Sen. Rand Paul Endorses Mitt Romney
- Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:28pm by
Becket Adams
- Print »
- Email »
Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul went on Fox’s “The Sean Hannity Show” Thursday night to endorse former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
“First of all, before you say what I think you’re going to say, did you check in with your congressman father?” Hannity asked in reference to Sen. Paul’s father, Texas Congressman and former GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul.
“Well, you know, my first choice had always been my father. I campaigned for him when I was 11-years old. He’s still my first pick. But you know, now that the nominating process is over, tonight I’m happy to announce I’m going to be supporting Governor Romney,” the Kentucky Senator replied.
“Tell me why you’re supporting Governor Romney,” Hannity said.
“Governor Romney and I actually have quite a few similarities,” Sen. Paul replied, stressing their similar political histories (Romney’s father also ran for president) and family values.
Sen. Paul continued:
I met with him recently. I had about a 30 minute meeting with him…and we talked about a lot of issues.
[…]
We talked issues, frankly, that are very important to me, that are important to my dad, and to many of his followers. And many of these Gov. Romney has already taken a position on. One of the big issues for our supporters, for myself, and my dad is auditing the Fed. We think there needs to be more transparency to the Fed and more oversight by Congress. This is something Gov. Romney was supportive of throughout his campaign and also was supportive of in private to me.We talked about other issues that are important to my dad’s followers. My dad has a legion of young followers who are on the Internet and they think they rule the Internet (maybe they do, maybe they don’t), but they’re very concerned about the freedom of the internet. There’s been legislation recently, SOPA, that Gov. Romney came out in the debates and was opposed to this SOPA which would take away some of the process of ownership on the Internet and we were very afraid that it would limit internet freedom and Gov. Romney is right there with us on those issues also.
So I think there’s a lot of kinship on those issues.
“When it comes to fiscal responsibility, Obamacare, there are vast differences here,” Hannity said in reference to Gov. Romney’s political spending versus President Obama’s, “Do you think this country can survive four more years of Obama?”
“No,” Sen. Paul replied, “My state is really suffering. We stand to lose 50,000 jobs in the coal industry if President Obama continues. I think one thing Gov. Romney would make as a president is he would bring a more balanced approach to regulation.”
“We’re going to have some regulations. Some regulation actually protects the environment. But President Obama has allowed the tilt and the balance to go so far that he’s crushing the economy down, crushing jobs,” he added.
Sen. Paul went on to say that he plans on stumping for Romney and that he believes the former Massachusetts Governor will make a very sober and responsible Commander-in-Chief.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (448)
HatesLiars
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:59pmKidCharlemagne
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:15pm
amabotsumog
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:03pm
At least with Romney you are getting closer to your vision.
================================================
How do you figure that??:
Candidate Comparison: Top Contributors 2012 Cycle
Mitt Romney:
Goldman Sachs $573,080
JPMorgan Chase & Co $415,075
Bank of America $398,850
Morgan Stanley $373,850
Credit Suisse Group $317,410
KID, How many jobs do you want created? How much MORE DEBT do you want? Ron Paul and Gary would take the money if it was offered to them. They need it to win. Since they cant win, they can run around and say anything they want. You vote for Johnson or Ron Paul and its a vote for Obama. Your best chance of getting something done is the Teaparty. In two years, the Teaparty has elected more candidate than either libertarian or other third party. And other republicans vote with them. They are not a stand alone third party. You guys dont get it. You either bug republicans to get it done or you lose, period. Democrats and Republicans want TWO different Americas. Being an independent means you dont care about winning. If you are not winning you are LOSING. GROW UP! Maybe Rand Paul knows something you do not. And thats not hard to achieve.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:03amwhoa there. The question that needs to be asked is…..”why do these banks support Romney (or the Republican candidate so much”.
You will not like the answer
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:12amRomney just expressed his support the other day for the idea of providing weapons and money to the Al-Qaeda rebels that are trying to take over Syria right now:
————————-
“Mitt Romney urges US to arm Syrian rebels, lead effort to oust Bashar Assad
05/29/2012 4:06 PM
By Callum Borchers, Globe Correspondent
Mitt Romney has renewed his call for the United States to arm Syrians rebelling against the regime of Bashar Assad, after more than 100 people were massacred in the village of Houla last Friday.”
http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2012/05/29/mitt-romney-urges-arm-syrian-rebels-lead-effort-oust-bashar-assad/8ASReNmBrMHqY1DpUz2bWN/story.html
“Back in mid-February, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper warned that al-Qaeda had “infiltrated” the Syrian opposition. At roughly the same time, videos began emerging on the internet that clearly revealed just what an understatement–to put it mildly–Clapper’s observation represented. The videos show Syrian rebel brigades proudly posing with the al-Qaeda flag and protestors holding it high. This was not a matter of “infiltration,” with the word’s connotations of stealth and cunning, but rather of an openly publicized affiliation.”
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/05/10/Al-Qaeda-Ladies-Choir-Struts-Its-Stuff-in-Rebel-Syria
————————-
I don’t know about you, but I don’t think that this is even remotely a good idea!!
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:12amTwo things.
1. I vote republican party ONLY with Paul. If not, I go back to my Constitution Party.
2. The REAL Tea Party HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE LEFTIST REPUBLICAN PARTY. The “tsunami of 2012” was a COMPLETE TEA PARTY FAILURE and ONLY ELECTED MORE LEFTIST REPUBLICANS… and gave us MORE unconstitutional “Patriot” Act, unconstitutional NDAA, another 2 years of AMNESTY, debt ceiling HIKES, CR, CR, CR, EXTENDED unconstitutional unemployment, MORE NATION-BUILDING, etc. etc.
The tsunami of leftist republicans was A COMPLETE FAILURE… as predicted.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:17amHatesLiars
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:59pm
Your best chance of getting something done is the Teaparty.
======================================================
Good point:
YouTube: “The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather”
http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/BostonTeaParty07.jpg
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:15am@kidcharlemagne nor do I …Middle East policy is a blood soaked mess…We have our own oil we should work on that..we are not winning anything in the Middle East.For as long as we continue to try to control them we will have to fight wars.
Report Post »black9897
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 10:12amThat’s too bad. He should support dad.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:08pmInsanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
And the GOP thinks we are the nutty ones. Your the ones that try the same thing over and over.
Same garbage candidate over and over.
Romney = Obama
That is if we can keep track of the flips and the flops.
Next week he might not equal but as of right now his legislation is pretty close.
Romney:
NDAA
TARP
Assault rifle ban
Lowered taxes while raising every fee the local government had their hands on
U.N.
Romneycare
WAR
And yet us Constitutional Paulbots are nutty.
Report Post »What agencies has Romney said he would cut from federal hands?
What regulations go back to the states? Anything?
What about the tax code? Anything?
Is he pro-life now? Thats one he’s flipped on a few times. I’m not sure if he is currently on the flip or the flop.
What about the federal reserve? Pretty sure he stated he sees no issue with it. Oh, unless he just doesn’t want it known. He did talk with Rand about it apparently but why not let us know exactly where he stands?
Yeah, retort your crap about me being crazy for asking the Constitutional questions.
Don’t even look at the questions, just tell me i’m insane for being pissed off about working almost 5 months out of the year for the government. I’m crazy for wanting accountable leadership!
I’m crazy for wanting the people who are deemed worthy to rule over me to follow the law of the land.
