Entertainment

Stewart Slams GOP Reaction to Gadhafi’s Death: ‘What The F*** is Wrong With You?’

On the “Daily Show” last night, Jon Stewart weighed in on the death of Moammar Gadhafi from a number of comedic angles– as well lambasting the Republican reaction for what he considers cynical politics.

The death of the equal-parts brutal and bizarre Libyan dictator has caused media reactions that overall are positive, but some GOP members and right-leaning critics of the administration believe it’s too early to spike the football in the end zone.

Others, like Senators McCain and Rubio, praised the efforts of the British and French rather than applauding the White House.

Stewart wasn’t having any of that sour talk. In response to the GOP hesitation to full-throated praise, Stewart told them not to worry because “Obama‘s policies can’t be vindicated every day.”

He thinks Gadhafi’s death was an unqualified victory, and the GOP should have fallen in line with the rest and praised Obama.

Watch the clip below and decide for yourself, courtesy of The Daily Show (content warning for language and adult references):

Comments (169)

1 2 3 4
  • TxMadMac
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:38pm

    Quadaffi had some good friends in this country that were good friends with obama and they are holding him accountable for this ! He’d better watch his back, cause farrakhan and the popular reverand not right are super pi$$ed.

    Report Post »  
    • FoundingPrinciples
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 2:08pm

      We’re all happy to see another dictator fall, but what many fear is that they will just trade one dictator for another. You know the old saying, “Better the devil you know…”

      Report Post » FoundingPrinciples  
    • Lotus503
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 2:51pm

      Also, it’s against the law for a President to order the assasination of another head of state, which the dirtbag Gadafi was. Just like it’s against the law for a President to order the assasination of an American citizen…or in Mr. Obama’s case, TWO American citizens.

      “We are all servants of the laws in order that we may be free.” Cicero

      Report Post »  
    • Miguelito
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 2:54pm

      Liberals like Jon is against the Death Penalty but its ok to capture a living enemy and execute him. These same liberals want cop killers to go free. Talking about a two faced individual. God please help the people not awake to the destruction of America by these evil people, please, please help them realize their freedoms are being taken away!

      Report Post »  
    • raiderglenn
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 3:47pm

      The Daily Show (the lost episode)

      http://goanimate.com/movie/0v1vbGYKEYIs?utm_source=linkshare

      the one we wish would happen… LOL!!!

      Report Post » raiderglenn  
    • mils
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 4:01pm

      The Blaze and Glenn..have made this man more than he really is….with all their free advertising of his program..

      Report Post »  
    • NHwinter
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 4:53pm

      You know, John, we’ve been asking what the h— is wrong with you, for a very long time.

      Report Post » NHwinter  
    • ozchambers
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 5:27pm

      Qaddafi praised Obama as a “friend”. He was doing EVERYTHING to try and please the USA and the West in general. While Bush was in office, he voluntarily gave up his nuclear program to avoid getting on our bad side after the war started in Iraq and Afghanistan. While certainly, his distant past is full of confrontation with USA, he had turned over a new leaf with regards to US relations for the most part.
      So the USA through NATO sends supplies and runs deadly sorties against Qaddafi including the attack that destroyed his escape convoy and resulted in his running into the drainage pipe to escape the attack, which of course is where he ended up getting executed.

      What does this say to any leaders of Mid Eastern countries? That the USA cannot be trusted, and that playing nice with us very well could end up costing them their lives. You call this a sane foreign policy??

      Report Post » ozchambers  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 5:28pm

      Problem is, the celebrate when the dem kills a bad guy, but spill hate filled rhetoric when the Republican kills a bad guy. They are hypocrites of the highest order. GADHAFI should have been kiiled, but there are many worse dictators the deserve it more, but we are not doing anything about that.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • US_SOLDIER
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 6:28pm

      The guy did some messed up things Im sure but he wasnt what they making him out to be. Ghadaffi, believed that housing was a right, so much that he made his own parents sleep in a tent until he had housed all the Lybian people, thus his father died in a tent in the 90′s. He built the worlds largest man made river to bring water to his people. He believed medical care was a right and the Lybian people had free medical care, and if the Lybian doctors couldnt treat you the Lybian govt would fly you to wherever and pay for your treatment. He gave first time married couples $50000 to buy a house if housing wasnt available. He kicked al quieda out his country and helped hunt down terrorists. And finally to the real reason he became a “boogeyman” He was holding meetings with the African Union to produce a gold backed currency, thus making all FIAT money obsolete overnight. He was trying to unite the African countries into the United States of Africa with a gold backed currency. A divided africa is more easily conguered and stripped of its abundant resources not to mention you cant have a gold backed currency threatening our paper money system. Everyone would flock to their currency, because its a sound investment and a guaranteed return on investment, and we would be left with nothing but green toilet paper. Thats the evil dictator they killed. But dont worry, the new Govt will be so much better for both the Lybian people and the world

      Report Post »  
    • Lemon Party Patriot
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 7:24pm

      Lotus is a muslim radical sympathizer That guy gave up his rights as an american citizen when he committed treason. Get your head out of your a55.

