Politics

Trump Gives Heated Interview to ABC: ‘Obama & His Minions‘ Have ’Co-Opted You’

Donald Trump is continuing to wave the birther flag. And when ABC’s George Stephanopoulos challenged him on it this morning, the interview got real heated.

The interview is interesting on many levels. First, Trump claims the birther issue is not central to his campaign. Second, Trump entertains the idea of releasing his tax returns if Obama releases his birth certificate. And third, Trump’s refusing to say what his Hawaii investigators have found. Mediaite explains:

However, Stephanopoulos continued on the birth certificate issue until Trump told him that he’s been “co-opted” by “Obama and his minions.” Finally, when Stephanopoulos wanted to know what Trump’s investigators in Hawaii found regarding the subject, Trump angrily said “it’s none of your business right now” and repeatedly demanded the next question be asked. On other topics, Trump declared Obamacare to be a “total disaster” and suggested since Saudi Arabia is not our friend, we should stop protecting them unless OPEC lowers their price for oil.

Watch the combative back-and-forth below:

Whether you view the above as good or bad for Trump, what you’ll find below seems to fit into the “latter” category. In an interview with NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, Trump admitted he sees an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution, something a majority of conservatives believe is actually the work and interpretation of activist judges. Lifenews.com reports:

Businessman Donald Trump faltered when responding to a series of questions on abortion that saw NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie attempt to challenge him on the so-called right to privacy the Supreme Court invented to create a “right” to abortion.

“Is there a right to privacy in the Constitution?” Guthrie asked Trump.

“I guess there is, I guess there is.  And why, just out of curiosity, why do you ask that question?” Trump responded, his tone of voice changing to one of skepticism.

Guthrie asked Trump how his newfound pro-life view “squares” with the so-called privacy right and Trump replied to the question with an answer that made it appear he doesn’t understand the legal arguments underpinning the abortion debate.

He said, “Well, that’s a pretty strange way of getting to pro-life.  I mean, it’s a very unique way of asking about pro-life.  What does that have to do with privacy?  How are you equating pro-life with privacy? ”

Comments (450)

1 2 3 ... 11
  • DemocracyisTyranny
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:10pm

    “I’ll disclose when Obama discloses his Birth Certificate”

    This should be the standard line when liberal media interviews our candidates. Also disclose his financial aid forms, and college aplications and adoption papers.

    Report Post » DemocracyisTyranny  
  • Non-sequitur
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:10pm

    This guy is a businessman and doesn’t know that the reason for high oil prices is not OPEC but the speculation on oil?

    Report Post »  
    • Awakened One
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:17pm

      The reason for high oil prices is the limiting of US supplies by barring drilling, and printing massive amounts of money out of thin air.

      Report Post »  
    • jjoy
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:36pm

      There are more oil reserves in the U.S. than in the entire middle east… Trouble is, our president won’t let our oil companies drill for our own oil… The prices we pay for oil have little to do with “speculation” and/or opec… Meanwhile, the Cubans, Chinese, and Russians are drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico,

      Report Post » jjoy  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:12pm

      OPEC and speculators ARE the reason for high oil prices. BTW, just for your information, that company that WAS drilling in the Gulf was BP – British Petroleum – not a US company. OPEC controls the price with output. and while it is true, perhaps, oil drilling getting in the US MIGHT have some effect on the price of oil – if it’s not a US company, dedicated to producing the oil for US consumption – at the right price – it’ll go to China or Russia, India, or France. It’s a commodity and they with the best price gets the goods.

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
    • mill
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 6:03pm

      speculation…definitely
      AND the fact that the US is not “allowed” to drill for it’s own oil and support itself
      is the answer to the high oil prices in our country.
      This “not allowed” crap and supporting countries like Brazil to drill so that we can become their “best customers”…needs to be stopped.
      This all contributes to the liberal dream of “one world order”

      Report Post »  
    • sonseeker
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:37pm

      on the issue of drilling…this very minute there are 170 + active rigs in western ND not to mention MT, WY, CO, OK, TX, NM, PA and Now OH, & those are just the places I know about. Here in ND we will drill over 1600 new wells this year. From what I understand there are not any drilling rigs left, they are all being used and we are scrambling to build more.

      TEA

      Report Post » sonseeker  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 1:41am

      When we drill, the oil doesn’t go straight to the U.S. market and drop our prices. It goes on the world market and drops the worldwide price a little bit. More drilling is great for Americans who actually work for oil companies, for the rest of us – not so much.

      Report Post »  
  • Awakened One
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:09pm

    These Obama lackeys are afraid of what the truth might be. Never do they question. Never do they encourage Obama to put it to rest.

    I think it’s possible that there is no birth certificate. What there is that passes for a legal document is a sworn affidavit from Obama’s grandmother on file that resulted in the creation of a certificate of live birth, which is a legal option in Hawaii. That does not prove that Obama was born there, it only proves that his grandmother said he was. If so, no way do they want that shown.

    Report Post »  
  • Whostolemypig
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:09pm

    Trump may not be the best man for the job, but at least he has a set of big bass ones, the likes of Washington has never seem. I can deal with his in your face attitude much better than I can deal with the Obama game of hide and seek. Obama’s testicles evidently never descended.

    Report Post »  
  • NickDeringer
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:09pm

    Ya. He’s honestly nuts.

    Report Post » NickDeringer  
  • Doug-a-Hole-Diggin-out
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:09pm

    Theater.

    Report Post » Doug-a-Hole-Diggin-out  
  • fineyounglad
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:08pm

    Obummer needs to show his birth Certificate if he has one. He must be from Kenya or Newfoundland

    Report Post »  
  • Showtime
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:08pm

    I have an email address for a staffer in Allen West’s office. I emailed her and asked that she urge Col. West to run for POTUS.

    Report Post » Showtime  
    • RLTW
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:26pm

      Email her every day, I think he’s our only hope.

      Report Post »  
  • Annette
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:08pm

    I love this guy! I would vote for him in a minute. I 100% like the fact that he has no political experience beyond juicing the wheels. We need someone to tell it like it is…NOW. Romney Huckabee..I like them too but America needs a guy like Trump.

    Report Post »  
    • Eblaze44
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:07pm

      Well, you got Obama with NO political experience, how you like that bit of no experience?

      Report Post » Eblaze44  
  • NickDeringer
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:07pm

    There is no question, Donald.
    Hillary supporters have co-opted you, Donald. You are a chump. The stink of stupid is on you like cheap cologne.

    Here is a short list of some of those co-opted by “Obama and his minions.”

    John Beohner
    Marco Rubio
    Michelle Bachmann
    Paul Ryan
    Eric Cantor
    Ron Paul
    Allen West
    Rush Limbaugh
    Glenn Beck
    Mar Levin
    Dennis Prager
    Hugh Hewitt

    Why aren‘t all these people demanding Obama’s Birth Certificate?

    Report Post » NickDeringer  
    • UlyssesP
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:24pm

      Because they agreed that D.T. is going top push that issue so by comparison the rest of the candiates look tame. They have agreed and have it planned out.
      I have no problem with that.

      Report Post » UlyssesP  
    • straightstreet1
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:30pm

      They believe the lie of the short form birth certificate and the doctored newspaper ads in the Hawaii newspapers announcing Obama’s birth. Even if there is a long firm birth certificate, it doesn’t change the fact that his father as NOT a citizen, so Obama can’t be a “natural born citizen.”

      Report Post »  
    • AmbroseTurdside
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:32pm

      I believe the race card does still hold some power in this country. It did give the ‘08 election to Obama, did it not? When the Democratic political platform for ‘08 and’10 was centered around “Hey, those baggers are racist!” what else would you expect?

      Be prepared for more of the same next year. I’m throwing up a little bit in my mouth just thinking about it. Once again, calm veterans in lawn chairs attending Tea Party rallies will be called “extreme” and “unAmerican” and that’s just from the Liberal pundits.

      If the Donald, or any other Conservative, wants to be taken seriously, someone will have to step up with at least a 200 billion annual cut in Defense and/or Homeland Security. Overhauling medicare/medicaid could be a no-brainer if we can hold the house and win the White House and Senate. Only then can real change take place and we, as Conservatives, have to put Defense spending on the table.

      Report Post » AmbroseTurdside  
    • en2deep
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:12pm

      Although Donald may be wrong he has a right to bring up the issue. I personally like to see them squirm when he says it. But to infer West or Bauchman has been co-opted because they aren’t challenging Obama is way off. They also are not willing to defend him at all cost like the media. The media gets personally offended when someone challenges Obama.

      Report Post » en2deep  
    • NickDeringer
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 6:50pm

      @en2deep

      You missed my point. If Stephanopoulos has been co-opted it means that all those other people have been co-opted as well because the GOP hasn’t pursued an investigation.

      Obama is a US citizen. Come to grips with that and move on to the real issues.

      Amen?

      Report Post » NickDeringer  
  • Baikonur
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:07pm

    What an ugly man, inside and out

    Report Post » Baikonur  
    • Rob
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:20pm

      Yeah, and Stephanopoulos is short too!

