Media
‘Watch My Blazer, Bro!’: Liberal Bloggers Attempt to Ambush Fox News’ Jesse Waters
- Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:17am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Yesterday at CPAC in Washington DC, a liberal blogger from a Soros-funded smear site attempted to “ambush” Fox News’ Jesse Watters, who was covering the conservative conference for FoxNation.com and whose “ambush” interviews are frequently featured on The O’Reilly Factor. It was an embarrassing disaster for the little left-wing blogger. We’re surprised he posted the video because it was such a failure, but thrilled he did.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (362)
nostromo
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:59amI think a better response would be to have asked for the name of supposed insider. Then if it could not be produced explain to the ambusher that he needs better info to pull off a successful ambush and then instruct him further in successful techniques. Nonetheless a simple no would have been nice to hear.
Report Post »Nigel2
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:09pmOr perhaps simply asked for an example of something FOX just made up. Then Jesse could have explained how Glenn posts all relevant research for his shows on his website. This would really have had this guy fumbling.
Report Post »macruadhi
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:56amHe really did what most libs are guilty of doing, he avoided the question. I realize the question wasn’t really worthy of an answer, but avoiding it was the same as saying yes to this idiot
Report Post »DVT
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:53pmSince when, is not answering the same as yes? Not answering is just that not answering. One may infer anything they choose…doesnt mean the answer is yes though.
Report Post »When Jesse waters “ambushes ” hes usually get an answer that correlates to one of the questions he’s got FACTS(which he points out) to back up his question with. This liberal tool blogger, learned just that…that he is just a tool blogger.
knuckle dragger
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:56amI’d a said;
Report Post »Were you talkin’ to Alan Colmes? You were! Weren’t you?
Volsense
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:56am“The hunter becomes the hunted.“ So every punk with a camera phone is a”hunter”. Jesse didn’t give credibiluity to a punk with a lie for a question and “he runs away.” Oh the tricks a liberal mind will play on those who deceive. Hilarious stuff though.
Report Post »Jabber
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 9:52pmI’m waiting for S(&)M to resort to “I know you are but what am I?”
Report Post »snufy
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:47amI would like to know who the aledged ‘insider’ is, and what hard evidence there is. People who say Beck lies, Rush lies, Fox makes stories up…they never have anything they can point to to back up their allegations with fact. I’m open to discussion, but all I see from the left are proveable lies and distortions that are so blatently obvious. Don‘t pee on me and tell me it’s raining.
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:53amDidn’t you see the Jane Akre court case where Fox basically “won the right to lie” (which is a little inaccurate: They always had the right to)?
Jane Akre was asked to broadcast blatantly false information, was fired after denying to, then went to court with Fox under a whistleblower law. The court basically ruled it’s fine if Fox broadcasts blatantly false or slanted information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Akre
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:30amWowwo.
That’s pretty damning on their credibility.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
Report Post »macpappy
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 7:49pm@Sinista Mace
@ Non-sequitur
And other trolls
From the link you posted: You show how all progressives and liberals twist the truth to the ends they seek. Read your own links.
Akre has failed to state a claim under the whistle-blower’s statute.”[6] The appeal did not address any falsification claims, noting that “as a threshold matter … Akre failed to state a claim under the whistle-blower’s statute,” but noted that the lower court ruled against all of Wilson‘s charges and all of Akre’s claims with the exception of the whistleblower claim that was overturned
Someone wasted good money on your education
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 9:14pmDon’t lump me into any group of trolls, I’m far from a troll.
Trolls follow ME.
I’m not liberal or a progressive.
I’m a Conservative Libertarian.
I don’t think you graduated high school.
All I said is that it was interesting.
In other words, it sparked my interest.
If that makes me a troll, then everybody in this entire forum is a troll.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 9:49pmCrap, I was multitasking and responded incorrectly. (I spilled my drink reaching for the mouse)
Look above for your response, Macpappy.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:36pmThat’s that Kush for you.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:42amYou know when, you approach someone with a camera phone, and that person can’t answer the simple question, it’s kinda weak, ya know…a little piece of advice.
The hunter becomes the hunted. And he runs away.
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:04amAnswer my question SINISTA
ARE YOU A 911 TRUTHER?
IF NOT THEN WHY DO YOU POST LINKS FROM A 911 TRUTHER SITE???
Report Post »BelowAverageJoe
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:08amWho in the world with any credibility would do an interview for someone with a camera phone? You? I would hope even you have more dignity than that. He didn’t answer the question because the question was ill-formed, not thought out, and possibly, from Mr. Watters’ perspective, a joke. Good Lord!
Report Post »georgiaman
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:11amA lame dude with a lame question and a camera phone wouldn’t be worth my time either. He should be thrilled he got ANY response at all from Jesse. I wouldn’t have suffered this fool for two seconds. Unnamed sources, no evidence to back up claim, no follow up questions…..the very definition of “LAME”.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:24amAlex Jones’ website is not a 9-11 “truther” site.
I do believe 9-11 was an inside job, it’s my prerogative and I can draw my own conclusions, thank you very much.
I have a brain to think with and not a Borg mind such as you and the rest of the neocons who regularly attack people who think 9-11 was an inside job, and Glenn Beck who openly attacks the families of 9-11 victims and the victims of Katrina.
BelowAverageJoe, why not answer a simple question?
It makes it appear he has something to hide.
Perhaps this has something to do with it?
I think the reporter did a good job, even though it was mediocre.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:35amALEX JONES IS a 911 TRUTHER
want proof
Here is a video of your whack job leader ALEX JONES
explaining how OUR GOVERNMENT blew up the TWIN TOWERS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMjgyzKoXy4
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:55amAlex Jones whole website
READ LIKE A TOM CLANCEY NOVEL
THATS FICTION BY THE WAY
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:31pmThat’s awfully hilarious of you to mention Tom Clancy.