      Report Post » Lemon Party Patriot  
    • teamarcheson
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 8:00pm

      Who Is Next On Obama’s Kill List?

      The American people will be held responsible for these murders ordered by Obama. The German people were held responsible for what Hitler ordered done because they elected him and allowed him to do what he did. Obama is the re-incarnate of Hitler.

      Report Post »  
    • lillymckim
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 8:29pm

      The only time I ever hear anything this man has to say is when someone gives him some free advertisement … I sure as hell wouldn’t pay to hear it…

      Bozo the clown.

      Report Post » lillymckim  
    • lillymckim
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 8:33pm

      Jon!.. thats VP Rubio … to you!

      Report Post » lillymckim  
    • So
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 9:36pm

      Jon, you are infected with liberalism. It has eaten you inside out.

      Give Obummer another Nobel Peace Prize. Starting wars. Killing dictators. Being vindicated.

      You are quite the comedian, Jon.

      Report Post »  
    • the wireworker
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:24pm

      LOOK AT THE FACTS.
      mubarak called barack hussein obama a muslim brother ….he’s gone
      kaddafi called barack hussein obama a muslim brother….he’s gone
      al jazeera is in the white house reports of being on every tv
      al jazeera is funded by the muslim brotherhood and is their mouthpiece
      barack hussein obama has spoken with the muslim brotherhood and supports them
      the muslim brotherhood stands to take over tunisia, egypt and libya since obamas been muslim in chief
      muslim brotherhood wants a caliphate
      muslim brotherhood wants to destroy Israel
      top barack hussein obama advisor refers to Israel as al-quds
      barack hussein obama wants Israel to move back to 67 borders
      barack hussein obama disses Benjamin Netanyahu
      barack hussein obama came from literally out of nowhere on the scene from chicago
      muslim brotherhood is rooted in america out of chicago
      barack hussein obama is ruining this country into oblivian.
      the muslim brotherhood wants this country destroyed into oblivian from within.
      and the lists goes on and on and on…..

      Report Post » the wireworker  
    • foobear
      Posted on October 22, 2011 at 2:19am

      The libs were celebrating his death as much as Republicans.

      Report Post » foobear  
  • The next to last american president
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:36pm

    Americans inherited many sacred gifts. These included our constitution, stable republic form of government, sacrifices of our forefathers and wisdom by the grace of God. At the end the gifts from our founding fathers and God were squandered as throwing “pearls to Swine.”

    Barack and Michelle felt entitled by birth and this was acerbated by their status as President and First (Lady). Now for the first time nothing was beyond their reach. If Michelle is the First Lady, who was number two? They behaved and spent our money like they were King and Queen and the country belonged to them. Michelle flew into a rage at the end of their reign, being told she could not take another lavish tax payer all expense paid vacation to Spain. It sometimes does rain on the plains in Spain. Michelle modeled herself after and emulated Marie Antoinette. She would often come out of the White House closet, wearing a seventeen century style flowing gown. Her ruby slippers had real African rubies. Even the secret service was forced to bow before her person. Michelle at all times had twenty maids awaiting, ten “yes women”, one fanny flatterer, two makeup artists and one Kobe Steak Cooker. The growing number of hungry, unemployed citizens resent their flaunting our former wealth and their supposed superiority. Queen Michelle saw the ending of her reign and hoped to avoid the same fate of Marie.

    Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:06pm

      Cute. But the vacation was on her dime, not the country’s. Yes, the secret service was paid for by the government, just as for every other First Lady, but not the vacation.

      But your post, really cute. I wonder what you have against this particular First Lady?

