Where Does Romney Stand on Guns? It‘s ’Complicated’ (With Flashback Video)
- Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:11pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »

Is Mitt Romney a fearless defender of the Second Amendment, a fierce anti-gun zealot or a flip-flopper merely looking to capitalize on the right to bear arms for political gain? The jury may still be out, but BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski claims that the Republican presidential nominee has a “complicated history on guns.” The Wall Street Journal, too, embraces this notion:
Mr. Romney’s record on guns as governor was mixed. He signed an assault-weapons ban in 2004, but gun-rights groups supported the bill because it created certain protections for gun owners, according to a scorecard compiled by the Gun Owners’ Action League. During his tenure as governor, Mr. Romney also proposed raising the fees for a permit to $75 from $25. The legislature eventually bumped it up to $100.
Gun-rights advocates said their relationship with Mr. Romney and his staff improved noticeably during his tenure as governor. In 2005, he deemed May 7 “Right to Bear Arms Day.”
As a presidential candidate, Mr. Romney has been unequivocal in his opposition to any new restrictions on gun owners, saying he believes in “safe and responsible gun ownership” as long as those who exercise the right “do so lawfully and properly.” His campaign website says Mr. Romney “will fight the battle on all fronts to protect and promote the Second Amendment.”
In the past, Romney has seemed — at moments — to part ways with the National Rifle Association (NRA), but today, he will address the NRA’s Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum. Through a timeline of events, statements and documentation, Romney’s opinions on guns and the Second Amendment can be tracked and assessed.
First, BuzzFeed presents a 1994 clip from a Massachusetts Senatorial seat debate between Ted Kennedy and Mitt Romney. In it, Romney derided Kennedy for working to ensure that “there would not be mandatory sentences imposed on people who used guns in the commission of crimes.”
Watch the debate, below:
In 2002, Romney was seen discussing Massachusetts gun laws — laws he said he supported and would not chip away at (Romney became governor in 2003 and served until 2007). “They (the laws) help protect us and provide for our safety,” he said:
During the same year, while running for governor, he claimed that, once “the science tells us it works,” he’d support ballistic fingerprinting (the NRA, among other right-leaning groups has been highly critical in the past of this method of crime-fighting).
Romney, of course, was careful to say that he would rely on studies before definitively supporting it:
BuzzFeed also provides a screen shot from Romney’s 2002 web site that reiterated his support for “the strict enforcement of gun laws” and “the federal assault weapons ban.“ But the statement also claims that he supported hunters who ”responsibly own and use firearms.”
In a 2004 press release, Romney signed a permanent assault weapons ban into law in Massachusetts. But while many will see this as an anti-gun stance, there were some elements within the provision that assisted gun proponents.
For example, a two-year extension on the firearm identification card and term was granted and a 90-day grace period was given for those seeking to renew licenses. Here’s a copy of the letter announcing these regulatory changes:

In 2007, he reiterated support for the Second Amendment and claimed that he has a gun, goes hunting and is a member of the NRA. BuzzFeed called these claims “false.” After Romney made his gun ownership claim, he was corrected — and he inevitably admitted — that the gun was his son’s and not his own.
At a town hall event earlier this year, Romney, again, claimed that he owns guns. Following his statement, a spokesperson told reporters that the candidate owns two shotguns. The natural question is: Did he purchase them after the 2007 flap? Listen to his comments from 2007, below:
At a Feb. 2012 town hall, Romney comprehensively stated the reasons why he believes Americans should be able to purchase guns.
“But we have a right in this country to bear arms and I know that there are people who think that somehow that should change and they keep looking for laws for a way to stop awful things from happening,” he said. “And there are awful things that happen. But there already are laws that are designed to protect people and unfortunately people violate the laws.”
Romney continued, going on to discuss how the laws should be managed.
“So trying to find more laws to change bad behavior isn’t the answer, the answer is to find that bad behavior the people who are inclined to bad behavior, my own view is lets protect the second amendment let’s protect the right of Americans to bear arms whether for hunting, for sportsman for personal protection for whatever legal purpose someone might have,” he said.
During the same year as the gun-ownership mishap, Romney said “I don’t line up 100 percent with the NRA,” as he went on to explain some of his views on gun laws:
Also in 2007, he said “my door was always open to you” in an address to NRA members at the annual Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum:
So, it seems Romney’s record is indeed complicated when it comes to guns. While he has consistently defended the Second Amendment, he has done so with numerous caveats. These exceptions will likely be viewed as reasonable by some and as evidence of flip-floppery by others.
In the end, the former Massachusetts governor and likely GOP presidential nominee has taken — all things considered — a relatively moderate stance on gun regulation. In the past, the NRA has given Romney a “B” grade for his handling of these issues. This, too, corroborates the notion that he has had a mixed bag of policies when it comes to addressing ownership and usage.
(H/T: BuzzFeed)



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (227)
Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:15pmSo Now…lets all fal in like good little sheeple and repeat the mantra “well at least he’s not a commie!” (sorry, those re-education camps won’t work on me! I believe in liberty, and the American people! And in my God!)
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:29pmDEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
DEMAND A DEBATE it is our Republican Party.
Gingrich vs. Romney
The Heavy Weight Fight… Who is ducking it.
Romney Must Beat Gingrich in a one on one debate to earn respect and the vote of many Americans.
