VFW Commander Moves to Dissolve PAC Following Contested Endorsements
- Posted on October 18, 2010 at 5:19pm by
Meredith Jessup
- Print »
- Email »
After members’ outcry over a number of political endorsements reached Richard L. Eubank, the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Commander-in-Chief didn‘t hesitate to ask the group’s PAC to rescind them. But the VFW PAC was unrelenting in their choices leaving Eubank one last option. In a Memorandum to the VFW’s National Council of Administration, Eubank has called for a vote of “no confidence” to disband the VFW PAC.
It is now evident to most of the VFW leadership, both National and especially the departments, that the VFW has been subjected to extreme negative publicity throughout the nation, and the recent endorsement decisions have, in fact, harmed the VFW’ s reputation and future ability to fulfill our mission.
I cannot let this erosion of public support for our great organization continue. …
The backlash doesn’t stop there, however. The VFW’s Ladies Auxiliary has also pulled all its funding from the PAC, a significant amount of the total funds raised for it.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (77)
Eric-n-OTown
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 11:08pmYES! There are true-blue Americans in positions of power, I applaud the Commander-in-Chief for his leadership! Those in Washington should take heed, the time of reckoning is coming in this Nation, better be sure you’re on the right side…
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 11:07pmThe VFW is one of the best organizations that has ever been. We can’t let the progressives just take it over. Just like in war we have to be strong and kick the progressives out and not let them back in charge of anything. I served in VN 68 69 in II core. MacV recon. I will always try my best to keep the VFW standing for the soldiers that have served. We need to stand strong for our beliefs and not let the enemy win at any cost.
Report Post »TPaine
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 10:51pmFinally, a sensible response from a revered organization. At last, the VFW has done a great service to its members and the nation. Good for you, VFW. Keep up the good fight and defend our veterans.
Report Post »Wags999
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 10:29pmCancelled my membership, this is the final straw. AARP, VFW among other socialist fronts pretending to be conservatives. Look into any organization before you join, far too many are corrupted .
Report Post »politicaljules
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 9:06pmGod bless you Richard L. Eubanks. Progressives have invaded every aspect of American life in order to pursue their horrid agenda. They are in every thing from our veterans organizations, to our churches, to our schools, and even our organizations that support children with disabilities. I deplore the destruction of our country and I wonder what it is going to take to get it back. Disband all of the organizations that endorse candidates? Rely on our own devices instead of what the AARP or the VFW or the Catholic Bishops endorse? All of the above?
Report Post »Dan in P.A.
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:34pmShort for being communist Barbra Boxer has always been whats wrong with are government . Look at what California has has to show for it, Bankrupt- stupid programs and a lot of stupid Holy Wood people who look threw rose colored glasses . They are the poorest state and was once the richest state because of who ,THIS IS A DEMOCRATIC STATE
Report Post »DMD
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:15pmI would still get out of the VFW. They have a progressive agenda let it fold.
Report Post »Fedup
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:09pmFirst, to all of those who have served in our military, thank you for your service. For those in the VFW thank you for risking life and limb in order to protect our freedom.
This smells like a fight over the Connecticut Blumenthal debacle. Better to give nothing than to support a fraud.
My father was in the VFW (my mother was in the Auxiliary) until his death. He served aboard the USS Manila Bay (CSS 62 – a Casablanca Class aircraft carrier) in the Pacific. He was a radio navigator/ machine gunner. It was not unusual at the dinner table for my father, on occasion to pull a piece of shrapnel from one of his legs. This went on for years so as a young child I saw first hand the result of war on my father’s person and therefore gained a strong respect for anyone who served and fought in a war. It is tiring at best to hear politicians use any military experience be it active or passive during war time for political gain. I admire every single person who has served and put his/her country first. But not the politicians who prostitute themselves in order to gain power.
Report Post »M31Sailor
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 10:06amThanked your dad for his service in my prayers.
USS Manila Bay participated in the Battle of Leyte Gulf proudly. It was where a Destroyer Escort,
Destoyers, and Several Jeep Carriers sacrificed themselves to save the troop landings.They
defeated a vastly superior Japanese fleet. My dad was on a repair ship in the Phillipines
Sailor
Report Post »tnalp
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:07pmI had that same question EDDIE333…….
