Politics

Will Activist Law Student Group That Backed Fluke Condemn Chapter’s ‘Slut Pride’ Celebration?

Will Activist Group That Backed Fluke Condemn Chapters Slut Pride Celebration?

Grandma may be proud that you’re going to Harvard Law…you just might not want to tell her that while paying $47,600 a year for tuition, you are also spending time at the “Sex-Positivity and Slut-Pride” workshops.

Harvard University kicks off Sex Week this Monday, coordinated by the student-run organization Sexual Health Education & Advocacy throughout Harvard College (SHEATH). What is Sex Week at Harvard? An event website explains:

“Sex Week at Harvard intends to promote a week of programming that is interdisciplinary, thought-provoking, scholastic, innovative, and applicable to student experiences in order to promote a holistic understanding of sex and sexuality. Our goal is to connect diverse individuals and communities both within and beyond Harvard through common human experiences with love, sex, sexuality, and relationships. Sex Week 2012 will be held the last week of March, March 25-31.”

One of the event’s sponsors is the Harvard chapter of Law Students for Reproductive Justice(LSRJ). The Harvard LSRJ will sponsor and lead several events during the week, including co-hosting Monday’s “Sex-Positivity and Slut-Pride: Sex Tips for a Modern World from Good Vibrations.” The event description reads:

“Join HLSRJ and Good Vibrations for a short discussion of sex-positivity, a demo of lube and some popular sex toys, then Q&A. Free Food!”

No details on where to wash your hands before the food.

LSRJ is a nationwide organization “that focuses on the promotion of reproduction justice as a central civil and human right.“ The organization promotes curriculum enrichment for ”new course offerings in Reproductive Rights Law and Justice, the provision of supplemental educational tools, and increased scholarship on reproductive justice and the law.”

The LSRJ National Office also supports law students in “their valiant efforts to gain contraceptive coverage in student health insurance,“ and efforts to ”transform local policies to advance reproductive justice for marginalized populations in their communities; increase access to emergency contraception; write amici curiae briefs in domestic and international court cases; raise money for abortion funds and post-natal maternal healthcare; and recruit volunteers for clinic defense work.”

A notable LSRJ member is Sandra Fluke of the organization’s chapter at Georgetown Law. As Fluke became a national figure following her testimony before a congressional committee regarding contraception costs and her opinion on the mandate controversy, LSRJ released a statement supporting Fluke as outcry grew against radio-host Rush Limbaugh following his comments about the law student.

“Law Students for Reproductive Justice (LSRJ) is proud of our member Sandra Fluke for her courage and commitment in the face of cruelty. Fluke is the Georgetown law student whose contraceptive access advocacy has been called into question with language that falls, as Fluke said in her  press statement, ‘far beyond the acceptable bounds of civil discourse.’ Such personal attacks are intended to shame women out of advocacy and into silence, but Fluke refuses to back down, ‘No woman deserves to be disrespected in this manner. This language is an attack on all women, and has been used throughout history to silence our voices.’”

But do events hosted by LSRJ’s Harvard chapter that use language like “Slut-Pride” follow the same standards advocated by the LSRJ national organization and Fluke in rejection to her critics? Cornell Law School Professor William A. Jacobson writes in the blog Legal Insurrection that the event is “more evidence of the education bubble:”

 ”If only they had offered such activities when I was at Harvard Law School, I might have amounted to something.

Um, did they say “Slut-Pride”?

Boycott Harvard! Or at least its advertisers donors.”

What do you think of the LSRJ national organization should do? Support the event or condemn language that some may perceive as ”an attack on all women.”

Comments (77)

1 2
  • Free2speakRN
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 5:41am

    What a bunch of elitist hypocrits. The people are dangerous! “Reproductive Justice?!” Does China come to mind?!

    ‘These people’ along with their ‘Bio-Ethicists’ who believe you can kill your own child until he/she can justify their own Existance??!, these mentalities united remind me of the idol worshippers of the Old Testament that would sacrifice their own kids, or simply eat them. These people are sick. ‘Reproductive Justice’. What a sham.

