Woman Screams Out During TSA Screening: Alleges ‘Molestation,‘ Demands Agent’s Arrest
- Posted on June 3, 2011 at 7:55am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
A chilling video has surfaced of a woman allegedly going through a TSA screening checkpoint last weekend at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport.
After apparently experiencing one of the TSA’s new enhanced pat-downs, the woman begins weeping and screaming out for the police, accusing the agent of “molesting” her and demanding the agent’s arrest.
“I want a police officer now! Now! I want a police officer,” she yells. “She [the agent] just molested me!” Later, as the screams get more intense, she cries out for someone to “help me” and tells the agent “this is illegal” and “you can’t do that!”
In the video, she continues her screams for almost a minute and a half before another agent shoos away the man filming it all:
Gateway Pundit has more.
This isn’t the first time the TSA has been accused of “molestation.” In April, former Miss USA Susie Castillo accused an agent of the same thing while going through security in Dallas.
UPDATE:
A more complete version of the video is below:
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 594 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 420 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 415 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 390 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 377 Comments
Faith
Arab-Muslim Character to Join DC Comics‘ ’Green Lantern’ Series Read More- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 420 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 415 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 390 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know 100 Comments- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 303 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 420 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (265)
progressiveslayer
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:41amThe high school dropouts that work for tsa and routinely violate our fourth amendment rights will probably unionize.That’s just what we need more public employee union members,they don‘t work and you can’t fire them.
Report Post »mrsmileyface
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 4:41pmThat whole episode of that womans tantrum at the TSA checkpoint was the most idiotic thing I have witnessed all week long and theres a ton of idiotic things that have happened this week. The TSA failed themselves by not detaining the woman and the person taking the vid. I would have put them on a permanant No Fly list for that performance. I love it how she went from normal volume to blood curtling rant in no time flat. It was a set up. And even if it wasnt lets say for arguments sake she still should of been detained for disrupting the peace and hauled off by cops. I dont like the TSA either but theres better ways to rid our nation of them instead of screaming like a 3 year old.
Report Post »ED4237
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:35amThis is just absurd what they do to us the law abiding public. This woman is right the TSA should be dibanded and she should sue for violatinmg her 4Th amendment rights and we should all help her and others so we get our rights back in this country. I will not fly unless it is a private plane with a bunch of friends so we can pay for it and not get molested.We are losing our country and people wake up the politicians are not helping they are taking it a way from us. It is time to take our country back from them and it needs to start before it is to late.
Report Post »Millhouse2therescue
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:35amWouldn’t that be ironic if she voted for Obama…?
Report Post »Entropy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:15amI will bet you a dollar that she did. All of the fat ugly ones do.
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:33amhere is a quote ….“YOU ARE SUBMITTING TO SCREENING ” …. thats is the objective of the TSA …the Security Protocals used by the TSA is a joke …They are pushing the envolope on this but it is needed .
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:29amQuite a reaction on her part. Maybe they told her about the risk of arrest or the $11,000 fine for refusing the patdown.
Report Post »BMC105
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:27amHit them where it counts – don’t fly. Proud to be a Texan !
Report Post »Entropy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:12amYour Senate caved to the Obama “no fly zone” threat. Still proud?
Report Post »Amy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:26amI won’t fly. I cannot do the electronic body-scan and will not be subjected to this. I bought a reliable car instead… longer but safer… AND get to see our beautiful America.
Report Post »mendolover
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:26amHmmm…where did this story come from?
Report Post »AIDANMAN
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:23amSTOP FLYING… then they can start doing this at the bus stations…at least then the TSA wouldn’t look forward to groping those travelers..
Report Post »snowflake220
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:18amI have not flown now for almost a year now. I drive the 2,000 miles round trip to see my kids and grandkids. I enjoy the quiet drive and have plenty of time to reflect on how hour nation is going down the toilets.
I refuse to be touched by TSA agents. It may cost me more in fuel but it is well worth it knowing I won’t have to go through TSA. Being a rape victim just thinking about someone strange touching my body makes me have a panic attack.
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:55am………… hour … ????
Report Post »WTFHappenedToTheUSA
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:17amRon Paul said it best, we tolerate it, therefore we deserve it!
http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/ron-pauls-great-speech-against-tsa-abuse-video/
Report Post »JEDhbo
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:15amRon Paul said it best, we tolerate it, therefore we deserve it!