Report Post »JackBoot101
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:00pmGave up my membership years ago. Didn’t agree with the national leadership. Just about to do the same thing with the American Legion
Report Post »eddie333
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 7:44pmI wonder how many of the board members are members of a labor union
Report Post »LoneStarGigger
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 7:24pmNow I don’t feel bad about cutting off the money to the VFW last year when they endorsed the take over of medicine by this regime. I’ll still hold off a while until I am sure they have come legit once again. Their loss.
Report Post »Michigan Vacation
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 7:01pmPerhaps Obama can spend his $50 Billion second stimulas to build a wall for the Gulf to the Pacific?
Report Post »lizaz
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:45pmGet rid of the PAC…it’s a disgrace to the VFW. My husband was about to terminate his membership…what a shame!!! The VFW should not be seen as supporting socialist/marxist policies coming from Washington DC!
Report Post »Constitutional Chris
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:27pmThis, Despicable Political Tactic, of CO-Opting, Time honered Organiztions, Associations and Organizations Is “TREACHERY,” at it’s WORST!
Any IMMORAL person that would: STOOP so LOW, is surely DEVOID, of MORALS, SCRUPELS or ETHICS and most likely a: DEMONCRAT, like MY Grandfathers Democrat Party, that was MODERATE and American, specifically NOT as the DEMONCRATS subverted by: Communistas, DISGUISED as DEMOCRATS.
It is intersing to NOTE: that over:“70” Congress mebers, belong to: Democratic Socialist Party of America!
Report Post »338lapua
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 9:35pmI would like to see their names. Where did you find that?
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 12:01amThe Blaze needs to put together anarticle on that and list the names of the congressman that are members of the DSP and expose them all !!!! Because no- one I know of has published that list, Talk about october surprise!! I want to know, how about you.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 1:05amThe list is available at this link But I felt compelled to post the complete list here in this post.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/08/american-socialists-release-names-of-70-congressional-democrats-in-their-caucus/
Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?
A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez,
Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].
Q: Who are these members of 111th Congress?
A: See the listing below
Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
Vice Chairs
Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
Senate Members
Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)
House Members
Report Post »Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)
Rogue
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 10:08amAmerican – thanks so much for the link and post! I will be forwarding this to everyone in my address book, and I ask that everyone else do the same please. We need to get this list out in the districts these people represent. I’m not big on chain emails, but this is one I am going to ask all my friends to keep on forwarding!
Report Post »YesToFreedom
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 10:53amQ: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?
A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez,
Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].
Co-Chairs
Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)
Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
Vice Chairs
Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)
Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)
Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
Senate Members
Report Post »Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)
House Members
Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)
claymoremacm
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:24pmShell Shocked
Report Post »gentleman greg
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:19pmThank god!!!!!!! Someone has some common sense…..Finally.
Report Post »Looks like we need to dump these old
looks like we need to drain the swamp
grandpa
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:13pmI felt the same way about the AFL/CIO president telling all of its members to attened a rally in Washington D.C. this month with a bunch of communist, socialists and other non-american groups. It was so disappointed, that I shreded my union card and called my local to put me on a withdrawl card. The president of the AFL/CIO is selling out its members for his own gain in washington politics.
Report Post »nothingbuthetruth
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 9:35pmRight on!! Grandpa… our vets have fought communists and I cannot believe that some of them cannot see what is right in front of them here. We need them now!!!!
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 11:12pmGrandpa, hopefully you can send a message to the others in the UNION. The UNIONS were a good thing when they first started. But now they have pretty much destroyed the union members. Hope you don’t get much fallout from it. You have my vote.
Report Post »missmarie
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:09pmAs with many well-intentioned organizations, the leadership has been infiltrated by progressive minded individuals and their influence in the election process is just now being noticed by the membership. Many citizens blindly gave money to a group they believe is promoting their values and moral standing on issues, only to find they have been duped and the opposite is true. It is time for individuals that fund or volunteer for any organization to review it’s platform and political policies before cutting that next check. If you feel strongly about the organization itself, spend a little time at their meetings, volunteering for service projects, or perhaps running for office. Lots of these organizations are worthwhile and their membership are fun and friendly folks – it’s the administrators that need a little work.