You know why?
Because it was Glenn Beck who expoused the idea of science fiction writers having the level of intelligence and access to critical persons involved in high level and top secret sensitive positions that enables them to provide their general audience with a very credible and believable fiction, because we all know, if you read, which I doubt you do, that in order to keep your audience entertained when writing a fiction work you have to present a believeable story that keeps them interested and reading.
Digest.
Report Post »Paul G
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:41amI know Jesse was obviously just messing with him…kinda like a cat plays with a mouse, but he coulda at least just said “NOoooo!”
Report Post »Soldier4Christ
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:37amI like this guy. He’s pretty smooth.
Report Post »OhSuzieQ
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 8:04pmAnd Hot too! What a smile. LOL
Report Post »ibanrfknm
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:37amAmateur hour
Report Post »anutter
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:37amJesse took it in stride but probably should have played with him a little more. Oh well, he must of thought not worth his time. Amateurs…
Report Post »Gabby Johnson
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:37amThat was not even newsworthy. I would think Jesse would have a better “canned” answer for such stupid comments.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:33amIt must be to some extent…the Soros Trolls are out in numbers here.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:42amSoros is not some boogeyman. He is a peon amongst the real players.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
KeithOlberdink
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:36amThese libs got nothing. My 8 year old son could have done a better job. I guess doritos and pot does make you stupid.
Report Post »weeblewacker1
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:04ami agree!!!! any 8 year old could answer a yes or no question!
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:20amI Agree Weeblewacker1.
Report Post »TreeTrimmerJim
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:35amIn this age of debit our nation needs self reliance, creativity and persistence in increase our nations sales. Instead we get mind wasting gotcha.
Report Post »mr.goodvibe
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:35amSchooled. I’d like to see him try that on Jason Mattera.
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:35amHe gave the guy more respect than he deserved. Thuther leftist morons should be completely ignored.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:34amWhy couldn’t he answer the simple little retarded question?
Would have made the blogger look dumber if he had answered with intelligence.
Perhaps because there is some truth to what the blogger was asking.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:43am“Some truth”? FOX literally won the right to lie and obfuscate in a court case when they demanded that one of their reporters broadcast information she knew was made up and fired her when she denied.
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:01amSINISTA
Im just curious
Do you have a giant poster of ALEX JONES (the 911 truther whack job)
in your living room.
Or does the whack job pay your to post his links?
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:02amAnswer this SINISTA
ARE YOU A 911 TRUTHER?
Report Post »Scoutmapper
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:05amLOL, this is your “truth”?
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:19amHey Non-Sequitor, got some links to that?
Dash, I’m convinced that you have a giant poster of ME in your bedroom directly over your bed.
I am a truther.
Are you an imbecile?
Scoutmapper, “lol”?
You “LOL-ed” but can’t counter or debunk one single thing in the entire video?
Alex Jones rips Glenn Beck to shreds on this video.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:29amSo SINISTA admits to being a 911 TRUTHER
Just like the JONES’
ALEX JONES and VAN JONES
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:41amDashriprock, you’re a joke. So, because I think 9-11 was an inside job, I’m the same as Van Jones?
HAHHAHAHA. Damn I drooled while laughing.
So, are you going to tell me to go post at the Puffington Toast and that I’m not a patriot and anti-american, and that I’m not a Tea Partier, and that I’m a domestic terrorist?
Are you going to tell me, who had family die in 9-11, that you hate me like Glenn Beck did?
You‘re so damn predictable it’s pathetic.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:48amLet me spell it out for you, idiot.
9-11 was an inside job.
See? That was easy.
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:53amSINISTA
Right or Left
ALL NUT JOBS DRINK FROM THE SAME FOUNTAIN
OF MISINFORMATION
Report Post »Gita
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:12pm@Sinista Your ignorance is showing, any first year journalism student learns the reporting rules. WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE. A yes or no question is never good reporting!
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:37pmDashriprock, which fountain would that be….Glenn Beck, or Alex Jones?
If you don’t realize, I’m setting you up for the woo woo.
Gita, I‘m not ignorant for having the opinion that the man should’ve answered the question.
I don’t care about your fabricated rules.
Whether or not it was good reporting is a moot point. We’re discussing it. I’d say he had the impact desired and his mission was successful. He made the guy look like he had something to hide by not answering.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:18pm@DashRipRock
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:29am
So SINISTA admits to being a 911 TRUTHER
___________________
Thank you for a good time tonight!
Sinista has raved and ranted, ripped the head from her Cabbage Patch doll off, called you stupid, and admitted to what you accused of of!
ROFLM-A$$-O!
Report Post »Thank goodness I have a new box of Kleenex! She is STEAMING at what you said, and MacPappy SMOKED her! (Somebody call the fire department!)
Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:43pmShowtime
I know you trolls have to support each other, because nobody else supports your ridiculous garbage.
But seriously, you all look pretty pathetic piggybacking each other like 12 yr old boys in the gym shower dropping bars of soap.
BTW, I’m a he, not a she.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 2:22pm@Sinista ~
Report Post »“BTW, I’m a he, not a she.”
——————-
Fooled me. You come across like a dumb blond.
Sinista Mace
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 2:30pmShowtime
I didn’t “fool” you.
You’re just a fool.
Report Post »SnapTie
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:32amRun with anomis ghost former Fox insiders.What happened to real reporting?who.what,when,how.
Report Post »sbleve
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 9:21amActually the 5 W’s – what where when why who
Report Post »jinx83
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:31amif i couldnt get an answer of a simple questions my hands would shake too.. thanks to the camera man who held composure.
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:31am“The question is very important.”
