Technology

Aerial ‘Shadowhawk’ Police Drones Can Now Deploy Tasers & Tear Gas

Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:03pm by Buck Sexton
Print »
Email »

“Drones are coming to America to a police department near you.”

That’s the initial assessment of Catherine Crump, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, who narrates part of a short video clip that explores the Shadowhawk drone and its implications for domestic law enforcement here in the U.S.

The technology is useful, but poses significant privacy risks.”Drones have very powerful cameras attached to them,” Crump says, “they can see a lot more than the naked eye.” In fact, they can even see through walls with FLIR thermal imaging technology.

Crump believes one of the most alarming prospects is that police drones won’t just have cameras on them, but will also be armed with non-lethal weapons. As can be seen in these photos from Vanguard Defense Industries, the Shadowhawk platform is sturdy enough to be fitted with a variety of “less lethal” munitions.

Below is the video with some explanation of the drone’s implications for the U.S. Homeland, courtesy of The Daily:

Randy McDaniel, Chief Deputy of the Montgomery County, Texas Sheriff’s Office, also weighs in on the Shadowhawk drones in the clip. “We were able to purchase a UAV to use here at the Sheriff’s Office,” McDaniel says.

Instead of the ACLU’s sweeping privacy and civil liberties concerns, McDaniel focuses in on the benefits of drones for law enforcement. Shadowhawk drones armed with an array of non-lethal force options–including impact rounds, chemical munition rounds, and tasers– could save lives in McDaniel’s opinion.

Deputy McDaniel points out that these are technologies “law enforcement utilizes day in and day out” already.

“If it is developed to the extent that we are guaranteed the accuracy, it is certainly something that we could look at, if I can give our swat teams a tool to save their lives, that’s what we are going to do,” McDaniel said.

The ACLU’s Crump, on the other hand, believes that an officer on the ground will always have a better sense of the situation, and seems to caution against any police department going beyond surveillance drones to an armed aerial platform.

Here is a longer video clip of the Shadowhawk police drone in action, courtesy of Vanguard Industries:

But while a debate rages over police departments using drones, it should be noted that the private use of drones is on the rise. As The Blaze’s Liz Klimas noted last month, “drones have been used by the media to capture aerial footage of Russian protests and riots in Poland“ and a ”civilian drone operated in Texas recently spotted a meat packing plant violating laws by dumping animal products into a local stream.”

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (189)

robinakilt
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:03pm
Ahhh target practice! Fly it overtop of my property!
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- SimpleTruths
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:11pm
  Do you shoot at police cars as the drive by too? Same crime idiot.
- Mikes MuuMuus - Home of the Big Boy Burqa
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:47pm
  Again @ Simpleton
  Shooting at an unmanned UFO invading your home is not the same as firing on peace-officers in a cruiser across the street. Good grief! We still have the right to protect our property from space aliens and their menacing robot drones.
  Report Post »
- Weiners Wiener
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:50pm
  @SIMPLETRUTHS — You really think shooting at an unmanned drone is the same thing as shooting at a police car with a living person inside? You’re the idiot.
  Report Post »
- Baddoggy
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:15pm
  I can tell you if one of those flies over my property…It will need repairs. My 4th ammendment trumps about anything they can send up….
  
  By the way. If you havent noticed the police state is getting way way way out of control because of idiots like simpletruths not knowing thier rights.
  
  If police come kick down my door without a warrant…they are also free game. But simpletruths would probably let them do a cavity search on him…
  Report Post »
- BarackStalin
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:34pm
  Dead or alive…you’re coming with me!
  
  Thank you for your cooperation.
  Report Post »
- Onowicit
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:35pm
  as long as I can own one too……super modified of coarse. MuuMuus is right I’m not getting abducted and probed. UFO’s are going down.
  Report Post »
- B-Neil
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:11pm
  Look at it this way; You don’t have to holler ( PULL ) anymore. I‘m suprised the cameras there putting all over the place haven’t been used for target practice. GOD BLESS AMERICA and INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM
  Report Post »
- Ruler4You
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 8:32pm
  Lethal weapons WILL NOT be far behind.
  Report Post »
- oldguy49
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:45pm
  yep ………..been wanting to try out the new mossberg
  Report Post »
- Anarcho Capitalist
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:00am
  @BADDOGGY
  The continental mafia family does not recognize your 4th amendment right so it trumps nothing.
  Report Post »
- Captain Crunch
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:14am
  I don’t care if there are cameras…it‘s coming down and I’ll have a new toy. For all I know it could have lethal weapons on it. Self defense.
  Report Post »
- PaxInVeritate
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:02am
  I’m wondering if a magnetron yanked from a microwave with a shielded funnel could fry the circuitry. Wouldn’t get charged with firing a weapon in city limits then.
  Report Post »
- poorrichard09
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 7:44am
  Now with tazers and tear gas, tomorrow Hellfire missles? Get ready for the police state-the two cops pictured look like they should be patrolling in Afghanistan, not the US. Now, if they were using these drones on the Mexican border it would make sense.
  Report Post »
- TomFerrari
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 8:00am
  Not to worry, folks…
  The police unions will get rid of these as soon as they realize a fleet of these puppies can be controlled by civilians, being paid much less and without paying their extortion, er, ‘union dues.’
  Potentially they could replace patrol cars and issue speeding tickets via mail, like traffic cams do.
  
