U.K. Considers Banning ‘Burn-A-Koran’ Pastor Terry Jones From Country
- Posted on December 12, 2010 at 4:57pm by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Britain is considering banning Florida pastor Terry Jones, best known for threatening to burn the Koran this fall, from entering the country to share his thoughts on Islam.
Britain‘s Home Secretary Theresa May told Sky News in London on Sunday that she’s considering the ban because of Jones’s views on Islam and Muslim extremism. Jones intends to preach at a February 5 event for the English Defense League (EDL) and will speak “against the evils and destructiveness of Islam.”
May spoke about Jones‘s visit to London’s Sky News on Sunday: “Pastor Terry Jones has been on my radar for a few months now. It wasn‘t clear that he was definitely coming to the UK but if it is now clear that he’s definitely coming to the UK, then of course this is a case that I will be actively looking at.”
Activists across Europe have been calling on the government to ban Jones from the country. The group Hope Not Hate says Jones should be barred because “only extremists will benefit from his visit.”
“As we have tried to relay many times, we are by no means against Muslims,” May told Sky. “What we are against is Sharia law and Muslims not willing to submit to the constitution.”
And while Sky reports EDL events have degenerated into violence in the past, Jones says he has no intention of that happening.
“I would by no means advocate something that would cause a riot or disturbance,” he said.
According to the Guardian, the Home Secretary can bar someone from entering if he threatens national security or the safety of British citizens, or promotes terrorism. However, any decision to deny entry could be overturned by an immigration tribunal.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (121)
huntee
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:16pm@hermeuticals. You are right, by the way Ken Livingstone used to be a Trade Union leader, he was a trouble maker back then too!
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 11:43pmWhen was Ken Livingstone a Trade Union leader?
Report Post »Hermeneuticals
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 8:21amI dont think he was ever a union leader – but active in the Labour Party since his 20′s. Trained as a teacher in London (a union incubation pot) but then was elected to local governemnt abd has been a full time politician / activist since age 28 in 1973.
Report Post »http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Livingstone
Stronge
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 4:06pmis the right answer. Apart from the slightly odd (and certainly unnecessary) “union incubation pot” reference.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:13pmThe reason that the U.K. won‘t let him in their country is because they are afraid that we won’t let the nutjob back into the U.S. and they would be stuck with him.
Report Post »Hermeneuticals
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:43pmPart of the problem is the Conservative governement’s view of the EDL (English Defence League). Prime Minister Cameron is in a real box here having slandered them previously as an agitator group, backing instead the UAF (United Against Fascism) led by Ken Livingstone (AKA Red Ken). The recent riots in Britain have actually been caused in part by the UAF, part of a loose coalition of the looney left in the UK.
Whereas i thought Jones idea was too extreme it nevertheless brought some needed balance to a debate being dominated in the US by left-wing media types.
Report Post »N37BU6
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:36pmMaybe one day they’ll ban the “behead all who defy Islam” sign people.
Report Post »Dakota
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:33pmHaving a BBQ today…trying to think of what to start it with…hmmm..
Report Post »PatriotDaze
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:34pmBacon bomb
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:53pmIf you don’t have a copy, print out pages from google images.
Report Post »Then douse the pages with bacon grease and use them to light the coals in the chimney starter. Works for me.
Happy roasting!!
huntee
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:33pmI came here from England in 1996 and do not miss it at all, it was screwed up then and has only got worse since ! Sad thing is I can see the same mistakes that the English goverment made are been repeated here. It makes for a very bitter and resentful population, hope it’s not too late to change the outcome here in the USA.
Report Post »DevotedDad
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:31pmI am 100% certain that there will be an effort to ban all Muslims that burn the American Flag and wish to destroy the United States.
Then again, that might wipe out half of their Country.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:06pmThis might surprise you, but the UK doesn’t care about the USofA flag.
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:31pmSTRONGE ….. Are you speaking for the entire population of the United Kingdom or just the Homosexuals ?
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:47pmSorry, what has homosexuality got to do with this? Are you really so insecure?
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:56pmSTRONGE ..Are you really so arrogant to think that you can speak for the entire population of the United kingdom about their personal beliefs?
