US
Sen. Reid’s Pledge of Allegiance Quote: ‘One Nation…[Omitted]…Indivisible’
- Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:28pm by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Sure they will say it was intentional use of a partial phrase meant to emphasize the importance of national unity and not to be a strict quotation…but how hard is it just to leave the those two key words in there?
(h/t Fox Nation)
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 584 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (303)
jackact
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:53pmReid is a living example of the Godless and morally depraved progressives that infest our country. Their ideology does not include ‘our creator’ because centralized societal planning cannot succeed globally when one’s individual faith is based in faith and not government. They actually believe that the capacity to love is a chemical reaction much like eating chocolate.
Report Post »And you wonder why they are so angry all the time?
And you wonder why they create so much destruction and division all the time?
And you wonder why attempt to trample our constitution?
And you wonder why they continually maul any American tradition that we hold so dear?
…..The writing is on the wall for senator Reid as he rally‘s the ’faithless’ to battle.
One hundred and four years….and they still just don’t get it?
DangerClose
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:57pmSadly “Dingy” is not without religion or God. He choses the god of socialism and despotism as his master. He and others like him will follow that master to the end. They will use any means necessary, will you? Will I? Will anyone among us do the same? If we are to win(survive) as a nation we must be equal in our convictions. Liberty takes vigilance, freedom takes lives. Can you or I say honestly we are willing?
Report Post »AmericanWomanFirst
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:52pmOne Nation Under God ….don’t worry Mr. Reid, we got you covered.
Report Post »Ron_WA
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:50pmAs a practicing Mormon you would think he’d have no problem using the word God … yeah, I know he’s a hard core liberal & a big fan of the contrived separation of church & state but even so I’m at a loss that he can’t use an accepted & official phrase of praise
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:12pmYea, Obama says he is a Christian too. And we know how that is going………………
Of coarse Obama did say he was a Muslim also. So you just have to go by their actions or,“fruit”, as the Bible says………………….
They are all phonies!
Report Post »broncfyter
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:19pmUuuummmm yeah, Harry. You are making one HUGE miscalculation if you think God is ok with being removed from all acknowledgement. You CANNOT serve two masters; cant claim to be a man of faith and then actively support & defend the murder of His children. Choose wisely senator -
Report Post »jfreak13713
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:50pmAs much as my American values makes me want to react to Reids clear attempt to stick it to the Christians in this country those same values urge me to remember that not only does he have this right as an American he also has this right as a creation of God. It does us “Christians” no good to react in anger as that is what they are hoping we will do. We should simple live out our faith and peacfully urge others to respond with our VOTES.
In the end the country will be a different place. It will not be what we have known it to be but we need to salavage our dignity and our Christians values so we can begin to rebuild the next generation for generations to come.
This system is broken beyond repair as the corruption is too deep from politican to individual citizen. Its only a matter of time for the correction to come.
Report Post »Deutscher
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:48pmWho cares, honestly. This is just put here to whip Christians into a frenzy. If you want to go back to the original – what’s the big deal? Do you not like the original pledge the founders used?
Report Post »So many real issues. This crap annoys me.
American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:32pmTo be fair, the Pledge was written in 1892, long after all the founding fathers were already dead and buried.
Report Post »psycodad36
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:45pmwell atleast he didn’t say what he wanted to.(under Obama) which is how he see’ him.hey Harry those aren’t tingles running up tour leg,it may be a stroke.go get some help.
Report Post »dscon
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:45pmone nation under (obama)!………………………..
Report Post »MS70
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:44pmgeez getting alot easier to spot evil these days
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:43pmWhen I’m a dottering old fellow, I hope to not resemble Reid physically, mentally, or spiritually. What a disappointing grandfather–if he is one. Oh yeah, and he sucks as a senator.
Report Post »MS70
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:41pmLooks like Lucifer is here
Report Post »NC
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:41pmToday is Independence Day here in NC. It’s also the start of the War between the States.
I’ve noticed an emphasis placed on the State news today that today is a “commemoration” not a “celebration”.
NC (commemorating today)
Report Post »james hayden
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:41pmWow. And he was even referencing the Civil War! It was Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address that inspired the very words “under God”. “That we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, UNDER GOD, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
Report Post »TheVOR
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:59pmThank-you for that additional historical perspective. We need more reminders like this. Especially during times like these.
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:25pmYou realize of course that this is the very reason that the Gettysburg Address and George Washington’s Farewell Address cannot be taught in public schools any more.
Report Post »Frogginit
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:40pmNo wonder this country’s being destroyed. There’s obviously enough anti-American stupid people to keep voting these idiots back in.
Report Post »Wdawg
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:00pmI prefer the version established by our founding fathers!
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:33pmFrancis Bellamy was not a founding father.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:40pmONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, in THAT order Harry. Get inspired by that!
Report Post »My2
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:39pmProgressives’ true goal has always been to eliminate God.
Also, I would like to argue that the whole bookshelf discussion should be moved from the blog to the stories so that comments may be made! Brad Thor’s Blowback = Best Political Thriller Book Ever!
Report Post »randy
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:39pmUnder God! you piece of crap!
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:41pmRandy, I can’t quite feel comfortable saying the Pledge your way: “…One Nation under God! you piece of crap!, Indivisible…”
Report Post »Fueldex
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:37pmThese people never cease to amaze me with their total disregard or disdain for America and the values for which this country was founded.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:30pmI don‘t know if it’s selective reading, but several people, including myself, have mentioned that:
A) The Pledge was written by a socialist
B) Under God was never in the original Pledge. It wasn’t until 1954 that it was “ADDED” to it.
