Swanky Deluxe: Get a Load of Some of These Homes Where President Obama Has Held Fundraisers
- Posted on April 15, 2012 at 9:45pm by
Becket Adams
- Print »
- Email »
Now nobody should begrudge these homeowners for their wealth or lifestyles. Most, if not all, have earned the right to live in such spacious and beautiful homes.
At the home of Harvey Weinstein, the president raised $1.7M
The whole thing just seems a little odd considering the fact that the president and his re-election team are trying their best to position him as a “warrior for the middle class.” Now we don’t know about you, but when we think “middle class” (i.e. our childhoods), we don’t remember having eight bathrooms or hurricane-proof wine cellars.
But, again, that’s fine; no one begrudges Don and Katrina Peebles for their $7.49 million home. It’s their right.
The president has traveled the country giving speech after speech about how “millionaires and billionaires” don’t pay their fair share and that they don’t play by the rules.
At the home of Costco co-founder Jeff Brotman, the president raised $1.16M
Isn’t that speech just the slightest bit uncomfortable when delivered in, say, Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein’s $15 million home?
Watch Bloomberg’s Hans Nichols report on some of the president’s fundraiser’s ultra-swanky homes (via Bloomberg):
“This year, Obama has attended a series of fundraisers at high-profile donors’ homes, including NBA all-star Vince Carter and director Tyler Perry,” the Washington Free Beacon reports.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (67)
hogtrashhd
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 6:04ambelieve me.. these millionaires aren’t going to pay more in taxes.. that’s just pablum for the unwashed.. the ignorant non-producer people think they’re going to somehow take away from the wealthy and obama is just going to hand it over to them.. they believe that garbage.. no it ain’t gonna happen.. they will continue soaking the regular working joe’s to give to the welfare queen and kings..
Report Post »pastorcop12
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:48pmAnd WHO is the party of the rich??
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 2:47pmI cant wait for the debates … so much vetting on Obama this time around
get your popcorn ready its gonna be fun!
Report Post »lillymckim
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 2:49pmYes, Obama thinks we should be offended by Romneys’ wealth a self made man who EARNED his money and not with the trillions Obama has spent in 3 1/2 short years of our children’s money?
Report Post »db321
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 3:49pmThat goofy looking reporter failed to mention how much America paid for Obama to go to all of these fund raiser on our dime!
The liberal media know something that we don’t – I don’t think I have ever seen as much suck up by the press in my life time. Am I missing something!
Report Post »TheBurningTruth
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 5:50amYou guys don’t get it. Take the really filthy rich that Barry is sucking up to. Say someone with 50 million in assets, and maybe a million in income vs. a middle class person with maybe half-a-million in assets (includes house and everything) and maybe 100K in income. Now do the math:
Confiscate 90% of the assets and tax all of the income at 50%. Mr. Gotbux still has $5million in assets and $500k in income while Mr. Middleclass has $10K in assets and $50k in income. Mr. Middleclass is wiped out while Mr. Gotbux is still riding high.
It’s about pushing the upwardly mobile people middle class that can now afford to do whatever they want back down into poverty. For the filthy rich, after they can afford anything they want, the extra money doesn’t mean that much. Then its more important for them to prevent anyone else from joing their club. If they lost 90% of everything and we lost 90% of everything, we’re in poverty and their relative wealth is even greater.
Of course, that won’t stop the filthy rich from buying all the taxbreaks they can get through congress, but that‘s why they don’t seem to care about higher taxes. It hurts us far more than it hurts them.
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:37pmExactly, they are trying to prevent challenges. Old wealth always tries to keep out new wealth. This is just another way to do it.
Report Post »Arc
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 3:25amYep, the best Presidency money can buy. When are we gonna get our money’s worth.?
Report Post »lassiegirldawn
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:52amThis must have been some trip, here is hillary dancing the night away, guess all ss was upstairs with the ladies.
