White House Plans to Release New Gun Safety Measures ‘in the Near Future’
- Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:32am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
WASHINGTON (The Blaze/AP) — Six months after Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot, the White House is preparing to propose some new steps on gun safety, though they’re likely to fall short of the bold measures activists would like to see.
Spokesman Jay Carney said that the new steps would be made public “in the near future.” He didn’t offer details, but people involved in talks at the Justice Department to craft the new measures said they expected to see something in the next several weeks. Whatever is proposed is not expected to involve legislation or take on major issues, like banning assault weapons, but could include executive action to strengthen the background check system or other steps.
“The president directed the attorney general to form working groups with key stakeholders to identify common-sense measures that would improve American safety and security while fully respecting Second Amendment rights,” Carney said Thursday. “That process is well under way at the Department of Justice, with stakeholders on all sides working through these complex issues, and we expect to have some more specific announcements in the near future.”
Anti-gun groups have been disappointed to see no action so far from President Barack Obama, who supported tough gun control measures earlier in his career but fell largely silent upon becoming president. Some activists were using the opportunity of the six-month anniversary of the Giffords shooting on Friday to speak up.
The shooting rampage in Tucson, Ariz., killed six people and wounded more than a dozen others, including Giffords. Two months later, Obama wrote an opinion piece in Giffords’ local paper, the Arizona Daily Star, calling for “sound and effective steps” to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, including strengthening background checks. He wrote:
Most gun-control advocates know that most gun owners are responsible citizens. Most gun owners know that the word “commonsense” isn’t a code word for “confiscation.” And none of us should be willing to remain passive in the face of violence or resigned to watching helplessly as another rampage unfolds on television.
So far the president has done nothing and administration officials have signaled that no major steps should be expected, given the climate in Congress against gun legislation of any kind.
But, the president faces a tough battle when dealing with “gun control.” If he moves too far to the left, he risks launching an intense Second Amendment debate. However, if he simply ignores his former proclamations he faces alienating gun rights advocates. FOX News has more:
What remains unclear is just how far out on a limb the president is willing to go on gun control. If he goes too far, the Second Amendment debate could reach great heights as the president battles for his re-election. If he doesn’t go far enough, some in his base may view him as weak on gun laws.
Interestingly, CNS News reports that Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is taking a hardline against the Obama administration’s enforcement of gun laws. In the wake of the “Project Gunrunner” scandal, Issa has been a tough Obama administration critic. On Thursday, he said the following on FOX News:
“Under President George W. Bush, U.S. attorneys were even fired for not enforcing guns laws strictly enough.”
He went on to say that under the Obama administration:
“there seems to be a ‘don’t bother to enforce at all’ policy, so that disturbs us — that there’s less gun enforcement about illegal gun transactions under an administration that theoretically is more for gun control, and George W. Bush went out of his way to try to help the Mexicans by having a zero tolerance to illegal guns sales that could end up in Mexico.”
Watch Issa discuss these issues, among others, below:
The uncertainty regarding what the newfound steps will bring isn’t stopping activists from pushing Obama. The group Mayors Against Illegal Guns, headed by Boston Mayor Thomas Menino and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, sent Obama a letter calling him to act. The Blaze recently reported on the group’s push for stricter firearm regulations.
“To prevent the next Tucson, we need a comprehensive background check system, which is what the president called for in April,” said the director of the mayors’ group, Mark Glaze. “That said, there are many steps the president can take on his own authority, without new laws, that could make a very real difference.” NPR highlights one of these proposed steps:
For example, military and federal agencies are required to report people with mental health and drug problems to the criminal background check system, but they often don’t. That’s something gun control advocates say the president could fix.
The mayors‘ group’s suggestions included enforcing reporting laws that could have stopped the Tucson shooter from getting a weapon.


















