‘Shut Up!’: Ed Schultz Unloads on Liberal Viewers Upset Over His Santorum Praise
- Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:42pm by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
On Tuesday, we published the video of liberal MSNBC commentator Ed Schultz praising Rick Santorum. Not that he agreed with Santorum’s policies, but he thought Santorum‘s presence on the campaign trail was as good as Barack Obama’s. And if conservatives found that shocking, it seems liberals found it even more so. How do we know? Well, Schultz posted a frustrated YouTube video on Wednesday where he responded to those liberals who have been furious with him. And he didn’t mince words.
HuffPo explains:
Schultz took to his blog to address critics who, according to Schultz, accused him of “eating Santorum’s salad,“ and calling him a ”turncoat.”
Schultz had a simple response: “shut up!“ Schultz seemed frustrated by the criticism and said he went ”as an objective reporter” to find out what was happening on the ground in Iowa. “Whether you like it or not,” Shutlz said, “Santorum is as good as President Obama with a crowd.”
Schultz said that the criticism “kind of pissed him off” but did not get “under [his] skin.” Shultz asked, “are we at the point now on the Ed Show, that I can’t go out and do an objective story?”
Check it out for yourself, and notice the animated facial expressions:
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 585 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 303 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (126)
KeithOlberdink
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:26pmThere’s a method to this slime bags tactics. Don’t be fooled. Romney is the only that can beat obama. He wants you to support Santorum.
Romney continues to be the only GOP hopeful to lead Obama in more than one survey. The former governor’s support has ranged from 38% to 45%, while Obama has picked up 40% to 46% of the vote in the surveys over the past year – Source: Rassmussen January 5 2012.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:37pmI see you are falling for the liberals trying to pick our candidate again. Liberals would love Romney to be the nominee, then we could have Carter’s third term because Obama is Carters second term. Romney is a RINO. Liberals know if they praise a candidate (like Santorum) conservatives will shun them. The liberals are trying to use reverse psychology and you gullible ones are falling for it. Liberal media has you believing Romney is the only one that can beat Obama. With Obama’s record my dog could beat Obama. Romney will not call Obama’s policies what they really are, Socialist!
Who says Romney is the only one that can beat Obama? The liberal media! Beware!!!!!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:45pmRomney? Really? You want a RINO? Good for you….You fell into the anythings better than Obama crap head first.
Ron Paul 2012 to return to the CONSTITUTION oe we all die!!
huckfinn28
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:46pmNice copy and paste. Right now, anyone has the chance to beat Obama. (R) or (D) were headed in the wrong direction, spend, spend, spend. It is going to take an actual collapse of something to wake people up. When Obama postponed the economic collapse he just continued the fleecing of America for a little while longer. It doesn’t matter what toys or puppets hedge fund owners play with next presidential term. It all ends the same, like it has been, for the past 30 years.
Report Post »KeithOlberdink
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:47pmRassmussen is a liberal poll? LOL. Go ahead support Santorum and (Tin foil hat) Paul. Gurantee obozo second term. Romney is Obama?? gimme a friggin break. Go put your tin foil hat on.
Report Post »Bakko Bomma
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:49pmThe thinking of some of you is so convoluted no wonder you can’t function in real life and spend all day arguing with other looneytoons on web forums.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:56pmBADDOGGY…by all means..sit out the election if Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination. Give Obama another four years champ. ANY of the GOP candidates that gets the nomination will have my fullest support. ANYONE BUT OBAMA!!!!!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:00pmThe progressives AND the media are pushing Santorum because they KNOW he can’t beat Obama.
Keep your eyes on the prize conservatives and do NOT pay any attention to these mouthpieces in the media OR to any of their polls. GOD BLESS…
**************************************
Gov Rick Perry is the only true conservative in this race and the only one who can beat Obama. If you read this article you will understand WHY. We need to come together and back the RIGHT candidate for America and for WE THE PEOPLE. Also…Please watch the vid at the site…The Rick Perry I Know… Thanks and GOD BLESS AMERICA
http://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2011/12/19/dont-settle-rick-perry-for-president/
Perry For President
Report Post »http://www.rickperry.org/
Hobbs57
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:04pmI think you have that backwards there Blackhawk, but your not alone. The only one the media have been bashing is Romney, repeatedly. If you supported him, as I do, you would then understand and notice how nearly every commentator out there aside from O’Reilly, Hume, and Krauthammer ( sp) are bashing Romney at every turn. All the name for Mitt came from the Media supporting McCain last election and I all I hear is the Democrats repeating it over and over again. Well, that is, besides all of you who haven’t realized you are being played by the national media yet again. Quite honestly, I now understand why the left has been able to pull off what it has over the years when concerning Republicans. Just as the 2008 Campaign proved it, they play on your fears, your biases and even the underlined discrimination most aren’t even aware of. By doing this, they got us McCain last time. Their plan worked perfectly. Obviously this is over your heads though because so many on here are so full of knowledge your smarter than those intellectual elites. Ok.
