Unfairly Edited? Full CNN Video Shows Ron Paul May Not Have Walked Off Interview as Suggested
- Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:24pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
CNN
Uncut footage shows Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul may not have walked off a CNN interview this week in quite the manner originally suggested.
Paul has been caught in a media storm over incendiary racial statements mailed out under his name in the late 1980s and early 1990s. When asked about the content of the newsletters in an interview with CNN’s Gloria Borger Wednesday, a testy Paul pulled off his microphone and walked away. The issue was compounded by reports that the Texas congressman knew about some of the more inflammatory remarks as early as 1996, despite telling Borger he only became aware of them 10 years after the fact.
In the original interview broadcast on CNN, Borger asked Paul whether he ever read the content of the newsletters and if he objected to any of it.
“Not all the time, on occasion, we talked about this twice,” Paul replied. “I didn‘t write ’em, I disavow ‘em, that’s it.”
Borger then asked Paul about reports he had made $1 million dollars off of the newsletters in 1993. Paul said he was still practicing medicine at the time and said, “I’d like to see that money.”
There was a cut, then Borger asked, “So, you read them but you didn’t do anything about it at the time?”
Paul, getting agitated, responded, “I never read that stuff…I was probably aware of it 10 years after it was written and it’s been going on 20 years that people have pestered me about this and CNN does every single time.”
Borger tried again, asking Paul whether he thought the questions were legitimate.
“When you get the answer, it’s legitimate that you take the answers I give,” Paul said. “I didn’t write them, I didn’t read them at the time and I disavow them. That is the answer.”
Borger continued to ask him about it and there was another cut, at which point Paul unbuttoned his jacket and reached for the microphone, ending the interview.
But in the uncut version released on CNN’s website, talk of the newsletters comes at the end of the eight-minute interview, and Paul’s departure appears much less abrupt. In between the cuts in the originally broadcast interview, Borger continues to ask the same questions about whether Paul made money off the newsletters, and when he moves to take his microphone off, it seems the interview had been coming to a close anyway.
Watch the original broadcast version, via Mediaite. Paul’s remarks begin at the 1:20 mark.
Now watch the full interview below, via CNN. Questions about the newsletters begin at the 5:30 mark.
Paul supporters have seized on the new footage, calling CNN’s original broadcast “a creative editing hit job.”
Does this uncut video change your opinion of the original interview? Take our poll below:
(h/t Mediaite)
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 590 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 415 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 414 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 379 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 375 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 415 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 414 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 379 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know 100 Comments- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 303 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 415 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (394)
hiteker
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:33pmRon Paul is a genius, or is he. He is at least smart enough to understand we are bankrupt, today, now not sometime in the future. That seems to make him smarter than most politicians. Most people think he is nuts because he wants to cut 1 trillion from the govt spending right away. He is nuts right? Wrong!
Report Post »We still need to borrow 600 billion to get by. Unfortunately he may be what gets BAm BAm re-elected.
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:47pmI think most people think he is a nut FOR NO OTHER REASON, than the corrupt media says he is.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:00pmThat’s assuming Paul gets the nomination,because some people freak out about his foreign policy which is so radical like actually declaring war like it reads in the constitution instead of having the imperial president decide weather or not to send in the troops.You‘re right Paul knows we’re bankrupt and he’s the only candidate offering to slash the budget one trillion dollars.
When other countries decide to stop lending us money that’s when the system collapses and hell breaks loose.People say it’ll never happen here,I say why because it happened once before?
Report Post »If people would let Israel defend herself which she is certainly capable of doing and vote for Paul in the general,assuming he makes it to the general election we would be much better off with a constitutionalist like Ron Paul over the Marxist we have to endure today.
quiltgal
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:21pm@progressiveslayer
I can tell you this much: if Ron Paul becomes president, he will probably only get a fraction of what he wants through the Rinos and Dems in Congress. That’s fine with me. He’s in the right direction and scares me a lot less than a Republican Rino like Romney who may be able to push through all kinds of liberal agendas.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:50pmThe Tea Party doesn’t just “stop” if Ron Paul is elected or not. We don’t just swing back and relax. We hold his feet to the fire, and we elect ONLY those willing to start from zero and adhere to Tea Party values. This doesn’t end 2012, it only begins.
Report Post »BLarocca
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 10:55amRon Paul is just as much a radical as George Washington, they both had the dangerous attitude that we should only go to war to defend the National Security.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 11:06amRon Paul is claiming to be frustrated with CNN because they asked these questions twice the day before. It’s a legitimate gripe.
But I still think, like I’ve said before, that he knew about the contents of the letter, but wants to avoid explaining what was meant by the supposedly racist language because there is a double standard being used by the so-called “black community” that is difficult to expose to many, due to their lack of precision in their thinking skills.
So far, the language of which I have been made aware is not racist, and I continue to offer to explain why this is so.
In the meantime, here again is Tom Woods’ take on this issue.
See here.
The Ron Paul Newsletters
Report Post »http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/the-ron-paul-newsletters/
Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 4:03pmAgain, you miss the Ron Paul point, Yep. But frankly, I don’t care as much as I used to.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 6:18pmJust take a look at the crowds Paul is bringing in when he speaks, its standing room only. His organization in 2nd to none. Paul is Polling 1st in Iowa and 2nd in NH behind Romney. With Bachmann, Santorum, Huntsman, Perry and Newt all not making the Ballot in VA, because they don’t have any organization or support on the ground. And most of them broker than a 3 legged dog. He as move into striking distance of the nomination. It looks like its Paul vs. Romney now. So it time to Welcome all the supporters of these 5 poor souls to “The Revolution”
Report Post »John 1776
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 8:46pmPaul’s financial view is right on the money. His Iran view stops me from voting for him. Still, what CNN did in this piece is a textbook example of how the media lies to people. Paul was far more patient with them then I could have been. How many times do you beat a dead horse over a question that he has answered so many times before? What, were they hoping that if they asked it one more time, he would give a different answer?
Report Post »KTsayz
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 9:13pmRon Paul IS a genius! And I took that poll and voted for ‘something else’ because of how the question was worded.
Report Post »Is everyone here willing to say that they ‘changed their mind’?
What about those of us who always saw the footage as propaganda and were never fooled by it?
The only choice I could have voted for would be: No, this new evidence doesn‘t change my mind one bit because Ron Paul never ’stormed‘ off as first reported and he never ended the interview because of the repeated questioning by that Booger woman who wouldn’t accept that her question was ‘asked and answered’ and move along.
And I’m surprised that blazers were taken in by the slick question.
Ron Paul is the only candidate worthy of the Office of the President.
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 11:13pmThey say he’s nuts because the Media said so. I call them sheep.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 7:40amFirst, let me say I have serious concerns about Dr. Paul’s foreign policy stance.
Having said that, he is a sincere, honest man, in my opinion. While I may not agree with everything he says, I believe he is CONSISTENT and HONEST ! Which is more than I can say about MOST politicians!
This was edited to reflect him in a poor light, clearly.
In the future, Dr. Paul, I would simply answer with something like, “Let me refer you to the interview I gave your network in .” You have answered the question repeatedly. Answering it again, only gives them additional opportunities to attack you. You have answered it. If they want to use it against you, let them dig out the old footage and use that. Answering it again makes it seem like a CURRENT issue, which it is not. Let them use 20 yr old clips to attack you.
RESTORING LOVE , July 26 27 28 , Dallas, TX
LINK UP NOW !! http://www.meetup.com/MercuryOneHQ
Do you GBTV?
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:25pmIf you cant get viewers evidently you just make up your own news? A propaganda machine…..
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:42pmThat about sums it up,‘journalism’ died many many years ago and we’re left with drones spewing the party line,only when a progressive is in office, when a semi conservative is in power he’ll be savaged in the press relentlessly.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:42pmIm going out on a limb here. Now do you think Glenn is a Closet Paulist?
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:02pmIt sure looks that way,maybe the light bulb went off and he figured it out.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:18pmI go along with quite a lot of what Ron Paul says then whoa, It’s like he got Kuciniched by a UFO.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:33pmThank you, Blaze. Fair is fair.
Report Post »TeaParty_RonPaul_R3VOLUTION
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:54pmThe goal of progressive media is to label anyone who opposes the welfare/socialist state as being selfish, evil, hateful towards minorities, islamaphobic etc.