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (617)
Texas Grasshopper
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:56ammore Gov suppression of rights ? …whats to fear from the ATF , FBI or DOJ ? oh yeah they are completely trustworthy ..* gulp* tell that to our citizen who have killed by Goverement weopons . aka
“fast and furious” ….sorry I used to regard the FBI as beyond repoach and Honorable …..But alas they themselves have tarnished thier own reputation. Respeat of Operation Northwoods ? But the DOJ actually conducted the Op …..If you do NOT know about Operastion Northwoods it IS your duty to understand what the Operation was about .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Report Post »TheCenturion
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:58pmSadly, our history is loaded with this type of covert crime perpetrated by our “leaders”.
There are tightly kept secrets about several “incidents” that made headlines and where people innocent died. Jonestown was one such incident, but the truth will never get out.
Report Post »thecrow
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 12:54pmhttp://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/background-check/
Report Post »Ronko
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:56amThere is nothing anyone can do, if a criminal is going to get a gun you aren‘t going to stop him no matter how much you ban it and banning guns puts people at risk because they won’t be able to defend themselves which people are entitled to under the 2nd Amendment.
Report Post »NOTALOTTAYITTAYADDA
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 2:05pmMaybe if they focused on the AMA doling out, so called, antipsychotics drugs the shooting rampages would stop. Notice how Lauders records were seal by a court after the shooting, but they couldn’t do it fast enough at Virgina Tech or Columbine.
Report Post »These rampages are a direct result of the AMA promoting drug use, of course it drugs THEY deal.
VTDave
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:55amWhen is enough, enough? How many lines in the sand have to be crossed by Obama before we are uncomfortable enough with his agenda to actually take a stand?
Report Post »eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:53amMolon labe!
Report Post »Shootist
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:50amAs a dealer, I am required to call in the “Instant” background check on anyone making a firearm purchase. There are some exceptions such as if the person holds a Concealed Carry Permit then that exempts them from the background check.
Report Post »The problem with adding people with “Mental” problems so some list to prevent them from buying a firearm crosses the doctor-patient privacy boundaries. Also, suppose you went to see a professional counselor after a tragic event, such as a death in the family, will that now put you on the list where you cannot excercise your Second Amendmewnt rights ??
This is a Slippery Slope we dare not get on….
Aaron in Polk County
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:50amI will never understand why politicians only want criminals to have guns.
Report Post »TheLeftMadeMeRight
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:23amBecause the true meaning of the second amendment is not personal self defense or hunting, it was to have an armed citizenship that could stop out of control politicians. The founders knew this would be a problem for future Americans as was the reason they came to the new world in the first place. When the people fear the government you have tyranny. When the government fears the people you have liberty.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 6:35pmBefore the democrap party went completely communist this is what one of them had to say about it:
“Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms…. The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America but which historically has proven to be always possible. ”
— Senator Hubert H. Humphrey
” historically has proven to be always possible.” Senator Humphrey was talking about what is the democrap party today.
Report Post »Ne_FAL
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 6:51pmIt’s very simple & can be summed up in two words: Politicians want criminals to be the only folks to have guns is PROFESSIONAL COURTESY….. It is that simple & the fact that we keep electing these prime specimens of fecal matter is truly a sad state of affairs.
Report Post »robbmeistr
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:49amAbolishing the Constitution through regulation. All “under the radar”.
Report Post »dannyvabchva
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:28amYou got that.
Report Post »jihadazzkicker
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:49amHere we go again….Rush is right the gon running thing back fired, it was all about regulation. This guy knows he may not be coming back so he will push agenda fast and furious. He also knows there is NO one in congress to go after impeechment because the the race issue.
Report Post »EyeofthePatriot
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:23amGlenn was right too on this. Way back when NRA’s LaPierre was on his show (correct me if I’m wrong) when he [Wayne LaPierre] was FIRST BREAKING this story.
Beck pointed out the same exact thing… that this was all intended on coming back and doing harm as to promote cries for further gun control action.