All you Romney Supporters should be excited about this…
You would see the
In the Blue Corner, drinking Kool-aid the “SEVERELY CONSERVATIVE” ( Romney )
And in the Red Corner “THE PROGRESSIVE” so says beck ( Gingrich ).
Report Post »SacredHonor1776
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:34pmIt doesn’t matter what president we have, if we don’t clean out Congress… The worst presidents will be amplified, the best presidents put in check…
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:34pmGingrich??? the whiniest Bxtch boy I’ve ever seen! LOLOLOl…the guy who wants to increase the state dept by %)5 (ie Blackwater) and build a moonbase! LOLOL
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:36pmGingrich is a horses Axx! The economy is an issue…and he wants to buy us Prada! LOLOLOL…what a moron!
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:45pmI know where he stands with them, wherever he has to stand with or without them whatever it takes to maintain the value of money through government power. As long as money stays good, people will keep their guns, but if uncle Sam has to mop up much of your money, then the guns got to go.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:53pmSee I know how they are going to in-part take away you guns. Like now people are going to doctors for check-ups and doctors are asking patients if they own guns. Well, in my estimates they are going to take the records of all the people who say they own guns, and they are going to find a common characteristic of all the patients who own guns, and then they are going to “Nudge” some kind of new regulation by painting that characteristic in a bad-light, then all those previous gun owners won’t be able to register to own guns.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:54pmWho cares?
Romrhoid is going to lose if he gets nominated in Tampa.
He can barely draw a crowd of 500 people, compared to Ron Paul who CONSISTENTLY draws 2 to 8,000+ people EVERYWHERE he goes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1VZh0TlVAXI#!
No one is excited about a Goldman Sachs vs Goldman Sachs contest for the White House.
Santy has now “etch a sketched” his website clean of any Romrhoid criticism, and will most likely get a bailout from Romrhoid for his in debt campaign. Doesn’t sound very fiscally conservative to me.
“Mr. Moonbase”, who is several million in debt, and supposedly can’t account for a million of it, will probably also get a bailout when he falls in line.
(And these guys think they can solve the nation’s debt crisis?!?)
I repeat. Romrhoid WILL LOSE, just like McStain did.
You’ve been sold out. Again.
P.S. Ron Paul BEATS Obombya in the most recent Rasmussen head to head poll. Romrhoid tied.
Report Post »http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/polls/221163-rasmussen-obama-and-romney-tied-nationally
Itsjusttim
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:01pmOr perhaps when people go to the doctor for a check-up, and doctors ask whether or not they have guns, and the patient says “It’s not your business“ or they do but say ”No”, they will pass legislation saying immoral liars shouldn’t have guns, or if you say “It’s not your business” then maybe they will pass a law saying you are impeding justice in a healthcare system where the government is overseeing fairness. Out of a need to protect you will be labeled a criminal and not allowed to own a firearm.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:19pmHE IS A JOHN McCAIN RINO BUT ROMNEY IS NOT A COMMIE
If he was not a RINO the people of Mass would have impeached Romney.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:24pmVoters will quickly find out why Obama and the Democrat-Commies wanted Romney to run against. The attack on Mrs. Romney was just a little taste of what the Commies have in store. Just wait till they begin their attacks on the five sons. Every puff of pot they were near while in college will have been video taped. The attack on the Romney family will make the attack on the Palin family as a kiddie Family Feud TV show.
Report Post »Hobbs57
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:32pmThat’s right Jefferson, Ron Paul is still in the race, so what is your concern ?? All those people he brings out, I mean if he is the man, he still has his chance … SO what’s the deal brother, what is your issue ?? OH , I know, we are all stupid, and you are all smart. JUst like the intellectual elite on the left, you know what is best for us uneducated folks… While I personally support Ron Paul, as an EDUCATED man, I know the utopia of Communism never came to bear the fruit the paper said it would. However, there are communist countries in existence. Can you please show me where in the history of the world has ever a purely libertarian utopia existed and succeeded ? I am sorry guys, while i love the idea, we are from from having evolved enough as people to do exist as you wish. You act as Ron Paul had discovered some secret recipe to a happy and pure existence, yet, the man has done nothing in all those years to promote any part of this existence. Even so much as limit the Federal Reserve. With such a following, and with such a position, one would think he could at least accomplished this. Just sayin ….
@ MSIDIOT , look at Newts Gun record, not very good… Next time you are over his house, ask him why he didn’t fill out the gun survey this year ?? We all know you are his secret lover.. or at least related..
Report Post »countrygirl56
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:32pmAgreed…Teabunny! This is just one more problem in a L-O-N-G LIST of problems w/ Mr. Romney. But as you said, “at least he’s not a COMMIE!” Unlike our current Comrade-in-Chief!
Pray for the protection, wisdom, and strength of Almight God…and God Bless Glenn, his family, and staff!
OMG 2012!!!!!
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:37pmHey, Teabunny….”and build a moonbase! LOLOL”….Ever seen this?: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6582960 It’s from December 5, 2006. NASA thinks it’s a great idea.
Just watched Flipper speak at the NRA. Talk about irony. Newt also spoke, and was very well recieved. Santorum is on now.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:54pm@HOBBS
I never referred to some “Libertarian utopia” in any of my communication here. You assume quite a bit about me without having anything to base your assumptions on. So yeah, in that sense, pretty stupid.
