Politics

‘The Man Is a Dictator’: Beck Blasts Obama’s Move to Circumvent Congress

Glenn Beck on Thursday blasted President Barack Obama’s use of executive authority to make a recess appointment, calling him a dictator who views the American people as children.

On Wednesday, Obama announced he was appointing Richard Cordray the country’s chief consumer watchdog, making a recess appointment while the Senate was technically in session. The same day, he named three members to fill vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board. Explaining his decision before a crowd in Cleveland, Ohio, Obama said he has “an obligation to act on behalf of the American people” when Congress refuses and hurts the economy as a result.

Obama had been at odds with Senate Republicans over Cordray’s appointment as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, part of new bank regulations passed in 2010. Republicans had stalled Cordray’s nomination, arguing the new agency — tasked with overseeing mortgage companies, payday lenders, and other financial companies — is too powerful and unaccountable.

“The arrogance of this man and the way he rewrites all of American history — all of American history — is astounding,” Beck said on his radio program. “Americans, hear what your president is saying: I’ll work within the system. But if they won’t move, then…I will dictate where we’re going.”

Defining a dictator as “someone who dictates what’s going to be done,” Beck said Obama meets the definition and is running the country according to his vision of what it ought to be, with no regard for the Constitution.

“He just looks at people as children,” Beck said of Obama’s aforementioned “obligation.“ ”The man is a dictator and he is building a dictatorship outside the Constitution of the United States of America.”

GOP candidates hoping to unseat the president in November also reacted to his move, with Iowa caucus winner Mitt Romney calling him a “crony capitalist” and Rick Santorum saying the Senate should sue over Obama over the decision.

“What the president did was wrong — pretty scary stuff,” Santorum said, according to The Hill.

In a statement also reported by The Hill, Ron Paul slammed Obama for his “continuous overstepping of his constitutional boundaries” and said if he “insists on behaving in such a cavalier manner…then action by Congress may become necessary to rein in his flagrant contempt for the rules.”

The Associated Press reported former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Obama showed “a total willingness to violate the law and impose an imperial presidency.”

Comments (671)

1 2 3 ... 16
  • Sam Brown
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:37pm

    The goal is to create a constitutional crisis and seize power. All he has to do is keep stirring the pot till it boils then here comes the commie government.

    Report Post »  
    • MS-GlenNBC
      Posted on March 27, 2012 at 1:23am

      I wonder if Ann Romney has the stones to call Obama a Socialist or a Dictator?

      Mittens sure Can’t muster up enough courage to do so.

      Report Post » MS-GlenNBC  
  • DoctorRon
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:35pm

    Obama knows that, with his record, there is no way he can be re-elected so he’s going to do all he can in his last year to impose socialism on the American people.

    Report Post » DoctorRon  
    • Miami
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:34pm

      HELLO..!!!

      Chavez and Castro have said that Obama was getting things done faster than they had. This was no joke when he took over the car companies, last I checked the government still had controlling interest in GM and Chrysler. So its no longer corporations moving production of shore but our government. GE has moved much of their production to China after they got a bailout. The government is dictating where companies can and how they do business. Shutting down power plants, not forcing them to upgrade but close their doors. Giving away! Giving away! money to their supporters under the disguise of green energy jobs by Billions of dollars.

      HELLO…..!!!

      CAN YOU NOT PUT THESE TOGETHER…?!

      Miami  
    • Ronko
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:47pm

      We would be better off with 4 more years of Obama then an unknown Republican who could do worse damage like Paul or Romney. After Obama leaves then hopefully a real Republican or somebody for the Republic shows up, wins and fixes the problems that the country has.

       
    • Dumbwhiteguy
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:01pm

      They told him to do it.

      http://www.globalreport2010.com/globalwatchspecialreport.pdf

      Report Post »  
    • The10thAmendment
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:09pm

      When this site first started I warned that in 2012 Obama would invoke the Patriot Act and other measures through Executive Order and declare a Constitutional Dictatorship. Glad to see that Beck is finally listening and coming around to what’s going on. But to be completely honest, if some freak of scam failed and Obama DIDN’T get to remain in office and the American people elect Romney, and especially Gingrich, the program to take America apart would go forward with just minimal slowdown. Santorum is rapidly kneeling to the progressive gods of idiocy and doesn’t possess the intellect, courage, or principles to do a damned thing about it.

      This is what we get America and it’s exactly what progressivism has purchased at OUR expense. Obama 1, 2, or 3, and the mental midget Santorum who is Minnie Obama in drag.

      The10thAmendment  
    • Sirfoldallot
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:20pm

      Y is he & Eric H. not removed ? I have gone 2 Pensacola Fl. since 1980 & since that time I have not seen so many business board up. It almost made me cry. Wake up american , please..

      Report Post » Sirfoldallot  
    • Redd
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:24pm

      dunham is not a dictator, he is a communist usurper dictator.

      Report Post »  
    • John 1776
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:26pm

      “Glenn Beck on Thursday blasted President Barack Obama’s use of executive authority…”

      That’s the thing… He didn’t HAVE the authority because the Senate was being gaveled in every three days so that it would not be considered in recess…. Therefore, he could not make a “recess appointment and does not have the authority.

      Report Post » John 1776  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:29pm

      @ronko

      Yeah that Paul guy and that pesky old Constitution.

      Wake up, quit listening to Billy, Sean, Glenn, and Rush to tell you who to vote for. Do your research, then you will see there is only one choice we have other than destruction of the United States.

      Ron Paul 2012. Writing his name in if I have to.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • jzs
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:29pm

      Actually the bill in question, the one creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was passed by the House, passed by the Senate and signed by the President. That’s the way our Constitution works. That is now the law of the land.

      But the Republicans, despite the fact that the creation of this agency was passed, legally and in accordance with the Constitution, are using a parlimentary procedure to block the President’s obligation, under the Constitution, to enact the law. They are using their “advice and consent” roll to block confirmation on the nominee, which even Boehner states he doesn’t have a problem with.

      He and the Republicans just don’t like this law, a law passed in accordance with the Constitution of the United States of America. So they have refused to allow this law to go into effect by blocking a nominee that they agree is competent. They are using their “advice and consent” role to try to change existing law.

      That’s bologne. Who is abusing the legal system?

      Report Post » jzs  
    • jonnyfontain
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:50pm

      Just one more reason obama looses 2012.

      Report Post » jonnyfontain  
    • singleparent
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:00pm

      He need’s to go to JAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:08pm

      MARTINEZ012577 Paul is a cherry picker when it come to the continuation. Considering that Washington invaded Canada and Jefferson sent the navy after the Barbary Pirates, it is a bit rich to compare their foreign policy with Ron Paul’s, don’t you think? Madison wanted no part of the Articles of Confederation, or the pure “states’ rights” position, which is a misnomer considering states do not have rights. Ron Paul’s position, at best, would turn the states into separate warring “factions” (i.e. what Madison wanted to avoid) In other words Bots are as clueless as Kook Paul

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Miami
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:26pm

      jzs

      No actually it was jamed through with 51 votes in the Senate which violates Senate rules. Just like All the crap this administration has done being Extra-Constitutional. For a guy that claims to be a “Constitutional Professor” he sure seems to not know the limits of his powers. As for the clowns that jammed these bills down the throat of the United States, it was the reason they got thrown out of office in 2010 with record loses.

      You can’t really be so stupid…? Can you ?

      Report Post » Miami  
    • Miami
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:29pm

      jzs

      PS; The Congress does not have the power to give away its power as Dodd Frank does.

      Report Post » Miami  
    • Miami
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:32pm

      martinez012577

      Good Sheep, good sheep

      Go ahead and vote for Obama it’s what you really want to do…

      Report Post » Miami  
    • PRRedlin
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:41pm

      He’s leading in every poll…

       
    • PoliticiansRCrooks
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:45pm

      He is a dictator.. at least wants to be & quite acting like one. That’s why I have no idea why any one would vote from Obama after the NDAA being passed. Thats absurd.

      Report Post » PoliticiansRCrooks  
    • survivorseed
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:02pm

      Whats a recess appointment? It must be a new term since Obama is the first president in history to make one….oh thats right Bush made 171 and Reagan made 243. Beck, you are a moron

      Report Post »  
    • NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:09pm

      @ Republicorp

      If you want to out someone for being a cherry picker, first you should learn to spell “Constitution” before you try to determine it’s dictates.