OK…….Mr. Paul……HOW “DO” WE STOP IT???
As witnessed, we know full well that anyone that expresses umbrage and/or shows any sort of physical resistance will be immediately (if not sooner) shuttled to a secluded area and treated with much less dignity than they’ve already been subjected to. THERE HAS TO BE A “BETTER” ANSWER…….wait……a…….minute! Doesn’t Israel use a “different” tactic and hasn’t it worked for them thus far? THEY PROFILE…….it works in Israel and it will work here. “Damn the torpedos, full speed ahead”!!!
Report Post »twigcc
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:55amWe tolerate it, and then when we’re adjusted to it being “normal” and “routine,” some knuckleheaded idiot decides to shove the device where the sun doesn’t shine. Then our TSA will have “no choice” but to up the ante, and offer the choice of body cavity searches or CAT scans or MRI’s, with all the radiation that they provide.
Report Post »They should have just invested in trained sniffing dogs in the first place, and they still ought to asap. I‘m sure it’s less money, and it certainly doesn‘t violate anyone’s privacy. Regardless of where someone stuffs the device, dogs would sniff it out.
This current system is not expandable for invasive searches. All those expensive machines will have to be replaced with scanners that can search internally as well as externally. Plus, the extra radiation. We are already cautioned against unnecessary MRI’s and CAT scans due to the danger of radiation. SO the alternative, getting a full body cavity search, is mind-bogglingly invasive.
love the kids
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:15amStrip searches for all, well except for people in Arab garb, because that would be against their beliefs.
Report Post »Entropy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:10amThe reason that the obviously Arab passengers are not searched is because they are importing Arabs faster than cheap Chinese products. They are part of Obama’s “army” to use against us. So, he absolutely does not want to offend them with these patdowns. So, they are just paraded around the checkpoints, right in front of the sheeple crackers. Can you imagine the looks on the sheeple’s faces when they see this while they are getting groped? Hilarious. (not)
Report Post »TopOfTheMuffin2u
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:13amI refuse to fly now. This is a violation of our civil rights.
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:12amToo bad applaud didn’t break out through out the building. Too bad more people didn’t start screaming for the arrest of TSA people. When do we get to watch Obama’s wife and girls, and Napolitano get ‘felt up’? Clearly there needs to be an example set.
Report Post »streetrodder
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:34amIncompatano would like it. Thats the only place she will get felt up.
Report Post »Entropy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:04amIf you are waiting for the cops to side with the people against the fed TSA goons, you will be waiting until the cows come home. It ain‘t gonna’ happen. Two peas in a pod.
Report Post »Barry Soetoro
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:12amNaked body scans, TSA groping, Why are “We the People” allowing this to happen? The USA is dead, welcome to the police state of Amerika. Thanks Obama!
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:32amHey Barry…….. love your pic!!! :)
Report Post »koyettsu
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:11amThat is it for me, it is time to start arresting TSA employees and the beast in charge of them.
Report Post »tbb
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:24amI totally agree with you KOYETTSU. The sooner we stand up to these thugs the better. If they started getting arrested for their crimes maybe the rest of them will stop.
Report Post »quicker
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:10amHeard that Sen.Dan Patrick is trying to put the Tsa groping bill back through the Texas senate.
Report Post »Entropy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:50amThe Texas legislature caved to the Obama threat that “Texas will be a no fly zone if you pass this law”. Really, Obama will order the military to shoot down flights originating in Texas? Yeah right. I don’t think our guys will follow those orders. Maybe a few woman pilots that want to move up the ranks will, but I doubt the guys will. Somebody needs to start calling Obamas bluffs.
Report Post »PWiscombe
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:08amOK, this one is just a dumb setup. She won’t go through the xray screener, she screams that she was molested when she goes through the patdown that she chose to do as an option, all the while here son happens to be filming.
I don’t think she should be allowed on the plane as a security risk. Who knows what her next stunt to bring attention to herself would be. Is it something that would actually endanger the other passengers or crew?
Report Post »streetrodder
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:19amYou need to go to the head of the feel up line dumb A$$.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:29amWhere on the Airline Ticket Purchase request form does it say – “by purchasing this ticket you are forfeiting your rights as granted by God and guaranteed by the 4th amendment to the US Constitution.” ?
