(Updated) That Wasn’t a Raccoon: Couple Shoots Female Intruder Initially Thought to be Animal
- Posted on May 25, 2012 at 8:59am by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »

(Image: CBS screenshot)
When you hear a noise outside your window, it’s often safe to assume it is a nocturnal animal of some sort. That’s what a Boulder, Colo., couple initially thought, until the thing entered their bedroom.
The Denver CBS affiliate reports that the wife realized the intruder was not a raccoon when their bedroom door opened in the wee hours of Wednesday morning. They yelled and warned for the intruder to leave. When the person continued toward them, the husband fired a shot.
When the lights were flipped on, it revealed a woman unknown to them. The woman was hit in the thigh and taken to the hospital.
Watch the local report:
Police are investigating who the woman is and why she entered the home in the first place.
Interestingly, the Denver Post reports a nearby couple saying they have had a similar experience with a female intruder before, who they believed was intoxicated at the time but non-violent:
College Avenue neighbors Fanta Watson and Sergi Gomis said they had similar experiences when they lived near 11th Street and Baseline Road, when they didn’t lock their doors at night. One night they heard a loud noise in their living room, and when Gomis went downstairs to investigate, he said, he encountered a confused young woman who believed she was in her own home.
“This woman was dressed very nicely and she said, ‘We go way, way back. Why are you throwing me out?’” Gomis recalled. “She was really upset about it.”
According to the Post, it is yet to be determined if Colorado’s Make My Day Law will even need to be applied in this case:
Under Colorado’s Make My Day law, homeowners are allowed to use deadly force if a person enters their residence uninvited and either has committed a crime other than trespassing in the residence or intends to. Homeowners are also within their rights to use deadly force if they reasonably believe a trespassing person intends to use any measure of physical force on any occupant of the home, under the law.
Residents protected by the law are immune to criminal prosecution as well as civil liability, according to Boulder County District Attorney Stan Garnett.
Authorities are also still determining if any charges will need to be filed.
UPDATE:
The intruder is not believed to be a drunk college student who might have just stumbled into the wrong house and was too intoxicated to realize it or respond. The Denver Westword blog has more:
The featured players in a Boulder “Make My Day” shooting could hardly be more unlikely: Zoey Ripple, CU student and ultra-perky food blogger, and the pair of Timothy Justice and Doreen Orion, whose saga of traveling the country for a year in a “glorified tin can” is told in the book Queen of the Road.
Justice won’t be charged. But Ripple, who was ultra-drunk at the time of the incident, isn’t out of the woods yet.
[...]
Ripple, a CU student listed on the university’s website as majoring in speech, language and hearing sciences, is hardly a notorious scofflaw. The Camera discovered that she’d pleaded guilty to shoplifting in Broomfield in 2010, but her record was cleared after she successfully completed a deferred sentence. Her LinkedIn profile lists her as “Food and Beverage Intern Manager” at Columbine Country Club, and she’s also blogged about food for the website Bite Into Boulder. Her most recent review, a June 2011 analysis of Khow Thai, features lines like “Thai food is one of my absolute top favorite foods” and “So BEWARE, those who cannot handle the heat, stray from the items on the menu with chili peppers by their name!”
The presumption at this point is that Ripple was simply so out of it that she mistakenly wandered into the wrong house and was unable to respond to Justice before he sent a chunk of lead in her direction. But in a prepared statement shared by the Camera, Boulder District Attorney Stan Garnett also offered compassion to Orion, whose online bio describes her background as a psychiatrist and appearances on Good Morning America and the Discovery Channel, and Justice.
Also, the full 911 call has been released. You can hear it below:




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (135)
LameLiberals
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:17amShe came in through a window in the middle of the night. She’s lucky she was just shot in the thigh.
Report Post »mtcountrygrl
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:29amWhat I want to know is if the couple didn’t know her, it probably means she is not a neighbor, how did she get there? If she is so drunk that she doesn’t know what house she is in, did she drive there? I say throw the book at her, before she kills someone
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:55amIsn’t where an other famous case was totally screwed up?
Report Post »JonBenét Ramsey
In the house in the middle of the night with occupants present is not tresspassing!
Dishevel
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:00amThis is exactly how it should go down.
Report Post »Someone enters your home you point a weapon at them and tell them to leave.
One step more and they get shot in the Leg.
One step after that and it becomes time to empty a clip into the center of mass.
ChiefGeorge
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:09amMaybe that bullet in the leg with accompanied pain and medi bills will help this woman snap out of the daze she apparently is living in. Next time it might be through the head.