  While our elected representatives are running around passing law after law, claiming to be protecting us, who is protecting us from THEM?
  THAT was their sole responsibility -to protect our God-given rights. When was the last time a law was passed to protect our God-given rights? When good people DO try to protect our rights, obama sends holder and his DOJ goons in to put a stop to it!
  Report Post »
- midwesthippie
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 10:31am
  …the first time an average 12 year old hacks into the controls and does damage with this “toy” the story will get pretty good…
  Report Post »
- FlamingFartSyndrome
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 10:37am
  At least theres 2 of us. Invasion of privacy anyone? Whatever… Just one more step towards martial law.
  Report Post »
- generalnuisance
  Posted on March 18, 2012 at 3:52am
  A REAL simpletruth can easily be found by re-reading the fourth amendment.
  Report Post »
- Protoham
  Posted on March 18, 2012 at 10:09pm
  Several small weather balloons tethered over the property should snare one of these.
  Report Post »
- nocalifornia
  Posted on April 17, 2012 at 9:42am
  Without a warrant the cops have no right to be on or over your property, that makes the bird fair game.
  Report Post »
- nocalifornia
  Posted on April 17, 2012 at 9:47am
  By the way with our jack booted swat squads being armed for combat in Afghanistan the politicians don’t need to worry about the Posse Comitatus statute, they will just turn the police loose on We The People/Servants.
  Report Post »
- Elijah123
  Posted on April 24, 2012 at 5:32pm
  Police planes and helocopters have been chasing and flying for over 40 years, helping in tracking and finding crooks, kids and traffic. Theres a lot of benefits to cops, as the Sheriff details, however, with any new technology from mace to airplanes, once the bad guys get ahold of the technology or defense mechanism, (like drones with arms or tear gas), the technology is turned upon the cops, citizens and rival drug and gang members. Law and liability keeps public deep pockets from utilizing what lawbreakers routinely ignore. U.S. cops can be controlled, through law and liability. Its other countries, gangs, corrupt politicians and companies who legalize and sell the same technology that will untie the remaining ability to protect soverignity and citizens from harm that is in danger. Think internet, counterfeiting, identity theft, mace and pepper spray in robberies and strong arms, guns to illegals and cartels. Licensing hasn’t stopped gun violence, eventually licensing drones will be as useless and unenforceable as gun laws, once the “bad guys” figure out how to get their hands on another method to violate law and the air.
  Report Post »
blackstone22
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:01pm
Although there are positive uses of drone technology, the potential for abuses are truly frightening
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- TH30PH1LUS
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:24pm
  Janet Napolitano needs them to monitor veterans and Christians. Eric Holder needs them to monitor his gun-running to Mexico.
  Report Post »
- rawmilker
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 12:46am
  Notice federal grant happy Sheriff in the video’s last statement was, “If I can give a tool to our SWAT or LEO‘s thats going to save THEIR life then thats what we’re going to do.”
  
  Not one mention about the safety of the public, or helping to fight crime for the greater good of the community, etc. Its all about projecting fear & control over the citizens and invasion of 4th amendment rights violating private property airspace and the “see thru walls” technology. Just a matter of time before they develop lethal projectiles for these things.
  