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:35amAre Ben Franklin quotes now considered hate speech by the Blaze?
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:37amIs PWISCOMBE a HuffPo employee working at the Blaze? Founding Father quotes burn your ears?
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:39amLet’s try this one more time. “Those who would give up their liberty for a little security deserve neither”. Which founding father said that?
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:42amLet me paraphrase: Those who would give up liberty for a little security deserve neither.
Report Post »CaptainKook
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:44am@ PWiscombe
You might be too smart to be posting on this board – just a thought.
Report Post »PWiscombe
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:58pmI’m not arguing against the Founders (where did you get that from my post) nor am I in any way not a conservative.
Do I think the pat downs go to far: Yes.
Do I think the “let me see your junk” scanner goes to far: Yes.
Do I think this woman who chose to get the pat-down instead of the xray while she just “happened” to be video taped was doing a publicty stunt: YES.
The problem is that these types of stunts cause knee-jerk reactions that ultimately endanger us all.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 2:07pm@PWISCOMBE
Where did I get that? From your statement “She won’t go through the xray screener, she screams that she was molested when she goes through the patdown that she chose to do as an option…”
The point being that either going thru an xray scanner that shows your naked body to some TSA perverts OR getting the “enhanced” grope IS NOT A CHOICE!
If she did this as a stunt to make a political point then good for her. This process is completely illegal and unconstitutional. And I don’t agree that her behavior will cause any “kneejerk” reaction that “endager us all”. What does that mean anyway? If you want to feel safe about flying, how about the TSA remove any and all Muslims from the airport until proven otherwise. How about TSA stop walking them around the checkpoint past all of us infidels. That would make me feel safer about flying anywhere.
And we wonder why they are so emboldened?
Report Post »Annie Fields
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:08amSome reporter somewhere needs to ask Obama the following question:
“Will you volunteer Michelle, Sasha & Malia to an enhanced pat-down ON TELEVISION in order to calm the fears of the flying public as to the invasive nature of the procedure?”
Oh, right. I forgot. We have a eunuch press corps. Nevermind.
http://www.anniefields.com
Report Post »JEDhbo
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:56amNow, now, Annie; you know that this query would make far too much sense and would NEVER be asked by “any” LSM flunky.
Report Post »ON THE OTHER HAND
How about it FOX…….anyone at my favorite source have the cajones to follow Annie’s lead? Maybe Megyn will jump into the fray when she returns? I know Glenn has the grit required to face-down the establishment…….too bad he’s leaving at the end of this month.
wampanoag
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:07amI do believe that she is vastly over-reacting. I bet the TSA will pay her $3000 to move on. Its a nice way to pay for your flight, just yell and scream and carry on. The present system is absurd. There should be no random pat downs. The new X-ray machines were supposed to eliminate them. (we know that they are not reliable). TSA should use profiling, and not subject real American to humiliating rub downs.
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:51amYeah, easy to say when it’s not YOU getting the treatment… Get a life..
Report Post »eternalhostility
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:35amYou are a moron who obviously doesn’t fly often. No one wants your nude x-ray machines. How about getting a bomb sniffing dog, seems harmless enough and would likely actually WORK.
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:06amShe was calling for a police officer. Did one ever arrive?
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:14am.
Report Post »No they were too busy fondeling themselves over by the Total Body Scan machine……
kentuckypatriot
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:30amI was wondering the same thing. I’m betting my house that not one showed up. Makes me glad I don’t fly.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:55amAccording to the story at Drudge Report an officer did arrive, yet nothing was done to the TSA agent as best as I understand this; for these two, the mother and son, the same thing happened a year ago and when he filmed it was threatened by the TSA with arrest.
Report Post »Cemoto78
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:51amHey Spank, where ya been I have really missed your wit!
Report Post »DMSNC
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:04amThanks Janet. Bet you wish YOU were able to feel up everyone.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:25amWell she is the lesbian in chief. No time for dating.
Report Post »benrush
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:03amTo hell with the unions and their anti-liberty and communist roots! TSA is nothing more than a gift to unions and communist leaders in America. The inevitability of gradualism , the encroachment on our civil liberties.
The fight for freedom is on!!!
