Utah Mall Accused of Kicking Out Customers for ‘Looking Too Gay’ & Having Visible Tattoos
- Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:00pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
The City Creek Center in Salt Lake City, Utah, is coming under fire amid reports that its staff has been kicking shoppers out for “looking too gay,” holding hands or having visible tattoos. The mall, which has only been open for one month, has allegedly been hit with numerous complaints over what some see as over-the-top rules and regulations. But shopping center executives are denying the charges levied against them.
One man took to Facebook, where the Daily Mail claims he complained that he was harassed by shopping center security guards for wearing women’s clothing. According to ABC 4, the man wrote, “I was in heels and my makeup was fierce. And they kick me out for looking too gay.”
Dallon Thorup, another individual who has frequented the mall, claims that mall cops spoke to him about his tattoo, a Chinese symbol on his upper arm.
“I got approached by someone that asked do you mind covering up?,” Thorup claimed in an interview with ABC4. “I laughed, and asked why, and he said, ‘Some people might find your tattoo offensive.’”
But managers for the City Creek Center are denying that this alleged treatment would be permissible based on the company’s code of conduct. Director of Marketing Dee Brewer says that holding hands, kissing and showing tattoos would not draw the attention of security officials.
“Any activity or conduct, which is detrimental to or inconsistent with a first-class, family oriented shopping center is prohibited,” reads the company’s code of conduct.

Image Credit: ShopCityCreekCenter.com
Some are blaming these alleged incidents on The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as ABC4 reports that various individuals believe the church is enforcing the overtly-strict rules. Property Reserve, Inc., the commercial real estate arm of LDS, joined with Taubman Centers Inc., another real estate company, in launching the shopping center. Taubman has denied that the church is involved in City Creek’s rule-making.
And as the ABC4 report noted in its video report, many have said that they have never encountered any odd situations or bizarre interactions with mall security.
Now, it’s important to note: If there is any truth to these allegations, it’s entirely possible — even likely — that individual security guards could be implementing policies based on their own personal views. This, of course, is not a charge that such actions are taking place. But it’s certainly worth noting the possibility.
(H/T: Daily Mail)



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (186)
SREGN
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:22pmDon’t like it? Don’t be gay, Sparky.
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:50pm@SREGN
That’s like telling someone, “If you don’t want to be racially profiled, don’t be black.” You are an absurd individual.
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:10pm“Utah Mall Accused of Kicking Out Customers ‘for Looking too Gay’ & Having Visible Tattoos”
Excellent. When will schools and the military do the same?
Report Post »The_Jerk
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:22pmDoes the military have queer gear for its new recruits? Can staff sergeants still use the Queers and Steers line in boot?
Report Post »YAHSHUARULES
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:30pmTo correct my post link was not complete sorry about that:
Report Post »http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/08a/born_gay_hoax/TheBornGayHoax.pdf
mymissusisanutter
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:47pmSo much for what Jesus said.
Report Post »But I say to you, love your enemies and bless the one who curses you, and do what is beautiful to the one who hates you, and pray over those who take you by force and persecute you. ~Matthew 5:44
johnjamison
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:55pmI all fairness anyone saddled with the name sparky has an 89% chance of being gay.
Report Post »But you gotta love the early south parks.
johnjamison
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:04pmBut I say to you, love your enemies and bless the one who curses you, and do what is beautiful to the one who hates you, and pray over those who take you by force and persecute you. ~Matthew 5:44
Report Post »Tried that and just like everything else what one generation tolerates the next is expected to embrace and one after that is expected to celebrate it.
Not going to work in a society of free people like it did with those dumba55e5 in Europe or South America. No in free society it only take one public counter voice to the main stream media to buck the system. And thus halt the gay lifestyle to what it should be tolerated but not accepted or embraced.
FROTHYDISCHARGE
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:01pmVanceUppercut Your argument is that of a 2 yr old. Believe it our not there are some of us wold like to take our family to a place and not have to see the drudges of society, including guys trying to get attention. If you black hear no fear go to the mall but if you want go gansta stay home or go to white castle. You have not right to being in the mail . go home and play d&d in the basement
Report Post »Tex Expatriate
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:05pmFor Vanceuppeercut, it is not the same thing at all. I’d say you are absurd. The mall has the right to require any mode of dress they choose.