All I want is a President that can be TRUSTED to uphold his oath to the Constitution, and his office.
Report Post »A President that can’t be bought off by the corporate and special interest lobbies, like we’ve had for the past 80+ years. Is that too much to ask?
I’m tired of the pre-packaged, pre-ordained Ken Doll prostitutes that are paraded around like they are actually going to DO something. Aren’t you?
Inkmage
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:55pm@TEABUNNY
With that type of attitude you’ll be seeing Obama as president again. Romney IS NOT Obama, and there won’t be any magical perfect candidate coming up. Romney is the nominee except it, and support him- if you want Obama gone. If you choose to sit on your hands, because Romney isn’t some perfect candidate, then you have no right to complain about Obama and what he’ll do- if re-elected.
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:56pm@ms-glennbc
Report Post »“And in the Red Corner “THE PROGRESSIVE” so says beck ( Gingrich ).”
Glenn didn’t say it he played the video of Gingrich saying it himself. Get your facts straight.
Stuck_in_CA
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:11pm@jcldwl …”Glenn didn’t say it he played the video of Gingrich saying it himself. Get your facts straight.”
Have you heard the many clips of Flipper saying how “Progressive” and “not really a Republican” he is, aired by Glenn?
Report Post »TexasHunter
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:21pm@TEAMARCHESON I am trying to form a blog for the Republic. I need a little help but we have to be prepared!! All of America. The time is now.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:36pmGingrich said, “The populist movement and the progressive moment profoundly changed America for the better.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zex6qptVIPU
Gingrich Admits He’s a Progressive in the Theodore Roosevelt Tradition:
youtube.com/watch?v=Qi314LJ6uwM
Gingrich said, “We have to rethink the State Department, I’d say we have to increase in size about 50%.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH_h4hrrYjA
Gingrich said, “The greatest leaders in fighting for an integrated America in the twentieth century were in the Democratic Party. The fact is, it was the liberal wing of the Democratic Party that ended segregation. The fact is that it was Franklin Delano Roosevelt who gave hope to a nation that was in despair and could have slid into dictatorship. And the fact is, every Republican has much to learn from studying what the Democrats did right.”
Romney said, “I’m someone who is moderate, and my views are progressive.”
youtube.com/watch?v=vvx7qLtrPkk
Romney said, “I’m a big believer in getting money where the money is, and the money is in Washington.” youtube.com/watch?v=bM_si-JVfhI
…Just so you know what kind of GOP nominee we will vote for…
Report Post »hcartexas
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:56pmRomney is a schmuck. If he does not choose a VERY conservative VP.. ie Rubio, West (I dont have a third) he will not be elected. Romney is weak, unacceptable to conservatives, unctuous, and uncool. This election literally will determine the fate of the Republican Party.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 6:04pmGingrich gave the presidency to Romney. Why would you need for them to debate?
Report Post »ronin_6
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 6:20pmIts not all about ideology. Not in the real world anyway. Gingrich would have been as polarizing as Obama. It was always about Romney as it should have been. Your choice now is do you skulk around like spoiled little kids or do you get behind the very best chance we have to kick Obama to the curb of history?
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:14pm@Inkmage – I won’t complain if Obama gets re elected. We are going to hear guys like complain. I’m going to be the one telling you I told you so when Obama gets re elected. Vote Ron Paul or expect the raping your going to get.
Report Post »duhwut
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:27pmi wish herman cain were still around. these damn career politicians think they know everything thats good for us. herman was just a cool guy with knowledge in how to leave the market alone. damn, he would have made a fine president, because he wouldnt have done **** besides relax taxes and watch the economy get on its feet again. he had a simple agenda to fix our money problem and nothing more. all these other career politicians have crooked agendas that have built up over their time in office. these guys work most of their life to unleash all of their “ideas” upon the people, and herman would have just cut them all off and shown them all how a real man does it. a real man that built a major company from the ground up, not a ***** kenyan who bows to false kings and cant use his own words in speeches, or a mormon who uses his smile and chatterbox mouth to divert attention from his lies and hypocritical actions.
R.I.P. America. We will not live free again.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:57pmAmen, Ronin_6.
Report Post »CultureWarriors
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:33pmA well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Sorry, but this on sentence amendment is so unambiguous that ANY law restricting an American’s right to own, carry or use a firearm is unconstitutional. THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It doesn’t say SHALL SOMETIMES NOT BE INFRINGED. ALL LAWS RESTRICTING GUNS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The problem with our country is that we no longer value liberty. We should imprison ANY person who votes to take another persons liberty away. We can’t fix the country without holding these liberty thieves accountable.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 12:58am@JCLDWL
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:56pm
@ms-glennbc
“And in the Red Corner “THE PROGRESSIVE” so says beck ( Gingrich ).”
Glenn didn’t say it he played the video of Gingrich saying it himself. Get your facts straight.
OK JCLDWL……. Get the Tape…..
I heard the tape.. along with all of the crap Beck Said.. Where do you think the name MS-Glenn BC came from.
Beck said Gingrich was a Progressive and played a tape CUT UP to make the point and it was worse than anything MSNBC has ever done.
Here is the ROMNEY Tape…. Produce the Gingrich Tape in Context…. ( I KNOW YOU WILL NEVER DO IT ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMcjJEXt9To
If you want to talk facts you came to the right place….