      As far as Jefferson goes, he sent his fleet of Presidential defense ships after them pirates after diplomatic attempts and failure of FRANCE (surprise surprise) to defend the Mediterranean shipping lanes from the pirates capturing and ransoming American commerce vessels and crews. From 1784 to 1804. Ron Paul would protect our RIGHT to free trade just the same way that Thomas Jefferson did, it’s a staple to his 30 year mantra.

      And, Washington attacked the BRITISH in Canada, not the ‘Canadians’ that we know and love today.

      Ron Paul, 2012! Free Trade and Defense against Pirates! ;-)

      Report Post » NoNannyState4me  
    • epming
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:16pm

      I hope you are right. The bummer’s wife stated that they would change our history and our traditions. I wondered at the time how one changes history; now I know: lies and distortion.

      Our tradition of being a constitutional republic is in jeopardy also. Bummer’s policies are nothing like what our founders wanted. This “recess” appointment and the reduction of our military personnel are flagrant examples of that.

      Report Post »  
    • KICKILLEGALSOUT
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:22pm

      The real question is where is the checks and balances in this country? Where is the House and Senate? The great majority are just as corrupt as Obama, just look at who voted for the NDAA American detention and torture bill. Only a few Dems and Reps in the Senate voted against it. This is exactly why we need Dr Ron Paul to drive the establishment out of Washington.

      Report Post » KICKILLEGALSOUT  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:27pm

      @jzs
      No, you are wrong. Congress added one line to the Bill that was passed that says that the CFPB can not start until the Senate appoints the person to run it. This was the only way the Bill could be passed. This is why Congress has been in technical Session. That Bill would never have passed without that one sentence. So, Obama making a recess apointment defies what the Bill says.

      Read the Bill first and post second.

      Report Post » The-Monk  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:03am

      Unless Ron Paul gets in there will be no USA left. There will be no more elections, there will be no more personal liberty, freedom will be defined by your local/state and federal representative. Maybe you could ask anyone from russia what it is like, Im sure they can tell you all about it. If you resist you are labeled and dealt with, in short order. You will not be able to own property, if you do you will be extremely restricted by use regulations and controls. You will not be able to bear arms. You will not even be able to decide where you want to live. Those decisions will be made by your freindly agenda 21, WHO/NWO representative. WAKE UP!!!

      Ask Romney what he will do about agenda 21
      Ask Santorum how he plans to pay for his world domination tour (crusade).
      Ask Gingrinch what his name is, then check his ID.Cant trust him.

      In any of these cases, these candidates will not stop or even stand up to the U.N., The FED, or the CFR. They will bow to the kingmakers like survants to their masters. None of them even volenteer constitutional observance, much less constitutional legality or support for their plans or proposed policies. Patriots! Support the constitution, let it be your measure, your guide. Do not forsake your heretage or your responsibility!

      WAKE UP!!

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:15am

      Ronko, unknown like paul? ROFL… nice try comrade.

      Report Post »  
    • ooooonooooo
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:24am

      as usual, glenn is spot on.

      here is a great video on the disgraceful obama presidency and the condition our nation is in
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6hvmWDYiCY

      Report Post »  
    • Reelist
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:54am

      “We would be better off with 4 more years of Obama then an unknown Republican . . . ”

      Ronko, we go with Obama first? After that we go with the unkown Repubican after that? In that order? Is that what you are saying?

      Report Post »  
    • Cornflake
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 1:10am

      We have to admit that he’s done a pretty good job of it so far! The car companies, the banks, the energy sector, healthcare, etc. What exactly are the 99 percent gripping about? They are getting exactly what they want: Socialism. I guess the money isn’t being passed out fast enough to suit them. If socialism isn’t bad enough, it’s always been said that a war time president always gets elected again. Iran, had better watch her p‘s and q’s. When we are asking Israel to allow us to deal with Iran, just what conclusions can we reach?

      Report Post »  
    • finky555
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:29am

      @ NoNannyState4me
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:09pm

      quote:
      And, Washington attacked the BRITISH in Canada, not the ‘Canadians’ that we know and love today.

      Thanks nonanny, I wish my fellow Canadians would get that right as well.

      Report Post » finky555  
    • Murray100
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:38am

      RONKO
      Utter nonsense! If 0bama is re-elected for another term there will be no America with problems for someone to fix.

      If you regard the Constitution as law, this is lawless behavior by an out-of-control, rogue executive. This is what happens in banana republics’ tinhorn dictatorships. In places like Venezuela and Cuba this is what happens — all under the guise of populism and helping the middle class.

      0bama is building a shadow government that will take over running the country when he disolves Congress and declares martial law!

      Resistance will be futile given the power he has under the NDAA, National Defense Authorization Act, to incarcerate anyone and hold them for an indefinitie time. The NDAA of 2012 is arguably the most repressive and right-wing pieces of legislation ever passed in the history of the country. It allows the military, a.k.a. the Pentagon, to determine who is a “terrorist” and to detain that person in prison, indefinitely, without trial, under its jurisdiction. It makes no difference whether the person is a U.S. citizen or a foreign “enemy combatant.”

      it doesn’t take a great intellect to connect the dots and see where 0bama is taking us…AND HE IS BEING ALLOWED TO DO IT!! This is scary stuff folks.

      Report Post »  
    • Stillsane
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:27am

      My prediction. The RNC is determined to shove Romney down our throats. He will get the nomination because of superpacs and Ron Paul superpacs destroying the only viable candidate IMO, Newt Gingrich. No one in their right mind would let Ron Paul on the ballot. He is to the left of Obama. Now that being said, people would hold their noses and vote for Romney. However, if you think voter fraud was rampant in 2008. wait until next year to see Obama’s thugs hijacking the election. America is finished under this Commie lowlife Kenyan. The Republican party is doing absolutely nothing to protect us from the coup d’etat taking place. My fellow Americans, welcome to the Soviet States of America.

      Report Post »  
    • Stillsane
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:52am

      My prediction for the election. Obama wins because voter fraud will be even more prevalent than it was in 2008.

      Report Post »  
    • Master Sergeant Malone
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 7:05am

      I‘ve been sayin’ the same thing Doc. Nov is just around the corner and this sorry excuse is shovin’ the envelope as far as he can. To include Moochele and his junkets costin’ the taxpayers an arm and leg. U can‘t tell me Jimmy Carter ain’t doin’ one-handed back flips while tossin‘ back a few of his late brother’s “Billy Beer” thankin’ the man upstairs for “annointin” a worst POTUS than him. Hallelujah!!!!! Who da thunk? Praise the Lord and pass the peanuts!

      Report Post »  
    • TheWholeTruth
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:27am

      You guys are screaming about the wrong thing here. Even if the Senate WAS in recess he couldn‘t appoint the guy because the absence didn’t occur DURING the recess! Here: what The Federalist Papers say about “recess” appointments. In Federalist No. 67 (next to last para) Hamilton is very clear that Article II, Sec. 2, last clause, means what it says:

      …The ordinary power of appointment is confined to the President and Senate JOINTLY, and can therefore only be exercised during the session of the Senate; but as it would have been improper to oblige this body to be continually in session for the appointment of officers and as vacancies might happen IN THEIR RECESS, which it might be necessary for the public service to fill without delay, the succeeding clause is evidently intended to authorize the President, SINGLY, to make temporary appointments “during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.”… [caps are Hamilton’s]

      Do you see? Article II, Sec. 2, last clause, means exactly what it says. Before this clause even kicks in, the vacancy must have happened while the Senate was in “recess”.

      Report Post »  
    • TheWholeTruth
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:38am

      JZS: ” But the Republicans, despite the fact that the creation of this agency was passed, legally and in accordance with the Constitution, are using a parlimentary procedure to block the President’s obligation, under the Constitution, to enact the law.” Please tell me where the Congress has the authority in the Constitution to create ‘agencies’ in the first place. I can’t seem to find it. I‘m looking down the list of their ’powers’ and I must be overlooking it somehow. Can you enlighten me, please? I’ll help you with the list below.

      Report Post »  
    • Emrys
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:40am

      Dictator? Yes, but hey, Glenn said he’d rather that Obama had won than McCain, so there ya go. Just another ‘wake-up’ call, right Glenn?

      Report Post »  
    • TheWholeTruth
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:41am

      (1) To lay certain taxes;
      (2) To pay the debts of the United States;
      (3) To declare war and make rules of warfare, to raise and support armies and a navy and to make rules governing the military forces; to call forth the militia for certain purposes, and to make rules governing the militia;
      (4) To regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and among the States, and with the Indian Tribes;
      (5) To establish uniform Rules of Naturalization;
      (6) To establish uniform Laws on Bankruptcies;
      (7) To coin money and regulate the value thereof;
      (8) To fix the standard of Weights and Measures;
      (9) To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting;
      (10) To establish post offices and post roads;
      (11) To issue patents and copyrights;
      (12) To create courts inferior to the supreme court; and
      (13) To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the Laws of Nations.