Report Post »Luke611
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:50pmNo– Glenn is not a closet Paulist… but thankfully, he is an open room forumist who believes truth is not something to be relegated and regulated for purposes of sound-bites….I apologize for considering CNN may have actually revealled an accurate assessment on Mr Paul.
I wonder what laws can be established against media mechanisms such as this CNN display, that will hold to a criminal statuate without violating freedom of speech. The only way media will conform to principles of fairness, accuracy and absolute truth is if the probability of criminal judgment threatens such deliberate actions. Im not referring to suit and government fine upon them– im discussing jail time for producers and interviews given a length of time where the proposition of exchanging body fluids are a significant fear.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:53pmI thought the most notible part of that interview was that Ron Paul has the exact same stance on what he feels the proper Iraq strategy should have been that Bill O’Rielly has. Is it really that kooky?
Report Post »If he would quit saying wierd things he would do alot better. But he’s old enough now I guess you can give a pass on some of that.
ChiefGeorge
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:01pmShe clearly wanted some kind of gotcha moment and he kept giving her the answer the way he’d answered it in the past but she kept coming and would not move on. So he ended the interview because she was not interested in anything else or any other questions. Its media bias once again at its best.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:40pm@LUKE611 All the voter fraud in the 2008 elections ..you know..all the kids moving from one town to another registering and voting.. dead people voting..illegals voting..and all Acorn got was some $500 fines..Kind of light in comparison to getting the office of President..Right? We probably paid the fines. As I understand..when Harry Reid ran in Las Vegas..it was told to me that his opponent was ahead..the lights went out….came back on and Harry was ahead..One of the Blazers said that Acorn was in charge of the voting poles.. I hear that they are even in charge in Iowa..I wouldn’t be surprised if they are in charge in all the key places..We fund Acorn..and they are a liberal machine started by Clinton and perpetuated by Obama..as I understand. What did some famous guy say? How a person votes in the elections doesn’t count so much as the people in charge of tabulating the votes…
Report Post »last frontier
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:49pmMETEORICLIMBO
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:25pm
If you cant get viewers evidently you just make up your own news? A propaganda machine…..
And then you become the news.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:00pmRon Paul is right. All atacks on the US have been our fault and any future attacks will be be our fault regardless of our actions. We deserve to have our country attacked again and again. Don’t ask what you can do for your country just bend over.
floridabeeker
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:11pmWhats so great about our current foreign policy?
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:16pm@NEOFAN That upset me when I first heard tthat the attacks were our fault..but that what the invesitgations of the CIA and others came up with…It wasn‘t Paul’s assessment..it was their’s
Report Post »tarkus
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:19pm“Im going out on a limb here. Now do you think Glenn is a Closet Paulist?”
If you read Glenn Beck’s books (especially “Broke”), he really espouses libertarian views that line up with Ron Paul’s.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:55pmWhat is even more amazing that the fact that all attacks against the US were the fault of the US or the work of the US is that not one person in the tens of thousands that took part in killing their own citizens has ever felt enough guilt to come foward or speak a word about it.
Report Post »Maybe if Ron Paul is our president he can lead us all in a mass 310 million person suiside for being so evil to the angels in the rest of the world.
Dumbwhiteguy
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:56pmPeople, On paper we have already been taken over. Beleive it or not we may need someone like Ron Paul to go in and shred everything in the white house and undo all the last 50 years of orders. This may sound dumb but, this may be our only choice.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:58pmHe’s really not a Libertarian. He is a true Conservative. Most of what people think is “Conservative” today is really Neo-conservatism – the main difference being that Neo-conservatives believe in aggressively pushing our agenda on the world where a true Conservative does not. I’m ex-military and I have to say that I’m sick of all the wars that Obama has us in. We don’t need to be the worlds policeman – we spend way way too much on defense. Gingrich and Romney are wrong for America.
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 10:55pmThis isn’t news.
I saw the entire video, and he did start taking his mic off, but after answering the same question multiple times at the end of the interview…
Why is this being reiterated?
Because no matter how old or how many times a story is debunked, the media can keep bringing it up because they think it hurts him (and it’s all they have). It doesn’t faze his campaign at all, what it does its focus attention on Paul some more, and when people do their own research and find out it isn’t true, the media loses MORE credibility.
Alex Jones has more credibility in his pinky than the entire corporate media.
Why aren’t we talking about how Grinchgrinch pulled a John Edwards on his cancer-striken wife?
Because Ron Paul has enough integrity to attack the man on his policy views, not on his personal life.
But I’m not Ron Paul, and I don’t have to pull any punches on that NWO adulterous slimeball.
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 11:15pmThe media is so corrupt today, the great majority is just propaganda and trash. Go get them Dr. Paul, you have these corrupt B@stards on the run. It is funny that the only thing the media can do is bring up some lame nonsense that Dr. Paul had nothing to do with and that was already answered years ago but now comes up again like it is some hot scandal. The corrupt media is really grasping at straws now to do anything they can to attack the only real candidate. Don’t worry Dr. Paul the American people who want Freedom, Liberty and Fiscal Sanity restored in this country are with you!
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 11:32pmYep, fair is fair, but RP is still a loser!
Report Post »JohnnyinthePedros
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 3:04amCome to the light, Mr. Glenn Beck. What did Ron Paul say in the unedited interview in regards to foreign policy that you disagree with? I know you’re afraid to come out in support of Ron Paul because of its possible effect on your bottom line among other things, but look at the poll on your own site and the comment section… Your fan base is mostly there already, and such an announcement would bring new readers/listeners as well. Why? Because folks that truly believe in freedom and liberty will know that you have fully disassociated yourself from the corporate media, and not just pretended to.
Report Post »nomolibs
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 5:10amthe liberal media is a joke they will lie and cheat to get they boy back in office, we have seen that once already. after trying to stuff the race card down everyones throat for a week and it not being affective they must have figured they would just make there own story up.
p.s. saying the government (the same government that wont stop butting in and screwing up our lives) went to thses middle eastern countries and butted into and screwed up there lives doesnt sound all that controversial. i mean thats all this govt has done for a very long time to anybody citizen or not. we should kill anybody who attacks us, but we should try to stop it at the source instead of adding fuel to the fire by getting out of there let them kill eachother or wait for isreal to kill everyone else there.
Report Post »grumpyt
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 6:46amAs all honest people know, Ron Paul (warts and all) is the only candidate truly “says what he means, and means what he says”! There are no perfect politicians but Dr Paul comes as close to a Founder as any we have. As Glenn would say “read history” and then decide.
Report Post »stormcrow53
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 7:36amBeck has said repeatedly that he agrees with Paul’s economic and fiscal policies. He stridently disagrees with his foreign policy especially regarding Israel. Those who do not recognize that are being less than honest at best.
Report Post »weldman7
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 7:39amHere’s your proof !! Don’t ask me about my racist newsletters!! http://ronpaulflix.com/2011/12/tmot-damn-it-dont-ask-bout-my-racist-newsletters/
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 9:23amFor all the blazers that stood behind and fought the good fight for the Doctor on the Blaze, I commend you.
I am so delighted that people are finally coming our way.
It is very exciting to see the Good Doctor doing so well, his potential Presidency could be the end of the 2 party lie.
It makes me anticipate the possibility of a bright future for America.
Report Post »little big man
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 10:01amI don’t think Romney would try to push Rino or liberal agendas. he’s not stupid he knows the country is in bad shape.
Report Post »As for paul I agree with 50% of his thinking the other 50% he’s just nuts.
Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 4:08pm@LITTLE BIG MAN
Report Post »His record as a conservative is dysmal; he should be running in the other party.
thepatriotdave
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 10:47pmNeoFan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:00pm
Ron Paul is right. All atacks on the US have been our fault and any future attacks will be be our fault regardless of our actions. We deserve to have our country attacked again and again.
==============================
I’m going to pray for you tonight before going to bed. How anyone can have your attitude is a shock to the system. We may not be perfect, but the USA is the worlds only hope for the majority of the planets populations to know what freedom feels like. Some of you that have come to live in the USA from other countries know exactly what I’m talking about.