How does omitting “Under God” from the Pledge make you any less of an American?
Report Post »chips1
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:58pmAMERICANSOLDIER:
Report Post »As a matter of fact you claim you never say “under God” just like Obuma, so yes that makes you less of an American just like your Muslim leader. No God, no purpose for being alive! Now go away!!!!!
American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:18pmWow, completely unbelievable. You obviously never read any of my previous posts. I’m a bit of a regular, you see. I despise almost every bone in President Obama’s body. I also despise as much of President Bush. I dislike Islam as much as I dislike Christianity.
Yet I had the nerve and the courage to stand up and fight a war that I realized (after the fact) was unconstitutional. So I’m an Agnostic, that makes me less of an American huh? How much have you sacrificed for this country of ours? I hope you say you’ve been to war, otherwise how dare you render my sacrifice for my country obsolete on the fact that I don’t believe in God.
It’s people like you, and the general belief system of Christianity and Catholicism that opened my eyes to the ideals of Agnosticism.
Report Post »VERYCONCERNEDCHRISTIANPATRIOT
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 12:37pm@AMERICAN SOLDIER,
Thank you for your service and I for one would consider you any less of a Patriot than anyone who believes in God and probably way more of a patriot than the majority of Americans. While I do very much believe in God that does not make you an dishonorable person just because you do not. I hope you do someday find God but you have every right in this country that I love to worship God, a rock, the spaghetti monster or nothing it is entirely your choice.
Report Post »UlyssesP
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:37pmIt goes“UNDER GOD” you scum bag. Drippy fresh warm scum at that.
Report Post »bhelmet
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:37pmAccording to Pat, this guy gets elected in NV b/c he is a Mormon. Mormons are better than this and I hope they see the error of their way.
Report Post »teddrunk
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:36pmWhere’s he from, Nevada? Those morons keep voting in the Satanic demon. Perhaps Our Lord will cause a great earth quake and take care of that whole left coast while he’s at it.
Report Post »aro5o75
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:36pmHey Reid, stick it up your pelosi you digusting POS
Report Post »chips1
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:44pmHe did!!! It’s common knowledge.
Report Post »scguitar
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:35pmWhat a disgrace to our government and country this man is.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:28pmI omit “Under God” each and every time I say the Pledge. What does that make me? Does that make you a better American than me? Does that make you a better Patriot then me? Does that mean the years I gave to my country means nothing?
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:46pmSoldier, thank you for your service to the USA. I understand that sacrifice, and applaud your resolve and bravery. As to saying the pledge as written today, you have the right to say it as you feel it in your heart (or not say it at all). I wish you could see it as it was intended, to unify and show renewed resolve against the godless communists. I assure you that it was not put in there to drive you nuts.
Report Post »chesta
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:31pmHow does this scumbag keep getting elected??
Report Post »aro5o75
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:36pmUnion commie morons and Acorn
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:40pmUnion commies and morons.
Report Post »marine249
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:42pmby dark of night
you can fool some of the people some of the time
Report Post »ypu can fool some of people all the time this is what harry did
Ellbee
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:40pmhttp://www.truethevote.com
Report Post »Please. We can all help.
BetterDays
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:31pmWow, just like Obama, wonder how much the FED via the IMF pays extra for omissions?
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on April 14, 2011 at 4:24pmThe money to the “Paid” does not have to come from the Federal Reserve directly; most get checks isued to the Vatican Bank from the TREASURY of the United States….I should say UNITED STATES, the Corporation, not the Republic. See John Roberts/Vatican Bank (google) and then google Corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:30pmVote out all of these sleezzzzbag leftists. They WANT TO DESTROY America!
Report Post »neverending
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:35pmHe should have been voted out last November but sad to say some insisted on Angle and it didn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out she could not win.
Report Post »AzDebi
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:37pmJust a tad bit gutsy on Reid’s part…isn’t he just a little too close to the end of his life to be acting so arrogant? Bible says to “call no man a fool”…but…he makes it all too tempting to do so!
Report Post »Obama Bin Lying
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:40pmWell if Reid, Peelosi, Boxer, Feinstein or any of those other Hell Spawn mention the word God, they will all bust into flames….
Report Post »joseph Fawcett
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:41pmHow we know who Obama got it from. Ried is showing his true colors and it is filthy. It explains a lot about how things are going when one of these exposes themselves, like Obama did.
http://www.josephfawcettart.com western artist
Report Post »ImahaIngttta
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:44pmHe could use a copy of “The 5000 Year Leap”.
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:52pmAngle hung herself, but the election was won because the casinos strong-armed their employees (unionized) to vote for him. Don’t know what he promised them but it must have been huge.
Report Post »Marylou7
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:52pmSince these libs keep omitting God from everything maybe God will start omitting them. Nah, God is good BUT a man does reap what he sows.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:02pmYes Reid……… even if you don’t say it you are still “under God”
Report Post »indigo710
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:08pmAnyone running against Reid would have lost. Reids son ws running for governor and lost bigtime. The union s put harry back in office.
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:09pmDoesn’t the bible also say “only a fool says in their heart there is no GOD”?
