Health

Study: Ladies Who Live With Boyfriends Pre-Marriage Unhappier Than Married Women

Study: Ladies Who Live With Boyfriends Pre Marriage Unhappier Than Married Women

Men, on the other hand, were not affected…

Via The Daily Beast:

Even in this day and age, the pressure’s on for women to find a husband. A new study of 22,000 people from around the world found that British women who shacked up with their boyfriends before they were married were unhappier than married women because society disapproves of their arrangement. Women who lived with their boyfriends without a ring on their finger in countries with traditional views of marriage such as America, Bulgaria, Brazil and Mexico were found to have low-self esteem.

In countries with a more relaxed outlook on marriage such as the Netherlands, this was not the case. Men, on the other hand, were not affected by their society’s views on marriage, since they are traditionally considered to be “breadwinners.“ The German research team suggested that women are ”pitied and look down upon” for not being married and could improve their self-esteem by convincing their boyfriends to walk down the aisle.

Read on.

Comments (128)

  • Vunks
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:40pm

    The reason men are uneffected is they are unhappy either way.

    Report Post »  
  • kickagrandma
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:35pm

    My dad preached the “cow” and “milk” adage to me so much, I‘m surprised I didn’t moo.

    My first thought when reading the headline is “ladies” is a presumption. “Women” would have been more appropriate.

    Report Post »  
    • UpstateNYConservative
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:46pm

      I was raised to believe there ARE genuine Ladies out there. I wise woman, and a better man, knows the difference.

      I guess it’s all up to personal choices rather than presumptions.

      Between you and me ( I know, too, this is public), the things I saw from my dad were these: He kissed my mom every time he came home from work. The second, when once at a party, a Lady approached our table and my dad stood, as would a gentleman. I did, too–following his lead.

      there are whores and johns, but there are also Ladies and gentlemen.

      Not to argue or make some kind of ‘statement’, mind you. Just the way I see things on this subject.

      Report Post » UpstateNYConservative  
  • UpstateNYConservative
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:33pm

    Notice the trolls aren’t jumping in on this one! ~LMBO~

    As usual, they’re out of their (Pee-Wee) league!

    Report Post » UpstateNYConservative  
  • teddrunk
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:29pm

    Women blew a good thing. Motherhood is devalued to the point that some stranger now raises their kids, until the state takes over in kindergarten. Why bother having them if you’re not going to raise them.

    Report Post »  
    • 1959
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 7:31pm

      Could not agree more! I can not understand women (who don’t HAVE to work to put food on the table) going back to work and leaving ther babies and children with strangers. Beyond sad. I am convinced this has a very detrimental effect on these children.

      Report Post »  
    • crushynn
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 8:06pm

      Good point!

      Report Post » crushynn  
    • ThatCatGirl
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 8:24pm

      my opinion: during the sexual revolution, women were told that just bcuz they had a family did not mean they could not have a career and vise versa. The entire workforce changed to the point where, in many cases, a 1 income family just cannot cut it. Not only does it leave latch key kids and emasculated men, but we have government who was happy to step up and tell women that they did not need husbands or children need fathers. They convinced girls that it was marvelous for them to explore their sexuality no matter where it leads, nor how often – and there are no consequences. Women are overworked, underpaid and lacking in clear moral absolutes. Men are all but obsolete, except in the media where they are portrayed as weak, bumbling fools. Children are being raised by MTV and the marxists in schools while the government penalizes marriage and gives more welfare to those shacking up. Wheee…..

      That’s my $0.02 – YMMV.

      Report Post »  
  • teddrunk
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:25pm

    Women are never happy anyhow. Something is always wrong, and bet it’s a guys fault.

    Report Post »  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:29pm

      If you’re the guy they may be right.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • UpstateNYConservative
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:36pm

      Oh, it’s all comical!

      If a woman is in a bad mood, and you ask if she‘s having her period when she’s not, you’re going to get hurt.

      If you ask when she is having her ‘time’, you might get killed.

      After being married for long as I was, I realized the less I say among women, the better for me.

      Report Post » UpstateNYConservative  
    • 8jrts
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:39pm

      teddrunk

      ” Something is always wrong, and bet it’s a guys fault.”