Report Post »Contrarianthinker
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 7:49pmFact of life. So few people volunteer to work to move a cause ahead. That allows progressives to infiltrate into leadership positions that allow them to make decisions like supporting/endorsing Boxer. Notice that the PAC Committee is NOT elected by members by appointed.
This is also a danger to the Tea Party movement. That is why we MUST be careful in who will support as a “Tea Party” candidate.
Report Post »missmarie
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:58pm@Contrarianthinker – I agree, not enough volunteers and certainly not enough officers to ethically run a lot of our organizations! We need to focus on being more proactive, rather than reactionary!
Report Post »w4jle
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:01pmYou may find the board of directors at http://www.vfwpac.org/bdofdir.html I leave it to the reader to draw their own conclusions based on the geographical homes of the directors.
Report Post »RightWingKookTank
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 5:59pmI‘ve been a member of the VFW Auxiliary for over 20 years and I’ve thought that the VFW has ALWAYS made “questionable” endorsements of political candidates on a national scale. That being said, I can’t say that I agree with their decision to dissolve their PAC. Seems to me like, yet again, another knee-jerk reaction to some goings on within the organization. (If you’re not involved in a local VFW, you won’t have ANY clue what my last statement means.) They get all worked-up about a current issue, take-action and then usually forget within 6 months WHAT action they took…the one that they were all “worked up over” just a few months prior. The VFW PAC will be back up and operational before the 2012 election cycle. I hope. I also hope/wish that they would POLL their membership (online would be great) BEFORE their “new PAC” decides to endorse ANY candidate from ANY district.
Report Post »troyvar
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 8:01pmWe all need to be vigilant and hold those responsible for these outrages accountable.
Report Post »BlackCrow
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 5:56pmI have been baffled for years how the VFW can stand up behind out and out communists. People who would destroy this country because they promise (but don’t deliver) support for vets. WAKE UP!!! Those people are NOT your friends!
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 5:51pmI will wait until it has been done before I renew my membership.
Report Post »AmericanPatriot01
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 12:44amthis is subversion and tyrany in its most hideous form. Those of us that are veterans and associated with groups like the VFW should be able to count on our leadership to honor and defend the memory and commitment of the poven warriors and hold high those principals we risked life and limb to defend. To have it infiltrated and subverted due to political favor is an insult to every vet alive and dead. Every member in the PAC should be deposed and the PAC if it remains , should be restructured and issue their support according to general membership consensus. Providing support to candidates that have not been vetted for ideological standing. Candidates should never be allowed to be on the supported list when they are involved in organizations like DSP, and other communist or Anti-American, constitutional deconstructionist groups hell bent on the destruction of the USA.
This wa a huge failure on the part of the commander to not see this as a potential disaster. Makes you wonder what he got in exchange for allowing this to happen. Sad, sad, sad.
Report Post »raybojabo
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 5:33pmWho are these COMMIE RAT-BASTARDS in the PAC? We demand names, and preferrably addresses and phone numbers also.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 11:12pmabsolutely.
Report Post »Navyguy30
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 5:33pmThis news came just in time! I was about to cancel my membership.
Report Post »snowleopard3200
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:36pmThank God there is still some honest folks who understand what the difference between correct and what is RIGHT (morally and ethically) in matters.
May the VFW shine on for the commanders actions.
To those who have served in the past, and serve now as defenders of our country, thank you.
To the families of those who have fallen in their service to defend our countries, thank you for the ultimate gift given.
May they all be remembered.
http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mix art)
USNRET04
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 6:40pmSame here. I’m due for renewal…just in time.
Report Post »DrammyCoke
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 9:33pmI called, sent an email and already wrote a nastygram to them in their self addressed and stamped “we need your membership dues” envelope.
Here is a copy of the email I received in reply.
“Thank you for contacting VFW National Headquarters.
Report Post »First let me apologize for the generic response in regard to VFW-PAC, as many of our members and supporters have questions regarding recent endorsements. I will do my best to sum up quickly the events that have taken place and what we can expect to see in the near future.
VFW-PAC was formed in 1979 by the delegates of the VFW 80th National Convention as a committee that would operate as a “separate and non-partisan organization charged with the single task of working in Congress to support candidates who have taken responsible positions on issues involving national defense and legislation pertaining to the nation’s veterans”.
On September 24, 2010 VFW-PAC released its list of endorsed candidates, immediately igniting controversy over many of its choices.
