Woman Dies After Officer’s Gun Is Triggered by…a Hug?
- Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:43am by
Jason Howerton
- Print »
- Email »

Adaisha Miller was killed after a hug triggered an off-duty police officer's gun to discharge (Source: WXYZ)
DETROIT (AP) – A woman celebrating the weekend before her 25th birthday was fatally shot Sunday when she hugged an off-duty police officer while dancing at a party, causing the officer’s service weapon to fire, according to police and her mother.
Adaisha Miller would have turned 25 on Monday, according to her mother, Yolanda McNair.
The shooting happened at an outdoor social gathering about 12:30 a.m., said police Sgt. Eren Stephens. It happened on the city’s west side.
According to Stephens, the woman “embraced the officer from behind, causing the holstered weapon to accidently discharge.” The bullet punctured Miller’s lung and hit her heart, and she died at a hospital.
Stephens said the Detroit officer will remain on administrative duties while authorities investigate the shooting and report their findings to the Wayne County prosecutor. The officer’s name was not released.
“For this to happen to her, whether they want to call it freak accident or mistake in judgment, it should have never happened to my child, and there’s nothing I can do to get her back,” McNair told WDIV-TV.
McNair said her daughter was out to mark her upcoming birthday.
“All she wanted to do was enjoy the weekend for her birthday,” the mother said. “She had every right to enjoy turning 25 and look beyond that.”
WXYZ in Detroit has more:


















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (132)
hydtguy
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:37amSomething stinks,
Report Post »If the pistol was in any holster the trigger is protected and would not be able to fire.
It sounds more like a CYA deal, or a Plaxico..
To any shooter, a ND at a party is just unsafe gun handling, and I for one think the story will change soon.
No LEO (sober) would let his duty pistol be touched by anyone, just in the training DNA.
AintLIBSjuzGreat
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:33amI have seen an affirmative action LEO @ a bar on long island take his gun out point it at a guy`s head B4 his cop buddy`s grabbed him and they left.I know the cop who scored lower than the guy`s who are still waiting for the job
Report Post »black9897
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:49amOf course. No possible way a gun could go off by giving someone a hug. It’s just not possible.
Report Post »NateB
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:16amHere is how it could happen. Just think should holster instead of IWB.
http://www.itstactical.com/warcom/firearms/safety-warning-worn-leather-holsters-can-cause-accidental-discharges/comment-page-1/
Report Post »rickc34
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:20amSomething smells fishy here, A holstered gun, going off from a hug ? I have a hard time believing this one.
Report Post »Secret Squirrel
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:30am.
Wanna bet there’s more to this story?
Guns don’t fire by hugs. guns fire because the trigger is pulled.
Think about it, the gun is in a holster, presumably pointed at the floor.
So even if I except that it fired, why wasn’t she shot in the foot or leg?
Even a horizontal shoulder holster has the trigger covered, and another safety too.
Nah. Somebody was showing off.
Report Post »Secret Squirrel
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:33am.
Report Post »“The shooting happened at an outdoor social gathering about 12:30 a.m., ”
Is that what they call it in Detroit?
Here we call it a riot.
chips1
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:38amYour a squirrel, but it’s no secret.
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:50am…and the “officers” name is…
Report Post »NateB
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:56amDid you click the link and read the story? At least look at the picture. If the shoulder holster failed like this and she hugged him from behind it would happen.
Report Post »Jpreaume
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:24pm@NATEB…He was wearing his holster in his waistband. How did she manage to take a round in her chest? I carry that same S&W M&P 40 with an “In the Waistband” holster…the S&W M&P 40 has a trigger safety. No way did that weapon fire from a “hug”.
Report Post »NateB
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:50pmI did not read anywhere that the office was carrying IWB, but I am just saying if the officer was carrying with a shoulder holster and the shoulder holster failed in the same manner as this link shows it could happen.
Report Post »Matt
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:52pmANY gun with the safety on, regardless of whether its in a waist or shoulder holster would not go off.
Furthermore, what is an off duty cop doing with his gun anyways? You’re off duty, leave the gun at home.
Beyond that, YOU ARE AT A PARTY!!! Who carries a gun to a party?
He should be prosecuted for manslaughter and given a prison sentence.