      Report Post »  
    • alienguns
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:25pm

      who? Donald, George or the pretender in chief

      Report Post » alienguns  
    • alvino
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 6:51pm

      If you think that’s ugly, just wait until you see what you get when George Soros crowns himself as monarch and king!

      Report Post »  
  • Showtime
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:06pm

    Trump is wrong. He said “Certificate of Birth” when in fact he meant to say “CertificaTION of Live Birth.”

    It doesn’t matter where Obama was born. His father was a British subject. He and Obama Jr. became citizens of Kenya on December 12, 1963. He was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. Obama is a foreign national and could very well be an illegal alien!

    Report Post » Showtime  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:19pm

      If you are born in the U.S., which Obama was, you are a natural born citizen. Everything else you are saying doesn’t matter.

      Report Post »  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:30pm

      If you have a foreign national for a father, and your U.S. citizen mother did not meet age and residency requirements of Hawaii law in effect when you were born to pass her citizenship to you, then you are a citizen of your foreign national father’s country.

      Read the Constitution of Kenya under Citizenship and see for yourself.

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:33pm

      @Godfather
      “If you are born in the U.S., which Obama was, you are a natural born citizen. Everything else you are saying doesn’t matter.”

      Source?

      By definition US “natural born Citizen”= one born of two US citizen parents.
      Now look up “dual citizen” and let reason be your guide. They both can’t mean the same thing.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:24pm

      @SWIGS

      I guess I could ask you the same question, what is your source? But I’ll tell you what mine is, U.S. Supreme Court cases going back to the early 1800s, which were applying the common law from the time when the constitution was adopted. You can disagree with that, but then I guess you are saying that hundreds of years of legal precedent is wrong.

      @SHOWTIME

      It does not matter what the constitution of Kenya says because he was born in the U.S., thus subject to U.S. law. I thought that would have been clear.

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:49pm

      @Godfather
      “I guess I could ask you the same question, what is your source? But I’ll tell you what mine is, U.S. Supreme Court cases going back to the early 1800s, which were applying the common law from the time when the constitution was adopted. You can disagree with that, but then I guess you are saying that hundreds of years of legal precedent is wrong.”
      ======================================================================

      Spare me your circular arguments. SCOTUS cases you refer to all point to jurisdiction as determining factor for citizenship. FYI the 14th Amendment did not alter change or modify the A2S1C5 of COTUS.

      I’m not questioning if Odumba is a citizen, there no way to know for sure since he has kept all his records a secret first day in offfice. I can say with absolute certainty using his own words his father is a Kenyan and that makes him a Kenyan. In order to satisfy the “natural born Citizen” Constitutional requirment he would have to of been born of two US citizen parents on US jurisdictional territory.

      I bet you didn’t bother to look up “dual citizen”. I can tell you now you won’t need a US Supreme Court case to define that one.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 8:32pm

      @SWIGS

      Whether or not he’s a dual citizen has nothing to do with him being a natural born citizen. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the law of the land if you weren’t sure, a natural born citizen, as used in the Constitution, is someone who is born within the country whether or not the parents are citizens. So again, my definition, and the actual definition of natural born citizen comes from the common law and the Supreme Court. How about yours? You wanted a source, I gave you one, something you have yet to provide.

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 9:11pm

      @Godfather
      “Whether or not he’s a dual citizen has nothing to do with him being a natural born citizen. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the law of the land if you weren’t sure, a natural born citizen, as used in the Constitution, is someone who is born within the country whether or not the parents are citizens. So again, my definition, and the actual definition of natural born citizen comes from the common law and the Supreme Court. How about yours? You wanted a source, I gave you one, something you have yet to provide.”
      ======================================================================

      Again you haven’t sited the SC case. And if one is a dual citizen at birth, one is certainly not a NBC.
      Your definition assumes an anchor baby could be POTUS. The NBC requirement used in the COTUS Supreme Law of the Land would not permit an anchor baby to be POTUS. The natural circumstances surrounding ones birth are immutable. No act of Congress can make one a NBC.

      I believe you are confused between the use of the term “citizen” and “natural born Citizen”. If you read the COTUS you will see one eligibility exception being made for POTUS. All other references to office holders only require one to be a citizen.

      Answer this…Would the COTUS the Supreme Law of the Land allow for a “dual citizen” of questionable nativity and nationality to be eligible for POTUS?

      You already know my answer.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 12:02am

      @SWIGS

      In U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court adopted the definition of Natural Born Citizen from British common law. British common law stated, “Subject to the exceptions hereinafter mentioned, any person who (whatever the nationality of his parents) is born within the British dominions is a natural-born British subject. This rule contains the leading principle of English law on the subject of British nationality.” The exceptions afterwards mentioned by Mr. Dicey are only these two: “1. Any person who (his father being an alien enemy) is born in a part of the British dominions, which at the time of such person’s birth is in hostile occupation, is an alien.“ ”2. Any person whose father (being an alien) is at the time of such person’s birth an ambassador or other diplomatic agent accredited to the Crown by the Sovereign of a foreign State is (though born within the British dominions) an alien.”

      This definition of natural born citizen then became our definition of natural born citizen, under the constitution. The case cited above has been cited numerous times by other federal courts, even very recently.

      Thus, your idea that “anchor babies” could not become president is flat out wrong. Again, whether or not Obama was a duel citizen at birth has nothing to do with this. He is still a natural born citizen as being a dual citizen doesn’t negate that fact.

      Since you are so curious what the sources of my information are, why have you not presented any?

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 3:40am

      Don’t bother trying to read the impenetrable rubbish Tea Party Conservatism links to. It’s just another whacko putting forth the entirely erroneous notion that there is some kind of difference between a “natural born” and a “native born” citizen. Birthers will eagerly lap up anything that tells them what they want to hear and looks enough like a scholarly argument to befuddle the ignorant Not one of them can cite an actual court decision saying that there’s any difference between a natural born citizen and a native born citizen or citizen by birth, because there is no such thing. Not one of them can cite a court decision after US v Wong Kim Ark that says you have to be born of two citizens to be considered natural born, because there is no such thing.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 3:57am

      In Perkins v Elg (1939) the Supreme Court ruled that a person born in the US. And traised in another country does not lose their status as a natural born citizen and can invoke it if they choose to return to the United States and live there as an adult.

      You idiots do know that Obama is a lawyer, right? And all of the Republicans who hate his guts, they’re all lawyers too? And that you aren’t one? So why would you think that a fact that was known and never disputed like Obama spending his childhood in another country could disqualify him, even though you have no legal knowledge and can’t cite any law or court decision to back up this opinion that you have formed entirely out of wishful thinking?

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 10:01am

      @Godfather

      That’s it? Kim vs Wong, that’s your proof? That‘s laughable on it’s face value. Answer this ….how many British subjects natural born or otherwise ever become kings and queens? You need to read about the founders and how the COTUS came to be. Here in the United States “We the People” are sovereign. One can rise to attain the highest office in the land provided they meet the eligiblity requirements specifically written in the COTUS.

      I repeat…you are confused between the use of the term “citizen” and “natural born Citizen”. An act of Congress cannot make one a natural born citizen. Only those natural circumstances at the time of ones birth can make one a “natural born Citizen”. You also appear to be confused about the use of the term “native born”. Native born and natural born are not synonymous.

      FYI when I asked for a source about your statement of fact it to was to disprove your comments.
      You on the other hand have yet to disprove how Odumba is not a dual citizen by definition.
      No SC case needed. Look it up and then answer my question….can a dual citizen be eligible for POTUS according to COTUS?

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 11:50am

      @SWIGS

      What does any of this have to do with becoming a king or queen? All the Supreme Court determined there was what “natural born citizen” means. Since the Constitution does not provide a definition, they looked to the common law at the time the constitution was adopted and stated that under the constitution, the common law definition applied. Thus, if someone is born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, that child is a “natural born citizen.”

      Again, whether or not someone is a dual citizen is irrelevant. Being a dual citizen does not change the fact that someone is a natural born citizen. You can be a natural born citizen of the U.S. because you are born here and a citizen of another country through your parents or any other way. How do you not get that?

      Seriously, you birthers will find anything to support your arguments. If there was a video that showed Obama being born in Hawaii you still wouldn’t believe he was born there.

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:14pm

      @Godfather
      “What does any of this have to do with becoming a king or queen? All the Supreme Court determined there was what “natural born citizen” means. Since the Constitution does not provide a definition, they looked to the common law at the time the constitution was adopted and stated that under the constitution, the common law definition applied. Thus, if someone is born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, that child is a “natural born citizen.”
      =======================================================================

      SC has not determined what NBC means for the simple reason no definition on the part of the SC was necessary. You keep avoiding the dual citizenship question. Now I know I’m onto something.

      You wrote=”Again, whether or not someone is a dual citizen is irrelevant. Being a dual citizen does not change the fact that someone is a natural born citizen.”

      The dual citizen question is most relevant one cannot be both a dual citizen and a natural born citizen. You still haven’t answered my question. can a dual citizen be eligible under The COTUS to be POTUS?

      You wrote;=”You can be a natural born citizen of the U.S. because you are born here and a citizen of another country through your parents or any other way. How do you not get that?”