    I saw no mention of ‘Marriage’. Family is a perversion of their faith. Their vision is to have sex whenever they want, Abort anybody they want, Curse anybody against them, Condemn anybody who calls them by the same ‘slut’ name ‘they’ call a phosophy. So, what do you call these people? I don’t like the word, ‘slut’.

    It‘s ’license’ to be unaccountable. Self-Control has no place in their world. Yet, rapes ‘Will’ go up. And they will be the first to complain.

    “Join HLSRJ and Good Vibrations for a short discussion of sex-positivity, a demo of lube and some popular sex toys, then Q&A. Free Food!”
    Free food? Afterward, they probably tickle their throat with a feather.

    Sex is like a symphony? Even when it’s just okay, it’s good. THIS is not the Point !!!

    This is about Left Power Rule, unbridled hypocrasy, murder by approval, elitist breakdown of family, and the like.

    Report Post »  
    • nzkiwi
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 5:56am

      I don‘t know why they just don’t get on with the work. Studying at Harvard or similar is a tremendous priviledge given to relatively few. Many more people than who are currently there would give their eye teeth to join them.

      They are making themselves look like a bunch of spoiled,self-absorbed brats.

      Report Post »  
    • KickinBack
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 6:51am

      This is liberal logic at its best. Reproductive justice as a human right?

      Kind of reminds me of the liberals’ second bill or rights…such as…
      1. A right to housing
      2. A right to education
      3. A right to a job
      4. A right to never go hungry.

      Well heck, If you’ve got a right to a house and food, I guess that eliminates the point of a job and education…But I’m not a liberal, I don’t think like a slave.

      Report Post » KickinBack  
    • SpankDaMonkey
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 7:55am

      .
      What’s the Door Prize? A Handfull of Lube and a Freshman?……

      Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 8:00am

      So, they want a man-made, fictitious entitlement “reproductive justice” to trump a God-given, constitutionally protected RIGHT of LIFE. Who‘s fighting for the baby’s life?
      It would be interesting to study lives of baby killers vs the lives of baby protectors.
      How old are they? Who has given birth to children? Who is happier? Who is predisposed to anger/violence? etc.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 8:15am

      @free2…
      I think it boils down to a lack of morals, and a guilty conscience that seeks to justify its actions and desires by foisting same upon others until it becomes the norm.
      We are looking at the recreation of Caligula’s Rome. HEDONISM. They even celebrate hedonism by name! I started to rebut my own statement about this being Rome, because they aren’t calling for beheadings or dismemberment; but then I recalled the movies we are consuming…
      “Saw,“ ”Saw 2,“ ”Saw 3″ … even “300,“ ”Gladiator,” and other gory media we can’t seem to get enough of. We keep buying things that “thrill” us more and more. Once we have become accustomed to each degree of gore, we must find something more vile and disgusting to relive that sensation. Why do we seek that sensation rather than the feeling we get from charity and love? From feeding homeless? From helping a neighbor?
      This is just plain old “ EVIL ”

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • pavepaws
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 2:09pm

      Most likely not a feather.

      Report Post »  
    • BarackStalin
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 2:26pm

      I completely support sluts…

      at least until Monday morning when I disappear.

      Report Post » BarackStalin  
  • nj-patriot
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 5:37am

    Uhm…..why is it called “reproductive justice” when it’s all about contraception? Is it to get even with reproduction? Never mind, it‘s too early in the morning and I don’t want to set off 3rd acorn.

    Report Post »  
  • Apple Bite
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 5:00am

    We need to burn Harvard to the ground. Their history is quite trifling when you dig into their dusty annuals.

    Report Post » Apple Bite  
    • Gumbercules
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 6:52pm

      I guess their ‘anals’ aren’t so dusty . . . .

      Even nerds need sex.