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:22pmI can say for certain that there’s nothing in UK law about burning the American flag. IN fact, there’s nothing in UK law against burning the Union Jack.
Sorry, what was that again about homosexuals? Was there any relevance?
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:38pmSo you really are kind of arrogant, I guess thats why I made the reference to homosexuality. But I would like to really know how you feel about Islam being a fascist political organization.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 9:01pmIn what way am I arrogant? And what has that got to do with homosexuality.
I find all religious extremism problematic.
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 9:17pmDidn’t America help save England from Nazi aggression during WW II, so I’m sure our flag is important to at least the older generation. Also those who publicly proclaim their sexual orientation as a civil right are in my opinion arrogant. For you to say that the U.K. doesn’t care about our flag being burned is at best a personal assumption on your part.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 10:29pmThe USA did indeed play a part in WW2. Eventually. That doesn’t make your flag important or relevant. It’s just a flag.
Where does people proclaiming their sexual orientation in public come into this? Where’s the link?
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 11:07pmTo the American Soldiers and Airmen who lost their lives helping save England it is more than just a Flag it is the symbol of Freedom and Democracy. But to an arrogant ass like you its just a flag. You are just what we need here another arrogant wind bag.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 11:15pmAnd you have every right to get excited about it, just don’t expect other nations to feel the same way about your symbol.
Report Post »wash1776
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:27pmThis is no surprise. With all of the communists and muslims over there, what would one expect. Guess they don’t have free speech there anymore, do they?
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:01pmThe U.K. may be in the process of becoming the U.I.K. “ United Islamic Kingdom ” I would deeply regret seeing that happen. Too bad Winstom isn’t there to show them the danger they are engaged in, he would never accept the fascist disease of Islam.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:17pmDo you have any evidence to back up this outlandish claim?
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:13pmStronge Do you have any evidence to refute the possibility that England could become an Islamic state sometime in the next 5 years?
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:18pmHow exactly does one go about refuting insanity? You provide some evidence – ANY evidence – that this is going to happen and I’ll happily set about disproving it.
I think the USofA is going to be eaten by a giant cockroach in 2020. Prove that it won’t.
Report Post »Nvrforget
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:40pmWhat? *runs off to buy a million tons of bug repellent*
Report Post »mtnclimberjim
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 9:29pmStronge,
Report Post »Your another one that needs to quit using your belly button as a window.
Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 10:23pm@mtnclimberjim – do you have anything constructive to say, or are you capable only of (really quite unimpressive) insult?
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 9:52am@Stronge
Do some basic research. Here’s your assignment, hit google and come back and report to me what the most commonly chosen name for a boy is in England from 2009 forward.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 4:00pmResearch done. It’s Oliver (http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/oct/27/oliver-top-boys-name-jack). And your point is?
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 4:16pmIn case you can’t be bothered to follow the link, the top 10 are: 1 Oliver; 2 Jack; 3 Harry; 4 Alfie; 5 Joshua; 6 Thomas; 7 Charlie; 8 William; 9 James; and 10 Daniel.
Report Post »WISEPENNY
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:59pmI don’t understand why the guy thinks he must fight this battle. The Bible dosen’t tell us to go out and preach about all the enemies of Christ, but it does tell us to preach the gospel (means; good news) of Christ and our being restored to favor of God the Father. That’s what the cross did for us. It made atonement for our battle with God. Atonement (means at-one-ment) with a God that we pissed off and Jesus cut a deal to let us back in the house again. If that preacher would stick to that message, instead of a message of condemnation, he’d have much more inner peace and power in his life. IMO :)
Report Post »komponist-ZAH
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:20pmWell said and very true.
Report Post »13thGenerationAmerican
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:55pmI think they want to keep him out in case he decides to breed while he is visiting.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:51pmThat’s okay as long as YOU never breed. God help us all…
Report Post »wash1776
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 10:33amTO EQUALJUSTICE! Boy did you get that right. One of this clown is enough.
Report Post »mtnclimberjim
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:51pmWho cares? We can still burn and use the koran as toilet paper at home with just as much effect.