Report Post »LiberTEA partier
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:18pmLooks like the anti Paul blazers will have to eat crow after parroting the media lie. In the past Paul has accepted responsibility for allowing 2 to 3 newsletters out of thousands to contain politically incorrect statements, but in 30+ years of public service and even longer in private practice this shows that he made a managerial mistake, how many mistakes, bad votes, corruption, and crimes can we point out in the other candidates? Too many, and Dr. Paul is a principled man so this is the best they can do. Perhaps this will finally awaken the statists who think that the status quo is the answer to our nations woes, and while many do not think Paul is a fix all making any change has to be better then what we are getting now. Each and every day the other candidates are expose, as well as the insiders in the media protecting the criminal elements in Washington, it is as clear to many as the nose on their face, but there is no need for the obvious to get in the way of partisan fantasy,
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:20pmCrow is a step up from the sewer rats they usually feed on, they will not acknowledge it just look at yepimatrolls post.
Report Post »jackwrench
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:45pm@ The Truth
You should read all of YEPIAMTROLLORANEOCON he is truly afraid.Maybe If the Doctor can get elected it might lead to all of the neocons and socialist getting voted out of congress that’s where all of the problems come from.That is the true big picture behind Ron Paul getting elected.It’s really sad that this country turns it back on liberty and freedom.
Report Post »Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:09pmIt truly saddens me to read the RonPaulatron comments on the blaze. You people have declared war on conservatives. Clearly you‘re not trying to change my mind about Ron Paul or you wouldn’t insult me in every one of your posts that I read. Now I just voted with the 85% on this post who said yes CNN editing changed the way the interview looked. What it does not change his Ron Paul’s response. I agree he did not walk off without good cause. The problem is the MSM will not ask him the right question and there are questions he needs to answer. Like, is the guy who wrote these articles still working for him? These were not merely incorrect statements, they were racist and conspiratorial. Which gets to the heart of the problem the vast majority of Americans have and will have when Ron Paul starts to get vetted. The vast majority of conservatives agree with and support his constitutional economic proposals. But many of us will NEVER understand or support the 9/11 truther crap or his general moral equivalence. If as a libertarian, you guys don‘t have a problem with all this than you’re either willfully ignorant or a couple bricks shy of a load. There are literally volumes of books written by much smarter man than me which you need to read up on so you can understand the guaranteed folly of postmodern theology and moral equivalence. Most of you libertarians are trying to swim in the intellectual deep end of the pool but you forgot your floaties.
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:56pm@blilofrights Where in the bill of rights or constitution does it say occupy 170 countries globally with our military? Where does it say bomb countries from 1991-2010? Where does it say preventive war is defense of our country? Where does it say to intervene in other countries civil wars? Where does it say tax people based on income and do it at different rates in different pay scales? Where does it say to push democracy which we aren’t globally? Where does it say our virtues must be shown with force? When does it say that our civilians and money are meant to provide the safety of all other countries on the planet? Is there ever a time when you ask yourself, what good are all these wars really doing? Why is the American war on drugs a cause of a global battlefield to prevent its citizens from getting them? Why do we keep our borders open when the war on drugs is so important? Why is the war on drugs now combined to the war on terrorism? With all of the secret wars and missions we have globally no one knows about is it not a safe assumption we are creating more enemies? Why is it our job to make Israel safe? Why is it our job to pay 90% of the UN and NATO budget? Why did we expell 1 billion dollars worth of arms on Libya and the people who started the war spent 100 million? Is our society and police state really the answer to prosperity and freedom or is there a better way?
I would rather die fighting for my liberty than enslavement of the globe including US citizens.NDAA
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:29pmBillofrights
Report Post »Thanks for talking down to us Paulist. Im sure the favor will be returned. Its Romney vs Paul now. Pick a side. Im on the side of Liberty and Freedom. Its to late to stop it now.
“Come Join The Revolution”
Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:46pm@LEEROYJENKINS thank you; you did an artful job of proving my point. I don‘t agree with you so therefore I support all of the things that you just applied to my position because I don’t want to legalize drugs? Or because I support Israel? There is another position between all of those that you just tried to attach to me and conservatives in general and your “stick my head in the sand and mind my own business just please make it legal for me to smoke dope” position. Just about everything you just listed and have arrogantly assigned to me and conservatives in general are progressive, liberal, socialist manipulations of our Constitution and government in general. The fact of the matter is that many times it has been the moral, freedom loving, and quite constitutional thing to do; when we have projected our power out into the world to liberate people and protect our national interests. Libertarians act as if they would see a crime and not do anything about it; not help the little old lady as it were from the proverbial purse snatcher. Now just because I think there are and have been times when our country was right and just in its foreign-policy does not by any stretch of the imagination mean that I agree blindly with every foreign-policy decision our country is made in the last 235 years. That would be ridiculous. What is also ridiculous and dangerous are people who fail to acknowledge that evil exists in the world and that evil has to be confronted.
Report Post »Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:08pm@ COMMONSENSE Join the revolution? I have voted on the side of the Constitution every chance that I’ve had, like Reagan. And as far as this tree of liberty needing the blood of tyrants and patriots to survive; I have got my gear, my guns, my ammo,and my training (former Marine). I will live free or die. I assume from your log on that you’re a fan of Thomas Payne. He too never met a revolution he didn’t like; unfortunately for him he failed to understand why the outcome of the American Revolution was so different from that of the French. Clearly this problem continues to exist with Libertarians to this day. I’ll save you some time reading history books. There is one huge difference between the American and French revolutions. That was God. The American Revolution was led by founding fathers that were God centered Christians and Jews. The French Revolution was led by godless egomaniacs like Robespierre. The French Revolution murdered hundreds of thousands of people and ended under the rule of a tyrannical dictator. Be careful not all revolutions are created equally. As for talking down to fans of Paul; you must be kidding me. The vile hateful things that are said by libertarians on the blogs of the blaze embarrass your comments.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:14pm@BILL
Oh boo f’n woo, your sad, who cares… We didn‘t declare ’war’ on conservatives, we declared war on FAKE conservatives, RINOs, and warhawks. Explain to me how its conservative to continue wars and occupation abroad while spending wild money for it, that we dont have??? Conservatives, what a joke. And as for the insults, what forum have you been reading lately??? Almost every anti-paul post contains name-calling (including yours ‘RonPaulatron’ hahahahah) loser, stay sad and watch our Republic die because you let your ‘feelings’ trump logic and what this country needs to turn it around (hint NOT more wars).
Report Post »sawbuck
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:16pmBillofrights
Report Post »Thank you .I tried to use sarcasm mixed with end-game predictions to no avail , but you put all my points together perfectly.
The liberal left cant hardly contain themselves because we the (GOP )are tearing each other apart and it seams that some or most (I can’t say all) supporters of Ron Paul are willing to pull the lever for Obama , split the vote ,Or not vote at all. If they don’t get their way.
But what they fail to realize is Ron Paul statements on…. 9/11 alone …!
Will cost him the general election. You clearly pointed that out and the proverbial baby(Ron Paul) is joined at-the-hip ..To the 9/11 conspiracy theorist (bath water ) and when the left is finished with them…. They will BOTH be ( thrown-out )…!
And the Paulians have the gull to call anyone neocons or trolls if you disagree with them , I think they “contributed” to getting Herman Cain to excuse himself from the race . He wasn‘t their guy. They flooded blog sites and web sites with their “neocon boiler plate” . So it ends up to be fight or flight .That inevitably turns into a “division of the people”… I think Herman Cain seen this in the “American Conservatives”
And that’s why he threw in the towel .Why go through what Palin did ? I think when its all said and done…The 9/11/ truther/ Pualians did as much damage to the GOP/last stand as any Obamian could
dream of…!
Congrats Paulians …Second place Paul will be the 1st place looser to Obama .
Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:51pm@ SAWBUCK Right on! @ YOUNGBLOODNEWS You just did The same thing LEEROYJENKINS did; See where I get RonPaulotrons from? So you’re the arbiter of conservatism. I don’t agree with you, so you put me in an ideological position that I don’t hold and have not espoused and then point out to me how wrong I am. WOW you’re brilliant. Explain to me how your behavior is any different from David Axelrod,or anyone of a dozen leftists arguing there case in the public today. I think what really ****** you off is that I accurately describe and understand your positions. Just like the leftists you are unable and unwilling to have a conversation openly and honestly. Instead resort to third grade play ground crap. I wonder if you could put the water bong down long enough to formulate and defend an ideological argument. Here’s a question for you since you want to deal in absolutes only. If I’m a fake conservative for defending Israel and believing that sometimes foreign wars are necessary. Then aren’t you a cowardly isolationist who was is so selfish and self-centered that you can’t be trusted by your allies to help them when they need it? I‘ll bet I couldn’t count on you to even cross the street and piss on me if I were on fire. I bet you would be glad to start the fire though. You‘re just as dangerous to free and civil people as those occupy Wall Street idiots and I won’t count on you being there when the actual revolution really starts. You could get hurt so you’ll be in the
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:58pm@BILLOFRIGHTS You seem to be a very admirable man…however..we are 16 trillion in debt..and there are no candidates who have any real solutuions but Dr Paul..I too had a problem with the legalization of drugs and prostitution..then I started realizing that some of the posters here might have a different problem with it than I did…like some may be living off the government dole and pimping and dealing on the side…it did cross my mind..When I spoke to a Vet about it..he said…oh that will get rid of a lot of people…I had never thought about it from that aspect…it will take the money out of it however…Even the government was getting in on the Hezbollah action down in Mexico furnishing them with weapons and I am sure you have heard of law enforcement in your area being on the take..NO? Where there is that much money..well you catch my drift.. Paul is the only one who voted for Israel to bomb one of her neighbors..the only one..As for war..he wants it to be a Congressional decision..not his own..The countries who need help can ask and Paul will take the necessary measures..IF going to war..wants to go in Reaganesk style..get in..win..get out..He will cut 5 Communistic government agencies which will go toward restoring our Constitution and cut One trillion the first year and have a balanced budget by the third.. You should rethink your position..Kind of hard to carry on a war with no money and no gas…lol
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:08pm@BillOfRights
It seems you do not know what you speak about when you say Ron Paul supporters “declared war on conservatives”. That is totally untrue.
Ron Paul is not a 9/11 truther at all.
Ron Paul supporters would defend any lady getting her purse snatched.
Ron Paul doesn’t want legalized drugs.
Ron Paul stands with Israel, respects their sovereignty and does not want to dictate to Israel how to run Israel.
You issue many insults in your post. Why?
As a conservative and Christian I take it, I will simply ask: would our Christian God approve of us using our military to protect Muslim Nations? That is exactly what occurred in both Iraq wars, we defended Saudi Arabia, a nation who worships Allah as a collective. Was that what God wants us dying to defend, Muslims in Saudi Arabia? I don’t believe so….
Please, do not come complaining about Ron Paul supporters comments and then insult in the very manner you complain about. That is called being a hypocrite.
Anytime you’d like to have a respectful conversation about views of Ron Paul or any other candidate we can and I welcome it. Let me know.
Report Post »Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:28pm@ ASHESTOASHES I agree with the majority of your sediments. There is no doubt that our country’s economic condition is apocalyptic. I don’t believe that we can even conceive in this country what the world and our country will look like if this economic house of cards finally completely collapses. In this I couldn’t agree more with Ron Paul and many of his followers. Unfortunately I said that many times here on the blades and it always seems to fall on deaf ears. My biggest rub with Ron Paul is the same exact problem I have with moral equivalent leftists. Ron Paul as president I believe would make us less safe. I don’t think that he begins to understand what he is dealing with when it comes to Islam and Islamic terrorists. Ron Paul and many libertarians seem to not understand the nature of natural man. When you walk the streets of your cities local bad neighborhood, you’d try to appear confident and strong; able to handle your business while carrying pepper spray or knife or just your keys in your hand at the ready for trouble? Yes of course you do because if you walk down the street looking scared, confused, and worried you’d end up a victim of crime so fast that it would make your head spin. Dealings with countries on an international level are no different. Under Obama we look weak and confused and financially unable to handle her business. Under Ron Paul I don’t think we would look much different to our enemies. And here’s a big one for me, Ron thinks we started it
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:35pmBill of Rights, that is why you get us up in arms because you blindly listen to the establishment. He is not a truther period. That is why so-called conservatives fall below the conservative measure. neoconservatives are conservatives with progressive ideologies. Paul goes along with the reports from different departments. Any cover up he talks about was aimed toward trying to save face for the FBI who had info that possibly could have stopped the attacks at least partly. He does not believe the U.S. is responsible for carrying out the attacks, but our foriegn policy helps to make terrorists want to, and he is right.
Report Post »Shane74
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:36pm@BILLOFRIGHTS, the reason people will label you as for all of these things, is because we know the truth. The people who are running, other than Paul, stand for more war, defending the Federal Reserver system which is stealing from us, defending their ability to insider trade and get rich off of industries that THEY REGULATE, and they support making laws that will allow them to throw us all into labor camps, if we decide to get really uppity about it.
Many of you blazers are only HALF AWAKE. Now you just have to see through the lies that are coming at us from every angle.
Also, it would help you with Ron Paul supporters, if you actually understood Ron Paul’s stances on issues. If you tell a Glenn Beck fan that Glenn is a racist, or try to twist his words, Glenn Beck fans will know if you’re lying to them. Because they pay attention.
But you haven’t paid attention. People scream bloody murder all day long here, and elsewhere online, that the media is distorting Ron Paul. But you just think they’re crazy, because you’re not really listening. You’re hearing the echo chamber.
Top down, bottom up, inside out. (I don‘t think it’s Top down, from the left, and the left-inside out!)
When everything crashes down, which is inevitable at this point, many of you are just going to be in awe at how many of the “god fearing” conservatives are going to peel the mask off.
Report Post »Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:47pm@ OKIE First of all I have to say it’s hard to know where to start with your comments given I only have 1500 words to reply. I’ll start here, I try not to speak for God but it‘s pretty clear in the Bible that he regards the souls of all people equally valuable to him so I don’t think it’s a stretch that he would expect Christians to defend and protect anyone of any faith when they are under tyranny. As for calling names, that is not what I was complaining about. Just like in your post libertarians are short on fact and thought and long on insults. I merely attempt to give as good as I get and will never apologize for that, again I refer you to the Bible and point out to you that even Jesus Christ was indignant a lot. Indignant means angry, just so you know. As for your list of Ron Paul facts. A couple minutes on YouTube will prove you wrong about the 9/11 truther thing. The legalized drug thing, are you really telling me that libertarians don’t believe in legalized drugs? And Israel, would there be more war or less war if Ron Paul was president and told Israel that we may or may not have your back but hey if you feel the need to take care this on your own knock yourself out. I think Ron Paul’s proposed Israeli foreign-policy would force Israel to take out its enemies before they tested Ron Paul. As for the little old lady analogy, that remains to be seen and I haven’t seen much yet that would make me change my mind. When it comes to my freedom I won’t count on you.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:52pm@YoungBloodNews
Got a link for you to watch.
http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1108PSISHOVD/PPSIMC82/PR
Have a Merry Christmas.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:53pm@BILLOFRIGHTS..Thank you for your service..I am quite sure that you understand more than I ever could having been in your situation..Paul isn’t the one who came up with the blowback thing however..When I first heard that from his first debate..I was one of the ones booing..It was the CIA and other investigative agencies that reported that, and that is what he is going by.. I had no idea that we were running interference in any other countries, but I heard it from other sources as well and I discounted them…For all I know..someone put the CIA up to saying it..look how CNN falsely reports.. I am desparate for a Constitutionalist for President however and I could not understand how this country could ever be fixed again what with all the Muslim immigration and the Obama administration going to Arab countries and inviting 300-350 into US governmental agency jobs…I just want a chance to start over and stop this nightmare.. I feel his cutting these Communistic agencies would be a start to take us back to us again..To get rid of Communists in our education system. and government. ..I fear for this country..I feel that you more than likely a man of God.. We should both pray about this and ask God’s will be done . I am please to make your acquaintance Marine..
Report Post »Billofrights
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 10:05pmAllow me to add one more thing before I go help Santa this evening. I wish all you guys a Merry Christmas and thank you libertarians for engaging me this evening. If I could just point out to you that it may be a bit arrogant for you to think you’re the only ones with the facts. For instance Glenn Beck is no libertarian but you can’t deny the man is informed. I encourage all of us including me to challenge our assumptions and worldviews if you’re interested in truth. I agree with and understand how important limited government is to our freedom. I would also remind you that for me as a Christian I am well aware of both the real and imagined conspiracies that man is capable of. No need to lecture me there. Free markets and limited government; freedom for all; so help me God
Report Post »TheFastestCamper
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 10:33pm@BillofRights Even though I dont agree with your assessment that Ron Paul would make us ‘less safe’ lets just assume for a second that its true. Would you not be willing to sacrifice safety for freedom? We will never be free from threat. Evil does exist but that does not mean that we need to go looking for it.
“Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
-Benjamin Franklin
“Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.”
-John Quincy Adams
“Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations — entangling alliances with none.”
Report Post »~Thomas Jefferson
Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 10:35pm@BILLOFRIGHTS: Dr. Paul only reiterated the statements coming from CIA reports. Truthers believe that our own government was responsible for the 9.11 attacks either by planning, direct action or knowledge in advance, and culpable for allowing the attacks. Dr. Paul is not a 9.11 truther.
Just clarifying. Merry Christmas.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 10:37pm@SAWBUCK Ron Paul’s staements on 9/11 alone will win Obama the election? Did you happen to understand that Ron Paul only quoted what the CIA reported…They are the ones who said that 9/11 was blowback…Oh and did you also remember that the government was warned about 9/11 before it happened and did nothing to stop it? I remember..
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 10:51pm@SAWBUCK thought it was another poster but alas..it was you..I just wanted to address you saying that you thought we were partially responsible for getting Cain to submit..HAHA Really? Maybe you didn’t get the memo..but Herman endorsed Ron Paul as I recall.. Even Herman thinks Paul would be the best President. And for your information..if Obama wins because we were for Ron Paul…so what..we all just go to Commyville a little faster..because the rest of the GOP are on the train..And imagine Obama winning fair and square…just like he did last time.lol
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 11:10pm@BillOfRights
We protected Saudi Arabia in the gulf wars. Saudi Arabia is a tyrannical government is it not? YES, so would God be honored by our Christian Nation defending a Muslim tyrannical Government? I do not believe he would..What say you, yes or no?
Your own words: “You people have declared war on conservatives. Clearly you‘re not trying to change my mind about Ron Paul or you wouldn’t insult me in every one of your posts that I read.”
I asked why you issue insults. I ask you not to complain about Paul supporters comments and then issue insults yourself. Said nothing about “name calling”. FACT, needless to say your words saying “Just like in your post libertarians are short on fact and thought and long on insults” is factLESS….
Ron Paul is not a 9/11 truther. Saying so doesn’t make it true.
Legalized Drugs: I can‘t speak for all Libertarians but Ron Paul for sure doesn’t want to “legalize” it. Ron Paul is for the States to decide, not the Federal Government. Giving the Federal Government that much control ends up with Federal Government telling us we can’t eat salt or fast food.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 11:18pm@BillOfRights
Israel: Less war because right now the Muslims know the USA has been, for decades, holding Israel back. The USA has been for years trying to dictate to Israel how Israel should conduct herself. Israel has a superior army to all Arab nations put together. The only reason Israel does not have more land nor beat back the aggression of Arabs is because of the US scolding her each time she does. Ron Paul would stop telling Israel what to do. Ron Paul would be Israel’s friend, not dictator or czar as we have had.
If Israel says they do not want our soldiers fighting for Israel nor do they want USA aid, which both has been said and also goes with Israel’s motto of Self Reliance and Independence, why do you think the USA knows better than Israel over what’s best for Israel? Aren’t you saying “we” know better than Israel and isn’t that a tad anti-Semitic? Do you think “we” know better than Israel? I do not.
I think we could be best friends with Israel if we stop defending tyrannical Muslim nations like Saudi Arabia and stop giving aid to the same groups, don’t you?
Depend upon yourself to retain your freedom and do so by voting Ron Paul for President.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 11:20pmBillofrights
Report Post »“Join the Revolution” Im talking the “Ron Paul Revolution.” Im a little to old to be fight wars. As to the name calling and insults, Its on both side here at the Blaze. So there is lots of blame to go around. But im sure we will band together against ob in the end. Let the libs think different.
Merry Christmas
YepImaConservative
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 8:39amRon Paul encourages “truther” conspiracy nuts: Even though Ron Paul admits that he does not believe in a 9/11 government conspiracy, he has been flirting with the wackjobs in the “truther movement,“ like Alex Jones and the ”Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth.” Republican politicians should either ignore people like them or set them straight, not lend credence to their bizarre conspiracy theories by acting as if they may have some merit, which is what Ron Paul has done.
Just like Ron Paul says he not a racist, bigot, anti-semite or Holocaust denier, but you can’t spend 30 years in with all these folks hovering around your campaigns without red flags going up. I think Ron Paul is a coward. Ron Paul knows full well that his closest connections are a mixed bag of the most extremist sort of anarcho-capitalists ever seen. He refuses to engage these subjects personally… he has to be put on the spot to get answers and his answers are lame at best. He sits on the sidelines, collecting millions in campaign contributions as a candidate but is never asked to separate himself from his lunatic friends. It is appalling. Ron Paul is responsible for his associations.
Ron Paul is a panderer to the fringe elements in our society and that fringe loves and supports Ron Paul. He even has kind words for a treasonous POS like Bradley Manning, the gay Army Private who provided secrets to WikiLeaks. What support is he pandering for there… gays and the treasonous?
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 9:15amYepima
Report Post »Did you stay up all night typing that with Santa? I have to say you sure are a dedicated Paul Hater.
Merry Christmas
KTsayz
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 9:24pm@Bil Could you please tell us what your definition of ‘conservative’ is? When I look at the legislation the so-called conservatives are passing, I see them as nothing more than progressives. Tell me how building FEMA camps (authorized in the Military Commissions Act) and legislating away our 2nd (about to be done), 4th (TSA) 5th, 6th and 8th Amendment rights are ‘conservative’?
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:16pmTHANK YOU BLAZE! There IS a Santy Claus… MORE Ron Paul !!
To me it’s like saying MORE “PORK” SAUSAGES MA’ !!!
Heh-heh-heh…. er, sorry, Ho-ho-ho!!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:19pm@yepimatroll,
Report Post »You defend the middle east more than the U.S, are you sure you can eat pork?
I thought muhammed told you no oink oink.
jackwrench
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:26pm^
Report Post »^^^
^^^^^
|
|
|
NeoCon!
c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:38pm@yepimgoingtoendupapaulist
Report Post »Just when you think it cant get any better. Just got to love it!
This thing cant be stopped now.
“Ron Paul Revolution”
YepImaConservative
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:42pm> TRUTH. Awww, nevermind!
It’s Christmas Eve and I refuse to help you embarrass yourself any longer. PLEASE take COMMON and OPIE’S advice and PLEASE ignore me, lol.
Plus, I have to go soon. BIG PARTY at the BEACH!
Wish you could be here, but they don’t allow Noobs near the grownups after 7p. You’re stuck with the other friends of Paul at the kiddie table far from us…. about 5 miles. Ha!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:50pm> WRENCH. Merry Christmas to you and your art work. Learn that a Ron Paul summer camp? Lol.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:58pmMERRY CHRISTMAS COMMON ! I‘ll be lookin’ for ya’ at the festivities here. You’ll be the one wearing the powdered wig, with the gunpowder burn on yur’ arse right?
I’ll toss you the keys… put my car in safe place okay? No messin’ around this time.
Have a Happy!
Report Post »jackwrench
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:04pm@YEPI
Merry Christmas to you and yours it’s been a hoot at the blaze.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:39pm@yepimatroll,
Report Post »merry Christmas to you too! just remember at your “party” to wear protection, You don’t need anymore diseases!
Jefferson
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:21pm@ TheTruth
Report Post »I think you meant to warn the others to “wear protection.” Yep is just the one who was hired to pop out of a cake and bend over.
He makes a pretty good living between welfare checks, and being the….ehem….life of the party.
You know how Ohmamma and his “boys” roll. Yep’s probably wearing something sassy for him tonight.
West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:11pmHey Yep, I can see you are getting more frightened all the time, but I will let bygones be bygones and wish you and your family a very merry Christmas.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:11pmThe Clinton news network doing what they do,they’re just a mouthpiece for the Marxist in chief and every dem president in the future.He answered the idiot’s question and she kept pressing,she wanted to irritate him and have him explode,see how unstable he is. Come on Rep.Paul mop the floor of these candyass RINOS and progressives who are afraid of their own shadow.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 9:49amDid Dr Pork Paul send out racist Christmas cards? (just wondering) Here are some of Dr Small Government’s 2011 earmarks
Report Post »$3 million to test imported shrimp for antibiotics. (Does anyone think there is a big shrimp industry
$8 million for the marketing of wild American shrimp.