      Report Post » Gumbercules  
  • candcantiques
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 2:35am

    Slut pride? Hey I wont lie…. I like sluts…… I like women that know what they want…. but Sandra Fluke, I’ll admit she is attractive but at the same time she is EXTREEMLY UGLY. and I do not like ugly women. If you do not understand why she is ugly you havent thought very much and the one thing I hate more than any other ios a STUPID PERSON. Weather you are ACTING STUPID OR JUSTM BEING STUPID,
    IT DOESNT REALLTY MATTER

    Report Post »  
  • candcantiques
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 2:28am

    “Sex Week at Harvard intends to promote a week of programming that is interdisciplinary, thought-provoking, scholastic, innovative, and applicable to student experiences in order to promote a holistic understanding of sex and sexuality.

    I however would bet $1,000.00 that nobody that goes to this week of education will have any idea of how to answer this question……http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhm7-LEBznk

    If we are traveling at 80 MPH how long does it take us to go 80 miles. This isnt funny folks. People are actually this stupid? Their stupidity is based upon their own non willingness to think. They dont want to think. It’s to hard. They bwant to play videos and play video games. People dont think anymore. This is sad. It really isnt funny. It really isnt. All a person has to do is condition themselves to think BEFORE TALKING, but people choose not to and men think it’s great that their women are so stupid. IT‘S NOT GREAT AND ANY GUY THAT THINKS IT’S FUNNY THAT YOUR LADY IS SO STUPID WILL WIND UP LEARNING THE HARD WAY. Stupidity isnt a joke folks.

    Report Post »  
  • JBARRANCHAZ
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 2:28am

    slut pride? Daddy would be so proud. OR maybe Daddy runs the video camera.

    I don’t have to pay for birth control for anyone, except my wife.

    Sex isn’t a necessity, it is a lifestyle and behavior, a choice.

    Report Post »  
  • Arc
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 2:13am

    Whether it’s reproductive justice, contraception or abortion, any person, who believes they must have the sanction from the president to enjoy the rights of Freedom, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, are already lost. The president doesn’t issue those rights, GOD guarantee’s all of our rights.

    Keep this in mind if you like the thought of someone controlling your life. If any POLITICAL group of people, especially who are already in power, can somehow persuade you into believing that they are the “ keeper of the keys” to your rights, then you deserve to be controlled, because its apparent then that freedom to govern yourself is not important to you, just please DO NOT involve me in your TREASONOUS acts to appease a mere mortal.

    Report Post » Arc  
  • blackyb
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 1:24am

    I meant to say that God’s laws and Commandments are NOT up for debate.

    Report Post » blackyb  
  • blackyb
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:41am

    where is my slut joke?

    Report Post » blackyb  
  • blackyb
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:40am

    I do think that when flocking Fluke gets back to school there will be a line of males with their own condoms if she needs help with that.

    Report Post » blackyb  
  • The Third Archon
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:32am

    I‘ll say it again since apparently conservatives didn’t understand the first time–it’s not the WORD “slut” that Limbaugh used that was the problem; it was his IMPLICATION, than any women who couldn’t afford contraception, or any woman who received financial assistance for contraception more broadly, MUST be a slut. His tenuous reasoning, is that they pay more when they have sex more. Nevermind the astounding ignorance of basic facts about contraception, which any person who knows can prima facie see the illogic of Limbaugh’s “reasoning” (because many, in fact most used, kinds of contraception are fixed cost, with a certain duration of effectiveness per cost, rather than cost-per-use). Let‘s just think of how flabbergasting and hasty Limbaugh generalizes ALL women’s claims to need or desire financial assistance for contraception–apparently, the all-knowing and oh-so-wise Limbaugh is so knowledgeable about the affairs and states of ALL women in the United States, so as to be able to definitively and authoritatively speak on their behalf, thus we KNOW when he judges that CATEGORICALLY women who desire financial assistance for contraception are “sluts” and/or “whores” he does so validly and truthfully–I mean, if it WEREN’T the case that Limbaugh had the definitive knowledge and authority to make such a judgment, well then we would have to conclude we was an idiot and a sexist.

    Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • blackyb
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:38am

      The woman is using her slutism to promote Obama’s agenda. The boyfriends ought to spring for some condoms. I believe between two people they could knock off a brew or two and spring for a few good ones. If a woman has so much loving on her mind, she should charge and pay her way through school and have enough money left over for condoms for all the males on campus.