Pendragon
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:38pmWow I must respect the Humility of Rand Paul….Actually I have a whole new view on him now…I thought it was all a Paulbot thing but seeing this gives me a New outlook on Rand Paul and him Possibly running for President in the future… i guess it all depends on the Paul People and if they truly sciphon off Rebublican Votes…If they do Then Rand really is not the man and leader I now thought he was in not bringing the party together which is really what needs to happen. I do think and agree it would be great to let Ron Paul Replace Geithner though
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 12:05amIt Just doesn’t make sense why people support Romney. Tell me how this man is conservative? He supports the NDAA which lets them Kill you or throw you in prison for life just being suspected of terrorism. He supports HR-347, which diminishes your Freedom of Speech. He Supports more wars which cost money we do not have right now. He Supports bail outs which we were all against Obama for. He supports the Federal which all you BeckBots were told from the all mighty Beck is bad news. I haven’t heard Romney talk about getting rid of the EPA, or even fix the TSA. What do Republicans see in this man has me greatly lost but if that is what you want expect more of the worse to happen.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 1:00amIf anyone cares to see some things that are gping on behind the scenes, look here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX4DdfSGiFs&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Warning, this is over a half hour but is very interesting.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 1:35amTo All Blazers, I want to reiterate to you something you may forget from times past. You are all sheeple when you just listen to what you hear from all the media, even Glenn. Did you guys just not see the change in Glenn after his somewhat secret meeting with a George Soros Rep? Glenn before meeting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWi4aRht3Ms&feature=watch_response
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo3a8VigHyo
After the meeting, he started going along with the establishment that Ron Paul was crazy. Why??
I take it that, even with the battles we have done back and forth on Paul vs. Romney, you do not get the feeling that something is wrong here? You think that there is no such thing as election fraud from the establishment from both sides (since they are pretty much the same anymore) parties? You guys are smarter than that I know it. I have been blogging with all of you for quite some time. Are you just going to sit back and take it knowing that you are being deceived? I do not know what to say anymore.
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 1:52amWill somebody give BROTHER WINSTON SMITH back his ball? His mother is calling and he needs to go home…
Report Post »ecoquesttom
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 7:14amFor me it is more simple. If the GOP wanted my vote, they would have given me someone. The founders predicted a two party system would lead to bank control of government. It is exactly what happened. I disagree with Rand Paul. While Romney may be better than O on some issues, he is worse on others. I am glad Rand endorsed Romney, as now I know who Rand is at his core. I have voted for 40 years now, and wasted my presidential vote every time. I will never again waste my vote on any evil candidate. I repent of the vile votes I cast for both the GOP and the D Parties. Better not to vote if there is no third party.
Report Post »Bonnieblue2A
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 9:28amWinning the candidate while losing our Constitution to big government is not winning, IMO. Romney‘s policies are every bit as Progressive as are Obama’s when it comes to foreign policy, big government, socialized health care, gun bans, etc…… . Romney will be lying when he takes his Presidential oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States from enemies both foreign and domestic.
Romney didn’t see the crash of 2008 coming and he has not addressed our spending, national debt, or monetary system (Federal Reserve’s control of currency) in any meaningful way. Romney is just another New World Order puppet. He supports the transition from sovereign nation states to global corporatacracy.
You need to wake up and decide if liberty is worth the price of your personal discomfort!
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:42pmIf the LEFTIST republican party successfully cheat-nominates LEFTIST Romney… THEY, I repeat, THEY… will have just reelected Obama.
Report Post »Joey Odendahl
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:53pmAnd if you refuse to vote, you will have helped.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:00amjust like if you didnt support Iraq war you were unamerican, right?
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:05amWho said anything about not voting?
I voted for the Constitution Party’s Michael Peroutka in 04.
Report Post »I voted for the Constitution Party’s Chuck Baldwin in 08.
If the LEFTIST republican party cheat-nominates LEFTIST Romney… guess where I return.
soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:12amChuck Baldwin was 100 times better of a candidate than John McCain
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:15amJoey, this is going through all the Paul supporter sites and it is not good for Romney. We all took a pledge, and like the ones we follow, we are true to our word. We will not vote for your progressive Romney. He will lose to Obama, the OWO is at our doorsteps and it will be because too many Americans were not willing to; wake up to what is really going on, help their grandchildren have a country they could be free in, save the Republic, be unselfish, be true Americans according to our heritage. You are all going to get exactly what you deserve.
AnimalsAsLeaders
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:50amWEST
Report Post »Spoken like a true American patriot.
jsciai
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:12amBrother Winston,
Report Post »Pride goeth before the fall. I sense hurt pride here. Repent and work towards getting Obama out of the WH. I know that may hurt, but if you are really for the restoration of this country you would first start with promoting the best option to do that. Otherwise, I think you are just writing here at the Blaze to try to divide the conservative movement. Certainly your posts would indicate that. I suggest you frequent the RP sites where your ideology would be most appreciated. Otherwise, I suspect an Obamaton troll here.
Todd P
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 6:39amThere are only 2 ballots that matter this November: Romney and non-Romney, If you don’t vote for him, then whatever else you do benefits Obama. It’s really just that simple. I will not help Obama. Not by voting for him, not by staying home, and not by writing in the name of someone who will NEVER be president.
ROMNEY 2012
Report Post »usedCZARsalesman
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 8:40amLOL, I used to think you PaulBots were on to something. I actually thought you guys cared about America…I was/am wrong. You are a bunch of misfit losers and you give all Libertarians/Constitutional conservatives a bad name.
For all you know, Ron Paul is just as much a totalitarian as the rest of them he just has a different vehicle he wants driven over the cliff. You demonize these people so heavily but it is IMPOSSIBLE that every single one of the Republicans in Washington (ESPECIALLY those that have only been there a few years) are setting us all up for this global power grab, NWO crap. You can safely assume that ALL the Dems are not very bright and that MOST of them actually do have bad intentions (socialism and the like), but not the majority of Republicans. Of course there are bad people everywhere but many of these folks honestly want to do whats best for the nation and it isnt always easy to know what that is. I‘m betting if any of you geniuses were in Congress you might vote for something from time to time that you regret or didn’t quite jive with you convictions.
The thought that Romney is an actual PROGRESSIVE is laughable. He may not be as hard core as YOU want, but that is why you all look like fools talking about him the way you do. Even YOUR Jesus (get it, God’s son) Rand understands that we need to come together now and simply beat Obummer…what’s so hard about that?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:42amSo is Rand on the Paulbot hit list now Brother? What will you do when Ron endorses Romney?
Report Post »honor007
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:50amGonzo, my thoughts exactly!!!
Report Post »I can’t wait for that day, it will be beautiful~
usedCZARsalesman
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 10:26amJSCIAI…I think the majority of the RPers on this site are liberal plants/trolls. Its either that or these people are so stupid they actually believe the things they write. All they have done, from the time it was obvious RP couldnt win till now, is deepen the divide…Those of us that are willing to do the HARD WORK over the next 20 years understand the this is step one in a LONG process. They are so bitter and short sighted they really believe Romney and Obama are the same…and that the Tea party has already been hijacked…and that RP is the messiah and the only one that can do it…hmm, I seem to remember another group or people in ‘08 that thought the same thing about someone else. Seems that they were so hellbent on him be THE ONE that they ignored all the signs and voted for him anyway. Can’t remember how that turned out, but I don’t think it was good.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:35pm@usedCZARsalesman Whoa… Hold your horses there.
Romney said, “I’m… moderate. And, my views are progressive.” -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwGQDXgzzVk
Romney said, “I’m a big beleiver in getting money where the money is, and the money is in Washington.” – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bM_si-JVfhI
Romney, Obama the Same?
youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38
I’m a life long Republican, have voted for the TEA party candidates in the primaries, and GOP nominee in the general elections. However, I know that even if I vote for Romney in Novermber, that he will, just like John McCain, lose. I think I know who the real bitter, short sighted folks on here are though.
