Wife of Mexican Drug Lord Crosses the Border to Give Birth to Twins on U.S. Soil
- Posted on September 28, 2011 at 1:54pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
Joaquin Guzman is head of the Sinaloa Cartel (the most powerful drug trafficking organization in the world), one of the world’s most wanted men – and now the father of two American citizens.
The L.A. Times reports that Guzman’s 22-year-old wife crossed the border in July in order to give birth to twin girls at a hospital in Los Angeles County on August 15. Following the birth, the multibillionaire fugitive’s wife and children returned to Mexico.
“Name of the Father” was left blank on the birth certificates, but U.S. law enforcement confirm the children‘s mother is Guzman’s wife Emma Coronel, a former beauty queen who already holds U.S. citizenship, thus making the children eligible for U.S. Citizenship. The 54-year-old drug lord nicknamed “El Chapo” (Shorty), married Coronel in a lavish ceremony on her eighteenth birthday. The L.A. Times explains why Coronel was not apprehended when she crossed the border:
“U.S. federal agents apparently kept tabs on Emma Coronel even before she crossed the border at Calexico, through her hospital stay and until she left the country to return to Mexico. Although her husband tops most-wanted lists on both sides of the border, Coronel was not arrested because there are no charges against her, the law enforcement official said.
While she no doubt could have provided useful information on her husband’s whereabouts, drug agents have said the problem with apprehending Guzman has less to do with finding him and more with how Mexican troops can seize him. He surrounds himself with enormous bands of well-armed security and tends to stick to isolated, mountainous regions that are difficult to reach, agents say.”
U.S. authorities have placed a $5-million bounty on Guzman’s head and allege that he and the Sinaloa cartel control the majority of cocaine and marijuana trafficking into the U.S. from Mexico and Colombia, according to MSNBC:
The 5′6″ Guzman was arrested in 1993, but escaped prison in 2001 by bribing guards to hide him in a laundry basket. Guzman has been ranked by Forbes as one of the richest and most powerful men in the world.
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 593 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 419 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 415 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 386 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 376 Comments
Faith
Arab-Muslim Character to Join DC Comics‘ ’Green Lantern’ Series Read More- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 419 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 415 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 386 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know 100 Comments- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 303 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 419 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (193)
MightyMouth
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:41pmThey could have at least put a GPS bug on this chick so we could drop a JDAM on papa’s lap!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:56pmYou want to GPS track US citizens? I hope you never make the laws of this country…
Report Post »Kae Mechiso
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:41pmGuzman is a clear and present danger to this country just as al qaeda is. Predator Drone his hide out and members of his organization.
Report Post »mad_hatter
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:04pmREMEMBER THOUGH, YOU DON‘T HAVE A ’HEART‘ IF YOU DON’T FUND THE REST OF THIS KIDS LIFE, ESPECIALLY EDUCATING THEM: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/sep/perry_instate_tuition.html
This is why that comment is so wrong.
Report Post »mad_hatter
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:05pmRemember also that Obama said we don’t want to deport them (Illegals) all we want them to succeed: http://www.americanparchment.com/video/2011/mar/obama_illegals_succeed.html
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:19pm@Mad_hatter
The kids aren’t illegal, as the wife is a US citizen.
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:30pmToo bad she wasn’t caught. They could have sent him his son and his wife in a box.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:38pmif we only had a brain. sung to the tune from the wizard of oz.
Report Post »Seamus236
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:53pmI would agree that in the case of all of the narcotrafficante kingpins, use of a Predator drone is entirely appropriate.
Report Post »Also, folks need to keep in mind, that his children born here in the Estados Unidos are indeed American Citizens-now. A little thing called the Constitution guarantees that by their birth on American soil. Like it or not, they are indeed US citizens. For the folks who have blood-shooting-out-their-eyes already, please note I am an ardent anti-iIlegalist without embarrassment.
Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 4:00pm@Seamus
“Also, folks need to keep in mind, that his children born here in the Estados Unidos are indeed American Citizens-now”
… and they probably would have been US citizens even if born in Mexico, because their mom was a US citizen.
Report Post »JESUS-IS-LORD
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 4:13pmWhen control is on both sides of the game, you always win; order through chaos.
Report Post »pavepaws
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 4:33pmWith any luck the family will be victims of rival gang activity. Those who sleep with dogs………..
Report Post »Morris
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 7:02pmHere we go two more Mexican Babies for the American Taxpayer to pay for their College Education,!
Report Post »Most American Middle Class working Americans cannot afford to send there own Children to College,
and yet we have Dictator Barack Hussein Obama our Muslim -in-Chief, Nancy Pelosie,Hillary
Clinton and Harry Reid all pushing to give all “ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS” Babies “FREE COLLEGE”!
Watch how many more “ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS” We will have crossing over the Mexico Border
now for “FREE COLLEGE” Paid for by the American Working Tax Payers!
Don,t forget America, Dictator Barack Hussein Obama our Muslim-in-Cheif is bringing Thousands of
Muslims into our America every Day,I did hear that most of the Muslims already here are on “WELFARE”,They were saying 75% are on “WELFARE”, But now I hear that their maybe 90%
on our “WELFARE SYSTEM”!
Come to America all MEXICANS and MUSLIMS for “FREE DICTATOR BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
AMERICAN LIVING”
“WE THE PEOPLE” Have to start saying something about Dictator Obamas “EXECUTIVE ORDERS’”,
“WE THE PEOPLE” Cannot afford to keep all of Dictator Obamas “CHOSEN PEOPLE”,MUSLIMS
from all of these 3-rd World Countries!
IMPEACH DICTATOR OBAMA,Start DEPORTING ALL “ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS”,No Exceptions
all “ILLEGALS” Must GO!
Should “WE THE PEOPLE” also demand that we start DEPORTING MUSLIMS????????
Wake up America,Don,t let a Muslim Dictrator Destroy our America,IMPEACH this MUSLIM DICTATOR NOW!
GOD BLESS AMERICA>
jhaydeng
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 8:33pmTie her up and send her back!
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 8:43pmCan’t do predator drones unless they fire only bean-bags… just like when our law enforcement enters Mexico. It’s a Mexican law.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 9:18pm@ Locked
I KNOW we have to go by the “letter of the law,” but it is pretty bad that intent of the law is not covered in some way. Seems the mother’s “rice husband” was worth much more to her than either herself or her children! I’m not saying they are in danger from their father, but anyone who is the next top “drug lord to be” can rise a notch or more by hitting the current ruler “close to home.” Therefore, definitely in danger!
Report Post »Obama Been Lauding
Posted on September 29, 2011 at 6:17amPeople elude to paying for “Illegals” college.
Report Post »Think about how many “U.S. taxpayers dollars“ go to educate these ”Illegals”!!!!
For 12 years, in many cases, these people will drain significantly more tax dollars, because there will have to be someone teaching them in spanish, thus another teacher for every classroom!!!!
And the list goes on and on!!!
Both parties are to blame on this issue!!!
Stop this crap now!!!!
Deport them “All” now!!!!
old white guy
Posted on September 29, 2011 at 7:04amcome on, one of the twins could be the next u.s.president.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on September 29, 2011 at 8:22amIf this narcoslut is a naturalized Mexican, there might/should be a way to charge her with treason, and thereby strip her of her U.S. citizenship. The way I see it, it makes a lot more legal sense than mandating Obamacare under the Commerce Clause.
Report Post »joe1234
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:35pmhe’s a seriously dangerous man
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:43pmAgreed. No doubt he’s bad news.
Report Post »dealer@678
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:49pmBet she didnt pay the bill either
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:49pmHe’s retired, but maybe we can get the famous Ray Guy to drop kick their butts back across the border.
I can only hope they land on a cactus.