      Report Post » blackyb  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:57am

      Even if you had proven that sexual proclivity was directly correlated with immorality, and even if the frequency of a woman’s (or all peoples’) sexual activity were at all related to the measure of public benefit derived from providing public incentives or direct subsidies to decrease the cost to women (or all people) for contraception, you STILL wouldn’t have any REASON to conclude, JUST because contraception costs someone a great deal, that THEREFORE they MUST be having a great deal of sex. In fact, the more popular methods of contraception (i.e. the oral contraceptive pill, the ring, etc.) are all FLAT COST/time contraceptives, where you pay for a certain time unit’s supply of the contraception, which you take the same amount of EVERY TIME regardless of whether you are celibate or a playboy/girl. For example, “the shot,” which is a hormone therapy, a shot you get every 3-4 months essentially, that prevents contraception during that period. This is another example of a flat cost/time contraceptive (as opposed to cost/use). More likely than not (given popularity statistics) Fluke uses a flat cost/time method, but since no one seemed to bother to investigate this (not that it really would be appropriate or important to do so) before making wild accusations about sexuality, that are only pejorative in the conservative cultural context anyway, hey we don’t know.

      The Third Archon  
    • NOTAMUSHROOM
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 1:28am

      Geez Third! Take a pill! Why so worked up? Unless you are actually Fluke under this moniker, no one really cares or buys into this manufactured “issue” that wasn’t an issue before you yourself (hi Sandy!) decided to profit from making it so. And failure to accept an apologywhen one is sincerely given says way more about you and your real motives than the person who offered said apology in the first place. So please, just go back to your dorm room and do whatever you like. It’s just that I will not pay for it. Ok? Buh bye.

      Report Post »  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 1:44am

      I just find it hilarious to watch the tracks along which minds like Limbaugh’s chug along. Based upon absolutely nothing, they proceed to make wild assumption and accusations about someone’s character and sexual activity, something of which they have no knowledge, nor any right to comment upon or judge in polite company certainly (and a moral case could be made as well). Their over zealous concern, without basis for the reasons I’ve talked about, but irrelevant aside (because it’s a childishly simplistic and stupid notion to boil morality down into a simple correlate with the number of times you have coitus–clearly that’s not the case, people would get demonstrably more evil as they aged if morality and copulation REALLY were somehow correlated–how much you have sex is irrelevant to whether or not you are a moral person, i.e. a good person), for the sexual activity of fellow citizens is more insightful into their own personal character deficiencies than anything else.

      The fact that is, and should be, at debate here is whether or not public financial assistance for the contraception of women (and possibly men) yields net benefits for the public, relative to the amount of money it costs us (which I can tell you right now would be a lot less than the sum of money we spend for no purpose whatsoever). If it seems reasonable to believe it would, then we ought to–if not, then we ought not.

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • brickmoon
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 3:17am

      Yes, maybe it is boorish to use a hyperbolic insult to criticize someone on a public interest scholarship at Georgetown, who can’t afford “an entire summer’s salary” to pay for birth control, yet who can manage to squeeze in a romp through Spain and Italy with her boyfriend. Tsk. First world problems.

      Apparently, it’s not the word itself, but the implication. That explains a lot of things:

      At a “bring your kids” event on the National Mall it’s okay if the top-billed entertainer drops 75 F-bombs — as long as it’s at a “Reason Rally.”

      Racial epithets and overt threats of violence from Occupy protesters? “God bless them for their spontaneity,” says Nancy Pelosi.

      No harsh words from the White House for Jesse Jackson’s use of the N-word, or expressing a wish to cut the president’s “acorns” off.

      Al Sharpton spouts derogatory statements about Jews and other groups, but all is forgiven when he gets his own show.

      Who can forget — I mean, remember — Harry Reid’s description of candidate Obama as a “light skinned” African-American “with no Ne*** dialect, unless he wanted to have one.” Yes, remember the protests and boycotts over that idiot and racist and…oh, wait…Obama campaigned for him in 2010…and he was re-elected?

