US

The Blaze‘s Will Cain Confronts Sandra Fluke and Her ’Logic’ on CNN

Will Cain & Sandra Fluke Face Off Over Contraceptive CoverageSandra Fluke, the darling of the leftist perspective in America’s never-ending contraceptive debate, had a busy morning.

First, she had an op-ed published on CNN.com, in which she defended many of the same stances she‘s reiterated before on the women’s rights front (the piece was entitled, “Slurs Won’t Silence Women”). Then, she appeared on the network, where she was greeted with a head-to-head match by The Blaze’s Will Cain.

The two, of course, didn’t agree on much. Cain, for instance, attempted to focus upon the real issue he sees at the center of the debate — government mandates versus private institutions making their own determinations about health care coverage. In beginning of his dialogue with Fluke, Cain looked for common ground (via Mediaite):

“You used this word several times, ‘access.’ I hope you and I can agree on one term of this debate. And that is that no one is attempting to ban contraception or limit access and make it illegal for women to have this! The debate is about who should be providing it, who should be paying for it. Should employers determine what is involved in their compensation, determined in their health care benefits or should the government make certain requirements of employers? Can we agree that that is what this debate is about?”

Of course, “agree” was not something Fluke was willing to do so quickly.

“Well, not exactly,” she countered. “I think there are multiple ways to limit access. Certainly making something illegal would be the most extreme form, but not covering it as a health care benefit the way other types of health care benefits are covered is another way to limit access and that’s what many women across the country are currently experiencing when they — even if they have insurance, co pays, can be as high as $50 a month, which is significant for a woman not making a lot of money.”

Cain then took aim at this explanation, questioning whether other elements — like gym memberships — would also fall under Fluke’s definition of “health care benefits.”

Watch the Cain versus Fluke discussion, below:

Following Fluke’s appearance, CNN host Soledad O‘Brien railed against Cain’s analogy about gym membership, calling it a “flawed analogy.” Cain, though, defended his comments against her assault. CNN cut this portion out of the above clip.

Below, see the video in its entirety, with the O’Brien portion coming in around 4:40:

Comments (854)

1 2 3 ... 20
  • littlefish
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:26am

    She is still promoting UN-PROTECTED SEX !!!

    littlefish  
    • FormerLib
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:33am

      Her saying that our refusal to pay for her birth control is “anti-women’s health“ is like saying my refusal to pay for her groceries is ”anti-food”.

       
    • CatB
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:34am

      Yes .. and at 30 YEARS OLD you would think she would understand that diseases are spread this way .. of course she will want us to pay for her HIV treatment for the rest of her life also!

      Report Post »  
    • lani59
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:34am

      Unprotected liberal sex is a good thing as HIV can help to reduce the population….

      Report Post »  
    • drbage
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:43am

      Wonder when they are going to start BLAMING Rush and others on the right when Ms Fluke flunks out of Georgetown Law? Who is going to pick up that tab–Gloria“Gimme Publicity” Allred, defrocked Pope Pelosi, or will Moochelle and the One go all in??

      Report Post »  
    • Lumbar Spine
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:44am

      FORMERLIB…what do you mean “our refusal to pay for her birth control”? Are you either the Catholic Church or a health insurer?

      Report Post »  
    • USPATRIOT101
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:44am

      I understand the other reasons a woman would use the pill, but once again, I don’t expect my insurance to cover my prilosec when I eat wings. Whenever you “mandate” coverage, the basic cost of insurance increases because the manufacturers of the goods no longer has to worry about keeping their price rwasonable, “it’s mandated”.

      Report Post » USPATRIOT101  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:51am

      .
      UN-PROTECTED SEX !!!
      If that’s the case, maybe she’ll come down with a fatal of case of “GonnaRotYourCrotchOff”…….

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • k1607
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:54am

      what is wrong with including gym membership? Isn’t that a health benefit? Also, the Dr who wrote the note is absolutely right. The cost will be disbursed, and if the government really cared about women’s health-they wouldn’t be talking about cutting much needed screenings and exams for women. I see it as a way for them to say, here’s birth control-it should take care of your woman problems, therefore money doesn’t need to be spent (or as they might put it) wasted on screenings and treatments, but if it does, the women will have to pay. I really think there is an alternative somewhere and that it will be bad.

      Report Post »  
    • Biff Marupis
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:02pm

      There’s no clause in The Constitution for a right to healthcare OR birth control…..yet….The 2nd Ammendment guarantees my right to bear arms…. How come nobody is buying me guns or bullets? Are they trying to limit my access?

      Report Post » Biff Marupis  
    • lukerw
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:02pm

      All Conflicts and Disagreements… can be resolved by Concession & Cooperation… or a Bullet!

      Report Post » lukerw  
    • tvtailor
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

      @Lani59 – Usually it’s GOP representatives having unprotected homosexual public restroom sex while their wives are at home. You have to admit that there’s some truth to this, while your comment is just plain snarky.

       
    • OklahomaBound
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

      Lumbar Spine
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:44am

      “FORMERLIB…what do you mean “our refusal to pay for her birth control”? Are you either the Catholic Church or a health insurer?”

      What he/she mean Lumbar Spine (more accurately “spineless’) is that nothing is free. When the government forces a company, in this case health insurers, to provide a service or product for “free” the insurer/company doesn’t take it out of their own pocket they just pass the cost on to their customers. This means “WE” as customers of health insurers then have to pay higher premiums for this new “free” service on behalf of other customers who refuse to pay for their own contraceptives.

      I’ll bet you think food stamps are paid for with “Free Obama Money” or “fairy dust” too, they are not, that money comes from tax payers who have to pay their own way and then are also forced to pay for leftist freeloaders who think they are ENTITLED to other peoples money and to have their lives paid for by others. I‘m sure this doesn’t bother you because you are no doubt that 47% who don’t pay Federal income taxes, but does get subsidized in all kinds of ways by money stolen by government from the producers (tax payers) so it can be spent on you. LEECH!

      Report Post » OklahomaBound  
    • Michael61
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:08pm

      Her boyfriend is a multi-millionaire. For sure she can pay for any contraceptives…

      She is about as fony as Harrison Ford is an environment lover (with his 7 private gas guzzling planes)…

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:08pm

      So Sandra says the prices given with regards to how cheap birth control is as misinformation?

      Well here:
      http://pharmacist.hubpages.com/hub/genericprograms
      http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2007/10/cheap-birth-control-at-wal-mart/
      http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/03/05/attention-media-walmart-and-target-have-been-offering-9-birth-control
      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/28/business/28drug.html

      All of these are well lower than the $50 a month she gives in the video. The price she is giving is for nigh top shelf versions, not generic alternatives. So not only should woman have access to birth control (which they do), they should get the more expensive at a lower price equal to the generic… Then why offer a generic version?

      What of the jobs lost? Who will pay the name brand versions for the cut in price?

      The last time and price fixing was down to the healthcare system that I know of is Clinton with flu vaccines. Last I remember it is leading to the shortages in the US today as only four US companies make it where 26 did in 1963 a 16 in 1980…
      http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba493
      http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=8736

      Also, bad tort policies caused for lawsuits against the pharmaceutical companies in the 1980s over vaccines. This is also what is leading to the large attack versus vaccine manufacturing with regards to autism. Problem is, that most of the vaccines we use are from overseas now-a-days… Only 4 companies still

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • lbyrd26
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:15pm

      She is simply a tool. A function of left wing propoganda. She is what the left would call “A useful idiot” if she was’nt a liberal. She is just enjoying her 15 minutes of fame(liberals can’t get enough negative attention} She has a long history of left wing spin activism and her puppet masters go clear up to Prime Minister Obama.