Report Post »pavepaws
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 4:32pmTime to make a constitutional change regarding births on US soil.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:33pmThe mother needed to held accountable for breaking the law. screw those kids, they are not Americans
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:38pmWhat law did she break?
Report Post »True American66
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:44pmILLEGAL ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA……try to keep up.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:51pmShe’s an America citizen. Try to keep up yourself.
Report Post »LibTardHater
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:30pmTime to dissolve the “ANCHOR BABY LAW”!!!!!!
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:53pmTime to read the article
Report Post »SoiledDove
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:08pmI think you mean the Constitution.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 4:40pmNo, Soileddove, the “Anchor Baby” scheme is not part of the 14th Amendment. Congress could stop it — no constitutional amendment required. My earlier nearby post explains why.
Report Post »Liberty1791
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:26pmWe need US troops on the border for more than 1 reason!
Report Post »THANKS FOR NOTHING JANET!
commonsenseguy
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:26pmi just wonder if she paid with bloody dope money, or with a credit card??? either way it was drug money that paid the hospital, if they paid at all, i know she is an american citizen,but i also know her husband has ordered the murders of 100′s of people, so why not keep her here,by revoking her pass port,her husband is a wanted escape murderer, and for those of you who say that it is her right, it is also her responsibility to protect her kids, and living with a murderer and drug lord is not keeping them safe,and besides our government can stop anyone at any time from leaving this country, i hope those kids will grow up to be good kid and adults, but you are a product of you environment, i hope i am wrong,but i want hold my breath, and who knows they just maybe come the president of mexico and america at the same time,
Report Post »Uncle Tom
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:35pmI’m sure she paid nothing at all. She just walked in, said “yo soy en labor-o,” and they delivered the babies.
Report Post »Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:50pmPerhaps, revoke her passport or her citizenship for consorting, aiding, and abetting with a known, international, wanted murderer and drug cartel leader?
Report Post »Tickdog
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:24pmand they are alive because?????????????
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:26pmBecause it’s illegal to shoot US citizens without cause?
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:52pmThey could have been aborted. That, sadly, is not illegal inthis country. But, tickdog, you are a miserable dog for suggesting the murder of innocent children because of their father.
Maybe you should have a chat with God.
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:56pm@ Locked
Its illegal to shoot american citizens unless of course they are Randy Weaver’s wife and child or the children living at the Branch Dividian compound then it seems to be ok.
Maybe they could have shot her with the guns that Obama is giving to the cartel ….
It is almost hard to believe what a major CLUSTER F … this government has become and the limited response from the people. Maybe if we give htem all guns and in-state tuition for college they will be nice now….
AAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH
Report Post »roadhog
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:23pmLike All Mexicans they Stick us with the Bill . This one of a Million kids born in the U.S. free and Citizenship Free. A new Law any kid born in the U,S to a Non Citizen is the Citizenship of the Brith monther,
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:27pm“A new Law any kid born in the U,S to a Non Citizen is the Citizenship of the Brith monther,”
Helpful hint: the mother was a US citizen.
Report Post »WithOutGodWePerishAsARepublic
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:41pmRoadhog…did you vote for Obama ?? Cuzz it sure seems like it with a comment like that … !!!! Mother is a Citizen… what the article does not say is that the bill was paid !!!!! And can you get me the stats where it clearly indicates …that there are millions of children born free of charge to only illegal parents please…just like a liberal …throwing numbers and talking points w/o facts to backem up just like someone who would vote for Obama !!!!
Report Post »csbulldog
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:51pmHow about we interpret the 14th amendment as it was intended. Those born to an American citizen AND under the legal jurisdiction of the USA. I will grant that if the mother is an American AND under our jurisdiction (hasn’t renounced citizenship and is a citizen of one the the 50 states) the kids are American citizens. However, the millions simply born here to Illegal aliens who are NOT under our jurisdiction are NOT American citizens.