Report Post »Look, I can understand those who support Paul, while I do in many ways, but he isn’t modern in his thinking. In a world having life becoming so dependent on technology, if we are invested heavily in remaining modern, we are shark meat to the world. Many on the right wouldn’t agree with me here, but that is because it is only “ideas” they have, reality is a whole different story. Just as the reality of our founders and who they
Baddoggy
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:20pmI never said i would sit out if Ron Paul did not get the nomination. Keep pushing that issue and I might though You RINO loving Progressives had better not alienate the Ron Paul camp or we will sit out and let Obama have his way with the Nation. Fair warning to be kind to us. After all we are the TRUE Constitutionalists and the TRUE Republicans…you are RINOs…
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:53pmRomney is not the only one that can beat Obama and to those who think he is “The One”, they obviously drank the Media Koolaid. They also said Reagan couldn’t win. Of course Santorum can win as well as other candidates….that is if people use their heads and decide for themselves and not be conned by the Media telling them who to vote for. I have to laugh when I see the commentators speak with such authority on who is in and who is out, only to be embarrased days later when they were wrong. It’s rather comical. We the people will decide who is elected, not We the Media.
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:23pmKeith your math is off
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:25pmEd Schultz,,,,there is nothing objective about you. Your vision is out of you left eye with head leaning permanently to the left. Going on so long its an apparent lie when you SAY you want to be objective about ANYTHING.
Get a life.
Report Post »MS Patriot
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:46pmRight Romney is the only one who can win, that is why McCain is backing Romney. The only reason the establishment wants Romney is because even if there is enough fear in the country to push voters away from 4 more years with King Hussein, Romney will give you the same at a slower pace just to keep the progressive socialist movement moving forward. This gives the Dems and the socialist four more years to sneak another socialist into the WH under the guise of his just a great person and has nothing negative to attack.
Report Post »People it’s plain and simple voting for Romney or Gingrich is a vote for a Republican progressive. A vote for Obama is a vote for a marxist progressive. Don’t vote for any of these three because they will only ensure the downfall of our Republic. Santorum has caught fire because he is smart enough, can speak well enough and knows how the DC establishment doesn’t work. He has been burned by it already when he tried to play the compromise game when he was in DC before, he knows what the game is now and won’t be going to the WH to compromise with the socialist. He will be going to the WH to place the people of the United States back in to control of their country. We need to show the progressives they don‘t own us and they don’t run this country.
The only way to do so, is to vote for Rick Santorum.
marvel
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:07pmYou guys still don’t know what RINO means. You seem so ignorant when you use it incorrectly just because you think it’s fashionable to call everyone you dislike RINO.
Romney is not a RINO. He is an actual Republican. If anyone, Ron Paul is the Republican In Name Only. He should be running as a Libertarian Party candidate. The fact that a Libertarian would run as a Republican makes him RINO. If Republicans and Libertarians were the same thing, then there would not be a need for the Libertarian Party (http://www.lp.org/).
Don’t get me wrong, I like Paul. That’s not the point though.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:33pmThank You Gov Perry For Answering Our Nation’s Call…You Are A True Patriot
Video…On To South Carolina
http://youtu.be/DGN_9ACuvh4
Perry For President
Report Post »http://www.rickperry.org/
Clara88
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:02pmSouth Carolina campaign chairman Katon Dawson told NBC News, “Iowa picks corn, New Hampshire picks campaigns’ pockets, and South Carolina picks Republican presidents and we are ready to rumble.”