Report Post »pavnvet
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:28am@ DISHEVEL WRONG. You can wind up very dead with that mind set. In this situation, if you tell a person to stop and they continue towards you, you place two to center mass. If that doesn’t stop them one to the ocular cavity. At 20 feet, it only takes one and a half seconds for a perp to be on you. Shooting to wound or a warning shot is the surest way to lose the fight. You decide – do you want to be the victor or the victim? These people were very lucky in the fact the intrusion was not a home invasion.
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:30amCan’t be a vampire, she was not invited in. Maybe a vampire wannabe.
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:32amThey should have there guns taken away and put in jail. This woman wasn‘t hurting them and I didn’t see in the article where they warned her 3 times and fired a warning shot. This is what police have to do! In NYC, Chicago, Washing DC and Phillie they would already be in jail and charged with attemted murder.
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:44ampavnvet
Agreed 2 40′s or better center mass. If that does not take them back out the door do it again!
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:50amturkey13
Ignorance is bliss! You must be one happy camper!
Report Post »AZRACISTBIGOT
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:07pm@Turkey 13,
Report Post »If the first twelve turkeys beleived like you do, no wonder that they are toast.
Nathaniel Horn
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:08pmWill somebody please pull turkey13′s life support? It’s brain is dead.
Report Post »budzy1911
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:32pmWow – could Turkey 13 pack any more ignorance in to a post? Everything you said is wrong.
How do you survive every day? Really, I want to know.
Report Post »skippy6
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:15pm@ Turkey… I hope you don’t dress like a turkey and roam around in the woods!!!!!
Report Post »toto
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:20pmTurkey13, Your moniker should turkeybrain.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 2:04pmJust like every other story written by the Denver Post its an editorial in disguise. This one is against the castle laws and they use a non-sequitur of a harmless women that at one time entered someone else’s home which may or may not have ever happened to make it seem as if the victims in this story took extreme action that was unwarranted. Reporting like this is the reason the Rocky Mountain News is gone.
Report Post »The Post will soon follow in its footsteps.
NeoFan
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 2:44pmNice setup by the post with the tease story released first and the blaze readers like me taking the bait. Then Doh! what do you know the post updates the story a few hours later and their speculation was right on the money. Well duh I guess we just need to go ahead and take away ever homeowners right to defend themselves inside their house in the middle of the night. They are so clever.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 2:55pmSorry for making any comments at all on this story. Now that I have completely re-read the the story and the update I now realize that the entire thing is incoherent. Way to go Blaze.
Report Post »Rajabear1
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 2:57pm@turkey13-Oh man! Thank you, for you did not disappoint! I was wondering how fast a stupid lib would respond and just how stupid they would sound! Whew! you made me laugh and how!
Report Post »You are SOOO correct. These folks should have waited until the UNKNOWN INTRUDER was at their bedside with the muzzle of their own gun next to their temple. She‘s lucky that he didn’t shoot to kill.
But I’ll tell you what. You give me your address and I‘ll make sure you get nightly visits from all kinds of ’folks’ wandering into your house refusing to ID themselves and you can use your telepathic skills to see what their real intentions are. We‘ll just see how fast you determine it’s time to get a gun for the protection of you and your family.
But wait! you’re a lib, right? Well shucks, my bad. I guess that means you’d rather do nothing and be the perpetual victim your entire life even if it means be robbed, raped or 6 feet under–whether it be you or the people you care about, cuz a criminal’s life and well being is much more important than yours, eh bright one?
NeoFan
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 3:02pmFrom the main page “Update: The intruder is believed to be drunk college student.”
From the story page “The intruder is not believed to be a drunk college student who might have just stumbled into the wrong house and was too intoxicated to realize it or respond.”
Report Post »RightSideofTRUTH
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 6:15pm@Dishevel I see your logic but I have to strongly disagree. Firstly: There are no warning shots or “shoot to Injure” this is flawed logic that will get you killed in this situation. If a terrorist is in your home and is a threat (meaning they do not leave after a verbal) you have an obligation to subdue that terrorist until they are nolonger a threat. google ballistics of any home defense caliber 9mm, .38/.357, .40, .45, .223/5.56 etc and have fun. But please realize that a bullet passing through tissue will leave the reciever with a relativly small hole that may not stop a threat with 1 bullet.
Secondly: With the mindset to “Wound” the terrorist, you are left open to civil if not criminal prosecution putting you both in jail because the jury will find that by “shooting to wound” you were not in “immediate” grave danger.