      Tthese people are actually dumb enough to believe the hype they spew and that’s why it only makes sense to other liberals. The rest of just say”WTH?”, scratch our heads and go back to our JOBS!!

      I got on Liberal Women Who Lunch page and was called Names like idiot, a-hole, a fool and other vile names. I didn’t see one conservitive voice that called anybody any names. I did however see conservitive women get on there and talk about how people are getting tired of paying for liberal sex.. I did ask why they think they have the right to make me pay for their sexual daliences. I asked why they want so desperately for the Catholics to pay for their sex, when the Catholics stick to a far more restrictive sex life of their own. I asked if they feel they should be responsible for their own sex life. I also asked why they take a simple issue like tax payers getting tired of having to pay for their sex and so desperately trying to spin it into an all out war on women.

      You won’t see any of this on their page because at that point they decided that any disagreement with their agenda would be deleted.

      Just another group of libera

      Report Post »  
    • ToddinVB
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:27pm

      Let’s stretch this, for the good of women’s health argument, really really far. Let’s say I enjoy walking through rough neighborhoods late at night. That’s risky too, right? Bullets for my CCW can be expensive, but are good for my continued health. So… should the government make my employer or insurer pay for my bullets? My absurd point is that the list could grow really long in a hurry.

      Report Post »  
    • drago
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:29pm

      The only thing she is promoting is, getting a freebie,(contraseptions),so she can continue to be a whore, pure and simple.I have to wonder how many men shes bedded down since the age of, oh i dont know, 10 maybe.One things for sure, she is representative of soooo many women on the left.Rush was right……..

      Report Post »  
    • VolunteerBodyguards
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:39pm

      women need pills for vulvadynia & ovarian cysts, don’t you get it?

      Report Post »  
    • Tigger House
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:50pm

      Will my vasectomy be covered next?

      Report Post »  
    • Jim in Houston
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:08pm

      Can one of these liberal morons explain to me why their sexual activity is a medical necessity? I DO NOT want to pay for her sexual escapades period!!!

      I love a glass of wine, shouldn’t the government to pay for it too?

      Report Post »  
    • VinnieCCT
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:09pm

      VBODYGUARD, diabetics need insulin to live yet that is not mandated to be free. don’t you get it?

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:10pm

      LUMBAR SPINE Fact: insurance costs are passed along to everyone. Are you just playing stupid?

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:20pm

      Paid detractor…taking the heat off Obama…pretty sure it’s coming off a check list of things to do to counter attacks on Obama.

      Keep on outing her GB…she’s been asked but has not accepted any speaking engagements with Fnews.

      MSMs seriously playing this up should be outed…and Rush had to start it up…you see the right can’t say things like the left…they hold us to a higher standard than themselves. Interesting, eh? Weird, I say.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • ReallyQuestion
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:20pm

      Interesting that the faculty already has contraception coverage, yet the students don’t. I thought the government now requiers “children” up to the age of 26 to be covered on their parent’s insurance. Thus there is no need for a University to cover students. Except of course, who’s insurance will cover a 30 year old student?

      Report Post »  
    • tketterer
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:22pm

      She wasn’t speaking before congress

      Report Post »  
    • Falindraun
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:35pm

      @LUMBAR SPINE – what @FORMERLIB meant was that if she wants birth control then she better pay for it herself, however, if she wants free birth control then she needs to keep her legs closed (btw that second option works 100% of the time and prevents 100% of all std’s).

      Report Post »  
    • NC1
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:46pm

      Right on Biff! Gas is expensive too and the price of it makes it hard on us who don’t make a lot of money. It cuts into our budgets to much and we can’t drive around wherever we want to go because it costs too much. Maybe the government should provide access to cheaper gas.

      Report Post » NC1  
    • TH30PH1LUS
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:48pm

      In this clash between Obama and and a worldwide Religion, Obama is claiming that his morality is superior, and that Religions can be forced by government to pay for things which they consider sinful.

      Obama’s actions and position is the very antithesis of the United States Constitution.

      Report Post » TH30PH1LUS  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:52pm

      FormerLib

      Nice! Succinctly said & true.

      Report Post »  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:00pm

      Michael61 is right.

      1 de Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver (N28S)
      2 Aviat A-1B Husky (N6HY)
      3 Cessna Citation Sovereign (N5GU)
      4 Beechcraft B36TC Bonanza
      5 Cessna 208B Grand Caravan
      6 1929-vintage Waco Taperwing
      7 Bell 407

      If Joe 6 pack can’t have cars as a hobby why should a Hollywood type have airplanes as a hobby. aircraft have large carbon footprints as well as burning thru a lot of oil.

      Report Post »  
    • cessna152
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:01pm

      To Seamen,(pun intended) Fluke- on the larger size are commonly known as a “doormat”. A doormat is used quite often for only one sole (Pun intended) purpose. Once it’s old and worn out, it has little to no use. I see this “doormat’s” usefulness coming to an end.

      Report Post » cessna152  
    • no_more_harkin
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:01pm

      Like all liberal d@mb-a$$ women, she has no problem sacrificing freedom for laws.
      The ONLY time liberals will help out is if it somehow helps them.
      The couldn’t care less about right or wrong, good or bad – just what they want.
      Like a spoiled child who’s given everything they want throughout their life, and then told they have to fend for themselves, the whine, fuss, scream, pout, insult and cover their ears until they get an answer they want.

      Report Post »  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:03pm

      Would we have to pay for condoms for Sandra Fluke, if she were into barebacking? Just saying condoms for a whole year are expensive & it is about health.

      You wouldn’t want an Obama supporter to get a venereal disease in the colon because you were too heartless to pay for their condoms. it is a health issue. Don’t be cruel.

      Report Post »  
    • Izzy2626
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:09pm

      Fluke her

      Report Post »  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:11pm

      Lumbar Spine

      FORMERLIB…what do you mean “our refusal to pay for her birth control”? Are you either the Catholic Church or a health insurer?
      _________________________________________________________________

      Why should an employer or insurer have to provide a one size fits all plan?

      Employers provide insurance to get around liberal wage & price freezes of WWII.

      IMO employers should pay a wage& people can shop for their own benefits. Conservatives might form mutual aid societies bases on profession, religion or ethnicity as was done in the past if the private insurers are not good enough. I joined a mutual aid society in the recent past.

      As a liberal you should find a patron to make decisions for you. The Democrat politician could act like a Roman patron in the way he treated a commoner or a recently released slave. Of the Democrat politician could act like a Scottish Lord/Laird & threat his clansmen like children.

      Lumbar spine, why do you need the 30% or so of conservatives be forced to join your group efforts. Will the efforts of liberal groups fail without participation of the whole population? ? ? ?

      Report Post »  
    • IMCHRISTIAN
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:12pm

      She is still a plant to get us thinking and talking about this and we will forget about the ECONOMY and GAS PRICES, HEALTHCARE BILL, ETC. ……………Just a reminder

      Report Post »  
    • Walkabout
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:13pm

      If people have really bizarre or active sex lives are we going to have to pay for condoms & dental dams as well as contraception?

      Would Sandra look could with one of those?

