U.K. Judge Tells Teacher Sex-Offender Busted with Child Pornography: ‘I Don’t Criticize You for Being…Attracted to Children’
- Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:09am by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
Well this is abhorrent to say the least. A school teacher who escaped jail with a suspended sentence after owning up to possessing literally 4,500 pornographic images, some of children as young as two years old, was told by his presiding judge that she did not criticize him “for being a teacher who’s attracted to children.”
63-year old substitute teacher David Armstrong was reportedly caught after a colleague noticed files on Armstrong’s laptop with names such as “rape wife,” “nude model” and “gay alligator.” Disturbed by the obviously deviant behavior that was at play, the teaching assistant immediately reported Armstrong to the police.
But it gets worse.
After finding a shocking 4,500 indecent images and videos on two laptops and an external hard drive, police arrested Armstrong. What is perhaps most repugnant, is that more than 300 of the images were reportedly of the “worst kind,” some involving children as young as two.
But despite the damning evidence, Armstrong was somehow allowed to walk free, after Judge Mary Jane Mowat reportedly told him, “I don‘t criticise you for being a teacher who’s attracted to children.”
“Many teachers are but they keep their urges under control both when it comes to children and when it comes to images of children,” the judge reportedly told Armstrong.
As if she were condoning Armstrong‘s urges while commending other deviants who just haven’t managed to get caught yet.
Needless to say child abuse advocates are reportedly enraged by the judge’s wildly inappropriate comments — comments that have been cited as an “insult” to child victims.
Teachers were also reportedly up-in-arms over the judges outrageous comments, saying the incident cast a shadow over the teaching profession while sending the wrong message to pedophiles. The Telegraph reports:
Peter Bradley, deputy director of the children’s charity Kidscape, said: “Children who have been sexually abused would be horrified to read this judges remarks.
“Schools are not places where those attracted to children can work – schools are there to provide learning in a safe environment where children know the people who look after them can be trusted and relied upon.
“This teacher should not have been in the profession and it is outrageous for the judge to say many teachers are sexually attracted to children.
“The message needs to be clear – if you are sexually attracted to children then you don’t work with them.”
Christine Blower, General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: “Teachers are professionals whose interest is ensuring children and young people achieve their educational potential.
“To suggest their interest in pupils could understandably be anything else is totally unacceptable.”
Jayne Phillips, Senior Legal Advocate at the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, added: “It is a very worrying message to send out.
“The judge’s comments do not reflect our knowledge of the UK’s teaching staff – they would be appalled by the suggestion that they are in anyway attracted to children.”
According to Telegraph, Armstrong confessed to five charges of making pornographic photos of children between 2007 and 2010. Some, however, were reportedly not of real children but were instead Japanese animations of children engaged in sex scenes.
But even though Judge Mowat admitted that Armstrong’s “was by any standards a substantial collection, with some 300 of the worst kind,” she only handed the sexual deviant a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years.
It might not come as shock then, that this is not the first time Judge Mowat has caused controversy over sentencing sex-offenders:
In 2008, she allowed former headmaster Phillip Carmichael to walk free from court after accepting that medication for Parkinson’s disease had turned him into a paedophile.
Sentencing a bus driver to ten-months in jail in 2006 for abusing a 12-year-old girl, the judge acknowledged that she felt “obliged” to lock him up because of “current views about sentences”.
“I have a record of trying to suspend sentences in cases like this and them ending up in the Court of Appeal,” she told Robert Prout, following a public outcry over the brevity of prison sentences for sex offenders.
Perhaps it is the judge who should be the one on trial over perpetuating such gross injustices. Why no one has investigated her or taken action to suspend her from the bench is still unclear.
While no real justice has been served, at the very least Armstrong has now been placed on the registered sex offenders list for ten years and has reportedly been banned by the court from owning a computer or other device capable of connecting to the internet. In addition, Telegraph reports that the sex-offender was ordered to undergo psychiatric treatment for his attraction to children and will allegedly never be allowed to work with children again.
