Whale Skull Discovered Last Year in Mass. Is A Lot Older Then First Thought — A Lot
- Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:10pm by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
Last year, resort workers in Brewster, Mass., set out to dig a walkway on the beach and in the process stumbled upon an unexpected find. Although it wasn’t what most would consider buried treasure, researchers were excited about the six-foot across, 400-pound whale skull they unearthed.
My Fox Boston reports the skull, initially thought to be only about 30 years old, has now been found to pre-date even the early English settlers. The skull after it was carefully extracted and dried was given to Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute researchers who used carbon dating to determine its age as between 1500 and 1650.
Watch the My Fox Boston report with footage of the skull:
CBS Local out of Boston reports Brian Sharp from the International Fund for Animal Welfare, which coordinated removal of the skull, said it was “incredibly fragile” and took two days of digging to extract from the sand.
The whale bone will be put on display at the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C.
Watch a crane lift the skull last year in this YouTube video:


















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (61)
Able
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 9:48amIt’s a lot older THAN….not then. The kids today and their spelling. sheesh
Report Post »Marcia
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 10:21amThe Blaze is excellent, but not in spelling. It’s their downfall and tends to impact their creditability, IMHO. They seriously need to hire a spell and grammar checker.
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 8:11pmBoy you should of seen me (and a few others) trying to correct an article about gangs in the military. Had all kinds of bigots flaming me and others thinking I was a liberal because The Blaze decided to correct the story after some of our comments. I provided screen shots but they of course they kept replying without reading the evidence…
Report Post »kegbuna
Posted on August 2, 2012 at 3:00amHeh, what does that tell you about Blaze readers?
Report Post »FlagWavingPatriot
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 7:27amThey found just a skull? No brain?
Must have been a democrat.
Report Post »BuckarooBanzai
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 9:49amOf course it was an empty headed democrat; it was found in MASSACHUSETTS!!
Report Post »Doggystyle
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:11amYour all wrong. This is clearly onr of Ted Kennedys Girl friends , burried after a drunken night of debauchery!
Report Post »Niferno
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 2:45amShe wasn’t fat, she was just big boned!
Report Post »ACACIA
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 11:30pmbig deal!!!! some one all ready ate the meat
Report Post »Snidely
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 11:06pmThat’s not a crane. It’s the loader end of a loader-backhoe. #petpeeve
Report Post »chips1
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:58pmMass was once covered in water or else they would have found the whales carbon footprint.
Report Post »4xeverything
Posted on August 1, 2012 at 5:54amIt makes me wonder how Obama and Elizabeth Warren are on the same team. I mean Warren’s “peeps” needed that water in order to feed their families (hence the whale skull) and Obama went off and lowered the sea levels. What ya gonna do? ;0)
Report Post »wbaranowski
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:52pmExcuse me, sir, where’s the rest of it, then? Not even a teensy, weensy little piece besides the head?
Report Post »chips1
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:39pmAs long as they have dug the hole, why don’t we …………………?
Report Post »noelgreco
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:04pm“Scull [sic]” ??
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:32pmThe whale skull is not that old. The baseball hat it had on was not rotten at all. Seems the whale was a Yankee fan and it is believed that red sox fans killled him.
Report Post »smcdaniel
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 12:23amYeah, I thought they meant a kitchen whale,
Report Post »Matt
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:29pmUh, its actually from the future, duh!
Report Post »jocko
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:12pmBased on the THEORY of carbon dating which has found to wildly inaccurate they think it is that old. Of course C14 varies with the amount of cosmic rays and no one can tell how much they have varied, even over the last 100 years. So, it could be that old, then again, maybe not. Damn indians have killed off over 10,000 large mammal species since they arrived on our continent. Too bad they just couldn’t get along with natural and not kill off those cave bears, wolves, camels and saber tooth tigers.
For a good analysis of carbon dating… http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 12:35pmI also read that if something spends a significant time UNDER water, carbon dating is not accurate. Unless the whale beached itself, it probably isn’t that old.
Report Post »Maximus_Delta
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:09pmcarbon dating, another science flaw and deception.
Report Post »Joyzee
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:02pm///***That whale didn’t make that Whale skull***///………………..#:0(
Report Post »GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:09pmNo, someone road it first.
Report Post »GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:12pmNo, someone road it to death.
Report Post »scook84
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 9:36pmIt‘s Bush’s fault..
Report Post »billrow
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 10:29pmI like the blaze and everything but why does everyone spell phonetically?
Is it a troll thing?
Report Post »Coonrapids
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:35pmHey you Massholes, Did you get the OK from that Indian soon to be Senator Elizabeth Warren the rignt to dig up that land. The Indians owened it first and Warren will protect the rights of that dead whale to get stimulis money and a $2 million grant to fund globale warming research.
Report Post »tkcinak
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:32pmFor all you science worshippers out there let it be known. We are humans not God and we have no idea how things actually work in this universe, there are miles of science books disproven as factual and true. Even e=mc2 is no longer true as of recent discoveries. So, as far as, we self proclaimed gods, we have only proven ourselves to be fools, as the only true book of scientific evidence proven true in every case is the HOLY BIBLE. A large percentage of scientist now go to The Bible for proof before publishing. Now all you haters out there come and get some, but you should do some research before posting, because you will only make fools of yourselves.
