Crime

Sneak Peek: Greta Talks to Jury Foreman From Casey Anthony Trial

FoxNewsInsider:

Monday at 10p/1a ET, Greta Van Susteren has an exclusive interview with Juror #11, the jury foreman, in the Casey Anthony trial. In the interview, he takes you inside the jury room and details how they came to the not guilty verdict.

Check out this sneak peek clip in which Greta asks him if the jury thought Casey Anthony’s father, George, was believable on the stand. Juror #11 says, “There was a suspicion of him, that was a part of our conversation.”


Comments (55)

1 2
  • ying
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 6:48pm

    All these jurors got together before the trial and ALREADY decided to call her ‘not guilty’. The reason is that they would not have gotten any attention if they had called her ‘guilty’, and thus, not made any money. The jurors want money for interviews, as you can see. Greta paid this guy $60k for the interview. They should be ignored!

    Report Post » ying  
  • dadsrootbeer
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 5:39pm

    So even if George sexually abused his daughter (even though is no evidence of it) what does that have to do with her killing her daughter.

    Report Post » dadsrootbeer  
  • Greg in Central Virginia
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 4:41pm

    You know, the people of Florida have really gotten a bad name of late. First, they didn’t know how to vote. Now they vote to release a guilty mother. I guess Scott Petersen wishes he had killed Lacey in Florida now.

    Report Post »  
    • HisNameWasRobertPaulson
      Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:01am

      The people of Florida didn’t vote in a trial. Man, you need to get your head screwed on straight. Thank goodness people don’t vote on innocence or guilt! Imagine if they voted for President? We might end up with some insane idiot or something!

      Report Post »  
  • quinteastwood
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 3:19pm

    Measures which will effect the lives of millions,born and unborn,are now before us.We must expect a great expense of blood to attain them.But we must always remember that a free CONSTITUTION,of civil government can not be purchased at too dear a rate as there is nothing on this side of Jerusalem of greater importance to mankind.
    Some people have given AMERICA a grim outlook for the future,but where they see apocalypse,I see hope.
    I see a new nation,ready to take it’s place in the world,not an empire,but a REPUBLIC.A republic of laws,not men.
    We are in the very midst of Revolution,the most complete and unexpected and remarkable of any in the history of the world.
    How few of the human race have ever,had an opportunity of choosing a system of government,for themselves,and their children.I am not without apprehensions ,gentlemen,but the end we have in site is more than worth all the means.I believe citizens that the time has come.
    My judgement approves that this measure and my whole heart is in it.All that I have,all that I am,and all that I hope in this life,I am now ready to stake upon it.
    While I live,let me have a Country.A FREE COUNTRY.
    Join “The March For Freedom” j e r r y b 5 3 5 3 at y a h o o dot c o m

    10 and counting..on social media 10 becomes 1000,1000 becomes 10,000 WE CAN do this PATRIOTS

    Report Post » quinteastwood  
  • Ghandi was a Republican
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 3:09pm

    Unless somebody has any evidence the prosecution didn’t have– CASE CLOSED! Move on..
    You are not the judge and jury people. THEY have spoken! Anyone who thinks this family is happy without their precious child is a pelosi!

    Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
  • cmsmik
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 2:32pm

    These jurors now want us to listen to them?! Why because now they are getting paid with blood money?!! They wouldn’t talk after the verdict, but now will not shut their mouths! We already heard what they have to say, a child killer goes free. Now get lost!

    Report Post »  
    • HisNameWasRobertPaulson
      Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:03am

      Blood money? Really? You know all money is blood money. People died to keep you free. Free to earn and spend money. Therefore, it is all blood money. And you need therapy man.

      Report Post »  
  • dontbotherme
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 2:31pm

    This crime reminds me of Clinton’s “Scorched Earth” policy. Part of that policy is to throw as much mud as possible till something sticks. I think the insinuation of the Grandfather doing something (unproven) stuck with the jury & a murder has not been solved.

    Report Post »  
  • Robert-CA
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 12:30pm

    Can they tie her tubes before releasing the baby killer ?

    Report Post » Robert-CA  
  • georgeisn6
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 12:05pm

    Only the brain dead care about any thing to do with this product of the filth of a nation in decline.

    Report Post »  
  • bailey08
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 11:12am

    The “Crime of the Century” is the president of the United States and his DOJ allowing thousands of guns into the hands of bloodthirsty gangs—gangs that murdered US border agents and many innocent people.
    It is a huge scandal that should bring down a president and would bring down a Republican president.

    The MSM remains silent because they know it would destroy the guy they have been protecting for over three years. When the families of those killed begin lawsuits I hope they sue the MSM too for ignoring the crime of the century committed by a president and his administration.

    Report Post »  
  • Southern Man
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 10:27am

    Isn’t it obvious…the whole family lied so much that there was no way any jury could reach any sensable conclusion, hence the “not guilty” verdict. remember this if you ever get hauled into court.

