SNL: Mitt Romney Assures Everyone His Campaign Is Not Peaking Too Soon
- Posted on February 12, 2012 at 7:41am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
NBC
Saturday Night Live‘s Mitt Romney sought to assuage voters that his campaign might be in trouble following Tuesday’s triple loss to Rick Santorum in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri.
(The real Mitt Romney had a better Saturday night than the one portrayed on SNL, coming off a win in the Maine caucuses and victory among conservative activists in the Conservative Political Action Committee presidential straw poll.)
“Hello, I’m Mitt Romney. You‘ve just caught me in my den where I’m relaxing and not appearing ill at ease,” he said, standing behind a chair instead of in it.
Romney continued, “Tuesday‘s results couldn’t have pleased us more. Just what we were hoping for and nowhere near peaking too soon.”
It was a close thing in Colorado, where the polls suggested they could have won, “which would have upset out carefully crafted strategy of staying below the radar.”
Instead, everything went according to plan he said, though he admitted some pundits viewed the night as a victory for Santorum.
“You could make that argument in the sense that he did get the most votes in each of the primaries held that day,” Romney said. “But I’ll tell you this: I sure wouldn’t want to be Rick Santorum right now, with all that pressure and the expectations and the tension and so on, being more popular with the party’s base than the other candidates, et cetera. No thanks.”
With that, he turned to the golden retriever that had been sitting beside him — but it didn’t go as planned when the dog went into a barking fit.
“He does that with me,” Romney said, trying to laugh off the dog’s reaction. “You want to go back on that roof?”
Watch the full sketch below, via NBC:
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 585 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 413 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 368 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 303 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 412 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (81)
ISRAEL_IS_NOT_THE_51ST_STATE_AND_SPIES_ARE_NOT_ALLIES
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:38pmHey Rick! You’re a POSER! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxeg22lDFps
Report Post »DividedWeFail
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 10:56pmRomney is a liberal poser. Someone posted this awhile back. Very interesting.
RomneyCARE ENDED my thought of EVER voting for Shxty Mitty. Nothing Gingrich or Santorum did matches what a liar Romney is.
Between January and September 2011, Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital gave Barack Obama $27,500!
So far this year, Bain Capital donated $123,200 to the Democratic National Committee. They also donated to a Romney super PAC; $1.25 million!
Romney’s companies have sent 25% of this year’s donations to the Democrats, while in 2008, 2/3 of their money went to Obama!
Romney‘s top contributor is Goldman Sachs who was Obama’s top contributor in 2007-2008:
“According to Federal Election Commission figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Goldman Sachs’ political action committee and individual contributors who listed the company as their employer donated $994,795 during 2007 and 2008 to Obama’s presidential campaign.”
April 20, 2010 From Robert Yoon, CNN Political Research Director
Isn’t it funny how so many people who are tired of the same old thing, go for the same old thing election after election
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 12:17amHere is that video in context http://youtu.be/vLQnoVpkyqc
Report Post »trappedinwv
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 1:50amHow do people look at a list of who the employees of a company give too and make any connections out of that other then the employees of a company like this candidate to a tune of so much money. Then look at another list and see that the employees of that company like candidate B to a tune of this much money.
Report Post »Vegasdad702
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 9:03amNO WAY!!!!! I just watched that link about Santorum!!! IM SHOCKED!!!! Then I watched the one where the guy says heres the video in context, ITS EVEN WORSE!!!! Look he is a social conservative, believes government has a right to tell you how to live, and legislate morality and that the government knows better then you about how you should live your life!!!! I am starting to believe its almost certain that Obama is going to be re elected because the only guy that believes you know better then the government how to live your life is Ron Paul and he can’t win because of the forces against him. Of coarse the trade off is that his supporters won’t get behind any of the other government knows better candidates (Take your pick). So bummed people are so unaware of whats REALLY happening. :(
Report Post »investlite
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 12:57pm@divided, I’m not pro romney, but I thought I’d point out that romney left bain capital in 1998.