      What you do not get is when one is born here one is a native of the geographic region known as the US. what determines one’s country of origin is the country of the father. The country of the father is the country of the son. Blood loyality to nation of peoples is what ties one to country. That’s the reason anchor babies are Mexicans and not Americans even though the were born here, thier country is Mexico. The same with Odumba. The country of his father is Kenya, even though he may have been born here (we won’t know for sure until he releases his records) he is a Kenyan.

      Being born a Kenyan in no way makes him eligible for POTUS.

      You wrote=”Seriously, you birthers will find anything to support your arguments. If there was a video that showed Obama being born in Hawaii you still wouldn’t believe he was born there.”

      I never said I was a birther and I most certainly refuse to be misled by those such as yourself who insist on making stuff up to protect the Usurper in Chief.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 3:25pm

      @SWIGS

      It’s funny that you say I am making things up, when that is actually what you are doing. In U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark the Supreme Court defined what a natural born citizen is. You saying that case didn’t say that is actually making things up. Have you read it?

      And, I am not dodging the dual citizenship issue, I am just telling that does not matter. If you are born here, regardless of where your parents are from or whether they are citizens, you are a natural born citizen. That is all that matters. You are dead wrong in believing that having dual citizenship has anything to do with this issue.

      I have yet to see you provide a source for your arguments. If you are so sure that you are correct, why can’t you provide citations to this information?

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 4:31pm

      @Godfather

      Only funny thing here is your insistance that the SC in Kim vs Wong defined the natural born citizen term. Just saying it did repeatly doesn’t make so. I have read the decision and you are wrong and confused. Further…the 14th amendment did not in any way shape or form change alter or modify the COTUS eligiblity requirement for POTUS. To say it did is making stuff up.

      The dual citizenship issue does matter especially since you know how it is defined. And we both know dual citizen is not same as natural born Citizen. Look up it’s definition in US title 8.
      Once again instead of denying the dual citizen question is an issue….answer the question…
      Can a dual citizen be eligible for POTUS under the COTUS?

      I cite the Constitution of the United States, the Supreme Law of the Land. And that buddy boy supercedes any case law you can come with.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 5:43pm

      Yes US vs Wong Kim Ark established the definition of a natural born citizen. There are only two kinds of citizens, natural born and naturalized. Since Wong Kim Ark’s claim of citizenship was based on his place of birth, not a claim that he had already been naturalized, ruling him a citizen was the same as ruling him a natural born citizen. The Court quoted the English Common Law definition of a natural born subject in its decision. There are a lot of kooks out there saying that a natural born citizen is something more than just a citizen by birth, but you will never find a court decision endorsing this view because there are none. You will never find a court decision post 1898 saying anyone born here isn’t a natural born citizen, because there are none.

      And no, citing what you think the Constitution means does not supersede what the Supreme Court says it means.

      Report Post »  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 6:41pm

      @SWIGS

      If you are so sure what I have said is not the actual definition of natural born citizen, what is your source that it requires to citizen parents? Saying that you know that is the definition is not enough. You actually need some legal precedent.

      Contrary to what you said about the constitution trumping anything from the Supreme Court is inaccurate. If the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution a certain way, from that point on, or until the decision has been repealed, that is how the Constitution shall be applied. So far, Wong Kim has not been overturned, meaning it is still good law.

      So again, I ask you, what is your source for saying that a natural born citizen requires two citizen parents?

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 8:07pm

      @Godfather
      “Contrary to what you said about the constitution trumping anything from the Supreme Court is inaccurate. If the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution a certain way, from that point on, or until the decision has been repealed, that is how the Constitution shall be applied. So far, Wong Kim has not been overturned, meaning it is still good law.”
      ==================================================================

      Well that’s where you are wrong again. Evidently you are not familiar with the central gov’t separation of powers written in the COTUS. The COTUS has never authorized the SC to interpret the COTUS. That’s a Progressive-Marxist-Commie left-wing nut fallacy which is intended to enslave us all.

      You have not shown where the SC ruled on the eligibility requirement for POTUS. Further if you had read the COTUS you would have read about that pesky part where Congress has the authority to Amend the Constitution not the SC. Now you may contine to chase your tail ad finitum but the one thing you can’t deny is Odumba in his own words say his father is a Kenyan and that makes him a Kenyan. No act of Congress or SC ruling is going to change the circumstances surrounding his birth, at time of his birth. The 14th Amendment certainly did not alter change or modify A2S1C5 of COTUS.

      You refuse to look up “dual citizen” and see how it applies to your messiah. Don’t expect me to spoon feed you. As for the definition of US NBC, one is not needed since it has always meant to be one born of two US citizen parents under US jurisdictional territory.

      Kim vs Wong did not redefine NBC. The British subject example you used is a non-sequitor. Here in the USA “We the People” are Sovereign. Did you think the founders were going to let an off spring of foreign nationality hold the highest office of the Land?

      You One World Order Progressives are a joke and “We the People” are on to you.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 8:42pm

      @Swigs
      The COTUS has never authorized the SC to interpret the COTUS. That’s a Progressive-Marxist-Commie left-wing nut fallacy which is intended to enslave us all.

      Wow, so we’ve been a Marxist dictatorship since 1803 when The Court under Chief Justice John Marshall assumed the power to interpret the Constitution! Well, if that is the case then this a “Progressive-Marxist-Commie left-wing” form of government has been working pretty well for the last two hundred years.

      It doesn’t matter whether you think the Court should be able to interpret the Constitution, they can. It doesn’t matter whether you think US v Wong Kim Ark established a definitiion of a natural born U.S. citizen based on English Common Law, everyone with any legal education knows it did.

      What facts do you have on your side? Where in the COTUS do you think it defines natural born citizen? What court has ever defined it as what you want it to mean?

      “It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born. III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, AND CONTINUED TO PREVAIL UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AS ORIGINALLY ESTABLISHED.”

      Doesn’t sound like a non-sequiter to me.

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 9:46pm

      @Chet Hempstead

      What you think doesn’t matter either. You evidently never read the COTUS or you would have known only Congress has the power to amend the COTUS. So what if a SC ruling disagrees with an act of Congress. Their decision goes to the POTUS for enforcement. The role of SCOTUS is to interpret acts of Congress and determine it’s constitutionality according to COTUS. It does not make sense that they (SC) would be given the authority to interpret the authority that grants them the authority.
      Only a One World Order Progressive would think otherwise.

      You wrote=”What facts do you have on your side? Where in the COTUS do you think it defines natural born citizen? What court has ever defined it as what you want it to mean?”

      Dude, All the presidents except those who were eigibile under the “grandfather provision” at the time of the signing of COTUS were “natural born Citizens. The only time a sitting president fail the NBC eligibilty requirement is when Chester Aurthur and now Odumba took office. Chester Aurthur was not allowed to run when it was discovered he was not a NBC. If no one knew what a NBC is then how did his eligiblity become an issue? You think Americans are stupid?

      Now answer this….except for the founders who grandfathered themselves in what did all presidents have in common to make them eligible? Could it be that they were born under US jurisdiction and thier parents were US citizens?

      You damn Progressives are so quick to discount the birth right of all Americans who were born to two US citizen parents on US jurisdiction territory. While it’s true the 14th made sure all citizens had equal rights before the Law, that does not change the one exception….”No one except a NBC shall be eligible for POTUS.”

      One more thing. The next time you want to validate your talking point with a British subject analogy do everybody a favor and move to jolly Ol’ England. There’s a reason the American Revolutionary War was fought.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 11:17pm

      @SWIGS

      It appears that you are confused about the difference between amend and interpret. The Supreme Court interprets the constitution by determining what the different provisions mean. Congress amends the constitution by passing amendments.

      Like CHET HEMPSTEAD said, the Supreme Court has been interpreting the constitution since 1803, but I guess that according you, that has been improper the entire time and somehow communist.

      You also don’t like the fact that the Supreme Court has cited English common law for our its decisions. Well, did you know that our law comes from English common law? That is why they look to English common law at the time the constitution was ratified to determine what its terms mean.

      The 14th Amendment has nothing to do with this conversation, so I’m not sure why you keep brining it up.

      Again, what is your authority that a natural born citizen requires two citizen parents. You say it has always been that way but according to what? Whether you like it or not, the Supreme Court interprets the constitution and whether or not you agree with their decisions, that becomes the law of the land. That is how our legal system works. It appears that you weren’t paying attention in high school civics class.

      Report Post »  
    • swigs
      Posted on April 21, 2011 at 8:55am

      @Godfather

      In typical Progressive Marxists Commie Socialist left-wing nut fashion you managed to convince me you have no concept of what the founding documents are about. According to you we may as well rip up COTUS and entrust a handfull of people in black robes to dictate it’s meaning. Well sir you are wrong. Read the Federalists papers, Read the anti-Federalists papers. Read about the ratification process among the individual States.

      And most of all get a clue about “WE the People” and learn what it is to an American.

      Good luck to you…..I’m off this thread.

      Report Post » swigs  
    • godfather
      Posted on April 21, 2011 at 10:02am

      @SWIGS

      In a typical tea party fashion, although all you want to do is talk about the constitution, you have demonstrated that you don’t actually know what it says or how the American legal system works.

