Politics

‘Stupid’: Huntsman Reacts to Pro Ron Paul Ad Painting Him as ‘Manchurian Candidate’

Jon Huntsman Manchurian Candidate Pro Ron Paul Ad

Image source: YouTube

GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman said Friday a new online ad posted by apparent Ron Paul supporters painting him as a “Manchurian candidate” is “stupid” and out of line.

The ad, posted to YouTube by “NHLiberty4Paul,” includes video footage of Huntsman with his daughters – he adopted two girls from China and India — and wonders, “China Jon’s daughters: even adopted?”

Huntsman served as the U.S. ambassador to China under President Barack Obama from 2009 to 2011, when he resigned from his post to explore a Republican bid for president.

The ad features clips of Huntsman speaking Chinese and says, “The Manchurian candidate. What’s he hiding?”

“American values? Or Chinese?” it asks. The video ends with the words, “Vote Ron Paul.”

Asked about the video during a campaign stop in New Hampshire Friday, Huntsman said, “First of all, it’s just stupid.”

“If someone wants to poke fun at me, that’s OK,” Huntsman said, according to the Associated Press. “What I object to is bringing forward pictures and videos of my adopted daughters, and suggesting there is some sinister motive there.”

He said his daughter Gracie, now 12, was abandoned in China when she was two months old and left in a vegetable market.

“She was picked up by the police and sent to an orphanage. No future, nothing to look forward to. Now she’s in my family,” Huntsman said. His daughter Asha, 6, was left to die by the side of a road in India the day she was born.

Paul’s campaign told the Boston Globe it has no connection to the video and does not know who made it.

“We had nothing to do with it and we think it’s completely distasteful,” Paul spokeswoman Kate Schackai told the Globe. “Nobody who actually supports Dr. Paul’s principles would put together something like that.”

Huntsman has put his campaign efforts into New Hampshire, opting to skip Tuesday’s Iowa caucuses in favor of shoring up a base in the Granite State, whose first-in-the-nation primary will be held Tuesday. Huntsman’s campaign has posted several ads attacking Paul, calling him unelectable.

Despite his efforts, the latest poll released Friday from Suffolk University has Huntsman in fifth place at 8 percent among likely Republican primary voters, ahead only of Rick Perry, The Hill reported. Iowa caucus winner Mitt Romney leads at 40 percent, followed by Paul in second place at 17 percent and Rick Santorum at 11 percent. Newt Gingrich is fourth at 9 percent.

Comments (221)

1 2 3 4
  • PJL
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:13pm

    I do not like Huntsman as a presidential candidate, but that is a stupid ad, I’m starting to see that a lot of the Paul followers are way out there. I wrote on a Paul blog that I didn’t think I could vote for Ron and within 20 seconds I had around 28 replys hoping I would Die, be killed by the made up jihadist, that I was uneducated and it went on and on, now those are pretty rabid replies to a non-combative statement I made.

    Report Post » PJL  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:21pm

      Why attack a guy who is polling at 7% or less? Waste of time and money.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • riseandshine
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:29pm

      Gonzo…You’re right, that‘s why the Paul campaign wouldn’t do such a thing.

      Report Post » riseandshine  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:30pm

      I think you’re seeing a level of frustration with Paul supporters,I being one of them that believe the msm has chosen the candidate and the reporting on Paul always puts him in a bad light.Still there’s no justification for death threats,people aren’t going to agree on every issue but we can still be civil.

      I get trashed for supporting Paul all the time so I know what you mean,like I said we just need to be more civil.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Doctor Nordo
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:31pm

      All of the candidates have followers who are way out there, let’s be honest. This is obviously an ad that was not supported by Ron Paul, and I don’t know any Ron Paul supporters who think this “ad” was at all appropriate.

      Report Post » Doctor Nordo  
    • thekuligs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:31pm

      No kidding. And heaven forbid you say you are scared of his forgein policy. I have started having to find more forceful ways to tell them I don’t like the guy.

      Report Post » thekuligs  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:31pm

      LMAO, this wasnt even an official ron paul ad. Yet, theBlaze makes it seem that it was. This ad was funny at best.

      Here is a more serious non-offical ron paul ad about china: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRLi0nSkBMg

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • Abraham Young
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:31pm

      If you‘ve see one Ron Paul supporter you’ve seen them all. I‘ve you’ve seen one Romney supporter, you’ve seen them all. If you’ve seen one Huntsman supporter, you’ve seen them all. If you’ve seen one white man, you’ve seen them all. If you’ve seen one woman, you’ve seen them all. If you’ve seen one Chinese guy, you’ve seen them all.

      If you’ve seen one conservative, you’ve seen them all. If you’ve seen one liberal, you’ve seen them all.

      Report Post »  
    • huh
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:32pm

      That is because all Ron Paul supporters are pot heads and drug addicts. Talking bad about Ron Paul is like talking bad about marijuana and we all know how a drug addict will defend their drug. People who like Ron Paul are no better than the dirty hippies on wall street. They don’t care what else he stands for as long as he will legalize there pot. I guess the ends justifies the means. Dirty Pot Heads

      Report Post »  
    • The_Revolution
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:32pm

      as a paul supporter i agree some are a bit over the top and make the rest of us look bad but i really have to question, if your statement is even true, the fact that all you said was you couldnt vote for him. you added nothing else to your “cant vote for him statement”? i have a hard time believe 30 people immediately told you to die just over a “i cant vote for him” comment.

      Report Post » The_Revolution  
    • The_Revolution
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:52pm

      HUH

      -so the 26,000 iowans that voted for ron paul are all drug addicts? im a huge ron paul supporter and i dont touch drugs. i support him because im an iraq and afghanistan war vet that understands ron pauls foreign policy and completely support it. ron paul himself came out and said he hates drugs but its not the governments job to protect us from ourselves. besides, he said he would leave it at the state level where it belongs, where the constitution puts it. Are you not for the constitution? Ron Paul is. Hes been fighting for it for 30 years and people like you keep electing the status quo. tell me, what difference will any of the other candidates make? how will they improve this country?

      Report Post » The_Revolution  
    • Weiners Wiener
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:57pm

      @The_Revolution — I believe him, because I’ve gotten the same response many times. You tell a Ron Paul supporter you like his fiscal policy but not his foreign policy (which is the sole reason Paul doesn’t have much of a chance), and I’ve gotten HUNDREDS of vicious responses. I said it in 2008 — Ron Paul will NEVER win the presidency, because people now equate the loony words and acts of his followers (not all of them) with Ron Paul, and it makes him seem like less of a serious candidate. Put it this way — I’d probably be giving Ron Paul the time of day right now if his cult member fanatical followers acted like Romney fans or Perry fans, etc. But nooooo… They act just like Obama fans. Criticize Obama, and they call you a racist redneck who hates minorities and poor people. Criticize Paul and they call you phony conservative who hates the Constitution, hates freedom and loves war. It’s so goofy they destroy any chance Paul ever had before he really gets going. And mark my words — that will be his legacy as a presidential candidate. Too bad, really. The man should be able to win or lose on his own merits, not the wackiness of his overzealous fans.