Report Post »Jpreaume
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:04pmThe story so far…
http://www.freep.com/article/20120708/NEWS01/120708029/Woman-hugs-off-duty-Detroit-police-officer-151-dies-after-his-gun-goes-off?odyssey=mod|mostview
Report Post »The Giver
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:12pmIt’s so darn hard to pull the trigger … and we are supposed to believe that his gun was holstered and still went off? I hope her death is investigated by independent sources.
Report Post »Jpreaume
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:14pm@Matt…I carry my firearm everywhere I go…that includes when I am mowing the lawn. Everyone laughed at me when I told them that…until a few weeks ago when the retired Detroit police chief was robbed while mowing his lawn. I had the biggest “I told you so” grin when that story hit the news.
Report Post »shakedowncrews
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:23pmI don’t agree. Keep in mind that some semi-auto pistols are carried in “condition 1”–loaded, chambered, cocked and ready to fire if the trigger is pulled. They do not have safety engaged, if there is a safety. You say “If the pistol was in any holster the trigger is protected and would not be able to fire” If this were true, then dropping a pistol in condition 1 would NEVER result in an accidental firing. But guns fire when the firing pin is released. The trigger is usually what releases the pin. But accidental discharges DO HAPPEN when the gun is bumped, especially if the firing mechanism is defective or dirty and so the release is dangerously easy. If she had jumped on his back to hug him and bumped the gun, an accidental discharge is quite possible. Some shoulder holsters hold the firearm with the grip forward and the barrel pointed back. So if she had hit the gun in tha tposition it could easily have fired directly into her chest. And then there is the possibility the holster was old and worn out, offering even less protection of the trigger.
Report Post »So no, I disagree that this could have happened as described.
Rocky_Top
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:26pmDetroit Free Press: ( The weapon, a department-issued, 40-caliber Smith & Wesson semiautomatic pistol, was in a holster worn inside the officer’s waistband and was covered by his shirt, McNair said she also was told her daughter “was being a little flirty” with the officer and the gun fired as they were in a face-to-face hug.)
Report Post »NateB
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:29pmThanks for the link. It is a sad story.
Was the officer was carrying a pistol with a round in the chamber hammer cocked and the safety off? Or is it a striker fired weapon with a safety on the trigger?
Report Post »Just because it is in the holster don’t assume it is safe. Check and make sure it is in right.
Jpreaume
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:36pm@NateB…that is a striker fired “trigger safety” weapon. I carry mine with one in the pipe, IWB, and 3 extra magazines at all times. I leave the extra magazines in the house while mowing the lawn though. :)
Report Post »Rocky_Top
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:39pmMichigan Live: (”I don’t want to speculate on a lot of things” but when holstered, “typically the barrel direction is down” and the weapon was “concealed,” Godbee said.
The weapons have a safety built into the trigger and “the trigger had to be engaged in some manner for the weapon to fire” 99.9 percent of the time, Godbee said, adding that the weapon was in a non-department-issued waist holster that had a soft neoprene trigger guard.)
Report Post »Rocky_Top
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 2:18pmAfter reading over 20 reports and watching the police statement from Fox News Detroit. You can see the spin that is being paced on this story. Many are editing the story to say that 99.9% of the time guns don’t just go off. When the officer said that 99.9% of the time guns don’t go off without pulling the trigger. and went on to say that the holster was made of a soft material. ( The spin is that guns sometime just go off. In reality the trigger has to be pulled or with a cheap or old gun you would have to drop or hit it hard ) Some are saying that the holster was police issue when the statement clearly said that the department does not have or issue that type of holster. ( the spin, even cops with dept. issue are not safe) http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/18977832/2012/07/09/woman-killed-after-off-duty-detroit-officers-gun-goes-off
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 2:29pmFor sure: something‘s rotten in someone’s story. Even a Glock won’t go off unless the trigger is pulled. And a revolver would have even more problems going off without the trigger being pulled. Unless she thought his zipper was that high…
Report Post »betterthantv
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:54pm@MATT Your argument is absurd. Off duty cops are REQUIRED to carry their firearm in the state of Michigan. And secondly, you did see that this was in DETROIT?
Report Post »bigdaddyt46
Posted on July 10, 2012 at 8:38am@matt
by law a peace officer(cop) MUST CARRY his weapon at all times, even when off duty.
Report Post »chingachgook
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:36amthis story is not correct a gun is in a holster to prevent exactly that. The gun will not fire unless the trigger is pulled. It is not magic. There is more to this than what I read here.