Report Post »BeerSnob
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:13am“The fight for freedom is on!”
Not really… we aren’t doing anything but commenting on an obscure website. When the fighting finally does start, the union bosses need to be the first to go!
Report Post »CaptainKook
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:26amRE: “Not really… we aren’t doing anything but commenting on an obscure website. When the fighting finally does start, the union bosses need to be the first to go.”
I always love the “i can’t wait to kill someone” posts from nerds like you
Report Post »BeerSnob
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:55pmGlad to provide some entertainment, I’ll be here all week
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:08pmRE: “Not really… we aren’t doing anything but commenting on an obscure website. When the fighting finally does start, the union bosses need to be the first to go.”
Report Post »__________________________________________________
I always love the “i can’t wait to kill someone” posts from nerds like you
__________________________________________________
Was that what that was? Didn’t exactly sound like that to me. Kook, looks like you‘re putting a few words in someone else’s mouth.
RepubliCorp
Posted on June 4, 2011 at 12:46amKeep the border wide open so anything can come in
Report Post »And don’t ask a Mexican for ID………..insane Libturds
teddrunk
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:02amWell, we know where lesbians can get a job.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:10am.
Report Post »Better watch it Ted you getting close to the Moderator flame, with the Lezbo comment. Better be glad you did not say she was Nappy Headed lol……..
The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:19amYes…“men” join the clergy and “women” join the TSA…or become PE teachers
Report Post »Entropy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:44amI don’t know why she was screaming for a police officer. They are on the same side as the TSA goons. All are govt union goons. If a cop would have been there, he probably would have tazed HER then arrested her.
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:00amYou all need to bite the bullet and not fly anywhere for 6 months…force the airlines to demand their removal.
Report Post »benrush
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:04amHear hear! I second that motion.
Report Post »benrush
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:05amAnd what is with that agent telling us not to video this public display? Under what regulation? These busybody government employees micromanaging our freedom away have got to go!
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:12am.
Report Post »If you have allways wanted to see your wife with another woman heres your chance……..
GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:17amthat’s a fact, jack.
Report Post »jrmhrpr78
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:20amProblem is the government will just bail em out with our endless supply of money…
Report Post »ILUVAMERICA
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:25amThe FULL Video!!!
Report Post »http://www.infowars.com/video-woman-screams-for-help-after-tsa-molestation-2/
kralspaces
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:26amAlready made that pledge when TSA expanded their searching. I am not boycotting the airlines, but I am not going to subject myself to this harrassment.
Report Post »NOTAMUSHROOM
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:26amHow about we turn around and feel up the TSA agents? Really, turn about is fair play. One good grope deserves another, right? Oh I bet that would stop this crap right now!
Report Post »joe conservative
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:32amNow it’s illegal to film the TSA? The loss of freedoms under Obama is expanding at a scary pace. Stand up America. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le53dbWpg_Q Secure our borders if you want to keep American citizens safe.
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:36amAgreed. Refuse to fly and also civil disobedience to communicate to the public so the media can’t lie about it.
Report Post »Viperkeeper
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:39amExactly… Can’t rely on Congress to get anything done.
Report Post »GODSAMERICA
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:41amI guess that other agent figured that chasing away the guy filming a crime being done would keep everyone from finding out about it. These idiots don’t realize (which some police in certain areas of the country does) that it doesn’t matter where you work or who you work even, even the government. That an order given to them that breaks the law does not make the order legal. It is still up to the employee to refuse to follow the order. There have been cases where the courts have stated this that an employee getting an order from their employers that would break the law does not protect the employee from being charged and convicted for breaking the law. They just need to start stepping in and arresting these perves and molestors. They will still be legally responsible for breaking those laws.
Report Post »one yrs. food ration like Glenn says..
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:46amI’m flying on the 8th this month and I feel so much safer now that the 6 year old was forcibly patted down the “ correct” way… This is unbelievable , amazing the stupidness of the action.. The muslim man of course would walk right through, “PC” .. Right ?
