my straight friends who have a head on their shoulders. What most gays do not realize (see CNN article on liberal commentator Roland Martin being suspended for twittering about violence towards gays) is that they are being duped by the liberal crowd. They only want us around when it’s time to vote and people in the gay community fall for it hook line and sinker. Similarly to Martin, even the president is in on it, now that he’s in trouble electorally, he‘s decided that DOMA isn’t something he is willing to support. Bill Clinton sold us down the river in the 90′s over and over. The gay community seems to have collective Muchausen Syndrome and continues to take the abuse. It’s really sad! Glad I’m no longer a liberal and working everyday to convince others that conservatism is the only view that will give everyone a fair shot no matter who they are.

      Report Post »  
    • ACLUHater
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 5:56pm

      Let’s start calling a ****** a ******.

      Report Post »  
    • leftisneverright
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:23pm

      @TH30PH1LUS – You are absolutely right and they will NEVER be accepted!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • koyettsu
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 11:11pm

      I think they need to start charging these morons with assault, I dislike Romney but where do you get off thinking you can throw crap at people?

      Report Post »  
    • myway2112
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 11:16pm

      Yes Sir, I agree. I have had about enough of all these people.

      Report Post »  
    • mmabri
      Posted on February 9, 2012 at 6:01am

      @Berbart – what multi million offshore accounts to avoid paying taxes are you talking about? He did pay taxes on those offshore invetments. His Tax returns show that he did pay taxes to the IRS for those invetments.. Just because someone has money dosn’t mean they avoid taxes, and since its HIS MONEY he should be able to invest it where he wants. Romney even taxed himself 15% more by giving to charity. Obama paid th same rate as Romney and only gav 1% to charity. I’m not a Romny supporter, but I’m getting sick of higher end people getting villified because they have more money then someone else.

      Report Post » mmabri  
  • florida123
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:21am

    Freaks Freaks Freaks! This is who the Liberals want to embrace, less than 1% of the population and then make the rest of us Bow down and love them too…………GTH

    Report Post » florida123  
    • georgiavietvet
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 2:24pm

      FLORIDA123……………..you are absolutely right. the gays and athiests believe that the rest of us are supposed to bow down and kiss their proverbial a$$. it doesnt seem to register with them that they are a very small minority in this country. yet they expect to impose their views on the vast majority. the trouble is that they find activist judges to afirm their views. any judge who who does not follow the law and constitution exactly, should be removed from the bench, and never again be allowed to be a judge………………………….

      Report Post »  
  • soybomb315
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:15am

    why does romney get secret service protection and the others do not? i understand we the taxpayers are paying for it

    Report Post » soybomb315  
    • stone2016
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:44am

      Why not do a search instead of asking it here? There’s a new invention called the “in-ter-net”. It allows us to find out information for simple inquiries for ourselves, rather than rely on comment board responses. I’d give you the reasons, but that would deprive you of the opportunity to look things up for yourself.

      Unless it was just an attempt to say this is “the system” picking Romney as the nominee. Then you’d be wrong, since the rules are clear and (here’s a hint) another GOP Pres. hopeful did have SS protection.

      Report Post »  
    • teresa2010
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:54am

      Only creeps like you believe anything on the IN-TER-NET……Duh Yep!!

      Report Post »  
    • soybomb315
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:00am

      I looked into this in-ter-net thing but the point of my question was why the ‘others do not’. It appears homeland security has only approved romneys security request. hmmm. They say one of the criteria is fundraising. sooooo, if a candidate raises a bunch of money – the taxpayer has to protect them? That makes no sense. The candidates who dont have a lot of money are the ones that cannot afford security.

      It also appears that another criteria is the ‘size of the event’. We all know ron paul draws the largest crowds. Ron paul has crowds that are full of young people and he is despised by many republicans – dont you think he should have security? Personnaly, since these are voluntary campaigns and events – they should have to pay for their own security. but i wouldnt expect someone like romney to understand a conservative position

      Report Post » soybomb315  
    • Regdunlop
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:38am

      I believe the rules for secret service protection apply to the leading candidates. I’m not sure but I think all four are recieving protection now.
      As far as “we all know that Ron Paul attracts the largest crowds”, that might be debatable. If he is, his supporters aren’t showing up to vote. I guess they are just to stoned to remember to go down and vote.

      Report Post »  
    • FROTHYDISCHARGE
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:47am

      Hey Paulpuke. Romney gets Secret Service protection because he is Mormon so in your face. In addition the criteria is decided by homeland security and they base that on who is a “Major Candidate”. Ron Paul is a Major Dingus who will not win one state so why should we pay to protect that racist anti-Semite? I know I know he’s the only one that can save us from the lack of heroine and hookers.

      Report Post » FROTHYDISCHARGE  
    • JayCee
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 1:54pm

      Any presidential candidate that asks for the Secret Service protection gets it.
      Herman Cain also had Secret Service protection.