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:13pm@AzDebi–The Bible also says in Psalm 14.1-3 – The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none who does good. The LORD looks down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there are any who understand, who seek God. They have all turned aside, they have together become corrupt; there is none who does good, no, not one.
Report Post »prov1
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:14pmok Reid, may God leave you out of his mind as well……Say hi to Saul Ol. when you get there..bring some sun block for the next 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000years
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:14pm^______^______^
Uhhhh hey Hank you left out ‘UNDER GOD’, thats okay we all know you did it on purpose! NV voters what in the blue H3LL is wrong with you? Why do you vote this parasite in term after term? He isnt working for YOU he is working for himself!
This country is never going to heal and get back on track until all the pieces of gum like Reid are removed from office. Nov 2 ‘10 was nothing more than a band aid on a gaping wound. Those with influence and power were re-elected and continue to destroy this nation.
Every single Senator and Representative MUST be removed from office. Each one is like a cancer cell. You rid the body (USA) of a large portion of the cancer but it gains strength b/c you didnt remove it all. So until that day comes Americans, that they are all removed, continue to enjoy being a little fuzzy yellow ball! Thats what we all are, a tennis ball, between republicants and demoncrats!
Report Post »My Sacred Honor
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:16pmAnd why exactly would Harry Reid, one of the most corrupt Senators in the House want to evoke the word of God, lest he be stricken in the cameras of almighty C-SPAN?
Report Post »I am a man of faith, but always with a grain of salt (too much to explain in a forum). But these recent episodes of the left flat out REFUSING to even UTTER the Name of God has me baffled.
Even IF they are (and I don’t believe this) demons, they SURELY can say “God” even in a quote…
SURELY satan can allow THIS??
RJO
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:22pmHarry, Harry, Harry…
Get it right…..”One World Order….under Soros (new God)….with socialism and government for all!”
Report Post »AmeriWoman
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:23pmI agree VOTE THEM OUT. But we just had elections for his ugly Godless [beep beep] and he’s there for 2 years. We have to get the majority in the senate, at least get it and a hard Conservative President un afraid to move America back to where it belongs. Just look at the other nes today…. the UN wanting equal rights for bugs and animals the same as humans????????????? We have got to save our country!! I believe in my very being that if we have 4 yrs to set this country back on it’s right course, the people will keep it there, that a lesson has and is being learned from this radical tipped and dishonest President and the present representatives. I truly believe that before 2013, there will be a lot of crooks walked out in handcuffs…..
AW
Report Post »cognitivedissonance
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:24pmYou folks do realize that “under God” isn’t in the original pledge, it was added during the Eisenhower administration.
cemerius
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:27pmIntentionally done to cause friction! What a sham our politics have become…see how much they can do to upset the “little people”
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:29pmBy far the most important 2 words
Report Post »My Sacred Honor
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:30pmsaviorammo
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:01pm
Time for voting is over. They need to be tried for treason and hung!
and the ones to do this, if NOT our elected officials is us. WE the PEOPLE.
Report Post »Beck preaches patience but I will not stand in the middle of my burning house and wait for the fire department while i have an extinguisher at my feet.
You want him gone? Lets rally to make it so. I am SICK TO DEATH of reading posts complaining about “what needs to be done” and NONE about “let’s GET IT DONE”
You want to sit behind a computer screen and type your anger or do you want to RESTORE OUR REPUBLIC? I want answers, NOW. Do what you say or shut you pie holes. I want MY COUNTRY BACK! Do you?
Answer me now!
banjarmon
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:32pmIf elections weren’t local we could clean Congress in one election cycle…the White House TOO
Report Post »RJO
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:32pmOR….Hairy Harry….Hairy Harry, Hairy Harry
I pledge my money (and soul – **optional**) to the MAN of the Bankrupt States of the new World Order…and to the Reserve for which it debts….one Regime, under the MAN, invisible, with taxes and servitude for all!
Report Post »Ellbee
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:34pmWell NEVERENDING, I don’t think he was reelected legally. Nevada cannot be that stupid. Go to
Report Post »http://www.truethevote.com There are things that WE ALL CAN DO to help stop illegal voting.
My Sacred Honor
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:34pmYou people are constantly chirping about “2012′, there ain’t gonna BE no “2012” if all you do is chirp! Get your shtuff together and DEMAND obama’s absence!MAKE this illegal and anti-American administration go away! We have to roll soon, or we will be under a Mighty Thumb of oppression. We CANNOT just “wait an’ see” and pray and hope for a better, truer America, we HAVE TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN NOW!!!!
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:40pmAll of you do realize that “Under God” was added to the Pledge in 1954, when Harry Reid was about 15 years old, right? All you people acting like removing that saying would be destroying something, but it would only make the pledge religiously neutral again, as it was meant to be (it could be argued that the pledge was “destroyed” when the phrase was added). Also, it is hilariously ironic that conservatives cling to the pledge, which was written by a socialist.
restorehope
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:42pmHe’s already broken the oath he took when he came to Congress, so what is a few more words left out of his vocabulary?
Reed is not trying to preserve America. He is attempting to change it into a socialist government that would never allow “UNDER GOD” to be a part of it.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:42pmImahaIngttta
Report Post »Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:44pm
He could use a copy of “The 5000 Year Leap”.
______________________________________
Is more a work of Mormon historical fiction than fact. Reid recited the pledge as originally written.
Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:43pm@My Sacred Honor
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:16pm
“And why exactly would Harry Reid, one of the most corrupt Senators in the House want to evoke the word of God, lest he be stricken in the cameras of almighty C-SPAN?”
You do realize that he is the Senate majority leader, and not a member of the House of Representatives, right?
Report Post »Wdawg
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:44pm@My Sacred Honor
you guys should use the Blaze Site to coordinate attacks on your targets!
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:46pmMy Sacred Honor
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:30pm
saviorammo
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:01pm
“Time for voting is over. They need to be tried for treason and hung!
and the ones to do this, if NOT our elected officials is us. WE the PEOPLE.
Beck preaches patience but I will not stand in the middle of my burning house and wait for the fire department while i have an extinguisher at my feet.
You want him gone? Lets rally to make it so. I am SICK TO DEATH of reading posts complaining about “what needs to be done” and NONE about “let’s GET IT DONE”
You want to sit behind a computer screen and type your anger or do you want to RESTORE OUR REPUBLIC? I want answers, NOW. Do what you say or shut you pie holes. I want MY COUNTRY BACK! Do you?
Answer me now!”
I think that “under God” should be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance, seeing as how our country should remain neutral on matters of religion (unless harm is being done). The Pledge was written without that phrase to begin with. If you want to accuse anyone of anything, you should be complaining that Christians hijacked the Pledge in the first place. If you do seriously want to hang people for treason, why don’t you try to start with me, since I agree with him on this subject?
Report Post »MGreene64
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:54pmI don’t know how some people are still optomistic about the American people turning this ship of fools around when Reid and those like him are still voted in time after time.
Report Post »RJO
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:58pm@
encinom
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:42pm
ImahaIngttta
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 6:44pm
He could use a copy of “The 5000 Year Leap”.
______________________________________
Is more a work of Mormon historical fiction than fact. Reid recited the pledge as originally written.
*****Hey Commie-enema – How are “things” at Media Matters? Gotta hunch this bozo is on the Georgie Porgie payroll to “take down” the opposition…….
Report Post »theonefromabove
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 7:59pmAlright I am tired of this Reid.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Videos
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:09pmSigh!
Report Post »waggie
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:09pmWhat a shame. First the President and now Reid. How do you think that makes God feel knowing that some of us do not consider ourselves to be under Him anymore?
Report Post »frodis
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:14pmWhat a bum.
Report Post »HumbleMan
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:14pmRead the communist manifesto. Morality and any notion of God or religion must be erased.
I personally believe the “left” is trying to establish a federal religion … atheism. They hide behind words, as always. But atheism is a bonafide religion … it espouses a specific relationship between man and deity … “none”. In most manifestations it establishes an alternate “god” from “Gaea”, “mother-earth” or marxist-ideology … complete with the rules and regulations concerning what you believe and do not believe.
Every time I see Reid, I throw up a little in my mouth. My reaction can’t be unique.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:22pmI don’t believe in God. When I recited the Pledge, I would omit that exact phrase every single time I said it. Does that make me less of an American, less of a patriot then any of you?
Technically, it is you that is reciting the modified version of the Pledge. It wasn’t until 1954 when “Under God” was added to the pledge.
Does not saying “Under God” render all my military service, the sacrifices my family and I had to make, obsolete?
God bless America!
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:27pm@BANJARMON As the great president once said, (paraphrase) “It’d be a hell of a lot easier if I were a dictator!”
Be careful what you wish for.
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:39pmHumbleMan
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 8:14pm
Read the communist manifesto. Morality and any notion of God or religion must be erased.
“I personally believe the “left” is trying to establish a federal religion … atheism. They hide behind words, as always. But atheism is a bonafide religion … it espouses a specific relationship between man and deity … “none”. In most manifestations it establishes an alternate “god” from “Gaea”, “mother-earth” or marxist-ideology … complete with the rules and regulations concerning what you believe and do not believe.
Every time I see Reid, I throw up a little in my mouth. My reaction can’t be unique.”
How ridiculous can you get? You do understand that atheism is the opposite of religion, right? Also, if someone is an atheist, that doesn’t automatically make them a communist. Honestly, do you understand the difference between pushing atheism, and leaving government neutral in matters of religion. I am an atheist, but I don’t think there should be signs on government buildings that say things against religion (unless religious literature is also allowed… neutral would be every religion+atheism/agnosticism, or none). Taking “God” out of the Pledge returns it to its natural, neutral state. How do you not understand the difference between not advocating a view on religion and trying to force a belief on people? For example, if we had a conversation, and no one mentioned God, would you consider that an atheist conversation? Or what about buildings without any references to religion? Are buildings without the 10 Commandments posted forcing you to be atheist, or would you say they don’t have a stance?
Report Post »jzs
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:04pmNick84 has it right. From Wiki: The Pledge of Allegiance of the United States is an oath of loyalty to the national flag and the republic of the United States of America, originally composed by Francis Bellamy in 1892. The Pledge has been modified four times since then, with the most recent change adding the words “under God” in 1954.
Another note, the words God, Creator, or Jesus are not in the United States Constitution. That wasn’t an oversight. The Founders were wiser than most and had experienced the tyranny of the imposition of religion by government. The US Constitution and the Amendments make no reference to any Deity.
But for you Evangelists out there, if you say we have a “Christian government” then why are you so against the Government helping the poor, which was one of Christ’s central tenants?