Report Post »Sheepdog911
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:51amSo diishe manage to get on an aircraft or what? TSA should have just left her standing there screaming like a kindergartener and gone about their business, until the cops came to escort her from the airport. I don’t like the security procedures either, but guess what …. If I want to fly, I have to put up with them. My only problem with it is that while they check granny, they ignore Abdul. Let the idiot film it all, use him as a witness when the local cops prosecute her for creating a disturbance. In trying prevent the film, TSSimply proves themselves to be the morons we aall know them to be.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:52amThis happens all too often out at Sky Harbour, and I have seen it too much personally over the years, along with the fact of them letting people who are obvious muslum’s dress and such be escorted by the TSA AROUND the security without any testing or criminal sexual assault patdowns.
This lady should have filed charges as this is the second time it has happened to her and her son.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 8:53amForgot to add:
The Drudge Report has a link on the story as well with full video of the son being threatened with arrest for filming the incident, along with the one that happened a year before to his mother and him.
Report Post »VegasGuy
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:00am@THE_ALMIGHTY_CREESTOF,
I totally agree! Flying has become so invasive and the airlines so callous that I drive now, even if it is half way across the country.
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:05amI think we need a lot more of what this lady did. We need more public outcry from these illegal searches.
Report Post »CaptainKook
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:25amThis woman is a moron or is mentally unstable.
So let’s do away with the airport security program.
Report Post »After the first hijacking or other incident that follows, the Right-Wing media will scream that the Gov isn’t doing its job.
lcassavaugh
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:28amIt is disgusting what they are allowed to do under the guise of security….. does the TSA have probable cause to do that? NO!
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:44amWe shouldn’t bite the bullet and not fly. We ought to simply refuse en masse to be touched by anyone because we are INNOCENT until PROVE guilty. We don‘t have to PROVE to them that we AREN’T guilty before getting on a plane. This is training our citizens to allow our liberties to be violated for security. we have to simply say NO loudly and EVERYONE refuse to be patted down.
You stupid sheep keep going right on through the microwaves and TSA NAZI Thugs touching you. DON’T LET THEM. Force them to shut down air traffic for their stupid molestation.
Glenn Beck supports the TSA NAZI THUG MOLESTATION. I bet he grins broadly as the Nazi Thugs make him bend over and cough twice. Let me help you Glenny Beckity Beck. VIOLATION of my PERSON is MOLESTATION.
Ron Paul 2012.
MOLESTATION IS TORTURE AND SEXUAL ABUSE.
If I walk up to a little kid that isn’t doing anything wrong (even if he is shoplifting and jamming items into his underwear), I as a citizen cannot touch that kid and start feeling his crotch and going into his waistband.
THAT IS MOLESTATION. The INTENT doesn’t neccessarily MATTER. If that person doesn‘t want to be touched THAT’S all that matters. What you INTENDED doesn’t freakin matter to me. Don’t touch me AT ALL DAMNIT or lose a hand, arm, or other extremity, including head.
I can’t waltz up to random people and start pulling their buttocks apart to check to see if they wiped well, so the damn TSA shouldn’t be doing it either.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:48amIf I can’t take my pistol, knife, light, and extra clip with me, I don’t need to go there. I will only fly if I am the pilot. I have no desire to fly anywhere. If everyone else had this attitude they would be begging us to fly. Flying’s for the birds.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:51amLet me help you, Beck. I know you don’t like definitions of words, like the word TORTURE, SEXUAL ABUSE or MOLESTATION.
Definition of MOLEST
transitive verb
1: to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile intent or injurious effect
2: to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to force physical and usually sexual contact on
Origin of the word Molest is MOLECH, the false god that was worshipped and people sacrificed their children to.
Leviticus 18:21:
‘Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molek, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the LORD.’
Leviticus 20:2-5:
Again, you shall say to the Sons of Israel: Whoever he be of the Sons of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that gives any of his seed l’Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man and will cut him off from among his people; because he has given of his seed l’Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do at all hide their eyes from that man, when he gives of his seed l’Molech, and do not kill him, then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go astray after him, whoring l’Molech from among the people.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:53amAs a sacrifice of “innocence” to Moll (Moloch)
In spite of the deliberate efforts to confuse both the origin and key original religious meaning of the word “Molest”, there exists strong evidence of a second important meaning of the word in relation to the common meaning of Moll in the 14th Century onwards.
In England, the word Moll by the 16th Century became a common euphemism for “criminal” and prostitutes became commonly known as “Molls”—the claim it is a shortened version of Mary a ridiculous diversion.