Here is another one for you… 6 degrees of Newt Gingrich by Glenn Beck.. Tell me how Newt Gingrich is Just as Dangerous as the Nazi’s killing 11 million people…. Give some facts to support that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGFxEupRK0E
No Put Up or SHUT UP…. Produce the TAPE Produce the TAPE
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 11:27pmMS-GLENNBC, Gingrich scores a C- with Gun Owners of America, the only source for 2nd amendment rights advocates since the NRA has become so political. Romney D- !!! Ron Paul A+. The only other candidate that has been in the race that stood up with Paul on 2nd amendment rights was Rick Perry with an A, both from Texas, go figure. We need someone in the White House that is absolutely for the 2nd amendment. Our government, through both Republicans and Democrats, have already trashed our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 10th amendent rights. Are we really looking to put another in that is as or almost as bad as Obama on this???????????????????????????????????
If anyone can truthfully say that they are OK with putting another anti-second amendment president in the White House, I say you need to look for another country to live in and leave mine alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am adamant about this. We are on a dangerous course to take even the smallest chance of losing our 2nd amendment. If that is trashed, we will lose our country for sure!!
Report Post »BlackCrow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:14pmIs there any wonder why Ruger can’t keep up with their orders?
Report Post »flsnipe
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:30pmI know I want my Sr1911
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:30pmNo. It’s because entities like the DHS are buying it all up.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:30pmWhy? Romney or Obama will just order you to surrender them. Who will dare to resist an order to surrender your guns? Look what happened to Zimmerman, do you think it will be any different with you. If you resist, you better have an army ready and diplomats ready to petition foreign nations for help. Obama or Romney will be glad to request UN Peace Keepers to come and help put down the “racist” uprising.
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:45pmHey, doesn’t everyone know that Mormons collect guns? They store food, guns, bullets.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 6:07pm@ oneshiner,
Report Post »Those are the things that I agree with Mormons on. We should all celebrate that.
Nevermind
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:11pmReally? This is your nominee? All this talk of Tea Party and only supporting conservatives that share the same values and you end up with Romney? So i guess it just shows that the Tea party has no principles other than gaining power if they vote for this guy, TEa Party is just as bad as the GOP if they vote for Romney. Either vote on your principles or you end up lost. 2008 you guys had Mccain, how did that work out? Mtt will say anythign for a vote and he really has no principils other than winning an election. I have said the Tea Party was just a gimmich for the GOP and you all saying you will vote for Romeny proves my point, no vlaues or principals just want power. SAd but funny
Report Post »CaptainD51
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:24pmThere was no Tea party when McCain was running, they came after Obamacare was forced down our throats. Romney, just like McCain was pushed and pushed by the Republican establishment. That is why he can not get over 25% , most people (personnal opinion), including Republicans, did not support him, at this point, he is the lesser of two evils.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:17pmAnd here I thought the Tea Party started under Bush after TARP. Has history already been rewritten?
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:39pm@CAPTAIN
Report Post »Wrong,
Original modern day “Tea Party” was started in 2007 by the Ron Paul campaign. It was swiftly hijacked by Beck, Palin, Armey, Fox News and a few others.. Now it is just a hollow shell, which is what they wanted to turn it into.
Ron Paul: The Original Tea Party before it was hijacked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJnGlp3VKu0
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:05pmRon Paul is Not the Founder of the Tea Party Movement | Broadside Books: http://bit.ly/HE2Eoz
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:34pmRon Paul Is Just the Latest to Claim He Started the Tea Party Movement | Broadside Books: http://bit.ly/HE8uWX
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:55pmTIME_2_DO_SOME_REAL_RESEARCH can’t help but to reference only bias asinine opinions of others. Paul has never ascertained that he is the founder, leader or originator of the TEA party. The article that TIME_2_STOP_LYING provides has not one direct quote from Paul ever stating such an absurd thing. That is a lie promoted by his opponents. IN FACT, Paul has stated that the TEA party was a movement begun BY THE PEOPLE. The TEA party began under Bush’s second term when he began passing laws expanding the powers of federal Government (TSA, DHS, etc) and bailing out businesses “too big to fail”. The TEA party was actually heavily maligned by the Marxist MSM during this period as racists, conspiracy theorists, anti-Semites, and crazies. IBy the time Obama was elected, and the Healthcare law was passed, the movement had grown in size and influence. It was a true grassroots movement with no leader, but only the spirit of liberty and genuine sense of patriotism leading the way. At this time, many more joined and felt the necessity to unite as one nation, one people, and to vote out as many corrupt politicians out, including icmbent R‘s and D’s. The party was made up of patriotic Americans from many backgrounds (Conservatives, Blue Dog Democrats, Republicans, Constitutionalists, Disgruntled Democrats, Libertarians, Independents, etc). This unity helped the GOP win the majority in 2010 for the House of Representatives.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 6:20pm@Time2ChangeMySoggyDiaperIn2012
Don’t let the facts get in the way of your agenda there soggy one. I know you’re probably on dial up in your trailer house, but if you wait for a long time, the video will load and you can learn something.
Paul campaign (that’s grassroots for the slower ones) STARTED the modern day Tea Party in 2007.
That‘s why he’s frequently called the “Godfather of the Tea Party.”
Report Post »Isn’t learning fun?