Report Post »NJTMATO
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:48amLock n load!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yikes…it’s comming
Report Post »Baikonur
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:48amI don’t understand the point of this article–is The Blaze ragging on the President for not enacting more gun control regulations?
Report Post »VTDave
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:59amDo you not have a clue? The president is planning on enacting gun control via Executive Order!!!!!
Report Post »RIGHTHOOK
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:47amGestapo will be in your neighborhood soon and taking inventory/weapons of those who legally own guns and respect their usage. The gangbangers, aka criminals will all have guns as they do already and will have their way with law abiding citizens.
Report Post »This is a precursor set up by BHO and Soros prior to their launching a revolution.
RebelSon
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:13amRIGHTHOOK
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:47am
Gestapo will be in your neighborhood soon and taking inventory/weapons of those who legally own guns and respect their usage.
When they knock on my door, they’d be wise to “respect their usage.” Brush up fellas, there’s gonna be a quiz.
Report Post »Tyr
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:24amThe revolution occured in Nov. 2008. We lost. We are responsible now for the counter-revolution.
Report Post »RIGHTHOOK
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:51pm@Rebelson: I suspect we speak the same language!
Report Post »Lesbian Packing Hollow Points
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:47am“Commonsense” gun laws *IS* code for incrementalism leading inexorably to confiscation. Make no mistake, the fact that the Left’s gun control agenda has been dealt a few crippling blows by Heller and MacDonald in no way changes their overarching goal of total prohibition of private ownership of firearms.
Report Post ».45peacemaker
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 2:27pmlphp. i love the way you move your mind.
Report Post »KJenkinsAF
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:46amOh I forgot Michelle Obama IS outlawing food for your kids. You’re next. Nanny state run amok.
Report Post »Jacque
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:19amMore for her big ol fat ass! I don’t remember ever seeing First Lady Bush stuffing her face, of course she had one asstant in 8 yrs and the low life ghetto queen has THIRTY someone has to feed her cake.Is it 2012 yet?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Report Post »KJenkinsAF
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:45amI say we outlaw food. More people die of choking on food than bullets fired from guns. Yeah that’s the ticket.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 12:11amGood God people, we must stop this idiot before he kills off our Constitution altogether. We need someone to go up against Obama that has a prayer of beating his Election War Machine. We need Allen West for president. Let me repeat that in case you didn’t understand… WE NEED ALLEN WEST FOR PRESIDENT! Please help put him on the ballot and we can take back our country.
http://www.AMillionGoWest.com
This time, the country we save may be our own!
This new posting method is confusing as he**.
Report Post »Rickfromillinois
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:44amLaw enforcement knew that the nutjob who shot the Congresswomen had mental problems but neglected to inform anyone so he was able to purchase a handgun. As a result, the President is going to once again bypass Congress and put more restrictions on law abiding citizens through Executive order. Politicians so called “common sense” usually makes no sense at all. If it what he is going to do is such a good idea why isn’t he submitting it to Congress to change our laws instead of going through this legislation through fiat route?
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:44amWe knew this was coming.
BRING IT ON YOU NAZIS!!!
Common sense IS codeword for CONFISCATION!
1984!!
George Orwell!
RESIST THE NAZI POLICE STATE!
ARM YOURSELF NOW!!!
2ND AMENDMENT OR DEATH!
DIE ON YOUR FEET RATHER THAN LIVE ON YOUR KNEES!
I tried to warn you.
You laughed at me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBVVfed4cpA
Report Post »LibTardHater
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:09amRight on V-MAN!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Neo Con John
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:30amV man, Yo dawg, you gotta slow your roll, You have a very important message to get out and you deliver it in a very effective way. Problem being is that you are exhibiting too much paranoia. You have to leave the emotion out of it and just deal with the facts my brother. The facts are all you need to address your concerns. And don’t threaten to break the law like you did in you you tube vid. If you are confronted, simply comply with the officers request and don’t run, then you are playing their game, and they generally win that game. Don‘t forget there are many patriots in police uniforms that are of the same opinion you are about our liberty’s. We are all on the same team, but we do have people here that absolutely hate us for our freedom. Just state the facts V man.