      Report Post »  
  • tobywil2
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:06pm

    PRESIDENT OBAMA’S LEADERSHIP:
    Where is our country headed under President Obama’s leadership?

    Legend has it that before civilization invaded the Mid-West, the Plains Indians used to stampede herds of buffalo over a Clift to harvest the buffalo for food. The herd had a lead animal that the herd followed to disaster or to the feast, depending on your point of view.

    Slaughterhouses are supposed to use a Judas Goat to lead the goats into the slaughterhouse. The Judas goat steps aside just before entering the slaughter house and the goats continue on into the slaughterhouse.

    In 2008, Mr. Obama was elected the leader of the free world. President Obama’s policies will result in the destruction of the greatest economy in the history of the world. The whole world will sink back into the poverty and despair that has characterized the Mideast and Africa for thousands of years. The oppression of the “Middle Ages” will dominate our lives. Except for the elite, the 21st Century version of King George III and his peers, the population will wallow in oppression and poverty.

    Is Mr. Obama the lead buffalo headed over the cliff, or is he the Judas goat?
    The question is actually irrelevant it makes no difference whether Mr. Obama ends up as the Dictator of or just another casualty of the disaster he is precipitating!

    Regardless of Mr. Obama’s ultimate fate, if we continue to follow him we all face the oppression and poverty resulting from the unbridled use of government force! http://commonsense21c.com/

    Report Post » tobywil2  
    • MG-42
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 7:23am

      Absolutely great comment. Worth reading.

      Report Post » MG-42  
    • OneRepublic4us
      Posted on April 21, 2011 at 11:26am

      I think Obama looks like he loses sleep at night knowing what he’s doing to his daughters and their generation. They will know slavery like no one in the US has ever experienced. I’m guessing G.Soros has promised he would set them up for life but wealth has no value to the enslaved. Would you trust Soros?

      Report Post » OneRepublic4us  
  • gotta light
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:05pm

    Looks like its finally happening!!!
    People are starting to stand up to the corrupt media and politicians… yay!!!

    hey bud gotta light?

    Report Post » gotta light  
  • Drum Man
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:04pm

    This guy does not take ANY B.S. Very refreshing.

    Report Post » Drum Man  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:18pm

      Yeah but I don’t trust him. I think we are being played by Trump

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • forthepeople
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 1:30pm

      If we are “ being played by Trump ” as you say, then what word do you use for what Obozo has done to us ?

      Report Post » forthepeople  
  • tbolt71
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:04pm

    Isn’t it amazing how the lame stream media presses on those acept the ones that need to provide answers

    Report Post »  
  • AzDebi
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:04pm

    You keep “calling them out” Donald…keep them having to deal with the “uncomfortable” things they have chosen to ignore for so long…I don’t care whatever the topic is…I love seeing these Obama useful idiots being made so uncomfortable…they are NO MATCH for the Donald! I’d pay an admission fee to watch this kind of things for hours! We’ve earned the right…NO ONE has spoken for us in a very, very long time! It feels GREAT!

    Report Post » AzDebi  
    • DianeCee
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:22pm

      Yes it does, Azdebi!

      Report Post »  
    • docvet
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:25pm

      That is Trump’s job. I’m convinced he has no expectation of becoming President. He has “marching orders” to bring out issues that the more serious candidates dare not touch. By making a lot of noise, the libs attention is on him while the other candidates are doing more earnest and focused campaigning. Spin ‘em up Trump! While the MSM is pointing fingers at you, they are leaving the other candidates alone.

      Report Post »  
    • Paydert33
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:03pm

      @Docvet That’s a great theory. I feel the same way.

      Report Post » Paydert33  
    • NancyBee
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 10:46pm

      I agree…..Trump, keep making them “uncomfortable.” I’m having a good time watching them squirm!

      Report Post » NancyBee  
  • i want the truth
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:04pm

    Not a huge fan of the Donald but, he would be a lot better than the Monkey in the oval office. We all know he(this president) is destroying America. I just can not believe his approval rating is still so high..? It just troubles me that American’s are so blind and or could care less. Very sad…

     
    • Awakened One
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:14pm

      Your “Monkey” reference is completely uncalled for. It says far more about you than it does about Obama. I’m all for exposing his lies and deceit, but this kind of ignorance is worse.

      Report Post »  
    • moreteaplease
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:20pm

      It seems to me that the people I talk to could really care less. It’s like they really think ” Nah, that couldn’t happen in America“ or ” to America.” It’s like they have no clue as to what is going on in the W.H. and how close to ruination this president has brought this country to.

      Well, I’m sure a lot of people said the same things about the Roman Empire before it fell.

      Report Post » moreteaplease  
    • i want the truth
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:23pm

      Sorry Awakened One and others if I offended you. I guess I call my kids monkeys. Sorry I was not Politically Correct.

      Report Post »  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:33pm

      @iwanttruth
      It’s not the PC issue, it’s a question of impropriety. Common sense should have steered you away from that point of reference, as it is considered defaming and derogatory by members of a segment of our society.
      Thin skin aside, I believe you infered no harm in your remark. Ammo in the hands of the adversary provide by us, is unwise and leads to our group at large to be held in account for a single persons poor usage of words. In simple terms, what you write here, effects us all somewhere else.

      “all have sinned and fallen short of the glory if GOD.” perhaps the reason we all could use a lot of Jesus in our lives.

      Report Post »  
    • Lamarr01
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 8:38pm

      The truth is George has nicer hair than Trump. Obama should show his birth certificate when Trump cuts off his comb-over. Hairspray and the lame-stream media can’t coverup the bald truth forever.

      Report Post » Lamarr01  
  • TheCynicalMe
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:04pm

    I love the fact that he doesnt let little georgie steam roll him in the interview, he completely controlled it!

    Report Post » TheCynicalMe  
    • hauschild
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:17pm

      Yeah, and why were little Georgie’s ears so “red”? It’s probably because The Donald was “boxing” them prior to the interview.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:38pm

      You know what comes next right? .. they are going to try to “destroy” Trump … I will put my money on The Donald!

      Report Post »  
    • LaurenAndAntsMom
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 12:59pm

      YES-YOU GO TRUMP! Whether he runs or not he is doing a great job with the liberal media and not giving up on the issue! WHY IS GLENN and other SOOOO against Trump when there is more evidence that obama legally can not be the US President? I want to know!! They should be applauding and supporting Trump for not giving in and pressing the issue! Is it for the same reason that MICHAEL SAVAGE is never mentioned or supported by anyone on FNC?? I thought, for the most part, you all were on the same page. Sounds like a berry berry heaveh dareson birdtation to me!

      Report Post »  
  • Revere1
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:04pm

    Agreed, he’s one heck of an interview. Trump certainly knows how to make headlines and make waves. I‘m glad he’s talking about the stuff that nobody else will touch. But he will need to get into some policy issues to convince people he’s not a RINO… http://www.elephantwatcher.com/2011/04/why-is-trump-unlikely-to-win.html

    Report Post » Revere1  
    • mill
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:48pm

      I agree, policy issues. can you see him and obama in a debate..no teleprompters..
      “there you go again”

      Report Post »  
    • AmeriCat
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:34am

      I would Love to see Trump and Obama in a debate.
      No teleprompters. No walkie-talkie earpieces, Mr. Obama.

      THAT is my idea of fun! Better than any football game!

      Report Post »  
    • AmeriCat
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:38am

      I bet that is exactly why MSM and the Left are trying to trash Trump.

      Obama must be terrified at the thought of debating Trump!

      Report Post »  
    • sackley5
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 12:53pm

      You are so right, how do you debate someone like Trump when you are Obama, who went to school(to become a lawyer, who are taught to distort the truth to win their case) Trump shoots from the hip, Obama just keeps on bloviating!!

      Report Post » sackley5  
    • searching for the Truth
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 8:32am

      He weights and considers. If he can exchange and adapt to the needs of the majority, then he would be the best so far.

      Report Post »  
  • Dakota
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:03pm

    Whether you like Donald as President or not…he is saying and doing many things a lot of people would like to do…and that is challenge the “canned” crap that is put out in the press. Go for it Donald! I completely appreciate the fact that he doesn’t care about how it looks. He just goes after the press the way someone should. Good for him.

    Report Post »  
  • Clara88
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:03pm

    http://shouldtrumprun.com/

    Report Post » Clara88  
  • Puddle Duck
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:03pm

    Let‘s face facts The Donald just ins’t all that smart ….he‘s a top shelf Gordon Gecko but outside of that discipline he’s no better at understanding subtle inference anymore than Snooky could write a novel without a 50 page run on sentence.

    Report Post » Puddle Duck  
    • Dakota
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:09pm

      Well…that was an intelligent remark. Boy George looked like a total idiot in comparison.