Report Post »nptden
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:07pmNotice the Dems all follow the Commie line. No God. Yet they let a Chinaman play a Communist victory song. Go figure. Oh I forgot Soros told us China will be THE power under the NWO.
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:07pmNick84, you do realize that the phrase included in the Pledge, “under God,” is not a Christian phrase – right?
Are you implying that because Hairy Reed chose not to repeat it that he is an atheist?
Report Post »Johnwr41
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:10pmAs much as I can’t stand Reid, I think he was referencing the Pledge back during the Civil War. “Under God” wasn’t in the Pledge back then. Perhaps I’m giving him too much credit.
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:14pmJZS passes on more bum dope. He says “The US Constitution and the Amendments make no reference to any Deity.” Perhaps it has just been awhile since he read the entire thing (or perhaps he’s never really read it at all).
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:25pmNot only does JZS pass on bum dope about the U.S. Constitution and Amendments, but he also passes on bum dope about the Bible. He says “But for you Evangelists out there, if you say we have a “Christian government” then why are you so against the Government helping the poor, which was one of Christ’s central tenants?”
I’ve read it (apparently he has not) and not only does Jesus never teach that the Government helps the poor, in fact, he never says that the Government should help the poor.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:30pm@SPARKY101 Please quote me where in the United States Constitution does it mention a God or Deity? I even took the time to pull up a copy of the United States Constitution.
Is it in the preamble? It’s not very long, I’m sure I would be able to find God in there if it existed…. nope not there. Is it within the seven articles? Let’s see…legislative branch, executive branch, judicial, states…. hmmmm no God.
Is it in the Amendments? Let’s stick to the first ten. Well, there’s a word “religion” in the first one, but doesn’t mention a god. All it says about religion is that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof [...]”
So where exactly is this elusive God in the US Constitution?
Now I do acknowledge the word God being in the Declaration of Independence. “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” which could really mean anything. If you think of the ideals of Deism which was prevalent back in those days. If they truly wanted a Christian nation, why use such generalized terms such as “their creator” which could mean to anyone as my mother and father, our ancestors, those that paved the way for or “created” our current existence. Why not just say “[...]that they are endowed by [Jesus Christ and the almighty Lord our God] with certain unalienable Rights[...]?”
Report Post »RevPh
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:39pmAnd they are doing a fine job of it…while we sit here powerless to do anything other than point out what should be obvious to our “fearless” representatives and senators. It’s pitiful and a very sad day for Americans. Our beloved country is being crushed and dismantled. We are the victims of a bloodless socialist/communist coup!
Report Post »Anti_Spock
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:45pmIsn’t Reid a MORMON? Uh.. thought so.
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:58pmSoldier, even though I was not writing to you, I’ll respond to your questions. In the U.S. Constitution, you’d be looking for the words written within that document “our Lord.” Notice that Lord was capitalized out of respect for the Lord.
In the Declaration of Independence, notice a similar thing was done with “divine Providence.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy says this in defining divine Providence: “…all that occurs in the universe takes place under Divine Providence — that is, under God’s sovereign guidance and control.”
Although I was not writing about the mention of diety in the Declaration, please notice how it is written there “,,,that all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,…“ It is again instructive to note the reverence provided by the capital letter used in the word ”Creator” when it is referring to the diety that created mankind. But, you are correct that they were very careful with the words they chose, understanding what they wanted to effect.
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:59pmSPARKY101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 9:07pm
“Nick84, you do realize that the phrase included in the Pledge, “under God,” is not a Christian phrase – right?
Are you implying that because Hairy Reed chose not to repeat it that he is an atheist?”
First of all, the capital G means it is referring to an individual god and the inclusion of e phrase wasnpushed for by Christians. Secondly, it doesn’t matter what religion it is. The government should be neutral as far as religion goes. Lastly, how can you even begin to argue that I implied he was an atheist? In fact, that is pretty much the opposite of what I am implying. Many others on here are calling him an atheist, and implying that being an atheist is negative. I am arguing that the way he said the pledge was religion neutral (as opposed to many people on here saying that he was promoting atheism), which also happens to be the way the pledge was originally written.
Report Post »concealled9mms
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:00pmnevadas stuck and so is calif with boxer the only way do get rid of them is with the total collapse of the state and that might not work. what we need more is a complete over haul of the court system no more lifetime appointments for federal judge should be termed and picked by winning the popular vote where the candidate most state party affiliation
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:01pmI am a mormon and Reid makes my skin crawl
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:05pmAnti-Spock, Hairy Reed claims to be connected to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, however, by his actions, that connection appears about as tenuous as Nancy Pelosi’s claim to be connected to Roman Catholocism.
Report Post »Corruptgovernment
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:06pmReid is a product of evolution….snakes.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:10pmEncicom > 500 year leap is the the non-fiction section wherever I’ve checked. Never read it though. Just because it‘s written by a Mormon doesn’t mean it’s endorsed by the Mormon church, however. But then, you can‘t make a single one of your points honestly without twisting anyone else’s points, or else no one will believe you. (we still don’t)
Report Post »JZS > No one disputes the Founder’s careful avoidance of injecting any particular religiosity into the framing of the nation. But none of the founding could have been possible without the specifically Christian ideas that most of them held: liberty, equality, self-government, etc. To this day, the basis for the morality underpinning our laws and the criminal code is all Judeo-Christian, whether or not any law references the God of the Bible. Oh, and Sparky has it right on New Testament almsgiving.
Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:23pm@Mysacredhonor-
If you don’t understand that the Senate majority leader is in the senate, and not the house of representatives, you don’t belong in a discussion about either. Honestly, it could have been an innocent mistake, but why not just admit that, instead of saying you were tying to make it easier to say. Senator implies senate, so there would be no need to clarify further.
Report Post »Also, my offer still stands. If you want to talk like you are some tough guy on here that wants to start hanging people that you disagree with, why don’t you step out from behind the computer and try it? It cracks me up that you can call someone a Nazi, within minutes of suggesting we hang someone for treason for not saying “God” in the Pledge.
Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:26pmNick, you are the one who wrote: “Christians hijacked the Pledge in the first place.” You blamed them for the inclusion of the word God in the pledge. Now you say it does not matter, but I believe from your statements that it matters very much to you. You appear to not like Christians.
As to our government remaining “neutral to religion,” might that include not appearing hostile to religion also? Or does this “neutral” only go in one direction in your world?
You say “Lastly, how can you even begin to argue that I implied he was an atheist?” Hmmm, I did not realize I was arguing, I thought I simply asked you a question. I’m going to assume your response should have been a simple “No.”
Report Post »Wilkins
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:39pm@cognitivedissonance
“You folks do realize that “under God” isn’t in the original pledge, it was added during the Eisenhower administration”
Which, since it has not been amended since to remove those two words, “under God” is part of the Pledge of Allegiance. Eisenhower added those words, taken from Lincoln’s Gettysburg address. The change was passed into law by Congress on June 14, 1954 (Flag Day). So now in 2011, do you realize that “under God” is part of the Pledge of Allegiance?
Would Obama have the guts to delete those words? Would Congress pass a law if he did, or would Obama just issue an executive order?
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:40pm“Nick, you are the one who wrote: “Christians hijacked the Pledge in the first place.” You blamed them for the inclusion of the word God in the pledge. Now you say it does not matter, but I believe from your statements that it matters very much to you. You appear to not like Christians.”
So are you denying that Christian groups are the ones who pushed for that to be included in the Pledge? The fact of the matter is that Christians are the group that put it there, and as far as I know, the only group that gets this worked up when someone doesn’t say “under God”. So, what I’m saying is that the Christians are the ones who added it, thus hijacking the Pledge. What I mean by it doesn’t matter who did it, is that overall it doesn’t. I would be just as opposed if it was Muslims, Jews, Scientologists, or any other religion that tried adding something like that.
“As to our government remaining “neutral to religion,” might that include not appearing hostile to religion also? Or does this “neutral” only go in one direction in your world?”
Do you even understand my point? I would be against it if he said: “without God”, or anything like that. How is not mentioning anything about religion anything except neutral? If what he did isn’t neutral towards religion, could you give me an example of what would be neutral in your opinion?
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:47pmLook, every one of you would be upset if it was changed to “under Allah”. I guess I just don’t understand why it is ok for you to have it your way, but not anyone else.
Report Post »sgallion1
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 10:53pmIf this move by Harry Reid doesn’t convince people that the dems are not for God…..nothing will convince them.
Report Post »Jesse
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:00pmYou are a shame to your religion. You practice and believe many things opposite of what your religion teaches. You should be ashamed.
Report Post »tbevan60
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:05pmPledge of Allegiance was changed in 1954 to read: “ Under God”
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:10pmSo Nick, back to my original question, are you somehow, in sort of a back-door way, now conceding that “under God” in the Pledge is not a Christian phrase?
In answer to your recent question “So are you denying that Christian groups are the ones who pushed for that to be included in the Pledge?” Nope. Just implying that due to your bias against Christians, it appears to make it more repugnant to you. But, it is not a Christian phrase, per se.
You ask “How is not mentioning anything about religion anything except neutral?” Well, when people see you railing against a memorial cross to those American soldiers who died in Korea, railing against the words “under God” in the Pledge, wanting to sand-blast Moses and the 10 Comandments off the Supreme Court building, and erasing religious elements from every view, you don’t appear very “neutral” towards religion. So, I asked if your definition of “neutral” only goes in one direction. You chose not to answer.
You also asked “…could you give me an example of what would be neutral in your opinion?” Easy, the government should not promote nor demote any religious aspects of our country, just accept that they exist and accentuate the positives. Neutral cannot imply the erasure of religion, but the total acceptance of it where it appears, the admission that it has been a great part of our country and has value. Nothing in our founding documents implies the eradication of religion from government, that government bodies cannot begin with prayer, that a Chaplin should not be hired for the Senate, paid by taxpayer funds. At least I can’t find that. Perhaps you could point it out for me.
If what he did isn’t neutral towards religion, could you give me an example of what would be neutral in your opinion?
Report Post »LB
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:22pmReid was voted out. Remember when there was a mysterious power outage in NV right towards the end of voting. CHEATERS!!!!
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:27pmHere’s the thing… If they put quotes from the quaran on a public building, you would most likely flip out (rightfully so). If atheists put anti religion signs on public buildings, Christians would protest. I am against all religious, as well as anti religious things being posted or said by the government. I don‘t see how you can’t agree that not saying anything about god or posting religious (or anti religious) text is the most neutral and best way to go. I am not arguing for my religious beliefs to be included in the pledge or anything, I just don’t think yours should be either. That is my problem with people like you. You think compromise means having everything your way.