      Report Post »  
    • leftisneverright
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:28pm

      STONE2016 – Don’t be a dick!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
  • YesNdeedie
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:11am

    The secret service walked him out……….darn! dragged or carried would have been a better choice.

    Report Post »  
    • TerryDo
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:55am

      The Secret Service should have given Glitter Boy a good elbow rammed into his ribs cracking them open.

      Report Post »  
    • SoCaLCapitalist
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 12:26pm

      That was walking him out, dude was resisting, too bad they should of tazered him. So when his friends react they could catch them too.

      Those rebels without a clue want their rights but at the expense of peaceful people having theirs. There is an equillibrium in everything.

      Report Post »  
    • JayCee
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 1:57pm

      He should be sprayed with adhesive pepper spray, then glittered.

      Report Post »  
  • rambosharley
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:07am

    What is it with these FREAKS and their GLITTER! DUMBA$$E$

    Report Post »  
    • thetroll01
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:31am

      Can you say….practitioners of the “alternative sex life”?

      Report Post » thetroll01  
  • caleejr
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:42am

    They should take the person to a secure location – then put on hazmat suits, walk into the room and throw a bag of flour…not much, just enough to make the man think he’s been exposed to anthrax or something – begin to show these people what it’s like to fear the unknown….give and it shall be given

    Report Post » caleejr  
    • moodtd01
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:02am

      I really like your idea. No real harm done. Powerful lesson learned. One less glitteratti to annoy us.
      I would like to add just a little tazing, or a couple of whacks with a nightstick. Would that be ok?

      Report Post »  
    • supressorgrid
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:18am

      The problem with flour bombing and tasing him is it might cause a spark and make a dust explosion…Oh go ahead, might be fun.

      Report Post »  
    • landman1
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:55am

      moodtd01 says give glitter boy a couple of whacks with the night stick, heck, that‘s what he’s looking for. That ‘ole night stick is what seperates Rainbow from the straights. No, give him a dose of the taser and 6 months for assault. He’ll also need a couple of bars of Irish Spring so he can star in the prison showers. Teach them skinheads a thing or two about cleanliness while he’s incarcerated.

      Report Post »  
    • JayCee
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 2:07pm

      Strip him naked, dunk him in sticky adhesive, then roll him in glitter.

      Then again, …. he might like that.

      Report Post »  
  • Viper1
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:34am

    Thank You Secret Service. I was at the Santorum event in The Villages when he got hit by a glitter bomb. There were no Secret Service anywhere to be seen. The kids were not even arrested but simply held until Santorum left the building. What if there had been ANYTHING in the glitter other than glitter? How are these kids getting that close to the candidates? Why aren’t they being thrown under the jail? TOO MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS!

    Report Post »  
    • Dstarr55
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:09am

      Viper1, I totally agree with you. Just as the MSM shows these glitter bombs, they should also show what happens to them – are they arrested and jailed? If not, the question should be asked why not. First, glitter can cause damage to the eyes and the fact no one has been injured is not a reason to think these occurrences are ‘nothing’. Second, it is glitter now but if they can approach the candidate this close with glitter, who is to say some nut will not have acid or something more dangerous somewhere down the line. I am tired of people in the gay and lesbian community applauding glitter bombs and claiming this is a free speech issue – when you are throwing something at someone it is not speech, it is violent. The left has got to start denouncing these acts and those that commit them has to be dealt by the justice system as violent offenders.

      Report Post »  
    • yiska8
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 11:45am

      Mitt Romney is the chosen GOP nominee. It’s all but over. He’s get the Secret Service detail and none of the other candidates do. I saw the Santorum being “glitter bombed” and thought? How in the hell are these people getting so close to the candidates? And the media ignores this fact relentlessly. Romney will probably get the glitter eventually. These angry gay factions are free to do whatever they want to whoever they want and no punishment is ever heard of. Cooper Anderson thinks its cute along with Rachel Maddow. What if gunpowder was thrown at Obama? Maybe even some Holy Water? They would have cameras at the jail, pre-trial, and eventual sentencing hearing. Anderson and Maddow might even have competing in depth investigations of all the Secret Service detail (and call for their resignations)who allowed Obama to be sprayed by Holy Water by a violent Christian zealot. Completely plausible.

      Report Post » yiska8  
  • Shrugged
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:07am

    I’ll bet these two secret service guys get a new detail now that the public has seen their faces.

    Report Post »  
    • USAMEDIC3008
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:29am

      Looks like the bomber
      got detailed

      Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
    • Joey8
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:19am

      so before this the public couldn’t see their faces? I didn’t see them have to take off their masks. It’s not hard to pick out secret service agents

      Report Post »  
    • rosecityken
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:37am

      @joey8… true…there the ones with the dark suits, earpieces and sunglasses ….casing the crowd with folded hands.