Report Post »fastfwd
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:46pmBritain‘s Home Secretary Theresa May .. Can kiss my A$$ ! Her damn country is already in the control of Muslim extremists and look how fine and peaceful that country is right now.. This is AMERICA biatch ! If its ok for someone to burn our damn flag then its ok for someone to burn a terrorist book.(note i didn’t says a religious book) As i don not believe Islam is a religion but rather a terrorist organization that is out to rule the world ! So maybe you should try to get your country back from the terrorists that have taken control and mind your own damn business !!
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:15pmWhich part of controlling who does and doesn‘t enter the UK isn’t Teresa May’s business?
Report Post »roostercogburn
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:42pmThey would do much better banning Islam and the Koran from their country, would make it a much safer place.
Report Post »123gone
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:32pmOK American’s, it’s time to get out of England. They have lost the war, and it really is over, over there!
Report Post »New-American-Saviors
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:30pmThe UK is a lost ally if they don’t control their populace.
Report Post »PatriotDaze
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:39pmcontrol their populace? That’s HILARIOUS. You’re FOR the tight governmental control of its citizens?
Report Post »Nvrforget
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:38pmNo, just for Eugenics pertaining to Muslims. Problem?
Report Post »PatriotDaze
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:27pmReally? Why do we care about this guy. THE BLAZE….FANNING THE FLAMES. Predictable, and Oh so lame. And most of you are suckered in yet again.
Report Post »wash1776
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:10pmGo pound sand in a rat hole and crawl in.
Report Post »Jsh1284
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:39pmWhy do we care? It’s simple .. this is a gross and disgusting display of political correctness. Banning an American Citizen from speaking his mind is ridiculous. Sure, it’s their nation. They can destroy it as they see best fit. HOWEVER if they DON’T want to destroy their nation .. they need to let free speech and the power of the human mind/logic take over. How do you do this? It’s simple .. let people gather up as much info as possible on various topics then let them form their own opinions on each subject! You CAN’T accomplish this however by stifling people and banning them from your country. What you get when you do that is a controlled police state where the people only hear what you WANT them to hear.
That’s why the UK is socialist .. and that‘s why they’re going down the crapper ..
Report Post »ronmorgen
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:55pmI agree with him, the koran is a demonically inspired hate book which has inspired the death of millions. Book burning, however, is when the government burns all of a books it doesn’t like. This man only was going to burn one book in protest. Both protest and freedom of speech used to be allowed in this country. Not so much any more I’m afraid.
Report Post »Bad Thunder
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:23pmand yet another reason we kicked their candy asses 235 years ago
Report Post »Tired_of_the_lies
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:18pmWhy is anyone defending this moron. Book burning is unacceptable, and so is slamming anyone else’s religion.
Come on people. You know what is right. Don’t defend this type of behavior.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:45pmIf I own a book it is my property. If I choose to burn it that is my right to do so. What is not right is to give special rights to one particular religion and its followers. Do you eat pork? Well then that is just unacceptable!!!!
Report Post »Tired_of_the_lies
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:13pmI agree Neofan – all religions should be treated equally.
And btw, since you ask, I do not eat pork, or beef or chicken, etc. That is a moral decision, not a religious one.
Report Post »mtnclimberjim
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:54pmHey Tired,
Report Post »Not eating meat has nothing to do with morals. You just haven’t been hungry. As for you thinking the muzies are religious, you need to quit using your belly button as a window.
Merry Christmas
ronmorgen
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 8:49pmHey Tired, this is what happens when this so called religion gets a foothold. Like Nazism, people die.
Report Post »Do we give freedom of religion to those who practice human sacrifice?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/12/after-jihad-attacks-iraqs-christians-live-in-fear.html
Tired_of_the_lies
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 9:27pmAh yes – more of the warped Christian view that is so prolific on this site.
In my view, Christians do not condem people of other faiths.
I think you guys need to go read the teachings of Christ. You seem to have become confused.
Truth is one. Paths are many….
Report Post »Tired_of_the_lies
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 9:30pmMTNCLIMBERJIM – “muzies” – your ignorance is showing, get a grip and refrain from the offensive rhetoric.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 11:16pmTired, I will not comment on anything other than a single remark you made. If you believe that the paths are many then I suggest you might take your own advice and read the Bible. I can supply you at least 5 clear verses that say Christ is the ONLY way. I would suggest you start with John chapter 14, pay particular attention to 14:6.