Report Post »Magyar
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:05amI’m with you! I remain L & L and will go down in a blaze of bullets before OBumma and his lice take it from me!
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:44amit’s just for public safety, says Chairman Obama.
Report Post »mikester8888
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:43amGun safety??? What about the 1750 guns this adminitration unleashed on the people on the border and on Mexico? We had one agent killed and possibly hundreds of innocent Mexicans murdered. Safety? By god, we need to lock up Holder and Barry until we have the truth
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:50am@ SREGN – Exactly!
Report Post »JeanieinFl
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:45amHere’s the smoking gun -
http://www.justice.gov/ag/speeches/2009/ag-speech-090402.html
Report Post »NEAF
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:54amRemember this rule don’t apply to our administration and the Elite. Regulations are for us that we don’t know how to behave and stupid.
Report Post »Rev.sLeezy
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:42pmI agree. Gunwalker aka Fast and Furious is a shame. As a law abiding citizen I take my gun rights serious. If I was sending guns to Mexico I’m sure I would be sitting in a federal holding cell until the very last possible charge could be added. But, it appears that ATF is above the law. Directly violating several of their own policies and laws.
Report Post »Ne_FAL
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 7:02pmThe actual numbers are over 2500 plus ammo & extra magazines & DOESN’T include guns run down to HONDURAS & GUATEMALA as part of OPERATION CASTAWAY out of the Tampa Florida & New Orleans Louisiana offices of the BATFE. GOD alone knows how many dead but one thing is certain the number of dead is gonna climb on both sides of the border because of this.
Report Post »SREGN
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:43amDisarming the populace is the first step to tyranny. Check the history books: Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot, Castro.
Report Post »FNTM
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:53amObama….
Report Post »ACLUHater
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:43amOnce again, the liberals think that all roads lead to more regulation. How about, “You murder someone you get hanged?” Problem solved.
Report Post »USACommoner
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:18am@ACLU Hater
Once again, the liberals think that all roads lead to more regulation. How about, “You murder someone you get hanged?” Problem solved.
________________________
But isn’t that the problem? Libs want gun control, but when someone is accused of a crime, they’re right there to defend them trying to get their cases thrown out or their sentences reduced. Or, according to Holder, they won’t be punished at all. Nothing makes sense anymore! They don’t want gun control to reduce crime. Honest citizens already play by the rules when it comes to owning a personal weapon. Do they think the CRIMINALS will play by any new rules they create…? No, that‘s why they’re called criminals. In order to control criminal access to weapons, they will have to take away EVERYONE’S right to own a gun. Expect something sneaky and underhanded – it‘s this administration’s SOP.
Report Post »agameofthrones
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:21am@ACLUHATER – murder someone- get hanged= problem solved. Eloquent. Could not have said it better. My guns will still be mine. No one must give in to this. An armed citizenry is the only thing standing between freedom and absolute tyranny. I don’t care how many laws they pass. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to Bass Pro to stock up on ammo.
Report Post »tasmanianwabbit
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:35amOr shot.
Report Post »Big Mickey
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:42amAnd, so again starts the dans macabre. The Beltway Talking Heads will be muttering about this for weeks and then the airwaves/cable will be awash with expertise, once again, telling us great unwashed masses what we ought to think, both pro and con. In the end, unless the battle is joined vigorously, the result will be one more incursion into our freedom.
Report Post »ENDOFSANITY
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:17amTroll. Go back to your hippie commune, stop tying up the library’s computer.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:41amWe see right through them, don’t we? Tune in to http://www.1530kcmn.com at 9:30 eastern and hear from Frank Miniter and his book SAVING THE BILL OF RIGHTS. I‘m sure we’ll talk up this story.
Report Post »nacilbuper
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:39amSomething is just not right.