      Report Post »  
    • stealthyk9
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:16pm

      Sandra Fluke has definitely been denied access…to a hairdresser!

      Report Post »  
    • mtcountrygrl
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:20pm

      @VBODYGUARD – the Catholic church already covers birth control for medical purposes. This is a distraction and misinformation campain. The only thing they do not cover is birth control for birth control purposes. In other words, birth control to aid in having sex. Sandra even admitted that in her own testimony.

      Report Post »  
    • mtcountrygrl
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:30pm

      I love that the liberals are keeping this discussion up. Have you seen the latest poles it is backfiring on them! Why? Women are not stupid, we know this is about religous freedom and the First Ammendment. And women are statistically more religous than men. Since the war on religion was started last month, democrat support has shot down among WOMEN! The New York Times did a pole on this issue and it lost support among women 51 percent to 40 percent. This is a losing issue for them and they thought it was a slam dunk. Also, you liberals who think this is great because your guy is in power. Stop for a minute and imagine a Conservative Christian in office with this kind of power to disregard your deeply held religious and moral beliefs. Oh wait liberals don’t have religious or moral values…never mind.

      Report Post »  
    • The_Jerk
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:50pm

      Fluke is proof that women need others to survive; the weaker, dependent, sex.

      Report Post »  
    • rs9
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:51pm

      Why does someone that ugly need birth control?

      Report Post »  
    • The_Jerk
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:52pm

      CNN, the Communist News Network.

      Report Post »  
    • mmmrookatdat
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:58pm

      @FORMERLIB Very good point. She’s basically saying, “I have a right to have access but since I can’t afford it, I don’t have access. So someone else needs to step up & pay for me to have it, so I can have access” That’s very flawed logic because that would mean someone else somewhere has the basic or inherent obligation to provide it. But it‘s not a basic or inherent human or woman’s right. It‘s our right to be free to pursue contraception but it’s not our right to be provided a product or service based on our choices. It‘s also not a woman’s health issue because having sex without getting pregnant is not mandatory for a woman to survive & live. It’s a choice.

      Report Post » mmmrookatdat  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:21pm

      The_Jerk = Troll for those new to the Blaze…

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • USAMEDIC3008
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:39pm

      I would’nt call her a slut
      A sperm bank maybe

      Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
    • DWilliams08
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:55pm

      Once you dispel the victim facade, it becomes obvious just how vacuous this broad is. If this is a 30 year old law student, Georgetown doesn‘t owe it’s students birth control, it owes them refunds.

      Report Post » DWilliams08  
    • The_Jerk
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:56pm

      JohnnyMidknight, truth always hurts those who live to deceive.

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:59pm

      “The_Jerk = Troll for those new to the Blaze…”

      False. He might be somewhat anti-semitic, but he’s not a troll. Just… well… somewhat of a jerk at times. His positions are usually better made than other anti-semites (like Techgineer) or racists (Spankdamonkey).

      Trolls are likely Monicne and Encinom (look at the names…) and Spank’s sock puppet, Sock_Monkey.

      As for the topic at hand, meh. I don’t think the issue at hand is religious freedom; making your insurance cover contraceptives is the same degree of separation as making an employee spend their paycheck on it (perhaps even more, as the employee has to pay for her insurance premium as well). The big issue is obviously Obamacare’s health mandate, which is forcing all insurance companies to cover a baseline of care (like contraceptives). As all citizens will need to be insured in the next few years, the only groups being forced against their wills to provide birth control are Christian (sorry, Catholic; most Christians aren’t opposed to birth control) insurance companies.

      I feel social conservatives should join us, their fiscal brethren, in pointing out the actual issue: Obamacare’s Unconstitutional basis in forcing insurance upon all citizens. The religious freedom argument is a non-starter… especially with candidates like Santorum saying he’d let states vote to ban birth control. Doesn’t mesh well with most people and is easy fodder for the Dems.

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:04pm

      @ The_Jerk

      Well, quite hurting yourself with such a idiotic position as:
      Fluke is proof that women need others to survive; the weaker, dependent, sex.

      The only truth in this statement of yours is that you are sexist. lmao It in no way hurts me, it just hurts your potential love life.

      Now, the CNN comment was spot on.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • theshortwhiteguy
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:05pm

      @FormerLib – that is “flawed analogy” as SO’B would say.

      Report Post » theshortwhiteguy  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:14pm

      @ mtcountrygrl

      Hey, don’t confuse Liberals with Progressives. Keep in mind that the “Liberal” label was stolen by the Progressives when no one wanted to be identified with them. Now that the left has taken the Progressive label back, Moderates like me can claim the Liberal name and dowse it in lighter fluid, burn it, dip it in bleach, give it a shot of Penicillin and return it to its former glory. You know that our founding father were considered liberal. They were Classical Liberals. Please watch this video:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU-8Uz_nMaQ

      You will most likely find that your positions are in line with the classical liberal philosophies. What your seeing today is the Progressive play on liberal principles. It is their smoke and mirrors game.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • pierrepierre
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:18pm

      In the old days, we ran away from home as soon as possible in order to use illegal substances, practice “free love”, and hide from the police.

      Things have really changed! Now everyone stays home with their parents, use their parents illegal substances, practice unbridled/subsidized sex, and go on TV to talk about it!!

      Report Post »  
    • Realist4U
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:41pm

      Because she is the “unintended result” of sloppy birth control.

      Report Post »  
    • GramSam
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 5:04pm

      Exactly, If the health issue is STD than use a condem, as a birth control pill will not prevent it. If it is not STD, what is the health issue???? Birth control is free from PP or dirt cheap from Walmart. This is a big scam and it’s time we stop playing this game with the left. Instead of Cain, there should have been woman debating her that knows what she’s talking about.

      Report Post » GramSam  
    • The_Jerk
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 5:09pm

      Locked: “His positions are usually better made than other anti-semites (like Techgineer) or racists (Spankdamonkey).”

      Could it be that some people simply don‘t like the points that I’ve made? So, the default position for those without a substantive argument is always the label, be it: antisemite, homophobe, xenophobe, racist, bigot… .

      As for the present debate, Fluke is a female. She is asking that others lend her support for that which she should provide for herself. They are calling the process an attack on women. I see it as an argument for women being the weaker sex, dependent, because it is factually true. They cloaked the argument as a women’s issue. Women need others to do for them. I’ve simply offered a perspective that can only be defeated with the label of sexist, if one accepts their argument.

      I didn‘t make Fluke’s argument. She did, and she spoke for ‘women.’

      Report Post »  
    • jcldwl
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 5:35pm

      It‘s going to be funny when it is revealed she is a lesbian and doesn’t even need birth control. Just my opinion.

      Report Post » jcldwl  
    • Izzy2626
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 5:51pm

      Nobody whined or cried about contraceptives being covered till the left made it an issue….period. Nobody said a word

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:06pm

      @ The_Jerk

      Much better put on your last post. Now I see where you are coming from. I personally do not subscribe to that philosophy (meaning Fluke’s). However, you make an excellent point. I wish you would expand on your statement more than some of the broad generalizations. In doing this, you are misinforming all readers on your intents.

      Just think what the next argument from Fluke will be… Women are paid less then men… But Obama signed the Equal Pay Bill in 2009:
      http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html

      Therefore, less pay needs to be connected to another statistic… Like single mothers who have too many children so they can’t afford birth control and perpetuate the cycle.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • Locked
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:27pm

      @The_Jerk

      “Could it be that some people simply don‘t like the points that I’ve made? So, the default position for those without a substantive argument is always the label, be it: antisemite, homophobe, xenophobe, racist, bigot… .”