Report Post »usedCZARsalesman
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:27pmCOLT, there is no convincing you folks…and thats ok. I just hope at some point you wake up from this dream land where RP is the lord almighty and everyone else (even staunch conservatives that just happen to think differently about Paul than you do) is a pink-o commie that hates America. NO ONE HERE thinks Romney is perfect, we would all like to see someone more historically conservative in there.
The point is that Romney WILL do what is ness. to a) slow spending…even though I know you don’t believe, they will pass a Ryan-like budget. b) create jobs and c) take some of the heavy regulation off of business and kick start the economy…He WILL sign what congress puts in front of him, it isnt like he is going to get away with an openly progressive agenda. Congress and WE THE PEOPLE won’t let him…get real!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 6:13pm@Used, All the crap you listed about Romney isn‘t even the president’s job description. You expect him to fix things, he can’t. I mean if you think the president is supposed to do all that stuff… you are a HUGE progressive. Until you admit it, yeah you’re right… you’ll never be able to talk to a RP supporter.
Report Post »resme
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 7:05pmRyan budget is that where they cut medicare, But not foreign aid? Is that the same plan that balances the budget in 30 years?
Report Post »usedCZARsalesman
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 11:05pmJUST…you can be as obtuse as you want, I was obviously saying that he would SIGN all those bills that the conservative congress sent to him…Is that really how you want to play this till Nov? Just act like children playing games with peoples words to try and make yourself sound better? That sounds far more like a liberal than a libertarian. Romney will do what he is asked by WE THE PEOPLE and the conservative congress we elect. That is the way it is SUPPOSED to work and that is the way it WILL work…IF you RPers get behind Romney and help us out
Report Post »black9897
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 12:05am@USED
It’s hard to say that when Ron Paul has been saying the same thing for 30 years. Doesn’t get more consistent than that. I’m not crazy about any bureaucrat, but Ron Paul is the best out of any of them.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 6:21am@Used, Man, I’m not playing any games. Just responding to what you posted. I wasn’t aware you meant something different. Regardless, that conservative congress you mentioned doens’t exist. Only a progressive congress, and like all progressives, they believe their programs will work, or that they’re able to fix the bad ones. They can’t. Really the only legitimate job for the Federal Government is to protect freedom and our Consitution. The problem is, you are asking us to help you elect a candidate that cares little about either. And after all the corrupt BS the RNC did thoughout the primary we should hop on board and help get your progressive Bilderberger elected? Sorry, I’ll pass. Once you become a part of the Liberty movement, there’s no going back to the same sacks of crap that want to enslave us.
Report Post »usedCZARsalesman
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 9:28am@JUST…so then what you are saying (since EVERYONE in the ENTIRE government, except of course our lord and savior Ron Paul, is a progressive hell bent on destroying the world) is that NO MATTER WHAT we do, we are all screwed? If congress is what you say it is, then even a RP pres couldn’t possibly change a thing. I’m not 100% against you on that thought, but then you guys need to change your argument. Why are we even talking about RP if, by your own admission, neither he nor anyone else can do a damn thing to save us from destruction?
Report Post »justangry
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 11:34amYeah, I kind of think a correction needs to happen, and it will SUCK. It will suck worse without the Bill of Rights. Not everyone in Washington has been voting against them, just most. I mean it’s simple for me, dude. I‘m not voting for anyone who thinks it’s ok for government thugs to molest my daughter without probable cause, detaining Americans, etc. Right now the so called conservatives are eating this $hit up, so they don’t reflect my values. I won’t vote for them, and I’ll continue to try to rally enough people to demand they be purged from the GOP until they throw my ass in FEMA camp. Then I’ll tell the guards the same thing. Nothing’s stopping you from rallying people behind tyranny.
Report Post »usedCZARsalesman
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 12:08pmwell then we are on the same page brother, and I will GLADLY give my life to right the ship if it comes to that. I just feel like we can make some good things happen with the folks that are in there right now, and then get the right people in there to strip away at the laws that have been destroying our liberty. The only way to do that, however, is to elect people on the SPECIFIC platform or repealing NDAA, Patriot Act, and so forth. I am definitely on RPs side on all that, but we can’t be alienating EVERYONE ELSE in the process. The way MOST RPers talk down to other conservatives is not helpful in the least, nor is the assumption the Paul is the only man alive that can “save us”.
Report Post »dock
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:36pmHe is supporting Romney because Romney was at BILDERBERG this year! The Corporate/banking elites have chosen him to be president, just like they CHOSE Obama who attended the BILDERBERG meeting in 2008!!!!!!!
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:43pmIs Alex Jones a paid Russian shill? (little coverage of Russian spies or anti-Russian stories)
http://www.redstate.com/barrypopik/2010/07/09/is-alex-jones-a-paid-russian-shill-little-coverage-of-russian-spies-or-anti-russian-stories/
Report Post »AUsername
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 8:07amBilderberg doesn’t mean he will be president, rick perry went there and he dropped out, it appears likely for Obama to win because the company counting the votes are ran by his supporters and associated with his big donors like Soros.
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:09amAUSER:
Report Post »Check your statement on vote counts with your sec of state and report back.
Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:35pmI am one voter who will NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER vote for LEFTISTS Romney or Obama.
If the LEFTIST republican party successfully cheats the Doc out, like they did in 08… they will have just reelected Obama.
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:41pmBreathe in your nose and out your nose very slowly feel your belly rise. Focus on your breathing. Then get you head out of your butt.
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:46pmSorry… it‘s a little hard to breathe when I’m being raped by LEFTIST republicans and their PARTNERS, the LEFTIST democrats.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:56pmAmen, Brother.
Hurts doesn’t it?
:(
Report Post »Bob_R_OathKeeper
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:03amSorry to tell you this, no matter who the president is, nothing will be fixed unless it starts with the individual and you sound like one effed up individual. You stomp your feet and cry all you want, don’t vote or vote for somebody who has no chance and you will have voted for Obama and if Obama stays, things will get very bad and you’ll deserve every bit of pain and suffering that ensues. That’s my opinion, have a nice day.
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:20am@Bob_R_OathKeeper
As much as it pains me to correct an Oathkeeper…
Anybody who nominates LEFTIST Romney WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A REELECTED OBAMA. I HAD NO PART IN HIS ELECTION (nominating McCain) and I will have NOTHING to do with Obama’s REELECTION (A Romney nomination).
Things will get EVIL with either EVIL Obama or SLIGHTLY, SLIGHTLY, IMPERCEPTIBLY LESS EVIL Romney, but MAKE NO MISTAKE…
I’ve had NO PART IN IT and “deserve” NONE OF IT.
Report Post »Bob_R_OathKeeper
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:33amOh? You are not correcting me, you are giving me your opinion, same as I did. I disagree with your opinion and think it’s dangerous…..time will tell.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:48am@Brother Winston Smith
So….. are you voting for Gary Johnson now?
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:06am@Bob_R_OathKeeper
My “opinion” is BACKED UP BY 08′s ABO FAILURE.
Dangerous? HOW?!?!?!?!?!?!
WHAT MORE CAN WE LOSE!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Is there an Amendment or Enumerated Power that I’ve overlooked?
Is there a SOVEREIGN NATION WE HAVEN’T BOMBED?!?!?!?!
Is there a Mexican STILL IN MEXICO?!?!?!?!?!
Is there ANY AREA THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T ILLEGALLY “REGULATE” AND TAX?
