The War in Iraq Has Officially Come to a Close
- Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:21am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
BAGHDAD (The Blaze/AP) — After nearly nine years, 4,500 American dead, 32,000 wounded and more than $800 billion, U.S. officials formally shut down the war in Iraq – a conflict that U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said was worth the price in blood and money, as it set Iraq on a path to democracy.
Panetta stepped off his military plane in Baghdad Thursday as the leader of America’s war in Iraq, but will leave as one of many top U.S. and global officials who hope to work with the struggling nation as it tries to find its new place in the Middle East and the broader world. Watch Panetta, among others, address the war’s conclusion:
He and several other U.S. diplomatic, military and defense leaders participated in a highly symbolic ceremony during which the flag of U.S. Forces-Iraq was officially retired, or “cased,” according to Army tradition.

The US Forces Iraq colors are lowered before being encased in a ceremony in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, Dec., 15, 2011. The ceremonies mark the official end of the US military mission in Iraq. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, Pool)
The U.S. Forces-Iraq flag was furled – or wrapped – around a flagpole and covered in camouflage. It will be brought back to the United States.
“You will leave with great pride – lasting pride,” Panetta told the troops. “Secure in knowing that your sacrifice has helped the Iraqi people to cast tyranny aside and to offer hope for prosperity and peace to this country’s future generations.”
During several stops in Afghanistan this week, Panetta made it clear that the U.S. can be proud of its accomplishments in Iraq.
“We spilled a lot of blood there,” Panetta said. “But all of that has not been in vain. It’s been to achieve a mission making that country sovereign and independent and able to govern and secure itself.”
That, he said, is “a tribute to everybody – everybody who fought in that war, everybody who spilled blood in that war, everybody who was dedicated to making sure we could achieve that mission.”

Panetta echoed President Barack Obama’s promise that the U.S. plans to keep a robust diplomatic presence in Iraq, foster a deep and lasting relationship with the nation and maintain a strong military force in the region.
As of Thursday, there were two U.S. bases and about 4,000 U.S. troops in Iraq – a dramatic drop from the roughly 500 military installations and as many as 170,000 troops during the surge ordered by President George W. Bush in 2007, when violence and raging sectarianism gripped the country. All U.S. troops are slated to be out of Iraq by the end of the year, but officials are likely to meet that goal a bit before then.
The total U.S. departure is a bit earlier than initially planned, and military leaders worry that it is a bit premature for the still maturing Iraqi security forces, who face continuing struggles to develop the logistics, air operations, surveillance and intelligence sharing capabilities they will need in what has long been a difficult neighborhood.
U.S. officials were unable to reach an agreement with the Iraqis on legal issues and troop immunity that would have allowed a small training and counterterrorism force to remain. U.S. defense officials said they expect there will be no movement on that issue until sometime next year.

Still, despite Obama’s earlier contention that all American troops would be home for Christmas, at least 4,000 forces will remain in Kuwait for some months. The troops will be able to help finalize the move out of Iraq, but could also be used as a quick reaction force if needed.
Obama met in Washington with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki earlier this week, vowing to remain committed to Iraq as the two countries struggle to define their new relationship. Ending the war was an early goal of the Obama administration, and Thursday’s ceremony will allow the president to fulfill a crucial campaign promise during a politically opportune time. The 2012 presidential race is roiling and Republicans are in a ferocious battle to determine who will face off against Obama in the election.
Panetta acknowledged the difficulties for Iraq in the coming years, as the country tries to find its footing.
“They’re going face challenges in the future,” Panetta said Wednesday during a visit with troops in Afghanistan. “They’ll face challenges from terrorism, they’ll face challenges from those that would want to divide their country. They’ll face challenges from just the test of democracy, a new democracy and trying to make it work. But the fact is, we have given them the opportunity to be able to succeed.”
The ceremony at Baghdad International Airport also featured remarks from Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Lloyd Austin, the top U.S. commander in Iraq.

Austin is leading the massive logistical challenge of shuttering hundreds of bases and combat outposts, and methodically moving more than 50,000 U.S. troops and their equipment out of Iraq over the last year – while still conducting training, security assistance and counterterrorism battles.
Over the coming days, the final few thousand U.S. troops will leave Iraq in orderly caravans and tightly scheduled flights – a marked contrast to the shock and awe that rocked the country on March 20, 2003, as the U.S. invasion began.