Disturbingly, Armstrong had reportedly worked at many schools and colleges during his career.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (187)
SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:27amA lib is a lib is a lib. Does not matter which western country you call home. Western culture is on a down hill slide and I‘m starting to think it can’t be stopped until it hits bottom. I’m truly worried about the conditions future Americans and other western peoples will have to live in. I fear it will not be a pleasant experience.
Report Post »Thomas
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:47amIts coming and you can thank homosexuals for paving the way for other perversions.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 4:11amHer “comments” aren’t the problem—it’s her thought process. Usually when people claim that “comments are troubling” a ridiculous rewording and “out of context” excuse ensues. This judge is enabling sex offenders and condoning them—considering her position, that is as good as being an accessory to the crime. As she is the only one who stands between him and a lengthy sentence to protect other children, she is guilty. Add that to the precedent she sets, and apparently, she has done this MORE than once, and you have to question her motives. Is she herself a pedophile? Either way—she is aiding in the crimes.
Report Post »jrmhrpr78
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 4:51amThomas, that is the most ignorant statement I have ever heard. Pedophilia is not nearly the same thing as homosexuality. One of the two pray on children dumb_ss. You are one of the many paving the way to yet more ignorance.
Report Post »LibertarianForLife
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 5:56amThomas you idiot, what does that have to do with anything? Should they instead follow your book of fairytale’s morals and stone women? Maybe commit a little genocide, enslave a few people, rape and kill your enemies wives, all on order from an imaginary friend? You and all of your relatives will die out from inbreeding soon, so you won’t have to worry about seeing it for long.
Report Post »nothingbuthetruth
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 6:03amDemocrat
Report Post »chazman
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 6:37am… England is truly gone …
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:18amSHOWMESTATEGUY………..
Western culture is on a down hill slide and I‘m starting to think it can’t be stopped until it hits bottom.
Yes, we will have to hit bottom. Millions are sick of judges like this obvious PC piece of crap in the UK and their legislating society from the bench.
Another example would be the Mt. Laurel, NJ decisions from the 1970′s. Those decisions forced Mt. Laurel to include ‘affordable’ housing as part of any future development. So, instead of people getting an education and working their way to be able to live in ‘better’ conditions, others who had already done so would have to have as neighbors people from gov. housing projects. It currently stands at 15% in NJ. Great, huh? Kiss your property value good-bye!
So, the question is….what will be the trigger to stop nonsense like we see from the bench. Will someone who has had enough take matters into his/her own hands? My quess is that it will happen. It’s just a matter of when.
Report Post »USAF2003
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:21amRight on Thomas. I’m on your side with this one.
Report Post »BrotherWill
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:26amYou geniuses knocking Thomas’ comment should read a book sometime. Explain why is that in over 40% of pedophilia cases its homosexual in nature when by their own admission less than 2% of the population is homosexual? Thats alarmingly high for only 2%. Is your argument going to be the same nonsensical one as the libs such as “well even though the victim was the same sex as the offender they aren’t really gay”? Wake up.
If the homosexuals are allowed to practice their perversion with the approval of the the public then so should pedophiles, people into beastiality, polygamists, people who want to marry inanimate objects, etc. ITS ALL THE SAME. Normal = attracted to age appropriate opposite sex. Anything deviating from this norm is just that. DEVIANT. Freaking libertarians are just fiscally conservative liberals. Just as bad for society.
Report Post »arx
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:31amThomas is exactly right. Homosexuality is a sexual perversion. It does not matter how many of the brainwashed masses have been twisted and conditioned to think otherwise. Anyone with a healthy and just soul knows this instinctively. Does that mean homosexuals should be ‘punished’ or prevented from living their lifestyle? I don’t think so, because it is between consenting adults and what is behind closed doors is their business. But like many other descents into evil, it is a slippery slope…and pedophelia and other terrible crimes are not far behind. And as everyone knows, many homosexuals are not content to just live in privacy, they feel the need to ‘shove it down our throats’, teach it to our children, and demand that their deviancy be not only tolerated, but celebrated.