      Report Post »  
    • TheWholeTruth
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:43am

      Other provisions of the Constitution grant Congress powers to make laws regarding:

      (14) An enumeration of the population for purposes of apportionment of Representatives and direct taxes (Art. I, § 2, cl. 3);
      (15) Elections of Senators & Representatives (Art. I, §4, cl. 1) and their pay (Art. I, § 6);
      (16) After 1808, to prohibit importation of slaves (Art. I, § 9, cl. 1); **
      (17) A restricted power to suspend Writs of Habeas Corpus (Art. I, §9, cl. 2);
      (18) To revise and control imposts or duties on imports or exports which may be laid by States (Art. I, § 10, cl. 2 &3)
      (19) A restricted power to declare the punishment of Treason (Art. III, §3, cl. 2);
      (20) Implementation of the Full Faith and Credit clause (Art. IV, §1); and,
      (21) Procedures for amendments to The Constitution (Art. V).

      Sorry, I still can’t find it JZS

      Report Post »  
    • old white guy
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:01am

      doc, if the american people don’t know who and what obama is by now they are never going to know. i used to think that the second amendment would be needed to get rid of a commie and his administration i now think that the people are cowards. they are not well informed and too many are at the trough and do not want to give up getting other people’s money. the 2012 vote may be the last chance the people have to retain what little freedom they have left. america is more socialist than canada at this point and will be destroyed by the increasing debt and loss of freedom.

      Report Post »  
    • AhLeahIris
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:08am

      I’m glad Beck picked up on this. Others are also: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1T5

      Report Post » AhLeahIris  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:16am

      @PRRedlin

      “He’s leading in every poll…”

      Yeah, so was Kim Jung Ill. And now, so is Kim’s son.

      Go figure.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:17am

      RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:08pm
      MARTINEZ012577 Paul is a cherry picker when it come to the continuation. Considering that Washington invaded Canada and Jefferson sent the navy after the Barbary Pirates, it is a bit rich to compare their foreign policy with Ron Paul’s, don’t you think?

      You are no different than the pathetic lying brain dead commies on the Left! In both situations we were atacked first. What American is not in favor of standing their ground and defending ourselves when we are attacked?

      I really don’t see how you can live with your sick self as you insinuate that my Founding Fathers were War Mongers and Interventionist. You smear their great Names with your lies and innuendo. You hate our Constitution and hate the America which my Forefathers founded. You are simply a brain washed Neo-Con worshipping fool.

      Please we all know that you are a Progressive fool who only wants to enslave our children with more debt while we piss away trillions of dollars in the Middle East but try to refrain your filthy mind from casting aspersions on my most virtuous Founding Fathers. Can you do that you sick pathetic man?

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:27am

      Keep your eye on the Gunrunner Scandal, Blazers.

      See here.

      SSI Exclusive: The Cover-up Stonewall Continues. Eric Holder’s ATF Kabuki Play in advance of the February hearing designed to deflect blame from higher ups, including himself. Hoover, Chait and McMahon among the designated sacrificial goats.
      http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2012/01/ssi-exclusive-cover-up-stonewall.html

      Report Post »  
    • IMPEACHBHO
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:15am

      We agree with Beck on this one. He IGNORES our laws and constitution, and does WHATEVER HE WANTS. That is a dictator.
      http://youtu.be/7kqVZUCRth0?t=7m13s

      Report Post » IMPEACHBHO  
    • JRook
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 10:23am

      First, you can always tell by the tone of their rhetoric when Ann Coulter, GB and the like are realizing they are becoming increasingly irrelevant. Such is the case here. Second, it is not the people he is treating like children, it is the Republicans in Congress. As they clearly cannot even function beyond their 15 sec. sound bites and slogans. They are the worst politicians money can buy.

      Report Post »  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 11:22am

      JRook: Obama is a fraud and a Marxist. A disgrace to this Nation and its heritage. By far the most disgusting disturbing sick individual to ever set a foot in the White House. I wish him nothing but the absolute worse and quickly.

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • jzs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:23pm

      Miami, no need to the gratuitous insults. They don’t help your argument.

      Passing a bill with 51 votes violates Senate rules? What rule? In fact the Founders, anticipating tied votes in the Senate, gave the Vice President a tie breaking vote (although that wasn’t used here). That’s not “jamming down your throat” that called “majority rule.” Perhaps you’d like to share just how many votes you think it takes to pass a bill in the Senate? 60? 99? Sorry, it’s 51.

      MONK – no the bill doesn’t say the Senate will appoint the head of the CFPB. Now you’re just making stuff up.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • SJvet
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:01pm

      Problem is, Congress does nothing about this phony American. They wring their collective hands and say he’s a bad boy, but they do NOTHING to get this idiot out of office!

      Report Post »  
    • mike san diego
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:59pm

      obama has the republicans doing their best to make his life easy as regards reelection. with congress holding approval ratings at the 9% level most americans (lumps) will eat his routine up like cake. all he has to do is make the congress, and by extension the repubs like us who are incensed at his brazen disregard for the law, look like selfish elitists and he will skate in. a guy like santorum is an easy kill for Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • nanalynn
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:30pm

      Why do so many Americans say, ‘Socialism’ when describing b. hussein o.’s actions and intentions? Stealing from those who work hard to earn in order to line your pockets first and then throw crumbs to those you intend to oppress and turn into dependents is MARXISM!!!!! Look it up; there‘s no ’socialist’ in b. hussein o., but there’s plenty of MARXISM!!!
      Also, please take a look at all the Marxists who are his best friends, including the Marxists in OUR white house. Van Jones, Valerie Jared, Anita Dunn, Robert Bauer, ETC., ETC., ETC.!!!

      Report Post »  
    • Irish Eyes Are Smiling
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:41pm

      You are exactly right. He is trying to get people into powerful places like these agencies he is creating and then will use them to either bribe or punish anyone who doesn’t go along with our new Dictator.

      I have been writing to Glenn, Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly for a year now that Obama was making Congress obsolete. He doesn’t need them anymore. With all of these agencies reporting directly to the President they can do what FDR did. He tried to bribe the state caucases to vote for him by spending ‘new deal’ money he had control over in their state and if he couldn’t bribe them he sicked the IRS on them and made their life hell, even causing some to resign. Obama’s tactics are much the same. Axlerod is a master at smearing people with just enough truth in his lies to put doubt into peoples minds. They did this with Hermain Cain. They started with a truth that Cain had been charged with sexual harrassment. Then they got women to come up with other claims that can’t be proved or disproved. Look for Obama to smear the Conservative candidate with allegations that put doubt into the minds of the people that hold a tiny bit of truth and 99 percent pur lies.

      Report Post »  
    • Byzantine_Catholic
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:48pm

      Why DR. Ron Paul is our best bet to beat Obama (more so than Romney)

      We are ALWAYS told that elections are determined by the “independents and moderate”.. Well guess who wins those voters?

      CNN did exit polling in Iowa and found the following (google cnn exit polls Iowa for more info)

      • Ron Paul won the Independent vote by more than 2:1 (43% to 19%) over Romney
      • Ron Paul won the Moderate vote by (40% to 35%) over Romney
      • Ron Paul won the first time voters by (33% to 17%) over Romney
      • For voters who want a “True Conservative” (37% to 1%) over Romney
      • Paul and Romney tied (26% each) for the urban vote – typically strong democratic vote.

      Dont let the Media fool you that Romney is the only one who can beat Obama by “winning the Middle”

      Vote Ron Paul for Liberty

      Report Post » Byzantine_Catholic  
    • Paul Revere
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 5:51pm

      http://youtu.be/rOnbWzvMEh4 The judge explains the difference between candidates

      Report Post »  
    • WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges07
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:44pm

      AND … if you want THEIR PLAN exposed … watch Glenn Beck explain it:

      “DICTATORSHIP PLAN For America 2012!! :: Glenn Beck Names The TRAITORS & Exposes Their CONSPIRACY!!”
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAu_-UmERuo

      Report Post » WeDontNeedNoSteenkinBadges07  
    • 100 Million Patriots Standing
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 12:02am

      “HOW FAR WILL THE NEXT PRESIDENT GO IF ALLOW OBAMA TO GET AWAY WITH HIS ACTIONS…“ and if he gets a second term think of how far he would continue”

      It seems that his activity and ‘testing’ are designed to see what he can get away with now…..an abuser that crosses boundaries without consequences just goes a little further next time…and in short order with no workable way to stop them the abuser is seen as omni-potent…..so the abuse continues and the victims give up and give away their power in dispair and hopelessness….in most cases the obvious answer is to just stand and leave…or kick them out…

      We are being mentally abused by the threat and actions of a single person of influence and control over our lives, threatening our safety, threatening our freedom, threatening our system of government.