Report Post »Alvin691
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:22pm“Coronel was not arrested because there are no charges against her, the law enforcement official said”
Except that she isn’t an american citizen, you dolt!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:28pm“Except that she isn’t an american citizen, you dolt!”
” U.S. law enforcement confirm the children‘s mother is Guzman’s wife Emma Coronel, a former beauty queen who already holds U.S. citizenship. ”
You read the same article we did?
Report Post »republapig
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:29pmWouldn’t it be ironic if the kids grew up to be drug addicts?
Report Post »Josh
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:31pmShe actually is a citizen.
wife Emma Coronel, a former beauty queen who already holds U.S. citizenship.
Report Post »NeoKong
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:34pmAhem….”Name of the Father” was left blank on the birth certificates, but U.S. law enforcement confirm the children‘s mother is Guzman’s wife Emma Coronel, a former beauty queen who already holdsU.S. citizenship.”
Report Post »Sgt_Rock
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:37pmUnfortunately, she is
“Guzman’s wife Emma Coronel, a former beauty queen who already holds U.S. citizenship.”
It’s in the article, and now unfortunately, her little chilitos have citizenship too. Sorry state of affairs, that we could not restrict her entry, but as a citizen, she can come and go as she pleases. If I were the Mexicans, I would not have let her back into Mexico…that would have pissed off homie for sure and maybe forced him to try a trip up north, where he can’t pay off the police for protection. That could have had a happy ending.
Report Post »stp51
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:40pmYes I was just about to say…she along with her kids are already citizens. She was a citizen before she ever married the creep.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 9:11pmUS law enforcement also confirmed that no ATF guns were going into Mexico… that is until those whistle blowers came forward. And now the DOJ and the WH says they didn’t know anything about it. Do you really trust what “law enforcement” tells us?
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on September 29, 2011 at 12:17pmPoor LOCKED…so “locked” in his little defense of “but she’s a U.S. citizen” that he can‘t acknowledge what’s going on here. Had the children been born in Mexico there’s the distinct possibility they could not have been afforded U.S. citizenship knowing their father’s background. It was important to her (for whatever reason) that those children be born on U.S. soil, thus ensuring they received U.S. birth certificates and citizenship. THIS is why she came here to give birth to her children. She left right after her hospital stay to return to Mexico. CLEARLY she doesn’t “behave” like a U.S. citizen. CLEARLY she is abusing the 14th amendment and her proximity to a drug lord is further insult to this country. Her case warrants review of her status and actions. But please…keep defending her and her actions.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:20pm“U.S. federal agents apparently kept tabs on Emma Coronel even before she crossed the border at Calexico, through her hospital stay and until she left the country to return to Mexico.”
Later the US federal agents later gave her a bag of high powered weapons.
Freaking enablers.
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:01pmHA!!! Excellent … maybe they gave the kids bullet proof diapers and a 45ACP as well … lets just arm all the little criminals in Mexico…
ARRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH
Report Post »Censored_by_the_Illuminati
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:19pmWe need a battery of circus cannons to launch them all back across the border.
Report Post »republapig
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:24pmTribochets (catapults) will work too.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:18pmOK, if the mother chooses to return to Mexico, let her. However, as American Citizen’s her twins come under the protection of Child Service (if they only cared to protect instead of ignore. . . ). The children must remain in the U.S. for their safety, they will have the rights of U.S. citizens, but they will have the responsibilities of U.S. citizens (once we get rid of all this “free stuff” going to just anyone).
How did (newborn) citizens of the U.S. leave the country without passports?
And, should one or the other at an adult age choose to return to Mexico, she (the child now adult) relinquishes her U.S. citizenship with that decision. Heck with this “do as you please” rights!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:25pm“How did (newborn) citizens of the U.S. leave the country without passports?”