  A good full choke shotgun with some # 4′s could take these out @ 200 maybe 300 ft up…..
  Report Post »
- pamela kay
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 4:28am
  BlACKSTONE22; I agree,
  Report Post »
- christopher.duncan2388
  Posted on May 19, 2012 at 6:50am
  Milker, he worded it that way because the SWAT teams and LEOs are the ones RISKING their lives to keep you safe when someone decides to break the law
  Report Post »
petev1717
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:01pm
Will be fun target to shoot at what a waste of taxpayer’s money the lazy domb A// cops need another toy to play with, only because they can’t solve any crimes just give out speeding tickets on their high paying saleries.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- SimpleTruths
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:15pm
  Do you currently shoot at law enforcement cars that drive by? How about police helicopters? That fair game in your mind too? You don’t own the airspace above your property by the way.
  Report Post »
- Mikes MuuMuus - Home of the Big Boy Burqa
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:45pm
  @ Simpleton
  Shooting at an unmanned UFO invading your home is not the same as firing on peace-officers in a cruiser across the street. Good grief! We still have the right to protect our property from space aliens and their menacing robot drones.
  Report Post »
- Baddoggy
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:17pm
  You are so right Pete. People are too stupid to realize how our rights are being taken away. I for one will fight. Hell with a police state. Simpletruths can let them come search his backyard…Not me!
  Report Post »
- SgtB
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:44pm
  @ Simple truths, “you don’t own the airspace over your land”…..
  
  Well, maybe we should. In fact, alot of people do own the airspace over their land to a certain height or the airspace over others’ land. Also, it is people like you who have taken us away from allodial title rights and given us state or municipality owned lands that we cannot even build a tool shed on without permits signed in triplicate and posted in public view.
  
  You know what, it won’t take much in this nation for me to actually start shooting at police officers. Especially after watching the video of the murder of Marine Sergeant Jose Guerena. In case you haven’t heard, a swat team showing up unannounced shot a Marine veteran in his own home while his wife and child hid in the closet fearing for their lives and then after shooting 70+ rounds into his home and dozens into his body, they denied medical aid for over an hour and instead let his wife and child watch as their father and husband bled to death in the home he provided for them with the sweat of his brow working in a mine all night.
  
  They were supposed to be conducting a search warrant for drugs because he was pulled over as a passenger in his brother’s truck and there was a roll of saran wrap present in the vehicle. Because of this, they sent a dozen or more men in body armor with m-16′s and glocks to his door. When his wife saw a figure hop their fence, she woke him up for the last time. Sgt. Guerena never shot at the police, I w
  Report Post »
KenshinDragon
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:40pm
Once again as the president of a non-profit company that is going to deploy drones for use in the National Airspace, I wanted to comment on this story. This particular drone generally takes at least a year to become proficient with. And even long than that when trying to be very delicate and accurate with your videos.

I can train our people to fly in about 3 hours and true proficiency is reached in days. Again with all that said, there is always the possibility for abuse of any technology. For those who wish to learn more about what we are doing, please go to our website:

http://www.flyaser.com
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- PoliticalSmackdown {Subscribe & Friend me on YouTube}
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:55pm
  Tell me how would this drone react to say a nicely placed .308 rifle round?
  Report Post »
- hidden_lion
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:03pm
  If you see a drone flying by, shoot it down. Doesn’t matter who owns it. There is already to much surveillance in this country. People need to mind their own business, and the police need to get search warrants if they want to see what I am up to.
  Report Post »
- SgtB
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 10:48pm
  No one appreciates your work. If I see a drone flying around my home, it will become scrap. You are actively working against our rights to privacy and the 4th amendment. I don’t have a problem with a hobbyist taping his flights around his property or an airpark where he flies, but I have a serious problem with people purposefully and maliciously spying on me, my family, and my friends. Please get a real job and stop playing with toy planes.
  Report Post »
- KenshinDragon
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 3:43am
  I will freely tell all of you that the drones we use here at http://www.flyaser.com would easily be brought down with a shotgun and some buckshot. So should any of you for any reason believe that we at A.S.E.R., Inc are “spying” on you please feel free to contact us with the date and time of the “spying”. However as of today, we are not air born as we refuse to take federal dollars to fund the project. We will not have unmarked vehicles, but rather a large truck that is clearly marked. The UAVs will be white so as to be easily seen by rescue and emergency service workers and volunteers, and as we grow, we will be hiring Veterans to fly the UAVs and man the stations.
  
  But for those of you who are concerned, PLEASE contact us with your concerns. I want to hear about them and help to ensure that YOUR freedoms and mine are not impinged upon by this project.
  