      It is ironic that those that respect the Constitution have no remedy for those that don’t – president or otherwise.

      Obama has taken on and apparently defeated the will of the congress and/or military to defend us. he is gathering power as we lose ours.

      We are only a few days into 2012 and this non stop assault on our nation will continue….

      the abuser will not want to leave the house….manipulation, guilt, and boundary erosion will continue until someone draws a line and means it…or until all of Obama’s dreams of his father are accomplished.

      It is amazingly sad to think of all the blood, pain, wars and countless lives lost fighting

      Report Post » 100 Million Patriots Standing  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 6:07am

      Just thought everyone would like to know, Wikipedia has been HIGHLY SCRUBBED to remove any mention of the length of recess required, and to remove any mention of Harry Reid using the 3 day gavel rule to block Bush’s appointments!!!!!!

      Also, for those of you who get your “facts” from Wikipedia… DON’T!!
      Everybody is allowed to edit it, at will, so it is NOT a reliable source of “facts.”

      However, reviewing the EDITS of a page ((revision history)) reveals what people are TRYING to hide.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • fightingforfreedom
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:40am

      my prediction is obozo is causing a race and class war….one person is going to get tired of him doing everything that this country once stood for and they are going to fire the first shot. I believe he is pushing this so he can declare marshal law and then not have an election…..something crazy like that will happen. OR GATES, BUFFET, ROCKEFELLER SOROS WILL GET TIRED OF HIS STUPIDITY AND PUT HILARY IN HIS PLACE OR ON THE TICKET…that‘s my story and i’m sticking to it….those guys do not want a Republican in the white house…..

      Report Post »  
    • Hiremeglenn
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 9:58am

      From the Daily Caller:
      The two Democrats that President Barack Obama appointed to the National Labor Relations Board during what he considered a congressional “recess” are not on the White House’s official list of Obama’s appointments and nominations for various positions.

      Obama referred his two Democratic nominees, Sharon Block and Richard Griffin, to the Senate on Dec. 15. The Senate adjourned for the year – but did not go into an official recess — on the following day!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • ginge
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 10:04am

      Or maybe he knows the election is rigged for his reelection and is using the election distraction to do what he wants. Better question is whether the Repubs candidates were hand picked to to insure his win.

      Report Post »  
    • LaureenHolt
      Posted on January 7, 2012 at 1:18pm

      You bet–you are spot-on about this.

      Report Post »  
  • AvengerK
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:34pm

    Enough is enough…it’s time to flood the GOP senate and house with phone calls to take Obama to court. Obama’s gone TOO D@MN FAR this time.

    Report Post »  
  • LiberalMarine
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:31pm

    President’s make recess appointments, Reagan made over 200 of them compared to Obama’s 30 (Give or take a couple). If people don’t like it, change the system but don’t point out ONE person who has done it.

    Report Post » LiberalMarine  
    • GaryInTheMiddle
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:37pm

      Yeah, but Ragan didn’t appoint communists.

      Report Post » GaryInTheMiddle  
    • In a Bunker
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:37pm

      The problem is, they weren’t in recess!

      Report Post » In a Bunker  
    • johnnycarson
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:40pm

      Exactly. I get a kick out of the hyperbole and hysteria directed at things many other presidents have done/will do in the future.

      There are more important things to get worked into a lather over.

      Report Post »  
    • AJDeCarlo
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:47pm

      Every other president, every single one, has previously used recess appointments when the Senate was in recess. This time, the Senate was not in recess. That makes these appointments illegal. As a (putative) Marine, you should know that you can’t pick and choose which laws apply to you. Neither can the President.

      The oath of service has “support and defend the Constitution” before “obey the orders of the President” for a reason. The Founders understood that even Presidents can break the law. You are forbidden by the UCMJ to obey illegal orders, because it was understood that eventually someone in authority would issue illegal orders.

      Nazi guards were hung for crimes against humanity after WWII because it was determined that “following orders” was NOT a valid defense.

      Report Post »  
    • momrules
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:48pm

      There was no recess. Obama just decided to do whatever he wanted to do, something he has done since he took office.

      Report Post »  
    • thekuligs
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:48pm

      BUT they are still in session.

      Report Post » thekuligs  
    • drago
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:51pm

      @liberalmarine aka encinom
      They werent in recess dumbazz, marine my azz…..

      Report Post »  
    • Xavier_Holden
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:51pm

      Yes, and Reagan was in office for 8 years, not 3. He also didn’t play 72 rounds of golf.

      Perhaps Golf and vacations are doing us a favor by keeping Obama AWAY from the White House?

      Join me on http://www.facebook.com/xavierholdenUSA

      Report Post »  
    • encinom
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:54pm

      The GOP by fraud kept the Seante in Pro Forma sessions, the Seante was not conducting any business, there where not enough member in town for quorum, none of the leadership was in town. No, the GOP attemtped to do an end run around the Constitution. Obama should appoint the rest of his nominees, all 200+ of them and force the Senate in court to defend the its fraud.

       
    • NeverSurrender
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:59pm

      They are not in recess. Republican leaders have been meeting every three days. How is that a recess?

      Report Post »  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:14pm

      I know you‘re not an expert so you’re excused,Barry’s action violated the constitution,I know it was written over two centuries ago and Barry despises it but the law is the law.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • ollie42
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:26pm

      @Encinom: The DEMOCRATS by fraud kept the Senate in Pro Forma sessions, the Senate was not conducting any business, there where not enough member in town for quorum, none of the leadership was in town. No, the DEMOCRATS attemtped to do an end run around the Constitution. BUSH should have appointedt the rest of his nominees, all of them and force the Senate in court to defend the its fraud. You must be too young to remember the DEMOCRATS doing this to Bush. Your own words, (changed slightly), come back to bite you!!!! By the way you should learn to spell, it’s SENATE not SEANTE.

      Report Post »  
    • Jaycen
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:32pm

      Yeah! I mean, if Reagan did it, then anyone can do it. Right?

      Two wrongs make a right for Liberalmarine. All the other kids are jumpin’ off bridges, why can’t I?

      When you go back in time, make sure to hold Ronald Reagan accountable for what he did. The rest of us will try to hold the current President accountable today. How about that?

      Report Post » Jaycen  
    • encinom
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:44pm

      Ollie, are you upset the brain dead W. didn’t think of this first? Of course W. did make over 200 reccess appointments compared to Obama’s 30. The Senate GOP, with the use of the Fillerbuster and Pro Forma sessions have attmept to block everything Obama has doen. No other Senate has used hold and Fillerbusters as the GOP of this Senate has.

      T

      Report Post »  
    • Cottoneyed77
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:55pm

      The Senate was NOT IN RECESS.

      Report Post »  
    • Cottoneyed77
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:02pm

      There cannot be liberal marines. It’s impossible. Whats next, patriotic liberals. LoL……..

      Report Post »  
    • sonseeker
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:05pm

      yes but congres WASN”T in recess!!!

      Report Post » sonseeker  
    • eagle2715
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:07pm

      @COTTONEYED77

      There are a few that make it into the fleet now and again…mostly Officers though….

      Report Post » eagle2715  
    • eagledown
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:17pm

      LiberialMarine. Now that’s an oxymoron.

      I guess we can’t count on you on upholding the Constitution when Marshall law is placed by your dictator in chief. Will you be goose-stepping in a parade for him?

      Why are you defending this traitor?

      Report Post » eagledown  
    • sndrman
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:28pm

      liberal marine is a oxymoron in the 1st place that being said. Reagan never did such a thing… I have read everything there is to read about the man his autobio. as well as his boigrapher…. if that was the case the libs would be yelling it over and over on the socialist media…. but point taken….GOT DADT…..

      Report Post »  
    • majasdad
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:29pm

      Well said my friend. Beck and his lackeys are such clowns.

      Report Post »  
    • Average_JoeMN
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:49pm

      You’re an idiot and you know it. They weren’t in recess, doucheb*g. Of course, you know this and decided now was yet another time you wanted to display your stupidity.