Report Post »filiusdracul
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:17pm@VANCEUPPERCUT
Really, do I have to explain the difference between identity and behavior again? I‘ll give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you’re just acting like a ******.
Report Post »Gladius_Doctorae
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 9:14pm@vanceupthebutt
No, you can take off a dress, you cant take off skin color you idiot
Report Post »B_rad
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 9:26pmCan you stop being straight, SREGN? If you really believe all gay people make a decision to be so, you are out of your very small mind.
This mall, like any private business, should be allowed to set whatever standards they like, and then reap the consequences -or rewards. Free market. If someone doesn’t like it, they can shop elsewhere. If enough people don’t like it, the business will change or cease to be. It is that simple.
The problem with the entitlement mentality we’ve cultivated, is that people will start mobs and protests over this kind of thing instead of merely choosing to not do business with them, and just being politely vocal about their decision.
As far as attire, it seems like most people these days, gay or straight, don’t know how to dress appropriately for being in public. I never cease to be amazed at mothers towing their 12 year old daughter around who has “Juicy” writ across her rump, or of all the girls with a muffin top wearing midriffs. Really classy, people, really classy.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:43pmThis sounds like the work of the same group that protested the LDS church by having same sex heavy petting and kissing in the park owned by the church in front of the LDS temple.
Report Post »do_it_all_again
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 10:48pmfinally,, a decent place to shop
Report Post »manphin
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:48pm… you guys are group-thinking. That is why everyone hates Utah, its because of all the bigots who feed off of each other, and only bear to listen to each other ideas.
Did anyone note that the guy with the Chinese symbol tattoo just said that some guy came up to him, he didn’t say a security guard.
While I don’t agree with homosexuality, the gays choose it to be a lifestyle. Don’t be such a bigot.
Report Post »Constantine Ivanov
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 11:53pm@VANCEUPPERCUT:
“That’s like telling someone, “If you don’t want to be racially profiled, don’t be black”” you said.
No.
It’s like telling someone: “If you don’t want to be racially profiled, behave properly and make your brothers do the same. Then nobody will have any motive to profile you.”
I dare recommend you to take a look at statistics of crime: in which racial groups is the crime rate higher?
And statistics of terrorist acts – in which racial groups is the terrorist activity rate higher?
And statistics of illegal immigration – in which ethnic groups is the illegal immigration rate higher?
If you are honest and decent person, you would agree that profiling doesn’t occur for no particular reason…
Report Post »USA-Ron
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 10:42amwhoever you are, just keep your sexual preference private, out of the public.
Report Post »Windwalker
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:02am@johnjamison
“what one generation tolerates, the next is expected to embrace and one after that is expected to celebrate it”. I have taken note of that. In so few words, it sums up actual truth. Don’t know if you originated it, but it is a profound statement.
Lewd behavior of any kind should not have to be tolerated in and viewed in public places. It is displayed by heterosexuals and homosexuals alike. That means adults urinating/defecating in public, sexually groping each other, topless women, etc. Copulating in a public park is no different either.
People use the scriptures admonishment to love our enemies and twist it to mean love with broad brush, and accept whatever they do as acceptable. We are to love the sinners soul, not their habits. Witness Jesus conversation with the woman at the well. He did not condemn her and did not excuse those who did condemn her for being immoral. But, when she departed, he stated to her “go and sin no more” .
Report Post »Windwalker
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:15am@manphin
For a state that everyone hates, they are seeing a tremendous amount of population influx. I would never live there, but many are moving there. There was a recent article that of all 50 states, Utah is experiencing the most dramatic increase of gay/lesbian citizenry. Not San Francisco, not Atlanta. Also, Utah has been very sympathetic to illegal aliens…..what an odd pair to draw to and I don’t think Mormons play cards.
Report Post »Non-regulator
Posted on April 16, 2012 at 6:20am@vanceuppercut
So you will be for queer reparations in 300 years? Don’t be gay dude.
Report Post »ShyMan
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:19pmKeep the perverts out. Good for them.