Report Post »SerenityPlease
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 6:55pmHave to do whatever it takes to beat Obama. So Romney isn’t as conservative as many republicans would like he stands the better chance of beating Obama. He comes across as tough on the issues, the others don’t. He comes across as being a strong leader for the world, the others don’t. We all know the history of Gingriche’s liberalism but Santorum has historical moments of it also. I don’t see how anyone can say that either one of them is more conservative than Romney. As far as Romneycare goes, it was a state decision. And he says he will repeal BamaCare.
Report Post »DividedWeFail
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:07pmHe comes across as tough on the issues,
_____
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!
Romney is type of person we have to be tough AGAINST.
He is worse than a RINO!!
Report Post »nizy
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 1:31amHave you checked out the facts about Little Ricky’s big government voting record? Why on earth did he lose in PA by 18%? Because the people in PA were on to him. Why would he vote to raise the debt ceiling 5 times without requiring comparable spending cuts….
Mitt Romney is the MAN in the room.
I for one have had enough of whiny former senators. ;-)
Report Post »nizy
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 1:39amYup…Only add that Obamacare=2700 pages of legislation that massively expanded government in pursuit of national takeover of healthcare. Romneycare=less than 80 pages.
Of course my personal preference would be to let people that refuse to pay for their own healthcare die in the streets. Just sayin’
Report Post »Nanaswords
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 6:32pmJust to comment to the CPAC Rinos’ …I for one will not drink the “tea” and vote for another Mccain type candidate !!! The only one that will get my vote in 2012 will be the one who Stands for Faith…Family…and…Contitutional /Founding Fathers principles !!! Also…donations though small… will have more effect …than mega bucks from long-term politician within their own group ! Do you still think that mid-american conservatives believe that mega-buck candidates will give them the position in the W.H. again..Think Again !!!
Report Post »MCLOVINIT
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 5:16pmPolitical Prayer:
Report Post »It is January 20th, 2013.
Rick Santorum has been sworn in as the new President of the United States.
ISRAEL_IS_NOT_THE_51ST_STATE_AND_SPIES_ARE_NOT_ALLIES
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:38pmAhhh… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxeg22lDFps WTF?
Report Post »Phoneguy
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 5:08pmI wish and hope that Mitt is done, Rick is the only Conservative, remember Soros is pulling for Mitt, enough said.
Report Post »mikenleeds
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 4:58pmrick is the only choice . mitt and newt are the same as king obama
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 3:41pmDog in a carrier on the roof of a car. Who cares?
Apparently, none of these people have seen one of those horse trailers on the highway. Whoopdy freekin doo.
Report Post »BlesstheJews
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 7:05pmMe, my family and many of our friends. How about I strap you to a roof of a car and drive hundereds of miles at 70 MPH and we’ll see how it feels. Idiot.
Report Post »CaliforniaD
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 2:17amOver the past few months I have taken photos of dogs in the back of 6 different pick-up trucks– some in carriers, most loose in the back. Big deal! Romney made a special wind break for the dog’s carrier. The dog enjoyed traveling with the large family on trips rather than being unhappy at the vet’s. What is the difference between the protected dog carrier on the top of the top of the van vs. the back of a pick-up? Don’t be too quick to condemn Romney for loving the dog enough to bring it along with the family.
Report Post »JoJoinSC
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 2:56pmBob Marley for Mitt Romney video here on youtube http://youtu.be/Tyc_TkprO_M
Report Post »UrbanFervor
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 2:14pmCHRISTHEFARMER – get a life. No one wants to read your long rambling diatribes.
Report Post »ISRAEL_IS_NOT_THE_51ST_STATE_AND_SPIES_ARE_NOT_ALLIES
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:37pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxeg22lDFps
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 12:13amHuh, what did I hit on something with my “long rambling diatribes” that bothered you. Get a life huh… Lets see what you talk about. “Don’t know what Allain is attempting to do other than grab his 15 minutes, but anyone with basic knowlege of physics can point out the fallacy of his arguments. “This doesn’t seem all too likely since he was not touching the ground the whole time”. Can Fujitra leviate while he is moving forward? The still shot of his feet off the ground is clearly before he extends his arms to push Simpson. And his momentum doesn’t go to zero just because his feet leave the ground anyway. Simpson clearly embellished, but he was clearly shoved. Fujita’s arms did not extend themselves.”