      Report Post »  
    • Anamah
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:05pm

      The nasty thing with Ron Paul is that he seems to have no scruples, can lie and use dirty tricks. It demonstrates poor moral failure. What is worrying is the level of organized bigotry of his followers. I love his commitment toward less spending and bureaucracy and all of this but find him a very dangerous candidate to the presidency.

      Report Post »  
    • Cause4Liberty
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:08pm

      @huh. Your statement is like saying: NeoCons on theBlaze are pill eating, alcoholic, coke-sniffin, wife-beating, dirt bags. Anyone that follows and clings on Glenn Beck’s opinion, as if it were the word of God and Israel, is a hynpotized religious-bigot following a false prophet. They’re no different than the Jim Jones crowd, the Benny Hinn Crowd, or the Jim Baker ‘PTL’ club. Televanleicals who support ushering the end of days. Who lobby and send millions of dollars in support of re-building the temple and preach Armageddon. You know, Pastor Hagee? I‘m a Christian and I’m Pro-Israel; However, I think the real ‘kooky’ ones, are the so-called Christians who actively pursue a end-times holy war. How is that any different than the ‘savage’ jihadists?

      You keep paying for GB’s opinion, while he gets millions from advertising, book selling, and book marketing. Ya know it’s kinda like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QJYjHVgLUI

      And this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lLh7aVEh2o&feature=related

      Btw, Glenn beck was once an alcoholic, pill-eater, and a “Pot head.” H3ll i wouldnt it it past him that he sniffed with white too. Glenn, pat, and Stu are the modern day Three Stooges.

      Report Post » Cause4Liberty  
    • The_Revolution
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:10pm

      well if this really did happen it is sad that fellow ron paul supporters would resort to that. The reason they are not like Romney supporters is simple. Ron Paul sparks an enthusiasm and energy in people that no one else can. theres just no one out there that i see that will change a thing and when you see this status quo behavior year after year you get excited when finally there is a man standing up and finally saying enough. i use to just blindly follow whatever the media put out there and believed the hype and voted for mccain last time but then i heard about and looked into ron paul and actually did it with an open mind and he has completly changed my political views. unfortunately some peoples bad attitudes still exists after hearing his message and act like fools to people who dont agree

      Report Post » The_Revolution  
    • riseandshine
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:12pm

      @Anamah…..Give an example of a lie or a dirty trick from Paul.

      Report Post » riseandshine  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:39pm

      @Weiners Wiener
      Here is Ron Paul’s foreign policy.

      http://www.fff.org/comment/AdamsPolicy.asp

      “Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be.

      But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.

      She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all.

      She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.

      She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.

      She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.

      The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force….

      She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit….

      [America's] glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is, Freedom, Independence, Peace. This has been her Declaration: this has been, as far as her necessary intercourse with the rest of mankind would permit, her practice.”
      John Quincy Adams

      Call that crazy if you like, but I’ll take the founders over the “New World Order”

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • Byzantine_Catholic
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:41pm

      Why DR. Ron Paul is our best bet to beat Obama (more so than Romney)

      We are ALWAYS told that elections are determined by the “independents and moderate”.. Well guess who wins those voters?

      CNN did exit polling in Iowa and found the following (google cnn exit polls Iowa for more info)

      • Ron Paul won the Independent vote by more than 2:1 (43% to 19%) over Romney
      • Ron Paul won the Moderate vote by (40% to 35%) over Romney
      • Ron Paul won the first time voters by (33% to 17%) over Romney
      • For voters who want a “True Conservative” (37% to 1%) over Romney
      • Paul and Romney tied (26% each) for the urban vote – typically strong democratic vote.

      Dont let the Media fool you that Romney is the only one who can beat Obama by “winning the Middle”

      Vote Ron Paul for Liberty

      Report Post » Byzantine_Catholic  
    • prmermen
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:42pm

      ron paul supporters not stupid..looks like a set up..the blaze on the other hand might.besides no one yet has been able to track this person down

      Report Post » prmermen  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:47pm

      NHLiberty4Paul’s account is only 2 days old, and this is the only video that they have posted.

      About NHLiberty4Paul’s channel
      Created by
      NHLiberty4Paul
      Latest Activity
      Jan 4, 2012
      Date Joined
      Jan 4, 2012

      http://www.youtube.com/user/NHLiberty4Paul

      So now Paul is responsible for everyone that uses his name?

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • deac0n
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:52pm

      i remember way back to goldwater when i campained for him then reagan , kids get over zelious do and say things that just are not good too say but that doesnt mean they do not understand who they are supporting. kids today have way much more too loose then i did as a kid. back then we still had a decient economy and could even afford a war now we have very little left. They realise this and are scared.

      Report Post »  
    • evsmom
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:27pm

      I agree with PJL. This was a flat-out horrible ad. It matters not if it was officially affiliated with Ron Paul or not. I also agree with the fact that a lot of Ron Paul supporters are “out there.” I was actually interested in learning a little more about him until I realized he’s the go-to guy for people who think that the sun coming up each morning is a conspiracy. And yes, if you dare to leave comments questioning Ron Paul’s policies on some of the popular posting boards, some of his crazy followers will be all over you like flies on you-know-what, telling you to go spontaneously combust somewhere. Not very classy. Not at all. Just like this anti-Huntsman ad. And no, I’m not a Huntsman supporter either. I actually can‘t believe conservatives don’t have a better candidate to choose from…sad.

      Report Post »  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:44pm

      evsmom
      Did you read any of the post here? Its not Paul”s Add. Scroll up and read a few posts.

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:25pm

      That‘s a lame ad posted against someone that’s not even a threat. No one even knows the poster. Stop getting a panty-wad over nothing.

      A much better Paul approved ad?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Aohgrn1peA&feature=youtu.be

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • TXPilot
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:27pm

      Umm…is it just me, or does this supposed caricature of Huntsman, actually look like a weird morphed pic of a combined Joe Biden and Obama?

      Report Post » TXPilot  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:28pm

      Regardless of what ANYONE says….THIS is MY next President

      http://yfrog.com/g05cadjj

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • STOP AND GO
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:47pm

      As a Paul supporter, I do not appreciate being lumped alongside the Paul supporters who engage in childish behavior towards those who have not fully understood Ron Paul and where he stands on issues. But then again those who are lumping in reasonable Paul supporters with the crazy Paul supporters are behaving a bit childish also.

      I don’t go around in Ron Paul clothes with Ron Paul stickers pasted all over my truck preaching Ron Paul messages to everyone I come across. They are around for sure, and yes the Paulness has gotten to their heads a bit too much! Those Paul supporters are just the ones who stand out among the public.