Report Post »spirited
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:19pmNo shoes
No shirt
No Service
No Smoking
No Loitering
>No Nonsense
Report Post »Wringeaux
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:35pmNo PDA
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:17pmI smell Axlerod in this…..
Report Post »spirited
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:24pm–what a visual.
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:13pmThe RIGHT will be SILENT NO MORE.
Keep your GAY stuff to yourself.
Go ahead and BE gay all you want but SHUT THE HELL UP about it.
If you want to try and shove your GAY stuff down my throat – by VERBAL or NON VERBAL means – then EXPECT IT IN RETURN.
So if you DON’T want ME to shove MY “One Man – One Woman” marriage stuff or No Tattoos and combed hair stuff down YOUR throat – then stop trying to shove it down mine.
Have some integrity for Chrissake
Report Post »MammalOne
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:36pmI’m not even going to make a joke about the “shove your GAY stuff down my throat” comment… Too much.
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:51pm@Eric_The_Red_State
Are a man and a woman holding hands in public “shoving a straight agenda” down anyone’s throats? No, you say? The why should a two men or two women holding hands in public be considered as such?
Report Post »Sickofthebull2012
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:28pmOkay, I can understand not wanting to be around cross-dressers, they can make most people feel very uncomfortable. But…. I am a straight, conservative, married, Catholic, combat veteran of 17 years of service, and I happen to have tattoos covering my arms. Tattoos have long been a tradition of military members. So under HALF of your argument, you don’t think veterans should go shopping or otherwise out in public without covering up thier tattoos?? Hmmm, and I bet you would claim to love the military. Yeah, you‘re so holy aren’t you.
Report Post »Gladius_Doctorae
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 9:21pm@vanceupthebutt
“Are a man and a woman holding hands in public “shoving a straight agenda” down anyone’s throats? No, you say? The why should a two men or two women holding hands in public be considered as such?”
Why? you query. Because its normal, the pieces fit with a man and woman. Nothing is normal about a man finding another mans hairy sweaty @$$hole appealing.
Report Post »Aunt Diana
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 12:18pmBravo! I’ve been saying this for years. When I saw my first (and last, by choice) gay parade about 40 years ago I thought I would get sick to my stomach. It seems that most of the participants were actually exhibitionists…and that is what is offensive. I don’t care about anyones sexuality or sexual preferences but PLEASE have the decency and kindness to keep it to yourself.
Report Post »There is no need for the rest of us to have to witness your depravities.
But, the nature of the movement is not to respect any one else’s sense of fairness….they seem to prefer to use a bullying tactic to embarass straight people into some kind of awareness, when who really cares. No one but the exhibitionist.
PIL
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 7:20pmTo the guy defending tattoos, I hate to break it to you:
“Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.”
Lev. 19:28
Now how about we all try to be a little more tolerant and mind our own business? I have my own prejudices, I’m not crazy about interracial dating, I don’t like people who wear body piercings, and I HATE seeing women in burkas. But unless someone is making a scene as in shouting, screaming, attacking people, I don’t give a crap.
P.S. The military itself regulates tattoos:
“The Army has revised its policy on tattoos in an effort to bolster recruitment of highly-qualified individuals who might otherwise have been excluded from joining.
Tattoos are now permitted on the hands and back of the neck if they are not “extremist, indecent, sexist or racist.” Army Regulation 670-1, which was modified via a message released Jan. 25, also now specifies: “Any tattoo or brand anywhere on the head or face is prohibited except for permanent make-up.”
For women, allowable make-up would be permanent eye-liner, eyebrows and makeup applied to fill in lips, officials said. They said permanent make-up should be conservative and complement the uniform and complexion in both style and color and will not be trendy.”
Report Post »Source: http://usmilitary.about.com/od/army/a/tattoopolicy.htm
Windwalker
Posted on April 15, 2012 at 11:05am@ pil
Thank you.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:08pmI would hope that a mentally disabled man who dresses up in women’s clothing and wears makeup would be escorted out of ANY family gathering and shopping area.