So true. Well handled Mr. Waters.
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:25amAmen FOX give Jesse a raise!!!
Report Post »What class dealing with a Soros Moonbat
highcarry
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:30ami’m sorry, but watters acted like all the people he ambushes. what a wasted opportunity.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:35amHe should have answered the question.
Report Post »Scoutmapper
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:02amThat is exactly why he ignored the question…it makes the piece useless, regardless of the truth. You cannot honor them with an answer when they are not legitimate reporters.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:15amUseless?
He got the idiot on tape not answering simple questions. That‘s hardly useless or he wouldn’t have posted it.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:30amOk, you’re sorry. A person is not obliged to answer a question that comes from a lie or false premise. If you‘ve seen Waters’ “ambush” pieces, he works from a known fact and asks a question that make the person being ambushed look like the fool that he is.
Report Post »In this case, the Soros employee starts from a lie, and goes NOWHERE.
Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:36amA person is not obliged to answer a question at all.
I wonder what this has to do with the idiot not answering the SIMPLE QUESTION that isn’t based on any lies.
Perhaps this has something to do with it?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
DMcPher316
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 1:14pmWell, as this dummy obvoiusly had no follow-up question, I would have answered “no” and left or said no and asked if he had some proof, which I would bet he didn’t. The problm with dummies like this guy is they parrot what they read on their blogs and on’t look into it any further. How about doing some research to see where the info came from, who said it and how did they back it up. this is what Beck does, resaerch, confirm and put it out there in “thier own words”
Report Post »RN MOM
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 4:21pmI disagree, Waters was in charge of the interview, he chose not to answer the simpleton’s question. He chose to badger and belittle the amateur instead.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:05pm@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:15am
Useless?
He got the idiot on tape not answering simple questions. That‘s hardly useless or he wouldn’t have posted it.
_______________________________
Sinista, pay close attention, okay?
Jesse Waters did not answer the question BECAUSE he recognized that no matter WHAT he said, Mr. Anonymous Cell Phone Holder would have twisted the reply. There was no reason for Waters to give credence to someone without credibility.
Waters tried to help the guy, but Mr. Anonymous Cell Phone Holder was too dense to realize that he needed to turn off the camera phone instead of demonstrating what a phony he was to Waters, right on up to the elevator door closing.
The liberals are jumping all over Waters; but when Obama walks off from a speech to the press and refuses to answer questions from a lawn FULL of reporters with PRESS ID, do they open their pie holes?
Get a life!
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:47pmShowtime
Sounds like a pretty lame excuse not to answer a simple question to me.
“There was no reason for Waters to give credence to someone without credibility.”
Sounds exactly like Robert Gibbs or Obama talking about Fox News.
Get a clue.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 1:01pm@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:47pm
Showtime
Sounds like a pretty lame excuse not to answer a simple question to me.
“There was no reason for Waters to give credence to someone without credibility.”
Sounds exactly like Robert Gibbs or Obama talking about Fox News.
Get a clue.
——————————————————————————————————————————-
“Sounds like a pretty lame excuse not to answer a simple question to me.”
OBAMA did the same thing, except that OBAMA did not even smile when he walked away.
OBAMA whines about “failure to communicate” to the public, but he walks away when asked a question.
OBAMA does not even recognize the reporter’s presence; Jesse Waters did.
In your words, “Get a clue.”
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 1:22pmShowtime, thanks for making my point for me, clueless.
It was inevitable.
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:28amAnother child sent to do a man’s work. And without any background education about his question or he would know how bogus a question that was. Poor uneducated fool.
Report Post »weeblewacker1
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:02amhe was just asking a simple yes or no question!! now,if you think just a little itty-bitty bit,you do have to wonder why he was running away from “this poor uneducated fool”? oh-well! its better than being a fox-gop right-winged, fanatical,Tool!
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:35amIf he bothered to look at FOX news and pay attention to history and current events, he would see that it was a stupid question. If FOX were lying to the public it would hardly be #1 in the news people trust to be fair, balanced and honest. Someone got this guy to run around with his cell phone, hopefully earning a pay check, but that question hardly dignified an answer.
Report Post »rkrives
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:45amyou sure gave weeblewacker1 fits, I wonder why he wants nobody to reply to his ignorant postings…lol
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:13pmWEEBLEWHACKER>>>If only YOU could ask simple striaght forward quentions. When you’re on the attack, better have the script ready. Don’t overestimate yourself weeble….you are a novice at this stuff.
Report Post »RN MOM
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 4:18pmweeble- He could have answered the question, and I bet a part of him was tempted to respond “no”, but the ambush interviewer came off as a inept amateur therefore garnered no respect from Waters.
Report Post »Supreme Galooty
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 6:02pmSome of you quaint folks beleaguered by irrationality must surely realize that SOME “yes or no” questions demand a swift kick in the patootie rather than an actual response. To wit:
You: Did you ever cultivate the art of solitary romance?
Me:
You: OUCH! OW! JEEZ, OW.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:30pm@Grandmaof5 ~
Report Post »If this guy starts backtalking to you, this is going to get GOOD! He doesn’t realize you have more brains in your little finger than he has in his entirety! (He’s asking for it!)
spod
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:27amFollowing in the footsteps of that guy Maddow.
Report Post »Solsta Lynn
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:27amOwned!!!
Report Post »TennesseeConservative
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 10:25amThe question was a speculation not based on facts. Hearsay not fact. Like this ” Hey, have you stopped beating your wife yet?” What would you answer to that? Any answer would be stupid. Just say like Jesse did, get away from me you moron. At least he did try to tell the kid how stupid he was. Just the facts Mam. The left actually believe they are more intelligent then anyone else. When in fact they are not too smart.