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:24pmLol. COLT/JEFF . Soooo, what you‘re saying is that didn’t like what I provided because it doesn‘t fit the Ron Paul Revolution’s message? Is THAT what you’re saying?
Attacking me personally doesn’t quite get it either… but neither of you have ever gotten it anyways, thus you support Ron Paul.
As the Paul acolytes will continually say to anyone who ISN‘T a disciple of Paul’s seditious and almost treasonous nonsense…. WAKE UP you two!
Wakey, Wakey I say, time to take the geranimals off and grow up a bit. And IF you’re GOOD… you might get to sit at the big people table sometime soon. Maybe. Lol.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:47pmTIME_2_FINALLY_COMPLETE_HOOKED_ON_PHONICS is so darn indoctrinated into his own thinking that he can’t remotely understand that his assertions are based on complete lies. At no point in time has Paul himself ever claimed to have began the TEA party. TIME_2_END_HIS_DELUDED_FANTASY is just troubled by the fact that patriotic Americans were finally fed up with all politicians and able to trigger a real grassroots movement not in covenant with any political establishment.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_HIS_WILD_ALLEGATIONS can’t contemplate the idea of Americans uniting for freedom and patriotism if such a movement was not led by the GOP establishment. TIME_2_STOP_WORSHIPING_THE_ELITES would rather see America divided and in ruin if all voters are not aligned to one single belief system. TIME_2_STOP_BEING_A_COMMIE can’t understand that only in North Korea and Cuba are citizens and politicians practically required to promote and advance the exact same things, with no differing beliefs or opinions. His attempt at labeling us patriotic Americans and Republican supporters of Paul’s candidacy is a shame, and an insult to our free and open elections. The only treasonous and seditious persons here are those who would lie, exaggerate and distort the truth in order to just advance an agenda contrary to the most organic and fundamental laws in our country. We’re the land of the free and home of the brave. Cowards and talebearers for the Establishment do not speak for us.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 1:43amColt and Jfferson, Do not take Time_2 so seriously. He is always giving the Lame Stream Media’s talking points. The intelligent people that read these rants know perfectly well that it is media bias that Time_2 is repeating. I mean Broadside Books is Harper Collins Publishing,a subsidiary of Rupert Murdochs News Corp. or in other words, Fox News. Enough said, Time_2 is shown again to be a puppet of the Lame Stream Media.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 3:11amTime_2, “Ron Paul is Not the Founder of the Tea Party Movement ” Really???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak5Op4Bo4QU&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »IIIper
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:09pmThe “anyone but Obama” crowd is the reason we keep getting the choice between bad and worse. Would you rather be shot or stabbed? Maybe you should consider answering “I’d rather be left alone”. I wouldn’t vote for Romney or Obama, but between the two, I think I’d rather have Obama in office. At least they won’t be able to blame the wreckage on “conservative policies”, which neither candidate actually has.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:13pmSo how much is Axelrod and the Obama campaign paying you guys to cheerlead for an Obama victory?
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:17pmAnd, you sir, are a fool.
Not even Obama will touch gun laws, he knows it’s a no-go zone and would destroy his chances of re-election. You’ll even here Dems on MSNBC saying “we’re not touching the gun issue.”
How much more do you think Romney will touch that 3rd rail of politics?
I’ll be voting Romney.
Report Post »youdidthis
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:25pmMittvMitt.com: The story of two men trapped in one body
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9njHHyRI7g
mittens is obama white
Report Post »USPATRIOT101
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:31pmNow the Paulbots have a new chew toy.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:57pmUSA. Their play toys are little Ron Paul action figures with a catnip type of filler in the groin area… lol.
Report Post »hcartexas
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:58pmI agree….. Im conservative… conservatives ALWAYS stand on principle. I will not sacrafice my Principle’s for Romney. He’s a fake, no better than a used car salesman. I would rather have OBAMA, at least I can watch the country crash and burn, and take out that anger on the Democrats.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:15pmVoting Romney is like voting McCain. People want to argue the fact but it’s true. No Dems or independents are going to vote Romney, even Paul Supporters. We need some one that will take the liberal/black vote & That is RON PAUL.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 1:49amTime_2, at least Ron Paul action figures would have assault weapons, Romneys action figures would ban them. Gun Owners of America’s report card for Romney: Big Fat D – Ron Paul’s: Big Fat A +. The only other candidate that ran in this primary that was even close, Rick Perry: A. Both A’s from Texas, go figure.
Report Post »Capt. Ron
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:07pmWe had at the time had a good candidate she said her favorite gun was a Ar15 but nobody voted for her.
Report Post »TheReasonableLib
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:18pmMaybe because nobody wanted to slit their wrist and become one of her blood brothers?
Report Post »ChuckSammich
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 6:50pmThere is no such thing as a reasonable liberal. You don’t exist, therefore your opinions are not counted.
Report Post »BlackCrow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:06pmCharging a license fee in order to exercise a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IS TREASONOUS!!! No different than forcing one to buy health insurance as a condition of citizenship. ROMNEY IS A RINO!!!! Next a license to exercise ones freedom of speech or ones right to pray. There is NO difference, a RIGHT IS A RIGHT!!!! North East RINOS are NO different than Democrat/Communists!
It is past time to kick those “establishment”, “RINO” North East LIBERAL “Republicans” to the curb!