      Nope. Unlike other antisemites here, I agree with some of your positions (such as pointing out the atrocities that Israel has committed against Palestinian civilians). However, you constantly put forward that there is a global Zionist conspiracy attempting to uproot America, and you make interchangeably use Zionist and Jew. That’s the part I say makes you anti-Semitic. I don‘t think you’re a troll however.

      “As for the present debate, Fluke is a female. She is asking that others lend her support for that which she should provide for herself. They are calling the process an attack on women. I see it as an argument for women being the weaker sex, dependent, because it is factually true. They cloaked the argument as a women’s issue. Women need others to do for them. I’ve simply offered a perspective that can only be defeated with the label of sexist, if one accepts their argument.”

      Good argument! And I agree to an extent; the left has made this a false argument about “women’s rights” to counter the false argument from the right that it’s about “religious freedom.” Both ignore the actual issue: the lack of Constitutional grounding for mandatory, government-mandated health insurance. Both sides’ positions are false.

      Report Post »  
    • Female
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:31pm

      Wine: I use it in the evenings for medicinal purposes, rather than heavy duty seditives and stomache meds….When can I use medical benefits, neighbors, employer, and government to cover my wine-o-bill at the liquor store?

      Next, Healthcare will be paying for all the details of romance for all these apparent nymphomaniacs.

      Bad Habits–
      Drink alcohol—you pay for it.
      Smoke cigarettes–you pay for it.
      Have sex–you pay for it.
      You Pay For IT!

      Report Post »  
    • Ray2447
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:35pm

      I attended a T-party rally in 2009, and was told by a prominent Republican official that my sign was not appropriate for the tax protest event. http://tinyurl.com/77sbg9u What‘s not appropriate are his comment and Sandra Fluke’s addled statements about who should pay for women’s contraception. There are Offices of Women‘s Health at the federal level at my State’s level and at my County’s level, but none anywhere for men. Of the fifteen leading causes of death in America (according to the CDC), men lead in 12 categories, men are tied with women in two categories, and women lead in only one category. http://manamongoaks.com/lumber.html It’s way past due to stop all the wasteful taxpayer funding of feminist pork. :-/

      Report Post »  
    • coldarkstare
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:48pm

      she is a political libb slut…there i said it. again (with no guilt,shame, or regret..i callem as i see them)

      Report Post » coldarkstare  
    • kjjboy
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:54pm

      Does Nobody understand that birth control is not solely prescribed for preventing, but also for many OTHER hormonal things for women???? Do no women comment on this site? someone must understand this?
      That being said, it is beside the point….government shouldn’t be mandating religious entities to do anything. BUT, constantly making this about sex is making you people look ignorant.

      Report Post »  
    • Mateytwo Barreett
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 7:30pm

      @Spiney
      Can we put you down for $40.00/ mo.

      Report Post » Mateytwo Barreett  
    • Mateytwo Barreett
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 7:33pm

      @spankey
      Or even worse Gohnarealectum! Incurable- tota;;y impervious to antibiotics.

      Report Post » Mateytwo Barreett  
    • EchoHawk
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 7:35pm

      The issue is of individual liberty. The Church cried foul, in the defense of the religious institution of Georgetown University, attempting to make the argument that their religious conviction was violated by the government forcing them to not refuse access, through it’s offered health care plans, hormonal contraception. The Church lost the First Amendment argument because the government has no authority to force the Churches religious convictions to apply to individuals seeking access to legally established medical benefits. The religious institution must offer a health care plan that includes hormonal contraception or it denies access by legal definition. If that plan differs in cost then either the insurer or the individual should make up the difference. In many cases the insurer may find that offering hormonal contraception is an overall cost reduction considering the alternative. $1000 in pills or the cost of delivering a child. Frankly I‘m surprised the insurer isn’t passing them out like tic tac’s.

      Report Post »  
    • Mateytwo Barreett
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 7:37pm

      @Biff.
      Now We’re talkin”!!!
      Arms include explosive and rocket propelled systems. You know, I just don‘t think I could survive without some RPG’s!!!

      Report Post » Mateytwo Barreett  
    • AOL_REFUGEE
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 7:59pm

      A ‘fluke’ is, and obviously continues to be, a class of parasitic flatworms.

      Report Post » AOL_REFUGEE  
    • FreedomPurveyor
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 8:34pm

      Ms. Fluke has her logic backwards (as is usually the case with liberals). Not providing contraception under health care does not limit access; instead, providing it increases access.

      Her logic says that your access to any product or service is being limited if it isn’t provided for free. Classic entitlement mentality.

      Report Post » FreedomPurveyor  
    • Link8on
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 9:04pm

      @lani59
      “”" Unprotected liberal sex is a good thing as HIV can help to reduce the population…. “”"

      only if the rest of us do not have to pay for the treatment of irresponsible people.

      Report Post » Link8on  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 9:21pm

      At 30 years old, and attending Georgetown University Law School, one of the more prestigious schools in D.C., which comes along with a corresponding price tag, if the little lady could afford the cost of the education, could she not, as well as most other female law students there afford their own birth control pills. If not, why should taxpayers or insurance companies support them. Let them come up with their own resources and “pay to play” on their own.

      Report Post »  
    • little big man
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 9:53pm

      Ok I take blood pressure meds 2 of them so that stupid bit_h is compairing birth control pills to blood pressure pills.

      Is she out of her f-ing mind?? if I don’t take my blood pressure pills I may have a stroke and die, if she doesn’t get birth control pills what will happen to her????? well she could us a rubber or just don’t have sex.

      Good god this woman is very stupid.

      Report Post » little big man  
    • Glenn in Virginia
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 10:13pm

      A thousand dollars a year for birth control?

      That woman is doin‘ a lotta sumthin’.

      Report Post »  
    • voiceofreason305
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 10:30pm

      Glenn Beck you need to listen to this comment. I have listenend to Beck, Rush, and now Hannity tonight trying to defend the Catholic church’s right to offer the healthcare of their choosing. The left has tricked you into helping them, they are shifting the window. They have passed the arguement of whether or not ANY private institution or business can be forced to provide any benifit at all to free willing members. If my company decided to offer a box of bandaids as our healthcare package, that is between my company and any free willing individual who chose to accept my offer. For every freedom there is an equal and opposite responsibility…THAT is the only discussion left.

      Report Post »  
    • TexasKnight
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:00pm

      Not only is she promoting something that is unsafe, she is asking for us to pay for un-health insurance. I want my health insurer to pay for my big macs, since they make my body less healthy.
      You do realize, birth control stops a healthy function of the body. I think the libs are all attacking women by pushing this destruction of their natural bodies. Can we get mandated coverage for my cigarettes, since I like smoking after sex.
      Also, I seem to have to get my wife drunk first, so maybe I can get wine covered too?

      Report Post » TexasKnight  
    • Meyvn
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:01pm

      and she’s still a slut.

      Report Post » Meyvn  
    • destrecht
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:17pm

      Except that groceries are actually food…

      Report Post »  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:31pm

      It’s not about unprotected sex, it‘s about her demand for all taxpayers to pay for one more thing for someone who isn’t contributing to the tax burden.