The judge should be tarred and feathered.
Report Post »Jack MeOff
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:32amWestern culture?? A cleric ruled Sharia Law allows marriage to a female of ANY age!! It’s everywhere!
Report Post »SFsuper49er
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:51amThomas I tend to agree with you… Once you let any kind of perversion in, it tends to fester. Anybody knows with a normal mind knows that homosexuality is wrong. It’s perversion, period. In 30 years it went from unaceptable to being a legal act of law. That’s what you have with this case. The more cases you have the more It’s acepted. Example… I went over to my ex wifes house the other week and saw her doughter 13 years old from another father kissing another girl laying on the couch in there house. When i asked there mother what was going on she said oh It’s legal now. It’s what allot of them do… You see it on TV. I haven’t been back since. I never realized my ex was such a liberal nut case. She must have been keeping it from me.. That’s how liberals think. If it feels good its ok because i am liberal free and the coruption gets passed on through out people like a disease.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:53amI read this last night and I stiill cannot come up with logical answer other than lock her in the tower.
How is this “Judge” not before the Queen or Parliament…?
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 8:04am@jrmhrpr78
I think what the person is refering to is homosexuality is devient, not the norm and neither is pedophilia. A lot of pedophiles prey on the same sex. It’s just like MAMBLA or whatever that group is that promotes man boy love. I admit MOST homosexuals are not. I don’t have a problem with gays that have long lasting relationships, though I believe it to be wrong. That’s between them and God, but I have a bad experience of a lesbian in the Navy telling me she would rather bend straight women than date other gays. That’s their militant attitude.
Report Post »arx
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 8:05amBrotherwill…I consider myself a conservative libertarian, and the two are not mutually exclusive. There is no true ‘liberty’ to do whatever one wants, because respect for others‘ and God’ rights must be present for any society to be truly libertarian.
I draw the line for society, but not for God. In other words, if it does not directly harm anyone else, I believe people should be able to do what they want. God will judge us all in the end.
It could be argued that homosexuality, prostitution, hard drugs, etc. DO harm society at large, and of course this is true. But morality cannot be legislated, and the effort to do so only leads to strains of theocracy. And then you have men, not God, telling people what is right, and what is wrong…with the force of law and all manner of selfish schemings behind their decisions.
Report Post »one years food ration like glenn says
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 8:11amWOW !! All I can say is WTF ?
Report Post »ecurbyy
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 8:22amI’d bet Obamao would love to have her on the U.S. Supreme court. This freak judge and Debbie Wasserman would be good buds.
Report Post »Katydidnt
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 8:29amThomas, I agree with you, but the blame for the fall of Western Christian culture started with the heterosexuals. A lot of the people claiming marriage is sacred did not treat it that way themselves. They did not wait until they got married, they had multiple sex partners before marriage, they commit adultery within marriage, they divorce and remarry multiple times, and they promote the pornography industry. It is hypocritical for hetereosexuals, to rigorously enforce Biblical injunctions on others and be tolerant and accepting of flagrant violations of Biblical injunctions applying to people like yourself.
Report Post »The truth is all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Repent for your own sins, then you can be in position to help others who have gone astray.
HUGGINGMYBABIES
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 9:44amHey stooges, what’s NAMBLA about then? It’s a gateway drug of sorts…..much like drinking can lead to other drugs so can other deviant behavior…..once you condone one, you are a path to condone others. We say it’s okay to steal if your needy, but everyone’s need is defined differently. look at our Saudi pals….they we’d infants and their Muslim leader muhammad consummated a marriage with a nine year old. The more you live amongst it the more you accept it….even if it’s wrong.