      Report Post » rosecityken  
    • thetreyman
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 5:15pm

      they are secret service not secret agents.

      Report Post » thetreyman  
    • scattersunshine78
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:30pm

      to: THETREYMAN : “they are secret service not secret agents.” … Thats Funny! Thanks for the laugh.

      Report Post »

      Report Post » scattersunshine78  
  • chingachgook
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:00am

    the problem with the glitter bomb or a pie is some day it will not be a harmless thing. Why should anyone have to take a hit to find out if you had a brick or knife in stead of a bunch of glitter. I find the actions of these people arrogant self centered and threatening. You have no right to invade anyone’s personal space let alone hit them with anything.

    Report Post »  
    • txbigfoot
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:05am

      I hope they tasered him and throw him in jail for attempted assault. Or they make him eat his glitter; now would that not be a “Glitter bomb” in a day.

      Report Post » txbigfoot  
    • flatdaddio
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:33am

      it’s actually assault on a elected official….just because he is no longer in office it does not give anyone the right to attack him…imho..

      Report Post »  
    • Drifter1
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 4:21pm

      One thing wrong in the handling of these thugs is that they are being arrested and released–not even having to post bail. They should be trated like any other criminal…

      Report Post » Drifter1  
  • Tickdog
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:54am

    what an idiot.. throw him in jail…

    Report Post » Tickdog  
  • Detroit paperboy
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:53am

    Does Santorum get secret service detail ? He just swept three states….

    Report Post »  
  • notreally
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:49am

    Very impressive how Romney shook it off.

    Report Post »  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:38am

      Oh yea, he’s an iron man. Reminds me of Mitch Rapp. It was glitter!

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Onodacops
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:11am

      Can you imagine what Mitch Rapp would have done ? Wouldn’t have been pretty :)

      Report Post »  
    • aggiebrewer
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:14am

      What did you expect? Should he have curled into a ball and whimpered like a little girl?
      Good grief. Are we looking to see Mitch Rapp in our candidates here? I hear he’s a NINJA!

      Report Post »  
  • stratomaster
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:39am

    A glitter bomber lol what a **** thing to do. Good job secret service. And yes if that had been done to Obammy by a Tea Party person they would have sent the military out to disband all “Tea Party Extremists” as the demonrats like to call them.

    Report Post »  
  • blkbelt7
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:21am

    Secret Service finally gets one of these morons…good time to use the new law and put him in gitmo for a few years…

    Report Post »  
  • The American People
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:09am

    Way to go secret service!!!

    Report Post » The American People  
  • Quiata
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:47am

    Yay! One for the Secret Service. Nice work.

    Report Post »  
  • whereareyourbrains
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:46am

    Why are we paying for secret service for candiates………huh…………………….why do we pay for former presidents to have secret service? No one cares one they are out of office…who the heck wants to kill them then……………dah……………..

    Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
    • Susie
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:26am

      Are you kidding ? WHEREAREYOURBRAINS ?
      That‘s one of the most asinine comments I’ve ever read.
      Where are YOUR brains ? I think they must be up you ying-yang.

      Report Post »  
    • sposilovich
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:33am

      So you honestly don‘t think that there’s some nutjob out there that wants to take a swipe at Bush I, II, or Clinton? Seriously??

      The evidence is clear that all politicians, whether high profile or not, are at risk of being attacked…whether its as insignificant as a glitter bomb to Romney or Santorum, or attempted murder on Giffords…the left will stop at nothing to push their agenda.

      Report Post »  
    • txwheels
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:49am

      @SUSIE

      That comment is not asinine at all. Do you understand how many tax dollars are spent annually protecting former Presidents?

      They have it made for life once they’ve been in the White House. Let them hire their own security. As for the the candidates, they can use some of those millions in campaign dollars they collect for their bodyguards.

      Nobody twisted their arms to enter government and public life, and we the tax payers shouldn’t be left on the hook for their damned expenses after they leave office!

      Report Post »  
    • soybomb315
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:44am

      If a former politician is worried about his security – THEN HE CAN HIRE PRIVATE SECURITY OR STAY HOME. the taxpayers should not have to pay for what a politician does after no longer in office. There are literally a thousand people in this country who have served in the house of reps and senate. You want to pay secret service for each one cuz they ‘feel threatened”? Give me a break – when you are not in office, YOU ARE A NORMAL CITIZEN

      Report Post » soybomb315  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:54am

      Let me preface this with the fact that I am not a Romney supporter, but will vote for him should he become the candidate. ANYBODY BUT 0bama! As for Romney having a Secret Service detail. We are not privy to everything behind the scenes. There may very well have been some serious enough threats made against Romney to allow this.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • Mtroom
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:56am

      Your are right txwheels…This isn’t an asinine question, but this report should explain why they are there..I still don’t see what this glitter bombing proves…To me, it shows that gays don’t want people to take them seriously…That is what this is about, right? I don’t have any issues with someone being gay or any of these other things that people complain about…But to start throwing things, anything, makes no sense to me..To me, they are showing the weakness in their cause..These actions need to be dealt with severely so they stop…It’s an assault, not a protest…And to any Gay, PETA, Atheists, Right to life or anyone else who decide to throw things when I am around, you better hope security gets to you first…I won’t stand for it.
      P.S. Just so you know, my bullets aren’t rubber. So,behave yourself.

