U.N. Leaders Consider World Tax to Fund ‘Social Protection’ Services for the Poor
- Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:40am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
Since its inception in 1945, the United Nations has attempted to serve as an organization that cohesively binds together diverse nations and values in an effort to create a more equitable and just world. But despite decades of intense activity and effort, inequality and poverty still run rampant.
So to combat these ills, on Jan. 31, a special committee of civil society leaders convened at the U.N. building in New York City for “The Civil Society Forum” — a preparation conference for the U.N.’s 10-day Commission on Social Development (CDS) forum (which started Feb 1.). One of the potential solutions to global poverty that was discussed? A global tax that would help fund “social protection” and international services for those in need.
According to Deseret News’ Susan Roylance, the forum’s focus was on ”universal access to basic social protection and social services.” These basic elements include health care, primary education, housing, sanitation, water and other related elements that human beings require — or crave — for survival and social viability.
“This movement for a social protection floor [SPF] is becoming solidly entrenched in the United Nations’ agencies and programs,” Roylance writes. “Some U.N. leaders are calling for the SPF to become the new focus for the U.N., when the Millennium Development Goals are finished — after 2015.”
During the meeting, Milos Koterec, the president of the U.N.’s Economic and Social Council, said that no individual should be living below the poverty level. He went on to dub the aforementioned services as “essential,” and participants went on to say that these services were directly tied to the rights associated with ”life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
Of course, no one would dispute that people should absolutely have access to basic services. But the main question remains — with so much poverty and need, how would this massive undertaking be funded? Participants in the forum said that a small global tax would be a potential answer.
Jens Wandel, the Deputy Director of the United Nations Development Program, explained:
“We will need a modest but long-term way to finance this transformation. One idea which we could consider is a minimal financial transaction tax (of .005 percent). This will create $40 billion in revenue.”
Fatima Rodrigo, one of the individuals who presented at the forum, echoed this sentiment, saying that a “very small tax of .005 percent” would be waged to help fund the healthcare, education, income and housing for those in need.
“There is plenty of money, we just need to stop spending it on militaries and wars,” she said.
Wandel and Rodrigo weren’t alone in heralding such a proposal. In fact, Ambassador Jorge Valero, the current Chairman of the Commission on Social Development, went on to say that it’s “absolutely essential to establish controls on capital movements and financial speculation.” To accomplish this, Valero called for “progressive policies of taxation.” Translation: “Those who earn more [should] pay more taxes.”
Valero, a prominent spokesperson for and advocate of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, unsurprisingly focused upon capitalism as the source of global financial problems.
Forum organizer and chairman of the NGO Committee on Social Development Winifred Doherty stood in agreement, saying that military spending is at the root of the problem.
“There is no scarcity of resources,” Doherty said. “Where do we put our resources? Destroying people and the planet.”
Regardless of whether these elements were anomalies, it does seem the U.N. is making a push in this direction. At the CDS forum the next day, similar words about inequality were uttered. The U.N. News Service has more:
“The Social Protection Floor is an important initiative. UN agencies and our partners are using this to integrate our strategies so that we can help protect people from falling or being trapped into poverty,” Deputy Secretary-General Asha-Rose Migiro told the Commission.
“The poor want to lift themselves out of poverty. That is why we have to invest in social protection. That means food, education and basic services – especially for the poorest.” [...]
“This Commission knows that the future we want to chart…is people-centred, inclusive, equitable and sustainable. It is a future where a healthy, resilient environment can support present and future generations. These goals must be one and the same.”
It’s important to note that the tax was only a proposal. Enacting something this wide-reaching would be difficult and would likely have numerous barriers. But the fact that it’s being discussed at all is certainly noteworthy.
(H/T: Deseret News)





















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (151)
ElChupaCabraDeUSA
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:13amWe already pay a tax to the third world – It’s called the IMF and World Bank. About 5% gets to the poor and the rest is confiscated by the brutal marxist despots who rule those countries and murder their poor
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:26amthat would be taxation without representation. no one in any country votes directly for the fools at the un. it is time to close the place and free the world from this abomination.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:33amI’ll pay mine in pesos……
NHwinter
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:36amThis is just another push for NWO that even our own administration would like to happen. Just reading the headlines on the Blaze shows how this is permeating our society/schools. Is it too late to stop all this?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:37amThe Sharia Compliant Banks that the 700 billion in TARP went to in our tax dollars pays 2.5% of all investments to as I understand terrorist funding organizations and the Sharia Banks are fined 7% if they break even one Sharia law..I believe that Elena Kegan Obama Supreme Court Justice appointee was responsible for settting it up..I mean after all..our government is partnered with the Muslim Brotherhood..Our military through Hilary helped take down ours and Israel’s secular friend dictators in the ME where Christianity was allowed..since the Muslim Brotherhood Sharia Law leaders have taken over..Christians have been being rounded up and shot in the head.. 9 million Musims here since 1965 -2008 because one Congressman wanted to loosen up laws for Holocaust survivors..mass numbers imported since 2008, through executive order..Supposedly 11 thousand a month trickling in . College classes in environmentalism teach Americans to have 1.3 children/fanily to make room for immigration.A culture cannot be sustained at that. They also were teaching before gas prices rose that 3rd world countries wanted to reach our level of living so we would have to pay more. Muslim Demographics skip advertisement http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU
Report Post »..
islamhater
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:42amI don’t care what they do. I’m self employed all my clients pay in cash. Quit paying taxes 6 years ago. They can kiss my a$$.
