See the ‘Brutal’ Anti-Perry Attack Ad the Romney Campaign Mysteriously Pulled
- Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:53am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
There‘s an interesting story brewing after Mitt Romney’s campaign posted an attack advertisement on YouTube and then later removed it.
The ad, which focuses on Texas Gov. Rick Perry, is characterized by Gawker’s Max Read as “personal and direct” — an accurate description to say the least.
The short video doesn‘t contain a stitch of anything that is favorable to Perry’s speaking abilities, intelligence or preparedness. Clearly, lambasting each of these areas was the Romney campaign’s goal, as the video concludes by asking, “Is he ready to lead? “HotAir.com’s Allah Pundit describes the clip as follows:
It’s a symphony of Gump-ishness. Being a bad debater, while problematic in the general election, doesn’t disqualify you from being the nominee; being an idiot in general does. That’s the lesson. Offhand, I can’t remember ever seeing an ad like this that’s aimed not at showing that an opponent is stupid about a particular issue but that he’s stupid in general.
While the ad has been taken down, CNN ran a version of it during one of its shows. In it, various clips of Perry’s less-than-stellar debate performances are knitted together along with news reports that lambast the governor:
Read contends that it’s a bit odd that the Romney campaign would be focusing on Perry, considering that the Texas governor’s campaign is weak at the moment.
However, Romney‘s heated exchange with Perry at the Republican debate this week surrounding Romney’s hiring of illegal immigrants may have served as a catalyst for the ad. Erick Erickson shares his views on the making of the ad (his comments were posted before it was pulled by the Romney campaign):
This is a necessary attack from Mitt Romney. Had he not pushed something out like this, the story would be that Mitt Romney got wounded last night. In several unscripted, unguarded moments he mentioned he failed to keep costs down in Massachusetts and was worried about illegals working for him because he was running for political office.
But this doesn’t explain why the campaign would post, then remove the ad. ThinkProgress has been promoting the ad and its removal via social media:
Allah Pundit does note that some ads are pulled temporarily, especially when they utilize video footage that may be called into question due to copyright. While he suggests that it’s possible the clip is being re-edited because of this, if it was, indeed, yanked, he says it is “a total embarrassment.”
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 584 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (243)
kfouche
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:51amwhy has the rnc and romney and fox and cnn and the media been so pointedly after Perry ????hmmmmm………………….Because he is a conservative and he could win????
Report Post »americanfirst
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 2:16pmuhh…actually NO.
I’m a Texan resident. He is MY governor. Governor Perry is not a conservative by my estimation.
Report Post »You cannot be talk hard against immigration and behind close doors push legislation that promotes illegal immigration.
And if getting invited in 2007 to the annual Bilderberg meeting doesn’t make you a potential globalist then that level of naivety from voters is just inherently dangerous.
kfouche
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:45amThe RNC’s candidate is Romney, I will not vote if Romney is my only choice. I am open to a third party candidate if its Romney ths would be a first for me. I resent the way the RNC has pushed him on us like they did budh, dole, mccain and I will not accept it again. they think they can force us but we can always stay home that day.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:01amI hear, ya Kfouche.
Report Post »sissykatz
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:04amk
If A 3rd party came in we are ruined.
I wish they would do the debates like they do American Idol. Each debate one gets
Report Post »eliminated. That way we could hear what the REAL candidates would have to say.
walkyrie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:05amPerry is governor over one of the worlds strongest economies (15th last I read) and it is booming. Of course it’s a magnet for illegals – hell it’s a magnet for everyone based upon relocation numbers both national and international. He’s been chosen to head the Republican Governors association. Eagle Scout (non-trivial distinction), actual military aviator (non-trivial distinction), leader of the strongest free-market conservative state (non-trivial distinction), comes from verrry humble background (NOT another silver spooning East Coast elitist). WHY does everyone keep propping up these neo-liberal Republican elitist bastards who can’t even stick to a position – not just one . . . ANY position. Hell, at least Romney waits a couple of days beforetripping and then flipping, Cain did it in a matter of hours. Just like that liberal congresswoman who said we should suspend elections! . . . just kidding. Well, Rick Perry isn’t kidding – this election is NON-TRIVIAL and he’s the man. Period. Look who the libs, the Rep elite, the literatti (MSM) etc. are rooting for and propping up – Romney. So ya’ll keep focusing on silly style over substance issues – see how that works out.
Report Post »kerryinperry
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:05amIf a third party runs, that will surely give the election to Obama…..remember the Clinton election. Clinton only got 38%?? of the vote and the other two candidates got 62%????. I truly fear this thought!
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:08amYou want 4 more years of hell?
Report Post »Applehead
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:14amI’m voting Ron Paul regardless! I’m not voting for a neocon or NWO Bilderberger!!!
Report Post »Selfreliance
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:21amKflouche, I hope few people share your poorly conceived strategy. I will support any candidate but one of the current field over Romney, but am also convinced that four years of an Obama administration unfettered by a desire for re-election is the end of America as we know it, and would vote for any Republican nominee to prevent it. Even Huntsman.