However, prior to the word Moll becoming associated openly with the notion of criminals, it appears the word was used at least from the 13th Century as a shortened version of the name of Moloch and actions undertaken in the name of Moloch, or “Molls”.
This gives us then a second important and credible religious meaning associated to the word “Molest” being “the adherence to the doctrines and customs (of the Roman Cult) concerning the soft, weak, and young child/boys and a sacrifice to Moloch.”
They’re sadistic sexual predators.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:54amThe history of religious and systematic abuse of children
To date, the Roman Cult, otherwise known as the Vatican is the only organization in history to orchestrate as a “sacred” religious ceremony the systematic and widespread encouragement of its clergy to abuse of children from as late as the 14th Century.
The physical and mental abuse of tens of millions of children for 700 years by the clergy of the Vatican is the largest unbroken “child abuse ring” of all time, still in complete operation througout its priesthood today.
The motivation for such evil remains the dedication of the innocence of children to the demon god of sacrifice- Moloch either consciously or unconsciously by the Roman Catholic clergy and some Christian clergy.
Due to the lack of understanding of religious terms and the true meaning of words, some parents with children under the care of Catholic clergy mistakenly believe that the Roman Cult of the Vatican have openly repudiated the “sacred act” of molestation—a false assumption.
The Vatican – always precise with their words—has condemned pedophilia which is a modern term and has absolutely nothing to do with the ancient worship of Moloch, nor the religious term molest/molestation.
No parent who values the sanctity of the innocence of their children should ever believe that their children are safe in the hands of Catholic Clergy until the Roman Cult and Vatican is disbanded.
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 9:56amWe’re innocent until proven guilty.
Do not sacrifice your INNOCENCE to MOLOCH!
DO NOT ALLOW YOUR CHILDREN ESPECIALLY TO PASS THROUGH THE MICROWAVE FIRE OR THE MOLESTATION OF MOLECH!
Report Post »Sinista MACE
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:12amEveryone call the TSA “See Something, Say Something” number and report that the TSA are terrorists.
They‘re the only terrorists you’ll be seeing anytime soon. Coming to a random Stasi roadblock checkpoint near you.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:16amThink this is bad?? You’ve seen nothing yet.. Get ready for life under the Jewish Apartheid in the Soviet States of America…
Report Post »ecso828
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:16amI’m no fan of the TSA by any means. In fact, I’m familiar with the laws governing these types of searches and these TSA patdowns are a clear violation of those laws.
BUT….
This woman is the idiot in this video. First, if this search surprised her then she needs to get her head out of her rear end and pay attention to whats going on in the world today. How long have these TSA patdowns been in the news? Second, (and what I believe really happened here) it’s pathetic that this woman put on a show and acted like a moron just to try and make a political point. By doing so, she made a painful process even more painful and delayed other people trying to get on the flight.
There is a time and a place for everything. And the place she choose, and the manner she choose, was wrong.
She should be the one to be arrested.
Report Post »UlyssesP
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:18amI am on year two. About you?
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:19amBy the way was Chertoff Jewish? How much money did he make by selling these porn scanners to the TSA??
Ah you silly weak minded gullible Americans.. You desire some shackles don’t you??? Don’t worry they’re coming.. You’ll get what you deserve.
Report Post »JREDMARTIN
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:26amThat guy totally schooled that cop!
Report Post »greenherring
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 10:51amTSA = The Sexual Assaulters
Report Post »Gasparri
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:08amSecurity is in the eye of the stock holder.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:20amGreat point. But unfortunately, most of our fellow Americans don‘t make a stand untill it’s too late. Hopefully I will be proven wrong.
Report Post »patriotgamer
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:25amBy the way, Ms. People’s Security Official, it is not illegal to film you, except maybe if you were naked…oh, like you film us when we exercise our right to travel. What’s that? Travel is a privilege not a right. And you bureaucrats have all the authority you need to do whatever is necessary to ensure that all travel is “safe”? Ah yes, comrade, now you are beginning to see.
Report Post »swehes
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:35amMaybe we should start our own airport without the TSA there. And do complete racial profiling like the Israelis do it, and only allow flight companies that agree to these terms to enter and exit the airport.