Report Post »http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/hillary-clinton-dances-the-night-away-in-colombia/
lassiegirldawn
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:50amObama in Colombia: ‘Part of My Job Is to Scout Out Where I May Want to Bring Michelle Back Later for Vacation’
Report Post »http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-colombia-part-my-job-scout-out-where-i-may-want-bring-michelle-back-later
VanceUppercut
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:44pm(stats taken from August 2011)
“At this point in his term, compared to other presidents, Obama has had 61 vacation days. Reagan had 121, Bush 200.”
You don’t get to create your own truth. Sorry.
Report Post »ITGuy
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 3:40pmBush and Reagan spent the majority at their own homes dill hole while Obama and his wife spend millions of our money trotting around the world in luxury. Suck on that truth.
Report Post »paperpushermj
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:19amWith all Politicians listen not to their words but what they Do
Report Post »lassiegirldawn
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 12:22amThis is a good explanation of our presidents religion
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w&feature=player_embedded
Stoic one
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 4:30pmThank You that is a very good explanation.
Report Post »Goldenyears22
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 12:19amOh my, seems to speak with a forked tongue. Or do some rich get exempt if they give to his campaign. Just wondering.
Report Post »RestoreCapitalism
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:57pmWell, so much for Tyler Perry espousing traditional values in his movies. If your Christian faith doesn’t affect your vote, maybe it isn’t really Christian at all.
Report Post »Mr.Fitnah
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:50pmYou can take the thug out of the ghetto but you can never take the ghetto out of the thug..
Report Post »mauijonny
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 3:14amAlthough he wasn’t born in a physical ghetto (as grandmommy was VP of Bank of Hawaii and mommy raked in 82K a year), he was certainly born in an intellectual ghetto – much like you. Now, go change your huffnpuff/mommy’s basement underwear – I can smell them from here.
Report Post »DesdemonasCrew
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:40pmThey are buying their elitist status now before the slots are all taken.
Report Post »65Mustang
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:59pmSupporting Obama and his future communist regime will not allow them to buy their way out of hell.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:28pmAll too true, or whatever band of radicals survives to dominate after Obama is finished.
Report Post »marine249
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:57pmHey Blaze slow news day. I tried to post a comment on Fri. last
Report Post »when you 1st put this up.
South Philly Boy
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:55pmAnd DemonCrats complain the GOP is for the RICH… BULL
Report Post »Tired of Code Names
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:44pmSimple questions. Why do the rich elite support Obama? What is their goal? Why would they support being taxed more with the buffet rule? How come they have the ability to pay more in taxes and yet, they legislate every tax loophole to get around paying those taxes? The big question is this. Why does’nt John Boehner point that out? Even bigger question. Suppose some lawmaker were to tax the rich elite 90%. Would it make a dent in the deficit? Is the deficit a real thing or just a media talking point? What about what’s going on in Europe? Go figure.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:55pmDear Code
See answer to your question below:
It’s called “being obsequious”. They all hope if they’re nice to him and give him money, he’ll be “nice” to them and let them keep their money. Get it?
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:29pmIt’s not just about loopholes. They will invest their money in companies that suddenly get subsidized by or contracts from the government or they own the company that wins these contracts and subsidies. Or they create legislation that stifles competition. They also buy their way or their families way into posh bureaucratic positions.
Report Post »What this country needs most is anti-corruption laws the likes of which have never been seen.
NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:36pmIt’s called “being obsequious”. They all hope if they’re nice to him and give him money, he’ll be “nice” to them and let them keep their money. Get it?
Report Post »duhwut
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:04pmI believe that’s called “corruption”.
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:26pmOne ass wipes the other.
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:26pmThey will be adequately paid with contracts or subsidies headed their way.
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:24pmDon’t know where the second home was pictured. But it looks like a good friend’s house from growing up. Sure her parent’s house was valued more than most, but $7.49M? Not a chance. Maybe $749K on a good day.