Romney is clearly a big government guy, but at least he’s also pro-business. He may not actively seek the repeal of the provisions of Obamacare, but he also won’t stand in the way if we have a Congress that will. He may be a relatively big spender, but he would be the alternative to the man who has driven the largest annual deficits in the history of the world. Staying home in 2012 is not an option for anyone using their brain instead of their heart, and neither is a late third party candidate.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:24amPerry is a party switcher, the ultimate flip-flop. He supported Al Gore. That in itself is unforgivable. Both he an Romney do nothing but act like bratty children and are not fit to lead. They have no ideas and no backbone when push comes to shove. Besides, no independents would vote for either of them. ron Paul, even if he went third party would get most of those votes. He would probably score quite few Dem votes to boot for his foreign policy stance. We need a good 4 years of his ideas to get back on track. Otherwise we are toast. Herman Cain is my 2nd Pick with Bachman in 3rd, only because she is a little to timid.
Report Post »IntransigentMind
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:28amRomney has plenty of issues. This isn’t the first time he or his supporters have gone after somebody unfairly. It’s much like their attack on Rush over alleged “flip-flopping”:
Report Post »http://markamerica.com/2011/10/20/pro-romney-crowd-goes-after-limbaugh-others-for-flip-flopping/
acovenantinblood
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:33amI won’t vote for any bad GOP candidate. I will write in my own name. We are ruined either way if they give us a lousy candidate. Romney and Perry both are a joke.
Report Post »IIIcorp
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:34amI’m just waiting for the first time Mitt loses in the primaries and quits like last time.
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:37amYour logic makes no sense whatsoever. If enough people think your way we’ll have 4 or more years of the commie in chief and America will be turned into a third world country.
Report Post »The ultimate goal is to save America and the only way that can be done is to remove Obama in 2012.
America can not survive another 4 years of the Soros/Obama agenda.
TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:42amThe most important right we have and you would stay home? Wow! So stay home and we’ll decide.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:56amThat would be a vote for Obama.. oh well…we’d just go down a whole lot faster. He was campaigning for that second term even before the first so called “election” was over with. We won’t get another chance to vote..I’m betting. That’s an ace in the hole for the current snake.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:58amLittle by little, I beginning to realize how maybe I am moving away from the far right. While I certainly agree with the components, I am also a realist. As I am seeing, many are not. First,The establishment got behind Romney, they didn’t promote him, big difference. If Cain doesn’t make it, Romney is the only other electable candidate. He will certainly make Cain his VP, and WIN !! I am tired of the hearing the bashing of our candidates and the war with in the party. You fools who won’t vote if Romney is nominated are ridiculous. Obviously you are as disconnected as the people who live in NY City. This nation is so extremely divided right now, we need a candidate to bridge the gap, one who will put a stop to Obama, and change the direction to the candidate. Patience is a virtue, hold the course. We have our elected Tea Party members in Congress and need more in the Senate, which is where you should focus your efforts. The President, especially a Republican, has limited power.All we need to do is get Obama out, Rubio is in the works and will lead our nation to the change we need. How many of you were in love with Christie back when Glenn was slobbering over him ?? Yeah, that’s what I thought, he is further left than Romney. Wake up people and get you biases out of the way.There is no media slanting the issue, there is no establishment having superior power in this election, the establishment lost out to us. Those of you talking about a 3rd party are out of your freaking m
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:09amSo does that mean you are going to vote for Ron Paul, because he is the one who is going to be a third-party candidate? I will never vote for Ron Paul. So that means what we have is B.O. in the office for another four years.
Report Post »mad_hatter
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:22amThis was a little uncalled for, or is it. Everyone seems to be spreading lies about others and attacking others. Perry did the same thing by lying about Romney in the debate about illegals. That was a McCain 2008 tactic and it was proven Romney had taken the actions he took. Romney was truthful as well as we can tell in 2008 and now during Perry’s attack. How can we get that mad at Romney when everyone is doing this… even Cain said he is going to start doing this because the other candidates are getting on his last nerve.
Even Obama‘s camp is coming out attacking Romney’s wealth and telling lies about him: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/oct/romney_rule_attack_ad.html
Report Post »jmiller_42
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:24amThe only candidate that might go third party and pull a lot of votes is Paul. It seems that Paul supporters will not just cast their vote for any R who wins the nomination, but just about all the other candidate’s supporters say they will elect anyone but Obama. Here is an idea, if you don’t care which republican gets the nomination, just vote Paul, and ensure that you have no third party to worry about. He beat Obama in a couple polls a couple times and is still neck and neck with him. We would easily beat Obama.
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:24amThis type of reasoning is what past generations would call “cutting off your nose to spite your face”. I hated when Karl Rove dissed a few Pure Tea Party candidates but some lost and if we had won those seats with more mainstream Republicans we could have had CUT,CAP and Balance and reversed Obamacare, NOW. ( sigh) The Nation would have been better off for it. Begrudgingly, I confess Rove was correct. WHOEVER the REPUBLICAN nominee, we’ll be FAR better off than a second Obama term or do you want more of the last 3 years??? I know THE ESTABLISHMENT is pushing but so many Republicans have become purists. ( Think annoying environmentalists who won’t flush the toilet to save water). Mathmatically, we HAVE to attract Independents. Perry, Bachmann, Paul, Gingrich, Santorum cannot do that. THE GOAL IS TO WIN, NOT TO BE SAINTED.
Report Post »etshoney
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:26amYou folks a real thinkers! Let’s see if all of you stay home I can ASSURE you that we will have Obama for another 4 years! Is that what you want? How about this thought….I’m not a Romney fan and I think we could do bett BUT I will do EVERYTHING I can to make sure Obama is GONE in 2012. PLEASE THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU’RE SAYING AND THE RESULTS!