I really hate this argument because it should not be an argument. It is wishful thinking. The Bible CLEARLY states this doctrine, the only way out us if you do not believe the Bible or take it literally. If I felt that way then I am afraid that I would most likely join MrButcher. Why would you believe in the resurrection of Christ if you cannot believe what Christ Himself said?
Report Post »cnerd
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:17pmthey fear this person, and look at some of the upstanding young citizens who are tearing up London.
Report Post »untameable-kate
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:51pmThis is clearly an attempt to appease the Muslim population. They clearly fear the Islamists among them so this is their way of ‘petting’ them.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:17pmthey‘ll ban a white American minister but they won’t ban the thousands of terrorists muslims freely pouring into England everyday. they’ll be crying to us for help again when they are under the blitz from the muslims. already muslim faces are showing up standing amongst those rioting students.
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:11pmWhat does a “muslim face” look like?
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:47pmWhat does a “muslim face” look like?
Report Post »————
Take your pick :
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_vBfoDAPj3Ek/TPD2Fn-2RcI/AAAAAAAABsM/2gTf2u-Y860/s1600/Angry%2BMuslim%2BMan%2B2.jpg
http://signsofthelastdays.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/burka-Islam-women-Muslim.jpg
Stronge
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:10pmOr, alternatively:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_M9vslhokstU/SdkjHeyje0I/AAAAAAAADUA/ZkPg2klCrcQ/s400/Richard_Thompson.jpg
http://muslimahmediawatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Lauren-Booth-006.jpg
which don’t quite fit your stereotype.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:28pmLauran Booth ? Really ?
Report Post »Just because she is blonde and blue-eyed doesn’t mean that she is not a jihady now does it ?
If only she wore a burka……
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 9:48am**What does a “muslim face” look like?**
Most of the time, it is a face of an Arab. Of course, there are exceptions. But should we all pretend to be blind because of the exception, and ignore the general rule? That‘s kind of silly don’t you think?
Report Post »Stronge
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 4:04pmYou don’t need to “pretend to be blind”. You just need to avoid making assumptions based on appearance. Those “muslim faces” may not be the faces of muslims.
Report Post »CTHULHUWILLEATYOUFIRST
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 11:24pmC’mon. They mean dusky, towel wearing faces. (Non-white faces.)
Report Post »powhatan
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:12pmBanning an AMERICAN citizen from England because he isn’t a fan of Islam? Incredible. I feel sorry for eNGLAND..They have lost the war already…
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:18pmthey sure have.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:23pmThey banned Geert Wilders too, but look what happened .
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNYx63Pfz5U
cheezwhiz
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:08pmThis from the country which is the de facto capital of islamic hate speech in Europe and the exporter of jihadies all over the western world ….nice going Brits.
Report Post »No wonder Pat Condell stirs you up .
It didn’t affect Dr Micheal Savage. It won’t affect Pastor Jones.
NoDaDAZone
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:05pmPC Nonsense BS. Dhimmis. Feeding the good pastor to the crocodiles as Churchill would say.
This insanity must end. Why do anarchists, communists, socialists and Islamists get along so well? What are the similarities between the Koran and the DADA Manifesto (the operating manual of the Progressives)?
See the WIKI-LEAKS ON THE LEFT VIDEO, the DADA expose http://www.marcrubin.com/dada/ivnu created by Marc Rubin who learned about the original Progressive-Dadas from Salvador Dali, their foremost enemy of the time.
Why is the FBI, CIA, DHS and other government agencies watching this movie?
And why are they listening to http://www.marcrubin.com/judean-eve.ivnu where Rubin speaks of the history of Islam and the dominators of history for the last 5000 years.
THESE VIDEOS WILL GIVE YOU CLEAR VISION AND REALLY PI** YOU OFF BECAUSE WE’RE BEING PLAYED…..TIME TO REMOVE OUR BLINDERS AND FIGHT….WE WILL WIN WITH RIDICULE, TRUTH AND GOD. YES. AND ART. NEVER FORGET THAT ARTIST’S ARE THE OLDEST PROFESSION.