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:32pmOk sparky, here is the point, if islam became the majority religion in the united states, would you be ok with pages from the Koran being posted on courthouses? Would you accept prayer to Allah in congress? Would you accept Muslim imagery for memorials? Would you support changing the pledge to saying under Allah.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:57pmHey JZS
You are wrong in so many ways it’s hard to keep track.
I see a few others have already taken your post apart, so I will only add that i have never heard anyone on here say that we have a Christian government.
I have heard it said that we are a nation founded upon Christian values and principles. Quite a difference there.
Speaketh not about that which you knoweth not.
Report Post »Kurty C Wipe
Posted on April 12, 2011 at 11:58pmOne day Searchlight is going to give Harry a well deserved welcome home. One day.
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 12:10amYou’re funny Nick. You say “I guess I just don’t understand why it is ok for you to have it your way, but not anyone else.”
I‘m thinking you didn’t think very carefully before you wrote that, because if it was your way, would that then be “Okay”? Okay your way but not my way? Sounds pretty lame doesn’t it. See, it isn’t “my way” either, but I accept it as it is. But, I don’t want it your way, so I’m at peace. If it was your way, I could accept it. The Pledge is speaking to unity. You are speaking to division.
Bottom line, the phrase appears in our (not my, but our) Pledge of Allegiance. Hairy Reed claims he is Mormon (follower of LDS beliefs which include God). By him not saying that phrase, he seems to promote it as negative instead of positive. That is not being “neutral.”
Surely you are aware that there is a depiction of Muhammad on the North wall of the courtroom? I don’t hear too much “clammor” for its removal. You ask “if islam became the majority religion in the united states, would you be ok with pages from the Koran being posted on courthouses?” No, but Muslims would be. I don’t think you could point me to anywhere in their countries that pages of the Koran are posted on buildings, but please go ahead and try.
You ask “Would you accept prayer to Allah in congress?” With Muslims already in Congress, I think that has already occurred. I lived.
You ask “Would you accept Muslim imagery for memorials?” Yes.
You ask “Would you support changing the pledge to saying under Allah.” Realize that your pipedream would be a specific God, whereas now it does not imply a specific God. It would if it said Yahweh or Father God, but it does not.
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 12:22amNick, I guess your statement “That is my problem with people like you,” speaks volumes to me, but I maintain that you are your own problem.
Hmmm, “…people like you.” That’s quite a generalization. Once you can put people with whom you disagree or dispise, into a box that you get to label, then it’s a short step to be able to demonize them, throw stones at them, disparage them to others, regardless of their worth.
You don’t know much about me. Certainly not enough to claim “…people like you.”
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 12:34am“I‘m thinking you didn’t think very carefully before you wrote that, because if it was your way, would that then be “Okay”? Okay your way but not my way? Sounds pretty lame doesn’t it. See, it isn’t “my way” either, but I accept it as it is. But, I don’t want it your way, so I’m at peace. If it was your way, I could accept it. The Pledge is speaking to unity. You are speaking to division.”
That makes absolutely no sense…
Here is a better example though. If atheists became more numerous than religious people, would you support “without God” or anything similar? That would be declaring atheism (it is declaring theism as it is now). To me, that is the two ends of the spectrum-Implying against religion on one end and implying having religion on one end. You act like not mentioning it is catering to atheists, whereas I see it as a fair compromise between both sides. If you act like it isn’t a big deal that “under God” is in there, why was it so important to insert it in the first place? Oh I know, because it is a big deal to Christians in America until they get their way. If it doesn’t matter, why are all these people commenting about how horrible Reid is for not saying it? Seriously, read some of the other comments if you haven’t already. I would like to think that people wouldnt want to kill me for omitting “under God”, but many of these comments are implying that’s what should happen to this senator.
I am so tired of the “it doesn’t cater to Christianity” argument. The g in God is capitalized, meaning it is referring to a specific god. Christians refer to their deity as God, not any of the other names. Also, it caters to monotheism. Why not gods? Gods would include all religions.
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 1:01amI know enough about you to make that comment. I know that you think making something neutral is wrong in this case. I know that you are debating with someone that thinks it is wrong to favor any religion (or lack of) in government, as opposed to arguing your point to the many people on this site that are getting downright violent in their speech against a senator for not including “God” (if you read the comments on here, you would see that most of them think it does refer to christianity) in the pledge. If it is meant to be for all religions, why shouldn’t someone be able to say it the original way if that suits their beliefs the best?
Report Post »staythecourse
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 4:24am“country, countrymen, and our conscience”….what happened “to God”?
Report Post »Marcobob69
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 7:58amRight on, RIGHTPOLITICALLY!!! That has been their plan all along, we have to wake the people up and tell them! That is why Glenn is so important, he has woke a large portion of the population up to what these radical liberal progressives are doing and trying to do to our beautiful country. Why in God’s name would we have to “fundamentally change” this great land? Into what? For what purpose? It doesn’t add up. There is one man holding the reins of the progressives, the money man backing all their agenda. Yes, I’m talking about the puppet master himself, George Soros. People do need to be made aware of what Soros and co. have in mind for our country after they have destroyed the foundation this country was built on and has survived under for the last 234 and 3/4 years. A little hint, it’s not a good thing they have planned. Our lives as we know them would be GONE. Every thing we have been brought up to believe will be called a lie. The mis-information will flow just like it did in 1939 Germany. It will not be a great place to live anymore. The media is already in their pocket, with the exception of Fox and various talk shows and publications; what do you think will become of those when the government is “fundamentally transformed”??? Not a pretty picture for freedom, is it? We all have to make sure the public is made aware of what is happening in this country, every person should know what is at stake. If Obama gets reelected, he will not be able to be stopped in implementing his, and Soros’, agenda, which spells the end of the USA!