I know where I’m going shopping if I ever go to Utah!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:17pmoops – I meant “mentally disturbed” – but its probably a technicality anyway. HIS makeup was “fierce”?? LOL
Report Post »SingerGuy
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:15pmBy late fall you can take a 10 minute light rail trip from the airport and be at this mall. If you’ve got a two hour layover, or longer, downtown SLC will soon be within easy reach for the traveler. I’m glad the mall owners want to keep the place respectable (although I completely doubt the validity of this story). I‘m there at least once a week and I’d like for this to not turn into the homeless and teenage hangout. It should be a nice tourist attraction. That’s what the property owners built it for.
Report Post »morgill
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:56pmI’ve been to that mall and it is absolutely beautiful! My brother in law even worked construction on that job for awhile. If the LDS Church wants to impose rules for shopping there, GREAT! If people have a problem with it, they can go elsewhere. It’s a free country.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:02pmThis is obviously an attempt by the DNC to paint a negative picture of mormons in a roundabout way.
Report Post »That’s how progressivism work.
troymac20
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:21pmSeems whoever runs the mall should have the right to enforce a dress code if they want. Just like stores with the no shirts no shoes no service.
Report Post »Daveed
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:55pmI doubt that the Mall harassed any one. They want people’s money. Money has no ethnic or gender, it is money. I want to go to a Mall that respects families and has standards. I don’t want my grandchildren to see people making out, even if they are not in drag. Yuk Why do they continue to try and turn America into a Wymar Republic? Morals never go out of fashion, knowing your Nation’s true history never goes out of fashion. There is a war going on, it is against mankind. Obama likes to dogmatically undermine, destablize, cause discord, division and disunity among Americans by declaring wars on every faction of our Republic, whether it is socially, economically, in Religion, Race, Science, Judicial, Education, Business, Muslim Communist demokrat/repubiKrat death care plan and that is not very nice is it?
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:48pmIf you are gay,you should not live in Utah.
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:00pmPlease this obviously an attempt at attacking mormons because guess who is running against Obama.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:25pm@John….I don’t think so….see REDBARON’s post below.
Report Post »MammalOne
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:37pmIn all fairness, no one should really live in Utah. Even the mormons went there as a last resort…
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:44pmOne man took to Facebook, where the Daily Mail claims he complained that he was harassed by shopping center security guards for wearing women’s clothing. According to ABC 4, the man wrote, “I was in heels and my makeup was fierce. And they kick me out for looking too gay.”
Hey dude, you are wearing a dress and heels with makeup? Duh, you are gay.
If the security officers stepped out of line against mall policy then reprimand them. If no such occurrence happened, then shame on the liars. Since you don’t adhere to the word of God, I know “bearing false witness” would not mean anything to you.
Frankly, I would have left them alone and let them make a spectacle of themselves, explaining to my children that this is what happens when you do not have God in your life and are driven by Satan.
Report Post »ACLUHater
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:49pm“I was in heels and my makeup was fierce”
Duh. Creep.
This is a made-up story to try to paint Mormons as bad. Can you say Axlerod?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:06pmAre Most/All crossdressers gay? A man dressing as a woman,, looking to attract a woman dressing as a man or a man dressing as a woman hoping to attract another woman or a man dressing as a woman hoping to attract a man dressing as a woman, hoping for a , ah, eh, I’m so confused.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:16pm@acluhater…..If this was an attempt to make the LDS Church look bad….it failed.
Report Post »busterpuddles
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:41pm- We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.- Words of wisdow for business. I applaud those people implementing this policy.
@ OLDGUY49 – Exactly! “No speeky Spanny. Eengleesh, yes?”
Report Post »redbaron13
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:38pmYou need to understand the history of this area. LOTS of people who hate the LDS church make it a point to come to this area around temple square and the church headquarters to demonstrate. They do everything they can to cause a scene and draw attention to themselves. For example, many gay couples have gone into temple square, which is privately owned LDS church property, and make a scene hugging and kissing, all because they know it will set off the security because that is not allowed on the church’s private property. The point is for them to make a scene and cause disruption, (and get on the nightly news). So, since we know the intentions of many gay people in SLC, is it any surprise that they would try to get attention in the new mall that they LDS church has a stake in? ANYTHING to get attention and make the church look bad. Welcome back to Jr High folks!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:34pmYeah, I remember going to general conference growing up and the gay demonstrators outside making a scene… I also remember those “true christians” (at least thats what their protest signs stated) as they used to tie a Book of Mormon to a string and drag it around on the ground challenging people to take it from them – again, obviously trying to make a scene and hoping someone will do something stupid so they can get on the news.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:25pm.