Report Post »Delta D-5-3
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 10:08amI‘ll be damned if i’m paying ANY new “tax” to the UN. NO WAY, NOT GOING TO HAPPEN………….
Report Post »marhee9
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 10:13amWouldn’t that be a great progressive idea? Then the world could tax the US, geez I’m sure in the words of the current administration, they would treat us “fairly.” Especially now that Obama is President and the whole world loves America now. Wow!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzy7c0JUWEA
Detroit paperboy
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 10:13amI would love to take a big dump in the lobby of the UN… love to..
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 10:31amRon Paul on the UN in the 90′s
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ArUoyuDd74
ashestoashes
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 10:37amWhen Obama first took office as I remember..the UN was talking about taking our children and raising them so that they would have a “choice” of what religion they would choose..and as I remember..Obama was in favor of that..
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 11:00amLOL! LMAO! ROTGLMAO! The U.N. ! LOL !
Every time the U.N. sees money being handed out they come out with another insaniac “Global Tax” scheme! To tax the rich in an act of “social justice” to be carried out by by the U.N.!!! LOL HA!
I have got to tell you, SNL has to get down to the U.N. to get these writers! This “IS” hilarious!
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 11:01amLat time I checked only Congress has the ability to tax . And America needs to opt out of the U.N.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 11:13amFirst off the very first sentence is wrong the U.N. was established in during the Wilson presidency in 1917 under name league of nations…..1945 was just a rebranding of the failed league.
Report Post »Secondly the U.N. hasn’t the power to tax U.S. CITIZEN only congress can do that.
Thirdly the entire U.N. proposal is a scam to line more U.N. member pockets. I doubt that more 5 cent out every dollar would actually make it to help any poor….THUS IS THE EVIL(I MEAN WAY) OF GOVERNMENT.
hidden_lion
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 12:05pmHow long are the people of the US going to allow this enemy of our sovereignty hold their meetings, at our expense, in our country? What happened to all the domestic militia terrorists that are supposedly running around?
Report Post »ltbdb
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 12:08pmThen we can stop giving the UN any aditional money and just pay their miniscule tax and everybody will be saved from poverty. Sure. Yeah right. (Pure sarcasm if you are too liberal to get it.)
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 12:09pmIslamhater-
Report Post »That is exactly what everybody must do. Buy, sell, trade locally. Deal directly with customers and don’t do the BS tax thing.
bigben357mag
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 3:21pmWhen the UN tax collectors come to my door. I will tell them to go to h3ll! With extreme measures!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 4:46pmIs the U.N. simply populated with curroptocrats constantly looking for new ways screw money out of successful nations? That’s all these guys seem to be doing lately.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 4:47pmThree words for the U.N…“OIL FOR FOOD”.
Report Post »Wartface
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 6:13pmObummer would sign off on that… That’s what socialist do. Bet this plan has George Soros’ name all over it. The new world order sucks!
Report Post »TAXLORDCOMETH
Posted on February 4, 2012 at 9:21amHas Hugo Chavez socialist movement eliminated poverty in Venezuela — even with enormous oil revenues to spend at his disposal? Chavez has a decade of failure behind him. He’s turned the streets of Caracas into some of the most dangerous in the world. His excuse for failure has always been that he just didn’t have enough power to fix the problems, so the people of his country handed him more and more, and we see the results. This is socialism 101 — we’ve seen it play out over and over and it always fails.
Report Post »nzkiwi
Posted on February 4, 2012 at 1:26pmThe UN has been trying to do this for years (search “Tobin Tax”)
They also want their own standing army and to reduce or eliminate sovereign armies.
The fact that they must rely on nations paying their contributions really aggravates them. If the UN does something that western countries don’t like then the UN is threatened with having the payments delayed or halted. The USA pays about a quarter by itself. Canada, UK, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand take the payments to about half. The entire rest of the world pays the rest.
The UN absolutely hates this, and is constantly pushing for income outside the control of these nations.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on February 4, 2012 at 9:36pmELCHUPACABRADUSA, Amen. Thats not even counting the work our churches do. We need to get OUT of the UN. Without our funding I wonder how successful they would be? They seldom stand by us anyway.
Report Post »love the kids
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:11amSeveral suggestions, First, the poverty level would have to be based on the entire globe if this was enacted, so instantly every American would be instantly above the poverty level.
Report Post »Second, I will bet ANYONE 1 million dollars that within 5 years that the tax will be higher than.005%.
Third, I also bet there won’t be any Americans on the decision making panel, (unless Obama appoints someone himself)
doomytram
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:50amGreat! Hooray!