“This election is about stopping a President of the United States and his administration that is abusing the Constitution of this country, that is putting America on a track to bankruptcy. It is a powerful moment in Americans’ history, and you are on the front lines. This is Concord. This is Omaha Beach. This is going up the hill realizing that the battle is worth winning.” ~ TX Gov. Rick Perry
Perry For President
Report Post »http://www.rickperry.org/
jonnyfontain
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:05pmEd come on over to the side with common sense sir! Yes it has come to that, the democratic base is literally insane! The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results (like spending money to “stimulate” the economy and having it back-fire…. over and over and over……)
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:03amReminds me of that crack head in the movie New Jack City (i think)
He was in the alley begging the dealers for a rock of crack and offering them some old bag of cheeseburgers, and or oral sex. “I GOT THESE CHEESEBURGERS MAN!!”
They’re all “presstitutes” as Gerald Celente says.
Report Post »MachIV
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:57amKeith, If Romney is the only GOP’r who can beat Obama, then what you are really saying(and you are whether you realize it or not) is that Conservatism is dead and that only another liberal can beat a liberal, because that’s exactly what RINOmney is.
Report Post »mmabri
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:03amKeith – I’m not going to let the media pick my canidate this time around. Polls at this point are meaningless until after the primary. The simple reason polls show only Romeny beating Obama is because everyone has their favorite pick, and will not look at the other canidates, but that will change once we have a primary winner. Obama will go after Romney on one issue and that is because he is mormon. Now yes we have freedom of religion in our country, but Mormons believe that when they die they will become a god of their own world. I could care less what Romney believes as a Morman as long as he could run the country well, but what do you think the liberal machine will do with that belief????? Exactly, and thats why Romney would lose to Obama
Report Post »Pacman116
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:33amGet off the juice man.
Report Post »TheMaestro68
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:43amWhen are you fools going to realize that all of these polls are meant to influence your decision, quit paying attention to these small sample polls that don’t reflect the country. If the poll is less than 10,000 people questioned it is not reliable.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:45pmRomney is profoundly not the only one who can beat Obama.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:49pmCheck Out This Photo….
Regardless of what ANYONE says….THIS is MY next President
http://yfrog.com/g05cadjj
Report Post »blamelessace5
Posted on February 24, 2012 at 8:06pmPresident Obama campaign just moved into a 50,000 square foot office in downtown Chicago. Meanwhile, Ron Paul’s campaign landed a sweet kiosk at the mall.
Report Post »semihardrock
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:23pmTo Ed Schultz…..Please ignore the “tweets” and emails from the Whitehouse that you speak of. If nobody has told you yet, MSNBC (The Communist Channel) is OWNED by the Whitehouse (GE)
Report Post »PPMStudios
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:22pmEd Schitz does ONE objective story and all of a sudden he’s supposed to be seen as a fair Journalist?
Don’t think so Eddie. Not on my watch!!
Report Post »heyjim55
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:36pmIt’s admission that he and his employer are not objective they are biased and will not tell the truth.
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:48pmIt’s like when Chris Matthews makes his once a year sensible comment.
Report Post »WIENER
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:20pmHey Ed, your huge collection of viewers have never heard you truthfull and objective.
Report Post »Hey Ed, SHUT UP
Rational Man
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:18pmWell Eddie, you’ve never been “objective” before, so your viewers were shocked.
Report Post »No point in changing now. Might as well be the same progressive lunatic you’ve always been and keep those 100 viewers happy.
karencole
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:26pm“Objective Reporter” hahaha!
Ed….you will never be objective about anything other than Obama (clearly because you actually went on to say so yourself)
Ed….you are not a reporter.
No one really cares about you.
Report Post »gotta light
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:30pmHow quick they are willing to eat their own.
Ed Shultz is a piece of CRAP!
During the Mass Brown election he publicly encouraged voter fraud to keep Ole’ Dead N Drunk Teddys old seat Democrat.
Ed is a living, breathing, humanoid piece of corrupt crap.
Hey Ed you know what they’re sending back over seas in those metal shipping containers?
NOTHING!
Because the unions have killed all the manufacturing in this country!!!!
Hey bud gotta light?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:57pmGOTTA LIGHT…Fat Eddie is a piece of garbage. What he’s doing is trying to push what he believes is the most defeatable GOP candidate.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:13pmHuh? What foam are you talking about??
Report Post »Pat_in_NC
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:11pm“are we at the point now on the Ed Show, that I can’t go out and do an objective story?”
Well… I guess even Ed was bound to do at least one objective story.
Report Post »But I‘m sure hearing the truth for once blew his viewer’s mind.