      So if you find yourself in agreement with Paul more than others, do not be ashamed. You do not have to put his name across everything you own. Just discreetly express your interest in Paul if the subject is brought up, and go ahead and put a vote in for Paul in the upcoming primaries or elections.

      Report Post »  
    • Amica
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:36pm

      I haven’t made a decision yet, but Ron Paul’s supporters are off-putting to me. If you say anything at all against him, their response is that you’re either ignorant, stupid or evil. I know all candidates have their extremist supporters, but it seems that most of Paul’s supporters are extreme.

      He spends a lot of time disavowing supporters ads. The question I have to ask myself is, why does he attract the kind of people he does?

      Report Post » Amica  
    • STOP AND GO
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:52pm

      Amica, I think he gets a lot of support from a lot of people who seem a bit whacked out to others because they want the government to leave them alone! America has a colorful mix of people of different types, like them or not. Ron Paul probably would better allow those people to live freely as long as they are not hurting anyone, but also he would not make it your responsibility to take care of these people you may see as crazy, unless if you voluntarily decide to out of your own wallet.

      Report Post »  
    • Amica
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:34pm

      Stop and Go: I want the government to leave me alone too, but I don’t brand those people who disagree with me as either ignorant, stupid or evil.

      Report Post » Amica  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:51pm

      2 More!
      The same add was posted by NH4MIttRomney @ http://youtu.be/wb1M0bV9dFk
      and NH4Santorum @ http://youtu.be/yJsfCto4S6M
      Nice troll theblaze
      Thanks Fella

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • jmsptrck404
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:33am

      The google analytics from the YouTube video uploaded by the supposed Ron Paul supporters, NHLiberty4Paul, clearly show the video came from someone in the Huntsman campaign. http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/9726/68016587.png
      Notice anything fishy? The first referral is not coming from Ron Paul’s camp, but from jon2012 . com

      Also, why (if this was a Ron Paul ad) is the EXACT same video also tagged with Romney? Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb1M0bV9dFk

      and Santorum?
      Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJsfCto4S6M

      Well… at least the Huntsman camp learned to disable the video statistics for their Romney and Santorum versions, albeit too late.

      This is a joke. The Huntsman camp has some explaining to do.

      Report Post »  
    • KICKILLEGALSOUT
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:45am

      Who is foolish enough to really believe this? This is an obvious fake gotcha piece to tarnish Dr. Paul’s good name. The ad probably came from Romney the flipflop RINO. It’s the same as the supposed Dr. Paul supporters calling Glenn saying they support Bin Laden etc. It’s all fake and a set up by the corrupt media and establishment. I support Dr. Paul and know the truth and this is not it.

      Report Post » KICKILLEGALSOUT  
    • Scottsman
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:48am

      God speed Ron Paul. Real Americans, and your real supports will pull you through!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4

      Report Post »  
    • Stuck_in_CA
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 5:52am

      Not a Paulbot, but this ad looks like a set-up by the Huntsman camp! Here’s a post from http://www.reuters.com/article/comments/idUSTRE80601720120107
      TXNForPaul wrote:
      The facts:
      The account is created the same day the video is uploaded, same day the twitter account is created.
      The twitter account hashtags jon2012gir­ls.
      The YouTube account tags jon2012gir­ls.
      One of the first views is from jon2012.co­m.
      It contains family footage.
      Jon Huntsman said his daughters were going to do it on Piers Morgan a couple days prior.
      See: /watch?v=7­OtYxz1WL6M
      His daughters immediatel­y respond to it.
      Huntsman responds to it.
      The video was posted by the Huntsman camp. Click statistics next to total views on youtube and you’ll see the first hit came from jon2012.com
      Jan 06, 2012 8:03pm EST — Report as abuse

      Report Post » Stuck_in_CA  
    • AlanVT
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:44am

      Ahhh PJL. See, even here you’re not safe from the pseudo-intellectual extremists from among Ron Paul’s supporters. They can indeed be a vitriolic, curious, and confused bunch. Just remember, they’re never wrong, no one else is ever right, and for voicing a reasonable opinion you must be an “anti-constitution, war loving neocon“ falling for the ”MSM’s “narrative”.

      Report Post » AlanVT  
    • SgtB
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 11:54am

      Don’t worry about all the negative Ron Paul supporters. Plenty of his supporters, such as myself, are true Libertarians and many of us are veterans. I myself am a Marine Corps Sergeant. I have adopted cousins from here in the US, from S. Korea, and from Romania. So I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that having an adopted child from a foreign nation does not make you a bad person. Quite the contrary. Did I mention that my cousin from Korea is an active member of the National Guard?

      So don’t fret, not every person supporting Paul is a nutty anarchist with a shallow view of the world. Also, what you should be more worried about is not what Paul supporters think, but what Paul himself believes and has espoused for decades.

      Report Post » SgtB  
    • iuwolf
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:34pm

      http://www.theendrun.com/huntsman-complicit-in-false-flag-style-dirty-trick-against-paul This was produced by the Huntsman people. Check the evidence.

      Report Post »  
    • Paul Revere
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:36pm

      Just so you know Huntsman made the add. He’s playing his establishment role. The revolution has begun and all establishment including, establishment representative for alternative media- Glenn Beck, have been exposed by their efforts to silence very well informed Ron Paul supporters.

      Report Post »  
    • Captain77
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 2:54pm

      Maybe you should be careful about blaming Ron Paul supporters for this one. Fox Reporter Ben Swann brings up so very interesting facts about where this video comes from that no other reporter seems to have minded looking into, sadly including the blaze. He’s on facebook, and you can find where he addresses the issue there.

      Report Post »  
  • GoodStuff
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:02pm

    A kook vs a kook.

    Who cares?

    Report Post »  
    • ShyLow
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:12pm

      another Alinskyite

      Report Post » ShyLow  
    • Naps
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:01pm

      I am urging all Anti-Paul Blaze readers to go to YouTube and watch “Ron Paul Predictions in Due Time”. If you can watch that video? And still not support Dr. Paul? Then my friend,you are part of the problem. A man who can foresee all of these events coming is not a prophet,but a person who has a concrete understaning of what is happening in the world. And a person who can predict problems has a better chance of fixing the problem. For the love of GOD people,stop listening to the talking heads on TV and Radio. This man is trying to save our country,NOT get elected president. No other candidate has the balls to say what this man says! Remember,the truth is not always comforting.
      Ron Paul or none at all!

      Report Post »  
    • spankadonkey
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:56pm

      NAPS – If you think FRAUD Paul is the only one predicting problems ahead then you obviously are very sheltered and tunnel visioned on your savior. Have you missed all the posts that point to the fact that all your boy does is talk. Have you taken a good look at his almost complete failure while in Congress. I think most smart people are looking for a President who can accomplish fixing the country, not a failure who just complains, predicts, and talks but has no track record of accomplishments. Ron FRAUD Paul – what a guy.