Do you know that they did? Babies can receive passports as well. Because their birth certificate had no father listed you can’t legally claim that they are in danger because their father is a drug lord.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 9:17pm“Because their birth certificate had no father listed”
Report Post »Just to clarify… Obama changed birth certs from “Father and Mother” to “Parent 1 and Parent 2” not too long ago.
hillbillyinny
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 9:23pm@ Locked
How fast have YOU gotten a passport lately? There‘s no way they had passports BEFORE returning to Mexico and you can’t travel between U.S. and Canada or Mexico on a birth certificate anymore!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 9:48pm@Hillbilly
” There‘s no way they had passports BEFORE returning to Mexico and you can’t travel between U.S. and Canada or Mexico on a birth certificate anymore!”
False (when you’re traveling by land or sea): “Children up to the age of 15 may present proof of citizenship alone, such as a birth certificate, a consular report of birth abroad, a naturalization certificate, or a Canadian citizenship card.”
Report Post »MBA
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:17pmWhen is this country going to stand up for the US citizen rights and stop the total r a p e of this country by illegals? Enough already, this is ridiculous that the illegal drug dealers are collecting US welffare and US welfare and medical support of their children–start making Mexico pay the US for this US tax payers’ financial support of their people.
Report Post »alcarfl
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:17pmWhen are we going to begin to capture, insert a tracking chip somewhere in thier bodies and escort ALL illegals to the border for release. If they come back, treat them as terrorists and eliminate them upon alert of their chip effected signal at America’s, needed, totally patrolled, 2000 mile border. Empty the jails of illegals in the same fashion – implant, deport and execute on attemt to re-enter. We all know the positive, economic impact on the states and the nation when the illegals AND their American born offspring exit, stage south.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:26pmWhat illegals crossed the border in this article? The mother is a US citizen; the children would have been citizens even if born in Mexico.
Report Post »republapig
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:33pmI like your idea Alcarfl
Report Post »selloursouls
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:39pmLocked you don’t know citizenship law apparently. If you are born in a foreign country the parents have to still file for citizenship, unless they are born on a US military base. Just because your mother is a citizen does not mean you suddenly are a citizen as well. The reason she crossed the border was to guarantee they would be citizens. Now they will have a free pass to come and go doing business for their dad.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:45pm“Locked you don’t know citizenship law apparently. If you are born in a foreign country the parents have to still file for citizenship, unless they are born on a US military base. Just because your mother is a citizen does not mean you suddenly are a citizen as well. ”
Apparently you don’t, actually. Born on foreign soil, the children of a US citizen still gain US citizenship themselves provided they meet the conditions of our citizenship policies. Assuming this woman spent at least one year of her life in the US, any children she has without a father on the birth certificate would be US citizens. The government needs to be informed and make sure the laws are followed, but legally, yes, they will be US citizens.
Report Post »momof200
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:16pmDid Obama go down there to escort her to the U.S.?
Report Post »teapartyconservatism
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:15pmObama precedent will make them eligible!
Wouldn’t it be great if you could undo the laws Obama passed, cancel the debt he caused, and return trillions to our Treasury? Well you can!
Politically disregarded Constitution, Art. 2, Sec. 1, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible … .”
Exempting a citizen (the minimum requisite then was US birth to a US father) from being a natural born citizen, proves they are not equal. Only US birth to US citizen parents (plural) is greater, thus defining a natural born citizen; as confirmed by Supreme Court binding precedent in Minor v. Happersett, 1874.[1]
Obama’s Kenyan father precluded his eligibility! Impeachment isn’t applicable, the damage remains and the Senate may not cooperate. The solution is to prosecute Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, Harrison J. Bounel, Barack Soebarkah) for using an alleged fraudulent social security number and birth certificate to usurp the Presidency.[2]
Then if he resigns or is later pardoned, we can still undo the damage. Demand your state and federal elected officials prosecute Obama now!
That makes sense to me. What do you think?
1. TeaPartyConservatism, “Obama is Not an Eligible Natural Born Citizen,” http://teapartyconservatism.blogspot.com/ (8/18/2011).