$2.3 million for shrimp fishing research.
$4.5 million to study the effects of the health risks of vanadium.
$1.18 million asthma and pharma-dependent victims
$10 million to repair the Galveston railways causeway bridge.
A total of 400 million for **His** distract. Merry Christmas Galveston !
ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:09pmIs this the Blaze responding to an open challenge? Or a email campaign for truth? I don’t know, but I like it. The truth can not be denied. The rEVOLution can not be stopped. Ho Ho Ho Merry Christmas to All, Next year Ron Paul in the White House Elect.
Long live the Republic!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:14pmGood point dear, I think tgey are responding to the fact we have seen their bias on here as bad as the MSM and glenny boy was losing dollars quick, they are trying to stop the blood flow.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:45pmI sent both Buck and Madeleine an email, and I’ll guarantee there were a lot of people mad as well.
Report Post »ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 3:31am@ The Truth & Go Rhino
Take a look at Fox’s Christmas card. I guess we know what Fox thinks of all their faithful neocons.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/fox-news-zings-cnn-msnbc-holiday-card-just-164515834.htmley
@Every single anti Dr. Paul poster out there who spews the media trash against him,
All you sycophantic establishment types, keep pulling your sled, your masters will tell you where to go.
Merry Christmas to All, & to All a good night.
Report Post »ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 3:35amhere is the proper link:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/fox-news-zings-cnn-msnbc-holiday-card-just-164515834.html
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 11:22am@ ArmedPrincess
Report Post »If those Christmas cards couldn’t be more blatantly symbolic, I don’t know what could. Their little sleds being pulled by mindless sheep. Wow. Thank you for sharing that. Glad to have you as part of the restoration.
If these other “sheeple” don’t wake up in time, the blame will be on THEIR shoulders, not ours. Our conscience will be clear.
This is what it feels like sometimes posting on “The Blaze”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKExXjFAQz4
Enjoy, and Merry Christmas.
ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 4:46pm@Jefferson,
Your welcome, Thank you, & Merry Christmas Jefferson. The boldness of those cards shocked me. At first I couldn’t believe that they think they can get away with that, and now I can‘t believe they haven’t caused a real stir here at the blaze. I guess the best cages are the ones the sheep refuse to see. I wonder though if that masked sheep has been offered an executive position at Fox yet?
Long Live the Republic!
To quote Thomas Jefferson “I swear eternal hostility to all forms of tyranny over the minds of men.”(and women)
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 12:24am@ArmedPrincess
Report Post »“the best cages are the ones the sheep refuse to see”
Excellent point. Speaking of cages, this is a fascinating video that is only 13 minutes long, but goes a long way to explain these “cages” that you refer to. I highly recommend it, and would be curious if you had seen it already, since you made the “cage” reference.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A
It is an interesting perspective on how populations are indoctrinated, and then pitted against each other, to allow the few to keep control of the many.
Well worth the watch IMO.
Cheers.
ArmedPrincess
Posted on December 26, 2011 at 4:31pm@Jefferson,
Yes, in fact I have seen that video, and I am a fan of it. I think it is a great video to keep up on the blaze. Stefan Molyneux has the ability to bring things into layman’s terms for the general populace out there. Maybe it’s just the accent? Here is a link to one on his non-aggression theory. For those who have trouble grasping the non-interventionism ideal, this should only cause mild aneurism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLCEXtpTNYU&feature=relmfu
Cheers Jefferson, here’s to the red pill.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:03pmHas Paul ever apologized for the racist sounding newsletters? They were sent out in his name. He said he didn’t know about them. He made excuses for himself about the newsletters. But has he ever apologized for them? Has he ever looked into a camera and addressed the people that are offended be these letters and said, “I’m sorry that this was written in my newsletters”? Has he ever gone after the person who did write the offensive newsletters?
If he has, I have never heard of it. And his body language and manner when confronted with the subject shows uncomfortable guilt to me.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:12pmI don’t usually call names here but, just for you I shall
Report Post »Your a “P!ss Porr Loser”
Merry Christmas
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:12pmSpooky troll, YOU ALREADY know the facts about Ron Paul, This racist charge has been debunked with proof 100 DIFFERENT WAYS WITH PROOF, At this point you are wasting your last reamaining brain cells on being a “ polly parrot ” of the MSM and establishment clowns.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:22pm@c0mm0nsense
Why are you so upset? I merely asked a question. If you don’t know the answer, or you know the answer and don’t like the answer, then why do you act like Paul and get all ticked off.
Report Post »Seems to be a pattern here……………………….
Steelhead
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:25pmthat’s why so many at the Blaze support his past views- they like what his newsletters say
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:43pmHe’s said on Cavuto that he was negligent in ever letting it be written in his newsletter, on national TV. And the uncomfortable guilt that you see might be from him realizing that this was a set-up. It took him 4 minutes to see it, but he remarks at the end “I understand… eh… how the system works…”
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:49pmRationalman…I have 10K to give to you or anyone else that comes up with a video of Ron Paul saying ANYTHING racist. ANYTHING? NO? Crickets? Yes.
Maybe you should stop your stupid accusations and listen to the man. He is the ONLY Constitutionalist in the race. But if you want to live your life as a stinking Neocon, then you will have a Gingrinch, Rpomney, Bachman or Santorum,,,,Not a Constitutionalist in the bunch.
Stop the BS and return to the Constitution.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012
KewlBigDan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:58pm@RationalMan;
Exactly Why should Ron Paul apologize? For what has he done wrong that he needs to apologize?
He is a victim of Identity Theft.
Are you saying that people that are victims of Identity Theft should call all the businesses and apologize that a thief ran up huge credits card bills under their name without their knowledge?
RationalMan said “All Blaze people are stupid”…..Did you just say that RationalMan? I think you need to apologize to the Blaze readers now….even if I just made it up…I don’t hear you apologizing…that must mean admission of guilt…
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:59pm@Baddoggy
There is not a single “accusation” in my post. Only two questions. If you can’t answer them, then stop trolling and making yourself look like the typical ignorant Paulistinian.
Report Post »I’m embarrassed for you………………………….
KewlBigDan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:59pm@RationalMan;
Exactly Why should Ron Paul apologize? For what has he done wrong that he needs to apologize?
He is a victim of Identity Theft.
Are you saying that people that are victims of Identity Theft should call all the businesses and apologize that a thief ran up huge credits card bills under their name without their knowledge?
RationalMan said “All Blaze people are stu pid”…..Did you just say that RationalMan? I think you need to apologize to the Blaze readers now….even if I just made it up…I don’t hear you apologizing…that must mean admission of guilt…
Report Post »KewlBigDan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:15pmgood grief, now I went and said it twice.
I apologize for the Blaze doing that under my name.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:17pmSNAP! $10k, Money talks, ******** walks. If you have no proof of guilt of Dr. Paul’s racism lace up your shoes and get to it.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:18pm@KewlBigDan
Not all “Blaze people”, just you, as I am now posting it.
Paul’s first excuse when these original allegations came to light back during Ron Paul’s 1996 Congressional run, his defense was absolutely not that he didn’t write them or know what was in them; his defense was that he was being taken out of context. He defended the comments on their merits. His campaign spokesman literally said that the problem was that the media was too intellectual to understand them. Yes, well, admittedly some people miss the intellectual nuance in statements like “If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet of foot they can be” (a statement which Paul specifically defended when questioned by the media).
Apparently, Paul did not change his story on these newsletters until 2001, when he started to tell people that maybe the racist remarks in his newsletter were not okay and he in fact did not write them. When asked why he did not just say that in the first place, Paul responded that he felt like he had a “moral responsibility” for these words since they were published in his name (and presumably since he profited from them). Suppose we believe this story – what has happened since then to change that?
So back to my original post, “Has Paul ever apologized?”, and “Did he ever go after the one who wrote the offensive newsletters?”
Report Post »Or is he just going to keep changing his story which just instigates and fuels these
Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:29pm@Rational: Seriously, I’m looking for video or audio of comments from the man himself. Dude, it’s $10k! Time is wasting and if I find something first Bad pays me. I’d hate to sink Dr. Paul, but $10k is $10k.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:45pmDr. Paul was a practicing physician when that was written in his newsletters. He said he had a moral responsibility for them and apologized for not watching more carefully.