Report Post »kindling
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:07amI agree. I bet someone was showing off the fact they had a gun and it was fired. I am so sorry that young lady is gone. May she rest in peace.
Report Post »ati058
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:28amOccam’s Razor… the trigger was pulled by someone with access to the gun, resulting in the death of the victim.
The urban myth that Glock pistols do not have any safeties, and are therefore prone to accidental discharge, is repeatedly promulgated by those who are ignorant of facts and by anti-Second Amendment “pundits” with Progressive and Statist agendas.
Report Post »hydtguy
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:38amDitto
Report Post »uisignorant
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:01amThe Glock does not have a Safety in the conventional sense. It has the Safe Action trigger. If you snag the trigger and depress the safe action, the gun fires.
Report Post »The0bserver
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:40pmI own a Glock and it does not have a true safety lock. If you had one, you would know. The Glock’s “safety” was apparently designed to inhibit a accidental discharge if it drops to the floor, but the “safety” would not stop the trigger from being pulled, because the “safety” is built into the trigger. Pull the trigger, “safety” released, gun will fire. Once I realized that, I stopped walking around with it. I thought it would be too easy to accidentally pull the trigger when retrieving the gun from a holster. Good only for target shooting at the range, in my opinion.
Report Post »Del_Ray
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 1:58pmObserver you’re not seriously concerned about pulling your trigger as you draw are you?
Finger stays AWAY from the trigger till the gun is pointed at a threat. THAT’S what I teach every student. Maybe you never learned that. Your finger should be away from the trigger till the barrel transitions to the threat, THEN your finger goes to the trigger. It takes thousands of rounds of shooting to get it set. But once there you should never worry about a “safety-less gun” like the Glock.
I worry about all the idiots WITH safeties that think they work 100 percent of the time. What do they do when asked?
“Don’t worry the safety is on.” Then they pull the trigger to prove it. I’ve have TWO bangs go off in the shop because of that. One VERY close to my melon. Guns without manual safeties are NOT a problem. Poor training is.
Report Post »LOTO
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:19amI suppose there is a hug ban coming down.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:52amIt’ NOTabout HUG conrol, it’s about GUN CONTROL!
Report Post »Mr.Fitnah
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:06amSomething about this sounds a little fishy.
Report Post »noproblems
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:40amAgain i wll ask why the blazes the Blaze publishes depressing stories like this. for what purposse? the are thousandds of tragedies that will occur today. unless we can do something about why publish.
Report Post »Missouri Mule
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:51amThey publish stories like this to get suckers like you and me to read them. Glenn, I love you man, but do some investigative journalism! Big Bad guns don’t just go off and you are playing into the hands of those phony “journal-illusionists” you say you oppose!
Report Post »P.S. the firearm was probably a “safe-action” Glock in a shoulder holster and she negligently shot her self because she had no firearms training – well it was Detroit. Sad day. Firearms handling should be taught in school, ya the public ones……
GIVE.ME.LIBERTY.OR.I.WILL.GIVE.YOU.DEATH
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:28am@ NOPROBLEM,
The story is from the AP, Associated Press, not from The Blaze, as it is stated at the beginning of the story.. The Blaze is a news aggregation website like Drudge Report where they mostly link from news sources The Blaze and Drudge Report are very good at what they do…This is a tragic story, but it really occurred. I thought that many police guns had extra safety features.
Report Post »The0bserver
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 12:43pmBecause it is news, as defined by the principle, man bites dog is news, something rare and life threatening is news. Who would think that getting a hug from the back would discharge a gun? A pretty rare thing.
Report Post »facilitiesmgr
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:02pmThe reason stories like this are published is because the best person‘s experience to learn from is someone else’s, not your own. The worst thing that can happen is for tragic things like this to happen and not learn anything from them.
Maybe someone will reasess their way of operation with a gun and someone else’s life will be spared.
It is also disappointing that so many people come to hard conclusions and make definitive statements of what took place without having the facts in the case. All that does is enflame the emotions.
Report Post »DTR
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:38amThis makes no sense. There is no such thing as an “accidental discharge.“ There is only ”negligent discharges.” There is a lot missing from this story. I’d say a good 90% of automatics have built in firing pin blocks that prevents the firing pin from striking the primer of the round unless the trigger is actually squeezed. If it was a Single Action/Double Action revolver, most people would carry it in DA (hammer forward, but squeezing the trigger pulls the hammer back and releases it). Sense the weapon has to do the work for you, the trigger pull is at least 50% stronger than if it was in SA (hammer’s locked back, squeezing the trigger releases the hammer). There is just no way this went down the way it did. Either way, that off duty cop should be held responsible for his negligence.