Report Post »intothelight
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 10:12amCrikey! Tell me that’s not Judi Dench!
Report Post »Applehead
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 10:16amPURE EVIL! Many have put themselves in the hands of the Devil!!!
Report Post »drybackinpi
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 10:38amThe proverbial chickens are truly ‘coming home to roost’. We have stood by and watched the decline of morality for decades, what else could we expect? If you sleep with dogs your gonna get fleas.
Report Post »nonamesleft
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 10:51amThomas is SPOT ON
jrmhrpr78 – you sir are wrong. When you allow deviate behavior to become acceptable new deviant behavior moves up the list. Soon you will accept adults marrying children – oh wait that is being debated now with the Jeffs lunatic under the umbrella of a so called religious belief.
Report Post »usually_right
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 11:33amThomas, I aggree with you. Read Romans 1.
Report Post »MartyTr
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 12:51pmSexual deviancy is a down hill slope. Follow God‘s word or satan’s.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:59pmThis U. K. judge must be muslim to condone this type of behavior.
Report Post »DeliverUsFromEvil
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:02pmHow can you take UK justices seriously when they’re still wearing carpet swatches on their head?
Report Post »Sicboy
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:21pmAll the lib’s say we should be more like Europe. And, this is what some of the perv freaks want. God please save this country from ourselves. I think we have turned from the Lord, there is no saving us from the punishment that is on the way.
Report Post »copatriots
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:39pm@ Decendent,
I don’t think I can handle “the bottom” of man’s depravity. But, i agree with you……it is exactly where we are heading. May God help us all!!!
Report Post »WhiteHorse
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:45pmTHOMAS is absolutely correct. By average, there are far more pedophiles that are homos than heterosexuals. Search the internet. The facts are there.
If a person has gotten past the fact that it is perverted and sick to have homosexual sex, then it‘s not a great leap for them to move on to something else in the sexual realm that’s just as perverted and sick. They are acting out one sexual perversion and condoning it in their mind, so to them, acting on another sexual perversion is not something that’s a problem for them. Pedophilia is a mental illness, just as homosexuality is. Both should be treated as such.
Report Post »DSVet
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 4:45pmSomething about this womans face….evil, disturbing.
Report Post »robert
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 5:33pmThe only thing US courts could do to dress more clownish than black robes is to wear a white powdered wig.
Then, it would be a challenge to keep from laughing any time you were unfortunate enough to have to go for some reason.
And how about, “All rise!” as the clown-in-chief arrives? In one case he used a penis pump during proceedings. In another he was sexually harassing his female clerks during courtroom breaks, pressing them for sex. In another he was accepting bribes to get a case moved up in civil court. On and on and on it goes. And the females have their problems as well and many are disgusting examples of partisanship.
It is a farcical system of clowns that contain the greatest number of miscreants in the civilized world today, so when a bad decision comes down, it is just more of the same 3-ring circus with the same cast of characters.
You can’t expect anything better.
Report Post »Rightsofman
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:33pmBetter checks the judge’s PC….WTF anyhow!!
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 10:23pmI think the judges wig is cutting off the circulation to the brain. Sounded to me like the judge has some fantasies, as well.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 10:56pmIt makes one wonder if someone should get a “Court Order” to search every hard drive, external etc. that she has access to. She obviously has a “soft spot” for predators!
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 11:16pm@arx
Report Post »…DO harm society at large, and of course this is true. But morality cannot be legislated, and the effort to do so only leads to strains of theocracy. And then you have men, not God, telling people what is right, and what is wrong…with the force of law and all manner of selfish schemings behind their decisions.
***
I‘m SO SICK OF HEARING THAT MORALITY CAN’T BE LEGISLATED! This is the argument the hippies brought in during the 60′s to sow the seeds of decadence and undermine this country!
MORALITY IS LEGISLATED EVERY DAY!!!
1) murder is immoral, and there are laws against it!