Report Post »boats48
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:29amThen you will have voted for Obama! Not voting or going third party is not advisable this cycle. Romney may be “Obama-Lite” but he doesn‘t share Obama’s blatant disdain for our laws or constitution.
Report Post »Krutch
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:29amYep, mbama is a shoe-in for re-election!
Report Post »Kevman
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:35amEven if you don’t like Romney, can there be anything worse than Obama??? I would happily take any of the eight Republicans running (and even Hillary) over Obama. We need to begin rebuilding this country, even if it is only one small step at a time. Obama needs to go, and a third party will not make that happen.
Report Post »Alky
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:43amThink third party…. Donald Trump! He’s the most likely to jump in as independent. It wouldn’t surprise me if it were fully funded by Obama on taxpayer money with a huge bonus for Trump, just to split the Republican vote.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:54amPerry’s job growth PRECEDED his governorship. He is making a fortune off of our TAX DOLLARS in supporting those illegals. We spend $338 billion a year…a year! on these illegals. Bless their hearts..I love them…but we cannot afford them. That is morel…way more than anything else we spend on. Think about it. We are losing our own benefits because we support their healthcare (medicade) welfare, imprisonment, elementary and Jr high education plus what they send back to their respective countries. IIllegals are stealling us blind. The liberals have already done it to us…Perry is a lliberal who swapped sides,but not values.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:58am@walkyrie 3 Key points. Bush Jr. was also governor of Texas…., Stupid is as stupid does, the immunization thing shows he can be bought and for not that much money. He is merely another example that we have the best politicians money can buy on both sides of the isle. Don’t pretend to suggest he is his own man or represents the people.
Report Post »walkyrie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:26amLion? what are you talking about? REAGAN as a party flipper and changed side later in his career than Perry. Plus, a Texas Democrat is more conservative historically, than an eastern Republican, so your objection needs to be re-evaluated.
Here‘s Perry’s response ad to Romney’s style over subsatnce critique (and he even flip-flopped on running his own ad!! lmfao). Here it is -
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/20/new-perry-ad-that-romneys-kind-of-a-liar-aint-he/
Welcome to Texas, MOFO!
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:30amI will vote for any Republican if I like them or not . obama winning reelection is not an option. Saying your going to vote third party or write in nuts ,sounds like something a troll would say to influence the weak minded into electing obama by default. Only children and liberals take their ball and go home if they don’t get their way.
Report Post »NWWADD
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:33amPlease list why you would not vote for ROMNEY…. I would like to know why!
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:36amAnyone who sits home is just shooting himself in the foot. I’m not crazy about Romney either, but I’d rather vote for him (only if I have to) than just hand it over to Mr. Marxist to continue ruining our Country that he’s already laid the foundation for collapse of the America we know and love.
Report Post »Cain/Newt is my best choice as it stands now.
walkyrie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:39amJRook, ok those are some points but I think they are more minor compared to say, Obama being reelected and replacing 2 supreme court justices with his ilk. By the way W is not and was not an idiot – but he damn sure is way more of a globalist, big gov. guy. To your point though, yes, politicians are, for the most part, bought and paid for – about half buy the people and half by their paymasters. SO!?! what’s the alternative? A dictator who rides in on blood and chaos – not bought or oweing anyone but his wolfpack? A kid from a dirt farm in Paint Creek doesn’t get far without being true to his peeps and yes accomplishing things for every level of his support. W. was hoisted into public life through a series of Prescott Bush legacy maneuvers that HW pulled and will pull again for Jeb. By the way I’ll vote for Jeb too.
ANYTHING is better than these Progressive Liberal Euro-model loving fools that are blunding around now!
Report Post »I think, orr at least hope, we can agree on THAT. peace
republitarian
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:41amSo what if the nominee is “establishment”? SO WHAT? The president can’t do much on his own (as the the current one is now learning) he needs the approval of congress. We have the House. Now we need the Senate and then it won’t matter. What’s he gonna do? Veto?
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:06pmEveryone i know is voting Paul, if he doesn’t make the Primary, he’s being wrote in… to me, there is only one candidate with any sort of responsibility, character, honor and values… and that is the only person i will vote for, no matter what… you can say i’m “throwing” my vote away all you want, and i’ll say to your face, YOU are throwing YOUR vote away voting for someone you do not agree with, if you don’t agree with someones policies… then they do Not represent You, end of story. I’m for liberty, freedom, respect of our Constitution, respect for Others and free markets…
Romney’s Top 5 Donations ALL come from the large Banks. he is a puppet.
Goldman Sachs $354,700
Credit Suisse Group $195,250
Morgan Stanley $185,800
HIG Capital $176,500
Barclays $155,250
Ron Paul
US Air Force $23,437
US Army $23,053
US Navy $16,973
Mason Capital Management $14,000
Microsoft Corp $13,398
The proof is in the pudding folks… Paul is for the people…
Report Post »Watchdog826
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:15pmI want vote for Mitt. I told the RNC 3 yrs ago we as voters want a chose between nuts and bolts not 2 nuts or 2 bolts. If it has an R by their name it should mean conservative let the D be libs. That‘s way we get blamed for all this stuff is we have had Libs for R’s McCain, Bush
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:24pmSELFRELIANCE & HOBBS57 couldn’t have said it better. As much as it may irritate to have Romney as the RNC candidate, it is still FAR better than the alternative. We have to keep in mind there is no such thing as the perfect candidate. When the bus is heading for the cliff, the first thing you have to do is get it to stop. THEN you can back it up. Romney may be a big government guy, but likely one we can live with until we get this bus to back up
Report Post »PJL
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:42pmBlaw, blaw.