      Report Post »  
    • riptide
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:29pm

      The Senate is not in Recess. They need to have the approval of the
      House to go into recess for more than three days and they didn’t get it. End of story.

      Report Post »  
    • Seneca264
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:35pm

      What moronic comment. I don’t see how you could have been a Marine, you are too stupid.

      Report Post » Seneca264  
    • kkentucky
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:44pm

      Also the law states that the recess has to have been at least 3 days. This appointment did not meet that criteria.

      Report Post »  
    • ScreaminMime
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:11pm

      Yea, They all made recess appointments DURING CONGRESSIONAL RECESS!

      Report Post »  
    • cassandra
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:30pm

      Hey liberal marine they weren’t in recess GOT IT obama is acting like a dictator, and by the way how can you be a liberal and a Marine at the same time, just asking I’m from a big time Marine family

      Report Post »  
    • jonnyfontain
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:58pm

      No one cares about your views because your title explains everything thats wrong with you. If you actually did serve you were most likely a pencil pusher or “pogue” is what we call them @ the 3rd Ranger Battalion where men aren’t stupid. This is a Libertarian website. Not Liberal, and not extremist right wing either. However their is a Conservative undertone to this website because lets face it, If you aren’t a little conservative your just a wacko……….. In this country the conservatives outnumber liberals 3-1!! Not Republicans against Democrats, Conservatives vs. Liberals. You are out numbered sir, 3-1!! Do yourself and us a favor and start your own website and quit bringing your liberal garbage here, not welcome.

      Report Post » jonnyfontain  
    • PRRedlin
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:41pm

      They are in pro-forma recess. Precedent has been set in 1903 by Roosevelt. (Teddy, the one with the R behind his name).

      Pro-forma is not the same as in session.

      Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:49pm

      And Obama is certainly not Reagan! Obama lied today to the American people as he has done so many times and some how this is OK. Get ready you Flemmings – line up – were all going over the cliff together. Not me – I’ll stand back and watch – then I will die and have eternal life in a promised place where I wont need Obama care or Ron Paul’s legalized pot, Welfare – you Flemmings enjoy!

      Report Post » db321  
    • dealer@678
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 10:58pm

      Youre no marine i would have a beer with AND no other marine either

      Report Post »  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:36pm

      Recess appointments are Consitutional, BUT, the appointment when Congress is not in Technical Recess, is NOT, the dem’s did this to Bush constantly, holding committee meetings, or gaveling in and gaveling out so that they were NOT technically in Recess, and NO RECESS APPOINTMENTS COULD BE MADE! The last 2 dem administrations both HAD LEGAL OPINIONS THAT WHAT THE REPUB’s ARE NOW DOING MADE RECESS APPOINTMENTS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
    • ollie42
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 8:07am

      Encinom, W was in office for 8 yrs., Obama only 3. Your understanding of history is sorely lacking in facts. You need to read some history about recess appointments & fillibusters, (not FILLERBUSTER you really need some education). The Senate is not in recess & these appointmens are UNCONSTITUTIONAL whether you like it or not. Unlike you, I would not like it if Obama made these appointments legally but I would not moan & cry about it if they were made according to the Constitution. That is the difference between you & I, I believe in the Constitution & you seem to think that Obama can bend the law anyway he wants. Well get over it, he is not King although he appears to think he is. Also, please hire a proof reader and stop embarassing yourself with your spelling.

      Report Post »  
    • TheWholeTruth
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:11am

      Jarhead (don’t worry, i’m married to one!) First off, Presidents CAN make recess appointments Constitutionally, IF they meet two simple criteria: 1) the vacancy MUST have occurred DURING the recess and 2) There is a public NEED for that vacancy to be filled. Other than that, it doesn’t matter who the President is, if the vacancy doesn’t meet those two criteria, the President must wait until session is back in. OH YEAH and the appointment will only last until the end of the next session.

      Report Post »  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 9:22am

      The vacancy didn’t occur during a recess, ergo, there is no authority even IF Congress were actually not in session, for a recess appointment.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • jzs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:20pm

      Maybe the courts will decide rather the Senate was in recess, but the Republicans will likely lose if they challenge this.

      “In a 1905 report that the Senate still considers authoritative, the Senate Judiciary Committee recognized that a ‘Recess of the Senate’ occurs whenever the Senate is not sitting for the discharge of its functions and when it cannot ‘participate as a body in making appointments.‘ The committee cautioned that a ’recess‘ means ’something actual, not something fictitious.’ In 1921, citing opinions of his predecessors dating back to the Monroe administration, Attorney General Harry M. Daugherty argued that the question ‘is whether in a practical sense the Senate is in session so that its advice and consent can be obtained. To give the word ‘recess’ a technical and not a practical construction, is to disregard substance for form.’ The Senate, of course, does not meet as a body during a pro forma session. By the terms of the recess order, no business can be conducted, and the Senate is not capable of acting on the president’s nominations. That means the Senate remains in “recess” for purposes of the recess appointment power, despite the empty formalities of the individual senators who wield the gavel in pro forma sessions.”

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/14/AR2010101405441.html

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Irish Eyes Are Smiling
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 3:48pm

      This was not a recess appointment.

      Report Post »  
  • Bakko Bomma
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:31pm

    Ron Paul 2012

    Report Post » Bakko Bomma  
    • SoCaLCapitalist
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:49pm

      Your really shoudn’t post the paul stuff. all your post does is make his supporters look like fools.

      Report Post »  
    • @leftfighter
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:57pm

      Uh- you’re a Paul supprter?

      That pic look more like Ross Perot.

      Just sayin’.

      Report Post » @leftfighter  
    • NIPPOHIPS
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:28pm

      @SOCALCAPITALIST
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:49pm
      Your really shoudn’t post the paul stuff. all your post does is make his supporters look like fools.

      The fact that you posted guarantees that you’re one. Take your shithouse child psychology elsewhere

      Report Post »  
    • NOBAMA201258
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:45pm

      WHY? ron paul is a foreign policy nightmare

      Report Post »  
    • db321
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:19pm

      The only way Paul wins in 2012 if Obama Voters are allowed to vote twice – Libs, Dems and Druggies will support Ron Paul – Not one Constitutionalists in the bunch – Just a convenient talking point.

      Report Post » db321  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:28am

      screw liberty and freedom, we need to be told what to do.
      people are too stupid and lazy to do anything for themselves.
      we need no private jobs and no more growth, just keep it this way forever. everyone can work for the government, since money is fake, who cares. gg America, we tried and failed. freedom doesn’t work. back to another 400+ year struggle of tyranny and opression from kings and dictators.

      Report Post »  
  • JP4JOY
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:31pm

    When dictators have taken control of their populations in the past they have all eliminated the “intelligentsia”. Perhaps it is time to finally turn the tables on these control freaks. Instead of them herding those who need reeducation into FEMA camps perhaps we should find some islands in the Pacific where they can spend their days.? Midway would be great along with several other corral atolls like the Bimini group to place these “socialist pigs”. We could airdrop them food but nothing else and they could work out their hierarchy and social structure to their own desires and leave the rest of us alone. My guess is that if we relocated about 500,000 people the remaining Marxists would get a clue and reeducated themselves. Just a pipe dream I guess, but just maybe…

    Report Post » JP4JOY  
    • Mil Mom
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:04am

      I’ve posted something VERY SIMILAR many times, BUT YOU DON’T GO FAR ENOUGH; THEY NEED TO KNOW IF THEY TRY TO RETURN THEY’LL BE TRIED FOR THE CRIMES AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION! AS FOR A JURY OF THEIR PEERS, WE’D HAVE TO LOOK INTO THE PRISONS TO FIND THEM!!! (Or in GITMO!)

      Report Post » Mil Mom  
  • Grizz47
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:28pm

    the REALLY astonishing thing is not one so called “conservative” legislator has the courage to obey THEIR oaths and introduce Articles of Impeachment.

    Report Post » Grizz47  
    • phillipwgirard
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:19pm

      So True!!!

      Report Post » phillipwgirard  
    • RBSWORLD
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:37pm

      Amen to that!!