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Obama_Sham
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:56pm

      I guess the airplane tickets were also on her dime? I guess she did not “expense” any of her trip as official business? I guess the hotel they stayed at where an entire floor was rented by her because of security reasons was also on her dime? She may have paid for a dinner or two…

      JZS, get a clue…

      Report Post » Obama_Sham  
    • EddardStark
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 2:53pm

      Was the divinity of these gifts revealed to you on gold plates or were they revealed to you through auditory hallucination? The Constitution and republican government were created by mankind for mankind in a decidedly secular manner. How is it that you can bend your Christian narrative to include things that came about in the 18th Century? Seems a lot like wishful thinking to me.

      As far as the first family is concerned: WHAT??? All modern first ladies travel. Laura Bush traveled just as much as Michelle Obama does, you wouldn’t want Michelle to break from that type of tradition would you? Oh and Marie Antoinette was chosen by God to be royalty and had plenty of biblical justifications for her excess. People who cloak their actions in the absolutism of religious certainty are always the worst, aren’t they?

      By the way, what’s the deal with the class warfare type rhetoric here? The First Family buys their own clothing and you obviously begrudge their personal success, you godless socialist you.

      Report Post » EddardStark  
    • MHP
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:42pm

      She has a big ass that she willingly shows off, she’s a coon, and she’s a ho.

      jzs
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:06pm

      But your post, really cute. I wonder what you have against this particular First Lady?

      Report Post » MHP  
  • Californiasodbuster
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:36pm

    He is probably still alive, i think they got Mickey Rourke.

    Report Post »  
  • The next to last american president
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:36pm

    Libya is another victory for the radical terrost Muslim Brotherhood. Oduma calls them his Muslim Borthrs in the hood.

    Report Post »  
    • The10thAmendment
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:34pm

      You hit the nail on the head. Obama ordering assassinations is a disgrace on the face of the United States. Especially since Obama is a card carrying member of the Muslim Brotherhood. So is Hillary Clinton.

      Report Post » The10thAmendment  
    • AZpatriotmama
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 2:42pm

      You’re correct. And I believe it’s illegal for a president to take out the leader of another country without declaring war and/or without the approval of congress. Hmmm…where’s the media on this?

      Report Post »  
    • US_SOLDIER
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 6:45pm

      I think its illegal for us to oust/kill/assassinate anybody in the world. Americas power stops at its borders. The idea that we can kill anyone in the world at whim is dangerous and only threatens our national security even more than it does any good. There is no nation that can stand toe to toe with our military might. However, we started out as a gleaming beacon of hope and a model for the rest of the world. For the first time in history a govt was established based on self-governing principles of the people. We started out as a Republic, but now weve been shifted into a Democracy where 51% of the people rule 49%. We have become the bully on the block. The idea that we can use force against someone or some individual just because he doesnt do as we say is not the way our nation was intended to be. What do the muslims want from us? to get out of the middle east, so get out! They particularly hate us because we are in Saudi Arabia, their holy country. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to see that that is the only viable solution to this problem. Unless you want endless wars, millions killed through sanctions, absolute hatred towards the U.S., and eventually the total collapse of America through a financial meltdown because we simply cant afford it anymore. We will go down just like every other empire that stood before us. Not through military invasion, but through economic meltdown of its financial system because it was spread too thin and couldnt pay its bills

      Report Post »  
    • motonutt
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 8:05pm

      Why did obama and Hillarey kill Gadaffi our alie against Al Qeada, and put in our enemy?
      JZS mabey you can answer that?

      Report Post » motonutt  
  • paperpushermj
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:34pm

    Good for you Mr Stewart. Now if you could in all your Brilliance explain why we where at War with Libya in the first place I would appreciate it. Oh and don’t BS me with we where protecting the Citizenry from the Dictator because that excuse fell apart by the Second Week of our bombing.

    Report Post » paperpushermj  
  • Constructionist
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:24pm

    @BioHazard23
    “Meanwhile, Condi Rice is breathing a sigh of relief that her #1 fan/admirer/stalker is on ice somewhere.”

    Good call, I had almost forgotten about his fetish collection of Condi paraphernalia.

    Report Post » Constructionist  
    • Gcopp6
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:31pm

      Lol. Ya me to til you reminded me. To funny. Doubt she is very upset.

      Report Post »  
  • momrules
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:15pm

    Praise Obama? Really? ……………Never.

    Report Post »  
  • pwatkins
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:10pm

    He needs another visit from O’reilly…lol. I think that is what he is really asking for bc that gets him a little recognition beyond the Blaze.