Report Post »shackero
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:43pmI hear ya—-These limp-wristed progressive-type Republicans should NOT be the Republican nominee!!!
Report Post »Better to have 4 more years of BHO so that you at least know who the enemy is. Bush tried to push amnesty down our throats—He rammed that Medi-Care prescription coverage bill through……This country cannot handle another RINO in the White House—-We need a steady constitution-minded President that will buck the trend and push for the reduction of the size and scope of the federal government!!!!!!
hornblower
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:05pmYeah Sure, and let’s have four more years of Barry. Wake Up!
Report Post »junkmaninohio
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:10pmIf you stay home then Obama wins. Do you really want 4 more years of this communist and his Marxist policies? I don‘t like Romney either but I’ll be damned if I will sit home if he is the Republican Party’s candidate. Maybe we can push a third party after we defeat Obama.
Report Post »HounddogCincoRzrbkUno
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:39pmGreat, people don’t like the probable Republican nominee, so they just stay at home and sit on their dumbass and don’t vote, which will ultimately benefit the idiot currently in the Whitehouse. Your attitude and all the other jackasses who think like you is why Obama got elected. Ever hear of the old adage “the lesser of the two evils”. I dont care for Romney or the established Republican elite, but I’d vote for any of the current Republican candidates over Obama in a heartbeat, no hesitation or remorse whatsoever.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:46pmIm not a huge fan of any of the republican candidates, but come on people, anyone is better than these asss clowns……. Third party vote assures obamas re election …..
Report Post »brian8793
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 2:14pmThen enjoy another four years of Obama you anti-Mormon bigot.
Report Post »CLEttinger
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 2:24pmNewt has the best track record and most experiance. Just wish he was electable.
Report Post »suzannegentle
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 3:09pmi agree! no more giving my vote to the sucks less than the other guy nominee
Report Post »YOU WILL NOT GET MY VOTE FOR ROMNEY OR ANY OTHER RINO PERIOD!!!!
so, RNC, go ahead, make my day….. i would much rather see this country run into the
ground by a do nothing congress run by demonrats than the same outcome by a
so called GOP who is actually a RINO, impotent, limp wrist-ed, spineless RINO!!!!
Faith1029
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 3:21pm“The RNC’s candidate is Romney, I will not vote if Romney is my only choice. I am open to a third party candidate if its Romney ths would be a first for me.”
Then you may as well just give your vote to Obama because that’s what will happen. No third party will win.
Report Post »C.Gallicchio
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 5:17pmAll I have to say is go read this (http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/), then you decide who is tight for the job.Liberty,Trade,Peace and Prosperity. Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »VIGILANTE NfdL
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:09pm@BehindBlueEyes
Report Post »Republicans voting for a big government candidate IS “another 4 years of the Soros/Obama agenda.”
VIGILANTE NfdL
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:23pm@HounddogCincoRzrbkUno
Report Post »When you say, “the lesser of the two evils” I have to wonder; if given the choice between Hitler and Stalin would you vote for the “the lesser of the two evils” (whichever you think that might be)? Or would you be enough of an individual to abstain?
To those of you encouraging us to settle for the Easter Elitist Yankee Romney, if you guys would vote for Ron Paul now, we could resolve this whole thing now and defeat Obamao. Or are you not willing to follow your own advice and make the compromise you yourselves recommend?
Its you, the Establishment Republicans who are unwilling to settle for what you feel is an imperfect candidate.
UrbanCombatSurvivor
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:24pmI completely agree. For the first time I am seriously considering either not voting, or voting for a third party.
Romney is a progressive, no different in actual substance that Obama.
Perry is a cloaked Al Gore supporter and a dictator(Exec Order for forced vaccines of little girls?)
Bachmann is also cloaked, she worked for Jimmy Cater.
Gingrich is trying to force big government control of medical care and has been for a long time.
Cain is a viper who was head of the Federal Reserve in KC.
Santorum is a zealot, who would force raped women to have the baby.
Huntsman has way to many ties to China, and openly cows to them.
Johnson has a gay agenda he seems to be trying to force down our throats.
Ron Paul seems the best choice, but has a few really whacky ideas that are tough to get behind.
I’m not willing to vote for any of them, with the exception of Ron Paul, who I don’t think will get the nomination.
Report Post »Leaving me with the only logical opinion I can come to: Obama with a gridlocked congress is a better choice, IMO.
BehindBlueEyes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:40pm@UrbanCombatSurvivor
Report Post »If enough people follow your logic you’d better start brushing up on your goose step. I hate to inform you but we a president that is showing latent signs of marxist/communism ideology. Actually he has a history of involvement with communists. Take for interest Obama’s mentor when he was growing up in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis. There are many other facts tying Obama to communists and Marxists.
In other words, its in our national interest that Obama be voted out in 2012.
Grey Eagle
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:29pmA third party candidate ensures the election of Obama. I am puzzled though why the GOP candidates have all been ganging up on Perry over and over. Part of the time it has seemed that two of them has been carrying water for Romney. Perry has and still is a good Governor in one of the largest states in the US. He is a staunch conservative, but I know from all accounts that the GOP elite want Romney, so the destruction of Perry is needed. I will stay home before I vote for Romney.
Report Post »ccr
Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:58amJust vote for Obama…….voting for a third party will do just that for ya!
haha…….I love how everyone on the blaze says Romney is what the GOP wants when 2 wks. ago it was Christie they wanted.