      Report Post »  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:09pm

      Smiles wryly, yea, one has to wonder just exactly is keeping them from doing so? Time and time again since His Royalness Obama has assumed the throne they’ve ( conservative representatives) had opportunity to step up and do what’s right according to the constitution, yet they have proven themselves wholly incapable to doing what’s right.
      My comment is not an exoneration of any member in congress, but I once held the conservatives to a higher standard, one they have joined in utterly failing with the obviously unAmerican representatives whom we know to be already morally bankrupt.
      Perhaps this is why, after nearly a decade of closely observing and investigating politicians and their links to globalist elite corporatism ( visa vie the CFR), I’m suffering malaise. For I’ve seen the hand write upon the wall.
      Mene, Mene, Terkel, Adoni.
      On one hand I look towards my saviors return, on the other I hurt for those who have lost themselves to this monster of the end times. Rev:13, 11-18 this IS America in Prophecy, and GODS word shall not return to itself void. Goodnight noble experiment, the good ruler is coming after the evil has short sway.

      Report Post »  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:31am

      i believe they have. the courts will not hear any obama impeachment cases.

      Report Post »  
  • mildot rider
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:22pm

    The Dark Lord is a commie dictator for sure. If he wins this election…it’s over for our liberty and freedom.

    Report Post »  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:26pm

      It may be over before the elections even arrive; we now face the darkest days of the Republic since her founding.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:26pm

      Four more years and he will pull all the stops.Wake up America!!

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • georgiavietvet
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:40pm

      MILDOT RIDER……………… amen, you are absolutely correct. this is going to be the most important election this country has ever seen. its a choice between dictatorship or freedom. the sad part is, 90% of the country has no clue as to what is happening, politically speaking. the blacks will vote for obama simply cause he is black, and a whole lot of whites are eat up with the liberal bs and lies. and then we have to contend with the massive voter fraud that the dems are planning, and are going to use, to get the marxist in chief reelected. its a huge uphill battle that we have to win, or loose our free country forever. the only alternative will be civil war to stop obama and his minnions. im very afraid that we are going to have to resort to armed violence to keep our country free………………………..

      Report Post »  
    • fixer
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:49pm

      today obama cut over 400 billion from our national defense …and said he wants to share our rocket secrets with the Russians….ISN’T THERE ONE DAMN POLITICIAN WITH THE ****** TO BRING THIS COMMUNIST S.O.B. UP ON TREASON CHARGES?

      Report Post »  
    • boundforglory
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:00pm

      All he needs to do is declare martial law and the elections wont even happen, then its game over!

      Report Post »  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:00pm

      @boundforglory
      It’s already over, they just want to “peaceably” round up as many as they can when they do declare martial law.
      Say for some reason that some of escape the initial round up, how do deer rifles compare to night vision, and full auto? How do we escape the satellites , the cameras on every corner, the drones? Either GOD almightily makes the worlds electric systems utterly cease to work, or our freedoms are toast. Why the worlds, because what enemy of ours won’t invade us if our systems fail, then we are toast yet again.
      But what the Globalists fail to take into account is the consuming power of America, at nearly 70% of the worlds purchases, Americas failure, or tyranny shall be the death knell of the global economy, and the entire world will never recover. The globalist know this, but fail to adequately measure the effect that they themselves shall endure. For when the globe is willfully thrown into abject poverty, even 1000 security guards won’t keep the elite safe forever.

      Report Post »  
    • Husband_Beater
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 11:26pm

      I don‘t know what the heck he does with his time and if he’s a dictator or not. I don’t care, I have my fair share after all, and he’s my lap dog for sure!!!………Barry!! come here!!! good boy!!!!

      Report Post » Husband_Beater  
  • Baddoggy
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:21pm

    Really Glenn…you just now figuring that out? For a man with vision you sure are behind on that one…

    Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • Shasta
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:12pm

      He has been talking about this for over two years.

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • Sirfoldallot
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:50pm

      He is try 2 educate the mass’s the pll should know from screwl, he & we know.

      Report Post » Sirfoldallot  
  • Die Trying
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:21pm

    So Glen, when will you stop talking about it and advise us to do something about it? We are just waiting for the word. You are a leader of men, like it or not. Be a leader and make a difficult decission because it is the right decission. Some will die, but such is the cost of liberty. If we wait much longer there won’t be a republic left to defend and we will all have to live and die knowing we could have saved it if we had only acted.

    Report Post »  
    • girlnurse
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:34pm

      You are spot on! And what about all the “so called” conservatives letting him get away with this and just dismantle our country piece by piece?! I’m starting to think we have some “controlled opposition” going on here…SICK of lip service! Men????? Men?????

      Report Post » girlnurse  
    • johnnycarson
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:38pm

      @DIE_TRYING:

      I’m not sure which is more embarrassing, your belief that Gllen Beck is a ‘leader of men’, or your absolutely terrifying and loony willingness to die in the revolution you’re apparently waiting for him to start. Yikes. Get a life, bro.

      Report Post »  
    • AJDeCarlo
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:49pm

      Why do you have to be told what is right or wrong? Aren’t you a grown up? You know what you need to do. Get ready. Don’t be caught flat footed. The chaos is inescapable now, you have to be ready to survive it when it arrives.

      Report Post »  
  • G.E.R
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:21pm

    Bush used his executive authority 288 times. So what’s that make him.

    Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:23pm

      Please come back when you understand what you’re talking about..ok?

      Report Post »  
    • TJinNJ
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:35pm

      I’m no Bush fan but he did have to go against a Marxist/Anti-American Demonic-Rat Party. Besides show me what executive orders he signed went to the demise of this country.

      Report Post »  
    • G.E.R
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:59pm

      Look it up.

      Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:56pm

      G.I.T….did Bush make any “recess” appointments when congress was not actually in recess? Let me help you champ..the answer is no. In fact,in 2007 Obama himself was part of Harry Reid’s “pro forma’ session of congress that the democrats set up to prevent Bush making any recess appointments. But hold on a second G.I.M.P. Obama’s own legal counsel in 2010 stated that congress should be in recess for at least 3 days before a president can make any recess appointments. What’s it like G.I.M.P? What’s it like being a blind lefty tool where you ignore reality all for the love of your socialist “struggle”? I ask because I can’t understand why you flatulate your “Bush signed executive orders” when this isn‘t about an executive order it’s about recess appointments and the ignoring of precendents. Oh and speaking of “executive orders”…Obama bashed Bush for making “signing statements” and “ignoring the will of Congress”. But Obama’s done the same thing 20 times since taking office. Obama’s most recent signing statement came on New Year’s Eve, when he signed a 13-paragraph memorandum declaring he did not intend to follow several sections of the National Defense Authorization Act that funded the military for 2012.
      You’re an idiot G.E.R. Take your idiocy back to Moveon and cry them a river.

      Report Post »  
    • beckyspatflaveredstew
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:47pm

      Executive authority, from where does this supposed authority come from? It ain’t from the Constitution.
      The first sentence says All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.

      Report Post »  
    • watashbuddyfriend
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:10pm

      AvengerK
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:23pm

      “Please come back when you understand what you’re talking about..ok?” AMEN, AMEN, and Amen to you comment!

      Report Post »  
  • LLATPOH
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:18pm

    I had perused a couple opinions on “the other side” of this argument. One of the theories being passed around is that this move was to fight the “pro-forma” sessions – basically sessions of Congress that do nothing but show that they’re technically still in session, thus blocking recess appointments.

    I’m not too keen on legislators using a loophole to prevent an appointment while the body is in recess, be it their guy or our guy. I *do* know that the left would be foaming at the mouth if a republican did this though.

    Report Post »  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:25pm

      The only stadard the left has is a double standard!

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:28pm

      Barack Obama was happily part of the Senate in 2007 when Harry Reid was doing the same “pro forma” sessions to block Bush from making recess appointments. To add insult to Obama’s urinating all over the constitution…in 2010 Obama’s own legal counsel asserted that at least three days of recess should take place before any appointment should take place. Where’s the media on this? Hands in their pockets, whistling and hoping that no one remembers. Obama’s own sock puppet Jay Carney cannot even demonstrate that the court was in recess. Obama must be held accountable for this one. He’s gone too far..too d@mn far this time.

      Report Post »  
    • beckyspatflaveredstew
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:45pm

      The left would be foaming at the mouth if a republican had done this,
      True, but the republican party is riddled with marxist leftys also, which is a big part of the problem we face.

      Report Post »  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:16pm

    Of course Barry is a dictator a Marxist bastard who lied to gullible people in 08 and continues to lie.
    He said he would abide by he constitution,what a joke, and people actually believed this community agitator.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • Darla_K
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:54pm

      Yes, and all the stupid people who voted for him and now we have to try and put all the broken pieces together again.

      Report Post » Darla_K  
  • LibsFIB
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:16pm

    You socialists think we’ll really just roll over???! Forces are aligning against you and your dumbocrat stooges! IMPEACH obama NOW!