      Report Post »  
    • Naps
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:31pm

      SPANKADONKEY…And get Santorum all over yourself. Please Please show me another candidate who has made the amount of accurate predictions that Dr. Paul has. Any other candidate besides Paul will continue these endless wars,and crank up our national debt.But what should you care SPANK? You wont be on the front lines. SHEEP! I can only pray to GOD that our country wakes up and makes Ron Paul our president. Romney,Santorum,and Obama are simply more of the same.
      Ron Paul or America will FALL

      Report Post »  
  • DenDave
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:50pm

    Hey Blaze, this is not an “AD”. By you stating so, implies that it came from the Paul campaign. Your bias is obvious. Maybe it’s time to go back to The Drudge Report. Later, Glen. I won’t miss ya.

    Report Post » DenDave  
    • MeteoricLimbo
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:57pm

      DENDAVE. Did you even read it? This is what I saw: Perhaps a chill pill is in order Sir
      “We had nothing to do with it and we think it’s completely distasteful,” Paul spokeswoman Kate Schackai told the Globe. “Nobody who actually supports Dr. Paul’s principles would put together something like that.”

      Report Post » MeteoricLimbo  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:10pm

      The only reason Huntsman is a candidate is because of his family’s money and his super ego. He inherited $1 billion. That gives him the means ot be whatever he wants to be.

      Report Post »  
    • PJL
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:15pm

      It‘s Glenn 2 n’s you must be a big fan, please!

      Report Post » PJL  
    • DanBrogan
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:35pm

      The title of this article does give the connotation of this being a Ron Paul ad, so many people who do’t take the time to read the article will think less of the person being portrayed within the title.

      Report Post »  
    • MeteoricLimbo
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:45pm

      ad/ad/
      Noun:
      An advertisement.
      Synonyms:
      advertisement – announcement – notice – advertising

      Report Post » MeteoricLimbo  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:54pm

      NHLiberty4Paul’s account is only 2 days old, and this is the only video that they have posted.

      About NHLiberty4Paul’s channel
      Created by
      NHLiberty4Paul
      Latest Activity
      Jan 4, 2012
      Date Joined
      Jan 4, 2012

      http://www.youtube.com/user/NHLiberty4Paul

      So now Paul is responsible for everyone that uses his name? This site is nothing more then Anti-Paul Propaganda

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:38pm

      @POLWATCHER,
      There is no excuse for your post. It ‘s a blatant lie! Got it?! It’s a lie!

      I do not want Jon Huntsman Jr. as my next Presdent Polwatcher. I do not.
      That does not change what a wonderful family the Huntsman’s are.

      Jon Huntsman Sr. grew up in poverty. Got that Idiot…,POVERTY!
      The family is amazing. They are philanthropists. They do good things.

      And guess what Polwatcher ? Guess what? When Jon Huntsman Sr. dies ALL of his money goes to CHARITY…,not his children. And his children made their fortune on their own.

      Just because I would not vote for Huntsman as President does not mean that I do not think that he and his family are not amazing. They have done such good!

      There is no excuse for your post. NONE!

      GOOGLE Jon Huntsman Sr. Idiot Polwatcher. I dare you.

      Perhaps you could learn a few truths before you post you lies!

      B.T.W. Polwatcher….,how many children have you rescued from certain death? UGH!

      Report Post »  
    • Fella
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:00pm

      The same add was posted by NH4MIttRomney @ http://youtu.be/wb1M0bV9dFk

      and NH4Santorum @ http://youtu.be/yJsfCto4S6M

      Nice troll theblaze

      Report Post »  
  • BetterDays
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:50pm

    I’m grateful that Paul has come out against this tasteless ad!
    Personally, I think Huntsman would make a great liberal globalist elite president, but America isn’t the place for him to do so. But to use anyones children in such a manner in ads like this, is child abuse.
    I think the ad may be a provacature ad placed by someone OPPOSED to Ron Paul, to besmirch his name, because that’s how most of the uneducated, unthinking, non questioning sheep will see it. Sadly, there are far too many of that ilk right here at the Blaze, of the NeoCon variety, preceding unending war, good GOD.

    Report Post »  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:59pm

      How many dumb videos are posted about Glenn Beck? Why doesn’t yhe blaze make that an issie? And than call it an “ADD”, which is fasle and misleading. Don’t compain folks when the left does it to us on the right when it has been proven the right is as bad or worse.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • I.Gaspar
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:02pm

      You guys are crazy.
      I am glad that Paul came out against it.
      And as much as I disagree with his defense philosophy and his stand on drugs, I think he is a decent man who truly supports the constitution, and many of his ideas are spot on…
      But it’s his zombie-like followers who are the biggest problem. You don’t allow for any opposition to your beliefs and you will attack anyone who is not a Paul-bot with the usual neo-con bs.
      Step away from the KoolAid pitcher once in awhile and take a look in the mirror….

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:26pm

      @I.Gaspar

      You accuse others of attacks, and then go on an attack of your own?

      Here’s one of the many reasons I back Ron Paul.

      Who is out there fighting to have insanity like this stopped?

      4th amendment…what 4th amendment?

      http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/01/dhs-officers-armed-with-semiautomatics-set-up-unannounced-id-checkpoint/

      Residents of Leesburg, Florida were shocked to see their local Social Security office turned into a random Homeland Security checkpoint Tuesday morning, as DHS officers armed with semiautomatic rifles and accompanied by sniffer dogs checked identifications of locals.

      “With their blue and white SUVs circled around the Main Street office, at least one official was posted on the door with a semiautomatic rifle, randomly checking identifications. And other officers, some with K-9s, sifted through the building,” reports the Daily Commercial.
      ——-

      Where is Romney, Santorum, Huntsman, Newt and Perry? All I hear are crickets.

      The only one willing to condemn this kind of tyranny is Ron Paul.

      Would you vote for someone who refuses to condemn such madness?

      Ron Paul 2012

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
  • OHSundevil
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:50pm

    I don’t know who is worse, the people attacking Paul over this, or the Blaze for posting absolute crap that is not sponsored by Ron Paul’s campaign…go look at YouTube, there are literally hundreds of videos created by utter idiots. Why choose this one?

    Report Post » OHSundevil  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:57pm

      This one was chosen because the last thing the establishment wants is someone who will not bow down to the “New World Order”.

      And the sheeple say Bbaaaahhhhhh!

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:02pm

      So your videos are there too?

      Report Post »  
    • OHSundevil
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:36pm

      Betterdays, Yes the videos of me and your mom can be found on YouTube…

      Report Post » OHSundevil  
  • Scalzo
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:49pm

    I love that Huntsman represents the Republicans best chance to beat Obama, and they disregard him out of hand just because he was Obama’s ambassador to China. And that he believes in science. Hell, I‘d even consider voting for him and I’m an Obama supporter. So you need to ask yourselves, Do you want a conservative president who happens to believe in evolution? Or 4 more years of Obama?