      Report Post »  
    • DrFrost
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:25pm

      Do you want a genius in the white house? Do you want someone with character? Do you want someone that understand business? Do you want someone that understands the intricate state of foreign affairs? It‘s unlikely you’ll get a candidate with more than a couple qualifications that really matter so you need to decided what’s on your list. Character (not to be confused with personality) is at the top of my list. Understanding financial matters is second (because I believe that’s by far our biggest problem at this point). If Trump can convince me he qualifies under the first item (and I’m not questioning his character here, I simply don’t know enough to make that judgement call now) then I’d have no problem voting for him.

      Report Post »  
    • Puddle Duck
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:29pm

      George always looks like an idiot, that’s his natural state. It’s clear that Mr Trump needs to brush up on a pile of subjects if really does plan of running for President. I like Donald but I don‘t think he’d make a good President.

      Report Post » Puddle Duck  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:31pm

      @Puddle Duck ~
      Huh?

      Report Post » Showtime  
  • Showtime
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:00pm

    Good news! Congressman Lynn Westmoreland’s office (GA-3) is researching Obama’s eligibility and citizenship.

    “Unleashed” at last! I can send her all my documents and results of investigations!

    Report Post » Showtime  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:11pm

      @Showtime
      Courage to change the things we can………449/517.
      Prays for success my friend.

      “Gods word shall not return to Him void.”

      Report Post »  
    • NickDeringer
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:17pm

      Let’s place a little bet. I’ll pay your mortgage off if Obama is not a legal US citizen.

      Report Post » NickDeringer  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:24pm

      @Nick
      Fools bet, not because he is, but because he’s had to much time and unlimited acres to cover his tracks.
      And, what’s a mortgage?

      Report Post »  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:25pm

      Nick, I don’t have a mortgage. My home is paid for, but I’ll think of something. How about a new car? Obama is an illegal alien.

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:27pm

      @Betterdays ~

      I started researching BEFORE he had time to cover his tracks. I have PROOF!

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • LOOKING_BOTH_WAYS
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:33pm

      Well Well Nick, are you going to go for that bet ? or are you just full of it ?

      Report Post »  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:36pm

      @Showtime:

      On the new sight for New Zeal, check the two lead articles out; one details some new information of Soros and his possible links to the communist parties of the world. There are a couple of others that just show how much farther his influence extends.

      Including the interesting point that Soros is buying up major portions of the grain and corn silo storage sights here in America.

      http://trevorloudon.com the first article is: Is Soros a communist agent?

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:37pm

      @Showtime
      WE have proof, and I’m not a gambler. More like my Grandpa that owned three casinos in Nevada, before he passed. Which is why WE know about Obama.
      My comment to Nick wasn’t a denial, it was a push away.

      Report Post »  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:42pm

      @Showtime
      Note NICKs question, he says citizen, not NATURAL BORN citizen, it’s a trick bet, I though you would have caught that. Of course Obamas a citizen now, just not a NATURAL BORN one.

      Report Post »  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:05pm

      NICKDERINGER I agree with you
      The key is the charlatans SS# not the BC
      The BC is a distraction and Trump is playing us

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:32pm

      It’s a he but great idea.

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • CatB
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:35pm

      “legal U.S. Citizen” is not what is required to be President … and if he never changed his citizenship and NAME back after being adopted and living in Indonesia .. he doesn’t even have that to his “credit”.

      Report Post »  
    • mill
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:42pm

      yeah but brewer caved on the eligibility ….i thought she was better, stronger

      Report Post »  
    • Libertarian
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:08pm

      So if one kills an individual in privacy, it is ok? Abortion has nothing to do with privacy, other than the created excuse (Roe v. Wade) to maintain the lefts hunger for infanticide.

      Abortion is about the definition of when life begins, as we know it is the role of government to protect LIFE, liberty and property.

      Report Post » Libertarian  
    • ozchambers
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 9:32pm

      @LIBERTARIAN: Hey pal, I think you’re on the wrong story……..

      Report Post » ozchambers  
    • ozchambers
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 9:34pm

      @LIBERTARIAN: retraction of above post. I’M on the wrong story!

      Report Post » ozchambers  
    • Theleftisda
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 12:05am

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:36pm
      @Showtime
      Including the interesting point that Soros is buying up major portions of the grain and corn silo storage sights here in America
      It is all over the financial news media today that George Soros
      just invested $67 MILLION in Haliburton stock! I guess if you
      can’t beat them, join them, must be his thinking? Else why would
      he buy 2 Million shares of Haliburton which was run by Darth Vader
      Cheney before he ran for VP? I don’t know if this is a good move
      by George.

      Report Post » Theleftisda  
    • Tea Party Conservatism
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:28am

      @ Showtime, that it great news. What’s your proof, genuinely very interested, please post it. Have gathered a bit of proof myself, beginning with the Constitution!

      The Constitution uniquely requires only the President to be NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. The Founding Fathers stipulated that being a “citizen” is adequate for Congressional eligibility but the Founding Fathers purposefully and specifically required a “natural born citizen” for the President.

      Birth certificate speculation, in isolation from other equally disqualifying factors, becomes a fruitless diversion. Obama obviously expects not to be compelled to produce it by either Congressional or Supreme Court subpoena. However even assuming he is a citizen born in Hawaii, he is still not eligible because he is not a “natural born citizen” as required by the Constitution, meaning born on American soil of TWO citizen parents!

      Again, assuming he is a U.S. citizen, he is further disqualified from eligibility for holding dual citizenship by being born a British citizen pursuant to the British Nationality Act of 1948, as his father was a British citizen of colonial Kenya.

      Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace
      By Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=134881

      Report Post » Tea Party Conservatism  
    • getalong
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 8:01pm

      Wouldn’t it be just like God to make it so easy to impeach Obama and rid ourselves of his corrupt administration. Let‘s just hope the birth certificate investigation turns up the truth about Obama’s eligibility. It is just like the libs to treat anyone who asks about Obama’s birth certificate like they are crazy. There is a saying that come to mind……..Money (certificates) talk – ******** walks. I am disappointed that so many Republicans are bad-mouthing people who want to see his birth certificate. It is a simple request.

      Report Post »  
  • Obama_Lies
    Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:00pm

    Go T. Rump Go

    Report Post »  
    • hauschild
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:14pm

      My question is about the “difference” or “not” between the certificate of live birth and a birth certificate. There is either a difference, or there is not, AND that would be regardless of “who” or “what” accepts a certificate of live birth.

      Once the moronic press gets by this, then we can move forward to whether the Marxist is actually a citizen of the United States. It infuriates me to hear all the talking heads parrot the same line, “Uh, a certificate of his live birth has been accepted.” By whom? And, again, if it was accepted by whomever, do the two documents actually differ?

      Is it possible to ever get a birth certificate (or copy) if you currently possess a certificate of live birth only? To an expert, what would their response be if you said that you had a certificate of live birth but no actual birth certificate on record?

      This is where the media is corrupt. Why aren’t they trying to answer these very simple questions? It would remove any questions, either way.

       
    • Arminianism
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:14pm

      Don’t like Trump but I love to see the Lame Stream Media called out.. Its been happening a lot here lately and its about time!!

      Arminianism  
    • chirodoc007
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:19pm

      Like him or not Trump doesn’t let Stephy push him around. Whether he runs or not is less important at this moment than the fact that he has been putting heat on the Big Press Outlets and on the White House with regard to a Birth Certificate, China, and Oil.

      Let’s see where it goes, it’s been fun so far.

      Report Post »  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:19pm

      I think Trump should always sneak in the facts about the “reporter” he is talking with, and put the reporter on defensive.
      For example, while talking with Stefy, he could have said ” hey you should know how sleazy coverups, you use to do that for Clinton” .
      There is plenty of stuff out there on these “ reporters” which will make them squirm ..

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:21pm

      Trump is right about ABC being co-opted by the left and the Obama administration; the one fact for me though, with Trump, I have checked out his record poltiically and his statements that rant across the board, and can no longer support him as a candidate to be taken seriously.

      He is now being used in turn by the progressives as a foil against the left, and a sleeper agent for the possibility Obama loses.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:21pm

      I like the Donald,by taking on Stephanopoulos like he did, Donald will get the full force of repercussions from Georges boss’s at the CFR.org. But I doubt Donald much cares.

      Stephanopoulos, is like Chaney, they both worked in the white house for many presidents. In fact if we were able to discover the men/ women some of whom have had presidents ears for thirty years or better in the white house, we‘d find out who’s speeches we are really listening too when Obama reads his TelePrompTer.
      All I know is that Chaney, Stephanopoulos, And many other white house “ staffers ” have been there forever, and they ALL are members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The staffers are the real voices of our “tyrant”, and it should be unconstitutional for anyone to work within the white house for longer than four years as a staffer. A shadow government I think Glenn calls such as this?

      Report Post »  
    • thegrassroots
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:29pm

      Takes some lessons from The Donald, Speaker Boehner, on how ya stand up to Soetoro’s, drunk on the kool-aide, gang o thugs.!

      Battles Loom, Boehner! And, you’ve got to grow you some Guts and a BackBone!

      [this is my next email to the spineless speaker boehner]

      Report Post »  
    • banjarmon
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:36pm

      Play the Trump card on BHO…NOW!!!

      Report Post » banjarmon  
    • gman46
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:38pm

      A few things about Trump I‘ve heard is he’s a liberal and likes universal health-care. That worries me.