Report Post »Yup your right I shouldn’t talk about the finer points of politics and mob nature, I should talk about a football player fake falling to have a penalty called….
Truthfully when I write I do it for myself, I do it publicly so that others might try to pick apart what I say so I can fine tune my arguments and points better. Unfortunately not one person has responded on any points I make, they talk around the edges, take shots at some candidate they think I support, or they say no one wants to read what I say. All really worthless.
Hey but thanks for @ing me, just wonder whats wrong with you for posting such a thing.
1PORattler
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 1:59pmRomney’s campaign will continue as long as he is propped up by the stolen billions sitting in the coffers of Goldman Sachs and the rest of his puppeteers
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 3:32pmSeek help.
Report Post »nizy
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 1:35amLike Goodstuff said
Report Post »stage9
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:45amWhat are the chances of getting the golden retriever on the ballot? He certainly has more charisma than Romney!
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 3:38pmBut does he have more charisma than Santorum? That guy has the charisma of a door knob.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:09amEven this site has become nothing but
Pro Romney vs. Anti Romney
I blame Beck’s assaults on Newt Gingrich which started the ball rolling. We all had a favorite when the race started but no one really had one they hated. Gingrich got to 40+% in Iowa and then Beck started the attacks on Gingrich, here is proof for all you haters…… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi2sJHeHg_8
Beck could have stated each day, if I were voting today I would vote for Santorum but he had to spend hours and days and weeks trashing Gingrich. Now Beck’s Base is split and we are Romney or Anti Romney.
I no longer can listen to Beck…. Crap like this is just to “ T R U T H Y Y Y ” for me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhOBFCmK2kk That did not sound like an agenda to me.
The same people who laughed at SNL making fun of Gingrich last week don’t find this funny this week.
AND W H A T is with calling everyone bigots. It is like a bunch of Black people calling everyone Racists.
Rush, Hannity, and Mark Levin seem to be the professionals in this industry. They are 1,2, and 3 in listeners and that is why. I was a huge Beck Fan but when you see the destruction done to his base and show you C A N ‘ T help but ask yourself why and how did we get to this point. There are people on this site who are just blind followers and anything B says is Gold. Beck said to question with Boldness, why aren’t you?
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:42amDon’t blame Glenn for having a political position – this discussion was entirely inevitable. I will agree though that Beck’s style is less professional though. Just not my cup of tea to listen to professionals in politics. I like to call it as I see it.
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:58amNot getting your point really. We had a favorite but then Glenn started attacking Newt (pointing out things he said). Now we are all split anti-Romney and pro-Romney, yes this is a mistake you should just be pro-your-guy. If you have a national talk show and thought someone is bad for the country/party then you could be anti-someone to try to influence the vote of your listeners. So are you saying Glenn should not have gave his opinion because it was not the same as yours, or even if it was the same as yours he should not had given it? Should he only talk about all the good things about each candidates and never call into question any of their missteps? No wait you said to question with boldness at the end which means to.. question with boldness. The problem is he questioned your guy I would guess. Look MS-GlennBC someone you trust can not influence you to change your vote with facts, do you think one of these candidates can change the mind of an Obama lover? Newt winning debates in the general would be worthless, no one on the other side would trust him, and you trusted Glenn but his words did nothing for you. No conservative trust Mittens, nothing he can say will change that (how many times has he lied about what his book said) so why should we support someone we can not trust. Sorry I didnt know what candidate you support nor did I understand your point from what you wrote. People are pro and anti because they are simple, just pick who best reps you.
Report Post »Rocky_biskit
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 12:07pmBeing from Massachusetts and seeing first hand what Romney has done for this State I can tell you Glenn had absolutely NOTHING to do with my NONSUPPORT of Romney.
I submit to you … GAY marriage and Romneycare AGAINST the will of the people!!!
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 12:22pmYou ever think that Glenn might be anti-Newt because Newt co-sponsored the fairness doctrine and Reagan had to veto it? Newt said at the time that he thought without the fairness doctrine the left would rule the airwaves and have an unfair advantage. Now Newt is against the fairness doctrine because conservatives rule the airwaves. What do you know now the left wants to have the fairness doctrine and they use Newt’s own argument in why we need it just change one word.
If Newt had his way there would be no talk radio.