    (btw, believing in evolution doesn‘t negate god’s existence)

    Report Post » Scalzo  
    • Naps
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:48pm

      I want Ron Paul as President!

      Report Post »  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:16pm

      Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate from any party that has VERY strong positions that are attractive to Dems and Repubs AND Libertarians and Constitutionalists.

      It’s not his “Defense” policies that people seem to not like, it’s his ANTI-Aggression policy of not attacking countries that are not attacking us. Defense is great, Ron wants the coolest weapons and best army, he just doesn’t want to use them to mow down one sect of Islamists in support of a second set of them…

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
  • JackieWalker
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:45pm

    15. Cut Pentagon civilian workforce $105 b.
    16. Reform Military Pay and Health Care $115 b.
    17. Reform DoD Maintenance and Supply Systems $13 b.
    18. Reduce RDT&E $70 b.
    19. Obtain Add’l Savings in Command, Support, and Infrastructure $100 b.
    Total $1,111 b.
    * This set of options was developed by Benjamin Friedman and Christopher Preble of the Cato
    Institute.

    Now I am not a defense knowable person and could not say wither or not these cuts would be a bad thing. I would imagine most people can not either. I am willing to bet most of this is outdated and needs to be cut, you know part of that gov’t waste we all ways here about. Would welcome someone who is knowable to comment if this is the cause or not.

    Lastly note that…* This set of options was developed by Benjamin Friedman and Christopher Preble of the Cato
    Institute.

    The Cato Institute, that correct me if I am wrong, is not connected to Soros. Do you think that Mr.Friedman and Mr.Preble were two of Ron Paul’s picks for this task force?

    Report Post »  
  • Locked
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:45pm

    Shame on these supporters taking digs at the man’s family. I support Ron Paul, but sometimes his fervent followers just go too far. This ad is in terrible taste and does NOT reflect how most of us feel about Santorum (I think he’s been perfectly open about wanting large government and authorities controlling your behavior in your personal life; he’d be the worst Manchurian candidate ever).

    At the same time, I wonder how Santorum’s daughter feels when her father is discussing with a national audience how she was unloved and left in a vegetable market, or the other was “left to die on the side of a road.” The people I know who were adopted often already have a lot of issues reconciling their birth parents without having to have the world know their issues or their father candidly speak about such crushing private information.

    I feel he’s exploiting his children to an extent, but I guess every politician does it. Still don‘t think it’s right.

    Report Post »  
    • Norm D. Plume
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:59pm

      HUNTSMAN, not Santorum.

      Huntsman is not frothy.

      Report Post » Norm D. Plume  
    • rotcarpenter
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:00pm

      You have Rick Santorum on the brain because this article is about Jon Huntsman. Yet, for some reason, you’re talking about Rick. I think this proves the point that Paulbots are exactly that.. Robots. You can‘t even tell the difference between two different people yet you’re only response is to attack rivals of Ron Paul.

      Santorum is the ‘rival’ to Dr. Muslims aren’t real for the time being so it makes sense you direct your nonsense toward him instead of Jon Huntsman. Can’t wait until Ron Paul is gone. Not for the man but for his looney followers. Its a shame because I’d have more respect for him if he tell his followers to stop acting like the losers that elected Obama and stop treating him like a Demi-God. He must love having his devoted minions though.

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:08pm

      Ah, my bad, yes :) Came from the other article on Santorum

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:13pm

      Actually, realizing it’s Huntsman is even more saddening. He was my preferred candidate after Paul. The reason for thinking Santorum (besides not realizing that Huntsman was still in the race at this point) was due to all the article about him bringing home his dead child on The Blaze recently.

      Report Post »  
    • rotcarpenter
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:17pm

      And that frothy comment. You think its appropriate to account that to him when a sadistic liberal homosexual launched a campaign against Santorum for his belief against gay marriage. How is using a sickening sexual term for a man’s name proving anything in the political stage?

      No surprise it comes from a Paulbot.

      Paulbots = Obama Zombies. New Man. Same people.

      Report Post »  
  • JackieWalker
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:45pm

    So there are 4 congressmen that formed this Task Force of 14 members. Seems to me that it would take along time for all 4 men to agree on every task force member. That it would be a lot easier for each man to pick 3-4 task force members. Per Beck 11 of the 14 were connected to Mr.Soros. That leaves 3 there were not connect to Mr.Soros. Do you think Ron Paul picked the 3 there were not connected to Soros. I DO! I have no why of proofing this, however Beck has no way of proving Ron Paul supported every member of the task force and every recommendation. As for those recommendations here they are….

    Table 4. Defense Reductions Associated with Restraint Strategy*
    Strategic Capabilities
    1. Nuclear arsenal (warheads) $100 b.
    Ground Forces
    2. Reduce the size of the Army $220 b.
    3. Reduce the size of the Marine Corps $67 b.
    Navy and Air Force
    4. Build/operate fewer aircraft carriers and associated air wings $43 b.
    5. Operate fewer ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) $4 b.
    6. Build/operate fewer tactical submarines (SSNs/SSGNs) $34 b.
    7. Build/operate fewer destroyers $28 b.
    8. Build/operate fewer littoral combat ships $11 b.
    9. Reduce the number of expeditionary strike groups $9 b.
    10. Cancel the Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future) $17 b.
    11. Build/operate fewer Air Force fighters $89 b.
    Other Reforms, Procurement and RDT&E
    12. Cancel Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle $11 b.
    13. Terminate V-22 Osprey $15 b.
    14. Realign Missile Defense Program

    Report Post »  
  • The_Revolution
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:45pm

    Seriously, this site is out of control trying to find everything it can to bash Ron Paul. Every article they are trying to twist what he says or like this, take some random lone supporter that has nothing to do with his campaign and try to make it look like ron paul himself ordered it. Beck agrees with ron paul execpt on foreign policy and he is even coming around to that and his website is doing everything in there power to discredit the one man that is bringing real change to the table.

    Report Post » The_Revolution  
    • THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:53pm

      If people are honest it’s like tonya harding when she kneecapped nancy kerrigan, the only difference is that it it the MSM trying to kneecap Ron Paul with this kind of twisted reporting. There are over 300 million people in the U.S that could have done this, In fact for all we know some loser reporter could have done it himself to get himself a “story” to report on.

      Report Post » THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE  
    • The_Revolution
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:28pm

      its just sad. ron paul is the only person proposing real change. i dont see how anyone thinks any other candidate will change anything significantly. everyone keeps electing the same types of candidates but expecting different results

      Report Post » The_Revolution  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:35pm

      @THE_REVOLUTION I agree,and Paul is the only constitutional conservative running the rest are progressives,Mitt with his fondness for socialized medicine and Rick with his 2nd amendment issues.Paul is the only candidate talking about slashing 1 trillion from the budget and eliminating five unconstitutional departments.These so called ‘conservatives’ will simply vote for the progressive who gets the nomination,probably RINO I mean Romney.The ‘conservatives’ will vote for Romney because he‘s taller than Rick and looks ’presidential’. Concerns about the deficit and the death of the republic,you know trivial stuff like that that’s not an issue,no we‘ll have a tall president who’ll continue the destruction of the republic but he’ll look presidential doing it.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:59pm

      NHLiberty4Paul’s account is only 2 days old, and this is the only video that they have posted.