Report Post »nattybrooks
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:53ami agree weapon must have been holstered only answer i can come up with is a shoulder holsered single action with a custom trigger at less than 2#
Report Post »thop1960
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:57amReally? Here’s a bit of advice. There are no absolutes, except for dying. Accidents do happen. Just because your mind can’t fathom it, doesn‘t mean it can’t happen. Granted, there are details missing from the article. That still doesn‘t mean it wasn’t an accident.
Report Post »Gunnett
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:37amI am calling BS on this one. The only way this could happen is that the officer had some twenty dollar holster on, that she inserted her finger into the trigger and pull the trigger. Unless the officer has a shirt with a bullet hole in it and burns to his side from the muzzle flash then something ain’t right. If the gun was worn on his right and she was behind him, then she would have been hit on the right side also.
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:29amHolstered weapons don’t just discharge from a hug. It takes a finger pulling the trigger for them to discharge. Something is a miss here.
Report Post »OldVietVet
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:22amUse “Occham’s razor”, (sp.), and decide for yourself if this is believable!– I don’t buy this story!
Report Post »Msgt Ret
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:16amI’ve worn many many shoulder rigs and something is just not as described here. There was more than a HUG going on!
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:54amI think it’s stange that they mention a “SECOND OFFICER INVOLVED” on administrative leave???
Report Post »jndough
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:51amI remember a story that was in the news not too long ago. A man was in his car and either fastening or unfastening his seatbelt and his holsterd gun discharged. His leather holster was very worn and the trigger guard had become flimsy and worked its way inside the trigger. The seatbelt pulling on the holster discharged the firearm. Maybe it was something like this? Leather shoulder holster and a Glock?
Report Post »Sherra
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 3:58pmThis is probably the story to which you are referring. http://www.itstactical.com/warcom/firearms/safety-warning-worn-leather-holsters-can-cause-accidental-discharges/comment-page-1/
Report Post »Uechi
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:49amAnything is possible but the whole story is highly unlikely as described. As someone who carries a firearm all the time I can’t conceive of a way any firearm goes off from a hug. The only possiblity I can think of is if the handgun was unholsterd i.e. what is called “Mexican Cattt:.
Report Post »jackbauer
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:41amI call BS. There’s way more to this story. Holstered guns don’t just go off. Guns fire when safeties are off and the trigger is pulled. The trigger would have been protected by the holster.
Report Post »uisignorant
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:22amGlock’s do not have a safety.
Report Post »Baja
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 9:55amURIGNORANUS,
Report Post »You don’t have clue one regarding Glock pistols. Glocks have three built in safeties plus the one between the ears.
uisignorant
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:57amFunny BAJA…. I have 3. There is no SAFETY. There is the trigger Safe-Action, but ther is not safety in the 1911 format.
Report Post »Would you like to play again?
NateB
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 11:19amhttp://www.itstactical.com/warcom/firearms/safety-warning-worn-leather-holsters-can-cause-accidental-discharges/comment-page-1/
Report Post »Baja
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 2:29pm@URIGNORANUS
Report Post »You are the uninformed nimrod that stated Glocks don’t have a safety. Obviously you know little about firearms and should considering selling (legally) your weapons to a responsible party. Only you can spin stupidity. Anyone knowledgeable about firearms can see you for fool you are. Nice try.
uisignorant
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:05pmBAJA,
Report Post »Anyone that knows anything about Glocks knows you are not just a fool, but a damn fool.
Baja
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:20pmURIGNORANUS
Unfortunately for you there are gun savey commenters here. You’ve clearly demonstrated your prowes as an ignorant loud mouth fool. I suggest the next time you go popping off, you use facts.
Report Post »Too much time in mommies sweltering basement wiping the sweat off of your Mr. Magooo glasses? Check that basement for radon son. Try increasing the air flow down there too. Does she know you play with guns?