      Report Post » Mtroom  
    • hcartexas
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 10:33am

      @WHEREAREYOURBRAINS…. no where in your rambling, incoherent, babbling did you ever even come close to making a valid point. We are all now dumber for listening to you. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

      Report Post » hcartexas  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:40am

    The main thing here is that so many of these ‘glitter bombers’ are getting close enough to do so; how long until someone tries to use a real firearm or bomb to do the damage.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • Latter-Day-Soldier
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 7:44am

      Security is generally to tight for weapons to get in, I’d be more worried (if I was part of the security detail) about some knuckle head using pepper instead of glitter, pepper in the eyes can be quite painful, that and those “glitter bombers” are just plain obnoxious anyways.

      Report Post » Latter-Day-Soldier  
    • Shrugged
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:06am

      Yes. Watching the video feed, did he crawl on the floor to get that close? I didn’t see him walking up to where Romney was standing. The problem is the secret service must assume the worst – they have a weapon – until they apprehend the culprit.

      Report Post »  
  • Impenitent
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:25am

    at least it wasn’t a shoe…

    Report Post »  
  • AmericanWomanFirst
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:14am

    Looks like glitter boy got a glitter wedgie whilst getting the boot out the door. Wait..he might of enjoyed that.

    Report Post » AmericanWomanFirst  
  • RJL
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:09am

    Really! This is the top story after Willard (Glitter) Romney got his clock cleaning in 3 states?

    Report Post »  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 8:43am

      All the Republican blue bloods are going to act like it didn’t happen. Wait and see, everyone on FNC and GBTV will act like it’s a fluke and that Romney is still the anointed one. Rick has won more states now than any of them now. Newt needs to go and let us have a conservative VS progressive contest.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • thetroll01
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 9:47am

      @Gonzo….I don’t think so. I listened to post election coverage last night, and most of them are starting to get a “Coming to Jesus”, and confessing their sins at NOT taking Santorum as seriously as they should have.

      I’m starting to agree, Newt has blown it, and needs to bow out.

      Report Post » thetroll01  
  • MTSchmidt
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:07am

    I love the secret service! It has always infuriated me that these “glitter bombers” were allowed to get away with their actions. What if everyone continued to pay little attention to these glitter attacks and then late into the election, a glitter bomber laces the glitter with a poison or even worse – just simply replaces it with a bomb? He would get away with it because no one took it seriously and we would have a dead candidate. I am glad that the Secret Service stopped the pathetic excuse for a human being. I also hope that this person is severely punished for his attempted attack.

    Report Post » MTSchmidt  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:41am

      Yes, who knows what might be mixed in with the ‘glitter’. What idiots. The fairies, I mean.

      Report Post »  
    • texasoysterman
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 1:39pm

      Not sure about punishment-he might be charged with assault.
      Probably within an hour of the “glitter-bombing”, the Secret Service knew everything about this gay boy from birth to present day. They take this type of thing very seriously.
      And they’re not going to forget about him either.

      http://www.secretservice.gov/ntac.shtml

      Report Post » texasoysterman  
  • keenwhiz
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:00am

    We should not be allowed to “toss” anything at anybody! If tossing is now allowed, I’ll be “tossing” something at libs myself, let them see how they like it.

    Report Post » keenwhiz  
  • Societal Misfit
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 5:49am

    Ok really? Just what do these people actually think they are accomplishing with glitter??? There is no point and the only real injury that could even be sustained from it is if it gets in the recipients eyes, otherwise it is just a pansy thinking that they are making some kind of point which is all reality they are really just a pansy. Just so you all know I am not a Romney supporter. lol

    Report Post » Societal Misfit  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 5:58am

      I hope they shoved the glitter up his ( ) and made him spend the night with some guy that killed his mother……………

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • KAdams
      Posted on February 8, 2012 at 6:43am

      @Repu
      You should really see a therapist about those repressed memories…

      Report Post »  
  • dpselfe
    Posted on February 8, 2012 at 5:30am

    It’s only violence when its done by someone that can be tied to the TEA Party, or ever went into a Christian church (other than to urinate/defecate as was done in NYC by OWS people).

    Imagine if a TEA Party person tossed glitter at Obama. They’d likely be publically executed.

    Report Post » dpselfe  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love