2) kidnapping is immoral, and there are laws against it
3) stealing is immoral AND…..
4) rape is immoral And…
5) child abuse is immoral And…
6) incest is immoral And…
7) shooting anyone who irratates you is…
8) embezzlement is…
9) financial fraud is…
10) about 70% of US Code deals with things which are BOTH immoral AND ILLEGAL!
(IT USED TO BE AT LEAST 90% BEFORE THE DECADENT 1960′s.)
Favored93
Posted on July 31, 2011 at 2:52amI am willing to bet that this “judge” is herself a child molester.
Report Post »You commit the crimes you go easy on.
Just say’n.
Daryn J. Moran
Posted on July 31, 2011 at 8:45amhomosexuals, lesbians and bi-sexuals prey on our children by advocating their wicked lifestyle in front of them every day, and now, with it being taught in schools, trying to get kids to “do” their lifestyle
it’s all wrong
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on July 31, 2011 at 12:52pmTo MilMom
Cooincidentally,,,,,your list of crimes are covered in the Ten Commandments…..so yes, they can and do govern by rules of morality.
Report Post »katiefrankie
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:01amCasting aside all arguments about children not being able to consent to sexual relationships due to age, this is what I believe will happen in our own country. Why? Because the definition of marriage, of gender, and of other terms that have undergirded our society are being regarded as irrelevant, outdated, or “unconstitutional.” Why should people who are sexually attracted to children be ostracized? Surely they, like others who have sexual preferences that until recently have been regarded as unacceptable, deserve the same consideration and esteem for having such orientations hardwired into their DNA. Like was said by Steve Simon, D-MN, “How many more [pedophiles] does God have to create before we ask ourselves whether God actually wants them around?”
Maybe because not all appetites are healthy, or good for us, or beneficial to ourselves, our families, or our societies. Maybe because certain preferences, inclinations, or urges are not right. Regardless of whether the object of this man’s affection can legally return his feelings, there are certain behaviors that just are not right. I don’t really care if I am deemed a bigot for thinking so – that guy is a pervert, and the judge is depraved.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:31amAbsolutely agree, 100%.
Report Post »BrotherWill
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:31amThats the mistake most people make. That they think God created them that way, when in reality God created them and its their sinful heart that made them that way. God had nothing to do with it, He simply allows it, not wanting to interfere with our own free will. He allows us to make bad choices. Otherwise it wouldnt be free will now would it?
Report Post »lisa2994
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:32amWhat he doesn’t seem to GET is that GOD puts on this earth and we have the freedom to make our own choices. Some people choose to do EVIL! This judge and people like her make me sick!
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 12:42pmWhy can’t the government shut down these sites where people find these images?Do they purposely leave them there?The government needs to set up a site where individuals can cut and paste the url’s of these sites so the govenment can shut-down and prosecute the owners of these sites…I only hear stories of individuals being caught with images on their computer.I never hear any stories of these sites where they get their images being shut-down
Report Post »whatthecrazy
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:47amI would like to snatch that wig off of her head, she herself looks like a freakin pervert .How the hell else could she rule like this? Nasty BBBB
Report Post »UKANTISOCIALIST
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:41amThis country now known as Englandistan really is going down the pan.Examples being,teacher sacked for saying a prayer to a child with cancer,gay flags outside police stations,employee reported & suspended for cross on dashboard,woman stopped from breastfeeding in shopping centre as it may offend moslems & of course gay marriage & so on…
Report Post »AmericanSubject
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 11:49amThis a widepread, premeditated and willfull act carried out by the power elite wth the intent of destroying Western Culture The intent is to create an enviroment where
Report Post »the population is so demoralized that it accepts the slavery of Sharia Law as the only salvation. The SA is Tipping, Engand is falling and europe is sinking.
stage9
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:37amThe obvious result of the putrid cancer of liberal politics and debauchery. Liberalism has come straight out of the pit of hell.