I am not advocating that we all shoot to kill for the sake of. A human life is precious. However the moment a terrorist breaks into someone’s home and becomes a threat, the terrorist’s life is deemed less valuable than that of the rightful occupants.
On a lesser note: Most every semi-auto firearm uses a MAGAZINE to store ammunition not clips.
@Turkey…You’re an idiot. I hope that you are never in that situation but, I summize to believe you would assume the fetal position in a corner for the 20min+ for the police to arrive and if the terrorist finds you first, I pray the police don’t find you in a corner, lying in a pool of exc
Report Post »encinom
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 6:38pmAgain, gun owners are more a danger to the innocent than criminals.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 8:46pmI guess we can see from that comment that molesting little boys does effect the molesters ability to reason and make sense.
Report Post »Sheriff Goober
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 3:38amENCINOM
You are the reason why we need to own guns. they stop you from committing crime, even murder.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 9:50amTurkey… the name says it all. Dumber than a box of rocks and bound to be someone’s lunch.
Report Post »MBA
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:14amWhat does it matter if it was a female or male intruder (or white, black or purple for that matter)–an intruder is still an intruder in someone else’s house for no good reason.
Report Post »twistin
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 12:41amThere are some mean mean women around these days, too, for sure.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:13amUnder Colorado’s Make My Day law, homeowners are allowed to use deadly force if a person enters their residence uninvited and either has committed a crime other than trespassing in the residence or intends to.
~~~ What a stupid law. So if the trespasser has not committed a crime other than trespassing, you have to be able to read the trespassers mind in order to justifiably use deadly force. ~~~
I’ll go with, “They intended to steal my stuff every time”, while the corpse cools.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:11amHow about the ole school saying…..Shoot first and ask questions later!
Report Post »ChevalierdeJohnstone
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 3:07pmRepeat after me:
Report Post »“I was afraid for my life.”
“I want to cooperate.”
“I can’t answer any questions until I talk to my lawyer.”
Repeat.
Wolf
Posted on May 26, 2012 at 9:47amRepeat after me: “Shoot, shovel, and shut up.”
Report Post »TWO BITS
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:11amLike others, I suspect the intoxication is a ruse when caught red-handed. Anyone still outside the door may get a courtesy warning shot, but inside my humble abode, I’m going for the bulls-eye.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:40amYou and me too! However, I check my windows & doors before bed and if someone came in, it wouldn’t be a family member, and you know what happens to the intruder, drunk or not is never an excuse.
Report Post »DGuy
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 4:29pmAnything worth shooting once is worth shooting twice…
Report Post »Karron
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:06amObviously the woman was in the house for some reason. Maybe she was drunk, who knows. But the couple did exactly the RIGHT thing to do. Every man, woman, or child, has the right to self defence when they feel threatened.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 11:13amA cop on the street can feel threatened even if he has superior firepower and will kill you. If someone is actually breaking into your home, how much more is your life and safety at stake? Way more! Shoot first and ask questions later.
Report Post »Skee
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:59amFlorida needs to change the name of our law from “stand your ground” to “make my day”.
Report Post »How about “do you feel lucky, punk”, even better.
Thomas Paine
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:57amWhy the hell would there be any charges, The man was defending his home.
Report Post »infortheride
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:06amIt’s Colorado, they think differently there
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:08amNo brainer, of course they should be allowed to take action against an intruder who is INSIDE their home. However, not even a remote comparison to the Zimmerman – Martin situation. One where Zimmerman an adult followed, confronted, fought with, shot and killed a KID.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:19ambecause common sense rarely prevails these days. tired of prosecuters ruining good people’s lives.
Report Post »mtcountrygrl
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:25amJROOK you are obviously not too bright.