  Thank you all for your comments, please keep them coming.
  Report Post »
Gary_K
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:40pm
I want a drone with a 50 cal. on it.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- PoliticalSmackdown {Subscribe & Friend me on YouTube}
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:11pm
  that is what is going to need to happen. people building better drones and using them to watch the watchers.
  Report Post »
- Patrick Henry II
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:13pm
  You make an excellent point. If they build it WE will have it too; very soon. They are alreay selling the helicopters at gunshows. Just need to adapt video and a jam proof signal. What’s good for the goose. Not really up my ally but these tech savey couch potatoes may have lots of fun with this.
  Report Post »
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:36pm
One more machine for Obama and friends to use in the suppresion of the American People.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- amdoktor
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 7:04pm
  Wise cracks and disagreement. We however still continue to vote for freedom stripping Progressives.
  NDAA bill voted YEA by almost all the Republicans/Democrats, FAA bill voted YEA by almost all the Republicans/Democrats. Ladies & Gentleman, It is all one party, all the discord is window dressing, to have us vet and blame the other side. The media(controlled) keeps us fighting the other bad guys. FACT. We are losing our Country, freedoms, rights, voice and our chance to live in peace.
  Who is the only one that has denounced this Government over reach? Who is the only one to predict the dilemma we find ourselves in, who is the only one to actually say we are broke as a Nation? One answer: Ron Paul, my vote and only vote. We are all one nation, our party choice makes no difference.
  God bless us all
  Report Post »
cessna152
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:36pm
I‘m sure they’ll need a permit to fly it over populated areas…It’s for “our safety” of course.

How many times do we need to call out “conspiracy theorist” before we get on the cattle car? They know we are law abiding citizens. I guess I’ll have to step up my target practice…
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
brntout
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:30pm
@LUKERW A small potatoe on the end of a barrel makes an adequate silencer.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:04pm
  potatoe? good way to blow your face off (Don’t try this!)
  Report Post »
- brntout
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:22pm
  @REPUBLICORP Sorry ,forgot to add the hollowed out part.
  Report Post »
drago
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:30pm
Sure hope the local leo’s fly one near my house…………
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
TexBork
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:29pm
Wasn’t it recently decided Obama could simply order the killing of any American citizen without warrant or cause required?
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Thighmaster
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:34pm
  and I suppose you see a connection here? Like that would happen….
  Report Post »
- TexBork
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:03pm
  Thighmaster, When the administration came out with it’s terrorist watch list, whom did it target for “watching”. It seems the government is targeting certain citizens and already setting expectations and it was about US citizens. Obama said he wanted a domestic military force to enforce his domestic policies. Mark Lloyd and FCC czar, says that free speech should be limited so that the administration’s policies are easier to enforce. Surely you are aware of these things as well.
  Report Post »
- Thighmaster
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:57pm
  More than you know. I guess you didn’t pick up on me being facetious…
  Report Post »
- TexBork
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:05pm
  Thighmaster, Ah, see it’s hard to judge the body language…. It’s cool. You know, the whole thing is worse when you consider that Obama said that if the political winds shift, he will choose to side with the Muslims. In a sense, we elected our own greatest threat to ourselves.
  Report Post »
- Thighmaster
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:14pm
  I have been warning anyone who would listen about so many things we’re seeing now. And another warning: Don’t trust the Republicans either, look at all they said they would do if they won the midterm elections.. anybody out there?
  Report Post »
Thighmaster
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:28pm
Just wait until it follows your wife or daughter(s) home.. Tell Me how it’s gonna be George..
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Mr.Fitnah
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:26pm
War, what America does best. The target is now the teaparty and hate radio.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- martinez012577
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:29pm
  What is funny about your comments is the facts that the “hate radio” guys are supporting candidates that have shown they have no issue taking American citizen freedoms away.
  Report Post »
- drago
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:29pm
  @mr.fitnah aka encinom.
  Seriously kid, stay on your meds,you make about as much sense, as voting for odumbass this year,idiot….
  Report Post »
- TwoLazy
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:41pm
  It’s about time you realized how hateful those democrat/progressive radio talking heads are … the difference is that we don’t need to have them slienced. It seems that only you on the left can’t defend you positions and need to have conservatave show shut down .. have you ever bothered to take note of that?
  
  Very similar to Achmed the dead terrorist …“ shutup or I keeeel you” what a bunch of fakes you people are ..truly Sandbox Kids. Boy, go away and leave the adults alone we don’t need you, we dont’ want you involved in our lives. Run along now.
  Report Post »
- robinakilt
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:06pm
  “Hate Radio” is code for take away free speech because it hurts our feelings!
  Report Post »
youdidthis
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:24pm
they are out now. have been out .

will shoot this thing out of the sky whenever i see it.
these corporate enforcers can plat their games elsewhere.