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • TeacherJeff
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:54pm

      Reading stories like this makes me all the more thankful that I fled America to Thailand five years ago. Thailand is a third world country by most standards yet it quite easy to buy condoms and other contraceptives. There’s a 7/11 every two blocks here and each and every one of them carries multiple brands of condoms. Additionally, there’s a Planned Parenthood downtown Hatyai, I know America has lost alot of it‘s luster the past three years thanks to King Obama but I find it hard to believe that it’s worse than a third world country. Gimme a break!

      Jeff

      Report Post »  
    • Dr. Sandy Kramer
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 2:01am

      Abortion is not “health care”. Abortion is MURDER.

      Report Post »  
    • Locked
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 8:05am

      “Abortion is not “health care”. Abortion is MURDER.”

      Good thing that not a single person in the debate was mentioning abortion though, right?

      You’d think a doctor would be able to stay on the topic. Perhaps it’s a doctor like “Dr Pepper” is one?

      Report Post »  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 8:24am

      They keep focusing on one out come of sex (pregnancy) and talking the expensive IUD’s birth control. When the fact of the matter condoms should always be at the forefront of this debate they’re the only one that protects against disease as well as pregnancy.They’re also very inexpensive and have zero chance on any side effects if use priorly. IUD’s have caused blood clots,strokes,heart aatcks,and death in some cases. Condoms have never killed or injuried a single person.

      Report Post »  
    • chigger
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 10:13am

      kjjboy
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:54pm
      Does Nobody understand that birth control is not solely prescribed for preventing, but also for many OTHER hormonal things for women???? Do no women comment on this site? someone must understand this?That being said, it is beside the point….government shouldn’t be mandating religious entities to do anything. BUT, constantly making this about sex is making you people look ignorant.
      __________________________________________________________-

      Do you understand that bc pills used for medical problems IS already covered by insurance? And, even for sex it is covered by some insurance.

      Report Post » chigger  
    • Spartacus1990
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:23pm

      I thought it was only a press conference made to look like testimony? Was she ‘sworn’ before the presentation? She mentions in the CNN interview “her testimony,” there are many points that she made in Washington that were wholly false and unsubstantiated, if so why wouldn’t Congress be taking action for false testimony? If it wasn’t “testimony” someone needs to call her on the carpet for that!

      Report Post »  
    • wlc
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 3:37pm

      Actually she is promoting free riding on the health care system. Interesting that the mandate was designed to reduce free-riders. Unintended consequences?

      Report Post »  
    • marhee9
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:19pm

      This whole thing has been twisted in an effort to divert from the real issue of the government mandating to the people. When you peel the onion, it has nothing to do with womens health, religion, or Rush Limbaugh. It’s the whole pay no attention to the man behind the curtain tactic.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMToF_H7rqM

      Report Post »  
    • brick001
      Posted on March 15, 2012 at 12:21am

      How?

      Report Post »  
    • Anamah
      Posted on March 15, 2012 at 1:27am

      So disagreeable is to be the object where both activist are shooting. That Hispanic woman employee in CNN thats a mockery!!! We find her so offensive talking to necessarily low IQ public… why is she always laughing on everybody? Always so blind, pretending to ignore the truth, she is so dishonest! With this kind of employees CNN is mocking the viewers. I’ll never be one again. Very rude!!! Is she paid to make the idiot as the other one planted by Anita Dunn, the Fluke are all those kidding us? How dare all of you with our country falling apart by design!!!

      Report Post »  
    • VolunteerBodyguards
      Posted on March 15, 2012 at 8:45am

      Sandra Fluke only promotes women’s healthcare no differently than we promote national defense or veterans healthcare. It remains a Limboss lie & Vatican lie that such shared costs via tax payers or private insurers is a religious or “unprotected sex” issue.

      Report Post »  
    • kabenninger
      Posted on March 18, 2012 at 1:17pm

      Let’s not forget, also, that the use of contraceptives, through oral medications, is dangerous for women. Just watch the commercials for birth control. There are disclaimers at the end of those commercials telling us all that can go wrong – like blood clots, etc. As far as I’m concerned, birth control is anti-women’s health.

      Report Post »  
    • beaJ
      Posted on March 18, 2012 at 1:45pm

      Women burn‘t their bra’s for women’s right to be
      equal pay as well being equal to men. Am i right”???
      I had the right to work beside men and was treated
      equal pay and respect. After womens lib i had to prove
      myself qualifed to get the job. And then i was requared
      to do more tahn the men. Now women have to pay the bill
      for thier freedom from men to do what they want. And
      now the so called liberated women wants the family man
      to pay for thier medical bill. Take that back demand everyone
      has to pay her medical bill’s.
      Before government got so big people took care of the
      small bills and used insurance for hospital bills. That is the best way
      to do it. Then the unions demanded companys give imploies insurance
      you all used to to extreme. Now you scream 20 to 50 copay is to much.
      Tell me you are a liberated women no. If you want to play
      pay for it or get paid when you play. Keep your mouth shut .
      Name call it what it is what you get when you advertize over the media.
      Just like all the women in television and movies dress and show to much.
      Act like you are better than anyone else. I do not watch television
      or movies any more it is just trash.

      Report Post »  
    • conservativecat
      Posted on March 18, 2012 at 11:40pm

      The question is actually about the 1st amendment. She is very stoic and very practiced. I do not care for her.
      The whole intention here is to attack the religious community and also to make a place that is vulnerable enough that Abortion can be tacked on later. I know, as these people are Communists. They hate goodness and justice. They are the same little gnats that couldn’t play by the rules on the playground. Never content, jealous, insecure and narcissistic.
      The true women of America marry our guys, and have beautiful babies and have careers.

      Report Post » conservativecat  
    • Busybea007
      Posted on March 19, 2012 at 10:51am

      Not only is this ridiculous – but just a “screen” to take our minds off the REAL problems like JOBS,
      THE DEFICIT, INFLATION, OBAMACARE and the Gigantic WORLD-WIDE PROBLEMS- that have continually gotten worse over the past three years since Obama was elected!! This is just a shill – doing
      the will – of the Obama Administration.

      Report Post »  
    • scarletworm
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:36am

      Keep your PILLS off my BILLS!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • WardMD
      Posted on April 9, 2012 at 11:26pm

      @JohnnyMidknight, I haven’t bothered watching the video (she won’t say ANYTHING to convince ME of her position), but taking you at your word (that she NOW says Birth Control costs $50/Month) – I’m even LESS convinced of her position – as in her PREVIOUS comments, she said that Birth Control cost $1,000 (or more) a year..

      Now, I never graduated from college, but the last time I checked, 1,000 divided by 12 (we still have ONLY 12 months a year, right?) equals slightly over $83 a month.

      SO, Sandra, WHICH IS IT? $50/Month or $83/Month, AND – more importantly – WHY the hell should you have a “RIGHT” to contraception in the first place (ESPECIALLY paid for by someone ELSE)?!

      You want to spend your time screwing around (literally) – be my guest – but NOT on my dime!

      Might I suggest you GET your law degree, pass the bar, become a high-paid (1%’er), and screw as many sleezy lawyers you care to (while you’re screwing your clients [figuratively]) – THEN you can afford to PAY for your own Contraception (like the REST OF US do)!

      Better YET – Go Screw Yourself!

      Report Post »  
  • blazingaway
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:25am

    Liberals are mindless midgets, incomprehensible dolts unable to understand real issues.