      And no phone call from the White House to any of the Palins, after Bill Maher calls them much more vile names. I wonder why? That’s the million dollar question.

      Report Post » brickmoon  
    • Dstarr55
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 4:50am

      Great job, Brickmoon.

      Archon, Limbaugh did not implicate that women who couldn’t afford contraception were ‘sluts’. Rush was using hyperbole to say if she wanted to be paid to have sex, what would that make her? He wasn’t saying people who need assistance for BC were sluts – it was people demanding the government pay for their BC when obviously access and cost is not an issue in this country. He took it to the extreme saying to demand to be paid to have sex is what prostitutes do – he did not say that people who need assistance with BC were ‘sluts’. Perhaps that is why your posts are ignored – you have flawed reasoning.

      It was Sandra that outright lied about the cost of birth control, that women going to a top law college were basically being denied access to birth control because they could not afford it. She put herself out there with her lies and misrepresentations. There are clinics where you can get birth control for low cost or for free and even if there is not a clinic around, most birth control is inexpensive and condoms are given away at most schools health departments. She also indicated women who need it for medical reasons were not covered (loved the word ‘technically’ she used – the lawyer in her must have kicked in with that statement). Her own school’s insurance did ‘technically’ cover BC for medical reasons as do most insurance coverage – the technical part is there has to to be a medical reason.

      Report Post »  
    • the gray lensman
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 5:21am

      Third Archon, I don’t ask someone else to pay for me to go to the movies. I don’t ask someone else to pay for me to go out to dinner. I buy my own beer and my own trojans. If men are so eager to have women spread their wings for them, then the men should pay for the necessary contraception. If dudes want to play, then let them be responsible and do the right thing by the females they wish to impregnate. I see no reason why I or anyone else should have to pay for somebody else’s pleasure. It ends up having the government sticking its damned nose into something that IS NOT ITS BUSINESS.

      Report Post »  
    • kaydeebeau
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 6:36am

      actually Rush came to the slut conclusion based upon the math …..Fluke claimed that it was costing $3000 for birth control. Doing the math to spend that amount of money would require near 24 hr a day sex. The generally accepted use of the term slut means sexually promiscuous – having unmarried sex 7 or 8 times a day every day is considered by reasonable people to be sexually promiscuous.

      And oh one more BTW – Rush didn’t call her a slut – he asked what do you call someone who has that much indescriminate sex? Answer a slut? there was a question mark at then end of his answer….

      Report Post » kaydeebeau  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 6:56am

      Archon-
      The most effective birth control costs nothing, it is called self control. If someone wants to use any other kind, they need to pay for it. They are always free to choose health care coverage that includes it, unless they expect someone else to give them insurance for free. If someone gives you something, you don’t have the right to complain about what is contained in the “gift” coverage.

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
  • brickmoon
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:26am

    ‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

    ‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.’

    ‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.’

    Report Post » brickmoon  
  • PoliticallyRightUs.Com
    Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:21am

    So…. Is anyone here surprised???
    Join us in running these Psychotics out of our Gov.t and out of our schools…

    Report Post » PoliticallyRightUs.Com  
  • SmarterThanTheAverageBear
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:37pm

    Keep in mind that these Harvard graduates will be our future congressmen, senators, and president.

    Report Post » SmarterThanTheAverageBear  
    • blackyb
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 1:04am

      Maybe it will get to be that anyone with a degree from communistic Universities will be unable to get a leadership role. Some of those Universities and schools have been hijacked years ago by communists, These professors have, no doubt, over the years bullied people into accepting their indoctrination or not getting good grades. People will continue on in a field long after they quit believing in what they are saying or doing to keep money flowing. Money becomes their god. It will eventually come full circle. Those indoctrinated may have to believe what they are doing is right to keep from going crazy. They have invested years, money, sacrificed morals, some have forsaken God and country and and believe the lie that it is their lot in life. They need to turn around and stand for the Truth. The communistic people they are following cannot save them from hell, nor would they likely if they could, as misery does love company.