admiralty law, common law and the sovereign
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwZhU6uv9sA

refuse to play the game.
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
brntout
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:23pm
Ah, to be tased and confused from above.
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Melvin Spittle
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:20pm
As a private pilot, I am concerned that UAV’s will endanger manned aircraft especially those with passengers. No satisfying answers have come from the FAA and FCC regarding our concerns. One of my chief concerns is the ability for interception of control and video data by a third party with malicious intent.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Thighmaster
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:32pm
  The chances of one of these bringing down an aircraft is about as likely as……….say, a goose. Not so scary now huh? Fat chance
  Report Post »
- hidden_lion
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:07pm
  Geese have brought down many aircraft. But, consider that geese don’t hover.
  Report Post »
- Thighmaster
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:02pm
  The word “facetious” comes to mind yet again…
  Report Post »
- Belchfire V-8
  Posted on April 26, 2012 at 7:07pm
  Thighmaster, some people take EVERYTHING seriously. No fun whatsoever.
  Report Post »
vtxphantom
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:19pm
The frequency range of these drones are known. Time to make some jammers
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- Patrick Henry II
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:17pm
  lol…
  Report Post »
- Thighmaster
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 6:16pm
  Can I hunt and fish with them?
  Report Post »
ChildofJesus
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:18pm
pull…BANG!! the end. :)
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
thegreatcarnac
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:16pm
Throw a piece of litter on the ground…go ahead…see what happens.
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
jackact
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:16pm
Drones, oh I forgot, you mean Barry‘s ’war machine”?…
Coming to American cities soon?
I guess the brown-shirt brigade was nixed?
Obviously no mention here of where drones could actually provide the American people with a much needed and valuable protection, on the Mexican or Canadian borders?
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
brntout
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:14pm
Time to hone up on some trap and skeet skills.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- skippy6
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:21pm
  Good ole Remington!!!
  Report Post »
- brntout
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:26pm
  @SKIPPY^, Looks like we’ll need a new breed of retriever!
  Report Post »
- martinez012577
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:31pm
  I am pretty sure shooting it will be considered assault on a police officer and will find you jail time.
  Report Post »
justangry
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:12pm
The government can just suck it! So how do we drop these birds, Buck?
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- 13th Imam
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:23pm
  Jam their controller frequency.
  Report Post »
- martinez012577
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:27pm
  At least we arent trying to vote in a guy that thinks the NDAA and other intrusions into our freedoms is a good thing. Oh wait nevermind, the GOP are trying to put Romney/Santorum/Gingrich in.
  Report Post »
- justangry
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 5:47pm
  Fear not Martinez, Ron Paul will be the only one at the convention with his own personal American trained army. It put a smile on my face when I heard Veterans for RP are planning to march a division on the convention. I’m sure they try to stop it from happening, but it’s in the works.
  Report Post »
JimL
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:10pm
And Coming to the Municipal Code Officer, the USDA Conservation Office, the EPA…
Think twice before stating, “Go and image, I have nothing to hide.”
A society that is ignorant of what’s in the bill is guilty.
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:09pm
Yeah – I’ve seen one – It can stay in the air for about 10 minutes and it’s noisier than a 1973 Pinto running on two cylinders stuck in first gear with a screaming baby in the front seat.
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- GrayPanther
  Posted on March 13, 2012 at 11:00am
  Eric; you made me pee my pants! If you are right it is worthless! The photo of the military type sheriffs department with one of these little screamers is frightening. Reminds me of WACO and Ruby Ridge. NOT very comfortable pictures of America. TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY!
  Report Post »
TexBork
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:08pm
Won’t it be cool when they are all linked together for intelligence use in DC so that the president can follow targeted citizens? Nah… That’ll never happen, right?
Report Post » Log in to Reply Reply
Mark0331
Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:07pm
Target Practice…
Report Post » Log in to ReplyReply
- lukerw
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:14pm
  Then… they need a Vehicle with sound equipment to detect where the shots come from… and a SWATeam…
  Report Post »
- Melvin Spittle
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:15pm
  Yep, target practice. I doubt I will ever be the subject of drone surveillance, but if so, I would enjoy the opportunity for a little target practice or remote interception of their control freq to take control and monitor the video feed.
  Report Post »
- Mark0331
  Posted on March 12, 2012 at 4:23pm
  The crazy thing Lukerw is that here in NJ, they have gun shot detection monitors on every street pole in the ghetto to track gun shots…not kidding. Even have a red spotlight to shine on pedestrians or cars that the cops deem ‘potentially criminal’, pre-crime..Big Brother is alive in the inner cities of NJ. Every ghetto in this state, ruined by Liberals and Democrats.
  Report Post »

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.