Report Post »Dde13
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:20pmWell, talking about disconnect. All the while people are struggling to buy gas and pay for groceries. JOB WELL DONE Do the people who own these homes realize BHO wants more of their money. Always wants more, more, more, more!!!!!!! I wonder if those who give to his campaign get waivers or special treatment. Kinda like the whole mafioso thing. Chicago style….
Report Post »kcinco
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:42pmThe elite always get special treatment, just like all the waivers given for obamacare to the left’s special interests.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:20pmI will never be a member of Costco again, that’s for sure.
Report Post »hi
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:30pmI don’t know if I can give Costco up. I do try to shop at Target instead as much as possible though. If there is a movement and lots of people drop Costco, I will.
Report Post »doublej702002
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:15pmI think it’s safe to say each of those fund raisers were filled with people that truly understand the middle class!
Report Post »spirited
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:58pmAnd
:^> know what women want –right ?
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:46pm@doublej702002
I thought you people were always saying the Left was “jealous of success”. Sure sounds like you are.
Report Post »PatriotDadOfSix
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:15pmWe need a list of celebrities that donate to the DNC or Obama directly so we know who to hound in person..and what movies to avoid supporting.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:42pmJeffy Immelt and George Clooney
Tom Hanks and Ben Affleck
Harvey Weinstein and Comcast
OMG 2012
Report Post »But a spanish company owned by spooky dude soros is counting our november ballots…………..
MCDAVE
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 12:08amThese celebrities are so disconnected from normal life they don’t have a clue what life is like for the people who pay to see their films…Tom Hanks and George Clooney both disappointed me supporting the communist and chief…I thought they were smarter than that…
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 8:03amA list of celebrities that don’t support him would be a lot easier to compile.
Report Post »Satrix
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:15pmAre these homes “Occupied” yet? Where is our beloved Pelosi with her sleeping bag on the front lawn?
Report Post »JACKTHETOAD
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:24pmReminds me of a scene from ‘Easy Rider’. Heh, heh, heh.
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:13pmGee, anyone else feel pigeoned holed here??? {No, I’m NOT a Leftist Liberal troll}. Just rather disappointed {again} that The Blaze seems to take a story thread and then streeeeeetch it out like a rubber band to include ANYTHING that might remotely relate to an original story that catches interest. Is it just me or what???
Report Post »doublej702002
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:18pmIt’s just you…the point is how the president is constantly bashing the wealthy as if he pals around with the middle class, when in fact all he associates are the wealthiest people in society!
Report Post »nonofmybiznez
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:41pmNot only that, but the wonderful electric cars and solar panels that are too expensive for us to buy are being bought by the rich and subsidized by you and me the taxpayer. All these energy programs are benefiting…that’s right! The rich! It used to be that the rich would pay for the development of new technology because they had to have the latest and best and we could get it when it got cheeper. They finally found a way to stick it to the middle class!
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:12pmI bet he doesnt say tax the rich when he is in their homes…But then again liberals are so stupid they dont think that he is targeting them. They think they will get an opt out.
Report Post »Wake up you stupid liberals before you wake up with the IRS gun to your head…
CatB
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:16pmRead the book ….
http://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Hypocrites-Jason-Mattera/dp/1451625618/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334542477&sr=8-1
They won’t pay .. their accountants will find ways around it .. that others won’t be able to get .. oh and then there are those like Pam Anderson and Lionel Ritchie who don’t think they need to pay at all.
Report Post »spirited
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:05pm@BADDOGGY: “I bet he doesn’t say tax the rich when he is in their homes”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> “tax” no
$^>More like, “gimme” my “fair share”
Report Post »whatthecrazy
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 10:08pmI don’t begrudge them for having lots -o – money i begrudge them for being stupid and letting this traitor who has NO right being in OUR WHITE HOUSE raise money at thier homes to use against this Country and its people.I guess having lots of money does’nt make you smart just lucky…………
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 1:44pmHow does he have no right to be in the White House? Unlike Dubya, he actually WON the popular vote.
Report Post »