      Run the professors out who are tearing down the schools and stop funding them or sending young people to them. Some of those professors are not bright enough to learn a trade, so they employ to dupe people into thinking that a diploma associated with them and/or a certain University automatically qualifies the graduate to lead. At this point in time, it would seem more like graduating from Universities of this kind would be something to be ashamed of.

      Report Post » blackyb  
  • Misha
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:33pm

    wtf is “reproductive justice?” Seriously, what does that even mean? Who makes this crap up? It‘s not enough that their mothers dismantled families with the Women’s Lib debacle, now this generation wants other people to pay for their play. I want to have as much sex as I want – protected or not and I fully expect taxpayers to pay for whatever consequences there may be – my abortion, medication for stds, contraception for future romps. To do otherwise would be an injustice to my reproductive rights. When did sane people stop laughing in the face of such complete insanity? These little dolts are all taken far too seriously. It’s time to call the shiz what it is and perhaps slap their silly little heads until reality starts to take hold. And then slap them some more just for the fun of it.

    Report Post »  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:37am

      Reproductive justice is the humble notion that human beings ought have autonomy over their bodies, and over their decision when to reproduce, with whom, and on what terms–that those who are involved in reproduction ought to define that activity for themselves, and not have its conditions dictated to them by others.

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • NOTAMUSHROOM
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 1:58am

      Uhm. Thirdy? News flash. Everyone in the Western world has always had your definition of “reproductive justice”. It’s in the word “N-O”. Unless, of course, you are dedicated to being a receptacle for any male to ********* into whenever he so desires, you’ve always had that “justice”. So go get a real issue and I’ll even pay for your contraception at this point, but you have to do it my way, since I’ll be providing the dime which I will require you to hold between your knees permanently.

      There. Your problem is solved.

      Report Post »  
  • riseandshine
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:24pm

    I‘m glad I haven’t followed any of this Fluke business.

    Report Post » riseandshine  
  • mountainmover101
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:23pm

    Am I the only one that sees a discrepancy with the use of slut-pride and disrespect in the same context? If one is a slut, tramp, layaround, spreadlegs, human mattress, by sheer definition disrespect is part of the overall package. Others cannot respect another which has no self respect. That is impossible. I wonder if they are going to have seminars on the possible diseases one gets through coprophagia or seminophagia. They said one of the goals was scholarship. I’m just saying.

    Report Post »  
    • The Third Archon
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 12:48am

      Here’s the thing–there’s a difference of beliefs here. On the one side, you have the belief that certain procedures MUST be followed in order for sex to be moral (and an addendum that sex can ONLY be either moral or immoral), whereas on the other side, you have the belief that the link between morality and sexuality is subjective, meaning each individual must decide for themselves what kind of sexual relationships are healthy and desirable to them. Some people enjoy a little, some people enjoy a lot, but as long as one is honest, respectful, and treats people with value in and of themselves, one commits no moral error in pursuing whatever state of sexual relationship(s) one finds desirable and mutually pleasurable for the participants.

      It’s a fundamentally different worldview that causes a different connotation to attach to the word “slut.” For to the former group, it is a pejorative used to denote a lifestyle that is from their perspective immoral. Whereas, the latter group accepts the descriptive accuracy of “slut” in its sense of a “person who enjoys sex and enjoys it often, usually a woman,” but don‘t hold the former group’s normative beliefs, and therefore don’t SEE anything inherently immoral about such a person any more than they would a celibate. When Limbaugh call’s Fluke a “slut” what he’s saying is “you are not conforming to MY views on what a woman’s acceptable social, namely sexual in this case, behavior OUGHT to be.” Nothing more, not

      Report Post » The Third Archon  
    • blackyb
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 1:19am

      God says that sex outside of marriage is a sin. Sin causes death. Now, it is a hard one to follow, but when people put their lives in such situations to adopt this as a lifestyle they are not trying to cut down or quit. They are not trying to do what is right. It is a sin. God said it. It is not my rule, so you take it up with Him. The author of confusion is from the Devil. When people turn to God, he will give them a desire and a strength to avoid sin for they will be able to see themselves for who are are and what they were meant to be. They will desire and want a different life and work towards having things that are clean and above how they have been using themselves and others.