Is there ANY VALUE LEFT IN OUR COUNTERFEIT, FIAT DOLLARS?!?!?!?!
Dangerous? You’re about 50 years too late.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:15amRepublicorp, That is nonsense. Did you listen to Pauls speech today in Texas?? I did and he praised Wisconsin. He had good to say about Walker. Paul supporters were behind him.
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:13amStay true to your principles. I respect a person who does that.
Just understand the consequences of your vote. If Obama is re-elected you contributed to that win. If Obama wins you gave up the “right” to complain.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:07pm@DISMAYED VETERAN..You can do all of the complaining yourselves..We don’t care.
Report Post »Chromo200
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:34pmI hope he made it clear to MItt to be a conservative as Mitt is telling us he is. We need a well behaved and serious CEO for this country. We need a person who is going to inspire us to be independent and rely on our own initiative, and reduce the size and influence of the gov’t. I hope that Rand will be heard by Mitt.
Report Post ».
soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:36amsounds like, ‘hope and change’
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:32pmBarring any monumental gaffes or closet skeletons; Romney‘s got this one It’s his to lose I’m feeling pretty good about the state of things concerning the election. That said, I am doubling, redoubling, tripling, quadrupling my efforts to ensure the removal of Obama in November.
Report Post »Way to go, Rand. Way to go Wisconsin!
godhatesacoward
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:07amyep.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:26amB.S. different face same policies. Romney is a progressive. If He comes out with plan to CUT government , reduce regulations, and simplify the tax code i’d listen otherwise … forget him.
Report Post »Brother Winston Smith
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:32pm2008 + ABO + “Hold your nose and vote for evil” + LEFTIST McCain
Report Post »= President Obama
2012 + ABO + “Hold your nose and vote for evil” – war hero – pro life + LEFTIST Romney
= President Obama
chewfatlip
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:52pm2012 + ABO + Not Romney = Obama
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:25pmIf you paid attention to Rand Paul’s senate campaign, he has said he is not an idealogue. If i remember right, he said “moderate libertarian” or something like that. Lets not pretend like Rand Paul is Ron Paul.
Also, i am surprised to see the calmness of the paul supporters, much to the dismay of the anti-pauls
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 10:57amThat’s because it is not about Ron or Rand. It is about a Liberty Movement.
Report Post »GaryJohnson2012.com
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:10pmPlease look at Gov. Gary Johnson. If you truly believe in the Constitution, you can’t vote for either President Obama or Gov. Mitt Romney.
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:14pmA vote for Gary is a vote for Obama.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:16pmNo, no, no!!! There is no way Gary can get any more votes than Ron Paul has. You seriously cannot want to water down the election further to give 0bama more of a chance. I absolutely respect Gary Johnson but if he and you love this country….just stop already.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:04amA vote for Romney is a vote for a white Obama.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:27amDIVINE: These “ white Obama” comment people are either dysfunctional or Lefty Trolls. Nothing like handing the Marxists another four years for Obama to destroy America and American capitalism.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:38amFirst take note, Wisconsin happened without the help of the paulbots. If you want a voice than you should be part of the winning team. Backing a loser will gain you zero and on top of that no one will care what you think.
Report Post »sonnetswan
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:08amObviously no one cares what I think now. Just me and my maker. He will know that I voted for the right candidate without making a deal with the devil.
Report Post »AUsername
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:32pmThat guy is the man he is way better than Ron Paul and would be a great president and he was one of the best governors in American history. Gary Johnson 2012
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:06pmThe choice is clear:
http://www.writeinronpaul2012.org/
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:13pmI did that in 2008 and it was a vote for Obama. Ron Paul would be a good US Treasury Secretary.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:14pmOK… ok… one Battle at a Time!
Report Post »WatchingChurchOnTVWhileDrinkingAlone
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:22pm“I did that in 2008 and it was a vote for Obama”
wtf are you talking about? No. It was a vote for Paul. Obama won because he got more votes. McCain was a garbage candidate, Obama was a garbage candidate, Paul looked promising. You voted for who you thought represents your views best – because we have a representative democracy. Voting any other way is throwing your vote away.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:21am@KidCharlemagne
Report Post »Love you like a brother but ‘write-in’ will not get the job done. I dont think they will even be counted. Better to vote either constitution party or libertarian party – the republicans will see exactly how many votes they COULD HAVE HAD with a constitutional candidate
Bob_R_OathKeeper
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:41amMost of you RP supporters do more damage to him than anything else, man you are some nutty people.
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:44amBob – I have always felt the same way.
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:04amA vote for Romney or Obama is throwing your vote away..
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:23amThis is what I am talking about. I will campaign against Obama and Romney for a write in vote for Paul. Wouldn’t that be something. We just have to convince all those disenfranchised Democrats. The youth are going to do it, a lot of Ron Paul Independents and quite a few Republicans (like myself) are going to. We said so and took oaths in January and February: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OV8RSgCr2g
Report Post »justangry
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:07pmHey Bob, The federal government has taken away our 2nd amendment rights with the Brady Bill. Our first with HR 347, the 4th with the Patriot Act. The 5th & 6th with the NDAA. The 9th and 10th with every progressive bureaucracy they‘ve established since the 1920’s. What do they have to take away before you start “oath keeping”? I mean are they going to have to quarter troops in your house before you do something other than bitch about the people who actually trying to fight for our rights?
Report Post »neoconenemy
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:25pmI’ve been done with the GOP for quite some time now. I will happily write in Ron Paul. These republicans must really be insane if they think they can railroad my candidate at every turn and then expect me to write a blank check for them. If Republicans can take back the senate then it would be better if Obama wins. That way we can try and get a real constitutional conservative in 2016.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:28pm@BOB OATHKEEPER.. You are just uniformed..I don’t hold it against you..You have been programmed and you believe what you have been taught..I suspect that you may be a Viet Nam Veteran..I checked out the Oath Keepers..sworn to defend the Constitution..Funny thing Bob..what you were sworn to protect you spit in the face of..sad..very sad..Bob..
Report Post »AUsername
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:34pmwrite ins in some states are not allowed so just vote Gary Johnson.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:04pmJUST ANGRY and ASHESTOASHES…………I tend to like and listen to both of you even if I don’t always agree with your point of view. What do you think about this?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:01amill chime in….it stinks – but Rand is just a man
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:20amIt’s all over but the crying…..
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:24ami’ll take a stab – Rand Paul is just a man.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:33am@MOM..Thank you Mom..I am very disheartened by all of this..Romney is bought and paid for by the bankers..Goldman Sachs I believe is his biggest contributor followed by the rest of the cartel, and as you know the 700 bn in TARP went to Sharia Compliant banks which means that they finance terrorists. and that suggests to me that the terrorists are nothing more than paid mercenaries. .Have you seen this video Mom? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USGSOViaulc&feature=related
Report Post »and this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28tE0fKpISM
I thought Rand would never stoop to support Romney..As for me.for the first time in my voting history…I have no plans of voting..Our Presidents are chosen for us..we have no say.. I am tired of playing the game..but I do look forward to the return of our Lord and Saviour..Blessings Mom.
Mutiny
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:43am@ashes
I loved your last comment. Honestly who cares about this life. Its a blip in time. We will never find happiness and safety here, Heaven is where its at!
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:50am@ ASHES,
I asked this below and I am genuinely interested in your answer. For additional background, please see PHANTOM_AXEL’s post below. If Ron Paul directly tells his supporters to vote for Romney for the good of the country knowing that the restoration will take more time, would you do it? Dr. Paul knows he can’t win the election although he has certainly set the stage for a return to our founding. If he clearly explains why and clearly tells his supporters to vote for Romney, would you?