TAXED
ENOUGH
ALREADY
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:19pmQuit acting like it’s six months ago. The primary is over, Romney is the nominee. It’s either him or Obama.
Living in denial is unhealthy.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:24pmYour 1st sentence say it all. I could not agree more.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:30pm@goodstuff
When Romney gets crushed by Obama in November are you going to change your screen name or just quit posting for good?
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:39pmYes, agree with you, Romney is a RHINO. To me, being a rhino is the worst candidate for this election. I DON’T WANT to vote for Romney but I will. I think more highly of a liberal (ugh) than I do a Rhino. A rhino is someone I will NEVER trust(liberals are a given) but like I said, to stop the current regime, I will vote for Romney. The big plus is that he has business experience. I really like his even-keel personality and his family values…& guess other than having “good-looks gene”, his lifestyle & secure marriage shows his “youthful-looks” on his 65th birthday. Some people at age 65 look like 25 miles of bad road! LOL
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:54pmMorticians can make you look good…at any age! that man has had so many face lifts…(place dirty joke here) (can’t think of one…just think “soul patch”) his looks are as phony as he is. have you noticed “richie rich” the poor little rich boy, hasn’t got a clue about what is happening to the middle class? you ask him about middle class , his response don’t tax the rich (oh, I thought we tried trickle down…about 8 years before the housing crash!) you ask him about the poor 9which is growing! he says let them eat cake…we will be sure it is the same price as bread “marie antoinette & co) ie “there are safty nets in place, but if any holes exist , we will repair them (oh, thanks for wanting them to stay put! how very fabian of you!)
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 1:54amYou guys really take the cake. Oh Romney is a business guy, we want him to run our country like a business, even though it was never meant to be a business. C’mon guys, read the Constitution and the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers so you can see what our country is supposed to be like. Everyone get‘s caught up in this lie that the President is supposed to be our country’s CEO. Well he is not supposed to be a CEO period. No wonder our country is on the verge of collapse. What is wrong with everyone??
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:05pmGovernor Romney was the governor of the most liberal state in the country and I am sure this is the major factor in his mixed gun law legislation. He actually moved MA to the right with regards to gun legislation.
Again people need to remember when you have a legislature whose composition is 85% liberal who can veto anything you push their way…the legislation produced will not be conservative legislation.
Report Post »Richard_Cranium
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:09pmSomebody with reason…^
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:20pmThat’s a rational, pragmatic post…that’s not allowed. Only emotional ranting against Romney is permitted, sir!
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:24pmabout half the poeple of this country are idiots….so romney will be half idiotic as president?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 1:56amSlr, ??????????????? I believe what you say, not.
Report Post »babylonvi
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:04pmHe will do whatever the Globalist NWO Masters tell him to do.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:26pmYup
Report Post »True American66
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:01pmWell…..at least he’s not a commie.
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:11pmNeither is Ron Paul. Nor was Santorum, Or Bachman, Nor Cain. but these were not facists! they were against cronnie capitalism. tell me…you elect the cronie’s poster boy…what will that do to OWS? Sortos will be so pleased!
Report Post »Paul
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:00pmSee this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=7SGWH3kirzg&vq=medium
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:58pmAs a college student I was featured, photo and all, in the college paper for a piece I wrote against gun rights. I was vicious. I felt that way for years after that. Then, one day, I had an epiphany. I own several now and you’d have to pry my dead fingers . . . well, you know what I mean. People change. He says he has. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt until I see otherwise.
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:06pmyou elect a man who’s views are inked in etch-a-sketch…you will see more turns than a revolving door! and get ready….while hillary rosen was Pr for BP…they were rubbing elbows with romney (link posted on friday top stories here on the blaze! comment section, my name)
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:25pmwhat made him change? a new electorate?
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 10:18amSOYBOMB315 – I don’t ask an alcoholic to justify why he quit drinking. I give the man the benefit of the doubt until he proves me wrong.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 2:09amDisenlightened, You go right ahead and feel that way, you will give him the benefit of the doubt and then when he signs a law that bans assault rifles across America, and it is too late, then what?? I do not trust anyone who is against any right and then tells me they have changed. I will not give them the benefit of the doubt. Let Romney go out as a regular citizen for another 8-12 years and show us a record that he has changed.
If you had a chicken farm and a fox came up to you wanting to sleep in the hen house, told you he was a changed fox and had become a vegetarian, would you just give the fox the benefit of the doubt to sleep in the hen house?? That would be insane. Romney report card on the 2nd amendment: Big Fat D – !!! Just above an F !!!
Report Post »Tickdog
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:58pmwhy would it be complicated? It is our right to own guns.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:29pmIt’s not. It’s only complicated for those who are trying to appease an enemy without the notice of those who elected him.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:32pmIt’s complicated for moderates. They change according to the topic of the day, and according to the audience listening. These moderates are willing to compromise and say whatever it takes, mostly for political gain. Just look at McCain’s record.
Report Post »joey59
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:57pmTotally agree with EQUALJUSTICE. We need to get that man out of the WH and then we become even more emboldened to flush out ALL those in government who would “Fundamentlly Change” our country.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:53pmopportunist.
Report Post »zpritchard
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:49pmThere is part of me that wants Romney to lose so we can get rid of the establishment republicans once and for all. Only then will we get a real conservative as a nominee. Our only hope now(regardless of whether or not Romney wins) is to take the Senate and even more of the House with real conservatives with some backbone. I am so close to supporting a third party that I can almost taste it!