      People change. God does not, and does not have to apologize to anyone for we are His creation. He tells us how to live better, cleaner, safer and more peaceful lives. So if someone is no inclined to believe this or does not like this. Take it up with God. It is His rules and for His reasons. If you do not believe in God, it does not make it so that he is not. He said that He is the “Great I AM, the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.” No one can out do that. There is good and there is evil and no one is going to straddle the fence. That is all I have to say about all of this at this time because Gods laws and commandments are up for debate. I did not make Him, He made me and you.

      Report Post » blackyb  
    • mountainmover101
      Posted on March 26, 2012 at 10:01am

      @THE THIRD ARCHON Your premise is based on the concept of morals being fluid and there being no absolutes. In your world pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia would all be a part of the array of acceptable behavior that everyone would just have to tolerate. I don’t have any problem with people being immoral and having frequent sex with all sorts of different people and getting all sorts of diseases and acquiring all sorts of mental disorders. If they think so little of themselves, I cannot help that. I cannot respect such a person. I think they are pitiful sad lonely people with huge holes in their souls that they frantically try to fill with anything. Studies show these people that are sexually lax are also prone to other sorts of destructive behavior such as drugs and alcohol. Here is where I draw the line. I DO NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR ABERRANT BEHAVIOR.

      Report Post »  
  • dealer@678
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:50pm

    Fluke was right about one thing. Sluts do exist and they are insatiable

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:33pm

      LOL .. oh the hypocrisy … not surprising though …

      Report Post »  
    • Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
      Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:41pm

      What can you say, what ever happened to Math Club and Pep Rallies, now its just Sex, sex, and more. Then again, Fluke is studying law, and who is some of the biggest Wh ores anyway.

      Report Post » Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra  
  • Just in time
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:33pm

    Insurance is meant for serious medical emergencies. It is not meant for frivolous medical problems. This whole thing has been to promote Obamacare. Sluts can have pride by knowing that they pay for their own rubbers and pills. Obamacare has not reformed healthcare. It has enslaved everyone in America. By making them buy something from private enterprise. Not legal, not constitutional

    Report Post »  
    • Voice_of_One
      Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:44pm

      Not sure what this has to do with Healthcare.
      ** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual’s bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.

      Report Post » Voice_of_One  
  • lukerw
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:30pm

    Good ole… Slut & Racist U… may the Bird of Paradise… steal your funding!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • TominArizona
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:30pm

    The libs tried to make this look legit. Then all of a sudden it turns out it was a set-up. Nasty Pollutsi got caught with her pants down and tried to distance herself from it.

    Report Post »  
  • TheBurningTruth
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:23pm

    Progressive Liberals know no decency or honesty. Every issue or concern is just to advance their agenda.

    Report Post » TheBurningTruth  
    • hidden_lion
      Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:27pm

      I guess that means Rush’s description of her was correct and he should retract his apology…

      Report Post » hidden_lion  
    • lukerw
      Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:25pm

      @HIDDEN…
      No… he was Right… he should not criticize a person for being a Slut… rather, only condemn a Group of Sluts for desiring to take Tax Payer funds for their Activities!

      Report Post » lukerw  
  • possom
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:20pm

    “Law Students for Reproductive Justice (LSRJ) is proud of our member Sandra Fluke for her courage and commitment in the face of cruelty. Really what cruelty? All she did was stand up in front of america and say she couldn‘t keep her leg’s closed and she want’s us to pay for it!

    Report Post » possom  
  • TORCH9
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:11pm

    This is not news-worthy….it’s a JOKE to even discuss these idiots.

    Report Post » TORCH9  
  • Comeandtakeit
    Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:10pm

    The height of cynical hypocrisy, and living proof this was a manufactured controversy from the getgo. These sluts were sluts before slut outrage became “cool”, it seems. Oopsie.

    Report Post »  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love