2. WND, “Eligible?,” http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98546 6/10/2008.
Report Post »DanWesson455
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:11pmStinikin Homeland Security… Anchor Baby for a Narco Terrorist. Now we have a separated family. Will we allow him to enter the US LEGALLY??? Stinkin Anchor Baby nonsense. Go ahead Demo’s buy some more votes from these DIP WADS!
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:23pm“Anchor Baby for a Narco Terrorist.”
Report Post »Anchor babies would have been US citizens anyway; the mother was a legal citizen.
Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:59pmI think the Blaze is negligent or culpable of the rampant misunderstanding of the facts in this case. Saying that she crossed the border clearly brings up the idea that she is not a citizen. Whoever says that of a citizen? If I go to Cananda and then come back to the States, technically I am crossing the border, but how is that fact worth mentioning?
They could have said “US wife of drug lord crosses the border…”
Report Post »Just South Of Heaven
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:05pmThe 54-year-old drug lord nicknamed “El Chapo” (Shorty)
Nickname should have read El Cheapo!
Deport the trash, oh wait, she went back to Mexico, the **** hole on earth! What… are ya gonna tell me how great Mexico is? I don’t even drink their beer. But if “you” do, you have to put a piece of lemon/fruit in their beer to cover up the piss taste! Cheers.
KidCharlemagne
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:05pmGotta‘ love that liberal interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause….
Does Guzman’s newest offspring meet both of the following conditions?:
1. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States”
Report Post »2. “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:14pmNo, they meet the “children of a legal US citizen who since 1954 has spent at least one year living on US soil” part of citizenship requirements.
The new mother is a US citizen.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:05pmOK everybody, calm down. These kids may have been citizens anyway even if born in Mexico because the mother’s a citizen. She may only have come to give birth in the US because the hospitals are better.
The real problem is why she wasn’t apprehended. If he‘s such a wanted criminal on both sides of the border why isn’t she a target as well, not for prosecution but as a material wtiness? It just seems like there’s no common sense whatsoever down on the border.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:16pm” If he‘s such a wanted criminal on both sides of the border why isn’t she a target as well, not for prosecution but as a material wtiness?”
If there person in question hasn‘t been arrested you can’t legally hold someone as a material witness. Without a court case you have no legal need for a material witness. If they were watching her so closely, I’m sure they could have nabbed her for anything; even jaywalking or a busted tail-light. Looks like she obeyed the law; there’s no legal cause to hold her.
Report Post »Rightallalong
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:10pmUnder the Bush and Obama Patriot Act they could have arrested her and held her indefinately due to her association with a terrorist group. There are cases of such arrests currently. This was clearly Obama, Big Sis and Holder looking the other way as to not upset the cartel they are selling guns too, and allowing for the mass import of drugs. Makes you wonder how much campaign money is coig in with those drugs….
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:04pmNot to poo-poo the story, but the woman was an American citizen. There was no basis upon which to arrest her; and even if she was arrested, her children would still be born long before she could be extradited. Furthermore, because the mother was a US citizen, as long as she had spent at least one year any time prior to the birth of her children in the US, they would become citizens.
So I guess the story is a US citizen crossed the border to give birth, presumably for the better healthcare in the US compared to Mexico. Aka, non-story.
You may now commence with your rage, Blazers.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:10pmLocked–get over yourself and your false argument. The issue is who she is married to. It’s bad enough we let terrorists walk through the border as it is, (and then let them out on bond to roam the U.S. streets) but at the very least, her direct connection to this criminal should have been examined. Is she guilty of anything? Probably not, but she is in direct proximity to a huge criminal. It’s a huge issue, and your strawman argument is a joke. Commence with your stupidity troll.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:21pm“she guilty of anything? Probably not, but she is in direct proximity to a huge criminal. It’s a huge issue, and your strawman argument is a joke.”
If she’s not guilty of anything -you can’t legally hold her.- The “huge issue” is based on nothing because there‘s nothing the government can do if someone hasn’t broken the law. The government is reigned in by the laws, and sometimes even law enforcement gets bitten by them; or do you want the police to break US laws, detain people illegally, and completely destroy any chance of using the evidence in a court?