Report Post »Richard_Cranium
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:57pm4 years as governor of the most liberal state in the country…the rest of life in private sector turning around and running businesses. The establishment media including FOX was anti Romney from the very beginning. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh were all for Santorum and Gingrich (the real establishment) while projecting (just like liberals do) that Romney was the “establishment”. Why are the liberals and the true “establishment” so scared of Romney???
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:00pmoh right…like 2010! when the republicans sold out the TEA Party, and raised the debt ceiling….and now you want more etch-a-sketch deals with the GOP?????
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:11pmIf Romney loses and Obama wins then this country will have passed the tipping point and we will quickly move towards a government controlled Socialist society just like Europe. Obama and the Democrats will continue to financially weaken the country so we are indebted to the United Nations and other countries to bail us out.
All of those so called conservatives who won’t vote for Romney to ensure 4 more years of Obama rule are the true traitors to this country!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »CMDR6
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:23pmI believe that cleaning out the Republican establishment would be much easier if we were not having to fight the WH. When we get the WH, then we can take the next four years (8?) and get rid of the Congressmen and Congresswomen that do not support the constitution.
Report Post »Think bigger than 7 months from now, please? We did not get to this juncture overnight, and we will not reverse it overnight. Stay vigilant and stay principaled and stay active……..for the “children’s” sake!
slr4528
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:39pmCMDR6
I completely agree with you. I was very disappointed with the Republicans in Congress under GWB and GWB’s out of control spending. We need to vote for more congress people like Paul Ryan,Rand Paul, Michelle Bachman etc…
We need to vote out congress people who mindlessly rubber stamp spending by a republican president as Rick Santorum did under GWB.
The 15 plus trillion deficit is going to sink this country if we do not act aggressively to reduce it!
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:45pmCome on Blaze. You shill for him for months, he gets the nomination and then you bring this stuff up?
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:58pmyou need a new translator fish! yours is speaking Chinese!
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:26pm@gonzo
Report Post »now that they got their guy, they are in the ‘whatever’ phase
searching for the Truth
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:41pmWell, what can one say – the storm comes – it either waters your crop or blows it down?
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:46pmGlenn needs to release a “vote for my shoe” tee-shirt.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:39pmHe is a really bad candidate. You can say “well he is better than Obama” which is true, but I am tired of voting for crappy candidates. The only way the GOP will understand is to vote third party and hope we have elections four years from now. Its time to make a stand. Show the GOP we will not have a candidate shoved down our throats like McCain and now Romney.
I will not vote for Romney!!!
Report Post »Richard_Cranium
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:46pmWow, the most harmful video for Romney happens to be a 9 second clip…good job Blaze…still on the big government progressive Santorum wagon??? I see the phony Obama trolls posing as anti-Romney “conservatives”. There’s a reason Romney handedly won the nomination: because the Tea Party, Conservatives and Independents voted for him. He is the Tea Party candidate.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:55pmYeah, I’m not voting for him either. Any politician who wants my vote needs to protect ALL of our freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights, otherwise… see ya.
Report Post »AZindependent
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:59pmAgreed. Romney is Obama lite. The Etch-a-Sketch candidate seems like a better looking version of John McSame. Our last shot at saving this Country was (is?) Ron Paul. Looks like we will have to wait until post collapse to restore the republic.
Report Post »Richard_Cranium
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:04pm@ justangry…so banning assault weapons that are more superior than the local law enforcement and not touching every other gun out there that isnt automatic and can cause mass harm is “AGAINST THE 2nd AMMENDMENT”???? I would then ask you if our founding fathers wanted NO Government or LIMITED Government? Can you still protect yourself with your semi auto rifle, shotgun, handgun? Either you literally want anarchy and lawlessness on our streets or you dont and are just plain ignorant and need to pull your heads out of your…
Report Post »dlmldm
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:10pmYeah, lets vote for Obama or a third party (same thing), then it wont matter who we vote for 4 years later because Obama will have appointed at least 2 and maybe 3 Constitution hating, far left Marxist to the Supreme Court. Lifetime appointments! No matter what you say about Romney, he is not a Marxist.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:12pm@richard
Sorry but the Tea Party hasnt voted for Romney. They have been voting for the others. The reason Romney has been winning is he outspends his opponents 10 to 1 and he has had Fox news in his pocket. Obama is going to beat Romney by 10 points. As I said, I just hope we have an election in 4 years and you people supporting a flip flopping progressive have ruined the last chance this country has.
Report Post »dlmldm
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:23pmYeah, lets vote for Obama or a third party, that will teach the GOP. Of course Obama will appoint at least 2 and maybe 3 – Constitution hating, far left marxist to the Supreme Court in his next 4 years, lifetime appointments. So it really wont matter who we vote for in 2016. America as we know it will no longer exist. But imagine if those appointments were solid Conservative jurist, What happened in 2008, the election of a foreign born, America hating Communist, could never happen again. Romney is not a marxist.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:27pm@richard
Yes touching assault weapons was wrong. Criminals dont worry about gun laws and will get the guns anyways. Assault weapon bans only hurt law abiding citizens. If I feel the need to protect my family with a full automatic machine gun I should be able to do so. The police are armed to the teeth now, why is that? Because the criminals have those type guns. If the government decides its time for us to be communist and starts to crush its people just like every other communist country before it, do you think we (the people) can fight to protect ourselves with shotguns and hunting rifles?