    Report Post » Southern Man  
    • not funny
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 11:06am

      I agree that the family is not a great bunch, but that is not a reason to acquit her. Who killed that child, she did not kill herself, and then put her in a swamp without calling anyone for a month? Casey says she knew that Caylee was dead the whole time–what is she hiding? Do you really think that George or Cindy did it? Someone from the house did it–and it was Casey.

      Report Post »  
    • Ghandi was a Republican
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 3:23pm

      What is she hiding? Nothing really. Anything she would say and do would be held against her. She gas never been given a chance to come clean. It is not unheard of to freak out and act irrationally in the face of a tragedy. In fact- Some would say it is the norm. One of the first human responses to trauma (emotional or physical) is disbelief and even denial. Some even go on to act on behalf of denial. Once that child passed their was only one way to undo it – in one’s mind. Act on that and you get a life sentence? By day 2 she was headed for death row and never an opportunity to undo or explain what happened, why this, why that? And the investigators were in the attack, however reasonable that might be. The prosecution was on the attack for something, anything, the whole thing. I can’t imagine a worse punishment than 3 years in a concrete box alone with the terror of losing your child as your only companion. And the jury says that was wrong in the face of insufficient evidence!

      Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
  • avgconservative
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 10:07am

    The reason why Greta gets these great interviews, is because she lets them speak… UNLIKE BILL O’REILLY who spends half the interview time spewing his own opinion. Go Greta!

    Report Post » avgconservative  
  • Kiwon
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 9:33am

    If the jurors were smart they would decline all interviews and do their best to remain hidden. They are in a no-win situation and the interview money is not worth the scrutiny.

    Report Post »  
    • Dagger82
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 2:03pm

      Those 12 jurors are OUR representatives (…a jury of your peers). Many of us cannot comprehend their unanimous decision made in only 11 hours without even refreshing their memory of 360 pieces of evidence or 55 witnesses’ testimony. In a trial to determine the life or death of a fellow citizen, how could they come to unanimous consensus with so little contemplation?

      It would seem from national reaction that most of us don’t understand how they did that. We have a right to know their reasoning and method. All who are selected to serve as representative of freedom must be held accountable for their decision. Media or future offers be damned ~ cannot have a place in our justice system. Simple as that.

      Report Post » Dagger82  
  • katgolf
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 9:02am

    Guess the next move will be to give Octomom and Casey Anthony a talk show on how to raise children responsibly

    Report Post »  
  • PatriotPam
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 8:51am

    The best earthly justice, at this point, would be to ignore everyone involved, learn, and direct that energy and disgust toward positive and preventative action to maintain liberty for all Americans.

    Report Post » PatriotPam  
  • orlandojon
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 8:48am

    After 35 days as jurors, they basically said “not guilty” so they could all go home

    Report Post »  
  • not funny
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 8:34am

    We might learn more about who killed Caylee and put her in the swamp when Zenaida Gonzalez’ attorney deposes her next Tuesday. He can ask her whatever he wants. No jury present.

    Report Post »  
    • not funny
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 8:44am

      I am referring to Casey Anthony obviously–she is being sued by Zenaida Gonzalez.

      Report Post »  
    • streetrodder
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 8:46am

      I hope they take Casey (Anfoney) for everything she will ever make now and in the future.

      Report Post »  
  • streetrodder
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:53am

    This jury saw $ signs. Not guilty they cash in, guilty they just go home.

    Report Post »  
    • NOBALONEY
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:57am

      Ye$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. I agree.

      Report Post » NOBALONEY  
    • Ed from Justice
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 9:01am

      Ok let’s just say for the sake of argument that the States Attorney in your area had an investigator working for him and that investigator was mad at you because you owed him some money. The investigator goes to the states attorney and has you indicted on some sort of a trumped up charge. They often say they can indicte a ham sandwish and they can. You are arrested on a felony charge and brought into court and you have a jury trial. Wouldn’t if you were a member of that jury wnat to make sure that there was absolutely no doubt that you were guilty before they found you guilty of something you did not do and sent you away to prison That is what happened here . It was a terrible thing and the family of this little baby is obviously dysfunctional and something happend to her that killed her. However I don’t see how in good concious you can say that the prosecutor proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the mother did it or even what happened. Not to the extent that they could send her to prison for life or execute her. The prosecutor left them no other lesser crimes to convict her of so what could they do? They did the only thing they could and should have. Meantime in the prviously mentioned case, lets say they found you not guilty. You still had to hire a lawyer, probably had to mortgage your house or use your savings and how do you ever get that money or your reputation back. We need loser pay- civil and felony. That way prosecutors will always have a good ca

      Report Post »  
    • fantasywriter
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 2:20pm

      Ed from Justice, where is the evidence that the Anthony family was anymore dysfunctional than most other families? Where is the proof that any of the allegations Jose Baez made in his opening were true. Yet, these allegations tainted the jury, many of the pundits and many viewers. This jury and many of you out there need to re-read the definition of “Reasonable doubt.” Study jury reverse nullification and you will see that is exactly what Jose Baez did and got away with it. If anything good can come from this trial it would be to eliminate the ability of attorneys to make outrageous statements in opening that they either know to be false, have no intention of proving to be true or cannot prove it to be true. Whatever side you’re on in this case justice was not served here because to much of it depended on false, unprovable statements.