Once elected 7 new congress members saw corruption in the house bank and house post office, and said they would expose it no matter what it cost them. Newt looked at the list of those abusing the system and said well it would hurt democrats more the republicans so go for it. Newt was on the list with 23 bounced checks by the way other members had in the 900′s but still. But Newt had been using the scam so he must had known about it and since the 7 were going to expose it no matter what he thought he would jump on board.
If Newt had his way there would not have been a house banking/post office scandal.
So no talk radio, no house banking scandal no republican revolution. Oh you wanna say the contract with America, without talk radio who would of talked about it? So Newt cant claim much credit for the revolution, it happened in-spite of him not because of him.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 12:25pmI will let Andrew Breitbart try to explain Beck to you….
Beck’s own words B E ~ F O R ~ S O M E T H I N G ~ N O T ~ A G A I N S T ~ S O M E T H I N G~
Is BECK a MAN of his WORD ??
Andrew Breitbart on Beck…..
http://www.breitbart.tv/breitbart-coward-liar-thief-beck-is-dead-to-me-after-calling-tea-party-racist/
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 12:46pmAhh but here is the problem with that, people treat politics as if it’s a sporting event, they want to just support who they think will win. You can see this in the polls, as soon as someone begins to build momentum everyone begins to join on. You also hear things like I really like so and so but I don’t think they can win, mind you we are speaking about in our primary not the general. So everyone loves so and so but no one will vote for them because no one has voted for them, but if everyone that loved them did vote for them then everyone would vote for him because others had voted for them. When this problem arises (which is illogical to begin with) you have to find a way to push voters from the other candidates as to have more support for the person you support so as to have those that love your candidate be okay supporting them because others do. To do this you point out flaws in the others and you continue to do so until the support goes to your candidate. Once it does then you speak about your own candidates positions and build excitement for them. If you wish to vote for someone who would win vote for Obama.. or is the D next to his name a problem. Oh I see so you could vote for someone with the same ideas and policies with a R next to their name as long as you think they could win. I see your point we should elect Obama R because he has the R by his name. No I would rather Glenn to at least try to point this out even if it causes some to run and hide.
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 1:11pmBut by running and hiding you point out the obvious flaw in your reasons for supporting either Newt or Mittens. “Newt will win the debates and therefore be able to get voters that would vote for Obama because he will crush Obama” Okay, but logic and reason on why not to vote for Newt does not work on you from people you trust, people I think make better arguments then anyone of those still left in the race. So how is it Newt can first build trust then make a argument that would pull Obama supporters, when someone who already has your trust can not pull voters off Newt.
Mittens, this goes to the R and D argument. What thing different would Mitten do from Obama, Obama care is Romney care and Romney said that we could do the same for everyone in the country “everyone is insured and pays only what he or she can afford.” the rest I guess is covered by government. (Auto bail outs) supported. (Walstreet bailout) supported. (Cap Trade) supported. (forcing Catholics to give free birth control) Romney care caused it. (Egypt) “Mitt Romney calls for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to step down” (Libya) both sides. At the end of Romney’s term, several of his staffers purchased the hard drives from their state-issued computers…. What!!!! Sure sounds like Obama lol.
Yeah but dont point that out, just say you love your candidate and let people go on supporting Obama with a R because he can win, even though no one will support your guy because no one has supported your guy..
Report Post »Christhefarmer
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 1:38pmHere is my simplest main point with everyone. Do you support a border fence? Would it be nicer then the one the USSR put up in Germany because people crossed it. Will it be better then the one the Israeli’s have because once again people get across that one. Will it surpass the ones in structure and man power that prisons have around them because people escape from prisons. Have you ever thought about any of these questions when you went along with wanting a fence or did you just assume someone else smarter then you had and that was the reason they suggested it. Think about it this way, if someone built a fence to keep Americans out of somewhere could it stop us if we really wanted to cross it. People in prison with limited resources and tight control over their time and actions can figure out ways to escape, are you telling me someone with unlimited resources, time, and no constraints on their actions can’t? Don‘t blindly follow anyone’s ideas, think about everything you support and figure out if it makes sense or not. The people that lead us are not smarter then us, in fact most people that lead us on average have a lower IQ then the general population. Like! Totally! For Real! use your God given intelligence and follow no man without first thinking about what they say, when you realize they are all fools at least pick the one that understands the people in this country are smarter then they are. That is what freedom is, you knowing how to live your life better than the
Report Post »WiseFox
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 1:39pmNot everyone on this site is pro or anti Romney. This race is far from over. If the decision has been already made, no one would be discussing this subject, although it appears that the party leaders have already chosen their boy. The American voters have something to say, and this is one of the places that they get to say it. So just chill out, and enjoy, or go somewhere else to complain.