      WOW!! You get it!! As long as you remember that you can make any women happy!! LOL

      Report Post » 8jrts  
  • momprayn
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:18pm

    Yep – they‘ll try to say and convince themselves they’re happy but no, deep down, they’re not. My theory is it’s just common sense re females anyway. I think we’re all born with this “insecurity” deal (albeit in different degrees) and generally, we all have this longing we’re born with to be loved & cherished, taken care of by a man – to feel like we’re “number 1”, secure. When you’re not married, you don’t have the same security. God made us this way. Men, on the other hand, don’t have these same needs & always have been sort of “expected” to mess around, etc. Double standard. Women have rebelled and society in general has rebelled against traditional “religion” & their “restrictions”/morals, thinking they’ll be happier…..but it usually doesn’t work & deep down, they’re not satisfied. Also, many are just afraid of getting married bc of the high divorce rate.

    Report Post »  
  • UpstateNYConservative
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:17pm

    This is the end result of the liberal version of feminism: explore your feminity and you will be free! More so if you thrill to a lesbian encounter, have three abortions, and vote Democrat.

    Pfft!

    Call me old-fashioned, but no woman of worth respects a man who won’t commit. And, realistically, living together is not a commitment.

    Women, overall, like being courted. You know–the suitor arrives with flowers, sits on the porch with her talking of thing profound and inane. She speaks of family and children, and he tells how he can provide that.

    Her daddy–like it or not–is the referee (No, you fracking libs–that’s not the same as Daddy being a Hitler).

    When a man can’t stand up, the Lady is harmed. And she knows it.

    When a woman is a liberal feminist, the woman is harmed because her politics outweigh everything else.

    And you liberal trolls here say Christian men ‘abuse’ the women we love. If you reallt think that, outside your politics, take a look at Islam

    Report Post » UpstateNYConservative  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:29pm

      I have heard powerful African women say that Christian marriage has been the most liberating thing to women in Africa.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • UpstateNYConservative
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:52pm

      Liberals love saying Christian men ‘abuse’ our wives, keeping them barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.

      They never read the Bible: The wife is to be treated gently, like a treasured fragile urn more rare than purest gold (grossly paraphrasing).

      Report Post » UpstateNYConservative  
  • SUU_ARNG
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:16pm

    So it‘s society’s fault for making women who don’t share the same cultural values as others depressed?

    I’m sure pedophiles are depressed, too, for the amount of social disapproval they live with. Tear ;(

    Report Post »  
  • streetrodder
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:14pm

    Thats because when they break up, there’s no alomony.

    Report Post »  
  • Grasshopper42
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:13pm

    Thanks TexanPatriot. Been there, done that. They know better but choose the dark side of life. No surprise they’re on the Govt. dole as well.

    Report Post » Grasshopper42  
  • avenger
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:13pm

    you bet…I told my daughter when she was 14 to keep her legs crossed and not to give it away on a whim.cheap sex is not valued,it is like taking a crap….she followed my advice because dad was always there.today she(age34) is in her 6th year of a great marriage,both college grads making over $250,000 annually.no waiting tables or bar tending careers….

    Report Post »  
  • welovetheUSA
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:12pm

    Ofcourse, their is no bond…….no trust, no security, no family responsibilities shared…there is only…me..me..me

    Report Post » welovetheUSA  
  • teddrunk
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:10pm

    Add your comments

    Report Post »  
    • kickagrandma
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:33pm

      @TEDDRUNK ~~~ See above reply about Glenn’s FRI. special being dumped by FOX. Since it was about ISRAEL, I find that extremely provocative, and will not be watching FOX any more.

      Report Post »  
  • jeffyfreezone
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:00pm

    Why was Beck’s TV show dumped tonight? I won’t be watching Brett tonight.

    Report Post »  
    • kickagrandma
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:31pm

      @JEFFYFREEZONE ~~~ We don’t know why it was dumped, but I immediately fired off an email to FOX NEWS about it and that their timing could not have been worse, esp. due to the topic: ISRAEL. I copied that email to one of Glenn’s addresses.

      Everyone needs to be on FOX about this.

      We are done with FOX.