Dear Blaze,
Please will ya’ll stop with the Gay This & Gay That stories. I’m so sick of this Gay Trash, everywhere I turn someone is trying to force their Gay Lifestyle on me. Hell you can’t turn on the TV anymore without some butt bumper ruining the whole show…….
Take your Gay Pride Self back to the shadows where Preverted Freaks belong. Oh and take Obama with you………
Report Post »redbaron13
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:41pmAmen brother!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:03pmI do love your candor.
Report Post »spirited
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:23pm8>spank you
Report Post »scruffycat
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 3:54pmYeah and the Huffington Post too, hide that huffpo salami where the sun don’t shine on the way out.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:46pmPack that Hillary Rosen away too.
Report Post »macpappy
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:22pmLeave it to theblaze to give us the lefts talking points on a daily basis.
Report Post »pmbrsf
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:25pmBe careful Utah. They are out to get you – I once lived in New York City. I came from California wearing a little gold cross on my neck. My new “friends” tore it off my neck and made fun of me. Atheists are lots of fun you know. Just a blast a minute. They like to kick dogs too. Be careful -
Report Post »iblvingd
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:07pmYeah… here‘s the HuffPO’s version of the mall. Biased as usual.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/22/city-creek-mormon-mall_n_1372695.html#s806024&title=City_Creeks_waterfall
Report Post »Git-R-Done
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:41pmThe radical atheists tend to be even less tolerant and more fundamental towards anybody who doesn’t think like they do than the fundamentalist Christians.
Report Post »YellowFin
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:22pmBusiness’ can and do post signs saying “no shirt – no service“ or ”shoes required”.
The Mall can post signs indicating the requirements to enter their business mall. If the customer does not want to comply, then they can go somewhere else to buy their shoes.
Report Post »Blacktooth
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:41pmA business does have the right to require a dress and conduct code of its customers. This limits their customer base but they do have the right to select their customers. And customers have the right to support or ignore a certain business if they choose to do so.
It is called, freedom to choose. Do we want to stamp out this freedom?
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:50pm@Blacktooth…Yep. It’s that simple.
Report Post »pmbrsf
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:21pmI once read a book called: “Winning by Intimidation” by Robert O. Ringer.
Report Post »There ARE people who CRAVE being PROVOCATIVE in order to: “get their way”. Win. . . . in other words.
Watch out for them – they are everywhere now – purposefully trying to intimidate, harass, pass gas, whatever it takes to be rude to you – to you nice people in Utah. They have never left junior high school and never will – it is the new 60′s mentality. Absolutely pathetic really.
ShyLow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:18pmTo restore love , you have to restore something that is worthy of love…a country that forces groups together that despise each other is not worthy of love…a country that allows communities to set their preferences and allow people to vote with their feet is worthy of love…our town our rules , if you don’t like it move to San Fran or atleast start your own mall.
Report Post »Kankokage
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:17pmI’ve been to this mall (as I live in Salt Lake City). It’s AMAZING. And yes, there is a dress code as it is across the street from Temple Square and the LDS Church Headquarters. The owners of the mall want to maintain an appropriate decorum to make it a safe, happy place to be. That said, I really suspect the intentions of those making these claims.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:22pmGays were probably beginning to use it as a pickup spot like they commonly use parks and secluded parking lots.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:27pmI think enforcing a dress code is a great idea. Otherwise the malls are filled with teenage boys walking around with their backsides hanging out of their pants.
Report Post »Susie
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:28pmI agree KANKOKAGE
Report Post »Looks like the envelope is purposely being pushed on this one.
the man wrote, “I was in heels and my makeup was fierce. And they kick me out for looking too gay.”
“… my makeup was fierce”???
Sounds like ‘fight’n words to me.
Gonzo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:35pmYou’re right to suspect those intentions. I have a feeling we are about to see more negative coverage of the LDSs in the next 7 months than we have seen in the history of the country.
Report Post »BrucePMajors
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:37pmOut gay people don’t have to go to parks and parking lots. The people who go to them may be gay but are I believe usually married men who are not out.