Report Post »It is not illegal to follow someone (and a 911 dispatcher is a glorified secretary so they have no authority). It is not known if Zimmerman touched Martin. He says he didn’t and no evidence has come forward to prove that he did. In America you are inocent until PROVEN guilty. I know you commies would like to change that. You were not there, no one knows who made physical contact. The person who made PHYSICAL contact is the one who broke the law. ANd if Martin made PHYSICAL contact with Zimmerman (I don’t care what he was doing or even if he called his momma a name), than under the law Zimmerman is justified in using whatever force he needs to, to defend his person from an assult. Quit trying to spin that case into something it isn’t
BIgWheeler
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:24pmTo play devil’s advocate for a minute, the police have to investigate to make sure the woman wasn’t lured into the house and murdered. We can’t have people abusing the law; this isn’t welfare, after all.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:44pm@mtcountrygrl Ah yes, everyone who doesn’t view the world through an ideological pathology must be a commie. Save your arguments for your friends who pretend to agree with you. At no point did I say Zimmerman was guilty, but you are completely incorrect that a self appointed neighborhood watch whimp has the authority to follow and confront a private citizen walking down the street. There is no indication that Martin initiated any confrontation, so yes logic would tell you that Zimmerman initiated contact. And the next time you come down from the Mountain, take the time to learn what battery means. Zimmerman is not within his rights to confront, question or undertake threatening action. You also cannot claim stand your ground in a situation you initiated unless your LIFE is truly threatened. All we know to this point is a 28 yr. old adult who outweighed a 17 year old KID by 70 lbs initiated something and when the KID started kicking his ass, he shot him. Yes let’s wait for the verdict. But of course if it doesn’t fit you narrow minded narrative, the jury will of course be commies.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:50pm@mtcountrygrl Not to overwhelm you but read something about assault also. Like so many you are starting with the end point, the shooting and not the potential criminal sequence. You are incorrect Zimmerman had no basis or standing to confront Martin in any manner, other than on his own property.
Report Post »Samps
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:03pm@JROOK just a few things to clear up your post, 1) Z was not self appointed, im not sure why everyone thinks and keeps saying that, the community appointed him. 2) even if Z confronted M first, once Z was on the receiving end of a beating, deadly force is fully justified under floridia law, ask a lawyer or look it up yourself.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:44pm@Samps The record indicates he self appointed himself that night as he wasn’t scheduled. And yes you are correct that you can utilize deadly force if the individual goes behind defending themselves. Which of course is at best a judgement call and would require witnesses who can speak about the entire confrontation not just the point at which they heard screams. While some outlets have tried to depict Zimmerman as having serious injuries, I’m not sure a “broken” nose (looked more like a bloody nose) and a few superficial scraps on the head would cross the threshold of excessive response by Martin. The difficulty of course is the only one who knows what transpired between the time Zimmerman left his car and approached Martin and shooting him. I personally think the 2nd. degree murder charge is either a gift in that it can’t be proven and may lead to an acquittal, or an attempt to push for a plea bargain. Zimmerman may be sacrificed to protect a wider review of the SUG law. Hard to tell.
Report Post »wdittgasn
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:49pmI was just going through the posts and then I came upon an extremely stupid one. That when I looked to see who it was and then I realized OH of course, Just JROOK…..typical.
Report Post »2GodBeTheGlory
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 2:34pm@ JBROOK
If you had bothered to read the police and corner report, you would have noticed that the “kid” as you called him was over 150 pounds. Throughout history, that person would be a fighter on the front lines. Learn your history and apply common sense before you post as it appears that you are a person that listens but does not hear, a person that looks but does not see, and does not realize that it’s easy to grow old but difficult to grow up.
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:53amMy neighbor and I have an agreement. If either one of us hear shots in the middle of the night, we will
NOT call 911 but will bring a shovel and help dig.
Report Post »ivote
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:16amI love that!
Report Post »schroeder123
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:52amI knew a guy who slept walked into a bank and demanded money….. He’s in prison right now.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 6:33pmYou snooze, you lose!
Report Post »dianna9490
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:40amAll states should have this law – I bet burglarys would GO TO NEARLY ZERO!
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 3:43pmI know here in western upper Michigan we have few to no burglaries. We also have no liberals stupid enough to try. Liberals here know their place and realize we who work and are successful also have concealed carry permits.
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:38amThey will investigate forever. This is The Republic Of Boulder Colorado. Progressive police force used to investigating burning couches at fraternity houses. A Gun in the county and especially one that is loaded will be punished if not in court it will be punished in the court of public opinion.
Report Post »Macman1138
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:43amWell, maybe it was a coon, but not a raccoon.
Report Post »raderby
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:29amsomnambulism – ever hear of that? “sleep walking”…? Yes, this can happen. And the woman is lucky she is not dead. The guy needs more time at the range. shoot from a knees bent squatting position
Report Post »SBR308
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:25amIf she is good looking she can come over a break into my house and I promise not to shoot.
Michael
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:50amSo you guys are saying you would Rape the woman? That is pretty sick…
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:40amMICHAEL Grow up! Learn a little sarcasm. They should teach you that somewhere down the dirt road.