America needs the MOST prepared, experience-wise and intellectually, as well as a person with a history of turn around experience, working with others (and not this “my way or the highway” attitude destroying our country), and a person that is not rude and hateful.
Go ahead……….look for your perfect candidate…….be a total purist. (Have you ever really studied out the founding of this country and its early days??? It was not “pure and clean” ideologically!)
Go ahead………vote 3rd party………re-elect Obama.
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on October 21, 2011 at 4:51am@Grey Eagle
Report Post »Mr. Perry has no one to blame for his dismal debate performance but himself.
htnkd5
Posted on October 21, 2011 at 7:03amYou have two choices, Obama or whomever is the Republican candidate– one thing about the Democrats is they will vote Democrat no matter what– one thing about Republicans is if I do not like the candidate– I will not vote or vote for a 3rd party candidate- therefore letting the Democrats win– what have you accomplished- nothing– if you really dislike the policies and the way the country is going- then you vote for whomever is the candidate running against Obama to get him out of office so he can not do anymore damage– Republicans need to learn how to stand together that is why we have primaries–if there is a candidate you really like – than promote them to your friends– I personally like Cain and Bachman- but if they do not get it- I will support whomever we have because I do not like Obama’s ideologies.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:38ami like a Cain/Newt ticket myself.
Report Post »OneRepublic4us
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:42amI’ll vote for that!
Report Post »Doug in Seattle
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:44amAgree!
Report Post »hempstead1944
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:50amditto
Report Post »Ok-Sure
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:55amThat is what i was thinking as well. If Paul can’t get the push he needs I would for sure vote for the “Herminator” Cain and Newt. Man it would be nice if the GOP did something smart.
Report Post »sissykatz
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:02amI’m with you, but I had rather it be Newt- Cain. I am sure Newt will make Cain a
Report Post »BIG PRESENCE AS VP AND NOT A FIGURE HEAD.
KTsayz
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:05amCain is Fed Res and Newt is CFR! Cain withholds information (won’t release p&l info GF Pizza), lies through his teeth (Bloomberg debate) and is a corporatist/banker.
Report Post »Sounds to me like you really want America destroyed.
escape_from_socialism
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:06amIf Cain drop 999 and get Paul’s plan, then he have my vote.
Report Post »Del Scorcho
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:21amYES! I’ll drink to that!
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:35amCain/Gingrich or Gingrich/Cain with Paul in a cabinet position as Sec. of Treasury.
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:05amYou people are screwed.
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:36amI definitely think Newt is the best choice for VP. I think he’s a strong choice for President, but I worry that his personal and political baggage would hurt his chances. But if he doesn’t get the nomination I sincerely hope whoever does chooses him as their running mate.
My personal favorite for president, as I’ve said many times, is Gary Johnson. He has a very strong record of execute leadership in limiting government growth and balancing budgets. And at this point in my life I put a lot more weight on what people have done than what they are saying. And no one has an executive resume that even begins to touch that of Johnson’s. It’s honestly that good.
My second teir choices are Cain, Paul and Newt. If any of these four get the nomination I’ll be happy to vote for them.
To be honest I really like what Romney SAYS. He’s TALKING like a conservative. And he has kept his cool when many would have lost it. I‘m just afraid that if he actually gets elected he won’t ACT like a conservative. If he gets the nomination would I vote for him? Every one running for the republican nomination would be far better than Obama so yes, I would vote for him in 2012. It would be a disaster to have a conservative run as an independent in 2012 (I’m sure Obama would be the first to write a campaign donation for them).
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:39am“You people are screwed.” – SimpleTruths
If we get four more years of Obama in 2012 I’ll have to agree with that sentiment.
Report Post »Bluebonnet
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:58am@ KTsayz Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:05am
Report Post »Cain is Fed Res and Newt is CFR! Cain withholds information (won’t release p&l info GF Pizza), lies through his teeth (Bloomberg debate) and is a corporatist/banker.
Sounds to me like you really want America destroyed
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NO, If we want America destroyed, just follow along with the uneducated people who believe Obama!
Besides everything he’s done to help destroy this Country, I don‘t like the things he’s said in his books, like: “Audacity of Hope” ie: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
I think he’s already proved this. Many other knowing things he’s written in other books, like he has “Animosity against his mother’s race.“ from ”Dreams of my father”
Just these thoughts from his books and knowing who his personal friends are makes me wary of this man. Who keeps friends like this and fills the White House with these people?
Zorro6821
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 2:18pmRon Paul all the way…..Perry looks like an amateur and he is as dumb as they come. The guy is mumbling, jumbling mess. Romney is my second choice along with the Newt. Newt is Savant when it comes to American History. They don’t come much brighter that. Health Care For All!! Single Payer! Health Care Is our Right just like the politicians. I have never heard of an Employer (US Citizens) paying for the employees healthcare (politicians) and denying his own.
Report Post »mspullig
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 3:17pmsounds good to me :-)
Report Post »patriot48
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:37amPerry and Romney have destroyed each other and themselves with their petty bickering. They have shown that they are in no way effective leaders. On the other hand, Cain and Gingrich have both stood out as strong, capable, rational leaders who have more interest in fixing Washington and defeating Obama than slinging mud at one another. The choice is becoming quite clear.