Report Post »Carl1
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:26amIs that the best Soros could get? Pretty lame…. Guess he could get a job at current tv. .
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:29amUnfortunately for this one case, Soros has the losing end of the investment.
Report Post »drhunt
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:20amweeblewacker-LOL! Not full of myself, just stating fact. And yes, many of the lame progressives at TP also utilized the “h” for “c” ad hominem approach against me…it’s really all they had. I will state this, that many of the blog contributors at TP were debating me using an alias, and I handled them will relative aplomb. I exposed them as hypocrites, made one prediction after another, which are coming true on a weekly basis. FWIW, I made the prediction in March 2009 that the GOP would take back the House in nov 2010 in an election that made 1994 look close in comparison. I was right. You are wrong. I made many other predictions, and exposed Obama as being perhaps the least fit POTUS that we’ve ever elected in my lifetime…which is stating a LOT, considering how lame carter was…but…’nuff ‘said’.
Report Post »Robert-CA
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:51amEpic Fail LOL
Report Post »SLEUTH
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 9:24pmSINISTA MACE, if someone you dont know came up to you and asked you the same type of question, would you answer? just anybody with a camera phone? that could end up going through Printshop and you tube? you wouldnt know. if you say yes, then you would be a naive. Jesse Waters is not naive.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 9:44pmSleuth
I don’t have a problem answering truthfully, so it wouldn’t be a problem for me at all.
Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:46pm@weeblewacker1
You don’t need to get crude.
Dr. Hunt didn’t blow you away because obviously he has upbringing and an education.
Report Post »SLEUTH
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 12:44amthats right SINISTA MACE, you would be foolish enough to have anyone A/V you and put an edited version on youtube. Jesse Waters is not naive. you’re drooling for attention. you believe anything from Alex Jones? what say you about the ‘Fema Camps’ ?
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 10:44amSleuth
They could edit it all they wanted. It wouldn’t increase their credibility, it would decrease it. There’s too many ways to detect edited video and audio. I know because I’m an audio producer and have dabbled in some video editing myself.
I’m “drooling” for attention?
Why do you say that? I’m simply expressing my opinion like everyone else here. Why wouldn’t everyone else be also “drooling” by your criteria?
What I believe is my prerogative.
I think the FEMA CAMPS are real, proven.
Jesse Ventura blew that wide open, and then they yanked it off TruTV , along with other episodes of his show.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 6:21pm@Sinista Mace ~
You have not made me to anything. If I apologized, I did so of my own free will. By the way, WE ALL make mistakes. I am guessing now that my apology was a mistake.
Meanwhile, you have gone to the trouble to post every comment that is Progressive or is in the slightest way similar to your opinion. However, NO ONE has siad, “Sinista, you are right.” Nobody includes zero person, to say he or she agrees with you. But look at the people who have jumped back AT you.
You have called people names. You have been insulting to nearly everyone here. You have made leud remarks. You have SCOLDED people who have replied to you, telling them to be quiet, yet you have been a pain in the rosterium by doing exactly what you’re telling others to do.
And, you have afforded me an opportunity to vent at an absolute empty head. Do you hear an echo when you think? Or are you capable of real thought.
You have absolutely blown up like a CHILD over the fact that someone disagreed with you! I don’t care what you think any more than you care what I think. And, I’m just leaving it at that. If you want to engage in schoolyard behavior, have at it. Make an even bigger fool of yourself. No one is amused or impressed by what you’re saying.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 15, 2011 at 2:34pmI don’t care what you think any more than you care what I think. And, I’m just leaving it at that. If you want to engage in schoolyard behavior, have at it. Make an even bigger fool of yourself. No one is amused or impressed by what you’re saying.
Hey Showtime
“You have not made me to anything. If I apologized, I did so of my own free will. By the way, WE ALL make mistakes. I am guessing now that my apology was a mistake.”
Remember this?:
Showtime
Posted on February 8, 2011 at 5:53pm
@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 8, 2011 at 4:24pm
Sinista Mace, you are a thinker after all, not a troll. My apologies for snotty remarks earlier.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/coming-soon-the-obamacare-comic-book/
Ahahahahaha!!!
Bwahahahaa!!!
SHOWTIME!!!
ROTFLMFAO!!!!
AHAHAHAHA
Your mistake is ever challenging me.
“Meanwhile, you have gone to the trouble to post every comment that is Progressive or is in the slightest way similar to your opinion”
I don‘t know what the hell you’re talking about. I posted 7 solid examples of people generally agreeing with me. You ***FAILED*** again.
“However, NO ONE has siad, “Sinista, you are right.”
Really?
saviorammo
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:48pm
Sinista, you are on fire today!
Stand tall. Im sre we don’t agree on much, but man, each post is getting better and better. The truth will always bring those together who seek it.
You love ***FAILURE***, don’t you?
“But look at the people who have jumped back AT you.”
Yea. look at them. AHAHAHAHAHAHAA
They’re a joke. And I dispatched every single one of them.
“You have called people names. You have been insulting to nearly everyone here. You have made leud remarks. You have SCOLDED people who have replied to you, telling them to be quiet, yet you have been a pain in the rosterium by doing exactly what you’re telling others to do.”
You’re hilarious. Would you like me to go back through 7-8 threads of your trolling and start posting your ridiculous comments for everyone to see how obsessed you are with me and my opinions?
“And, you have afforded me an opportunity to vent at an absolute empty head. Do you hear an echo when you think? Or are you capable of real thought.”
ROTFLMFAO.
You’re as dumb as a ball of yarn. And I’m toying with you like a black panther.
“I don’t care what you think any more than you care what I think. And, I’m just leaving it at that. If you want to engage in schoolyard behavior, have at it. Make an even bigger fool of yourself. No one is amused or impressed by what you’re saying.”
hahahaha!!