Saddam Hussein has been ousted, the reports of weapons of mass destruction largely laid to rest. And the future of a nascent democracy awaits.
What do you think about the end of the war in Iraq? Let us know in the comments section.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (118)
the point
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:57am4,500 U.S,troops killed in 10 years . and , when all of the troops are pulled out, what did these troops die
Report Post »for. In WWII,in some battles, 4.500 were killed. That war lasted only 4 years.
It seems as though our government wants us to forget about wars that were started while we had a Democrat for President. We must never forget that all of the U.S. troops who were killed in all of the wars we fought in died for one reason….our freedom
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:03amExactly how many ARMED TROOPS will be in Iraq going forward now that the “War” (that has never been declared) in Iraq is over?
Report Post »grudgywoof
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:08amI agree, however this was a dubious war at best and I hope some good came of it. I still don’t understand any of this Afganistan included.
Report Post »SEPARATENOW
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:33amWell, zero is the answer. (Though it shouldn’t be.) Leftist idiot.
Lived for satellite phone calls during my son’s combat deployment. He got home in one piece despite multiple attempts to the contrary. I ache and often weep for those grandparents, parents, spouses, siblings and children who were not as lucky as me.
Here is a Christmas wish for the success of Iraqi civil rights and their new republic. A gift so many gave their lives to give.
Report Post »smackdown33
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:52amThe Iraq war was a war fought for the security of another nation, Israel. The Iraq war was not a fight for America’s national interests, otherwise the reasons given to promote the war would not have changed time after time. Were it a war for America, the reason would have been clear to all. As it was, Bush changed the excuse for war, weekly. A lie always requires more lies. The truth does not.
Report Post »Iraq did not, and could not threaten the United States. Israel is the problem.
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 1:27pmThere’s probably gonna be a good 50 thousand troops still over there. Mark my words.
Report Post »kim
Posted on December 16, 2011 at 9:29amto me we dont have freedome any more everything come with a price you can say anything with out getting in trouble for it and so on and so forth
Report Post »RaidersImperium
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:55am…Ended on Bush’s same time table…one less thing to haunt obama in the presidential debates…even though he promised to end it in 2008…
Report Post »DrFrost
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 11:48amI agree. This decision was, without a doubt, all about politics. Obama cares more about his reelection than he does about Iraq or the soldiers that died to give them a chance at freedom. He cares more about his reelection than he does the country itself!
Report Post »goldmind
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:50amThe draw done of troops in Iraq, is a smokescreen for the impending war with Iran. When economies fracture, war is the only option. Combine that with Iran’s suicidal mindset, China and Russia’s lust for world domination, and the 2nd biggest oil reserves basically under American control in Iraq, and you just about have the ingredients for the 3rd World War. Don’t take my word for it. Ted Koppel…, did a report on it just the other night, and all but got those staying behind in Iraq to admit it’s an oil and nuclear chess game. Being the gasoline gluttons we are here in America, it makes sense in an insane kinda way. We have a dirty government, but in war you have to play dirty. 2012 (if not sooner), will test the resolve of this nation as never before. We have at the very least a half dozen Hitler wannabes postured for taking down this country. Instead of staying tuned, tune your awareness.
Report Post »youguysready_letsroll
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:15pmIf we have control of Iraqi oil, I wonder why gas prices haven’t returned to early 2001 levels. Some people say we were there for oil – which maybe we were, but why does gas cost so much if we gained all that oil?
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:39amRemember President Eisenhower warning us in his farewell speech about the “Military industrial complex” and their powerful influence in government? Tens of thousands of people are employed in the weapons industry and politicians receive millions in contributions from them. Peace is their enemy.
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:30amMy son will be home Saturday from his 3rd tour. As far as I am concerned, that is the victory that I will cherish–I didn’t have to bury my son.
To my brothers from Viet Nam, please let the troops know our bitterness about another war ending without honor is, in fact, a demonstration of our love for them. We didn’t want them wasted. I am going to end with the quote that is often seen here.
All gave some.
Report Post »Some gave all.
Texas_Tip
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:12amFor your sons return Dismayed Veteran. All those coming home, and all those staying abroad.
Report Post »S!