Griffin06
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:38amThere’s a lot more to this. Most LEOs carry semis with one in the pipe. What I can surmise from this, it was probably a cheap horizontal carry shoulder holster that didn’t cover the trigger guard. Don‘t know if we’ll see more details or if this will be swept under the rug. I can bet the gun control Nazis will be all over it, though. I generally carry in a “red” status myself, but use a high ride hip holster or a vertical carry shoulder rig that covers the trigger guard to prevent incidents like this.
Report Post »yougottabekidding
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:55amThats why I prefer a blackhawk cqc for a glock
Report Post »There is no way you can get to the trigger till it is out and the release puts your finger in a safe position
watashbuddyfriend
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:36amHuh? Something not right in denmark! It just don’t happen that way?
Report Post »Mathchopper
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:42amProperly holstered weapons don’t fire..
Report Post »Inlandmar2
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:35amI smell a rat! Something is not quite right here.
Report Post »The Knave
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:34amNo way, no how did this happen as written. A sidearm just doesn’t discharge unless the trigger is pulled….and if the weapon was holstered as stated then the woman would have had to make an attempt to unholster the weapon to even get to a point where the trigger could then be pulled.
Contrary to what most people think, modern handguns are engineered to be unable to “just go off”. Gun companies learned very quickly that being held liable in accidental handgun discharges could be financially crippling, ergo they designed handguns with passive safetys…..meaning unless a person physically pulled the trigger the weapon would not fire.
My gut tells me this chick was fooling around with the officer, hugging and teasing and felt the weapon (likely a Glock 26), and said “oohh, let me see it”…started pulling the weapon from the holster and the officer realizing what she was doing turned or attempted to stop her in some fashion and during the incident she pulled the trigger and whacked herself. While the incident was most likely accidental, the officer is a dumb a*s for going to a club while armed. You telling me he wasn’t drinking?
Report Post »olliehop
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 10:46amYou are probably close. I would guess She didn’t just give him a quick hug from behind. She probably felt the gun in the holster, may not have even known what it was, started to grab for it, he turned and she got her finger on the trigger. THe gun won’t fire unless something depresses the trigger.
Report Post »Rodhaines
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:25amA tale from the‘ 60’s about racism:
Southern sheriff investigates the death of a black man. He’s hanging from a tree, shot in the head several times and stabbed in the back numerous times. TV reporters ask the sheriff to speculate on the cause of death. The sheriff says; “Worse case of suicide I’ve ever seen….”
I thought of this IMMEDIATELY when I first heard the story on WJR-Detroit this morning. Lift that rug and sweep it all under….
Report Post »SFsuper49er
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:20amIf the gun was holstered and the hammer wasn‘t pulled back i can’t see how the firing pin could have been engaged without the trigger being pulled. Most holsters even have a trigger guard that covers the trigger. That firing pin has to be smacked by the trigger for it to go off because it has to hit the bullet primer… Somethings not right here… I’d like to know what kind of firearm that was and how it was holstered .
Report Post »Marsh626
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:03amAnd this is why I ignore the “tactical” gurus who advice carrying cocked and locked. I’ll only carry a semi-auto (not a revolver) with the chamber empty and the safety off (if it has one). That’s the best comprimise between safety and quick access.
Report Post »Fubared
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:17amTo each, his own. Sounds like a dumb ass shoulder rig he saw on an old Miami Mice rerun and when properly blinged out, impresses the easily impressionable. Somebody’s family will get a lotto sized pay off out of Detroit.
Report Post »MachIV
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:18amThere really isn’t enough details in this story to tell exactly what happened; however, I bet that the weapon the officer was carrying was some kind of double action only(like a Glock 22). The only real safety those things have is on the trigger itself. They are extroidnarily reliable service weapons, but in my opinion safety is lacking. You can “**** and lock” really only with an arm that is both single and double action or has an external hammer, like an HK for example. There is no “locking” to a Glock, in my opinion.
Report Post »Carolina Infidel
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:23amYou’d be better off ignoring this story than the “tactical gurus”.
Noone carries a revolver cocked. With a revolver there is always one in the chamber but the amount of force required to activate the double action trigger acts as a safety in itself. If this was a revolver or weapon with a double action trigger, no way it “went off”.
If it is a cop carrying a semi auto then he had one in the chamberbut most modern handguns have dual safeties to prevent accidental trigger pull. The only way most will fire is if you have your hand squeezing the grip and finger on the trigger.
If you are going to carry unchambered you had better practice that way at the range.