    Report Post » blazingaway  
  • Veteran Patriot
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:23am

    this is not about access or anything like that. This is about diversion that is meant to change the national conversation from the economy, unemployment and fuel prices. The fact that this has become the questions and and campaign debates for president is proof of that. The current administration and the democratic party are carefully orchestrating this so that when one debate starts to die out, the next one is prepared and waiting in the wings to take center stage. They are controlling the conversation. Since the MSM is not calling them out on it, then the job falls to us to keep the really important issues in the spotlight. This should be our discussion and debate.

    Obama Must Go in 2012!

    Report Post »  
    • Lumbar Spine
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:28am

      Ummmm…I believe it’s Rep. Daniel Issa and Rush Limbaugh, among other right wingers, who have kept this alive.

      Report Post »  
    • PPMStudios
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:30am

      Yep, this is just a canard designed to disrupt the focus of the people on real issues…

      Report Post » PPMStudios  
    • heyjim55
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:33am

      Thank you
      Why do so many people on the right fall for this crap is beyond me , the left pulls this all the time and now they have gotten almost two weeks of air time out of it. The Blaze should along with other forms of media turn it around on the Left.

      Report Post »  
    • sawbuck
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:38am

      Spinless
      Another twisted comment from a projecting idiot..!

      Report Post » sawbuck  
    • OklahomaBound
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:15pm

      You are correct Veteran Patriot, but this issue was also manufactured because polls were showing that Obama was losing the female vote so they had to create an issue that made it look like Obama and the socialist were looking out for women’s rights against an anti-woman GOP. Of course no one from the GOP, the church or anywhere else is trying to eliminate contraceptives or deny them to anyone, they are just saying that like any other product if you want it then FREAKING go out and buy it with your own money rather than thinking government can mandate that others have to pay for it for you! But that makes too much sense so the WH and its compliant propagandist media rephrase the argument as the evil GOP and church as being anti-female therefore your choice in the next election should be for the party that is fighting for your “rights” to free stuff.

      Report Post » OklahomaBound  
    • mrqstixx
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:23pm

      Exactly right, and it was very clever. Their little boy George started the ball rolling at the debate he
      moderated. If nothing else they are devious.

      Report Post »  
    • lbyrd26
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:30pm

      Lumbar spine, others in here just ignore you as your MBSNBC talking points are so easy to shoot down with facts logic and reasonning. I am not one of them. I amwilling to get down to your level and set your talking points straight. 1] nobody is trying to destroy planned Parenthood. They serve many good purposes and are a valued service. We simply are trying to get them to quit using hard working tax payers money, most of which don’t want their money used for this and in our republic we have before 2008 gotten to say where that money should be spent. In full disclosure, I support a womans right to choose after she is given all the facts and can make an informed decision. I believe this because it is liberal women who are doing this and that limits their breeding to a minimum.

      2}Ahh, the hell with 2. it’s makinng my head hurt trying to find single sylable words so you can understand.

      Just another product of the liberal public school system.

      Report Post »  
    • BikerMickAG
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:26pm

      Why is it that liberals are always so wrong?! It’s those in the Obamao administration & connected with it who are continuing to keep this useful idiot, Fluke, out there just like this. Some enterprising entrepreneur should start selling T-shirts that read, “Fluke sukes!” That would actually solve her whole dilemma & also about says it all too.

      Report Post » BikerMickAG  
    • mtcountrygrl
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:36pm

      @OKBound – But is backfiring on Obama. Have you seen the latest poles. He is LOSING support among women! Why? Women tend to be more religious then men and this is about religious freedom.

      Report Post »  
    • Inlightofthings
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 6:23pm

      VET…
      I could care less who keeps it alive. Look at ALL polling data the last 10 days since this broke. There is no doubt an awakening has taken place and Rush really is the wrong guy to try and take down. Never happen and he becomes a rally point for the right. Lumber…Jerk… et al have got to be in knots over this….

      Report Post »  
    • Chief Joe
      Posted on March 14, 2012 at 7:14am

      VP, you are correct. As far as Rush is concerned, he is in the business of making money, he is an entertainer. Albeit a right wing one, he is going to say things that get more people to listen to him, his advertisers can attest to that, well, except for maybe the ones who bailed out on him, but soon they will see the err f their ways.

      I been saying it for a few years now, and I will keep saying it. “Keep your powder dry”.

      Report Post » Chief Joe  
    • Susie40
      Posted on March 18, 2012 at 4:06pm

      Not only is the argument all that you say it is, it IS about the First Amendment. Our right to free exercise of our religion. This bunch ‘up there’ knows they must destroy the practices of the Catholic Church first before they destroy the rest of remnant of believers.This health business is just a facade. How is pumping our women full of hormones a healthy thing? It causes blood clots in the legs and is proven in some instances to contributing to the explosion of breast cancer. But the important fact in all the discussion is our Bill Of Rights and our First Amendment. They are so good at distracting.

      Report Post »  
  • littlefish
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:22am

    Will S O M E O N E P L E A S E . . . . . .

    A S K T H I S “ L A D Y ” . . . .
    W H Y . . . Does she continues to promote…

    U n P R O T E C T E D S E X ? ?

    Report Post » littlefish  
  • Obama Nation
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:20am

    Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Sarah Palin and even Andrew Brietbart and his legacy all say they want to vet Obama this time around. Yet none of them will stand behind Sheriff Joe Arpaio who has announced that there is probable cause to believe Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.

    They are all full of you know what!

    Report Post »  
    • Lumbar Spine
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:30am

      Andrew Breitbart is dead…and the others don’t publicly support Joe Arpaio because Joe Arpaio is an embarrassing nutjob. Only lazy, ignorant people are unable or unwilling to see through Arpaio’s bull***t “investigation”.

      Report Post »  
    • Wally P
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:30am

      Very true my friend.

      Report Post »  
    • FormerLib
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:36am

      Even in death, Breitbart is still smarter than any lib posting here.

      Report Post »  
    • Leader1776
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:11pm

      @SPINELESS
      The only issue with Sheriff Joe is his investigation is about a year late. Many of us dl’ed the WH long form and dropped it into Photoshop to view the 11 or so layers. Proof this was a fraud. They are defrauding the feds. Secondly, they should be jailed on terminal stupidity for not“flattening” the file before saving as a PDF. I thought you lefties were so tech savvy? Just like all your pseudo-science behind global cooling ………. I mean warming ………. I mean climate change.

      Report Post » Leader1776  
    • SquidVetOhio
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:15pm

      Here’s the dirty little secret that you need to come to grips with. Even IF Obama was not born here and it COULD be proven. NOTHING will happen. The Republicans would have to act to remove him from office. Let’s see, what’s the history of this happening? Think Bill Clinton. The focus needs to be removing him from office at the ballot box. Everything else is futile. I know you don‘t want to hear that laws don’t mean anything anymore but really, are you surprised?

      Report Post » SquidVetOhio  
    • 1TrueOne55
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:42pm

      I think when you go look at the laws of Hawaii it is that when Barry was adopted by his Step Father his original Birth Certificate was sealed away in state archives and a new one issued when the adoption was certified as legal. When that happened he now had a different father listed on that certificate.

      This is an area I know of some certitude since this is what happened to me with my oldest daughter when her mother remarried and her new husband adopted my oldest daughter. I was removed from the B/C and he was replaced as the biological father on the paperwork.