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:30amYes but – what does this have to do with Casey Anthony? Nothing! Nothing I tell you.
Report Post »thomas242007
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:10amAAAH see there, what did i say just a few week ago, how long will it be before pedophiles are considered a recognized subculture or people with “disabilities” and they cant be discriminated against, if theres judges sympathetic to these perverts, then rest assured its only a matter of time
Report Post »profile-two
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:59amI agree……it will not be too long. Not the way we are going now
Report Post »Lone Ranger
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:04amI‘m guessing this person wouldn’t have been nearly as forgiving if the pedophile had been a priest.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:10amI will never go to the UK, after being a victim of a family pedophile as a kid to my teen years, the fact is if I caught this man with the stuff — and the judge as well saying that too; then outrage once I was outside of the courts would be the least of the titles given when I would be done.
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:24amExactly! Christians are held to a higher standard, but it’s fine for Muslims to “marry” a seven year old, and rape the little girl when “she can bear her husband’s weight” on her tiny body.
Report Post »Lone Ranger
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:32amPedophiles arrange their entire lives around their sickness. They choose professions that bring them in contact with children, whether it be clowns, daycare workers, teachers or priests. But the ones we hear most about in the news are the priests and other clergymen. It‘s just more proof of the left’s demonic hatred of Christians.
Report Post »margerry
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 6:51amThey only go after priests because of the deep pockets of the Vatican and because it is Christian.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:59amBorn That way.
Report Post »Lux
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:44amNope, its a choice.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:38amDoes it really matter? This man made choices to indulge his attractions in illegal ways AND hey pursued a carreer where he will be in direct contact with children at the same time. THAT’s a choice and he should be blamed for it and punished.
Give him another choice: Life time imprisonment; or lose the testicles.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:59amThe UK is lost! With a judge like this I would be kicking her out ASAP!
Report Post »Wayner
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:11amCome on now…. Why are we judging the UK…. It’s coming to America…. Imagine the “erections” teachers are going to get while they lecture students about gay history in their classrooms.
Report Post »margerry
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:59amWhy are these perverted judges allowed to make such rulings ? She and others like her should be removed from the bench. It makes me ill ! What is going on with our world today ? LORD come soon, please. This is so biblical and surreal I can’t believe what is allowed to go on, everyday is another shock.
Report Post »alabamaslammer
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:53amWell Im glad conservatives just hate children. Cuase if I was a lefty I would have to watch kiddie porn or just be cool with it. So while we fat cats eat all their food and make live in the streets you leftys take them in and feature them in film. You sick SOB! Give me 5 minutes with him and you wont have spend money jailing him cuase I’ll rehabillitate the hell of him! That judge should step down and pursue her true calling of ambulance chaser and $200 divorce lawyer.
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:42amHere’s an article on “The American Thinker” which delves into what might be the purpose of gay marriage.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/the_gray_ladys_sexual_agenda_revealed.html
This is the “devolution” of morays, that have guided human beings for Centuries. Do we really want to go to the place where sex with children becomes accepted? How about sex between siblings, or between parent and child? Casting away moral judgements, there are scientific reasons why child and parent, or brother and sister should not mate.
Report Post »muhamadhater
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 3:03amWhat is making it more exceptable is the muslim being allowed 2 have sex with children, they can aparantly wed a baby and its okay..cause muhamad did it…and now were letting these sick indivisuals into our western countries.and some our saying well maybe it isnt that bad if the muslims are such a peaceful, kind caring, people…how can it be wrong to have sex with children…cause muslim are so religeuos and pray five times a day, and have I mentioned peaceful(J/K)….I just wonder how long everyone thinks it will take before muslims are allowed to have sex with children in western countries (if there not all ready) be cause its apart of the muslim religeon 2 be able 2 molest children??