That’s why you keep responding to my every single breath.
Again….
(rotflmfao)
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:20amEven a disaster of a“AMBUSH” to the Soros bands are a success, to them anything is becoming a success as they are falling apart, and the people are becoming use to the free comedy they provide for us.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:28amOther great AMBUSH moments of this libberal blogger…
Ambush of a tree, “Hey where did the tree go…”
Ambush of a dog, “Run faster!!!”
Ambush of a cat. “Mad kitty! Mad Kitty!”
Ambush of a rat (Thud, fainted)
Ambush of a bat (Stands still in a cold sweat with it perched on his head…”Uh, dracula…”
You get the idea…
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:30amSNOW, like the new artwork. Good contrast with the pinks and green, one of my favorite combos.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:32amI think the ambush was quite effective.
The man won’t answer.
He wouldn’t let up.
I’d say overall, good job!
Of course the follow up questions weren’t planned well at all, but hey?
We got another idiot on video refusing to answer simple questions.
545 vs 300,000,000+
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:33amWhat Soros could not afford a camera for this bonehead!
drhunt
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:38amI’ve spent a LOT of time posting at the Think Progress blog site, under various alias’s, because they kept bouncing me for supposed TOS violations…they simply didn’t want to read contrarian views, especially from one as articulate, comparatively, as myself. I’m still a legend at that site, as I took apart progressive ideology, decimated liberal agendas, and exposed the bloggers as the misinformed miscreants they are. It was time well spent. I did the same at Air America before their demise. Ben is one of the worst bloggers there…acidic, incendiary stories that reek of socialism. The contributors to the blogs are liberal wannabe’s, many of whom are medicated on a variety of anti-depressive type medications, and actually admitted to it in writing. Considering that Think Progress was advertising for bloggers recently, it appears that they are in need of fresh minds, or are in financial chaos. Good. Have Soros keep pumping money into a losing gig…and perhaps TP will fall like AA did a few years ago.
cnsrvtvj
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:39amI’m sure they just hate Jesse Waters. He’s always exposing them for what they are. I loved the VP of human relations at Planned Parenthood last week who said he was absolutely positive the videos had been doctored. When pressed by Jesse Waters, he finally admitted he hadn’t even watched the video. Keep rocking Jesse.
http://www.donsmithshow.com – see the liberal mindset video
Report Post »bigbud
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:40amI just wish that Jessie would have answered the question. He could have blistered that chump. Put him in his place . It was going to be pretty much as he said . I don’t think that they could have edited the cell phone to take his words out of context.
Report Post »Cemoto78
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:45amPretty lame ambush tactics, Waters was goofing with the guy for that reason, however, how hard is it to FINALLY answer the question. What is it, yes or no? Enquiring (sic) minds would like to know. I’m leaning towards no.
Report Post »barstooltestpilot
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:50amNothing specific in the question. Do you think Fox News makes up stories? The only answer to that question is ” Do you mean make up stories like the New York Times reporter Jayson Blair?” Is that what your asking?
Report Post »weeblewacker1
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:51amwell,don’t worry,the progressive’s are kinda new to these kinds of tactics and the good g.o.p.ers folks and fox news have been doing it for ages!! and he never did answer the simple question now did he? and what was that simple question? something about a ex foxnews person saying that fox is just a right wing smear machine that will say and do anything,true or not to smear the democrates.that they make up a lot of their stories? no big surprise there for anybody that uses there brain.
Abby Normal
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:57amAnswer what? That Fox makes things up? How rediculous is that…I don‘t think they’d have the highest cable news ratings if they were in the business of fabricating the news??? So Jesse had no reason to respond to such a rediculous question, and was schooling the ******* on how to do the ambush right…go back to kindergarten interviewer, you need more learnin’…
Report Post »rappini
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:23amI think that Jesse handle that situation like a pro. That was Beautiful. The Soro’s crew tanks again.
Report Post »docvet
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:36amThe question didn’t need to be answered by Waters. The possible answers are:
Report Post »Yes. End of waters career and explosive propaganda for the libs.
No. The libs don’t believe him and the interview was a waste of time (which it was anyways).
A good reply might have been “Watch Fox and find out”. Nevertheless, he allowed the interviewer to make an amateir fool of himself. That was enough.
Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:37amThe answer was obviously yes, because he wouldn’t answer.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/dear-glenn-beck-egypt-destabilization-op-hatched-by-globalists-not-communists.html
John 1776
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:56amAny answer would have validated the ambush, of course he gave no answer. Fox is good at backing up what they say with video of the people saying the things themselves, something the rest of the media has forgotten how to do. As Beck says, “Look it up yourself.” I always do as I don’t take anything at face value. What I find is a higher level of fact with comments in context. I don’t see this with the MSM.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:57amIs an “ambush” a special kind of situation where you’re somehow not obligated to answer the question?
What does it matter if the guy had a camera phone or not?
All Jesse Waters did was ignore the question and raise insignificant points about the guy’s hand shaking (which I didn’t notice) and the type of camera he had. I am not impressed. Also, I think Waters was doing his best to avoid looking nervous so as not to give the Left something to distract their followers from any actual answer he would have given – which is why the guy posted the video, because it was obvious what Waters was doing.
Using style over substance to try and convince people of your point of view is a Saul Alinski type of tactic, and is exactly why this country is in trouble – people don’t learn to think critically because they think style is an argument.
The answer to his question is: Insofar as Fox News’ agenda favors our Constitutional Republic, and insofar as Republicans favor (or pretend to favor) our Constitutional Republic, there is going to be a kinship between them. But to say that Fox News is not fair, or that it has an agenda, is disingenuous since all news organizations should be in favor of the Constitutional Republic. When the Founders said they wanted to guarantee the freedom of the Press, guess what?: they had an agenda. And the agenda was NOT to merely report on the facts, but specifically to guard the Republic against government abuse of individual inalienable rights – that’s the REASON for a free Press. And Fox News’ agenda reflects this.