Report Post »Bill Rowland
Posted on February 4, 2012 at 4:49amValero blames capitalism for the sociall problems of the third world.
You can bet your sweet bippy that they expect capitalism to fund their social programs and that they will figure a way for their relatives to administer the programs and steal 90% of the money.
The last time I checked the UN didn’t have the right to tax me and congress better not allow them to if congress wants to keep their jobs.
OMG
Report Post »Stevsea
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:09amThe airliners on 9/11 hit the wrong target.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 10:06amCouldn’t have said it better myself.
Report Post »ares338
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:09amJust try and collect a UN tax from me and see what you get. They can kiss my big round white boy butt.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 12:14pmThey will get from you via your banking transactions, and at the supermarket cash register. The only way to avoid paying would be to buy your stuff from local people in cash or trade. Any electronic payment method would be automatically taxed.
Report Post »TAXLORDCOMETH
Posted on February 4, 2012 at 9:25amExactly, they won’t tax incomes — it will be a stealth tax you don’t even know you are paying. We’re seeing this in the EU now — notice the solutions being offered up are all bigger government, more centralization of power and taxation.
Report Post »williaml
Posted on February 6, 2012 at 1:20amthat is full flavored A$$
Report Post »constitutionaldirective
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:07amUN Global governance is the absolute furthest thing from individual liberty..
global governance the furthest thing from freedom..
UN stands in direct conflict with American Principles.. I stand in direct conflict with their goals of global domination..
Report Post »Jesse
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:05amThe U.S. needs to get out of this corrupt POS communist, socialist, one world rule corporation! Like Hell my money will go anywhere but the U.S. I pay too much as it is in taxes!
Report Post »Speak without Fear
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:05amNO WAY in HELL………WAY past time to close the doors to the UN!
Shut the doors……and rent the space.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:05amI was reading Revelation again last night and I implore all unbelievers to please pick up a Bible and read.
Report Post »Open the Book, open your hearts, minds, ears and eyes to the truth before it is too late.
Time is getting short.
crazyoz
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:02amPlease go ahead with your world tax. That would be the end of the US participation in this liberal world organization.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:08amI only wish it would end the US participation in it. As long as there is one liberal progressive in government power, it will not happen. I refuse to pay the tax because I do not recognize the UN’s athority over my sovereign nation and my rights therein.
Report Post »Vickie Dhaene
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 11:45amMakes me wonder even more what Romney feels about the U>N> With his stupid (or Not) the other day about him not being worried about the poor. I also do not recognize the U.N. Authority over my rights granted to me by my Lord and my Country.
Report Post »Nemo13
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:00amAh, the USELESS UN, the ultimate FRAUD. I think the people of the USA give enough and FAR MORE than the rest of the world, so we do not need to participate. This is nothing more than a way to fleece us more. Time to close the doors on this bad idea, they can move it over to Kenya, when Obummer is out of a job he can move their and run it into the ground, his specialty.
Report Post »Watcher1952
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:00amI will not abide by any decision the UN comes up with. You can rest assurd that most of the countries of the world will not participate in this tax and it will fall on AMERICANS to foot the bill, especially with this administration. Damn near 50% of Americans don’t pay any taxes now…..
Report Post »HKS
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:59amThe tools of politics are poor people, they will go to any length to insure adequate supplies of these tools to use against the rest of the populations. Doesn’t matter where in the world you go, it’s the same, run out of poor people and politicians die away. Tax code and regulations insure adequate supplies of these people in the future.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:59amThey all learned a long time ago that if you control the money, you control the people.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:57am.
Report Post »Wouldn’t it be cheeper to just shoot the poor people?……..
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:56amAnd here is the reason the UN REALLY exists. To redistribute the wealth of the more productive countries and give it to the unproductive, non-contributing countries that the members of the UN just happen to be from.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:56amGet the U.N. out of the U.S.A.
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:55amI am speechless!
Report Post »dgremark12
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:55amoUS ut of UN and UN out of the US! Our government steals enough already!!!!!!
Report Post »Impenitent
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:53amI wonder when the blue helmeted tax cops will enforce this new tyranny?
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:50amThe U.N. can “F” off for all I care!
Report Post »AMERICA4EVER
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:47amWe already give many nations too much money. Many of them hate us. Get out of the UN!
Report Post »NewLife56
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:47amAnother Tax? Man this will make the Liberals and Obama’s mouth water
Report Post »drst4scss
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:56amThe U.N. are Liberals!!!
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:59amRight, but the only thing is, Obama and Liberals won’t get any of it!
Report Post »Darla_K
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 9:07amDon’t we already pay the biggest share to the UN? Keep your hands the hell off our money. We need to get out of the UN. It is nothing but a big phoney joke.
Report Post »Sirfoldallot
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:47amlol, it’s here , lmao , we have been told , lol.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:44amWhy do I smell some real trouble coming?
Report Post »Clownshoes
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:43amAnd so I begins… The One World Gov’t… Gonna be one Hell of a ride to the End of Days! Hope you all have your crash helmets.
Report Post »ZeldaZick
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 8:57amI could not have said it better myself, ditto
Report Post »