VFW’s initial response dated October 8, 2010 stated the national line officers of Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) are at odds with the VFW Political Action Committee (PAC), calling the methodology process used by the PAC “seriously flawed at best this year and in immediate need of extensive review” further stating, “Obviously, an organization’s political positions have to reflect the opinions of its members. But those opinions can’t be perceived as ‘off the wall,’ and the methodology used this year to grade candidates obviously is skewed in favor of the incumbent. That isn’t fair, and it actually subverts the democratic process.” It was at this time VFW line officers had decided to bring the question of continued existence of the PAC to the floor during the 112th VFW national convention in August 2011. Many of you questioned, “Why 2011?” Because the VFW By-Laws allow for the PAC Committee to exist and VFW By-Laws may only be amended by the delegates of the VFW Convention, which is held annually.
As word of the endorsements spread, members and supporters of VFW grew more irritated over VFW-PAC’s choices and demanded answers.
Not understanding that the VFW itself had no control over the endorsements, many of you continued to write, expressing displeasure asking the national commander somehow intervene. In an open statement to VFW members, national officers stated “As determined in the VFW By-Laws, as the national officers, we have specific responsibilities to take definitive action when events can have a detrimental impact on the organization. It is clear to us that the current situation now demands direct action; therefore, we are requesting the chairman and the directors of the Political Action Committee immediately rescind their endorsement actions.” The VFW-PAC refused, stating “VFW-PAC disagrees with those who claim their endorsement process is skewed, flawed, or unfair”.
On October 15, 2010 VFW National Commander Richard Eubank, using his authority under Section 619 & 620 of the VFW National By-Laws/Manual of Procedure, withdrew all PAC Committee appointments effective immediately. Furthermore, he is asking the VFW national council for a vote of “no confidence” in the VFW PAC (this council administers the affairs between conventions). VFW national officers are gearing up to propose an amendment to the VFW National By-Laws to dissolve VFW-PAC.
It is important to remember, VFW membership dues nor donations made to VFW or VFW Foundation do not support VFW-PAC.
View statements referenced above at http://www.vfw.org and http://www.vfwpac.org“
123gone
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 9:50pmDitto !!
Report Post »Kinnison
Posted on October 18, 2010 at 11:27pmI already had canceled my membership, about three days ago. I called national headquarters and asked to resign my membership and the lady I talked to sounded pretty exasperated and told me snippily that I had to do so in writing. So I immediately typed out a letter explaining why I was resigning my long-time membership and mailed it off to them. I suspect they got a bunch.
Report Post »Blackhawk63
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 1:57amThank you for bringing this to light….
Report Post »Please tell Mr Beck to spread the word!!!
AND I am proud of all of the vets who stood up and had their voices heard.
RobertCA
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 2:16amThis was a great news thanks to our loyal Vets . GOD Bless You .
Report Post »golfguy
Posted on October 19, 2010 at 11:57amAdd your comments
Report Post »FIRED UP FREE MAN !
Posted on October 20, 2010 at 9:37pmMr. SOROS is an international criminal. Any government official taking money from this monster or those he supports should be brought up on treason charges. Anybody who takes money from this monster has sold his soul and our government to HELL ! GOD BLESS AMERICA AND THE LIGHT OF DAY! For only TRUTH and the light of day is what this country DESERVES. Democrats seemed to have been infected by this DEADLY parasite and his minions. This country will NOT rest until SOROS is in prison orange and handcuffs standing in front of a military tribunal in Guantomino Bay, Cuba
If you have any complaints about Mr. SOROS here are the names and addresses, maybe you can send them a line.
Tides Foundation Info:
National Office
Physical Address: 1014 Torney Ave. San Francisco, CA 94129-1755
P.O. Box 29198*
San Francisco, CA 94129-0198
415-561-6400
415-561-6401 Fax
info(at)tides.org
New York Office
Tides New York
55 Exchange Place, Suite 402
New York, NY 10005-3304
212-509-1049
212-509-1059 Fax
nyinfo(at)tides.org
Center for American Progress Information:
1333 H Street Northwest
Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20005
Phone: 202-682-1611
Fax: 202-682-1867
Mailing Address
Democracy Alliance
P.O. Box 18607
Washington, DC 20036
Media Matters Information:
455 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 756-4100
..
Report Post »