Report Post »SERE22
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 1:28pmHa, no. Sarcasm isn’t always funny. The image this projects is pretty disgusting actually…
Report Post »chips1
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 6:38pmIt’s also possible she is an unfulfilled wife of a muslim.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:20am“Authorities are also still determining if any charges will need to be filed”. Really? A stranger walks into their bedroom in the middle of the night, they warn the stranger to leave, the stranger walks towards them and they shoot said stranger. What charges?
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:36amHey Rick! Try that in Illinois! Haha!!!
Report Post »RRFlyer
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:37amYou didn’t read the sentence right. they haven’t determined that the “make my day” law even Needs to be used. Which means they aren’t expected to file any charges, but if they need to they can invoke the “make my day” rule.
In other words they will not be prosecuted in either case
Report Post »4theRepublic
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:41amMy best guess would be charges against the female intruder…. I hope…
HOOAH Signal Corp Jump Master (me too, Ft. Bragg ‘89-’95)
Report Post »gperky
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 2:08pmShe will most likely sue the owners of the home for every penny they have and win. Most cops tell you that if you have in intruder, shoot to kill, not wound. Many criminals have won lawsuits because they were injured breaking into a home.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 5:35pmgperky
“She will most likely sue the owners of the home for every penny they have and win.”
You sound happy to report that. First, she shoplifts. Then she breaks into homes.
Could this be next? >> She will be working for a liberal non profit & it will have to shut down, when she embezzles the funds
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:18pmThe law in Illinois, not Chicago, is if they break into your home and enter your bedroom then you have the right to use deadly force to defend yourself. The act of entering your bedroom by itself is justification. You are not required to give any type of warning and it doesn’t matter if they threaten you or have a visible weapon.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:20pmI should have said it doesn‘t matter if they don’t have a weapon or don’t threaten you. The act of entering your bedroom is considered threat enough.
Report Post »SgtB
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:18amI bet she stops pulling the drunk home invader act now. A bullet through your thigh might have that effect. But seriously, she is lucky that she didn’t do that in my home. I wouldn’t have aimed for or hit her thigh. I’ve got years of training that tells me two in the chest and one in the head all the time. You don’t fire a gun with the intent to wound. You fire it with the intent to kill and you do it.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:27amThe Thigh is a BleedOut/Kill Wound!
Report Post »BIgWheeler
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 12:28pmWell if he thought it was a raccoon he would have aimed lower.
Report Post »rebelwuf
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:18amThe intruder should have to pay the replacement cost of the bullet.
Report Post »9111315
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 7:07pmNot just the bullet — but the gun and all the training the home owner needed to get to that point.
. . . In any case, I like where you are going.
Report Post »RIGHTHOOK
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:17amWhy did the camera focus on the address? Absurd!. Just going to be problematic for home owner/gun owner.
Break into my home and there will be no conversation. You will be leaving in a body bag.
Report Post »NOT A CRAZY
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:16amSounds like the intruder was lucky this time.
Report Post »toomuchgovt
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:15amI’ll bet this woman goes into these homes all the time, steals a little and leaves. When she is caught she “acts” drunk. She is stealing stuff the people won’t miss or think they misplaced / lost.
Report Post »GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:15amGood shot.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:13amHey blaze, your video is blocking the text of the story…..”it’s been happening a lot lately, can’t read the story cuz its behind the video…”FIX IT PLEASE…..
Report Post »Justthefactsmam
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:37amMight be a problem on your computer…have been seeing reports like yours and I never have had that happen…
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:13am“Residents protected by the law are immune to criminal prosecution”
Report Post »Doesn’t that all depend on the ethnicities of the persons involved now?
Altair
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:24amThat’s why the old axiom…
Shoot.
Shovel.
Shut up.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 6:45pmSounds like the good town of Skidmore, Mo. Americans All.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:09amWhat kind of food are they leaving out?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:04amBait?
Report Post »term limits for congress
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 10:36amTequila and Lead shooters? Thighballs? Gun powder on the rocks? Colt 45?
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:05amIf it’s the same woman, she is not there “by accident” or lost. She’s a good actress at playing confused.
Report Post »hatchetjob
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 3:03pmHopefully she learned a lesson by now.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 6:49pmHATCHETJOB:
Report Post »You missed the part of the story that said she was BLONDE> He! He! He!
bdandsl
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:03amStay out of other people‘s home and you won’t get shot. Sounds easy enough to me.
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:18amOoooorrrrr, the husband isn’t being honest…. ?? Ya never know….
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on May 25, 2012 at 9:20amShe is lucky they shot her only once in the leg. I practice two to the chest, one to the head at the range.
Report Post »