Report Post »NES
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:52amThat’s exactly what Obama wants. Think about it. This policy makes zero political sense and is not necessary for security. I believe this has to do with controlling travel and intentionally harming the airline industry. If Obama can hit the Airline industry, then he can “bail them out” and take them over with government control like he did to the auto industry, moving the country further in the direction of a socialist state. With increased government control and regulation, he can control travel and the free movement of people even more.
I am personally aware of technology that is as much or more sensitive than a dog in detecting explosive chemicals. It was developed by a professor at MIT years ago and has been in use by the DoD and DHS. In fact, they’ve been using this to clear land mines and IEDs in Iraq and Afghanistan for years. It’s completely noninvasive and can be placed at security and other checkpoints throughout the airports.
http://www.icxt.com/products/icx-detection/explosives/
Report Post »Lywanna
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:55amThat’s right! If we don‘t stand up for our rights we won’t have any!
Report Post »ForTheRepublic
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:57amI haven’t set foot on a plane in 15 years.
Report Post »If I need to go anywhere, I’ll drive. It may take longer but who cares.
Steev
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:14pmInitially thats the way i viewed it too and if the american people would have taken that particuliar ground it would have had the affect you espouse, but now the TSA has been in operation for too long for there to be a simple solution, the tsa’s intrusiveness has become a govt.sponsored goading designed to be so outrageous to the american people it helps to serve to shut down the economy simply out of spite on our part. – this is a symptom of terror, a flame if you will, it’s not the base of the fire
Report Post »Jaycen
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:20pmSome airports and cities have laws about filming on premises. Crazy, but true.
I don’t know about Sky Harbor, though. Someone needs to check that out to see if the TSA agent was within his rights to demand people stop filming.
Report Post »@ Coyote2
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:39pmEvery once in a while some big fat and ugly will try to get attention one way or another.
Report Post »Reedo
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:45pmI have already committed my act of civil disobedience. I have left the US for the time being and will fight this cesspool of a government from a location that they cannot shut me up. I may be gone a long time with the way things look.
Report Post »@ Coyote2
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:45pm@TECHENDINEER11
I agree with you 100%
Report Post »red_white_blue2
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:52pmAgreed! Perfect Idea–hit them where it hurts most..their wallet!
Report Post »joseph Fawcett
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 12:53pmI agree too, stop flying! It will be hard but when is enough is enough!! I won’t fly again until this stops. I drive.
http://www.josephfawcettart.com western artist
Report Post »101
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 1:09pmPhoenix police handled the situation professionally (escorted her away from TSA)
TSA acted out with anger attempting to intimate and use force, the police intervened and TSA backed off because the “TSA” overstepped their bounds by going above & beyond the law.
Thanks to the Phoenix Police people are safe from TSA uncontrollable anger & abuse!
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 1:21pmBan the TSA now and for ever.
Report Post »ShawnB
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 1:58pmI agree with you on that.
Report Post »1911HeadBanger
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 2:25pmI’m In. Let’s all do it.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 2:28pmTHIS IS A TOTAL EFFORT to DEMORALIZE AMERICAN CITIZENS…this is what it is. THIS is another COMMIE TACTIC they’ve used in other countries…make us subordinate to ‘authority’. Napolitano can look into a TV camera and lie her fat a. off …she’s part of the COMMIE CLAN in the WH.
I agree…don’t fly anywhere for 6 months and tell the airlines why. I haven’t and that IS why. VOTE THEM OUT.
AND LOL…. AP is reporting a new poll (THEY ARE ABOUT AS LIBERAL AS IT GETS in case you haven’t figured it out) that it’s 50/50 whether we’d want the way Obama is running things… YE GADS…anyone who votes for him again is voting against FREEDOM.
Report Post »getalong
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 2:37pmTSA – stands for Total Sexual Assault.
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 2:54pmI swore off flying as soon as they started this crap. I can drive anywhere I need to go and I certainly won’t become one of this administrations sheeple.
Report Post »bharris0
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 3:08pmStop flying altogether. Putting up with this assault on our persons in violation of our constitutional rights is encouraging the government to see how far they can push us.
We need to elect officials that support the constitution, not ignore it. We then need to go after Bush, Obama and the head of the TSA and charge them with rights violations and assault.
Report Post »Michael600r
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 4:11pmAgreed! hit them in the purse, the tune will change then.