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:56am@co
I am not voting for Romney or Obama. I will vote for Ron Paul. If the GOP wanted my vote they would have put up a decent candidate.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:18amI don’t understand, MUTINY. I get where you‘re coming from and I agree on the majority of Paul’s incredible platform. But even he knows that he can’t make it happen in this country in the next election cycle. The founders weren’t able to convince the people to go to war with Britain for several years. Drastic, necessary change takes time. Dr. Paul’s letter reflected the number of delegates he did win which will continue to advance the liberty we all believe in. By no means was Romney my first choice but I am surely not going to write in a name that has no chance of actually winning.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:31am@CO-PATRIOT..I kept up with the Paul campaign..There was talk that the GOP tried to force Paul delegates to vote Romney via threats made..lawsuits from the Paul camp may be coming down..This is not a free America.. It is true that we don’t choose our Presidents..but it was nice that we had people taking a stand and trying to make a difference..The media is owned by the Rothchilds. They did not give Paul a chance..nor would they ever give anyone else one..It’s all smoke and mirrors.. I will wait..but I will not make any promises.. Right now the thought of voting for liberal flip flopper Romney makes me ill.. even the Mormons were for Ron Paul..People do not realize that Romney is just another NWO shill. They have tricked us with that Zionist BS..and there is a huge difference between Zionism..which is Communism/NWO/atheist/Secular and Judaism which is a religion..The true Torah observant Jews are not Zionists..They say it is going against the Torah..They are not materialistic..They are Godly. This is a good place to show you where Zionism started .. in Germany. People need to know the difference..
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw9Qm_TejCo&feature=related&skipcontrinter=1
copatriots
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:54amThanks ASHES. I know Romney was chosen for the GOP 4 years ago and We the People had precious little input in the decision. I don’t like it either and will be no happier to vote for Romney than I was for McCain. But, the Conservative movement is gaining as seen with Rand Paul, Allen West, Marco Rubio, Gov. Walker, etc. Ron Paul mentioned that a very significant 20% of the delegates at the convention support his stance. While Romney is certainly no prize, you have to admit he is certainly better than 0bama. He is and will continue to listen to the 20% and gaining input of the Ron Paul supporters. With 0bama, you can be sure you will have no voice.
Again, thanks for the dialog. Signing off for tonight. Will catch your response another time. : )
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:21am@co
I understand what you are saying but the way I see it if people like me keep biting our tongues and keep voting for the lesser of two evils we are going to keep getting crappy candidates. What the GOP needs is a wake up call. Had we had a good candidate in 2008 and just lost is one thing, but forcing McCain down our throat and now Romney. Who will be our choice in 2016? Biden?
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:29amMUTINY, I know it will be tough and I genuinely respect your ethics but I have a feeling that come November you will know the right thing to do for this country.
Blessings to you and good night!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:32amI will write Pauls name in. I will not sit home and not vote. If you stay home and do not vote at all, you will never be able to stand there and say I did my best, I did what I felt had to be done to take a stand, to make a statement. I will be able to say that I voted to turn back to our Constitutional roots where others were too afraid to. I will be able to look into my grandchildrens faces and tell them that I did all I could to help us keep our freedoms.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:46amI’m confused and a bit miffed. I hear so many things, I just don’t know. One day Romney is for sure the nominee, the next he‘s buying a shadow party in NV to undermine the electorate suggesting he’s not really suecure at all that he has it wrappd up. Then there’s the dad thing. My dad could be 100% wrong on every issue, and I‘d still endorse him if I had the chance because he’s my dad. IDK, I like Rand, but I’m still not voting for anyone who supports all that post 9/11 legislation.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 8:57amit appears theblaze was blocking my posts last night and then all of a sudden they show up this morning – weird
Report Post »amabotsumog
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:03pmRon Paul supporters – please take a minute to think about it without being emotional and reactionary. If you really want to make a difference, you first have to change the trajectory of where things are going. If you vote for a third party or stay home on Nov 6th, you have essentially placed your vote with Obama. At least with Romney you are getting closer to your vision. You are not going to get results overnight. It is usually a slow process that can take a couple of election cycles. But with a good and respectable message and organization, in the next few years you will come to see the fruits of your work. If you keep having temper tantrums of Ron Paul or no one – you will find that in the next few years your agenda will not have advanced and your message will not resonate at all. Surprise us all and respond with something other than the old tired rhetoric we’ve been hearing.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:12pm@amabotsumog
I hope you understand that the ‘lesser of two evils” game has been played on us for 50 years. Has it gotten us any closer to a constitutional republic??? HELL NO. I played the game in 2000 and 2004, I’ve done my time – never again. Give me a constitutional candidate or give me 3rd party.
I’m not alone – these are the feelings of a great number of people. If you want to win now and in the future – republican establishment needs to make the change. I cannot vote for a moderate candidate who is backed by an establishment that is either moderate or progressive.
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:15pmHear ye hear ye.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:15pmamabotsumog
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:03pm
At least with Romney you are getting closer to your vision.
================================================
How do you figure that??:
Candidate Comparison: Top Contributors 2012 Cycle
Mitt Romney:
Goldman Sachs $573,080
Report Post »JPMorgan Chase & Co $415,075
Bank of America $398,850
Morgan Stanley $373,850
Credit Suisse Group $317,410
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contriball.php?cycle=2012
WatchingChurchOnTVWhileDrinkingAlone
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:19pmI completely agree. Representative democracy is about voting for someone who can win, not someone who best represents your views. Voting for the candidate you think is best is throwing your vote away.
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:26pmWATCHINGCHURCHONTVWHILEDRINKINGALONE <<a real snarky Ron Paul zombiebot.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:28pmgive me a constitutional republican, or give me Gary Johnson!
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:31pmA democrat president with a republican house or senate = stagnation, because their whole job at that point is to make the president look bad so they are voted out in the next election. The same goes for a republican president and a democrat house/senate.
So they wind up bypassing congress and doing whatever they want while stripping our liberty from us by ignoring the constitution.
So, the dream is –for me– to get a republican president and a republican house/senate…because they will work together and get stuff done with little to no gridlock.
So what will happen with a libertarian president? Guaranteed gridlock & stagnation from both the republicans & democrats.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for either Obama…or a wasted 4 years…and brother, we don’t have any more time to waste.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:38pm@The_Almighty_Creestof
Report Post »When the republicans had president AND congress, spending exploded, the deficit increased, the constitution was ignored, and the federal government expanded – nevermind the whole housing bubble thing. Were those great years? Until the republicans get their act together (McConnell and Boehner are NOT GOING TO CUT IT), the best we can hope for is gridlock. During gridlock, the federal government is not growing and not tearing apart the constitution
KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:41pmThe_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:31pm
So, the dream is –for me– to get a republican president and a republican house/senate…because they will work together and get stuff done with little to no gridlock.
=========================================================
Oh……they will get stuff done alright:
———————————————————
Report Post »“Divided government gets less done (always a good thing in Washington). The Cato Institute’s William Niskanen points out that in the last 50 years, the only two periods of extended fiscal restraint from the federal government came during the Eisenhower and Clinton administrations, both under divided government. The two eras when government expanded were the Kennedy/Johnson administration, and the current administration, both under united government. Note that party affiliation really doesn’t factor into the equation. A government that can’t pass laws can’t spend money. It can’t raise taxes. It can’t create new federal agencies or benefits.”