Report Post »PossumStu
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:46pmI work in this mall and I’m calling these claims out as hogwash. If these people really were asked to leave, I have to believe they were making a scene. We have several obviously gay customers, and they are not harassed by security or anyone else. Then again, they are polite themselves, and don’t show up dressed in drag and looking for a fight. This sounds like just another attempt by anti-Mormon gay activists to stir the pot.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:40pmLance Papercut
Keep jabbin, oneday you may actually hit something. and keep that floppy wrist straight.
Report Post »SingerGuy
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 4:06pm@PossumStu:
This sounds like just another attempt by anti-Mormon gay activists to stir the pot.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That was my first thought when I read the headline. There is a certain element in Salt Lake City who take great enjoyment in tearing down all things LDS. I’d bet that if this mall property was not owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints that these people wouldn’t show up looking “fierce” in the first place. It’s like the two gay men who decided to go onto the property between the administration buildings and Temple Square (formerly Main St.) and engage in a heavy makeout session a few years ago. LDS Security officers escorted them off of the private property and they screamed persecution. It wasn’t persecution, it was public morality. They’d have done the same thing if a heterosexual couple was going at it the same way.
I don’t work in this mall, but I‘ve been there four or five times since it opened and I’ve never seen anything but respectful people, and I’ve never once been consciously aware of security. These accounts don’t fit in with my observations.
Report Post »iblvingd
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 5:15pmMany hotels even the Bellagio (sp) in Vegas have codes they enforce, to protect their investments against the malfeasance.
Report Post »sacwoodpusher
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 2:57amIf you have ever known gays, you might change your concept of their choice in the matter. My wife and I sat at a restaurant table near a couple…two men. One was obviously the “male” component, and the other guy was the “girl”……and did the “girl” ever bitch! There is simply no way that a man cound be that efeminate and girllike by choice. It was ingrained!
I think the lot of you don’t get it…..I don’t, and I have a gay daughter. When I saw two guys kissing for the first time (I was in college) I nearly threw up in the street. And I gagged all the way to my dorm room, about 2 miles. Dry heaving all the way!
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on April 14, 2012 at 8:30am@BRUCEPMAJORS
Report Post »Right, outed gays don’t have to go to parks, secluded parking lots or public bathrooms . . . but they still do. Just ask George Michael.
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:13pmThis is the kind of stuff that the Ron Paul Libertarian movement would support. If you don’t want them in your business… well… the hell with ya’… GET OUT!! Slippery slopes….
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:32pmIf I owned a night club , white women would not be dragging black men up in it…but someone else would be FREE to occomadate that kind of behavior…night clubs should be allowed to discriminate on race , behavior , or whatever…hotels,resturants,gas stations should not be allowed to discriminate based on race or sexual preference , but should be able to have dress codes and behavior policies…Night Clubs fall under right to assembly
Report Post »BrucePMajors
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:42pmCross dressers and gay people are not the same thing. Telling people they can’t cross dress or go nude is not the same as barring gay people. Even banning public displays of affection by everyone is not the same as barring gay people.
That said, a mall should be ale to ban gay people, or, since you don’t know who is gay, people engaging in public displays of homosexual affection. Of course, you may lose customers doing it. And gays should be able to ban heterosexuals and lesbians should be free to ban men from their bars, restaurants, b&bs etc.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:48pmSHYLOW. Dress codes are one thing and many places have them, but the first part of your comment is exactly what I’m talking about and completely asinine. This is exactly the slippery slope I’m writing about and why the new libertarianism of Murray Rothbard, Lew Rockwell and Ron Paul should be kicked to the curb by Conservatives, or anyone with a clear thinking mind in general.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:07pm@ time to end When you are traveling you have to stop at gas stations,sometimes motels,and places to eat or releive yourself…You don’t have to stop at night clubs…Forced integration is also a slippery slope…
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:12pmBRUCE. Yes, the “invisible hand” of the free market place will take care everything and we can be free to discriminate and for whatever reasons we dictate right? I‘m all for keeping the riff raff out of one’s establishment, but many would take that just a bit too far and then what have we become as a society, and where does it end? Like I wrote… a slippery slope… back to pre Civil Rights of 1964 which Ron and Rand Paul would not have supported or voted in favor of.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:17pmI agree with Shylow on a lot of things. Not this one. I just want our government to abide by the Constitution. I’ve also been checking out LewRockwell.com and haven’t seen anything that reflects these ideas either. Tom Woods refuted Levin’s claims about Rothbard and pretty much schooled Levin. Sorry, bud I’m just not seeing a problem.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:43pmJUST. Can’t seem to post my last comment so will try again. Lew Rockwell has toned it down the last few years. Dig deeper regarding Rothbard… Levin is not the only one that has a disagreement or knowledge of his history. We’ll see if this SHORTER version of my comment posts?