Ok?
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:16pmTo date Paul wont answer the question “who wrote the newsletters” Until he does this isn’t going away. And nothing has been debunked ..the racist letters are real. If he cant manage a simple newsletter with his name on the banner what make you think he could run a country? Just like Holder should he get a pass because he is saying he didn’t read the memo?
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:23pmRational…Why try to defend something that did NOT happen? You are a Neocon idiot. Brainwashed by the Progressive Republicans. I feel bad for you. Returning to the Constitution would probably kill you because you couldn’t get your Government check.
Rational man my a@@…you are a fool.
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:45pmTypical neo-con/progressive – playing the race card.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:52pmWell, instead of name-calling, I’ll give you this; the likely theory is that it was Murray Rothbard or Lew Rockwell. Rothbard, like in the newsletter, praised David Duke, and both of them were “scientific racialists”. While I detest Lew Rockwell, and chances are it was one of them.
I think the point is, that if someone was killed with a Smith&Wesson revolver, you don’t go and interview the president of Smith&Wesson.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:57pmBaddoggy
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:23pm
Rational…Why try to defend something that did NOT happen?
Even your cult leader says it happened. He talks about the letters every time he is forced to. Paul has never denied the letters were sent out. He can’t. But you do?
So who is the fool here?…… You or me?
Thats not just foolish. Thats delusional!
I merely asked, (since Paul took, “moral responsibility”, for the letters), “Has Paul ever apologized for the racist sounding newsletters?”
Report Post »To me, anything less is insincere.
Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:02pm@Go-rin-no-sho
If S&W sanctioned it you do!
Report Post »DOCCONSTANT
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:05pm@Rational Man
You always post such contentious things about Paul and so naturally, being a Paul supporter, we disagree. I always took you for a troll or a 95 year old crusty curmudgeon sourpuss. Maybe it’s just the Christmas spirit but I suddenly realized that you need a hug. I all of the sudden feel like Bob Cratchit smiling upon Ebenezer as Scrooge complains about the good in the world. I have faith in you Rationalman. I suddenly don’t think you are mean to the core like I used too.
Merry Christmas to you and yours and have a Happy New Year.
Report Post »Think It Thru
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:01pmIf only they’d be as persistent with Eric Holder or Obama and actually ask, and then ask a follow up, about Fast & Furious.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:07pmNever gonna happen with either Obama or Holder, the great deniers and liars. The Democratic Communist propagandists of CNN have to make the opposition look like they are out of control and dangerous as would be leaders of the nation. Wait until the next years election campaign once the candidates are known finally on all sides; then the jaws of the abyss will flow forth with destruction.
Report Post »Loose-Cannon
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:09pmBingo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »KewlBigDan
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:17pmThere was no followup question. It was just the same question again…and again…and again.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:33pmGive Eric Holder some slack, He didn’t read the memo……just like Paul.
Report Post »Ron Paul / Eric Holder 2012
c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:00pmThis is the reason I have been saying this is the best thing that can be happening to the Dr. We couldn’t have asked for a better Christmas Present. Then Trump going independent and Newt (smartest man in the room) jumping on the wagon with these news letters. On top of it all Bachmann, Santorum, Huntsman, Perry and Newt cant even get on the Ballot in VA. The Revolution is alive.
Report Post »Merry Christmas Everyone.
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:04pmI’m beginning to think your right this was good for us.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:06pmLol Brother I was thinking the same thing. Its between The good Dr. Paul and Mitt now. All we have to do is show the record of Mitt, and keep telling everyone how Paul has always been the defender of the Constitution. And a champion of Liberty.
Merry Christmas to the world.
Report Post »sheerterror
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:37pmRon Paul 2012!!!
Report Post »Merry Christmas to all
Baddoggy
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:52pmAll I want for Christmas is…
Report Post »Ron Paul as my President in 2012
Churchill
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:46pmRon Paul 2012!!
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 4:11pmYou would think, for the GOP who have had such kind words and understanding for the Tea Party, that they’d be more receptive to our ideas.
Report Post »Wakeup Maggie
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:57pmCNN cannot be trusted…and their graphics blow rhino chunks
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:48pmWell, I hate to burst your bubble, but Fox News is biased as well. Want me to show you some of THEIR tape editing? Disgusting to say the least. They aired an announcement of Dr. Paul winning a straw poll bit lots of boooooos. The ORIGINAL, real tape had so much cheering the announcer had to stop before he could finish the sentence. Several YouTubes of it if you want to check it out for yourself.
Report Post »Wilma
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:57pmIs the link for the entire interview missing from the story?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:06pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0
Report Post »LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:12pmWe all know that CNN is a joke and has no credibility whatsoever.
Report Post »Jenny Lind
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:55pmI’m not a big fan of Paul, but the way they harped at him after he answered was insulting and he had every right to give up and say the heck with it. There are no manners anymore with reporters, just badger and badger until they tick them off enough to do or say something they can exploit or spin. I don’t watch much news for tis very reason. It goes for BOTH sides, too.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:07pmYou are right this is disgusting but they don’t do this to progressives..( clinton, bushies, romneycon,newtie) makes you wonder why doesn’t it…Who owns the major MSM again? Oh, that’s right progressives.
Report Post »Ssenkrad
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:49pm@Jenny Lind I completely agree; whether you like Paul or not, this interview was purely a way for CNN to try and badger Ron into saying something they could exploit. They do it with any candidate they don’t like; they ask loaded questions, perform stealth insults, or ask damned if you do damned if you don’t questions that will make the candidate look bad no matter what. It truly sickens me.
Report Post »cgbs6183
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:52pmHere is information about the Austin TX. NAACP President Defending Ron Paul
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1134-naacp-president-ron-paul-is-not-a-racist.html
You Tube of an African American Man defending Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1uc7×4a8SM
What this is, is one incident of poor management by Paul by allowing at the time about a half a dozen people write in his name for several newsletters not just one while he was practicing medicine and raising 5 kids. Do some research and you will find the one that was of particular interest to him was his newsletter on investments/financials/monetary policy. So was Paul negligent in this, yes, he admits that much and that he is morally responsible for that. However his entire life and belief system is predicated on individual liberty and freedom not racism which is a socialist collectivism mindset.
He has been asked this same question every election and he gives essentially the same answer. If Race baiting is all they have on Paul then they have nothing.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:50pmWhat, corruption in media? No way. Surely you jest!
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:49pmhmmmmmm
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:00pmAnd The Blaze jumped on the “edited version” with both feet, because they are as corrupt as the rest.
Report Post »Now they are just trying to save whatever tiny shred of credibility they have, since this unedited footage has been posted all over the web.
c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:04pmClara88
Report Post »Come Join “The Revolution” to the White House.
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:09pm@jefferson, my fellow American, I agree but some really good Patriots on here have began to speculate that Beck is a closeted Ron Paul supporter, What do you think?
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:22pmI’ll NEVER trust Beck after the hit job he did on Medina. She was the ONE TRUE non establishment candidate for Texas Governor, and GB set her up for Perry (who is a raging bisexual adulterer) I live in Austin, and have known of his escapades for years.
Perry had robo-calls going out within 30 minutes of the Beck radio interview with clips of Medina on them.
It was a calculated hit job, because Medina was climbing in the polls and had to be taken down.
So, no. I don’t trust him. He lost many 9/12 members here in Texas after that.
Report Post »behonest
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:05pmmedina was a 9/11 thruther too, also with Alex Jones and infowars. Back in the 2000′s they were always bashing bush every chance they got. Just because they are bashing Obama now doesn’t change my opionin of them. They had a horrible 9/11 video on you tube about 5 years ago it was so full of propaganda totally sick.
Report Post »And Jefferson saying
I’ll NEVER trust Beck after the hit job he did on Medina. She was the ONE TRUE non establishment candidate for Texas Governor, and GB set her up for Perry (who is a raging bisexual adulterer) I live in Austin, and have known of his escapades for years.
Well I don;t trust Alex Jones I have tried to listen but it is hard
Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 11:20pm@The Truth…: For whatever it’s worth, I don’t think Glenn is a Ron Paul supporter because of one simple issue, Israel. I respect Glenn’s perspective, but it puts him in an intellectual inconsistency. On the one hand Glenn is devout in his belief and support of a foreign nation, but at the same time he idealizes George Washington. Washington was very clear in his “Farewell Address” about entangling alliances with other nations.