Report Post »NoDaDAZone
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:08pmSorry. The Dada Expose link is: http://www.marcrubin.com/dada2.ivnu
Report Post »guyperram
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:08pmYour first link appears to be scrubbed. Can’t wait till 12/23 when the FCC imposes its new rules.
Report Post »guyperram
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:02pmSounds about right for merry ol’ england. They have enough muslims there to topple the government. Or at least to take it over. They also have their own shairia law problems. A lot lateto wake up the folks that are hanging by their fingernails.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:10pmMisleading headline here .
Report Post »“Koran-Burning Pastor”
Really ? When did he burn the koran ?
ADMIRAL747
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:11pmMichael Savage needs company here.
Report Post »guyperram
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:17pmwell chezwiz, he did think about it and in the world of hate filled muslims that is all it takes. Of course we do know how to deal with the situation. Just ask Barry and crew; ignore it.
Report Post »Buck_Ofama
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:42pmIt’s their country so they can be as Police-State as they want to be (Hmmm…what about the declaration of Human RIghts? You know a humans right to free speach. Oh never mind.)
But, I have it on good authority that ol Terry is part Mexican so he gets to go to any country he wants. After all, he is one of the ‘special’ Americans.
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:42pmAfter the attack on the prince and his consort, who can blame them for wanting to avoid other types of conflicts intheir country?
Report Post »ADMIRAL747
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 5:56pmOsama Bin Laden is still welcome. Maybe he could drive a cab and raise money for the cause.
CatB
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:15pmI agree he only said he was going to burn it .. now they are banning people for what they didn’t do? Well I wouldn’t go to England now — rioting spoiled brats and Muslims blowing things up .. they can keep it. I was going to go and see the old family homestead “Grimsthorpe” but not as long as they have those who want to destroy the country running wild. Obama is anti-British (remember he sent back the bust of Churchill FIRST thing in office) Now they are giving us reason to agree with him .. something is terribly wrong in the World.
Report Post »HillBillySam1
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 6:45pmIt‘s good to know that jolly ’ol England can enforce it’s immigration laws…..not against Muslims, of course. That would just be mean. How many hate-spewing Imams have come to England to speak in the mosques there??
Report Post »1proudAmerican
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 7:40pmHow many ant-Christian, American flag burning idiots have been banned from the UK? Hmmmm – ZERO!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on December 12, 2010 at 10:01pm“As you sow, so shall you reap.” This man’s threat to burn the holy text of another religion gave him his 15 minutes of fame, but made few friends outside places like this website, where hatred has festered and putrefied to the point where it’s no longer noticed – like a dead rat in the cellar – or, with some, enjoyed.
This is a man that most of your would welcome into your hearth and home. But you are in the distinct minority of not only the rest of the world, but this country as well.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 7:22amSo they will violate this mans right to free speech because you are afraid of the Muslims. If anything wouldn’t you want to use this opportunity to draw out the violent Muslim elements in society, you could make an example out of them if they get violent and at the same time protect freedom of speech. But I guess in Londonistan they would rather silence one man’s freedom of speech and protect barbarians right to hate, violence, and intimidation!
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 7:37amWhere can a I get a Terry Jones Tshirt, you know like the popular Che Tshirt. This man is a patriot and it is refreshing to see someone stand up against this Evil in our society!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 9:46am@jzs
You are assuming, first, which is bad form. Secondly, you express, as always, nothing but vile hatred of people who don’t share your politics.
Have you nothing better to do in life than run around sneering at people? Is that all your political philosophy has left you with to fill the void where intellectual discussion would reside in any other political philosophy?
Report Post »CAPTAIN
Posted on December 13, 2010 at 9:59pm@JZS…..Go hug a terrorist and quit wanking off on this site.
Report Post »nptden
Posted on December 14, 2010 at 4:24amJust another Neville Chamberlain moment for the Brits….I‘m sure they have a ’written’ commitment by the the leaders of the mosques that they will just say there prayers….lol…Gunga-dins revenge is coming…and they want to put their heads in the sand….When it comes, there will be a lot of heads in the sand, disconnected from their bodies…And they won’t have the US to bail them out….because our heads are being served on a platter by our wonderful progressive/Marxists.
Report Post »