      About NHLiberty4Paul’s channel
      Created by
      NHLiberty4Paul
      Latest Activity
      Jan 4, 2012
      Date Joined
      Jan 4, 2012

      http://www.youtube.com/user/NHLiberty4Paul

      So now Paul is responsible for everyone that uses his name? Good Investigative Journalism, “nnelG” and The “ezalB”

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • JackieWalker
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:44pm

    Not directly related to this ad but needed to post.
    Travis Foster- this is what i have come up with….glenn beck says ron paul is “purposing” the sustainable defense task force, speaking of this task force as in future tense, as in when (not if) Ron Paul is POTUS. when the truth is this task force has already taken place and should be spoken about in past tense. why does beck speck this way? so his viewers will not vote for Dr.Paul.

    this task force took place in 2010 and the final report came out on June 11, 2010. beck failed to say this and this is well…

    The Sustainable Defense Task Force was formed in response to
    a request from Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), working
    in cooperation with Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC),
    Representative Ron Paul (R-TX), and Senator Ron Wyden
    (D-OR), to explore possible defense budget contributions to
    deficit reduction efforts that would not compromise the essential
    security of the United States.

    and…

    A sub-committee of
    the Task Force reviewed the final draft before publication.
    It should not be assumed that all Task Force members endorse
    all items and sections of the report.

    Turns out its not just Barney Frank and Ron Paul involved, it is was also Rep. Walter B. Jones and Senator Ron Wyden. Question Beck, are Mr. Jones and Mr.Wyden also really bad people? or just Mr.Frank and Mr.Paul?

    Continued in next comment:

    Report Post »  
  • Rational Man
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:42pm

    The Paulistinians are their own worst enemy in this campaign.
    There are not enough ugly Americans to get Paul the nomination

    Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:55pm

      Right back to your silly ad hominem attacks eh?

      Now…next time your beloved heroes at the TSA strip search your children, your spouse, and your grandmother…don’t forget to salute them and give them your thanks.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • ShyLow
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:10pm

      Ron Paul supporters only seem like a-holes because they have to beat down Saul Alinsky attacks by people who claim to support the constitution but their record says otherwise…Who ever puts out garbage in his name sure isn‘t helping him and leads me to beleive it’s some Alinskyite doing what they do best…name calling is all the anti Paul crowd seem to know how to do…Ron Paul is the only true conservitive by his actions…and the only true Christian by his actions…Jesus has the hard Job of bringing peace to the world…and that Job is much harder when so called Christians want to oppress and bully through sanctions or bomb in Jesus name…if you are not working with Christ you are working against Christ…against means anti…please don’t work against Christ…Fight the good Fight

      Report Post » ShyLow  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:17pm

      There are not enough ugly Americans to get Paul the nomination

      But there may be enough to nominate a progressive to go against the Marxist,what a great choice we’ll have irrational man.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:57pm

      @ShyLow

      The main reason I will not vote for Paul is because I am a Christian.
      Any Christian that votes for Paul is simply stupid.
      Throwing society and individuals under the bus in the name of “individual liberties” is stupid and national suicide.

      Of coarse there are several other reasons Paul stinks on ice too!……………….

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:07pm

      @ShyLow

      BTW, Your stupid little cult leader AIN’T CHRIST!!!!!!!
      The fact that you cult freaks try to proseltize in the name of Christ is even more reason to despise your cult. I have finally come to the conclusion that I would not vote for Paul if he won the nomination. I would just stay home. My conscience, guided by the Holy Spirit, will not allow it.
      But thankfully, It won’t have to come to that because Paul will most surely lose……AGAIN!!

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:17pm

      @Rational Man

      What kind of Christian would vote for a candidate who refuses to condemn the “New World Order”?

      What kind of Christian would vote for a candidate that would allow the TSA to molest their children and their spouse?

      What kind of Christian would vote for a candidate who refuses to condemn the NDAA that allows for your arrest with no charges, no jury, no witnesses, and no release date?

      What kind of Christian would vote for a candidate who demands Israel follow their commands?

      You just don’t get it…do you irrational man…

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • Columbobear
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:12pm

      @Rational Man
      You need to check your facts buddy. You’ve got the whole thing backwards. But your probably watch and read and believe everything in the main stream media without even bothering to fact check. Sadly this is the case for most Americans. The real problem I believe the Ron Paul Campaign is facing is that most voters dont educate themselves on who they are voting for. Granted its because most of us are to busy to actually do the research. Lastly a person who just calls people names and insults anyone with a different opinion is neither a true christian nor a true American! So do some soul searching friend. Read the bible. Then do some research and you’ll see the light. …if you don’t… well we’ll just end up with another Socialist President… and this country will be destroyed by Obama Care.

      Report Post »  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:26pm

      irrational man likes the cult of Mormon, which actually IS a cult. One man’s kool-aid is another mans toilet water.

      The problem is that overly christian, evangelical types don’t really want “Freedom”. They want their own type of forced society and to label it freedom.

      And also, that ‘ad’ was great. Huntsman is a double speaking tool that himself put out ADS about Ron and the Twilight Zone, so he ought to quit his crying. Fact is, Ron Paul is a much nicer human being than he is and wouldn’t put out such an AD himself while Huntsman would and did.

      Republicans won‘t win in 2012 and the reason is that most Republicans aren’t truly conservative anymore and are War Mongering egomaniacs. We gotta stop attacking people, folks. We are broke broke broke. Until we Republicans are ready to face up to this reality and stop killing people in other countries for our supposed political beliefs, then why bother having elections at all? Just submit to your leader and give up.

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
  • Vegasdad702
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:39pm

    Ron Paul is himself blasting this ad. It is very disrespectful. We must be kind and not fall into these traps. Today on Glenn Becks radio program he outlined that we do congressman paul a great disservice anytime we call names or become angry and disrespectful. Please fellow Ron Paul supporters lets all expand the freedom message by being kind, and intelligent. Please don’t fall into the name calling game, or we just inspire more nicknames like “paulbots” and so on. We must rise above ANY and ALL hateful speech, tricks, or ignorance. Bring others to or side with love. We after all have truth and the constitution on our side. Thank you friends.

    Report Post »  
    • JRook
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:46pm

      Interesting but I bet most of the individuals here don’t mind when Rush refers to the administration as the “Regime”. LOL it is amazing how people indict themselves through their blatant hypocrisy.

      Report Post »  
    • Kaoscontrol
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:51pm

      Amen! You sound so different than many Paul supporters. Thank you!