    Report Post » LibsFIB  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:29pm

      In the end, they will find that they were on the wrong side of history and eternity.

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • Shasta
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:18pm

      Congress can not even pass a budget. How can you think they could ever impeach anyone? Obummer has said he would act without congress many times now. Does anyone really still think that ‘postponing’ elections is just a far fetched tin hat conspiracy?

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • ohiochili
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:04pm

      Even if Congress tries to impeach, they are up against a Democrat majority in the Senate..

      Report Post »  
  • commonsenseguy
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:16pm

    i mean with the crap obama and his communist buddies have done since taking office,it is not such a stretch to call him a dictator, glenn is about to get more liberal crap for this comment,but the truth hurts some times, and truth is not a word in this administrations vocabulary

    Report Post »  
    • KevRo65
      Posted on March 7, 2012 at 10:23am

      Most people think there’s a real election about to happen.

      Report Post »  
  • Bakko Bomma
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:15pm

    We know Glenn. We know.

    Report Post » Bakko Bomma  
  • martinez012577
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:14pm

    WHAT, WHAT?!?!?!?!

    Beck is mad someone isnt using the constitutional way to do things? This I find amusing since he supports canidates that will do the same Constitution as toilet paper when it comes to war.

    Report Post » martinez012577  
    • Theleftisda
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:17pm

      Explain ?

      Report Post » Theleftisda  
    • Socialist Pride
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:17pm

      Beck stirs the pot for money. It’s his American Dream.

      Report Post » Socialist Pride  
    • justangry
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:20pm

      Yeah and he says “there are some in the congress” that are enemies to the constitution. More like most of them.

      Report Post » justangry  
    • SoCaLCapitalist
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:22pm

      like our current cunundrum in chief? The obominator that assassinated Bin Ladin?

      Why are liberals so opinionated on others, but don’t look at themselves? because they can’t stand to see what they look like?

      Report Post »  
    • Baddoggy
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:25pm

      Glenn supports all the RINOs in some way and calls Ron Paul a kook…The ONLY Constitutionalist in the bunch and Glenn makes fun of him. Really smart Glenn…

      I was a Glenn fan for a long time…not so much now.

      Report Post » Baddoggy  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:35pm

      The canidates Glenn supports are all on the attack Iran bandwagon. Attacking without provocation and without congressional approval is against the Constitution. We are not allowed to attack people because of what they have, it simple as that. We are the warmongers of this world. We have been at constant war for like 60 decades now.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
    • AJDeCarlo
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:51pm

      Senate was not in recess. Therefore there are no recess appointments. Why is that such a difficult concept?

      Report Post »  
    • eagle2715
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:03pm

      You Paul Supporters realize this argument of ‘attack with out provocation’ comes across as looking like your only OK with attacking Iran AFTER they set off a nuke? You can’t actually believe that right?….

      Report Post » eagle2715  
    • beckyspatflaveredstew
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:19pm

      Not just war, the people would be amazed at how far we as a nation, have drifted from our founding principles of Liberty, if they just take the time to actually read the Supreme Law Of The Land, known as the United States Constitution.

      Report Post »  
    • martinez012577
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:52pm

      @eagle

      You completely misunderstand the stance Ron Paul has on this. If we sanction Iran that is act of war and must be voted on by the congress. Congress will send our troops to war with a purpose, plan, and time table. By doing this you actually have a say, you can call your congressman and say yes or no. In turn if you do not like his choice on the war decision you can run for office or work to get someone else elected. Either way its the way the Constitution intended it to be. Glenn supports canidates that will not go to Congress with this decision. They cannot go to Congress with it.

      Most Americans are tired of this endless war crap!!!!

      Ron Paul 2012, I am writing him name in if I have to.

      Report Post » martinez012577  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:14pm

    .
    ‘The Man Loves Dictator’s!! So that’s why he stays bent over……What? Oh ‘The Man is a Dictator’ My Bad Ya’ll………

    Maybe we should all chip in and get him a Muslim Sex toy to keep him occupied till the election. I’m thinking Sheba the Sucide Blow Up Doll would be a good choice……….

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • shelblynn
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:13pm

    What did the colonists do when the King George overstepped his boundaries? Americans got to do it again. This man has declared himself king and dictator. Glenn warned the people in Congress that Obama was taking what power they have away and no one their is doing anything about, Instead they are busy arguing among themselves. Can’t anybody see what this man is doing? The more he stays in office the more worried I am about my family and our country. We have to do something.

    Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:21pm

      Obama acts like he is king and rules by executive order. He MUST be a 1 term President
      ******************************

      Gov Rick Perry is the only true conservative in this race and the only one who can beat Obama. If you read this article you will understand WHY. We need to come together and back the RIGHT candidate for America and for WE THE PEOPLE. Also…Please watch the vid at the site…The Rick Perry I Know… Thanks and GOD BLESS AMERICA

      http://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2011/12/19/dont-settle-rick-perry-for-president/

      Perry For President
      http://www.rickperry.org/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:27pm

      Clara
      2007, Istanbul Turkey, May, Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Perry vetted and approved by Bildebergs for global elite leadership positions. Google it.
      Then stay away from that diseased globalist socialist Perry.

      Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:56pm

      BetterDays….NOT A Chance!!!!! *wink
      //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

      Rush Limbaugh: “I Hope Perry Stays In”

      “I hope he stays in.” said Rush Limbaugh today on his radio show, after acknowledging that there was some confusion about whether Rick Perry had decided to stay in the race for president or not.

      “Does he have a high enough base here to pull off what now would be a miracle?” asked Limbaugh, “I hope he stays in.”

      From Rush Limbaugh’s website:

      There was a tweet, you know, Perry last night said he’s gonna head back to Texas for prayer and reflection to figure out what he should do next. ‘Cause he spent a lot of money in Iowa, and it didn’t translate to votes. And the theory is that, you know, money didn’t translate to votes in Iowa, then it may not translate to votes anywhere else. And is it worth going into debt? Does he have a high enough base here to pull off what now would be a miracle? I hope he stays in. ‘Cause I told you I like Perry, and I like Santorum, and I told you countless times I know either one of those guys — and I said this about Bachmann as well — if any of them are elected president, I have no doubt whatsoever they are gonna be fighting for this country each and every day, no doubt whatsoever. I hope Perry stays in.

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:58pm

      Cont.

      From the day before:

      Rick Perry has always made me smile. I look at Rick Perry speak and I smile, sometimes I laugh. I’ve met Rick Perry a couple times, and I’ve enjoyed it thoroughly both times. I like Rick Perry.

      Anyway, I’ve got the sound bite now of Rick Perry. This was Sunday in Des Moines, and this is The Politico White House correspondent Mike Allen interviewing Rick Perry. He says to him, “Governor, some of your staffers have told us that you ran this as a gubernatorial campaign for too long, that you didn’t look big enough, you didn’t get big enough. You take some responsibility for that?”

      PERRY: (echo) I don‘t know who you’re talking to.

      ALLEN: Well, these are members –

      PERRY: So I can’t respond unless you give me a name.

      ALLEN: These are members of your staff –

      PERRY: You got a name?

      ALLEN: — who say –

      PERRY: You got a name?

      ALLEN: (1.5 second pause) You won’t listen to…?

      PERRY: You got a name?

      ALLEN: (1.2 second pause) Uhhhh.

      PERRY: If you don’t have a name to tell me this individual who said this, then I don’t take that as a corroborated source.

      RUSH: And that’s Rick Perry, “You got a name? You got a name?” This is not somebody stupid, folks, doing this. You got a name? In fact, it was Mike Allen, (imitating Allen) “Uh, you’re — you’re — well, you — you — uh — you’re not gonna reply? You’re — you — you’re — you’re not gonna react to that?“ ”You gotta name?“ ”But I got

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:05pm

      “You gotta name?“ ”But I got a staffer, the staffer said that you’re basically stupid and suck.“ ”You got a name?“ ”But you — uh –”

      RUSH : It doesn’t sound like somebody stupid to me, folks.

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 8:23pm

      Thank You Gov Perry For Answering Our Nation’s Call…You Are A True Patriot

      Video…On To South Carolina
      http://youtu.be/DGN_9ACuvh4

      Perry For President
      http://www.rickperry.org/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:01pm

      South Carolina campaign chairman Katon Dawson told NBC News, “Iowa picks corn, New Hampshire picks campaigns’ pockets, and South Carolina picks Republican presidents and we are ready to rumble.”