      Report Post » JohnGalt  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:39pm

      thegrassroots
      Takes some lessons from The Donald,
      ————-
      Exactly. What is it with Repubs that they feel obligated to be kicked in their rears by lefty hacks a k a Obama’s fluffernutters during interviews ? Why do they let his minions control the interview? How about putting the MFM lackey on the defensive by pointing out how openly partisan and uncivil they have been .
      Stop with all that submissive attitude ….it looks lame

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:54pm

      Mr. Trump do not let up on these people ! I know it just a part
      of the Big Picture and there are a lot of major issues to be addressed.
      This man is so arrogant he refuses to disclose any of the documents
      that would “put this issue to bed” why is that ?? unless he has something
      that would be embarrassing to him. The Media is totally ignoring this..
      fearing the Racist label.. I am an American and required to have these
      documents, I have been required to present them on occasion..
      No Problem !!! As a Citizen I demand he show his documentation as
      as required by the Constitution..

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
    • Skippy Toes
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:54pm

      Booya!

      Report Post » Skippy Toes  
    • A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:56pm

      Trump, like Bush, is willing to abandon some of his free market principles in order to stick it to China.

      WE OWE CHINA! And we must repay our debt.

      Cut the spending in government, and cut the taxes. Keep spending below revenues, and there you have it. No more spending on so-called entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare, subsidies, etc.).

      Report Post »  
    • ZOMBIE JESUS LOVES ME
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 4:57pm

      Trump is a joke.

      If you think he would be a great choice for a Republican president, you’re a tremendous fool.

      I am, however, complete behind your right to support him. TRUMP IN 2012!

      Report Post » ZOMBIE JESUS LOVES ME  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:00pm

      The key is the charlatans SS# not the BC
      The BC is a distraction

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:09pm

      RepubliCorp
      The key is the charlatans SS# not the BC
      ———-
      and his mother’s marriage , conversion and divorce records.
      Ofcourse his school and college and employment ( W-2) records will be an info bonanza on this brazen fraud

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Killa From Wasilla
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:12pm

      What is wrong with this picture ????

      So he’s accusing President Obama of witholding information.

      And now Trump is withholding information that his investigators supposedly discovered.

      If this is the best the Republican party can come up with, then it’s Obama another 4 years.

       
    • No1YaKnow
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:13pm

      Steponallofus is as usual a whiny little shill of a so-called reporter. Note that his intention was to ONLY focus on that issue. I applaud Trump for not putting up with his crap. I however, am one of those people who questions why Trump NEVER addressed this concern in 2008. If he can answer why he never thought it was an issue before, I might be able to trust him on this one.

      Report Post » Marci  
    • rodamaa
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:15pm

      You know what I find funny here is the media creating interference for Obama on this issue? Is he or is he not a citizen? Why all the obfuscation? Bringing this issue up conjures up same level of emotions as intense as the Islamofacists issue. I did not start out believing the whole birther thing but now I’ve had a change of heart. This has been brought about by the reaction of those who defend Obama with their hysterical reactions. A prudent thing would be to ignore the cranks and move on but no, it becomes a point of contention for the Left. Why?

      There seems to be an obsession on the part of the media to mute or discredit those who have doubts. To me this is just another way of suppressing free speech. This could be solved by Obama very fast by producing the birth certificate. Why would this president refuse to show his birth certificate? What is the president trying to keep out of the public eye?

      Let’s once again look at the evidence.

      1 – Shows a certificate of live birth
      2 – A couple of clippings on a newspapers
      3 – They also bring a couple of references to state that he was born in Hawaii.

      Sorry that is flimsy evidence at best. It should not be a problem for the president of the United State to get a copy of his birth certificate and show it to world and shut everybody up. He reluctance to do this makes me a little suspicious. Hey maybe he was born as Birtha Obama and had a sex change or he is some sort of alien. You know, from out of space. Any level of wild speculation is fair game under this set of circumstances. Just for one moment, let’s assume he is not legal to be president.
      Why would this happen? How do we prevent this in the future? If we choose to ignore these lapses, next we will some Osama trying to run for president.

      In the end, this may be nothing more than Obama’s typical disingenuous tactics to get capital at the polls which I find just as reprehensible. Obama’s behavior through his presidency appears be filled with unseemly and indecent behavior. No matter whether he is or he is not born on the United State he is certainly not a true American president in any sense of the word.

      Report Post »  
    • Sgt.Crust
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:18pm

      BLAZERS, you know what, it does not make ONE IOTA of difference where the Obumbler was born, really, BUT it DOES matter where his father was born, and what citizenship HE had – Kenya and Britsh..so you see the LFBC is a moot point isn’t it?! I applaud Trump for trying to get to the bottom of the issue, I really do, and I think he has no intention of running for Prez, it is a ploy to further the LFBC issue, period! Why would he give up the billion $ business he loves so much to run this God foresaken country?

      Report Post »  
    • MIBUGNU2
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:27pm

      These Media Yahoo’s have a new victim to feed on, (Mr.Trump) and they
      will be veracious. Maybe they will slack up on Sarah Palin a little, NAH !
      as long as there someone that disagrees with the Massiah, there will be
      a feeding frenzy at CNN,ABC,CBS and MMMMMsn’s group of trools are
      the very best at Demonizing and degrading obama’s challengers.. should
      see these people in action i’ts scary. the drooling and I know they wet
      themselves.. usually with a grin on their faces.. Spookie !!!

      Report Post » MIBUGNU2  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:37pm

      Other than Ron Paul there‘s really no one else I’d consider supporting on the Republican ticket.

      I have doubts about Trump but he’s saying all the things which I want to hear.. He’s plainly said that these Wars were so uneccessary and are only draining us dry.. Then he proceeds to say make them pay for it.. lol Of coure the Bush administration told us up front that it would be paid for in Iraqi oil… I don’t even like to think about the situation anymore really. It makes me sick to my stomach to consider that invaded a sovereign nation under false pretense..
      Regardless as of yet I’ve not heard anything out of Trump which I strongly oppose. I don’t even mind the tariff talk. Not a big supporter of the Global economy.. I’d still prefer the America first economy.

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • BetterDays
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:53pm

      @ZOMBIE=walking dead.

      Grant, get off the computer and pay attention in class! Must you be so obsequious ?

      Report Post »  
    • EXDEM.
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:54pm

      The irony, it burns: Paul Ryan, the Republican congressman who proposed a budget to gut social programs, collected social security benefits until he was 18 years old and saved it for his college education!

      Report Post » EXDEM.  
    • Professional Infidel
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 6:10pm

      Trump wouldn’t be ;my 1st choice, but lets face it is anyone worser than Obozo!!

      Report Post »  
    • AzDebi
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 6:17pm

      You keep “calling them out” Donald…keep them having to deal with the “uncomfortable” things they have chosen to ignore for so long…I don’t care whatever the topic is…I love seeing these Obama useful idiots being made so uncomfortable…they are NO MATCH for the Donald! I’d pay an admission fee to watch this kind of things for hours! We’ve earned the right…NO ONE has spoken for us in a very, very long time! It feels GREAT!

      Report Post » AzDebi  
    • Robert-CA
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 6:57pm

      to Karl Rove you had your chance & you were in The White House so tell me again what you did in all that time … ?
      Stop lecturing people on what to do or not to do .

      Report Post » Robert-CA  
    • Jediusetheforce
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:02pm

      Trump for president!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:04pm

      Here’s one to raise your eyebrows over Trump. CatB sent it to me:

      http://articles.cnn.com/1999-10-25/politics/trump.cnn_1_reform-party-donald-trump-independence-party?_s=PM%3AALLPOLITICS

      It’s dated October 25, 1999, but it says that he left the Republican Party to join the Reform Party. So, of which party is he a member?

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:07pm

      @Killa From Wasilla
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 5:12pm
      What is wrong with this picture ????

      So he’s accusing President Obama of witholding information.

      And now Trump is withholding information that his investigators supposedly discovered.

      If this is the best the Republican party can come up with, then it’s Obama another 4 years.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Nice try, to make something out of nothing.

      Do you think Trump is going to show his hand to an Obot, so that O‘s people can scrub whatever he’s found? You’ve never played poker, have you? Think about where the expression “poker face” originated.

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:20pm

      @RODOMAA ~

      Let’s once again look at the evidence.

      1 – Shows a certificate of live birth
      2 – A couple of clippings on a newspapers
      3 – They also bring a couple of references to state that he was born in Hawaii
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      1. Shows a certificaTION of live birth.
      2. CertificaTION has a 2007 date stamp
      3. CertificaTION has different border, depending upon on which site it appears
      4. Ambassador to Kenya said it is common knowledge in Kenya that Obama was born in Kenya.
      5. The daily record of the Kenyan Parliament discusses the fact that Obama was born in Kenya.
      6. Early newspaper articles stating that Obama was born in Kenya have been scrubbed and represented.
      7. A contact in my con\gressman‘s office told me TODAY that there are a number of people in the district who are concerned over Obama’s citizenship, that they think he might not even be a U.S. citizen; and she said that she is researching the matter.