Steelhead
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:05amwe- Obama finished what Reagan failed to do by killing Quadaffi.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:00amVictory? Only if that @hithole was leveled by the military would it be a victory…We should have been gone the day they caught Saddam…
Report Post »autigers2010champs
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:59amDoes anyone on here have family or friends in Special OPS? If so have any of them been called to Washington DC within the last few days or weeks? I ask because here at my local church one of our members who is on the police force and is Special OPS was just called to DC out of the blue? Is there something going down we need to know about. Please respond if you have any information. Thanks
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:08amThey all died or were injured for nothing-just like viet nam. iraq most likely would have toppled saddam as part of the arab uprisings in that region. now iraq and iran will possibly have relations . We have once again shown our hypocrisy as we murdered iraqis and tortured them and are ourselves a terrorist nation. Kudos for the iraqis for throwing us out rather then giving us a green light to murder more iraqis with impunity. if there were real justice there would be war crimes trials for americans.hopefully they’ll demolish that triumphalist embassy which proved to be a bogus triumphalism as we are being thrown out.God bless the iraqis and kudos to them for not submitting to our unjust terms. And for all our advanced weaponry-they fought back!
Report Post »robert
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:23amWhether it was pushing for amnesty for illegals or starting two unnecessary wars, or both, George Bush, the Idiot Prince, single-handedly destroyed the Republican majority in Congress and was more responsible for the black racist getting in office than any other single factor. To be sure, fat man Karl Rove and war monger Dick Cheney, were encouraging him all the way, But, in the last analysis it was the work of the Idiot Prince.
All those thousands of American men killed and maimed amounts to no less than a criminal act.
And now they’re saying the Iraq war is over.
You wanna bet?
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:48am@ Rose You remind me of Jane Fonda. If America is so bad, why don’t you go live in Iraq? Yes, this war was dragged on to long and wasted tons of cash. All anyone needed to do is look back in history and see what happened to other countries that fought in the region for an extended period of time. Just as a reminder, we were attacked on 9-11 and a response was necessary. I’m a scorched earth kinda guy be damn the collateral damage. Get in, get it done and then get out. As far as torture, what would you preffer, have a group video tape you as they hack your head off or get waterboarded? You side with radicals that want me and mine dead just because our addresses are located in this country. I will not bow down to radicals whos goal is nothing short of my destruction under the guidance of a man made book they consider holy scripture.
Merry Christmas!
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 2:23pmGod bless the great Jane Fonda. And if you‘re a scorched earth kind of guy then you can’t complain when you get some blowback for your murderous policies toward others via a9-11 say.When your calling card is shock and awe you can‘t say you’re there for the people. We were there cause after alquada attacked us we feared they might topple the saudi royals and that would be a problem for us and our oil supply. iraq- being a secular society -we thought would welcome us after toppling their dictator and we could have a military base there as well as an oil supply without fear of fundamentalists like alquada . we underestimated the reality that they did not like shock and awe and occupation and fought back. because they’re men[and women] not mice.I hope they trade with iran..
Report Post »barber2
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 11:55pmYoung , naive, brainwashed Rose Ellen : Two words for you to absorb : Pearl Harbor….( be sure to read the “pre-views”…)
Report Post »SmallGovBigGuns
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:58amdear brotherhood,
we leave you iraq for your taking. just be sure to be very democratic in the future *wink wink*
signed your brother
Report Post »President Osama
MEANS2RESIST
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 11:43amROSE-ELLEN, what do you know….STFU JANE FONDA JR.
Report Post »TelepromoterNChief
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:47amSweet!!
Report Post »Let’s bring those soldiers home so they can start rounding up Americans for heir Obama.
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:02amThey need to stop lying. It may be “officially” is over (that’s what they tell us), but there’s still over 30000 troops there, and they ARE armed.
They’re STILL OCCUPYING that country.
Obama is a liar the war isn’t over. This is appeasement for the silent anti-war left who probably won’t vote for this douchebag again because he is a liar and did the opposite of what he campaigned on.
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:42amGet real. What our elected politicians have accomplished in Iraq by sacrificing the lives of over 4000 Americans, the wounding of tens of thousands more, and squandering a trillion dollars from the national treasury can be summed up in one word. “Nothing.”
Report Post »mils
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:49amWe lost our soldiers, we lost our honor….we lost that war, period.