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108422,00.html
tersky
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:44pm(Where is the ‘like’ button?) YES.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:33am@ama. my wife is out of town so i can‘t be with her but my neighbor is nice and she is not a commie And since i can’t have my wife tonight i‘ll just have my neighbor because it’s the next best thing…. Thanks
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:49am@circled
Report Post »LOL – thats a very good point
tzion
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:10amAllow me to amend this by adding that it took the socialists and progressives nearly 100 long years of patiently eroding this country to get it to where it is today. No one person, Ron Paul included, is capable of undoing all of that alone. I don‘t know about anyone else but I’m certainly not planning on betting the fate of the nation on a single election. Even if Paul wins that only buys us four years during which every leftist media outlet and politician will attempt to destroy him. Paul alone won’t fix the MSM nor will he get rid of the indoctrination in high schools.
But listening to some of you Paulbots, I get the impression that if Ron Paul did somehow become President you would expect him to fix the country while you sat around and did nothing. How is that any different than the entitlement mentality that caused much of this mess? Sure you are smart enough to realize that entitlement programs are actually a disservice but beyond that you are still stuck looking to government to solve everything. So to all you Paulbots out there, what is it that you personally are doing to fix the country? What actions are you yourselves taking? And if Paul were to become President, how would you assist him in helping this country?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:58am@TZION I beg your pardon..Paul would have fixed even the indoctrination in schools by eliminating the Dept of Education that Newt Gingrich worked so hard to establish..Ron Paul was going to eliminate 5 of those Communist NWO Departments like EPA which works to relieve us of private property..He would have eliminated the Dept of Homeland Security which has been fronting weapons to Hezbollah and fought Arizona over trying to keep illegals out.. Ron Paul would have had us debt free in 3 yrs.. If you watch the first video I posted to Mom Rules..It tells that the Federal Reserve started the war of 1812 to run the debt so high that we would be forced to take them on.. Now if you watch the second video I posted to Mom..you will see similar tactics..
Report Post »WatchingChurchOnTVWhileDrinkingAlone
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:04amDIVINEPROVIDENCE
Report Post »You’re right about one thing, I am a zombie. I’m looking for BRAINS – but i still havent found any here. I fear I may starve to death. Send more libertarians!!!
Titbit
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:28am@amabotsumog
Report Post »Nice try but these vocal Paulbots aren’t listening. After Rand endorsed Romney this afternoon, he said that most Paul conservatives would vote Romney but gaining support from the Paul independents (assume he’s referring to the so called strict constitutionalists) would be problematic. Rand has been a staunch supporter of his dad for decades but he clearly understands the current priority is assembling a unified front against this administration. Nice to know there are some rational Paulies out there.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:46amAmaBot, Here is a form for you: http://www.writeinronpaul2012.org/
Report Post »jsciai
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:36amWPC–here’s a form form you:
Report Post »http://www.barackobama.com/obama-for-america-2012-campaign?source=OM2012_DD_G_donations-search_name-d_my1b&utm_medium=om2012&utm_source=G&utm_campaign=DD_donations-search&utm_content=my1b&gclid=CKyntoeevrACFQRl7AodWFsksA
West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:01pmJSCIAI, Let me see, I am for a true liberty candidate, so if Romney gets POTUS, I have to wait 8 years, if Obama gets another 4, I only have to wait 4. You guys should have turned to the Constitution as now we may lose the Constitution completely. I hope not, I hope that in 4 years we can find another liberty candidate to put forth.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:26pmTo us..getting Romney will be getting Obama..It is like ..Do you want to die quickly..or do you want to die really slow.. If we vote for Ron Paul.. I am quite sure that the liberals will count those votes to Obama..literally..THey voted dead people..animals and the same people many times last election..they pull votes out of car trunks..and they switch votes if the opponents count is higher..I understand they did it in Las Vegas when putting Harry Reid back in.. Our country is gone..whether Obama or Romney get in..It is just time..Face it..We are all owned..and they will do as they please..They including including the “rodeo clown” whom I hear sold out a couple of years ago..have led you down the yellow brick road..As a matter of fact..remember that book being sold which had his photo on the front dressed up as a Nazi? Well that has a whole new meaning to me now..kind of like these guys. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw9Qm_TejCo&feature=related&skipcontrinter=1
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:35pm@TZION
1. The MSM shouldn’t be “fixed” by a President. It will either implode, remain the same or remake itself based on market forces.
2. Should Ron Paul become President us “Paulbots” would not sit around. We haven‘t been sitting around when he wasn’t the POTUS. I’m not sure how you drew the entitlement analogy. It seems to be a bit of pretzel logic to me.
3. I can’t speak for all “Paulbots” but all I would look to RP to do is to begin dismantling the huge bureaucracy that has developed in DC so that our liberties can be restored. I don’t want him, or any other POTUS, to expand ANY programs.
Your use of the phrase Paulbot gives away your agenda. Go ahead and do exactly what the MSM, who you supposedly decry, tells you to do. Vote safely. May you find liberty, peace and happiness in your ignorance, sir/madam. But remember: They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Benjamin Franklin). Peace
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:23pm@CYKONAS It is not the President who controls the media..It is who controls the Presidents..
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7MlNT4Okd0
All Pro
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 6:32pmYou’re telling us that we have to choose between Stalin and Hitler. Heads they win. Tails we lose.
Report Post »NO! I’m not going quietly into the night.
cykonas
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:44pm@ASHESTOASHES
I have no interest in the childish vid. Chase your conspiracies and your fantasies as you see fit. We adults have serious work to do. Please go to your room and entertain yourself.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 1:44amCyconas, Ostriches like you are the reason our country is in the situation it is in. You know, everything around you is a theory. Math, science are all started with a theory. Conspiracies are no different. If you stick your head in the sand and take things as they are on what the media tells you it is, you will never know the truth. Start with a theory, research, find facts and either discount it or prove it. Everyone needs to start somewhere.
I will add that if you think that the richest families in the world do not minipulate world affairs to their advantage, then you are not as intelligent as you htink you are.
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 12:25pm@WCP
In a nutshell, the reason our country is in the mess that‘s it’s in is a lazy electorate that refuses to put our Republic ahead of their own personal interests and desires. I understand theories and their usefulness quite well. I am, however, rather tired of posters who think that their youtube videos alone are an actual form of logical discussion that I, or others, should pay attention to.
The rich have always been the more influential in almost every society known to this earth. Yes, even though I don‘t think that I’m all that intelligent I managed to grasp that abstract point. However it’s of no value to me. I can’t change it.
The problem with conspiracy theories isn’t that they are without merit. The problem is that when that is all one presents to advance their arguments the arguments, and the person advancing them, will be marginalized. It’s one of my hardships as a Ron Paul supporter. Because their are so many others in his camp that do little more than peddle in the latest conspiracy theory all of us are painted with the same broad brush as idiots.
I prefer to argue from a more concrete verifiable position. Like RP’s long and distinguished voting record. You are welcome to call me whatever names you like, as I have little respect for your opinion, so it’s of little consequence to me. We’ll see what happens in August. Hopefully things go the way we both would like them to go. Peace.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on June 9, 2012 at 4:50pmCykonas, I do not really think you are an ostrich and I apologize for that, I am upset over the news we have received this last week. I still hold out hope as I know that Paul supporters are going to fight hard at the convention. It will still be very interesting. I have the understanding that the lawsuit to bring forth 42 USC 1971 is still in the works, at least at this point, and I do believe that if it does, we could possibly see a brokered convention, It will be harder to accomplish at this point, but I will not stop supporting Ron Paul, and I will not do as you have done and throw my support to Romney. I will hold steadfast and with my vote, I believe I will be sending a message to the GOP.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:01pmThe worst part about this endorsement is that he did it on Hannity’s show! Hannity has hated everything about Ron Paul for years. Hannity is pure establishment and hates anything he does not recognize
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:17pmRon Paul would make a good US Treasury Secretary. Vote for him and you vote for Obama. I wrote in Ron in 2008 and what a mistake.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:20pma write-in vote is a waste of time. Better to vote 3rd party so at least it counts somewhere
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:01amSoybomb, my friend please come to my house and collect all my sharp knives….and flamables…and the oven….and the rope. :(
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:08amI’m kidding of course. I‘m sure I’ll still be alive and well and bringing a barfbag with me to the polls in November once again….can’t wait!