Report Post »Del Scorcho
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:33amAgreed. Cain has been my one of my top picks since Trump was talking about running. Now he IS my top pick.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:35ami think they should have a gage match.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:39amthats cage match
Report Post »riveractor
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:31amPerry and Romney do not belong in the same room as the others.
Report Post »Do people ever stop to think why the left wants them in?
Dustyluv
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:53amNo they don’t. I am sick of the liberal progressive so called republicans picking our candidate. Let the primaries start in the southern states and let’s see who we get. There is no wisdom in the east coast at all….all a bunch of crap for brains liberals playing like they are republicans.
Report Post »duskerhu
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:16amThis is exactly the reason we keep hearing they’re the two front-runners…
It’s difficult; I have very little trust in any of these folks. Especially when they keep meeting with The Donald.
Report Post »walkyrie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:13pmThe left damn sure doesn’t want Perry – that’s why noone is showing his new ad(s). The attacks have been like 3:1 on Perry vs all the other R candidates COMBINED – that piece of data was layed out on Politico the other day. Perry is the only one (including Obama) who has lead a huge international growth economy – and don’t whine about how he inherited it – the US downturn happened on his watch and he still kept the ship off the rocks and sailing strong. Sure, i’ll vote for Romney if we make that goof – hell I’ll vote for preachy Santorum or scary-eyes Bachmann if I have to. jus get ride of the O-Hole.
Report Post »Tagudinian
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:27amMitt Romney and Gov Perry have shown us that they cannot govern this country effectively with their penchant for 7th-grader behavior. This kind of ineffectiveness all the more buoys Newt Gingrich and allows him to rise. As they say, the cream always rises to the top and you can’t keep a good man down for too long.
Report Post »JohnFourteenSix
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:25amI‘m glad we’ve had the opportunity to see just how childish and petty these candidates are. It’s time to put an adult back in the White House; a real leader with real ideas to solve the real problems facing America. http://www.hermancain.com
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:30amThey are not helping him either, 9-9-9 is getting smeared as hard from the Republican bluebloods as it is from the leftists. It‘s ridiculous that they all stand on that stage and act like they don’t understand the difference between state and federal taxes!
Report Post »Ok-Sure
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:05amHere is a really interesting article explaining the 9-9-9 plan. I thought it was very helpful in understanding how the plan will work. I am a fan of Cain, he has a great attitude and seems like a great leader. I am just not sure if he sees the whole picture. Either way he is a great man!!! Go Ron Paul!!! oh and check out this article for the 9-9-9 Rundown…
The creator of the Laffer Curve and the architect of Reagan’s boom in the 80’s
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204346104576637310315367804.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:42am@OK SURE
Thanks for the link. It was informative.
Report Post »honor007
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:08amCain 2012!
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:24amI think its sad… they should be following Reagan’s rule of not attacking each other… .Sure, there is civil discourse, but you keep the debate civil and you keep composure and just state facts without deploying the viciousness…
At the end of this, I am hopeful these candidates will all come together in one way or another and form into cabinet positions, they are all strong, good people and each brings a lot to the table, collectively they can make for a very strong cabinet.
I wouldn’t mind seeing something like:
Cain – President
Report Post »Perry – VP
Romney – head of new heathcare repeal/replacement initiative
Paul – Head of Fed Reserve Oversight and Foreign Affairs
Bachmann – not sure with her.
AntiLiberal74
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:29amBachmann and Sarah Palin can star in a rew reality tv show called ‘Conservative Cougars’
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:33amCain can go back to Burger King. I’m getting sick of this phony dude, with plan to destroy free America greater then Bush and Obama. Can somebody tell Cain, learn from the past. You can’t trust government with anything.
Report Post »I hear about cult of Ron Paul, but for real Cain supporters are a real cult. They can’t provide any reasonable answer to any thing. Cain is a weak candidate compare to Obama, and we will witness repeat from 2008. Instead McCain, we will see defeat of McCain without Mc.
Islesfordian
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:36amI keep hearing about Reagan’s 11th Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican. But I don’t really think it applies within a primarry campaign where Republicans are running against other Republicans. It seems to me Reagan meant it for normal political life where Republicans should close ranks angainst the common for of the Democrats. McCain was always a prime violater in this area, as most RINOs are along with their moderate (liberal) pundits and operatives. The key would be to see how Reagan campaigned against Ford in 1976.
Still, engaging in this kind of negativity is bound to make it difficult to bring all Republicans together for the general campaign later.
I can see why Romney pulled this ad. It will make HIM look bad. Perry was already looking bad all on his own. There is an adage in politics: When your enemy is destroying himself, don’t get in the way.
Report Post »drhunt
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:36amHow about…
Gingrich-POTUS
Report Post »Romney-VP
Paul Ryan-Sec. of Treasury
Herman Cain-Sec. of Commerce
Sarah Palin-Sec. of Interior, (if she doesn’t run for Sen. in AZ)
Allen West-Assist Sec. of Defense(long enough to allow Petraeus to square him away)
Michelle Bachmann-Head of Homeland Security
Condi Rice-Sec. of State, (bring her experience back)
drago
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:43am@escape_from_socialism
Report Post »You might want to lay off your meds, before posting on here……
escape_from_socialism
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:48amOnly one but, Perry and Romney are RINO’s – R in name only, so I’m not sure 11th apply.
Ok, I have question. They almost all talk good, but who can deliver? Who have the most solid record of talking the talk and walking the walk? Who is not scared to tell people the truth, plain and simple?