Obama will spin it a thousand different ways. The simple truth is, it was a disaster, we lost because of incompetence on the part of the American government and it’s not wanting to win.
Now it will all go back to the way it was before we ever sacraficed our nation.
It’s all political, nothing more.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:56amNow if we could REALLY pull out our troops. How many will remain?? Lots of them!! This is total bullcrap lies. We are still there with a BILLION dollar Embassy to protect. Bullcrap if we are gone. We are NOT gone from Iraq…it’s an illusion.
Bring all our boys home and let the world iron out theor own problems. we can use the military to round up illegals and ship them back to wherever they came from. Yes Newt…all of them!
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Wake up America!
Umexcuseme
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:27amVietnam was for nothing? Iraq was for nothing? What about Korea? Philippines, any area of World War II, How about Grenada, Panama, any friggen hostility we have gone to and supported. Yea Somalia was a bust but that’s not over.
Report Post »I’m astounded by the short sightedness of the postings here. True believers of Michael Moors propaganda, You are here now spouting crap about that this was for not.
Can you tell me why we went into Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. Sorry we didn’t meet the time tables of all of you sitting on the side lines, watching your TV’s screaming about the injustice of it all.
I do believe that the people YOU elected, surrounded themselves with more qualified individuals to make those decisive and tough decisions. Bla, Bla Bla, Just sit here and complain, don’t do anything no, because if you did you might just make a difference and understand more than what is presented to you, in some form of Intel, other than your spin off that you get from any news or media outlet.
Go back and burry your head in the sand. Believe everything in the news. Complain cry about the injustice of it all, ME,ME,ME Dbags.
In case you didn’t know the Vietnam conflict was to stop the spread of communism, guess that didn’t work did it, Iraq yea maybe there weren’t any WMD’s that you know of, but there was Serine, (if you don’t know what that is look it up) something we had to deal with every friggen time an IED went off.
So just sit a home, in your happy little
encinom
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:28amThe Boy King W. got to get over his daddy issues. Theis war was nothing more than W. and the Neo-Cons play a game with the lives of poor, that they have no care for.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 11:42amThe spread of communism had NO chance of getting here. Why the hell do we have to be the world’s police officers? Neocon fool!!
Report Post »Umexcuseme
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 2:34pmI guess the poppy plants growing in AFGAN have nothing to do with U.S. But I guess that is a problem for you, arm chair politicians and the local authorities to figure out. Or just for fun maybe you liked watching the news on 9/11. World police? It’s called pay back.
Report Post »I guess you don’t remember the Regan era , having our confrontation with Moammar and Libya, the terrorist training camps and his welcoming with open arms any terrorist organization against U.S. Or his safe haven after we bombed the crap out of him. Yea he went to Russia, the place where communize grows, I guess the Bay of Pigs was for nothing right. As far as I know there is no ICBM’s in Cuba. If you ask me that’s pretty dam close to home.
Do you remember the Ollie North trials; Congress asked LTC North why he had such an elaborate security system. Do you remember what his reply was…. Or do you even care, Do you remember when he was made the scapegoat, oh in the late 80’s. His reply was because of people like Osama Bin Laden, Hmm 20 years earlier.
boca_chica
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:40amI’ll be curious to see how much equipment we leave behind this time ( compared to VietNam).
Report Post »autigers2010champs
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:01amWe will be leaving all equipment and it has been cycled out with older equipment not as up to date and will be sold to the Iraqis I just had a conversation this week with a high up Ranger and asked the very question and that is what I was told.
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:02amVietnam was all for nothing also. What is different there today except for all the rusting ordnance littering the countryside, a scarred landscape, and the graves of a million civilians? It’s as though it never happened.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:32amQ – really. Bush got us in ( under false pretenses ) and Obama ,our commander in chief, led us out in victory.
Report Post »loveoursoldiers
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:22amyeah.. the blood of good Americans was spilled so someone who has done NOTHING for our country
Report Post »could gain power and break it down and/or turn it into an Islamic state? It disgusts me what has happened and then the big liar getting up there and cleverly pretending he has supported the troops. yeah.. right.
If you listen closely to that speech he made sure that EVERYONE.. on both sides of the feeling about the war ( himself against) all are patriots. yeah right. He is anti-American and pro Muslim and taking credit for what our troops have done and what Bush put in place. He is a coward and a narcissist and perhaps the biggest threat this country has faced.