Other networks, such as MSNBC, seem to have the opposite agenda: the destruction of our Constitutional Republic. And that‘s why you don’t see a lot of their people on Fox News, or their views represented. That’s not unfair, but responsible.
Besides, no one’s trying to silence far Left views. They are welcome to say whatever they want, and we are welcome to listen and respond, or not. We know where to find Left wing views, and sometimes we listen to those. But some of us like to listen to Right Wing views more. That’s our choice.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:07pmrofl .. Jesse tries to school this guy and he still isn’t smart enough to get it!
Report Post »fitzpjo
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:18pmThat question should be directed to the New York Times
Report Post »Jill
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 1:07pmI found this article on this website http://www.opednews.com/articles/FOX-NEWS-INSIDER–Stuff-I-by-Eric-Boehlert-110211-333.html …but the source is not identified..big shocker….which has been picked up by Olbermanns new home… on currentTV website…News | February 10, 2011 |
FOX NEWS INSIDER: “Stuff Is Just Made Up” which has the source from media matters
…. http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102100007
also found this listed under comedy…
Report Post »MSNBC INSIDER: “Stuff Is Just Made Up”
source: http://opensourceworld.us/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7424:msnbc-insider-st...
http://current.com/entertainment/comedy/92977489_msnbc-insider-stuff-is-just-made-up.htm
butler180
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 1:09pmTo Sinista Mace – How was it a good job? The guy with the cell phone used unnamed sources, this translates into ‘made up quote’ and was baiting the trap.
Report Post »Cell Phone got his 15 seconds of fame and now into oblivion. Good-by
mcfinch
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 1:12pmLiberals are fun.
http://politicalbowl.com – Political Video Website
Report Post »Malachai
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 1:50pmHAHAHA… “Soros funded smear site.” So pathetic. I guess when you can‘t argue with facts it’s best to just throw out ad hominem attacks. It’s funny that when they bring things up, the information presented is almost never battled head on; writers for this site simply hide behind “It’s funded by Soros so it must be false!”
I also love this “Ambush” interview thing too. Yes, how dare you ask people what they think without giving them 24 hour prep time!
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:04pmWEEBLEWACKER….nonsensical……you really ought to get more control of syntax befere you try to troll on this site. You just look uneducated and sloppy.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:10pmButler180,
Are we discussing it, or not?
Report Post »waggie
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:11pmI‘m thinkin he didn’t need to justify himself or Fox News to that idiot! To answer the question would be to admit that they are a legit news outlet and worthy of an answer! Neither of which is true!
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:33pmWaggie,
That sounds exactly like Fox News‘ griping about the White House freezing them out and Glenn Beck complaining that he won’t respond to him!
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 2:57pmSinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:32am
“I think the ambush was quite effective.”
You fail. The first two words in your post gave it away.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 3:13pm“well,don’t worry,the progressive’s are kinda new to these kinds of tactics and the good g.o.p.ers folks and fox news have been doing it for ages”
Really, the Progressives at 60 Minutes invented the concept
Report Post »joseph Fawcett
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 3:34pmI think the guy was ok, he pursued his target and Waters just tried to demean him, by giving him advise. The camera phone captured everything, I don’t see a problem with using one if it did the job. Too bad Waters made it look like that there is truth to the story, maybe Waters is the inside source and didn’t want to be exposed, that is why the demeaning comments and the lack of response. Hummmmmmm! Don’t get me wrong I am a big Fox News fan, I try to be fair and balanced, just like Fox claims. Waters did not do any favors to the truth and the question was a fair question asking for his opinion and comment.
http://www.josephfawcettart.com Western Artist
NeoFan
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 3:38pmThis guy goes after pedophile loving judges so its no surprise that the left hates him with a passion.
Report Post »The ACLU gives free legal representation to groups like NAMBLA(a group that advocates the abduction rape and murder of boys) and you see the current support planned parenthood gives to pimps running child sex slave rings. The ACLU and planned parenthood are strongly supported by the left. Anyone that attacks pedophiles will be attacked by the left.
Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 4:14pmThePatriotDave, I guess you’re just here talking about nothing at all and obsessing over my comments, so his ambush failed.
What a klutz you are for that, Dave.
Be silent with your personal attacks.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 4:32pmI would of said “Hell no”! and then would have offered for a one on one interview to allow enough time to get the facts straight for the people to decide. I’d of smiled from ear to ear and ask if there was anything else. Upon leaving I might of stumbled and fell into the guy inadvertently racking and or heading butting the guy. All on “accident” of course. Accidents happen. Just saying….
Report Post »Dandylyon
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 6:29pmDon’t you just love what all the money in the world can buy for a liberal.This is as good as they get………….even with Soros’s money.
Your employee’s reflect directly upon you Soros……….does that mean your a MORON to big guy???
Report Post »Hugh Williams
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 6:36pmWith the amount of money Soros is spending you think they would be able to list specific things FOX lied about and give proof it was a lie. We here all the time from the left Fox lies, but they never list any lie that can be verified as a lie.
Report Post »Hugh Williams
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 6:42pmYes I know it should have been hear. Lol
Report Post »Sparky101
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 7:13pmSinista Mace says “The answer was obviously yes, because he wouldn’t answer.” Well there you go then, the product of an exclusive education has never heard what it means to “assume.” What a dreadfully stupid answer. Is that all you’ve got?
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 9:35pmSparky101
What are you talking about an exclusive education, what exactly are you referring to?
I didn’t assume anything at all.