That’s viewer singular form.
jriv88
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:09pmI love the way he basically admitted that every other story is bias if ‘this one’ was objective…
He probably wanted to do an objective story because even these msdnc talking heads have to keep it real once in awhile…but of course the ‘lib’ viewership cant handle it…lmao…
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:09pm.
Report Post »,So Ed told 3 people to shut up, and this what they call news………..
Baddoggy
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:46pmIt was acutally 2 and his wife…
Report Post »Airgun
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:09pmEd Schultz OWNS the airwaves in Madison Wisconsin, which would help explain the behavior of those involved in all aspects of lefty politics there.
Report Post »lodgerat
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:08pmI wish Ed would choke on his own nasty tongue. Both times that I’ve watched him made me sick. Hey Ed, SHUT UP.
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:22pmMaybe he and “rev” al could choke on some blueberry pie
Report Post »perry1980
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:07pmThat is what we should all tell the Liberals……..Shut UP!
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:07pm.
Report Post »Likc the foam? I think they straight up swallow…..
Restore the Republic
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:07pmEd is clinically insane. lock the guy up so he doesn’t hurt himself.
Report Post »wewantchillywilly
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:06pmgreat, great way to keep an audience, Ed. you’re doing great.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:09pmIndeed, let his anger come forth for all to see where he really stands.
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:05pmIt’s always so cute, when the liberal herd begins to eat their own offspring.
Report Post »moosegirl
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:04pmRed Heading POS! nothing wrong with red heads…he’s just so creepy!
Report Post »Akbarjonnie Shaheed
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:55pmCrack head Ed looking for a free hit.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:54pmSgt. Schultz asks “are we at the point now on the Ed Show, that I can’t go out and do an objective story?” Um no you can’t Ed your lib audience is closed minded locked on to their Marxist POS president.So the lib talk isn’t paying the bar tab eh Sgt.Schultz? Go home and read the constitution over and over,read some books by Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell and maybe you’ll learn something.
Oh scratch that Sgt.you’ll never figure it out,too much booze.
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:54pmHow do they make that turd appear to talk? These graphics people are really good.
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:53pmHis ratings must have been below zero for him to have done the piece praising Santorum.
Report Post »Nobody should worry about this sack of feces changing sides. He’s just looking for some press.
grannyjojo
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:52pmHe’s such a person non gratis, when it comes to his “opinions”. “Every knee will bow and every tongue confess”
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:55pmAnd, the ironic thing is, when the country collapses, and all the liberal left are being starved and torn apart, they will blame ole Ed for not telling them what was about to happen, even though he was just flapping his mouth and lying, just like they wanted him to do.
Report Post »NOBAMA201258
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:50pmEd Scultz objective reporting? Puhleeeezze
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:49pmSantorum’s shocking statements analyzed by Judge Napolitano
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=1Gwwmm-cQxU#t=85s
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:37pmJeffrey Lord on Ron Paul
Report Post »http://www.therightscoop.com/jeffrey-lord-on-mark-levin-show-ron-paul-is-a-neo-liberal-not-a-conservative/
Baddoggy
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:53pmReally Republicorp? You want to tell people Ron Paul is a liberal? Please, they have help for crack addicts now. Go get some help.
Would you call our Founding Fathers Liberals? You must have been dropped on your head when you were a child.
Report Post »amtsoundsmith
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:46pmIt could be argued that the Founding Fathers were classical liberals. Although it‘s all in who’s definition you choose to use….
Report Post »Cannon
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:47pmWho is Ed Schultz?
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:52pmHe is a guy that The Blaze seems to follow a lot. I would not have heard of him but for The Blaze, but he must be very important in the eyes of The Blaze editors.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:54pmA dry drunk
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 3:57pmBlaze likes him — he’s a LIBERAL LIAR mostly.
Report Post »HotFixIt
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:03pmYou must not watch MSNBC since you don’t know who he is. Unfortunately I do know who he is. My father and I do occasionaly watch MSNBC just to know what sort of crap they are telling the mindless sheep. It is enlightning to hear the way they spin a story. Your should try it some time…. beware… you will not be able to stomach more than a few minutes at a time!
Report Post »Jackie Rogers, Jr.
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:03pmWell, about as important as you or I am Mr. Stein.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:08pmI really have not a clue.
Report Post »lodgerat
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 4:11pmNobody…Hey Ed, SHUT UP
Report Post »