Report Post »loaded454
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:48amThe only thing that’s really not right here is that while these statements by Obama were being printed and read in Tucson, 50-100 miles south assault rifles were being handed out to drug rings by Obama’s people. Hypocracy is not new to this President but it still stings at every turn.
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:12amYou are so right! If obama had outlawed cigeretts the shooting in Arizona wouldn’t have happened. The kid that helped wrestle the shooter down would have been right there at the speech. But because he went over to the drug store first to get smokes it happened. He had a gun and a carry permit and knew how to use it. If someone had been at Virgina Tech with a gun all those kids wouldn’t have been shot. Many years ago at a Furr’s cafa in Texas a bunch of people were shot to death in a likewize situation. If that same Inciedent happened the shooter would be shot because nearly everyone in Texas has agun and a carry permit.
Report Post »garylee123
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:17amThis is what would have been phase 2 for the “fast and furious” debacle. Blammo is going to try to do it anyway and blame Bush.
Report Post »Alky
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:31amIt would be nice if they concentrated on taking guns away from criminals instead of law abiding citizens.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:37am.
Report Post »If guns killed people I guess you could say that would be problem. But they don’t…..
Delta D-5-3
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:13amYep. Here we go. Surprised it took this long. We all knew it was coming. What’s the FIRST thing thug governments do, before the SHTF??? Yep, bye bye guns. Unarmed citizens have NO chance to defend against tyrannical governments. AND THAT’S THE TRUTH FOLKS!
Report Post »Bloody Sam
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:47am“Two months later, Obama wrote an opinion piece in Giffords’ local paper, the Arizona Daily Star, calling for “sound and effective steps” to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, including strengthening background checks.”
This is unreal.
Let’s review;
I want to own a pistol. I have two options.
1. Go to the police station and request an application for a license to carry. Fill it out. Turn it in with my $100 dollars and the certificate that shows I completed a handgun safety course (another $100). Get fingerprinted, interviewed and photographed. Wait 8 weeks. Pick up my LTC. Go find the best price on the piece I want. Present my new LTC. Fill out another form with THE SAME DAMNED QUESTIONS ON IT AS THE ORIGINAL LTC APPLICATION. Wait for the result of a phone call to ATF. Pay for the pistol and ammo. Leave the shop.
Or…
2. Go downtown with $500 in my pocket. Make some discreet inquiries about obtaining a pistol. Wait for about 2 hours and then meet with a guy who shows me a nice little KelTec 9mm and a box of Plus P ammo. Pay the money. Leave.
Now…just what the HELL is Obama talking about when he calls for “sound and effective steps to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, including strengthening background checks.”
Certainly not option #1 above. And certainly not option #2.
CRIMINALS DO NOT FILL OUT PAPERWORK SO THAT BACKGROUND CHECKS CAN BE DONE!
But….I think he and all his hoplophobic, miscreant, a-hole, gun grabbing, Liberal
Report Post »kerf
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:15amNext we’ll see government controls on baseball bats, golf clubs and kitchen knives. Don’t laugh, the Marxist in Europe are already headed down that road.
Report Post »Tankertony
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:16amBingo
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:38amI keep mine locked in a safe so they can’t get out….LOL!!!
Report Post »bigben357mag
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:05pmIf guns kill people, do spoons make Rosie O’Donnel fat?
Report Post »BigDaddyRamFrog
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:11pmI saw a bumper sticker: If guns kill people, do pencils cause spelling errors? What did Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez all do – disarm the citizens!!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:34amThe freakin’ commies really gotta go!
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:47amOne step closer to complete violation of the Second Amendment.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:52amCRIMINALS WILL ALWAYS GET GUNS!!! Hey morons these restrictions hurt the HONEST citizens only!! That’s right… it is the honest, hard working citizen that you fear. Remember the “Declaration of Independence”… what it says about “tyrannical” governments?
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:59amReply test…
BTW, criminals will always have and get guns… even if they are outlawed!