Report Post »I truly hope the end is near..if not for MY sake for the sake of the children in the (near) future…
God help us!!! and bless those poor children!!
jeffyfreezone
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:40amGod help us!
Report Post »heyjms
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:36amWait did I just read that this judge thinks many teachers are attracted to children???? WOW…. I’m shocked…. must have been “everybody gets to be a judge day”
Report Post »BrownBear
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:35amShould we be surprised that this is where the tolerance of sexual perversion leads?
This insidious obsession with childlike bodies is encroaching and we don’t even notice. Aren’t models looking more and more prepubescent– like knubby-kneed kids? They don’t even look like women anymore.
Men should look like men, and women should be proud of their curves instead of starving themselves into looking like 6 year old pageant contestants.
Report Post »Geese Howard
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 7:12amI agree and I am anti “man-scaping”
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:34amAnother reason to celebrate the treason of the Declaration of Indepence, and be glad that the Limeys were beaten by a bunch of American farmhands and shoe-less militia.
They’ve been going downhill ever since. I give England 40 more years before it fizzles completely and gives way to sharia law.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:03amFarmhands and shoe-less militia.I Like that!
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on July 31, 2011 at 12:21amAnd the power of their God. Didn’t He prove when He had Gideon winnow out so many, that Our God, is able, but most often works, when He knows that He will get credit for His Mighty Acts.
Report Post »I think of a statement, my childhood Sunday School teacher taught me, and over about 58 years it’s proved true. “It’s ALWAYS DARKEST just before the DAWN !!! “
Akbarjonnie Shaheed
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:32amYep, another closet perv. craving your kids. The freak is out! Keep close watch!
Report Post »MinorityRightsAdvocate
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:26amThis is part of the plan to destroy Western Civilization by the destruction of any standards of morality.
This Judge should be immediately fired for complete lack of judgment!
http://minorityrightsadvocate.wordpress.com/2011/07/29/a-free-society-must-contain-a-moral-and-just-people-or-it-will-not-survive-as-a-free-society/
Report Post »Dale
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:38am“While no real justice has been served, at the very least Armstrong has now been placed on the registered sex offenders list for ten years and has reportedly been banned by the court from owning a computer or other device capable of connecting to the internet.” I guess the understanding is that in ten years he will be cured!
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:26amSounds like this old bag is herself a closet pedophile. Wonder what a casual perusal of her home desktop would find.
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 2:03amYup
Report Post »shane2813
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:24amThis is the end result when you get rid of GOD from your society!!! So go the Romans……MARXIST=-DEMOCRATS=TERRORIST All the same.
Report Post »nysparkie
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 8:02amTwo thumbs up brother!
Report Post »ZaphodsPlanet
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 5:42pmAmen Shane…. more proof that Michael Savage is spot on.
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder….
Report Post »XScramblerX
Posted on August 1, 2011 at 9:34amAmen!
TEA
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:23amSomeone needs to take a peek at what this judge has on her personal computers. She sympathises and relates just a little too much to the child molesters.
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:22amHow disgusting! Has Society degraded so far that it’s acceptable for adults to regard toddlers as potential “partners”?
These kind of people are mentally ill, and should be locked away from the rest of us.
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:22am“Gay alligator”? I don’t even want to know.
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:35amlol
Report Post »laney
Posted on July 30, 2011 at 1:21amCan a judge be impeached for such gross miscarriages of the oath of office? Clearly we have laws which this judge is willingly NOT supporting even in verbiage. I wonder if this JUDGE is one with “urges” for children because these are not the comments of a normal person. Two year olds are not sexual beings and those sexually attracted to them are clearly evil who rob children of more than we can calculate. HOW DARE THIS JUDGE KEEP HER JOB! What can we do…Someone out there out her contact info and let’s find out who is above her. Clearly she NEEDS THERAPY. Meanwhile she is allowing dangerous preditors to feel as if their “urges” are normal. It cannot be ignored. IT is INFURIATING!!!
Report Post »