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:21ami’ll give you whatever duct tape i have leftover for the exploding head
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:25am@soy
That was the worst part. The only way he could have done it worse is on the Factor. What Rand did is he is learning from Ron’s mistakes. To be president you have to bow to the talking heads. So politically he is making the right move.
After Romney gets his teeth kicked in by Obama in November we will need strong leadership if there is anything left in 4 years. The saddest thing of the whole deal is even is Romney won, we still lose. His budget doesnt cut current spending levels so the middle of his first year in office he will either have QE4 or have to install martial law to stop the riots after the bankruptcy.
Report Post »Jezreel
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:26amI agree with you. Hannity is very ignorant, especially of the constitution. He goes with what and who is is told to endorse and sell to the public that are too stupid to realize that they are being manipulated. Still, we have to vote for Romney. At least if he gets in, the Tea Party and We the People can scramble and do our best in the next coming years to change things in American and finally get a president in that is a good man. We need to get rid of these democrats in the senate because Obama would be impeached if there were not so many communists and socialists masquerading to be servants of the people but are nothing more than greedy fat bloated evil men who care nothing for our country or their children or grandchildrens future. They are stupid enough to believe that if they do the will of the world’s elites, that they will have a slice of the pie if the new world order government is installed. Boy are they stupid! So is Obama. I bet Obama cheated all his way through college, since he is nothing more than a liar and a cheat, it seems like he has been that way all his life.
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:57pmThe choice is now clear. Please don’t muck it up Ron Paul supporters. June could be a really good month for America. Obama thought it started out bad, he is just climbing the first hill of the roller coaster. Let’s shake out some more Dem defectors.
(By the way, Romney was not my first choice either)
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:05pmwhat do you mean by ‘muck it up’. What about the people who have researched Romney and prove facts and links to his record? Shouldnt we search for the truth? Most are still pissed off because of the corrupt way this primary was played out. Maybe time will heal wounds, maybe not
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:09pmTo clarify, I am not stating Rand Paul is a “Dem defector”. I am saying that more and more Dems are making anti-Obama statements with every push on the “conservative gas peddle”. Rand’s statement frees up Romney to concentrate resources towards defeating Obama rather than playing defense in primary battles.
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:10pmGo over to Rand’s Facebook page and see all the hate. One guy told him to kill himself. My vote is for Mitt, though not my first choice either. I wrote in Ron Paul in 2008, so really I voted for Obama :( and will not make that ignorant mistake again.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:30pmI agree .. we MUST defeat Obama to save the country .. .then fight for more conservative ideals once that is accomplished.
OMG 2012 LIBERTY !
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:48pmSounds like the same old game….Power first, principles later
No thanks!
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:13amYou know, it would make it a lot easier to get behind Romney if he would adjust his budget plan but he is hell-bent on spending almost as much money as Obama. He know it has hurt him with conservatives, but he’s not budging.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:22amCATB’s comment….
“I agree .. we MUST defeat Obama to save the country .. .then fight for more conservative ideals once that is accomplished.”
So its the same old game huh…..Power first, principles later. NO THANKS
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:56pmGood grief what will our Ron Paul people and our Lefty Trolls who POSE as Paul people do now ? This should prove to elicit some interesting comments ! Stay tuned…
Report Post »DIVINEPROVIDENCE1776
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:20pmThe Ron Paul comments are being censored for foul language and death threats as we speak.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:15amyou two are delusional.
Report Post »AUsername
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:39pmGary Johnson
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:56pmPaul Who?
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:00pmOh, ok. Rand Paul. It is about time. I guess they all knew what they were doing stalling us all like that.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:33pmThis is likely to push the Ron Paul people right over that cliff ……
,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:49pmWhy – most of us knew ron paul was a longshot. Ron Paul sent out a statement the other week that his goal is increasing delegates – not winning nomination. Either you are poorly informed or are an anti-paulite
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:51pmWell, that’s no surprise. But, Rand Paul came out today and put in his support for Romney.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/07/sen-rand-paul-endorses-romney/
I wonder if his daddy if mad?
RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 6:45amI hope that Ron Paul is about to drop out of the race:
Report Post »http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-just-released-a-big-statement-is-his-presidential-bid-over/
This is of course still some what obscured, but my belief is that he is still in to collect enough campaign funds to pay off his debts. Romney is still not my favorite, but right now our dog’s ass is a better choice than 0bama. As Beck says, Romney is not a Communist.
GoodStuff
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:50pmI hope the Paulbots take a deep breath and eat some fruit or something. It’s not the end of the world guys.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:56pmI think you jumped the gun – haven’t seen any over reaction yet. Did you read the posts?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 6:49amSOYBOMB315
Report Post »http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-just-released-a-big-statement-is-his-presidential-bid-over/
PATTY HENRY
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:48pmGOOD FOR RAND. I tried to post earlier, so this might be a duplicate…sorry! Rand is a Class Act.
Report Post »We have quite a few great guys in DC now: Allen West; Marco Rubio; Paul Ryan; and Rand! Thanks!
amabotsumog
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:56pmThat was going to be my response exactly. There are some really great people rising through the ranks. We need 8 good years with Romney to first put things right again, and next we need those 8 years followed by the Rands, the Rubios, the Ryans of the GOP to keep America safe and strong. Once Romney “saves” the U.S.A., hopefully intelligent people will realize that the GOP was really is the right way.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:58pmRand is a smart man, he realizes that this will be a long haul and change will come from the bottom of the government, upwards rather than from the top (presidency) down. The whole nation, including its citizens, not just the government needs to change. That takes time to build, and as long as you keep your eye on the goal and keep slogging in that direction, you will eventually reach it. With his patience, comittment logic (vs emotions) and levelheaded approach someday, he could be President and it would be a big step in the right direction.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:07amWell said, AXEL!
Report Post »Wolfgang the Gray
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:41pmI figured all the Ron Paul disciples would be blasting comments on this article. “Sorry Dad, you’re not going to be President this time around either.” – Rand Paul (guessing).