      State Motto of SC: While I breathe, I hope!
      State Motto of NC: To be rather than to seem.
      State Motto of GA: Wisdom, Justice and Moderation

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • Showtime
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:26pm

      @Betterdays ~
      What proof do you have that Obama is a citizen?

      I have more proof that he’s NOT a citizen, much less a natural-born citizen. My info says he’s an illegal alien.

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • sWampy
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 7:54pm

      We don’t owe China a thing, they have used slave labor, bad environmental laws, unfair trade practices to destroy the middle class/poor of this nation, the last thing on earth we should do is pay them back a penny. We should start weening ourselves from their teats, and when they catch on, kick them to the curb and default. We are the only nation on the earth with enough resources to live on our own, all free trade with other nations does is bring them up and us down.

      Report Post »  
    • veruca salt
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 8:30pm

      Glenn, why is Trump willing to go where you fear to tread? Have you been co-opted by Obama and his minions, also?

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 8:59pm

      Trump is wonderful. He’s running only one issue – seeing the long form of Obama’s birth certificate – and is leading the pack of Republican candidates. That’s pitiful statement about the United States today, but it shows the state of conservative politics.

      It show clearly how people will latch onto anything anti-Obama to explain their objections to his Presidency rather than to admit to themselves the the obvious. Here we have a large group of people, who claim to be loving Christians, latching onto a publicity seeking person, whose companies have filed four times for bankruptcy, although Trump has managed to hang onto his own fortune while vendors and stockholders lost theirs. Here’s a guy with three marriages and a history of infidelity behind him, and a person who makes his living from people gambling in Las Vegas casinos. Yeah, he’s a real Tea Party Christian.

      It’s a glorious triumph of ideology: conservative Christians, fiscally conservative voters, supporting a man whose life represents everything they are against. But he has support from this group for one reason: he wants to see the “long form” of Obama’s birth certificate. Now why would anyone reject their religious beliefs on that basis? Explain.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • obama-mecca-me-sick
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 9:19pm

      It doesnt matter what Trump has said in the past. If its a contest between Trump and Hussein Obama , I will vote for Trump. State TV’s admitted socialist and hatemonger, Lawrence O’Donnell, is going to extreme lengths to discredit Trump. So The Donald must scare the WhiteHouse. I saw tonight on Fox that Obama’s campaign is being investigated by FEC. Lets see if Trump can get that tidbit out to the public as well in an interview with the main stream media. Thats the only way it will be reported other than by FOX.

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 9:32pm

      obama-mecca-me-sick

      You’re a little confused. The White House, Democrats, and liberals would all love for Trump to be nominated as the Republican candidate OR to run as an independent.

      Republicans are the ones afraid of Trump. I’ll switch parties and vote for Trump in the primaries if it might make a difference.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • pappy
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 10:15pm

      Just imagine….. If Trump comes up with something to bring down obummer, he’ll go down in history. Our grandkids & great grandkids may even read / learn about the “Great Presidential Scam”.
      Maybe we could call it “obamagate”?…. Trumpgate just doesn’t sound right.
      How about “BirthCertGate”?… Never mind. I’m going to bed. It’s been a real long, busy day….

      Report Post »  
    • DTOM_Jericho (leaving PA)
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 10:27pm

      Supports “assault weapons bans”, wants a universal healthcare(single payer) system, supports unions, works the system with tax loopholes and bankruptcy, buys building materials from China; Trump is a liar. There is nothing to admire about this masked-progressive other than he doesn’t cower to our current dictator.

      Report Post » DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)  
    • TeaBeliever
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 10:27pm

      I think Trump is a sinner and sodomite and would NEVER vote for him for dogcather, but he is 100% right that ZZZZZZZZZObama is not a true American. Iwant my counytry back

      Report Post »  
    • The Big Pickle
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 10:56pm

      Show us THE DAMN BIRTH CERTIFICATE$!!!!!!

      I’m so sick and tired of idiots and morons telling us that Obongo has shown his birth certificate! A COLB is NOT a damn birth certificate!

      I‘m with Trump on this issue as I think Obongo’s grandmother phoned the newspapers a week after his birth and put the announcement in the paper that he was born. And according to the current Gov of Hawaii he couldn’t find a Long Form Birth Certificate only some documentation in a file.

      SHOWN US THE DAMN BIRTH CERTIFICATE!

      Report Post » The Big Pickle  
    • darnell7654
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 10:59pm

      Mr. Obama (and I’m very hesitate to call you Mr.) Just produce the damn document! Mr. Trump, you have my wholehearted support should you choose to run in 2012.

      Report Post »  
    • Miami
      Posted on April 19, 2011 at 11:01pm

      Here is what the State of Hawaii’s official government websites publish about the matter:

      QUOTE: “The Certification of Live Birth is a legal document, but it is TOTALLY INADEQUATE when it comes to proving an individual was born in Hawaii.

      The State of Hawaii DOES NOT EVEN ACCEPT the Certification of Live Birth as valid proof that an individual was born in Hawaii.

      The Hawaii Department of Homelands, which administers programs to encourage property ownership for native Hawaiians states the following on its website.

      “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found ONLY on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth(a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.“ [Emphasis Mine].

      The bottom line is that the Certification of Live Birth can be erroneous. It has been reported that it was not uncommon for foreigners residing in Hawaii to bring their infant children to the Clerk of the Court, swear they were born in Hawaii and have actual Certificates of Live Birth issued to their children.

      It has even been reported that foreigners residing in Hawaii, in some cases, produced birth certificates from foreign countries and the State of Hawaii still issued Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth to the infants in question.

      —————————————————————————————————————-

      To be honest either way, I am more concerned about his ties to radicals Marxist who want to over throw our way of life. For it seems he’s doing it all to make it happen, all the wheels have been set in motion to destroy the American structure. With Communist, Socialist and Anarchist moving as one, lets not forget the Pancho Villa wannabe’s who want to take back the southwest. Who remarkably behave a lot like Hezbollah and Hamas, sore losers. As I recall even after the US bought the southwest, The Mexicans Attach the US not once but twice losing both times

      Report Post » Miami  
    • missionarydad
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 12:34am

      I like Donald Trump, certainly not as Presidential material, but he sure knows how to handle himself with reporters. He is a take charge kind of guy and I hope he keeps this going until he can find out the truth not because I want to see Obama destroyed but because the American people have every right to know if our President is legally qualified to be President. If it does come out that he was born in the United States and everything is in order it doesn’t change my opinion of him at all. He still will be the worst President and the worst disaster that has ever befallen America.

      http://www.saywhatyoureallymean.blogspot.com

      Report Post »  
    • I Love Section 8 Housing
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:02am

      Trump got OWNED

      Report Post » Bible Quotin' Science Fearin' Conservative American  
    • Tea Party Conservatism
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:03am

      .

      Mr. Trump is right. A “Certificate of Live Birth” or COLB is not a birth certificate! It only confirms that Obama was born alive, somewhere.

      The alleged COLB was issued at a time when, as a new state, Hawaiian law permitted a resident to request and receive a COLB for a child up to one years of age. The state did not require or conduct any verification of information beyond what the family member provided. Could Obama’s mother have given birth to him abroad and later returned to Hawaii to request and easily receive a COLB? Yes.

      In addition, the overly touted birth announcement in the local paper is completely insignificant; it simply means that the information was also provided to the paper by the family or the State following the issuance of the COLB, for routine casual inclusion.

      The alleged COLB, whether from a valid original or not, was posted on Obama’s campaign website as a computer graphic image. Graphic images can be altered, compiled from similar images or even easily created from scratch. A computer graphic image is not an acceptable means establishing the authenticity of an original document. If you respond to a city, state or federal request to present your drivers license, let alone your birth certificate, by opening your laptop to show the officer or official a graphic image, they will likely not be very amused or find it acceptable.

      Neither should you! Particularly regarding eligibility to serve as President and Commander in Chief or our beloved courageous military.

      “Why Obama is ineligible – regardless of his birthplace”
      Article by Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=134881

      Report Post » Tea Party Conservatism  
    • Therightsofbilly
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:18am

      Hey JZS,

      First, I highly doubt the Donald is running. He is taking one for the team.

      If you have actually listened to him speak, and you still think he is “running” on only one issue, you only hear what you want to hear. No surprise there.

      I hate to nitpick, but when holier than thou liberals feel the need to lecture, they should at least get the details right. Trump casinos are in Joyzee, not Vegas. His Vegas property is non gaming.

      The rest of your argument is moot. You explain to us how a “Christian” democrat can support a candidate that supports abortion. (No need to actually explain, I was making a point)

      There are no perfect candidates on either side. (Especially yours). But right about now, I would bet that most conservatives would vote for anyone who is not a flaming marxist, and supports free market principles.

      I do love the way you set up your arguments by pigeonholing all conservatives in to one nice little group that must think and act exactly alike.

      Who the hell ever said, or implied that the T.E.A. Party was a “Christian” organization?
      Not all conservatives are Christian. Not all T.E.A. Partyers are Christian. Very closed minded of you to imply it.

      T.E.A. stands for taxed enough already. (No religious connotation) It came in to being for monetary reasons, not religious reasons.