    Report Post »  
  • ltb
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:07pm

    A Liberal asking Conservatives, “are you that small?” What a joke. Liberals have perfected pettiness to an art form. BTW Liberals, while you’re slapping Obama on the back for letting NATO go after Qaddafi, remember what he campaigned against: Guantanamo Bay, enhanced interrogation techniques, rendition, keeping troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Patriot Act. Seems to me like Liberals need to show their gratitude to President Bush for giving Obama the tools that allowed NATO to murder Qaddafi. If Obama had his way, Qaddafi and Bin Laden would still be sipping Mai Tais in their mud huts.

    Report Post » ltb  
  • CJgipper
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:06pm

    Will he still be voicing his support for the rebel victory when they‘re beheading everyone who isn’t an islamic radical?

    Report Post »  
    • geonj
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:55pm

      that is the exact reason republicans in congress aren’t giving full throated support to the death of ghadafi.

      Report Post » geonj  
    • UT.VIVANT.ALI
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 3:51pm

      Do you really expect the left to think that far in advance?

      Report Post » UT.VIVANT.ALI  
    • UT.VIVANT.ALI
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 3:55pm

      Do you really think the left can think that far ahead?

      Report Post » UT.VIVANT.ALI  
  • hauschild
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:05pm

    Typical progressive hypocrisy.

    Report Post »  
  • biohazard23
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:05pm

    If this had occurred under Bush’s administration, Code Pink and MoveOn would be screaming for his head to roll and for him to be executed for crimes against humanity. Where are they now? Hmmm….. Probably at OWS stealing iPods & MacBooks, and smelling people’s feet.

    Meanwhile, Condi Rice is breathing a sigh of relief that her #1 fan/admirer/stalker is on ice somewhere.

    Report Post » biohazard23  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:14pm

      I’m curious, you must have cites for this when Saddam bit it if these groups called for his impeachment. Near as I recall, impeachment calls were for presenting false evidence to engage in a war with Iraq.

      Saddam didn’t even sponsor terrorism (as Islamists hated him), but only repression and brutality against his own people: yet Gadhafi did both. Can you at least agree that the country is better off without Gadhafi? If not, well, I assume you were among the forefront calling for impeachments for fighting a war in Iraq.

      Report Post »  
    • Itchee Dryback
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:28pm

      Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:14pm
      __________________________________

      Delusional.

      Report Post »  
    • dacrunk
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:44pm

      LOCKED, you are liar at worst or quite confused at best. saddam was a ‘global’ sponsor of terrorism. He paid a cash reward to the families of homicide bombers in Israel. He planned the assassination of a US President. Launched missiles against Iran and later Israel. And significant evidence suggests saddam helped support the 1993 WTC attack as Iraqi agents were among the conspirators that were arrested and convicted. I guess your failure to acknowledge saddam’s evil is your blind rage against W. I’m happy that Gadafi is gone, but his reign was far less bloody than the Iraqi butcher. and unlike with the case of Osama, Obama had little to do with this coup. Either praise or blame the Libyan people. They did the vast bulk of the fighting. I only hope that Libya does not follow the example of Egypt or Iran–though they probably will.

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 3:01pm

      Weird, my response to Dacrunk never came up (or was deleted). The gist of it was: 1993 WTC did not involve Saddam (as per the 9/11 commission); no concrete evidence was found to connect Saddam to an assassination attempt on President Bush (besides that several, but not all, of the planners were Iraqi); missiles were launched during wars; and “reward” to the Palestinian families was technically payment after death; Saddam also paid families of those killed by Hamas or radical groups. An attempt to buy goodwill from the Palestinian people because, as said, Saddam was no friend to Islamic militants.

      I should revise my statement to say he didn’t sponsor jihad or Islamic fundamentalism; his actions could rightly be called terrorism, but not of a religious type, a la 9/11.

      Report Post »  
    • LibertyFirst
      Posted on October 23, 2011 at 2:20am

      dacrunk~ says who? Other sources say the U.S. lied about Kadafi’s “atrocities”.

      We’ve got to think for ourselves. NEVER believe anything we hear or see until we’ve done a search on the subject.

      Report Post »  
  • spudwhite
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:04pm

    He realizes he’s been seen as being too anti-obama lately, so he’s remedying that by this. Typical toady behavior by a State-Approved Jester.

    Didn‘t show Hillary’s ghoulish glee vid, I notice.

    Report Post »  
  • HTuttle
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:03pm

    Oh STFU Stewart, you racist bigot!

    Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:23pm

      I’m curious, can you point out racism or bigotry in this clip? I watched it, and the closest I could get was his terrible accent impersonating Gadhafi.