God, please let him be defeated.
rose-ellen
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 4:25pmYou all volunteered to go murder iraqis. in the freest country the world has ever seen-you followed whatever narrative your war mongers in government and media fed you. That’s on you.you went there cause you wanted to kill as many arabs as you could after 9-11. whatever narrative would allow that, you aquiesed to. So stop whining that the people of iraq fought back. my solidarity is with them-not the american agressors. And 9-11 WAS blowback for our unjust policies including war there too.PTSD is befitiing the crimes you committed against iraqis. Short of war crime trials and reparations to iraqis it’s the next best thing. Whing mass murdering hypocrites. And those iraqis are still there-God bless them-hope they trade oil with iran .
Report Post »ZengaPA65
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:08amThe war in Iraq has officially come to a close Next pointless war please.
Report Post »jgeespot
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:59amWe just finished one, Libya…oh wait, that was a “Kinetic Action”, never mind.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:11amNato helping the people once they themselves rose up against a dictator was just and right. We should help the syrians who are being slaughtered en masse-but because it is in israels interest to keep assad in power we don’t . hypocrites!
Report Post »Umexcuseme
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 10:33amRight on target, ROSE-ELLEN
Report Post »Jim in Houston
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 4:09pmrose-ellen: Take your Hanoi Jane loving commie butt and crawl back under your rock!
Report Post »mikee1
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:08am5,000 dead Americans. Trillions of dollars down the drain, rebuilding the enemies’ mosques, etc. after they blow them up. AND NOW THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD WILL TAKE OVER IN TIME, WORSE THAN SADDAM. This is how a PC WAR, LED BY THE OLIGARCHY, RINO’DUMMYCRAP bushy/ODUMBO inc. ends. tragic. RON PAUL WAS RIGHT.
Report Post »UpstateNYConservative
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:05amWhen Iraq falls into anarchy about a year from now, with help from an Administration-empowered and enabled Iran, will Obow and Panetta take credit for that, too?
Report Post »Apple Bite
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:55amThis is like a street brawl before the riots….
Leaving Iraq was a bad idea. Hope they have a good backup plan, because McCain hit on an important issue, this was politically motivated for Obama’s re-election. Iraq‘s security isn’t stable and they’ll need help in the near future.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:58amSo why does the AMERICAN TAXPAYER have to foot the bill? Let them work out their own problems! Wake up NEOCON fool!
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:52amThe worst idea was invading Iraq in the first place. Until my dying day I’ll believe George Bush ordered it mainly because of his personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein for trying to assassinate his father.
Report Post »louise
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:53amHere is the link …same song, Dantes Prayer sung by Loreena McKenitt, but with the correct videoI wanted to post .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nptA5uj6ZRY&feature=related
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:50am@Steelhead
Report Post »Actually 0bama had little to do with it. This is being done on the schedule that was set by Bush.
louise
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:47amTo all soldiers and veterans, Thank you.
In remembrance of all who died…….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEqpdSKdpxs
Report Post »wbalzley
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:46amMaybe Iran will decide to take advantage of the vacuum of power we leave behind. After all the two nations have been historical enemies, and Iran has just been itching for a fight…
Report Post »lodgerat
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:39amtrolling so early?
Report Post »MEANS2RESIST
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:18pmGo bama….
Report Post »GreatGu
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:35amWhat Victory???? Just as before under Democrat control we have left without Victory. You think there was a blood bath under Hussein? You ain‘t seen nothin’ yet. Leave with Great Pride; *********!!! The Blood Spilled will have been for nothing, just you wait and see.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:24amWatching Obama and Panetta take credit for America’s victory in Iraq turns my stomach.
Report Post »lodgerat
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:35amMine too. I wonder on our wayout if they gave us our promised oil? Oh no never mind, I think China got that contract
Report Post »wbalzley
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 7:47amVictory? What victory? What was our objective?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 8:00amTo overthrow Saddam and set up a democratically elected government. If you hadn’t noticed, our troops have accomplished that. Your lack of gratitude and respect for what our troops have accomlished is as sickening as Obama taking credit for it.
Report Post »autigers2010champs
Posted on December 15, 2011 at 9:03amHey GONZO please Beat Bama and shut them up so they can stop crying for a rematch Geaux Tigers and WAR EAGLE!!!
Report Post »