Report Post »InversionTheory
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:34amExactly… If there were NO gun crimes in gun-free zones…I‘d say let’s ban them all. Except…oops…That doesn’t exactly work. And I’ve called the police before. What do I do in the 12 minutes before the get here?
That’s why I have the Walther on my hip.
Report Post »Divineliberty
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:52amI bet none of these people have even shot a gun!
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 8:54amThis announcement of new gun safety measures comes RIGHT ON THE HEELS of a story that broke showing that the ATF deliberately allowed guns into HONDURAS (It had previously been revealed that the ATF allowed guns into Mexico).
Breaking News: Source claims ATF’s Tampa SAC walked guns to HONDURAS! Part of Operation Castaway? Exclusive Report by David Codrea & Mike Vanderboegh.
Report Post »http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/07/breaking-news-source-claims-atfs-tampa.html
Texas Grasshopper
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:02amahh…one small glaring question ….Is this another Executive Order or will the WH follow the law this time ?
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:19amThere are already too many anti-gun laws on the books. Enforce those, Obama, instead of creating new ones. We all know what your commie plans are, we know that you are a pathological liar.
Report Post »FormerLib
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:31amWouldn’t “:common sense” be teaching every kid how to properly handle and use a firearm? I learned when I was a kid. Most of us did. We used to bring guns to school and keep them in the car for hunting after school. We had rifles in the corner of the kitchen or den and pistols hanging on the coat rack. And no one ever got shot. The kids that get shot today are gang bangers or kids who find a gun in someone’s house and never learned to handle it before they take it out and start playing with it.
Report Post »Bloody Sam
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:31am“…while fully respecting Second Amendment rights,”
What a friggin’ joke.
Report Post »The Fraud in the White House has no respect whatsoever for the Second Amendment.
The sooner this POS is gone the better for ALL of us. Some just don’t realize it yet. Or refuse to.
JRook
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:54amNo question that the gun show loophole should be closed and tighter registration. Having said that, I will be purchasing my first gun in the very near future. For it is the conservative christian ideologues that present the most concern to me regarding the future of our country and true liberty.
saviorammo
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:15amHow about just get rid of all the evil, radical, idiotic, gay, muslim, commie, socials pigs that are trying to destroy all that is good in the world?
Or, if they wish to believe in Darwinism, Kill the weak? Survival of the baddest mofo on the block.
If you wish the government to do anything you should leave our country. We are more than capable of handling our business. Big and little governments had their chance, they failed. Just like women and blacks in politics.
NO punches being pulled anymore. If you see yourself as anything but American, if you decry American values, if you openly wish to transform our country from the inside out, you are a Traitor!
The truth hurts. Our inner cities are being destroyed by godless heathens, on purpose. Uneducated filth is being allowed into our country on purpose. All those elected to our government are not doing their job, on purpose.
What are willing to do?
Report Post »DYNA
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:19am@JROOK
You wouldn‘t even have the right to bear arms if it wasn’t for the “conservative Christian ideologues”. These Christians do not have a spirit of fear, but a spirit of power, love, and self control and do not need the government to control them.
Report Post »Pujols
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 9:54amIf they do take Guns people will use sticks, rocks, 2 by 4′s, bricks, arrows, spears, lead pipes, sling-shoots, acid, HIV blood, oil, gasoline, etc. etc. etc.
THIS IS ALL A JOKE. IF IT WAS CONSERVATIVE THE LIBS WOULD HAVE A PARTY ….
Report Post »Red Meat
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:23amGuns kill people just like Rosie O‘Donnell’s spoon made her fat.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:38amany compromise with the leftwing commies is a loss.
Report Post »drphil69
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:42amTypical liberals – don’t enforce the current laws, just add more laws. Eventually everything you do will be illegal.
Report Post »tasmanianwabbit
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:37amIF they decide that law needs enforced. (or enforced on YOU)
Report Post »USAPLISKENXI
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 10:44amThat just controls the good guy. If a criminal wants a gun there isn’t a law on the books any where that will stop them they are all about breaking the LAW.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:13amTrying to stir up the left wing base.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:21amCivilians must be disarmed so the Federal Government can carry out its new genocidal policy against white Americans. White Americans will not be marched into the showers if they have guns. The TSA workers are waiting for you at the FEMA camps near where you and your family lives.