Report Post »Can your candidate have spine strong enough to withstand forces like NWO, UN, FED, IMF and unions thugs? or we will end up with another puppet president?
escape_from_socialism
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:58am@DRAGO – what? is the blaze, a Herman Fed Cain fun club now?
I just simple can’t trust Herman. His connection with money trust, and his protecting stance on fed are troublesome.
Next, I run small business, and after a quick estimate I will save about 50-70 thousand a year in federal taxes. Cool, right?
Tell me how we will protect 9% from not going up, knowing Congress can change any rule. It will have to be Amendment.
I know Bachmann was wrong to call 999 a VAT.
I know what VAT is. It is bureaucracy on steroids.
PS. my meds work fine, don’t worry about it.
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:59amEscape from Socialism, I’m already sick of Cain.
Hides his papers just like Owebamao – refuses to release the profit and loss staements from GF Pizza during the time he wa CEO
Says he will release all GITMO detainees to get back one US POW the back tracks
Flat out lied during the Bloomberg debate about his FRB position to Ron Paul and didn’t even blink when he did. We know what a liar BO is and there are people ready to endorse and vote for another liar? Unbelievable!
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:13am@antiliberal74 Michelle Bachman is probably the most honest candidate in the race. Anyway your comment on the cougars brought the idea to mind nothing but nothing would create a wasp nest of liberal woman going berserk as a ticket with Bachman-Palin. Or a ticket with Cain-Bachman. Imagine that. Berserk liberal women.
Report Post »Secessionista
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:23amThankfully, each of the candidates will slowly fall apart, leaving only one steadfast and solid candidate – Ron Paul. A man who has given us the same TRUE message for 30 years. Every vote he has ever cast backs it up. His record is impeccable. His performance remains unstained.
Can’t say that about anyone else.
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:40amLast night Black This Out money bomb $2,288,787.42
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »concho
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:21amGonzo, I like the way you think, hate Romney, but if we have to hold our proverbial noses to vote him in to get rid of the “liar in thief”, so be it.
Report Post »zorro
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:50amNope. At least with Obama I know what I’m getting. With Romney, who the heck knows. No sir…Romney will NEVER get my vote. I‘ll vote for any other Republican running even if I don’t agree with all their policies. I know there is no perfect candidate. But everyone else running, everyone, is better than Romney.
Report Post »SeanKD
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:02amSorry, but I cannot and will not vote for a man who ran TO THE LEFT of Ted Kennedy when he wanted to be the senator from Massachusetts. Romney is a RINO and a leftist at heart.
Report Post »republitarian
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:54pmThat’s right, Concho. I’m a Libertarian who always votes Republican. You think I like it? Am I happy to pull a lever for John McCain? No. But no one gets everything they want in a candidate.
Report Post »Ebbertron
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:21amI really dont see anything wrong with it. Thats how Perry communicates, and it wasnt like he was showing clips of Romney saying he’s got a disconnect between his mouth and his brain, he was showing news anchors saying that!
ehh….not nearly as big a deal as people want to make it out to be. You dont think Obama is going to have the smear machinine running full tilt?!?
Report Post »LadyLibertykicksASS
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:43amNot to be the bearer of bad news, but the past 3 years were just a warm up for what’s coming; if America does not elect someone other than Obama…!!!! He already has the next 5 years planned out ; and remember how quickly he got down to business, passing legislation and making changes to everything that effects our everyday lives???? Hang on Baby, if he get’s reelected, You ain’t seen nothing yet !!! We have got to be Wise; can’t afford to shoot ourselves in the foot. We must focus on getting the Conservative candidate elected ….who ever it is!!! The Candidates need to focus on explaining exactly, how they will undo all of the sneaky Socialist crap Obama has managed to get into
Report Post »Law !!!! If we keep being extremely critical of each and every candidate; we will be cutting our own throat…..As much as I pray for a Ronald Reagan….we may have to settle for someone who will pass a thorough Vetting, who is honest and will follow the Constitution.
.
C.Gallicchio
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 4:54pmLadyLibertykicksASS@ http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/ Here is your answer. Liberty,Trade,Peace and Prosperity. Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »elrond3737
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:20amRomney is the Clinton of the Republican Party.
Report Post »Zorro6821
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 2:21pmRomney has a handle on the issues and is a great statesman, However Ron Paul is the real Deal!!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:18amI sure hope neither one of these twits is our nominee.
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:17amIf either Perry or Romney gets in were in as much trouble as we are in now. It would serve us better to go for control of both houses, they can control the white house and over ride anything he trys to do.
Report Post »Tankertony
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:16amPerry is finished. Hopefully, Romney will be finished soon enough.
Sarah Palin 2020-2028
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:11amFunniest post on this article award goes to TANKERTONY! Sarah Palin…that was a good one.
Report Post »walkyrie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:22pmPerry Is Finished!???! that’s even better. bro, go write that down in your journal so you laugh at yourself over the years. Goofball
Report Post »AntiLiberal74
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:14amReminds me of a classic cartoon line…”OH MY GOD!!! WHO THE HELL CARRRRES?????”
Report Post »drhunt
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:12amThis is exactly why Newt continues to gain momentum in the polls…people are tired of the bickering and infighting, and are looking for candidates that can articulate solutions and defeat Obama. A politician cannot swim in the sewer of national politics as long as Newt has, and not have a few “cling-ons” attached. Then the question becomes, are conservatives willing to overlook his past foibles and indiscretions in order to elect, IMHO, the smartest candidate on the stage.