      “This election is about stopping a President of the United States and his administration that is abusing the Constitution of this country, that is putting America on a track to bankruptcy. It is a powerful moment in Americans’ history, and you are on the front lines. This is Concord. This is Omaha Beach. This is going up the hill realizing that the battle is worth winning.” ~ TX Gov. Rick Perry

      Perry For President
      http://www.rickperry.org/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:57am

      perry needs to give it up and stay gov of tx. tx will need to succeed soon anyway, might as well stay and be texas president. ;)

      Report Post »  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:09pm

      @kb

      Gov Rick Perry WILL Be The Nominee

      After South Carolina….everything heads into the south…Florida Georgia Tennessee Texas Virgina Alabama Mississippi. Also Arizona will be favorable. The South will support Rick Perry 100% WHY? Because Gov Perry is for state’s rights…BIG DEAL in the red states. Gov Perry is the ONLY candidate who {{Volunteered}} to serve his country. Gov Perry is also supported thru The Perry For Veterans Coalition..the south loves the military. Gov Perry will repeal health care…BIG DEAL in the south. Gov Perry has been endorsed by America’s Sheriff…Sheriff Joe>>who is currently fighting to bring down Obama. The south loves and supports Sheriff Joe. Gov Perry does NOT play golf he loves guns…The 2nd Amendment>>HUGE DEAL in the south. Rick Perry is a Christian….HUGE Deal in the south. The south LOVES SEC college football and Gov Rick Perry attended Texas A&M. Texas A&M is now a part of the SEC. HUGE thing in the south. And Rick Perry stood up to the liberal media..the south loves a man with GUTS. And the MAIN REASON……THEY consider HIM to be one of their OWN…A VERY BIG AND HUGE DEAL in the south….It is because of these and MANY MORE reasons why the south loves Gov Rick Perry. I know some may NOT….but the MAJORITY do and that is what is IMPORTANT.

      This will give Gov Rick Perry all of the momentum in the race….going forward ..to finish his marathon ALL THE WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE……

      Perry For President
      http://www.rickp

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:11pm

      @JB

      Gov Rick Perry WILL Be The Nominee

      After South Carolina….everything heads into the south…Florida Georgia Tennessee Texas Virgina Alabama Mississippi. Also Arizona will be favorable. The South will support Rick Perry 100% WHY? Because Gov Perry is for state’s rights…BIG DEAL in the red states. Gov Perry is the ONLY candidate who {{Volunteered}} to serve his country. Gov Perry is also supported thru The Perry For Veterans Coalition..the south loves the military. Gov Perry will repeal health care…BIG DEAL in the south. Gov Perry has been endorsed by America’s Sheriff…Sheriff Joe>>who is currently fighting to bring down Obama. The south loves and supports Sheriff Joe. Gov Perry does NOT play golf he loves guns…The 2nd Amendment>>HUGE DEAL in the south. Rick Perry is a Christian….HUGE Deal in the south. The south LOVES SEC college football and Gov Rick Perry attended Texas A&M. Texas A&M is now a part of the SEC. HUGE thing in the south. And Rick Perry stood up to the liberal media..the south loves a man with GUTS. And the MAIN REASON……THEY consider HIM to be one of their OWN…A VERY BIG AND HUGE DEAL in the south….It is because of these and MANY MORE reasons why the south loves Gov Rick Perry. I know some may NOT….but the MAJORITY do and that is what is IMPORTANT.

      This will give Gov Rick Perry all of the momentum in the race….going forward ..to finish his marathon ALL THE WAY TO THE OVAL OFFICE……

      Perry For President
      http://www.ric

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 4:20pm

      The Correct Link

      Perry For President
      http://www.rickperry.org/

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 6:38pm

      Check Out This Photo….

      Regardless of what ANYONE says….THIS is MY next President

      http://yfrog.com/g05cadjj

      Report Post » Clara88  
  • txwheels
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:06pm

    I’m thinking before the 2012 elections, he’ll find a reason to declare Martial Law so as to post pone the election indefinitely and stay in power..

    Report Post »  
    • TXPilot
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:13pm

      Obama is following Hitler’s playbook, so I don’t see this ending well. The only advantage we have over pre-war Germany, is the fact that here, the public is armed. Civil war anyone?

      Report Post » TXPilot  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:14pm

      Kodak is headed for BK! Will he act to save them in time? Will he solve yet another crafty caper put forth by the bansters. Stay tuned for the next episodes starring Dear Leader Barak H. Obama (acting the part of president). We’ll see next time.

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • Socialist Pride
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:16pm

      I think a Terrorist attack inside the USA will be the reason there are no elections this year.

      Report Post » Socialist Pride  
    • HKS
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:17pm

      I think a dictator can be agreed upon. What’s next.

      Report Post » HKS  
    • momsense
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:18pm

      Bet on it–a dictator doesn’t need excuses either. He’ll use the Black Panthers as his storm troopers and the union thugs will clean up.

      Report Post »  
    • Shasta
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:32pm

      I used to agree with you. Obummer will create some emergency, declare Martial Law, and ‘postpone’ elections, thus creating a dictatorship. All for our own good of course. Lately I am of the opinion that so few of the citizens of this once great country even care how Obummer is dismantling the constitution and the freedoms it protects, that he may just feel free to declare his emperorship and be done with it, sans emergency, sans elections. What options does that leave us?

      Report Post » Shasta  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 2:53am

      Even if he would do a thing like that, which he wouldn’t, he doesn’t have to. He’s going to win the election fair and square and be president for four more years, and after those four years, despite all the crazy predictions of all the people who hate and fear him, it will still be pretty much the same country it’s been for all of our lifetimes.

      Report Post »  
  • Rayblue
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:05pm

    Singing to the choir Glenn.

    Report Post » Rayblue  
  • kentuckypatriot
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:05pm

    Why is Congress not demanding this bozo’s impeachment??

    Report Post » kentuckypatriot  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:11pm

      They are all in on a socialist New World Order agenda and think they will be the ruling elite!

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • Robert-CA
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:15pm

      Because they’re all crooks in DC .

      Report Post » Robert-CA  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:15pm

      When do they start serving the “Victory Gin?” In the book, “1984,” By George Orwell ,the people drank Victory Gin.Today, we call it Kool-Aid.Orwell saw the future.

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • Mary M. Tebbe
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:20pm

      kentuckypatriot: We should not call for impeachment. That would just be a slap on the wrist. We should call for a trial to try him and his progressive/communist/socialist/marxist cohorts with treason or sedition. That would impose a more just punishment for these arrogant rabid usurpers.

      Report Post » Mary M. Tebbe  
    • Elena2010
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 6:24pm

      @Mary — that is what impeachment does. Impeachment is similar to the Grand Jury that indicts criminals. Fm impeachment, the trail goes to the Senate. The Senate can strip him of his Presidency and remand him to further court action.

      The Constitution does not have a provision for court action w/o impeachment and conviction in the House and Senate, respectively.

      Report Post » Elena2010  
  • Socialist Pride
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:05pm

    Do you feel that warm sensation? That’s the loveing blanket of Socialism comforting you. Relax, lie down and enjoy.

    Report Post » Socialist Pride  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:27pm

      Socialism never works A hole it’s been tried before and it always fails and your Marxist president will be defeated,that’s the warm feeling.

      Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • SoCaLCapitalist
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:31pm

      socialists will never lead, they will always be the town idiots. You can bank on that.

      Report Post »  
    • Bakko Bomma
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:33pm

      Awesome troll Socialist. I tip my hat.

      Report Post » Bakko Bomma  
    • Komponist-ZAH
      Posted on January 6, 2012 at 12:44pm

      Yep, weaved by Satan himself out of the very fires of Hell.

      Report Post »  
  • Carter John
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:05pm

    Can we Impeach him now?

    Report Post » Carter John  
    • mrfunn
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:36pm

      During an election year?

      btw:
      I think the House and Senate need to cooperate.

      Report Post »  
  • BOMUSTGO
    Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:01pm

    Obama is the son of perditon.The number 44 is the number of perdition (Destruction). The 44th president is destroying our Country.

    Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • Socialist Pride
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:08pm

      ‘Bo’ is bringing America into the 21st century. Socialism is the future. You will all be better off. Stop struggling. Enjoy.

      Report Post » Socialist Pride  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 5:32pm

      I took an oath to defend the country and theConstitution.I will not bow to the NWO!

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  
    • Icnivad
      Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:18pm

      The things this Prideful Socialist is saying sounds a bit like something out of George Orwell’s 1984…

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 16

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love