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:49pmwhat are you talking about
Ron Paul issued a statement the other week saying he was focusing on delegates and not the nomination
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:02pmWell, he has focused long enough. It is time to get to work getting this country out of the hands of those who are about crazy.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:08pm@blackyb
Report Post »Ron Paul is focusing on fixing the republican party. When you think about it, he is right – we need to get our own house in order. We need to get the progressives and crazy ideas out of the Republican party before we **** it up like in 2000-2008. He is a true statesman
soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:26am@blackyb
Report Post »Ron Paul is trying to put the Republican house in order before power corrupts it AGAIN. I dont know how he is able to do it – knowing that half the people in his party hate his guts….He is a true statesman
soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:01amdouble post – it appears theblaze had blocked me last night
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:40pmRand Paul is a class act and he has a big future in the National Arena of USA Politics. Marco Rubio; Paul Ryan; Allen West; Rand Paul…. a lot of real and good people coming forth! Thanks Rand.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:53pm“I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”
Report Post »Patrick Henry
blackyb
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:59pmWell, they all are smart and can contriute.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:40pmDear faithful followers of Dr. Paul (the elder),
Please, PLEASE, refer to the breathing technique in the below article.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/these-are-the-secrets-for-tactical-breathing-in-combat/
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:42pmlol – good one
Report Post »BilderbergBeck12
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:39pmI like Rand Paul. But he plays politics to much. I know he has to work with these people and he is without a doubt one of the strongest conservatives in the government. I just hope Rommney does not ask him to be VP. Rommney is a shill for the big bankers and has surrounded with the same neocon war mongers from Bush.
mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:50pmIt begs the question,
http://www.redstate.com/barrypopik/2010/07/09/is-alex-jones-a-paid-russian-shill-little-coverage-of-russian-spies-or-anti-russian-stories/
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:51pmKook alert.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:56pmwhat is kooky? That is all factual. Man you are so partisan
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:12pmLooks like Indiana governor Mitch Daniels is gonna‘ be Romney’s VP (not Rand):
——————————————————
“Gov. Daniels participants in mysterious Bilderberg Meeting
Jun. 2, 2012
INDIANAPOLIS — Gov. Mitch Daniels was to come home Friday from an appearance at the little-known and somewhat mysterious Bilderberg Meeting.
Daniels spoke on a panel at the event in Chantilly, Va., but neither the governor’s office nor Bilderberg would say what the panel was about. The conference started Thursday and will continue though Sunday.”
Report Post »http://www.indystar.com/article/20120602/NEWS05/206020326/Gov-Daniels-participants-mysterious-Bilderberg-Meeting
soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:15pmon a related note…was Mitt Romney at Bilderberg??? It would explain why Glenn has been hands-off and his recent hatchet job on alex jones….
Report Post »http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-news-blog/2012/jun/05/bilderberg-2012-chantilly-occupy
mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:07amhttp://www.patriotnewsnetwork.org/2010/11/hard-look-at-alex-jones-part-1.html
Report Post »BilderbergBeck12
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:16amKook alert! Hmm I feel so smart, fox news and glenn beck told me bilderberg was not real. Alex jones workd for the commies in russia Iol only if the commies are for the smallest form of government and the second amendment. The only coward is glenn beck.
http://www.infowars.com/breitbart-glenn-beck-is-a-liar-thief-and-coward/
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:43amBilderberg is treacherous, no doubt at all, whenever politicians meet with the extremely rich who have there own agenda contrary to Americas is suspicious at best and more likely treasonous, Ron Paul is a great Constitutionalists, Alex Jones has always made me suspicious of his intentions even before I my infowars account somehow quit working, there is so much information out there it is hard to sort out truth from fiction.
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:55ammr.goodvibe
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:43am
Alex Jones has always made me suspicious of his intentions
===========================
Since when did Alex Jones take over the Indianapolis Star?:
Report Post »http://www.indystar.com/article/20120602/NEWS05/206020326/Gov-Daniels-participants-mysterious-Bilderberg-Meeting
The-Monk
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:19pm@BilderbergBeck12
I apologize for missing this account Anonymouse; it’s gone now. : )
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 9:50pmIts gone now?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:37pmugh – this stinks of washington politics
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:49amIt was the Build-A-Burger people……… Alex told me
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:36pmNow Romney ought to put Rand Paul on the ticket as V.P. That would get the father’s supporters out to vote in November!
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:43pmi dont think you understand ron paul supporters. maybe a few will – but most of them are not voting for the VP since Romney’s progressivism stinks to high heaven
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 10:54pm@soybomb315
And Obama’s communism really, really stinks to high heavan. But, since Paulestinians aren’t pragmatic, they’ll sit at home on election day and cry.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:02pmYeah, those who don‘t like Romney’s so-called “ progressiveness ” should not vote ? Huh ? That’s called ” shooting yourself in the foot.” That is called dysfunctional behavior. That is called Lefty Progressive Dysfunctional behavior. That is called ” a vote for Obama.” That is correctly called a vote for Marxist Insanity and the Destruction of a Successfully Functioning America . DUH.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:03pm@goodstuff
I dont think you understand the voting system either. They will not stay home. They will vote for 3rd party.
Just like the Celtics – you guys are not on your game tonight
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:29pm@ SOY
If Ron Paul himself tells his supporters to vote for Romney to begin the restoration of this country, why would you all write his name in? Dr. Paul has done a phenomenal job of advancing liberty in this country and is moving many in this country to want to return to our founding. He was/is admittedly unable to attain the presidency at this point. How does 3rd party or writing his name is……even against his and his son’s wishes, actually help?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:52pm@copatriots
I dont think you understand what 3rd party means. 3rd party means voting for someone in the constitution or libertarian party.
I replied to a post above about “write-in” candidates but it was apparently deleted. I am completely against write-ins because they are a waste of time and not really counted. Voting 3rd party is the honorable thing to do in such a scenario.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 7, 2012 at 11:56pm@copatriots
Report Post »By the way, i think it would be immoral for Ron Paul to tell his supporters who to vote for since we all have brains and critical thinking. That is more of a progressive thing to do
Bob_R_OathKeeper
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:15amI would love to know the true average age of Ron Paul supporters, it’s got to be low. I would have loved RP while I was in the military………24 years ago!, but some people do become more wise with age thanks to something called reality. Voting 3rd party is a vote for Obama, not voting is a vote for Obama and those are the facts, kids.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:17amSeems theblaze is blocking my posts….here is my 3rd try
I dont think you understand what it means to vote 3rd party. In this scenario, it would be voting constitution party or libertarian party. I posted a comment above (doesnt look like it was ‘accepted’) about how write-ins are a waste of time since they are not really counted. Much more effective to vote for one of the two i just mentioned.
I think it would be immoral for Ron Paul to tell his supporters who to vote for (since we have brains and critical thinking). Seems that is a progressive strategy….
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:45am@copatriots. i don’t care who Rand or Ron endorses, I am a free man and will vote my own will. I was a Paul supporter back in 88. in 2008 i voted against obama and for mccain as of this time i have NO reason to vote for romney
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 12:55amThanks for your response, CIRCLED. I respect your position that you are a free man and wasn’t suggesting otherwise. Do you not intend to vote at all in the coming election or you are going to write in a name who admittedly doesn‘t have the delegates and doesn’t want you to waste your vote by writing his name in?
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:24pm@ oathkeeperbob:
The only wasted vote is a vote that is not in line with ones conscience. There is no such thing as a vote for X is really a vote for Y. Can you spell sheeple? A vote for X is a vote for X. Political debate is supposed to be robust. Those who berate others concerning their beliefs and the way they vote are not patriots; they are kool-aid drinkers. A vote is, just that, a vote.
My average age, since that seems to be important to you, is 57. I first encountered Ron Paul at a rally in DC protesting Nixon’s decision to take the US off the gold standard. I liked, and believed in, what he had to say. I voted for Ron Paul in 1988 when he ran as a Libertarian and I wish he hadn‘t changed over to the R’s. I wrote him in in 2004 as I wasn’t satisfied with the other choices. I’ve not yet decided how I will vote this year.
Your assertion that “some people do become more wise with age” is gratuitous and is merely an admission that some people are willing to sell out their principles to have what they think is a better alternative when they lose their desire for what is the best for our Republic. I want best, not better. If you think Romney is really the best person for the job then vote for him. If not, then maybe YOU should rethink YOUR position. Peace.
Report Post »