Report Post »DividedWeFail
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:02pmI REFUSED to vote for Mitt Romney in 2008.
Glen Beck’s contantly putting FAVORABLE blogs stories about Romney on The Blaze and either ignoring or putting up neutral stories about the other 3 candidates is getting OLD>
Report Post »Augie4
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 10:40amI’m not sure why any conservatives would vote for this guy. Check out his history, he’s a liberal Republican. He’s just saying what he needs to say and if he gets elected, you can be sure you won’t get what you want. Maybe it’s a good year to just sit out. Obama gets elected, you get four more years to trash the guy, everyone will get bored with it and be up for a change.
In 2016, you can vote in another conservative, we can have a couple of new wars, maybe a terrorist attack or two, a nice tax cut for the high bracket, and another recession. Problem solved!
Report Post »idarusskie
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 11:06amsure I would much better vote for a nut like sanatorium.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 3:36pmBecause Newt and Ricky have zero chance of beating Obama. Should we select a quasi-conservative bland candidate like Newt, or Santorum, and watch him get pummeled by Obama in November? Or should we pick the moderate Republican who actually has a chance at beating Obama in November. That should be a no-brainer.
The longer these primaries go on without Republicans getting behind Romney, the more time Republicans spend bashing eachother instead of directing our aim at Obama.
Stay focused…beat Obama!
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 10:35amBulogna
Report Post »mchurchwell
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:59amHahaha… Just thinking back to all those funny SNL skits of them making fun of Obama as he ran for president and as president…. oh wait… never mind.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 10:11amSNL has what one might call “selective” humor : they select a weekly conservative target and then ridicule him/her . Just the usual lop-sided liberal Dominant Media which provides free campaign ammo for the Obama administration. Sort of a visual version of NPR..the BBC..etc.
Report Post »mrfunn
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 4:26pmIf you want to see all things SNL, head over to mediaite on a Sunday.
Report Post »btw: Its fun to stir the libs up there.
barber2
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:40amThe dog and the roof story : New York Times libs like Gail Collins and Maureen Dowd have been running that mocking smear every time they run one of their reputation assassination smear column about Romney for years. If that’s the worst thing they have in their usual “Trash the Conservative ” arsenal, maybe Romney is a good choice for the Republicans. Dealing with the arrogance and disrespectful attitudes of the Dominant Media is one of the hardest battles Republicans have to face. The liberals form the Occupy Movement of the media : they are arrogant, in-your-face bullies who control the “news” and aim to sway public opinion. The liberal LapDog media is the Propaganda Machine for the Obama Administration and their International Far Left allies. A very lop-sided situation .( and they are still trying to destroy conservative media voice of Murdoch with their London – now U.S. FBI – witch hunt which aims to shut down Fox and the WSJ )
Report Post »ireport uderide
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:40amBoring… SNL’s Romni skit is proof the economy is worst than we are being told. The obvious lack of pre show free whiskey has decidedly taken its toll on shows like SNL, Late Night and the Conan O’brien. The only thing funny was the dog ad-libbing his part.
I guess if Mitt wins the GOP nomination then SNL can release their bigoted writing hounds and really dig the heels in on the Mormon faith. That stuff writes itself.
Report Post »canadianlady
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:36amAfter what SNL did to Sarah Palin in 2008, I wouldn’t watch another SNL video clip if you paid me.
Report Post »welloddyfriggindah
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:18amHello Blaze…I appreciate many of the stories you report, but this comments forum is very often as thoughtless, mean, and pointless as ANY progressive/left leaning forum. I guess people are people!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:47amI can tell by the name you chose to call yourself that you are a deep,respectful scholar of politics and the human psyche…
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:17amWow that was lame and not very funny – exactly what I’ve come to expect from SNL in the last decade.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:58amWhat really would be a funny skit would to have Obamas many campaign and early pledges etc. then show the new ones and what he has actually done.