      Report Post »  
  • texanpatriot
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:57pm

    Ever heard of tough love? Are you willing?
    Don’t visit them but invite them over for a meal at your house.
    If they are out of town and want to visit have them sleep in separate bedrooms. Don’t be afraid to take the lads, who do not believe in buying the cow, for a long walk.
    At least once a quarter, in a neutral venue, bring up marriage.
    Oh, and show this finding to your daughters. Remember you are the one who is on the right side of this one.
    Believe in tough love to teach a lesson to those you love?

    Report Post » texanpatriot  
  • paulamadden
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:53pm

    Nonsense. Most of the young women I know are less inclined to marry now because it’s less beneficial for them to do so. They often are more educated and make more money than their BFs.

    Report Post »  
    • avenger
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:04pm

      yep..they are the ones supporting their favorite stud… a never ending dead series of relationships.

      Report Post »  
    • Sam Brown
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:04pm

      Todays educated woman is more about money and less about heart. I was married to the finest woman in the world for 40 years till she died of cancer. I know something about heart.

      Report Post »  
    • sissykatz
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:18pm

      Sam

      I hope my husband can say the same thing about me, when the time comes. That is such a sweet and nice thing to say. Sorry for your loss

      Report Post »  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:26pm

      Women deceive themselves about a lot of things these days. But the deception doesn’t make them much happier. When they bother to search their heart they know they are missing something.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • 1959
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 7:19pm

      @ Sam Brown, yes indeed you must know something about heart. Bless you.

      Report Post »  
  • nfbailey
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:49pm

    This is old, but it still holds true…..”Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free?”

    Report Post » nfbailey  
    • dinadp
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:54pm

      LOL! The cow & milk thing was the first thing that came to my mind too!

      Report Post » dinadp  
    • SingerGuy
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:41pm

      I had one of these liberal women throw that back at me by saying, “why buy the pig when you can get the sausage for free?”

      Report Post » SingerGuy  
  • Sam Brown
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:46pm

    Gosh, so confusing. If they are “ladies” how can they be shackups? Is this like the new math or something being applied to English?

    Sammy

    Report Post »  
    • teddrunk
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:10pm

      True..if a woman is shackin’ up, she’s certainly no lady.

      Report Post »  
  • West/Paul/Cain 2012
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:45pm

    I was really expecting this study to show the opposite. I’m kind of relieved that marriage still may be valued a little bit.

    Report Post » Reduce.Our.Govt.Footprint  
  • NickDeringer
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:43pm

    If he don’t love you enough to marry you, he don’t love. All else is a big steaming pile of BS.

    Report Post » NickDeringer  
  • Lost in the Flyover
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:42pm

    Haha the Boyfriends are too!

    Report Post » Lost in the Flyover  
  • AZPSYGUY
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:38pm

    How were countries determined to have a “more traditional view of marriage” vs. those with a “relaxed outlook?” The U.S. has an over 50% divorce rate, and multiple states have pro-gay marriage laws. That doesn’t sound very “traditional” to me.

    Report Post »  
    • pajamash
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:46pm

      “How were countries determined to have a “more traditional view of marriage” vs. those with a “relaxed outlook?”
      ___________________________________________________________________________________

      I think it is determined by the tax rate. The higher the tax rate the more“relaxed outlook” (“progressive”) the country is viewed. ; )

      Report Post »  
    • avenger
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:05pm

      you can thank the fkng liberal freaks…

      Report Post »  
  • riseandshine
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:38pm

    no doubt

    Report Post » riseandshine  
  • Showtime
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:36pm

    I’ve heard that before, and I believe it.

    Report Post » Showtime  
    • keaton
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 8:14pm

      anybody want to live with an unhappy woman

      Report Post »  
  • and to the republic
    Posted on April 8, 2011 at 5:34pm

    they needed a study to verify this????

    Report Post »  
    • avenger
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:01pm

      why buy the cow..when you can get it by the quart…momma is always right !

      Report Post »  
    • Dustyluv
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:04pm

      My wife and i did not live together nor have sex before marriage. We are as happy as anyone I know. I know plenty who went the other way and they all have ended in divorce. Keep it in your pants until you slip her the ring first…

      Report Post »  
    • JeffersonSmith
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:05pm

      You can pay me any time to ‘not do a study’ and come up with the same answer.