Report Post »gwssacredcause
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:38amI am through voting for Republican candidates that continue to preach “We need to be more Moderate”. Everytime there is an election conservatives are told we need to move more to the moderate, we have moved so far moderate now we look more like moderate Democrats than conservative Republicans. What is the difference if Obama wins or we continue to be moved more to the left, we still end up in the same place. The inevidiability of gradualism is working on the Republican leadership comrades.
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:07amGingridge
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:17amright on
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:18amGingrich
Report Post »sissykatz
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:59amI’m with you all the way…. Newt knows more than the rest combined….
Report Post »Zoe
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:17am“A Grown up”
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:11pmhe has horrible baggage and horrible voting record… you better look into Newt. he is a nice guy though, i can’t lie about that… he just does Not vote how he says he believes… i feel he would pander to the same big corps and banks as everyone else…
Report Post »One Man Progressive Wrecking Crew
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:07amPerry and Romney doing the job the MSM won’t do….destroying one another.
Report Post »Jukes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:06amI am ok with this ….push each other to be better. As long as there is no lie or you are not miss leading the public…I say push Rick Perry to be better… the world is what is ruthless.
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:04amGingridge for president. These kids (perry and romney) can go out and have a fist fight. I want someone who is going to solve our problems. Get real …..Gingridge. Donate to Gingridge. So what if he isn’t a pretty boy. This is not a beauty contest…it is for our President who will command respect. Do you really think Romney or Perry are adult enough to handle this? NO>
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:19amAny bets on who would win the fist fight
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:27amDoes Gingridge have as much personal baggage and questionable past political actions as Gingrich?
Report Post »hojo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:34amNo winner it would be all bitch slaps.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:02amPolls showed that voters REALLY HATED this type of sparring — so Romney crew decided to pull the ad. Everything most politicians do are for “polls” and not “for the people.”
Notice on the debate last night when NV was asking if nuclear waste was going to be dumped on them?
TWO candidates (Perry/Romney) saw it as a matter of PAYING NV ENOUGH MONEY and only Ron Paul said IT WAS A CONSTITUTIONAL STATES RIGHT ISSUE!
What do you think? Does a slick politician with MONEY solve America’s problems, or is the CONSTITUTION the answer?
Ron Paul, President 2012
Report Post »larman
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:14amBoth of these candidates are just more of the same. Status quo if you will. We need real change, Ron Paul is the only candidate that can bring real change.
Report Post »Ok-Sure
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:01amRon Paul for President!!! We really need to start making a push to get his mesage out there. The media wont do it so real people must. The people who actually get things done in this country. I am taking every opportunity to talk with others about his views and voting for him. Spread the word. RON PAUL 2012. The only chance we have at re-balancing the budget and securing our country.
Report Post »C.Gallicchio
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 4:47pmhttp://www.usdebtclock.org/# Neither Romney or Perry will do anything about the debit, Only one candidate has proposed a solution to the problem at hand. http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/ . Need i say more. Liberty,Trade,Peace and Prosperity. Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Reduce.Our.Govt.Footprint
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:27pmPeople wanted hope and change and got Obummer, now there is a chance for REAL hope, and REAL change, and they call him a nut. I am tired of the same old crap, look at our country now, the once great USA is now being laughed at, it’s embarrassing. Romney has good morals and intentions, but would sell his soul for a vote. Cain, is a very likeable guy and has economic knowledge, but a lot of baggage, same with Newt, the most intelligent man on the stage, be a great VP. I like Bachman and Santorrum, they are just not ready yet. Perry, well, I can’t get past the illegal issue among others…Ron Paul will get my vote, I don’t agree with everything, but out of all the major problems in the USA – he is the answer, as for foreign affairs, I’m sure that congress will agree with us and most of his foreign policies will get denied or congress will come up with alternate plans! Do we really need 220 bases all over the world, no, bring most home, keep the strategic ones. Remember, we are broke….we have to make changes, hard choices….RON PAUL is the man for those choices!!!
Report Post »wakeup1
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:01amRomney, deep down is a dirt bag politician, never will get my vote !
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:09amIf he’s up against Obama, you better vote for him, we all better vote for him or 4 more years of Obama is on US! If we take the Senate, keep the House and the Tea Party stays on him, we can keep him on the right track.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:17amThe ONLY way I’d vote for him (Romney) is if he was running against Obama, and I’d vote for my dog against Obama. Romney is NOT a conservative. He’s FOR abortion, AGAINST the second amendment (for gun control) and then there’s Romneycare. I’m not a fan of Perry either, but he’s been honestly MAD at being attacked. Romney (from what I saw) complained about being talked over, and then talked over Newt. I hate hearing this cr@p about Romney is the only one who would win against Obama, because he’s the least conservative…..Duh, he‘s the LEAST CONSERVATIVE so we don’t want him. Period.
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:18amAgree. He is nothing more than one of the elitists. We do NOT need any more elitists in OUR government. Let them all go live in china, say, and see how that works out for them.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:26amI agree with all of you but, if he wins the nomination, we have to hold our nose and get behind him. It’s not how it should be, I know.
Report Post »escape_from_socialism
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:04amIf people get nominated Romney or Perry, it means they haven’t learn anything and they deserve 4 more years of Obama. Its call, tough love my friends. So better get your a.. strait and go around your neighborhood and preach.
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:00amRINO vs. RINO!!! Now on pay per view!!!!
Report Post »crackerone
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:30amThe winner gets John McCain.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:12amYep.
Report Post »