Report Post »Kaoscontrol
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:09pmCarbon 14 dating is so old fashioned. Around here we’ve already upgraded to Carbon 15.3… It’s a much newer Operating System, but there are still some bugs that are being worked out.
Report Post »jman-6
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:07pmAgreed 100%!!!!!!!!! Thi science nonsense is nothing more than a BIG LIE from the ENEMIES of GOD!!!!! Its nothing but ANTI-GOD cultism!!!! All anyone needs is the Holy Bible and read it GOD explains that he feeds and raises every creature….HIM… not man!!! GOD Bless!!!
Report Post »BigAl78
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 1:30amUmmm… actually we do have a pretty decent understanding of the universe. We have a good enough understanding of it to cure ourselves of ailments, send robots to other planets, and keep tiny, powerful computers in our pockets. There’s still a lot to be learned, and our current knowledge is constantly revised and altered to fit new discoveries. But that’s how science works, and it’s been doing a damn good job so far.
Report Post »MarcNTyme
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:50pm“Than” not “then”. Sheesh.
Report Post »commonsensefreethinker1
Posted on July 31, 2012 at 9:08am@JMAN-6
I see your parents forced you to go to church and it warped your brain.
Report Post »TPITED
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:23pm16th Century Whale Skull found on Mass. beach. Government confiscates land for 5 miles in both directions and cites endagered species grave site act!
Report Post »mattmo79
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:56pmMore proof of global warming!
Report Post »OneTermPresident
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:19pmCarbon dating…? I remember a test that was done on a LIVING Sand Crab… the results using carbon dating showed the crab to be 10,000 years old. Funny how they consider dinosaur bones they’ve found just sticking out of the ground today to be “billions” of years old… I don’t buy it.
Report Post »mauijonny
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:51pmNever happened.
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:52pmProvide a link to the test.
No dinosaur “bone” is a billion years old however, the oldest fossil of a single cell organism is a little over 3 billion.
Do you understand the difference between a bone and a fossil? I don’t think you do.
Report Post »Johnny916
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:53pmIt is always good to learn how scientist determine the age of fossils and what that means for the age of the Earth and how life has changed over time.
Report Post »http://www.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geology/fossil.htm
THX-1138
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:54pmReferece please. Carbon dating, done properly, works.
Report Post »RamonPreston
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:05pmIt was “funnier” when they did carbon dating on a dinosaur and discovered that one end was 10,000 years older than the other end. Must have been a slow death.
Report Post »Carbon dating is NOT accurate. Carbon dating assumes that conditions have always been as they are now.
skwiggy21
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:10pmIsn’t carbon dating only accurate up to about 50,000 years anyway? How can they carbon date dinosaur bones if they believe them to be over 65 million years old???
Report Post »Maximus_Delta
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 6:10pmI agree with you. Just another deception to full the masses…
Report Post »Melika
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 7:48pmYou also can’t carbon date rock.
Report Post »Pontiac
Posted on August 1, 2012 at 10:47am@skwiggy21
It’s called making s*** up and willfully regurgitating the lies used to protect your antiquated bronze age mythology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbvMB57evy4
Report Post »http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html#page%2019
BryanB
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:02pmNo No No !!!!!!
The Story Title should Read:
Boy in well eats Ancient Whale Skull Stays Alive One Year, While Smithsonian employees eat sandwiches, President Obama Orders Drone Strikes !!!!!!!!
Report Post »GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 5:58pmThose drone strikes he prefers medium rare. Also, Bush‘s fault that whale didn’t make it as long as our fragile United States.
Report Post »oldduffer
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:40pmDug up Ted did you? Hurry and get him registered.
Report Post »FoxholeAtheist
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:53pmAnd here I thought Andrew Breitbart lived in New York.
Report Post »OniKaze
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:31pmNote to Blaze Staff:
Scull…. Is SUPPOSED to be spelled: “Skull”…
Spell Check MAY not be reliable… But it never hurts to try….
Report Post »SREGN
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:42pmYou‘re right in this case but spell chack wouldn’t catch it. Scull is a nautical term for a rowing technique and also a type of rowed boat..
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:46pmYou have got to be kidding me, get a life ..
Report Post »nattybrooks
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:49pmwouldnt hurt to hire an editor before posting stories either
Report Post »historyguy48
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:26pmComrades whales didn’t exist in1500AD? Or is the non-story that American Indians caught and ate the whale in 1500AD?
Report Post »Perhaps this shows that Ancient Aliens taught the Indians how to catch and kill a whale in 1500AD?
Or maybe a visiting Inuit just got hungry so he caught and ate the whale?
Perhaps our “scientisits” are amazed that Indians were smart enough to catch a whale and eat him. After all scientific consensus is that they only crept through the forest trying to catch rabbits and stuff while being half starved until the Pilgrims came and taught them civilization!
That’s why the Six Nations are the oldest democracy on Earth!
If they want some old bones my dogs been hiding them since he was born and so have his two predecessors.
billrow
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:23pmBefore that thing goes to the Smithsonian I’m sure the dems will register it to vote.
Report Post »BIgWheeler
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 3:22pmThe title should read: Whale Skull Discovered Last Year in Mass. Is A Lot Older Then First Thought — Slightly.
Report Post »Constructionist
Posted on July 30, 2012 at 4:10pmor perhaps:
“Irrelevant Update to Original Non-Story”
Report Post »