“Wilson and Akre planned a four part investigative report on Monsanto’s use of rBGH, which prompted Monsanto to write to Roger Ailes, president of Fox News Channel, in an attempt to have the report reviewed for bias and because of the “enormous damage that can be done” as a result of the report.”
That tells me that they were caught and that they were seeking help from a MSM outlet to help sway public opinion about their actions because “enormous damage could be done” as a result of the report.
“WTVT did not run the report, and later argued in court that the report was not “breakthrough journalism.“ ”
That tells me that they have a very weak excuse for not running the story.
“An appeal was filed, and a ruling in February 2003 came down in favor of WTVT, who successfully argued that the FCC policy against falsification was not a “law, rule, or regulation”, and so the whistle-blower law did not qualify as the required “law, rule, or regulation” under section 448.102 of the Florida Statutes.”
Right there it corroborates exactly what Non-Sequitur posted- “The court basically ruled it’s fine if Fox broadcasts blatantly false or slanted information.”
“The appeal did not address any falsification claims, noting that “as a threshold matter … Akre failed to state a claim under the whistle-blower’s statute,…”
How the courts ruled in the case in of little consequence to me.
Non-Sequitur was right.
And you’re the troll.
Seek higher education.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 9:47pmOh, I’m sorry Sparky101, you didn’t call me a troll. That was meant for macpappy.
I’m far from stupid though.
Opposite side of the spectrum.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:14pm@Sinista Mace ~~
Do you REALLY expect a Fox News employee to give credence to an ambush sponsored by George Soros? The question was absurd. If you will WATCH Fox News, you will see video after video AFTER VIDEO of what they report. Same goes for ((GB)), too.
I think Jesse Waters did an excellent job of putting the guy in his place. Instead of Waters being on the defensive, the liberal was put on the defensive. And, Waters even smiled at him. If the liberal ever gave his name, I don’t recall it.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:17pm@DashRipRock
@Sinista Mace
Sinista, he simply asked you a question. You could watch the tone of your answers.
Report Post »No need to turn into being just another hate-spewing Progressive!
Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:21pmI would’ve called his bluff and made him describe what the hell he was talking about, where it came from, who he was, sources, then laughed at him for quite a while, then did him like I do the trolls in here.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:22pm@CatB
Report Post »Posted on February 13, 2011 at 12:07pm
rofl .. Jesse tries to school this guy and he still isn’t smart enough to get it!
- – - – - – - – - -
Neither is Sinista Mace smart enough to get it!
Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:37pm@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:37am
“The answer was obviously yes, because he wouldn’t answer.”
- – - – - – - – -
For a while there, I was giving you credit for having some sense, but you have blown that impression all to pieces.
The answer was an unspoken, “If you were a member of the press, I would honor your question with an answer. Since you are not a member of the press, you don’t need a videotaped answer.”
Even when I wrote for a newspaper in North Carolina, I had press ID and a decal on my car each year. And, I carried a Sony camera, notebook, and tape recorder. Without press ID, would I have asked such a question of Jesse Waters? NO! I would have expected him to tell me, “When I think it’s any of your business, I’ll answer your question.”
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:41pmShowtime
I don’t think you, Fox News, Glenn Beck, or any of you blind lemmings in here are smart enough to spin it.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:44pmShowtime
You said: “The answer was an unspoken, “If you were a member of the press, I would honor your question with an answer. Since you are not a member of the press, you don’t need a videotaped answer.”
Sounds like an answer Obama and Gibbs would give to Beck and other Fox News reporters.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:51pm@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:41pm
Showtime
I don’t think you, Fox News, Glenn Beck, or any of you blind lemmings in here are smart enough to spin it.
———————–
When you show some modicum of intelligence, it will matter to me what you think of Fox News, Glenn Beck, or me. Until such time, however, you don’t have to be here at this Fox News site, listen to Fox News, Glenn Beck, or read what I have to say.
You sound a lot like “MULTI-NAME.”
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:50pmShowtime
I have shown a great deal of intelligence, and all you can do is personally attack me, showing your arrested development. In spite of your claims not to care about my opinions, you keep following me around to every single thread trolling after my every breath, showing your admiration and obsession with me.
I still don’t know who, or what “MULTI-NAME” is.
Maybe it’s you….
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:54pm@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:41pm
Showtime
I don’t think you, Fox News, Glenn Beck, or any of you blind lemmings in here are smart enough to spin it.
——————————–
No, Sinista. I am not blind. I used to be, when I voted the Democratic ticket for 50 years. But then I wised up. I was all for Obama, but when I asked the Democratic Party for some information about him for a story, they would not answer my questions. They just asked for a contribution–in a form email. I called them on the phone. No answers. I emailed asking specifically that some live person respond. I asked my questions, and I never heard from him again. Just received form emails asking for contributions.
I didn’t leave the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party left me. The Democratic Party is not what it used to be. Far from it. Today it’s all about socialism. Ask Maxine Waters. Ask Van Jones. Ask any of the czars, Ask any Progressive Democrat, such as John Kerry, Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, etc.
No, I’m not blind. You’re the one who is in denial.
Report Post »Loki
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 12:22amKinda funny that a jackhole for prison planet is here bashing beck and fox news….
Report Post »the prison planet website and jackholes that read it show that with $15 and a braincell, people can post crap as news…
Showtime
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 12:50am@Sinista Mace
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:41pm
Showtime
I don’t think you, Fox News, Glenn Beck, or any of you blind lemmings in here are smart enough to spin it.
Report Post »———————–
I don’t know, Sinista. You’ll have to ask the newspaper. I was the only one writing from my office, and the circulation increased enough six months after I started working there that they RAISED the advertising rates! I left in 2007. They folded up after two years, in 2009. A friend told me that the papers weren’t even selling in the stores or boxes after I left.