Report Post »CultureWarriors
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:49pmSeriously, only a moron would watch CNN. They are NOT a news organization, they are a liberal propaganda outlet. They do NOT employ journalists. NO ONE at CNN can be considered a journalist. This is indisputable.
Report Post »Jefferson
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:12pmRiiiight. Only the SMART people watch Fox News.
When are people going to realize that Fox,CNN, and MSNBC are just 3 flavors of the same polarizing BS?
They used to be watchdogs, but now they are simply Corporate lapdogs. The talking heads get passed around like prostitutes from pimp to pimp. You see the same faces showing up on different networks. Once they are no longer pretty or convincing enough to fool and dazzle the American people, they are tossed out on the street like the “presstitutes” they are.
Over 55% of the American people no longer trust the MSM. (and for good reason)
Report Post »AmericanStrega
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:48pmI don’t like any of the candidates. I would like to see an average American become president and average Americans control our congress (with term limits and no life-long perks). I know that will never happen, so I’ll just have to hold my nose and vote for whatever the GOP gives us. I sure as corn will not vote for Obama or a democrat! Although I really don’t know why I should vote at all. If Obama loses there will be contrived riots in the big cities causing Obama to declare Marshal Law and that will be the end of the United States of America as we know it. Anyway, Merry Christmas all.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:16pmYou must be new around here, Ron Paul is WE THE PEOPLE!
Report Post »AmericanStrega
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:45pmNo, I’m not new around these Blaze parts. I’m an old AmericanStrega.
Report Post »Merry Christmas!
Veritas Libertas
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:08pmThat is an interesting perspective regarding civil unrest if President Obama isn’t re-elected. Frankly, I think Dr. Paul might be the only (R) candidate that could bridge that gap. I think Dr. Paul represents the real “change” for America that the black (hyphens create division figuratively and literally) community was hopeful for with Obama. It’s a chance to succeed, the freedom to achieve and I believe that’s what why Nelson Linder (NAACP Austin) came to Dr. Paul’s defense.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:43pm@American
Report Post »my apologies..merry Christmas.
Vegasdad702
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:47pmWow! Thank you Blaze! Thank you so much for being a credible news source I can always count on for the TRUTH!
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:23pmdon’t hold your breath..
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:45pmThe commie news network at its best
Report Post »LeeroyJenkins
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:45pmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMkvxyJnOmM&feature=g-u&context=G20bd1bdFUAAAAAAAAAA
Carl Gallups at the Daytona TEA party. Enjoy.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:41pmThank you Blaze for at least playing fair.
Report Post »David
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:39pmNot surprising that news organizations are realizing that Ron Paul stands against the big government that they want, so they will edit videos and smear him relentlessly until he gives up.
Never give up Ron.
Report Post »juneau
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:38pmNo mainstream media interview will make up or change my mind about the candidate I will vote for in the primary or general elections. It‘s about time we stop looking to news personalities to tell us how to vote and start researching each candidate’s record, history, etc. on our own. ANYTHING can be misconstrued, edited and slanted to fit someone‘s or some news corporation’s agenda. I’m especially disgusted by the recent talk about Ron Paul by conservative media, “If he wins Iowa, then something’s wrong with the Iowa caucus,“ or ”All Ron Paul supporters are as nuts as him, and he’s dangerous.” Well, I‘m on the fence about who’s my favorite, but I’ve got to tell you, I don’t want to hear another word about nation-building or foreign financial aid until OUR country is back on track fiscally.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:29pmMy fellow American, this “system” of stacking the deck with progressive canidates and demonizing the Canidate that follows the Constitution has been going on for well over 60 years, WE THE PEOPLE have the right to vote for who WE WANT, Not just the next painted pony rove and the old gaurd trot out andvdemand we vote for them…I want this Country fixed, No more trillions wasted on endless wars for profit! Ron Paul for me !
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 7:53pmNation building, spreading democracy, being the worlds policemen, foreign aid etc. is NOT Conservatism. That’s a progressive foreign policy!! Why should my taxes go to protect Europe just because they’d rather spend their own money trying to create some socialist utopia?
Ron Paul 2012!!
Report Post »texanpatriot
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:37pmI don’t watch CNN, I don’t care about their yellow journalism, and I would not believe a story by them if I was present when it was taped (and of course would not know that they published it).
Where is the story in this? Maybe over on PMSNBC this is a story but it don’t watch them either…
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:36pmAll this poll will show us, is how many Paulistinians are voting.
Report Post »texanpatriot
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:38pmYou are a RATIONAL MAN!!!
Report Post »juneau
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:43pmSorry, untrue. I had not given Ron Paul a second look until recently. Please do not do as media personalities do and paint all Ron Paul supporters with the same brush. It’s just not true anymore. It reminds me of pro-choice women who try to paint all pro-life women as abused, frigid and uneducated. It’s just not true, but they just can’t believe it.
Report Post »WAKEUPUSA2012
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 4:45pmHmm I bet you are one of those guys who said there is no way Ron Paul will ever take a state let alone win the nomination. If you are one of those guys, I have a suggestion. Quit listening to the main stream media. Quit listening to Rush, Sean, Mark. They are statist who carry the water for the republicans. If you wanna know what real for the better type change is. Get us out of this mess type change. Look at Paul. The people are starting to see that. Out with the old (that got us into this mess) in with the new!
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »(cause we cant have another neocon or liberal in the white house)
Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:06pmI think this reply to one of my other posts is worth re-posting.
Pendragon
Report Post »Posted on December 24, 2011 at 6:41am
I simply find it amazing that if you read the Newsletters, They contain possessive statements of” I’ve“ ” I did“ ”In My Practice as a Doctor” All Possessive of Authorship, and then the racists rants through out accusing African American and Jewish Races of theft and robbery and even Suggesting exclusively that Mossad, From Israel bombed the World Trade Centre in 1993…Even after it was established it was Bin Laden and his group… Then at the end it is signed “Ron Paul” ok Give him a Pass maybe but then we find Him Posing with Ron Black of the Nazi Group Storm Front here http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt116/FredWitzell/RonPaulDonBlackDerekBlack-1.jpg
and Randy Gray His Campaign organizer for Michigan and a Grand Wizard for the KKK Here http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_BLlJwLdIRpk/SRUp0MhMayI/AAAAAAAAA7U/NTya74WmcC4/s400/Gray+With+Paul.jpg
And Here http://www.realcourage.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/gray-schoep-wickstrom.jpg
So Strike 1 Newsletters written in the Possessive, Storm Front and Don Black Party and posing, Strike 2 and then Randy Gray his Campaign Organizer and Grand Wizard of the KKK Strike 3 you are out.. it is not just 20 years ago it is a pattern all the way up to current time… It is his way of life as he lives it in the course of associating with them.
Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:09pm@juneau
By definition, a new recruit is still a Paulistinian.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:18pm@WAKEUPUSA2012
“Hmm I bet you are one of those guys who said there is no way Ron Paul will ever take a state let alone win the nomination.”
Nope! I’m the one who said that Paul, in all his presidential bids, has never won a single electorial vote in 23yrs.
And quit assuming that you know who I listen to or how I came to the conclusion that Paul and his cult are nuts and this country would be better off without them.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 5:37pm@junea,
Report Post »Have you seen the video of Ron Paul in Iowa at a campain event, His supporters are not just college kids like the msm liars have said, but there many Americans that have woken up to the message of getting back to the Constitution and what made this Country great to start with! You are not alone, there are many that are disenchanted with the establishment in both parties that only destroy us from the inside out, It is time for a real change! One without the same ilk that have gotten us into this mess.
Mr. Oshawott
Posted on December 24, 2011 at 8:00pmIf race-baiting is all that the media establishment have left to attack Ron Paul, they’re really sending themselves deeper into the abyss. They know all too well that the status quo is about to suffer its beginning of its end, so their going to exercise all of their efforts to smear Dr. Paul. But their vile actions will be for naught as more and more people are having a look at his three-decade voting record showing his adherence to the Constitution and his policies of limited government and personal freedom. It’s Ron Paul 2012 or bust!
And since Christmas is tomorrow, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to all! :-)
Report Post »foobear
Posted on December 25, 2011 at 4:05pmI’m probably not going to vote for Paul, but I at least picked up on the story that CNN faked this interview and posted it several times in the last comments threads.
Report Post »