Wake up!!!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:45pm@Richard, No, I don’t have a problem with assault weapons. I don’t want to live in anarchy, just within the confines of the Constitution. Besides, the 2nd isn’t the only amendment Romney has come out against now, is it?
Report Post »SLARTIBARTFAST
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:48pmFace it. If Obama wins, it will be the last election this country has. Well, maybe we’ll get some like they have in Cuba and Venezuela. Say, doesn’t N. Korea have some elections too?
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:38pmDuring the founding of this nation, the citizens owned the same type of arms the military owned. In fact, some cannons used during the war were from private parties, including rifles, and other artillery. Even during the Civil War, that was the case. Second of all, most assault weapons ban legislation is pure BS. They aim to ban “machine guns” and make it illegal to own AR-15′s that are really just semi-automatics.
Report Post »flsnipe
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:38pmHe is no different than the rest, its only going to get worse no matter who gets elected ! It wont get better until it all falls apart and we can reset the country. Hopefully there are enough of us left.
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:50pmThere would need to be a structure (like scaffolding) to fall into. Have we built that? have they? what do you see the outcome being?
Report Post »We could have had such a structure…but what do i know. I’m just a Housewife. Oh well, get ready to live with your choices folks!
flsnipe
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:21pmThe Constitution aka the manual for this Country. A solid structure that is in place its not scaffolding.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:37pmwhy would any republican politician support tougher gun laws anytime or anywhere?
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:51pma Fabian socialist would.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:25pmGreat question.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:44pmI can’t believe Romney advocated for a FEDERAL REGISTRY for ballistic fingerprints. What the heck!? The last thing I want is for some bureaucrat to know how many guns I own, where I live, and which kind I have. That is unacceptable. Just look at what happened after Katrina in New Orleans:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4
Report Post »carpee
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:36pmjust a white Obama.
Report Post »IIIper
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:34pmHe is not moderate and most certainly has NOT “consistently defended the Second Amendment”. He supported the Federal “assault weapons ban” and implemented a permanent version on his own constituents in MA. This does not, can not, square with the Second Amendment. And then there’s “RomneyCare”. And then there’s a million other things. Our collective willingness to vote for the “lesser of two evils” is why we get candidates like this. Romney or Obama? Who cares. Same guy. And if call yourself a conservative or claim to care about the Constitution and vote for this loser, you’re just ensuring we get more like him in the future and continue to go the wrong way.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:39pmif just 10% of the country votes constitution party in 2012 i gaurantee there will never be another progressive republican candidate
Report Post »tropolis
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:31pmAnd you all are going to vote for him like good little sheep.
Romney is a complete wildcard. He’ll either govern center left, or end up to the left of Obama. Don’t believe me? Read about the election vs. Kennedy, and how Romney repeatedly went LEFT of him.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:33pmYES! HE’S STILL A MILLION times better than BO and his gang of Commies.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:24pmWell, Obama is not a wildcard…he‘s already shown he’ll govern from the far left.
Beat Obama, that’s all that matters. A moderate president I’ll take over Obama.
I’ll be voting Romney and working hard to get as many conservatives in the House and Senate as possible.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:16pm@EqualJustice – Obama just a puppet. Obama, not printing up money, the Federal Reserve is and Romney will be a puppet all over again.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 2:15amEqualjustice, It is that type of thinking that has gotten us to this point and time in history where we may lose everything. They have stomped on our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 10th amendment rights, put Romney in and we will see our 2nd amendment rights stomped on, ENDGAME.
Report Post »hawkeyez
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:24pmGuess what the 1st sign you see is when you cross over the border into his State?
Report Post »It is a gun warning that you can’t carry you hunting guns through his State.
floridacockleburr
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:21pmReally GOP, this is the best candidate you could come up with?
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:35pmANY candidate will do this time around. WE JUST NEED TO DEFEAT Obama. After that we can be more demanding of our candidate. I’ve said all along that I would vote for ANYONE BUT OBAMA, even if it were a Democrat and I’m sticking with that!
Report Post »Godzgrl247
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:44pmThank you! Finally, someone said it! ( Besides me, of course.) I have been amazed and fascinated with this whole campaign. It’s as if the media has steered this fight from the beginning. From the vilification of Herman Cain to the non mention of Ron Paul, we are left with the likes (I use that term lightly) of Mitt Romney to go against O’Bama. With his tendency to flip flop on issues and his personality of tighty whitey, I fear that Romney is going to fall flat on his face. I may be wrong but that’s the way I see it.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:49pm@Equal
people like you are the reason we keep getting these terrible candidates. Did you vote in the primary? i hope not, because you yourself said that you dont care who it is. Since people like you dont care – then you should have to live with the candidate WE (the people who care) pick.
I will not vote for romney because I dont want my kids to have to make these same idiotic decisions that we are forced to today
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:18pm@EqualJustice – I can’t stand your stupid comments. IT IS NOT ANYBODY BUT OBAMA. In 2008 it was anybody but Obama but you idiots didn’t listen. I will never go with that brainwashing technique ever again. I will make my own choice who I like as President. Not who you or the establishment prefer. ITS WHO I PREFER!
Report Post »