      Report Post »  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:08pm

      women ………………. could improve their self-esteem by convincing their boyfriends to walk down the aisle.
      —————-
      So whats in it for the boyfriend ? Other than being vulnerable to part with half of his everything taken away by a woman with low self-esteem, in case she wants to hook up with another schmuck she friends on Facebook ?

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • bullcrapbuster
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:15pm

      Womens liberation smoke,booze,easy sex,abortion,stress filled jobs,unsupervised out of control kids,etc etc thanks a lot progressives.

      Report Post » bullcrapbuster  
    • 8jrts
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:19pm

      Dustyluv
      Glad it’s worked out for you, but living together first does work also. When I was 22 my boyfriend moved in with me…. 7 years later we were married. We spent another 18 years together before he passed away. We were very happy. I think it just depends on how hard a couple works on their relationship.

      @avenger Yeah well sometimes the cow likes to test the milking machine before buying, they don’t always work as well as they say they do and who wants to get stuck with a dud.

      Report Post » 8jrts  
    • davisgarvey
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:31pm

      To 8jrts

      Glad it worked for you, point of study was that it doesn’t work for most

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick in AZ
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:40pm

      Bullcrap, they’re unhappy either way :-)

      Report Post » Patrick in AZ  
    • Anti_Spock
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:43pm

      Aw gee… you mean living in an open relationship doesn’t bring happiness? Where have I been all these years.

      Report Post » Anti_Spock  
    • KwikKarl
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:49pm

      Same here Dusty… 1 Corinthians 7:8-9

      Report Post » KwikKarl  
    • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:56pm

      But the study did show Men were happier.

      Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
    • Amica
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 6:59pm

      8JRTS: Regarding your response to avenger (not the rest of your post).
      That’s fine, if the relationship is all about the milking.

      Report Post » Amica  
    • 8jrts
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 7:23pm

      Amica
      The post I replied to was all about the milk…. it was sarcasm!

      davisgarvey
      I guess I don’t think the stats on the story are completely correct. Not by comparison to the couples I’ve known over the years. Of course it doesn’t state ages they surveyed, and I am from an older era where couples don‘t walk out because it’s easier, whether they lived together first or not. I should have been clearer.

      Report Post » 8jrts  
    • Physicist_In_Training
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 7:41pm

      Why is the picture on the main page a picture of the new royal lady in England?

      Report Post » Physicist_In_Training  
    • paperpushermj
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 8:19pm

      Some people are just clueless. Why would the males attitude change. They have all the benefits of marriage without the commitment. It is considered a win win. The ladies need to learn to say no playing house without a ring.

      Report Post » paperpushermj  
    • maumau
      Posted on April 8, 2011 at 8:47pm

      @bullcrapbuster

      Womens liberation smoke,booze,easy sex,abortion,stress filled jobs,unsupervised out of control kids,etc etc thanks a lot progressives.

      nail on the head brother, nail on the head….

      (also selfish and body obsessed…. )

      Report Post » maumau  
    • Cobra Blue
      Posted on April 9, 2011 at 1:10am

      New Flash….and did you really think otherwise.

      Report Post »  
    • WhiteFang
      Posted on April 9, 2011 at 1:40am

      Aaaa, has anyone considered how our God feels about it?

      Report Post » WhiteFang  
    • foobear
      Posted on April 9, 2011 at 5:29am

      @Whitefang: “Aaaa, has anyone considered how our God feels about it?”

      Unmarried couples could shack up for at least a month.

      Not the answer you were expecting, I imagine. But then again, most modern Christians have never actually read what the Bible says about sex, trusting their ministers and priests to give them an unbiased version.

      Deut 21:10-14
      “When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.”

      Report Post » foobear  
    • SassyJenn
      Posted on April 9, 2011 at 7:41pm

      @avenger Why buy the whole pig when all you want is a little sausage?

      Report Post »  
    • independentvoteril
      Posted on April 10, 2011 at 3:31pm

      Hummm.. I am unhappy??? I am the HAPPIEST I have ever been in my life.. Now what??? Am I suppose to suddenly become UNHAPPY to prove their point??

      Report Post » independentvoteril  
    • Legs33
      Posted on April 11, 2011 at 10:34am

      Why buy the cow when you can get the sausage for free?

      Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In