Showtime
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 1:05am@Sinista Mace ~
“I have shown a great deal of intelligence, and all you can do is personally attack me, showing your arrested development.”
—————————
Is that the reason that six people on this page alone have disagreed with you specifically?
I just find you an amusement, that’s all.
And, as for “Multi-Name,” everybody here knows to whom I am referring. They also know that I am not that person.
Give it a rest. You aren‘t going to change anyone’s mind by calling them “trools,“ ”blind lemmings,“ ”imbecile,“ ”a strawman-setting imbecile,” or other names. If you are so well educated, and if you are so smart, why don’t you know how to “win friends and influence people?” You lost your debate.
Report Post »Jayk Signal
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 3:35amIt wouldn’t matter if Fox news “makes stuff up” since, unlike the liberal media, I always get an independent secondary source for all the information I believe.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 11:01amShowtime
Your little story about how you’re a failure at reporting, nobody cares about.
Nobody asked to hear your life story.
Loser.
Get over yourself.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 11:46am@Sinista Mace ~~
Okay, so I’m a failure as a reporter?
We don‘t fail unless we don’t try.
I won a state press award for my writing.
I have not called you any names because I am showing the same respect for you that I wish you would show me and others.
I have not seen six people stand up against what I have said, but I have seen them disagree with your comments.
Carry your hate somewhere else. It’s one thing to be dense, but it’s quite another to be dense AND hateful, verbally abusive, disrespectful, and annoying.
Go ahead and have the last word. You are absolutely right. You can’t argue with being absolutely right, can you?
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 1:55pmShowtime
Not only are we NOT interested in your imaginary awards, you narcissistic peon, you’ve been trolling me for a number of threads along with a number of other butthurt little troglodytes trying with earnest to produce a worthwhile insult or “gotcha” from the combined conglomerate of amoebas that constitutes your definition of a brain.
Perhaps you’re such a failure in attacking my opinion yourself that all you can do is search around the forum for someone who disagrees with me to support your feeble assertions.
Nevertheless, here we go, FYI:
bigbud
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:40am
I just wish that Jessie would have answered the question. He could have blistered that chump. Put him in his place . It was going to be pretty much as he said . I don’t think that they could have edited the cell phone to take his words out of context.
Cemoto78
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 10:45am
Pretty lame ambush tactics, Waters was goofing with the guy for that reason, however, how hard is it to FINALLY answer the question. What is it, yes or no? Enquiring (sic) minds would like to know. I’m leaning towards no.
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:57am
Is an “ambush” a special kind of situation where you’re somehow not obligated to answer the question?
Malachai
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 1:50pm
HAHAHA… “Soros funded smear site.” So pathetic. I guess when you can‘t argue with facts it’s best to just throw out ad hominem attacks. It’s funny that when they bring things up, the information presented is almost never battled head on; writers for this site simply hide behind “It’s funded by Soros so it must be false!”
I also love this “Ambush” interview thing too. Yes, how dare you ask people what they think without giving them 24 hour prep time!
joseph Fawcett
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 3:34pm
I think the guy was ok, he pursued his target and Waters just tried to demean him, by giving him advise. The camera phone captured everything, I don’t see a problem with using one if it did the job. Too bad Waters made it look like that there is truth to the story, maybe Waters is the inside source and didn’t want to be exposed, that is why the demeaning comments and the lack of response. Hummmmmmm! Don’t get me wrong I am a big Fox News fan, I try to be fair and balanced, just like Fox claims. Waters did not do any favors to the truth and the question was a fair question asking for his opinion and comment.
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 4:32pm
I would of said “Hell no”! and then would have offered for a one on one interview to allow enough time to get the facts straight for the people to decide. I’d of smiled from ear to ear and ask if there was anything else. Upon leaving I might of stumbled and fell into the guy inadvertently racking and or heading butting the guy. All on “accident” of course. Accidents happen. Just saying….
weeblewacker1
Posted on February 13, 2011 at 11:02am
he was just asking a simple yes or no question!! now,if you think just a little itty-bitty bit,you do have to wonder why he was running away from “this poor uneducated fool”? oh-well! its better than being a fox-gop right-winged, fanatical,Tool!
Dang it, that’s 7 SHOWTIME before I got tired of counting.
Continue your trolling somewhere else. Find another scrotum to dangle from, you dinkleberry.
I’m not trying to have the last word, I have the right word, and I always get the last laugh.
Like the fact that you just confirmed that I’m absolutely right.
Can’t make sense out of nonsense!
*rotflmfao*
Do you actually think before you post crap to me, or do you just place your buttcheeks on the keyboard and go at it?
Loki, you said:
“the prison planet website and jackholes that read it show that with $15 and a braincell, people can post crap as news…”
That’s quite hilarious considering your comments on the Blaze, where idiots like you can post crap like you just posted for free, until Obama taxes you for it. If http://www.prisonplanet.com is crap, then at least Alex Jones is smart enough to get paid for crap. Klutz.
Report Post »Sinista Mace
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 2:11pmDon’t forget, SHOWTIME
I already made you apologize to me before….
ahahaaaa
Report Post »Chris G
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 2:45pmI have NO respect for ThinkProgress, but Watters shoulda answered the guy’s question. His silence gives the libturds just another excuse to attack FOX News.
Report Post »TotallyBelievableGuy
Posted on February 14, 2011 at 4:48pmHe’s… not funded by George Soros.
Report Post »colonial10
Posted on February 15, 2011 at 1:49amWe can never count out the liberals. That’s how we have come to be in this position. Billions of them are out there hardly thinking basing there strategies on lies. There power is in numbers and lies. They take everything at face value. Your right they think this is a success.
Report Post »