      Report Post »  
    • helluvagoodgod
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 2:34pm

      If you don‘t praise the first muslim president’s actions, you must be a racist.

      Report Post »  
    • Obama>Jesus
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 6:18pm

      That would be funny, if he were a Muslim. Which he isn’t.

      Report Post » Obama>Jesus  
  • garyM
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:01pm

    Aren’t these the same guys who wanted to impeach Bush for all the killing of Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq? Aren’t these the same people who said Islam was a peaceful people? Aren’t these the same guys that elected Obama because of his no war foreign policy? Aren‘t these the same guys who thought Bush’s 1.6 trillion war deficit debt was too high?. Aren’t these the same guys that are not concerned with the 14 trillion dollar deficit now? Aren’t these the same *******-heads that want to let Obama add about half trillion onto the 14 trillion deficit with a jobs bill without any cuts? Aren’t these the same guys who hate Christians? If they hate God’s children then who would be their father?

    Report Post »  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:07pm

      Same guys, they are hawks all the sudden though. Strange to see, isn’t it?

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • RightUnite
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:19pm

      @Gonzo… Actually it isn’t surprising to see… Obowma cannot do wrong.

      Report Post »  
  • gobnait
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:59am

    Where was Stewart’s defense of Bush during the water boarding controversy? After all, he seems to be saying the ends justifies the means.

    Report Post »  
  • Nemo13
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:58am

    No Trial for Gadaffi, he is just basically executed, we had special ops there, Egypt dictator? In prison. Oh, but what of Seria? Or dictators in line with Obummer & Soros anti-Isreal movement? Those dictators are ok. Muslim Brotherhood loves their greatest memeber, Obummer.

    Report Post »  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:58am

    Yea Jon, we remember how happy you all were when we pulled Sadam out of his hole. You fought it every step of the way and BTW our POTUS got Congressional approval, your‘s didn’t even bother trying. The only hypocracy I see is the sudden joy Democrats seem to get from deposing evil dictators while were accused going to war for oil. Moamar gave up his WMD programs and it was verified while Sadam was still playing games. Then we never heard the end of “mission accomplished” and Obama basically did the same thing yesterday in the Rose Garden. People in glass houses shouldn’t be slinging rocks Jon.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:22pm

      Gonzo,

      I was curious as to how accurate your description was. Luckily, there’s the internet!
      Daily Show clip on Saddam’s capture:
      http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-december-15-2003/headlines—the-capture-of-saddam-hussein

      Gonzo wrote: “Yea Jon, we remember how happy you all were when we pulled Sadam out of his hole. ” presumably with sarcasm.

      Jon Stewart: “Here you have a guy who’s a dictator, a ruthless dictator, the Butcher of Baghdad, the guy’s been in charge forever…”

      Yeah, doesn‘t sound like he’s really on Saddam’s side there. Now, argue the wars all you like: most Americans agree the Iraq war was a terrible idea. I imagine most agree Libya was a terrible idea as well. But most also agree the world is better without Saddam Hussein and Momar Gadhafi. Going solely on that idea, I would say Stewart sticks perfectly to his point: these were “bad dictators” and it’s a good thing they are out of power.

      Plenty of other reasons to pick apart the wars themselves, but taking out a dictator hostile to the country? Especially one who actively sponsors state terrorism like Gadhafi? Not a bad thing for American interests.

      Report Post »  
  • G.E.R
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:57am

    Jon Stewart Rules

    Report Post »  
    • I.Gaspar
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:04pm

      Yeah, he rules the malcontents, the junkies, the brainless, and the rest of the losers who find him entertaining.

      Report Post »  
    • G.E.R
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:24pm

      You‘re confused that’s Glenn Beck

      Report Post »  
    • Itchee Dryback
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:34pm

      G.E.R
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:57am
      Jon Stewart Rules
      ______________________________________

      Rule 1. Hide behind “clown nose off/on”.

      Rule 2. See Rule 1.

      Report Post »  
    • G.E.R
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:55pm

      With wit like that you should start touring the trailer parks

      Report Post »  
    • THX-1138
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:59pm

      Jon Stewart is a great capitalist. He‘s found a niche market and is milking it for all it’s worth. P.T. Barnum would be proud. With an ample supply of illiterate, America hating, Marxist losers to pander to he will never go hungry.