      It just so happens that most conservatives believe in God, and that our rights were bestowed upon us by God.

      My candidate of choice need not be a Saint, so long as he is not a marxist that pretends not to be a marxist. Or course if he had not pretended, he would not have been elected.

      Strange isn’t it? That dumbocrats have to pretend not to be what they really are in order to get elected.

      PROVE SOCIALISM WORKS

      Report Post » Therightsofbilly  
    • AmeriCat
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 4:07am

      Let’s have some patience and see where Trump stands on issues.
      What he has recently discussed so far has been fine.

      What year did Reagan leave the Liberals and become Conservative?

      Report Post »  
    • GETLIFE
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 5:02am

      Go Trump! Once again breaking the lefty media’s rules on who gets to be rude and who should be polite. He doesn’t treat them as though they automatically deserve respect. As a matter of fact, his treatment of the interview and Stephanopoulos reveals ABC as the lazy opportunist’s that they are. They have nothing on the eligibility question, and tried to taunt Trump into giving up something from his research–which they would then present as “news” AND try to spin against Trump. He’s not afraid of not being asked back– and they WILL want him back.

      No matter what you think of him, he is doing conservatives a favor and showing one way media bias can be dealt with.

      Report Post » GETLIFE  
    • GETLIFE
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 5:11am

      And, The Blaze–Why are you using the MSM -coined pejorative “birther” to talk about eligibility questions? Vocabulary is not accidental in politics. Are you just being honest about your bias?

      Report Post » GETLIFE  
    • Jackers
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 5:18am

      Why are so many anchors and commentators on FOX News continually bashing the Donald? Seems that our reporters at FOX have been given their marching orders from up above… Perhaps Donald is too much of a threat to the status quo? So much for “fair and balanced”…

      Report Post » Jackers  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 5:43am

      I gotta compliment Mr. Trump for knowing how to handle himself. He is gives it back right on the spot.

      Report Post »  
    • frcomega
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 6:55am

      Trump is STANDING UP….

      Report Post » frcomega  
    • MG-42
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 7:11am

      I think Trump just says what we all want to scream, but are too educated & PC to say.

      Report Post » MG-42  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 8:45am

      Something to think about folks.

      Trump has the money, resources and time to actually track down a birth certificate, no matter how well hidden, if he so desired. He has no need to go around ranting like this. I strongly suspect that he’s in league with the powers that be and is doing this to discredit opposition to Obama.

      Trump is not on our side, I don‘t care how much he’s squawking right now. IF he’s GOP, he’s a RINO right out of the gate. Look at whose campaigns he contributes to, look at how many of his businesses “succeeded” only by using government to strong arm his competition out of the market. This man is playing us.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 9:28am

      @jzs

      “Trump is wonderful. He’s running only one issue – seeing the long form of Obama’s birth certificate – and is leading the pack of Republican candidates. That’s pitiful statement about the United States today, but it shows the state of conservative politics.”

      I half agree with you. Most actual died in the wool conservatives and libertarians are not buying his crap, but I do happen to believe that he is a “single issue” buffoon who is ultimately going to derail any opposition to Obama come 2012 if he keeps this up.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • rose-ellen
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 1:46pm

      A certificate of live bith is what is isuued in that state. It is accepted in every state or federal agency. The “birth certificate” is kept on file by the state. That‘s how it’s done there and elsewhere.It is probably time -saving [for state workers] and less costly then issuing the kind of birth certificates of the past where more personized information as well as signitures are recorded.The birth certificate on file is probobly just like the certificate of live birth.People are born every day and a standardized version devoid of time consuming personalized and beutiful versions of the past are no longer tenable.
      That this is an issue just reveals how the right wing does not stand for anything.To mull over the letter of the law like mullahs or orthrodox rabbi’s in the hope of geting Obama exposes your lack of substance.Even if he wasn’t born here, and thereby his presidency violates the letter of the constitution.Your constituion is an abstaction that can be amended and interpreted any way you want regarding most issues. No basic human values are violated if Obama is president and was not born here.You’re treating your constitution like fundamentalist pharrisees and Muslim Mullahs you deplore treat their sacred books to parse the letter of the law and dispense with the spirit.You’ve made Americanism into your religion and are now appealing to your text[constituion ] to nail someone.That you right wingers are divided on the birther issue shows that all you can do is be ddivided on issues .What is important to some of you is regared as ridicculous to some other of you.That’s becaause all your issues are in fact ridiculous.That you have to keep reminding yourselves of what the “core values” are is because you have no core values.If you did you wouldn’t have to remind yourselves what they are. You’re reactionarys through and through.Once you were against civil rights.Then you came along. Once you rejected equal rights for women,then you came along, once you rejected medicare for seniors,till you came along Your core value was anti-gay rights, now you came along, once it was marriage betwewn men and women only, now you’re coming along..recently your core value was warring in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now you distance yourself. And trump appeals to your hatred in calling on the legitimacy of a nazi like spoils of war imperialist vision[imperialists always justify their thevery as well as mass murder] Once you decrried immigrants now you ‘re divided Now it’s the deficit wanted war at all costs with iraq and Afghanistan.Now you distance your selves from the wars. Now what do you have that unites you right wingers?All you have is anger that the world keeps changing .All you have is rabid genocidal hatred against Muslims and blind unjust one sided support for israel.And alot of talk about take back america but no substance.You’re divided on what that even means.The only thing thast unites you is your religion . Your new religion of rabid nationalism. Ironically America which used to brag that unlike the rest of the world we were not nationalst. ,five minutes after 9-11,became rabid nationalist. At leasst it took those europeans we looked down our noses ofor being nationalists,thousand years to become nationalists. we did it in five minutes the one and only time someone finally gave us a taste of our own medicine.Ironically. the Europeans we love to mock[ unless they behave like our slaves in gratitude for all eternity because we "saved' them in ww2 [another gross exageration-the Russians were really the ones who saved Europe and we rewarded them by giving them half of Europe to subjugate. Half of europe became totalitatian any way after 150 million dead to fight totalitarianism only to collapse 50 years later. So much for a good war. Would it have been worse had we not fought? it's not like we prevented the haloucast. maybe more talking and less fighting could have prevented both the haloucaust and the deaths all everyone else.i don't know I'm just saying.,] are moving away from nationalism as you rigght wingers are becoming rabid nationalists. The reality is you are the ones behind the times. The europeans are ahead of us and always have been when it comes to sociopolitical ,philosophical sphere. One day we’ll catch up to them and have democratic socialism,a parliament and judiciary like theirs [trial by jury of your peers where any one who has heard of the case is disqualified ]is ludicrous.as is the judge’s instrution to disregard what you just heard and where jury nullification can become the norm.]We’ll have a constitution that actually says something and stop the obstrruction of reason which occurs when we appeal to an interpretation of the meaning of the words in the constitution as oppossed to an appeal to what is right and just based on inaliable rights and fairness in weighing individual rights versus society.[basic fairness where each player has equal value the principles in the Bill of Rights].We’re starting to catch up to those Europeans already in our new found love of food and cookin.II remember when all any one liked was meat and potatoes and if you liked any thing else that was unamerican. The same with interest in home decor. I remember when americans had no concern with quality furniture or aesthetics. Only”pansys’ did. Now we’re cartching up.I remember when speaking another language was a shameful thing-unamericn .Now slowly we’re starting to very relunctently recognize the humanity[value] of other languages.Unfortunately you rightwingers are entering the phase of nationalism like the Europeans before us hopefully this will pass.You ethically bankrupt right wingers have only your rabid nationalism devoid of substance[hence you have no core beliefs and are divided among yourselves on issues like birthers, gay marriage, war in Iraq,aid for Libya,etc.The world is passing you by so you cling to your new found religion; rabid nationalism .

      Report Post »  
    • JAZZFREEDOM
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:02pm

      The Democrat’s argument as to the legitimacy of President Obama appears to be this, … Obama is the President and a requirement to be President is that he is a Natural Born Citizen, therefore he must be a Natural Born Citizen or he wouldn’t be President. (?) Now I know why the Democrat‘s use a Jackass as their party’s symbol.

      Report Post »  
    • NanaDonna
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 2:43pm

      After listening to Mr Trump on Michael Savage show, I came to believe that he has had his come to Jesus moment, whatever he used to think, it is obviously different now. Don’t we all want our liberal leaning associations to consider a change of heart, understand what is going on here on earth at the political and spiritual level. I find him to be sincere and honest in his replies, and the integrity it would bring to DC and the support for our troops and economic recovery would be the answer to many prayers. Dont know if he is running, but thanks to the Good Lord that he is raising the bar back up where God first placed it when the constitutuion was drafted. Long way to go, but he sends the conversation in the right direction, no pun intended.

      Report Post »  
    • getalong
      Posted on April 20, 2011 at 6:14pm

      Oh Yeah!! Go Donald – Take your allegations to federal court, and Obama will be forced by a judge to show his certificate of birth. Bring it on. Priceless – If we only knew it could be this easy to dethrone Obama. Georgie looks scared, and notice he did not argue the point when Trump accused him of being co-oped by Obama and his minnions.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 11

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love