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 4:28pmIt’s a police state when they make up the rules as they go.
Report Post »jhrusky
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 4:58pm@Benrush
How? How do we make them stop? We all keep saying the same things: “This has to stop”, “They have to stop”, “We have to put an end to this” ad nauseum.
How do we stop it? Voting? Hasn’t seemed to help much yet has it? If 2012 don’t do it, we’re screwed, plain and simple unless we can get large numbers of people together to start demanding of our elected officials — preferably by writing and phone calls. In fact, we should be doing that now. Each and every one of us should be writing letters weekly (I do) to our reps. Civil letters, yet demanding.
They need to begin starting legislation to ban this crap that is going on everywhere … school children threatened with jail if they mention God, gov’t officials demanding people not film in public areas, allowing illegal aliens to drive, to work, to vote, and so much more. It‘s ludicrous what we’ve allowed.
I don’t recall who said it, but he was 100% right … ” … a republic, IF you can keep it”. We obviously don’t appear to be able to :(
Report Post »BlazingPatriot
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 5:05pmSomething just doesn’t seem right about the whole scenario. TSA agents are doing a critical job to protect “our own” lives. Surely we do not want a terrorist to blow up the place or for that matter, an airplane full of people. These TSA agents are tax paying Americans like most of us, who are working an 8 hour job at $14 hr, (or less) trying to get by.
I’m thinking this woman grossly over-reacted. It is extremely doubtful that she was molested in any possible way such as having her nipple pinched or a breast rubbed in a sexual manner.
As far as the video taping, that is an entirely different story. Citizens have the right to video and take pictures in a public place as long as it does not interfere with a workers ability to perform his (or her) job.
Of course, something this hideous would never be staged. ……Or could it??
Report Post »JRook
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 5:11pmAh yes the TSA, Bush’s job creation program. About as efficient and productive as the DOD.
Report Post »Susanna
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 5:22pmNotice in the first min. of the video how the husband switched out suitcases with his wife. This could easily be a smuggling ring and she was the distraction. Just sayin.
Report Post »NuffSaid
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 6:41pmTurn the entire US into a NO FLY ZONE. These airlines and all big companies are more afraid of the Jerk in the White House than they are of the American Consumer public. They may sound like moderates in public, but behind our backs these national companies are contributing to the disgusting power mongrels in Wash DC. Don’t think the same thing did not happened in Venezuela. Greedy, cowardly capitalists, paying off the thugs in the dark so that their industry would move down on the list for nationalization. Do not for one moment think that American Capitalists are any different than the Venezuelan manufactures, retailers and service providers who now hide out in their homes at night and try to remember how it felt when you could speak the truth to another human being without fear.
“When the government fears the people. there is liberty. When the people, especially the rich, cowardly, greedy pigs of industry, fear the government, there is tyranny.” (Somebody Dick Morris quotes.)
Take action, take a stand or take a valium (or ten).
Report Post »Lost in the Flyover
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 7:04pm“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Benjamin Franklin
Report Post »Anti_Spock
Posted on June 3, 2011 at 11:23pmI never did believe the 9/11 conspiracy. But with every passing day, watching scenes like this, with decent Americans being treated like CRIMINALS by our Government… well I wouldn’t put it past our Government for engineering 9/11 in pursuit of ultimate control.
Report Post »hannahh
Posted on June 4, 2011 at 10:30am@Sheepdog – your handle fits you to a T. If you enjoy being groped that’s your fantasy, this woman did not want to and she has every right not to be touched if she doesn’t want to!
Report Post »kindling
Posted on June 4, 2011 at 2:28pmIt is time that when you are booking a flight you can choose to go on a flight that is patdown free or go on those where only non Muslims are patted down. There are no other choices.
Report Post »Libby Tarian
Posted on June 6, 2011 at 9:39amI have not flown since 9/11 when the Lousy airlines let terrorists on planes all over the country…don’t trust the airlines at all. They abuse the people who survived 9/11 and let the criminals walk on through. Please do not tell me that I should not let the terrorists win. They are running the govt. I will never submit to the TSA molestations nor any of my children will submit.
Report Post »Why is Rick Perry not standing up to the filthy washington group of Chicago mobsters? I thought he wanted to run for President. Texans will not vote for the centrist Perry.