Report Post »GayDem4Beck
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 8:54amA story for a different reason: As long as they make a pledge to this country and our flag. NOW it’s a different story when they do something to dishonor their pledge and this country. ‘Under God’ , was added in 1954 (57 years ago). Not everyone believes in God or the Same God, but many believe in this great country of ours. Not to mention that whole separation of Church and State clause.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIkqKVztYg
SHOCKER (the real story) -I found this SHOCKER while looking up the History of our Pledge of Allegiance. It seems that the creator (Francis Bellamy) was a Baptist minister, and an active Socialist in Boston. http://www.religioustolerance.org/nat_pled1.htm
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 9:33am@ neverending. What are you talking about Sharon almost won but the cheated with the unions..
Report Post »StonyBurk
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 9:52amHarry Reid a Senatorial reflection of the 0 he serves and protects. While I credit Senator Reid with knowing the Marxist pledge adopted in 1892 .I find his deliberate misrepresentation of American history as unacceptable as I find the Pretenders own manipulation of historical fact unacceptable. That the Democrats blithely ignore the fundamental principles of Religion (Christianity) Morality ( based upon our founding Religion) and Knowledge (not only of mans duty to God ,but to their fellow man -as once was taught in our American Education. ) suggests our modern politicians are either beguiled by that old deluder Satan– or just plain old fashioned in contempt of what was established in America.And I cannot vote for ,nor follow and support ANY godless,immoral and Ignorant Democrat.
Report Post »VERYCONCERNEDCHRISTIANPATRIOT
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 12:42pmI have to give Harry Reid as much as I dislike his political beliefs the benefit of a doubt on this one. He does have a knack for open mouth insert foot however, lol!.
Report Post »democratgirl
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 1:01pmEverytime I watch Reid, Pelosi, and Obama, I HAVE TO TAKE A SHOWER. I just can’t stand to look at the evil.
————————————————————————————————
The man who occupies the Oval Office will take to the airwaves Wednesday night to ostensibly inform Americans about the budget process and what needs to be done to fix it. Ostensibly, because in reality he is launching his reelection campaign and he will very craftily try to get buy in from the citizenry on tax increases to help pay down these historic and record breaking budget deficits he and a misguided Congress have created. He will use terms like “investment” and try to shame the “wealthy” into paying their own fair share. These are all code words for tax increases, and even more insidious, words of class warfare. Class warfare, pitting the nebulous rich against the less fortunate is classic socialist strategy.
Gasoline prices have surpassed $4 a gallon in many places. Food prices are soaring at levels not seen in 30 years. The consequences of this government not living within its means and robbing America of her wealth are about to come home to roost. And this man’s plan is to raise taxes–in other words–rob America and Americans of more of their wealth. If the goal is to destroy capitalism and establish socialism, the fastest way to accomplish it is to bankrupt the country and make the people totally reliant on the government. The transfer of wealth from the people to the government is the linchpin in accomplishing the promised “Remaking of America.” Invoking class warfare–casting rich vs poor–will set the stage.
In showing Moses how to govern properly, his father-in-law Jethro came to him with words of wisdom from the Lord. He said in Exodus 18:21, “Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens.” This is the system after which the Founding Fathers of America modeled our Republic. The word “covetousness” in this passage means “plunder, unjust gain, lucre, profit, dishonest gain.” Americans rejected this wisdom and elected men and women who do not fear God, who covet our enterprise, and who will lie to take it.
The consequences of these very actions mean that Americans could lose their nation, along with it our liberty, our way of life, our ability to pursue our inspirations. These are consequences of turning our backs on God, electing those who chose humanism in governance, and trusting godless liars with our national well being and security. Titus 1:10, 11 says, “For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake.” God honors the hearts of his people. We must want our nation, our homes, more than the covetousness of the socialists and Islamists. Otherwise they will have them.
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Report Post »Bill Wilson
Word of Life Ministry
http://www.dailyjot.com
independentvoteril
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 4:32pmReid didn‘t OMIT it he doesn’t REMEMBER the pledge..
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on April 13, 2011 at 7:16pmNick, you just proved another one of my points by saying “I know enough about you to make that comment. I know that you think making something neutral is wrong in this case.”
You know what they say about undeserved pride. I’m beginning to see a photo of you materializing next to the definition of pride in the dictionary. You are quite presumptious – and of course wrong, but that shouldn’t matter to one as prideful as you. You dance away from every question, and avoid every answer. Not sure why you are here, but you are failing so far.
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on April 14, 2011 at 4:17pmReid is following Obama’s lead in omitting GOD from the Pledge and Bill of Rights. The whole Progressive/Socialist/Communist Administration will do anything they can to mock God and force their
Report Post »agnostic/atheistic beliefs on us. We should string all these sorry SCUM up and take our country back. I am sick of these SOBs.