That would fill a whole hour and be hilarious.
Report Post »I just don’t think the boys at SNL have the conviction nor the gonades to do what is a no brainer!!
g.prunty
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:51amsnl that 1 was pretty good liked that……….freaking snl nothing is beyond or out of bounds of their humor
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:24amI guess it might be funny to people who never saw the real comedy in SNL’s earlier days. It sure explains why the OWS generation has absolutely no sense of humor.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 2:25pmBarry is!
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:41amThe…..Jerk……….BIG Government…………….you do mean Obama don’t you? Surely you didn’t forget the one person who has spent more and hired more government employees and opened up more departments and stuff…YOu did mena to put Obama on the list as number one for BIG government….right……..
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:53amWhereareyourbrains, if you think real hard you will come to the realization that my list was a Republican list of big time spenders, and big government types, calling themselves conservatives. Obama is a Democrat and is openly, and admittedly, a big spender, big government guy. One is honest, the others are not. That’s my point.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:07amHis campaign started 5 years ago, it’s got to peak sometime. No conservative could be elected to statewide office in Massachusetts. All else is fluff, lies, and rationalization.
Report Post »Guys can not get pregnant. It is what it is. Bush, Dole, Bush, McCain, Romney… no diff! Big government, big spending, fakes.
bolsen00
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:30amJerk–Are you enjoying yourself? That‘s the garbage spewed by those who are too gutless to admit you don’t like that Romney’s a Mormon. Just own up to your bigotry and your hateful personality. Been running for 5 years….of all the things you could say…that’s probably the stupidest one. Why don’t you just say Gingrich has been running for 35 years, Paul 26 years, Santorum 20 years….that would be the same thing…..totally wrong…but the same….stupid!
Report Post »whereareyourbrains
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:44amdid you forget about Obama’s HUGH government,.and he is the biggest spender ever……oh thats right he is allowed and no one else was………..lol
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:49amBolsen00, you bring up the Mormon thing and call me the bigot? Who’s off the deep end? Who’s the real hater?
I don’t care what the religious affiliations of fake conservatives are. I am an anti-liberal bigot… and proud of it. You obviously are not… and your liberal-like, personal, attack proves my point.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:58amRomney announced his run for the Presidency on February 13, 2007. That’s 5 years ago. He’s never stopped.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:43amThe jerk: just fill us in on all of those wonderful accomplishments of Obama which made him so prepared for the office of the presidency.
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on February 13, 2012 at 6:40amExcept Ron Paul has been running for more than two decades. Name an election year he didn’t run for President…
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 7:59amIt’s always a good sign when SNL has a difficult time mocking you. Mitt isn’t easily made fun of, so liberals won’t be so quick to dismiss him the way they immaturely do. Ann Coulter’s right – they always portray the Republican candidate as dumb, but Mitt makes going to make that difficult for them. Santorum, Gingrich and Paul on the other hand . . .
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:31amYou’re kidding, right?
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 8:37amYou know I’m not. SNL could destroy Santorum, Gingrich or Paul in a month of skits. They’re drooling all over themselves to have one of those three as the candidate. Not Romney.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:06amThey could destroy Romney with one simple acronym as far as I’m concerned. NDAA
Report Post »Lonescrapper
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:19amIt‘s no great blessing that they can’t do it successfully for Romney – they can’t do it successfully PERIOD. This is why Jon Stewart has such a big following. At least he’s funny.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:24amYep, they could make a really funny skit out of that. Ya, boy. Funny, funny.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 9:52amYou‘re right it’s not funny at all, nor is the apathy by SO MANY towards the atrocities being committed against our Bill of Rights.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 3:44pmYes, because I’m sure SNL cares about NDAA.
You need to break out of your RuPual bubble….it’s suffocating you.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 12, 2012 at 4:35pm@Goodstuff So you’re telling me to shut up and accept it, eh? I‘m afraid that’s not what the free and the brave do there, hoss.
Report Post »