Report Post »9111315
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:26amThat is the way a 1911 is designed. Locked and Cocked. Then you have about 3 safeties, including a grip safety. A proper holster then provides an additional physical barrier between the hammer and firing pin.
It is a system that has worked for 101 years. I don’t know what the fool was running with – but it was not a 1911 locked and cocked. Maybe a Glock, which has no lock.
If you feel better running in a green status – more power to you. I respect your liberty.
Report Post »sam1064
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:48ami intend to fulfill Mark Twain’s warning about its better to keep you mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt by the following comment.
So what if you need that weapon quickly to save your life or someone elses? do you ask the perpetrator whom is endangering your life to wait while you chamber a round? I will defer to the experts on how hard its it to take a semi that has a round in the chamber off safety and fire it. From what I read from some “experts” a good gun person can chamber a round and keep the safety on or if one is in “stealth” mode (hunting for bad guys for example like in war) the weapon is “hot” (safety off, round in chamber and hammer back). I would think a person who has a gun for safety should at least have a round in the chamber even if the hammer is at rest and the safety on. my .000002.
Report Post »edwinmcarter
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:00amholstered guns don`t discharge
Report Post »Dirty Harry
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:17amWrong. Many holsters do not cover the trigger.
Report Post »Blazebanned
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:41amJust “hugging” someone would not set a gun off,unless things happened perfectly.There is something wormg with this story, and it is correct in saying, not enough info.For example, where was the gun carried,in a shoulder holster?No, somethings wrong here,especially since it happened in detriot, and she’s black………..
Report Post »Blazebanned
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:42am@dirtyharry aka encinom.
Report Post »Sorry son, its you who are wrong, as usual……idiot.
Carolina Infidel
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:57amI first ask myself, “How stupid do they think people are?”And then I remember.
No way this went down this way. No gun that any self respecting officer would wear would discharge from a “hug”. There will be more to this story.
I can’t think of a cheap gun that would misfire from an activity such as a hug.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:05amShe “hugged” him from behind? Who ever hugs an officer (off duty or not) from behind? I know police officers that don’t sit with their backs to a door, even off duty. I’d say he thought he was being attacked, especially being in Detroit. I NEVER snuck up on or even touched an officer off duty. and I’ve known plenty. My husband said this is a Darwin thing, weed out the stupid.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:23amCheap soft holster made in China + Glock semi automatic.
The only saftey is in the double trigger.
Report Post »Carolina Infidel
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:39amDouble action trigger is extremely safe UNLESS YOU PUT YOUR FINGER IN THE TRIGGER GUARD AND PULL.
I typically don‘t slide my fingers around people’s guns and triggers when I hug them. Now, maybe she was trying to be funny and play with his gun or trying to grab it as if she was going to take his weapon.
Cheap China holsters still prevent a finger from going in the trigger guard. I have owned 3 weapons with double action triggers. Taurus PT-111, SWV9E, Keltec PF9 and I have fired many Glocks. You don’t make them go off without some effort. I got rid of them because i find that accuracy is an issue with the hard trigger pull.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 8:11amTwo stories about accidental discharges, both with Glocks, both with people who did not take proper safety precautions with their guns; Both people I know.
The first is the owner of a range we go to. He was shot in the stomach after a glock in a soft holster was placed on the counter by a customer. He asked “Is that thing loaded?” the guy said “nope” and then went to quickly pull the gun from the holster to check the chamber and it went off after catching on the edge of the hoster.
The second, a cop who stored his holstered glock (again soft holster, not his service weapon) on the top shelf of his closet and later not thinking about it, slid it around putting something else up there. It fired while still in the holster and went through two walls before embedding in a stud in a third wall.
I own a glock, and I love the performance of it. But I also treat it as if a round is always chambered. They are safe IF you don’t ever forget that it is a deadly weapon, loaded and ready to go.
Report Post »libchem
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:56amAs a Weapons Sgt. of the U.S. Army JFK Ctr., I smell a little B.S. here.
Report Post »Noonien_Soong
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:15amI would concur. It seems the weapon was shoulder holstered pointing in an upward position. The officer who was hugged used bad judgement by participating even if he was not facing the the young woman.
Report Post »Countrygirl1362
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 6:49amHow horrible. Prayers for the family and officer.
Report Post »nzkiwi
Posted on July 9, 2012 at 7:21amI agree, Countrygirl.
Sometimes these things just happen. It must be so devastating for the family, though. And the policeman also, no doubt.
Report Post »