This is not a test.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:27amAs each day passes Obama looks more and more like Hitler. Obama should be forced to return to Hell were he came from.
Report Post »IMPEACHBHO
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 11:41amThis dictator needs to go!!
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:02pmBest comment in this entire thread is SWAMPY’S reply to BAIKNOUR on page 2.
Says it all !!!!!!!!
Report Post »KICKILLEGALSOUT
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:12pmThis is the way dictatorships start. You take the peoples self defense from them, the government grows more corrupt and more powerful and you can’t do anything about it. If you lose the right to self defense you have lost your freedom. Look at Switzerland. They have one of the highest militia gun ownership rates in the world and have little violence. These Commie Leftists only pick and choose the statistics that fit their agenda to take your right to bear arms!
Report Post »Conserve_To_Live
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:16pmMr Carney,
Please go ask your boss how “common-sense measures“ will be used to ”work through these complex issues” Which is it? Common-sense or complex??
The entire administration is a lip-service front for the socialist movement.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 12:40pm“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
WHAT PART OF “INFRINGED” DO THEY NOT UNDERSTAND?????
——————————————————————————–
Switzerland has one of the lowest crime rates in the world, and one of the highest gun ownership rates in the world
Report Post »Morris
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 1:16pmThis will be the first step for Dictator Barack Hussein Obama to take away our guns!
Dictator Obama wants to destroy our 2-nd AMENDMENT,So that when his corrupt Mexican-Muslim
Administration start trying to take over and destroy our America “WE THE PEOPLE”,We will not be able to defend our selves,!
America if you do anything at all please go out and(BUY MORE GUNS AND AMMO-AND HIDE IT ALL AWAY),Don’t let this Dictator take away of our rights of our 2-nd Amendment!
CALL YOUR CONGRESSMEN and tell congress ,That “WE THE PEOPLE”,Will not bend to the Dictatorship of Barack Hussein Obama,“WE THE PEOPLE”,Will keep intact,our complete 2-nd AMENDMENT!!!!!!
Dictator Barack hussein Obama,to you and your complete corrupt Administration,“WE THE PEOPLE”,will not let any DICTATOR or CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION,Take away any part of our 2-nd AMENDMENT,
Report Post »(GO TO HELL OBAMA,AND TAKE YOUR CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION WITH YOU!!!!!!!
“WE THE PEOPLE” WILL NEVER GIVE UP OUR RIGHTS TO
Therightsofbilly
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 2:09pmJRook WROTE:
“No question that the gun show loophole should be closed and tighter registration. Having said that, I will be purchasing my first gun in the very near future. For it is the conservative christian ideologues that present the most concern to me regarding the future of our country and true liberty.”
Be careful now, we wouldn’t want you to hurt yourself.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on July 8, 2011 at 6:12pmJRook WROTE:
“No question that the gun show loophole should be closed and tighter registration. Having said that, I will be purchasing my first gun in the very near future. For it is the conservative christian ideologues that present the most concern to me regarding the future of our country and true liberty.”
Atta Boyyyy JRook, go down in a blaze of glory fighting for communism.
Actually it’s the Christian thingey that prevented citizens from rising up against Klinton. However, I think that rectitude is wearing thin.
Report Post »its_time_to_arrest_our_government
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 8:37ama well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. this means any gun laws that stop people from owning guns is illegal and unconstitutional. there is no except for or any other words here that allows the government to keep anyone from owning and carrying a gun. ALL GUN LAWS ARE ILLEGAL! try it obama and we will use our guns to put our government back in our control. we are done being screwed by you. WAKE UP AMERICANS THIS IS WHAT WE KICKED THE BRITISH’S BUTTS OVER!
Report Post »