      And what is not talked about is how he used this to his advantage to gain low cost college education on the taxpayers dime.

      Report Post » 1TrueOne55  
    • rosegrower
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:42pm

      Be happy – a recent issue of Pravda (!) published a piece taking the lamestream media in the US to task for not following up on Arpaio’s allegations. That really is the function of what used to be called the 5th Estate – to follow leads and either lay the claims to rest or push them to the fore with real evidence. What passes for journalism today is closer in nature to what used to be relegated to the National Inquirer.

      Report Post »  
    • pitboss711
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:47pm

      @LUMBAR SPINE – So, as an American, it makes no difference to you whether or not our president is qualified for the position?? And, don’t tell me his qualifications have been proven, because they haven’t! Don’t come on here unless you have something worthwhile to say. But, then again…if you had something worthwhile to say, you wouldn’t be a liberal.

      Report Post » pitboss711  
    • DIR
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:45pm

      While we’re talking about nut jobs, how about Al (Schitz) Gore. Even his wife has left him. Joe makes his inmates wear pink underwear. Gore wears pink underwear because he wants to. Henry Waxman. He was caught smelling someones bicycle seat. When the cops showed up at his house to question him about it they found his unregistered collection of stolen bicycle seats. And Nancy Pelosi, she’s just plain nuts. The list of nutty liberals is endless. Anyway what does this all have to do with paying for someone elses birth control whcih we already do for the most part.

      Report Post »  
  • COFemale
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:20am

    Was it my imagination it appeared like our Miss Sandra Fluke was reading her answers where Will was asking the question off the cuff? So Sandra can’t speak to the talking points without coaching. She either believes strongly in what she is saying and would not need coaching or she is just a means to an end. I believe the latter.

    Will made an excellent point about gym membership.

    Report Post » COFemale  
    • ADNIL
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:25pm

      Why should I pay for someone else’s recreation? We are talking about unmarried women having sex for recreation. Not even a health benefit, not compared to an active gym membership. If you are willing to pay for her recreational sex, why not my season lift tickets? At least I won’t be spreading STDs. And, there is a lot more physical activity and healthy benefits from a day spent on the slopes compared to a roll in the sack. IMHO

      Your 15 minutes is up. NEXT!

      Report Post »  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:09pm

      COFEMALE, Good to see that somebody else noticed that too. I started laughing to myself for seeing her following in the footsteps of 0bama. Maybe someday she can graduate from file cards to a government paid for Teleprompter.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
  • Mark0331
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:20am

    How did we go from a 1st Amendment issue and Barrys’ further trampling of our rights…to this idiot and her drivel? Is the Left this desperate?..must be.

    Report Post » Mark0331  
  • Lumbar Spine
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:20am

    The Catholic Church is, in effect, attempting to limit access to contraception to employees of schools and hospitals which it owns, regardless whether those employees are Catholic.

    Report Post »  
    • Balthazor
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:23am

      Refusing to pay does not equal limiting access, no matter what your script may say.

      Report Post » Balthazor  
    • NatalieF
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:27am

      Then don’t work for these organizations or go to school there! Why should one choice trump another???

      Report Post » NatalieF  
    • FormerLib
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:34am

      And refusing to pay for Ms Fluke’s groceries is limiting her access to food, too, I suppose.

       
    • teresa2010
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:36am

      Just is just an attempt to get religion out of everything……Planned Parenthood/Community health centers gives abortion/contraption pills for free….They are trying to back down the Catholic Church..

      Michelle said two weeks before the Obama mandate that the Irish Catholics are too powerful…

      This is an attempt to control and have one religion (Gov’t run national religion)..Preventing this is what the separation of Church and State is about

      Report Post »  
    • jvlag3
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:41am

      No the Catholic church is standing by its teaching, the government is forcing them to go against them. The employee is not stopped from buying supplemental insurance to cover a “health benefit.” BTW when did birth control and abortion become a health benefit? That’s right…“Roe vs Wade” the termination (since murder is such a strong word for the left) of a life after irresponsible sex…

      Report Post »  
    • Lumbar Spine
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:46am

      TERESA…allow me to remind you that conservatives are trying to put Planned Parenthood out of business.

      Report Post »  
    • angelcat
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:01pm

      No, they can access their birth control through Planned Parenthood, government programs, or pay for it themselves. If it is so important to them that insurance cover their birth control, they are not FORCED to work for a Catholic organizationl. Go work elsewhere instead of trying to force others to violate their consciences to save you the $9 a month that generic birth control pills cost at Target. I would venture to guess that those who are screaming the loudest about access to birth control think nothing of spending the same amount on Starbucks, alchohol , cigarettes, expensive shoes, etc.

      Report Post »  
    • ThankYouFounders
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:01pm

      Lumbar – Planned Parenthood, really? How come you want to limit access to life for babies?

      Report Post »  
    • hillbillyinny
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

      What @ balthazor said: “Refusing to pay does not equal limiting access, no matter what your script may say.”

      Amen and amen!

      Report Post »  
    • teresa2010
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:16pm

      @ Lumbar Spine…Thank God we are trying BIG TIME to DEFUND Planned Parenthood…Abortion Clinic is what it is!!! IT NEEDS TO BE GONE COMPLETELY ….GONE PERIOD!!!!!!!!

      Free Pills are available …Call your local Human health services…SO NO WE DON”T NEED THE BABY KILLING PLANNED PARENTHOOD

      Report Post »  
    • 1TrueOne55
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:50pm

      Yeah well she is a “STUDENT” not an employee so the argument is really mute if that fact would be noted by any of the pundits worth their weight out there. And that fact would disqualify her for coverage by the very nature of the argument currently on the table.

      So that is my two cents on this subject.

      Report Post » 1TrueOne55  
    • guntotinsquaw
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:51pm

      Lumbar..So glad you mentioned Planned Parenthood…I called to see how much my BC shot would cost…$90…It costs me $80 at my doctors office…why again am I paying for Planned Parenthood..and no I don’t want the government anywhere near my BC..I would rather have them as far from my bedroom and my womb as I can get them..

      Report Post » guntotinsquaw  
    • Henrys_Ghost
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 2:55pm

      Well folks you heard it here, Lumbar Spine, in favor of eugenics for inferior races, i.e. PLANNED PARENTHOOD’s founder, Margaret Sanger!

      Report Post » Henrys_Ghost  
    • unworthy
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:32pm

      no reason for the Catholic Church to be pimps. Religious freedom is at stake here. Do you have a moral conscience? Seems like it is all relative to you and you are willing to give up your freedoms and let the government control/mandate what you can and cannot do. You must be a socialist/communist at heart. Get your contraceptives elsewhere…we are so uninterested in your sex life and so unwilling to pay for it!

      Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:18am

    .
    Way too much plastic pecker…..Why do Lesbians need contraceptive’s?………

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • FormerLib
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:31am

      I wonder why they didn‘t point out that she’s being booked and represented by Anita Dunn’s PR firm SKDKnickerbocker. You remember Anita, the former White House Communications Director for Obama, who proclaimed Mao as a major influence of hers growing up until she had to resign. Ms Dunn’s husband, as it turns out, is Robert Bauer, former chief White House Legal Counsel and still Obama’s personal attorney. If anyone thinks the White House is not involved in this up to Obama’s barn door ears is either a moron or a Democrat.

      Report Post »  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:35am

      They said she was visiting her boyfriend over the weekend,in SF
      of all places, Pelosi Country….HMMMMM ?????
      The Boy Kings Mama….