      Report Post » Kaoscontrol  
    • Vegasdad702
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:58pm

      @Jrook, well friend im not Rush, and you would be hard pressed to find me saying anything negative about anyone on here. I care about you and everyone else, even when I don’t agree with them. There is no reason to be caught up in hate or ignorance. What purpose does it serve? We must be the change we wish to see in the world. Trust me my friend, if a man like me can see the light and find my way to a more reasonable, peaceful means of making my point then anyone can. :)

      Report Post »  
  • momrules
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:38pm

    I don’t like Huntsman at all but this was a tacky, tacky video.

    I am not a Ron Paul supporter but I’ve read their comments here and on other sites as well and can easily see some of them thinking this was a good idea.

    Report Post »  
  • sam b for liberty
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:35pm

    seriously of the 8 comments that were made I cant believe that some of you would even think ron paul would put this ad up with out doing any research to look the ad up on you tube and see it was one person.
    I bet I could find a whole bunch of stuff on youtube that bashed ron paul by diffrent gop supporters. wake up another example of bad media

    Report Post »  
  • thekuligs
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:34pm

    So I wonder how hard it would be to dig up dirt on who posted the video. I wish I had a bit more spare time today because I doubt it would be hard.

    Report Post » thekuligs  
    • sam b for liberty
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:37pm

      If you look it up on youtube there are comments underneath it were someone did look into it…and when it was created and stuff

      Report Post »  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:01pm

      Not hard at all. NHLiberty4Paul’s account is only 2 days old, and this is the only video that they have posted.

      About NHLiberty4Paul’s channel
      Created by
      NHLiberty4Paul
      Latest Activity
      Jan 4, 2012
      Date Joined
      Jan 4, 2012

      http://www.youtube.com/user/NHLiberty4Paul

      So now Paul is responsible for everyone that uses his name?

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:32pm

    Let the backstabbing continue.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
  • sam b for liberty
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:31pm

    I knew that this dumb story would be front and center on the blaze!!!! THis was made by ONE PERSON on you tube!!!!! THis is only news to try to slam ron paul. It was not a group it was not an organization it was one dumb person!!!! So much for journalism…..I herd Megan Kelly say it was a RON PAUL group…….dumb dumb dumb

    Report Post »  
  • uisignorant
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:29pm

    Why are people surprised? Paulbearers are fearful of outsiders….

    Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:35pm

      Paul’s campaign said they had nothing to do with it — so why bash Ron Paul?

      I can post dozens of DUMB You Tube videos made by other supporters that are even more stupid.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:36pm

      ….Come to think of it, remember the Blaze posting the “crying book girl” only to have to change the article three times — before finding out the video was a FAKE made by a Rick Perry supporter?

      Report Post »  
    • uisignorant
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:57pm

      I did not bash Ron Paul, I bashed his followers.

      Report Post »  
    • Norm D. Plume
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:03pm

      However,

      +1 Paulbearers.

      Hadn’t seen that one before.

      Report Post » Norm D. Plume  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:10pm

      @UISIGNORANT, Nah man. “Paul bearers” are quite open. Join us for the revolution. We like apple pie and freedom! You know you want to.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • uisignorant
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:20pm

      JustAngry,
      I can not accept his isolationist views of the world.

      Report Post »  
    • riseandshine
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:40pm

      @UIS….Isolationist…lol….U is ignorant.

      Report Post » riseandshine  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:43pm

      I‘d argue there’s a difference between non-interventionist and isolationist foreign policy, but that would be beating a dead horse. That debate isn’t going anywhere with both sides so entrenched. I will say, that there’s no country that can project the power necessary to invade this country at this point in time. That could very well change if we collapse economically. We’ll be ok without a war for 4 years. Try it, you might actually like the prosperity.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • uisignorant
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:55pm

      JustAngry,
      I agree, warless for 4 years would be a great thing. A nuclear Iran would not.

      Report Post »  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:39pm

      Man, I know the thought of Iran having nukes sucks ass, but there’s nothing realistically we can do about it. We can‘t become so paranoid that we don’t enjoy our lives. Worse, so paranoid we let corrupt politicians take away our liberties to “protect” us. I don‘t want to live that way and I REALLY don’t want my daughter to have to live that way either. Oh and did I mention that it’s REALLY good apple pie? …Ice cream topping!

      Report Post » justangry  
    • Veritas Libertas
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:49pm

      @Just & Uis: I tend to agree with both of you, and appreciate such civil discourse. I would point out a convergence in the peace and nonintervention ideas, namely our southern border with Mexico. Like you, Uis, I can see a tremendous threat in radical Islam, and like you, Just, I agree with a noninterventionist defense policy. We need our boys back in America and ready to repel attacks from the south. Hezbollah has camps in Chave’s Venezuala who have connections to the Mexican cartels. Remember we have been covertly supplying at least one of those cartels with arms via Fast & Furious. Drugs and terrorists in Afghanistan, drugs and terrorists in Mexico. They are closing in as we waste men and money in support of our own demise.

      Our current administration’s course (aided by infighting like we do here) is to pit us against one another and make us distrustful of Americans while turning a blind eye from very real threats to our true national security here in America. When SPTs and govbots stir the pot of dissent their goal is to turn those who should be allied in defense of liberty into enemies. Classic divide and conquer strategy, and it’s being masterfully orchestrated.

      Kudos to both of you and to all others who can see through the ruse.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:30pm

      You can take the +1 back — they copied it from Tron — unless Tron has multiple screen names here.

      Report Post »  
  • riseandshine
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:26pm

    I doubt this ad was from the Paul campaign……we’ll see.

    riseandshine  
  • justangry
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:21pm

    Wow, I’m a Ron Paul supporter, and found it distasteful. I can’t see this kind of add doing any good for the constitutionalist cause I hope the good doctor puts a lid on this as it only serves to discredit him further. The tweet was kind of funny though.

    Report Post » justangry  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:26pm

      I could not agree more. I’m no fan of Huntsman, but this was certainly way out of line.

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • JLGunner
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:31pm

      Get real ANGRY. If Ron Paul saw all the filth and garbage just on THIS site from his faithful following, he would just say “oh those crazy kids.”

      Report Post » JLGunner  
    • MeteoricLimbo
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:34pm

      @JUSTANGRY
      My friend I know exactly how you feel. I agree with Dr. Paul on so many topics then all of the sudden, blammo,I get that deer in the headlights look. Still a long ways to go…

      Report Post » MeteoricLimbo  
    • ShyLow
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:26pm

      Who are you people foolin with this“I was a Ron Paul supporter tactical nonsence”?…

      Report Post » ShyLow  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:30pm

      JUSTANGRY,
      Just read some of the vile posts here from people who say they are supporting Ron Paul. Does it not seem odd to you?
      The group responsible for the “Manchurian Candidate” Huntsman ad bill themselves as New Hampshire Liberty 4 Ron Paul”.
      Yet…,the ad is so vicious and hurtful to the Huntsman family, especially those two precious adopted children, it does not fit the typical M.O. of a “PAUL BOT” group.