      Of course the same can’t be said of his viewers. They’re just idiots…

      Report Post » THX-1138  
    • G.E.R
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 3:29pm

      You’re actually describing Glenn Becks helots and minions

      Report Post »  
  • CatB
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:55am

    If it were still GWB in the White House .. Libs would be singing a different tune … As would the MSM (which are libs/ Marxists also!).

    TEA!

    Report Post »  
  • Obama_Sham
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:54am

    But, I thought Obama had no part of this?!? This was all NATO… Remember?!? So, why praise someone who had nothing to do with it?!?

    Report Post » Obama_Sham  
  • Discord
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:54am

    He is brilliant. <3

    Report Post » Discord  
    • Firebrand
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:00pm

      [His writers are] brilliant. <3

      *fixed*

      Report Post » Firebrand  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:20pm

      BRILLIANT??How do we know this? . His Records are sealed. For good reason

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 7:08pm

      DISCORD,
      Uh….,no..,he is not brilliant. He is a moral relativist.
      He’s clever. He rakes in FILTHY LUCRE to say what he says.
      Were he brilliant he would actually get his learn on and find out who the bad guys REALLY are
      He does not do that.That makes him one of the bad guys .

      Were he brilliant he would recognize the damage he does to our nation.
      He does not seem to recognize his disservice. That makes him stupid!

      Report Post »  
  • Nemo13
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:53am

    Hey Stewart, where was Gaddafi’s TRIAL? Are we not a nation of LAWS? Since when do we celebrate acting like a 3RD WORLD NATION? Who is Obama going to spend another billion to whack next? Hmm? Are you also considering where the weapons are? Egypt perhaps? Hmm? Jon Stewart is an idiot.

    Report Post »  
    • loveliberty83
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 1:09pm

      I agree this man was awful BUT we as Americans are supposed to be civilized

      Report Post »  
  • AnAmerican111
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:52am

    Stewart is comedy! Nothing more!
    Why is there an article of him on the Blaze?

    Report Post »  
  • ltb
    Posted on October 21, 2011 at 11:51am

    Even Hitler did a couple of things right (e.g., autobahns), but it’s difficult to praise him considering he was an evil man. Likewise, Obama is such a pathological liar, that it’s difficult to commend him for doing something right when he is so despicable.

    Report Post » ltb  
    • Love_John_Galt
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:05pm

      Great point LTB! Has Obama ever given any credit to Hillary? Isn’t she his foreign affairs adviser? It does appear the few ‘accomplishments’ have been in the foreign policy category. Not that I’m a Hillary fan — just say’n.

      Report Post » Love_John_Galt  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:10pm

      So you agree he did right here? I think that was kind of the point of the clip: Obama played this perfectly. No American casualties. A dictator and sponsor of state terrorism is dead. The US can rightly claim multi-national support. And it was done quickly and efficiently.

      I think we can all say the world is a better place without Gadhafi. Full stop.

      Then we can start the criticism about the justness of the military action, whether we should be taking out bad guys, how much oil factored into the decision, etc. But for now: props. The president and his NATO allies did good on this.

      Report Post »  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:19pm

      I heard a rumor that it wasn’t K-Dog they killed.. He is actually here to exterminate the imposter posing as President of the US. Fair’s Fair

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • ltb
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:21pm

      Locked, I don’t agree that Obama did right. The only reason NATO was able to track down Qaddafi is because of the tools that were given to the military by President Bush. Obama railed about how evil these tools are, but now that those tools allowed NATO to murder Qaddafi, Obama wants credit? Are you kidding me?

      Report Post » ltb  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:40pm

      @LTB
      “The only reason NATO was able to track down Qaddafi is because of the tools that were given to the military by President Bush.”

      I would like some cites on this that waterboarding, the PATRIOT Act, or prisoners at Guantanamo Bay led to tracking down Gadhafi. I‘m not saying you’re wrong: I‘m just saying I haven’t heard anything about it. It‘s quite possible the MSM isn’t reporting it.

      Or perhaps there are other tools President Bush established that led to them; I’d like to know those as well. Again, not saying you’re wrong: just that I haven’t heard anything about these techniques leading to this capture.

      Honestly I’ve avoided the Libyan engagement almost all together; I don’t think military action was justified.

      Report Post »  
    • Itchee Dryback
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:41pm

      Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:10pm

      So you agree he did right here?
      ________________________________________

      What did he do?

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on October 21, 2011 at 12:57pm

      @Itchee

      Started the military action in Libya, for one
      Used the might of the US military to support the rebels for two
      Brought in NATO after the initial offensive, for three

      As said, he handled it well.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love