Report Post »Scottscobig
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 6:21pmWhen you attack someones ideas, it‘s not enough to just say he’s wrong. You must logically argue why he’s wrong. It‘s also necessary to rationally explain your own ideas and how they’re superior to his. So, specifically, what are your arguments against libertarianism and Austrian Economics? And could you please list and defend the ideas that are better than these?
In a nut shell, Ron Paul’s, Murray Rothbard’s, and Lew Rockwell’s ideology is that people should be absolutely free in their associations, exchanges, their ownership and control of private property. And that no one, including the govt, should be able to violate the individual unalienable rights of a person who isn’t violating the individual unalienable rights of anyone else. I, for instance, hold a whole host of conservative views on various social issues. But I’m against exercising any initiative force against anyone to force him to do or not do whatever I think he should do or not do. Freedom to experience negative consequences and to fail are burdens everyone can and should bear for his actions. If 2 people are going to engage in some kind of exchange, the rest of us, and the govt, should stay out of it. We, and the govt, should do nothing unless and until someone’s individual unalienable rights are violated. You don‘t defend yourself unless you’re attacked.
There. Now, refute that. Better yet, refute, specifically, the ideas of the men you’re attacking.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 8:51pmWell said…It will be nothing but crickets from “time to end”…He’ll be back on another thread spreading lies and half truths , pretty sure he is a hired gun…i would love to have video footage of Ron Paul laying the smack-down on him in a debate
Report Post »teddyc73
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:12pm“I was in heels and my makeup was fierce…” With comments like that from a man it’s no wonder people have such a negative opinion of these people. If these allegations are true then where is this mall? I need to do some shopping today.
Report Post »Mark0331
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:09pm…and then they will somehow tie this ‘narrative’ to Mitt Romney..he comes another ‘Trayvon’ moment…religous bigotry and race wars, thats all the left have remaining in their bag of tricks…oh, and civil unrest.
Report Post »Hephzibah
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:22pmYep, just watch how the attacks on LDS will intensify now.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:00pmThat’s the whole point. If Romney was a Catholic, it would be some some anti Catholic story. More to follow on at least a weekly basis.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:08pmThe attack on decency continues
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 1:52pm@ShyLow
The attack on logic and common sense continues.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 2:12pm@Vance I agree 100%… When are people going to wake up and stop complaining about other people not making accomadations for certain groups…The freaks should embrace the free-market and build their own mall…It doesn’t have to big and expensive.They could start with Hot Topics and Spencers , a music store and comic books
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:07pm“Some are blaming these alleged incidents on The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints”
Report Post »I‘m sure it’s just a coincidence that the Republican nominee is LDS, right? Nothing to see folks, move along.
hillbillyheartthrob
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 7:30pmI am willing to bet money it is no coincidence. I would even go so far as to say it is probably completely fabricated propaganda.
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:07pmIm guessing that there is no Hot Topic, and or an Abercrombie and Fitch or other like stores inside that mall. LOL
Report Post »Kankokage
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:18pmIt’s a pretty uppity mall. It’s awesome and open, but uppity in store selection. If you want the coarser, cheaper stuff, go down the road to the Gateway Mall (seriously, like a mile away).
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:02pmGood! Sounds like a good Mall and they have a plan to keep it that way.
Report Post »oldguy49
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:07pmAmen………………i would be happy to shop there and hopefully english only also
Report Post »Kankokage
Posted on April 13, 2012 at 12:19pmThere’s even a river with trout running through it. It’s gorgeous.
Report Post »