Come on, this isn’t trolling, this is common sense; the article is presented to make us instantly think “immigration, anchor babies, drug war, GRRRR!” and see red. It’s only closer reading that you realize, oh, the government had their hands tied in this case and the woman did nothing wrong.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:49pm“as long as she had spent at least one year any time prior to the birth of her children in the US, they would become citizens.”
You are wrong on the law here. She would have to be a qualifying citizen to pass her citizeship to her children automatically, which means she would have had to spend FIVE years in the US, two of them after her 14th birthday. The ONE year provision is if the child is born in a US “possession”, like Puerto Rico or Guam.
Still, odds on she qualifies so the anchor baby argument is moot.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:55pm@Isles,
You might be right: I was looking at this chart in particular:
http://shusterman.com/uscitizenshipchart2.html
for children born out of wedlock (no father on on the birth certificate) and after 1952:
“Mother had one year of continuous physical present in the U.S. or OLP at any time prior to child’s birth.”
Although she’s married, if the birth certificate has no father listed I believe it would still be equivalent to out of wedlock, right?
Report Post »CMDR6
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:57pmLocked….good effort. I agree that we should all read the article before making posts. I am a conservative that believes in a country of LAWS. Laws are made to be enforced and if they don’t work, then repeal them or change them, but ENFORCE them. And sometimes is seems like the bad guys are getting away, but that is what helps keep the “good guys” from getting thrown in jail unjustly.
Report Post »She apparently broke no laws and therefore could not be arrested. I think this just proves to the liberals (especially in Hollywood) that are partaking of Mr. Guzman’s exports that people still like and want this country! All of them constantly scream how bad we are (especially our health care), but isn’t it crazy that this suspected criminal sends his wife here to have a children and other world celebs and rulers come here for their care too. Diplomats have their children here for the same options of citizenship.
I also agree with others that it is time to CHANGE the current immigration laws and make them fit the world of 2011+.
Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 3:54pmLocked, that doesn’t look like an official site. I would refer to the official law as written in the US Code. It’s amazing how much misunderstanding there is about citizenship out there.
Report Post »MSMOM
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:02pmWonder who paid her medical bills?
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:06pmLikely her multi-billionaire drug lord of a husband.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:38pmMore likely the hospital/tax payers. There is no reason for the drug dealer to bother, what is some collection agency going to come to mexico and force him to give up his obama stash.
Report Post »Blazer123
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 1:59pmWe need to stop incentives like this and Rick Perry’s college tuition subsidies for illegals and promote LEGAL immigration.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:07pmWhat incentives? The woman is a legal US citizen. She crossed legally, gave birth, and went back (again, legally).
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 1:58pmWell, just escort that woman and those babies right back off AMERICAN SOIL,
OR,
hold them for ransom!!!
This is WAR, folks. Are we awake yet???????????????????????
Report Post »Locked
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:05pmThe woman was a US citizen and had committed no crimes. Last I heard there’s no war legally declared and habeas corpus is still in effect. If you want to rail against US citizens giving birth on US soil, well…
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:26pm@ locked ~~~
That woman is NO citizen of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA if she is wedded to (or not) a man who spends his life destroying other people’s lives.
She sold out. She’s gone. Rather like the nobummer’s birth mom, if you ask me.
Report Post »stp51
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:43pmNot saying it’s right of her to do this…but, fortunately we still live in a land with laws and she didn’t break any. She’s a citizen and so are her innocent children who know nothing of her parents wrong doings.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 4:11pmKickagrandma, you can’t lose your citizenship unless you renounce it. Even then the act has to be verified.
It‘s unAmerican to say someone isn’t a citizen because we don’t like what she does. Even murderers in this country retain their citizenship, and thus all the rights that go with it, like the right to a fair trial, etc.
Report Post »