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

      .
      MIBUGNU2, I think her boyfriend is Chas Bono…..

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:25pm

      SPANKDAMONKEY, good one Spank, but she is supposed to be seeing an unnamed son of William Mutterperl.

      Report Post » RJJinGadsden  
    • TheRealJoker
      Posted on March 30, 2012 at 11:43am

      Did any of you actually read/see her statement? It’s not about sex, it’s about the medicines other uses

      Report Post »  
  • Juniemoon
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:17am

    The Washington Post polls are saying this issue is not showing that women are rushing to Obama’s side on this. The scam isn’t working.

    Report Post » Juniemoon  
    • sbenard
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:26am

      “Scam” is the most accurate term I’ve heard yet. I had been saying “hoax”. Thank you!

      Report Post » sbenard  
  • USPATRIOT101
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:17am

    The feminist agenda is sickening. I’m a woman, you will cater to my every need!!!

    Report Post » USPATRIOT101  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:16am

    Sandra “obamaslut” Fluke will never stray from the script that the White House has given her – she is just another typical, mindless, liberal drone.

    Report Post » Tri-ox  
    • wildwood
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:31pm

      aMEN.!!!she was give her script. Obama wants to pit women against women, he has nothing to run on but diversion!!!
      I hope all women will realize that he used FLUKE and he is using all women just to get votes!!!
      I don’t mind paying for the really poor, but people like Fluke and there are millions ,let them have some self respect some pride!!!!
      A carton of cigarettes , a case of beer, two or three carton of pop, a movie , give a couple up, go tto the drug store and buy you birthcontrol.DON’Y EXPECT SOME ONE ELSE TO PAY FOR IT!!!!who DO YOU THINK PAY!!!!
      The insurance co. and etc doesn’t pick up the tab it handed down to the tax payers!!!!
      These women are shameful and so are the men FOR NOT CHIPPING IN they too belong to the GIMMIE, GIMMIE CLUB!!

      Report Post »  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:16am

    Sandra “obamaslut” Fluke will never stray from the script that the White House has given her – she is just another typical, mindless, liberal drone.

    Report Post » Tri-ox  
  • skiz
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:15am

    Is she on spring break or something. How do you appear on TV every day and still go to class? Yeah that’s what I thought. IDIOT!

    Report Post » skiz  
    • ThankYouFounders
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:21am

      Skiz, do some homework. She’s not even in college. She’s a thirty-year old FORMER law student who is a feminist activist.

      Report Post »  
    • Jenny Lind
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:31am

      So are you saying she never graduated? If so, I wonder why not? Got a better offer maybe?

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:36am

      AND FRAUD …. she needs to produce that “friend” who couldn’t get treatment from her testimony .. she is a PROVEN LIAR!

      Report Post »  
    • ThankYouFounders
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:02pm

      Jenny, her resume is (or at least was) on Linkedin. She only went to G‘town after finding out it’s insurance plan wouldn’t cover her birth control so she wanted to go there and become an activist and force them to change their views to fit hers.

      Report Post »  
    • chips1
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:07pm

      When is the last time she gave Al Gore a massage? Just wondering.

      Report Post »  
    • Clare Clare
      Posted on March 18, 2012 at 4:54pm

      She’s still listed as a “student” in the Georgetown University’s electronic student directory. I just checked. So no, while we can all see that she’s obviously not studying, she’s not a “former” student.

      As a Georgetown graduate myself, I’m sure all the REAL law-students there at Georgetown, who don’t have “public interest scholarships” and are thus going hundreds of thousands of dollars into debt, are studying their brains out while this s lu t tramps all over the airwaves… they must really appreciate the fact that she’ll nonetheless be graduating just like they will… the libs call that “fairness.”

      Report Post »  
  • SoupSandwich
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:15am

    Bennefits. All about what they deem is their rights to taxes in the form of bennefits. We are already monetarily broke, add morally too.
    The great Harvard guru dude that is too frickin brilliant to relate to the unwashed masses has 56 billion per year in regulations alone… Will they rebuild us in 0′s image or go right to Marx and Lenin?

    Report Post »  
  • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:14am

    I hope he washed afterward. For someone who has a $1000 worth of sex every year, yuck. Use lots of hand sanitizer and rubber gloves.

    Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • jrcess
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:14am

    I guess she has so many sexual partners she needs help. Help the poor woman before she comes down with so many sexual transmitted diseases. I guess she could move to Nevada and get help like the rest of the prostitutes.

    Report Post »  
    • Lumbar Spine
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:22am

      How do you know how many sexual partners Ms. Fluke has had? How could you possibly know that? You are aware, aren’t you, that oral contraceptives are taken by women every day regardless whether they have sex every day or once a year?

      Report Post »  
    • ThankYouFounders
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:05pm

      Lumbar. It’s pretty easy actually. She estimated it was costing $3,000 for contraception throughout three years of law school.

      Based on the cost of condoms and the pill, this means she’d have to have sex three times a day for three years to spend this much money.

      This is what spurred the slut comment.

      Report Post »  
    • spirited
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:14pm

      Is mouth wash included?

      Report Post » spirited  
    • SoupSandwich
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 1:31pm

      Spiney-
      Do we have to pay for your batteries, extensions and attachments too? If your 0 doll pops and zips across your mom’s basement, can you submit to SSI for a new one and does the other one go to PP for demonstration? How does it work with all of your F ing bidness being in the open?

      Report Post »  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:11am

    The last few weeks “have been difficult” for poor Sandra, boohoo. They have been the best weeks of your miserable life and you know it. Enjoy you phony because your 15 minutes are just about up… despite Soledad’s best efforts to extend them.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
  • Wdawg
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:10am

    She is the Joe the Plumber of the Left. Get use to her….

    Report Post » Wdawg  
  • NOTAMUSHROOM
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:10am

    She’s a tool. Case closed.

    Report Post »  
  • cvs334
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:09am

    California has medical marijuana .. is that covered by health insurance?

    Report Post »  
  • Wdawg
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:09am

    I think the argument they they are making is that if the cost is too high then that is banning it.

    Report Post » Wdawg  
    • ThankYouFounders
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:23am

      Sort of a good analogy.

      Joe the Plumber and the Right want less government intervention and the ability to keep more of the money we earn.

      Sandara Fluke and the Left want the government to control peoples lives and to steal money from people who earn it and hand it to people who don’t earn it under the guise of “access” or “entitlements”.

      Report Post »  
    • NatalieF
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:31am

      Yeah too bad they didn‘t get the memo that Target’s pharmacy charges between $12-$18 month for their prescription birth control pills.

      Report Post » NatalieF  
  • Minonkman
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:08am

    Maybe i missed something, but I think I would gladly pay for her birth control. The world does not need more than one of these.

    Report Post » Minonkman  
  • Really2012
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:07am

    She has had her 15 minutes. Lets move on..

    Report Post »  
    • TerryDo
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:46am

      My sentiments exactly…
      But by November 2012 Obama and his cabinet will be swept from the White House and a New Socially Correct Agendum will be in place with relevant input and referrendums from the people of each State.

      Report Post »  
  • Detroit paperboy
    Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:06am

    Isnt her fifteen minutes up yet ? I think so …

    Report Post »  
    • rosegrower
      Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:43pm

      Maybe she”s earning enough from her guest spots on these programs to pay for her birth control.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 20

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love