      Ask yourself…,what group of people could be that mean, that unfeeling , and most importantly.., have the MONEY to place that ad?

      I think it is Dem PROGRESSIVES doing it with the blessings of the DNC!

      Is the group Soros funded? I do not know.

      What I DO know is …,everyone here in high dudgeon for whatever reason, are doing EXACTLY what the group “New Hampshire Liberty 4 Ron Paul” wanted them to do.

      GOOGLE, research, learn! What is “Operation Chaos”?

      President Dunham and his minions want 4 more years. Don’t help them. Fight them!

      Vox Populi Vox Dei! We are awake!

      Report Post »  
  • FF5_Latingirl
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:20pm

    I’m a fervent Ron Paul supporter. Paul and his campaign would NEVER do such a thing!

    Report Post »  
    • uisignorant
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:33pm

      LOL HAHAHAHAHAHHAAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHHAAAA……. Let me wipe away that tear!

      Report Post »  
  • SimpleTruths
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:13pm

    In a sane world, Huntsman would be the most likely to actually win against Obama. But sanity went out the window when McCain chose Palin as a running mate. Sorry GOP, you lose.

    Report Post » SimpleTruths  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:24pm

      If anyone other than Ron Paul wins…we ALL lose.

      Who else is out there pointing out the fact that warrantless searches such as those in the Patriot Act are unconstitutional?

      Who else is demanding an end to the TSA’s strip searches, that violate our spouses and our children?

      Who else is warning us about the NDAA that allows for YOUR arrest with no charges, no witnesses, no jury, and no release date?

      WAKE UP!

      Who else is trying to dismantle the “New World Order”?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • jriv88
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:27pm

      all the liberals love huntsman because guess what, he is one…he WORKED for Obama RECENTLY…please simpletruths go back home to the politico message boards where you belong

      Report Post »  
    • louise
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:28pm

      Asked about the video during a campaign stop in New Hampshire Friday, Huntsman said, “First of all, it’s just stupid.”

      LOL…like the one of your daughters channeling Justin Timberlake’s song “I’m bringing Sexy Back” to different words…..or whatever the name of that song was.

      Report Post » louise  
    • SimpleTruths
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:38pm

      @JRIV88
      First of all, I don‘t ’belong’ anywhere, and I certain don’t need you to tell me where. Second, Huntsman is probably further away from being a liberal than any of the crop of candidates out there. His record demonstrates that if you’d take time to review it. My point is simply that the signal to noise level within the Republican field is incredibly bad, it’s the only reason I can think of that explains why Huntsman is so easily dismissed.

      Report Post » SimpleTruths  
    • SimpleTruths
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:45pm

      @JRIV88
      So in your view, anyone that works for the administration, or even is seen with Obama disqualifies them? How narrow minded are you?

      Report Post » SimpleTruths  
  • GETLIFE
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:08pm

    Sounds familiar:
    I don’t know who wrote those racist comments.
    I don’t know who is responsible for that video.

    Report Post » GETLIFE  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:16pm

      You are desperate.

      http://www.buzzfeed.com/ccbaxter/22-facts-that-dont-jibe-with-ron-paul-being-a-rac-41xp

      “Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans only as members of groups and never as individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike; as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. Their intense focus on race is inherently racist, because it views individuals only as members of racial groups.

      Conservatives and libertarians should fight back and challenge the myth that collectivist liberals care more about racism. Modern liberalism, however, well-intentioned, is a byproduct of the same collectivist thinking that characterizes racism. The continued insistence on group thinking only inflames racial tensions.
      The true antidote to racism is liberty. Liberty means having a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims….

      This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Rather than looking to government to correct what is essentially a sin of the heart, we should understand that reducing racism requires a shift from group thinking to an emphasis on individualism.”

      Ron Paul 2012

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • JLGunner
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:27pm

      Sounds abouit right GETLIFE. Ron Paul is the “look the other way” candidate.

      Report Post » JLGunner  
    • uisignorant
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:31pm

      Sure in 2012…. What about 1992???

      Report Post »  
    • Freedomluver
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:41pm

      @UISIGNORANT

      http://www.buzzfeed.com/ccbaxter/22-facts-that-dont-jibe-with-ron-paul-being-a-rac-41xp

      “After 200 years, the constitutional protection of the right of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is virtually gone. Today’s current terminology describing rights reflects this sad change. It is commonplace for politicians and those desiring special privileges to refer to: black rights, Hispanic rights, handicap rights, employee rights, student rights, minority rights, women’s rights, gay rights, children’s rights, student rights, Asian-American rights, Jewish rights, AIDS victims’ rights, poverty rights, homeless rights, etc. Unless all the terms are dropped & we recognize that only an individual has rights, the solution to the mess in which we find ourselves will not be found. The longer we lack of definition of rights, the worse the economic and social problems will be.”
      Ron Paul
      Year:1987

      Is that good enough?

      Report Post » Freedomluver  
    • recoveringneocon
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:22pm

      GETLIFE
      NHLiberty4Paul’s account is only 2 days old, and this is the only video that they have posted.

      About NHLiberty4Paul’s channel
      Created by
      NHLiberty4Paul
      Latest Activity
      Jan 4, 2012
      Date Joined
      Jan 4, 2012

      http://www.youtube.com/user/NHLiberty4Paul

      So now Paul is responsible for everyone that uses his name?

      Report Post » recoveringneocon  
    • Fella
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:06pm

      When will the media be asking Rick to comment on the add.

      http://youtu.be/yJsfCto4S6M

      Getlife, get a damn brain.

      Report Post »  
  • FREDD The WILSON
    Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:07pm

    How much more time and money is pretty boy gonna waste by staying in an primary he can’t even place 3rd in?

    Report Post » FREDD The WILSON  
    • gramma b
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:19pm

      He is so jealous of Romney he can’t even see straight. He is in this race to hurt Romney, nothing more. He has hated Romney since Romney got the Olympics job. Little Jonny wanted it. He thought if he just sat there smirking prettily, it would be bestowed on him, just like everything else in his life has been bestowed on him. When he didn’t get it, he started stomping his feet and pouting.

      Despite both being Mormon, Huntsman and Romney are very different. Romney got advanced degrees in business and law from Harvard. After Huntsman dropped out of high school, his daddy got him into Wharton. I think he graduated. Not sure. But I don‘t think it’s a coincidence that there is now a building bearing Daddy’s name at Wharton. Romney succeeded wildly in business on his own merits. Huntsman‘s only business experience is in Daddy’s company. Romney has been faithful to his religion his whole life. Jonny, on the other hand, looks down on the faithful Mormons who voted him into office as stupid, parochial rubes. He can’t distance himself fast enough. Romney’s kids always behave in a classy manner. Huntsman’s . . . . well. Huntsman has ridden his daddy’s coattails his entire life. Yet, for some reason, he considers himself smarter and better than almost everyone.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love