      Report Post »  
  • TxGold
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:42am

    I don’t want to hear anymore about it!!!

    Report Post » TxGold  
  • mickie4
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:34am

    They are milking this story for all its worth…..I’m sick of the whole stinkin mess. All I have to say is
    poor Caylee….RIP.

    Report Post »  
  • papabear27
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:34am

    Ladies and Gentlemen, this is NOT the crime of the century. Because the liberal media bias will NOT expose President BO for the FRAUD that he IS, we are being distracted by Anthony Weiner statements, Charlie Rangel statements, and Nancy Peolsi incredible insane statements. So we seem to be fascinated by mothers who kill their baby and do not report the baby missing for 30 days!

    President BO has criticize every effort by anyone that is “different” from his mind set. President BO has discriminated against every Republican in Congress and every Republican Governor in office. Why is it that as the leader of the “Free World” that he acts like such a BIGOT? Obama is totally dismissive attitude towards Paul Ryan is appalling. Obama’s manipulation of the Affordable Health Care Act is biggest SCAM that has every come out of Congress! Yet he seem to be proud of his actions as he panders to his political base and ignores the citizens of America. Enough already!
    We need real news stories about how this President has violated his oath of office several dozens of times. IMO

    Report Post »  
    • tower7femacamp
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:37am

      I am more interested in Bo Bo’s college transcripts than this idiotic crime story.
      What are we going to do ? Bring this kid back from the dead ?
      We abort Millions of babies in America so why hundreds of hours on this story
      and nothing on Bo Bo’s records ….

      Report Post » tower7femacamp  
  • cassandra
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:32am

    I don’t care to hear what a moron has to say about acting like a moron

    Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:25am

    .
    Why do I need to hear from the Captain of the Short Bus?…..

    Somebody chunk a rock………Where is Ernest T. Bass when you need him?…….

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • tower7femacamp
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 7:08am

    Who cares, This is one of the dumbest news stories of 2011,
    Scott Peterson and OJ all over again
    Do you Blazers realize how many hours of news has been
    wasted on this story ???

    this is proof of the Dumbing down of the USA
    the Republic is lost forever.

    Report Post » tower7femacamp  
    • Boojer56
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 9:30am

      A child is murdered and dumped in a garbage bag and you say who cares? really

      Report Post »  
    • mils
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 9:54am

      It was a tragedy…taken to another level by the media….there really is atory here..just not what the media has made it.

      They were “suspicious” of George…so they decided to let a murderer of children go free..amazing.

      Was this jury predominately Democrat or Republican…could explain a whole lot…

      Report Post »  
    • capitalideals
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 10:34am

      I think most Americans can multi-task. I can have an interest in this case and other issues as well. I like to watch America’s Got Talent, but that doesn‘t mean I don’t pay attention to important issues. I never understood the viewpoint that you can only concentrate on one thing at a time.

      Report Post »  
    • DDD
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 11:12am

      Scott Peterson is behind bars for killing his wife and son, dummy. No comparison there!

      Report Post »  
    • fantasywriter
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 2:05pm

      MIL is right when he says “They (the jury) were “suspicious” of George…so they decided to let a murderer of children go free..amazing.” So, why were they suspicious of George A.? Remember the defense’s opening when Jose Baez accused G.A. of molesting Casey. He not only said it but he was extremely graphic. He said, in his opening, that George Anthony had his #%@&$ in her mouth everyday and said this without a shred of proof. Do you really think a jury isn’t going to color everything the prosecution presented with this image firmly in their minds. Also let us not forget the vivid image he presenting about how George found Caylee drowned in the pool, also without any evidence to back up his scenario. He never forwarded any testimony or evidence supporting his claims or scenario. Even after making his assertions he continually hammered home this theme that George Anthony was the culprit and not Casey despite never having to prove anything. He hammered it home all the way to the end of his closing. How many still believe that the Anthony family was dysfunctional? No real proof to that effect but that theme is still hanging out there even among those who believe Casey is guilty. What a world.

      Report Post »  
  • GBMBulletsSKNRD
    Posted on July 11, 2011 at 6:53am

    Move along nothing to see here.

    Report Post »  
    • Cobra Blue
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 8:42am

      Enough all ready of the OJ Simpson #2 trial. Move on. Kangaroo court is over.

      Report Post »  
    • fastfacts
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 9:36am

      REMEMBER WHAT THE JURY HAS ALREADY SAID…

      Jury Number 3 has already spoken out: http://tiny.cc/7pct9 – Very Regretful

      Report Post »  
    • capitalideals
      Posted on July 11, 2011 at 10:37am

      Juror number 3′s eyes were so glazed over she could have been a Krispy Kreme donut.

      Report Post »  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love